Abstract
CDK12 is a transcriptional cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) that interacts with cyclin K to regulate different aspects of gene expression. The CDK12-cyclin K complex phosphorylates several substrates, including RNA polymerase II (Pol II), and thereby regulates transcription elongation, RNA splicing, as well as cleavage and polyadenylation. Because of its implication in cancer, including breast cancer and melanoma, multiple pharmacological inhibitors of CDK12 have been identified to date, including THZ531 and SR-4835. While both CDK12 inhibitors affect Poll II phosphorylation, we found that SR-4835 uniquely promotes cyclin K degradation via the proteasome. Using loss-of-function genetic screening, we found that SR-4835 cytotoxicity depends on a functional CUL4-RBX1-DDB1 ubiquitin ligase complex. Consistent with this, we show that DDB1 is required for cyclin K degradation, and that SR-4835 promotes DDB1 interaction with the CDK12-cyclin K complex. Docking studies and structure-activity relationship analyses of SR-4835 revealed the importance of the benzimidazole side-chain in molecular glue activity. Together, our results indicate that SR-4835 acts as a molecular glue that recruits the CDK12-cyclin K complex to the CUL4-RBX1-DDB1 ubiquitin ligase complex to target cyclin K for degradation.
Subject terms: Target identification, Drug development
Introduction
CDK12 (CRK7, CrkRS), along with its paralog CDK13 (CDC2L5, CHED), are amongst several cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) that regulate transcription [1]. Specifically, CDK12 interacts with cyclin K to phosphorylate RNA polymerase II (Pol II) within its C-terminal domain (CTD), which serves as a platform for controlling transcriptional and post-transcriptional events [2, 3]. Pol II phosphorylation by CDK12 regulates transcription elongation, splicing, as well as cleavage and polyadenylation [4, 5]. As CDK12 promotes elongation, it reduces the likelihood of cleavage at internal polyadenylation sites and increases the probability of cleavage at 3’ polyadenylation sites [6, 7]. Several DNA damage response (DDR) genes have multiple intronic polyadenylation sites and were thus shown to be particularly sensitive to CDK12 inhibition [6]. For this reason, CDK12 is thought to play important roles in genomic stability [2, 8], which underscores its potential as a therapeutic target.
Increasing evidence demonstrate the involvement of CDK12 in cancer [9–11]. In HER2-positive breast cancer, CDK12 was shown to be co-amplified with the HER2 oncogene, and to promote migration and invasion of HER2-positive breast tumor cells [12]. CDK12 plays an important role in the growth of cancers driven by dysregulated transcription factors, such as MYC (neuroblastoma) [13] and the EWS–FLI1 fusion (Ewing sarcoma) [14], or in melanoma driven by activating mutations in BRAF [15]. In other cancers, including ovarian [16], prostate [17], and breast [18], loss of CDK12 leads to the downregulation of DDR genes, which increases genomic instability and sensitivity to chemotherapy. CDK12 can thus be used as a biomarker, but also as a potential therapeutic target.
Several CDK12 inhibitors have been shown to have potential for cancer therapy. THZ1 is an irreversible covalent inhibitor of CDK7 that has therapeutic effects in several types of cancer [19]. At high concentrations, THZ1 can also inhibit CDK12, which was exploited in the design of THZ531 [20]. THZ531 inhibits both CDK12 and CDK13, and studies have shown that THZ531 reduces Pol II phosphorylation and the proliferation of many types of cancer cells [14, 15, 20, 21]. SR-4835 is another highly selective CDK12/13 inhibitor that act as an ATP antagonist [18]. SR-4835 was shown to reduce Pol II phosphorylation and to induce rapid tumor regression in multiple mouse models [18]. Recently, three groups identified molecules that bind to the CDK12-cyclin K complex and act as molecular glues to stabilize an interaction with the CUL4-RBX1-DDB1 ubiquitin ligase complex [22–24]. These compounds were shown to promote cyclin K ubiquitination without the need for a DCAF (DDB1- and CUL4-associated factor) substrate receptor, and to promote its degradation by the proteasome. These discoveries suggested that other CDK12/13 inhibitors may have undiscovered degrader activity [25].
Herein, we found that SR-4835 is another molecular glue type that induces cyclin K degradation. Our results show that the CUL4-RBX-DDB1 ubiquitin ligase complex is required for this effect, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis suggests the importance of the benzimidazole side chain in molecular glue activity.
Results
Characterization of SR-4835 in BRAF-mutated melanoma cells
BRAF-mutated melanoma cells were recently shown to display high CDK12 activity [15]. To assess the role of CDK12 in melanoma cells, we treated five BRAF-mutated melanoma cell lines (Colo829, A375, WM164, WM983A, WM983B) with increasing concentrations of SR-4835, a recently described ATP-competitive inhibitor of CDK12 and CDK13 [18]. We found that SR-4835 inhibited the proliferation of all cell lines with IC50 values ranging from 80.7 to 160.5 nM (Fig. 1A). To assess CDK12 activity, we determined the impact of SR-4835 on the phosphorylation of RPB1 (Fig. 1B), a Pol II subunit and specific substrate of CDK12 [26]. We found that SR-4835 treatment (6 h) strongly decreased RPB1 phosphorylation at Ser2, but not at Ser5, which is indicative of reduced CDK12/13 activity [27]. As CDK12 inhibition was previously shown to decrease the expression of many DDR genes [2], we quantified the abundance of BRCA1, RAD51, ATM, XRCC2, FANCI and FANCD2 in response to two different doses of SR-4835 (30 and 100 nM). As expected, SR-4835 treatment (6 h) decreased the expression of all DDR genes tested (Fig. 1C), which was also seen at the protein level for BRCA1, ATM and RAD51 when treatment was extended for 24 hours (Fig. 1D). As expected from previous findings, these data correlated with the accumulation of DNA damage in response to SR-4835 treatment, which was shown using γH2AX phosphorylation (Fig. 1D). Together, these results indicate that SR-4835 efficiently inhibits CDK12/13 activity in BRAF-mutated melanoma, which results in increased DNA damage and reduced cell proliferation.
To characterize the mechanism of action of SR-4835, we performed a knockout CRISPR/Cas9 screen in A375 cells infected with a genome-wide lentiviral gRNA library (Fig. 1E). For this, 18 053 genes were targeted using 70 948 gRNAs (4 guides/gene) in cells subjected to vehicle (DMSO) or SR-4835 treatment (50 nM). Cells were allowed to grow for seven (D7) and fourteen (D14) days before analyzing gRNA abundance respective to control cells (D0). Essentiality scores were calculated using DrugZ [28], which revealed 19 synthetic lethal genes (blue) and 19 rescue genes (red) (Fig. 1F; Dataset 1). We found significant enrichments in specific GO terms, including “RNA Pol II transcription regulator complex” (Log(p value) = −3.64) amongst synthetic lethal genes, and “Cul4B-RING E3 ubiquitin ligase complex” (Log(p value) = −8.68) amongst rescue genes. Specifically, rescue genes appeared to comprise genes coding for five members of a CRL4B complex (DDB1, CUL4B, RBX1, DDA1), and two genes coding for E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (UBE2G1 and UBE2M) (Fig. 1F). These data were confirmed by analyzing the impact of each individual gRNAs (Fig. 1G). We also identified a number of synthetic lethal genes, including several components of the Mediator complex (MED16, MED23) and other Pol II regulators (HEXM1, PHF3). Taken together, these results suggest that SR-4835 requires a functional CUL4-RBX1-DDB1 ubiquitin ligase complex to inhibit the proliferation of BRAF-mutated melanoma cells (Fig. 1H).
SR-4835 promotes the proteasomal degradation of cyclin K
The CUL4-RBX1-DDB1 ubiquitin ligase complex was previously shown to promote cyclin K degradation in response to CDK12 inhibitors, including CR8, HQ461 and dCeMM2/3/4 [22–24]. To determine if SR-4835 promotes cyclin K degradation via similar mechanisms, A375 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of SR-4835 (2 h) and assessed for cyclin K levels. Compared to THZ531, which is a covalent CDK12/13 inhibitor that does not promote cyclin K degradation [22–24], we found that SR-4835 reduced cyclin K levels in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2A). This effect was not specific to a particular cell line, as we found that SR-4835 treatment (2 h) of three additional BRAF-mutated (V600E) melanoma cell lines (WM164, WM983B and COLO829) also resulted in reduced cyclin K levels (Fig. 2B). To determine if SR-4835 affects cyclin K stability, A375 cells were treated with DMSO or SR-4835 (1 µM) over a time-course of cycloheximide (100 µg/mL) treatments (0 to 120 min) to block de novo protein synthesis (Fig. 2C). In DMSO-treated A375 cells, we found that cyclin K is a relatively stable protein with an apparent half-life that exceeds 120 min (Fig. 2C, D). However, cyclin K protein levels were found to rapidly decrease in the presence of SR-4835, resulting in an apparent half-life of 47.8 min (Fig. 2C, D). This effect appeared to occur at the protein level, as SR-4835 treatment (1 µM) did not affect CCNK mRNA levels (Fig. 2E).
To determine if cyclin K depletion requires the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), A375 cells were treated with inhibitors of the E1 ubiquitin-activating enzyme (MLN7243), the NEDD8-activating enzyme (MLN4924) and the proteasome (MG132), prior to CDK12 inhibition. While SR-4835 treatment alone reduced cyclin K levels, we found that addition of all three inhibitors prevented this effect, suggesting that SR-4835 promotes cyclin K degradation via the UPS (Fig. 2F). Conversely, none of the inhibitors affected cyclin K protein levels in the presence of THZ531, indicating that this effect was specific to SR-4835. Pre-treatment of A375 cells with MG132 resulted in the accumulation of slower migrating forms of cyclin K in response to SR-4835 treatment, suggesting the accumulation of ubiquitinated species of cyclin K (Fig. 2G). Conversely, SR-4835 treatment did not affect the protein levels of other cyclins (B1 and G1), indicating that the effect of SR-4835 is specific to cyclin K (Fig. 2H). MLN4924 efficiently blocks the neddylation of all cullins, leading to the accumulation of their substrates, such as cyclin K. To determine if MLN4924 treatment could reduce SR-4835 cytotoxicity, A375 cells were treated with DMSO or MLN4924 (0.5 µM) and increasing concentrations of SR-4835 or THZ531 for 72 h. Consistent with its effect on cyclin K, we found that MLN4924 prevented SR-4835 cytotoxicity by 3.7-fold (Fig. 2I). This effect was not seen with THZ531 (Fig. 2J), which does not promote cyclin K depletion (Fig. 2A). Together, these results suggest that cullin neddylation and cyclin K degradation substantially contribute to SR-4835 cytotoxicity.
Active-site engagement of SR-4835 promotes CDK12 binding to DDB1
Based on the identification of DDB1 as a knockout gene that rescues from SR-4835 cytotoxicity (Fig. 1F), we assessed whether cyclin K degradation requires the CUL4 adaptor protein DDB1. To verify this, we depleted DDB1 from A375 cells using two lentiviral vectors expressing different short hairpin RNA (shRNA) (Fig. 3A). We found that shRNA-mediated DDB1 knockdown conferred resistance to cyclin K degradation by SR-4835 (Fig. 3A), suggesting the implication of a CUL4-RBX1-DDB1 ubiquitin ligase complex. Several small molecules that promote cyclin K degradation were reported to act as molecular glues between CDK12 and DDB1 [22–24]. To determine if SR-4835 also promotes the interaction between CDK12 and DDB1, we performed co-immunoprecipitation experiments in HEK293 cells transfected with Myc-CDK12, Flag-DDB1 and HA-cyclin K. In the absence of inhibitors, we found a basal interaction between CDK12 and DDB1 (Fig. 3B), suggesting that CDK12 and DDB1 may naturally interact in cells. This interaction increased in response to SR-4835 treatment in a time-dependent manner, which correlated with cyclin K degradation (Fig. 3B). The interaction between CDK12 and DDB1 was not increased by THZ531 treatment, consistent with the fact that this inhibitor does not promote cyclin K degradation (Fig. 2A). As SR-4835 and THZ531 are both ATP-competitive CDK12 inhibitors, we determined whether covalent binding of THZ531 to the active site of CDK12 may prevent SR-4835 from promoting cyclin K degradation. For this, A375 cells were pretreated with DMSO or different concentrations of THZ531 (2 h) and exposed to SR-4835 (1 µM) for 2 h to promote cyclin K degradation. We found that THZ531 treatment efficiently prevented cyclin K degradation induced by SR-4835 (Fig. 3C), suggesting that saturating the ATP-binding pocket of CDK12 prevents SR-4835 binding and thereby rescues cyclin K destabilization. Molecular modeling studies using the X-ray structure of CDK12 in association with DDB1 and cyclin K predicts the binding mode of SR-4835 to be ATP-competitive (Fig. 3D) and pointed towards DDB1 (Fig. 3E), as was similarly shown for CR-8 [22]. Together, these data suggests that CDK12 active-site engagement is required for the cyclin K destabilizing effect of SR-4835.
The benzimidazole side-chain of SR-4835 is important for cyclin K degradation and cytotoxicity
To characterize the molecular glue activity of SR-4835, we conducted a SAR study. Based on its resemblance to CR8 (Fig. 4A), which binds to the active site of CDK12 and uses a surface-exposed phenylpyridine ring to interact with DDB1 [22], we targeted the similarly positioned dichlorobenzimidazole of SR-4835. As described elsewhere [29, 30], we generated structural analogs that probed the contribution of the benzimidazole side-chain, which included the corresponding 5,6-difluorobenzathiazole (CU-0904), 4,5-difluorobenzathiazole (CU-0905), and 5-methoxy,6-fluorobenzathiazole (CU-0906) (Fig. 4A). To evaluate their activity, we first measured cyclin K abundance in A375 cells treated with increasing concentrations of each compound (2 h). While we found that all analogues could promote cyclin K degradation to different extents (EC50 values between 197 and 333 nM), their activity remained lower than that of SR-4835 (EC50 of 112 nM) (Fig. 4B).
We also tested the analogues for their ability to inhibit CDK12 and thereby reduce RPB1 phosphorylation at Ser2. We found that all analogues reduced RPB1 phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner, but that SR-4835 appeared to be more potent (Fig. 4C). We also found that all drugs could inhibit DDR gene expression (ATM, RAD51 and BRCA1), as evaluated by qPCR (Fig. 4D) and by immunoblotting for protein levels (Fig. 4E). In both cases, SR-4835 appeared more potent, which also correlated with the accumulation of DNA damage, as shown using γH2AX phosphorylation (Fig. 4E). Finally, we determined the impact of the different analogues on A375 cytotoxicity. We found that CU-0904, CU-0905 and CU-0906 reduced cell proliferation with similar IC50, consisting of 288 ± 21.4 nM, 160 ± 10.2 nM and 240 ± 17.3 nM, respectively (Fig. 5F). Here again, SR-4835 was more potent than its analogues to inhibit cell proliferation, with an IC50 of 69 nM. These experiments characterized the molecular glue activity of SR-4835 analogs, and confirmed the role played by the benzimidazole side-chain for cyclin K degradation.
Discussion
CDK12 is an exploitable vulnerability in multiple types of cancer [9, 10, 25], including melanoma [15], making it an attractive therapeutic target. To characterize the mechanism of action of SR-4835, a recently described CDK12 inhibitor [18], we performed a genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 loss-of-function screen in A375 melanoma cells. We found that major components of the CRL4B E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, including DDB1, CUL4B, RBX1, and DDA1, along with E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme subunits, rescued cells from SR-4835 cytotoxicity (Fig. 1). Furthermore, we found that SR-4835 shortens the half-life of cyclin K through the UPS (Fig. 2), leading us to hypothesize that SR-4835 directs the CRL4B complex to the CDK12-cyclin K heterodimer. This function, known as molecular glue degrader, has been observed in other CDK12 inhibitors such as dCEMM2-4, HQ461, CR8, and NCT02 [22–24, 31]. Here, we demonstrate that SR-4835-induced cyclin K degradation depends on the adaptor protein DDB1 and occurs through increased DDB1-CDK12 physical interaction (Fig. 3). SAR analysis of SR-4835 revealed the importance of the benzimidazole side-chain in molecular glue activity and resulted in SR-4835 derivates with varying potency (Fig. 4). Together, our results show that SR-4835 functions as a molecular glue between the CDK12-cyclin K heterodimer and the CUL4B complex. Structural analysis will be required to better define the roles of each of CRL4B complex components in cyclin K degradation induced by SR-4835.
Canonical molecular glue degraders typically require DCAFs to promote DDB1 association with its targeted substrate [32]. Previous studies have also shown that cyclin K degraders can non-canonically bypass the requirement for DCAF by directly interacting with DDB1 [22, 23]. Interestingly, our CRISPR/Cas9 screen identified several DCAFs that either rescued or sensitized cells to SR-4835 cytotoxicity, including WDR82 and WDR12, or DCAF8, DCAF16, DCAF4L1 and TLE1, respectively (Dataset 1). These results suggest that some DCAFs can either compete or favor SR-4835 cytotoxicity, presumably by modulating the free pool of DDB1 in cells. However, it remains an open question whether these DCAFs can affect SR-4835-mediated cyclin K degradation.
Once bound to the ATP-binding pocket of CDK12, molecular glues such as CR8 expose critical domains that interact with specific residues within the β-propeller domain C (BPC) of DDB1 [22]. The structure of surface-exposed moieties determines the stability of the DDB1-CDK12 complex and ultimately affects the degrader activity of molecular glues. For CR8, a cyclin K molecular glue closely related to SR-4835, the surface-exposed hydrophobic phenylpyridine system, which is made up of 2-pyridyl moieties, was shown to mediate its optimal efficacy [22]. Roscovitine, the parent compound of CR8 that lacks one of the two pyridyl groups, promoted weaker complex formation between CDK12 and DDB1 and failed in inducing cyclin K degradation. These observations strongly support the contribution of this CR8-related sidechain for optimal CRL4-dependent molecular glue activity. Given its resemblance to CR8, we tested the importance of the related dichlorobenzimidazole sidechain in SR-4835. Indeed, docking studies indicated that SR-4835 is similarly positioned in the active site of CDK12, with its dichlorobenzimidazole sidechain pointing towards DDB1 (Fig. 3E). We generated three structural analogs with varying chemical groups attached to its benzimidazole sidechain, as previously reported [29, 30]. We found that all these analogs exerted CDK12 inhibitory activity and promoted cyclin K degradation to different capacities, but to a lesser extent than SR-4835. These results confirmed the importance of the benzimidazole moiety and justify the relevance of additional studies to further optimize the potency of SR-4835 and related molecules as molecular glue degraders.
Materials and methods
CRISPR/Cas9-based screening
1.6 × 108 A375 cells were transduced into thirty-two 150 mm plates with lentivirus carrying The Toronto Knockout Library v3 (TKOv3, Addgene # 90294) in standard culture media + 8 µg/mL polybrene. Lentiviral transduction was performed at a multiplicity of infection of ~ 0.3 to ensure that most cells would contain a single lentiviral insertion following selection. Twenty-four hours post-transduction, viral media was removed, and cells were subjected to 2 µg/mL puromycin selection for 2 days. After selection, transduced cells were trypsinized and D0 samples of 20 million cells were collected for genomic DNA extraction. The remaining cells were split into 4 replicates of 20 million cells. Two replicates were treated with 50 nM SR-4835 and the remaining two treated with an equivalent volume of vehicle (DMSO). Cells were cultured for 14 days in total with regular media changes and passaging, with a minimum of 20 million cells per replicate at all times to maintain a library coverage of greater than 200-fold. Cell pellets were collected for genomic DNA extraction at day 7 (D7) and day 14 (D14).
Genomic DNA was extracted from D0, D7 and D14 cell pellets using the QIAamp DNA Blood Maxi Kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. 50 μg of gDNA from each sample was amplified in 20 individual PCR reactions using Kapa HiFi Master Mix (Kapa Biosystems) using TKOv3 library primers (forward: 5’-GAGGGCCTATTTCCCATGATTC-3’, reverse: 5’- GTTGCGAAAAAGAACGTTCACGG-3’) for 19 amplification cycles. Replicate PCR reactions for individual samples were pooled and 5 μL was used as a template for a second PCR reaction to attach Illumina sequencing adaptors and barcodes for each sample. Barcoded PCR products were gel purified and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq500 instrument.
DNA sequencing reads were mapped to TKOv3 library gRNA sequences using MAGeCK version 0.5.8 [33]. Read count data was then analyzed using the DrugZ python package to identify synergistic and suppressor gene-drug interactions [28].
Cell culture
HEK293, A375, WM164 cell lines were purchased from ATCC. WM983A and WM983B cell lines were purchased from Rockland (Philadelphia, PA). All cell lines were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (GIBCO) with 4.5 g/liter glucose supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 IU/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin, under 37 °C/5%CO2 conditions. Colo829 cells were purchased from ATCC and maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute Medium (RPMI) with 10% FBS, 100 IU/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin, under 37 °C/5%CO2 conditions. Cells were regularly tested by PCR to exclude mycoplasma contamination.
DNA constructs and chemicals
The original plasmid encoding human CDK12 (pLP-3xFLAG-CDK12) and HA-CCNK were obtained from Gregg B. Morin (University of British Columbia). CDK12 DNA construct was used as PCR template for generating 6Myc-tagged CDK12 in pcDNA3. pcDNA3-FLAG-DDB1 was obtained from Addgene (#19918). SR-4835 was purchased from MedChemExpress and CU-0904, CU-0905, CU-0906 were purchased from Omegachem. All compounds used in this study are >95% pure by HPLC analysis (See Supporting Information; Figs. S1-13).
Immunoprecipitations and immunoblotting
Cell lysates were prepared as previously described [34]. Briefly, cells were washed three times with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed in RIPA or BLB buffer (10 mM K3PO4, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM β-glycerophosphate, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% Brij 35, 0.1% deoxycholic acid), complemented with 1 mM sodium orthovanadate [Na3VO4], 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and a cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (Roche). Lysates were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, supernatants were collected and heated for 10 min at 95 °C in 4 x Laemmli buffer (5 × buffer is 60 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 25% glycerol, 2% SDS, 14.4 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and 0.1% bromophenol blue). Alternatively, for immunoprecipitations, cells were lysed in BLB buffer and supernatants were incubated with the indicated antibodies for 2 h, followed by 1 h of incubation with protein A–Sepharose CL-4B beads (GE Healthcare). Immunoprecipitates were washed three times in lysis buffer, and beads were eluted and heated in 2x Laemmli buffer. Eluates and total cell lysates were subjected to 7.5 to 12% SDS-PAGE, and resolved proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes for immunoblotting. The data presented are representative of at least three independent experiments. Antibodies targeted against CDK12 (#A301-679A), cyclin K (#A301-939A) and DDB1 (#A300-462A) are from Bethyl Laboratories. Antibodies against, RPB1 (4H8; #2629), p-RPB1 (S2) (E1Z3G; #13499), p-RPB1 (S5) (D9N5I; #13523), p-H2AX (S139) (20E3; #9718), BRCA1 (#9010), cyclin B1 (#4138), cyclin D1 (#2922), ATM (D2E2; #2873) and Rad51 (D4B10; #8875) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technologies. Antibodies against Tubulin (#T5618), Myc (9E10; #MABE282), Flag (2EL-1B11; #MAB3118) are from Millipore Sigma and HA (12CA5; #MA1-12429) from ThermoFisher. All secondary horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated antibodies used for immunoblotting were purchased from Chemicon.
Survival assays
Cells were grown in medium supplemented with 10% FBS and relative number of viable cells was measured using WST-1 reagent from Millipore Sigma. WST-1 was added 2 h prior to absorbance measurement at 450 nm using a Tecan Infinite M200 PRO microplate reader. Cells were plated and after adhesion were treated with SR-4835, CU-0904, CU-0905, CU-0906 (0.01 to 10 µM) or THZ531 (0.005 to 5 µM) in addition or not to MLN4924 at 75 nM. Cells were grown for 72 h before addition of WST1. The results displayed represent the mean of n = 3, 4 or 6 ± standard deviation (SD).
Viral infections and transfection
For shRNA-mediated knockdown of DDB1, lentiviruses were produced using vectors from the Mission TRC shRNA library (Sigma-Aldrich) targeting DDB1 (#1 TRCN0000082855, #2 TRCN0000082857). One day after infection, A375 cells were selected with 2 μg/ml puromycin. HEK293 and HEK293T cells were transfected by calcium phosphate precipitation. Briefly, plasmid and CaCl2 2 M were diluted v/v in 2x HBS (274 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM Na2HPO4, 55 mM HEPES, pH 7) before adding slowly to cells.
RNA extraction and real-time quantitative-PCR (qPCR)
Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy mini Kit (Qiagen) and reverse-transcribed using the cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems), as described by the manufacturer. For each qPCR assay, a standard curve was performed to ensure the efficacy of the assay (between 90 and 110%). The Viia7 qPCR instrument (Life Technologies) was used to detect amplification level and was programmed with an initial step of 20 s at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 1 s at 95 °C and 20 s at 60 °C. Relative expression (RQ = 2 − ΔΔCT) was calculated using the Expression Suite software (Life Technologies), and normalization was done using both ACTB and GAPDH. qPCR experiments were blinded to the platform technicians and the investigators.
Docking studies
Docking was performed using Autodock Vina, version 4.2 [35]. The crystal structure of CDK12 (PDB ID: 6TD3) and the ligand SR-4835 were prepared using standard procedures and AutoDockTools 1.5.7. The grid box was defined to encompass the active site of CDK12 (center_x: −61.361, center_y: 21.611, center_z: −11.917, size_x: 52, size_y: 46, size_z: 56) and the scoring function was set to use default parameters.
Quantification and statistical analysis
For all relevant panels unless specified, center values and error bars represent means ± SD and p-values were determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests used for comparisons between two groups with at least n = 3. P values signification: ns, not significant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001. All experiments were performed a minimum of three times. Sample size and statistical tests for each experiment are detailed in the results, figures, and figure legends. The replicates were decided based on the data variability and type of experiments and instruments used. All experiments were repeated independently (at least n = 3) using different cell lines, different techniques or different investigators. No significant difference in variance was detected for groups that were statistically compared.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank all members of the laboratory for their insightful discussions and comments. We thank Dr. Gregg B. Morin (University of British Columbia) for providing DNA constructs. We are grateful for the expertise of personnel at the IRIC Genomics core facility. This work was supported by grants from the Cancer Research Society, the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, and from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (to P.P.R.).
Author contributions
TH, JB and PPR provided study concept and design; TH, JB, GL and GM planned and carried out experiments, provided acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, and statistical analysis. TH, JB and GL performed methodology development; SL provided technical support with CRISPR/Cas9 screening. TH, JB and PPR were involved in wrote the manuscript, and all authors provided review and revision of the paper; SA and PR supervised the project and helped acquire funding. All authors read and approved the final paper.
Data availability
All data are available in the main text or the Dataset.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Thibault Houles, Jonathan Boucher.
Contributor Information
Thibault Houles, Email: thibault.houles@igmm.cnrs.fr.
Philippe P. Roux, Email: philippe.roux@umontreal.ca
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41420-023-01754-x.
References
- 1.Malumbres M. Cyclin-dependent kinases. Genome Biol. 2014;15:122. doi: 10.1186/gb4184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Blazek D, Kohoutek J, Bartholomeeusen K, Johansen E, Hulinkova P, Luo Z, et al. The Cyclin K/Cdk12 complex maintains genomic stability via regulation of expression of DNA damage response genes. Genes Dev. 2011;25:2158–72. doi: 10.1101/gad.16962311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cheng SW, Kuzyk MA, Moradian A, Ichu TA, Chang VC, Tien JF, et al. Interaction of cyclin-dependent kinase 12/CrkRS with cyclin K1 is required for the phosphorylation of the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32:4691–704. doi: 10.1128/MCB.06267-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hsin JP, Manley JL. The RNA polymerase II CTD coordinates transcription and RNA processing. Genes Dev. 2012;26:2119–37. doi: 10.1101/gad.200303.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Davidson L, Muniz L, West S. 3’ end formation of pre-mRNA and phosphorylation of Ser2 on the RNA polymerase II CTD are reciprocally coupled in human cells. Genes Dev. 2014;28:342–56. doi: 10.1101/gad.231274.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dubbury SJ, Boutz PL, Sharp PA. CDK12 regulates DNA repair genes by suppressing intronic polyadenylation. Nature. 2018;564:141–5. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0758-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Krajewska M, Dries R, Grassetti AV, Dust S, Gao Y, Huang H, et al. CDK12 loss in cancer cells affects DNA damage response genes through premature cleavage and polyadenylation. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1757. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09703-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Juan HC, Lin Y, Chen HR, Fann MJ. Cdk12 is essential for embryonic development and the maintenance of genomic stability. Cell Death Diff. 2016;23:1038–48. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2015.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lui GYL, Grandori C, Kemp CJ. CDK12: an emerging therapeutic target for cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2018;71:957–62. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liang S, Hu L, Wu Z, Chen Z, Liu S, Xu X, et al. CDK12: A Potent Target and Biomarker for Human Cancer Therapy. Cells. 2020;9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Choi SH, Kim S, Jones KA. Gene expression regulation by CDK12: a versatile kinase in cancer with functions beyond CTD phosphorylation. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52:762–71. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0442-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tien JF, Mazloomian A, Cheng SG, Hughes CS, Chow CCT, Canapi LT, et al. CDK12 regulates alternative last exon mRNA splicing and promotes breast cancer cell invasion. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:6698–716. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Delehouze C, Godl K, Loaec N, Bruyere C, Desban N, Oumata N, et al. CDK/CK1 inhibitors roscovitine and CR8 downregulate amplified MYCN in neuroblastoma cells. Oncogene. 2014;33:5675–87. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Iniguez AB, Stolte B, Wang EJ, Conway AS, Alexe G, Dharia NV, et al. EWS/FLI Confers Tumor Cell Synthetic Lethality to CDK12 Inhibition in Ewing Sarcoma. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:202–16.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Houles T, Lavoie G, Nourreddine S, Cheung W, Vaillancourt-Jean E, Guerin CM, et al. CDK12 is hyperactivated and a synthetic-lethal target in BRAF-mutated melanoma. Nat Commun. 2022;13:6457. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34179-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ekumi KM, Paculova H, Lenasi T, Pospichalova V, Bosken CA, Rybarikova J, et al. Ovarian carcinoma CDK12 mutations misregulate expression of DNA repair genes via deficient formation and function of the Cdk12/CycK complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:2575–89. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wu YM, Cieslik M, Lonigro RJ, Vats P, Reimers MA, Cao X, et al. Inactivation of CDK12 Delineates a Distinct Immunogenic Class of Advanced Prostate Cancer. Cell. 2018;173:1770–82.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.04.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Quereda V, Bayle S, Vena F, Frydman SM, Monastyrskyi A, Roush WR, et al. Therapeutic Targeting of CDK12/CDK13 in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Cell. 2019;36:545–58.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kwiatkowski N, Zhang T, Rahl PB, Abraham BJ, Reddy J, Ficarro SB, et al. Targeting transcription regulation in cancer with a covalent CDK7 inhibitor. Nature. 2014;511:616–20. doi: 10.1038/nature13393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhang T, Kwiatkowski N, Olson CM, Dixon-Clarke SE, Abraham BJ, Greifenberg AK, et al. Covalent targeting of remote cysteine residues to develop CDK12 and CDK13 inhibitors. Nat Chem Biol. 2016;12:876–84. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang C, Wang H, Lieftink C, du Chatinier A, Gao D, Jin G, et al. CDK12 inhibition mediates DNA damage and is synergistic with sorafenib treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut. 2020;69:727–36. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Slabicki M, Kozicka Z, Petzold G, Li YD, Manojkumar M, Bunker RD, et al. The CDK inhibitor CR8 acts as a molecular glue degrader that depletes cyclin K. Nature. 2020;585:293–7. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2374-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lv L, Chen P, Cao L, Li Y, Zeng Z, Cui Y, et al. Discovery of a molecular glue promoting CDK12-DDB1 interaction to trigger cyclin K degradation. Elife. 2020;9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Mayor-Ruiz C, Bauer S, Brand M, Kozicka Z, Siklos M, Imrichova H, et al. Rational discovery of molecular glue degraders via scalable chemical profiling. Nat Chem Biol. 2020;16:1199–207. doi: 10.1038/s41589-020-0594-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tadesse S, Duckett DR, Monastyrskyi A. The promise and current status of CDK12/13 inhibition for the treatment of cancer. Future Med Chem. 2021;13:117–41. doi: 10.4155/fmc-2020-0240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bosken CA, Farnung L, Hintermair C, Merzel Schachter M, Vogel-Bachmayr K, Blazek D, et al. The structure and substrate specificity of human Cdk12/Cyclin K. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3505. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fan Z, Devlin JR, Hogg SJ, Doyle MA, Harrison PF, Todorovski I, et al. CDK13 cooperates with CDK12 to control global RNA polymerase II processivity. Sci Adv. 2020;6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Colic M, Wang G, Zimmermann M, Mascall K, McLaughlin M, Bertolet L, et al. Identifying chemogenetic interactions from CRISPR screens with drugZ. Genom Med 2019;52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 29.Monastyrskyi A, Nilchan N, Quereda V, Noguchi Y, Ruiz C, Grant W, et al. Development of dual casein kinase 1delta/1epsilon (CK1delta/epsilon) inhibitors for treatment of breast cancer. Bioorg Med Chem. 2018;26:590–602. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.12.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Roush WR, Duckett DR, Monastyrskyi A, inventorsSmall molecule inhibitors of cdk12/cdk13 US patent US20210186979A1. 2019 June 24, 2021.
- 31.Dieter SM, Siegl C, Codo PL, Huerta M, Ostermann-Parucha AL, Schulz E, et al. Degradation of CCNK/CDK12 is a druggable vulnerability of colorectal cancer. Cell Rep. 2021;36:109394. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sasso JM, Tenchov R, Wang D, Johnson LS, Wang X, Zhou QA. Molecular Glues: The Adhesive Connecting Targeted Protein Degradation to the Clinic. Biochemistry. 2023;62:601–23. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Li W, Koster J, Xu H, Chen CH, Xiao T, Liu JS, et al. Quality control, modeling, and visualization of CRISPR screens with MAGeCK-VISPR. Genome Biol. 2015;16:281. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0843-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Houles T, Gravel SP, Lavoie G, Shin S, Savall M, Meant A, et al. RSK Regulates PFK-2 Activity to Promote Metabolic Rewiring in Melanoma. Cancer Res. 2018;78:2191–204. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-2215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31:455–61. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are available in the main text or the Dataset.