Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2023 Dec 11;12:RP91263. doi: 10.7554/eLife.91263

Shh from mossy cells contributes to preventing NSC pool depletion after seizure-induced neurogenesis and in aging

Hirofumi Noguchi 1, Jessica Chelsea Arela 1, Thomas Ngo 1, Laura Cocas 1,2, Samuel Pleasure 1,3,
Editors: Joseph G Gleeson4, John R Huguenard5
PMCID: PMC10712957  PMID: 38079471

Abstract

Epileptic seizures induce aberrant neurogenesis from resident neural stem cells (NSCs) in the dentate gyrus of the adult mouse hippocampus, which has been implicated in depletion of the NSC pool and impairment of hippocampal function. However, the mechanisms regulating neurogenesis after seizures remain unknown. Here, we demonstrate that Sonic hedgehog (Shh) from mossy cells is a major source of Shh signaling activity after seizures, by which mossy cells contribute to seizure-induced neurogenesis and maintenance of the NSC pool. Deletion of Shh from mossy cells attenuates seizure-induced neurogenesis. Moreover, in the absence of Shh from mossy cells, NSCs pool are prematurely depleted after seizure-induced proliferation, and NSCs have impaired self-renewal. Likewise, lack of Shh from mossy cells accelerates age-related decline of the NSC pool with accompanying reduction of self-renewal of NSCs outside the context of pathology such as seizures. Together, our findings indicate that Shh from mossy cells is critical to maintain NSCs and to prevent exhaustion from excessive consumption in aging and after seizures.

Research organism: Mouse

Introduction

In the dentate gyrus (DG) of the adult hippocampus, neural stem cells (NSCs) are preserved beyond development in a special niche where newborn neurons are generated and integrated into the hippocampal circuit throughout life (Berg et al., 2019; Deng et al., 2010; Imayoshi et al., 2008; Ming and Song, 2011). NSCs in the adult DG are maintained in a quiescent state, thus adult neurogenesis begins by activating NSC proliferation, followed by differentiation and maturation of newborn neurons (Encinas et al., 2011; Lugert et al., 2010; Urbán et al., 2019). NSC proliferation and subsequent differentiation in the adult DG are influenced by neuronal activity and the processing of multiple external stimuli and have been shown to be dysregulated after brain insults and in disease states (Kempermann, 2019; Lugert et al., 2010; Moreno-Jiménez et al., 2019; van Praag et al., 1999a; Sierra et al., 2015; Tobin et al., 2019).

Epileptic seizures are known to strongly induce adult neurogenesis (Jessberger et al., 2007; Jessberger and Parent, 2015; Parent et al., 1997). Normally, increased neurogenesis has been shown to contribute to hippocampus-dependent learning and memory (Deng et al., 2010; Ming and Song, 2011). However, seizure-induced newborn neurons have morphological abnormalities, and many ectopically migrate into the hilus of the DG (Parent et al., 1997) contributing to formation of aberrant neuronal circuits in the hippocampus. These ectopic neurons are implicated in cognitive impairment as well as in the development of repeated spontaneous seizures (Cho et al., 2015; Lybrand et al., 2021). Furthermore, previous studies showed that once NSC proliferation is activated, NSCs are consumed after a series of cell divisions for neuronal production, resulting in the reduction of neurogenesis and the decline of the NSC pool with age (Encinas et al., 2011; Harris et al., 2021; Lugert et al., 2010). Excessive neuronal production induced by neuronal hyperactivity has been linked to accelerated consumption of NSCs and leads to depletion of the NSC pool (Fu et al., 2019; Sierra et al., 2015). Despite these studies, little is known about the mechanisms by which seizures induce neurogenesis and how NSCs are regulated in pathogenic conditions to result in NSC pool depletion.

NSCs are regulated by numerous signaling molecules from other niche cells (Bonafina et al., 2020; Morales and Mira, 2019). Dysregulation of the NSC niche in pathological conditions has been suggested to contribute to aberrant NSC behavior (Li and Guo, 2021; Salta et al., 2023). There are several different types of neurons in close proximity to NSCs in the DG. A recent series of studies demonstrated that hippocampal neuronal networks between these niche neurons regulate neuronal activity-induced neurogenesis (Asrican et al., 2020; Bao et al., 2017; Song et al., 2016; Song et al., 2013; Song et al., 2012; Yeh et al., 2018). Mossy cells are excitatory neurons in the dentate hilus that provide glutamatergic inputs to newborn granule neurons and GABAergic interneurons in the DG (Chancey et al., 2014; Scharfman, 2016). Mossy cells are among the most sensitive neurons to afferent excitation in the hippocampus and are vulnerable to continuous seizures (Scharfman, 1991; Scharfman, 2016; Sloviter et al., 2003). Mossy cell activity modulates NSC proliferation depending on the intensity of activation: only highly activated mossy cells increase NSC proliferation (Yeh et al., 2018). These studies suggest a potential connection between seizure-induced mossy cell hyperexcitation and the aberrant neurogenesis seen after seizures.

We previously found that Sonic hedgehog (Shh), a morphogen inducing cell proliferation, is expressed by mossy cells (Li et al., 2013). Dysregulation of Shh signaling activity has been reported in epileptic seizures where increased Shh signaling and Shh expression were observed in the hippocampus of temporal lobe epilepsy patients and epileptic rodent models (Fang et al., 2011; Pitter et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2017). Manipulation of Shh receptors in NSCs has shown that increased Shh signaling in NSCs drives NSC proliferation and neurogenesis (Antonelli et al., 2018; Choe and Pleasure, 2013; Daynac et al., 2016). These findings may indicate contributions of Shh in seizure-induced neurogenesis. However, the source and regulation of Shh that regulates neurogenesis, especially during seizure activity, remains undefined. Direct evidence connecting Shh signaling and neural activity with seizure-induced aberrant neurogenesis has not been examined.

In this study, we identify mossy cells as a major source of Shh during epileptic seizures and find that activation of Shh signaling promotes neurogenesis following seizures. Seizure-induced neurogenesis is attenuated by selective deletion of Shh in mossy cells. Our data also show that Shh from mossy cells is needed to preserve the NSC pool after seizure-induced neurogenesis. Interestingly, even though seizure-induced neurogenesis is reduced in the absence of Shh from mossy cells, deletion of Shh also results in premature depletion of the NSC pool after seizures. We find that Shh from mossy cells is important for NSCs to return to the stem cell state after seizure-induced proliferation. Furthermore, our data demonstrate that Shh deletion in mossy cells results in premature decline of NSC pool with age even without seizures, and that NSCs are less able to return to the stem cell state after proliferation without mossy cell supplied Shh. Together, our results indicate that Shh derived from mossy cells increases proliferation and self-renewal of NSCs during seizure-induced neurogenesis, thereby ensuring that the NSC pool is sustained.

Results

Shh signaling is activated by seizures and contributes to seizure-induced aberrant neurogenesis

To understand the role of Shh signaling in seizure-induced aberrant neurogenesis, we first investigated whether Shh signaling is activated upon induction of seizure activity. Expression of Gli1, a downstream transcription factor of Shh signaling, is transcriptionally induced upon activation of Shh signaling (Bai et al., 2002; Lee et al., 1997). In the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the DG, Gli1 expression and activation of Shh signaling are seen exclusively in NSCs (Ahn and Joyner, 2005; Bottes et al., 2021). To confirm this, using Gli1CreER mice crossed with Cre-dependent red fluorescent protein (tdTomato) reporter mice RosaAI14 (Ahn and Joyner, 2004; Madisen et al., 2010), we labeled Gli1 expressing cells in the DG with tdTomato. One day after a 3-day tamoxifen treatment, we observed that about 90% of tdTomato-labeled cells in the SGZ were Sox2+ S100B− cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 1), comprising Sox2+ GFAP+ radial glial cell population. This confirms that NSCs are Shh responsive and that Gli1 expression in the SGZ is essentially restricted to NSCs. Thus, we used Gli1nLacZ/+ mice, which carry the nuclear LacZ (nLacZ) transgene driven by the promoter of Gli1 (Ahn and Joyner, 2005; Bai et al., 2002; Ihrie et al., 2011) as a sensitive readout for the activation of Shh signaling in NSCs and examined the number of Gli1-nLacZ+ cells, which represent Shh-responding cells, in SGZ after seizure induction. We induced seizures with consecutive intraperitoneal injection of low-dose kainic acid (KA) in Gli1nLacZ/+ mice and found that Gli1-nLacZ+ Shh-responding cells in the SGZ are significantly increased 3 days post-seizure induction (Figure 1A, B). These data show that Shh signaling activity is increased in NSCs after KA-induced seizures.

Figure 1. Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling activity is increased upon seizure induction.

(A) Representative Gli1-nLacZ staining images of the SGZ of Gli1nLacZ/+ mice 1, 3, or 7 days after kainic acid (KA)-induced seizure. Control mice did not receive KA treatment. (B) Quantification of Gli1-LacZ+ cells in SGZ. Values represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM); ns: p > 0.05, **p < 0.01. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (control: n = 4, 1 day: n = 3, 3 days: n = 4, 7 days: n = 3 mice). (C) Representative Gli1-LacZ staining from SGZ of Gli1nLacZ/+ and Shh+/−;Gli1nLacZ/+mice 3 days after KA-induced seizure. (D) Quantification of Gli1-nLacZ+ cells in SGZ without (Naive) and with seizure induction (KA). Values represent mean ± SEM; ns: p > 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (naive: Gli1nLacZ/+ n = 4, Shh+/−;Gli1nLacZ/+ n = 3, KA: Gli1nLacZ/+ n = 4, Shh+/−;Gli1nLacZ/+ n = 5 mice). (E) Experimental scheme of analyzing neurogenesis by 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) pulse labeling. Seizures were induced in 2-month-old (2 m) mice by KA injection. One day after KA-induced seizures, the mice received BrdU for 5 days and then were analyzed 3 days after the last BrdU injection. (F) Representative immunofluorescence images of newborn neurons labeled with BrdU (green), DCX(doublecortin) (red), and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride (DAPI; blue) in the SGZ of wild-type (WT) and Shh+/− mice after seizure induction. (G) Higher magnification images from inset of panel (F), representing ectopic neurons in the hilus, which are indicated by white arrowheads. Quantification of newborn neurons (H) and ectopic neurons (I) produced after seizure induction in the SGZ of WT and Shh+/− mice. Values represent mean ± SEM; ns: p > 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (naive: WT n = 4, Shh+/− n = 4, KA: WT n = 6, Shh+/− n = 6 mice). #p < 0.05. Unpaired t-test (two-tailed) in two groups (WT vs Shh+/− in naive condition). There was reduction of DCX+ BrdU+ cells between WT vs Shh+/− in naive condition.

Figure 1—source data 1. Raw data for counts.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Sonic hedgehog (Shh)-responding cells in the SGZ are neural stem cells (NSCs).

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) Experimental scheme of tamoxifen injection to label Gli1 expressing cells in Gli1CreER/+;RosaAI14 mice. (B) Representative immunofluorescence images of Gli1 expressing cells labeled with tdTomato (red) in the dentate gyrus (DG) 1 day after a 3-day tamoxifen treatment. NSCs are defined as stem cell marker Sox2+ (cyan)-positive and astrocyte marker S100B (green)-negative cells in upper panels (white arrowhead). Radial NSCs are labeled with Sox2 (green) and defined by radial fiber stained with GFAP (cyan) in bottom panels (yellow arrowheads). (C) Quantification of Sox2+ S100B− NSCs in tdTomato+ cells and Sox2+ GFAP+ radial NSCs in tdTomato+ Sox2+ cells (n = 3 mice). Values represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Raw data for counts.

To investigate whether Shh contributes to seizure-induced aberrant neurogenesis, we analyzed Shh knock-in heterozygote (ShhEGFP-Cre/+, from here on referred as Shh+/−) mice (Harfe et al., 2004). We found that Gli1-nLacZ+ Shh-responding cells in the SGZ of Shh+/−; Gli1nLacZ/+ mice were significantly reduced (Figure 1C, D), indicating that the level of Shh signaling in NSCs is decreased in these mice. We also observed that Gli1-nLacZ+ cells failed to increase after seizure induction in these mice, indicating that Shh signaling activity is not upregulated with seizure activity in Shh+/− mice. We then investigated whether seizures induced aberrant neurogenesis in Shh+/− mice. After induction of seizures by KA, we injected 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) for 5 days to label newborn neurons and analyzed the number of BrdU-labeled DCX+ newborn neurons at 3 days after the last BrdU injection (Figure 1E). In WT mice, the number of BrdU+ DCX+ newborn neurons dramatically increased after seizure induction. However, this was significantly reduced in Shh+/− mice by comparison (Figure 1F–H). Ectopic migration of newborn neurons into the hilus is known to occur in post-seizure neurogenesis (Lybrand et al., 2021; Parent et al., 1997). Shh+/− mice have a reduction in ectopic hilar dentate neurons (Figure 1I). These results demonstrate that Shh contributes to seizure-induced aberrant neurogenesis.

Shh expression is induced in hilar mossy cells in the DG by seizure induction

To further understand the role of Shh in seizure-induced aberrant neurogenesis, we sought to identify the source of Shh ligands in the DG, particularly after seizures. ShhEGFP-Cre/+ mice were crossed with RosaAI14 reporter mice (from here on referred as ShhCre/+;RosaAI14) and seizures were induced. One week after seizure induction, we found that there was specific tdTomato expression in the dentate hilus of ShhCre/+;RosaAI14 mice both with and without seizure induction (Figure 2A, B). Since inhibitory interneurons and mossy cells are both prominent dentate hilar cell types, we explored which of these are included in the tdTomato+ cells. Co-immunostaining with the cell-type markers showed that the majority of tdTomato+ cells were GluR2/3+ mossy cells but with a much smaller number of Parvalbumin+ interneurons expressing tdTomato (Figure 2C, D). Furthermore, the cell types reflected in the population of tdTomato+ cells did not change with seizure induction, thus indicating that in the hilus, seizures did not lead to ectopic expression of Shh in cells that normally do not express the ligand (Figure 2D). Interestingly, we found that tdTomato+ cells were dominantly observed in the dorsal GluR2/3+ mossy cells but not in the ventral hippocampus (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). These data suggest that dorsal mossy cells are the major source of Shh in DG in both the naive and post-seizure hippocampus. We also observed increased numbers of Shh-responding NSCs of the SGZ upon seizure induction (Figure 1A, B). Therefore, we next tested the possibility that the amount of Shh expression is upregulated by seizures in mossy cells. To address this, we visualized Shh mRNA in the DG using RNAscope in situ hybridization technology. Consistent with the results from ShhCre/+;RosaAI14 mice, we observed that Shh mRNA is enriched in the dentate hilus (Figure 2E). Furthermore, Shh expression was dramatically increased throughout the dentate hilus from anterior to posterior of dorsal DG at 24 hr after seizure induction. Combining RNAscope with immunofluorescence, we analyzed the number of Shh mRNA puncta in the GluR2/3+ mossy cells and found significantly increased Shh in mossy cells after seizure induction (Figure 2F, G). Taken together, these data support the conclusion that mossy cells are the local source of Shh in the DG and that Shh mRNA expression is increased upon seizure activity.

Figure 2. Sonic hedgehog (Shh) is expressed in mossy cells and upregulated upon seizure induction.

(A) Representative immunofluorescence images of mossy cells labeled with GluR2/3 (green) and ShhCre/+;RosaAI14 (tdTomato; red) 1 week after seizure induction. (B) Quantification of tdTomato+ cells in each area of the dentate gyrus (DG). GCL: granule cell layer, ML: molecular layer (naive: n = 3, kainic acid [KA]: n = 3 mice). (C) Representative immunofluorescence images of interneurons labeled with parvalbumin (cyan) and ShhCre/+;RosaAI14 (tdTomato; red) in the hilus. (D) Cell-type population of tdTomato+ cells in the hilus of ShhCre/+;RosaAI14 mice 1 week after seizure induction (naive: n = 3, KA: n = 3 mice). (E) In situ RNAscope detection of Shh mRNA (green) in the DG from anterior to posterior 24 hr after seizure induction. (F) Representative RNAscope-immunofluorescence images for Shh expression in mossy cells labeled with GluR2/3 (red). (G) Quantification of Shh mRNA puncta in GluR2/3+ mossy cells. Values represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM); ****p < 0.0001. Unpaired t-test (two-tailed). A total of 608 and 584 GluR2/3+ cells were quantified from three mice in naive and KA treated groups, respectively.

Figure 2—source data 1. Raw data for counts.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Shh is expressed in dorsal mossy cells.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A) Schematic illustration of coronal sections of hippocampus (reference images of the coronal mouse brain from Allen Brain Atlas). (B) Representative immunofluorescence images of dentate gyrus (DG) from ShhCre/+;RosaAI14 mice 1 week after seizure induction. Higher magnification of inset panels from dorsal and ventral regions of posterior DG. GluR2/3+ (green) mossy cells in dorsal but not ventral DG were labeled with ShhCre/+;RosaAI14 (red).

Shh from mossy cells contributes to seizure-induced aberrant neurogenesis

To examine the role of Shh derived from mossy cells in seizure-induced activation of Shh signaling, we generated mossy cell-selective conditional Shh knock-out (Shh-cKO) mice by crossing a floxed Shh allele (Shhfl) with calcitonin receptor-like receptor (Crlr)-Cre mice, in which Cre-mediated recombination is induced in mossy cells and a subset of CA3 neurons in the hippocampus (Jinde et al., 2012). We first tested whether deletion of Shh in mossy cells affects Shh signaling using Gli1nLacZ/+ mice. We found that the number of Gli1-nLacZ+ cells was significantly decreased in Shh-cKO mice compared with control mice (Crlr-Cre;Shh+/+ mice and Shh+/+, Shhfl/+ and Shhfl/fl without the Cre transgene were used as controls) (Figure 3A, B). Three days after seizure induction, Gli1-nLacZ+ cells were significantly increased in control mice. However, this increase was not observed in Shh-cKO;Gli1nLacZ/+ mice, in which Gli1-nLacZ+ cells were rarely detected in the SGZ. We found that there were comparable number of Sox2+ GFAP+ radial NSCs in Shh-cKO mice compared with control mice (Figure 3—figure supplement 1), indicating that reduction of Gli1-nLacZ+ cells is not due to general loss of NSCs. These data suggest that Shh from mossy cells is responsible for Shh signaling in the DG, and that Shh signaling fails to be upregulated by seizures in the absence of Shh from mossy cells.

Figure 3. Deletion of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) in mossy cells decreases Shh signaling activation and attenuates seizure-induced neurogenesis.

(A) Representative Gli1-LacZ staining images of the dentate gyrus (DG) of control (Crlr-Cre;Shh+/+ and Shh+/+, Shh fl/+ and Shh fl/fl without Cre), and Crlr-Cre;Shhfl/fl (Shh-cKO);Gli1nlacZ/+ mice 3 days after kainic acid (KA)-induced seizure. (B) Quantification of Gli1-nLacZ+ cells in SGZ. Values represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM); ns: p > 0.05, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (naive: control;Gli1nlacZ/+ n = 6, Shh-cKO; Gli1nlacZ/+ n = 3, KA: control;Gli1nlacZ/+ n = 3, Shh-cKO; Gli1nlacZ/+ n = 4 mice). (C) Experimental scheme of analyzing neurogenesis by 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) pulse labeling. One day after KA-induced seizures, control and Shh-cKO mice were injected with BrdU for 5 days and analyzed 3 days after the last BrdU injection. (D) Representative immunofluorescence images for newborn neurons labeled with BrdU (green), DCX (red), and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride (DAPI; blue) in the SGZ of control and Shh-cKO mice after seizure induction (KA). (E) Quantification of newborn neurons after seizure induction in the SGZ of control and Shh-cKO mice. Values represent mean ± SEM; ns: p > 0.05, ****p < 0.0001. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (naive: control n = 5, Shh-cKO n = 4, KA: control n = 5, Shh-cKO n = 5 mice).

Figure 3—source data 1. Raw data for counts.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Deletion of Shh from mossy cells does not change neural stem cell (NSC) number.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

(A) Representative immunofluorescence images of Sox2+ (green) GFAP+ (red) radial NSCs in the SGZ of dentate gyrus (DG) in control and Shh-cKO mice. Higher magnification of inset panels representing radial NSCs labeled with Sox2 and GFAP. (B) Quantification of Sox2+ GFAP+ radial NSCs in the SGZ. Values represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM); ns: p > 0.05. Unpaired t-test (two-tailed, control n = 5, Shh-cKO n = 5 mice).
Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Raw data for counts.

Since we found impairment in seizure-induced activation of Shh signaling in Shh-cKO mice, we next investigated whether Shh from mossy cells is involved in seizure-induced aberrant neurogenesis. The mice were treated with BrdU for 5 days, starting 1 day after seizure induction, and analyzed for the number of BrdU-labeled DCX+ newborn neurons at 3 days after the last BrdU injection (Figure 3C). We found that the number of DCX+ BrdU+ newborn neurons was comparable between control and Shh-cKO mice in the KA treatment-naive condition, suggesting that deletion of Shh from mossy cells does not significantly affect baseline neurogenesis in this timeframe. After seizure induction, the number of BrdU+ DCX+ newborn neurons was significantly increased in both groups. However, we found that the number of BrdU+ DCX+ newborn neurons was significantly reduced in Shh-cKO mice compared to control mice after seizure induction (Figure 3D, E), indicating that deletion of Shh in mossy cells attenuates seizure-induced neurogenesis. Together, these data indicate that mossy cells function as a critical source of Shh for Shh signaling activity of NSCs, and that Shh derived from mossy cells contributes to seizure-induced neurogenesis.

Mossy cells control adult neurogenesis though Shh in an activity-dependent manner

A previous study showed that neuronal activity triggers secretion of Shh from hippocampal neurons in culture (Su et al., 2017). Since mossy cells undergo hyperactivation during seizures, we hypothesized that once activated by seizures, mossy cells increase secretion of Shh and contribute to seizure-induced aberrant neurogenesis. To test whether neuronal activity in mossy cells increases neurogenesis, we used a chemogenetic approach to activate mossy cells. Crlr-Cre mice were crossed with Cre-dependent Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADD) activator mice (RosaDIO-hM3Dq) which express excitatory G-protein-coupled receptor hM3Dq with mCherry upon Cre recombination (from here on referred as Crlr-Cre;hM3Dq) (Sciolino et al., 2016; Figure 4A). In Crlr-Cre;hM3Dq mice, mCherry+ recombined cells were observed specifically in the dentate hilus throughout dorsal and ventral hippocampus (Figure 4B and Figure 4—figure supplement 1). As previously reported, we found that over 90% of mCherry+ expressing cells are GluR2/3+ mossy cells (Jinde et al., 2012), and that these made up 65% of the GluR2/3+ mossy cells in the dentate hilus (Figure 4C, D). Since the high dose of Clozapine-N-oxide, frequently used in the DREADD system has a risk of causing behavioral abnormalities and might have contributory effects on neurogenesis (Gomez et al., 2017; MacLaren et al., 2016), we instead used Clozapine (CLZ) to induce neuronal activation (Cho et al., 2020; Gomez et al., 2017). In addition, we administrated CLZ to both RosaDIO-hM3Dq control and Crlr-Cre;hM3Dq mice to normalize the possible side-effects of CLZ administration. 1.5 hr after CLZ injection, we observed that expression of c-fos, a marker of neuronal activation, was significantly increased in the hilus of Crlr-Cre;hM3Dq mice (Figure 4E, F); we also confirmed that over 70% of GluR2/3+ mCherry+ mossy cells were activated (Figure 4G). To investigate the effect of mossy cell neuronal activity on neurogenesis, the mice received BrdU for 5 days concomitant with CLZ treatment (Figure 4H) and were analyzed 3 days after the last BrdU injection. We found that the number of DCX+ BrdU+ newborn neurons was significantly increased in Crlr-Cre;hM3Dq mice (Figure 4I, J), suggesting that increased neuronal activity of mossy cells drove neurogenesis. We therefore next investigated whether Shh signaling activity is activated by mossy cell neuronal activity using Gli1nLacZ/+ mice. After 6 days of CLZ administration (Figure 4K), we found that Gli1-nLacZ+ were significantly increased in the SGZ of Crlr-Cre;hM3Dq;Gli1nLacZ/+ mice, compared with RosaDIO-hM3Dq;Gli1nLacZ/+ control mice (Figure 4L, M), suggesting that Shh signaling activity is upregulated in NSCs by mossy cell neuronal activity. To test the role of Shh in mossy cell neuronal activity-induced neurogenesis, we deleted Shh in mossy cells and investigated whether neuronal activity in mossy cells induces neurogenesis using Crlr-Cre;Shhfl/fl;hM3Dq mice. After CLZ administration, we found no induction of neurogenesis by mossy cell neuronal activity in Crlr-Cre;Shhfl/fl;hM3Dq mice (Figure 4N, O), indicating that induction of neurogenesis by mossy cell neuronal activity is compromised in the absence of Shh from mossy cells. Together, these data indicate that Shh from mossy cells contributes to neuronal activity-induced neurogenesis by mossy cells.

Figure 4. Mossy cell neuronal activity induces neurogenesis though Sonic hedgehog (Shh).

(A) Schematic of conditional expression of Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADD) activator in mossy cells. Representative immunofluorescence images of DREADD activator hM3Dq/mCherry (red) expressing cells in the hippocampus (B) and in GluR2/3+ (green) mossy cells of dentate hilus (C). (D) Quantification of recombination specificity (% of GluR2/3+ mossy cells in mCherry+ recombined cells) and rate (% of mCherry+ recombined cells in GluR2/3+ mossy cells) in GluR2/3+ mossy cells (n = 3 mice). Values represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). (E) Representative immunofluorescence images of neuronal activation (c-fos, green) in the hilus of RosaDIO-hM3Dq and Crlr-Cre;RosaDIO-hM3Dq mice at 1.5 hr after CLZ injection. hM3Dq expressing recombined cells are labeled with mCherry (red). (F) Quantification of c-fos+ cells in the hilus of RosaDIO-hM3Dq and Crlr-Cre;RosaDIO-hM3Dq mice 1.5 hr after CLZ injection. Values represent mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05. Unpaired t-test (two-tailed, RosaDIO-hM3Dq: n = 3, Crlr-Cre;RosaDIO-hM3Dq: n = 3 mice). (G) Induction rate of neuronal activation in the hM3Dq expressing recombined cells (% of c-fos+ cells in mCherry+ cells in the hilus, n = 3 mice). Values represent mean ± SEM. (H) Experimental scheme of analyzing neurogenesis by 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) pulse labeling during DREADD activation. CLZ was administered to 2-month-old (2 m) mice for 6 days. Starting on the second day of CLZ administration, mice concomitantly received BrdU for 5 days and were analyzed 3 days after the last BrdU injection. (I) Representative immunofluorescence images for DCX+ (green) BrdU+ (red) newborn neurons produced after DREADD-induced neuronal activation of mossy cells in the SGZ of RosaDIO-hM3Dq and Crlr-Cre;RosaDIO-hM3Dq mice. (J) Quantification of newborn neurons in the SGZ. Values represent mean ± SEM; **p < 0.01. Unpaired t-test (two-tailed, RosaDIO-hM3Dq: n = 4, Crlr-Cre;RosaDIO-hM3Dq: n = 5 mice). (K) Experimental scheme of analyzing Shh signaling activation after induction of mossy cell neuronal activity. (L) Representative Gli1-nLacZ staining images of the dentate gyrus (DG) of RosaDIO-hM3Dq and Crlr-Cre;RosaDIO-hM3Dq mice after CLZ administration for 6 days. (M) Quantification of Gli1-nLacZ+ cells in SGZ. Values represent mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05. Unpaired t-test (two-tailed, RosaDIO-hM3Dq;Gli1nLacZ/+: n = 9, Crlr-Cre;RosaDIO-hM3Dq;Gli1nLacZ/+: n = 5 mice). (N) Representative immunofluorescence images for newborn neurons produced after DREADD-induced neuronal activation of mossy cells in the SGZ of Shhfl/fl;RosaDIO-hM3Dq and Crlr-Cre;Shhfl/fl;RosaDIO-hM3Dq mice, which are labeled with DCX (green), BrdU (red), and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride (DAPI; blue). (O) Quantification of newborn neurons in the SGZ of Shhfl/fl RosaDIO-hM3Dq and Crlr-Cre;Shhfl/fl;RosaDIO-hM3Dq mice after DREADD-induced neuronal activation of mossy cells. Values represent mean ± SEM; ns: P>0.05. Unpaired t-test (two-tailed, Shhfl/fl;RosaDIO-hM3Dq: n = 3, Crlr-Cre Shhfl/fl;RosaDIO-hM3Dq: n = 5 mice). (P) Our proposed model of mossy cell-mediated neurogenesis after seizures. Shh expression in mossy cells are upregulated by seizure activity. Neuronal activity of mossy cells activates Shh signaling in neural stem cells (NSCs) and contributes to the seizure-induced neurogenesis.

Figure 4—source data 1. Raw data for counts.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Crlr-Cre-mediated recombination in the dentate gyrus (DG).

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

Representative immunofluorescence images of Crlr-Cre recombination in cells labeled with mCherry (red) in the anterior to posterior DG of Crlr-Cre;hM3Dq mice.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2. Neuronal activity of mossy cells induces neurogenesis in the contralateral dentate gyrus (DG).

Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

(A) Schematic of adeno-associated virus (AAV) injection into the dorsal DG of Crlr-Cre mice. Either AAV::hSyn-DIO-mCherry (AAV::mCherry, as control) or AAV::hSyn-DIO-hM3Dq-mCherry (AAV::hM3Dq-mCherry) was injected into the dorsal DG of Crlr-Cre mice. (B) Representative immunofluorescence images of AAV::mCherry infection (red) in the DG of Crlr-Cre mice ipsilateral and contralateral to the AAV injection site. Projections of mossy cells were observed in the molecular layer (ML) in the contralateral DG. (C) Representative immunofluorescence images of AAV::hM3Dq-mCherry infection (red) in GluR2/3+ mossy cells (green) in the AAV-injected DG of Crlr-Cre mice. (D) Quantification of AAV::hM3Dq-mCherry infection specificity (% of GluR2/3+ mossy cells in mCherry+ infected cells) and fraction (% of mCherry+ infected cells in GluR2/3+ mossy cells) in GluR2/3+ mossy cells in the AAV-injected side of the entire (total) and dorsal DG of Crlr-Cre mice (n = 6 mice). Values represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). (E) Representative immunofluorescence images of neuronal activation in the hilus of AAV::hM3Dq-mCherry-injected Crlr-Cre mice 1.5 hr after CLZ injection. (F) Quantification of c-fos+ cells in the hilus of AAV::hM3Dq-mCherry-injected Crlr-Cre mice 1.5 hr after CLZ injection. Values represent mean ± SEM; ****p < 0.0001. Unpaired t-test (two-tailed, n = 3 mice per group). (G) Induction rate of neuronal activation in the hM3Dq expressing infected cells (% of c-fos+ cells in mCherry+ cells in the hilus) in the DG ipsilateral to AAV injections in AAV::hM3Dq-mCherry-injected Crlr-Cre mice (n = 4 mice). Values represent mean ± SEM. (H) Experimental scheme for AAV injection and analysis of neurogenesis by 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) pulse labeling in Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADD)-mediated neuronal activation. AAV was injected into 1-month-old Crlr-Cre mice. After 3–4 weeks recovery, mice were administered with CLZ for 6 days. Starting on the second day of CLZ administration, mice concomitantly received BrdU for 5 days and were analyzed 3 days after last BrdU injection, neurogenesis in the contralateral DG was analyzed. (I) Representative immunofluorescence images for DCX+ (green) BrdU+ (red) newborn neurons produced after DREADD-induced neuronal activation of mossy cells in the SGZ of the contralateral DG. (J) Quantification of newborn neurons in the SGZ of contralateral DG in AAV-injected Crlr-Cre mice. Values represent mean ± SEM; **p < 0.01. Unpaired t-test (two-tailed, n = 7 mice per group).
Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Raw data for counts.
Figure 4—figure supplement 3. Deletion of Shh attenuates seizure-induced neurogenesis in the contralateral dentate gyrus (DG).

Figure 4—figure supplement 3.

(A) Schematic of adeno-associated virus (AAV) injection into the dorsal DG of Crlr-Cre mice. Either AAV::hSyn-mCherry (AAV::mCherry, as control) or AAV::hSyn-Cre-P2A-tdTomato (AAV::Cre-tdTomato) was injected into the dorsal DG of Shhfl/fl mice. (B) Representative immunofluorescence images of AAV::Cre-tdTomato infection (red) in the AAV-injected side and contralateral DG. AAV infection was observed in the hilus of dorsal DG. Contralateral projection of mossy cells was observed in the molecular layer (ML) of contralateral DG. (C) Representative immunofluorescence images of GluR2/3+ (green) mossy cells infected with AAV::Cre-tdTomato (red) in the AAV-injected side and contralateral DG. (D) Quantification of infection in GluR2/3+ mossy cells (% of mCherry+ infected cells in GluR2/3+ mossy cells) in the entire (total) and dorsal DG of AAV-injected side (n = 5 mice). Values represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). (E) Experimental scheme of AAV injection and analyzing neurogenesis by 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) pulse labeling after seizure induction by kainic acid (KA). AAV was injected into 1-month-old Shhfl/fl mice. After 3–4 weeks recovery, seizure was induced by KA administration. One day after seizure induction, mice were given BrdU for 5 days and analyzed 3 days after last BrdU injection. Neurogenesis in the contralateral DG was analyzed. (F) Representative immunofluorescence images for DCX+ (red) BrdU+ (green) newborn neurons produced after seizure in the SGZ of the contralateral DG in AAV-injected Shhfl/fl mice. (G) Quantification of newborn neurons in the SGZ of the contralateral DG in AAV-injected Shhfl/fl mice. Values represent mean ± SEM; ns: p > 0.05, *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (naive: AAV::mCherry n = 6, AAV::Cre-tdTomato n = 5, KA: AAV::mCherry n = 3, AAV::Cre-tdTomato n = 5 mice).
Figure 4—figure supplement 3—source data 1. Raw data for counts.

Since mossy cells project their axons to the contralateral DG (Botterill et al., 2021; Houser et al., 2021), we then examined whether mossy cell neuronal activity influences neurogenesis in the contralateral DG. To address this, we stereotaxically injected Cre-dependent adeno-associated virus (AAV) expressing the excitatory G-protein-coupled receptor hM3Dq-mCherry under the human synapsin promoter (AAV::hSyn-DIO-hM3Dq-mCherry, from here on referred as AAV::hM3Dq-mCherry) into the DG of Crlr-Cre mice (Figure 4—figure supplement 2A). The mice were treated with CLZ to activate hM3Dq and analyzed 1.5 hr after CLZ injection. We found the specific infection of dorsal mossy cells in the AAV-injected side of the DG and contralateral projection of infected mossy cells in the inner and middle molecular layer in the contralateral DG (Figure 4—figure supplement 2B–D). We also confirmed that CLZ injection increases the expression of c-fos in the AAV::hM3Dq-mCherry infected mossy cells of the DG on the injected side (Figure 4—figure supplement 2E–G). To test whether mossy cell neuronal activity induces neurogenesis in contralateral DG, we injected AAV virus at 4–5 weeks old, and after 4 weeks recovery, mice received BrdU for 5 days concomitant with CLZ treatment and were analyzed 3 days after the last BrdU injection (Figure 4—figure supplement 2H). We found that the number of newborn neurons was significantly increased on the contralateral DG of AAV::hM3Dq-mCherry-injected mice (Figure 4—figure supplement 2I, J), indicating that mossy cell neuronal activity contributes to increasing neurogenesis in the contralateral DG.

Previous studies showed that Shh can be secreted from axons and anterogradely transported to distal regions along the axon (Beug et al., 2011; Peng et al., 2018; Su et al., 2017). These reports, together with our findings, raise the possibility that increased Shh expression after seizures is transported to the contralateral DG, thereby allowing mossy cells to regulate contralateral neurogenesis with neuronal activity. To address this possibility, we deleted Shh in mossy cells in a unilateral hemisphere of DG by injecting AAV::Cre-P2A-tdTomato (AAV::Cre-tdTomato) into the DG of Shhfl/fl mice at 4–5 weeks old and investigated seizure-induced neurogenesis in the contralateral DG in 2-month-old mice (Figure 4—figure supplement 3A). We found that infection by AAV::Cre-tdTomato was restricted to the injected DG. Dorsal mossy cells send projections to the inner and middle molecular layers of DG bilaterally into both hemispheres along the septo-temporal axis (Botterill et al., 2021; Houser et al., 2021). We found tdTomato+ mossy cell projections in the contralateral DG from the DG ipsilateral to the injection site (Figure 4—figure supplement 3B), indicating that AAV::Cre-tdTomato infected mossy cells. Shh expression is observed predominantly in dorsal mossy cells (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). We observed AAV::Cre-tdTomato infection in 31% of total GluR2/3+ mossy cells and 45% of GluR2/3+ dorsal mossy cells in the DG ipsilateral to the injection site (Figure 4—figure supplement 3C, D). We then tested whether Shh deletion affects contralateral neurogenesis (Figure 4—figure supplement 3E) and found that seizure-induced neurogenesis was attenuated in the contralateral DG of mice injected with AAV::Cre-tdTomato, in which DCX+ BrdU+ newborn neurons induced by seizure activity were significantly reduced compared with mice injected with AAV::mCherry control virus (Figure 4—figure supplement 3F, G). This suggests that mossy cells control contralateral neurogenesis by regulating Shh expression after seizures. Together with our findings that Shh expression was increased by seizure (Figure 2F, G), these data demonstrate that increased Shh following seizures may be transported and contribute to neurogenesis in the contralateral DG. Taken together, these data support our hypothesis that mossy cells release Shh with increased neuronal activity and induce neurogenesis driven by seizures (Figure 4P).

Deletion of Shh in mossy cells leads to reduction of the NSC pool after seizure-induced neurogenesis

Whether there is a functional benefit of increased Shh expression in mossy cells following seizure activity remains unclear, considering that seizure-induced aberrant neurogenesis negatively affects hippocampal function. Recently, it was shown that a population of quiescent NSCs in the adult DG, once activated to proliferate and produce neurons, can return to quiescence rather than being consumed by terminal differentiation (Botterill et al., 2021; Harris et al., 2021). This mechanism is suggested to contribute to the long-term persistence of NSCs and maintenance of neurogenesis throughout life by decelerating NSC pool exhaustion. Since Shh is important for proliferation and self-renewal of NSCs (Ahn and Joyner, 2005; Choe and Pleasure, 2013; Lai et al., 2003), we investigated whether Shh from mossy cells is involved in maintenance of NSCs after proliferation. We labeled proliferating NSCs with BrdU in the drinking water for 5 days after seizure induction (Figure 5A). Four weeks after BrdU administration, we analyzed the number of NSCs retaining BrdU, as previously addressed (Harris et al., 2021). Proliferated NSCs labeled by BrdU are eliminated from the NSC pool once they differentiate into neurons, whereas NSCs that have returned to the stem cell state after proliferation will be detected as BrdU-retaining Sox2+ GFAP+ radial NSCs even 4 weeks after proliferation (Figure 5B). We found that seizure induction increases the number of BrdU+ Sox2+ proliferating NSCs at day 0 (last day of BrdU labeling) in both control and Shh-cKO mice compared with the no seizure condition, although it was significantly attenuated in Shh-cKO mice compared with control mice (Figure 5C, D). Four weeks after BrdU labeling, we found that the number of BrdU-retaining Sox2+ GFAP+ radial NSCs was increased in seizure-induced mice compared with no seizure-induced mice, as expected from the increased proliferation after seizure (Figure 5C, E). However, the number of BrdU-retaining Sox2+ GFAP+ radial NSCs in Shh-cKO mice was significantly reduced compared with seizure-induced control mice (Figure 5C, E). To assess the persistence of NSCs’ identity after seizure-induced proliferation, we calculated the fraction of NSCs that persist as NSCs 4 weeks after proliferation by dividing the number of BrdU-retaining Sox2+ GFAP+ radial NSCs at 4 weeks with the number of BrdU+ Sox2+ proliferating NSCs at day 0 (Figure 5F). We found that the fraction of NSCs that retain stem cell identity after proliferation was comparable in control mice with and without seizure induction. This indicates that even though seizures induce NSCs to proliferate, they return to the stem cell state in the same ratio (Figure 5F). In contrast, we found that the fraction of NSCs that returned to the stem cell state in Shh-cKO mice was significantly reduced after seizure-induced proliferation (Figure 5F), suggesting that NSCs are less likely to return to their stem cell state after seizure-induced proliferation in the absence of Shh from mossy cells.

Figure 5. Sonic hedgehog (Shh) from mossy cells maintains neural stem cell (NSC) pool after seizure-induced neurogenesis.

Figure 5.

(A) Experimental scheme of long-term tracing of NSCs that proliferate after seizure induction. Seizures were induced in 2-month-old (2 m) control and Shh-cKO mice by kainic acid (KA) injections. One day after seizure induction, mice received 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) via drinking water for 5 days and were analyzed on the last day of BrdU administration (day 0) and at 4 weeks after BrdU administration. (B) Schematic of NSC fate after proliferation. (C) Representative immunofluorescence images of proliferating Sox2+ (green) NSCs labeled with BrdU (red) on day 0 and radial GFAP+ (cyan) Sox2+ (green) NSCs retaining BrdU (red) at 4 weeks after BrdU administration, which are indicated by white arrowheads. (D) Quantification of Sox2+ BrdU+ proliferating NSCs after seizure induction on day 0. Values represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM); ns: p > 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (naive: control n = 6, Shh-cKO n = 4, KA: control n = 3, Shh-cKO n = 3 mice). (E) Quantification of Sox2+ GFAP+ radial NSCs retaining BrdU at 4 weeks after BrdU administration. Values represent mean ± SEM; ns: p > 0.05, ****p < 0.0001. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (naive: control n = 7, Shh-cKO n = 4, KA: control n = 6, Shh-cKO n = 4 mice). (F) Quantification of NSC persistence 4 weeks after BrdU administration in naive and KA-induced mice. Values represent mean ± SEM; ns: p > 0.05, **p < 0.01. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (naive: control n = 7, Shh-cKO n = 4, KA: control n = 6, Shh-cKO n = 4 mice). (G) Representative immunofluorescence images of Sox2+ (green) GFAP+ (red) radial NSCs at 4 weeks after BrdU administration (5 weeks after KA-induced seizure). (H) Quantification of Sox2+ GFAP+ radial NSCs at 5 weeks after seizure induction in control and Shh-cKO mice. Values represent mean ± SEM; ns: p > 0.05, **p < 0.01. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (naive: control n = 7, Shh-cKO n = 4, KA: control n = 6, Shh-cKO n = 4 mice).

Figure 5—source data 1. Raw data for counts.

Seizures increase NSC proliferation and subsequent neurogenesis in the short term. However, it has been suggested that increased neurogenesis induced by neuronal hyperactivity accelerates consumption of NSCs and leads to depletion of NSC pool over time (Fu et al., 2019; Sierra et al., 2015). Since NSCs in Shh-cKO mice had fewer NSCs that returned to their stem cell state after seizure-induced proliferation, we next investigated the consequences on the NSC pool after seizure-induced neurogenesis. We analyzed the number of Sox2+ GFAP+ radial NSCs 4 weeks after BrdU labeling (which is 5 weeks after seizure induction). We found that the number of Sox2+ GFAP+ radial NSCs in the SGZ of control mice is comparable with and without seizures, suggesting that the NSC pool size is maintained at least 5 weeks after seizure induction in control mice (Figure 5G, H). However, in Shh-cKO mice, the number of Sox2+ GFAP+ radial NSCs was significantly reduced 5 weeks after seizure induction (Figure 5G, H), suggesting that deletion of Shh in mossy cells leads to premature depletion of the NSC pool after seizure-induced neurogenesis. Taken together, these data imply that Shh from mossy cells is required for maintaining the NSC pool after seizure-induced neurogenesis, and that Shh from mossy cells contribute to the NSCs’ return to their stem cell state after seizure-induced proliferation, thus preventing NSC pool depletion.

Loss of Shh from mossy cells accelerates age-related decline of the NSC pool

NSCs in the adult DG self-renew and return to a quiescent state after proliferation more often in aged mice than in young mice, which is thought to be the mechanism for maintaining the NSC pool during the aging process (Harris et al., 2021). We therefore next investigated whether deletion of Shh in mossy cells influences the aging-related NSC pool decline using 9- to 11-month-old aged mice. We found that the number of Sox2+ GFAP+ radial NSCs was significantly reduced in Shh-cKO mice compared with control mice (Figure 6A, B). We next asked whether the aging-related increase in NSC self-renewal is compromised in Shh-cKO mice. We administrated BrdU to mice via drinking water for 5 days to label proliferating cells and investigated the number of NSCs retaining BrdU in the SGZ at 10 days and 4 weeks after BrdU administration (Figure 6C). Consistent with previous reports (Harris et al., 2021), we found that a greater fraction of NSCs retained BrdU until 4 weeks after BrdU labeling in aged control mice compared with 2-month-old mice (Figures 5C, F, 6D, E), indicating that NSCs in aged mice tend to retain their stem cell state after proliferation compared to younger mice. However, in Shh-cKO mice, the fraction of NSCs retaining BrdU after BrdU labeling was significantly reduced compared with control mice (Figure 6D, E), suggesting that NSCs in aged Shh-cKO mice are less able to retain their stem cell state after proliferation. Together, our data suggest that Shh from mossy cells contributes to persistence of the NSC state after proliferation throughout life, which sustains the NSC pool during aging.

Figure 6. Deletion of Shh in mossy cells increases age-related NSC decline.

(A) Representative immunofluorescence images of Sox2+ (green) GFAP+ (red) radial NSCs in 9- to 11-month-old control and Shh-cKO mice. High magnification of inset images are shown in the right panels. (B) Quantification of Sox2+ GFAP+ radial NSCs. Values represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM); *p < 0.05. Unpaired t-test (two-tailed, control: n = 4, Shh-cKO: n = 3 mice). (C) Experimental scheme of long-term tracing of proliferating NSCs in aged mice. Nine- to eleven-month-old control and Shh-cKO mice were administrated with 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) via drinking water for 5 days and were analyzed on the last day of BrdU administration (day 0), and at 10 days and 4 weeks after BrdU administration. Schematic of NSC fate after proliferation. (D) Representative immunofluorescence images of proliferating Sox2+ (green) NSCs labeled with BrdU (cyan) at day 0 and radial Sox2+ (green) GFAP+ (red) NSCs retaining BrdU (cyan) at 10 days and 4 weeks after BrdU administration. (E) Quantification of the fraction of NSCs retaining BrdU until 10 days and 4 weeks after BrdU administration in aged control and Shh-cKO mice. Values represent mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Unpaired t-test (two-tailed, 10 days: control: n = 3, Shh-cKO: n = 4, 4 weeks: control: n = 5, Shh-cKO: n = 5 mice mice).

Figure 6—source data 1. Raw data for counts.

Figure 6.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1. Expressing Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADD) activator does not affect neurogenesis and number of NSCs of Crlr-Cre Shh mice.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1.

(A) Experimental scheme of analyzing neurogenesis by 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) pulse labeling. The mice were injected with BrdU for 5 days and analyzed 3 days after last BrdU injection. (B) Representative immunofluorescence images for newborn neurons labeled with BrdU (green), DCX (red), and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride (DAPI; blue) in the SGZ of control (Cre-negative mice), Crlr-Cre;Shhfl/fl, Shhfl/fl;RosaDIO-hM3Dq, and Crlr-Cre;Shhfl/fl;RosaDIO-hM3Dq mice without CLZ administration. (C) Quantification of newborn neurons in the SGZ. Values represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM); ns: p > 0.05. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (control: n = 5, Crlr-Cre;Shhfl/fl: n = 4, Shhfl/fl;RosaDIO-hM3Dq: n = 4, Crlr-Cre;Shhfl/fl;RosaDIO-hM3Dq: n = 4 mice). (D) Representative immunofluorescence images of radial NSCs labeled with Sox2 (green), GFAP (red), and DAPI (blue) in the SGZ of 2-month-old mice. (E) Quantification of Sox2+ GFAP+ radial NSCs in the SGZ. Values represent mean ± SEM; ns: p > 0.05. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (control: n = 5, Crlr-Cre;Shhfl/fl: n = 5, Shhfl/fl;RosaDIO-hM3Dq: n = 4, Crlr-Cre;Shhfl/fl;RosaDIO-hM3Dq: n = 4 mice). (F) Representative immunofluorescence images of radial NSCs labeled with Sox2 (green), GFAP (red), and DAPI (blue) in the SGZ of 9- to 11-month-old mice. (G) Quantification of number of GFAP+ Sox2+ radial NSCs in the SGZ. Values represent mean ± SEM; ns: p > 0.05, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (control: n = 4 , Crlr-Cre;Shhfl/fl: n = 3, Shhfl/fl;RosaDIO-hM3Dq: n = 6, Crlr-Cre;Shhfl/fl;RosaDIO-hM3Dq: n = 5 mice).
Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Raw data for counts.

Discussion

Here, we showed that hilar mossy cells are the source of Shh in the DG, and that Shh expression and signaling activity in the DG are increased by seizure activity and contribute to seizure-induced neurogenesis. Deletion of Shh from mossy cells attenuated the typical induction of neurogenesis by seizures. However, it also led to the reduction of the NSC pool after seizure-induced neurogenesis. Based on our results, we propose a hypothetical model for NSC pool regulation by mossy cells, in which hilar mossy cells provide Shh, which is important for NSC proliferation and self-renewal to maintain the NSC pool, thereby preventing excessive consumption of NSCs after the increased NSC proliferation that occurs during seizure activity.

We found that seizure-induced neurogenesis was attenuated in Shh-cKO mice, in which Shh signaling activity was diminished and failed to be activated upon seizure. However, neurogenesis in Shh-cKO mice was still significantly increased by seizure induction. This suggests that there must be additional signaling molecules and factors inducing neurogenesis following seizures in addition to Shh. The canonical Wnt signaling pathway is also upregulated after seizures and has also been suggested to be important in seizure-induced neurogenesis (Madsen et al., 2003; Mardones and Gupta, 2022; Qu et al., 2017). KA injection activates proliferation of both NSCs and intermediate progenitors (Lugert et al., 2010; Sierra et al., 2015). Our previous findings demonstrated that activation of Wnt signaling contributes to both NSCs and intermediate progenitor expansion whereas Shh signaling activity increases NSC proliferation (Choe and Pleasure, 2013). Thus, these signaling pathways may function together to induce and regulate neurogenesis following seizures, and Shh from mossy cells may contribute to proliferation of NSCs during seizure activity.

Previous research has demonstrated that mossy cell neuronal activity increases NSC proliferation through direct excitatory glutamatergic signaling onto NSCs (Yeh et al., 2018). Interestingly, Shh has been shown to inhibit the activity of glutamate transporters and increase extracellular glutamate (Feng et al., 2016). This raises the possibility that in addition to increasing Shh signaling activity in NSCs, Shh from mossy cells may also contribute to increasing glutamatergic signaling onto NSCs. Our results show that neurogenesis induced by mossy cell neuronal activity was compromised in Shh-cKO mice. Considering this together with our findings, this may be the result of concomitant reduction of Shh signaling activity and glutamatergic signaling onto NSCs in the absence of Shh from mossy cells. Whether Shh from mossy cells influences glutamatergic signaling to NSCs needs further investigation. However, the combination of increased Shh signaling and glutamatergic signaling activity by Shh from mossy cells may be an additional mechanism for mossy cell-mediated neurogenesis with seizures.

Previous studies indicated that NSCs in the adult DG proliferate multiple times once they are activated, and that NSCs display self-renewal through both symmetric and asymmetric cell division (Bonaguidi et al., 2011; Bottes et al., 2021; Harris et al., 2021). How the number and type of cell divisions of adult NSCs is regulated remains elusive. However, there are several findings suggesting that Shh signaling activity is involved in symmetric self-renewal and in regulating the number of cell divisions. In vivo live imaging of NSCs in adult DG using two different Cre lines for labeling NSCs demonstrated that NSCs undergo symmetric self-renewal only at the first cell division (Bottes et al., 2021). Interestingly, in their study, Gli1-CreER-tagged NSCs show long-term self-renewal capacity, and symmetric self-renewal was observed more abundantly in Gli1-CreER-tagged NSCs than in Ascl1-CreER-tagged NSCs, suggesting that Shh-responding NSCs have robust symmetric self-renewal capacity (Bottes et al., 2021). In chick spinal cord development, high Shh signaling activity has been shown to increase symmetric self-renewal of neuroepithelial cells (Saade et al., 2017). Although whether similar mechanism is adapted to regulate NSC proliferation in adult DG needs to be elucidated, this raises the possibility that increased Shh from mossy cells following seizures promotes the self-renewal of NSCs though symmetric cell division and contribute to maintaining the NSC pool. Furthermore, a study pulse-labeling NSCs by H2B-GFP demonstrated that NSCs in 6-month-old mice undergo a greater number of cell divisions compared with 1.5-month-old juvenile mice (Harris et al., 2021). Single-cell RNA sequencing results showed that direct Shh signaling target genes, Gli1 and Ptch1 expression are enriched in NSCs of aged mice compared to young mice (Harris et al., 2021). Thus, there is a possibility that Shh signaling activity is elevated in aged NSCs, which may contribute to self-renewal and increase of cell division with age. Given this, the reduced self-renewal and number of cell divisions may be a plausible explanation for the decreased ratio of NSCs that retain stem cell state in Shh-cKO mice after seizure induction and aging. Our data showed that the number of NSCs was significantly reduced in Shh-cKO aged mice, whereas it was comparable with control mice at 2 months of age. Accordingly, we found that NSCs were less likely to return to their stem cell state in aged, but not 2-month-old Shh-cKO mice. These observations suggest that Shh from mossy cells becomes especially critical for maintaining the NSC pool with age. NSC pool reduction in Shh-cKO mice may result from accumulated impairment of NSC self-renewal over time. Together, our results support the conclusion that Shh signaling activity is important for maintaining the NSC pool during both seizure and aging, and that mossy cell-derived Shh promotes long-term stem cell potency of NSCs.

Previous studies showed that mossy cells receive inputs intrinsic and extrinsic to the hippocampus and are involved in hippocampus-dependent behaviors (Azevedo et al., 2019; Scharfman, 2016; Sun et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2021). There is great interest in whether mossy cell-mediated neurogenesis is involved in other forms of activity that can induce neurogenesis, such as exercise and environmental enrichment (Kempermann, 2008; van Praag et al., 1999b). Whether neurogenesis induced by these types of activity leads to depletion of the NSC pool requires further investigation. We believe that mossy cell-derived Shh-mediated NSC regulation provides new insight into the mechanisms regulating the maintenance of the NSC pool while also increasing neurogenesis. In addition, there is evidence that Alzheimer’s disease model mice with seizures have premature deletion of the NSC pool after increased neurogenesis (Fu et al., 2019). Our findings provide a potential role for Shh to prevent the depletion of NSC after seizures, in which mossy cells function as a major source of Shh in the DG. Thus, modulation of mossy cell Shh expression in neurodegenerative diseases may be a therapeutic approach for maintaining the NSC pool and preserving neurogenesis during neurodegenerative diseases. Our findings contribute important new insights to further understand how seizures and aging lead to dysregulation in NSC behaviors.

Materials and methods

Mice

All mice used in this study were maintained on a 12-hr light/dark cycle with free access to food and water. Mouse colonies were maintained at University of California San Francisco (UCSF) in accordance with National Institutes of Health and UCSF guidelines. The following mouse lines were obtained from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine): Gli1CreERT2/+ (stock #007913, RRID:MGI:3053957), RosaAI14 (Stock #007908, RRID:MGI:J:155793), Gli1nLacZ/+ (stock #008211, RRID:MGI:J:79392), ShhEGFP-Cre/+ (stock #005622, RRID:MGI:3053959), Shhflox/flox (stock #004293, RRID:MGI:1934268), and Crlr-Cre (stock #023014, RRID:MGI: 5523525). Rosa-CAG-LoxP2272-GFP-LoxP-mCherry-hM3Dq-LoxP2272-LoxP (RosaDIO-hM3Dq) mice were generously provided by Dr. Zachary Knight (University of California, San Francisco, also available from Jackson laboratory, stock # 026943, RRID:MGI: 5771785). All mice were randomly assigned to experiments. Both male and female mice were analyzed with no distinction, except for seizure induction experiments, where only male mice were used. There was no difference in the number of newborn neurons and radial NSCs between Crlr-Cre;Shhfl/fl and Crlr-Cre;Shhfl/fl;RosaDIO-hM3Dq at 2 and 9–11 months old without clozapine administration (Figure 6—figure supplement 1). Thus, in the study of long-term tracing of NSCs in aged mice, both Crlr-Cre;Shhflox/flox and Crlr-Cre;Shhflox/flox;RosaDIO-hM3Dq mice were used as Shh-cKO mice.

Stereotaxic injection of AAV

One-month-old mice were anesthetized with Isoflurane (Piramal) in the sealed box and placed on stereotaxic instrument (Kopf). Anesthesia was maintained during surgery using a veterinary vaporizer (Surgivet). Unilateral stereotaxic injections were performed into the right dorsal dentate hilus (anteroposterior: −2.0 mm from Bregma, mediolateral: 1.9 mm, dorsoventral: 2.25 mm). All injections were performed using a Nanojector III (Drummond Scientific) with a glass capillary, pre-pulled by vertical micropipette puller (Sutter Instrument company, P-30). 500 nl of virus was injected at a rate of 60 nl/min. After the virus was delivered, the glass capillary was left in place for another 5 min to allow for diffusion of the virus away from the needle tract and was then slowly withdrawn. The mice recovered in a warm cage after suturing of the incision and then returned to their home cages. After 3–4 weeks of recovery, mice were subjected to the experiments at 2 months old. For Shh deletion experiments, either AAV-hSyn-mCherry (Addgene, 114472-AAV5) or AAV-hSyn-Cre-P2A-dTomato (Addgene, 107738-AAV5) were injected at a titer of 3.0 × 1011 GC/ml. For chemogenetic activation of mossy cell experiments, either AAV-hSyn-DIO-mCherry (Addgene, 50459-AAV8) or AAV-hSyn-DIO-hM3D(Gq)-mCherry (Addgene, 44361-AAV8) were injected at a titer of 4.0 × 1012 GC/ml.

Seizure induction by KA administration

Seizure induction was performed by consecutive intraperitoneal injection of low-dose KA (Enzo Life Sciences, dissolved in saline (0.9% NaCl)) in 2-month-old male mice. Mice received KA initially at a dose of 5 mg/kg. Then 20 min after initial injection, the mice consecutively received 2.5 mg/kg KA injection every 20 min until an initial Racine stage 4/5 seizure was observed, which are defined as rearing with forelimb clonus (stage 4); rearing and falling with forelimb clonus (generalized motor convulsions, stage 5) (Racine, 1972). Mice that did not display stage 4/5 seizure after receiving total 30 mg/kg of KA were excluded from the experiments. Seizure induction and behavior measurement were performed blindly to the genotype. Mice receiving no KA treatment were used as naive mice controls.

Tamoxifen, BrdU, and clozapine administration

Tamoxifen (Sigma) was dissolved in corn oil with 10% of ethanol at 50 mg/ml. Gli1CreER/+;RosaAI14 mice were orally administered 5 mg of tamoxifen once a day for 3 days at 2 months old and analyzed 1 day after last tamoxifen injection. For analyzing neurogenesis by BrdU pulse labeling, mice were intraperitoneally injected with BrdU (Sigma) dissolved in saline at a dose of 50 mg/kg once a day for 5 days at 2 months old and analyzed 3 days after last BrdU injection. For long-term tracing of BrdU-labeled NSCs in the experiments for NSC persistence analysis, mice were provided 1 mg/ml of BrdU in the drinking water for 5 days at 2 or 9- to 10 months old and analyzed on the last day of BrdU administration (day 0), or 10 days or 4 weeks after BrdU administration. For induction of neuronal activity by DREADD-based chemogenetic tools, mice were administrated with clozapine (CLZ, Sigma) by intraperitoneal injection at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg once a day and by drinking water (0.1 mg/100 ml) for 6 days. CLZ drinking water was replaced every 2 days. In the experiments testing induction of neuronal activity by c-fos expression, mice were perfused at 1.5 hr after intraperitoneal injection of 0.1 mg/kg of CLZ. For the analysis of Shh-responding cells using Gli1nLacZ/+ mice in DREADD experiments, mice were given CLZ for 6 days and perfused on the last day of CLZ administration. To investigate neurogenesis in DREADD experiments, mice were given CLZ for 6 days, and starting on the second day of CLZ administration, mice were also given 50 mg/kg of BrdU by intraperitoneal injection once a day for 5 days and perfused 3 days after the last BrdU injection.

Tissue preparation

The mice were deeply anesthetized and perfused with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS, pH 7.2. Brains were dissected and postfixed with 4% PFA overnight at 4°C. For cryoprotection, fixed brains were stored in 30% sucrose in PBS at 4°C. The brain was embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound (Tissue Tek, Sakura Finetek, 25608-930) and frozen at −80°C for cryosectioning. Frozen brains were serially sectioned with Leica CM 1850 or 1950 (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) in the coronal plane at 16 μm thickness. Every 15th sections (each slice 240 μm apart from the next) were serially mounted on individual Colorfrost Plus Microscope Slides (Fisher Scientific) in order from anterior to posterior and preserved at −20°C until use.

LacZ staining

Animals for LacZ staining were perfused with PBS, and the dissected brains were postfixed with 2% PFA for 1.5 hr at 4°C. Cryosections were washed with PBS, and X-gal staining was developed at 37°C overnight in the staining solution (5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 5 mM K4Fe(CN)6, 5 mM EGTA(ethylene glycol-bis(β-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid), 0.01% deoxycholate, 0.02% NP40, 2 mM MgC12, and 1 mg/ml X-gal). Sections were postfixed with 10% formalin at room temperature overnight, followed by counterstain with nuclear-fast red (H-3403, Vector Laboratories) at room temperature for 10 min before proceeding for dehydration (70%, 95%, 100% ethanol, xylene twice) and coverslipping with Mount-Quick (Ted Pella).

Immunohistochemistry

Cryosections were washed with PBS and incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution (10% Lamb serum and 0.3% Triton X-100). The following primary antibodies were used in this study: rabbit anti-Sox2 (1:1000; Abcam, ab92494, RRID:AB_10585428); rat anti-Sox2 (1:1000; Invitrogen, 14-9811-82, RRID:AB_11219471); rabbit anti-DCX (1:1000; Abcam, ab18723, RRID:AB_732011); chicken anti-GFAP (1:1000; Millipore, AB5541, RRID:AB_177521); rat anti-RFP (1:1000, Chromotek, 5f8-100, RRID:AB_2336064); chicken anti-S100B (1:500, Synapyic Systems, 287 006, RRID:AB_2713986); rat anti-BrdU (1:500, Abcam, ab6326, RRID:AB_305426) and mouse anti-BrdU (1:100, BD Biosciences, 347580, RRID:AB_400326); rabbit anti-GluR2/3 (1:100, Millipore, AB1506, RRID:AB_177521), rabbit anti-GluR2/3 (1:500, Epitomics, 1905), mouse anti-c-fos (1:500; Novus Biologicals, NBP2-50037, AB_2665387), rabbit anti-c-fos (1:1000, Synapyic Systems, 226 003, AB_2231974), rabbit anti-c-fos (1:100, Synapyic Systems, 226 008, RRID:AB_2891278). For staining of Sox2 and thymidine analogs, sections were heated in 10 mM citric acid pH 6.0 on boiling water bath for 15 min prior to blocking. After three washes in PBS, sections were incubated for 2 hr with corresponding secondary antibodies; goat anti-rat IgG (H+L) Alexa Fluor 546 (Invitrogen, A-11081, RRID:AB_2534125), donkey anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) Alexa Fluor 546 (Invitrogen, A-10040, RRID:AB_2534016), goat anti-chicken IgY (H+L) Alexa Fluor 546 (Invitrogen, A-11040, RRID:AB_2534097), goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) Alexa Fluor 633 (Invitrogen, A-21070; RRID: AB_2535731), donkey anti-mouse IgG (H+L) Alexa Fluor 647 (Invitrogen, A-31571, RRID:AB_162542), donkey anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, A-21206,RRID:AB_2535792), and goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen, A-11008,RRID:AB_143165). Nucleus were stained by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, dihydrochloride (Thermo Fisher, D1306). After a final rinse with PBS, sections were mounted on glass slides with Prolong gold antifade reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, P36930).

Single mRNA detection by RNAscope

RNAscope in situ hybridization combined with immunofluorescence were performed using the RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent V2 Assay (Advanced Cell Diagnostics) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, sections were dehydrated by ethanol and then treated with preheated co-detection target retrieval reagent (Advanced Cell Diagnostics). Subsequently, sections were incubated with primary antibody for rabbit anti-GluR2/3 (1:100, Millipore, AB1506, RRID:AB_177521) overnight at 4°C and post-fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin. After three washes, the sections were treated with Protease Plus (Advanced Cell Diagnostics), and incubated with RNAscope probe for Shh, designed commercially by Advanced Cell Diagnostics (314361, RNAscope LS 2.5 Probe-Mm-Shh) for 2 hr at 40°C in HybEZ Oven (Advanced Cell Diagnostics). Detection of probe and antibody were performed using Tyramide Signal Amplification system with Opal 570 or 520 reagents (Akoya Biosciences, FP1488001KT and FP1487001KT). Expression of Shh in each mossy cell was evaluated by the number of Shh probe puncta in a GluR2/3-positive cell body. Shh mRNA signals in GluR2/3+ cells were counted in a series of sections spanning from anterior to posterior DG per mouse.

Cell counting

Images were acquired using a CSU-W1 spinning disk confocal microscope (Nikon) and Axioscan Z.1 (Carl Zeiss). NIH ImageJ (RRID:SCR_003070) was used for cell counting. Cell counting was performed in the DG of the hippocampus in a series of sections that were collected by serial mounting on 15 individual glass slides. Marker-positive cells in the indicated areas of the DG were counted in a series of sections on a single glass slide that contained DG at the same anatomical level between each group. The counts were then multiplied by the number of intervals between sections to estimate the total number of marker-positive cells in the DG. To quantify c-fos+ cell density in dentate hilus, c-fos+ cells were manually counted and normalized to the area size of hilus that are measured by ImageJ. For counting the total number of NSCs in the DG, radial NSCs were identified with a radial GFAP+ process extending from a Sox2+ nucleus in the subgranular zone of the DG. Persistence of NSC identity in each animal was calculated by dividing the total number of BrdU+ Sox2+ GFAP+ radial NSCs at 10 days or 4 weeks after BrdU administration by the total number of BrdU+ Sox2+ NSCs on the day of last BrdU administration (day 0) in the same group.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using either two-tailed unpaired t-test (for comparisons between two groups); one- or two-way analysis of variance with Tukey’s multiple comparison test (for multiple groups comparison) with Prism 9.0 software (GraphPad, RRID:SCR_002798). Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. Asterisks indicate significant differences (*<0.05; **<0.01, ***<0.001, ****<0.0001). No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample sizes. Sample sizes were based on previous studies using similar methods (Harris et al., 2021; Jessberger et al., 2007; Parent et al., 1997; Sierra et al., 2015; Yeh et al., 2018). Statistical analysis for specific experiments is shown in figure legends.

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the members of the S.J.P. lab for helpful discussions, in particular Dr. M Lun for technical help, suggestions, and helping to write this manuscript and T Huynh and J G Castillo for technical help. We thank Dr. Zachary Knight (University of California, San Francisco) for DREADD mice. This research was supported by NIH grant R01 NS118995 (S.J.P.), The Uehara Memorial Foundation (H.N.), JSPS Overseas Research Fellowships (H.N.). We also thank the Nikon Imaging Center at UCSF. Confocal microscopy with the CSU-W1 spinning disk was supported by the S10 Shared Instrumentation grant (1S10OD017993-01A1).

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Samuel Pleasure, Email: Samuel.Pleasure@ucsf.edu.

Joseph G Gleeson, University of California, San Diego, United States.

John R Huguenard, Stanford University School of Medicine, United States.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grant:

  • National Institutes of Health R01NS118995 to Samuel Pleasure.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Reviewing editor, eLife.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft.

Data curation, Investigation.

Data curation, Investigation.

Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Ethics

All animal experimentation in this study were approved by the IACUC committee at UCSF (protocols AN191848 and AN200243) and were performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health.

Additional files

MDAR checklist

Data availability

All data generated or analyses during this study are included in the manuscript or in uploaded excel data files.

References

  1. Ahn S, Joyner AL. Dynamic changes in the response of cells to positive hedgehog signaling during mouse limb patterning. Cell. 2004;118:505–516. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahn S, Joyner AL. In vivo analysis of quiescent adult neural stem cells responding to Sonic hedgehog. Nature. 2005;437:894–897. doi: 10.1038/nature03994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Antonelli F, Casciati A, Tanori M, Tanno B, Linares-Vidal MV, Serra N, Bellés M, Pannicelli A, Saran A, Pazzaglia S. Alterations in morphology and adult neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of Patched1 Heterozygous Mice. Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience. 2018;11:168. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Asrican B, Wooten J, Li YD, Quintanilla L, Zhang F, Wander C, Bao H, Yeh CY, Luo YJ, Olsen R, Lim SA, Hu J, Jin P, Song J. Neuropeptides modulate local astrocytes to regulate adult hippocampal neural stem cells. Neuron. 2020;108:349–366. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.07.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Azevedo EP, Pomeranz L, Cheng J, Schneeberger M, Vaughan R, Stern SA, Tan B, Doerig K, Greengard P, Friedman JM. A Role of Drd2 Hippocampal Neurons in Context-Dependent Food Intake. Neuron. 2019;102:873–886. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bai CB, Auerbach W, Lee JS, Stephen D, Joyner AL. Gli2, but not Gli1, is required for initial Shh signaling and ectopic activation of the Shh pathway. Development. 2002;129:4753–4761. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.20.4753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bao H, Asrican B, Li W, Gu B, Wen Z, Lim SA, Haniff I, Ramakrishnan C, Deisseroth K, Philpot B, Song J. Long-range GABAergic inputs regulate neural stem cell quiescence and control adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;21:604–617. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2017.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berg DA, Su Y, Jimenez-Cyrus D, Patel A, Huang N, Morizet D, Lee S, Shah R, Ringeling FR, Jain R, Epstein JA, Wu QF, Canzar S, Ming GL, Song H, Bond AM. A common embryonic origin of stem cells drives developmental and adult neurogenesis. Cell. 2019;177:654–668. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beug ST, Parks RJ, McBride HM, Wallace VA. Processing-dependent trafficking of Sonic hedgehog to the regulated secretory pathway in neurons. Molecular and Cellular Neurosciences. 2011;46:583–596. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2010.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bonafina A, Paratcha G, Ledda F. Deciphering new players in the neurogenic adult hippocampal niche. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2020;8:548. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bonaguidi MA, Wheeler MA, Shapiro JS, Stadel RP, Sun GJ, Ming G, Song H. In vivo clonal analysis reveals self-renewing and multipotent adult neural stem cell characteristics. Cell. 2011;145:1142–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.05.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Botterill JJ, Gerencer KJ, Vinod KY, Alcantara-Gonzalez D, Scharfman HE. Dorsal and ventral mossy cells differ in their axonal projections throughout the dentate gyrus of the mouse hippocampus. Hippocampus. 2021;31:522–539. doi: 10.1002/hipo.23314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bottes S, Jaeger BN, Pilz G-A, Jörg DJ, Cole JD, Kruse M, Harris L, Korobeynyk VI, Mallona I, Helmchen F, Guillemot F, Simons BD, Jessberger S. Long-term self-renewing stem cells in the adult mouse hippocampus identified by intravital imaging. Nature Neuroscience. 2021;24:225–233. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00759-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chancey JH, Poulsen DJ, Wadiche JI, Overstreet-Wadiche L. Hilar mossy cells provide the first glutamatergic synapses to adult-born dentate granule cells. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2014;34:2349–2354. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3620-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cho KO, Lybrand ZR, Ito N, Brulet R, Tafacory F, Zhang L, Good L, Ure K, Kernie SG, Birnbaum SG, Scharfman HE, Eisch AJ, Hsieh J. Aberrant hippocampal neurogenesis contributes to epilepsy and associated cognitive decline. Nature Communications. 2015;6:6606. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cho J, Ryu S, Lee S, Kim J, Kim HI. Optimizing clozapine for chemogenetic neuromodulation of somatosensory cortex. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:6001. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62923-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Choe Y, Pleasure SJ. Wnt signaling regulates intermediate precursor production in the postnatal dentate gyrus by regulating Cxcr4 expression. Developmental Neuroscience. 2013;34:502–514. doi: 10.1159/000345353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Daynac M, Tirou L, Faure H, Mouthon MA, Gauthier LR, Hahn H, Boussin FD, Ruat M. Hedgehog controls quiescence and activation of neural stem cells in the adult ventricular-subventricular zone. Stem Cell Reports. 2016;7:735–748. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Deng W, Aimone JB, Gage FH. New neurons and new memories: how does adult hippocampal neurogenesis affect learning and memory? Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 2010;11:339–350. doi: 10.1038/nrn2822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Encinas JM, Michurina TV, Peunova N, Park JH, Tordo J, Peterson DA, Fishell G, Koulakov A, Enikolopov G. Division-coupled astrocytic differentiation and age-related depletion of neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;8:566–579. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2011.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fang M, Lu Y, Chen GJ, Shen L, Pan YM, Wang XF. Increased expression of Sonic hedgehog in temporal lobe epileptic foci in humans and experimental rats. Neuroscience. 2011;182:62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.02.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Feng S, Ma S, Jia C, Su Y, Yang S, Zhou K, Liu Y, Cheng J, Lu D, Fan L, Wang Y. Sonic hedgehog is a regulator of extracellular glutamate levels and epilepsy. EMBO Reports. 2016;17:682–694. doi: 10.15252/embr.201541569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fu CH, Iascone DM, Petrof I, Hazra A, Zhang X, Pyfer MS, Tosi U, Corbett BF, Cai J, Lee J, Park J, Iacovitti L, Scharfman HE, Enikolopov G, Chin J. Early seizure activity accelerates depletion of hippocampal neural stem cells and impairs spatial discrimination in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Cell Reports. 2019;27:3741–3751. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gomez JL, Bonaventura J, Lesniak W, Mathews WB, Sysa-Shah P, Rodriguez LA, Ellis RJ, Richie CT, Harvey BK, Dannals RF, Pomper MG, Bonci A, Michaelides M. Chemogenetics revealed: DREADD occupancy and activation via converted clozapine. Science. 2017;357:503–507. doi: 10.1126/science.aan2475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Harfe BD, Scherz PJ, Nissim S, Tian H, McMahon AP, Tabin CJ. Evidence for an expansion-based temporal Shh gradient in specifying vertebrate digit identities. Cell. 2004;118:517–528. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Harris L, Rigo P, Stiehl T, Gaber ZB, Austin SHL, Masdeu MDM, Edwards A, Urbán N, Marciniak-Czochra A, Guillemot F. Coordinated changes in cellular behavior ensure the lifelong maintenance of the hippocampal stem cell population. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28:863–876. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2021.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Houser CR, Peng Z, Wei X, Huang CS, Mody I. Mossy cells in the dorsal and ventral dentate gyrus differ in their patterns of axonal projections. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2021;41:991–1004. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2455-20.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ihrie RA, Shah JK, Harwell CC, Levine JH, Guinto CD, Lezameta M, Kriegstein AR, Alvarez-Buylla A. Persistent sonic hedgehog signaling in adult brain determines neural stem cell positional identity. Neuron. 2011;71:250–262. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Imayoshi I, Sakamoto M, Ohtsuka T, Takao K, Miyakawa T, Yamaguchi M, Mori K, Ikeda T, Itohara S, Kageyama R. Roles of continuous neurogenesis in the structural and functional integrity of the adult forebrain. Nature Neuroscience. 2008;11:1153–1161. doi: 10.1038/nn.2185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jessberger S, Zhao C, Toni N, Clemenson GD, Li Y, Gage FH. Seizure-associated, aberrant neurogenesis in adult rats characterized with retrovirus-mediated cell labeling. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2007;27:9400–9407. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2002-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jessberger S, Parent JM. Epilepsy and adult neurogenesis. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2015;7:a020677. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jinde S, Zsiros V, Jiang Z, Nakao K, Pickel J, Kohno K, Belforte JE, Nakazawa K. Hilar mossy cell degeneration causes transient dentate granule cell hyperexcitability and impaired pattern separation. Neuron. 2012;76:1189–1200. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kempermann G. The neurogenic reserve hypothesis: what is adult hippocampal neurogenesis good for? Trends in Neurosciences. 2008;31:163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2008.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kempermann G. Environmental enrichment, new neurons and the neurobiology of individuality. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 2019;20:235–245. doi: 10.1038/s41583-019-0120-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Lai K, Kaspar BK, Gage FH, Schaffer DV. Sonic hedgehog regulates adult neural progenitor proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Nature Neuroscience. 2003;6:21–27. doi: 10.1038/nn983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lee J, Platt KA, Censullo P, Ruiz i Altaba A. Gli1 is a target of Sonic hedgehog that induces ventral neural tube development. Development. 1997;124:2537–2552. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.13.2537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Li G, Fang L, Fernández G, Pleasure SJ. The ventral hippocampus is the embryonic origin for adult neural stem cells in the dentate gyrus. Neuron. 2013;78:658–672. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Li Y, Guo W. Neural stem cell niche and adult neurogenesis. The Neuroscientist. 2021;27:235–245. doi: 10.1177/1073858420939034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lugert S, Basak O, Knuckles P, Haussler U, Fabel K, Götz M, Haas CA, Kempermann G, Taylor V, Giachino C. Quiescent and active hippocampal neural stem cells with distinct morphologies respond selectively to physiological and pathological stimuli and aging. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;6:445–456. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lybrand ZR, Goswami S, Zhu J, Jarzabek V, Merlock N, Aktar M, Smith C, Zhang L, Varma P, Cho KO, Ge S, Hsieh J. A critical period of neuronal activity results in aberrant neurogenesis rewiring hippocampal circuitry in a mouse model of epilepsy. Nature Communications. 2021;12:1423. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21649-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. MacLaren DAA, Browne RW, Shaw JK, Krishnan Radhakrishnan S, Khare P, España RA, Clark SD. Clozapine N-Oxide administration produces behavioral effects in long-evans rats: implications for designing DREADD experiments. eNeuro. 2016;3:ENEURO.0219-16.2016. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0219-16.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Madisen L, Zwingman TA, Sunkin SM, Oh SW, Zariwala HA, Gu H, Ng LL, Palmiter RD, Hawrylycz MJ, Jones AR, Lein ES, Zeng H. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nature Neuroscience. 2010;13:133–140. doi: 10.1038/nn.2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Madsen TM, Newton SS, Eaton ME, Russell DS, Duman RS. Chronic electroconvulsive seizure up-regulates beta-catenin expression in rat hippocampus: role in adult neurogenesis. Biological Psychiatry. 2003;54:1006–1014. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00700-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mardones MD, Gupta K. Transcriptome profiling of the Hippocampal seizure network implicates a role for wnt signaling during epileptogenesis in a mouse model of temporal lobe epilepsy. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23:12030. doi: 10.3390/ijms231912030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ming G-L, Song H. Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian brain: significant answers and significant questions. Neuron. 2011;70:687–702. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Morales AV, Mira H. Adult neural stem cells: born to last. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 2019;7:96. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Moreno-Jiménez EP, Flor-García M, Terreros-Roncal J, Rábano A, Cafini F, Pallas-Bazarra N, Ávila J, Llorens-Martín M. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is abundant in neurologically healthy subjects and drops sharply in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Nature Medicine. 2019;25:554–560. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0375-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Parent JM, Yu TW, Leibowitz RT, Geschwind DH, Sloviter RS, Lowenstein DH. Dentate granule cell neurogenesis is increased by seizures and contributes to aberrant network reorganization in the adult rat hippocampus. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1997;17:3727–3738. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-10-03727.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Peng J, Fabre PJ, Dolique T, Swikert SM, Kermasson L, Shimogori T, Charron F. Sonic hedgehog is a remotely produced cue that controls axon guidance trans-axonally at a midline choice point. Neuron. 2018;97:326–340. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.12.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Pitter KL, Tamagno I, Feng X, Ghosal K, Amankulor N, Holland EC, Hambardzumyan D. The SHH/Gli pathway is reactivated in reactive glia and drives proliferation in response to neurodegeneration-induced lesions. Glia. 2014;62:1595–1607. doi: 10.1002/glia.22702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Qu Z, Su F, Qi X, Sun J, Wang H, Qiao Z, Zhao H, Zhu Y. Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway mediated aberrant hippocampal neurogenesis in kainic acid-induced epilepsy. Cell Biochemistry and Function. 2017;35:472–476. doi: 10.1002/cbf.3306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Racine RJ. Modification of seizure activity by electrical stimulation. II. Motor seizure. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1972;32:281–294. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(72)90177-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Saade M, Gonzalez-Gobartt E, Escalona R, Usieto S, Martí E. Shh-mediated centrosomal recruitment of PKA promotes symmetric proliferative neuroepithelial cell division. Nature Cell Biology. 2017;19:493–503. doi: 10.1038/ncb3512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Salta E, Lazarov O, Fitzsimons CP, Tanzi R, Lucassen PJ, Choi SH. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis in Alzheimer’s disease: A roadmap to clinical relevance. Cell Stem Cell. 2023;30:120–136. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2023.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Scharfman HE. Dentate hilar cells with dendrites in the molecular layer have lower thresholds for synaptic activation by perforant path than granule cells. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1991;11:1660–1673. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-06-01660.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Scharfman HE. The enigmatic mossy cell of the dentate gyrus. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 2016;17:562–575. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Sciolino NR, Plummer NW, Chen YW, Alexander GM, Robertson SD, Dudek SM, McElligott ZA, Jensen P. Recombinase-dependent mouse lines for chemogenetic activation of genetically defined cell types. Cell Reports. 2016;15:2563–2573. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Sierra A, Martín-Suárez S, Valcárcel-Martín R, Pascual-Brazo J, Aelvoet SA, Abiega O, Deudero JJ, Brewster AL, Bernales I, Anderson AE, Baekelandt V, Maletić-Savatić M, Encinas JM. Neuronal hyperactivity accelerates depletion of neural stem cells and impairs hippocampal neurogenesis. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;16:488–503. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sloviter RS, Zappone CA, Harvey BD, Bumanglag AV, Bender RA, Frotscher M. “Dormant basket cell” hypothesis revisited: relative vulnerabilities of dentate gyrus mossy cells and inhibitory interneurons after hippocampal status epilepticus in the rat. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2003;459:44–76. doi: 10.1002/cne.10630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Song J, Zhong C, Bonaguidi MA, Sun GJ, Hsu D, Gu Y, Meletis K, Huang ZJ, Ge S, Enikolopov G, Deisseroth K, Luscher B, Christian KM, Ming G, Song H. Neuronal circuitry mechanism regulating adult quiescent neural stem-cell fate decision. Nature. 2012;489:150–154. doi: 10.1038/nature11306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Song J, Sun J, Moss J, Wen Z, Sun GJ, Hsu D, Zhong C, Davoudi H, Christian KM, Toni N, Ming G-L, Song H. Parvalbumin interneurons mediate neuronal circuitry-neurogenesis coupling in the adult hippocampus. Nature Neuroscience. 2013;16:1728–1730. doi: 10.1038/nn.3572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Song J, Olsen RHJ, Sun J, Ming G-L, Song H. Neuronal circuitry mechanisms regulating adult mammalian neurogenesis. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2016;8:a018937. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Su Y, Yuan Y, Feng S, Ma S, Wang Y. High frequency stimulation induces sonic hedgehog release from hippocampal neurons. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:43865. doi: 10.1038/srep43865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Sun Y, Grieco SF, Holmes TC, Xu X. Local and long-range circuit connections to hilar mossy cells in the dentate gyrus. Eneuro. 2017;4:ENEURO. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0097-17.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Tobin MK, Musaraca K, Disouky A, Shetti A, Bheri A, Honer WG, Kim N, Dawe RJ, Bennett DA, Arfanakis K, Lazarov O. Human hippocampal neurogenesis persists in aged adults and alzheimer’s disease patients. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;24:974–982. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2019.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Urbán N, Blomfield IM, Guillemot F. Quiescence of adult mammalian neural stem cells: a highly regulated rest. Neuron. 2019;104:834–848. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. van Praag H, Christie BR, Sejnowski TJ, Gage FH. Running enhances neurogenesis, learning, and long-term potentiation in mice. PNAS. 1999a;96:13427–13431. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.23.13427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. van Praag H, Kempermann G, Gage FH. Running increases cell proliferation and neurogenesis in the adult mouse dentate gyrus. Nature Neuroscience. 1999b;2:266–270. doi: 10.1038/6368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wang KY, Wu JW, Cheng JK, Chen CC, Wong WY, Averkin RG, Tamás G, Nakazawa K, Lien CC. Elevation of hilar mossy cell activity suppresses hippocampal excitability and avoidance behavior. Cell Reports. 2021;36:109702. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Yeh CY, Asrican B, Moss J, Quintanilla LJ, He T, Mao X, Cassé F, Gebara E, Bao H, Lu W, Toni N, Song J. Mossy cells control adult neural stem cell quiescence and maintenance through a dynamic balance between direct and indirect pathways. Neuron. 2018;99:493–510. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang Z, Shen L, Law K, Zhang Z, Liu X, Hua H, Li S, Huang H, Yue S, Hui C-C, Cheng SY. Suppressor of fused chaperones gli proteins to generate transcriptional responses to sonic hedgehog signaling. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2017;37:e00421-16. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00421-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife assessment

Joseph G Gleeson 1

This study uses specific and robust genetic approaches to assess mechanisms of kainic acid-induced neurogenesis. This is a fundamental study that bridges several complementary methods and is a convincing use of existing approaches to explore roles for sonic hedgehog in activity-dependent and aging-associated hippocampal neurogenesis.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Anonymous

Summary: Seizure stimuli has long been recognized to exhibit potent effects on adult neurogenesis, from depletion of the NSC pool to promoting aberrant migration of adult-born neurons. However, the identity and source of extrinsic signals is still incompletely understood. The work by Noguchi et al., demonstrates that Shh from mossy cells is a major source of Shh signaling after KA-mediated acute seizures. This work is interesting because mossy cells undergo hyperactivation during seizures, so this study provides a mechanistic link between mossy cell neuronal activity control of neurogenesis through Shh signaling. Weaknesses are that only male mice were analyzed in the seizure induction experiments and several control groups are missing for seizure induction, tamoxifen induction, and the DREADD experiment.

Strengths:

1. The study uses rigorous and specific genetic approaches (e.g., GliLacZ/+ mice; ShhEGFP-Cre/+ mice; mossy cell selective conditional Shh knockout using Crlr-Cre mice) to demonstrate Shh signaling is activated by seizures in mossy cells and contributes to aberrant neurogenesis.

2. Use of DREADDs (Crlr-Cre; hM3Dq) to show mossy cells control adult neurogenesis through Shh in an activity-dependent manner.

3. Demonstration that Shh deletion in mossy cells leads to reduction of the NSC pool uses stringent methods and analysis, including BrdU pulse-chase and co-labeling with NSC markers.

Weaknesses:

1. The analysis of Shh deletion in mossy cells and influences of aging related NSC pool decline is not well connected with the rest of the study on the expression/requirement of Shh in mossy cells to regulate seizure-induced neurogenesis. To promote cohesion, the authors should examine/discuss what happens to mossy cells during aging - it is similar or different to what happens to mossy cell neuronal activity during seizures?

2. Only male mice were analyzed in the seizure induction experiments, leaving open the possibility of sex differences since previous reports suggest sex differences in adult neurogenesis.

3. Several control groups are missing:

-For seizure induction: missing vehicle (instead of no KA treatment).

-For TAM induction: missing corn oil only to check leakiness and specificity of transgene.

-For DREADD experiment: missing vehicle (to control for hM3 non-specific effects)

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Anonymous

Summary:

The mechanisms by which seizures induce neurogenesis has remained unclear. Prior work from the authors demonstrated Mossy cell expressed Shh, that altered Shh expression follows epileptic seizures, and that Shh is a neural mitogen. Here authors show that Shh from mossy cells, which are well positioned between the pyramidal and granule cell layers, are a major source of signaling after seizures, contributing to seizure-induced neurogenesis. Moreover, they find that Mossy cell-sourced Shh is required for self-renewal of NSCs even outside of the context of seizures.

SVZ Gli1 expression was detected in NSCs and Gli1 reporter activity follows kainate-induced seizures. Heterozygous Shh mice show reduced seizure induced Shh signaling and reduced neurogenesis. After localizing Shh production to Mossy cells, authors removed Shh from Mossy cells and found reduced neurogenesis. By activating mossy cells through chemogenetic DREADD, they found that the effect of mossy cells on SVZ neurogenesis is activity-dependent, that Shh signaling activity is upregulated in NSCs by mossy cell neuronal activity, and that the induction of neurogenesis by mossy cell neuronal activity is compromised in the absence of Shh from mossy cells. In a series of experiments incorporating AAV DREADD, they find that mossy cell activity can contribute to neurogenesis in contralateral DG, and that seizure induced Shh may be transported along mossy axons. To examine long-term effects, they study mice several weeks after seizure, and find that suggesting that NSCs are less likely to return to their stem cell state after seizure-induced proliferation in the absence of Shh from mossy cells, and that Shh from mossy cells contributes to persistence of the NSC state during aging.

Strengths:

The results are compelling and impactful, and the study is extremely well done. The various genetic lines in the study ensure robust results. Adequate consideration of statistics, methods of quantification, and avoidance of artifact is given.

Weaknesses:

None identified.

eLife. 2023 Dec 11;12:RP91263. doi: 10.7554/eLife.91263.2.sa3

Author Response

Hirofumi Noguchi 1, Jessica Chelsea Arela 2, Thomas Ngo 3, Laura Cocas 4, Samuel Pleasure 5

1. The analysis of Shh deletion in mossy cells and influences of aging related NSC pool decline is not well connected with the rest of the study on the expression/requirement of Shh in mossy cells to regulate seizure-induced neurogenesis. To promote cohesion, the authors should examine/discuss what happens to mossy cells during aging - it is similar or different to what happens to mossy cell neuronal activity during seizures?

We believe that both are similar mechanisms. Seizure induced neurogenesis increases NSC proliferation, which increases demand of Shh to increase self-renewal. Similarly, we assume that increased NSC decline in Shh cKO mice is due to the increased demand of Shh for self-renewal of NSC with aging. It has been shown that NSCs in young mice generally don’t self-renew and instead are consumed after one or two rounds of cell division. On the other hand, NSCs in old mice are known to undergo more rounds of cell division compared with younger mice. This suggests that NSCs may be more dependent on signals driving self-renewal in aged-mice. Our suggestion is that Shh from mossy cells contributes to minimising the NSC pool decline with aging, and therefore loss of Shh from mossy cells results in increased decline of the NSC pool in aged-Shh cKO mice. This aligns with our hypothesis that Shh from mossy cells contributes to maintenance of the NSC pool.

What is the exact mechanism regulating the shift of proliferation capacity of NSC with aging remains unclear and would be an interesting topic for future studies. In addition, whether mossy cell neuronal activity is decreased with age or Shh release/expression is compromised in aged animals remains to be elucidated. Considering these factors together, the brain region(s) and other factors that regulate neuronal activity of mossy cell thereby controlling Shh release and how these are dysregulated in pathological conditions and in aging will be important studies for future research.

1. Only male mice were analyzed in the seizure induction experiments, leaving open the possibility of sex differences since previous reports suggest sex differences in adult neurogenesis.

Seizure induced neurogenesis was observed in both male and female mice. Considering that, we assumed that mossy cell derived Shh regulates seizure induced neurogenesis also in female mice. However, we agree with the reviewers’ comments. We can not exclude the possibility that female mice reacts to KA or seizures differently from male mice, or that Shh from mossy cells might have distinct effects in female mice in that paradigm. It is also an interesting possibility that female specific behaviors may affect mossy cell activation and also regulate neurogenesis though Shh. Because these are large and unresolved questions, we elected to leave potential sex difference in mossy cell regulated neurogenesis for future research.

1. Several control groups are missing:

-For seizure induction: missing vehicle (instead of no KA treatment).

-For TAM induction: missing corn oil only to check leakiness and specificity of transgene.

-For DREADD experiment: missing vehicle (to control for hM3 non-specific effects)

About missing vehicles in KA treatments, we used saline (0.9% NaCl) as a vehicle for Kainic acid, which is commonly used as a vehicle for water soluable reagents in adult neurogenesis experiments. In addition, the average volume of KA solution that mice received intrapenitorially for seizure induction was less than 500ul, which is less than recommended maximum volume in NIH and UCSF. We have not tested if the saline injection makes a difference in our experiments but based on previous reports using saline, we believe that saline would not affect our experimental results.

About Tamoxifen injections, the Gli1-CreER mice have been widely used for fate tracing analysis including in our previous research where Gli1-CreER mice have shown specific recombination in Gli1-expressing NSCs. Our results in this study have shown consistently that Gli1-CreER;;Ai14 mice label NSCs in the dentate gyrus. Given this, we believe that our result using Gli1-CreER line are not affected by non-specific recombination without tamoxifen.

About Clozapine (CZL) injection, we decided to administer CLZ in both control and DREADD animals considering the possible side-effects of CLZ. We agree with the reviewer that our experiment cannot exclude the possibility that expression of hM3Dq affects neurogenesis without CLZ or CNO. However, although we have not included the analysis using saline as a control in our experiments, we have tested that both transgenic and virus-injected mice DREADD expressing mice respond to CLZ and activate neuronal activity of mossy cells compared with control animals. Therefore, we believe that it does not affect the interpretation of our data that mossy cell neuronal activity controls neurogenesis.

We appreciate reviewers' carefully considered comments and we will apply suggested controls to our future research.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. Raw data for counts.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Raw data for counts.
    Figure 2—source data 1. Raw data for counts.
    Figure 3—source data 1. Raw data for counts.
    Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Raw data for counts.
    Figure 4—source data 1. Raw data for counts.
    Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Raw data for counts.
    Figure 4—figure supplement 3—source data 1. Raw data for counts.
    Figure 5—source data 1. Raw data for counts.
    Figure 6—source data 1. Raw data for counts.
    Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Raw data for counts.
    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    All data generated or analyses during this study are included in the manuscript or in uploaded excel data files.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES