Skip to main content
The Western Journal of Medicine logoLink to The Western Journal of Medicine
. 2000 Aug;173(2):129–130. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.173.2.129

Does recreational ecstasy use cause long-term cognitive problems?

Paul A T Kelly 1
PMCID: PMC1071023  PMID: 10924441

The recreational drug ecstasy, also known as “XTC” or“E,” Adam, Clarity, or Essence, is widely used by young people throughout the United States and Western Europe. The drug is an amphetamine derivative, with the pharmacologic name 3,4-methylenedioxymeth-amphetamine(MDMA). Its popularity has been enhanced by its close association with particular forms of music and dance venues and, despite well-publicized casesof MDMA-associated death, by the widely held belief that it is a“safe” drug. Indeed, many users and social commentators believe that with better management, the negative consequences of MDMA use can be avoided.1 This belief is based on the false premise that the danger associated with MDMA lies exclusively with poor control of environmental temperature and“bad” or adulterated drug. The latter risk, it is believed, would be eliminated by better quality control as a result of legalizing the drug. A review of the scientific literature, however, paints a very different picture of this drug, which is far from benign.

ANIMAL STUDIES

Evidence of neurotoxicity

Numerous animal studies have yielded clear evidence of potent neurotoxic effects of MDMA that are specific to central serotonergic (5-HT)systems.2 Given the important role that 5-HT plays in regulating emotion, memory, sleep, pain, and higher order cognitive processes, it is possible that MDMA might cause avariety of behavioral and cognitive deficiencies, as well as impairing memory.Although the applicability of these results to the human condition has been vigorously contested, clinical observations are sufficient to raise legitimate concern over the negative consequences of exposure to MDMA in humans.

The evidence that MDMA is toxic to central serotonergic nerve terminals wasderived from experiments in several different species, including rats2 and a variety of subhuman primates.3,4The latter group appears to be up to 4 times more susceptible to MDMA than are rodents. Although initially it was thought that toxicity required multiple exposure to relatively high doses of MDMA, subsequent studies have shown that a single exposure to a high dose, or several exposures to lower doses, can induce the same profile of toxicity.5 Morerecently, studies in rats showed that even a single exposure can result in some manifestations of neuronal damage6; in primates, both the doses and treatment regimens that produce neurotoxic effects overlap with those doses that some humans received when using ecstacy recreationally.7

Radiologic and cognitive changes

Despite the loss of a high proportion of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)terminals throughout the forebrain in animals, functional imaging reveals that the short- to medium-term effects of repeated MDMA treatment are largely limited to alterations in subfields of the hippocampalformation8 where changes in glucocorticoid and 5-HT receptor expression are also evident.9,10These same changes in the hippocampus are thought to underlie a range honoured, affective, and cognitive dysfunctions associated with clinical depression and normal aging. Although initially it proved difficult to find any cognitive sequelae that correlated with these changes,11 recent animal studies have shown subtle, but lasting, deficits in cognitive behaviorsthat do correlate with the levels of damage to 5-HT systems in the hippocampus.12

HUMAN STUDIES

Evidence of neurotoxicity

Evidence from human studies has accumulated more slowly, but it is becoming apparent that the toxic effect of MDMA on central serotonergic systems found previously in animal studies has a clear parallel in human users of the drug.There is now direct evidence of a lasting decrease in 5-HT uptake sites (a marker for the integrity of 5-HT nerve terminals) in human volunteers with a past history of MDMAabuse.13 Moreover, this decrease correlates positively with the extent of their self-reported previous exposure to the drug, and is in keeping with decreases in more general biochemical markers for central serotonergic activity reported elsewhere.14Positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging has revealed that the consequences of MDMA toxicity may be even more widespread than predicted from animal experiments. In addition to the hippocampal formation, both the amygdala andareas of neocortex may be affected byMDMA.15

Cognitive changes in ecstasy users

The manifestations of this neurotoxicity, in terms of altered cerebral function and behavioral change, range from neuroendocrine impairments16 to deficits in verbal memory and reasoning,17short-term memory and semantic recognition,14 and visual memory.18More general indices of intelligence are also adversely affected,19 but reports of serious long-term psychiatric disorders are still rare, with the possibility that previous exposure to MDMA merely accentuates preexisting negative personality features.20 One particularly worrying feature that has emerged is that chronic psychosis, when manifest in MDMA users, reportedly responds poorly to therapy.21

The effects of MDMA on cognitive performance arising directly from drug—induced neurotoxicity may be compounded by indirect effects on the cerebral circulation. As well as providing extensive innervation of forebrainneuronal systems, there is also evidence that cerebral blood vessels are innervated by the same serotonergic neurons arising from themesencephalon.22 It should not be surprising then that both acute and chronic treatments with MDMAproduce cerebrovascular effects. In rats, the acute effect of MDMA is to produce pronounced focal cerebrovascularhyperemia,23 which, in anatomic distribution, is directly parallel to the occurrence ofMDMA-associated hemorrhagic stroke in humans.24 In contrast, the chronic cerebrovascular effects of MDMA are more subtle under normal physiologic conditions and require the superimposition of physiologic stress before becoming fully apparent.25 It is now evident that MDMA abuse is an important risk factor for cerebrovascular accidents in young people. If these vascular accidents are neurologically silent, however, they may only become apparent at a later date. This effect may parallel the type of cognitive decline seen in patients with multi-infarctdementia.

What should we tell ecstasy users?

Findings from animal studies suggest that long-term cognitive problems are associated with MDMA exposure, and clear parallels are now emerging from clinical experience.

It is important, however, not to overstate the case. The young people most at risk are likely to reject out of hand any “scare stories,”since they feel that there have been only a few well- publicized cases of harm from the drug. These numbers are small compared to the numbers of individuals who use MDMA regularly. Studies of the drug can be criticized on the basis that they depend heavily on the quality of self-reported data. The data analysis may also be confounded by failure to report multiple drug use or inaccuracies in the reported duration of drug abstinence immediately prior to the investigation.

Nevertheless, health care professionals should be aware that cognitive disorders, mood disturbances, and increased risk of cerebrovascular accidents are among the possible long-term, negative consequences of MDMA exposure in humans.26,27,28Although subtle at first, these effects may develop into major deficits over the lifetime of an otherwise healthy individual. In particular, minor short-term deficits may be exacerbated by interaction with normal aging processes in the brain, or as a result of subsequent exposure to physiologic or psychologic stress. Even if these long-term effects are confined to a subpopulation of particularly susceptible individuals, the very scale of current usage— 3.4 million young Americans have used the drug at least once— is such that the consequences of MDMA exposure could develop into a major health care problem for the future.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Recreational use of ecstasy can affect brain function

Competing interests: None declared

References

  • 1.Better than well [Editorial]. The EconomistApril 6, 1996, pp 99-100.
  • 2.Battaglia G, Yeh SY, O'Hearn E, et al.3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine destroyserotonin terminals in rat brain: quantification of neurodegeneration by measurement of [3H]-labelled serotonin uptake sites. J PharmacolExp Ther 1987;242:911-916. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ricaurte GA, De Lanney LE, Weiner SG, et al. 5-Hydroxyindolaceticacid in cerebrospinal fluid reflects serotonergic damage induced by3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine in CNS of non-human primates.Brain Res 1988;474:359-363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ricuarte GA, Forno LS, Wilson MA, et al. MDMA selectively damages central serotonergic neurons in the primate. JAMA 1988;260:51-55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Colado MI, Murray TK, Green AR. 5-HT loss in rat brain following3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), p-chloroamphetamine and fenfluramine administration and effects of chlormethiazole and dizocilpine.Br J Pharmacol 1993;108:583-589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Colado MI, O'Shea E, Granados R, et al. Relationship between the dose of MDMA and frequency of administration on the subsequent neurodegeneration of rat brain 5-HT. Br J Pharmacol 1997;122:303P. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ricaurte GA. Studies of MDMA-induced neurotoxicity in non-human primates: a basis for evaluating long-term effects in humans. NIDARes Monogr 1989;94:306-322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sharkey J, McBean DE, Kelly PAT. Alterations in hippocampal function following repeated exposure to the amphetamine derivative methylenedioxymethamphetamine (“Ecstasy”).Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1991;105:113-118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yau JLW, Kelly PAT, Sharkey J, Seckl J. Chronic3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) administration decreases glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptor, but increases 5-HT1C receptor gene expression in the rat hippocampus. Neuroscience 1994;61:31-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yau JLW, Noble J, Seckl JR. Site-specific regulation of corticoid and serotonin receptor subtype gene expression in the rat hippocampus following 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine: role of corticosterone and serotonin. Neuroscience 1997;78:111-121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ricuarte GA, Markowska AL, Wenk GA, et al.3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, serotonin and memory. JPharmacol Exp Ther 1993;266:1097-1105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Marston HM, Reid ME, Lawrence JA, et al. Behavioural analysis of the acute and chronic effects of MDMA treatment in the rat.Psychopharmacology 1999;144:67-76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ricuarte GA, McCann UD, Szabo Z, Scheffel U. Toxicodynamics and long-term toxicity of the recreational drug, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine(MDMA, “ecstasy”). Toxicol Lett 2000;113:143-146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.McCann UD, Mertl M, Eligulashvili V, Ricuarte GA. Cognitive performance in (+/-) 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA,“ecstasy”) users: a controlled study.Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1999;143:417-425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Obrocki J, Buchert R, Vaterlein O, et al. Ecstasy— long-term effects on the human central nervous system revealed by positron emissiontomography. Br J Psychiatry 1999;175:186-188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McCann UD, Eligulashvili V, Mertl M, et al. Altered neuroendocrine and behavioral responses to m-chlorophenylpiperazine in3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) users. Psychopharmacology(Berl) 1999;147:56-65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Reneman L, Booij J, Schmand B, et al. Memory disturbances in“ecstasy” users are correlated with an altered brain serotoninneurotransmission. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2000;148:322-324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bolla KI, McCann UD, Ricuarte GA. Memory impairment in abstinentMDMA (“ecstasy”) users. Neurology 1998;51:1532-1537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E, Daumann J, Tuchtenhagen F, et al. Impaired cognitive performance in drug free users of recreational ecstasy. JNeurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;68:719-725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Huether G, Poser W, Ruther E. Blasted by ecstasy:psychopathological implications of the loss of serotonergic axon terminals caused by substituted amphetamines. Neurol Psychiatry BrainRes 1997;5:131-136. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pennings EJM, Konijn KZ, De Wolff FA. Clinical and toxicologicalaspects of ecstasy (XTC) use. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1998;142:1942-1946. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Edvinsson L, Deguerce A, Duverger D, et al. Central serotonergicnerves project to the pial vessels of the brain.Nature 1983;306:55-57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kelly PAT, Ritchie IM, Sangra M, et al. Experimental neocorticalhyperemia produced by acute exposure to methylenedioxymethamphetamine.Brain Res 1994;665:315-318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Harries DP, De Silva R. “Ecstasy” and intracerebralhaemorrhage. Scott Med J 1992;37:150-152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kelly PAT, Ritchie IM, McBean DE, et al. Enhanced cerebrovascular responsiveness to hypercapnia following depletion of central serotonergicterminals. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1995;15:706-713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cohen RS, Cocores J. Neuropsychiatric manifestations following the use of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA; “ecstasy”).Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 1997;21:727-734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Curran HV, Travill RA. Mood and cognitive effects of +/-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, “ecstasy”).Addiction 1997;92:821-831. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Davison D, Parrott AC. Ecstasy (MDMA) in recreational users:self-reported psychological and physiological effects. HumPsychopharmacol 1997;12:221-226. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Western Journal of Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES