Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2023 Dec 1:2023.12.01.569589. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2023.12.01.569589

First detection of Anopheles stephensi in Ghana using molecular surveillance

Yaw A Afrane 1, Anisa Abdulai 1, Abdul R Mohammed 1, Yaw Akuamoah-Boateng 1, Christopher Mfum Owusu-Asenso 1, Isaac K Sraku 1, Stephina A Yanney 1, Keziah Malm 2, Neil F Lobo 3
PMCID: PMC10705536  PMID: 38076990

Abstract

The invasive Anopheles stephensi mosquito has been rapidly expanding in range in Africa over the last decade, spreading from the Indian sub-continent to several East African countries (Djibouti, Ethiopia, Sudan, Somalia and Kenya) and now in West Africa, Nigeria. The rapid expansion of this invasive vector poses a major threat to current malaria control and elimination efforts. In line with the WHO’s strategy to stop the spread of this invasive species by enhancing surveillance and control measures in Africa, we incorporated morphological and molecular surveillance of An. stephensi into routine entomological surveillance of malaria vectors in the city of Accra, Ghana. Here, we report on the first detection of An. stephensi in Ghana. An. stephensi mosquitoes were confirmed using PCR and sequencing of the ITS2 regions. These findings highlight the urgent need for increased surveillance and response strategies to mitigate the spread of An. stephensi in Ghana.

Background

Anopheles stephensi is an invasive mosquito species originating from parts of Southeast Asia and the Arabian Peninsula (1). The ability of this species to utilize artificial containers for larval sites has made this vector capable of thriving in urban areas, setting them apart from other major malaria vectors that primarily breed in rural areas (2). An. stephensi is capable of transmitting both P. falciparum and P. vivax (1,3). Over the last decade, An. stephensi has been expanding in range and has now been documented in several countries in Africa (4). It was first detected in Djibouti, the Horn of Africa in 2012, where it was implicated in an urban malaria outbreak (5). It was also detected in Ethiopia in 2016 and 2018, where it is well-established in eastern Ethiopia (6,7). An. stephensi was subsequently detected in Sudan (2016), Somalia (2019), Nigeria (2020) and Kenya (2023) (4,5,79).

The rapid expansion of An. stephensi in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) which has the highest burden of malaria globally, is a major public health concern. The spread of this invasive species could lead to high malaria transmission in urban areas though malaria is typically a rural disease. In Djibouti, An. stephensi mosquitoes are thought to be responsible for an increase in malaria incidence, from 1 to 4 cases in 2013 to 49.8 cases/1,000 persons in 2019 (10). With over 40% of the population in SSA living in urban areas, the spread of An. stephensi into these receptive areas will currently put about 126 million people at risk of malaria (2,4). Also, this invasive vector has been found to be resistant to insecticides further increasing the risk of malaria transmission in combination with limiting intervention efficacy (1113). An. stephensi mosquitoes from Somalia were found to be resistant to several insecticide classes, especially pyrethroids (13).

The World Health Organization issued an initiative in 2022 aimed at strengthening surveillance, increasing collaborations and prioritizing research to help stop the spread of An. stephensi in SSA and find strategies to combat or eliminate the vector in areas that have been invaded (4). Morphological and molecular surveillance of An. stephensi were incorporated into routine entomological surveillance of malaria vectors in the city of Accra, Ghana, following the WHO initiative, that seeks to take coordinated action to limit the spread of this invasive species by improving surveillance and control efforts in Africa (4). This study outlines the entomological surveillance that documents the identification of this invasive species in Ghana.

Methods

Study Sites

Sampling was conducted in 8 sites within the city of Accra, Ghana, as part of routine entomological surveillance from January 2022 to July 2022. These sites were categorized to represent different environments and socio-economic status; irrigated urban farming (IUF) sites (Tuba and Dzorwulu), lower socioeconomic (LS) sites (Nima and Chorkor), middle socioeconomic (MS) sites (Dansoman and Teshie) and high socioeconomic (HS) sites (East Legon and Cantonment). Tuba (5° 30′ 47″N 0° 23′ 16″ W) and Dzorwulu (5°36′53″N 0°12′03″W) are sites where irrigated farming is practised all year round leading to the creation of mosquito breeding sites. Socio-economic sites were classified based on their population, housing structures and the availability of proper drainage and sanitation systems. Low socioeconomic sites, Nima (5° 35′ 0″ N, 0° 12′ 0″ W) and Chorkor (5°31′39″N 0°13′55″W) are densely populated slums with poor sanitation and inadequate drainage systems. Dansoman (5° 33′ 0″ N, 0° 16′ 0″ W) and Teshie (5° 35′ 0″ N, 0° 6′ 0″ W) are middle socioeconomic sites with more standard residential structures with well-designed drainage and sanitation systems but poorly managed. High socioeconomic sites, Cantonment (5° 35′ 10″ N, 0° 10′ 35″ W) and East Legon (5°38′16.39″N, 0°9′40.33″W) have proper housing structures with good sanitation and drainage systems. Accra is the capital city of Ghana and it is the most populous. Accra lies in the coastal savannah zone of Ghana, with an annual mean temperature of 26.5 °C and an average annual precipitation of 787 mm. Figure 1 shows a map of the routine surveillance sites.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Routine entomological surveillance sites in Accra, Ghana

Larval Habitat Characterization

Larval habitats identified in each site were grouped into two; natural habitats and man-made habitats. The man-made habitats included ditches, footprints, tyres and tyre tracks while natural habitats included swamps, furrows and natural ponds. The land-use type where the larval habitats were found was recorded. The geographical coordinates of each larval habitat were recorded using a GPS device (Garmin eTrex 10 Worldwide Handheld GPS Navigator).

Larval mosquito sampling and densities

Larval sampling was conducted for all potential breeding sites using the standard WHO dippers and small ladles for smaller habitats (14). The total number of dips was recorded as described by Hinne et al. (14). The number of larvae and pupae was recorded, and the larval density was calculated as the ratio of the number of larvae collected per dip (14,15). Larval sampling was done in every site monthly for the dry (February – March) and rainy (June – July) seasons of 2022. Larval samples were transported to the insectary at the Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, where they were raised into adults for morphological identification.

Morphological and molecular identification of mosquito samples

Adults raised from larvae sampled were morphologically identified to species using their palps, wings, abdomen and legs using the keys of Nagpal and Sharma (16) and Coetzee (17). DNA was extracted from the mosquito legs using the alcohol precipitation method (18). PCR amplifications were carried out to detect An. stephensi using primers targeting the ITS region based on previously described protocols by Singh et al. (19). Members of the An. gambiae s.l complex were further identified by PCR using the extracted DNA as the template. Four sets of oligonucleotide primers (An. gambiae, An. arabiensis, An. melas and universal primer) were used in the PCR for the identification of members of the Anopheles gambiae s.l species complex (20). Anopheles gambiae s.s and An. coluzzii were distinguished by PCR-RFLP using previously described protocols (21).

Molecular Species Identification - Sequencing

After PCR, mosquitoes that did not produce bands indicative of the An. gambiae complex (n=11) were subjected to Sanger sequencing of the ITS2 regions and analysed based on comparisons to the NCBI database (22).

Results

Anopheles larval densities in different habitat types across different sites

Ten (10) different habitat types were encountered during the larval sampling. The highest larval density during the dry and wet seasons was observed in drainage ditches from Chorkor (9.72 larvae/dip) and swamps in Teshie (20.3 larvae/dip) respectively. Drainage ditches were consistently productive across almost all the sites in both seasons. The most productive habitat type across all the sites was drainage ditches. However, habitat types such as footprints, swamps and tyre tracks also recorded low to high larval densities in some of the sites (0.25 to 20.3 larvae/dip). In Tuba, Nima and Dansoman, where An. stephensi mosquitoes were found, and some of the more productive habitats were drainage ditches (1.45 to 8.39 larvae/dip) and tyre tracks (0.77 to 14.96 larvae/dip) (Table 1). Figure 2 shows habitats where An. stephensi mosquitoes were found. An. gambiae s.l. larval density was significantly associated with season (t = 4.14, P = 0.00).

Table 1:

Anopheles larval density in the dry and rainy seasons

Habitat type Sites/Seasons
Tuba Dzorwulu Nima Chorkor Dansoman Teshie East Legon Cantonments
Dry Wet Dry Wet Dry Wet Dry Wet Dry Wet Dry Wet Dry Wet Dry Wet
Man-made pond 5.15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Car tyre 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.3 0 0 0 0
Drainage ditch 6.08 0 1.68 0.59 8.39 2.25 9.72 4.35 1.83 1.45 6.7 5.78 1.14 0.9 2.33 1.43
Footprint 0 1.6 0 3.53 0 1.97 0 6.44 0 4.52 0 5.67 0 0 0 0
Furrow 3.18 6.27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Natural pond 0 0 6.15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Puddle 0 4.16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4.06 0 0 0 0
Swamp 0 0 5.75 1.27 0 2.67 0 0 0 2.31 0 20.3 0 1 0 2.85
Tyre track 12 14.96 0 0 0 2.69 0 3 0 3.16 0.77 8.95 0 1.52 0 1
Well 0.96 0 0 0 0 0 7.5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0 0

Values in bold represent habitat types were An. stephensi larvae were found.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Habitats were An. stephensi larvae were found. a Dug-out well (Tuba), b drainage ditches (Dansoman), c swamp (Nima)

Species distribution of Anopheles mosquitoes

A total of 1169 mosquitoes obtained from the larval sampling were identified using morphological keys and PCR methods for speciation. Out of this number, 551(47.13 %) were An. gambiae s.s, 582 (49.79 %) An. coluzzii and 32 (2.74%) Hybrids. Four samples (0.34 %) were identified as An. stephensi using a modified PCR-based method by Singh et al. (19) and sequencing (22)(Table 2). Results from the NCBI blast showed that the An. stephensi samples had 100% sequence similarity with An. stephensi voucher A268 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene and internal transcribed spacer 2 (GenBank: MH650999.1) (Table 3).

Table 2:

Anopheles larvae species distribution across different sites

Site Site Category Species, no. (%)
An. gambiae An. coluzzii Hybrids An. stephensi Total
Tuba IUF 197 (61) 116 (35.9) 8 (2.5) 2 (0.6) 323 (100)
Dzorwulu 5 (31.3) 11 (68.7) 0 0 16 (100)
Nima LS 67 (33.5) 120 (60) 12 (6) 1 (0.5) 200 (100)
Chorkor 17 (29.3) 41 (70.7) 0 0 58 (100)
Dansoman MS 7 (7.1) 84 (85.7) 6 (6.1) 1(1.1) 98 (100)
Teshie 166 (46.62) 186 (52.2) 3 (1.2) 0 355 (100)
East Legon HS 77 (77.7) 19 (19.3) 3 (3) 0 99 (100)
Cantonment 15 (75) 5 (25) 0 0 20 (100)
Total 551 (47.13) 582 (49.79) 32 (2.74) 4 (0.34) 1169 (100)

Table 3:

Sequencing results of suspected An. stephensi samples

Sample ID ITS2 Contig NCBI blast result GenBank accession number of best match %Identity match Final Species ID GenBank accession numbers
DN 035 283 An. stephensi voucher MH650999.1 100% An. stephensi OR711900
TP 002S 283 An. stephensi voucher MH650999.1 100% An. stephensi OR711899

Discussion

The invasion of An. stephensi in sub-Saharan Africa, which bears the world’s highest malaria burden, represents a significant concern for public health. This is because of their ability to thrive in urban areas and transmit both P. falciparum and P. vivax. Here we report the first detection of An. stephensi in Ghana using molecular surveillance. An. stephensi was found in larval mosquito samples from urban areas of Accra, Ghana, specifically Tuba, Dansoman and Nima.

While the vector’s spread could have occurred through land borders, air travel, or seaports, it is noteworthy that in Ghana, it was discovered at considerable distances from these points of entry, suggesting possible introduction via long-distance migration (Atieli et al 2023), local transportation, and/or human activities. Similar studies in Eastern Ethiopia have reported the collection of An. stephensi samples far inland along transportation routes that are not proximate to any seaport entry, underscoring the role of long-distance migration, local transportation, and human activities in driving the dispersal of this invasive species (23). This highlights the need to expand surveillance efforts to determine the distribution and spread of An. stephensi in Ghana. It is likely that this invasive species may have spread to other parts of Accra as well as other regions of Ghana.

Anopheles stephensi is known to breed in various types of larval habitats, including man-made water containers such as plastic tanks, cisterns, barrels, discarded tires, and plastic receptacles, as well as freshwater pools such as stream margins and irrigation ditches. Remarkably, in this study, An. stephensi was found breeding in habitats distinct from the typical ones observed in Asia and East Africa (10,24). In Ghana, this vector was identified in dug-out wells within irrigated vegetable farms and roadside ditches. Additionally, it was observed to breed alongside An. gambiae s.s and An. coluzzii, whereas it is commonly associated with Aedes mosquitoes.

Expanding surveillance efforts for An. stephensi in both urban and rural areas should be a primary focus of Ghana’s National Malaria Elimination Program. Such efforts are crucial to curbing the dissemination of this invasive species within Ghana, which could potentially elevate malaria prevalence in Accra, traditionally considered a low malaria transmission zone within Ghana(25). The rapid expansion of An. stephensi also raises the risk of its colonization in rural regions of Ghana, where malaria prevalence is already high, resulting in intensified malaria transmission, disease morbidity, and mortality. Incorporating molecular-based detection tools into surveillance systems is paramount for the early detection of invasive malaria vectors, preventing their adaptation and local establishment(8).

Conclusion

The first report of the invasion of An. stephensi in Accra, Ghana, represents a major public health concern, given the heightened risk of urban malaria outbreaks. It is imperative to reinforce surveillance and response strategies in both rural and urban settings across Ghana, with specific attention directed towards Anopheles stephensi, to mitigate the spread of this invasive species.

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by grants from the National Institute of Health (NIH: R01 A1123074 and D43 TW 011513).

YAA, KM and NFL were responsible for the study design, supervised the data collection and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. AA, ARM, YAB, CMO-A, SAY and IS performed the data collection, laboratory work and analysis. AA, YAA and NFL drafted the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Biography

Yaw A. Afrane is a Professor of Vector Biology at University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana. His research focus on vector and parasite biology and epidemiology with over 15 years of research experience in vector-borne diseases.

References

  • 1.Sinka ME, Bangs MJ, Manguin S, Chareonviriyaphap T, Patil AP, Temperley WH, et al. The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in the Asia-Pacific region: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic précis. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4(1):1–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sinka ME, Pironon S, Massey NC, Longbottom J, Hemingway J, Moyes CL, et al. A new malaria vector in Africa: Predicting the expansion range of Anopheles stephensi and identifying the urban populations at risk. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2020. Oct 6;117(40):24900–8. Available from: 10.1073/pnas.2003976117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Thomas S, Ravishankaran S, Justin NA, Asokan A, Mathai MT, Valecha N, et al. Resting and feeding preferences of Anopheles stephensi in an urban setting, perennial for malaria. Malar J. 2017;16(1):1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization. WHO initiative to stop the spread of Anopheles stephensi in Africa. 2022;4. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-UCN-GMP-2022.06 [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Faulde MK, Rueda LM, Khaireh BA. First record of the Asian malaria vector Anopheles stephensi and its possible role in the resurgence of malaria in Djibouti, Horn of Africa. Acta Trop. 2014;139:39–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Balkew M, Mumba P, Dengela D, Yohannes G, Getachew D, Yared S, et al. Geographical distribution of Anopheles stephensi in eastern Ethiopia. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13(1):1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Carter TE, Yared S, Gebresilassie A, Bonnell V, Damodaran L, Lopez K, et al. First detection of Anopheles stephensi Liston, 1901 (Diptera: culicidae) in Ethiopia using molecular and morphological approaches. Acta Trop. 2018;188:180–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ahmed A, Khogali R, Elnour M-AB, Nakao R, Salim B. Emergence of the invasive malaria vector Anopheles stephensi in Khartoum State, Central Sudan. Parasit Vectors [Internet]. 2021;14(1):511. Available from: 10.1186/s13071-021-05026-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ochomo EO, Milanoi S. Molecular surveillance leads to the first detection of Anopheles stephensi in Kenya. Research square. [Preprint]. 2023. [cited 2023 Sep 9]. Available from: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-2498485/v1 [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pommier de Santi V, Khaireh BA, Chiniard T, Pradines B, Taudon N, Larréché S, et al. Role of Anopheles stephensi Mosquitoes in Malaria Outbreak, Djibouti, 2019. Emerg Infect Dis J [Internet]. 2021;27(6):1697. Available from: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/27/6/20-4557_article [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Acford-Palmer H, Phelan JE, Tadesse FG, Kristan M, Collins E, Spadar A, et al. Identification of two insecticide resistance markers in Ethiopian Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes using a multiplex amplicon sequencing assay. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2023;13(1):5612. Available from: 10.1038/s41598-023-32336-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Enayati A, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Sedaghat MM, Zaim M, Hemingway J. Evolution of insecticide resistance and its mechanisms in Anopheles stephensi in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region. Malar J [Internet]. 2020;19(1):258. Available from: 10.1186/s12936-020-03335-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yared S, Gebressielasie A, Damodaran L, Bonnell V, Lopez K, Janies D, et al. Insecticide resistance in Anopheles stephensi in Somali Region, eastern Ethiopia. Malar J [Internet]. 2020;19(1):180. Available from: 10.1186/s12936-020-03252-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hinne IA, Attah SK, Mensah BA, Forson AO, Afrane YA. Larval habitat diversity and Anopheles mosquito species distribution in different ecological zones in Ghana. Parasit Vectors [Internet]. 2021;14(1):193. Available from: 10.1186/s13071-021-04701-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kweka EJ, Munga S, Himeidan Y, Githeko AK, Yan G. Assessment of mosquito larval productivity among different land use types for targeted malaria vector control in the western Kenya highlands. Parasit Vectors [Internet]. 2015;8(1):356. Available from: 10.1186/s13071-015-0968-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nagpal B. N, Sharma V. Indian Anophelines [Internet]. Oxford and IBH publishing co. pvt.ltd; 1995. 426 p. Available from: https://nimr.org.in/images/pdf/Indian_Anophelines_compressed.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Coetzee M. Key to the females of Afrotropical Anopheles mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Malar J [Internet]. 2020;19(1):70. Available from: 10.1186/s12936-020-3144-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Machani MG, Ochomo E, Zhong D, Zhou G, Wang X, Githeko AK, et al. Phenotypic, genotypic and biochemical changes during pyrethroid resistance selection in Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2020;10(1):19063. Available from: 10.1038/s41598-020-75865-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Singh OP, Kaur T, Sharma G, Kona MP, Mishra S, Kapoor N, et al. Molecular Tools for Early Detection of Invasive Malaria Vector Anopheles stephensi Mosquitoes. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29(1):36–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Scott JA, Brogdon WG, Collins FH. Identification of Single Specimens of the Anopheles Gambiae Complex by the Polymerase Chain Reaction. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1993;49(4):520–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Santolamazza F, Calzetta M, Etang J, Barrese E, Dia I, Caccone A, et al. Distribution of knock-down resistance mutations in Anopheles gambiae molecular forms in west and west-central Africa. Malar J. 2008;7(1):74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Laurent B, Cooke M, Krishnankutty SM, Asih P, Mueller JD, Kahindi S, et al. Molecular Characterization Reveals Diverse and Unknown Malaria Vectors in the Western Kenyan Highlands. Am Soc Trop Med Hyg [Internet]. 2016;94(2):327–35. Available from: https://www.ajtmh.org/view/journals/tpmd/94/2/article-p327.xml [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Balkew M, Mumba P, Yohannes G, Abiy E, Getachew D, Yared S, et al. An update on the distribution, bionomics, and insecticide susceptibility of Anopheles stephensi in Ethiopia, 2018–2020. Malar J. 2021;20(1):1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Thomas S, Ravishankaran S, Justin JA, Asokan A, Mathai MT, Valecha N, et al. Overhead tank is the potential breeding habitat of Anopheles stephensi in an urban transmission setting of Chennai, India. Malar J [Internet]. 2016;15(1):274. Available from: 10.1186/s12936-016-1321-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.NMCP. 2021 Annual Report: National Malaria Control Program. 2022; [Google Scholar]

Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES