Abstract
Objective To compare the effectiveness with which insured and uninsured persons with chronic illnesses managed their health care. Design Recruited volunteers diagnosed with a variety of chronic illnesses who underwent 3 semistructured interviews in a 1-year period. Setting Volunteers were recruited through referrals, flyers, and face-to-face contacts from community health clinics, senior centers, acute care hospitals, and home care services in 2 urban counties in California between December 1997 and December 2000. Participants A total of 297 persons between the ages of 23 and 97 years (35% African American, 33% Latino, and 32% Filipino American), of whom 42 (14%) had no health insurance. Main outcome measures Qualitative analysis of interview data compared insured and uninsured respondents on a series of components of chronic illness management, including control over illness, frequency of health crises, procuring medication, use of medication, understanding of the illness, knowledge of self-care measures, and awareness of risk factors. Whether respondents were under the care of a regular physician was also assessed. Results Compared with insured respondents, uninsured respondents were much less effective at managing their illnesses. The uninsured had poorly controlled illnesses, frequent health crises, difficulty procuring medication, used medication incorrectly, demonstrated poor understanding of their illness, and displayed little knowledge of self-care measures or risk awareness. They rarely had a regular physician or attended a specific health clinic. Conclusions The findings suggest that not only did uninsured persons with chronic health conditions lack adequate health care, their illnesses were also poorly controlled. Inadequately educated about their health, uninsured persons lacked the information, insight, and tools that would have allowed them to manage their illnesses more effectively.
Whether or not people have medical insurance has a major effect on their health. In 1999, 1 of 6 people living in the United States was uninsured.1 People in ethnic minority groups are even more likely to be uninsured2: 1 of 3 Hispanics and 1 of 4 African Americans are without health insurance.3,4 Although the challenge of providing effective health care to the 43 million Americans who do not have medical insurance is substantial, little or no research has addressed how those patients who are especially vulnerable—uninsured patients who suffer from chronic illnesses—manage their health and health care on an ongoing basis. I present findings from a qualitative study of African American, Latino, and Filipino American respondents. The main objective was to compare the management of chronic illness among those who were insured with those who were uninsured.
METHODS
The findings are based on 2 large qualitative studies that examined the same questions about the daily management of chronic illness but included different age groups. They are combined here to illustrate the issues that uninsured people address across the life span. Respondents were from 3 ethnic groups: African Americans, Latinos, and Filipino Americans; they were between the ages of 23 and 97 years, and they had 1 or more chronic illnesses. The most common illnesses were diabetes mellitus, asthma, and heart disease or hypertension. The total sample included in the study was 297: 105 African Americans, 97 Latinos, and 95 Filipino Americans. The total number of people who were uninsured was 42 (14%): 14 African Americans, 17 Latinos, and 11 Filipino Americans.
The study protocol and consent form were approved by the Institutional Review Board, Committee on Human Research, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine. Respondents were recruited through community health clinics, acute care hospitals, home care services, and other sources in 2 urban counties between December 1997 and December 2000 (table 1). The criterion for entry into the study was the presence of 1 or more chronic illnesses. The sample reflected a range of illness severity from mild to severe.
Table 1.
Sources | Insured Frequency, no. (%) (n = 255 [86%])* | Uninsured Frequency, no. (%) (n = 42 [14%])* |
---|---|---|
Senior centers | 58 (23) | 6 (14) |
Clinics | 57 (23) | 10 (24) |
Field contacts | 36 (14) | 6 (14) |
Participant referrals | 35 (14) | 10 (24) |
Home care services | 29 (12) | 0 |
Flyers | 20 (8) | 8 (19) |
Religious organizations | 10 (4) | 2 (5) |
Hospitals | 6 (2) | 0 |
Number represents all available data.
Following key tenets of the in-depth interviewing approach,5,6,7,8 respondents were interviewed 3 times in a 1-year period. Hour-long interviews were semistructured and addressed experiences with illnesses, daily living routines, economic situation, and use of and access to health care. Interviews were tape recorded and transcribed verbatim.
Respondents were interviewed in their language of choice by interviewers who were members of the same ethnic group. African Americans were interviewed in English. With 3 exceptions (interviewed in English), Latinos were interviewed in Spanish, and Filipino Americans were interviewed in Tagalog. Limitations: Interviewers translated and transcribed interviews they had conducted because of a dearth of trained people who were adequately bilingual to do the transcribing.
Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the data.9 The data were divided into the 3 groups; each group was analyzed separately, then cross-group comparisons were made. A specific procedure was followed in the analysis:
Core categories that repeatedly reappeared in the data were identified10
Selected transcripts were read by the entire team to generate consensus in coding categories, which led to the development of codes. This was followed by successive phases of trial coding until a level of agreement of 95% or more was reached by pairs of coders. This process resulted in 97 discrete codes
The entire data set was coded for specific topics using a data-sorting software program (Nudist)
A case-by-case narrative analysis was conducted, in which emphasis was given to how people portrayed their illnesses. Research has shown that such subjective reports are accurate reflections of illness severity11
RESULTS
Demographics
Table 2 shows the demographic information of respondents.
Table 2.
Demographics | Insured Frequency, no. (%) (n = 255 [86%])* | Uninsured Frequency, no. (%) (n = 42 [14%])* |
---|---|---|
Age, yr | ||
Range (mean) | 21-97 (63.9) | 23-95 (54.2) |
Sex | ||
Women | 157 (62) | 31 (74) |
Men | 98 (38) | 11 (26) |
Marital status | ||
Married | 93 (37) | 16 (38) |
Unmarried (widowed, divorced, separated, never married) | 162 (64) | 26 (62) |
Education | ||
No education | 3 (1) | 2 (5) |
Grade school | 85 (34) | 16 (38) |
Some high school | 42 (17) | 8 (19) |
High school graduate | 51 (20) | 6 (14) |
Some college or vocational training | 23 (9) | 5 (12) |
College graduate | 41 (16) | 2 (5) |
Postgraduate | 6 (2) | 2 (5) |
Other | 3 (1) | 1 (2) |
Work life | ||
Retired | 168 (66) | 13 (31) |
Currently working | 42 (17) | 15 (36) |
Homemaker | 20 (8) | 7 (17) |
Disabled | 14 (6) | 0 |
Unemployed | 9 (4) | 7 (17) |
Student | 2 (1) | 0 |
Occupation | ||
Higher Exec, major professional | 1 (<1) | 0 |
Business manager, administrative minor professional | 32 (13) | 2 (5) |
Technical semiprofessional | 13 (5) | 1 (2) |
Clerical, sales | 23 (9) | 4 (10) |
Skilled labor | 50 (20) | 3 (7) |
Machine operation, semiskilled | 50 (20) | 10 (24) |
Unskilled labor | 52 (20) | 13 (31) |
Farm labor, menial | 10 (4) | 1 (2) |
Homemaker | 20 (8) | 7 (17) |
Student | 2 (1) | 0 |
Never worked | 2 (1) | 1 (2) |
Number represents all available data.
Health care and poorly controlled chronic illness
The major finding to emerge from this research was that most of the uninsured respondents' illnesses were poorly controlled. A major difference could be discerned between the insured and the uninsured: whereas the insured reported occasional health crises (symptoms experienced as frightening or out of the ordinary, for which medical care is usually sought), the uninsured reported an ongoing chain of such health crises.
With few exceptions, the uninsured did not have a regular physician or a specific health clinic they consistently used; they sought their medical care from emergency departments, free clinics, or low-income clinics that had sliding scales. Small neighborhood clinics that operated free of charge were most heavily frequented. African Americans and Latinos were able to identify sources of free care much less frequently than were Filipino Americans because of the distribution of free clinics.
In almost all cases, the uninsured reported that they sought care only when they had persistent symptoms that interfered with their daily lives. Lack of money was the primary reason given for not seeking health care, and respondents often reported feeling extremely ill before they sought care. Those who had identified and used a free clinic were much less likely to delay.
Whereas the insured reported an infrequent use of emergency departments, the uninsured reported that they often found it necessary to seek emergency department use because of their acute symptoms. Almost without exception, visits to hospital emergency departments were described as emergencies, such as intractable episodes of asthma or episodes of severe dizziness by patients who had hypertension. The uninsured reported that they were usually given a limited supply of medication but rarely reported being sent home with a treatment plan. They were unaware of any reevaluation of their condition on subsequent visits to a community clinic.
Getting medication
Most of the insured had a regular physician, had complex medical regimens that included daily use of medication, and their illnesses were under control. In contrast, the uninsured reported being in a constant struggle to secure adequate medication. They said that they could not control their illnesses and described unremitting symptoms, functional limitations, and frequent health crises.
Three specific problems could be identified for the uninsured with respect to medication (see box). The first of these was getting appropriate medication. Some respondents were unmedicated and others were undermedicated. The uninsured who had asthma or hypertension were most frequently undermedicated.
Table 2.
The uninsured: problems associated with getting medication |
---|
|
The second problem respondents reported about medication was having an adequate supply. Those who had had a chronic illness for years recognized the need to keep up with their regular regimen of medication and were preoccupied with how to get more medication.
The third problem was the inappropriate use of medication. Half of the uninsured respondents did not use their medication correctly and reported several ways of dealing with dwindling medication supplies: cutting down on the dose and taking it half as often until it ran out, taking medication prescribed for daily use only when symptoms occurred, or sharing others' medication.
Lack of knowledge about illness and self-care
Those who were insured and had a regular physician were much more knowledgeable about their illness than were the uninsured. The insured recited danger signs they watched for and illness triggers they tried to avoid. Although the insured did not always follow guidelines for their illnesses, they were much more likely to know about them than the uninsured. This research has previously demonstrated the importance of patients' knowledge of their illnesses for effective illness management.12 A new finding is the extent to which lack of knowledge adversely affects people's ability to manage their chronic illnesses (see box). With few exceptions, the uninsured demonstrated little understanding of their illnesses or what to do about them. They were less effective at symptom recognition and were less knowledgeable about related conditions, such as foot infections in those who had diabetes.
Table 4.
The uninsured: lack of information about illness |
---|
|
The insured were much more likely than the uninsured were to think in terms of self-care. They reported that their physicians explained to them about exercise, diet, and the importance of not smoking. The uninsured rarely made such statements. More than half of the uninsured did not follow any dietary modifications, exercise, or other risk-avoidance behaviors. In contrast to the insured, the uninsured described home remedies as replacing a medical regimen rather than adding to it.
DISCUSSION
People with chronic illnesses who are uninsured face great difficulties in managing their illnesses. Ongoing contact with physicians fosters more comprehensive health awareness that informs illness management. Effective illness management has a battery of components, including symptom recognition; understanding how a particular illness works; and following a daily regimen that includes regular medication use, self-care practices, and risk awareness and prevention. The uninsured are simply unable to articulate these different components. They do not think about their illnesses in the same comprehensive way as do the insured. Their approach is piecemeal, an apparent result of their fragmented and infrequent medical care.
TREATING UNINSURED PATIENTS
What can physicians do who serve uninsured patients who are chronically ill, despite the current constraints of the health care system? Individual physicians can make a difference, in 3 main ways.
First, physicians need to be alert to patients who are unmedicated or undermedicated. Access to medication postpones the recurrence of acute illness episodes.
Second, physicians can promote the concept of managing the chronic illness to patients, who need to learn that there is more to chronic illness management than medication, however important medication may be. Physicians can help uninsured patients become better illness managers by talking with them about the specifics of chronic illness management. Although insured patients consistently receive such information, uninsured patients apparently do not. Hearing the same information repeated over time, even by different physicians, helps to reinforce it. Providing written guidelines in the patient's first language may facilitate this process.
Third, physicians should develop a treatment plan with uninsured patients. Discussing what would be a reasonable treatment plan—even with patients who may never be seen again—helps to educate the patient about the medical management of the chronic illness, information that patients carry with them to the next medical encounter. Such guidelines are essential to reduce subsequent health crises.
Despite perceptions of poor, uninsured persons as inattentive, problem-ridden, and difficult to treat,13 the uninsured are trying to control their illnesses. Although they often have many other concerns, such as securing adequate food, shelter, finances, and caring for family members, they appreciate information about illness management and try to act on medical advice.
This research attests to the critical importance of free community clinics for the uninsured. The capacity of the health care safety net—a loosely organized collection of publicly subsidized hospitals, local health departments, clinics, and individual clinicians14—to provide care for those without insurance is increasingly at risk because of cutbacks in public funding and pressures from the marketplace.15 Such facilities provide a much-needed resource for the uninsured and undoubtedly play a substantial role in decreasing mortality. In the continuing absence of health insurance, increased underwriting of the cost of such health care services is essential to reduce morbidity and mortality among the uninsured.
Summary points
Of 297 persons in 3 ethnic groups, 42 (14%) had no health insurance
The illnesses of uninsured persons were poorly controlled, and uninsured people reported ongoing health crises
The uninsured rarely had a regular physician or consistently used a specific health clinic, constantly struggled to secure medication, lacked understanding of their illnesses, and rarely practiced self-care
Acknowledgments
Photograph was taken by Alain McLaughlin. Patient shown gave written consent.
Funding: This research was supported by grants R37 AG 11144 and RO1 AG14152 from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging.
Competing interests: None declared
References
- 1.Serafini MW. One in six, and counting. Natl J (Wash) 1999;31: 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gorman S. Faces of the uninsured. Natl J (Wash) 1999;31: 2073. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Marwick C. Growing Hispanic association serves increasing population. JAMA 1999;281: 1687-1688. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Valdez RB, Morgenstern H, Brown R, Wyn R, Wang C, Cumberland W. Insuring Latinos against the costs of illness. JAMA 1993;269: 889-894. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Spradley JP. The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston; 1979.
- 6.Rubinstein R. Stories told: in-depth interviewing and the structure of its insights. In: Reinharz S, Rowles GD, eds. Qualitative Gerontology. New York: Springer; 1987: 128-146.
- 7.Langness LL, Frank G. Lives: An Anthropological Approach to Biography. Novato, CA: Chandler and Sharp; 1981.
- 8.Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnographic Principles in Practice. London: Tavistock; 1986.
- 9.Clark MM, Anderson B. Culture and Aging. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 1967.
- 10.Mishler EG. Research Interviewing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1986.
- 11.Janson-Bjerklie S, Ferketich S, Benner P, Becker G. Clinical markers of asthma severity and risk: importance of subjective as well as objective factors. Heart Lung 1992;21: 265-272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Becker G, Beyene Y, Newsom EM, Rodgers DV. Knowledge and care of chronic illness in three ethnic minority groups. Fam Med 1998;30: 173-178. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Miles SH. What are we teaching about indigent patients? JAMA 1992;268: 2561-2562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cunningham PJ, Kemper P. Ability to obtain medical care for the uninsured: how much does it vary across communities? JAMA 1998;280: 921-927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Davis K. Uninsured in an era of managed care. Health Serv Res 1997;31: 641-649. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]