Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2023 Dec 8;26(4):505. doi: 10.1007/s11019-023-10183-7

Correction: Editors’ statement on the responsible use of generative AI technologies in scholarly journal publishing

Gregory E Kaebnick 1,, David Christopher Magnus 2, Audiey Kao 3, Mohammad Hosseini 4, David Resnik 5, Veljko Dubljević 6, Christy Rentmeester 3, Bert Gordijn 7, Mark J Cherry 8
PMCID: PMC10725841  PMID: 38063954

Correction: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

10.1007/s11019-023-10176-6

In the original publication of the article, under the section “Toward shared norms” the following sentence “However, to our knowledge, previous position statements have not addressed the responsibilities of reviewers to authors (Zielinski et al. 2023)” was published incorrectly.

The correct sentence should read as follows “Previous position statements have addressed concerns about the use of AI for peer review and the importance of reviewers revealing to authors if they used AI in their review (Zielinski et al. 2023). However, to our knowledge, none have addressed the importance of using human reviewers to review manuscripts and editors retaining final decisions over what reviewers to select.”.

Footnotes

The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1007/s11019-023-10176-6.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


Articles from Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES