Abstract
Invasive diseases caused by the globally distributed commensal yeast Candida tropicalis are associated with mortality rates of greater than 50%. Notable increases of azole resistance have been observed in this species, particularly within Asia-Pacific regions. Here, we carried out a genetic population study on 1571 global C. tropicalis isolates using multilocus sequence typing (MLST). In addition, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis was conducted on 629 of these strains, comprising 448 clinical invasive strains obtained in this study and 181 genomes sourced from public databases. We found that MLST clade 4 is the predominant azole-resistant clone. WGS analyses demonstrated that dramatically increasing rates of azole resistance are associated with a rapid expansion of cluster AZR, a sublineage of clade 4. Cluster AZR isolates exhibited a distinct high-level azole resistance, which was induced by tandem duplications of the ERG11A395T gene allele. Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposons were found to be highly enriched in this population. The alarming expansion of C. tropicalis cluster AZR population underscores the urgent need for strategies against growing threats of antifungal resistance.
Subject terms: Fungal genomics, Genetic variation, Fungal infection
Candida tropicalis is a cause of invasive candidiasis infection in humans that has been increasingly associated with azole drug resistance. In this study, the authors investigate the genetic basis for azole resistance through analysis of whole-genome sequencing and multilocus sequence typing data.
Introduction
The fungal kingdom has been estimated to consist of up to 6 million species that are distributed across the globe1,2. As a key human-associated fungal genus, Candida includes species that are important components of the human commensal microbiome, but many species are also opportunistic pathogens that cause a broad range of human diseases, from cutaneous infections to lethal invasive candidiases3,4. Cases of invasive candidiasis are of particular note, as this disease is estimated to be associated with mortality rates that exceed 50%2,3,5. Although Candida albicans remains the most common infection-causing Candida species, other pathogenic Candida species have increasingly been isolated over the past several decades3,6. Among these species, C. tropicalis is the second- to fourth-most common cause of candidiasis worldwide, and infections caused by C. tropicalis tend to be associated with worse outcomes than those associated with C. albicans3,5. Moreover, while other commonly seen Candida species, such as C. albicans and C. parapsilosis, remain >90% susceptible to all antifungal agents, azole resistance in C. tropicalis has become a worrisome problem. This issue is especially striking in the Asia-Pacific region. C. tropicalis is more prevalent in the Asia-Pacific and Latin America regions6,7, and rates of azole resistance among cases of invasive candidiasis have reached as much as 16–30% in countries like Australia and China6–8.
Notably, associations between specific genetic lineages and decreased antifungal susceptibility have been revealed for several Candida species, and the spread of drug-resistant clones has posed difficult clinical challenges7,9,10. By using various typing schemes, such as multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and microsatellite assays, previous studies have demonstrated that C. tropicalis is associated with high genetic diversity, but most azole-resistant strains, especially those identified in the Asia-Pacific region, cluster in a few genetically-related groups11–13. Moreover, a longitudinal study in Taiwan using the MLST scheme has identified a shift of major resistant clones over time13.
In recent years, the application of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has allowed for a more detailed understanding of population structure, evolution, and geographic dissemination of different microbial pathogens. To date, there have been two large population genomics studies carried out on C. tropicalis. In one such study, O’Brien et al. studied 77 C. tropicalis isolates from clinical and environmental sources collected worldwide, and they determined that hybridization has been common in the evolutionary history of C. tropicalis12. The second study, by Keighley et al., used more than 80 clinical isolates from Australia and Singapore and identified a certain clonal complex (CC, i.e., MLST CC2) and particular gene polymorphisms that were associated with reduced azole susceptibility7. However, these two previous studies incorporated only a limited number of azole-resistant strains, and the potential connections between WGS phylogenetic clusters and geographic variations as well as dynamic changes of antifungal resistance remain unclear.
Further investigation of such connections may lead to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms responsible for the emergence and spread of antifungal resistance. In C. tropicalis, it has been well established that certain ERG11 gene mutations that lead to key amino acid substitutions in the azole target Erg11p (e.g., ERG11 gene mutation A395T conferring a key substitution Y132F) represent major mechanisms responsible for azole resistance14,15. Other mechanisms associated with azole resistance in C. tropicalis include the induction of ERG11 overexpression by overexpression or missense mutations of the transcription factor-encoding gene UPC27,16. Similarly, resistance can be induced by the upregulation of expression of drug efflux transporters, such as those of the Cdr and Mdr families, due to mutations in relevant transcription factor-encoding genes (e.g., TAC1 and MRR1)14,15. These resistance mechanisms are found almost universally in the Candida genus3,14, but an open question is whether unique mechanisms have led to the recent dramatic increases in azole-resistance rates, which have been distinctively observed in C. tropicalis but not in other Candida species.
Copy number variations, or CNVs, involve duplications or deletions of chromosomal segments and are major contributors to genome variabilities in diverse organisms, from microbes to plants and animals17–19. Some CNVs appear recurrently as either tandem duplications, in which one or two genes duplicate in tandem; segment duplications, in which a few genes to entire chromosomes duplicate; or polyploidies, which is synonymous with whole-genome duplication17,19. Other CNVs show non-recurrent end-points in structure; these are called non-recurrent CNVs17. Importantly, CNVs may change the levels of gene expression and can result in phenotypic effects17. In humans, CNVs are associated with a variety of diseases, including cancer, mental illnesses and autoimmune diseases17,18. On the other hand, alterations in gene copy numbers may also bring organisms adaptive advantages, such as enhancing antimicrobial resistance or tolerance in microorganisms14,20,21. In C. albicans and C. tropicalis, there have been reports that ERG11 gene CNVs have led to decreased azole susceptibility of strains; all of the previously identified cases resulted from aneuploidies of large chromosome segments that contained ERG11 gene coding domain sequences22,23.
In the present study, we carried out a large genetic population analysis of 1571 C. tropicalis global strains, comprising 629 isolates with complete genomes and an additional 942 isolates with MLST information. It was found that increases in rates of azole resistance are correlated with the expansion of a specific WGS phylogenetic sublineage, which was named cluster AZR. Of note, in addition to carrying A395T mutations, tandem gene duplication CNVs of the ERG11 gene were identified for the first time in C. tropicalis; these CNVs represent a unique feature of cluster AZR isolates and were associated with high-level azole resistance (fluconazole ≥ 256 mg/L). In addition, class-I retrotransposons were found to be more enriched in cluster AZR isolates, which indicated a higher potential of genome plasticity within this population. Altogether, our findings provide new insights to explain the rapid expansion of azole resistance in C. tropicalis, and they allowed us to identify a key target population that requires more effective interventions.
Results
Distinct geographic distribution of C. tropicalis MLST clades are associated with intercontinental variations of azole resistance
We analyzed MLST characteristics of 1571 C. tropicalis isolates distributed worldwide (Figs. 1 and 2). The collection was composed of 629 C. tropicalis isolates with WGS results, including 181 international strains that were described in nine previous studies, and 448 strains causing human invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in China that were sequenced in this study (Supplementary Data 1 and 2). The collection also included an additional 942 isolates whose information was obtained from published literature and the PubMLST database (http://www.pubmlst.net) (Supplementary Data 1).
A total of 726 diploid sequence types (DSTs) were identified among 1571 isolates, including 201 novel DSTs that were not recorded in the PubMLST database (Supplementary Data 1). Overall, 73.8% (1159/1571) of isolates could be assigned to 29 MLST clades, including 21 that were proposed previously13 and eight new designated in this study (Fig. 2, Supplementary Data 2). MLST clade 4 was the most common clade identified (15.8% of 1571 isolates), followed by clade 5 (10.1%) (Figs. 2 and 3a). These two clades were also predominant in Asia, where clade 4 and clade 5 included 19.3% and 11.7% of 1270 isolates collected, respectively (Fig. 3a). Geographic variations were observed across Europe, Oceania, and North America, where clade N6 (16.3% [26/160]), clade 3 (17.6% [13/74]) and clade 2 (15.8% [9/57]) were the most prevalent, respectively (Fig. 3a).
The overall rates of fluconazole resistance were 31.0% (n = 487) in the 1571 isolates. Of note, both MLST clade 4 and clade 5 exhibited significantly higher rates of azole resistance (93.1% and 31.0%, respectively) than did other clades (17.8% overall, both p < 0.001) (Figs. 2 and 3b). Clades 4 and 5 were the predominant azole-resistant genotypes globally, as they included 49.6% and 8.9% of all resistant isolates, respectively. The intercontinental variations of C. tropicalis clades, along with divergent antifungal resistant profiles among different clades, were considered to be associated with the significantly higher azole resistance rate found in Asia (35.4%) compared to other continents (13.0% overall) (Fig. 3c).
A recent shift of the predominant azole-resistant C. tropicalis lineage to MLST clade 4
The earliest strains in the C. tropicalis MLST database can be traced back to the 1970s, and the first fluconazole-resistant strain recorded was isolated in 1994 from North America (Supplementary Data 2). These long-term records provided an opportunity to analyze changes in major azole-resistant lineages over time (Fig. 3e). Of the two most prevalent azole-resistant genotypes, i.e., clades 4 and 5, the earliest fluconazole-resistant isolate in the latter clade were found in 1999 in Asia (Supplementary Data 2). During 1999–2008, clades 5 was the most common lineages among fluconazole-resistant isolates of the whole collection (Fig. 3e).
In comparison, the largest resistant clade, clade 4, emerged more recently, with the first isolate identified in 2010 within our collection in Asia (Supplementary Data 2). However, in a short period of time, the resistant population within clade 4 expanded quickly, and it became the predominant fluconazole-resistant genotype in 2009–2013 of the whole collection (52.7%), replacing the earlier-emerging clades 5, then continued to increase to 67.3% after 2014 (Fig. 3e). Moreover, clade 4 was the most common resistant lineage in a vast area of Asia-Pacific, including in China (China’s mainland and Taiwan, China), Thailand and Singapore from Asia and Australia from Oceania; the proportion of strains from clade 4 ranged from 34.7% to 86.7% among azole-resistant isolates in each region (Fig. 3d). These findings indicated that the emergence and wide dissemination of azole-resistant clade 4 isolates within last decades have become a unique challenge in Asia-Pacific.
Population genomics reveal phylogenetic cluster AZR, an MLST clade 4 subpopulation that exhibits high-level azole resistance
To gain a more in-depth understanding of the intra-population structure of MLST clade 4 isolates and potential correlations to antifungal resistance, we carried out a WGS-based analysis on 629 C. tropicalis strains. In general, 100% (458/458) of clinical isolates collected in China, along with 95.6% (173/181) of global strains achieved from previous studies reached ≥60× average read depth.
Overall, 97.8% (615/629) of the C. tropicalis isolates studied were diploid (Fig. 4a). Polyploidies were rarely identified, with triploid, haploid and octoploid isolates only accounting for 1.6%, 0.3% and 0.3% of the collection, respectively (Fig. 4b–d). Aneuploidies were observed in 2.1% of strains (n = 13), and most aneuploidy events were found on chromosomes 5 (n = 5) or 6 (n = 5) (Fig. 4e–j, Supplementary Data 2). Additional large structural variations were observed on chromosome 4 in 4.9% (n = 31) of isolates, and on chromosomes 2, 3, 6 or R in a total of 17 isolates (Supplementary Data 2). Moreover, genome-wide high levels of heterozygosity were observed in 2.7% (17/629) of strains that reside in two separate phylogenetic branches (Supplementary Fig. S1, Supplementary Data 2). Of note, all aneuploidy isolates with extra complete chromosome 5 (n = 3) or isochromosome 5q (n = 1) that contained ERG11 and TAC1 gene loci, were resistant to fluconazole (Supplementary Data 2). However, antifungal resistance was not found to be associated with other polyploidy, aneuploidy, large structural variation or high heterozygosity genotype features.
By combining phylogenetic, average nucleotide identity (ANI) and ADMIXTURE population structure analyses of WGS data, a total of 36 C. tropicalis clusters (CTC) were proposed, and 22 of major WGS CTCs (number of isolates >5) were named (clusters CTC01-CTC20, cluster AZR, and one cluster nested in group AZR-ADJ) (Fig. 5, Supplementary Figs. S1 and S2). Strains assigned to these 22 WGS clusters accounted for 64.9% of the 629 isolates studied. Generally, the association between WGS phylogenetic clusters and MLST clades was revealed, but WGS exhibited higher discriminatory power. Of 22 genomic clusters, 21 only comprised strains from unique MLST clades (except for those isolates not assigned to any MLST clade) (Fig. 6a). The only exception was CTC08, which was made up of isolates from MLST clade N7 (54.5%) and clade 19 (45.5%) that were located on two divergent branches in MLST maximum-likelihood tree (Figs. 2 and 6a).
The AZR cluster was the largest genomic cluster, accounting for 12.6% (79/629) of the collection (Figs. 5 and 6a). Within cluster AZR, strains’ pairwise SNP differences varied from 2112 to 25,160 bp (median = 7731 bp), and no evidence of nosocomial outbreaks was observed. Of note, 97.5% (77/79) of AZR isolates were fluconazole-resistant (Fig. 6b), all of which were also cross-resistant to voriconazole. The remaining two isolates were susceptible dose-dependently to fluconazole (SDD) (Fig. 6b) and of intermediate susceptibility to voriconazole. In addition, 60.8% and 96.2% of AZR isolates were also of non-wild-type phenotype to itraconazole and posaconazole, respectively. Moreover, 92.4% of these isolates (73/79) exhibited high-level resistance to fluconazole, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of at least 256 mg/L (Fig. 6c).
A dramatic increase in azole-resistance rates correlated with population expansion in cluster AZR
Interestingly, we observed a branch of 28 isolates immediately adjacent to cluster AZR in the WGS phylogenetic tree that also exhibited a high rate of fluconazole non-susceptibility (92.9%, 26/28). This branch is referred to as “group AZR-ADJ” in this study (Figs. 5 and 6b). Of note, all isolates in cluster AZR and 96.4% (27/28) strains in the azole non-susceptible group AZR-ADJ carried well-recognized nucleotide mutations A395T/W and C461T/Y in their ERG11 gene, which lead to amino acid substitutions Y132F and S154F in the azole antifungal target Erg11p (Fig. 6d). In addition, three AZR isolates (4.1%) carried an additional substitution, P397S (Fig. 6d). No fluconazole-susceptible isolates involved in this study carried any of these three substitutions. Of note, previous studies have confirmed that the mutations A395T/W, resulting in the amino acid substitution Y132F, play a crucial role in conferring azole resistance in C. tropicalis14,15. On the other hand, although mutation C461T/Y led to the substitution S154F is frequently observed together with mutations A395T/W, it does not independently contribute to the azole-resistant phenotype15.
All the cluster AZR isolates belonged to MLST clade 4/CC1, but only 39.3% (11/28) of the AZR-ADJ isolates belonged to MLST clade 4, and none of AZR-ADJ isolates belonged to MLST CC1 (p < 0.001, Fig. 6d, e). The proportion of ERG11A395T homozygous mutant strains was higher in group AZR-ADJ (50.0%) than in cluster AZR (7.6%) (p < 0.001, Fig. 6f). Within group AZR-ADJ, ERG11A395T homozygous mutant strains exhibited significantly higher fluconazole distributions compared to heterozygous strains (p = 0.002). Most importantly, though high rates of fluconazole resistance were detected within both cluster AZR and group AZR-ADJ (97.5% vs 92.9%, p = 0.33, Fig. 6b), group AZR-ADJ isolates generally exhibited low- to moderate-levels of fluconazole resistance, as 80.8% of isolates had fluconazole MICs of at most 128 mg/L, and the fluconazole MIC distribution in group AZR-ADJ strains was significantly lower than that in cluster AZR isolates (p < 0.001).
Cluster AZR was found to be widely distributed over a vast geographic region. Though 98.7% (78/79) of isolates were found in Asia, there was also one isolate detected in Oceania (Australia). Of 78 Asian cluster AZR isolates, 73 of them were identified in China and five were identified in Singapore, which accounted for 16.3% and 50.0% of isolates’ collection in each country, respectively. Besides, 77.8% of 27 cities in China involved in this study have cluster AZR isolates detected (Fig. 1b). Moreover, a rapid expansion of cluster AZR isolates was observed in China over time, with its prevalence among fluconazole-resistant strains elevating from 0% in 2009 to 64% over 8 years (p < 0.001, Fig. 6g). In comparison, the proportion of group AZR-ADJ strains decreased from 100% to 4% over the same time period (p < 0.001, Fig. 6g). During this period, previous research showed that the rate of fluconazole resistance of C. tropicalis isolates collected in China dramatically increased from less than 6% to more than 30% (Fig. 6b)8. There was a significant association between the changing azole resistance and the change of major resistant clones (p = 0.011); we propose that the notable increase of azole resistance of C. tropicalis in China was led by the expansion of the population of isolates from cluster AZR.
Detection of tandem gene duplication of ERG11 gene in cluster AZR isolates
To explore potential mechanisms, in addition to ERG11 gene mutations, that contribute to the distinctive high-level azole resistance among cluster AZR isolates, we carried out comparative CNV analyses for 6160 open reading frames (ORFs) previously predicted in C. tropicalis genomes, using group AZR-ADJ strains as comparators. Of note, only a single gene in cluster AZR isolates exhibited an average sequencing depth elevation greater than 3 times (average depth 3.48 ± 1.01) vs group AZR-ADJ strains (average depth 1.06 ± 0.11), suggesting that notable CNV events occurred (p < 0.001, Fig. 7a). Functional annotation indicated that this ORF was the ERG11 gene. There were no other ORFs in cluster AZR isolates observed to have elevations in sequencing depth of more than 2 times.
At the strain level, ERG11 CNVs occurred in 97.4% (77/79) of cluster AZR isolates, but in none of group AZR-ADJ isolates. In addition, ERG11 gene copy numbers varied from 3 to 16 copies among strains with CNVs (Fig. 7a, Supplementary Data 2). Subsequent sequencing depth analyses of the ERG11 gene and its adjacent 5’-upstream and 3’-downstream regions illustrated that the sizes of CNV segments and their breakpoint sequences were the same in all cluster AZR isolates. These segments started from −1164 bp in the 5’-upstream region of the ERG11 gene, to 316 bp in the 3’-downstream region of the ERG11 gene. Including the 1587 bp ERG11 coding domain sequence, this region is composed of a 3067-bp segment (Fig. 7b).
To further characterize the spatial distribution of ERG11 CNV segments in genomes of AZR strains, long-read sequencing was carried out on five selected AZR isolates and one AZR-ADJ isolate (Fig. 7c). All ERG11 CNV segments appeared tandemly; that is, the ERG11 CNVs resulted from tandem gene duplication events at the original ERG11 gene position of the wild-type strain (Fig. 7e). Long-read sequencing also supported the similarity of sizes of CNV segments and breakpoint sequences among all strains.
Moreover, short-read sequencing led to the finding that three of five AZR isolates had heterozygous ERG11 gene alleles and the other two were homozygous. Long-read sequencing illustrated that tandem gene duplication events had only occurred on the chromosome with mutated ERG11 alleles with the A395T and C461T mutations, while chromosomes with the wild-type ERG11 allele did not have gene duplications (Fig. 7c). In comparison, in two cluster AZR strains considered “homozygous” at the ERG11 locus according to short-read sequencing, one strain (strain ID no. F3504) carried an equal copy number of ERG11 genes (n = 5) on both alleles, while the other strain (strain ID no. F3358) carried a single copy of the mutant ERG11 gene on one allele but five copies of mutant ERG11 on the other allele (Fig. 7c).
Interestingly, among all clinical isolates not belonging to cluster AZR or group AZR-ADJ, an additional strain (ID no. F3784) was found to have the ERG11 A395W mutation coupled with CNVs (Fig. 5). This strain also shared the sizes of CNV segments and breakpoint sequences with the cluster AZR strains.
ERG11 CNVs are associated with increases in azole resistance levels
Further investigations were conducted to determine if additional copies of ERG11 were associated with an increase in azole resistance. By subgroup analysis of cluster AZR isolates that carried varying copy numbers of ERG11 gene, it was observed that strains without ERG11 CNV events, despite being resistant to fluconazole, had lower fluconazole MICs (32 to 64 mg/L) (Fig. 7d). In comparison, resistance azole resistance was more pronounced in isolates with ERG11 CNVs, and as copy numbers of ERG11 gene increased, a corresponding elevation in fluconazole MIC distributions was noticed. For isolates carrying 3–4 copies of the ERG11 gene, the median fluconazole MIC value rose to 128 mg/L and isolates with 5–6 copies of ERG11 gene displayed an even higher median fluconazole MIC value of 256 mg/L (Fig. 7d). The trend continued with cluster AZR isolates possessing 7–8 and ≥9 copies of ERG11 gene, which exhibited the highest fluconazole MIC distributions with median fluconazole MIC values of 512 mg/L (Fig. 7d). These results suggested that the high-level azole resistance character of cluster AZR isolates were associated with the presence of ERG11 CNVs.
Previous studies have shown that ERG11 gene overexpression contributes to decreased azole susceptibility in multiple Candida species; such overexpression may result from increases in ERG11 gene copy numbers, or it may be associated with mutations in transcription factors, such as UPC2, that regulate ERG11 gene expression22,24. In this study, in addition to the ERG11 CNVs identified, it was further revealed that 94.9% (75/79) of cluster AZR isolates had a missense mutation (T503C) in the UPC2 gene (Supplementary Data 3).
To evaluate the potential contributions of ERG11 CNVs and UPC2 gene mutations to the expression level of the ERG11 gene, qPCR was carried out within all cluster AZR isolates, using all group AZR-ADJ and a subset of other phylogenetic cluster (n = 15) strains as comparators and C. tropicalis strain ATCC750 as a reference (Fig. 7e, f). Generally, no significant changes in the level of ERG11 gene expression were observed in group AZR-ADJ isolates, nor in two cluster AZR isolates that carried UPC2 gene mutations but that did not carry ERG11 CNVs (Fig. 7e). In comparison, an average increase of ERG11 gene expression of 2.9-fold (IQR 2.2- to 3.6-fold) was observed among cluster AZR isolates with ERG11 CNVs, including four strains that carried the wild-type UPC2 gene (Fig. 7e). Furthermore, we observed a dose-dependent relationship between the copy numbers of ERG11 gene and its expression level (Fig. 7f).
Missense mutations in other genes previously reported to be associated with azole resistance were also analyzed (Supplementary Data 3). Of note, some unique mutations were observed in drug efflux transporter-encoding genes and the genes that encode their transcription factors. For instance, 97.5% (77/79) of cluster AZR isolates had amino acid substitution A446E in Tac1 (Supplementary Data 3), a transcription factor controlling the expression of the Cdr drug efflux pump. In addition, 98.6% (78/79) of AZR and 82.1% (23/28) of AZR-ADJ isolates had amino acid substitution L129F in Stb5, a regulator of the Pdr drug efflux pump, and 92.2% (72/79) AZR isolates had an additional Stb5 substitution T313N (Supplementary Data 3). However, qPCR analysis revealed no significant changes in the expression level of CDR or PDR genes in cluster AZR isolates.
Overall, these findings strongly suggest an association between ERG11 CNVs and the overexpression of the ERG11 gene among cluster AZR isolates, indicating a potential mechanism contributing to the development of high-level azole-resistant phenotype within this population.
Increase of ERG11 gene copy numbers induced in vitro results in enhanced azole resistance
We further aimed to verify whether ERG11 CNV plays an essential role in contributing to azole resistance. A cluster AZR strain (ID no. F4082, ERG11 copy number = 3, fluconazole MIC = 128 mg/L) was serially passaged 10 times in vitro under fluconazole stress of 256 mg/L. The 0th, 3rd, 6th, and 10th passages were specifically selected to evaluate alterations in antifungal susceptibility, ERG11 expression level, and ERG11 CNVs (Fig. 8a). Overall, from the 0th to 6th passages, no notable changes were observed in fluconazole MICs, which remained constant at 128 mg/L (Fig. 8b). Correspondingly, short- and long-read sequencing confirmed that 3rd and 6th passages of the strain carried identical copy numbers of ERG11 gene compared to the 0th passage (n = 3, Fig. 8c), and qPCR analysis indicated no variation in the expression level of the ERG11 gene (Fig. 8d). However, a significant 2-fold increase in fluconazole MIC was observed in the 10th passage that reached 512 mg/L (Fig. 8c). This alteration coincided with an expansion of the ERG11 gene copy number to n = 7 (Fig. 8b), and a corresponding 2-fold increase in the expression level of the ERG11 gene compared to the 0th generation was observed (Fig. 8d).
Furthermore, to assess the stability of ERG11 CNVs, we conducted an additional serially passaging of the original strain (0th passage) and its 10th passage for 10 times without subjecting it to fluconazole exposure. Our results showed no changes in both the fluconazole MICs and the copy numbers of the ERG11 gene, which suggests that once ERG11 CNVs have emerged, it has the potential to maintain stability and persist in the absence of external azole stresses. Consequently, this in vitro experiment strengthened the evidence that ERG11 CNVs play a contributory role in the development of high-level azole resistance in C. tropicalis.
Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposons are enriched in cluster AZR isolates
To further identify unique genomic features of cluster AZR isolates, a pan-genome analysis was carried out. A total of 16,824 clusters of gene orthologous groups (OGs) were identified, and a core genome composed of 4606 genes was found (Fig. 9a). A pan-genome-based comparative analysis only identified two OGs that were carried by a large majority (>90%) of cluster AZR isolates but that were less commonly seen (<20%) in other isolates, including strains of group AZR-ADJ (Supplementary Data 4). Of these two OGs, OG06397 was >1000 bp in length and is considered to be a functional gene. Homology-based annotation indicated that the product of OG06397 is a gag-pol fusion protein and that this gene is a Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposon (Supplementary Data 4). When pooling cluster AZR and group AZR-ADJ isolates together and comparing them with other strains, two additional OGs were identified, both of which were predicted to be putative transposable elements, and one of the two (OG06243) was also a Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposon (Supplementary Data 4).
To verify whether Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposons were more enriched in azole-resistant populations, we further screened all Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposons among all OGs, and five homologous OGs were identified (Fig. 9b). Of note, the proportions of isolates carrying each of these five OGs were all significantly higher in cluster AZR isolates than in strains belonging to other phylogenetic populations (Fig. 9b). Moreover, the overall cumulative copy number of retrotransposons was also significantly higher in cluster AZR isolates (median 14, IQR 12–15) than in group AZR-ADJ isolates (median 11, IQR 7–13, p < 0.001) and in other population strains (median 5, IQR 3–8, p < 0.001) (Fig. 9c). Along with the ERG11 CNVs that were observed, the enrichment of Ty3/gypsy retrotransposons in cluster AZR isolates are another indicator of higher genomic plasticity of cluster AZR.
Discussion
To date, the human impact of fungal diseases remains largely underrecognized, even though fungi are estimated to affect billions of people and cause 1.5 million deaths per year2,25. Invasive fungal diseases are associated with notably high mortality (20–50%), despite the availability of antifungal treatments3–5. Moreover, it is generally recognized that the prevalence of invasive fungal diseases is rising, because of the continuing expansion of high-risk populations, such as immunocompromised individuals, those receiving surgical operations or other invasive medical interventions, or patients in long-term intensive care units5. Invasive fungal diseases are associated with prolonged hospitalization and extra financial costs (more than €35,000/patient).
Compounding the problem of fungal diseases is the emergence of antifungal resistance as an important clinical problem5,14. To date, only a limited number of primary classes of antifungal agents, i.e., azoles, polyenes, flucytosine, and echinocandins, are available for treating invasive fungal diseases, and the loss of any of these options due to resistance will pose great challenges in patient management14. Among all antifungals, fluconazole and other azoles have been widely used as first-line therapies since the early 1990s, but increasing resistance to azoles quickly raised public concerns, and resistance has already driven changes to clinical practice26,27.
It has been noted that epidemiology and antifungal resistance related to invasive candidiasis have significant geographic variations3,6,24. For instance, in North America, increasing azole resistance was more notable in C. glabrata6,24,26, while challenges posed by azole-resistant C. tropicalis were more serious in the Asia-Pacific region7,8,24. In Australia, the rate of fluconazole resistance increased from 2% in the mid-2000s to greater than 16% in a decade; meanwhile, the rate of azole resistance increased more dramatically in China: from 6% in 2009 to more than 30% within ten years7,8.
Of note, rapid or broad dissemination of antimicrobial resistance in certain species could be attributed to the emergence of specific phylogenetic populations, a process that has been recognized in varieties of medically important microbes, such as the prokaryotic pathogens Mycobacterium tuberculosis28, Salmonella typhi29 and Clostridium difficile30, as well as within the most prevalent fungal pathogens C. albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus10,31. Moreover, the expansion of resistant populations occurs not only among human individuals but also in broader contexts, e.g., from animals or the environment to humans31,32. For instance, there has been compelling phylogenomic evidence supporting that the acquisition of azole resistance in A. fumigatus is due to the widespread usage of azole agents in agriculture31,33.
In C. tropicalis, the MLST scheme has been used for illustrating the phylogenetic relatedness of strains collected globally and has provided longitudinal insights into trends of clonal changes13,34. Using MLST, a study in Taiwan indicated that specific C. tropicalis clones associated with azole resistance had emerged earlier than 200034, while a shift of predominant resistant clones from MLST clade 5 to clade 4 was noted around 201013. We also observed that in 1571 strains analyzed by MLST, clade 4 azole-resistant isolates were more prevalent (15.8%) than those of clade 5 (10.1%), and azole resistance of C. tropicalis in broad Asia-Pacific regions, such as in China, Singapore, Thailand, and Australia, were significantly associated with clade 47,13,35. Furthermore, azole-resistant isolates of C. tropicalis belonged to MLST clade 4 (e.g., DST225) and clade 5 (e.g., DST140) have also been identified in environmental sources such as soil and fruits, which suggests the potential spread of resistant strains between the human population and the environment36,37.
However, due to the diploid nature of C. tropicalis, Sanger sequencing-based MLST analysis requires manual checking for heterozygosity at each base, which is labor-consuming and can potentially lead to the unintentional oversight of certain heterozygous sites38. One strength of the present study is that WGS was applied for a more precise characterization of C. tropicalis population structure in a large collection of strains. It has been recognized that mutations in the ERG11 gene, particularly A395T, which results in the amino acid substitution Y132F, are one of the major mechanisms that contribute to azole resistance of clade 4 isolates7,13,15,35. WGS analysis in this study revealed that 71.8% (79/110) of isolates carrying the ERG11A395T mutation belong to a specific subpopulation of C. tropicalis MLST clade 4, which was named cluster AZR. In addition, 22.7% (25/110) of isolates with the A395T mutation were assigned to group AZR-ADJ, which is phylogenetically adjacent to cluster AZR. Of note, though both cluster AZR and group AZR-ADJ isolates had high rates of azole resistance (rates of fluconazole of 97.5% and 92.9%, respectively), the azole MIC of cluster AZR isolates was significantly higher than that of group AZR-ADJ isolates. More importantly, it was found that the dramatic increase of azole resistance in China was associated with the rapid population expansion of cluster AZR isolates, while the prevalence of AZR-ADJ isolates decreased (Fig. 6g).
Gene expression analysis of clinical isolates collected in this study further revealed that overexpression of the ERG11 gene was significantly associated with high-level azole resistance phenotypes, and it was associated with MIC discrepancies between cluster AZR and group AZR-ADJ isolates. This overexpression may have also resulted in shifts in the prevalence of the clones. It has been noted that ERG11 overexpression contributes to azole resistance15,24,39, and resistance mechanisms known to occur in C. tropicalis had been limited to sequence mutations in or upregulation of expression of UPC2, a gene encoding a transcription factor that regulates ERG11 expression7,16. In this study, we also identified a mutation leading to the L168P substitution in the UPC2 gene of 94.9% of cluster AZR isolates but not in any of group AZR-ADJ isolates. This mutation had been previously reported in clade 4 azole-resistant isolates in Australia7; however, no correlation between this UPC2 mutation and the level of ERG11 expression was found by qPCR.
Previous studies in different yeast species have illustrated that duplication of chromosome segments containing key antifungal-resistant genes may contribute to gene overexpression and result in resistance14,21. For instance, an isochromosome composed of duplicated left arms of chromosome 5 in C. albicans, which led to CNVs of ERG11 and TAC1 located in this region, is known to cause resistance to azole agents21,22. More recently, several studies have illustrated that in the emerging multi-drug-resistant species of global concern, C. auris, there are also strains with ERG11 CNVs that are associated with increased gene expression and consequently high-level azole resistance40,41. In C. tropicalis, there was only one previous report that observed increased ERG11 gene copy number; this increase was induced in vivo during antifungal therapy in a facility in Canada (also involved in WGS analysis of this study, strain ID no. SRR11235418, Supplementary Data 1)23. This particular strain had a similar resistant mechanism to that described above in C. albicans, which carried an additional isochromosome 5q that contains ERG11 and TAC1 genes. It did not carry any missense mutations in the ERG11 gene and only exhibited a moderate level of azole resistance (fluconazole MIC of 32 mg/L). Furthermore, we identified two additional isolates from previous reports (strain ID no. SRR12823717 and SRR11235418, Supplementary Data 1), that exhibited aneuploidy involving an entire chromosome 5 and were resistant to fluconazole. Nevertheless, the prevalence of azole resistance induced by chromosome-level aneuploidy in C. tropicalis remained rare.
In comparison, our WGS analysis uncovered a notable prevalence of ERG11 CNVs occurred among 78 of 629 isolates (12.4%) in this study, which did not arise from chromosome aneuploidy but rather were characterized by the duplication of a specific 1587 bp-chromosome segment containing the ERG11 gene-coding region. Specifically, 77 (98.7%) of these isolates belonged to cluster AZR of MLST clade 4. More importantly, all ERG11 alleles with CNVs were non-wild-type and had the A395T mutation. A combination of short- and long-read WGS sequencing further allowed for a better understanding of CNV segment characteristics. We found that ERG11 CNVs occurring in cluster AZR isolates resulted from tandem gene duplications17,19, as the 1587 bp-chromosome segments, which comprised the complete ERG11 coding domain sequences and its 5’-upstream (1164 bp) and 3’-downstream (316 bp) regions, appeared recurrently in isolates’ genomes. In addition, all segments shared breakpoint sequences. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report for the occurrence of CNVs in the ERG11 gene that were observed in a tandem-repeat form and were accompanied by important azole-resistant mutations.
Notably, a clear dose-dependent relationship was observed between the copy numbers of the ERG11 gene, the gene’s expression level, and the distribution of fluconazole MICs among cluster AZR isolates. To further validate the role of the ERG11 CNV mechanism in azole resistance, an in vitro experiment was conducted. A cluster AZR isolate with a low copy number of the ERG11 gene (n = 3, fluconazole MIC = 128 mg/L) was subjected to azole stress conditions and passaged 10 times. Remarkably, the copy number of the ERG11 gene in the 10th passage expanded to n = 7. Concurrently, this increase was accompanied by a 2-fold elevation in the expression level of the ERG11 gene, and a corresponding 2-fold rise in the fluconazole MIC value (which reached 512 mg/L) compared to the 0th passage. Collectively, these findings provide enhanced evidence that the ERG11 CNV mechanism contributes to the high-level fluconazole resistance observed in cluster AZR isolates relative to other C. tropicalis populations.
Previous studies have shown that mechanisms of CNV formation are quite similar among different organisms, even across prokaryotic and eukaryotic kingdoms17. Tandem gene duplications with recurrent end-points, like the ERG11 CNVs observed in cluster AZR isolates in this study, generally arise by homologous recombination between repeated sequences, in a process called non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR)17,21. NAHR can occur in double-strand break-induced recombination by double Holliday junction double-strand break repair, or when collapsed or broken replication forks are repaired by break-induced replication, which can produce changes in copy numbers17,42. In addition to NAHR, microhomology-induced replications and unequal crossovers have also been characterized as mechanisms responsible for gene duplications and deletions17,42. As shown in Fig. 7e, our data indicate that the common ancestor of cluster AZR and group ADJ isolates acquired ERG11 mutation A395T and gained azole resistance first, then ERG11 CNV events occurred in the cluster AZR population. These CNV events would further enhance the fitness of cluster AZR isolates, particularly toward antifungal stresses14,20,21. Thereafter, a rapid expansion of the cluster AZR population occurred, allowing these organisms to surpass other resistant phylogenetic groups, and introducing a dramatic increase of azole resistance in China.
It has been recognized that transposable elements in genomes have contributed significantly to genomic plasticity14,43,44. In this study, pan-genome analyses revealed four putative functional gene OGs, all of which were transposable elements, that were enriched in cluster AZR and/or in group AZR-ADJ isolates but were rarely identified in other phylogenetic populations. Moreover, two of the four OGs were Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposons, and the cumulative copy numbers of all Ty3/gypsy homologies were also significantly higher in cluster AZR isolates. The Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposon is one of the class-I transposable elements with long terminal repeats (LTRs) in yeasts, and they have also been detected in wide ranges of eukaryotes43,45. Previous studies have demonstrated that retrotransposons bearing LTRs in yeasts are associated with chromosome segment CNVs, LOHs, and large aneuploidy events14,43,44. Here, our data suggest that the enrichment of Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposons in cluster AZR may be another mechanism that is associated with enhanced genomic variability and contributed to the rapid expansion of this population.
We acknowledge some limitations of the study. First, regarding sample inclusion, there is a noticeable geographic imbalance. While our MLST analysis included C. tropicalis strains from five continents, isolates from Asia accounted for over 80% of the total. This bias is attributed to a significant number of relevant studies published in Asia. Furthermore, given the higher prevalence of azole-resistant C. tropicalis in the Asian region, and many studies (including this one) primarily focused on the molecular epidemiology of resistant population, there is an overrepresentation of resistant strains in our analysis. Second, in our investigation of the molecular mechanisms, while our subgroup analysis of cluster AZR clinical strains and in vitro-induced azole resistance experiments demonstrated a dose-dependent correlation between ERG11 CNVs and azole MICs, the role of the CNV mechanism was not solidly verified by reverting the tandem duplicated ERG11 genotype back to a single-copy allele to examine changes in azole susceptibility. Additionally, the regulatory mechanism of ERG11 CNV events remains not well-illustrated. Besides, two cluster AZR strains carrying ERG11A395T CNVs that did not exhibit high-level resistance to fluconazole (categorized as SDD) were found, which suggests the presence of additional mechanisms that may affect the susceptibility phenotype of these strains. Third, there’s a lack of a standardized methodology for WGS bioinformatics in fungi, which can potentially lead to discrepancies in interpreting SNPs and heterozygosity. Moreover, interpreting heterozygosity in genes with CNVs may have a reduced level of confidence. Nevertheless, these limitations do not detract from the substantial implications of our findings regarding the escalating antifungal resistance threats posed by the rapid expansion of the cluster AZR population. To implement effective antifungal stewardship strategies, our results advocate for the targeted monitoring of the cluster AZR population, which can serve as a valuable indicator to assess the severity of antifungal resistance challenges over time and evaluate the effectiveness of transmission control measures24,33. Furthermore, our in vitro experiment has demonstrated that cluster AZR can acquire a stronger resistant phenotype under azole stress through the ERG CNV mechanism. This finding once again emphasizes the critical importance of controlling irrational use of antifungal agents both in clinical settings and the environment24,33.
In conclusion, a large-scale global phylogenetic analysis of C. tropicalis isolates revealed that MLST clade 4 has replaced other early clades and become the predominant azole-resistant population in Asia-Pacific regions, and this population expansion has led to high azole-resistant rates in these regions. Moreover, WGS approaches identified the emergence and rapid spread of cluster AZR, a sublineage of clade 4, which is responsible for the dramatic increase of azole resistance in China over the last several decades. Cluster AZR isolates exhibit extremely high-level azole resistance phenotypes. The tandem gene duplications of the ERG11 gene, coupled with the key mutation A395T, emerged as a distinctive characteristic observed in cluster AZR isolates. This specific CNV mechanism is strongly associated with an elevation in ERG11 gene expression levels and an increase in fluconazole MIC of the strains. Moreover, the enrichment of Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposons in cluster AZR isolates may have further contributed to higher genomic plasticity in response to environmental stresses. Maintaining ongoing epidemiological surveillance of the clade 4/cluster AZR population is imperative, and there is an urgent need to develop effective strategies to address the growing threat of antifungal resistance posed by C. tropicalis.
Methods
C. tropicalis isolates
In the present study, we analyzed whole-genome data of 629 C. tropicalis strains, including all available genomes that were released in the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) and described in previous publications until Dec 31, 2022 (181 international strains from nine previous studies in all, Supplementary Data 2). In addition, 448 isolates causing human IFDs were collected from 49 hospitals in 27 cities in 27 provinces in China in a CHIF-NET surveillance program (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Data 2)8. Of note, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of potential longitudinal changes in the azole-resistant population, we ensured a similar proportion of azole-resistant strains (30% ± 5%) within each surveillance year, and strains from each susceptibility category were randomly selected from the CHIF-NET study.
Furthermore, all available C. tropicalis MLST data until Dec 31, 2022, were acquired from published literature and a public database (http://www.pubmlst.net). Redundant data from the same isolates were eliminated manually, and isolates without azole susceptibility results reported were also excluded, making an additional dataset comprising 942 isolates. Therefore, a total of 1571 C. tropicalis strains were used in this study (listed in Supplementary Data 1).
Generally, 80.8% of the isolates in this dataset were from Asia, as previous C. tropicalis MLST studies carried out were mainly performed in Asia, but the dataset also included isolates from Europe (10.2%), Oceania (4.7%), North America (3.6%), Latin America (0.4%) (Fig. 1a, c). In addition, of 1481 isolates with known isolation sources, 97.9% (n = 1450) were clinical strains causing human infections (Fig. 1c). Out of the 1376 clinical isolates with detailed information on isolation sources, 58.1% (n = 782) were obtained from bloodstream infections. In comparison, a few (n = 28, 1.9%) isolates were from environmental sources (Fig. 1c).
Genome resequencing and quality filtering
All 448 fungal isolates collected in China were grown on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA, Oxoid, Thermo Fisher Scientific: CM0041T) at 28 °C for 48 h, and subjected to short-read sequencing. DNA extraction was performed using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen: 51306). A paired-end library with an average insert size of 300 bp was prepared with a Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina: FC-131-1096) and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq X10 platform (Illumina, California, USA) in PE150 (paired-end sequencing, 150 bp reads) sequencing mode. Raw FASTQ files were processed through a standard pipeline through Trimmomatic (version 0.36) to remove the adapters46, bases with phred score less than 3 and N bases in the leading and trailing parts, and bases with phred score less than 20 and length less than 36 in the 4 bp window.
In addition, long-read sequencing was carried out to characterize the spatial distribution of ERG11 CNV segments in genomes. Five selected cluster AZR isolates and one AZR-ADJ isolate were tested (Fig. 7c). Libraries were prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions for the PacBio Template Prep Kit (Pacific Biosciences: 100-938-900) using a 10 kb-template preparation protocol, then sequencing was carried out on the single-molecule real-time (SMRT) platform (PacBio Biosciences, Menlo Park, USA) at Novogene Co. Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Low-quality reads were filtered by SMRT 2.3.0 software.
Read mapping, variant identification and filtering
For each isolate, the filtered reads were mapped to the C. tropicalis MYA-3404 reference genome (GenBank assembly accession: GCA_013177555.1 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/GCA_013177555.1/]) with the Burrows–Wheeler Aligner (BWA version 0.7.7) using the BWA-MEM algorithm47. The “view” command of SAMtools (version 1.6)48 with the “-b” argument was used to generate the BAM file, and then the “sort “command was used to sort the BAM file with the default argument. Indel and variant calling were performed with the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) (version 4.3.0.0)49 according to the GATK Best Practices50. For each sample, variants were first marked by GATK MarkDuplicates, then called with GATK HaplotypeCaller to create single-sample GVCF files with the option “–emitRefConfidence GVCF” and using GATK CombineGVCFs to aggregate the GVCF files, using the default parameters including: –sample-ploidy = 2; –heterozygosity = 0.001 (for computing prior likelihoods). The GVCF files were then jointly genotyped with GATK GenotypeGVCF to produce a single multiple-sample SNP file containing data on every strain. Finally, SNPs were selected using GATK SelectVariants with the option “-select-type SNP” and filtered using the following parameters: VariantFiltration, QD < 2.0; ReadPosRankSum <−8.0; FS > 60.0; MQRankSum <−12.5; MQ < 40.0; and HaplotypeScore >13.0. INDELs were selected using GATK SelectVariants with the option “-select-type INDEL” and filtered using the following parameters: QD < 2.0, QUAL < 30.0, FS > 200.0 and ReadPosRankSum < -20.0. A “bamdst” script (https://github.com/shiquan/bamdst) was used for quality control by analyzing the BAM files, and samples with a low fraction of reads mapped (<60%) were excluded for further analysis. In addition, since C. tropicalis is a diploid species, an average read depth of 60× was considered to provide a high level of confidence for subsequent analyses.
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis
MLST analysis was conducted using six gene loci as proposed previously51. An in-house bioinformatic workflow for WGS-based MLST analysis was developed, enabling the determination of DSTs from 629 C. tropicalis genomes. For five out of the six loci (ICL1, MDR1, SAPT2, SAPT4, and ZWF1a), we directly extracted the SNPs within the reference regions of each locus from the VCF file of the C. tropicalis genomes. However, two copies of the XYR1 gene were found in each haploid chromosome set of C. tropicalis by long-reads sequencing. To enhance the comparability of results between WGS-based and Sanger-based MLST analysis, a separate read mapping process was performed, aligning each sample’s sequencing reads against a single copy of the XYR1 reference region sequence to identify SNPs within this locus. Next, the DNA sequences for each locus were reconstructed by a custom script and cross-referenced with data from the PubMLST database (http://www.pubmlst.net, last accessed on Dec 31, 2022) to determine the corresponding gene allele numbers and strains’ DSTs. For any novel DSTs identified in this study, DST numbers starting from DST10001 were assigned. It’s worth noting that our study revealed discrepancies in the MLST results obtained via the WGS-based workflow when compared to those from prior studies for certain strains. These disparities can be attributed to the bioinformatic pipeline utilized, including differences in mapping approaches (especially concerning the multi-copy XYR1 locus), variant caller settings, and the algorithm for calling heterozygosity and homozygosity sites.
A ML tree for the comprehensive dataset of 1571 strains was generated, using IQ-TREE (version 1.6.12) with 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates, based on concatenated six-locus DNA sequences. A bootstrap criterion of ≥70 was applied to support the determination of MLST clades. For phylogenetic clades that had been previously described in previous publications, the same nomenclature was adopted as provided in these works13,39. Newly identified MLST clades were named using the designations of Clade N1 to Clade N8 (Supplementary Data 1). In addition, the MLST allelic profiles of strains were analyzed by goeBURST in PHILOVIZ (version 2.0) software to define clonal complexes (CCs, started from CC0 and named in descending order based on the number of isolates within each CC)52.
Phylogenetic and population structure analysis
IQ-TREE was used to infer an ML tree of the 629 isolates using the dataset of 1,642,574 confident SNPs and 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates53, and the script “vcf2phylip.py” (https://github.com/edgardomortiz/vcf2phylip) was used to translate SNPs in VCF format to FASTA format, with heterozygous SNP loci converted as IUPAC bases. The Edge-linked Partition Model was utilized to determine the most suitable DNA model, and branch supports were assessed using 1000 ultrafast bootstrap replicate54,55. A bootstrap value of >99.0 was implemented to support the designation of clusters (Fig. 5). Additionally, average nucleotide identity (ANI) was calculated by FastANI (version 1.33) using the genome after quality control (see Genome assembly, quality control and annotation), and the intra-group cutoff value was set as ≥99.6 for proposing WGS clusters (Supplementary Fig. S1)56. Whole-genome SNP-based Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and ADMIXTURE (version 1.3) analyses were employed to estimate the best number of populations (Supplementary Fig. S2)57,58. Furthermore, Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components (DAPC) were carried out by GCTA (version 1.94) and PLINK (version 1.9) to evaluate the inference of genomic clusters (Supplementary Fig. S2)58–60. Besides, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis was carried out on 629 genomes as previously described10.
Analysis of polyploidy, aneuploidy, large structure variation and copy number variation (CNV)
Polyploidy was detected using the frequency of the non-reference allele for cumulative heterozygous biallelic SNPs across all scaffolds, as described previously12. To perform aneuploidy, large structure variation and CNV analysis, a “Splint” algorithm previously established61 was employed to process the BAM file with 500-bp window frames. This algorithm was designed to mitigate the “smiley pattern” bias commonly observed in the terminal regions of chromosomes61. In addition, the SAMtools “depth” command was used to calculate the sequencing depth of each base from the sorted BAM file of each sample, to predict breakpoint sequences for ERG11 CNV segments. Further, the mean read depth across nonoverlapping 1-kb windows spanning the entire genome was visualized using a custom script for assisting analysis of aneuploidy and large structure variation events.
Genome assembly, quality control and annotation
IDBA-hybrid (version 1.1.3) was used to complete de novo assembling of short-read sequencing reads62. IDBA’s “fq2fa” program was used to convert the filtered FASTQ files to FASTA files, and then C. tropicalis MYA-3404 genome was used as a reference with the option “–reference”. Canu (version 2.2) was used to assemble the long reads of PacBio63. The genome sequences were evaluated for assembly quality using BUSCO (version 5.2.2) with genomic mode64. The “–augustus” and “–augustus_species” parameters were added to specify the C. tropicalis evaluation model, and saccharomycetes_odb10 served as the database during the evaluation. AUGUSTUS (version 3.3.2) was used for structural annotation with the following options: “–strand=both”, “–genemodel = complete” and “–species= candida_tropicalis”65. Next, snpEff (version 5.1.2) was utilized for genome annotation, employing the VCF file generated by GATK HaplotypeCaller and the GFF file generated by AUGUSTUS66, with “codonTable” set to “Alternative_Yeast_Nuclear” as C. tropicalis belongs to the CUG clade. BUSCO was again used to evaluate the quality of the predicted CDS sequences using the option “-m transcriptome”.
Pan-genome and core genomic analysis
OrthoFinder (version 4.2.2) was used to screen orthologous genes based on the predicted CDS sequences. The screening process adds the “-d” parameter to specify the input file as a nucleic acid sequence. In the orthologous groups after clustering, the longest and shortest sequences of each homologous group (OGs) were selected as representative sequences. They were used to calibrate results with the genomes of each sample with the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST), using an E-value truncation of 1 × 10−5 67. To reveal unique OGs carried by a certain population, cutoff values of >90% in the studied population and <20% in comparative populations were used. For selected OGs, eggNOG-mapper (version 2)68 and the NCBI nr database were used to perform functional annotation.
Antifungal susceptibility testing
For clinical isolates collected in China, antifungal susceptibility testing was carried out using the “gold-standard” broth microdilution method in accordance with CLSI guidelines69. Nine commonly used antifungal agents were tested, including four azoles (fluconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole), three echinocandins (caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin), 5-flucytosine, and amphotericin B. Susceptibility testing results were interpreted followed the clinical breakpoints (CBPs) or epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) recommended in the CLSI documents69,70. Specifically, for general isolates, the range of fluconazole concentrations tested was 0.12–256 mg/L; however, to explore the potential dose-dependent relationship between amplified copy numbers of the ERG11 gene and elevated fluconazole susceptibilities, we expanded the upper limit of fluconazole concentration to 1024 mg/L for testing cluster AZR and group AZR-ADJ isolates. Strains Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 and Candida krusei ATCC 6258 were employed as quality controls69.
Real-time quantitative PCR
The gene expression levels of the ERG11 gene (azole drug target), UPC2 gene (encoding a transcription factor of ERG11), as well as CDR and PDR genes (encoding drug efflux pumps), were examined using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) methodology, with the ACT1 gene used as the internal control. Isolates tested including all cluster AZR isolates (n = 73) and all group AZR-ADJ isolates (n = 26) collected in China, and a subset of other phylogenetic cluster strains (n = 15) as comparators. C. tropicalis strain ATCC750 was used as a reference. Briefly, all selected isolates were grown in yeast peptone dextrose medium at 28 °C for 48 h. RNA extraction was performed with RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen: 74106). Gene expression levels were evaluated using the comparative CT method71.
In vitro induction of ERG11 gene copy number increase
To validate the dose-dependent correlation between the increase in ERG11 gene copy number and the escalation of azole MICs, we conducted an in vitro passaging experiment under fluconazole stress. A cluster AZR strain F4082 (ERG11 copy number = 3, fluconazole MIC = 128 mg/L) was selected. The strain was initially incubated on SDA agar plates (Oxoid), and then a single colony was transferred to an antifungal-free liquid YPD medium (BD Difco: 242720) and incubated at 30 °C for 24 h to establish the 0th passage. An adequate volume of the culture suspension was harvested and subjected to low-speed centrifugation (1000 × g) to remove the supernatant. The cells were then resuspended and inoculated into 3 mL of liquid YPD medium with a fluconazole concentration of 256 mg/L. The inoculum was adjusted to an optical density of 0.05 (corresponding to a cell concentration of 0.9–1.4 × 105 CFU/mL) and then incubated at 30 °C in a rotating shaker at 220 rpm for 24 h. This process was repeated until the 10th passage was achieved. The 0th, 3rd, 6th, and 10th passages were selected to evaluate alterations in antifungal susceptibility (by broth microdilution assay), ERG11 expression level (by qPCR), and ERG11 CNVs (by short- and long-read sequencing). Besides, the 10th passage obtained was further passaged for an additional 10 times without exposure to azole stress, in order to assess the stability of ERG11 CNVs in vitro-induced.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using R (version 3.6.362). A chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used to examine associations between categorical variables where appropriate, and Bonferroni correction was carried out when necessary. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was carried out on continuous variables where appropriate, and multiple comparisons were carried out if necessary. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to evaluate the dependence between the rankings of variables. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
Ethics declarations
This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (no. S-263). Waiver of informed consent was granted as the research only involved the use of fungal isolates and there was no linkage to patient data or identifiable information.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2022YFC2303002 to M.X.), National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (grant no. 2022-PUMCH-C-052 to M.X.), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81802042 to X.F.), and Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Programme (grant no. QML20190301 to X.F.). We extend our sincere appreciation to all the principal and co-principal investigators from the hospitals that took part in the CHIF-NET study for their significant contributions in collecting the isolates used in this study (Supplementary Data 5). We also extend our gratitude for the support provided by the Clinical Biobank, Peking Union Medical College Hospital in sample collection, storage, and management.
Author contributions
X.F., M.X., J.G. and Y.-C.X. designed the study. X.F., R.-C.D., S.Z., Y.-Y.G., M.K., D.-W.G., Y.-N.M., Y.-H.P. and Z.-Y.S. performed the experiments. X.F., R.-C.D., J.G. and M.X. carried out data analysis and interpretation. X.F., R.-C.D. M.X. J.G. and Y.-C.X. drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
New short-read and long-read sequencing results of C. tropicalis isolates generated in this study have been deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject ID PRJNA946688. Additional previously published WGS and MLST data used in this study (Supplementary Data 1 and 2) were sourced from the NCBI SRA database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) and the PubMLST database (http://www.pubmlst.net), respectively.
Code availability
Custom scripts used in this study have been released at https://chifnet.microonline.cn/NGS_ctr.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Xin Fan, Rong-Chen Dai.
Change history
1/18/2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1038/s41467-024-44825-y
Contributor Information
Ying-Chun Xu, Email: xycpumch@139.com.
Jie Gong, Email: gongjie@icdc.cn.
Meng Xiao, Email: cjtcxiaomeng@aliyun.com.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-43380-2.
References
- 1.Nilsson RH, et al. Mycobiome diversity: high-throughput sequencing and identification of fungi. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019;17:95–109. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0116-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fisher MC, et al. Threats posed by the fungal kingdom to humans, wildlife, and agriculture. mBio. 2020;11:e00449-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00449-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pappas PG, Lionakis MS, Arendrup MC, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Kullberg BJ. Invasive candidiasis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2018;4:18026. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kullberg BJ, Arendrup MC. Invasive candidiasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;373:1445–1456. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1315399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.World Health Organization. WHO Fungal Priority Pathogens List to Guide Research, Development and Public Health Action (WHO, 2022).
- 6.Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Turnidge JD, Castanheira M, Jones RN. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2019;6:S79–S94. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Keighley C, et al. Whole genome sequencing shows genetic diversity, as well as clonal complex and gene polymorphisms associated with fluconazole non-susceptible isolates of Candida tropicalis. J. Fungi. 2022;8:896. doi: 10.3390/jof8090896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang Y, et al. Continual decline in azole susceptibility rates in Candida tropicalis over a 9-year period in China. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12:702839. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.702839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Choi YJ, et al. Fluconazole-resistant Candida parapsilosis bloodstream isolates with Y132F mutation in ERG11 gene, South Korea. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018;24:1768–1770. doi: 10.3201/eid2409.180625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gong J, et al. Emergence of antifungal resistant subclades in the global predominant phylogenetic population of Candida albicans. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023;11:e0380722. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03807-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fan X, et al. Notable increasing trend in azole non-susceptible Candida tropicalis causing invasive candidiasis in China (August 2009 to July 2014): molecular epidemiology and clinical azole consumption. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:464. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.O’Brien CE, et al. Population genomics of the pathogenic yeast Candida tropicalis identifies hybrid isolates in environmental samples. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17:e1009138. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tseng KY, Liao YC, Chen FC, Chen FJ, Lo HJ. A predominant genotype of azole-resistant Candida tropicalis clinical strains. Lancet Microbe. 2022;3:e646. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00179-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Berman J, Krysan DJ. Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020;18:319–331. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0322-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fan X, et al. Molecular mechanisms of azole resistance in Candida tropicalis isolates causing invasive candidiasis in China. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019;25:885–891. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jiang C, et al. The role of UPC2 gene in azole-resistant Candida tropicalis. Mycopathologia. 2016;181:833–838. doi: 10.1007/s11046-016-0050-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hastings PJ, Lupski JR, Rosenberg SM, Ira G. Mechanisms of change in gene copy number. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009;10:551–564. doi: 10.1038/nrg2593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zarrei M, MacDonald JR, Merico D, Scherer SW. A copy number variation map of the human genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015;16:172–183. doi: 10.1038/nrg3871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Freeling M. Bias in plant gene content following different sorts of duplication: tandem, whole-genome, segmental, or by transposition. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009;60:433–453. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nicoloff H, Hjort K, Levin BR, Andersson DI. The high prevalence of antibiotic heteroresistance in pathogenic bacteria is mainly caused by gene amplification. Nat. Microbiol. 2019;4:504–514. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0342-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Todd RT, Selmecki A. Expandable and reversible copy number amplification drives rapid adaptation to antifungal drugs. Elife. 2020;9:e58349. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Selmecki A, Forche A, Berman J. Aneuploidy and isochromosome formation in drug-resistant Candida albicans. Science. 2006;313:367–370. doi: 10.1126/science.1128242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McTaggart LR, Cabrera A, Cronin K, Kus JV. Antifungal susceptibility of clinical yeast isolates from a large Canadian reference laboratory and application of whole-genome sequence analysis to elucidate mechanisms of acquired resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020;64:e00402–e00420. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00402-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Perlin DS, Rautemaa-Richardson R, Alastruey-Izquierdo A. The global problem of antifungal resistance: prevalence, mechanisms, and management. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017;17:e383–e392. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30316-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Brown GD, et al. Hidden killers: human fungal infections. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012;4:165rv113. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pappas PG, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016;62:e1–e50. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cornely OA, et al. ESCMID* guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: non-neutropenic adult patients. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012;18:19–37. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Merker M, et al. Transcontinental spread and evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis W148 European/Russian clade toward extensively drug resistant tuberculosis. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:5105. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32455-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.da Silva KE, et al. The international and intercontinental spread and expansion of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella typhi: a genomic epidemiology study. Lancet Microbe. 2022;3:e567–e577. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00093-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Clements AC, Magalhaes RJ, Tatem AJ, Paterson DL, Riley TV. Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 027: assessing the risks of further worldwide spread. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2010;10:395–404. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70080-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rhodes J, et al. Population genomics confirms acquisition of drug-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus infection by humans from the environment. Nat. Microbiol. 2022;7:663–674. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01091-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Aires-de-Sousa M. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among animals: current overview. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2017;23:373–380. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fisher MC, et al. Tackling the emerging threat of antifungal resistance to human health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022;20:557–571. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00720-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chou HH, Lo HJ, Chen KW, Liao MH, Li SY. Multilocus sequence typing of Candida tropicalis shows clonal cluster enriched in isolates with resistance or trailing growth of fluconazole. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2007;58:427–433. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chew KL, Cheng JWS, Jureen R, Lin RTP, Teo JWP. ERG11 mutations are associated with high-level azole resistance in clinical Candida tropicalis isolates, a Singapore study. Mycoscience. 2017;58:111–115. doi: 10.1016/j.myc.2016.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yang YL, et al. Comparison of human and soil Candida tropicalis isolates with reduced susceptibility to fluconazole. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e34609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lo HJ, et al. Fruits as the vehicle of drug resistant pathogenic yeasts. J. Infect. 2017;75:254–262. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fan X, et al. Novel polymorphic multilocus microsatellite markers to distinguish Candida tropicalis isolates. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0166156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhou ZL, et al. Genetic relatedness among azole-resistant Candida tropicalis clinical strains in Taiwan from 2014 to 2018. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2022;59:106592. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2022.106592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Carolus H, et al. Genome-wide analysis of experimentally evolved Candida auris reveals multiple novel mechanisms of multidrug resistance. mBio. 2021;12:e03333-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.03333-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Munoz JF, et al. Genomic insights into multidrug-resistance, mating and virulence in Candida auris and related emerging species. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:5346. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07779-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhang H, et al. Gene copy-number variation in haploid and diploid strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2013;193:785–801. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.146522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bleykasten-Grosshans C, Neuveglise C. Transposable elements in yeasts. C. R. Biol. 2011;334:679–686. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2011.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Todd RT, Wikoff TD, Forche A, Selmecki A. Genome plasticity in Candida albicans is driven by long repeat sequences. Elife. 2019;8:e45954. doi: 10.7554/eLife.45954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sultana T, Zamborlini A, Cristofari G, Lesage P. Integration site selection by retroviruses and transposable elements in eukaryotes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2017;18:292–308. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:589–595. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Li H, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.McKenna A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–1303. doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Van der Auwera, G. A. & O’Connor, B. D. Genomics in the Cloud: Using Docker, GATK, and WDL in Terra 1st edn (O’Reilly Media, 2020).
- 51.Tavanti A, et al. Multilocus sequence typing for differentiation of strains of Candida tropicalis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005;43:5593–5600. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5593-5600.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wang Q, et al. Multilocus sequence typing reveals clonality of fluconazole-nonsusceptible Candida tropicalis: a study from Wuhan to the global. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:554249. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.554249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015;32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. Terrace aware data structure for phylogenomic inference from supermatrices. Syst. Biol. 2016;65:997–1008. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast Bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018;35:518–522. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Jain C, Rodriguez, R L, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Alexander DH, Novembre J, Lange K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 2009;19:1655–1664. doi: 10.1101/gr.094052.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Miller JM, Cullingham CI, Peery RM. The influence of a priori grouping on inference of genetic clusters: simulation study and literature review of the DAPC method. Heredity. 2020;125:269–280. doi: 10.1038/s41437-020-0348-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011;88:76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chang CC, et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 2015;4:7. doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gallone B, et al. Domestication and divergence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae beer yeasts. Cell. 2016;166:1397–1410. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Peng Y, Leung HC, Yiu SM, Chin FY. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1420–1428. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Koren S, et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017;27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, Simao FA, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021;38:4647–4654. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Stanke M, Diekhans M, Baertsch R, Haussler D. Using native and syntenically mapped cDNA alignments to improve de novo gene finding. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:637–644. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Cingolani P, et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly. 2012;6:80–92. doi: 10.4161/fly.19695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Boratyn GM, et al. BLAST: a more efficient report with usability improvements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:W29–W33. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Cantalapiedra CP, Hernandez-Plaza A, Letunic I, Bork P, Huerta-Cepas J. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021;38:5825–5829. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.CLSI. M60: Performance Standards for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, 2nd Edition (CLSI, 2020).
- 70.CLSI. M59: Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing, 3rd Edition (CLSI, 2020).
- 71.Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat. Protoc. 2008;3:1101–1108. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
New short-read and long-read sequencing results of C. tropicalis isolates generated in this study have been deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under BioProject ID PRJNA946688. Additional previously published WGS and MLST data used in this study (Supplementary Data 1 and 2) were sourced from the NCBI SRA database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) and the PubMLST database (http://www.pubmlst.net), respectively.
Custom scripts used in this study have been released at https://chifnet.microonline.cn/NGS_ctr.