Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2023 Dec 14;18(12):e0295759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295759

An observational, multicenter, registry-based cohort study of Turkish Neonatal Society in neonates with Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy

Emel Okulu 1,*, Ibrahim Murat Hirfanoglu 2, Mehmet Satar 3, Omer Erdeve 1, Esin Koc 2, Ferda Ozlu 3,4, Mahmut Gokce 4, Didem Armangil 5, Gaffari Tunc 6, Nihal Demirel 7,8, Sezin Unal 8, Ramazan Ozdemir 9, Mehmet Fatih Deveci 9, Melek Akar 10, Melike Kefeli Demirel 10, Merih Çetinkaya 11, Halime Sema Can Buker 11, Belma Saygılı Karagöl 12, Deniz Yaprak 12, Abdullah Barıs Akcan 13, Ayse Anik 13, Fatma Narter 14, Sema Arayici 15, Egemen Yildirim 15, Ilke Mungan Akin 16, Ozlem Sahin 16, Ozgul Emel Bulut Ozdemir 17, Fahri Ovali 17, Mustafa Ali Akin 18, Yalcin Celik 19, Aysen Orman 19, Sinan Uslu 20, Hilal Ozkan 21, Nilgun Koksal 21, Ayhan Tastekin 22, Mehmet Gunduz 22, Ayse Engin Arisoy 23, Resat Gurpinar 23, Rahmi Ors 24, Huseyin Altunhan 25, Ramazan Kececi 25, Hacer Yapicioglu Yildizdas 3, Demet Terek 26, Mehmet Ates 26, Sebnem Kader 27, Mehmet Mutlu 27, Kıymet Çelik 28, Ebru Yucesoy 29, Mustafa Kurthan Mert 30, Selvi Gulasi 30, Kazım Kucuktasci 31, Didem Arman 32, Berna Hekimoglu 33, Nazlı Dilay Gultekin 34, Hasan Tolga Celik 35, Dilek Kahvecioglu 36, Can Akyildiz 37, Erdal Taşkın 38, Nukhet Aladag Ciftdemir 39, Saime Sundus Uygun 40, Tugba Barsan Kaya 41, Arzu Akdag 42, Aslan Yilmaz 43
Editor: Stefan Grosek44
PMCID: PMC10721008  PMID: 38096201

Abstract

Background

Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a significant cause of mortality and short- and long-term morbidities. Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) has been shown to be the standard care for HIE of infants ≥36 weeks gestational age (GA), as it has been demonstrated to reduce the rates of mortality, and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. This study aims to determine the incidence of HIE in our country, to assess the TH management in infants with HIE, and present short-term outcomes of these infants.

Methods

The Turkish Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy Online Registry database was established for this multicenter, prospective, observational, nationally-based cohort study to evaluate the data of infants born at ≥34 weeks GA who displayed evidence of neonatal encephalopathy (NE) between March, 2020 and April 2022.

Results

The incidence of HIE among infants born at ≥36 weeks GA (n = 965) was 2.13 per 1000 live births (517:242440), and accounting for 1.55% (965:62062) of all neonatal intensive care unit admissions. The rates of mild, moderate and severe HİE were 25.5% (n = 246), 58.9% (n = 568), and 15.6% (n = 151), respectively. Infants with severe HIE had higher rates of abnormal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and mortality (p<0.001). No significant difference in mortality and abnormal MRI results was found according to the time of TH initiation (<3 h, 3–6 h and >6 h) (p>0.05). TH was administered to 85 (34.5%) infants with mild HIE, and of those born of 34–35 weeks of GA, 67.4% (n = 31) received TH. A total of 58 (6%) deaths were reported with a higher mortality rate in infants born at 34–35 weeks of GA (OR 3.941, 95% Cl 1.446–10.7422, p = 0.007).

Conclusion

The incidence of HIE remained similar over time with a reduction in mortality rate. The timing of TH initiation, whether <3 or 3–6 h, did not result in lower occurrences of brain lesions on MRI or mortality. An increasing number of infants with mild HIE and late preterm infants with HIE are receiving TH; however, the indications for TH require further clarification. Longer follow-up studies are necessary for this vulnerable population.

Introduction

Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a major cause of mortality and short- and long-term morbidities. HIE is the subset of neonatal encephalopathy (NE) that is accepted to be caused by potentially asphyxiating birth events, or ‘sentinel events’ [1,2].

The estimated incidences of NE and HIE are 3/1000 and 1.5/1000 live births, respectively in developed countries, and it is thought to be higher in developing countries [3]. In a recent study from New Zealand, NE was found to have an incidence of 1.2/1000 live births, which is lower than the 2010 review’s estimate [4]. However, there were significant differences in reported incidences between population-based and hospital-based research. It was estimated that the incidence range would have been 2-6/1000 for NE and 1-8/1000 live births for HIE [5]. According to the data published by the Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy Study Group of the Turkish Neonatology Society in Türkiye in 2008, 93 infants out of 19,857 live births were diagnosed with HIE, resulting in a frequency of 2.6/1000 live births, and 1.2% among neonatal intensive care units (NICU) hospitalized patients [6].

Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) has been shown to be the standard treatment for HIE in infants with a gestational age (GA) of ≥36 weeks, and provides lower rates of mortality, cerebral palsy, hearing and visual impairment, and neurodevelopmental delay [79]. However, a recent study evaluating the use of TH for HIE in low-income countries found it to be neither effective nor safe, and advises against its use [10], in which these results and conclusions should be carefully considered. There is not enough evidence to determine any significant benefits or harms from using TH in infants with mild HIE [11,12].

This study aimed to determine the incidence of HIE in Türkiye, assess TH management in infants with HIE, and present short-term outcomes of these infants, including the underlying etiologies, clinical features, morbidity and mortality.

Material and methods

This was a multicenter, prospective, observational, nationally-based cohort study conducted between 15 March, 2020 and 15 April 2022. After the Turkish Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy Online Registry was established, clinical directors in 64 NICUs nationwide were made aware of the study. The study included 42 (66%) participating tertiary level NICU centers among which 24 were university hospitals, 15 were state hospitals and 3 were private hospitals. All participating centers all had an attending neonatologists and almost all included a pediatric neurologists.

Infants who met the following criteria and were born at or transferred to a participating center at ≥34 weeks GA with evidence of HIE were eligible for enrollment in the registry [6,13]:

  1. One or more of the following:

    1. Apgar score <5 at 5 min,

    2. Metabolic acidosis [Base deficit (BD) > –16 mmol/L at cord blood gas or blood gas analysis at 1st h after birth),

    3. Delayed onset of respiration for five or more minutes,

    4. Birth via emergency cesarean section due to fetal distress

  2. Need for ventilation immediately after birth (positive pressure ventilation or intubation)

  3. Evidence of encephalopathy (lethargy, hypotonia, altered state of consciousness, weakness/absent of reflexes and/or seizures)

  4. Multiorgan involvement [encephalopathy and at least one other organ system other than central nervous system (CNS)].

For multiorgan dysfunction, the following conditions were considered [1416]:

  • Renal: Oliguria/anuria, hematuria, proteinuria, myoglobunuria, and renal failure

  • Cardiovascular: Hypotension treated with an inotrope for more than 24 hours to maintain blood pressure within the normal range, shock, cardiomegaly, arrythmia, heart failure, cardiac ischemia

  • Metabolic: Hypo/hyperglycemia, hypocalcemia, hyponatremia, hypomagnesemia, metabolic acidosis

  • Pulmonary: Need for ventilator support with oxygen requirement, requirement of inhaled nitric oxide, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

  • Hepatic: Aspartate aminotransferase >100 IU/l or alanine aminotransferase >100 IU/l at any time during the first week after birth

  • Hematological: Thrombocytopenia, thrombosis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, impaired coagulation profile

  • Gastrointestinal: Bleeding, necrotizing enterocolitis

  • Skin: Skin injuries that were considered device related when they were in contact with a cooling blanket, and not present at the of hospital admission.

The participating centers were asked to report factors identified as the underlying etiology: antepartum [maternal/fetal: advanced maternal age, maternal disease (hypertension, diabetes, thyroid, cardiac, preeclampsia/eclampsia, anemia, infection), maternal substance use, pre/postmaturity, intrauterine growth restriction, multiple gestation, congenital malformation of fetus], intrapartum [uterine rupture, placental abruption, placenta previa, cord prolapse, tight nuchal cord, inflammatory events (maternal fever, chorioamnionitis, prolonged rupture of membranes), meconium-stained amniotic fluid], and postpartum (meconium aspiration syndrome, severe cardiopulmonary failure).

Encephalopathy was defined as the presence of moderate or severe encephalopathy ≥1 sign in at least 3 of the 6 categories of modified Sarnat criteria: 1. level of consciousness:

moderate (lethargy), severe (stupor or coma), 2. spontaneous activity: moderate (decreased), severe (no activity), 3. posture: moderate (distal flexion, complete extension), severe (decerebrate), 4. tone: moderate (hypotonia), severe (flaccid), 5. primitive reflexes, suck: moderate (weak), severe (absent) or Moro: moderate (incomplete), severe (absent) and 6. autonomic nervous system, pupils: moderate (constricted), severe (deviated, dilated or nonreaction to light) or heart rate: moderate (bradycardia), severe (variable) or respiration: moderate (periodic breathing), severe (apnea). The number of moderate or severe signs determined the degree of encephalopathy; if signs were distributed equally, then the designation was based on the level of consciousness [17,18].

To determine the incidence of HIE, the number of infants admitted to the participating units during the study period, whether the cases included in the study group were born inborn or outborn, and the number of deliveries performed in the same center during the study period was asked from the participating centers.

Data for each neonate was recorded, including GA, birth weight (BW), sex, place of birth, APGAR scores at 5-, 10-, 15- and 20-min, mode of delivery, delivery room resuscitation, underlying etiologies, Thompson scores at admission and during the first 72 h after birth [19], and whether cooling therapy was given. Care practices, such as amplitude electroencephalography (aEEG) at admission, timing of nactive TH initiation with servo-controlled device after birth (in h), the duration of TH, need for respiratory support, accompanying organ systems issues aside from CNS condition, the results of MRI, EEG, and hearing screening test, and mortality rate were all recorded. Mortality was defined as mortality before NICU discharge. Infants were grouped into three groups according to TH initiation time as <3 h, 3–6 h and >6 h. Initiation of TH within <3 h was defined as ‘early’ initiation.

The aEEG background activity was classified as follows [20]:

  1. Normal amplitude, the upper margin of band of aEEG activity >10 μV and the lower margin >5 μV;

  2. Moderately abnormal amplitude, the upper margin of band of aEEG activity >10 μV and the lower margin ≤5 μV; and

  3. Suppressed amplitude, the upper margin of the band of aEEG activity <10 μV and lower margin <5 μV, usually accompanied by bursts of high-voltage activity (“burst suppression”)

The findings shown by MRI and defined as ‘abnormal’ were as follows [21]:

  • Major conventional MRI findings: Cerebral cortical gray-white differentiation lost (on T1W or T2W); Cerebral cortical high signal (T1W and FLAIR), especially in parasagittal perirolandic cortex; Basal ganglia/thalamus, high signal (T1W and FLAIR, usually associated with the cerebral cortical changes but possibly alone with increased signal in brain stem tegmentum in cases of acute severe insults; Parasagittal cerebral cortex, subcortical white matter, high signal (T1W and FLAIR); Periventricular white matter, decreased signal (T1W) or increased signal (T2W); Posterior limb of internal capsule, decreased signal (T1W or FLAIR); Cerebrum in a vascular distribution,

  • Diffusion-weighted MRI: Decreased diffusion (increased signal) in injured areas.

Only de-identified data were provided to the registry, negating the need for informed consent. The local institutional review board reviewed and approved registry participation with the approval No. of 25.11.2019–227. Authors had access to information that belongs to only their own center’s participants during or after data collection.

Categorical variables were reported as number and percentage, and continuous variables as mean ± SD or median (IQR) where appropriate. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used for categorical variables. We used the Student-t test to analyze continuous variables with a normal distribution, and the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed data. For group analysis, the One Way ANOVA test was used for normal distributed data, and the Kruskal-Wallis H test for non-normally distributed ones. We used the post hoc Bonferroni test to analyze the differences between each group. Logistic regression was applied to calculate the odss ratio to access association between risk and covariates. The optimum cutoff of the Thompson scores for estimating the mortality was determined using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC). Logistic regression P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 11.5.

Results

Incidence of HIE

Among registered 1011 infants with HIE, 46 infants born <36 weeks of GA were excluded when calculating the incidence of HIE. Participating hospitals recorded 242440 births during the study period, and a total of 62062 infants were admitted for neonatal care. Among them, 53.6% (n = 517) were inborn, 45.9% (n = 443) were outborn, and 0.5% (n = 5) were born at home. The incidence of HIE in infants who are ≥36 weeks GA was 2.13 per 1000 live births (517:242440), and accounting for 1.55% (965:62062) of all NICU admissions. The incidence for mild HIE was 0.64 per 1000 births and 0.39%, and for moderate/severe HIE, it was 1.49 per 1000 births and 1.16%, respectively.

The characteristics of infants

Of the total 965 infants, 25.5% (n = 246) had mild, 58.9% (n = 568), had moderate, and 15.6% (n = 151) had severe HIE (Fig 1). The mean GA and BW for these infants were 38.9 ± 1.4 w, and 3219 ± 504 g, respectively. The mean maternal age was 28.0 ± 5.9 years, 57.7% of the infants were male, and 57.3% born vaginally. Most of the infants received resuscitation in the delivery room (83.3%). The median APGAR scores at 1-, 5-, 10-, 15- and 20-min were 4, 6, 7, 7, and 7, respectively (Table 1).

Fig 1. The flowchart of the study.

Fig 1

Table 1. Demographic findings of infants with the diagnosis of HIE born ≥36 weeks of gestational age.


Variables

Total
(N = 965)
HIE stages based on Modified Sarnat Scoring System
p
Mild HIE (Stage 1)
(n = 246)
Moderate HIE (Stage 2)
(n = 568)
Severe HIE (Stage 3)
(n = 151)
Gestational age (w) * 38.9 ± 1.4 38.9 ± 1.4 38.8 ± 1.4 38.7 ± 1.3 0.378w
Birth weight (g) * 3219 ± 504 3256 ± 512 3206 ± 479 3210 ± 584 0.413w
Maternal age (y) * 28.0 ± 5.9 27.3 ± 5.9 28.3 ± 5.9 28.3 ± 6.0 0.075w
Sex (male) 557 (57.7) 135 (54.9) 333 (58.6) 89 (58.9) 0.578y
Place of birth
Inborn
Outborn
Home

517 (53.6)
443 (45.9)
5 (0.5)

156 (63.4)a
89 (36.2)a
1 (0.4)a,b

289 (50.9)b
278 (48.9)b
1 (0.2)b

72 (47.7)b
76 (50.3)b
3 (2)a
<0.001z
Type of delivery (NVD) 553 (57.3) 142 (57.7)a.b 341 (60)a 70 (46.4)b 0.01y
APGAR scoresš
1st min (n = 965)
5th min (n = 965)
10th min (n = 537)
15th min (n = 236)
20th min (n = 207)

4 (1–2)
6 (5–6)
7 (5–8)
7 (6–8)
7 (7–9)

5 (4–6)a
7 (6–8)a
8 (7–9)a
8 (8–10)a
9 (8–10)a

4 (3–5)b
6 (5–7)b
7 (6–8)b
7 (6–8)b
8 (7–9)b

1 (1–3)c
4 (3–5)c
5 (4–6)c
6 (5–7)c
7 (5–7.5)c

<0.001x
<0.001x
<0.001x
<0.001x
<0.001x
Resuscitation at DR 804 (83.3) 176 (71.5)a 483 (85)b 145 (96)c <0.001y
Duration of resuscitation (n = 804)(min)š 2 (1–5) 1 (1–2)a 2 (1–3)b 5 (2–10)c <0.001x
Underlying etiologies
Antepartum (maternal/fetal)
 Maternal diabetes
 Maternal hypertension
 Intrauterine growth restriction
Intrapartum
 Meconium-stained amniotic fluid
 Umbilical cord compression
Postpartum
 Meconium aspiration syndrome
Unknown

239 (24.8)
42/140 (30)
13/140 (9.3)
18/123 (14.6)
398 (41.2)
173 (43.5)
77 (19.3)
99 (10.3)
63 (63.6)
229 (23.7)

66 (26.8)
15/42 (35.7)
3/42 (7.1)
4/29 (13.8)
87 (35.4)
41 (47.1)
14 (16.1)
22 (8.9)a,b
16 (72.7)
71 (28.9)

135 (23.8)
23/75 (30.7)
10/75 (13.3)
12/73 (16.4)
243 (42.8)
100 (41.1)
50 (20.6)
52 (9.2)a
33 (63.5)
138 (24.3)

38 (25.2)
4/23 (17.4)
0/23 (0)
2/21 (9.5)
68 (45)
32 (47)
13 (19.1)
25 (16.6)b
14 (56)
20 (13.2)
0.195y
0.644y
0.084y
0.021y

Data given as: *mean ± SD, number (%), šmedian (IQR). w:One Way ANOVA test, x:Kruskal Wallis H test, y:Chi-square test, z:Fisher-exact test.

Each subscript a,b,c letter denotes a subset of HIE categories whose column proprotions do not significantly from each other at the 0.05 level..

DR: delivery room; HIE: hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy; NVD: normal vaginal delivery; PPV: positive pressure ventilation.

Data of infants ≥36 weeks GA according to grading of HIE

The characteristics of infants ≥36 weeks GA with mild, moderate and severe HIE were compared on Tables 1 and 2. The GA, BW, sex distribution, and maternal age were similar among infants (p>0.05). Antepartum conditions (maternal/fetal) were responsible for 24.8%, intrapartum conditions for 41.2%, and postpartum conditions in 10.3% of infants as underlying etiologies, while the etiology was unknown in 23.7% of infants with HIE (p = 0.195). Among the identified etiologies, diabetes (30%) and hypertension (22.8%) were the most common antepartum maternal problems, intrauterine growth restriction (14.6%) was the most common antepartum fetal problem; delivery through meconium-stained amniotic fluid (43.5%) and umbilical cord compression (19.3%) were the most common intrapartum problems; respiratory disease due to meconium aspiration syndrome (63%) was the most common postpartum problem (Table 1).

Table 2. Clinical features and outcomes of infants according to degree of HIE.

Variables Mild HIE
(n = 246)
Moderate HIE
(n = 568)
Severe HIE
(n = 151)
p
Cord blood gas analysis
pH š
BE š

7.00 (6.93–7.07)a
-12.77 [(-15.57)–(-12.00)]a

6.97 (6.89–7.02)b
-17.00 [(-20.00)–(-14.00)]b

6.85 (6.77–7.00)c
-19.30 [(-23.50)–(-16.80)] c

<0.001w
<0.001x
Blood gas analysis at 1st h
pHš
BEš

7.14 (7.05–7.25)a
-10.41 [(-14.00)–(-6.92)]a

7.07 (7.00–7.17)b
-14.39 [(-17.30)–(-11.00)]b

6.93 (6.80–7.06) c
-19.00 [(-22.60)–(-14.90)] c

<0.001w
<0.001x
Abnormal aEEG at admission 26/211 (12.3)a 269/511 (52.6)b 119/137 (86.8)c <0.001y
Performed TH
Timing initiation of TH (h) š
85 (34.6)a
3.0 (1.0–4.75)
563 (99.1)b
2.0 (1.0–4.0)
151 (100)b
2.0 (1.0–4.0)
<0.001y
0.144x
Respiratory support during TH 160 (65.0)a 480 (84.5)b 150(99.3)c <0.001y
Clinical seizure at any time 9 (3.7)a 170 (29.9)b 91 (60.3)c <0.001y
Accompanying organ system/condition 85 (34.6)a 408 (71.8)b 137 (90.7)c <0.001y
Intractable acidosis 2 (0.8)a 34 (6.0)b 56 (37.1)c <0.001y
Received inotrope/hypotension 14 (5.7)a 148 (26.1)b 91 (60.3)c <0.001y
Bleeding/DIC 8 (3.3)a 78 (13.7)b 68 (45.0)c <0.001y
Thrombocytopenia 22 (8.9)a 115 (20.2)b 72 (47.7)c <0.001y
Blood glucose disturbance 18 (7.3)a 65 (11.4)a 37 (24.5)b <0.001y
Electrolyte imbalance 25 (10.2)a 149 (26.2)b 77 (51.0)c <0.001y
NEC 0 (0)a 23 (4.0)b 2 (1.3)a,b 0.002y
Acute kidney injury 12 (4.9)a 41 (7.2)a 56 (37.1)b <0.001y
Respiratory problems
Received iNO
23 (9.3)a
3 (1.2)a
163 (28.7)b
17 (3.0)a,b
75 (49.7)c
10 (6.6)b
<0.001y
0.01y
Liver dysfunction 15 (6.1)a 111 (19.5)b 74 (49.0)c <0.001y
Received ECMO
Skin problems
1 (0.4)
2 (0.8)
0 (0.0)
14 (2.5)
1 (0.7)
6 (4.0)
0.206z
0.110y
Thompson scoresš
At admission
24th h
48thh
72ndh

4.0 (2.0–6.0)a
1.0 (0.0–3.0)a
0.0 (0.0–1.0)a
0.0 (0.0–0.0)a

9.0 (7.0–12.0)b
7.0 (3.0–10.0)b
4.0 (2.0–8.0)b
2.0 (0.0–6.0)b

16.0 (13.0–18.0)c
14.0 (11.0–17.0)c
12.0 (8.0–15.0)c
9.0 (5.0–14.0)c

<0.001x
<0.001x
<0.001x
<0.001x
Abnormal EEG finding 12/77 (15.6)a 94/327 (28.7)a 40/63 (63.5)b <0.001y
Performed MRI
Type of MRI
Conventional
DWI
Spectroscopy
Timing of MRI (d) š
Abnormal MRI finding
112 (45.5)a
28 (25.0)
83 (74.1)
1 (0.9)
5.0 (4.0–7.75)
25 (22.3)a
429 (75.5)b
74 (17.2)
348 (81.1)
7 (1.6)
5.0 (5.0–7.0)
125 (29.1)a
95 (62.9)c
14 (14.7)
79 (83.2)
2 (2.1)
7.0 (5.0–13.0)
65 (68.4)b
<0.001y
0.286z
<0.001x
<0.001y
Outcomes (mortality)
Age at mortality š
0 (0.0)a
-
13 (2.3)a
4.0 (3.0–5.5)
45 (29.8)b
3.0 (1.5–10.0)
<0.001y
0.720v
Length of hospital stay š 8.0 (6.0–12.0)a 11.0 (8.0–15.0)b 15.0 (9.0–27.0)c <0.001x

Data given as: *mean ± SD, number (%), šmedian (IQR); w:One Way ANOVA test, x:Kruskal Wallis H test, y:Chi-square test, z:Fisher-exact test; v: Mann-Whitney test (for mortality in moderate and severe HIE groups).

Each subscript a,b,c letter denotes a subset of HIE categories whose column proprotions do not significantly from each other at the 0.05 level.

aEEG: amplitude electroencephalography DWI: diffusion-weighted; ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; EEG: electroencephalography; HIE: hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy; iNO: inhaled nitric oxide; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; NEC: necrotizing enterocolitis; TH: therapeutic hypothermia.

The place of birth, the APGAR scores at 1-, 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-min and the rate delivery room resuscitation were different between groups according to degree of HIE (p<0.05) (p<0.001) (Table 1).

The clinical and laboratory findings, as well as short-term outcomes for infants are presented in Table 2. Significant differences between groups were observed in the pH and BE in the cord and first hour blood gas analysis, and the rate of abnormal aEEG at admission (p<0.001). All NICUs administered whole body servo controlled TH, and performed TH to 100% of severe HIE, to 99.1% of moderate HIE, and to 34.6% of mild HIE neonates. The Thompson scores at admission, at 24th, 48th and 72nd h (overall with medians of 16, 14, 12 and 9, respectively) were different according to severity of HIE (p<0.001) (Table 2).

The frequency of clinical seizures observed at any time during hospitalization varied among groups (p<0.001), with phenobarbital being the most commonly used first-line agent. 65.3% of all infants with any grade of HIE had at least one accompanying organ system or condition during hospitalization. The most frequent problems were respiratory problems, inotrope required hypotension and electrolyte imbalances. During their hospitalization, almost all infants with severe HIE (90.7%) had at least one problem, while 71.8% of moderate and 34.6% of mild HIE infants had at least one problem (p<0.001) (Table 2).

Although conventional EEG was not performed to all infants, EEG findings were abnormal in 63.5%, 28.7%, and 15.6% of infants with severe, moderate, and mild HIE, respectively (p<0.001). MRI was performed to 62.9% of severe HIE infants with 68.4% of abnormal results at a median age of 7 days, to 75.5% of moderate HIE infants with 29.1% of abnormal results at a median age of 5 days, and to 45.5% of mild HIE infants with 22.3% of abnormal results at a median age of 5 days (p<0.001) (Table 2).

None of the infants with mild HIE died. The rate of mortality was the highest in severe HIE neonates (29.8%) (p<0.001). The duration of hospital stay was different among groups (severe HIE: median 15 days; moderate HIE: median 11 days; mild HIE: median 8 days) (p<0.001) (Table 2).

Timing of hypothermia in moderate/severe HIE

Among 719 infants with moderate/severe HIE, only 5 infants with moderate HIE did not receive TH. The median TH initiation time was 2 h (IQR: 1–4 h) for both moderate and severe HIE who received TH (p = 0.589). When these infants were grouped according to TH initiation time, TH was started <3 h, 3–6 h and >6 h in 55.5%, 41.4%, and 3.1% of infants, respectively. The median initiation time was 9.5 h (IQR: 7.375–12.25) for infants who received TH >6 h. The distribution of infants according to degree of HIE was similar among TH initiation timing groups (p = 0.320). TH initiated <3 h in 85.1% of inborn infants, and 75% of home-delivered infants, whereas TH initiated 3–6 h in 68.6% of outborn infants (p<0.001).

The rates of clinical seizure observed at any time and at least one accompanying organ system or condition during hospitalization were similar in TH initiation time groups (p = 0.829, and p = 0.492, respectively). There were no significant differences for abnormal conventional EEG findings, abnormal MRI findings and mortality and abnormal MRI results between the groups according to TH initiation time (p = 0.061, p = 0.348, and p = 0.809, respectively). Logistic regression analyses using TH initiation time (<3 h, 3–6 h, and >6 h) adjusting the severity of HIE and place of birth revealed no significant differences between groups for both mortality and abnormal MRI findings (Table 3).

Table 3. Mortality and abnormal MRI findings according to TH initiation time.

n (%) OR (95% Cl) p Adjusted OR* (95% Cl) p
Mortality
<3 h (n = 396) 31 (7.8) -
3–6 h (n = 296) 26 (8.8) 1.134 (0.658–1.954) 0.651 1.916 (0.869–4.222) 0.107
>6 h (n = 22) 1 (4.5) 0.561 (0.073–4.309) 0.578 2.047 (0.208–20.133) 0.539
Abnormal MRI finding
<3 h (n = 277) 93 (33.6) -
3–6 h (n = 224) 89 (39.7) 1.304 (0.905–1.880) 0.155 0.894 (0.559–1.429) 0.639
>6 h (n = 21) 7 (33.3) 0.989 (0.386–2.535) 0.982 0.750 (0.269–2.087) 0.581

*Adjusted for severity of HIE and place of birth.

MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.

In Kaplan–Meier survival analysis timing of TH was not associated with mortality (p = 0.784) (Fig 2). When the initiation time for TH within 6 h was compared as <3 h and 3–6 h, there were also no significant differences for mortality and abnormal MRI results (p = 0.651, and p = 0.154, respectively).

Fig 2. Survival analysis and interpretation of initiation time of TH.

Fig 2

Infants ≥36 weeks with mild HIE

There were 246 infants with mild HIE born at ≥36 weeks GA. The characteristics of infants who received TH (n = 85) and who did not (n = 161) were compared (Table 4).

Table 4. Characteristics of infants with mild HIE according to TH application.

Variables No TH
(n = 161)
Received TH
(n = 85)

p
Gestational age (w) * 38.9 ± 1.4 38.7 ± 1.4 0.246w
Birth weight (g) * 3311 ± 493 3153 ± 533 0.021w
Place of birth
Inborn
Outborn
Home

121 (75.2)
39 (24.2)
1 (0.6)

35 (41.2)
50 (58.8)
0 (0)
<0.001z
APGAR scoresš
1st min
5th min
10th min

5 (4–6)
7 (6–8)
8 (7–9)

4 (3–6)
7 (6–8)
8 (7–8)

0.013x
0.464x
0.503x
Cord blood gas analysis
pH š
BE š
n = 96
7.02 (6.98–7.08)
-13.1 [(-14.5)–(-11.62)]
n = 50
6.98 (6.90–7.02)
-15.00 [(-17.15)–(-12.00)]

0.001w
0.008x
Blood gas analysis at 1st h
pHš
BEš
n = 160
7.15 (7.07–7.23)
-11.0 [(-13.45)–(-6.72)]
n = 80
7.12 (7.03–7.26)
-12.0 [(-15.00)–(-7.62)]

0.286w
0.154x
Thompson scoresš
At admission
24th h
48thh
72ndh

3.0 (2.0–5.0)
0.0 (0.0–2.0)
0.0 (0.0–1.0)
0.0 (0.0–0.0)

5.0 (2.0–7.0)
3.0 (0.0–4.0)
1.0 (0.0–3.0)
0.0 (0.0–1.0)

0.029x
<0.001x
<0.001x
<0.001x
Abnormal EEG finding 6/53 (11.3) 6/24 (25) 0.175y
Abnormal MRI finding 11/54 (20.4) 14/58 (24.1) 0.632y
Length of hospital stay (d) š 7.0 (6.0–10.0) 10.0 (8.0–14.0) <0.001x

Data given as: *mean ± SD, number (%), šmedian (IQR).

EEG: electroencephalography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.

w:Student-t test, x:Mann Whitney U test, y:Chi-square test,z:Fisher-exact test.

The mean BW of infants who received TH was lower than who did not (p = 0.021). Most of infants who did not received TH (75.2%) were inborn, whereas 58.8% of infants who received TH were outborn (p<0.001). The type of delivery, need for resuscitation in the delivery room, and underlying etiologies were similar (p = 0.426, and p = 0,724, respectively). Infants who received TH had lower APGAR scores at 1st min (p = 0.013). The cord blood gas analyses were different in groups (for pH and BE, p = 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively). Thompson scores at admission, 24th, 48th, and 72nd h were all higher in infants who received TH (p = 0.029, p<0.001, p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Infants who received TH had more problems than who did not (p = 0.001). MRI and EEG were performed for more infants who received TH (MRI: 68.2% vs. 33.5%, p<0.001; EEG: 62.4% vs. 14.9%, p<0.001), but the rate of abnormal MRI and EEG findings were similar (p = 0.632, and p = 0.175). The duration of hospital stay was longer in infants who received TH (p<0.001) (Table 4).

Infants born at 34–35 weeks

In total, 46 infants at 34 and 35 weeks were diagnosed with any grade HIE. Of these, 26.1% (n = 12) had mild, 41.3% (n = 19) had moderate, and 32.6% (n = 15) had severe HIE. Among these infants, 67.4% received TH, of which almost all were with moderate/severe HIE except one infant. APGAR scores and underlying etiologies were similar between the infants who received TH and who did not (p>0.05). Thompson scores were higher in infants who received TH (p<0.05). The rate of mortality was similar according TH application (p = 0.132) (Table 5).

Table 5. Infants born at 34–35 weeks of GA with HIE according to TH application.


Variables
Received TH
(n = 31)
No TH
(n = 15)
p
Gestational age (w) * 34.9 ± 0.53 34.9 ± 0.54 0.749w
Birth weight (g) * 2426 ± 421 2248 ± 481 0.206y
Resuscitation at DR 28 (90.3) 14 (93.3) 1.00y
Grade of HIE
Mild (n = 12)
Moderate (n = 19)
Severe (n = 15)

1 (3.2)
18 (58.1)
12 (38.7)

11 (73.3)
1 (6.7)
3 (20)
<0.001y
Underlying etiologies (**)
Antepartum (maternal/fetal)
Intrapartum
Postpartum

15 (48.3)
14 (45.1)
4 (12.9)

11 (73.3)
6 (40)
1 (6.6)

0.11y
0.741y
1.00z
Thompson scoresš
At admission
24th h
48thh
72ndh

14.0 (10.0–17.0)
11.0 (6.0–15.0)
10.0 (4.0–14.0)
7.0 (2.0–13.0)

5.0 (3.0–12.0)
3.0 (0.0–5.0)
1.0 (0.0–4.0)
0.0 (0.0–2.0)

0.003x
<0.001x
<0.001x
<0.001x
Accompanying organ system/condition 28 (90.3) 8 (53.3) 0.008y
Abnormal EEG finding 9/18 (50) 0/3 (0) 0.229y
Abnormal MRI finding 13/16 (81.3) 2/5 (40) 0.115y
Mortality 9 (29) 1 (6.7) 0.132y

Data given as: *mean ± SD, number (%), šmedian (IQR); w:Student-t test, x:Mann Whitney U test, y:Chi-square test,z:Fisher-exact test.

DR: delivery room;. EEG: electroencephalography; HIE: hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.

Overall, the rate of mortality in infants with moderate/severe HIE born at 34–35 weeks of GA was 21.7% (n = 10) compared with those born ≥36 weeks of GA at 6% (p<0.001). Logistic regression analysis adjusting receiving TH, and severity of HIE showed also difference in mortality according to GA (OR 3.941, 95% Cl 1.446–10.7422, p = 0.007).

In-hospital mortality

A total of 58 (6%) deaths was reported, comprising 2.3% of the moderate, and 29.8% of the severe HIE neonates born at ≥36 weeks GA (p<0.001) of which death was occurred in similar days (Tables 1 and 2). The mean GA of non-survivor infants was lower accompanying higher need for delivery room resuscitation and lower APGAR scores (p<0.05) (Table 6).

Table 6. Findings of survivor and non-survivor infants.

Variables Survivors
(n = 907)
Non-survivors
(n = 58)
p
Gestational age * 38.9 ± 1.4 38.5 ± 1.5 0.044w
Birth weight š 3223 ± 492 3166 ± 688 0.537w
Place of birth
Inborn
Outborn
Home

485 (53.5)
420 (46.3)
2 (0.2)

32 (55.2)
23 (39.7)
3 (5.2)
<0.001y
APGAR scoresš
1st min
5th min
10th min
15th min
20th min

4.0 (3.0–5.0)
6.0 (5.0–7.0)
7.0 (6.0–8.0)
7.0 (6.0–8.0)
8.0 (7.0–9.0)

2.0 (0.75–3.0)
4.0 (3.0–5.0)
5.0 (3.25–5.75)
5.0 (5.0–7.0)
6.0 (5.0–7.0)

<0.001x
<0.001x
<0.001x
<0.001x
<0.001x
Resuscitation at DR š 749 (82.6) 55 (94.8) 0.011z
Cord blood gas analysis
pH š
BE š

6.98 (6.90–7.03)
-16.0 [(-19.0)–(-13.0)]

6.86 (6.80–7.02)
-19.6 [(-24.12)–(-15.25)]

0.140w
0.011x
Blood gas analysis at 1st h*
pHš
BEš

7.09 (7.00–7.18)
-14.0 [(-17.27)–(-10.0)]

6.91 (6.75–7.03)
-19.5 [(-22.6)–(-14.6)]

<0.001w
<0.001x
Thompson scoresš
Admission
24th h
48th h
72nd h

8.0 (5.0–12.0)
5.0 (2.0–10.0)
3.0 (0.0–7.0)
1.0 (0.0–5.0)

16.0 (12.0–18.0)
15.0 (12.0–17.25)
15.0 (10.0–17.0)
14.0 (11.5–17.5)

<0.001x
<0.001x
<0.001x
<0.001x
Performed TH 741 (81.7) 58 (100) <0.001y
Timing initiation of TH š 2.0 (1.0–4.0) 2.0 (1.0–4.0) 0.794x
Clinical seizure at any time 239 (26.4) 31 (53.4) <0.001z
Accompanying organ system/condition during TH 572 (63.1) 58 (100.0) <0.001z
Abnormal EEG finding 143/464 (30.8) 3/3 (100.0) <0.001z
Abnormal MRI finding 207/627 (33.0) 8/9 (88.9) 0.001z
Length of hospital stay (d) š 11.0 (8.0–16.0) 3.5 (2.0–8.5) <0.001x

Data given as: *mean ± SD, number (%), šmedian (IQR); w:Student-t test, x:Mann Whitney U test, y:Chi-square test,z:Fisher-exact test.

DR: delivery room; EEG: electroencephalogram; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging TH: therapeutic hypothermia.

The Thompson scores at admission, 24th h, 48th h, and 72nd h showed AUCs of 0.785 (95% Cl 0.723–0.847), 0.838 (95% Cl 0.777–0.898), 0.839 (95% Cl 0.766–0.913), and 0.864 (95%Cl 0.793–0.935) for predicting mortality, respectively. The Thompson scores of >10 at admission, 24th h, and 48th h showed that it had sensitivity and specificity of 0.810 and 0.546, 0.793 and 0.732, 0.719, and 0.85, respectively for mortality. The Thompson score of >8 at 72nd h showed a sensitivity of 0.842 and a specificity of 0.87.

All of the non-survivor infants received TH, but there was no significant difference in the timing of TH between groups (p = 0.794). Non-survivor infants were significantly more likely to have clinical seizures or any problem during hospitalization, abnormal EEG, and MRI findings (Table 6).

Discussion

This national population-based study revealed an incidence rate of 2.13 per 1000 live births in infants ≥36 weeks GA for HIE. This rate remained consistent over time when compared to previous national data [6], and the data from high-income countries [3]. However, mortality showed a downward trend (22.6% vs. 6%). In this study, we presented the care practices and outcomes of infants with HIE. We could also show data of infants with mild HIE and infants born at 34–35 weeks GA undergoing TH, for which there is still insufficient evidence in current practice.

Previous years’ reports from different NICUs in our country showed that the rate of infants with HIE was between 3.5–6% in [22,23]. The incidence of HIE in infants ≥36 weeks GA accounted for 1.55% of all NICU admissions in this study. The decrease in incidence observed in this study might be attributed to the study’s inclusion criteria, and the official Neonatal Resuscitation Program that has been widely implemented in Türkiye since the 2000s, with a focus on perinatal asphyxia prevention. Additionally, a national guideline established by Turkish Neonatal Society provides recommendations for both routine care of all newborns and resuscitation approaches for those requiring it [24].

Hypoxic-ischemic injury to the infant’s brain may occur during antepartum and postnatal periods, but it occurs less often than during the intrapartum period. From 5% and 20% of neonatal HIE results from hypoxic ischemic damage in the antepartum period [21]. A large population-based observational study, indicates that 56% of all NE cases were related to hypoxic-ischemic injury that occurred during intrapartum period [25]. In developed countries, it is estimated that intrapartum hypoxic-ischemia is related to 30% of cases of NE, whereas in developing countries, it is related to 60% of cases [3]. Postpartum events, including cardiac failure and severe pulmonary disease, may alone cause HIE and could account for about 5% to 10% of cases. Assessing infants with HIE necessitates consideration of the history of pregnancy, labor, and delivery [19]. Based on our data, antepartum conditions (maternal/fetal) were responsible for 24.8% of cases, while intrapartum conditions accounted for 41.2%, and postpartum conditions in were found in 10.3% of infants. The remaining 23.7% of cases causes could not be definitively established, which is similar to the rate reported by Pierrat et al. [25]. According to the Vermont Oxford Network Encephalopathy Registry, up to 50% of NE cases have an unknown underlying etiology that cannot be attributed to asphyxia or inflammatory indicators [26].

The neurological symptoms that can occur with HIE aid in determining the presence, pattern and severity of the patient’s hypoxic-ischemic injury. Standardization during neurological examination is accomplished using the APGAR score, modified Sarnat score and Thompson score [21]. The Sarnat scale classifies encephalopathy into three stages: mild (stage 1), moderate (stage 2) and severe encephalopathy (stage 3). The current recommendation advises starting TH for neonates with moderate to severe encephalopathy on the Sarnat assessment with historical and biochemical criteria [18]. The Thompson score including 9 independent clinical items, is now increasingly used, considering its relevant predictive values for short-term outcomes and neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months [27,28]. Thompson scores from admission to 3 days of life have predictive capability for death during hospitalization in this study.

Neurological dysfunction is only one aspect of the spectrum of injuries seen in NE resulting from hypoxia ischemic brain damage. Infants with HIE may also have concurrent multi-organ dysfunction, which increases the risk of morbidities and mortality [29]. In addition to having a compromised CNS, all infants with severe HIE exhibited signs of dysfunction in at least one additional organ or system dysfunction. Studies mostly reported involvement of pulmonary, hepatic, renal, and cardiovascular systems [15,30]. The following studies showed that the severity of multiorgan dysfunction was related to the severity of HIE [31,32]. In this study, it was observed that almost all infants with severe HIE had at least one accompanying organ system or condition with a higher incidence compared to other grades of HIE.

As per the current management guidelines, TH is recommended only for neonates ≥36 weeks gestational age with moderate to severe HIE [9,14]. The 2013 Cochrane review comprised 11 randomized controlled trials and involved 1505 infants. The findings of the review revealed that TH decreased the combined outcomes of mortality and major neurodevelopmental disability at 18 months, resulting in a decrease in mortality and reduced neurodevelopmental disability in survivors [9]. A considerable proportion of infants were reported to experience abnormal outcome during follow-up in also those with mild HIE [11]. For infants with mild HIE, there is currently insufficient data to recommend routine TH, yet significant advantages or risks cannot be ruled out [12]. A survey of cooling centers in the United Kingdom revealed that 75% of centers offered TH to infants with mild HIE [33]. In this study, almost all infants diagnosed with moderate/severe HIE received TH, and 34.6% of neonates with mild HIE received TH. Although long-term outcomes for infants with mild HIE are not available, the MRI and EEG findings of these infants were not different between those who received TH and who did not.

The current recommendation is to start TH within 6 h of birth [9,34,35]. Preclinical studies suggest that early initiation of TH improves neuroprotection [36,37]. However, a recent retrospective, observational, cohort study of Guillot et al. showed that early TH started before 3 h of life did not correlate with a reduction in brain lesions on MRI or better neurodevelopmental outcomes [38]. No significant differences in mortality and abnormal MRI findings were found in our study when evaluating the infants with moderate/severe HIE based on their TH initiation time (as <3 h, 3–6 h and >6 h). Although only 3.1% of infants received TH beyond 6 h (median 9.5 h), we compared the initiation time for TH within 6 h as <3 h and 3–6 h, and no significant difference was observed for mortality and abnormal MRI findings were observed. Long-term outcomes were unfortunately not included in this study.

The efficacy of TH in preterm infants remains uncertain. A study by Azzopardi et al. found that preterm infants born at 34 or 35 weeks of GA who received TH had a higher mortality rate compared to full-term infants [39]. The two small studies that evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of TH in late preterm infants concluded that TH appears to be feasible in preterm infants. However, the incidence of complications and the combined outcome of death and neurodevelopmental outcomes in this vulnerable population is concerning [40,41]. The outcomes of a recent pilot study revealed that, at 24 months of age, late preterm infants with moderate HIE after TH demonstrated age-appropriate neurodevelopmental progress. However, the study strongly advised against using the data for clinical decision making [42]. In addition, the study reported a higher mortality rate in late preterm infants (34–35 weeks of GA) with HIE as compared to infants born ≥36 weeks of GA. The mortality rate was found to be similar in late preterm infants who received TH and those who did not. Our study, did not find evidence that TH improved survival in this population, which could be attributed to small number of late preterm infants in our cohort or other unidentified factors leading to mortality.

Our findings suggest a mortality rate of 6% in this study, contrasting with the previously published national data which reported a rate of 22.6% [6]. According to HIE grading, there were no death in infants with mild HIE during both study periods. The current study reported mortality rates of 2.3% and 29.8% for infants with moderate and severe HIE, respectively; whereas previous data reported mortality rates of 6.6% and 51.7% for infants with moderate and severe HIE, respectively. We observed an improvement in mortality rates for moderate and especially of severe HIE. This discrepancy could be due to differences in distribution of HIE severity. While mild HIE incidences were comparable in two periods, there was a higher frequency of moderate HIE (58.9% vs. 38.7%), and a lower incidence of severe HIE in this period (15.6% vs. 31.2%). Vega-Del-Val et al. reported a temporal trend toward a decrease in severe HIE infants and a slight decline of mortality in a cross-sectional study conducted in Spain [43]. Most of the participating centers (81.2%) were the same in both periods, suggesting no major differences in the management of infants. The reduction of mortality is likely associated with the availability of TH in the new era and improved neonatal care throughout the country. In all cases, the severity of multiorgan dysfunction was thought to be the cause of death due to the lack of a legal basis for end-of-life decisions, which was the main reason for death in other series [18,44].

The use of nationwide data set from a database registry of prospectively recorded data, similar to those in other European countries [4548], is the main strength of this study. This is the largest sample size available to determine the incidence of HIE in our country. This observational study conducted in tertiary NICUs, with attending neonatologists and pediatric neurologists, and facilities of servo-controlled TH, aEEG (mostly), conventional EEG and MRI. All participating NICUs followed the same diagnosis and staging criteria for HIE, and TH initiation. However, there are few limitations to our study. While 64 NICUs were made aware of the study, 42 (66%) of them chose to participate. We only included the number of infants with HIE who were born in participating centers and the number of deliveries that occurred there to determine the incidence of HIE. Outborn infants and the number of deliveries at sending hospitals were not included as some outborn infants were transferred to a participating center due to reasons such as not having a TH device, another patient receiving TH, or the NICU of the transferring hospital being at full capacity. This is not a randomized controlled trial, so there may be variations in management and interventions during TH. Approximately one-third of the study’s infants did not have MRI results. Our data provided the short-term outcomes, but it is important to assess the long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of infants.

Conclusion

This study reveals a comparable HIE frequency and lower mortality rate compared to prior reports in our country. Early initiation of TH (<3h) did not demonstrate a decrease in brain lesions on MRI or mortality, however clinicians may attempt to initiate TH promptly after birth once the indication is confirmed. The registry analysis revealed that clinicians choose to administer TH to approximately one-third of infants with mild HIE and two-thirds of late preterm infants with HIE received TH, thereby indicating a broader application of TH in gray-zone patients. Due to the significant incidence of complications and the combined outcome of death and neurodevelopmental impairment, it is necessary to conduct longer follow-up studies in this vulnerable population.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist. STROBE statement—checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies.

(DOCX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.van Handel M, Swaab H, de Vries LS, Jongmans MJ. Long-term cognitive and behavioral consequences of neonatal encephalopathy following perinatal asphyxia: a review. Eur J Pediatr. 2007;166(7):645–54. doi: 10.1007/s00431-007-0437-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Executive summary: Neonatal encephalopathy and neurologic outcome, second edition. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Neonatal Encephalopathy. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(4).896–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kurinczuk JJ, White-Koning M, Badawi N. Epidemiology of neonatal encephalopathy and hypoxic–ischaemic encephalopathy. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(6):329–38. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Battin M, Sadler L, Masson V, Farquhar C, Neonatal Encephalopathy Working Group of the PMMRC. Neonatal encephalopathy in New Zealand: Demographics and clinical outcome. J Paediatr Child Health. 2016;52(6):632–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McIntyre S, Nelson KB, Mulkey SB, Lechpammer M, Molloy E, Badawi N. Neonatal encephalopathy: Focus on epidemiology and underexplored aspects of etiology. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;26(4):101265. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2021.101265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Turkish Neonatal Society Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy Study Group. Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in neonatal intensive care units of Turkey: risk factors, incidence and short-term prognosis. Çocuk Saglıgı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi. 2008;51(3):123–9.
  • 7.Shankaran S, Pappas A, McDonald SA, Vohr BR, Hintz SR, Yolton K, et al. Childhood outcomes after hypothermia for neonatal encephalopathy. New Eng J Med. 2012;366(22):2085–92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tagin MA, Woolcott CG, Vincer MJ, Whyte RK, Stinson DA. Hypothermia for neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(6):558–66. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1772 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jacobs SE, Berg M, Hunt R, Tarnow-Mordi WO, Inder TE, Davis PG. Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(1):CD003311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Thayyil S, Pant S, Montaldo P, Shukla D, Oliveira V, Ivain P, et al. Hypothermia for moderate or severe neonatal encephalopathy in low-income and middle-income countries (HELIX): a randomised controlled trial in India, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(9):e1273–85. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00264-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Conway JM, Walsh BH, Boylan GB, Murray DM. Mild hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy and long term neurodevelopmental outcome-A systematic review. Early Hum Dev. 2018;120:80–7. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kariholu U, Montaldo P, Markati T, Lally PJ, Pryce R, Teiserskas J, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia for mild neonatal encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020;105(2):225–8 doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Klinger G, Beyene J, Shah P, Perlman M. Do hyperoxaemia and hypocapnia add to the risk of brain injury after intrapartum asphyxia? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90(1):F49–52. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.048785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Akisu M, Kumral A, Canpolat FE. Turkish Neonatal Society Guideline on neonatal encephalopathy. Turk Pediatri Ars. 2018;53(Suppl 1):S32–44. doi: 10.5152/TurkPediatriArs.2018.01805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shah P, Riphagen S, Beyene J, Perlman M. Multiorgan dysfunction in infants with post-asphyxial hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89(2):F152–5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2002.023093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Filippi L, Catarzi S, Padrini L, Fiorini P, la Marca G, Guerrini R, et al. Strategies for reducing the incidence of skin complications in newborns treated with whole-body hypothermia.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(10):2115–21. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.683898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sarnat HB, Sarnat MS. Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress. A clinical and electroencephalographic study. Arch Neurol. 1976;33(10):696–705. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1976.00500100030012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Ehrenkranz RA, Tyson JE, McDonald SA, Donovan EF, et al. Whole-body hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(15):1574–84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcps050929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thompson CM, Puterman AS, Linley LL, Hann FM, van der Elst CW, Molteno CD, et al. The value of a scoring system for hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy in predicting neurodevelopmental outcome. Acta Paediatr. 1997;86(7):757–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1997.tb08581.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.al Naqeeb N, Edwards AD, Cowan FM, Azzopardi D. Assessment of neonatal encephalopathy by amplitude-integrated electroencephalography. Pediatrics. 1999;103(6 Pt 1):1263–71. doi: 10.1542/peds.103.6.1263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Inder TE, Volpe JJ. Hypoxic-Ischemic Injury in the term Infant: Clinical-Neurological Features, Diagnosis, Imaging, Prognosis, Therapy. In: Volpe’s Neurology of the Newborn. 2018. p. 510–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Türkmen MK. Hipoksik İskemik Ensefalopatili Yenidoğanların Klinik, Nörofizyolojik ve Nörogörüntüleme Sonuçlarının Değerlendirilmesi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Pediatr. 2009;18(4):264–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bilgin LK, Aladag N, Aygun C, Altay D. Hipoksik İskemik Ensefalopati: 63 Term Yenidoğanın Değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Çocuk Hastalıkları Dergisi. 2011;5(2):89–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Oygür N, Önal EE, Zenciroğlu A. National guidelines for delivery room management. Turk Pediatri Ars. 2018;53(Suppl 1):S3–17. doi: 10.5152/TurkPediatriArs.2018.01803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pierrat V, Haouari N, Liska A, Thomas D, Subtil D, Truffert P. Prevalence, causes, and outcome at 2 years of age of newborn encephalopathy: population based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90(3):F257–61. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.047985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nelson KB, Bingham P, Edwards EM, Horbar JD, Kenny MJ, Inder T, et al. Antecedents of neonatal encephalopathy in the Vermont Oxford Network Encephalopathy Registry. Pediatrics. 2012;130(5):878–86. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Aoki H, Shibasaki J, Tsuda K, Yamamoto K, Takeuchi A, Sugiyama Y, et al. Predictive value of the Thompson score for short-term adverse outcomes in neonatal encephalopathy. Pediatr Res. 2023;93(4): 1057–63. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02212-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Murray DM, Bala P, O’Connor CM, Ryan CA, Connolly S, Boylan GB. The predictive value of early neurological examination in neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy and neurodevelopmental outcome at 24 months. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(2):e55–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03550.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.O’Dea M, Sweetman D, Bonifacio SL, El-Dib M, Austin T, Molloy EJ. Management of Multi Organ Dysfunction in Neonatal Encephalopathy. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:239. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Iribarren I, Hilario E, Álvarez A, Alonso-Alconada D. Neonatal multiple organ failure after perinatal asphyxia. An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2022;97(4):280.e1-280.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.anpede.2022.08.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Alsina M, Martín-Ancel A, Alarcon-Allen A, Arca G, Gayá F, García-Alix A. The Severity of Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy Correlates With Multiple Organ Dysfunction in the Hypothermia Era. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(3):234–40. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang Y, Lei Y, Jiang H, Li X, Feng H. Analysis of the correlation between the severity of neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and multiple organ dysfunction. Am J Transl Res. 2022;14(1):311–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Oliveira V, Singhvi DP, Montaldo P, Lally PJ, Mendoza J, Manerkar S, et al. Therapeutic hypothermia in mild neonatal encephalopathy: a national survey of practice in the UK. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103(4):F388–90. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lemyre B, Chau V. Hypothermia for newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Paediatr Child Health. 2018;23(4):285–91. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxy028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Papile L-A, Baley JE, Benitz W, Cummings J, Carlo WA, Eichenwald E, et al. Hypothermia and neonatal encephalopathy. Pediatrics. 2014;133(6):1146–50. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0899 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Roelfsema V, Bennet L, George S, Wu D, Guan J, Veerman M, et al. Window of opportunity of cerebral hypothermia for postischemic white matter injury in the near-term fetal sheep. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004;24(8):877–86. doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000123904.17746.92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gunn AJ, Thoresen M. Animal studies of neonatal hypothermic neuroprotection have translated well in to practice. Resuscitation. 2015;97:88–90. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.03.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Guillot M, Philippe M, Miller E, Davila J, Barrowman NJ, Harrison M-A, et al. Influence of timing of initiation of therapeutic hypothermia on brain MRI and neurodevelopment at 18 months in infants with HIE: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2019;3(1):e000442. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Azzopardi D, Strohm B, Linsell L, Hobson A, Juszczak E, Kurinczuk JJ, et al. Implementation and conduct of therapeutic hypothermia for perinatal asphyxial encephalopathy in the UK—analysis of national data. PloS One. 2012;7(6):e38504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rao R, Trivedi S, Vesoulis Z, Liao SM, Smyser CD, Mathur AM. Safety and Short-Term Outcomes of Therapeutic Hypothermia in Preterm Neonates 34–35 Weeks Gestational Age with Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy. J Pediatr. 2017;183:37–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.11.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Herrera TI, Edwards L, Malcolm WF, Smith PB, Fisher KA, Pizoli C, et al. Outcomes of preterm infants treated with hypothermia for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Early Hum Dev. 2018;125:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lademann H, Abshagen K, Janning A, Däbritz J, Olbertz D. Long-Term Outcome after Asphyxia and Therapeutic Hypothermia in Late Preterm Infants: A Pilot Study. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(8):994. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9080994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vega-Del-Val C, Arnaez J, Caserío S, Gutiérrez EP, Benito M, Castañón L, et al. Temporal trends in the severity and mortality of neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in the era of hypothermia. Neonatology. 2021;118(6):685–92. doi: 10.1159/000518654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jacobs SE, Morley CJ, Inder TE, Stewart MJ, Smith KR, McNamara PJ, et al. Whole-body hypothermia for term and near-term newborns with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165: 692–700. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Brotschi B, Grass B, Ramos G, Beck I, Held U, Hagmann C et al.; National Asphyxia Cooling Register Group. The impact of a register on the management of neonatal cooling in Switzerland. Early Hum Dev. 2015;91(4):277–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chevallier M, Ego A, Cans C, Debillon T; French Society of Neonatology. Adherence to hypothermia guidelines: a French multicenter study of fullterm neonates. PLoS One 2013;8(12):e83742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Arnaez J, García-Alix A, Arca G, Caserío S, Valverde E, Moral MT, et al. Population-Based Study of the National Implementation of Therapeutic Hypothermia in Infants with Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy. Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag. 2018;8(1): 24–9. doi: 10.1089/ther.2017.0024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hage L, Jeyakumaran D, Dorling J, Ojha S, Sharkey D, Longford N, et al. Changing clinical characteristics of infants treated for hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy in England, Wales and Scotland: a population-based study using the National Neonatal Research Database. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021;106(5):501–8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Stefan Grosek

3 Oct 2023

PONE-D-23-19394AN OBSERVATIONAL, MULTICENTER, REGISTRY-BASED COHORT STUDY OF TURKISH NEONATAL SOCIETY IN NEONATES WITH HYPOXIC ISCHEMIC ENCEPHALOPATHYPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Okulu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: Please go through all reviewers' comments and reply to point by point. We believe that your study is very interesting comparing data pre and post invention of therapeutic hypothermia.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 17 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Stefan Grosek, Ph.D., M.D.,

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

 "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 

At this time, please address the following queries:

a) Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution. 

b) State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

c) If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

d) If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear Authors

Two reviewers reviewed your article as myself and we found it interesting and well presenting. Please go through all comments and reply point by point.

Kind regards

Academic Editor

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The current study explains the prevalence of HIE in their own nation, where they found decline death rate as compare to the prior report. They concluded that early TH would be preferable because it was not linked to brain damage. They also came to the conclusion that the incidence of HIE stayed the same throughout time with previously published reports but the death rate decreased.

Please find the few Suggestions for improvement of the study

1- Please improve the quality of the figures. It's hard to read the figures.

2- In these HIE instances, were there any sex differences?

3- For more thorough information, also provide the sex details and their results should be supplied. Please discuss any outcome if available.

4-The long-term neurodevelopmental effects of newborns, which may be crucial to discuss before drawing any conclusions about when TH should start, are important aspects. Please modify the conclusion and discuss this in details.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript, which is under evaluation, is designed to deal with data from the multicentre,

observational, nationally based Register of Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE).

The main strength of this study is to determine the incidence and progression of perinatal newborn

care during the analysed years based on a nationwide data set from a database registry of your country.

The added value of this study is to compare the treatment of newborns before and after the introduction of the national registry and, based on the finding’s improvement of treatment.

Congratulations to the authors for the introduced registry of newborns with HIE and the evaluation of their national data.

While reviewing this manuscript, I have a few comments, questions, and requests for minor corrections:

1. Minor corrections:

- line 366: number missing - value: "mild HIE: ......median"; please added.

- Line 508: need to be rewritten; a new term for HI "trauma" is needed?

2. Questions:

-- It is interesting that a postpartum event (probably in the first hours after birth), most likely defined

as Apparent Life-Threatening Event, occurred in 10.3% of newborns treated with hypothermia.

Do you have an explanation for this percentage of postpartum events underlying HIE?

- How can you explain findings in your study that only severe HIE is associated with

dysfunction of one organ system, when, we know that even mild and moderate hypoxia

is accompanied by impairment of organ systems; including the bone marrow.

- Before drawing conclusions about the differences between groups based on MRI and aEEG,

would it make sense to analyse their neurodevelopmental outcomes at 24 months of age?

Because HI is also a long-term process; when analysing the effectiveness of hypothermia,

we do not take into account the tertiary phase of HE brain damage,

which continues for a long time after the acute event. Do you have any data about

neurodevelopmental outcome of children treated with TH in newborn period?

- The same applies to the interpretation of TH in late preterm infants, please.

- Perhaps, a higher predictive value when comparing groups would be achieved if the

brain magnetic resonance imaging will be assessed based on

MRI scoring systems for HIE brain injury designed by Weeke and co-authors. I will suggest to use

Weekes MRI scoring system as a validated and standardized tool for defining HI brain injury

and as a marker for the analysis of two groups in your study.

- Your study highlights that the overall incidence of severe HIE has decreased; which is consistent

with the results of other studies. Given the fact that your study includes only inborn patients,

would the results be the same if you also included outborn neonates?

-With the introduction of the national registry of newborns with HIE, did you also notice a difference

in the treatment of such newborns before and after the introduction of the registry, such as achieving

the same cooling temperature between different centres; unified neuromonitoring,

unified imaging diagnostics and unified follow up?

Thank you,

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Preeti Singh Chauhan

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Dec 14;18(12):e0295759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295759.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


16 Nov 2023

Dear Editor and Reviewers,

We appreciate the time you and the reviewers spent to review our paper and contribute valuable feedback. Your valuable and insightful comments inspired potential improvements to this current version. The authors have carefully considered the comments and have done our best to respond to each one. We hope that the manuscript will be able to live up to your high expectations following focused edits. Any further beneficial criticism will always be welcomed by the authors.

We have listed the point-to-point responses below, and added the manuscript with tracking changes.

Sincerely,

Corresponding author

Emel Okulu

Response to Reviewers

Reviewer #1:

Comment: Please improve the quality of the figures. It's hard to read the figures.

Response: The figures were revised and added.

Comment: In these HIE instances, were there any sex differences?

Response: There were no sex differences according to HIE stages. This analysis is present in Table 1.

Comment: For more thorough information, also provide the sex details and their results should be supplied. Please discuss any outcome if available.

Response: This information is present in results section under the heading ‘Data of infants ≥36 weeks GA according to grading of HIE’. The word ‘gender’ was changed to ‘sex distrubition’.

Comment: The long-term neurodevelopmental effects of newborns, which may be crucial to discuss before drawing any conclusions about when TH should start, are important aspects. Please modify the conclusion and discuss this in details.

Response: Long-term follow-up is essential for this population. The conclusion revised as you recommended.

Reviewer #2:

Comment: Minor corrections:- line 366: number missing - value: "mild HIE: ......median"; please added; - line 508: need to be rewritten; a new term for HI "trauma" is needed?

Response: The missing value added and ‘trauma’ changed as brain damage.

Comment: It is interesting that a postpartum event (probably in the first hours after birth), most likely defined as Apparent Life-Threatening Event, occurred in 10.3% of newborns treated with hypothermia. Do you have an explanation for this percentage of postpartum events underlying HIE?

Response: This percentage may be high to due to meconium aspiration syndrome which was found as the most common cause for postpartum asphyxia.

Comment: How can you explain findings in your study that only severe HIE is associated with

dysfunction of one organ system, when, we know that even mild and moderate hypoxia

is accompanied by impairment of organ systems; including the bone marrow.

Response: In our study, it was found that it was not only the infants with severe HIE who had impairment of organ systems. Almost all infants (90.7%) with severe HIE, 71.8% of moderate HIE and 34.6% of mild HIE had at least one problem. This information is present in both text and Table 2.

Comment: Before drawing conclusions about the differences between groups based on MRI and aEEG, would it make sense to analyse their neurodevelopmental outcomes at 24 months of age? Because HI is also a long-term process; when analysing the effectiveness of hypothermia, we do not take into account the tertiary phase of HE brain damage, which continues for a long time after the acute event. Do you have any data about neurodevelopmental outcome of children treated with TH in newborn period?

Response: Thank you for your comment, you are absolutely right. Unfortunately, we do not have the data about neurodevelopmental outcome of these children now, but we are planning another study to collect this data soon.

Comment: The same applies to the interpretation of TH in late preterm infants, please.

Response: We are planning another study to collect this data soon

Comment: Perhaps, a higher predictive value when comparing groups would be achieved if the brain magnetic resonance imaging will be assessed based on MRI scoring systems for HIE brain injury designed by Weeke and co-authors. I will suggest to use Weekes MRI scoring system as a validated and standardized tool for defining HI brain injury and as a marker for the analysis of two groups in your study.

Response: We thank for your recommendation. It has been shown that Weeke scoring system is a high importance to assess the impact of perinatal asphyxia on MR imaging.

It would be good to use this scoring system. We reviewed our data in this respect, but we could not adjust our data on the extension of injury used for scoring. Therefore, we regret that we could not complete this suggestion.

Comment: Your study highlights that the overall incidence of severe HIE has decreased; which is consistent with the results of other studies. Given the fact that your study includes only inborn patients, would the results be the same if you also included outborn neonates?

Response: The registry data contained information on the proportion of inborn and outborn infants at each participating center. Certain outborn infants were transferred to a participating center for one of the following three reasons: i. No TH device available, ii.The TH device is in use by another patient, iii. NICU capacity is full. It may be challenging and inaccurate to calculate the incidence by simply asking the number of deliveries from the sending hospital, so the only the incidence of HIE was calculated according to inborn HIE infants.

Comment: With the introduction of the national registry of newborns with HIE, did you also notice a difference in the treatment of such newborns before and after the introduction of the registry, such as achieving the same cooling temperature between different centres; unified neuromonitoring, unified imaging diagnostics and unified follow up?

Response: Obviously we don’t know that. Nonetheless, the centers are maintaining more comprehensive rec

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Stefan Grosek

29 Nov 2023

AN OBSERVATIONAL, MULTICENTER, REGISTRY-BASED COHORT STUDY OF TURKISH NEONATAL SOCIETY IN NEONATES WITH HYPOXIC ISCHEMIC ENCEPHALOPATHY

PONE-D-23-19394R1

Dear Dr. Okulu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Stefan Grosek, Ph.D., M.D.,

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Dear Authors

I found that you addressed all issues I'll recommend to the Editor to accept your article for publication

Kind regards

Academic Editor

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: Thank you for your answers and corrections.

The manuscript is processed for acceptance and publication in PLOS ONE journal.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Stefan Grosek

4 Dec 2023

PONE-D-23-19394R1

An Observational, Multicenter, Registry-Based Cohort Study of Turkish Neonatal Society in Neonates with Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy

Dear Dr. Okulu:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Stefan Grosek

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Checklist. STROBE statement—checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES