ABSTRACT
We report here the draft genome sequences of Brevibacterium casei (n = 1), Heyndrickxia oleronia (n = 1), Kocuria palustris (n =1), Microbacterium spp. (n = 5), Staphylococcus cohnii (n = 3), and Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from high-touch surfaces in washrooms at a post-secondary institution.
KEYWORDS: Brevibacterium casei, Heyndrickxia oleronia, Kocuria palustris, Microbacterium spp., Staphylococcus cohnii, Staphylococcus epidermidis, genome sequencing, high-touch surfaces
ANNOUNCEMENT
High-touch objects (paper towel dispenser handle, soap dispenser handle, and toilet seat) in public washrooms on the Red Deer Polytechnic main campus in Red Deer, Alberta, Canada, were swabbed and streaked onto CHROMagar MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) (CHROMagar, Paris, France) with the objective of detecting MRSA or other methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. MRSA is a potential pathogen that can cause serious infections in both healthcare and community settings (1). CHROMagar MRSA plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h, and one mauve colony per plate was then selected, re-streaked onto brain heart infusion (BHI) agar, and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. The resulting 12 isolates were re-grown in 10 mL broth BHI overnight at 37°C, and 1.5 mL was pelleted and DNA extracted with the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Toronto, ON, Canada) as described by the manufacturer. The genomes of these isolates were then sequenced as follows. The DNA concentration was assessed with a Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Mississauga, ON, Canada), and 500 ng was used as input with the Illumina DNA Prep Kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) to prepare genomic libraries. Each library was then diluted to 4 nM and pooled. Prior to loading, the pooled library was denatured and diluted to a final loading concentration of 10 pM according to the supplier’s protocol and denatured PhiX (1%) (Illumina Inc.) was added to the library. The libraries were sequenced on a MiSeq instrument using the MiSeq Reagent Kit v2 (2 × 150 bp; Illumina Inc.).
Sequences were quality filtered using fastp v. 0.23.2 with automatic adapter trimming, and reads were discarded if they were less than 100 bp in length or had a mean Phred quality score below 15 within a sliding window of 4 bp. SPAdes v.3.15.5 (2) with the “isolate” option was used to assemble the paired-end reads, and assembly quality was assessed with QUAST v.5.0.2 (3). The Genome Taxonomy Database Toolkit (GTDB-tk) v. 2.2.4 (4) with GTDB release 207 (5) was used to classify the genome assemblies. Assemblies were annotated by NCBI using the prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline (PGAP) 2022-10-03.build6384 (6). Antimicrobial resistance genes were identified using the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database v. 3.2.5 with the Resistance Gene Identifier v. 6.0.1 (7). The average nucleotide identity (ANI) between strains was calculated using fastANI v.1.33 (8). Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified, and the assembly and sequencing characteristics for each genome are shown in Table 1. Although all isolates grew on CHROMagar MRSA, none were identified as S. aureus after genome sequencing. However, all Staphylococcus cohnii (n = 3) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 1) genomes carried the mecA gene for methicillin resistance which may explain their selection on CHROMagar MRSA. Based on their ANI values (>99%), the three all S. cohnii isolates were from the same strain as were the five Microbacterium spp. isolates. The Microbacterium spp. isolates appeared to belong to a potentially novel species based on their ANI to other Microbacterium spp. genomes in the GTDB.
TABLE 1.
BioSample accession no. | Isolate ID | Species | Source | Genome accession no. |
SRA accession no. |
No. of contigs | No. of reads | Genome size (bp) |
N50 value (bp) |
Avg coverage (×) | No. of coding sequences | G + C content (%) |
ARGs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAMN33819725 | RD01 | Staphylococcus cohnii | Paper towel dispenser | JAROYR000000000 | SRR24288510 | 98 | 1924778 | 2739586 | 139583 | 105 | 2,674 | 32.4 | mecA, mecI, mecR1, mph(C), msr(A) |
SAMN33819726 | RD02 | Microbacterium sp. RD02 | Soap dispenser | JAROYQ000000000 | SRR24288509 | 128 | 1055180 | 3687562 | 45298 | 43 | 3,666 | 69.8 | |
SAMN33819727 | RD03 | Heyndrickxia oleronia | Soap dispenser | JAROYP000000000 | SRR24288506 | 46 | 1593812 | 5398352 | 248092 | 44 | 5,321 | 35.0 | blaI, msr(G) |
SAMN33819728 | RD04 | Staphylococcus cohnii | Paper towel dispenser | JAROYO000000000 | SRR24288505 | 78 | 1240138 | 2713842 | 143395 | 69 | 2,650 | 32.3 | mecA, mecI, mecR1, mph(C), msr(A) |
SAMN33819729 | RD05 | Kocuria palustris | Soap dispenser | JAROYN000000000 | SRR24288504 | 141 | 1369204 | 2957926 | 36101 | 69 | 2,696 | 70.1 | |
SAMN33819730 | RD06 | Microbacterium sp. RD06 | Paper towel dispenser | JAROYM000000000 | SRR24288503 | 79 | 1255876 | 3686809 | 108078 | 51 | 3,633 | 69.8 | |
SAMN33819731 | RD07 | Staphylococcus epidermidis | Paper towel dispenser | JAROYL000000000 | SRR24288502 | 47 | 2907210 | 2455217 | 100095 | 178 | 2,292 | 32.0 | ant(4')-Ib, blaZ, mecA, |
SAMN33819732 | RD08 | Brevibacterium casei | Paper towel dispenser | JAROYK000000000 | SRR24288501 | 74 | 1094536 | 3798349 | 121230 | 43 | 3,426 | 68.2 | |
SAMN33819733 | RD09 | Staphylococcus cohnii | Paper towel dispenser | JAROYJ000000000 | SRR24288500 | 82 | 1342708 | 2717720 | 143395 | 74 | 2,650 | 32.3 | mecA, mecI, mecR1, mph(C), msr(A) |
SAMN33819734 | RD10 | Microbacterium sp. RD10 | Toilet seat | JAROYI000000000 | SRR24288499 | 79 | 1330330 | 3686251 | 99937 | 54 | 3,632 | 69.8 | |
SAMN33819735 | RD11 | Microbacterium sp. RD11 | Paper towel dispenser | JAROYH000000000 | SRR24288508 | 80 | 1247482 | 3668059 | 97322 | 51 | 3,609 | 69.8 | |
SAMN33819736 | RD12 | Microbacterium sp. RD12 | Paper towel dispenser | JAROYG000000000 | SRR24288507 | 127 | 1061090 | 3688021 | 52461 | 43 | 3,658 | 69.8 |
ARGs, antimicrobial resistance genes.
Contributor Information
Ahmad Esmaeili Taheri, Email: cyrus.taheri@rdpolytech.ca.
Irene L. G. Newton, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
All raw genome sequences and draft genome assemblies have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive and GenBank, respectively, under the accession numbers listed in Table 1.
REFERENCES
- 1. Turner NA, Sharma-Kuinkel BK, Maskarinec SA, Eichenberger EM, Shah PP, Carugati M, Holland TL, Fowler VG. 2019. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an overview of basic and clinical research. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:203–218. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0147-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. Spades: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. 2022. GTDB-Tk v2: memory friendly classification with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 38:5315–5316. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil P-A, Hugenholtz P. 2022. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D785–D794. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Li W, O’Neill KR, Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Chetvernin V, Badretdin A, Coulouris G, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Durkin AS, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Lanczycki CJ, Song JS, Thanki N, Wang J, Yamashita RA, Yang M, Zheng C, Marchler-Bauer A, Thibaud-Nissen F. 2021. Refseq: expanding the prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline reach with protein family model curation. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D1020–D1028. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Alcock BP, Huynh W, Chalil R, Smith KW, Raphenya AR, Wlodarski MA, Edalatmand A, Petkau A, Syed SA, Tsang KK, Baker SJC, Dave M, McCarthy MC, Mukiri KM, Nasir JA, Golbon B, Imtiaz H, Jiang X, Kaur K, Kwong M, Liang ZC, Niu KC, Shan P, Yang JYJ, Gray KL, Hoad GR, Jia B, Bhando T, Carfrae LA, Farha MA, French S, Gordzevich R, Rachwalski K, Tu MM, Bordeleau E, Dooley D, Griffiths E, Zubyk HL, Brown ED, Maguire F, Beiko RG, Hsiao WWL, Brinkman FSL, Van Domselaar G, McArthur AG. 2023. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D690–D699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. 2018. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All raw genome sequences and draft genome assemblies have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive and GenBank, respectively, under the accession numbers listed in Table 1.