Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Biol Anthropol. 2023 Sep 20;182(3):340–356. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24846

Lifestyle and patterns of physical activity in Hadza foragers

M Katherine Sayre 1, Mariamu Anyawire 2, Bunga Paolo 2, Audax Z P Mabulla 3, Herman Pontzer 4,5, Brian M Wood 6,7, David A Raichlen 1,8
PMCID: PMC10720916  NIHMSID: NIHMS1937633  PMID: 37728135

Abstract

Objectives:

Physically active lifestyles are associated with several health benefits. Physical activity (PA) levels are low in post-industrial populations, but generally high throughout life in subsistence populations. The Hadza are a subsistence-oriented foraging population in Tanzania known for being physically active, but it is unknown how recent increases in market integration may have altered their PA patterns. In this study, we examine PA patterns for Hadza women and men who engage in different amounts of traditional foraging.

Materials and Methods:

177 Hadza participants (51% female, 19–87 years) wore an Axivity accelerometer (dominant wrist) for ~six days during dry season months. We evaluated the effects of age, sex, and lifestyle measures on four PA measures that capture different aspects of the PA profile.

Results:

Participants engaged in high levels of both moderate-intensity PA and inactivity. Although PA levels were negatively associated with age, older participants were still highly active. We found no differences in PA between participants living in more traditional “bush” camps and those living in more settled “village” camps. Mobility was positively associated with step counts for female participants, and schooling was positively associated with inactive time for male participants.

Conclusions:

The similarity in PA patterns between Hadza participants in different camp types suggests that high PA levels characterize subsistence lifestyles generally. The sex-based difference in the effects of mobility and schooling on PA could be a reflection of the Hadza’s gender-based division of labor, or indicate that changes to subsistence-oriented lifestyles impact women and men in different ways.

Keywords: accelerometry, physical activity, Hadza hunter-gatherers, MVPA, step counts

INTRODUCTION

Engaging in a physically active lifestyle is associated with a wide range of health benefits. Physical activity (PA) is positively associated with physical and cognitive function throughout the lifespan, and with benefits to mental health, sleep, and overall quality of life (Blodgett, Theou, Kirkland, Andreou, & Rockwood, 2015; Bull et al., 2020; Erickson et al., 2019; Marquez et al., 2020; Piercy et al., 2018). Furthermore, in addition to associations with lower risk of all-cause mortality, engaging in a physically active lifestyle is linked with decreased risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, several types of cancer, and dementia (U. Ekelund et al., 2015; Piercy et al., 2018; Ramakrishnan et al., 2021). The health benefits of PA become increasingly important with age, as the risk of developing one or more of these chronic diseases or conditions increases (Bull et al., 2020; Piercy et al., 2018).

In post-industrial populations, levels of PA are low and decrease with age (Bull et al., 2020; Lee & Park, 2021; Piercy et al., 2018; Ussery et al., 2021; Wolff-Hughes, Fitzhugh, Bassett, & Churilla, 2015). People living in subsistence-oriented populations, on the other hand, often display high levels of PA throughout life and into older adulthood (Caldwell, 2016; Pontzer, Wood, & Raichlen, 2018). Here, we examine physical activity and sedentary behavior in the Hadza, a subsistence-oriented population of hunter-gatherers who live in northern Tanzania and are known for engaging in high levels of PA throughout life (Hawkes, O’Connell, & Blurton Jones, 1989; F. Marlowe, 2010; Pontzer et al., 2015; Raichlen et al., 2017; Raichlen et al., 2020; Sayre et al., 2020). As with most subsistence-oriented populations, though, increased market integration (MI) has altered the lifestyles of many Hadza women and men, and it is unknown how those changes in lifestyle have impacted their patterns of PA. In this study, we aim to characterize the PA patterns of Hadza women and men who engage in traditional foraging, as well as those who are more market integrated.

Patterns of PA in post-industrial and subsistence populations

The increased use and availability of activity-tracking devices, which provide an objective measure of PA, facilitate both the study and comparison of PA patterns in post-industrial and subsistence-level populations around the globe (Ramirez Varela et al., 2021). Data from large-scale epidemiological studies highlight several consistent trends in PA patterns among people living in post-industrial populations: Levels of activity are generally low and decline with age, and levels of inactivity are high and increase with age (DiPietro, 2001; Doherty et al., 2017; Du et al., 2019; Hallal et al., 2012; Lee & Park, 2021; Piercy et al., 2018; Troiano et al., 2008; Stewart G. Trost et al., 2002; Tucker, Welk, & Beyler, 2011; Ussery et al., 2021; Varma et al., 2017; Yen & Li, 2019). Men and people with higher educational attainment are generally more active than women and those with less education (Azevedo et al., 2007; Lee & Park, 2021; Piercy et al., 2018; Plotnikoff, Mayhew, Birkett, Loucaides, & Fodor, 2004; Shaw & Spokane, 2008; Troiano et al., 2008; Stewart G. Trost et al., 2002; Yen & Li, 2019).

The lifestyles of people in subsistence-oriented societies have long been characterized as more physically demanding than those of people in post-industrial societies (e.g., Eaton, Konner, & Shostak, 1988). Studies that use accelerometers and heart-rate monitors to measure PA in subsistence-level populations have confirmed that characterization: People who engage in traditional foraging, hunting and gathering, pastoralism, and small-scale agriculture display high levels of PA throughout life (see Caldwell, 2016 for review). Men are frequently more physically active than women (Christensen et al., 2012; Gurven, Jaeggi, Kaplan, & Cummings, 2013; Madimenos, Snodgrass, Blackwell, Liebert, & Sugiyama, 2011; Sayre, Pike, & Raichlen, 2018; Kraft et al., 2021) though not always (Raichlen et al., 2017; Sarma et al., 2020; Sayre et al., 2020; Yamauchi, Umezaki, & Ohtsuka, 2001). Significant age-related differences have been detected in some populations (Christensen et al., 2012; Gurven et al., 2013; Kashiwazaki et al., 2009), but not in others (Gurven et al., 2013; Madimenos et al., 2011; Raichlen et al., 2017). While it is possible that there exist populations whose activity levels do not decline with age, a lack of age-related differences in PA may also stem from aspects of study design, including smaller sample sizes and limited age ranges of participants.

For decades, increased market integration (MI) has altered the lifestyles of people in subsistence-oriented populations. Market integration involves commodifying resources like labor, land, and goods and services (Lu, 2007). In the last few decades, MI has become a growing focus of research in biological anthropology. While several studies have examined the heterogeneous health effects of increased MI (e.g., Lea, Martins, Kamau, Gurven, & Ayroles, 2020; Urlacher et al., 2016; Urlacher et al., 2021), fewer studies have carefully documented corresponding changes in behavior and physical activity. Yamauchi and colleagues (2001) documented differences in work-related PA levels of rural- versus urban-dwelling Huli in Papua New Guinea. But Urlacher and colleagues (2021) found no differences in the physical activity levels or total energy expenditure of Shuar children living in peri-urban versus rural contexts, despite displaying differences in other cardiometabolic measures. Gurven and colleagues (2013) measured activity levels in the Tsimané in Bolivia and found no differences in PA levels between those who live near to or further from a large city where market activities are concentrated. Given the ubiquity of MI in subsistence-oriented populations, it is critical that we examine both how the lifestyles of people in these populations are changing, and how those changes impact health and well-being.

In this study, we characterize patterns of physical activity (PA) for Hadza women and men aged 19 to 87 years old. We then evaluate how three measures of foraging and lifestyle—type of camp of residence, annual mobility, and schooling experience—impact patterns of PA for Hadza participants (see Methods for further description of lifestyle variables). The use of these measures of lifestyle allows us to better understand how transitions in foraging practices of Hadza women and men may impact PA as a key health-related aspect of their lifestyle. Most anthropological research with the Hadza community, including that of our team, has focused primarily on those women and men who live in more remote bush camps, and continue to engage in traditional foraging practices on a (more or less) full-time basis. These more traditional “bush” Hadza engage in high levels of PA, and display low prevalence of biomarkers for cardiovascular disease (Pontzer et al., 2015; Raichlen et al., 2017; Raichlen et al., 2020; Sayre et al., 2020). Other recent work has compared Hadza adults and children living in bush and non-bush camps and highlights how changes in subsistence engagement over the past several decades have impacted health measures and other dimensions of lifestyle in complex ways. For example, Crittenden and colleagues (2017) found that the oral health of Hadza women living in bush camps was better than that of women living in villages, but the opposite was true for Hadza men. Pollom and colleagues (Pollom, Cross, Herlosky, Ford, & Crittenden, 2020) found that a mixed subsistence diet had positive effects on growth for younger Hadza boys and girls. The current study is the first to examine how PA differs among groups of Hadza with variable access to and engagement with markets, and will help us better understand the implications of MI for PA-related health outcomes.

METHODS

Study Population: Hadza foragers of Tanzania

The Hadza are a subsistence-oriented population comprised of approximately 1,200 women and men who live near Lake Eyasi in northern Tanzania (F. Marlowe, 2010). The Hadza traditionally live in mobile camps of ~30 people (range of 1 to 100 people), and individuals are highly mobile, moving between different camp locations in response to changes in the availability of key resources (wild foods, water), to visit kin and friends, and to resolve social disputes. In Hadza society, a gendered division of labor prevails in which women typically target plant foods (tubers, berries, leafy greens) and men typically target animals and harvest wild honey. Women typically forage in groups (with and without children), and men typically forage solitarily. This gender-based division of labor arises early in life, around age 6 (Wood, Harris, et al., 2021). The foraging activities of both women and men are physically intensive; although daily step counts are higher in Hadza men compared to Hadza women (Wood, Harris, et al., 2021), all adults spend large amounts of time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) every day (Raichlen et al., 2017; Sayre et al., 2020).

Over the past several decades, large-scale changes to the environment and the transformation of the Tanzanian economy have posed challenges to the Hadza community’s ability to continue engaging in subsistence-level foraging on a full-time basis (Gibbons, 2018; F. W. Marlowe, 2002). For example, increased migration into the region and land conversion owing to agriculture and pastoralism have lowered the availability of prey animals and other wild foods (Wood, Millar, et al., 2021). A growing public interest in the lives of traditional hunter-gatherers has also resulted in an increase in ethnotourism since the mid-1990s, especially in the Mang’ola area (Gibbons, 2018; F. W. Marlowe, 2002). As a result of these and other changes, many Hadza women and men choose to live in more permanent or settled camps and villages, which have better access to medical care, schooling, roads, and the market economy. In these more settled camps, Hadza women and men engage in different kinds of subsistence activities, including small-scale agriculture, selling and trading craft goods, and seasonal work employed on farms to either protect or harvest crops (Gibbons, 2018; F. W. Marlowe, 2002).

We recruited 177 Hadza participants (nfemale=91; nmale=86) from ages 19 to 87 (age mean±SD=45.32±17.90 years) from 11 different camps to participate in this study. In addition to a willingness to participate, our inclusion criteria for recruitment were that the participant self-identify as a member of the Hadza community, and that they be able to speak Hadzane (their native language). Upon arrival in each camp, we met with Hadza community members to discuss the project and recruit participants. We did not proceed with data collection until we had verbal consent from both the community and individual participants to conduct research there. Data collection took place between June and December 2021. Typically, the dry season in this region spans June to November, and the short rains begin in December. When we finished data collection in early December 2021, the rains had not yet begun. Data collection therefore only occurred during dry months. Lead author MKS spoke with Hadza research participants in Kiswahili while research assistants MA, and BP, who are members of the Hadza community, translated and further explained instructions in Hadzane.

Research permits and approval were acquired from all appropriate agencies, including the Institutional Review Board of the University of Southern California (UP-20–00465) and the Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH). We took several precautions to minimize the risk of COVID-19 transmission among the researchers, research assistants, and both Hadza and non-Hadza community members throughout the field season. Details of our COVID-19 precautions can be found in the Supplementary Information.

Measures of Lifestyle

We evaluated aspects of foraging engagement and lifestyle using three measures that could impact patterns of PA: type of camp of residence, annual mobility, and schooling experience.

A subset of 152 participants (nfemale=79; nmale=73) completed a mobility questionnaire (see Supplementary Information) with questions about current and previous camp residency, as well as the number of different places the participant visited during the previous year. Most participants (nfemale=83; nmale=75) completed a schooling questionnaire (see Supplementary Information), which allowed us to measure their schooling experience.

Resident Camp Type:

In this study, we worked with Hadza living in more remote “bush” camps, where individuals relied mostly on foraging for subsistence, as well as those living in more permanent and accessible “village” camps, where residents had a more mixed subsistence lifestyle. We use “camp type” (bush or village) as a proxy measure for a participant’s degree of foraging engagement. We used the data collected from the mobility questionnaire to determine which camp a participant considered their home or most persistent residential location. We categorized each of the Hadza camps where we worked (or where a participant considered home, for those individuals who self-identified as visitors) as either a “bush” or “village” camp, based on discussions with MA and BP, who have both traveled widely throughout the region and have local expertise, as well-connected members of the Hadza community. From our discussions, Hadza bush camps were identified as those in which the adults engage in traditional foraging practices more frequently and regularly than those living in village camps.

Annual Mobility:

One of the key elements of the Hadza’s traditional lifestyle is their high degree of mobility, which likely impacts PA (F. Marlowe, 2010). In addition to moving camp locations or residences, Hadza women and men also regularly visit other camps and locations for a variety of reasons—for example, to set up a temporary camp to access ephemeral resources, or sometimes just to visit family members or friends who live in more distant places. In this study, we use “annual mobility” as a proxy measure for each participant’s degree of mobility (e.g., Davis, Stack, & Cashdan, 2021). Specifically, participant responses to the mobility questionnaire were used to count the number of different places where a participant reported staying for at least one night over the previous year.

Schooling:

Government initiatives to send all Tanzanian children to school over the past several decades have resulted in many Hadza children being sent to school, with varying degrees of continued engagement with formal schooling. Education has consistently been linked to PA patterns in post-industrial populations (Plotnikoff et al., 2004; Shaw & Spokane, 2008; Stewart G. Trost et al., 2002; Yen & Li, 2019), and is often used as a proxy measure for increased market integration (MI) in subsistence-oriented populations (Gurven et al., 2013; Veile, Martin, McAllister, & Gurven, 2014). Self-reported years of schooling, collected in our schooling questionnaire, is our measure of engagement with formal education.

Measures of Physical Activity

Participants were asked to wear a triaxial accelerometer (Axivity AX3, Newcastle, UK) on the dominant wrist continuously for between two and ten days. Differences in wear time across participants arose as a result of field logistics and the challenges of accessing and working in different camp locations. Hand dominance was determined by asking about which hand was used for important tasks (see Supplementary Information). Accelerometers were set to initialize collecting data at 100 Hz for 10 days, beginning at midnight of the first day the participant wore the accelerometer. Accelerometers were collected from participants at the end of the wear time period, and the data were immediately downloaded using OMGUI software (Open Movement, Newcastle University, UK).

Raw accelerometry data were downloaded through the open-source OMGUI software and processed using the R package GGIR (v2.4) (Migueles, Rowlands, Huber, Sabia, & van Hees, 2019; Sabia et al., 2014; Team, 2021; van Hees et al., 2014; van Hees et al., 2013; van Hees et al., 2018). We followed the accelerometry data processing and analysis methods outlined by Doherty and colleagues (2017). Briefly, using GGIR, non-wear time is identified as periods of time in which the movement of all three axes has a standard deviation of less than 13 mg for 60 consecutive minutes. The data are divided into five second epochs, and acceleration data from the three axes are used to calculate an average acceleration vector magnitude for each epoch. One gravitational unit is subtracted from the vector magnitude to account for Earth’s gravity, and the data are output as the Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO), which is a measure of an individual’s average acceleration in mg.

We followed the accelerometer wear-time–based inclusion criteria that Doherty and colleagues used to analyze physical activity patterns in the UK Biobank dataset (Doherty et al., 2017): Participant accelerometry data is included if the data includes (1) at least three valid days (one day = at least 16 of 24 hours) of wear-time, and (2) valid data for each of the 24 hours in one day. We excluded 14 participants who did not meet this wear-time inclusion criteria (nfemale=7; nmale=7). We further excluded two participants (nfemale=1; nmale=1) whose average daily acceleration values exceeded four standard deviations above the mean. A total of 161 participants (nfemale=83; nmale=78) met our inclusion criteria for accelerometry data analysis. Finally, we excluded participants who were missing mobility and/or schooling data, and a total of 136 (nfemale=71; nmale=65) were analyzed to evaluate our research questions.

Time spent in different levels of physical activity (PA) intensity were calculated using ENMO-based cut-offs published by Hildebrand and colleagues (Hildebrand, Hansen, van Hees, & Ekelund, 2017; Hildebrand, van Hees, Hansen, & Ekelund, 2014): light-intensity (between 45 and 100 mg), moderate-intensity (between 100 and 420 mg), and vigorous-intensity (at or above 420 mg). We used these cut-offs to calculate several PA measurements in GGIR:

(1). Average daily minutes in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA):

The health benefits of engaging in MVPA (activity at or above 3 METs; Norton, Norton, & Sadgrove, 2010) are well-established (U. Ekelund et al., 2015; Moore et al., 2012; Rey Lopez, Sabag, Martinez Juan, Rezende, & Pastor-Valero, 2020; Warburton, Nicol, & Bredin, 2006). Health officials recommend engaging in at least 150 minutes per week of MVPA (Bull et al., 2020; Piercy et al., 2018). Average daily minutes spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was calculated as time spent above the moderate-intensity activity threshold (100 mg).

(2). Percent of total time in MVPA in moderate-intensity activities (%MVPAmod):

Evaluating whether time in MVPA is accumulated in primarily moderate- or vigorous-intensity activities allows us to better characterize the nature of the high levels of PA that Hadza women and men display. The percent of MVPA time spent in moderate- as opposed to vigorous-intensity was calculated as the amount of time in moderate-intensity activities (between 100 and 420 mg) divided by the total time spent in MVPA (above 100 mg).

(3). Average daily step count:

Step counts are becoming an increasingly popular way to evaluate a person’s overall PA engagement (King et al., 2019; Kraus et al., 2019; Piercy et al., 2018). Higher daily step counts are associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality, several chronic diseases (Hall et al., 2020; Hamer, Blodgett, & Stamatakis, 2022; Paluch et al., 2022; Raichlen & Lieberman, 2022; Saint-Maurice et al., 2020), and dementia (Del Pozo Cruz, Ahmadi, Naismith, & Stamatakis, 2022). Furthermore, step counts are particularly important for understanding the PA patterns of subsistence-oriented populations, whose lifestyles are characterized by a high amount of walking (e.g., Leonard & Robertson, 1997; F. W. Marlowe, 2005; Pontzer et al., 2015; Raichlen & Lieberman, 2022). We used an algorithm developed by Verisense to calculate average daily step counts in GGIR. The algorithm is based on work conducted by Gu and colleagues (Gu, Khoshelham, Shang, Yu, & Wei, 2017) to detect steps from tri-axial accelerometry data.

(4). Average daily time spent inactive:

Time spent inactive is associated with a range of health effects, including greater risk of all-cause mortality and cardiometabolic diseases (Biswas et al., 2015; Brocklebank, Falconer, Page, Perry, & Cooper, 2015; Cavallo, Golden, Pearson-Stuttard, Falconer, & Toumazou, 2022; de Rezende, Rodrigues Lopes, Rey-Lopez, Matsudo, & Luiz Odo, 2014; Patterson et al., 2018). Furthermore, decreases in PA and increases in inactivity are frequently cited as important lifestyle changes associated with increased market integration (e.g., Assah, Ekelund, Brage, Mbanya, & Wareham, 2011; Eaton et al., 1988; Katzmarzyk & Mason, 2009). Average daily waking time spent inactive was calculated as time spent below the light-activity threshold (45 mg).

Statistical Analysis

We used linear regression analysis to characterize the physical activity patterns of Hadza research participants, and to examine associations between measures of lifestyle and physical activity. Modeled on the statistical approach of Gurven and colleagues (2013), we first evaluated the effects of age, sex, camp type, annual mobility, and schooling on each PA measure, without interactions (Model 1). Then, we used a simultaneous inclusion procedure to add all two-way interactions between age and sex, and age or sex and lifestyle measures, if they resulted in lower AIC values relative to Model 1 (Model 2). We controlled for accelerometer wear-time in all analyses. All regression models were inspected graphically and numerically for normality of residuals, and all met the criteria for use of generalized linear models (independence of observations, normality of residuals, linearity, and constant variance). We used a Benjamini-Hochberg FDR (Benjamini & Hochberg, 1995) to correct for multiple hypothesis testing. Results were considered significant if the FDR-adjusted p-value was less than 0.05.

RESULTS

Descriptive Statistics

Descriptive summaries are presented in Table 1. Of the 161 participants who met our inclusion criteria for accelerometry analysis (see Methods), 51.6% were female, and average age was 45.5 (SD 18.3) years. Average accelerometer wear-time was 6.2 (SD 2.1) days. Almost half (n=67; 41.6%) of the participants lived in a bush camp. Among the participants who completed the mobility questionnaire (nfemale=71; nmale=65), average annual mobility was 2.5 (SD 2.1) places per year, and was higher for male than for female participants (mobilityfemale=1.8±1.7 places; mobilitymale=3.2±2.2 places; p<0.001). Among the participants who completed the schooling questionnaire (nfemale=83; nmale=75), almost half (n=69; 43.7%) had some schooling experience, ranging from 1 to 11 years. Male participants had more years of schooling, on average, compared to female participants (schoolingfemale=1.7±3.0 years; schoolingmale=3.0±3.6 years; p=0.015).

Table 1.

Descriptive Characteristics

Female Participants Male Participants Total
Physical Activity Measures n = 83 n = 78 n = 161
Age (years) Mean (SD) 47.16 (18.96) 43.80 (17.40) 45.54 (18.25)
Range 19 – 87 19 – 86 19 – 87
Accelerometer wear-time (days) Mean (SD) 6.36 (2.09) 6.08 (2.02) 6.22 (2.06)
Range 3 – 11 3 – 11 3 – 11
MVPA (minutes) Mean (SD) 173.70 (76.95) 173.21 (78.50) 173.66 (77.46)
Range 19.13 – 375.40 27.50 – 369.55 19.13 – 375.40
% MVPAmod Mean (SD) 94.76 (3.95) 94.56 (3.66) 94.66 (3.80)
Range 81.88 – 99.85 83.60 – 99.40 81.88 – 99.85
Step Count Mean (SD) 14,186.33 (4,959.90) 15,963.63 (5,676.60) 15,047.38 (5,376.75)
Range 2,543.05 – 24,685.75 2,957.32 – 30,672.38 2,543.05 – 30,672.38
Inactive Time (hours) Mean (SD) 11.26 (2.53) 12.32 (2.42) 11.78 (2.53)
Range 5.24 – 17.05 6.09 – 16.68 5.24 – 17.05
Lifestyle Measures
Camp Type Bush Camp Resident no. (%) 36 (43.37%) 31 (39.74%) 67 (41.61%)
Village Camp Resident no. (%) 47 (56.62%) 47 (60.26%) 94 (58.39%)
Annual Mobility (no. places) n 71 65 136
Mean (SD) 1.81 (1.68) 3.21 (2.22) 2.48 (2.07)
Range 0 – 7 0 – 9 0 – 9
Schooling Experience (years) n 83 75 158
Mean (SD) 1.73 (3.04) 3.04 (3.59) 2.35 (3.37)
Range 0 – 11 0 – 11 0 – 11
Yes schooling no. (%) 29 (34.94%) 40 (53.33%) 69 (43.67%)
No schooling no. (%) 54 (65.06%) 35 (46.67%) 89 (56.33%)

Time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA)

Figure 1a displays average daily time spent in MVPA by age for Hadza female and male participants. Average time spent in MVPA was high for all participants: Hadza female participants spent 173.7±77.0 minutes per day in MVPA, and Hadza males spent 173.6±78.5 minutes per day in MVPA (Table 1). This is well above the 150 minutes per week of MVPA that health officials in the United States recommend (Piercy et al., 2018). Age was significantly negatively associated with average daily time in MVPA (Table 2), but even participants aged 60 years and older (n=40) spent an average of more than two hours per day in MVPA (mean±SD=125.6±74.7 minutes). Time in MVPA did not significantly differ between female and male participants (Table 2), but the effect of age was different for female and male participants (Table 2): Male participants displayed more pronounced age-related differences in MVPA than did female participants (Figures 1a; 2a).

Figure 1. Physical Activity Measures by Age and Sex for Hadza participants.

Figure 1.

Each filled orange circle represents one Hadza female participant (ages 19 to 87 years), and one filled blue circle represents one Hadza male participant (ages 19 to 86 years). Orange and blue lines represent a generalized linear model for female and male participants, respectively. Gray shaded area represents the 95% confidence interval for the regression line. Physical activity measures here are derived from wrist-worn accelerometers, and represent average daily (a) time (minutes) spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA); (b) percent of MVPA time spent in moderate-intensity activities; (c) step count; (d) time (hours) spent inactive.

Table 2.

Generalized linear regression model of average daily time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) for 161 Hadza female and male participants.

Variable Model 1 (AIC = 1539.3) Model 2 (AIC = 1531.6)
Estimate ±SE 95% CI [lower, upper] p-value Estimate ±SE 95% CI [lower, upper] p-value
Age −1.730 0.331 [−2.379, −1.080] 8.95e-06 *** −0.895 0.422 [−1.723, −0.067] 0.082°
Sex (male) −6.476 12.496 [−30.968, 18.017] 0.656 121.750 38.793 [45.717, 197.783] 0.014 *
Camp Type (village) −17.906 12.092 [−41.606, 5.794] 0.183 −17.967 11.708 [−40.914, 4.981] 0.183
Annual Mobility 3.391 3.123 [−2.730, 9.511] 0.330 9.844 4.611 [0.807, 18.880] 0.082°
School (yrs) −3.915 1.864 [−7.568, −0.262] 0.082° 1.052 2.775 [−4.386, 6.490] 0.705
Age * Sex (male) −1.817 0.634 [−3.060, −0.574] 0.021 *
Sex (male) * Annual Mobility −11.282 6.139 [−23.314, 0.750] 0.111
Sex (male) * School (yrs) −7.267 3.669 [−14.458, −0.076] 0.093°

Model 1 results are from a generalized linear regression model with all variables present and no interactions. Model 2 results are from a generalized linear regression model with all variables present, as well as any two-way interactions between age, sex, and lifestyle variables that reduce the AIC of Model 1. Interactions for Model 2 were chosen using a simultaneous inclusion procedure. All results shown are adjusted for accelerometer wear-time.

p values shown are FDR-adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing

°

p<0.1

*

<0.05

**

<0.01

***

<0.001

Figure 2. Effects of Age, Sex, and Foraging and Lifestyle Variables on Physical Activity Measures.

Figure 2.

Beta coefficient plots represent results from generalized linear models, stratified by sex. Results of models with female participants are on the left of each panel, and results of models with male participants are on the right of each panel. Blue circles represent a positive beta coefficient, and red circles represent a negative beta coefficient. Unfilled circles represent a non-significant effect, and filled circles represent a significant effect, after FDR adjustment. Panels represent beta coefficient plots for average daily (a) time (minutes) spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA); (b) percent of MVPA time spent in moderate-intensity activities; (c) step count; (d) time (hours) spent inactive.

Measures of lifestyle were not significantly associated with time in MVPA. Time spent in MVPA did not differ for participants in bush versus village camps (Table 2), and was not associated with either annual mobility (Table 2) or schooling (Table 2). Although our second model includes interactions between sex and annual mobility, and sex and schooling, these interactions were not significant after adjusting for multiple hypothesis testing (Table 2). Accelerometer wear time was not associated with time spent in MVPA in Model 1 (ßwear time [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 6.31 [0.29, 12.33], padj=0.07) or Model 2 (ßwear time [95% CI] = 7.03 [1.22, 12.85], padj=0.05).

Percent of MVPA spent in moderate-intensity activities (%MVPAmod)

Figure 1b displays the percent of average daily time in MVPA spent in moderate-intensity activities by age for Hadza female and male participants. Hadza female and male participants accumulated the vast majority of their time in MVPA in moderate- (as opposed to vigorous-) intensity activities: Moderate-intensity activities made up 94.8±4.0% of MVPA time for female participants, and 94.6±3.7% of MVPA time for male participants (Table 1; Figure 3). Age was significantly positively associated with %MVPAmod (Table 3), and %MVPAmod did not differ for female and male participants (Table 3).

Figure 3. Proportion of Waking Hours spent in different levels of activity intensities for Hadza female (left panel) and male (right panel) participants.

Figure 3.

Yellow shaded area represents proportion of waking hours spent inactive; blue shaded area represents proportion of waking hours spent in light-intensity activities; green shaded area represents proportion of waking hours spent in moderate-intensity activities; and pink shaded area represents proportion of waking hours spent in vigorous-intensity activities.

Table 3.

Generalized linear regression model of percent of average daily MVPA spent in moderate-intensity activities (%MVPAmod) for 136 Hadza female and male participants.

Variable Model 1 (AIC = 721.62) Model 2 (AIC = 717.79)
Estimate ±SE 95% CI [lower, upper] p-value Estimate ±SE 95% CI [lower, upper] p-value
Age 0.090 0.016 [0.057, 0.122] 1.39e-06 *** 0.133 0.024 [0.085, 0.181] 1.39e-06 ***
Sex (male) 0.533 0.618 [−0.679, 1.745] 0.429 0.621 0.609 [−0.572, 1.814] 0.378
Camp Type (village) −0.220 0.598 [−1.393, 0.952] 0.713 3.327 1.610 [0.172, 6.482] 0.056°
Annual Mobility −0.530 0.154 [−0.833, −0.227] 2.95e-03 ** −0.466 0.154 [−0.769, −0.164] 8.26e-03 **
School (yrs) 0.252 0.092 [0.071, 0.433] 0.016 * 0.216 0.092 [0.035, 0.396] 0.032 *
Age * Camp type (village) −0.077 0.032 [−0.140, −0.013] 0.032 *

Model 1 results are from a generalized linear regression model with all variables present and no interactions. Model 2 results are from a generalized linear regression model with all variables present, as well as any two-way interactions between age, sex, and lifestyle variables that reduce the AIC of Model 1. Interactions for Model 2 were chosen using a simultaneous inclusion procedure. All results shown are adjusted for accelerometer wear-time.

p values shown are FDR-adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing

°

p<0.1

*

<0.05

**

<0.01

***

<0.001

All three measures of lifestyle were associated with %MVPAmod for participants in this study. Although participants in bush versus village camps did not display differences in %MVPAmod (Table 3), the effect of age differed for participants in different camp types (Table 3): The effect of age on %MVPAmod was more pronounced for participants in bush camps compared to those in village camps. Annual mobility was negatively associated with %MVPAmod (Table 3), and schooling experience was positively associated with %MVPAmod (Table 3). Accelerometer wear time was not associated with %MVPAmod in Model 1 (ßwear time [95% CI] = −0.27 [−0.56, 0.03], padj=0.10) or Model 2 (ßwear time [95% CI] = −0.32 [−0.61, −0.02], padj=0.06).

Daily Step Count

Figure 1c displays average daily step count by age for Hadza participants. Average daily step count was high for all: Hadza female participants took an average of 14,186±4,960 steps per day, and Hadza male participants took an average of 15,964±5,677 steps per day (Table 1). Step count was significantly negatively associated with age (Table 4). Step counts for female participants were not significantly different from those of male participants (Table 4), but the effect of age differed for female and male participants (Table 4). As with time in MVPA, male participants in this study displayed more pronounced age-related differences in step count compared to female participants (Figures 1c; 2c).

Table 4.

Generalized linear regression model of average daily step count for 136 Hadza female and male participants.

Variable Model 1 (AIC = 2699) Model 2 (AIC = 2692.2)
Estimate ±SE 95% CI [lower, upper] p-value Estimate ±SE 95% CI [lower, upper] p-value
Age −97.926 23.531 [−144.046, −51.806] 6.88e-04 *** −52.616 29.463 [−110.364, 5.131] 0.115
Sex (male) 1032.467 887.879 [−707.743, 2772.677] 0.296 8866.941 2662.024 [3649.470, 14084.412] 6.80e-03 **
Camp Type (village) 352.875 859.171 [−1331.069, 2036.820] 0.682 364.831 837.475 [−1276.590, 2006.252] 0.682
Annual Mobility 353.324 221.874 [−81.542, 788.190] 0.152 902.459 329.875 [255.915, 1549.002] 0.028 *
School (yrs) −307.526 132.432 [−567.087 , −47.965] 0.044 * −242.808 130.226 [−498.047, 12.431] 0.111
Age * Sex (male) −112.663 44.722 [−200.317, −25.010] 0.036 *
Sex (male) * Annual Mobility −1072.213 434.374 [−1923.570, −220.856] 0.036 *

Model 1 results are from a generalized linear regression model with all variables present and no interactions. Model 2 results are from a generalized linear regression model with all variables present, as well as any two-way interactions between age, sex, and lifestyle variables that reduce the AIC of Model 1. Interactions for Model 2 were chosen using a simultaneous inclusion procedure. All results shown are adjusted for accelerometer wear-time.

p values shown are FDR-adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing

°

p<0.1

*

<0.05

**

<0.01

***

<0.001

Daily step count did not differ for participants in bush versus village camps (Table 4), but was negatively associated with participants’ schooling experience (Table 4). After adjusting for interactions (Model 2), we found that the relationship between mobility and step counts differed by sex (Table 4): Annual mobility was positively associated with step counts for female participants, but not associated with step counts for male participants (Figure 2c). Accelerometer wear time was not associated with average daily step counts in Model 1 (ßwear time [95% CI] = 197 [−231, 625], padj=0.42) or Model 2 (ßwear time [95% CI] = 210 [−204, 625], padj=0.40).

Inactive Time

Figure 1d displays average daily waking time (hours) spent inactive by age for Hadza participants. Average daily time spent inactive was high: 11.3±2.5 hours per day for females, and 12.3±2.4 hours per day for males (Table 1). Neither age nor sex was significantly associated with time spent inactive (Table 5). Although our second model included an interaction between age and sex, this interaction was not significant (Table 5).

Table 5.

Generalized linear regression model of average daily time (minutes) inactive for 136 Hadza female and male participants.

Variable Model 1 (AIC = 1756.4) Model 2 (AIC = 1747.9)
Estimate ±SE 95% CI [lower, upper] p-value Estimate ±SE 95% CI [lower, upper] p-value
Age 1.334 0.736 [−0.108, 2.776] 0.173 −0.154 0.937 [−1.991, 1.682] 0.970
Sex (male) 55.645 27.761 [1.235, 110.056] 0.150 −131.596 76.433 [−281.402, 18.210] 0.175
Camp Type (village) 1.132 26.864 [−51.520, 53.783] 0.970 0.985 25.969 [−49.913, 51.882] 0.970
Annual Mobility −0.829 6.937 [−14.425, 12.768] 0.970 −2.901 6.825 [−16.277, 10.476] 0.970
School (yrs) 2.933 4.141 [−5.182, 11.049] 0.823 −12.468 6.166 [−24.554, −0.382] 0.150
Age * Sex (male) 2.752 1.391 [0.026, 5.478] 0.150
Sex (male) * School (yrs) 26.010 8.063 [10.206, 41.813] 0.019 *

Model 1 results are from a generalized linear regression model with all variables present and no interactions. Model 2 results are from a generalized linear regression model with all variables present, as well as any two-way interactions between age, sex, and lifestyle variables that reduce the AIC of Model 1. Interactions for Model 2 were chosen using a simultaneous inclusion procedure. All results shown are adjusted for accelerometer wear-time.

p values shown are FDR-adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing

°

p<0.1

*

<0.05

**

<0.01

***

<0.001

Somewhat surprisingly, none of the three lifestyle measures were significantly associated with time spent inactive in model 1 (Table 5). In our second model (which includes interaction terms), however, we found that the relationship between schooling and inactivity differed by sex (Table 5): Schooling was not significantly associated with time spent inactive for female participants, but positively associated with time spent inactive for male participants (Figure 2d). Accelerometer wear time was significantly negatively associated with time spent inactive in Model 1 (ßwear time [95% CI] = −19.51 [−32.88, −6.13], padj=0.02) and Model 2 (ßwear time [95% CI] = −21.63 [−34.56, −8.71], padj<0.01).

DISCUSSION

In this study, Hadza female and male participants engaged in high levels of both physical activity and inactivity during dry season months. Younger participants generally engaged in higher amounts of physical activity (PA) than older participants, but older participants were still highly active compared to adults in post-industrial populations. We found no evidence for sex-based differences in PA engagement, nor did we find differences in PA engagement between participants living in bush versus village camps. Mobility and schooling impacted PA patterns, sometimes in different ways for female and male participants. We believe the results of this study can help us understand how changes in subsistence engagement impact an important aspect of lifestyle—physical activity patterns—for Hadza women and men.

High levels of mostly moderate-intensity physical activity

Physical activity levels during dry season months are high among Hadza participants in this study compared to their counterparts in post-industrial societies. Health officials in the United States and other developed countries recommend engaging in at least 150 minutes per week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA; Bull et al., 2020; Piercy et al., 2018). Recommendations for daily step counts are less consistent, but range from 6,000 to 10,000 per day (Del Pozo Cruz et al., 2022; Hamer et al., 2022; Paluch et al., 2022; Saint-Maurice et al., 2020). In this study, participants engaged in an average of more than 150 minutes per day of MVPA, and daily step counts averaged 15,000 (Table 1). Although older Hadza participants displayed lower levels of PA than younger participants, they were still highly active. Participants aged 70 and above (n=18) engaged in an average of 109.0±73.7 minutes per day of MVPA and took an average of 10,055±4,611 steps per day. Not only do these levels of PA exceed health-based PA recommendations, they also exceed levels of PA displayed by older adults in post-industrial populations like the United States, where older adults engage in less than 10 minutes per day of MVPA (Evenson, Buchner, & Morland, 2011; Troiano et al., 2008).

For participants in this study, physical activity was primarily of moderate-intensity. On average, more than 90% of time in MVPA was spent in moderate-intensity (as opposed to vigorous-intensity) activities (%MVPAmod; Table 1). Although younger participants displayed lower %MVPAmod compared to older participants, the majority of their time in MVPA was still spent in moderate-intensity activities. In this study, %MVPAmod ranged from 81.8–99.8% (Table 1), which is notable for two reasons. First, even the most highly active participants still accumulated the vast majority of their time in MVPA in moderate-intensity activities. These results complement those of Gurven and colleagues (2013), who report that PA for Tsimané foragers in Bolivia can be characterized as primarily light- to moderate-intensity.

Second, none of the participants in this study spent 100% of their time in MVPA in moderate-intensity activities; even older adults engaged in a few minutes of vigorous-intensity PA per day. Regular engagement in even small amounts of vigorous-intensity PA may offer several cardioprotective benefits (e.g., Rankin, Rankin, MacIntyre, & Hillis, 2012; Stamatakis et al., 2021). In fact, a recent study found that short (one- to two-minute) intermittent bouts of vigorous-intensity physical activity were associated with substantial decreases in both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (Stamatakis et al., 2022). Hadza women and men show no evidence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD; Raichlen et al., 2017). It is possible that regular engagement in small amounts of vigorous-intensity activity, in addition to the high levels of moderate-intensity activity, could contribute to the cardiovascular health of Hadza women and men, especially at older ages.

High levels of physical inactivity

Participants in this study also displayed high levels of inactivity—female and male participants spent more than 11 hours per day inactive (Table 1). Spending large amounts of time sedentary is associated with several health risks (e.g., Biswas et al., 2015; Cavallo et al., 2022; Patterson et al., 2018). The high amounts of physical inactivity displayed by participants in this study, though, do not necessarily indicate negative health risks. First, time spent inactive by Hadza may be quite different from time spent inactive in post-industrial populations. Many of the health risks associated with sedentary time in post-industrial populations are specific to time spent sitting and watching TV (Dunstan, Thorp, & Healy, 2011; Patterson et al., 2018; Raichlen et al., 2022). Raichlen and colleagues (2020) report high amounts of non-ambulatory time in Hadza adults (more than 9 hours per day), but found that Hadza women and men spent much of that time in active rest postures (e.g., squatting instead of chair sitting; Raichlen et al., 2020). Therefore, the sedentary behavior in this study might not be associated with the same risks of sedentary time seen in post-industrial populations if inactive time is spent in more active rest postures. Second, high levels of moderate-intensity PA appear to attenuate the health risks associated with too much sedentary time for many chronic conditions, and could eliminate them at the highest levels of PA (i.e., 60–75 minutes per day of MVPA; Biswas et al., 2015; Ekelund et al., 2016). The high levels of PA displayed by participants in this study could offset the risks of high levels of inactivity.

No sex-based differences in measures of PA

In this study, PA measures did not differ between female and male participants. In our models without interactions, sex was not significantly associated with time spent in MVPA, %MVPAmod, daily step counts, or time spent inactive. The similarity in PA measures between female and male participants in this study contrasts with the sex-based patterns observed in post-industrial populations, where women consistently display lower PA levels and higher inactive time compared to men (Hallal et al., 2012; Lee & Park, 2021; Piercy et al., 2018; Varma et al., 2017; Yen & Li, 2019). The relationship between female and male PA levels in subsistence-based populations is more variable. In many subsistence populations—including Ecuadorian Shuar foragers, Bolivian Tsimané forager-horticulturalists, several Kenyan agriculturalists, and Kenyan Pokot agro-pastoralists—men display higher levels of PA than women (Christensen et al., 2012; Gurven et al., 2013; Madimenos et al., 2011; Sayre et al., 2018). In Huli–speaking agriculturalists in Papua New Guinea, though, women and men engage in similar amounts of PA (Yamauchi et al., 2001). In BaYaka foragers in the Congo basin, women display higher amounts of PA compared to men (Sarma et al., 2020).

Previous work examining sex differences in PA among Hadza foragers has yielded mixed results. Kraft et al. (2021) found that the energy costs of subsistence activities was higher for men than for women in both Hadza foragers and Tsimané forager-horticulturalists. Our team has found little-to-no sex differences in accelerometer– or heart-rate monitor (HRM)–based MVPA for Hadza foragers (Raichlen et al., 2017; Sayre et al., 2020), but a pronounced sex difference in GPS–based daily step counts (Wood, Harris, et al., 2021): as early as 6 years old, Hadza males in bush camps travel further per day than Hadza females in bush camps, a difference only attenuated at older ages. A sex–based difference in daily step counts but similarity in overall MVPA would suggest that more of Hadza men’s time in MVPA is spent walking, while more of women’s time in MVPA is spent in other activities (e.g., digging for tubers, processing food). Indeed, Kraft and colleagues report that Hadza men spend the majority of their subsistence–based energy walking, while Hadza women spend a large portion of their subsistence–based energy digging and processing food (Kraft et al., 2021).

In this study, we did not find sex-based differences in overall MVPA or daily step counts (Tables 2, 4). While our previous work has focused on Hadza women and men in foraging camps, this study includes participants from a range of Hadza communities who engage in different subsistence activities. However, we also did not find evidence of camp-based differences in the effect of sex on PA measures. Our study also included data from only dry season months. The GPS–based step count sample (Wood et al., 2021) reflects data collected over a longer period of time and could therefore capture both seasonality and variations in Hadza ranging behavior over time, potentially accounting for differences in outcomes between the two studies. Future work that combines different methodologies (GPS, accelerometry, and heart rate) and/or examines specific subsistence activities participants engage in while wearing the devices will help us better understand how PA patterns compare for Hadza women and men.

While we did not find sex-based differences in overall PA for participants in this study, we found that the associations between age and both MVPA and daily step count were more pronounced for male compared to female participants. Although this differential association between age and female and male PA differs from some of our previous work (Sayre et al., 2020), it is consistent with prior research showing that men’s travel after age 35 (km/day walked) decreases more so than women’s (Pontzer et al., 2015; Wood, Harris, et al., 2021). This results in smaller sex differences in daily travel being observed at older ages, a pattern also evident in the current study.

No camp-based differences in measures of PA

Subsistence-oriented populations around the world have experienced changes to their traditional lifestyles as a result of increased engagement in the market economy, or market integration (MI). The health effects of increasing MI are often attributed to changes in diet and activity patterns. When examining how MI impacted cardiovascular health among the Turkana of Kenya, Lea and colleagues (2020) found that diet mediated health differences between rural– and urban–dwelling Turkana. But Lea and colleagues found no health-related differences between rural Turkana who continued to engage in traditional pastoralism, and those who did not. Similarly, Gurven and colleagues (2013) did not find evidence for differences in Tsimané PA patterns across geographic regions with differential access to the market economy, likely because the Tsimané across those regions still relied heavily on horticulture and foraging for subsistence.

In this study, we found little-to-no evidence of camp–based differences in patterns of PA displayed by participants during dry season months. We categorized camps as either bush or village according to local knowledge regarding the regularity and frequency of foraging engagement (see Methods). Hadza adults’ traditional foraging way of life is frequently characterized as physically demanding because of the subsistence activities they engage in, but foraging is certainly not the only physically demanding mode of subsistence. People living in a variety of subsistence-oriented populations display high levels of PA throughout life (Gurven et al., 2013; and see Caldwell, 2016 for review). Many Hadza women and men who do not engage in full-time foraging have adopted other subsistence practices that are also physically demanding, including small-scale agriculture. During data collection, we also informally observed that several Hadza women and men in non-foraging communities spend their days engaging in day labor (e.g., making bricks, operating corn-grinding machines) or collecting firewood or honey from community bee hives to sell or trade to non-Hadza community members

Furthermore, Hadza women and men may engage in activities not related to subsistence that are still physically active. Kraft and colleagues (2021) found that, compared to our great ape relatives, humans spend more energy but less time on subsistence activities. Compared to other great apes, then, human subsistence strategies allow for more time spent in leisure activities, like social interactions. Indeed, Hadza women and men in both foraging and non-foraging communities appeared to spend a good deal of time engaged in non-subsistence activities, like visiting with friends and family. In the larger and more spread-out non-foraging communities, especially, we often informally observed participants walking to and from different households, the village center, and the Hadza-specific community meeting space. Our informal observations underscore the importance, in future work, of documenting the subsistence and non-subsistence activities that participants engage in to better understand how the PA patterns of Hadza women and men compare across different types of communities.

It is important to note that although Hadza bush and village camps may differ in their subsistence activities or in access to the market economy, none of them represent an urban context. Our results suggest that the generally high levels of mostly moderate-intensity activity displayed by study participants reflects both a rural lifestyle context and multiple economic pursuits, all of which are physically demanding.

Associations with Mobility and Schooling

Both annual mobility and experience schooling impacted PA patterns in this study. In our models without interactions, annual mobility and schooling were only significantly associated with %MVPAmod: Participants with lower annual mobility and those with more schooling experience displayed higher %MVPAmod. In our models with interactions, we found that these lifestyle effects were significantly associated with both daily step counts and time spent inactive, and those effects differed for female and male participants. The differential impact of mobility and schooling on measures of PA for female and male participants could be a reflection of their gender-based division of labor, and/or indicate that changes in subsistence activities impact Hadza women and men in different ways.

In this study, annual mobility was positively associated with step counts for female participants, but negatively associated with step counts for male participants. The sex-based difference in the effect of mobility on step counts in this study seems primarily driven by how much more pronounced and positive the effect of mobility is for female step counts. When we stratify analyses by sex, mobility continues to be positively associated with step counts for female participants (ß [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 892 steps [235, 1,549]; Table S3) but is not associated with step counts for male participants (ß [95% CI] = −49 steps [−618, 521]; Table S3). It is unclear to us why mobility during the previous year would impact daily step counts differently for women and men. We used annual mobility—the total number of places visited during the previous year—to represent general mobility in this study. But we did not take into account the number of times a participant visited a place, the length of their stay, or distance traveled. Future work that examines the nature of Hadza women’s and men’s mobility patterns in more detail (e.g., total distance traveled or total time away from home) may help us understand why general mobility was positively associated with step counts for female participants in this study, but not for male participants.

We also found sex-based differences in the effect of schooling on time spent inactive. School was associated with significantly more inactive time for male participants (ß [95% CI] = 13.0 minutes [2.8, 23.2]; Table S4), and was not associated with inactive time in women (ß [95% CI] = −13.3 minutes [−25.9, −0.7]; Table S4). In post-industrial populations, education often reflects socio-economic status (SES), and is positively associated with leisure-time PA (Azevedo et al., 2007; Lee & Park, 2021; Shaw & Spokane, 2008). In work with subsistence-oriented populations, access to schooling is frequently used as a proximate measure for market integration (MI), and its effect on PA patterns is less clear. Among Tsimané forager-farmers in Bolivia, for example, neither schooling nor Spanish fluency (another measure of MI) were associated with levels of PA, though Spanish fluency was associated with women’s BMI (Gurven et al., 2013).

The differential effect of schooling on inactivity for Hadza female and male participants could reflect differences in how MI has impacted Hadza women and men. A little less than half of the participants in this study had schooling experience, and male participants had, on average, more years of schooling compared to female participants. Schooling experience may provide different work-related opportunities for Hadza women and men, or differential access to the market economy. Future work that compares the kinds of work that Hadza adults with and without schooling have access to and participate in might help us better understand why the relationship between schooling and inactivity differed for female and male participants in this study.

Limitations

In this study, we used accelerometry to characterize the PA patterns of Hadza women and men across adulthood. To measure PA, participants wore an accelerometer on their wrist for several days (wear-time mean±SD=6.22±2.06 days; Table 1). In post-industrial populations, at least three days of accelerometer wear-time is sufficient to capture habitual PA (Matthews, Hagstromer, Pober, & Bowles, 2012; S. G. Trost, McIver, & Pate, 2005), but the same may not be true for subsistence-oriented populations, who do not necessarily adhere to the same week-based calendar. Furthermore, our data collection took place between June and December, so this study only reflects PA in the dry season. Examining PA across seasons would allow us to better represent habitual PA patterns among the Hadza, as seasonality impacts subsistence activities and PA in other groups (e.g., Gurven et al., 2013; Panter-Brick, 1996).

We used wrist-worn accelerometry to estimate daily steps. Although hip–based accelerometry generally provides a more accurate measure of step counts (e.g., Nuss et al., 2020), we used an algorithm developed by Verisense to estimate daily step counts from wrist-worn tri-axial accelerometry, specifically (Gu et al., 2017). We would like to note that this step count algorithm, as with other accelerometry-based algorithms, was validated with community–dwelling adults in post-industrial populations. People in subsistence-oriented communities, like Hadza foragers, often engage in activities requiring repeated upper limb movements (e.g., chopping firewood, pounding baobab seeds or corn). As stated above, future work that combines different technologies and includes observations of the subsistence activities participants engage in while wearing accelerometers will help us better characterize PA patterns in non-industrialized populations.

We used type of camp of residence (bush or village) as a crude measure for foraging engagement in this study, following methods used in several prior studies with the Hadza (Apicella, Azevedo, Christakis, & Fowler, 2014; Crittenden et al., 2017; Pollom et al., 2020). But we did not directly measure diet or subsistence activities in the camps where we worked. Because Hadza adults often move back and forth between bush and village camps, current residence may not strongly reflect persistent differences in resident type or engagement with physically demanding tasks. A simple binary classification between bush and village camps may be appropriate for some types of research, but may be too coarse a categorization to identify the main determinants of habitual physical activity.

In this study, we used annual mobility and schooling as proximate measures for aspects of foraging and lifestyle that could impact PA patterns for Hadza women and men. And while we found that both mobility and schooling were associated with several measures of PA, other unmeasured confounding variables could be responsible for the associations we observed. For example, we found a sex difference in the effect of schooling on time spent inactive. We did not examine how participants spent their time while wearing the accelerometer, so we do not know what kinds of activities participants engaged in while inactive, and whether those activities differed depending on schooling experience. Overall, future work that examines what kinds of activities Hadza women and men engage in while wearing an accelerometer could help us better understand why we observed a sex-based difference in how aspects of lifestyle impacted measures of PA in this study.

Conclusions

The results of this study complement several previous studies that highlight the physically active nature of the Hadza people’s way of life, which includes large amounts of time spent active and inactive (Hawkes et al., 1989; Pontzer et al., 2015; Raichlen et al., 2017; Raichlen et al., 2020; Sayre et al., 2020). Time in MVPA and daily step counts were high in this study—even among older adults, whose levels of PA still far exceed baseline levels recommended by health officials in post-industrial populations. Similar to findings in other subsistence populations (e.g., Gurven et al., 2013), PA in this study can be characterized as primarily light-to-moderate, although participants of all ages engaged in some amount of vigorous-intensity PA. We found no evidence for strong camp-based differences in measures of PA. The similarity in patterns of PA between bush and village camps in this study may also highlight the physically active nature of subsistence lifestyles more generally. None of the camps in this study represent an urban context, where we might expect to see more pronounced differences in both lifestyle and health (e.g., Lea et al., 2020).

Overall, female and male participants in this study display similar levels of PA measures, but differences in how age, annual mobility, and schooling impact daily MVPA, step counts, and inactive time. These findings could be manifestations of Hadza adults’ gender-based division of labor and spatial use (F. Marlowe, 2010; Wood, Harris, et al., 2021), and could also indicate potential differences in how market integration (MI) impacts Hadza women and men. Moving forward, it will be important to examine how the subsistence activities and lifestyle of Hadza women and men changes alongside increasing MI, and how those changes ultimately impact the health and well-being of the Hadza community.

Supplementary Material

Supinfo2
Supinfo3
Supinfo1
Supinfo4
Supinfo5

Acknowledgments:

The authors would like to thank the Hadza research participants and community for their generosity and hospitality. Special thanks to Chris and Nani Schmelling for their hospitality and guidance. Thank you to Ibrahim Mabulla for providing in-country support, and to Dr. Gandhi Yetish, who provided invaluable mentorship throughout data collection. The authors also wish to thank the following generous funding sources that made this project possible: the National Science Foundation (Award NSF-BCS 2051519 [DAR, MKS], NSF-BCS 1440867 [DAR], NSF-BCS 1440671 [BMW]), the National Institute on Aging (R56AG067200 [GEA, DAR], R01AG72445 [DAR, GEA]), and the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (BMW).

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest Statement:

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Authorship:

M. Katherine Sayre: Conceptualization (equal), funding acquisition (equal), investigation (lead), methodology (equal), formal analysis (lead), visualization (lead), writing – original draft (lead), writing – review/edit (equal). Mariamu Anyawire: methodology (supporting), investigation (supporting), writing – review/editing (equal). Bunga Paolo: methodology (supporting), investigation (supporting), writing – review/editing (equal). Audax Z. P. Mabulla: resources (equal), writing – review/editing (equal). Herman Pontzer: Conceptualization (supporting), writing – review/editing (equal). Brian M. Wood: Conceptualization (supporting), funding acquisition (equal), resources (equal), writing – review/editing (equal). David A. Raichlen: conceptualization (equal), funding acquisition (equal), methodology (equal), writing – review/editing (equal).

Data Availability Statement:

Due to privacy and ethical restrictions, data is available upon reasonable request and discussion with corresponding author.

REFERENCES

  1. Apicella CL, Azevedo EM, Christakis NA, & Fowler JH (2014). Evolutionary Origins of the Endowment Effect: Evidence from Hunter-Gatherers. American Economic Review, 104(6), 1793–1805. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.6.1793 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Assah FK, Ekelund U, Brage S, Mbanya JC, & Wareham NJ (2011). Urbanization, physical activity, and metabolic health in sub-Saharan Africa. Diabetes Care, 34(2), 491–496. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Azevedo MR, Araujo CL, Reichert FF, Siqueira FV, da Silva MC, & Hallal PC (2007). Gender differences in leisure-time physical activity. Int J Public Health, 52(1), 8–15. doi: 10.1007/s00038-006-5062-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Benjamini Y, & Hochberg Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar]
  5. Biswas A, Oh PI, Faulkner GE, Bajaj RR, Silver MA, Mitchell MS, & Alter DA (2015). Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med, 162(2), 123–132. doi: 10.7326/M14-1651 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blodgett J, Theou O, Kirkland S, Andreou P, & Rockwood K. (2015). The association between sedentary behaviour, moderate-vigorous physical activity and frailty in NHANES cohorts. Maturitas, 80(2), 187–191. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.11.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brocklebank LA, Falconer CL, Page AS, Perry R, & Cooper AR (2015). Accelerometer-measured sedentary time and cardiometabolic biomarkers: A systematic review. Prev Med, 76, 92–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, . . . Willumsen JF (2020). World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med, 54(24), 1451–1462. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Caldwell AE (2016). Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure in Humans. 27–37. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-30409-0_4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cavallo FR, Golden C, Pearson-Stuttard J, Falconer C, & Toumazou C. (2022). The association between sedentary behaviour, physical activity and type 2 diabetes markers: A systematic review of mixed analytic approaches. PLoS One, 17(5), e0268289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Christensen DL, Faurholt-Jepsen D, Boit MK, Mwaniki DL, Kilonzo B, Tetens I, . . . Brage S. (2012). Cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity in Luo, Kamba, and Maasai of rural Kenya. Am J Hum Biol, 24(6), 723–729. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Crittenden AN, Sorrentino J, Moonie SA, Peterson M, Mabulla A, & Ungar PS (2017). Oral health in transition: The Hadza foragers of Tanzania. PLoS One, 12(3), e0172197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Davis HE, Stack J, & Cashdan E. (2021). Cultural Change Reduces Gender Differences in Mobility and Spatial Ability among Seminomadic Pastoralist-Forager Children in Northern Namibia. Hum Nat. doi: 10.1007/s12110-021-09388-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. de Rezende LF, Rodrigues Lopes M, Rey-Lopez JP, Matsudo VK, & Luiz Odo C. (2014). Sedentary behavior and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One, 9(8), e105620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Del Pozo Cruz B, Ahmadi M, Naismith SL, & Stamatakis E. (2022). Association of Daily Step Count and Intensity With Incident Dementia in 78430 Adults Living in the UK. JAMA Neurol. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. DiPietro L. (2001). Physical activity in aging: Changes in patterns and their relationship to health and function. Journal of Gerontology: Series A, 56A, 13–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Doherty A, Jackson D, Hammerla N, Plotz T, Olivier P, Granat MH, . . . Wareham NJ (2017). Large Scale Population Assessment of Physical Activity Using Wrist Worn Accelerometers: The UK Biobank Study. PLoS One, 12(2), e0169649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Du Y, Liu B, Sun Y, Snetselaar LG, Wallace RB, & Bao W. (2019). Trends in Adherence to the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans for Aerobic Activity and Time Spent on Sedentary Behavior Among US Adults, 2007 to 2016. JAMA Netw Open, 2(7), e197597. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dunstan DW, Thorp AA, & Healy GN (2011). Prolonged sitting: is it a distinct coronary heart disease risk factor? Curr Opin Cardiol, 26(5), 412–419. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e3283496605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Eaton SB, Konner M, & Shostak M. (1988). Stone Agers in the Fast Lane: Chronic Degenerative Diseases in Evolutionary Perspective. American Journal of Medicine, 84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ, Fagerland MW, Owen N, Powell KE, . . . Lee IM (2016). Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. The Lancet, 388(10051), 1302–1310. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30370-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ekelund U, Ward HA, Norat T, Luan J, May AM, Weiderpass E, . . . Riboli E. (2015). Physical activity and all-cause mortality across levels of overall and abdominal adiposity in European men and women: the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Study (EPIC). Am J Clin Nutr, 101(3), 613–621. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.100065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Erickson KI, Hillman C, Stillman CM, Ballard RM, Bloodgood B, Conroy DE, . . . For Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory, C. (2019). Physical Activity, Cognition, and Brain Outcomes: A Review of the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 51(6), 1242–1251. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Evenson KR, Buchner DM, & Morland KB (2011). Objective Measurement of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Among US Adults Aged 60 Years or Older. Preventing Chronic Disease. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.110109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gibbons A. (2018). Hadza on the Brink: Farmers, tourists, and cattle threaten some of the world’s last hunter-gatherers, long a magnet for researchers. Science, 360. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gu F, Khoshelham K, Shang J, Yu F, & Wei Z. (2017). Robust and Accurate Smartphone-Based Step Counting for Indoor Localization. IEEE Sensors Journal, 17(11), 3453–3460. doi: 10.1109/jsen.2017.2685999 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gurven M, Jaeggi AV, Kaplan H, & Cummings D. (2013). Physical activity and modernization among Bolivian Amerindians. PLoS One, 8(1), e55679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hall KS, Hyde ET, Bassett DR, Carlson SA, Carnethon MR, Ekelund U, . . . Fulton JE (2020). Systematic review of the prospective association of daily step counts with risk of mortality, cardiovascular disease, and dysglycemia. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 17(1), 78. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00978-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, & Ekelund U. (2012). Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. The Lancet, 380(9838), 247–257. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60646-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hamer M, Blodgett JM, & Stamatakis E. (2022). Dose-response association between step count and cardiovascular disease risk markers in middle-aged adults. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 32(7), 1161–1165. doi: 10.1111/sms.14173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hawkes K, O’Connell JF, & Blurton Jones NG (1989). Hardworking Hadza grandmothers. Comparative socioecology, 341–366. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hildebrand M, Hansen BH, van Hees VT, & Ekelund U. (2017). Evaluation of raw acceleration sedentary thresholds in children and adults. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 27(12), 1814–1823. doi: 10.1111/sms.12795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hildebrand M, van Hees VT, Hansen BH, & Ekelund U. (2014). Age group comparability of raw accelerometer output from wrist- and hip-worn monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 46(9), 1816–1824. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kashiwazaki H, Uenishi K, Kobayashi T, Rivera JO, Coward WA, & Wright A. (2009). Year-round high physical activity levels in agropastoralists of Bolivian Andes: results from repeated measurements of DLW method in peak and slack seasons of agricultural activities. Am J Hum Biol, 21(3), 337–345. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Katzmarzyk PT, & Mason C. (2009). The Physical Activity Transition. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 6, 269–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. King AC, Whitt-Glover MC, Marquez DX, Buman MP, Napolitano MA, Jakicic J, . . . Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory, C. (2019). Physical Activity Promotion: Highlights from the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Systematic Review. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 51(6), 1340–1353. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kraft TS, Venkataraman VV, Wallace IJ, Crittenden AN, Holowka NB, Stieglitz J. … Pontzer H. (2021). The energetics of uniquely human subsistence strategies. Science, 374(6575), eabf0130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kraus WE, Janz KF, Powell KE, Campbell WW, Jakicic JM, Troiano RP, . . . Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory, C. (2019). Daily Step Counts for Measuring Physical Activity Exposure and Its Relation to Health. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 51(6), 1206–1212. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lea AJ, Martins D, Kamau J, Gurven M, & Ayroles JF (2020). Urbanization and market integration have strong, nonlinear effects on cardiometabolic health in the Turkana. Science Advances, 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lee Y, & Park S. (2021). Understanding of Physical Activity in Social Ecological Perspective: Application of Multilevel Model. Front Psychol, 12, 622929. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.622929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Leonard WR, & Robertson ML (1997). Comparative Primate Energetics and Hominid Evolution. Am J Phys Anthropol, 102, 265–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lu F. (2007). Integration into the market among indigenous peoples. Current Anthropology, 48(4), 593–602. [Google Scholar]
  43. Madimenos FC, Snodgrass JJ, Blackwell AD, Liebert MA, & Sugiyama LS (2011). Physical activity in an indigenous Ecuadorian forager-horticulturalist population as measured using accelerometry. Am J Hum Biol, 23(4), 488–497. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.21163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Marlowe F. (2010). The Hadza: hunter-gatherers of Tanzania: Univ of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  45. Marlowe FW (2002). Why the Hadza are Still Hunter-Gatherers. In Kent S. (Ed.), Ethnicity, Hunter-Gatherers and the “Other”: Assimilation in Africa (pp. 247–275). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. [Google Scholar]
  46. Marlowe FW (2005). Hunter-gatherers and human evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 14(2), 54–67. doi: 10.1002/evan.20046 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Marquez DX, Aguinaga S, Vasquez PM, Conroy DE, Erickson KI, Hillman C, . . . Powell KE (2020). A systematic review of physical activity and quality of life and well-being. Transl Behav Med, 10(5), 1098–1109. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Matthews CE, Hagstromer M, Pober DM, & Bowles HR (2012). Best practices for using physical activity monitors in population-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 44(1 Suppl 1), S68–76. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399e5b [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Migueles JH, Rowlands AV, Huber F, Sabia S, & van Hees VT (2019). GGIR: A Research Community–Driven Open Source R Package for Generating Physical Activity and Sleep Outcomes From Multi-Day Raw Accelerometer Data. Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour, 2(3), 188–196. doi: 10.1123/jmpb.2018-0063 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Moore SC, Patel AV, Matthews CE, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Park Y, Katki HA, . . . Lee IM (2012). Leisure time physical activity of moderate to vigorous intensity and mortality: a large pooled cohort analysis. PLoS Med, 9(11), e1001335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Norton K, Norton L, & Sadgrove D. (2010). Position statement on physical activity and exercise intensity terminology. J Sci Med Sport, 13(5), 496–502. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.09.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Nuss KJ, Hulett NA, Erickson A, Burton E, Carr K, Mooney L, . . . Li K. (2020). Comparison of Energy Expenditure and Step Count Measured by ActiGraph Accelerometers Among Dominant and Nondominant Wrist and Hip Sites. Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour, 3(4), 315–322. doi: 10.1123/jmpb.2019-0064 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Paluch AE, Bajpai S, Bassett DR, Carnethon MR, Ekelund U, Evenson KR, . . . Fulton JE (2022). Daily steps and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of 15 international cohorts. The Lancet Public Health, 7(3), e219–e228. doi: 10.1016/s2468-2667(21)00302-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Panter-Brick C. (1996). Seasonal and Sex Variation in Physical Activity Levels Among Agro-Pastoralists in Nepal. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 100, 7–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Patterson R, McNamara E, Tainio M, de Sa TH, Smith AD, Sharp SJ, . . . Wijndaele K. (2018). Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol, 33(9), 811–829. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0380-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, . . . Olson RD (2018). Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans: 2nd edition. JAMA, 320, 2020–2028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Plotnikoff RC, Mayhew A, Birkett N, Loucaides CA, & Fodor G. (2004). Age, gender, and urban-rural differences in the correlates of physical activity. Prev Med, 39(6), 1115–1125. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.04.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Pollom TR, Cross CL, Herlosky KN, Ford E, & Crittenden AN (2020). Effects of a mixed-subsistence diet on the growth of Hadza children. Am J Hum Biol, e23455. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Pontzer H, Raichlen DA, Wood BM, Emery Thompson M, Racette SB, Mabulla AZ, & Marlowe FW (2015). Energy expenditure and activity among Hadza hunter-gatherers. Am J Hum Biol, 27(5), 628–637. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Pontzer H, Wood BM, & Raichlen DA (2018). Hunter-gatherers as models in public health. Obes Rev, 19 Suppl 1, 24–35. doi: 10.1111/obr.12785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Raichlen DA, Klimentidis YC, Sayre MK, Bharadwaj PK, Lai MHC, Wilcox RR, & Alexander GE (2022). Leisure-time sedentary behaviors are differentially associated with all-cause dementia regardless of engagement in physical activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 119(35), e2206931119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206931119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Raichlen DA, & Lieberman DE (2022). The evolution of human step counts and its association with the risk of chronic disease. Curr Biol, 32(21), R1206–R1214. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.09.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Raichlen DA, Pontzer H, Harris JA, Mabulla AZ, Marlowe FW, Josh Snodgrass J, . . . Wood BM (2017). Physical activity patterns and biomarkers of cardiovascular disease risk in hunter-gatherers. Am J Hum Biol, 29. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Raichlen DA, Pontzer H, Zderic TW, Harris JA, Mabulla AZP, Hamilton MT, & Wood BM (2020). Sitting, squatting, and the evolutionary biology of human inactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911868117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Ramakrishnan R, Doherty A, Smith-Byrne K, Rahimi K, Bennett D, Woodward M, . . . Dwyer T. (2021). Accelerometer measured physical activity and the incidence of cardiovascular disease: Evidence from the UK Biobank cohort study. PLoS Med, 18(1), e1003487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Ramirez Varela A, Cruz GIN, Hallal P, Blumenberg C, da Silva SG, Salvo D, . . . Pratt M. (2021). Global, regional, and national trends and patterns in physical activity research since 1950: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 18(1), 5. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01071-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Rankin AJ, Rankin AC, MacIntyre P, & Hillis WS (2012). Walk or run? Is high-intensity exercise more effective than moderate-intensity exercise at reducing cardiovascular risk? Scott Med J, 57(2), 99–102. doi: 10.1258/smj.2011.011284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Rey Lopez JP, Sabag A, Martinez Juan M, Rezende LFM, & Pastor-Valero M. (2020). Do vigorous-intensity and moderate-intensity physical activities reduce mortality to the same extent? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med, 6(1), e000775. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2020-000775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sabia S, van Hees VT, Shipley MJ, Trenell MI, Hagger-Johnson G, Elbaz A, . . . Singh-Manoux A. (2014). Association between questionnaire- and accelerometer-assessed physical activity: the role of sociodemographic factors. Am J Epidemiol, 179(6), 781–790. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Saint-Maurice PF, Troiano RP, Bassett DR Jr., Graubard BI, Carlson SA, Shiroma EJ, . . . Matthews CE (2020). Association of Daily Step Count and Step Intensity With Mortality Among US Adults. JAMA, 323(12), 1151–1160. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Sarma MS, Boyette AH, Lew-Levy S, Miegakanda V, Kilius E, Samson DR, & Gettler LT (2020). Sex differences in daily activity intensity and energy expenditure and their relationship to cortisol among BaYaka foragers from the Congo Basin. Am J Phys Anthropol, 172(3), 423–437. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Sayre MK, Pike IL, & Raichlen DA (2018). High levels of objectively measured physical activity across adolescence and adulthood among the Pokot pastoralists of Kenya. Am J Hum Biol, 31(1), e23205. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Sayre MK, Pontzer H, Alexander GE, Wood BM, Pike IL, Mabulla AZP, & Raichlen DA (2020). Ageing and physical function in East African foragers and pastoralists. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 375(1811), 20190608. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0608 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Shaw BA, & Spokane LS (2008). Examining the association between education level and physical activity changes during early old age. Journal of Aging and Health, 20, 767–787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Stamatakis E, Ahmadi MN, Gill JMR, Thogersen-Ntoumani C, Gibala MJ, Doherty A, & Hamer M. (2022). Association of wearable device-measured vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity with mortality. Nat Med. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02100-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Stamatakis E, Huang BH, Maher C, Thogersen-Ntoumani C, Stathi A, Dempsey PC, . . . Gibala MJ (2021). Untapping the Health Enhancing Potential of Vigorous Intermittent Lifestyle Physical Activity (VILPA): Rationale, Scoping Review, and a 4-Pillar Research Framework. Sports Med, 51(1), 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01368-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Team, R. C. (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
  78. Troiano R, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, & McDowell M. (2008). Physical Activity in the United States Measured by Accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 40(1), 181–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Trost SG, McIver KL, & Pate RR (2005). Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 37(11 Suppl), S531–543. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000185657.86065.98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Trost SG, Pate RR, Sallis JF, Freedson PS, Taylor WC, Dowda M, & Sirard J. (2002). Age and gender differences in objectively measured physical activity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Tucker JM, Welk GJ, & Beyler NK (2011). Physical activity in U.S.: adults compliance with the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Am J Prev Med, 40(4), 454–461. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Urlacher SS, Liebert MA, Josh Snodgrass J, Blackwell AD, Cepon-Robins TJ, Gildner TE, . . . Sugiyama LS (2016). Heterogeneous effects of market integration on sub-adult body size and nutritional status among the Shuar of Amazonian Ecuador. Ann Hum Biol, 43(4), 316–329. doi: 10.1080/03014460.2016.1192219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Urlacher SS, Snodgrass JJ, Dugas LR, Madimenos FC, Sugiyama LS, Liebert MA, . . . Pontzer H. (2021). Childhood Daily Energy Expenditure Does Not Decrease with Market Integration and Is Not Related to Adiposity in Amazonia. J Nutr. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxaa361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Ussery EN, Whitfield GP, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, Matthews CE, Katzmarzyk PT, & Carlson SA (2021). Trends in Self-Reported Sitting Time by Physical Activity Levels Among US Adults, NHANES 2007/2008–2017/2018. J Phys Act Health, 18(S1), S74–S83. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2021-0221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. van Hees VT, Fang Z, Langford J, Assah F, Mohammad A, da Silva IC, . . . Brage S. (2014). Autocalibration of accelerometer data for free-living physical activity assessment using local gravity and temperature: an evaluation on four continents. J Appl Physiol (1985), 117(7), 738–744. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00421.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. van Hees VT, Gorzelniak L, Dean Leon EC, Eder M, Pias M, Taherian S, . . . Brage S. (2013). Separating movement and gravity components in an acceleration signal and implications for the assessment of human daily physical activity. PLoS One, 8(4), e61691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. van Hees VT, Sabia S, Jones SE, Wood AR, Anderson KN, Kivimaki M, . . . Weedon MN (2018). Estimating sleep parameters using an accelerometer without sleep diary. Sci Rep, 8(1), 12975. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31266-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Varma VR, Dey D, Leroux A, Di J, Urbanek J, Xiao L, & Zipunnikov V. (2017). Re-evaluating the effect of age on physical activity over the lifespan. Prev Med, 101, 102–108. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Veile A, Martin M, McAllister L, & Gurven M. (2014). Modernization is associated with intensive breastfeeding patterns in the Bolivian Amazon. Soc Sci Med, 100, 148–158. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.10.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Warburton DE, Nicol CW, & Bredin SS (2006). Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 174(6), 801–809. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Wolff-Hughes DL, Fitzhugh EC, Bassett DR, & Churilla JR (2015). Waist-Worn Actigraphy: Population-Referenced Percentiles for Total Activity Counts in U.S. Adults. J Phys Act Health, 12(4), 447–453. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2013-0464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Wood BM, Harris JA, Raichlen DA, Pontzer H, Sayre K, Sancilio A, . . . Jones JH (2021). Gendered movement ecology and landscape use in Hadza hunter-gatherers. Nat Hum Behav. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01002-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Wood BM, Millar RS, Wright N, Baumgartner J, Holmquist H, & Kiffner C. (2021). Hunter-Gatherers in context: Mammal community composition in a northern Tanzania landscape used by Hadza foragers and Datoga pastoralists. PLoS One, 16(5), e0251076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Yamauchi T, Umezaki M, & Ohtsuka R. (2001). Physical Activity and Subsistence Pattern of the Huli, a Papua New Guinea Highland Population. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 114, 258–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Yen HY, & Li C. (2019). Determinants of physical activity: A path model based on an ecological model of active living. PLoS One, 14(7), e0220314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supinfo2
Supinfo3
Supinfo1
Supinfo4
Supinfo5

Data Availability Statement

Due to privacy and ethical restrictions, data is available upon reasonable request and discussion with corresponding author.

RESOURCES