Skip to main content
Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling logoLink to Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling
. 2023 Nov 29;17(4):1181–1202. doi: 10.1007/s12079-023-00789-0

miRNAs as short non-coding RNAs in regulating doxorubicin resistance

Sepideh Mirzaei 1,2, Mahshid Deldar Abad Paskeh 2,3, Farhad Adhami Moghadam 4, Maliheh Entezari 2,3, Zeinab Khazaei Koohpar 5, Elahe Sadat Hejazi 2, Shamin Rezaei 2, Amirabbas kakavand 2, Maryam Aboutalebi 2, Mohammad Arad Zandieh 6, Romina Rajabi 7, Shokooh Salimimoghadam 8, Afshin Taheriazam 2,9,, Mehrdad Hashemi 2,3,, Saeed Samarghandian 10,
PMCID: PMC10713513  PMID: 38019354

Abstract

The treatment of cancer patients has been prohibited by chemoresistance. Doxorubicin (DOX) is an anti-tumor compound disrupting proliferation and triggering cell cycle arrest via inhibiting activity of topoisomerase I and II. miRNAs are endogenous RNAs localized in cytoplasm to reduce gene level. Abnormal expression of miRNAs changes DOX cytotoxicity. Overexpression of tumor-promoting miRNAs induces DOX resistance, while tumor-suppressor miRNAs inhibit DOX resistance. The miRNA-mediated regulation of cell death and hallmarks of cancer can affect response to DOX chemotherapy in tumor cells. The transporters such as P-glycoprotein are regulated by miRNAs in DOX chemotherapy. Upstream mediators including lncRNAs and circRNAs target miRNAs in affecting capacity of DOX. The response to DOX chemotherapy can be facilitated after administration of agents that are mostly phytochemicals including curcumol, honokiol and ursolic acid. These agents can regulate miRNA expression increasing DOX’s cytotoxicity. Since delivery of DOX alone or in combination with other drugs and genes can cause synergistic impact, the nanoparticles have been introduced for drug sensitivity.

Graphical abstract

The non-coding RNAs determine the response of tumor cells to doxorubicin chemotherapy. microRNAs play a key role in this case and they can be sponged by lncRNAs and circRNAs, showing interaction among non-coding RNAs in the regulation of doxorubicin sensitivity.graphic file with name 12079_2023_789_Figa_HTML.jpg

Keywords: Doxorubicin, MicroRNA, Non-coding RNA, Chemoresistance, Cancer chemotherapy

Introduction

As an anthracycline antidiabetic, doxorubicin (DOX) is widely employed in the therapy of cancer (Meredith and Dass 2016; Tran et al. 2021; Sohail et al. 2021). DOX is derived from Streptomyces peucetius species and owing to its pleiotropic function, it is deployed for treatment of various cancers (Minotti et al. 2004; Keizer et al. 1990). Based on the studies, DOX application in therapy of various tumors such as breast cancer (Batist et al. 2002), lung cancer (Farago et al. 2019), acute leukemia (Ruggiero et al. 2013), childhood solid tumors (Marina et al. 2002), lymphoma (Guo et al. 2011), and soft tissue sarcomas (Carvalho et al. 2009). One of the most important drawbacks of DOX is its non-selectivity and affecting normal cells. The optimal doses of DOX in treatment of cancer patients should be deployed to prevent unexpected effects after chemotherapy (Mirzaei et al. 2023). The reason for toxicity of DOX on normal cells is related to increasing ROS levels and mediating mitochondrial damage. However, adverse impacts on organs and tissues are not the only problem faced in DOX chemotherapy. It has been shown that tumor cells have capacity of developing DOX resistance upon frequent application of this anti-cancer agent (Lovitt et al. 2018; Kang et al. 2017; Wen et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2021a).

Upon intravenous injection, DOX demonstrates multiphasic deposition in various organs of body. After that, DOX undergoes a triphasic plasma clearance (Tacar et al. 2013). The distribution half-life of DOX is suggested to be 3–5 min, demonstrating that DOX undergoes rapid absorption by the cells. The terminal half-life of DOX is suggested to be 24–36 h and it demonstrates that elimination of DOX from body takes longer than its uptake by cells (Zheng et al. 2006). DNA-associated enzymes including topoisomerase I and II are suppressed by DOX through DNA intercalation. At the next step, DOX evokes cell cycle arrest, suppresses proliferation and mediates DNA damage (Tacar et al. 2013; Hilmer et al. 2004; Buchholz et al. 2002). After DNA damage, tumor cells try to repair it and if they fail, apoptosis occurs. Furthermore, anti-proliferative activity of DOX is related to suppressing at G1 and G2 phases. Plus to inhibiting activities of topoisomerase I and II, DOX itself binds to DNA and by inhibiting DNA and RNA polymerases, it prevents DNA replication and RNA transcription (Tacar et al. 2013).

Tumor cells switch among various signaling networks in increasing their progression and inducing resistance to therapy (Hong et al. 2019; Gao et al. 2020a). Overexpression of STAT5a evokes DOX resistance in breast tumor cells through ABCB1 upregulation (Li et al. 2021a). The differentiation rate of neuroblastoma cells undergoes a significant decrease by Wnt signaling inhibition and after that, DOX sensitivity is obtained (Suebsoonthron et al. 2017). A combination of STAT3, β-catenin and Notch-1 signaling participates in mediating DOX resistance. siRNA reducing expression of STAT3, β-catenin and Notch-1 enhances DOX sensitivity (Alshaer et al. 2019). TMEPAI undergoes activation by TGF-β to elevate activity of drug transporters and to evoke EMT in DOX resistance (Wardhani et al. 2021). A combination of apigenin and DOX increases PTEN expression and inhibits PI3K/Akt in facilitating DOX sensitivity of prostate tumor (Ayyildiz et al. 2021). Curcumin-mediated P-gp suppression also promotes DOX sensitivity (Zhang et al. 2021a). Overexpression of P-gp leads to DOX resistance and its inhibition by therapeutics is recommended such as nanostructures (Mirzaei et al. 2022). The dysregulation of miRNAs also contributes to the DOX resistance (Zangouei et al. 2021). The current review provides an analysis of miRNA function in regulation of DOX resistance in different human cancers. After discussing the biogenesis of miRNAs and their function in cancer progression, this review specifically describes the role of miRNAs in modulation cancer proliferation and metastasis to relate them with response to DOX chemotherapy. Moreover, two distinct categories of miRNAs including tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressor miRNAs in induction and inhibition of DOX resistance, respectivey are discussed. Then, the regulation of miRNAs by other nan-coding RNA molecules is brought into attention. The impact of anti-cancer compounds such as ursolic acid and honokiol in regulation of DOX response and miRNAs is discussed. Finally, the delivery of DOX by nanocarriers and also, providing synergistic cancer therapy by delivery of genes or other drugs in overcoming chemoresistance or combination therapy is discussed.

miRNAs: biogenesis and carcinogenesis regulation

Biogenesis

The ncRNAs are evolutionary conserved RNA molecules that are not transcribed into proteins and they could control multiple biological events (Indrieri et al. 2020; Kalfert et al. 2020; Li et al. 2021b). miRNAs are endogenous short non-coding RNA molecules that their length is at the range of 18–22 nucleotides. The gene expression regulation is performed by miRNAs and most of them are involved in reducing expression level of target gene. This activity is mediated by binding to special regions in messenger RNA (mRNA) known as 3′-UTR to prevent translation or mediate degradation (Manvati et al. 2020; Korać et al. 2021; Zanoaga et al. 2021). The biogenesis of miRNAs is a multistep process occurring in both nucleus and cytoplasm. The mature and functional miRNAs capable of regulating gene expression are finally produced in cytoplasm. The RNA polymerase I or II participate in generating primary miRNA (pri-miRNA) and then, DGCR8 starts its function in producing precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA) from pri-miRNA. Then, the condition is provided for transferring pre-miRNA into cytoplasm with the help of exportin-5-Ran-GTP complex to produce a mature miRNA, to load it into RISC and to generate a functional miRNA (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The biogenesis of miRNAs in cells. RNA polymerase I or II can mediate biogenesis of pri-miRNA in nucleus that undergoes further processing by DGCR8 to generate pre-miRNA. Then, exportin 5 transfers it into cytoplasm to produce mature miRNA and to load it into RISC complex

miRNAs in regulation of carcinogenesis

After the discovery of miRNAs and by advances in field of biology and next generation sequencing, miRNA’s role in diseases and cancer was evaluated (Zhang et al. 2021b; Li et al. 2021c; Tanaka et al. 2021; Xie et al. 2021). It has been shown that miRNA-200c-3p increases growth and invasion of gastric tumor by KLF6 suppression (Wang et al. 2021a). miRNA-199b-5p-induced EMT enhances metastasis by HHIP inhibition (Chen et al. 2021a). miRNA-34a-mediated ZEB1 downregulation impairs melanoma malignancy (Xu et al. 2021). The miRNAs packed in exosomes are diagnostic markers. miRNA-187 is found in exosomes derived from plasma of hepatocellular carcinoma patients and has a poor expression, while miRNA-509-3p demonstrates an increase in expression. miRNA-187 down-regulation and miRNA-509-3p overexpression mediate undesirable prognosis (Dai et al. 2021). Exosomal miRNA-4443 stimulates cisplatin resistance in lung tumor through ferroptosis inhibition (Song et al. 2021a). miRNA-149-3p-mediated cisplatin insensitivity in ovarian tumor is performed by TIMP2 and CDCN1A downregulation (Wang et al. 2021b). There are also upstream regulators of miRNAs in cancer. For instance, LINC00922 sponges miRNA-361-3p to mediate EMT (Lu et al. 2021a). CircNUP98 prevents maturation of miRNA-519a-3p and it is localized in both nucleus and cytoplasm. CircNUP98 reduces mice survival and increases tumor proliferation in glioblastoma (Lu et al. 2021a). There are also anti-cancer agents targeting miRNAs in tumor suppression. Curcumin-mediated miR-320a downregulation via circ-PLEKHM3 overexpression could impair proliferation and induce apoptosis in ovarian cancer (Sun and Fang 2021). These evidences reveal the importance of miRNAs in cancer therapy and their association with various signaling networks. They affect proliferation, invasion and therapy response. Plus to revealing the role of miRNAs in drug resistance, the detection methods for miRNAs have been also introduced (Hu et al. 2022).

Upstream regulators of miRNAs in doxorubicin chemotherapy

LncRNAs regulating miRNAs in doxorubicin chemotherapy

One of the subclasses of non-protein coding RNAs is lncRNAs that demonstrate size higher than 200 nts and control biological mechanisms such as proliferation, autophagy, apoptosis and differentiation (Hashemi et al. 2022). The transcription of lncRNAs is conducted by RNA polymerase II and they lack protein coding potential (Kanojia et al. 2022). The lncRNAs are categorized based on genomic locations and their function depends on the location in nucleus or cytoplasm (Shabna et al. 2023). The lncRNAs could for tumor diagnosis and they can modulate chemoresistance (Pandya et al. 2020). The gene expression at transcriptional, post-transcriptional and epigenetic levels is regulated by lncRNAs and abnormal expression of these RNA molecules leads to development of various cancers (Wu et al. 2018; Schmitt and Chang 2016). LncRNAs affect miRNA expression and reduce its expression via sponging. LINC01977-mediated miR-212-3p sponging promotes GOLM1 levels to induce DOX resistance (Li et al. 2021d). Notably, a certain lncRNA can participate in resistance to two chemotherapeutic agents. miRNA-217 overexpression impairs gastric tumor. HOTAIR downregulates miRNA-217 to increase growth and invasion of gastric tumor, leading to paclitaxel and DOX resistance (Wang et al. 2018). Silencing TUG1 promotes DOX sensitivity of breast cancer and causes apoptosis. LncRNA TUG1 induces DOX resistance in breast tumor via miRNA-9 disruption (Wang et al. 2020a). miRNA-200c-3p downregulates ANLN to increase DOX sensitivity. Silencing XIST stimulates proliferation inhibition and mediates apoptosis in breast cancer. LncRNA XIST sponges miRNA-200c-3p to overexpress ANLN in DOX resistance (Zhang et al. 2020a).

CircRNAs regulating miRNAs in doxorubicin chemotherapy

circRNAs are RNAs with a special structure that lack 5/caps and 3′ poly-A tails and they are involved in important biological mechanisms in cells (Guarnerio et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2019a). The dysregulation of circRNAs could causes pathologies, more evident in carcinogenesis (Yin et al. 2021; Wu et al. 2021; Shi et al. 2021a). CircRNAs are able to exert their function via regulating expression of miRNAs. CircCSPP1 promotes DOX resistance in colorectal cancer. Silencing circCSPP1 impairs progression of colorectal cancer and induces apoptosis. CircCSPP1 dpeletion mediates DOX sensitivity in colorectal cancer. Levels of circCSPP1 and FZD7 increases in colorectal cancer, while miRNA-944 as tumor-suppressor factor downs downregulation. CircCSPP1 decreases expression level of miRNA-944 to elevate FZD7 level, causing DOX resistance (Yi et al. 2021). Exposing cancer to DOX can increase expression level of circRNAs involved in drug resistance. Expression level of circRNA-0004674 increases in osteosarcoma cells upon exposure to DOX. It has been shown that DOX-mediated increase in circRNA-0004674 expression downregulates miRNA-142-5p to promote MCL1 expression, resulting in DOX resistance. Restoring miRNA-142-5p expression or silencing circRNA-0004674 can lead to DOX sensitivity in osteosarcoma (Ma et al. 2021). Such strategy has been used in a recent experiment. CircRNA VANGL1 accelerates tumorigenesis in bladder tumor. VANGL1 overexpression prevents apoptosis and induces DOX resistance in bladder cancer cells. VANGL1 sponges miRNA-145-5p to upregulate SOX4, resulting in DOX resistance in bladder cancer (Zhu and Zhang 2021). CircITCH conducts a tumor-suppressor function in osteosarcoma. Level of circITCH diminishes in osteosarcoma to cause DOX resistance. Restoring circITCH expression stimulates apoptosis in osteosarcoma and decreases growth and invasion. CircITCH sponges miRNA-524 to facilitate RASSF6 in DOX sensitivity (Zhou et al. 2021).

The exosomes can be considered as nanocarriers to deliver the cargo in disease therapy (Gorshkov et al. 2022; Rajput et al. 2022). The intracellular communication is provided by exosomes and they are absorbed by target cells to exert their function (Meldolesi 2018). Exosomes are able to transfer genetic materials among cells and circRNAs are among them (Shi et al. 2020). Exosomal circPRRX1 evokes DOX insensitivity in gastric cancer. Silencing circPRRX1 impairs gastric tumor in developing DOX insensitivity. Exosomal circPRRX1 sponges miRNA-3064-5p to facilitate PTPN14 levels, causing DOX resistance (Wang et al. 2020b).

miRNA-663 is a tumor-promoting factor in gastric cancer that reduces expression of FADD to prevent apoptosis and to mediate DOX resistance. It has been shown that miRNA-663 has binding sites for Foxo3a and Foxo3a reduces expression of miRNA-663 to promote FADD expression, resulting in an increase in DOX-mediated apoptosis in gastric cancer cells (Pang et al. 2019). Taking everything together, it appears that miRNAs are key players in DOX cytotoxicity on tumor cells and their regulation by other factors can complicate signaling networks involved in this process (Fig. 2) (Zhou et al. 2021; Zhou et al. 2018a; Wang et al. 2020b; Wang et al. 2021c; Pang et al. 2019; Zeng et al. 2020; Cao et al. 2021; Ji 2020). Table 1 provides a summary of miRNA regulation in DOX chemotherapy.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Regulation of miRNAs in chemotherapy. LncRNAs and circRNAs with other transcription factors such as Foxo3a can regulate miRNAs in DOX chemotherapy

Table 1.

The regulation of miRNAs by upstream mediators in DOX chemotherapy

miRNA Signaling network Cancer type Remarks References
LINC01977 miRNA-212-3p/GOLM1 Breast cancer

Overexpression of LINC01977 in breast tumor cells

Association with tumor progression and drug resistance

miRNA-212-3p down-regulation by LINC01977 to increase GOLM1 expression

Li et al. (2021d)
HOTAIR

miRNA-217/PTPN14

miRNA-217/GPC5

Gastric cancer

Induction of paclitaxel and DOX resistance in cancer cells

miRNA-217 inhibition by HOTAIR

Upregulation of PTPN14 and GPC5

Increasing tumor progression

Wang et al. (2018)
TBX15 miRNA-152/KIF2C Breast cancer

TBX15 promotes miRNA-152 expression to increase DOX sensitivity of tumor cells

Inhibition of autophagy and glycolysis

Reducing expression level of KIF2C

Jiang et al. (2021)
TUG1 miRNA-9-5p/eIF5A2 Breast cancer

miRNA-9-5p down-regulation by TUG1

Increasing expression level of eIF5A2 to mediate DOX resistance in cancer cells

Wang et al. (2020a)
XIST miRNA-200c-3p/ANLN Breast cancer

miRNA-200c-3p down-regulation by XIST leads to ANLN overexpression

Increasing progression of tumor cells and triggering DOX resistance

Zhang et al. (2020a)
CircCSPP1 miRNA-944/FZD7 Colorectal cancer CircCSPP1 promotes FZD7 expression to mediate miRNA-944 down-regulation, resulting in DOX resistance in cancer cells Yi et al. (2021)
CircRNA-0004674 miRNA-142-5p/MCL1 Osteosarcoma DOX treatment promotes expression level of circRNA-0004674 leads to upregulation of MCL1 via miRNA-142-5p inhibition Ma et al. (2021)
VANGL1 miRNA-145-5p/SOX4 Bladder cancer

VANGL1 promotes SOX4 expression via miRNA-145-5p sponging

Apoptosis inhibition

Increased proliferation and viability of tumor cells

Mediating DOX resistance

Zhu and Zhang (2021)

miRNA-mediated proliferation regulation and doxorubicin chemotherapy

miRNAs, PTEN, PI3K/Akt and IGF-1R

The capacity of cancer cells for abnormal growth causes a problem to decrease population. There is a close connection between proliferation rate and drug resistance. Growth disruption enhances chemosensitivity. In respect to the effect of miRNAs on biological mechanisms in cells that proliferation is one of them, miRNAs are capable of affecting chemotherapy response via regulating growth of tumor cells. PI3K/Akt is a tumor-promoting pathway that its induction causes growth and invasion acceleration. PTEN is upstream regulators of PI3K/Akt and diminishes formation of PI3K to interfere this pathway (Wise et al. 2017; Papa and Pandolfi 2019). miRNA-202-5p demonstrates high expression in breast tumor, while expression level of PTEN reduces. Restoring miRNA-202-5p expression induces DOX insensitivity and accelerates proliferation of breast cancer. Furthermore, miRNA-202-5p upregulation reduces apoptosis in breast tumor that is of interest for mediating drug resistance. Poor expression of miRNA-202-5p causes DOX sensitivity via growth inhibition and apoptosis induction. In vivo experiment revealed that miRNA-202-5p down-regulation reduces tumor volume. miRNA-202-5p down-regulates PTEN expression to induce PI3K/Akt in increasing proliferation rate of breast tumor and triggering DOX resistance (Liu et al. 2019a). miRNA-520b overexpression can facilitate DOX sensitivity of breast cancer. IGF-1R is involved in increasing carcinogenesis and mediating resistance to apoptosis. miRNA-520b suppresses IGF-1R expression to accelerate apoptosis and elevate DOX sensitivity of breast tumor (Zhang et al. 2021c).

Exosomal miRNAs

Exosomes belong to extracellular vesicles (EVs) and they contain lipid bilayer membranes (Liu et al. 2021). Exosomes are secreted into extracellular matrix and they can contain proteins, lipids and RNAs (Kowal et al. 2014; Sousa et al. 2015; Théry et al. 2002; Ashrafizadeh et al. 2022). In respect to their cargoes, exosomes can influence biological pathways including angiogenesis (Teng et al. 2015), autophagy (Baixauli et al. 2014), and differentiation (Ashrafizadeh et al. 2022; Nair et al. 2014), among others. Therefore, exosomes can carry miRNAs among cells for providing intercellular communication. miRNA-501 can be transferred to gastric tumor through exosomes and it has tumor-promoting function. Exosomal miRNA-501 reduces expression level of BLID to elevate carcinogenesis, to suppress apoptosis and to mediate DOX resistance in gastric cancer cells (Liu et al. 2019b). Exosomes can be secreted by macrophages. Macrophage-derived exosomal miRNA-223 can stimulate DOX insensitivity in gastric cancer. FBXW7 undergoes down-regulation by exosomal miRNA-223 to facilitate DOX resistance (Gao et al. 2020b).

miRNAs, stemness and DNA damage repair

STAT3 elevates stemness of breast cancer and to this end, it promotes expression level of HIF-1. The STAT3/HIF-1 axis is involved in triggering DOX resistance in breast cancer stem cells. miRNA-124 suppresses STAT3/HIF-1 axis in facilitating DOX sensitivity (Liu et al. 2019c). Another important factor is DNA damage repair in cancer cells. Overexpression of PARP1 paves the way for DNA damage repair and mediates DOX insensitivity in lung tumor. miRNA-7-5p can inhibit PARP1 expression to prevent DNA repair, leading to DOX sensitivity in lung cancer (Lai et al. 2019).

miRNAs and autophagy

Proliferation rate, apoptosis and DNA damage were discussed previously and miRNAs regulate them in DOX chemotherapy. One of the most important and challenging mechanisms during DOX chemotherapy is autophagy. Similar to apoptosis, autophagy is a programmed cell death mechanism that causes degradation and recycling of aged and degraded macromolecules and organelles in cells. Primary aim of autophagy is to maintain homeostasis. However, abnormal activation of autophagy occurs in tumor and may cause tumorigenesis, since autophagy exerts dual roles (Ashrafizadeh et al. 2023). In addition, chemotherapy response is influenced by autophagy (Qin et al. 2023). Autophagy reduces DOX response in hepatocellular carcinoma. miRNA-223 shows poor level in DOX-resistant tumor and its upregulation is associated with autophagy inhibition. miRNA-223 reduces FOXO3 expression to impair autophagy, evoking DOX sensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma (Zhou et al. 2019). miRNA-26b can also inhibit autophagy in facilitating DOX sensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma and this strategy has been beneficial in vivo for reducing tumor growth (Li et al. 2021d). These two studies highlighted protective role of autophagy and future studies should emphasize on anti-cancer function of autophagy and its induction by miRNAs in increasing DOX sensitivity. Overall, proliferation rate and survival of tumor are tightly controlled by miRNAs in affecting DOX resistance/sensitivity of tumor cells (Fig. 3) (Lin et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2020b; Hu et al. 2018; Al-Momany et al. 2021).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Association of miRNAs regulating tumor growth with DOX resistance/sensitivity. Important biological mechanisms in tumor cells including apoptosis and autophagy are modulated by miRNAs to affect DOX’s response of tumor cells. STAT3, HIF-1 and PTEN are among the signaling networks affected by miRNAs in modulating tumor proliferation

miRNA-mediated metastasis regulation in doxorubicin chemotherapy

General description of metastasis

The tumors can metastasize to neighboring and distant tissues to establish new colonies. The metastasis of tumor cells has resulted in dissemination in body and ensuring survival. Although metastasis remarkably reduces patient survival and mediates undesirable prognosis. It has been shown that increased migration causes drug insensitivity. The miRNA and metastasis in determining DOX response is evaluated here. The EMT-mediated carcinogenesis acceleration can cause chemoresistance.

miRNAs, EMT and doxorubicin chemotherapy

miRNA-451a delays tumorigenesis in lung tumor. miRNA-451a suppresses c-Myc to suppress EMT mechanism, causing DOX sensitivity (Tao et al. 2020). miR-137 is also an inhibitor of EMT, but in breast tumor and accelerator of DOX sensitivity. miRNA-137 downregulates DUSP4 to interfere EMT and disrupt DOX resistance (Du et al. 2019). It has been shown that FBXW7 overexpression increases DOX sensitivity in colorectal tumor cells. miRNA-223 has capacity of downregulating FBXW7 to mediate EMT and to increase metastasis of colorectal cancer cells, resulting in DOX resistance (Ding et al. 2018). miRNA-200b is inhibited in breast cancer, while EMT stimulation occurs to mediate DOX insensitivity. miR-200b-mediated FN1 suppression can increase DOX sensitivity through EMT interference (Yang et al. 2017).

Lung cancer is a threat to human health. It has two subtypes such as SCLC and NSCLC that NSCLC is the malignant one and comprises 85% of cancer cases. The NSCLC cells have demonstrated capacity in developing DOX resistance (Jin et al. 2020). The miRNA-223 and FBW7 association determines DOX response of NSCLC cells. Low expression of FBW7 mediates poor response of NSCLC to DOX. Silencing Twist as upstream mediator of EMT elevates DOX sensitivity. Noteworthy, exposing NSCLC cells to DOX causes EMT via E-cadherin inhibition and vimentin acceleration. miRNA-223 owing to its tumor-promoting function, has capacity of reducing FBW7 levels to augment EMT in NSCLC cells, to facilitate their invasion and to reduce DOX sensitivity (Li et al. 2016).

Challenges and gaps

However, there are some studies showing that both chemo-sensitivity and metastasis can be regulated by miRNAs at a same time, but their association has not been investigated. For instance, miRNA-770 reduces invasion of breast tumor and suppresses drug insensitivity. miRNA-770 downregulates STMN1 to interfere with metastasis and DOX resistance in breast tumor (Li et al. 2018a). Although this study revealed function of miRNAs in controlling chemo-response and metastasis, more studies should show how their interaction can affect breast tumor. Taking everything together, metastasis is a critical signature in regulating DOX response. Due to role of miRNAs in regulating different biological mechanisms and their abnormal expression in cancer, it was shown that miRNA-mediated regulation of EMT can determine DOX cytotoxicity against breast cancer cells (Fig. 4 and Table 2) (Tong et al. 2020; Yue et al. 2020; Liang et al. 2019; Dou et al. 2020; Chen et al. 2021b; Zheng et al. 2016; Deng et al. 2017).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Association of miRNAs controlling cancer metastasis with DOX resistance/sensitivity. miRNAs regulate STMN1, FN1, c-Myc and DUSP4 as well as FBW7 to modulate EMT in cancer cells and affect DOX resistance/sensitivity

Table 2.

The miRNAs involved in regulating metastasis and DOX sensitivity

miRNA Signaling network Cancer type Remarks References
miRNA-451a c-Myc/EMT Lung cancer

Reversing DOX resistance by miRNA-451a overexpression

miRNA-451a inhibits EMT via c-Myc signaling suppression to impair tumor metastasis and to increase DOX sensitivity

Tao et al. (2020)
miRNA-137 DUSP4/EMT Breast cancer

Down-regulation of DUSP4 by miRNA-137

EMT inhibition and subsequent sensitivity to DOX chemotherapy

Du et al. (2019)
miRNA-223 FBXW7/EMT Colorectal cancer

miRNA-223 stimulates DOX resistance

FBXW7 down-regulation by miRNA-223

EMT induction

Ding et al. (2018)
miRNA-200b FN1/EMT Breast cancer

FN1 down-regulation by miRNA-200b in breast cancer cells

EMT inhibition

Metastasis suppression

DOX sensitivity

Yang et al. (2017)
miRNA-223 FBW7/EMT Lung cancer miRNA-223 down-regulates FBW7 expression to induce EMT and to mediate DOX resistance of tumor cells Li et al. (2016)
miRNA-770 STMN1/EMT Breast cancer

miRNA-770 inhibits invasion and drug resistance in breast cancer

miRNA-770 reduces STMN1 expression to suppress EMT and to impair metastasis of tumor cells

Li et al. (2018a)
miRNA-424-5p LINC011116/miRNA-424-5p/EMT Osteosarcoma miRNA-424-5p down-regulation by LINC01116 to induce EMT, leading to DOX resistance in cancer cells Li et al. (2021e)
miRNA-218-5p Circ-0003998/miRNA-218-5p/EIF5A2 Hepatocellular carcinoma

miRNA-218-5p sponging by circ-0003998 to increase EIF5A2 expression, leading to increased metastasis and EMT induction

Triggering DOX resistance

Li et al. (2020)

miRNAs overcoming doxorubicin resistance

General concepts

As a conclusion, metastasis-mediated chemoresistance is influenced by miRNAs and they are classified as protective or lethal factors. AGR2 undergoes overexpression in breast tumor and stimulates DOX resistance. miRNA-135b-5p is suppressed in breast tumor. miRNA-135b-5p downregulates AGR2 to sensitize to DOX (Zhang et al. 2019). HIF-1 causes carcinogenesis during hypoxia and its inhibition by siRNA impairs cancer progression (Liu et al. 2012). It appears that activation of HIF-1 stimulates DOX resistance in breast cancer via promoting activity of P-gp (Doublier et al. 2012). miRNA-194-5p accelerates lung cancer response to DOX. miRNA-194-5p significantly downregulates HIF-1 to impair progression of lung cancer cells (Xia et al. 2021). miRNA-519d-5p demonstrates down-regulation in breast cancer and its upregulation can facilitate DOX sensitivity. The miR-519d-5p-mediated RELA suppression can increase DOX sensitivity (Xi et al. 2021).

miRNAs and drug efflux transporters

ABCC1 and MDR-1 are two members of ATP-binding cassette transporters that are associated with drug resistance and their expression level increases in renal cell carcinoma. These pumps function via using ATP and they transport chemotherapeutic agent out of cancer cells (O'CONNOR 2007; Walsh et al. 2009). The expression level of ABCC1 and MDR-1 are considered as biomarkers for drug resistance in renal cell carcinoma (Walsh et al. 2009). miRNA-210-3p expression significantly decrease in renal cell carcinoma cells, while expression levels of ABCC1 and MDR-1 increase. Low expression of miRNA-210-3p occurs in renal cell carcinoma to promote ABCC1 expression, resulting in MDR-1 overexpression and subsequent DOX resistance (Li et al. 2018b). Depletion of miR-222-3p can diminish P-gp and FOXP2 levels to facilitate response to DOX (Wang et al. 2019b). The upregulation of P-gp depends on FZD5. miR-124 suppresses P-gp-induced DOX resistance through FZD5 downregulation in renal cancer (Long et al. 2015). In addition to FZD5, the PI3K/Akt axis faciliates P-gp activity to mediate DOX insensitivity, while miR-205 suppresses PI3K/Akt through PTEN overexpression to disrupt P-gp-induced DOX resistance (Li et al. 2022). The breast tumor cells also demonstrate P-gp upregulation in DOX resistance development that is reversed by miR-298 overexpression (Bao et al. 2012).

miRNAs, HMGB1 and osteopontin

HMGB1 is a new emerging target in cancer. Exosomal HMGB1 promotes carcinogenesis in lung tumor and prevents DOX cytotoxicity (Wang et al. 2021). In osteosarcoma cells, HMGB1 stimulates protective autophagy to mediate drug resistance (Huang et al. 2012). HMGB1 induces DOX resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma by stimulation of AMPK/mTOR signaling and subsequent induction of autophagy (Li et al. 2021e). Therefore, HMGB1 overexpression evokes DOX resistance and its suppression should be considered in future studies. miRNA-505 is capable of increasing potential of DOX in apoptosis acceleration and upregulation of caspase-3. miRNA-505 interferes with HMGB1/Akt in DOX sensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma cells and impairing their progression (Lu et al. 2018). The role of osteopontin as a regulator of DOX resistance has been interesting. The response of breast cancer to DOX enhances after silencing osteopontin (Yang et al. 2012). The regulation of osteopontin by miRNA-181c facilitates DOX sensitivity. miR-181c diminishes osteopontin expression to reverse DOX resistance (Han et al. 2019). Therefore, there are a wide variety of miRNAs affecting various downstream targets in cancer that are of importance for determining DOX sensitivity of tumor cells.

miRNAs in doxorubicin resistance induction

General concept

There are miRNAs inducing DOX resistance that are briefly discussed in the current section. One of the mechanisms that DOX uses for reducing tumorigenesis is apoptosis induction via upregulation of caspase-9. Overexpression of miRNA-96-5p promotes progression of hepatocellular carcinoma cells and prevents apoptosis via caspase-9 suppression, causing DOX resistance (Iwai et al. 2018). CKLF1 stimulates IL-6/STAT3 to suppress apoptosis and increase inflammation-mediated tumorigenesis in triggering DOX resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma (Liu et al. 2019d). Osteosarcoma cells exposed to DOX demonstrate increased stemness and metastasis. Apatinib is capable of suppressing STAT3 to decrease SOX2, enhancing DOX sensitivity of osteosarcoma (Tian et al. 2020). The mesenchymal phenotype and DOX resistance in osteosarcoma are suppressed via STAT3 signaling inhibition (Lu et al. 2021b). miRNA-595-5p is involved in preserving stemness of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Suppressors of STAT3 such as SOCS2, SOCS5, PTPN1 and PTPN11 undergo down-regulation by miRNA-589-5p, causing DOX resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma cells (Long et al. 2018).

Context-dependent function of miRNAs

One of the difficulties in understanding association of miRNAs with DOX resistance is dual miRNA function and their context-dependent function. For instance, miRNA-27b-3p has been shown to increase growth and invasion of colorectal tumor via HOXA10 inhibition (Yang et al. 2019). miRNA-27b-3p downregulates PARP to accelerate metastasis rate of breast cancer (Shen et al. 2020). miRNA-27b-3p suppresses progression of colorectal and breast cancer cells (Chen et al. 2018a; Chen et al. 2017). Therefore, exact function of miRNAs before their targeting in cancer should be revealed. miRNA-27b-3p evokes DOX resistance in thyroid tumor. miRNA-27b-3p downregulates PARPγ to induce DOX insensitivity (Xu et al. 2018). Reducing expression level of tumor-promoting miRNAs can reverse DOX resistance. miRNA-222-3p downregulates FOXP2 to mediate DOX insensitivity in LoVo cells. miRNA-222-3p depletion is associated with DOX sensitivity (Wang et al. 2019b).

The pharmacological intervention in doxorubicin chemosensitivity

As it was mentioned, miRNAs can affect DOX response and they are tightly regulated by upstream mediators. One of the important notes of miRNAs is that they are druggable targets and there are different studies showing that anti-cancer compounds can modulate miRNAs. For instance, curcumin increases expression of miRNA-30a-5p to evoke apoptosis in prostate cancer and to impair proliferation and invasion (Pan et al. 2021). Another study reveals that resveratrol administration impairs progression of liver tumor and preventing EMT via miRNA-186-5p upregulation (Song et al. 2021b). On the other hand, anti-cancer agents have demonstrated synergistic impact with chemotherapeutic agents in sensitizing tumor cells.

Honokiol is a naturally occurring compound that is isolated from Magnolia plants and it demonstrates protective impacts such as anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant. The in vitro and in vivo experiments have shown capacity of honokiol in suppressing tumor progression. Honokiol suppresses EMT, migration and proliferation of cancer cells and it induces apoptosis via affecting a number of molecular pathways such as STAT3, EGFR and others (Ong et al. 2019; Sengupta et al. 2017; Zang et al. 2020). Honokiol is capable of increasing sensitivity of breast cancer cells to DOX chemotherapy. miRNA-188-5p functions as a tumor-promoting factor in breast cancer and its overexpression is correlated with DOX resistance. Honokiol promotes expression level of miRNA-188-5p to reduce FBXW7 expression, resulting in c-Myc signaling inhibition and subsequent sensitivity to DOX chemotherapy (Yi et al. 2021). Ursolic acid is another compound that is commonly used for purpose of cancer therapy. Ursolic acid interrupts homeostasis of ROS and decreases expression level of survival-related genes to induce apoptosis and reduce progression of intestinal cancer cells (Rawat and Nayak 2021). Ursolic acid induces SP1/cavelolin-1 axis to impair glycolysis and to suppress metastasis of breast tumor cells (Wang et al. 2021d). By inhibiting Akt signaling pathway, ursolic acid impairs progression of esophageal cancer cells and enhances their sensitivity to paclitaxel-mediated apoptosis (Meng et al. 2021). Ursolic acid is beneficial in increasing DOX cytotoxicity against breast tumor cells. For this purpose, ursolic acid reduces expression level of ZEB1-AS1 to increase miRNA-186-5p expression. Then, a significant decrease occurs in expression of ABCC1 to suppress breast tumor progression and to increase DOX sensitivity (Lu et al. 2021c).

Curcumol is an essential oil of Rhizoma Curcumae (Lou et al. 2010) and recent studies have shed some light on its capacity in tumor suppression (Sheng et al. 2021). Curcumol suppresses ability of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells in migration and invasion via inhibiting PI3K/Akt axis and reducing expression of NCL (Guan et al. 2021). Curcumol has capacity of inducing both apoptosis and autophagy in nasopharyngeal cancer cells to reduce proliferation (Wang et al. 2021e). Notably, curcumol is beneficial in increasing sensitivity of tumor cells to chemotherapy. Curcumol reduces levels of MMP2, P-gp, survivin and β-catenin to increase sensitivity of colon cancer cells to 5flouroruacil chemotherapy (Gao et al. 2021a). A recent experiment has shed some light on the efficacy of curcumol in increasing DOX sensitivity of breast cancer cells. Curcumol promotes expression level of miRNA-181b-2-3p to down-regulate ABCC3, leading to DOX sensitivity of breast tumor cells in vitro and in vivo (Zeng et al. 2020). Thympquinone is another natural product employed in mediating DOX sensitivity of tumor cells (Atteia et al. 2021). Increasing evidence has revealed role of STAT3 signaling in increasing progression of tumor cells and inducing drug resistance. As anti-cancer agent, thymoquinone is able to increase expression level of miRNA-125a-5p to suppress STAT3 signaling, resulting in DOX sensitivity of cancer cells (Atteia et al. 2021). Taking everything together, these studies highlight the fact that anti-tumor agents are able to regulate miRNAs in increasing DOX sensitivity of tumor cells (Hsieh et al. 2020; Gao et al. 2017; Gao et al. 2018). However, studies have focused on using naturally occurring compounds for affecting miRNA expression in cancer cells. Therefore, future studies should use small molecules for targeting miRNAs in increasing DOX sensitivity of cancer cells. Although it has been reported that natural products are emerging compounds for regulation of gene expression in cancer therapy that can affect the drug resistance, immune responses and tumor microenvironment (Garg et al. 2020), a number of challenges should be mentioned. Furthermore, natural products suffer from poor bioavailability and next studies should consider using nano-scale delivery systems for these anti-cancer agents to increase their capacity in miRNA regulation and increasing DOX sensitivity.

Nanobitoechnology in doxorubicin chemotherapy

The previous studies revealed role of miRNAs in regulating DOX resistance/sensitivity of cancer cells. The nano-scale delivery systems have been used for delivery of miRNAs or co-delivery with miRNA and DOX in affecting DOX sensitivity of cancer cells. A recent experiment has used polyplex nanoparticles that are sensitive to ATP and redox for co-delivery of DOX and miRNA-23b in cancer therapy. These polyplexes induced apoptosis, suppressed proliferation of cancer cells and induced cell cycle arrest at S phase. Furthermore, co-delivery of DOX and miRNA-23b by polyplexes reduces MMP-9 expression to suppress migration and invasion of cancer cells. In response to intracellular ATP concentration and redox condition, DOX- and miRNA-23b-loaded polyplexes released DOX and suppressed tumor progression (Tang et al. 2021). In another experiment, DOX- and miRNA-34a-loaded polyplexes were developed for suppressing growth and invasion of tumor cells. This nanocomplex was sensitive to ATP and compared to single cargo, it demonstrated higher anti-cancer activity (reducing cell viability up to 40%). Apoptosis induction and cell cycle arrest were followed upon using nanocomplex for co-delivery of miRNA-34a and DOX (Wang et al. 2017).

Although nanoparticles are of importance for increasing intracellular accumulation of cargo and can provide a platform for co-delivery of DOX and miRNAs, their biocompatibility is of importance and should be considered. Based on the biocompatibility, studies have focused on using micelles that demonstrate high safety profile and can load high amount of drug (Guo et al. 2021; Shi et al. 2021b; Wang et al. 2021f; Zhu, et al. 2021). In a recent experiment, nanomicelles were prepared for co-delivery of DOX and miRNA-519c and for improving their selectivity towards cancer cells, their surface modification with AS1411 aptamer was performed. These micelles were internalized into hepatocellular cancer cells and their modification with AS1411 aptamer increased their cellular uptake and selectivity. Furthermore, delivery of miRNA-519c resulted in down-regulation of ABCG2 that subsequently, significantly promoted accumulation of DOX in hepatocellular carcinoma cells (Liang et al. 2021). In order to improve characteristics of micelles, its combination with polymeric nanoparticles is performed. In this way, an experiment has prepared polymeric hybrid nanomicelles for co-delivery of DOX and miRNA-34a. These nanoparticles mediated lysosomal and endosomal escape of miRNA-34a to prevent its degradation into cells and also, induced nuclear delivery of DOX. The delivered miRNA-34a decreases expression level of Bcl-2, cyclin D1 and CDK6 to suppress growth and metastasis of tumor cells. Then, sensitivity of cancer cells to DOX increases and it can exert its anti-tumor activity (Xie et al. 2019).

Similar to micelles, liposomes also demonstrate high biocompatibility and their long-term safety has resulted in development of nanoformulations for being used in clinic (Chang and Yeh 2012; Peer et al. 2007). In an experiment, stearylamine liposomes were prepared for delivery of anti-miRNA-191 in breast cancer therapy. Delivery of anti-miRNA-191 by liposomes led to growth inhibition, apoptosis induction and decreased invasion of tumor cells. Furthermore, anti-miRNA-191-loaded liposomes increased sensitivity of breast cancer cells to DOX chemotherapy (Sharma et al. 2017). Overall, several benefits result from using nanovehicles for delivery of DOX and miRNAs in cancer therapy. First of all, nanoparticles promote internalization of miRNA and DOX in tumor cells to boost their anti-cancer activity. Encapsulation of miRNAs by nanoparticles may protect them against degradation by enzymes. Furthermore, in order to increase selectivity of nanocarriers towards tumor cells, their modification with ligands has been performed and stimuli-responsive nanocarriers have been developed (Li et al. 2018b; Gajda et al. 2020; Zhao et al. 2017a; Chen et al. 2019; Fan et al. 2017; Fang et al. 2020; Xue et al. 2017). Based on these discussions, it is suggested to use nanoparticles for co-delivery of miRNAs and DOX in cancer chemotherapy. However, most of the studies have ignored effect on molecular pathways that should be evaluated in further experiments (Fig. 5). Table 3 provides a summary of miRNA role in DOX resistance with related molecular pathways.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Anti-cancer agents and nanoparticles targeting miRNAs in DOX chemotherapy

Table 3.

The miRNAs and related molecular pathways in DOX chemotherapy

miRNA Cancer type Signaling network Remark References
miRNA-218-5p Osteosarcoma CircSAMD4A/miRNA-218-5p/KLF8

DOX resistance by circSAMD4A

Silencing circRNAs induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis

miRNA-218-5p down-regulation by circSAMD4A and overexpression of KLF8

Wei et al. (2020)
miRNA-144-3p Neuroblastoma NORAD/miRNA-144-3p/HDAC8

Enhanced progression of tumor cells and association with DOX resistance

NORAD decreases miRNA-144-3p expression via sponging and subsequent overexpression of HDAC8

Wang et al. (2020c)
miRNA-140 Colorectal cancer miRNA-140/PD-L1 Down-regulation of miRNA-140 upon DOX treatment and subsequent upregulation of PD-L1 Naba et al. (2020)
miRNA-4319 Osteosarcoma LINC00426/miRNA-4319

Overexpression of LINC00426 in colorectal cancer and association with DOX resistance

miRNA-4319 down-regulation by LINC00426 to reduce caspase-3 expression

Wang et al. (2020d)
miRNA-137 Osteosarcoma CircPVT1/miRNA-137/TRIAP1

Stimulation of DOX resistance in cancer cells

CircPVT1 silencing decreases proliferation and stimulates apoptosis in tumor cells

miRNA-137 down-regulation by circPVT1 to increase TRIAP1 expression

Gao et al. (2021b)
miRNA-222 Breast cancer miRNA-222/bim

miRNA-222 stimulates DOX resistance in breast cancer

Low expression of miRNA-222 stimulates apoptosis

miRNA-222 reduces bim expression to induce DOX resistance

Dai, et al. (2019)
miRNA-137-3p Osteosarcoma OIP5-AS1/miRNA-137-3p/PTN

OIP5-AS1 induces drug resistance and promotes progression of cancer cells

miRNA-137-3p down-regulation by OIP5-AS1 and reduces PTN expression

Sun et al. (2020)
miRNA-370 Osteosarcoma Circ-0003496/miRNA-370/KLF12

Upregulation of circ-003496 stimulates DOX resistance in tumor cells

Circ-0003496 functions as sponge and reduces miRNA-370 expression to increase KLF12 expression

Xie et al. (2020)
miRNA-422a Gastric cancer D63785/miRNA-422a/MEF2D LncRNA D63785 promotes MEF2D expression via miRNA-422a down-regulation, leading to apoptosis inhibition and subsequent DOX resistance in cancer cells Zhou et al. (2018b)
miRNA-1205 Colorectal cancer Circ-0006174/miRNA-1205/CCND2 Circ-0006174 stimulates DOX resistance in tumor cells via miRNA-1205 sponging and subsequent overexpression of CCND2 Zhang et al. (2022)
miRNA-137 Neuroblastoma HDAC8/miRNA-137 Knock-down of HDAC8 promotes miRNA-137 expression and is associated with DOX sensitivity in cancer cells Zhao et al. (2017b)
miRNA-384 Osteosarcoma miRNA-384/PTN/β-catenin Luteolin promotes expression level of miRNA-384 to suppress PTN/β-catenin, leading to an increase in DOX sensitivity of tumor cells Qin et al. (2022)
miRNA-140-5p Hepatocellular carcinoma miRNA-140-5p/PIN1 miRNA-140-5p reduces PIN1 expression to enhance DOX sensitivity of cancer cells Gao et al. (2021b)

miRNA-378a-3p

miRNA-378d

Breast cancer EZH2/STAT3 Breast cancer cells secrete exosomes containing miRNA-378d and miRNA-378a-3p to induce STAT3 signaling via EZH2 recruitment, leading to DOX resistance Yang et al. (2021)
miRNA-381-3p Thyroid carcinoma miRNA-381-3p/HOXA9

Silencing HOXA9 induces apoptosis and impairs progression of cancer cells

miRNA-381-3p decreases HOXA9 expression to induce apoptosis, to suppress growth and metastasis, and to mediate DOX sensitivity

Zhang et al. (2021d)
miRNA-760 Osteosarcoma CircPRDM2/miRNA-760/EZH2 CircPRDM2 reduces miRNA-760 expression via sponging to induce EZH2 signaling, resulting in DOX resistance Yuan et al. (2021)
miRNA-221 Breast cancer - miRNA-221 prevents apoptosis and stimulates DOX resistance in breast tumor cells Kheradmand et al. (2021)
miRNA-21-5p Gastric cancer

miRNA-21-5p/PTEN

miRNA-21-5p/TIMP3

Silencing miRNA-21-5p promotes DOX sensitivity of cancer cells

miRNA-21-5p decreases PTEN and TIMP3 expression

Chen et al. (2018b)

miRNA-153-5p

miRNA-183-5p

Myeloid leukemia CircPAN3/miRNA/XIAP CircPAN3 promotes XIAP expression via down-regulation of miRNA-153-5p and miRNA-183-5p to induce DOX resistance in cancer cells Shang et al. (2019)
miRNA-590-5p Hepatocellular carcinoma miRNA-5905p/YAP1 miRNA-590-5p reduces YAP1 expression to impair tumor progression and to increase DOX sensitivity of cancer cells Chen et al. (2018c)
miRNA-197-5p Fibrosarcoma miRNA-197-5p may decrease expression and activity of ABCC1 and MVP in preventing drug efflux and suppressing DOX resistance of cancer cells Jain et al. (2022)
miRNA-381 Breast cancer miRNA-381/FYN/MAPK miRNA-381 decreases FYN expression to suppress MAPK signaling, resulting in DOX sensitivity of tumor cells Mi et al. (2018)
miRNA-376a-3p Myeloid leukemia miRNA-376a-3p/MT1X MT1X down-regulation by miRNA-376a-3p to induce apoptosis and to promote DOX sensitivity of cancer cells Xin et al. (2022)
miRNA-200c Breast cancer miRNA-200c/MDR1 miRNA-200c reduces MDR1 expression to increase DOX sensitivity Safaei et al. (2022)
miRNA-26a Osteosarcoma miRNA-26a/MCL1 miRNA-26a down-regulates MCL1 expression to reverse drug resistance Liang et al. (2021)
miRNA-495 Ovarian and gastric cancers miRNA-495/MDR1 miRNA-495 decreases MDR1 expression to increase DOX sensitivity Zou et al. (2017)
miRNA-34a Liver cancer miRNA-34a overexpression increases DOX sensitivity Zheng et al. (2019)

Conclusion

Chemotherapy is a gold standard in treatment of cancer. Although surgical resection is commonly used in cancer therapy, its efficiency significantly decreases during advanced stages and metastasis of tumor cells. Therefore, application of chemotherapy in cancer is inevitable. However, drug resistance is a big barrier towards treatment of cancer patients. DOX is among the anti-cancer agents applied in treatment of cancer and resistance occurs due to mutations in genetic materials. The aim of present study was to investigate role of miRNAs in DOX cytotoxicity against cancer cells. Overall, activation of tumor-promoting pathways such as STAT3 and HIF-1 can occur in mediating DOX resistance in tumor cells. Furthermore, drug efflux transporters such as P-gp demonstrate overexpression in reducing DOX accumulation in cancer cells. Therefore, chance of DOX resistance in cancer is high. miRNAs are major modulators of various molecular pathways and mechanisms in cells. The tumor-promoting miRNAs induce DOX resistance in cancer via apoptosis inhibition, increasing cell cycle progression and providing pro-survival autophagy, while tumor-suppressor miRNAs induce apoptosis, cell cycle arrest and pro-death autophagy in mediating DOX sensitivity. miRNAs can regulate metastasis of cancer cells and affect EMT mechanism to determine response to DOX chemotherapy.

Overall, miRNAs are divided into two categories including tumor-suppressor and tumor-promoting miRNAs in cancer and they were discussed in separate sections. One of the important aspects is regulation of miRNAs by upstream mediators in cancer. LncRNAs and circRNAs are the most well-known regulators of miRNAs in cancer and decrease their expression via sponging to determine DOX cytotoxicity on cancer cells. There are anti-cancer agents such as curcumin, apigenin and curcumol that can affect expression of miRNAs in increasing DOX sensitivity, showing that miRNAs are “druggable targets”. Besides, nanotherapeutics such as micelles and liposomes have been employed for delivery of miRNAs alone or in combination with DOX to suppress tumor-promoting molecular pathways, resulting in DOX sensitivity in cancer cells.

Abbreviations

DOX

Doxorubicin

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

EMT

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition

P-gp

P-glycoprotein

miRNAs

MicroRNAs

ncRNAs

Non-coding RNAs

mRNA

Messenger RNA

pri-miRNA

Primary miRNA

pre-miRNA

Precursor miRNA

RISC

RNA-induced silencing complex

EVs

Extracellular vesicles

SCLC

Small-cell lung cancer

NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer

AGR2

Anterior gradient 2

HMGB1

High mobility group box 1

lncRNAs

Long non-coding RNAs

circRNAs

Circular RNAs

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Afshin Taheriazam, Email: a.taheriazam@iautmu.ac.ir.

Mehrdad Hashemi, Email: mhashemi@iautmu.ac.ir.

Saeed Samarghandian, Email: samarghandians1@nums.ac.ir.

References

  1. Al-Momany B, Hammad H, Ahram M. Dihydrotestosterone induces chemo-resistance of triple-negative breast MDA-MB-231 cancer cells towards doxorubicin independent of ABCG2 and miR-328-3p. Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2021;14(5):860–870. doi: 10.2174/1874467214666210531170355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alshaer W, et al. Downregulation of STAT3, β-catenin, and notch-1 by single and combinations of siRNA treatment enhance chemosensitivity of wild type and doxorubicin resistant MCF7 breast cancer cells to doxorubicin. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(15):3696. doi: 10.3390/ijms20153696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashrafizadeh M, et al. Exosomes as promising nanostructures in diabetes mellitus: from insulin sensitivity to ameliorating diabetic complications. Int J Nanomed. 2022;17:1229. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S350250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashrafizadeh M, et al. A bioinformatics analysis, pre-clinical and clinical conception of autophagy in pancreatic cancer: complexity and simplicity in crosstalk. Pharmacol Res. 2023;194:106822. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Atteia HH, et al. Thymoquinone upregulates miR-125a-5p, attenuates STAT3 activation, and potentiates doxorubicin antitumor activity in murine solid Ehrlich carcinoma. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2021;35(12):e22924. doi: 10.1002/jbt.22924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ayyildiz A, et al. Co-administration of apigenin with doxorubicin enhances anti-migration and antiproliferative effects via PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway in prostate cancer cells. Exp Oncol. 2021;43(2):125–134. doi: 10.32471/exp-oncology.2312-8852.vol-43-no-2.16096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baixauli F, López-Otín C, Mittelbrunn M. Exosomes and autophagy: coordinated mechanisms for the maintenance of cellular fitness. Front Immunol. 2014;5:403. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bao L, et al. Increased expression of P-glycoprotein and doxorubicin chemoresistance of metastatic breast cancer is regulated by miR-298. Am J Pathol. 2012;180(6):2490–2503. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.02.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Batist G, et al. Myocet (liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin citrate): a new approach in breast cancer therapy. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2002;3(12):1739–1751. doi: 10.1517/14656566.3.12.1739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Buchholz TA, et al. Global gene expression changes during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for human breast cancer. Cancer J. 2002;8(6):461–468. doi: 10.1097/00130404-200211000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cao Y, et al. LncRNA MALAT1 mediates doxorubicin resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating miR-3129-5p/Nova1 axis. Mol Cell Biochem. 2021;476(1):279–292. doi: 10.1007/s11010-020-03904-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Carvalho C, et al. Doxorubicin: the good, the bad and the ugly effect. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(25):3267–3285. doi: 10.2174/092986709788803312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chang H-I, Yeh M-K. Clinical development of liposome-based drugs: formulation, characterization, and therapeutic efficacy. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:49. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S26766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen Y, et al. miR-27b-3p suppresses cell proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting LIMK1 in colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2017;10(9):9251–9261. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen D, et al. miR-27b-3p inhibits proliferation and potentially reverses multi-chemoresistance by targeting CBLB/GRB2 in breast cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(2):188. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0211-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen J, et al. miR-21-5p confers doxorubicin resistance in gastric cancer cells by targeting PTEN and TIMP3. Int J Mol Med. 2018;41(4):1855–1866. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2018.3405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen M, et al. miR-590-5p suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma chemoresistance by targeting YAP1 expression. EBioMedicine. 2018;35:142–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen W, et al. Delivery of miR-212 by chimeric peptide-condensed supramolecular nanoparticles enhances the sensitivity of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to doxorubicin. Biomaterials. 2019;192:590–600. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen S, et al. MiR-199b-5p promotes gastric cancer progression by regulating HHIP expression. Front Oncol. 2021;11:728393. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.728393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen Q, et al. MiR-873-5p targets THUMPD1 to inhibit gastric cancer cell behavior and chemoresistance. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021;12(5):2061–2072. doi: 10.21037/jgo-21-641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dai H, et al. MicroRNA-222 promotes drug resistance to doxorubicin in breast cancer via regulation of miR-222/bim pathway. Biosci Rep. 2019;39(7):BSR2019. doi: 10.1042/BSR20190650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dai G, et al. Expression of miR-187 and miR-509-3p in serum of primary hepatocellular carcinoma patients and its evaluation of prognosis. J BUON. 2021;26(4):1340–1345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Deng Z, et al. Exosomes miR-126a released from MDSC induced by DOX treatment promotes lung metastasis. Oncogene. 2017;36(5):639–651. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ding J, et al. MiR-223 promotes the doxorubicin resistance of colorectal cancer cells via regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting FBXW7. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (shanghai) 2018;50(6):597–604. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmy040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dou D, et al. CircUBE2D2 (hsa_circ_0005728) promotes cell proliferation, metastasis and chemoresistance in triple-negative breast cancer by regulating miR-512-3p/CDCA3 axis. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:454. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01547-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Doublier S, et al. HIF-1 activation induces doxorubicin resistance in MCF7 3-D spheroids via P-glycoprotein expression: a potential model of the chemo-resistance of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Du F, et al. miR-137 alleviates doxorubicin resistance in breast cancer through inhibition of epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting DUSP4. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(12):922. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-2164-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fan YP, et al. MiR-375 and doxorubicin co-delivered by liposomes for combination therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2017;7:181–189. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2017.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Fang J, et al. A nanomicelle with miR-34a and doxorubicin reverses the drug resistance of cisplatin in esophageal carcinoma cells by inhibiting SIRT1 signal pathway. Transl Cancer Res. 2020;9(7):4131–4140. doi: 10.21037/tcr-19-975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Farago AF, et al. ATLANTIS: a phase III study of lurbinectedin/doxorubicin versus topotecan or cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine in patients with small-cell lung cancer who have failed one prior platinum-containing line. Future Oncol. 2019;15(3):231–239. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Gajda E, et al. Combinatory treatment with miR-7-5p and drug-loaded cubosomes effectively impairs cancer cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(14):5039. doi: 10.3390/ijms21145039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gao AM, Zhang XY, Ke ZP. Apigenin sensitizes BEL-7402/ADM cells to doxorubicin through inhibiting miR-101/Nrf2 pathway. Oncotarget. 2017;8(47):82085–82091. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gao AM, et al. Apigenin sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells to doxorubic through regulating miR-520b/ATG7 axis. Chem Biol Interact. 2018;280:45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2017.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gao M, et al. Orphan nuclear receptor RORγ confers doxorubicin resistance in prostate cancer. Cell Biol Int. 2020;44(10):2170–2176. doi: 10.1002/cbin.11411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gao H, et al. Exosomal transfer of macrophage-derived miR-223 confers doxorubicin resistance in gastric cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:12169–12179. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S283542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gao J, et al. Curcumol increases the sensitivity of colon cancer to 5-FU by regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Transl Cancer Res. 2021;10(5):2437–2450. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gao X, Jiang Y, Li Y. Inhibitory effect of miR-140-5p on doxorubicin resistance of hepatocellular carcinoma. Exp Ther Med. 2021;21(5):507. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Garg M, et al. The pleiotropic role of transcription factor STAT3 in oncogenesis and its targeting through natural products for cancer prevention and therapy. Med Res Rev. 2020;41:1291. doi: 10.1002/med.21761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Gorshkov A, et al. Exosomes as natural nanocarriers for RNA-based therapy and prophylaxis. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2022;12(3):524. doi: 10.3390/nano12030524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Guan X, et al. Curcumol inhibits EBV-positive Nasopharyngeal carcinoma migration and invasion by targeting nucleolin. Biochem Pharmacol. 2021;192:114742. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Guarnerio J, et al. Oncogenic role of fusion-circRNAs derived from cancer-associated chromosomal translocations. Cell. 2016;165(2):289–302. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Guo B, et al. Individualized liposomal doxorubicin-based treatment in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Oncol Res Treat. 2011;34(4):184–188. doi: 10.1159/000327008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Guo Q, et al. Doxorubicin-loaded natural daptomycin micelles with enhanced targeting and anti-tumor effect in vivo. Eur J Med Chem. 2021;222:113582. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Han B, et al. The microRNA miR-181c enhances chemosensitivity and reduces chemoresistance in breast cancer cells via down-regulating osteopontin. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;125:544–556. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hashemi M, et al. Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) H19 in human cancer: from proliferation and metastasis to therapy. Pharmacol Res. 2022;184:106418. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hilmer SN, et al. The hepatic pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin and liposomal doxorubicin. Drug Metab Dispos. 2004;32(8):794–799. doi: 10.1124/dmd.32.8.794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Hong KS, et al. Calponin 3 regulates cell invasion and doxorubicin resistance in gastric cancer. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019;2019:3024970. doi: 10.1155/2019/3024970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Hsieh PL, et al. Soy isoflavone genistein impedes cancer stemness and mesenchymal transition in head and neck cancer through activating miR-34a/RTCB Axis. Nutrients. 2020;12(7):1924. doi: 10.3390/nu12071924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hu G, et al. miR-125b regulates the drug-resistance of breast cancer cells to doxorubicin by targeting HAX-1. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(2):1621–1629. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Hu XY, et al. Cancer drug resistance related microRNAs: recent advances in detection methods. Analyst. 2022;147(12):2615–2632. doi: 10.1039/d2an00171c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Huang J, et al. HMGB1 promotes drug resistance in osteosarcoma. Cancer Res. 2012;72(1):230–238. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Indrieri A, et al. The pervasive role of the miR-181 family in development, neurodegeneration, and cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(6):2092. doi: 10.3390/ijms21062092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Iwai N, et al. Oncogenic miR-96-5p inhibits apoptosis by targeting the caspase-9 gene in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2018;53(1):237–245. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Jain N, Das B, Mallick B. miR-197-5p increases doxorubicin-mediated anticancer cytotoxicity of HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells by decreasing drug efflux. DNA Repair (amst) 2022;109:103259. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ji, Y., et al., circ_0002060 Enhances Doxorubicin Resistance in Osteosarcoma by Regulating the miR-198/ABCB1 Axis. Cancer Biother Radiopharm, 2020. [DOI] [PubMed]
  56. Jiang CF, et al. TBX15/miR-152/KIF2C pathway regulates breast cancer doxorubicin resistance via promoting PKM2 ubiquitination. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-02235-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Jin Y, et al. miR-199a-5p is involved in doxorubicin resistance of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2020;878:173105. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Kalfert D, et al. Multifunctional roles of miR-34a in cancer: a review with the emphasis on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and thyroid cancer with clinical implications. Diagnostics. 2020;10(8):563. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10080563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Kang X, et al. DUSP4 promotes doxorubicin resistance in gastric cancer through epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Oncotarget. 2017;8(55):94028–94039. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kanojia D, et al. Transcriptome analysis identifies TODL as a novel lncRNA associated with proliferation, differentiation, and tumorigenesis in liposarcoma through FOXM1. Pharmacol Res. 2022;185:106462. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Keizer H, et al. Doxorubicin (adriamycin): a critical review of free radical-dependent mechanisms of cytotoxicity. Pharmacol Ther. 1990;47(2):219–231. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(90)90088-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Kheradmand P, Vallian Boroojeni S, Esmaeili-Mahani S. MiR-221 expression level correlates with insulin-induced doxorubicin resistance in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Cell J. 2021;23(3):329–334. doi: 10.22074/cellj.2021.7153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Korać P, Antica M, Matulić MJB. MiR-7 in cancer development. Biomedicines. 2021;9(3):325. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9030325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Kowal J, Tkach M, Théry C. Biogenesis and secretion of exosomes. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2014;29:116–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2014.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Lai J, et al. MiR-7-5p-mediated downregulation of PARP1 impacts DNA homologous recombination repair and resistance to doxorubicin in small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5798-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Li R, et al. miR-223/FBW7 axis regulates doxorubicin sensitivity through epithelial mesenchymal transition in non-small cell lung cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2016;8(6):2512–2524. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Li Y, et al. MiR-770 suppresses the chemo-resistance and metastasis of triple negative breast cancer via direct targeting of STMN1. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0030-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Li S, et al. Down-regulation of miR-210-3p encourages chemotherapy resistance of renal cell carcinoma via modulating ABCC1. Cell Biosci. 2018;8:9. doi: 10.1186/s13578-018-0209-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Li X, et al. Circ_0003998 enhances doxorubicin resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating miR-218-5p/EIF5A2 pathway. Diagn Pathol. 2020;15(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13000-020-01056-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Li Z, et al. STAT5a confers doxorubicin resistance to breast cancer by regulating ABCB1. Front Oncol. 2021;11:697950. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.697950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Li H, et al. miR-940 is a new biomarker with tumor diagnostic and prognostic value. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2021;25:53–66. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2021.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Li QK, et al. Circ-sirt1 inhibits growth and invasion of gastric cancer by sponging miR-132-3p/miR-212-3p and upregulating sirt1 expression. Neoplasma. 2021;68(4):780–787. doi: 10.4149/neo_2021_210218N222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Li Z, et al. LINC01977 promotes breast cancer progression and chemoresistance to doxorubicin by targeting miR-212-3p/GOLM1 axis. Front Oncol. 2021;11:657094. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.657094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Li R, et al. LINC01116 promotes doxorubicin resistance in osteosarcoma by epigenetically silencing miR-424-5p and inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:632206. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.632206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Li M, et al. miR-205 reverses MDR-1 mediated doxorubicin resistance via PTEN in human liver cancer HepG2 cells. Cell J. 2022;24(3):112–119. doi: 10.22074/cellj.2022.7231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Liang Y, et al. circKDM4C suppresses tumor progression and attenuates doxorubicin resistance by regulating miR-548p/PBLD axis in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2019;38(42):6850–6866. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0926-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Liang X, et al. Nucleolin-targeting AS1411 aptamer-modified micelle for the co-delivery of doxorubicin and miR-519c to improve the therapeutic efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:2569–2584. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S304526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Lin XJ, et al. miR-936 suppresses cell proliferation, invasion, and drug resistance of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and targets GPR78. Front Oncol. 2020;10:60. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Liu XQ, et al. Therapeutic delivery of siRNA silencing HIF-1 alpha with micellar nanoparticles inhibits hypoxic tumor growth. Mol Pharm. 2012;9(10):2863–2874. doi: 10.1021/mp300193f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Liu T, Guo J, Zhang X. MiR-202-5p/PTEN mediates doxorubicin-resistance of breast cancer cells via PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Cancer Biol Ther. 2019;20(7):989–998. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2019.1591674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Liu X, et al. Exosomal transfer of miR-501 confers doxorubicin resistance and tumorigenesis via targeting of BLID in gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 2019;459:122–134. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.05.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Liu C, et al. MiR-124 reversed the doxorubicin resistance of breast cancer stem cells through STAT3/HIF-1 signaling pathways. Cell Cycle. 2019;18(18):2215–2227. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2019.1638182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Liu Y, et al. CKLF1 enhances inflammation-mediated carcinogenesis and prevents doxorubicin-induced apoptosis via IL6/STAT3 signaling in HCC. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(13):4141–4154. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Liu J, et al. The biology, function, and applications of exosomes in cancer. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021;11(9):2783–2797. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Long QZ, et al. miR-124 represses FZD5 to attenuate P-glycoprotein-mediated chemo-resistance in renal cell carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(9):7017–7026. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3369-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Long J, et al. Maintenance of stemness by miR-589-5p in hepatocellular carcinoma cells promotes chemoresistance via STAT3 signaling. Cancer Lett. 2018;423:113–126. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Lou Y, et al. Isolation and identification of phase 1 metabolites of curcumol in rats. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38(11):2014–2022. doi: 10.1124/dmd.110.034215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Lovitt CJ, Shelper TB, Avery VM. Doxorubicin resistance in breast cancer cells is mediated by extracellular matrix proteins. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3953-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Lu L, et al. miR-505 enhances doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity in hepatocellular carcinoma through repressing the Akt pathway by directly targeting HMGB1. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;104:613–621. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.05.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Lu J, et al. CircNUP98 suppresses the maturation of miR-519a-3p in glioblastoma. Front Neurol. 2021;12:679745. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.679745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Lu M, et al. Notoginsenoside R1 counteracts mesenchymal stem cell-evoked oncogenesis and doxorubicin resistance in osteosarcoma cells by blocking IL-6 secretion-induced JAK2/STAT3 signaling. Invest New Drugs. 2021;39(2):416–425. doi: 10.1007/s10637-020-01027-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Lu Q, et al. Ursolic acid enhances cytotoxicity of doxorubicin-resistant triple-negative breast cancer cells via ZEB1-AS1/miR-186–5p/ABCC1 axis. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2021;37:673. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2020.4147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Ma XL, et al. Doxorubicin-induced novel circRNA_0004674 facilitates osteosarcoma progression and chemoresistance by upregulating MCL1 through miR-142-5p. Cell Death Discov. 2021;7(1):309. doi: 10.1038/s41420-021-00694-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Manvati MKS, et al. Association of miR-760 with cancer: an overview. Gene. 2020;747:144648. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Marina NM, et al. Dose escalation and pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (doxil) in children with solid tumors: a pediatric oncology group study. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8(2):413–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Meldolesi J. Exosomes and ectosomes in intercellular communication. Curr Biol. 2018;28(8):R435–r444. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Meng RY, et al. Ursolic acid accelerates paclitaxel-induced cell death in esophageal cancer cells by suppressing Akt/FOXM1 signaling cascade. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(21):11486. doi: 10.3390/ijms222111486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Meredith A-M, Dass CR. Increasing role of the cancer chemotherapeutic doxorubicin in cellular metabolism. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2016;68(6):729–741. doi: 10.1111/jphp.12539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Mi H, et al. miR-381 induces sensitivity of breast cancer cells to doxorubicin by inactivation of MAPK signaling via FYN. Eur J Pharmacol. 2018;839:66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Minotti G, et al. Anthracyclines: molecular advances and pharmacologic developments in antitumor activity and cardiotoxicity. Pharmacol Rev. 2004;56(2):185–229. doi: 10.1124/pr.56.2.6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Mirzaei S, et al. Advances in understanding the role of P-gp in doxorubicin resistance: molecular pathways, therapeutic strategies, and prospects. Drug Discovery Today. 2022;27(2):436–455. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Mirzaei S, et al. Resveratrol augments doxorubicin and cisplatin chemotherapy: a novel therapeutic strategy. Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2023;16:280–306. doi: 10.2174/1874467215666220415131344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Naba NM, et al. Doxorubicin inhibits miR-140 expression and upregulates PD-L1 expression in HCT116 cells, opposite to its effects on MDA-MB-231 cells. Turk J Biol. 2020;44(1):15–23. doi: 10.3906/biy-1909-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Nair R, et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from preosteoblasts influence embryonic stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells Dev. 2014;23(14):1625 . doi: 10.1089/scd.2013.0633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. O'Connor R. The pharmacology of cancer resistance. Anticancer Res. 2007;27(3A):1267–1272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Ong CP, et al. Honokiol: a review of its anticancer potential and mechanisms. Cancers. 2019;12(1):48. doi: 10.3390/cancers12010048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Pan L, et al. Curcumin inhibits prostate cancer progression by regulating the miR-30a-5p/PCLAF axis. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(3):969. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Pandya G, et al. The implication of long non-coding RNAs in the diagnosis, pathogenesis and drug resistance of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and their possible therapeutic potential. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Rev Cancer. 2020;187(2):188423. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Pang X, et al. Foxo3a-dependent miR-633 regulates chemotherapeutic sensitivity in gastric cancer by targeting fas-associated death domain. RNA Biol. 2019;16(2):233–248. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2019.1565665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Papa A, Pandolfi PP. The PTEN−PI3K axis in cancer. Biomolecules. 2019;9(4):153. doi: 10.3390/biom9040153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Peer D, et al. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nano-Enabled Med Appl. 2007;2(12):751–760. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Qin T, et al. Luteolin attenuates the chemoresistance of osteosarcoma through inhibiting the PTN/β-catenin/MDR1 signaling axis by upregulating miR-384. J Bone Oncol. 2022;34:100429. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2022.100429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Qin Y, et al. Autophagy and cancer drug resistance in dialogue: pre-clinical and clinical evidence. Cancer Lett. 2023;570:216307. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2023.216307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Rajput A, et al. Exosomes as new generation vehicles for drug delivery: biomedical applications and future perspectives. Molecules. 2022;27(21):7289. doi: 10.3390/molecules27217289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Rawat L, Nayak V. Ursolic acid disturbs ROS homeostasis and regulates survival-associated gene expression to induce apoptosis in intestinal cancer cells. Toxicol Res (camb) 2021;10(3):369–375. doi: 10.1093/toxres/tfab025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Ruggiero A, et al. Myocardial performance index and biochemical markers for early detection of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Int J Clin Oncol. 2013;18(5):927–933. doi: 10.1007/s10147-012-0458-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Safaei S, et al. miR-200c increases the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to doxorubicin through down regulating MDR1 gene. Exp Mol Pathol. 2022;125:104753. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2022.104753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Schmitt AM, Chang H. Long noncoding RNAs in cancer pathways. Cancer Cells. 2016;29(4):452–463. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Sengupta S, et al. Activation of tumor suppressor LKB1 by honokiol abrogates cancer stem-like phenotype in breast cancer via inhibition of oncogenic Stat3. Oncogene. 2017;36(41):5709–5721. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Shabna A, et al. Long non-coding RNAs: Fundamental regulators and emerging targets of cancer stem cells. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Rev Cancer. 2023;1878(3):188899. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2023.188899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Shang J, et al. CircPAN3 mediates drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia through the miR-153-5p/miR-183-5p-XIAP axis. Exp Hematol. 2019;70:42–54.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2018.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Sharma S, et al. Enhanced efficacy of anti-miR-191 delivery through stearylamine liposome formulation for the treatment of breast cancer cells. Int J Pharm. 2017;530(1–2):387–400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.07.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Shen SJ, et al. MicroRNA-27b-3p promotes tumor progression and metastasis by inhibiting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in triple-negative breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1371. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Sheng W, et al. Curcumol inhibits the malignant progression of prostate cancer and regulates the PDK1/AKT/mTOR pathway by targeting miR-9. Oncol Rep. 2021;46(5):1. doi: 10.3892/or.2021.8197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Shi X, et al. circRNAs and exosomes: a mysterious frontier for human cancer. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020;19:384–392. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.11.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Shi P, Song H, Ding X. Reduced expression of circRNA hsa_circ_001888 in gastric cancer and its clinical significance. J Clin Lab Anal. 2021;35(9):e23953. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Shi Y, et al. Dextran-polylactide micelles loaded with doxorubicin and DiR for image-guided chemo-photothermal tumor therapy. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;187:296–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Sohail M, et al. Research progress in strategies to improve the efficacy and safety of doxorubicin for cancer chemotherapy. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2021;21(12):1385–1398. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1991316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Song Z, et al. Exosomal miR-4443 promotes cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung carcinoma by regulating FSP1 m6A modification-mediated ferroptosis. Life Sci. 2021;276:119399. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Song F, et al. Resveratrol inhibits the migration, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in liver cancer cells through up- miR-186-5p expression. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021;50(5):582–590. doi: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2021-0197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Sousa D, Lima RT, Vasconcelos M. Intercellular transfer of cancer drug resistance traits by extracellular vesicles. Trends Mol Med. 2015;21(10):595–608. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2015.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Suebsoonthron J, et al. Inhibition of WNT signaling reduces differentiation and induces sensitivity to doxorubicin in human malignant neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells. Anticancer Drugs. 2017;28(5):469–479. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Sun S, Fang H. Curcumin inhibits ovarian cancer progression by regulating circ-PLEKHM3/miR-320a/SMG1 axis. J Ovarian Res. 2021;14(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13048-021-00916-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Sun X, et al. Long noncoding RNA OIP5-AS1 mediates resistance to doxorubicin by regulating miR-137-3p/PTN axis in osteosarcoma. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;128:110201. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Tacar O, et al. Doxorubicin: an update on anticancer molecular action, toxicity and novel drug delivery systems. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2013;65(2):157–170. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2012.01567.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Tanaka N, et al. Identification of miR-199–5p and miR-199–3p target genes: paxillin facilities cancer cell aggressiveness in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Genes (basel) 2021;12(12):1910. doi: 10.3390/genes12121910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Tang X, et al. Dual ATP/reduction-responsive polyplex to achieve the co-delivery of doxorubicin and miR-23b for the cancer treatment. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2021;206:111955. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Tao L, et al. MiR-451a attenuates doxorubicin resistance in lung cancer via suppressing epithelialmesenchymal transition (EMT) through targeting c-Myc. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;125:109962. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.109962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Teng X, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes improve the microenvironment of infarcted myocardium contributing to angiogenesis and anti-inflammation. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;37(6):2415–2424. doi: 10.1159/000438594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Théry C, Zitvogel L, Amigorena S. Exosomes: composition, biogenesis and function. Nature Rev Immunol. 2002;2(8):569–579. doi: 10.1038/nri855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Tian ZC, Wang JQ, Ge H. Apatinib ameliorates doxorubicin-induced migration and cancer stemness of osteosarcoma cells by inhibiting Sox2 via STAT3 signalling. J Orthop Translat. 2020;22:132–141. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2019.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Tong R, et al. Inhibition of miR-574-5p suppresses cell growth and metastasis and enhances chemosensitivity by targeting RNA binding protein QKI in cervical cancer cells. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2020;393(6):951–966. doi: 10.1007/s00210-019-01772-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Tran QH, et al. Melatonin and doxorubicin synergistically enhance apoptosis via autophagy-dependent reduction of AMPKα1 transcription in human breast cancer cells. Exp Mol Med. 2021;53(9):1413–1422. doi: 10.1038/s12276-021-00675-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Walsh N, et al. Expression of multidrug resistance markers ABCB1 (MDR-1/P-gp) and ABCC1 (MRP-1) in renal cell carcinoma. BMC Urol. 2009;9(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-9-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Wang Y, et al. An ATP-responsive codelivery system of doxorubicin and MiR-34a to synergistically inhibit cell proliferation and migration. Mol Pharm. 2017;14(7):2323–2332. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Wang H, et al. HOTAIR enhanced paclitaxel and doxorubicin resistance in gastric cancer cells partly through inhibiting miR-217 expression. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(9):7226–7234. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Wang Y, et al. Exosomal circRNAs: biogenesis, effect and application in human diseases. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1041-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Wang H, et al. Downregulation of miR-222-3p reverses doxorubicin-resistance in LoVo cells through upregulating forkhead box protein P2 (FOXP2) Protein. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:2169–2178. doi: 10.12659/MSM.913325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Wang S, et al. Interactions between lncRNA TUG1 and miR-9-5p modulate the resistance of breast cancer cells to doxorubicin by regulating eIF5A2. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:13159–13170. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S255113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Wang S, et al. Exosomal CircPRRX1 enhances doxorubicin resistance in gastric cancer by regulating MiR-3064-5p/PTPN14 signaling. Yonsei Med J. 2020;61(9):750–761. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.9.750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Wang B, et al. LncRNA NORAD accelerates the progression and doxorubicin resistance of neuroblastoma through up-regulating HDAC8 via sponging miR-144-3p. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;129:110268. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Wang L, et al. Long non-coding RNA LINC00426 contributes to doxorubicin resistance by sponging miR-4319 in osteosarcoma. Biol Direct. 2020;15(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13062-020-00265-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Wang JD, et al. Exosomal HMGB1 promoted cancer malignancy. Cancers (basel) 2021;13(4):877. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Wang Y, et al. MiR-200c-3p aggravates gastric cell carcinoma via KLF6. Genes Genomics. 2021;43(11):1307–1316. doi: 10.1007/s13258-021-01160-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Wang L, et al. The LINC00922 aggravates ovarian cancer progression via sponging miR-361-3p. J Ovarian Res. 2021;14(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13048-021-00828-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Wang Q, et al. Hsa_circ_0092276 promotes doxorubicin resistance in breast cancer cells by regulating autophagy via miR-348/ATG7 axis. Transl Oncol. 2021;14(8):101045. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Wang S, et al. Ursolic acid inhibits breast cancer metastasis by suppressing glycolytic metabolism via activating SP1/Caveolin-1 signaling. Front Oncol. 2021;11:745584. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.745584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Wang J, et al. Curcumol simultaneously induces both apoptosis and autophagy in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Phytother Res. 2021;35(12):7004–7017. doi: 10.1002/ptr.7321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Wang D, Zhang X, Xu B. PEGylated doxorubicin prodrug-forming reduction-sensitive micelles with high drug loading and improved anticancer therapy. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:781982. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.781982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Wardhani BWK, et al. TGF-β-induced TMEPAI promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in doxorubicin-treated triple-negative breast cancer cells via SMAD3 and PI3K/AKT pathway alteration. Breast Cancer (dove Med Press) 2021;13:529–538. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S325429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Wei W, et al. CircSAMD4A contributes to cell doxorubicin resistance in osteosarcoma by regulating the miR-218-5p/KLF8 axis. Open Life Sci. 2020;15(1):848–859. doi: 10.1515/biol-2020-0079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Wen C, et al. Curcumin reverses doxorubicin resistance via inhibition the efflux function of ABCB4 in doxorubicin-resistant breast cancer cells. Mol Med Rep. 2019;19(6):5162–5168. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Wise HM, Hermida MA, Leslie NR. Prostate cancer, PI3K, PTEN and prognosis. Clin Sci (lond) 2017;131(3):197–210. doi: 10.1042/CS20160026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Wu X, et al. The many faces of long noncoding RNAs in cancer. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2018;29(9):922–935. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Wu M, et al. Hsa_circRNA_002144 promotes growth and metastasis of colorectal cancer through regulating miR-615-5p/LARP1/mTOR pathway. Carcinogenesis. 2021;42(4):601–610. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgaa140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Xi L, et al. Circular RNA circCSPP1 knockdown attenuates doxorubicin resistance and suppresses tumor progression of colorectal cancer via miR-944/FZD7 axis. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-01855-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Xia M, et al. MiR-194-5p enhances the sensitivity of nonsmall-cell lung cancer to doxorubicin through targeted inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor-1. World J Surg Oncol. 2021;19(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02278-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Xie X, et al. Polymeric hybrid nanomicelles for cancer theranostics: an efficient and precise anticancer strategy for the codelivery of doxorubicin/miR-34a and magnetic resonance imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(47):43865–43878. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b14908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Xie C, et al. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0003496 contributes to tumorigenesis and chemoresistance in osteosarcoma through targeting (microRNA) miR-370/Krüppel-like factor 12 axis. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:8229–8240. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S253969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Xie X, et al. A circular RNA, circSMARCA5, inhibits prostate cancer proliferative, migrative, and invasive capabilities via the miR-181b-5p/miR-17-3p-TIMP3 axis. Aging (albany NY) 2021;13(15):19908–19919. doi: 10.18632/aging.203408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Xin X, et al. MiR-376a-3p increases cell apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia by targeting MT1X. Cancer Biol Ther. 2022;23(1):234–242. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2022.2054243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Xu Y, et al. miR-27b-3p is involved in doxorubicin resistance of human anaplastic thyroid cancer cells via targeting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018;123(6):670–677. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Xu Y, et al. miR-34a inhibits melanoma growth by targeting ZEB1. Aging (albany NY) 2021;13(11):15538–15547. doi: 10.18632/aging.203114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  174. Xue H, et al. Delivery of miR-375 and doxorubicin hydrochloride by lipid-coated hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles to overcome multiple drug resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12:5271–5287. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S135306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Yang L, et al. Down-regulation of osteopontin expression by RNA interference affects cell proliferation and chemotherapy sensitivity of breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. Mol Med Rep. 2012;5(2):373–376. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2011.679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Yang X, et al. miR-200b regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition of chemo-resistant breast cancer cells by targeting FN1. Discov Med. 2017;24(131):75–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Yang X, et al. MiR-27b-3p promotes migration and invasion in colorectal cancer cells by targeting HOXA10. Biosci Rep. 2019;39(12):BSR20191087. doi: 10.1042/BSR20191087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Yang Q, et al. Chemotherapy-elicited exosomal miR-378a-3p and miR-378d promote breast cancer stemness and chemoresistance via the activation of EZH2/STAT3 signaling. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-01901-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Yi X, et al. Honokiol antagonizes doxorubicin resistance in human breast cancer via miR-188-5p/FBXW7/c-Myc pathway. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021;87(5):647–656. doi: 10.1007/s00280-021-04238-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Yin TF, et al. Identification of the circRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory network and its prognostic effect in colorectal cancer. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9(18):4520–4541. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i18.4520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Yuan J, et al. CircPRDM2 contributes to doxorubicin resistance of osteosarcoma by elevating EZH2 via sponging miR-760. Cancer Manag Res. 2021;13:4433–4445. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S295147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Yue X, et al. LncRNA MALAT1 promotes breast cancer progression and doxorubicin resistance via regulating miR-570-3p. Biomed J. 2020;44:S296. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2020.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Zang H, et al. Overcoming acquired resistance of EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells to the third generation EGFR inhibitor, osimertinib, with the natural product honokiol. Mol Oncol. 2020;14(4):882–895. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Zangouei AS, Alimardani M, Moghbeli M. MicroRNAs as the critical regulators of doxorubicin resistance in breast tumor cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-01873-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Zanoaga O, et al. The Role of miR-155 in nutrition: modulating cancer-associated inflammation. Nutrients. 2021;13(7):2245. doi: 10.3390/nu13072245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Zeng C, et al. Curcumol enhances the sensitivity of doxorubicin in triple-negative breast cancer via regulating the miR-181b-2-3p-ABCC3 axis. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020;174:113795. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.113795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Zhang Y, et al. miR-135b-5p enhances doxorubicin-sensitivity of breast cancer cells through targeting anterior gradient 2. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1024-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Zhang M, et al. LncRNA XIST promotes chemoresistance of breast cancer cells to doxorubicin by sponging miR-200c-3p to upregulate ANLN. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2020;47(8):1464–1472. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.13307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Zhang J, et al. LncRNA SNHG15 contributes to doxorubicin resistance of osteosarcoma cells through targeting the miR-381-3p/GFRA1 axis. Open Life Sci. 2020;15(1):871–883. doi: 10.1515/biol-2020-0086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Zhang N, et al. Curcumin reverses doxorubicin resistance in colon cancer cells at the metabolic level. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2021;201:114129. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Zhang K, et al. A two-miRNA signature of upregulated miR-185-5p and miR-362-5p as a blood biomarker for breast cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 2021;222:153458. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2021.153458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Zhang H, et al. miR-520b inhibits IGF-1R to increase doxorubicin sensitivity and promote cell apoptosis in breast cancer. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2021;141(3):415–426. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.20-00160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Zhang Y, et al. miR-381-3p attenuates doxorubicin resistance in human anaplastic thyroid carcinoma via targeting homeobox A9. Int J Exp Pathol. 2021;102(4–5):209–217. doi: 10.1111/iep.12401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Zhang Y, Tan X, Lu Y. Exosomal transfer of circ_0006174 contributes to the chemoresistance of doxorubicin in colorectal cancer by depending on the miR-1205/CCND2 axis. J Physiol Biochem. 2022;78(1):39–50. doi: 10.1007/s13105-021-00831-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Zhao P, et al. MiR-375 delivered by lipid-coated doxorubicin-calcium carbonate nanoparticles overcomes chemoresistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nanomedicine. 2017;13(8):2507–2516. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2017.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Zhao G, et al. Targeted inhibition of HDAC8 increases the doxorubicin sensitivity of neuroblastoma cells via up regulation of miR-137. Eur J Pharmacol. 2017;802:20–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.02.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Zheng Z, et al. An ancestral haplotype defines susceptibility to doxorubicin nephropathy in the laboratory mouse. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(7):1796–1800. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005121373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Zheng Y, et al. MiR-181b promotes chemoresistance in breast cancer by regulating Bim expression. Oncol Rep. 2016;35(2):683–690. doi: 10.3892/or.2015.4417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Zheng SZ, et al. MiR-34a overexpression enhances the inhibitory effect of doxorubicin on HepG2 cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(22):2752–2762. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i22.2752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Zhou B, et al. Long noncoding RNA SNHG12 mediates doxorubicin resistance of osteosarcoma via miR-320a/MCL1 axis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;106:850–857. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Zhou Z, et al. The long noncoding RNA D63785 regulates chemotherapy sensitivity in human gastric cancer by targeting miR-422a. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2018;12:405–419. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.05.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Zhou Y, et al. miR-223 overexpression inhibits doxorubicin-induced autophagy by targeting FOXO3a and reverses chemoresistance in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(11):843. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-2053-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Zhou W, Liu Y, Wu X. Down-regulation of circITCH promotes osteosarcoma development and resistance to doxorubicin via the miR-524/RASSF6 axis. J Gene Med. 2021;23(10):e3373. doi: 10.1002/jgm.3373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Zhu J, Zhang F. Circular RNA VANGL1 knockdown suppressed viability, promoted apoptosis, and increased doxorubicin sensitivity through targeting miR-145-5p to regulate SOX4 in bladder cancer cells. Open Med (wars) 2021;16(1):1010–1021. doi: 10.1515/med-2021-0299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Zhu LB, et al. De novosynthesis of pH-responsive, self-assembled, and targeted polypeptide nano-micelles for enhanced delivery of doxorubicin. Nanotechnology. 2021;32(29):295707. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/abee49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Zou Z, et al. miR-495 sensitizes MDR cancer cells to the combination of doxorubicin and taxol by inhibiting MDR1 expression. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21(9):1929–1943. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling are provided here courtesy of The International CCN Society

RESOURCES