Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2023 Nov 8;299(12):105454. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105454

Phosphate uptake restriction, phosphate export, and polyphosphate synthesis contribute synergistically to cellular proliferation and survival

Masahiro Takado 1, Tochi Komamura 2, Tomoki Nishimura 2, Ikkei Ohkubo 2, Keita Ohuchi 2, Tomohiro Matsumoto 1, Kojiro Takeda 2,3,
PMCID: PMC10704438  PMID: 37949217

Abstract

Phosphate (Pi) is a macronutrient, and Pi homeostasis is essential for life. Pi homeostasis has been intensively studied; however, many questions remain, even at the cellular level. Using Schizosaccharomyces pombe, we sought to better understand cellular Pi homeostasis and showed that three Pi regulators with SPX domains, Xpr1/Spx2, Pqr1, and the VTC complex synergistically contribute to Pi homeostasis to support cell proliferation and survival. SPX domains bind to inositol pyrophosphate and modulate activities of Pi-related proteins. Xpr1 is a plasma membrane protein and its Pi-exporting activity has been demonstrated in metazoan orthologs, but not in fungi. We first found that S. pombe Xpr1 is a Pi exporter, activity of which is regulated and accelerated in the mutants of Pqr1 and the VTC complex. Pqr1 is the ubiquitin ligase downregulating the Pi importers, Pho84 and Pho842. The VTC complex synthesizes polyphosphate in vacuoles. Triple deletion of Xpr1, Pqr1, and Vtc4, the catalytic core of the VTC complex, was nearly lethal in normal medium but survivable at lower [Pi]. All double-deletion mutants of the three genes were viable at normal Pi, but Δpqr1Δxpr1 showed severe viability loss at high [Pi], accompanied by hyper-elevation of cellular total Pi and free Pi. This study suggests that the three cellular processes, restriction of Pi uptake, Pi export, and polyP synthesis, contribute synergistically to cell proliferation through maintenance of Pi homeostasis, leading to the hypothesis that cooperation between Pqr1, Xpr1, and the VTC complex protects the cytoplasm and/or the nucleus from lethal elevation of free Pi.

Keywords: phosphate, phosphate export, polyphosphate, the SPX domain, IBGC (idiopathetic basal ganglia calcification)


Phosphorus is the sixth most abundant element in living organisms and exists in the form of phosphate (PO4, hereafter Pi). Being central to energy metabolisms, a constituent of nucleic acids and lipid membranes, and serving various functions in intracellular signal transduction, Pi is involved in huge numbers of cellular biochemical reactions. Therefore, Pi homeostasis is absolutely pivotal in basic biology, agriculture, and medical sciences (1). In mammals, Pi is incorporated into the body from food, stored as calcium phosphate in bones, and excreted in urine by the kidneys, and Pi homeostasis at the organismal level is governed and fine-tuned by endocrine systems, for example, the FGF23-α-klotho system (1, 2, 3, 4). Loss of function mutants of α-klotho and FGF23 compromise phosphate metabolism (5, 6), resulting in pleiotropic phenotypes related to early senescence in mice (7). Hyperphosphatemia, a syndrome involving elevated serum [Pi], causes poor prognosis in chronic kidney disease patients. Thus Pi homeostasis at the organismal level has been intensively studied and is becoming well understood. Pi homeostasis in cells is also important, and its failure leads to diseases like primary familial brain calcification (PFBC) or idiopathic basal ganglia calcification, an abnormal accumulation of calcium phosphate in basal ganglia and other parts of the brain (8). As responsible genes for PFBC, two factors related to Pi homeostasis have been identified: SLC20A2, encoding the Pi transporters, Pit-2 and XPR1 (xenotropic and polytropic murine leukemia retrovirus receptor), encoding the SPX-EXS protein, the Pi exporter described later (8, 9, 10). Despite recent progress in understanding Pi homeostasis in mammals, as described above, many regulatory mechanisms remain unknown (1).

Intensive studies have been carried out on cellular Pi homeostasis by exploiting genetics of the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and revealed the phosphatase (PHO) pathway (11, 12, 13). The PHO pathway is a transcriptional regulation system controlling the so-called PHO regulon, which consists of Pi-responsive genes, including Pho5, an acid phosphatase that digests organic phosphates in the environment, and Pho84, a major Pi transporter. By activating the PHO regulon, budding yeast cells are able to utilize extracellular Pi and to adapt to Pi-limiting conditions. Changes in cellular Pi concentration are transduced to the nucleus through the PHO pathway (14), the core of which is the Pho80/Pho85, cyclin/CDK complex, and its CDK inhibitor Pho81. Pho80/Pho85 phosphorylates and inactivates Pho4, the key transcription factor of the PHO pathway (15, 16, 17). At low [Pi], Pho81 inhibits Pho80/Pho85 but not at high [Pi]. The metabolic enzymes for inositol pyrophosphates (PP-IPs), for example, Kcs1, are required for proper PHO regulation (18) and binding state of inositol pyrophosphates like IP7 to Pho81 modulates its CDK-inhibiting activity (19, 20, 21). It was reported that IP7 binds to the C-terminal S1 region of Pho81 (22). The abundance of PP-IPs presumably fluctuates in response to available Pi concentration; therefore, the PHO pathway transduces information about Pi concentration via PP-IPs. Pho81 possesses an SPX (Syg1-Pho81-Xpr1) domain, found in many regulators of Pi metabolism. Later, the SPX domain was found to act as a binding site for PP-IP (23). Therefore, the PP-IP–related signals could be mediated via the SPX domains and others and orchestrate cellular responses to the perturbation of Pi environment. S. cerevisiae possesses ten SPX proteins and nine of them, Pho81, Vtc2, Vtc3, Vtc4, Vtc5, Gde1, Pho87, Pho90, and Pho91, are reportedly involved in Pi metabolism (Table 1) (21, 24). The one exception is Syg1, an SPX-EXS (Erd1-Xpr1-Syg1) protein occurring at the plasma membrane, which has not been investigated in the context of Pi regulation. Syg1 was originally identified as a genetic suppressor of mutations of G protein α subunit (25). Given its sharing domain structure, SPX-EXS, with human XPR1, the Pi exporter, S. cerevisiae Syg1 might be a potential Pi exporter too, but no concrete evidence has been reported. These SPX proteins may be regulated by PP-IPs in a coordinated fashion to achieve Pi homeostasis. In S. cerevisiae, regulatory mechanisms for Pi homeostasis have been well studied. However, not all core regulatory elements, such as Pho81, are conserved among eukaryotes, even in the kingdom of fungi.

Table 1.

Comparison of SPX proteins from Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Homo sapiens

S. pombe S. cerevisiae A. thaliana H. sapiens Molecular function
Vtc2
Vtc4
Vtc2/Phm1b
Vtc3/Phm2
Vtc4/Phm3
- - The VTC complex subunit
polyP synthesis
- Vtc5 - - polyP synthesis activator
- Pho81 - - CDK (Pho80/Pho85) inhibitor
Pqr1/Spx1a - NLA
NLA2
- Pi quantity restriction
RING-type ubiquitin ligasedownregulation of Pi transporter
Plt1 Pho87
Pho90
Pho91
SPX-MFS1-3 - Pi transporter
Gde1 Gde1 - - Glycerophosphoryl diester phosphodiesterase
Xpr1/Spx2a Syg1 PHO1-10 XPR1 Pi exporter, EXS domain
- - SPX1-4 - containing solely SPX domain
involved in the expression of phosphate-related genes

Hyphens indicate that an ortholog is not found in the genome.

a

Spx1 and Spx2 are synonyms for Pqr1 and Xpr1, respectively (47).

b

Phm1∼3 are synonyms for Vtc2∼4 (43).

In fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Pi-regulating genes, such as pho1+ (acid phosphatase), pho84+ (major Pi transporter), and tgp1+ (glycerophosphate transporter) constitute the PHO regulon and are transcriptionally regulated in response to Pi concentration (26, 27, 28, 29). Regulation of the PHO regulon in S. pombe has also been intensively investigated relatively recently, revealing involvement of phosphorylation states of C-terminal domain repeats of RNA polymerase II and long non-coding RNAs (29, 30, 31, 32). In S. pombe, too, changes in Pi concentration are likely mediated by PP-IPs via transcriptional regulation, as in S. cerevisiae. Six genes encoding SPX proteins are found in the genome and they may be involved in Pi homeostasis (Table 1). Although it sounds analogous to the PHO pathway of S. cerevisiae, S. pombe lacks either SPX-CDK inhibitor, Pho81, pivotal for the PHO pathway or the functional ortholog of CDK, Pho85, which is similar to Pef1 in S. pombe. Pef1 is involved in meiosis progression and chromosomal cohesion rather than in the regulation of Pi homeostasis (33, 34, 35). Regulatory mechanisms for Pi homeostasis in S. pombe, many parts of which are still unclear, may differ considerably from those in S. cerevisiae.

In our previous study, we reported that the fission yeast Pqr1, a RING-type ubiquitin ligase with an SPX domain (SPX-RING), contributes to Pi homeostasis, restricting Pi uptake by downregulating the major Pi transporters, Pho84 and Pho842 (36). Loss of Pqr1 results in excessive influx of Pi into the cell, causing failure of phosphate quantity restriction. Consequently, it evokes hyper-accumulation of inorganic polyphosphate (polyP), a Pi polymer, synthesized by the VTC complex in vacuolar membranes. Hyper-accumulation of polyP in vacuolar lumens interferes with proper proteolysis in the vacuoles, which is indispensable for autophagic recycling of amino acids, thereby causing cell death during cellular quiescence (G0 phase) induced by nitrogen-limitation (36, 37, 38, 39). In Pqr1-deficient cells, inactivation of the VTC complex diminishes polyP and restores proteolytic activity in vacuoles. Interestingly, Pqr1, the key factor in Pi homeostasis, has no counterpart in S. cerevisiae but is functionally homologous to NLA, an SPX-RING ubiquitin ligase central to Pi homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana (40, 41, 42). The VTC complex is the polyP synthase identified in S. cerevisiae and comprises Vtc1, Vtc2, and catalytic Vtc4, or Vtc1, Vtc3, and Vtc4 (43, 44). As Vtc2, Vtc3, Vtc4, and an additional activator, Vtc5, possess an SPX domain in the N terminus, the VTC complex is also under the influence of PP-IPs (24, 45). Although the subunit composition is slightly different from that of S. cerevisiae, the VTC complex in S. pombe, composed of Vtc1, Vtc2, and Vtc4, is responsible for synthesizing cellular polyP too (36, 46, 47). While sharing common features, the regulatory mechanisms of Pi homeostasis in S. pombe differ from those of S. cerevisiae. Identifying mechanisms of Pi homeostasis in S. pombe will provide another standard and useful information to understand Pi homeostasis in eukaryotes.

The present study used Pqr1 as a starting point and attempted to further understanding of Pi regulation using S. pombe as a model. As described above, total Pi in the cell increases 3∼5-fold by inactivating Pqr1 (36). In this study, we first discovered that in Pqr1-deficient cells, a hyper-increase in total Pi is suppressed by deletion of Vtc4, a catalytic subunit of the VTC complex, so we investigated underlying molecular mechanisms. As a possible explanation for the suppression of hyper-accumulation of Pi, the Pi export process was considered and a potential Pi exporter encoded by SPCC1827.07c was investigated. Because our subsequent analysis revealed that it is a functional ortholog of human Xpr1, a known Pi exporter, we designated SPCC1827.07c as xpr1+. During preparation of this manuscript, we found that Drs. Beate Schwer, Stewart Shuman and colleagues named this gene spx2+ (47); however, in this manuscript, we have adopted the name, xpr1+. We show that S. pombe has Xpr1-dependent Pi export activity and contributes to normal proliferation and cellular viability, by maintaining Pi homeostasis synergistically in combination with Pqr1 and the VTC complex, leading to the hypothesis that the trio of SPX factors, Pqr1, Xpr1, and the VTC complex, protects the cytoplasm and/or the nucleus from lethal elevation of free Pi.

Results

Hyperaccumulation of cellular Pi in Δpqr1 is suppressed by inactivation of the VTC complex

Our previous study suggested that the SPX-RING-type ubiquitin ligase, Pqr1 restricts Pi uptake by downregulating Pho84 and Pho842, major high-affinity Pi transporters in S. pombe (36). In cells lacking Pqr1, Pi uptake may be enhanced, resulting in hyper-accumulation of polyP in vacuolar lumens, which interferes with proper vacuolar proteolysis in the last step of autophagy. When the polyP synthase, the VTC complex, is inactivated in Δpqr1 (a pqr1+ gene deletion strain), abnormal accumulation of polyP was suppressed. This result led us to question how cells manage excess Pi uptake without synthesizing polyP in vacuoles. To address this, total amounts of Pi in cells (Pitotal) were quantified and compared among the following: WT, Δpqr1, Δvtc4, and Δpqr1Δvtc4 (Fig. 1A). In Δpqr1, Pitotal was 214.5 ± 5.1 nmol/107 cells, while 96.7 ± 7.6 in WT, consistent with our previous study (36). Interestingly, the hyper-accumulation of Pi in Δpqr1 was suppressed in Δpqr1Δvtc4 cells, which are not able to synthesize polyP. Pitotal in Δpqr1Δvtc4 was around 48.3 ± 2.1 nmol/107 cells, significantly reduced compared to Δpqr1 (p < 0.02). The Pitotal of Δvtc4 was 45.6 ± 2.0 nmol/107 cells, virtually the same as that of Δpqr1Δvtc4 (nonsignificant difference, p > 0.2). These results suggested that either the majority of over-incorporated Pi in Δpqr1 is converted to polyP via the VTC complex or that S. pombe may possess alternative mechanisms to reduce Pitotal other than restricting Pi uptake by Pqr1. Such mechanisms may be keys to cellular Pi homeostasis and its molecular basis would be machinery to export excess Pi from the cell or a Pqr1-independent inhibitor for Pi uptake. In this study, we focused on the first possibility, the machinery needed to export Pi.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schizosaccharomyces pombe Xpr1, a potential Pi exporter, is involved in Pi homeostasis.A, total intracellular Pi (Pitotal) was measured in indicated strains cultured in normal synthetic medium EMM2 (Pi 15 mM). Experiments were repeated 3×, and individual data points, means, and SDs are presented. A double asterisk (∗∗) or 'ns' means the difference is or is not statistically significant by Student's t test (p < 0.02), respectively. ΔpΔv and ΔpΔx indicate Δpqr1Δvtc4 and Δpqr1Δxpr1, respectively. B, domain structures of Xpr1 orthologs. White squares represent estimated transmembrane regions. The N-terminal SPX domain and the C-terminal EXS domain are shown in green and blue, respectively. Sp, Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Sc, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Hs, Homo sapiens; At, Arabidopsis thaliana. C, intracellular localization of Xpr1-GFP expressed from multicopy plasmids with the inducible nmt41 promoter. Bar represents 5 μm. D, the three SPX factors, Pqr1, VTC, and Xpr1 in Pi homeostasis in S. pombe.

Gene deletion of a potential Pi exporter, Xpr1, affects cellular Pi amount

Previous studies have reported that a plasma membrane protein, Xpr1, promotes Pi export from mammalian cells (9). Xpr1 possesses an SPX domain at its N terminus and an EXS domain at its C terminus (Fig. 1B). The SPX domain reportedly functions as a Pi sensor and to bind signaling molecules, PP-IPs, like IP7 and IP8 (21). The EXS domain is composed of eight transmembrane regions. Orthologs of Xpr1, SPX-EXS proteins, are found in all metazoans (Table 1). S. cerevisiae Syg1, orthologous to Xpr1, has not been functionally analyzed in the context of Pi homeostasis. S. pombe has one gene, SPCC1827.07c encoding an SPX-EXS protein, function of which also has not been thoroughly investigated. We designated SPCC1827.07c as xpr1+ and examined its roles in Pi homeostasis in S. pombe.

Then we compared Pitotal in WT, Δpqr1, and Δxpr1 (Fig. 1A) and unexpectedly found that Pitotal in Δxpr1 was 95.8 ± 8.9 nmol/107 cells, similar to that in WT. Then, a Δpqr1Δxpr1 double-deletion mutant was created and its Pitotal was 314.1 ± 5.7 nmol/107 cells, approximately a three-fold increase from WT. Importantly, Pitotal in Δpqr1Δxpr1 was also significantly higher than that of Δpqr1 (214.5 ± 5.1 nmol/107 cells, p < 0.02). Therefore, Pqr1 and Xpr1 may synergistically restrict Pitotal, suggesting that these two are located in distinct pathways, consistent with the idea that Xpr1 is a Pi exporter. A Δxpr1Δvtc4 double-deletion mutant was also created and its Pitotal was similar to that of Δvtc4 (Fig. S1).

The intracellular localization of Xpr1 was examined by expressing Xpr1-GFP from multicopy plasmids with the inducible promoter, nmt41. It was localized mainly in the cell periphery, probably at the plasma membrane (Fig. 1C), consistent with its role in Pi export. Taken together, these results suggest that Xpr1/Spx2, a potential Pi exporter, may contribute to cellular Pi homeostasis with Pqr1 and the VTC complex (Fig. 1D).

The synthetic growth defect of Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4

To confirm the involvement of Xpr1 in Pi homeostasis, we created a triple gene-deletion mutant of pqr1+, xpr1+, and vtc4+ (Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4). To this end, the Δxpr1Δvtc4 strain was mated with Δpqr1 and yeast tetrad analysis was carried out (Fig. 2A). Asci (three examples shown in Figure 2A upper left) were dissected to four spores (a ∼ d) on an YES (complete medium) plate and incubated at 26 °C for several days. Spores germinated and formed colonies, and genotypes were subsequently analyzed (Fig. 2A upper right and bottom). We found that spores assumed to be Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4 did not form colonies, suggesting synthetic lethality of gene deletions of pqr1+, xpr1+, and vtc4+ on YES. We considered the possibility that germination or growth of Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4 is affected by Pi contained in YES. Then we quantified free Pi (orthophosphate) and total Pi (including organophosphorus compounds like phytate) in YES (Fig. S2) and found that concentrations of free Pi and total Pi in YES were 1.1 and 1.3 mM, respectively. Therefore, we next performed the same tetrad analysis on the lower Pi medium plate PMG (modified PMG synthetic minimal medium containing 0.15 mM Pi) (Fig. 2B). Normal PMG contains 15 mM Pi, as does normal EMM2 synthetic minimal medium (48). This time, we obtained Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4 colonies on PMG with 0.15 mM Pi, which did not grow on either normal PMG (15 mM Pi) or YES. We concluded that Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4 shows a synthetic severe growth defect at the normal [Pi] usually used in S. pombe studies.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4 and Δpqr1Δxpr1 are hyper-sensitive to higher Pi concentration.A, the triple deletion of pqr1+, xpr1+, and vtc4+ is synthetic lethal on complete YES medium. The double mutant Δxpr1Δvtc4 was mated with Δpqr1 and four spores per ascus were dissected on an YES plate (tetrad dissection, upper left). An asterisk indicates a dissection mistake. Each gene of pqr1+, xpr1+, or vtc4+ was substituted with a conventional drug-resistant marker gene: hphMX for hygromycin B, kanMX for G418, and natMX for clonNAT. By checking the drug sensitivity of each colony (bottom), genotypes of dissected spores were analyzed (upper right). Δp, Δx, and Δv indicate Δpqr1, Δxpr1, and Δvtc4, respectively. B, Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4 is viable on low Pi medium. As in A, tetrad dissection was done on PMG0.15 mM Pi instead. The ΔpΔxΔv (3b) was resistant to all three drugs and did not form colonies on PMG15mM Pi or YES, a complete medium. C, proliferation of indicated strains was examined on EMM2 plates with various concentrations of Pi (0.15–500 mM). Normal EMM2 contains 15 mM Pi. D, Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4 cells (ΔΔΔ in the figure) showed abnormal morphology on EMM2 with 15 mM Pi. Cells from agar plates were observed by microscope. Arrowheads indicate collapsed cells. Bar represents 5 μm.

Pqr1, Xpr1, and Vtc4 synergistically contribute to high Pi tolerance

To clarify how the three SPX factors, Pqr1, Xpr1, and the VTC complex, help sustain cellular proliferation through maintenance of Pi homeostasis, we examined the effect of [Pi] in the medium on cell growth of all possible gene deletion mutants of the three genes (Fig. 2C). All tested strains were grown in 0.15 mM Pi. Growth of Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4 was severely inhibited at 15 mM Pi and was completely blocked at 100 mM Pi or more. An aliquot of cells of Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4 was taken from the agar plates and observed microscopically. Cells were severely deformed/swollen and many were collapsed and probably dying (Figs. 2D and S2). These abnormal phenotypes of Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4 were dependent on [Pi] and were only seen at 15 mM Pi and never at 0.15 mM Pi. Notably, Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4 can form colonies at 0.15 mM Pi but is genetically unstable, probably due to accumulation of suppressor mutations. For this reason, we did not investigate this triple mutant further in this study.

All double mutants, Δpqr1Δxpr1, Δpqr1Δvtc4, and Δxpr1Δvtc4, were able to form colonies at 100 mM Pi. Δpqr1Δxpr1 showed slow growth at 100 mM Pi and failed to grow at 300 mM Pi (Fig. 2C). Contrarily, Δpqr1Δvtc4 and Δxpr1Δvtc4 grew as well as WT and single mutants even grew at 500 mM Pi. Cells of the three double mutants were observed at 0.15 or 15 mM and show no collapsed or dead cells (Fig. S3).

These results suggest that the three SPX factors, Pqr1, Xpr1, and the VTC complex, contribute synergistically to sustain vegetative proliferation under normal and high Pi conditions. Considering that only Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4 showed severe defects at normal [Pi] (15 mM), while all double mutants were rather similar to WT at 15 mM Pi, molecular functions of Pqr1, Xpr1, and the VTC complex are likely to be essential in the absence of the other two.

Loss of both Pqr1 and Xpr1 causes hyper-elevation of intracellular Pi levels

In Figure 2, we found that Δpqr1Δxpr1 showed the most severe growth defect, next to Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4, in the higher [Pi]. As the triple deletion mutant Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4 was difficult to investigate, we focused on investigating Δpqr1Δxpr1. To address whether a failure in Pi homeostasis is caused in Δpqr1Δxpr1, we performed a time-course analysis of cell growth, viability, [Pi], and cell morphology of Δpqr1Δxpr1, Δpqr1, and Δxpr1 at 15, 300, and 500 mM Pi (Fig. 3). First, time-course analyses showed that proliferation of Δpqr1Δxpr1 was inhibited at 300 and 500 mM Pi (Fig. 3A). At 27 h after the shift to 500 mM Pi, viability of Δpqr1Δxpr1 had decreased to 27.4 ± 11.0%, while the other strains sustained significantly higher viabilities (p < 0.02): 95.3 ± 9.0%, 91.9 ± 13.7%, and 93.4 ± 13.0% in WT, Δpqr1, and Δxpr1, respectively. At either 15 or 300 mM Pi, no significant loss of viability was seen in Δpqr1Δxpr1 and other strains (Fig. 3B). If the growth defect of Δpqr1Δxpr1 is caused by defective regulation of Pi homeostasis, we supposed that Pitotal must be affected; therefore, we quantified Pitotal of these strains at 15, 300, and 500 mM Pi, 8 h after the medium shift (Fig. 3C). As already shown in Figure 1, Δpqr1Δxpr1 showed extreme accumulation of Pi, and Δpqr1 was the second at 15 mM Pi. In Δpqr1Δxpr1, values of Pitotal were 302.3 ± 17.4, 392.3 ± 33.1, and 539.6 ± 32.9 mM/107 cells at 15, 300, and 500 mM Pi, respectively, increasing with medium Pi concentration. In sharp contrast, Pitotal of WT and Δxpr1 did not increase at 300 and 500 mM Pi (Fig. 3C), suggesting that Pi homeostasis is sustained in these two strains, if Pqr1 is functional. In Δpqr1, values of Pitotal were 215.5 ± 9.3, 261.8 ± 37.4, and 262.4 ± 37.7 mM/107 cells at 15, 300, and 500 mM Pi, respectively. These values were significantly higher than those of WT or Δxpr1 (p-values shown in Fig. 3) and increased with medium Pi concentration, although the increase ratio was far smaller than in Δpqr1Δxpr1.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Δpqr1Δxpr1 showed hyper-accumulation of Pi and lost viability under higher Pi.A, growth curves of indicated strains after the shift to 15, 300, or 500 mM Pi EMM2 from normal EMM2 (Pi, 15 mM). Y-axes indicate cell concentrations in the media measured with a particle counter and relative values are plotted (setting value at 0 h to 1.0). B, cellular viabilities at 8 and 27 h after medium shift. ΔpΔx indicates Δpqr1Δxpr1. C, total amounts of intracellular Pi (Pitotal) of indicated strains at 8 h after medium shift. Presented data were normalized by cell numbers (nmol Pi/107 cells). D, amounts of intracellular free Pi at 8 h. For B-D, experiments were repeated three times, and individual data points, means, and SDs were presented. Data of WT and each mutant were statistically analyzed: an asterisk (∗) for significantly different (p < 0.05) and a double asterisk (∗∗) for p < 0.02. Others were not significantly different from corresponding WT results. E, cellular morphologies were examined with Calcofluor White (CW) to stain cell walls. Structures indicated by arrowheads are septa formed before cytokinesis. Arrows indicate abnormal invaginations observed in Δpqr1Δxpr1. Materials stained strongly with CW were deposited in the invaginated space. The percentage of cells with invaginations is shown. Bar represents 5 μm.

As Pitotal represents the sum of all forms of Pi in the cell (free Pi, nucleic acids, polyP, phospholipids, etc.), we next examined the level of intracellular free Pi (Pifree) in WT, Δpqr1, Δxpr1, and Δpqr1Δxpr1 at 15, 300, and 500 mM Pi, 8 h after the medium shift. In Δpqr1Δxpr1, Pifree were 70.3 ± 10.7, 92.5 ± 8.5, and 93.8 ± 16.3 nmol/107 cells in 15, 300, and 500 mM Pi, respectively, significantly higher than in WT, 46.9 ± 9.9, 34.8 ± 7.0, and 35.8 ± 5.9 (p-values shown in Fig. 3). Pifree of WT is sustained around 35∼47 nmol/107 cells, regardless of medium [Pi], suggesting that this level of Pifree may be homeostatically maintained since it is suitable for the physiology of S. pombe. Pifree of Δpqr1 tended to be higher than that of WT, although the difference was significant (p < 0.05) only at 15 mM Pi. The Pifree of Δxpr1 was similar to that of WT, as seen in Pitotal, suggesting that the contribution of Xpr1 to Pi homeostasis may be minor in the presence of functional Pqr1 at extracellular [Pi] below 500 mM. This is consistent with Figure 3B showing no viability loss in Δxpr1. These results suggested that Pi homeostasis was compromised and free Pi hyper-accumulated in Δpqr1Δxpr1 in higher Pi medium. Taken together, we conclude that Pqr1 and Xpr1 contribute synergistically to prevent lethal elevation of [Pi] in the cell so as to sustain proliferation.

Abnormal morphology of Δpqr1Δxpr1 cells at higher Pi

What defects are caused by abnormal elevation of cellular Pi level? To answer this question, we examined cellular morphology by staining cell walls with Calcofluor White (CW) dye (Figs. 3D and S4). In Δpqr1Δxpr1, abnormal invagination of the plasma membrane was frequently observed at high Pi (0, 33, and 81% at 0, 8, and 27 h in 500 mM Pi, and 17% at 27 h in 300 mM Pi, respectively). In other strains, such invagination was not seen. In the invaginated space, probable cell wall materials were deposited, judging from CW staining, which detects polysaccharides. A similar phenotype was invoked by overexpression of Rga2, the Rho GAP, or by gene deletion of klf1+, a Krüppel-like transcription factor (49, 50).

Xpr1-dependent Pi export in S. pombe

Our results suggest that a potential Pi exporter, Xpr1, is important for Pi homeostasis in S. pombe. Is S. pombe Xpr1 a genuine Pi exporter? Budding yeast Syg1, orthologous to Xpr1, has not been investigated in the context of Pi metabolism (24, 25). Rather, to the best of our knowledge, Pi export itself has not been well investigated in fungi and no established protocol was available. Therefore, in this study, we developed a method to assay Pi export activity in S. pombe (Fig. 4A) and then we examined the activities of Pi export in Δxpr1 transformed with an empty vector (Δxpr1) or with an Xpr1-GFP plasmid (Xpr1-OP), controlled with the inducible nmt41 promoter (Fig. 4, BD for Pi export assay). A strain (h leu-32) transformed with an empty vector was also used as a control (WT).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Xpr1 overexpression accelerates Pi export.A, the scheme of Pi export assay. To induce gene expression by nmt41 promoter, cells were cultured in EMM2 without vitamin B1 for 18 h at 26 °C. B, confirmation of 32Pi uptake. After incorporation of 32Pi into cells, aliquots of cells were taken and total amounts of 32Pi in cells were measured with a liquid scintillation counter. The amount of input 32Pi was also measured and compared with the incorporated 32Pi (upper graph). Percentages in the graph indicate ratios of 32Pi in the cells to the input. Cell numbers used are also shown (bottom). Experiments were repeated three times and individual data points, means, and SDs are shown. C, time-course analysis of Pi export in 15 mM Pi EMM2. The Y axis represents percentages of 32Pi exported from cells to incorporated total 32Pi. D, comparison of exported 32Pi at 240 min after the chase. The double asterisk indicates that the difference is statistically significant (∗∗ for p < 0.02). 'ns' means not significant.

The cells in mid-log phase were washed and resuspended in EMM2-P (EMM2 without Pi), followed by the administration of KH2 32PO4. We confirmed that 32Pi was efficiently incorporated in virtually the same manner in all tested strains (Fig. 4B). In the Pi export assay (Fig. 4, C and D), Xpr1-OP showed significantly stronger radioactivity in supernatant than Δxpr1 (p < 0.02), showing Xpr1-dependent Pi export activity. The Pi export of WT was slightly, but reproducibly, stronger than Δxpr1. As shown in Fig. S5, Xpr1-GFP was indeed expressed. We detected two bands of Xpr1-GFP, implying that Xpr1 may be posttranslationally modified or partially cleaved, although we did not further investigate the nature of the modification. These results are consistent with the idea that S. pombe Xpr1 has Pi-exporting activity. Clearly, the radioactivity in the supernatant of Δxpr1 was slowly but gradually increased (Fig. 4C), suggesting that Xpr1 is not a sole Pi exporter, but S. pombe has other cryptic—not yet identified—Pi exporter(s).

The absence of Pqr1 or Vtc4 accelerates Pi export in an Xpr1-dependent manner

Next, we examined whether Xpr1-dependent Pi export is affected by the functions of other SPX proteins, Pqr1 and the VTC complex (Fig. 5). Similar to the previous assay, cells of indicated strains in mid-log phase were washed and resuspended in EMM2-P, followed by 32Pi administration (Fig. 5A). In this assay, Pi export was examined in EMM2 containing 15 or 500 mM Pi. First, we confirmed that 32Pi was efficiently incorporated in virtually the same manner in all tested strains (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Xpr1-dependent Pi export is accelerated in the absence of Pqr1 or Vtc4.A, the scheme of Pi export assay. B, confirmation of 32Pi uptake in tested strains. Experiments were repeated three times and individual data points, means, and SDs are shown. C, time-course analysis of Pi export in 15 mM Pi EMM2. The Y axis represents percentages of 32Pi exported from cells to incorporated total 32Pi. D, comparison of exported 32Pi in 15 mM Pi at 60 min after the chase. Single or double asterisks indicate that the difference is statistically significant (∗ for p < 0.05, ∗∗ for p < 0.02). 'ns' means not significant. E, time-course analysis similar to (C), instead the medium contained 500 mM Pi. F, similar to D, instead the medium contained 500 mM Pi. G, protein levels of Xpr1-GFP were examined by immunoblot and compared. The medium used for culture was EMM2 containing 15 mM Pi. Each signal intensity of Xpr1-GFP was normalized by Cdc2, the loading control, and the relative level of Xpr1-GFP is shown below the blot (the ratio of Xpr1-GFP level of each strain to that of WT). Xpr1-GFP levels were not increased by gene deletion of pqr1+ or vtc4+. H, localization of Xpr1-GFP expressed from the chromosomally integrated gene, controlled by its own promoter. Xpr1-GFP was enriched in the cell periphery in all tested strains. Bar represents 5 μm.

In the Pi export assay, at 15 mM Pi, neither WT nor Δxpr1 showed much radioactivity in the supernatant, as seen in Figure 4 (Fig. 5C for time-course, D for comparison at 60 min). However, Δpqr1 and Δvtc4 showed significantly stronger radioactivity in supernatants than WT (p < 0.02), depending on the presence of Xpr1. Strong radioactivity was not seen in the supernatant of either Δpqr1Δxpr1 or Δxpr1Δvtc4. These results suggest that S. pombe has Xpr1-dependent Pi export activity; Xpr1-dependent Pi export is accelerated by either Δpqr1 or Δvtc4. Importantly, the elevation of Pi export activity in Δpqr1 and Δvtc4 is synergistic. In Δpqr1Δvtc4, exported Pi was far greater than that in the single mutant (Fig. 5D for statistical analyses). Similarly, we examined Pi export at 500 mM Pi (Fig. 5, E and F) and obtained results similar to those at 15 mM Pi. The Pi export activity of WT at 500 mM Pi was similar to that at 15 mM. As both Pitotal and Pifree were homeostatically sustained in WT and Δxpr1 at 15 ∼ 500 mM Pi (Fig. 3, C and D), necessity of Xpr1-dependent Pi export might be limited in the tested conditions. The timing of activation of Pi export in Δpqr1, Δvtc4, and Δpqr1Δvtc4 was earlier at 500 mM Pi than at 15 mM Pi (Fig. 5, C and E). Additionally, we noticed that Pi export activities in Δpqr1Δxpr1 and Δxpr1Δvtc4 were slightly but reproducibly higher than in Δxpr1 at either 15 mM or 500 mM Pi (Fig. 5, D and F), suggesting that S. pombe may possess Pi exporters other than Xpr1. Thus, taken the results of Figures 4 and 5 together, we conclude that S. pombe has Xpr1-dependent Pi export activity, which is regulatable and activated by the absence of either Pqr1 or the VTC complex or both.

Protein level and cell peripheral localization of Xpr1 with deletion of pqr1+, vtc4+, or both

The Pi export assay shown in Figure 5 suggested that Xpr1-dependent Pi export activity is elevated in the absence of Pqr1 or the VTC complex. To obtain mechanistic insight into how Xpr1 is regulated, we examined the protein level of Xpr1 and its intracellular localization in WT, Δpqr1, Δvtc4, and Δpqr1Δvtc4 cells. To this end, a GFP gene was C-terminally fused to the endogenous xpr1+ gene (chromosomally integrated). Transcription of the fusion gene was regulated by the xpr1+ promoter. We found that Xpr1-GFP did not increase in Δpqr1, Δvtc4, or Δpqr1Δvtc4 (Fig. 5G). Accelerated Pi export in these mutants may not be caused by increased amounts of Xpr1 protein. Next, we investigated localization of Xpr1-GFP (Fig. 5F). In WT, Xpr1-GFP was enriched in the cellular periphery, probably the plasma membrane. In the mutants, Xpr1-GFP was similarly localized to the cell periphery, suggesting that accelerated Pi export in these mutants may not be caused by dynamic alteration of the localization of the exporter, Xpr1.

Pi hyper-sensitivity of Δpqr1Δxpr1 is suppressed by gene-deletion of Pi transporters Pho84 and Pho842

Our previous study showed that Pqr1 is required for the internalization of Pho84 and Pho842, the major high-affinity Pi transporters, from the plasma membrane, contributing to the restriction of Pi uptake (36). The double gene deletion of Pho84 and Pho842 suppresses the lethal phenotype of Δpqr1 in nitrogen-starved conditions. On the other hand, Pqr1 is reportedly involved in transcriptional regulations (47). How does Pqr1 contribute to Pi homeostasis along with Xpr1 and the VTC complex? To obtain insight, we examined the genetic interaction between SPX proteins and Pi transporters (Fig. 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The Pi hyper-sensitivity of Δpqr1Δxpr1 was suppressed by the gene-deletion of Pi transporters. A, proliferation of indicated strains on EMM2 plates with various concentrations of Pi (15–500 mM). Δ84, Δ842, and ΔΔΔΔ indicate Δpho84, Δpho842, and Δpqr1Δxpr1Δpho84Δpho842, respectively. B, cellular viabilities of indicated strains at 8 and 24 h after medium shift. A double asterisk (∗∗) means the difference is statistically significant (p < 0.02). C, Pitotal and Pifree of indicated strains at 8 h after medium shift. Presented data were normalized by cell numbers (nmol Pi/107 cells). Experiments were repeated three times. Individual data points, means, and SDs were presented. The data of Δpqr1Δxpr1Δ84, Δpqr1Δxpr1Δ842, and ΔΔΔΔ were analyzed with Δpqr1Δxpr1: an asterisk (∗) for significantly different (p < 0.05) and a double asterisk (∗∗) for p < 0.02. Others were not significantly different from corresponding Δpqr1Δxpr1 results. D, cellular morphologies at 24 h after shift to 500 mM Pi. See Figure 3E. Bar represents 5 μm.

The Pi hyper-sensitivity of Δpqr1Δxpr1 was suppressed by the double gene deletion of Pho84 and Pho842 (Figs. 6A and S6). Δpqr1Δxpr1Δpho84Δpho842 grew as well as WT even at 300 mM Pi and was able to proliferate slightly but reproducibly better than Δpqr1Δxpr1 at 500 mM Pi, while Δpqr1Δxpr1 did not form colonies. Both Δpqr1Δxpr1Δpho84 and Δpqr1Δxpr1Δpho842 were unable to form colonies at 300 mM Pi, suggesting that Pho84 and Pho842 function redundantly. Consistently, the loss of viability and hyper-accumulation of Pi of Δpqr1Δxpr1 were significantly suppressed by Δpho84Δpho842 (Fig. 6, B and C). Δpqr1Δxpr1Δpho842 proliferated better than Δpqr1Δxpr1Δpho84 at 200 mM Pi. The abnormal morphology of Δpqr1Δxpr1at higher Pi was also suppressed by Δpho84Δpho842 (Fig. 6D). These results are consistent with the idea that Pqr1 contributes to Pi homeostasis and proliferation through downregulating Pho84 and Pho842. The suppression of the phenotypes of Δpqr1Δxpr1 by Δpho84Δpho842 was obvious and significant, but not perfect; Δpqr1Δxpr1Δpho84Δpho842 formed fewer colonies than WT at 500 mM Pi. Therefore, we do not exclude the following possibilities: remaining Pi transporters, namely Pho841, Pho843, and Plt1, are involved; the other functions of Pqr1, such as transcriptional regulations, reinforce Pi homeostasis achieved through the direct regulation of Pi transporters.

Discussion

In this study, we investigated functions of Xpr1/Spx2, an SPX-EXS protein and potential Pi exporter, in Pi homeostasis in S. pombe. We also investigated the other two SPX factors: Pqr1, a ubiquitin ligase, and Vtc4, an enzymatic subunit of the VTC complex responsible for polyP synthesis. The major outcomes are the following: (1) Xpr1-dependent Pi export activity exists in S. pombe and is regulatable, accelerated in the genetic backgrounds of Δpqr1 and Δvtc4; (2) Pqr1, Xpr1, and the VTC complex (the SPX trio) contribute synergistically to Pi homeostasis; (3) Pi homeostasis sustained by the SPX trio is essential for normal vegetative proliferation in the laboratory.

First, we propose a working model of how the SPX trio functions in Pi homeostasis (Fig. 7). Xpr1, the SPX-EXS, localizes to the plasma membrane and exports free cytoplasmic Pi to the extracellular environment, reducing [Pi] in the cytoplasm. Pqr1, the SPX-RING ubiquitin ligase, downregulates major Pi transporters, Pho84 and Pho842, and restricts Pi uptake into the cytoplasm (36). Ubiquitination of Pho84 depends mainly on Pqr1 function. The VTC complex, localized to vacuolar membranes, synthesizes polyP in the vacuolar lumen in S. pombe, too (36, 46, 47). In budding yeast, it was reported that polyP synthesis by the VTC complex consumes cytoplasmic ATP and probably also occurs in S. pombe. Isolating phosphate as vacuolar polyP may result indirectly in the reduction of cytoplasmic Pi. Failure of all three regulatory mechanisms, Pi uptake, Pi export, and polyP synthesis (Pi isolation), disrupts Pi homeostasis, elevating Pi level in the cytoplasm and causing severe growth defects in medium with normal [Pi] (15 mM) or higher (Fig. 2). Regulation by the SPX trio is likely tied to Pi metabolism, as Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4 is able to proliferate like WT if the Pi concentration is reduced to 0.15 mM (1% of conventional EMM2).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

The working model: The SPX Trio, Pqr1, Xpr1, and the VTC complex contribute synergistically to Pi homeostasis, supporting cell proliferation and viability.A, in WT, Pqr1 restricts Pi uptake by downregulating Pho84 and Pho842 Pi transporters (36). Reportedly, Pqr1 may be involved in the regulations of Pi-related genes (47). Xpr1 exports and decreases cellular Pi. The VTC complexes (subunits Vtc2 and Vtc4 contain SPX) on vacuolar membranes synthesize polyP, sequestering a large amount of Pi as polyP in vacuoles. Functions of this trio synergistically sustain Pi homeostasis in the cell. B, in Δpqr1, the Pi export activity of Xpr1 is accelerated and the VTC complex produces more polyP. C, in Δvtc4, the Pi export activity of Xpr1 is accelerated. D, in Δpqr1Δvtc4, the Pi export activity of Xpr1 is accelerated 2-fold more than in Δpqr1 or Δvtc4. E, in Δpqr1Δxpr1, free Pi accumulates and Pi homeostasis is lost. polyP is assumed to have accumulated but was not examined. Δpqr1Δxpr1 does not form colonies at high Pi. F, hyper-accumulation of cellular Pi and viability loss of Δpqr1Δxpr1 were suppressed by Δpho84Δpho842. G, Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4 forms colonies only at low Pi (∼0.15 mM), probably due to complete loss of Pi homeostasis. polyP, polyphosphate.

All functions of the SPX trio reduce free [Pi] in the cytoplasm and possibly in the nucleus. In other words, loss of the trio may induce hyper-elevation of free [Pi] in the cytoplasm and/or the nucleus, which cannot be controlled by other cellular systems. Even the double deletion of pqr1+ and xpr1+ caused abnormal elevation of both Pitotal and Pifree (Fig. 3). High concentrations of free Pi in the cytoplasm may be lethal, as seen in Δpqr1Δxpr1, probably due to widespread disruption of biochemical pathways in the cell. Therefore, we propose a hypothesis: the SPX trio protects the cytoplasm and/or the nucleus by preventing lethal elevation of free Pi. In the cell, Pi is involved in more biochemical reactions than any other compound except water. Hence, uncontrollable elevation of [Pi] interferes with most cellular events. For example, hydrolysis of pyrophosphate, required for transcription and replication, may be affected by hyper-elevated [Pi]. Of note, S. pombe inorganic pyrophosphatase Ipp1 is essential for viability (51). Similarly, hydrolysis of ATP is affected. Inefficient hydrolysis of ATP would have a massive impact on all energy metabolism. To evaluate the above hypothesis, it is essential to examine phenotypes of Δpqr1Δxpr1Δvtc4, especially free [Pi], although we could not explore this further in the present study, due to the difficulty of handling the triple mutant. Conditional lethal mutants or shut-OFF strains using inducible promoters will be developed to address such questions in the future. Instead, in this study, we thoroughly investigated the second most severe mutant, Δpqr1Δxpr1, showing that both Pitotal and Pifree were highly elevated and subsequently, viability was lost. As for why elevation of cellular Pi decreases viability of the double mutant, we do not have an experimentally supported hypothesis, although some speculation was already offered above. Morphological abnormalities of Δpqr1Δxpr1 were readily apparent. Invagination of the plasma membrane was frequently observed. Given that a similar phenotype is invoked by Rho GAP overexpression (49), elevation of cytoplasmic [Pi] might affect Rho functions or cell wall synthesis.

We have provided the first direct evidence of the Pi export activity of Xpr1 in fungi by establishing 32Pi export assay using Xpr1-OP strain and gene-deletion mutants of the SPX trio. Furthermore, we have shown that Xpr1-dependent Pi export is vital. Human Xpr1 is medically important for several reasons. It is one of the genes responsible for PFBC. Inhibition of Xpr1 affects serum [Pi] in mice (8, 10, 52). Notably, the zebrafish mutant of Xpr1 lacks microglia, the specialized macrophages in the brain (53). The Pi export activity of Xpr1 has been studied in vertebrates. Regulatory and operating mechanisms for Xpr1 activity are not completely understood, although it is reportedly regulated by binding of PP-IPs to the SPX domain (54). In this study, it was clearly shown that Xpr1-dependent Pi export in S. pombe is regulatable and is accelerated in the absence of Pqr1 or Vtc4, without an increase in the Xpr1 protein level or dynamic alteration of its localization. Therefore we speculate that PP-IP–dependent regulation of Xpr1 may be responsible for acceleration of Pi export in Δpqr1, Δvtc4, and Δpqr1Δvtc4, as seen with human Xpr1 (54). Since our understanding of PP-IP metabolism and Pi regulations in S. pombe has advanced in recent years through efforts of fission yeast researchers (31, 46, 47, 55), it is interesting to examine Xpr1 activity in mutants of PP-IP metabolic factors, like Asp1, responsible for generation of PP-IP–like IP8. In proliferating WT, Xpr1-dependent Pi export was difficult to detect at 15∼500 mM Pi. It is important to explore physiological conditions in which Xpr1 is activated.

While analyzing the results of the 32Pi export assay, we realized that a second Pi exporter may exist in S. pombe, although Xpr1 has been thought to be the sole Pi exporter in eukaryotes (9). The unidentified Pi exporters may contribute to Pi homeostasis and viability in Δxpr1 in high Pi. In the future, dosage-suppressor screening should be used to identify such Pi-exporting factors.

Budding yeast Syg1, the potential ortholog of Xpr1, has not been proven to have Pi-exporting activity. If it does, the activity of Syg1 may be undetectable in a WT background, as in S. pombe, and it may become detectable only in the mutants of other regulators of Pi homeostasis, for example, Δpho81 or Δvtc4 or the double deletion. Syg1 was originally identified as a dosage suppressor for the lethal and cell cycle arrest phenotype of the gpa1 mutant, a loss-of-function mutant of the α subunit of the heterotrimeric G protein (25). Cellular Pi export activity may be linked to cell cycle machinery.

Pqr1 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase belonging to the SPX-RING family and is orthologous to NLA in A. thaliana (40) but is not conserved in S. cerevisiae. Originally, we identified this ubiquitin ligase as a proteolysis factor that quiescence requires (36), while now it is revealed to be important for “Phosphate Quantity Restriction.” The Pqr1 substrates are likely major Pi transporters, Pho84 and possibly Pho842, in the plasma membrane. Pqr1 may ubiquitinate Pi transporters and promotes their downregulation by endocytosis, resulting in the restriction of Pi uptake. As shown in the previous study (36), ubiquitination of Pho84 depends on Pqr1 but that of Pho842 is little affected in Δpqr1 at 15 mM Pi, although internalization of Pho84 and Pho842 are both inhibited in Δpqr1. Pqr1 might ubiquitinate a lysine residue of Pho842 important for internalization, and ubiquitination of other lysines of Pho842 might be catalyzed by E3 ligases other than Pqr1. The functional links between Pqr1 and Pi transporters, Pho84 and Pho842, were consolidated with genetic analyses in this study (Fig. 6). Other minor high affinity Pi transporters, Pho841 and Pho843, could be targets of Pqr1, as suppression of Pi hyper-sensitivity of Δpqr1Δxpr1 by Δpho84Δpho842 is not perfect. Or Pqr1 could contribute to Pi-related regulations other than downregulating Pi transporters. NLA also restricts Pi uptake in A. thaliana by downregulation of a Pi transporter (41, 42). It is interesting that S. cerevisiae lacks Pqr1.

In Pi homeostasis control in S. cerevisiae, the PHO pathway is important because it regulates transcription of the PHO regulon, including Pho5 and Pho84 (12, 13). The core of the PHO pathway is the Cyclin/CDK complex, Pho80/Pho85, and the CDK inhibitor, Pho81, with an SPX domain, controlling a key transcription factor, Pho4 (19). S. pombe and many other fungi lack Pho81 but possess an SPX-RING–like Pqr1, instead. The ortholog of Pho85 kinase in S. pombe is Pef1, reportedly involved in meiotic regulation and chromosome cohesion, rather than Pi metabolism (33, 34, 35). The core of the PHO pathway is not well conserved in fungi. Therefore, we speculate that Pqr1 may serve additional functions in transcriptional regulation of the PHO regulon.

Recently, Schwer et al. identified mutations of pqr1+/spx1+ (they call it spx1+; however, to avoid confusion, we use our nomenclature Pqr1 in this manuscript) as extragenic suppressors in an Asp1 pyrophosphatase mutant (47). Asp1 is the key enzyme in PP-IP metabolism and serves dual functions, kinase activity to generate IP8 and phosphatase activity for the reverse reaction (46, 55, 56, 57). In the Asp1 pyrophosphatase mutant, excess IP8 may cause cytotoxicity that is suppressed by Pqr1 deletion. Therefore, they suggested that Pqr1/Spx1 may act as the transducer of PP-IP signaling for transcriptional regulation of the PHO regulon. Considering that Pqr1 is a ubiquitin ligase, Pqr1 could have dual roles in Pi metabolism, restricting Pi uptake by ubiquitinating Pho84 and mediating PP-IP signaling to regulate the PHO regulon. As PP-IP binds also to the S1 region of budding yeast Pho81 (22), which is distinct from the SPX domain, Pqr1 could have multiple binding sites for PP-IP and could be differentially regulated. It is worth examining whether site-directed mutagenesis on the SPX domain compromises the activity of Pqr1 to restrict Pi uptake. Efforts to find substrates of Pqr1 other than Pi transporters will be also crucial. As Pi regulation is thus varied in species, it is interesting to review Pi regulations of various species in fungi and others at the level of systematic and evolutional biology.

Then, we discuss the VTC complex, the enzymatic subunit of which is Vtc4. The VTC complex, widely conserved in unicellular eukaryotes, but not possessed by metazoans or plants, is a polyP synthase in S. cerevisiae (44), as also shown in S. pombe by our group and others (36, 46, 47). One of the fundamentally important outcomes of the present study is that the VTC complex is basically essential for proliferation in the genetic background of Δpqr1Δxpr1. Given that the VTC complex functions exclusively in polyP synthesis, the above finding may facilitate understanding of essential roles of polyP. We propose the following hypothesis: polyP may be essential to avoid lethal elevation of free Pi in the cytoplasm and/or the nucleus by sequestering Pi as polyP in vacuoles. Our current data are consistent with this hypothesis and we plan to examine this in subsequent studies. As for physiological roles of polyP, many reports have appeared (protein polyphosphorylation (58), protein folding (59, 60), LON protease regulation (61), vacuolar proteolysis required for autophagy (36), transcriptional regulations (62), blood coagulation (63), relevance to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/ALS (64), replicative lifespan (65), etc. See the following comprehensive reviews (66, 67)). As the amount of polyP in the cell is far greater in yeasts (∼20% of wet weight) than in metazoans and plants, the physiological roles of polyP could vary. However, among nonessential functions of polyP in yeasts, there may be evolutionarily conserved activities, possibly with profound relevance to human health. Despite recent advances of our understanding of metazoan polyP metabolism (68, 69), still many remain elusive. Identification of related enzymes, for example, metazoan polyP synthase, will be key in this research field.

Of the SPX trio: Pqr1, Xpr1/Spx2, and the VTC complex, only Xpr1 is common to all eukaryotes, including humans. Xpr1 is the sole SPX factor in metazoans and may be central to Pi homeostasis in human cells (9, 54). Whereas at the organismal level, Pi metabolism is governed by the endocrine system, individual cells do not need multiple SPX factors to maintain Pi homeostasis. Accordingly, SPX factors other than Xpr1 have been lost evolutionarily, and it is interesting that only Xpr1 remains in metazoans. Understanding the regulatory and operating mechanisms of Xpr1 and its orthologs is in progress; therefore, studies of human Xpr1 may be of broad interest. A syndrome of high [Pi] in serum, hyperphosphatemia, is a risk factor in chronic kidney disease, afflicting over six hundred million people globally (70), and Xpr1 could be a possible therapeutic target for hyperphosphatemia (52). Given that it is also responsible for PFBC, the medical importance of Xpr1 is apparent (8). S. pombe is a tractable model organism for genetic and functional studies of human Xpr1 and orthologs.

Experimental procedures

Yeast strains, media, and culture

All S. pombe strains used are listed in Table S1. Complete and synthetic minimal media, YES (YE with five supplements: adenine, uracil, leucine, histidine, and lysine) and EMM2, were employed (48). To test drug sensitivity, 100 μl of stock solution of each drug (G418, 25 mg/ml; hygromycin B, 75 mg/ml; nourseothricin, 25 mg/ml) were spread on YES or PMG (synthetic medium) plates and yeasts were inoculated. In the case of blasticidin S selection, the drug was spread on YES plate at 0.3 mg/ml (71). PMG contains glutamate as a nitrogen source rather than NH4Cl used for EMM2; therefore, it is appropriate for the G418 sensitivity test. For reduced-Pi EMM2 (0.15 mM and 1.5 mM Pi), we first prepared EMM2-P (EMM2 without a Pi source (Na2HPO4), adjusting the pH to 5.8 with 10 mM MES and NaOH (36)), and normal EMM2 (15 mM Pi) was mixed with EMM2-P. For Pi-increased EMM2 (100 ∼ 500 mM Pi), the appropriate volume of Pi buffer (pH 5.8) was added to EMM2. To prepare solid agar plates of high-Pi media, Pi buffer was added after autoclaving, because the high concentration of Pi interferes with agar gelling. Pi buffer was sterilized using 0.45-μm filters before adding it to the media. Yeast strains were incubated on agar plates or in liquid media at 26 °C. Cellular concentration in liquid media was measured with a CDA-1000 particle counter (Sysmex).

Yeast genetics

Gene deletion and epitope tagging were performed as described previously (61). To generate double or triple gene-deletion mutants, random spore analysis or tetrad analysis was performed.

Bright-field and fluorescent microscopy

Cell images were acquired using an Axiovert 200M fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss) or a confocal microscope setting LSM800 (Carl Zeiss). CW (Fluorescent Brightener 28; Sigma-Aldrich) was used to stain cell walls after fixing cells with glutaraldehyde. For observation of GFP fluorescence, Xpr1-GFP–expressing cells were cultured in EMM2 at 26 °C to mid-log phase and were not fixed before microscopy. The Axiovert 200M was used for Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and 6 and the LSM800 for Figure 5.

Protein extraction and immunoblot analysis

To extract Xpr1-GFP, harvested cells were suspended in ice-cold TEG buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 150 mM NaCl, 1% (v/v) Triton-X100, 1 mM PMSF, and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)) and were crushed with glass beads at 0 °C using a Multi-beads shocker (Yasui Kikai). Cell extracts were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min and supernatants were incubated on ice for 120 min in the presence of LDS-PAGE sample buffer and 2-mercaptoethanol. For efficient extraction of membrane proteins, like Xpr1, incubation at a temperature lower than boiling is important. Identical amounts of protein (around 30 μg/lane) were separated on SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Anti-GFP (1/1000, Roche) and anti-PSTAIRE (1/1000, SIGMA) Cdc2 monoclonal antibodies were used as primary antibodies. Skim milk (2%) in PBS was used for membrane blocking and antibody dilution. Horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibodies (Promega) and Clarity Western ECL substrate (Bio-Rad) were used. Chemiluminescent signals were detected with a Lumino-Image Analyzer LAS 4000 (GE Healthcare) and were analyzed with ImageJ (https://fiji.sc) software.

Quantification of cellular total Pi and free Pi

To quantify intracellular total Pi, Pitotal, we followed the procedure of Sawada et al. (36). In short, harvested cells (5 × 107 cells) were suspended in 200 μl of 1 M H2SO4 and were boiled at 95 °C for 30 min to extract intracellular Pi. After boiling, the extract was neutralized with 1N NaOH. [Pi] was measured with a Malachite Green Phosphate Assay Kit (R&D Systems, Inc.). As for intracellular free Pi quantification, Pifree, cell extracts were directly employed in the Malachite Green assay. Harvested cells (0.5 ∼ 1 × 108 cells) were suspended in 400 μl of extraction buffer (10 mM Tris–Cl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100). Then 300 μl of TE-saturated phenol (FUJIFILM) and appropriate quantities of glass beads were added to the cell suspension in 2-mL screw-capped tubes. Cells were disrupted with a Multi-Beads shocker (Yasui Kikai) at 0 °C. To cell extracts recovered from glass beads, 300 μl of chloroform were added and tubes were vortexed and centrifuged for 5 min at 14,000 rpm. The separated water phase was transferred to a new tube, followed by the addition of 300 μl of chloroform. Then, tubes were vortexed and centrifuged. Separated water phases were transferred to new tubes and frozen in liquid N2. Extract aliquots were appropriately diluted with water and the concentration of Pi was measured with a Malachite Green Phosphate Assay Kit.

Pi export assay

S. pombe cells were cultured in normal EMM2 at 26 °C to mid-log phase (∼5 × 106 cells/ml), harvested with centrifugation, and washed twice with EMM2-P. For overproduction of Xpr1-GFP with nmt41 promoter, cells were cultured in normal EMM2 without thiamin for 18∼19 h. Radioactive monopotassium phosphate solution (KH232PO4, 74 MBq/ml, NEX060, PerkinElmer) was diluted 10-fold with EMM2-P, and 50 μl of the diluted solution was added to 450 μl of cell suspension containing ∼5 × 107 cells and incubated at 26 °C for 30 min for 32PO4 uptake. To measure cellular concentration, an automated cell counter Countess II (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used. Then, cells were washed three times with EMM2-P, and cell pellets were suspended in 850 μl of EMM2 containing 15 or 500 mM Pi. At indicated time point, 200 μl of the suspension was withdrawn, centrifuged twice for 1 min at 13,000 rpm to remove cells, and an aliquot (50 μl) of the supernatant was added to a scintillator (10 ml in a vial), Ecoscent ultra (National Diagnostics). Radioactivity was measured in a liquid scintillation counter AccuFLEX LSC-8000 (Hitachi). Radioactivities of cell suspensions at 0 min were also measured to determine amounts of total incorporated 32P. In Figure 4, CF, radioactivities of the supernatants at 0 min were subtracted from those at 0, 20, 40, and 60 min, and ratios of those values to total amounts of incorporated 32P were calculated as percentages. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Data availability

All the data described are located in this article.

Supporting information

This article contains supporting information (36).

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

Acknowledgments

We are greatly indebted to Dr Masanobu Horie, Mr Norinaga Kakishita, and other staff of the RI center of Kyoto University for valuable discussions and help with Pi export experiments and to Dr Masamitsu Sato (Waseda University) for plasmids and technical advice regarding blasticidin S. We thank Mr Wataru Kutami and Ms Kanon Tsukuda for their technical assistance. Parts of this study were supported by the following: Special Ordinary Expense Subsidies for Private Universities from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan; a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 19K06647 and Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research 22K19316 provided by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS); the Foundation of the Kinoshita Memorial Enterprise; the CORE Program of the Radiation Biology Center, Kyoto University.

Author contributions

M. T., T. K., T. N., I. O., K. O., T. M., and K. T. investigation; M. T. and K. T. methodology; M. T., T. M., and K. T. writing–review and editing; T. M. and K. T. conceptualization; K. T. writing–original draft; K. T. formal analysis; K. T. funding acquisition.

Reviewed by members of the JBC Editorial Board. Edited by Ursula Jakob

Supporting information

Supporting information
mmc1.docx (779.5KB, docx)

References

  • 1.Michigami T., Kawai M., Yamazaki M., Ozono K. Phosphate as a signaling molecule and its sensing mechanism. Physiol. Rev. 2018;98:2317–2348. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00022.2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Agoro R., White K.E. Regulation of FGF23 production and phosphate metabolism by bone–kidney interactions. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2023;19:185–193. doi: 10.1038/s41581-022-00665-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kurosu H., Ogawa Y., Miyoshi M., Yamamoto M., Nandi A., Rosenblatt K.P., et al. Regulation of fibroblast growth factor-23 signaling by klotho. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:6120–6123. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C500457200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Urakawa I., Yamazaki Y., Shimada T., Iijima K., Hasegawa H., Okawa K., et al. Klotho converts canonical FGF receptor into a specific receptor for FGF23. Nature. 2006;444:770–774. doi: 10.1038/nature05315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Benet-Pagès A., Orlik P., Strom T.M., Lorenz-Depiereux B. An FGF23 missense mutation causes familial tumoral calcinosis with hyperphosphatemia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005;14:385–390. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ichikawa S., Imel E.A., Kreiter M.L., Yu X., Mackenzie D.S., Sorenson A.H., et al. A homozygous missense mutation in human KLOTHO causes severe tumoral calcinosis. J. Clin. Invest. 2007;117:2684–2691. doi: 10.1172/JCI31330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kuro-o M., Matsumura Y., Aizawa H., Kawaguchi H., Suga T., Utsugi T., et al. Mutation of the mouse klotho gene leads to a syndrome resembling ageing. Nature. 1997;390:45–51. doi: 10.1038/36285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Legati A., Giovannini D., Nicolas G., López-Sánchez U., Quintáns B., Oliveira J.R.M., et al. Mutations in XPR1 cause primary familial brain calcification associated with altered phosphate export. Nat. Genet. 2015;47:579–581. doi: 10.1038/ng.3289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Giovannini D., Touhami J., Charnet P., Sitbon M., Battini J.-L. Inorganic phosphate export by the retrovirus receptor XPR1 in metazoans. Cell Rep. 2013;3:1866–1873. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.López-Sánchez U., Tury S., Nicolas G., Wilson M.S., Jurici S., Ayrignac X., et al. Interplay between primary familial brain calcification-associated SLC20A2 and XPR1 phosphate transporters requires inositol polyphosphates for control of cellular phosphate homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem. 2020;295:9366–9378. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.011376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bun-Ya M., Nishimura M., Harashima S., Oshima Y. The PHO84 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes an inorganic phosphate transporter. Mol. Cell Biol. 1991;11:3229–3238. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.6.3229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lenburg M.E., O’Shea E.K. Signaling phosphate starvation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1996;21:383–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Oshima Y. The phosphatase system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Genet. Syst. 1997;72:323–334. doi: 10.1266/ggs.72.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Auesukaree C., Homma T., Tochio H., Shirakawa M., Kaneko Y., Harashima S. Intracellular phosphate serves as a signal for the regulation of the PHO pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:17289–17294. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M312202200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kaffman A., Herskowitz I., Tjian R., O’Shea E.K. Phosphorylation of the transcription factor PHO4 by a cyclin-CDK complex, PHO80-PHO85. Science. 1994;263:1153–1156. doi: 10.1126/science.8108735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ogawa N., Noguchi K., Sawai H., Yamashita Y., Yompakdee C., Oshima Y. Functional domains of Pho81p, an inhibitor of Pho85p protein kinase, in the transduction pathway of Pi signals in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 1995;15:997–1004. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.2.997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jeffery D.A., Springer M., King D.S., O’Shea E.K. Multi-site phosphorylation of Pho4 by the cyclin-CDK Pho80-Pho85 is semi-processive with site preference. J. Mol. Biol. 2001;306:997–1010. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Auesukaree C., Tochio H., Shirakawa M., Kaneko Y., Harashima S. Plc1p, Arg82p, and Kcs1p, enzymes involved in inositol pyrophosphate synthesis, are essential for phosphate regulation and polyphosphate accumulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:25127–25133. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M414579200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee Y.-S., Mulugu S., York J.D., O’Shea E.K. Regulation of a cyclin-CDK-CDK inhibitor complex by inositol pyrophosphates. Science. 2007;316:109–112. doi: 10.1126/science.1139080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Choi J., Rajagopal A., Xu Y.-F., Rabinowitz J.D., O’Shea E.K. A systematic genetic screen for genes involved in sensing inorganic phosphate availability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One. 2017;12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Azevedo C., Saiardi A. Eukaryotic phosphate homeostasis: the inositol pyrophosphate perspective. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2017;42:219–231. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lee Y.-S., Huang K., Quiocho F.A., O’Shea E.K. Molecular basis of cyclin-CDK-CKI regulation by reversible binding of an inositol pyrophosphate. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2008;4:25–32. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2007.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wild R., Gerasimaite R., Jung J.-Y., Truffault V., Pavlovic I., Schmidt A., et al. Control of eukaryotic phosphate homeostasis by inositol polyphosphate sensor domains. Science. 2016;352:986–990. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Austin S., Mayer A. Phosphate homeostasis - a vital metabolic equilibrium maintained through the INPHORS signaling pathway. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:1367. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Spain B.H., Koo D., Ramakrishnan M., Dzudzor B., Colicelli J. Truncated forms of a novel yeast protein suppress the lethality of a G protein alpha subunit deficiency by interacting with the beta subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:25435–25444. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.43.25435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Henry T.C., Power J.E., Kerwin C.L., Mohammed A., Weissman J.S., Cameron D.M., et al. Systematic screen of Schizosaccharomyces pombe deletion collection uncovers parallel evolution of the phosphate signal transduction pathway in yeasts. Eukaryot. Cell. 2011;10:198–206. doi: 10.1128/EC.00216-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Estill M., Kerwin-Iosue C.L., Wykoff D.D. Dissection of the PHO pathway in Schizosaccharomyces pombe using epistasis and the alternate repressor adenine. Curr. Genet. 2015;61:175–183. doi: 10.1007/s00294-014-0466-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Carter-O’Connell I., Peel M.T., Wykoff D.D., O’Shea E.K. Genome-wide characterization of the phosphate starvation response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:697. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Garg A., Sanchez A.M., Shuman S., Schwer B. A long noncoding (lnc) RNA governs expression of the phosphate transporter Pho84 in fission yeast and has cascading effects on the flankingprtlncRNA andpho1genes. J. Biol. Chem. 2018 doi: 10.1074/jbc.ra117.001352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schwer B., Sanchez A.M., Shuman S. RNA polymerase II CTD phospho-sites Ser5 and Ser7 govern phosphate homeostasis in fission yeast. RNA. 2015;21:1770–1780. doi: 10.1261/rna.052555.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sanchez A.M., Garg A., Shuman S., Schwer B. Inositol pyrophosphates impact phosphate homeostasis via modulation of RNA 3’ processing and transcription termination. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:8452–8469. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Garg A., Shuman S., Schwer B. A genetic screen for suppressors of hyper-repression of the fission yeast PHO regulon by Pol2 CTD mutation T4A implicates inositol 1-pyrophosphates as agonists of precocious lncRNA transcription termination. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:10739–10752. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tanaka K., Okayama H. A pcl-like cyclin activates the Res2p-Cdc10p cell cycle “start” transcriptional factor complex in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2000;11:2845–2862. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.9.2845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Matsuda S., Kikkawa U., Uda H., Nakashima A. The S. pombe CDK5 ortholog Pef1 regulates sexual differentiation through control of the TORC1 pathway and autophagy. J. Cell Sci. 2020;133:jcs247817. doi: 10.1242/jcs.247817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Birot A., Tormos-Pérez M., Vaur S., Feytout A., Jaegy J., Gil D.A., et al. The CDK Pef1 and protein phosphatase 4 oppose each other for regulating cohesin binding to fission yeast chromosomes. Elife. 2020;9 doi: 10.7554/eLife.50556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sawada N., Ueno S., Takeda K. Regulation of inorganic polyphosphate is required for proper vacuolar proteolysis in fission yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 2021;297 doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sajiki K., Hatanaka M., Nakamura T., Takeda K., Shimanuki M., Yoshida T., et al. Genetic control of cellular quiescence in S. pombe. J. Cell Sci. 2009;122:1418–1429. doi: 10.1242/jcs.046466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Takeda K., Yoshida T., Kikuchi S., Nagao K., Kokubu A., Pluskal T., et al. Synergistic roles of the proteasome and autophagy for mitochondrial maintenance and chronological lifespan in fission yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010;107:3540–3545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911055107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sajiki K., Tahara Y., Uehara L., Sasaki T., Pluskal T., Yanagida M. Genetic regulation of mitotic competence in G0 quiescent cells. Sci. Adv. 2018;4:eaat5685. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat5685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Peng M., Hannam C., Gu H., Bi Y.-M., Rothstein S.J. A mutation in NLA, which encodes a RING-type ubiquitin ligase, disrupts the adaptability of Arabidopsis to nitrogen limitation. Plant J. 2007;50:320–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03050.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Park B.S., Seo J.S., Chua N.-H. NITROGEN LIMITATION ADAPTATION recruits PHOSPHATE2 to target the phosphate transporter PT2 for degradation during the regulation of Arabidopsis phosphate homeostasis. Plant Cell. 2014;26:454–464. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.120311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lin W.-Y., Huang T.-K., Chiou T.-J. Nitrogen limitation adaptation, a target of microRNA827, mediates degradation of plasma membrane-localized phosphate transporters to maintain phosphate homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2013;25:4061–4074. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.116012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ogawa N., DeRisi J., Brown P.O. New components of a system for phosphate accumulation and polyphosphate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed by genomic expression analysis. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2000;11:4309–4321. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.12.4309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hothorn M., Neumann H., Lenherr E.D., Wehner M., Rybin V., Hassa P.O., et al. Catalytic core of a membrane-associated eukaryotic polyphosphate polymerase. Science. 2009;324:513–516. doi: 10.1126/science.1168120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Desfougères Y., Gerasimaitė R.U., Jessen H.J., Mayer A. Vtc5, a novel subunit of the vacuolar transporter chaperone complex, regulates polyphosphate synthesis and phosphate homeostasis in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:22262–22275. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.746784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pascual-Ortiz M., Walla E., Fleig U., Saiardi A. The PPIP5K family member Asp1 controls inorganic polyphosphate metabolism in S. pombe. J. Fungi. 2021;7:626. doi: 10.3390/jof7080626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Schwer B., Garg A., Sanchez A.M., Bernstein M.A., Benjamin B., Shuman S. Cleavage-polyadenylation factor Cft1 and SPX domain proteins are agents of inositol pyrophosphate toxicosis in fission yeast. Mbio. 2022;13:e0347621. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03476-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Moreno S., Klar A., Nurse P. Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Meth. Enzymol. 1991;194:795–823. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(91)94059-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Villar-Tajadura M.A., Coll P.M., Madrid M., Cansado J., Santos B., Pérez P. Rga2 is a Rho2 GAP that regulates morphogenesis and cell integrity in S. pombe. Mol. Microbiol. 2008;70:867–881. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06447.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shimanuki M., Uehara L., Pluskal T., Yoshida T., Kokubu A., Kawasaki Y., et al. Klf1, a C2H2 zinc finger-transcription factor, is required for cell wall maintenance during long-term quiescence in differentiated G0 phase. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kim D.-U., Hayles J., Kim D., Wood V., Park H.-O., Won M., et al. Analysis of a genome-wide set of gene deletions in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010;28:617–623. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Moritoh Y., Abe S., Akiyama H., Kobayashi A., Koyama R., Hara R., et al. The enzymatic activity of inositol hexakisphosphate kinase controls circulating phosphate in mammals. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:4847. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24934-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Meireles A.M., Shiau C.E., Guenther C.A., Sidik H., Kingsley D.M., Talbot W.S. The phosphate exporter xpr1b is required for differentiation of tissue-resident macrophages. Cell Rep. 2014;8:1659–1667. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wilson M.S., Jessen H.J., Saiardi A. The inositol hexakisphosphate kinases IP6K1 and -2 regulate human cellular phosphate homeostasis, including XPR1-mediated phosphate export. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:11597–11608. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.007848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Pascual-Ortiz M., Saiardi A., Walla E., Jakopec V., Künzel N.A., Span I., et al. Asp1 bifunctional activity modulates spindle function via controlling cellular inositol pyrophosphate levels in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2018;38 doi: 10.1128/MCB.00047-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Pöhlmann J., Fleig U. Asp1, a conserved 1/3 inositol polyphosphate kinase, regulates the dimorphic switch in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010;30:4535–4547. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00472-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kuenzel N.A., Alcázar-Román A.R., Saiardi A., Bartsch S.M., Daunaraviciute S., Fiedler D., et al. Inositol pyrophosphate-controlled kinetochore architecture and mitotic entry in S. pombe. J. Fungi. 2022;8:933. doi: 10.3390/jof8090933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Azevedo C., Livermore T., Saiardi A. Protein polyphosphorylation of lysine residues by inorganic polyphosphate. Mol. Cell. 2015;58:71–82. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Gray M.J., Wholey W.-Y., Wagner N.O., Cremers C.M., Mueller-Schickert A., Hock N.T., et al. Polyphosphate is a primordial chaperone. Mol. Cell. 2014;53:689–699. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Dahl J.-U., Gray M.J., Jakob U. Protein quality control under oxidative stress conditions. J. Mol. Biol. 2015;427:1549–1563. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kuroda A., Nomura K., Ohtomo R., Kato J., Ikeda T., Takiguchi N., et al. Role of inorganic polyphosphate in promoting ribosomal protein degradation by the Lon protease in E. coli. Science. 2001;293:705–708. doi: 10.1126/science.1061315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Shiba T., Tsutsumi K., Yano H., Ihara Y., Kameda A., Tanaka K., et al. Inorganic polyphosphate and the induction of rpoS expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997;94:11210–11215. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.21.11210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Müller F., Mutch N.J., Schenk W.A., Smith S.A., Esterl L., Spronk H.M., et al. Platelet polyphosphates are proinflammatory and procoagulant mediators in vivo. Cell. 2009;139:1143–1156. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Arredondo C., Cefaliello C., Dyrda A., Jury N., Martinez P., Díaz I., et al. Excessive release of inorganic phosphate by ALS/FTD astrocytes causes non-cell-autonomous toxicity to motoneurons. Neuron. 2022;110:1656–1670.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Umeda C., Nakajima T., Maruhashi T., Tanigawa M., Maeda T., Mukai Y. Overexpression of polyphosphate polymerases and deletion of polyphosphate phosphatases shorten the replicative lifespan in yeast. FEBS Lett. 2023;597:2316–2333. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.14715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kornberg A., Rao N.N., Ault-Riché D. Inorganic polyphosphate: a molecule of many functions. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1999;68:89–125. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Xie L., Jakob U. Inorganic polyphosphate, a multifunctional polyanionic protein scaffold. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:2180–2190. doi: 10.1074/jbc.REV118.002808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Samper-Martín B., Sarrias A., Lázaro B., Pérez-Montero M., Rodríguez-Rodríguez R., Ribeiro M.P.C., et al. Polyphosphate degradation by Nudt3-Zn2+ mediates oxidative stress response. Cell Rep. 2021;37 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Baev A.Y., Angelova P.R., Abramov A.Y. Inorganic polyphosphate is produced and hydrolyzed in F0F1-ATP synthase of mammalian mitochondria. Biochem. J. 2020;477:1515–1524. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20200042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Collaboration G.C.K.D., Bikbov B., Purcell C.A., Levey A.S., Smith M., Abdoli A., et al. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395:709–733. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Aoi Y., Kawashima S.A., Simanis V., Yamamoto M., Sato M. Optimization of the analogue-sensitive Cdc2/Cdk1 mutant by in vivo selection eliminates physiological limitations to its use in cell cycle analysis. Open Biol. 2014;4 doi: 10.1098/rsob.140063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting information
mmc1.docx (779.5KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

All the data described are located in this article.


Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES