Abstract
Background
This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of kinesio taping on pain, respiratory function, and respiratory muscle strength in patients after posterolateral thoracotomy.
Methods
Between June 2019 and May 2020, a total of 88 patients (48 males, 40 females; mean age: 56.1±9.0 years; range, 28 to 69 years) following posterolateral thoracotomy were randomly allocated to the therapeutic kinesio taping group (n=44) or the control group (n=33). Kinesio taping was applied to the kinesio taping group for seven days. Pain, respiratory functions, respiratory muscle strength, amount of analgesic drug use, and quality of life were evaluated preoperatively, on postoperative Day 0, before tape application, postoperative Days 1, 2, and 7, and at postoperative first month.
Results
There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. The results of respiratory functions and respiratory muscle strength were all improved in both groups, while there were more significant improvements in the kinesio taping group. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean Visual Analog Scale scores on postoperative Days 2 and 7 between the two groups. The amount of tramadol use of the patients in the kinesio taping group was significantly lower on postoperative Days 2 and 7 than in the control group.
Conclusion
Kinesio taping is an effective method to reduce pain and improve respiratory function after posterolateral thoracotomy. Therefore, it is thought that kinesio taping should be applied as a part of the pulmonary rehabilitation program after thoracotomy.
Keywords: Kinesio tape, pain, pulmonary function, pulmonary muscle strength, thoracotomy.
Introduction
After thoracotomy, there is a decrease in lung volume and expansion due to incisional pain. Decreased lung volume and expansion causes retained bronchopulmonary secretions, atelectasis, and respiratory tract infections, leading to a significant decrease in respiratory function and respiratory muscle strength. Effective pain control is of utmost importance to prevent retained secretion, atelectasis, infection, and hypoxemia.[1]
The inadequacy of postoperative pain management has led to the development of alternative treatments.[2] More than one alternative treatment method can be used to manage pain and reduce functional impairment after thoracotomy.[3,4] Kinesio taping technique, which is one of these alternative treatment applications, was developed by a Japanese acupuncturist, Dr. Kenzo Kase, and presented as an alternative to traditional taping techniques. It can increase the effects of rehabilitation and is one of the ways to support postoperative physiotherapy.[5,6]
Kinesio taping applied after cardiopulmonary surgery reduces postoperative pain and analgesic drug use and improves inspiratory muscle strength and respiratory function.[7-10]
In the literature, the effects of kinesio taping on pain and respiratory functions after thoracotomy have been investigated. However, there is no study to evaluate its effects on respiratory muscle strength. In the present study, we, therefore, aimed to examine the effects of kinesio taping on respiratory muscle strength in addition to pain and respiratory function after posterolateral thoracotomy.
Patients and Methods
This single-center, unblinded, prospective, randomized-controlled study was conducted at Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Thoracic Surgery, between June 2019 and May 2020. Thoracotomy was performed in all patients by the same surgical team. Patients who underwent thoracotomy with a posterolateral thoracotomy incision, agreed to participate in the study, were aged between 20 and 75 years, had no known cerebrovascular disease, had no morbid obesity and heart disease that would hinder the study, had no cognitive and cognitive impairments, and had no previous paralysis and related effects were included in the study. Patients with hemodynamic instability, previous chest trauma, thoracotomy or tube thoracostomy, not complying with the pulmonary function test, allergic to the applied band, cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy (i.e., chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy) were excluded from the study. Finally, a total of 88 patients (48 males, 40 females; mean age: 56.1±9.0 years; range, 28 to 69 years) who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. The study flowchart is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. CONSORT diagram of study population. VAS: Visual Analog Scale; SF-36: Short-Form-36.
The patients were followed under mechanical ventilation support, until spontaneous breathing started and extubated in the intensive care unit (ICU).
All patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to kinesio taping group (n=44) or control group (n=44) using a computerized random number generator (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) on postoperative Day 0.[11]
The first group of the study consisted of patients in the kinesio taping group who underwent kinesio taping in addition to postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation and standard pain medication applications, and the second group consisted of patients in the control group who underwent postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation and standard pain medication applications. After surgery, the patients were administered diclofenac sodium 75 mg tablet (Voltaren; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Istanbul, Türkiye) once a day; intravenous tramadol hydrochloride 30 mg (Contromal; Abdi İbrahim Pharmaceuticals, Istanbul, Türkiye) before breathing exercises and mobilization; paracetamol (Parol; Atabay Pharmaceuticals, Istanbul, Türkiye) and morphine for additional pain control. The postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation program included breathing exercises, airway clearance techniques, and progressive ambulation exercises.
On postoperative Day 0, kinesio taping was applied to the patients in the Kinesio taping group whose hemodynamic status was stable after extubation by an expert physiotherapist. The material we used for kinesio taping was Kinesio® Tex Gold™ (Kinesio Holding Corp., NM, USA), a 100% cotton, latex-free, 5-cm wide elastic band. All tapes were applied by a single physiotherapist. We applied kinesio taping as described below:
1. To stimulate the facilitation of the diaphragmatic function, a 5-cm wide kinesio tape was applied on the skin.
2. Taping was applied to the latissimus dorsi and serratus anterior muscles which were cut during thoracotomy.
3. In addition, kinesio taping can be performed on the trigger pain point of the patient (usually above the pectoralis major).
The kinesio tape can stay for three to four days, if the patient does not develop any discomfort. Then, the tape was renewed. The bands were removed at one week postoperatively.
The patients were followed from the preoperative period until discharge. For each patient, age, sex, weight and height measurements, body mass index (BMI) educational status, type of surgery, whether there was any additional systemic disease, smoking, alcohol habits, concomitant medications, previous operations, postoperative complications, surgical procedure, duration of operation, duration of anesthesia, chest tube stay, and length of hospital stay were recorded.
Outcome measurement
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was used as a one-dimensional scale for pain assessment. It is a self-administered, one-dimensional measure of pain intensity widely used in various adult populations. The VAS is a 10-cm long line in which participants mark the point they believe best represents the severity of pain. “0” indicates no pain, while “10” indicates excruciating pain. When asked, patients touch a point corresponding to their degree of pain, and this mark indicates the degree of pain on the scale. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity.[12,13] Preoperative, on postoperative Day 0 after kinesio taping, postoperative Days 1, 2, and 7 and at postoperative first month were evaluated.
Pulmonary function testing was performed using a digital spirometer (Pony FX, COSMED Inc., Rome, Italy). This test was repeated three times for each patient and the best value was recorded. Forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC, peak expiratory flow (PEF), 25 to 75% forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75%) were recorded as described in the literature.[14,15] The tests were performed preoperatively, on postoperative Day 0 after kinesio taping, postoperative Days 1, 2, and 7, and at postoperative first month.
Respiratory muscle strength was evaluated by measuring maximal inspiratory and maximal expiratory pressures with a portable intraoral pressure measuring device (Pony FX, COSMED Inc., Rome, Italy). Maximal voluntary inspiratory pressure (MIP) or maximal expiratory pressures (MEP) are the most frequently reported technique to evaluate respiratory muscle strength non-invasively. The technique was reported by Black and Hyatt[16] as a non-invasive technique in the late 1960s. The maneuvers were repeated at least five times at intervals of at least 30 sec, and the best among the measurements with a 5 to 10% difference was selected for analysis. The tests were performed preoperatively, on postoperative Day 0 after kinesio taping, postoperative Days 1, 2, and 7, and at postoperative first month.
In addition, the Short Form-36 (SF-36) quality of life scoring was used to evaluate the quality of life of the patients. It is a questionnaire with eight subscales that gives information about the health status and quality of life of the person. It was translated into Turkish in 1999 and validation and reliability studies were conducted in different patient groups.[17,18] The SF-36 was applied in the preoperative period and at the postoperative first month.
Statistical analysis
The G*power sample size calculator (Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany) was used to identify the sample size of the study. A sample size of 35 subjects for each group was estimated with 0.05 type I error rate (α) and 90% power (1-α). A total of 88 patients were included to avoid possible dropouts.
Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS version 23.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). In the comparisons between the two groups, the Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test was used. The chi-square test (Fisher exact test, two-tailed) was used to compare categorical variables. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for repeated measures to evaluate the change over time of the measured variables of the treatment and control groups and the group-time interactions. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Demographic and clinical information of the patients are shown in Table 1. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, sex, type of surgery, weight, height, BMI, smoking status, and length of chest tube and hospital stay (p>0.05). In addition, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the preoperative respiratory function, respiratory muscle strength, quality of life and pain results (p>0.05).
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients.
| Variables | Kinesio taping group (n=44) | Control group (n=44) | p | ||||
| n | % | Mean±SD | n | % | Mean±SD | ||
| Age (year) | 54.3±6.4 | 57.3±7.2 | 0.064 | ||||
| Sex | 0.323 | ||||||
| Male | 23 | 52.27 | 25 | 56.82 | |||
| Female | 21 | 47.73 | 19 | 43.18 | 0.234 | ||
| Resection type | |||||||
| Wedge resection | 17 | 38.64 | 16 | 36.36 | |||
| Segmentectomy | 13 | 29.55 | 13 | 29.55 | |||
| Lobectomy | 11 | 25.00 | 13 | 29.55 | |||
| Pneumonectomy | 3 | 6.82 | 2 | 4.55 | |||
| Weight (kg) | 69.0±10.5 | 69.7±11.2 | 0.435 | ||||
| Height (m) | 168.1±5.9 | 164.4±3.5 | 0.265 | ||||
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 29.0±5.9 | 26.1±4.3 | 0.165 | ||||
| Visual Analog Scale | 0.1±0.9 | 0.1±1.0 | 0.265 | ||||
| Preoperative pulmonary function test | |||||||
| FVC (L) | 3.2±0.8 | 3.1±0.6 | 0.482 | ||||
| FVC (%) | 87.2±18.3 | 85.5±19.2 | 0.560 | ||||
| FEV1 (L) | 2.7±0.8 | 2.3±0.8 | 0.523 | ||||
| FEV1 (%) | 81.0±18.8 | 78.5±19.3 | 0.654 | ||||
| FEV1/FVC (%) | 84.2±15.1 | 82.2±14.5 | 0.231 | ||||
| PEF (L/s) | 6.3±1.9 | 59±2.5 | 0.093 | ||||
| FEF25-75 (L/s) | 1.8±0.8 | 1.2±1.9 | 0.843 | ||||
| Preoperative pulmonary muscle test | |||||||
| MIP (cmH2O) | 62.5±31.7 | 61.0±32.6 | 0.368 | ||||
| MEP (cmH2O) | 89.9±39.1 | 88.2±38.7 | 0.456 | ||||
| Smoking | 0.215 | ||||||
| Yes | 40 | 90.91 | 38 | 86.36 | |||
| No | 4 | 9.09 | 6 | 13.64 | |||
| Duration of chest drain (days) | 3.8±1.1 | 4.8±1.1 | 0.165 | ||||
| Hospitalization time (days) | 7.1 ±3.5 | 8.8±4.7 | 0.269 | ||||
| SF-36 | |||||||
| Physical functioning | 68.5±11.3 | 70.8±9.3 | 0.235 | ||||
| Role limitations-physical problems | 61.6±8.7 | 65.4±5.1 | 0.179 | ||||
| Pain | 65.8±9.3 | 67.2±12.4 | 0.542 | ||||
| General health | 71.2±11.7 | 68.4±6.7 | 0.589 | ||||
| Energy | 63.3±7.3 | 65.5±4.3 | 0.239 | ||||
| Social functioning | 691±90 | 64.4±7.4 | 0.067 | ||||
| Role limitations-emotional problems | 64.4±6.5 | 69.1±97 | 0.075 | ||||
| Mental health | 62.1±10.8 | 60.2±5.3 | 0.347 | ||||
| SD: Standard deviation; FVC: Forced vital capacity; FEV1: Forced expiratory volume in 1 sec; PEF: Peak expiratory flow; FEF25-75%: 25 to 75% forced expiratory flow; MIP: Maximal voluntary inspiratory pressure; MEP: Maximal expiratory pressure; SF-36: Short Form-36. | |||||||
The changes in respiratory function and respiratory muscle strength results between and within the groups after kinesio taping on postoperative Days 0, 1, 2, 7, and at postoperative first month are shown in Table 2. Accordingly, there was a statistically significant difference in the results of respiratory function and respiratory muscle strength between the two groups in the days after surgery. In the analysis of changes within the group performed in the kinesio taping group and control group, the results of respiratory function and respiratory muscle strength statistically significantly decreased in the postoperative period over time (p<0.001).
Table 2. Pulmonary function test and pulmonary muscle test averages of the patients in the kinesio taping and control groups in the postoperative period and intra- and inter-group time-dependent changes.
| Kinesio taping group | Control group | Inter-group changes | Intra-group changes | ||
| Kinesio taping group | Control group | ||||
| Mean±SD | Mean±SD | p | p | p | |
| FVC (L) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| Postop day 0 | 1.6±0.8 | 1.57±0.64 | 0.083 | ||
| Postop day 1 | 1.840.4 | 1.13±0.54 | 0.023 | ||
| Postop day 2 | 2.8±1.3 | 1.75±0.12 | 0.037 | ||
| Postop day 7 | 3.6±2.5 | 2.94±1.65 | 0.024 | ||
| Postop month 1 | 3.8±0.5 | 3.46±1.23 | 0.193 | ||
| FVC (%) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| Postop day 0 | 57.2±18.3 | 55.5±19.2 | 0.160 | ||
| Postop day 1 | 56.5±16.0 | 55.3±18.3 | 0.234 | ||
| Postop day 2 | 60.5±24.3 | 57.3±26.2 | 0.043 | ||
| Postop day 7 | 65.2±17.8 | 57.2±19.3 | 0.038 | ||
| Postop month 1 | 75.3±25.1 | 73.4±25.4 | 0.120 | ||
| FEV1 (L) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| Postop day 0 | 1.4±0.8 | 1.3±0.8 | 0.523 | ||
| Postop day 1 | 1.4±1.2 | 1.4±0.4 | 0.093 | ||
| Postop day 2 | 1.4±0.7 | 1.1±2.8 | 0.052 | ||
| Postop day 7 | 2.3±2.6 | 2.0±2.0 | 0.041 | ||
| Postop month 1 | 2.8±1.1 | 2.0±1.2 | 0.024 | ||
| FEV1 (%) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| Postop day 0 | 61.0±18.8 | 59.5±19.3 | 0.174 | ||
| Postop day 1 | 60.9±27.2 | 54.3±19.2 | 0.021 | ||
| Postop day 2 | 62.1±10.2 | 55.7±18.5 | 0. 034 | ||
| Postop day 7 | 71.9±16.2 | 63.1±27.2 | 0.029 | ||
| Postop month 1 | 78.3±27.1 | 71.2±18.0 | 0.035 | ||
| FEV1/FVC (%) | >0.001 | >0.001 | |||
| Postop day 0 | 84.2±15.1 | 82.2±14.5 | 0.231 | ||
| Postop day 1 | 85.7±24.2 | 83.3±22.6 | 0.134 | ||
| Postop day 2 | 82.4±18.4 | 80.9±25.0 | 0.078 | ||
| Postop day 7 | 78.2±16.1 | 80.5±23.2 | 0.237 | ||
| Postop month 1 | 82.3±23.3 | 79.9±22.1 | 0.107 | ||
| PEF (L/s) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| Postop day 0 | 3.2±1.9 | 3.0±2.5 | 0.243 | ||
| Postop day 1 | 3.2±0.4 | 3.1±2.3 | 0.087 | ||
| Postop day 2 | 4.5±1.1 | 3.4±2.6 | 0.022 | ||
| Postop day 7 | 4.5±2.5 | 4.0±1.4 | 0.050 | ||
| Postop month 1 | 6.0±0.7 | 5.3±2.0 | 0.215 | ||
| FEF25-75 (L) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| Postop day 0 | 1.14±0.78 | 1.1±1.9 | 0.243 | ||
| Postop day 1 | 1.09±0.34 | 1.1±1.7 | 0.743 | ||
| Postop day 2 | 1.76±1.02 | 1.5±1.4 | 0.048 | ||
| Postop day 7 | 2.21±0.36 | 1.9±0.5 | 0. 034 | ||
| Postop month 1 | 2.85±0.17 | 2.7±0.6 | 0.102 | ||
| MIP (cmH2O) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| Postop day 0 | 40.5±31.7 | 41.0±32.6 | 0.368 | ||
| Postop day 1 | 40.7±25.7 | 41.2±30.1 | 0.254 | ||
| Postop day 2 | 43.1±32.7 | 42.2±28.8 | 0.456 | ||
| Postop day 7 | 51.1±29.0 | 43.2±31.3 | 0.021 | ||
| Postop month 1 | 69.9±33.5 | 65.2±36.2 | 0.042 | ||
| MEP (cmH2O) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| Postop day 0 | 39.9±29.1 | 38.2±28.7 | 0.456 | ||
| Postop day 1 | 42.3±22.4 | 44.0±25.5 | 0.267 | ||
| Postop day 2 | 46.3±20.6 | 45.2±22.0 | 0.421 | ||
| Postop day 7 | 50.3±21.1 | 45.4±28.1 | 0. 023 | ||
| Postop month 1 | 89.3±34.2 | 82.4±20.2 | 0.039 | ||
| SD: Standard deviation; FVC: Forced vital capacity; FEV1: Forced expiratory volume in 1 sec; PEF: Peak expiratory flow; FEF25-75%: 25 to 75% forced expiratory flow; MIP: Maximal voluntary inspiratory pressure; MEP: Maximal expiratory pressure; SF-36: Short Form-36. | |||||
Table 3 shows the results of the statistical analysis of the amount of analgesia drug use and mean VAS scores, the change between the groups and the time-dependent changes within the group in the postoperative periods of the patients in the kinesio taping and control groups. Accordingly, there was a statistically significant difference between the mean amount of diclofenac use on the postoperative Day 2 and Day 7 between the kinesio taping group and control group. In the intra-group change analyses performed in the kinesio taping group and control group, the amount of tramadol and diclofenac use statistically significantly decreased over time in the postoperative period (p<0.001).
Table 3. The amount of analgesic drug use and VAS score averages of the patients in the kinesio taping and control groups in the postoperative period and intra- and inter-group time-dependent changes.
| Applied analgesic amounts (mg) | Kinesio taping group | Control group | Inter-group changes | Intra-group changes | |||||
| Kinesio taping group | Control group | ||||||||
| Mean±SD | Median | Min-Max | Mean±SD | Median | Min-Max | p | p | p | |
| Tramadol | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||||
| Postop day 0 | 290.4±29.2 | 295.5±18.3 | 0.945 | ||||||
| Postop day 1 | 172.9±12.7 | 265.3±27.0 | 0.234 | ||||||
| Postop day 2 | 60.3±37.5 | 79.6±32.9 | 0.018 | ||||||
| Postop day 7 | 2.5±29.1 | 65.9±14.4 | 0.008 | ||||||
| Postop month 1 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 1.000 | ||||||
| Diclofenac | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||||
| Postop day 0 | 137.9±39.2 | 138.9±40.0 | 0.805 | ||||||
| Postop day 1 | 124.5±62.5 | 133.9±56.5 | 0.256 | ||||||
| Postop day 2 | 58.9±52.3 | 135.7±35.7 | 0.026 | ||||||
| Postop day 7 | 27.3±48.9 | 106.9±26.6 | 0.005 | ||||||
| Postop month 1 | 0.0±0.0 | 0.0±0.0 | 1.000 | ||||||
| VAS | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||||
| Preoperative | 0.00 | 0.00-0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00-0.00 | 1.000 | ||||
| Postop day 0 | 0.87 | 0.55-0.89 | 0.89 | 0.72-0.90 | 0.074 | ||||
| Postop day 1 | 0.80 | 0.42-0.87 | 0.79 | 0.52-0.89 | 0.067 | ||||
| Postop day 2 | 0.44 | 0.32-0.61 | 0.58 | 0.30-0.74 | 0.030 | ||||
| Postop day 7 | 0.29 | 0.18-0.38 | 0.32 | 0.19-0.49 | 0.042 | ||||
| Postop month 1 | 0.09 | 0.00-0.10 | 0.12 | 0.00-0.32 | 0.017 | ||||
Table 4 presents the pre- and postoperative statistical analysis results of eight sub-dimensions of the SF-36. In the analysis of change within the group in the kinesio taping group, there was a statistically significant worsening in Role Limitations-Physical Problems (p<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant change in Physical Functioning, Pain, General Health, Energy, Social Functioning, Role Limitations-Emotional Problems, Mental Health in the kinesio taping group compared to baseline. Intergroup analysis showed that patients in the kinesio taping group had significantly better Physical Functioning, Pain and Role Limitations-Emotional Problems scores at one month after the operation compared to the control group.
Table 4. The results of the SF-36 mean scores of the patients in the Kinesio taping and control groups before and after the operation.
| SF-36 | Kinesio taping group | Intra-group changes |
Control Group | Intra-group changes |
Inter-group changes | |||
| Preop | Postop 1. month | Preop | Postop 1. month | Before treatment |
After treatment |
|||
| Mean±SD | Mean±SD | p | Mean±SD | Mean±SD | p | p | p | |
| Physical functioning | 68.5±11.3 | 55.5±7.2 | 0.267 | 70.8±9.3 | 43.1±6.3 | 0.004 | 0.235 | 0.043 |
| Role limitations-physical problems | 61.6±8.7 | 48.7±5.9 | 0.026 | 65.4±5.1 | 45.9±9.3 | 0.013 | 0.179 | 0.151 |
| Pain | 65.8±9.3 | 62.3±12.6 | 0.352 | 67.2±12.4 | 42.2±11.3 | 0.025 | 0.542 | 0.006 |
| General health | 71.2±11.7 | 67.8±11.3 | 0.251 | 68.4±6.7 | 65.2±9.4 | 0.156 | 0.589 | 0.127 |
| Energy | 63.3±7.3 | 57.2±6.3 | 0.102 | 65.5±4.3 | 55.2±8.6 | 0.092 | 0.239 | 0.312 |
| Social functioning | 69.1±9.0 | 65.1±8.8 | 0.287 | 64.4±7.4 | 62.3±9.2 | 0.305 | 0.067 | 0.245 |
| Role limitations-emotional problems | 64.4±6.5 | 62.3±10.0 | 0.124 | 69.1±9.7 | 48.9±12.7 | 0.005 | 0.075 | 0.007 |
| Mental health | 62.1±10.8 | 55.6±10.5 | 0.251 | 60.2±5.3 | 54.7±11.3 | 0.115 | 0.347 | 0.365 |
| SF-36: Short Form-36; SD: Standard deviation. | ||||||||
Discussion
Severe pain occurs in approximately 70% of patients in the postoperative period after thoracotomy. Effective analgesia and physiotherapy practices help patients to actively participate in respiratory rehabilitation after surgery and prevent complications.[19]
A study performed after laparoscopic cholecystectomy showed that tape applications had a significant effect on postoperative pain perception and analgesic consumption.[20] Adding kinesio taping to the post-cesarean physiotherapy program increases abdominal muscle strength and endurance, reduces pain severity and low back injury level, and improves the quality and efficiency of health care.[21] Kinesio taping is used in patients after cardiac surgery to reduce pain, stabilize muscle tone, support respiratory muscles, prevent pectoralis muscle contracture, accelerate wound healing process after surgery, and improve the respiratory functions of patients.[7]
Kinesio tape application can be applied for early pain control after thoracotomy, thereby preventing the development of postoperative complications. Kinesio taping after lobectomy reduces pain, stabilizes muscle tone, accelerates the wound healing process and increases wound elasticity.[?] It has been reported that kinesio taping performed after discharge is effective in long-term pain control.[8,10]
In another study, the results of kinesio taping on pain reduction and quality of life were evaluated in patients receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy for post-thoracotomy pain syndrome. As a result of the study, there was no additional benefit of kinesio taping in the treatment of post-thoracotomy pain syndrome.[22]
In this study, we found that the VAS scores of the patients in the kinesio taping group were significantly lower on postoperative Days 2 and 7 compared to the control group. However, it was not significantly different in both groups on postoperative Day 0 and at postoperative first month. This can be explained by intensive analgesic administration in the ICU on postoperative Day 0. The main finding of this study is a significant reduction in thoracic pain intensity in the kinesio taping group.
Kinesio taping applied to the thorax causes significant improvements in expiratory tidal volume and mechanical efficiency. Inspiratory muscle training and kinesio tape application improve minute volume.[23,24] Kinesio taping applied after lobectomy can also significantly improve early postoperative inspiratory volume loss.[10] The changes in pain, dyspnea perception, and respiratory functions were evaluated by applying kinesio tape in the postoperative period in patients after thoracotomy.[25] The kinesio tape application in patients who underwent thoracotomy was found to be a safe and simple method for pain control in the postoperative period. However, it had no significant effect on FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and PEF values.
In our study, respiratory muscle strength was also evaluated after thoracotomy. Decreased MIP and MEP values after surgery, with kinesio taping applied from postoperative Day 0, increased more in the kinesio taping group compared to the control group over time. This increase was found to be higher and significant, particularly on postoperative Day 7 and at postoperative first month. This finding confirms that kinesio taping provides an increase in respiratory muscle strength and this increase contributes to the increase in respiratory muscle strength due to pulmonary rehabilitation applied in the future.
In addition, we found a decrease in the values of FVC, FVC%, FEV1, FEV1%, PEF, FEF25-75% measured in both groups. This decrease was less in the patients in the kinesio taping group compared to the patients in the control group. After taping, the patients were able to inhale more deeply and cough more effectively.
Patients with less pain can breathe and cough more normally. Therefore, better breathing of patients can be explained by lower pain levels. If taping reduces the incidence of postoperative pneumonia by providing better respiratory functions, tape application in the early postoperative period is critical.
Nonetheless, this study has some limitations. First, it has a relatively small sample size. Second, there is no placebo group. Third, there are no data regarding long-term efficacy. In addition, physiotherapists who applied kinesio taping were not blind which is inevitable due to the nature of the intervention.
In conclusion, our study results demonstrate that kinesio taping is a cost-effective and simple method to safely and effectively reduce pain, improve respiratory function and respiratory muscle strength after posterolateral thoracotomy without side effects. Based on these findings, we believe that kinesio taping should be applied as a part of the pulmonary rehabilitation program after thoracotomy.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Author Contributions: Were involved in conceptualization, reviewing and editing the manuscript: N.T.A., M.E.; Were involved in data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, software, validation, visualization, and writing the original draft: N.T.A., M.E., A.E.
Financial Disclosure: This research was supported by University Scientific Research Projects.
References
- 1.Romero A, Garcia JE, Joshi GP. The state of the art in preventing postthoracotomy pain. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;25:116–124. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2013.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Torda TA. Postoperative analgesia. Prescr. 1995;18:88–91. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.1995.083. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Blichfeldt-Eckhardt MR, Andersen C, Ørding H, Licht PB, Toft P. From acute to chronic pain after thoracic surgery: The significance of different components of the acute pain response. J Pain Res. 2018;11:1541–1548. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S161303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet. 2006;367:1618–1625. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Aguilar-Ferrándiz ME, Castro-Sánchez AM, MataránPeñarrocha GA, Guisado-Barrilao R, García-Ríos MC, Moreno-Lorenzo C. A randomized controlled trial of a mixed Kinesio taping-compression technique on venous symptoms, pain, peripheral venous flow, clinical severity and overall health status in postmenopausal women with chronic venous insufficiency. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28:69–81. doi: 10.1177/0269215512469120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cho HY, Kim EH, Kim J, Yoon YW. Kinesio taping improves pain, range of motion, and proprioception in older patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;94:192–200. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brockmann R, Klein HM. Pain-diminishing effects of Kinesio® taping after median sternotomy. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018;34:433–441. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1422205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Imperatori A, Grande A, Castiglioni M, Gasperini L, Faini A, Spampatti S, et al. Chest pain control with kinesiology taping after lobectomy for lung cancer: Initial results of a randomized placebo-controlled study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;23:223–230. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Klein HM, Brockmann R, Assmann A. Pain-diminishing effect of Kinesio taping in patients after sternotomy. A76J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;10(Suppl 1) doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-10-S1-A76. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Imperatori A, Castiglioni M, Gasperini L, Borrelli J, Grande A, Nardecchia E, et al. F-034 kinesiology taping improves recovery of ventilatory function after thoracotomy lobectomy for lung cancer. ivx280.034Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017;25 suppl_1 doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx280.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.QuickCalcs. GraphPad randomisation software. Available at: https://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/randomize1.cfm . [Accessed: 09.10.2022].
- 12.McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: A critical review. Psychol Med. 1988;18:1007–1019. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700009934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) S240-52Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63 Suppl 11 doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:319–338. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gibson GJ. Standardised lung function testing. Eur Respir J. 1993;6:155–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Black LF, Hyatt RE. Maximal respiratory pressures: Normal values and relationship to age and sex. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1969;99:696–702. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1969.99.5.696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pinar R. Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:259–264. doi: 10.1007/s11136-004-2393-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Demiral Y, Ergor G, Unal B, Semin S, Akvardar Y, Kivircik B, et al. Normative data and discriminative properties of short form 36 (SF-36) in Turkish urban population. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:247–247. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cansever L, Sezen CB, Yaran OV, Duman S, Seyrek Y, Hatipoğlu M, et al. The effect of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation on chronic postoperative pain and longterm quality of life. Turk Gogus Kalp Dama. 2021;29:496–502. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2021.19800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Krajczy M, Bogacz K, Luniewski J, Szczegielniak J. The influence of Kinesio taping on the effects of physiotherapy in patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:948282–948282. doi: 10.1100/2012/948282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gürşen C, İnanoğlu D, Kaya S, Akbayrak T, Baltacı G. Effects of exercise and Kinesio taping on abdominal recovery in women with cesarean section: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;293:557–565. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3862-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kurt Saruhan H, Toprak M. Pain-diminishing and quality of life-related outcomes of Kinesio taping in patients on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy for postthoracotomy pain syndrome. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;66:147–153. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2020.4068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Malehorn K, Hiniker J, Mackey T, Heumann KJ, Murray SR, Pettitt RW. Kinesio Tape® applied to the thorax augments ventilatory efficiency during heavy exercise. Int J Exerc Sci. 2013;6:157–163. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lee M, Kim M, Ahn C. Impact of concurrent inspiratory muscle training and tape on inspiratory muscle strength, endurance and pulmonary function. J Korean Soc Integrat Med. 2014;2:65–73. doi: 10.15268/ksim.2014.2.3.065. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Türk SG, Kefeli Çelik H, Çelik B, Akça Z. Evaluation of the change in pain, dyspnea perception, and pulmonary function values with pain tape application in patients undergoing thoracotomy. Curr Thorac Surg. 2022;7:14–21. doi: 10.26663/cts.2022.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]