Abstract
Single-staged cartilage repair techniques have shown great clinical efficacy in the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee, particularly when using bilayered acellular scaffolds augmented with bone marrow aspirate concentrate. We describe an all-arthroscopic approach to the single-staged cartilage repair procedure using a porcine-derived collagen I/III bilayered scaffold that is templated arthroscopically and augmented with bone marrow aspirate concentrate, in the treatment of critically sized articular defects of the knee.
Technique Video
Single-staged cartilage repair procedures have shown comparable outcomes with staged procedures such as autologous chondrocyte implantation, with a crucial benefit of being performed in a single surgery, often at a lower overall cost and with greater international regulatory acceptance. At the forefront of single-staged cartilage repair is the AMIC procedure, wherein an acellular collagen I/III bilayered scaffold, Chondro-Gide (Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) is used with or without bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), with the latter being termed AMIC Plus. Chondro-Gide has been shown to provide the greatest degree of pain relief in short-term follow-up, with BMAC augmentation providing further improvement of outcomes.1 Cartilage repair with Chondro-Gide traditionally has been performed through a mini-open approach through a parapatellar incision to allow for adequate lesion exposure, and templating and fixation of the acellular patch. However, in this article, we present our technique of an all-arthroscopic cartilage repair with the AMIC Plus procedure.
Surgical Technique (With Video Illustration)
Patient Evaluation, Imaging, and Indications
Careful and comprehensive preoperative evaluation of patients presenting with symptomatic articular cartilage lesions is of paramount importance.2 Apart from localizing the likely areas of cartilage defects through clinical examination, identifying possible concomitant pathologies such as ligamentous damage, malalignment, and rotational deformities is crucial, as such comorbidities could contraindicate upfront cartilage repair. Standard weight-bearing orthogonal views of the knee joints, as well as sunrise or skyline Merchant views, in addition to long-leg films are valuable diagnostic tools and should be performed in the same initial clinic consultation; however, the gold-standard imaging modality for soft-tissue injuries of the knee still remains magnetic resonance imaging. Indications for cartilage repair include symptomatic lesions that affect activities of daily living or sporting activities, which have failed conservative management such as physiotherapy and intra-articular injections. Cartilage defects that are eligible for repair should be contained defects with healthy cartilage surrounding the defect.
Patient Positioning and Anesthesia
Under general anesthesia, the patient is positioned supine on the operating table with the ipsilateral foot attachment removed, allowing for a full range of motion, and improved access to the knee joint. A high thigh tourniquet is then placed and inflated.
Diagnostic Arthroscopy
With reference to the surface marking of the patella tendon, standard anteromedial and anterolateral portals are created, and the joint space is instilled with normal saline. Diagnostic arthroscopy is performed with a 30° arthroscope to directly visualize, probe, and stage the cartilage lesion. A note is made of any concomitant soft-tissue injuries (Fig 1).
Preparation of AMIC Plus: Chondro-Gide and BMAC
A bone marrow aspiration trocar is inserted to the ipsilateral proximal tibia, and 30 mL of bone marrow is aspirated using the BioCUE BMA Concentration System (Biomet Biologics, Warsaw, IN) as per manufacturer guidelines. The aspirate is then centrifuged at 3200 rpm for 15 minutes with the GPS III system (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN) to produce 3 to 5 mL of BMAC (Fig 2).
The sterile package cover of collagen I/III bilayer membrane scaffold, Chondro-Gide, (Geistlich Pharma AG) is opened, the articular surface marked with a sterile skin marker, and the BMAC solution instilled to the Chondro-Gide sheet within the sterile package container and left to soak for 5 minutes (Fig 3).
Cartilage Lesion Preparation
The Chondrectom Extended set – big joints (Biovico, Gdynia, Poland) is used to debride and prepare the cartilage defect site for graft implantation. The front and sideward chondrectomes are used to make sharp, 90° cuts of the vertical lesion margins, whereas the parallel chondrectome is used to grossly debride the defect bed and remove any intralesional osteophytes. Finer preparation of the defect bed is achieved by using a curette to gently debride the bed to the level of the articular tidemark, using audiological and tactile cues to signal an appropriate debridement.3 The instillation pressure of the saline arthroscopy is reduced, and the lesion base is observed for characteristic punctate bleeding, signifying an adequate depth of debridement (Fig 4). No microfracture is performed for the defect bed. At this juncture, saline instillation is halted, and the procedure is converted to a dry arthroscopy after suctioning of the remaining saline and instillation of carbon dioxide gas to the knee (Fig 5).
Graft Templating
The debrided lesion is then dried with a gauze patty, and the curved raspatory tool from the Chondrectom set is used to measure the size of the lesion (Fig 6). These approximate measurements are then transferred to the foil template included within the Chondro-Gide package and cut to size. Small artery forceps are used to introduce the cut template into the defect bed, and the size and shape of the template are checked for adequacy. It is important to size the foil template to match the defect bed as accurately as possible, as this greatly influences the subsequent adequacy of defect filling (Fig 7).
The BMAC-soaked Chondro-Gide is then cut exactly to the shape of the finalized foil template using a 15-blade scalpel and straight Metzenbaum scissors. At this point, the marking indicating the articular surface of the graft is re-shaded with a sterile skin marker to ensure visibility within the arthroscopic field (Fig 8).
Cartilage Repair
The prepared graft is carefully introduced into the arthroscopic field with a pair of small artery forceps gently grasping the apex of the graft so as not to traumatize the scaffold matrix. At this point, direct visual confirmation of the articular surface marking is obtained to ensure the graft has been positioned correctly. The graft is placed loosely onto the lesion bed and the curved raspatory instrument is reintroduced to assist in smoothing and tamping the graft onto the lesion bed. Tisseel (Baxter, Deerfield, IL), a fibrin sealant, is then liberally applied to the surface of the graft in layers and left to dry for at least 5 minutes, as per manufacturer’s instructions. After drying, the Tisseel layer is palpated with the curved raspatory to check for contact bleeding, which signifies an inadequately dried layer. If contact bleeding is present, further time is allowed for Tisseel drying. Once the layer is stable to palpation with an absence of contact bleeding, the repair is considered complete, and the stability of the repair must now be evaluated. All devices are removed from the working field, and the knee is passively ranged through maximal flexion and extension for a total of 10 cycles of motion. Dry arthroscopy is then resumed, and the repair is checked visually for displacement or dislodgement. This process of evaluation is subsequently repeated under saline arthroscopy (Fig 9).
Postoperative Protocol
The knee is then fitted with an angle brace and locked in extension, with continuous passive motion instituted from the first postoperative day. The prescribed ranges of motion and weight-bearing protocol differs based on location of the repair and is summarized in Tables 1 and 2 (Video 1).
Table 1.
Tibiofemoral Lesions | Week 0-2 | Weeks 3-4 | Weeks 5-6 | Weeks 7-8 | Week 9 Onwards |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Knee flexion permitted in locking angle brace | Up to 30° | Up to 60° | Up to 90° | Full range with brace worn | Full range without brace |
Weight-bearing status | Non–weight-bearing | Non–weight-bearing | Protected weight-bearing in full extension | Full weight-bearing in full extension | Full weight-bearing with quads strengthening |
Table 2.
Patellofemoral Lesions | Week 0-2 | Weeks 3-4 | Weeks 5-6 | Weeks 7-8 | Week 9 Onwards |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Knee flexion permitted in locking angle brace | Up to 30° | Up to 60° | Up to 90° | Full range without brace | Full range without brace |
Weight-bearing status | Non–weight-bearing | Protected weight-bearing in full extension | Full weight-bearing in full extension | Full weight-bearing with quads strengthening | Full weight-bearing with quads strengthening |
Discussion
We present our single-staged all arthroscopic cartilage repair using BMAC-augmented Chondro-Gide to treat full-thickness, critically sized articular defects of the knee. Additionally, we demonstrate that this technique is amenable in utility for both tibiofemoral and patellofemoral lesions. Table 3 summarizes the tips and pearls from our experience.
Table 3.
Tips and pearls for using an all-arthroscopic approach to AMIC Plus | |
---|---|
Patellar lesions | Direct visualization of the lesions is crucial before chondrectomy. |
|
|
|
|
Dry arthroscopy | A dry arthroscopic environment will greatly assist in graft implantation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scaffold adhesion | It is imperative to keep the cartilage defect bed as dry as possible when attaching the scaffold |
|
|
|
Pitfalls to avoid when using an all-arthroscopic approach to AMIC Plus |
---|
|
The all-arthroscopic approach, with templating and augmentation of orthobiologics, is the main advantage of the technique that we present in this study. Conventionally, the repair of critically sized articular defects with Chondro-Gide is performed through a mini-open arthrotomy due to the need for templating the Chondro-Gide membrane scaffold, for a customized fit. Such approaches, although excellent for achieving exposure, direct visualization, and manipulation of intra-articular structures, carry the standard increased risks of arthrotomy over arthroscopy, and are often associated with longer postoperative recovery periods, more significant postoperative pain.4 Our technique allows for minimal violation of soft tissues, a precise fit of the membrane scaffold in the defect, as well as providing advantages of orthobiologics augmentation. A limitation of this technique would be addressing patella cartilage defects with associated bone loss, where bone grafting before placement of the membrane scaffold is required. In the arthroscopic approach, this would be technically challenging, and the mini-open approach would still be recommended.
Currently, there exists high-quality evidence supporting the short- and long-term clinical efficacy of Chondro-Gide in the treatment of articular defects of the knee, particularly when used in conjunction with BMAC.5,6 Steinwachs et al.6 displayed that for cartilage lesions with a mean size of 4 cm2, the utility of Chondro-Gide resulted in postoperative pain relief and functional improvement that was not only clinically significant but maintained for up to 3 years’ post-repair. In addition, among the 12 studies reviewed by the authors, no cases of treatment-related adverse events were noted. Consequently, this slate of evidence in support of the safety and efficacy of Chondro-Gide has led to the adoption of the AMIC and AMIC Plus procedures as the recommended standard of care for critically sized articular cartilage lesions by international consensus bodies.7
In conclusion, the AMIC Plus procedure for critically sized articular defects of the knee results has been displayed to have a good clinical safety and efficacy profile. Hence, the addition of an all-arthroscopic approach to performing this procedure would allow a cartilage surgeon to deliver the current standard of care for cartilage defects through a minimally invasive surgical approach, with minimal disruption to knee capsule and extensor mechanism integrity.
Footnotes
The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: K.L.W. reports personal fees and other from Cell Research Corp., Urgo Medical, 3M, Geistlich, and Molnlycke, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
Supplementary Data
References
- 1.Ow Z.G.W., Cheang H.L.X., Koh J.H., et al. Does the choice of acellular scaffold and augmentation with bone marrow aspirate concentrate affect short-term outcomes in cartilage repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022;51:1622–1633. doi: 10.1177/03635465211069565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mall N.A., Harris J.D., Cole B.J. Clinical evaluation and preoperative planning of articular cartilage lesions of the knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23:633–640. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hevesi M., van Genechten W., Krych A.J., Saris D.B.F. The sound of cartilage repair: The importance of using pitch and volume cues in cartilage restoration surgery. Arthrosc Tech. 2021;10:e2049–e2052. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2021.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Peres L.R., Marchitto R.O., Pereira G.S., Yoshino F.S., de Castro Fernandes M., Matsumoto M.H. Arthrotomy versus arthroscopy in the treatment of septic arthritis of the knee in adults: A randomized clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:3155–3162. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3918-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.de Girolamo L., Schönhuber H., Viganò M., et al. Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) and AMIC enhanced by autologous concentrated bone marrow aspirate (BMAC) allow for stable clinical and functional improvements at up to 9 years follow-up: Results from a randomized controlled study. J Clin Med. 2019;8:392. doi: 10.3390/jcm8030392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Steinwachs M.R., Gille J., Volz M., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical evidence on the use of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis in the knee. Cartilage. 2021;13:42s–56s. doi: 10.1177/1947603519870846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Niemeyer P., Albrecht D., Aurich M., et al. Empfehlungen der AG Klinische Geweberegeneration zur Behandlung von Knorpelschäden am Kniegelenk. Z Orthop Unfall. 2022;161:57–64. doi: 10.1055/a-1663-6807. [in German] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.