Abstract
The mortality component of contemporary health indexes is discussed. Since these indexes reduce to mortality indexes when only life and death states enter the analysis, they share the conceptual weaknesses of mortality indexes. Also, they do not incorporate consumption variables explicity and therefore provide no structure for relating health status and living standard. Some attention is devoted to methodological problems of assessing survival probabilities, either from survey or experimental data or from beliefs of experts or individuals who are affected directly. The final section deals with individual preferences for survival lotteries. Conceptual weaknesses of common indexes are discussed, several canonical models for survival preferences are presented, the interdependence of individual utilities is discussed, and methods for eliciting individual survival preferences are considered, along with some illustrative empirical results.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Berg R. L. Weighted life expectancy as a health status index. Health Serv Res. 1973 Summer;8(2):153–156. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goldsmith S. B. A reevaluation of health status indicators. Health Serv Rep. 1973 Dec;88(10):937–941. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goldsmith S. B. The status of health status indicators. Health Serv Rep. 1972 Mar;87(3):212–220. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Patrick D. L., Bush J. W., Chen M. M. Methods for measuring levels of well-being for a health status index. Health Serv Res. 1973 Fall;8(3):228–245. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Torrance G. W., Thomas W. H., Sackett D. L. A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv Res. 1972 Summer;7(2):118–133. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124–1131. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]