Skip to main content
Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics logoLink to Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
. 2023 Dec 4;14:455–464. doi: 10.2147/PHMT.S433460

Patterns and Clinico-Radiological Characteristics of Primary Liver Masses in Children Treated at a Tertiary Referral Hospital, in Ethiopia

Melese Ayllo 1, Abebe Habtamu Tamire 2, Mohammed Bereinto Legas 3, Gashaw Arega 2,
PMCID: PMC10705446  PMID: 38074195

Abstract

Background

Liver masses are a cause of morbidity and mortality in children worldwide. Although the patterns and clinical-radiological characteristics of primary liver masses have been studied in developed countries, few studies have been conducted in developing countries. Studying the patterns of liver mass in children helps to improve the outcome of liver masses and to design preventive strategies if the identified risk factors are preventable.

Material and Method

A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted on children who met the inclusion criteria, using a self-administered structured questionnaire. The collected data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the determinant factors.

Results

A total of 74 children were included, with most patients being males (60.8%). More than one-third (n = 27) of the participants were between 1 and 4 years of age and the mean age at diagnosis of the liver mass was 4.6 years. The duration of illness at presentation to Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital was between 4 and 8 weeks, in 42% of the patients. The most common presenting symptom was abdominal swelling, accounting for 70.3% (n = 52) of the patients. Benign hepatic mass lesions accounted for 57.5% (n = 42), and 43.2% (n = 32) were malignant liver masses. Most lesions were solitary and involved the right lobe of the liver. The common benign hepatic masses were pyogenic liver abscesses (38.1%), and the most common malignant hepatic masses were hepatoblastomas (78.1%).

Conclusion

Pyogenic liver abscess was the most common benign hepatic mass and hepatoblastoma was the most common malignant hepatic mass in our study. Most lesions were solitary and involved the right lobe. Understanding the patterns of liver masses will help in the early diagnosis and improve treatment outcomes in children with liver masses.

Keywords: liver mass, liver abscess, hepatoblastoma, TASH, Ethiopia

Introduction

A wide variety of liver masses can be observed in the pediatric population and are one of the causes of morbidity and mortality in children and adolescents. Pediatric liver lesions are a heterogeneous group including infiltrative lesions that cause mass effects. Hepatic lesions can be congenital, infectious, or neoplastic.1–4

The liver accounts for 5–6% of all intra-abdominal masses in children, and one-third of the masses are benign, whereas the two-thirds are malignant.5,6 Among these malignant causes, hepatoblastomas are the most common, followed by hepatocellular carcinoma and other rare tumors, such as soft tissue sarcoma and extragonadal germ cell tumors.7 The benign liver masses usually present during infancy and include hemangiomas, hamartomas, and hemangioendotheliomas2,7 The patterns of the different types of infectious hepatic lesions vary from place to place and are related to the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).4

Hepatic lesions present a relatively common clinical dilemma, particularly with the increasing use of various imaging modalities for the diagnosis of abdominal and other vague symptoms.8 Accurate and reliable determination of the nature of the hepatic lesion is important, not only to reassure individuals with benign masses but also to ensure that malignant lesions are diagnosed accurately with noninvasive modalities like abdominal ultrasound.8–11 Abdominal CT and MRI also help better delineate the characteristics and nature of liver masses.12–14 In developing countries in Africa, where access to medical care and sophisticated imaging technologies is limited, deep-seated hepatic tumors often grow to an enormous size before they are diagnosed and treated. Little is known about the epidemiology and outcomes of liver tumor management in children in Ethiopia.4,15 Appropriate diagnosis of hepatic masses allows the appropriate selection of optimal management, which is frequently reassured or followed up for benign hepatic lesions. For malignant liver masses or those at risk of malignant transformation, treatment depends on tissue biopsy, tumor staging, functional status of the free liver, and availability of medical and surgical management options.8,16,17

Patients and Methods

Study Area

This study was conducted at the Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, which is the largest referral hospital in Ethiopia. It was established in 1964 and is now the main teaching center for both clinical and preclinical training in most disciplines. It is also an institution in which specialized clinical services that are not available in other public or private institutions are rendered nationwide. It is a tertiary hospital where pediatric liver masses are treated by a gastroenterologist and a hemato-oncologist.

Study Design and Methodology

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in children aged ≤ equal to 14 years, who had been treated for primary liver mass at Tikur Anbessa specialized hospital from June 2017 to May 2022, using a structured questionnaire that included sociodemographic characteristics and clinical, laboratory, and radiological imaging of children diagnosed with primary liver masses.

Data Collection and Analysis

Data were collected by the principal investigator using structured questionnaires. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Study Participants

Among the study patients, 45/74 (60.8%) were male, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.6:1. The mean age of the patients at presentation was 4.6 years. The majority of the cases; 27/72 (36.5%) were between 1 and 4 years and 18 (24.3%) were infants. Sixty percent (n = 44) of the study participants were from outside Addis Ababa. Almost all of the study cases, 73/74 (98.6%), did not have a sibling or parents who had a similar illness, two (2.7%) had HIV cases and one (1.4%) had a previous history of Hepatitis B (HBV) infection. The demographic characteristics of the children are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics of Children with Primary Liver Mass Attending at Tertiary Care Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Variable Frequency Percent
Age of the study participants in years
 <1 18 24.3
 1–4 27 36.5
 4–8 14 18.9
 8–14 15 20.3
Sex of the study participants
 Male 45 60.8
 Female 29 39.2
Residence of the study participants
 Addis Ababa 30 40.5
 Outside Addis Ababa 44 59.5
Did you have a sibling, parent, or offspring who have a similar illness?
 Yes 1 1.4
 No 73 98.6
Did have a previous liver problem
 Yes 1 1.4
 No 73 98.6
HIV
 Yes 2 2.7
 No 72 97.3

Clinical Presentation of the Study Participants with Primary Liver Mass

Seventy cases (94.6%) had presenting symptoms, and the remaining four (5.4%) were incidental findings. Approximately 42% (n = 31) of the study participants had an illness duration of 4–8 weeks. Abdominal swelling (70.3%) was the common presenting symptom in 52/74 (70.3%) of children, followed by abdominal pain, in 29/74 (39.2%) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Presenting Symptoms of Patients with Primary Liver Mass Who Were on Follow-Up in a Tertiary Care Center, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Variable Frequency Percent
Duration of illness in weeks
 ≤1wk 15 20.3
 1–3wk 17 23.0
 4–8wk 31 41.9
 8–16wk 5 6.8
 >16wk 6 8.1
Presenting symptoms
 Yes 70 94.6
 No 4 5.4
Abdominal pain
 Yes 29 39.2
 No 45 60.8
Abdominal swelling
 Yes 52 70.3
 No 22 29.7
Jaundice
 Yes 11 14.9
 No 63 85.1
Fever
 Yes 16 21.6
 No 58 78.4
Weight loss
 Yes 10 13.5
 No 64 86.5
Easily fatigability
 Yes 1 1.4
 No 73 98.6
Bleeding
 Yes 1 1.4
 No 73 98.6

The Laboratory Characteristics of the Study Patients

Basic laboratory investigations were performed in children with primary liver masses. AST was elevated in 42 (58.3%), ALT was elevated in 24 (17.8%), and ALP was elevated in 70 (94.4%). INR was prolonged in 26 (61.9%), and AFP was high in 20 (45%) of patients. Forty-five (60.8%) patients were anemic, ESR was elevated in 37 (52%), and LDH was elevated in 42 (60.9%) of patients at presentation. Only one case was HBVsAg positive as shown in Table 3.

Table 3.

Frequency of Laboratory Parameters in Patients with Liver Mass Who Were on Follow-Up in a Tertiary Care Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Variable Frequency Percent Mean (SD)
Liver test results
 AST (n=72)
 Normal 30 41.7 101.6 (171.6)
 Elevated 42 58.3
ALT (n=72)
 Normal 43 59.7 68.1 (116.4)
 Elevated 29 40.3
ALP (n=72)
 Normal 4 5.6 368.7 (281.7)
 Elevated 68 94.4
INR (n=42)
 Normal 16 38.1 1.42 (0.393)
 Elevated 26 61.9
PT (n=42)
 Normal 29 69.0 19.5 (6.87)
 Elevated 13 31.0
PTT (n=41)
 Normal 29 70.7 36.7 (10.61)
 Elevated 12 29.3
Bilirubin total (n=58)
 Normal 55 94.8 3.5 (7.34)
 Elevated 3 5.2
Bilirubin direct (n=56)
 Normal 35 62.5 1.84 (4.57)
 Elevated 21 37.5
Serum albumin (n=63)
 Hypoalbuminemia 1 1.6 3.57 (2.51)
 Normal 62 98.4
Alpha-fetoprotein (n=44)
 Normal 24 54.5 34,449.67 (126,130.87)
 Elevated 20 45.5
HBVSAg (n=74)
 Negative 73 98.6
 Positive 1 1.4
HCVAbs (n=73)
 Negative 73 98.6
 Not available 1 1.4
WBC (n=74)
 Normal 31 41.9 12.84 × 103 (5.97)
 Elevated 43 58.1
Hemoglobin (n=74)
 Anemia 45 60.8 11.06 (3.15)
 Normal 29 39.2
Platelet (n=74)
 Thrombocytopenia 9 12.2 422.7 (244.34)
 Normal 65 87.8
Urine bilirubin level (=48)
 Negative 34
 Positive 14
Urine urobilinogen level (=48)
 Negative 34
 Positive 14
ESR (=71)
 Normal 34 47.9 36.34 (31.31)
 Elevated 37 52.1
CRP (n=46)
 Normal 31 67.4 25.17 (54.14)
 Elevated 15 32.6
Uric acid (n=52)
 Normal 30 57.7 4.83 (2.26)
 Elevated 22 42.3
LDH (n=69)
 Normal 27 39.1 644 (984.7)
 Elevated 42 60.9

Imaging Pattern of the Study Patients

An abdominal ultrasound was performed; benign hepatic mass lesions accounted for 42 (57.5%) and 32 (43.2%) were malignant liver masses. The common benign hepatic mass was pyogenic liver abscess, 16/42 (38.1%), and the common malignant hepatic mass was hepatoblastoma, 25/32 (78.1%). The right lobe of the liver was involved in 48 (64.9%), the left lobe was involved in 12 (16.2%), and both lobes were involved in 14 (18.9%) of cases (Table 4).

Table 4.

Frequency of Abdominal Ultrasound Parameters in Patients with Liver Mass Who Were on Follow-Up in a Tertiary Care Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Variable Category frequency Percent
Abdominal ultrasound Yes 74 100
Ultrasound findings
Hepatocellular carcinoma 6 8.1
Hepatoblastoma 25 33.8
Hemangioma 5 6.8
Amebic abscess 2 2.7
Pyogenic Abscess/bacterial cause 16 21.9
Simple hepatic cyst 6 8.2
Hydatid cyst 8 11.0
Hepatic Adenoma 1 1.4
Hemangioendothelioma 3 4.1
Lymphangioma 1 1.4
Caroli’s disease 1 1.4
Mass lobe
Single 55 73.9
Multiple 19 26.1
Lesion character
Benign 42 57.5
Malignant 32 43.2
Mass size in cms
<2 4 6.2
2–5 25 38.5
5–10 24 36.9
>10 12 18.5
Mass lobe
Right 48 64.9
Left 12 16.2
Both 14 18.9
Mass Involved segment
Yes 51 68.9
No 23 31.1
1 10 19.6
2 11 21.6
3 7 13.7
4 19 37.3
5 26 50.9
6 21 41.2
7 15 29.4
8 26 50.9
Spleen size
Normal 63 86.3
Enlarged 10 13.9
Liver size
Normal 15 20.3
Enlarged 59 79.7
Any portal vein thrombosis
Yes 6 8.1
No 68 91.9

The size of the majority of lesions, 25 (38.5%) were between 2 and 5 cm, and 24 (36%) ranged 5–10 cm. Portal vein thrombosis was detected in 6 (8.1%), hepatomegaly in 59 (79.7%), and splenomegaly in 10 (13.9%), respectively.

Abdominal MRI scans were performed for eight patients; 62.5% were benign, and hepatoblastoma was the common malignant liver tumor (Table 5).

Table 5.

Frequency of Abdominal MRI Scan Parameters in Patients with Liver Mass Who Were on Follow-Up in a Tertiary Care Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Variable Category Frequency Percent
Abdominal MRI scan Yes 8 10.8
Hepatoblastoma 3 37.5
Pyogenic abscess 1 12.5
Simple hepatic cyst 1 12.5
Hydatid cyst 1 12.5
Caroli’s disease 1 12.5
Hepatocellular carcinoma 1 12.5
Mass size
Single 7 87.5
Multiple 1 12.5
Lesion character
Benign 5 62.5
Malignant 3 37.5

The Association of Independent Variables on Pyogenic Liver Abscess

In the binary logistic regression, residence, abdominal pain, and fever were statistically significant (P = 0.05). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, abdominal swelling and fever were significantly associated with pyogenic abscesses (P = 0.05) as shown in Table 6.

Table 6.

Bivariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression in Patients with Liver Mass Who Were on Follow-Up in a Tertiary Care Center, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Variable Pyogenic abscess P-value COR with 95% CI P-value COR with 95% CI
Yes No
Sex of the Children
 Male 13 32 0.069 3.5(0.91, 13.67) 0.710 1.5 (0.18, 12.24)
 Female 3 26 1 1
Residence of the study cases
 Addis Ababa 10 20 0.049 3.2(1.01, 9.98) 0.474 2.1 (0.29, 14.58)
 Outside Addis Ababa 6 38 1 1
Abdominal swelling
 Yes 3 49 0.000 0.04(0.01, 0.18) 0.001 0.03 (0.004, 0.26)
 No 13 9 1 1
Fever
 Yes 8 8 0.004 6.2(1.82, 21.42) 0.006 1.5 (1.22, 10.81)
 No 8 50 1 1

The Association of Independent Variables with Hepatoblastoma

In the binary logistic regression, age, sex, residence, duration of illness, and AST and LDH levels were statistically significant (P = 0.05). Infants had a 17.1-fold risk of developing hepatoblastoma disease compared to children aged >8 years (AOR = 17.1, 95% CI: 1.84, 3.49), and patients with an elevated LDH level had a 6.9-fold higher chance of having hepatoblastoma than those with normal LDH levels (AOR = 6.9, 95% CI: 2.20, 219.4), shown in Table 7.

Table 7.

Bivariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression Showing the Association of Independent Variables on Hepatoblastoma in Patients with Liver Mass Who Were on Follow-Up in a Tertiary Care Center, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Variable Hepatoblastoma P-value COR with 95% CI P-value COR with 95% CI
Yes No
Age of the children’s years
 <1 12 6 0.004 28.0 (2.94, 266.47) 0.045 17.1 (1.84, 3.498)
 1–4 11 16 0.041 9.6 (1.10, 84.2) 0.134 10.5 (0.48, 228.78)
 4–8 1 13 0.960 1.1 (0.06, 19.05) 0.746 0.39 (0.001, 10.6.46)
 >8 1 14 1
Sex of the study cases
 Male 11 34 1 1
 Female 14 15 0.037 2.9 (1.06, 7.81) 0.362 2.4 (0.36, 16.04)
Residence of the study cases
 Addis Ababa 6 24 1
 Outside Addis Ababa 19 25 0.043 3.0 (1.04, 8.91) 0.028 2.9 (1.41, 20.73)
Duration of illness in weeks
 <1 2 13 1 1
 1–3 5 12 0.283 2.7 (0.44, 16.68) 0.588 2.5 (0.09, 63.14)
 4–8 12 19 0.094 4.1 (0.79, 21.48) 0.972 1.1 (0.04, 28.3)
 8–16 4 1 0.016 26 (1.84, 367.69) 0.293 27.1 (0.06, 127.35)
 >16 2 4 0.306 3.2 (0.34, 31.07) 0.855 0.67 (0.01, 51.03)
AST
 Normal 5 25 1 1
 Elevated 19 23 0.014 4.1 (1.33, 12.87) 0.163 4.5 (0.54, 37.08)
LDH
 Normal 1 26 1 1
 Elevated 23 19 0.001 31.4 (3.90,253.87) 0.016 6.9 (2.20, 219.4)

Discussion

Our study showed that the mean age at diagnosis of a liver mass was 4.6 years and more than one-third of the children were between 1 and 4 years. The duration of illness from the onset of symptoms to the tertiary treatment center ranged from 4 to 8 weeks in nearly half of the patients. The most common presenting symptom was abdominal pain (74.8%), and based on ultrasound findings benign hepatic lesions accounted for 42 (57.5%) of the cases. Right lobe liver was involved in 48 (64.9%), and the left lobe was involved in 12 (16.2%) which is in line with other studies.18–20 The common benign hepatic mass was a pyogenic liver abscess, 16/42 (38.1%) in our study. The Multivariate logistic regression showed abdominal swelling and fever were significantly associated with pyogenic liver abscess at P-value of 0.05 (P = 0.001 COR, 95% CI: 0.03 (0.004, 0.26)) and 0.05 (P = 0.006; 95% CI: 1.5 (1.22, 10.81)), respectively.

Our study also showed that hepatoblastoma was the most common malignant tumor, which is similar to other studies.21–23 Patients aged <1 year had 17.1-fold high risk of hepatoblastoma diagnosis than children aged >8 years (AOR = 17.1, 95% CI: 1.84, 3.49), those with abdominal swelling had 6.7-fold increase in hepatoblastoma cases than the opposite compartment (AOR = 6.7, 95% CI: 2.15, 300), and patients with an elevated LDH level had 6.9-fold higher chance of hepatoblastoma than those with a normal LDH level.

In our study, the determinant factors that were significantly indicated for the presence of malignancy were female sex: had 2.1-fold malignant liver tumors than males (AOR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.62, 7.08), and abdominal swelling; had 11.7-fold increased risk of malignancy (AOR = 11.7, 95% CI: 1.79, 7.17).

Conclusion

In our study, more than one-third of children with liver masses were aged 1–4 years with a mean age of 4.6 years. Benign hepatic masses were the most common. Pyogenic liver abscess was the most common benign hepatic lesion, whereas hepatoblastoma was the most common malignant liver tumor in children. Most lesions were solitary and involved the right lobe. Knowing the patterns of liver masses will help in early diagnosis and decrease the morbidity and mortality in children with liver masses.

Strengths and Limitations of the Study

The study was conducted in only one tertiary hospital, and the results may not reflect the exact characteristics of liver masses in Ethiopia. However, the results can be assumed to reflect the characteristics of liver mass, as the survey was carried out at the nation’s largest referral tertiary hospital, where most cases were referred from all corners of Ethiopia.

Acknowledgment

We thank the Department of Pediatrics and Child Health for allowing us to complete this study. We express our deep sense of gratitude and respect to the patients and their attendants, who passed through challenges in their treatment course and disease state.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding.

Data Sharing Statement

Data are available on request from the corresponding author.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval was obtained from the Research and Publication Committee of the Pediatrics and Child Health Department, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, and College Institutional Review Board (IRB). The study was compiled with the Declaration of Helsinki and the requirement for informed consent was waived because of the anonymous nature of the data. Confidentiality was fully maintained during data collection and analysis.

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Jones J, Bell D, Lall N, et al. Liver lesions (pediatric). Reference article. Radiopaedia.org; 2023.
  • 2.Lucas B, Ravishankar S, Pateva I. pediatric primary hepatic tumors: diagnostic considerations. Diagnostics. 2021;11(2):333. PMID: 33670452; PMCID: PMC7922091. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chiorean L, Cui XW, Tannapfel A, et al. Benign liver tumors in pediatric patients - Review with emphasis on imaging features. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(28):8541–8561. PMID: 26229397; PMCID: PMC4515836. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Global HELP Organization. HELP (Health Education using Low-cost Publication); Paediatric Surgery: a Comprehensive Text For Africa; CHAPTER 107; Liver Tumours; Graeme Pitcher, V. T. Joseph; 2011:622–632.
  • 5.Potisek NM, Antoon JW. Abdominal Masses. Pediatr Rev. 2017;38:101–103. doi: 10.1542/pir.2016-0087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ng K, Mogul DB. Pediatric Liver Tumors. Clin Liver Dis. 2018;22:753–772. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2018.06.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tarek N, Herzog CE. Neoplasms of the Liver. In: Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. Philadelphia; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Venkatesh SK, Chandan V, Roberts LR. Liver masses: a clinical, radiologic, and pathologic perspective. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(9):1414–1429. PMID: 24055987; PMCID: PMC3959647. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.De Lope CR, Reig ME, Darnell A, Forner A. Approach of the patient with a liver mass. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2012;3(4):252–262. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2012-100146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ishak KG, Anthonly PP, Niederau C. Nakanuma Y Mesenchymal tumors of the liver. In: Hamilton SR, Aatonen LA, editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumors: Tumors of the Digestive System. Wiley and Sons; 1976. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bhaijee F, Oshima K, Anders RA. Hepatic mass lesions: challenges and pitfalls. Diagn Histopathol. 2017;23(12):544–552. doi: 10.1016/j.mpdhp.2017.11.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Segura Grau A, Valero López I, Díaz Rodríguez N, Segura Cabral JM. [Liver ultrasound: focal lesions and diffuse diseases]. Semergen. 2016;42(5):307–314. Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2014.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hansen N, Weadock W, Morani A, Carlos R. Liver lesions discovered incidentally on ultrasound: evaluation of reader ability to characterize lesions on MRI without intravenous contrast. Acad Radiol. 2012;19(9):1087–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hapani H, Kalola J, Trivedi A, Chawla A. Ultrasound evaluation of focal hepatic lesions. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2014;13(12):40–45. doi: 10.9790/0853-131244045 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Amare Woldie. Clinical and imaging characterization of patients with focal liver lesions with emphasis on hepatocellular carcinoma at TASH from August 1, 2019, to July 30, 2020; 2021.
  • 16.Chung EM, Cube R, Lewis RB, et al. Pediatric liver masses: radiologic-pathologic correlation, Benign tumors. RadioGraphics. 2010;30:801–826. doi: 10.1148/rg.303095173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schima W, Kölblinger C, Ba-Ssalamah A. Non-invasive diagnosis of focal liver lesions: an individualized approach. Cancer Imaging. 2012;12(2):365. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.9025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Urban BA, Fishman EK, Kuhlman JE, Kawashima A, Hennessey JG, Siegelman SS. Detection of focal hepatic lesions with spiral CT: comparison of 4-and 8-mm interscan spacing. Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160(4):783–785. doi: 10.2214/ajr.160.4.8456665 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kuszyk BS, Bluemke DA, Urban BA, et al. Portal-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT for the detection of malignant hepatic tumors: sensitivity based on comparison with intraoperative and pathologic findings. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166(1):91–95. doi: 10.2214/ajr.166.1.8571914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Butler TJ, McCarthy CF. Pyogenic liver abscess. Gut. 1969;10(5):389–399. PMID: 5771671; PMCID: PMC1552853. doi: 10.1136/gut.10.5.389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Geramizadeh B, Bahador A, Foroutan HR, Banani A, Nikeghbalian S, Malek-Hosseini SA. Pathology of pediatric liver tumors, a single center experience from south of Iran. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010;53(3):422. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.68258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Litten JB, Tomlinson GE. Liver tumors in children. Oncologist. 2008;13(7):812–820. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Moore SW, Davidson A, Hadley GP, et al. Malignant liver tumors in South African children: a national audit. World J Surg. 2008;32(7):1389–1395. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9526-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request from the corresponding author.


Articles from Pediatric Health, Medicine and Therapeutics are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES