Abstract
5G technology continues to evolve, and its potential to revolutionize various aspects of society is becoming increasingly evident. However, the successful adoption and utilization of 5G technology depends on various factors, particularly among consumers expected to be early adopters and critical drivers of technological advancements. This study investigates the effect of social influence, environmental awareness, and safety affordance on Chinese university students' actual use of 5G (AU5G) technologies. It also analyzed the mediating role of trustworthiness and intention to use 5G (ITU5G) between them and the moderating role of facilitation conditions between trustworthiness and ITU5G. Data was collected from university students (n = 364) in Beijing and was examined employing the structural equation modelling (SEM) approach. The outcomes confirm that trustworthiness and ITU5G significantly mediate the relationship between social influence, environmental awareness, and safety affordance on AU5G technologies among Chinese students. Further, the supportive facilitation conditions strengthen the relationship between trustworthiness and ITU5G. These findings are backed by UTAUT2 models that support the technology acceptance and adoption among the users. The study outcomes can help policymakers design strategies to address potential barriers and encourage greater uptake of 5G services among university students.
Subject terms: Environmental sciences, Environmental social sciences, Health care
Introduction
Considering the information technology background and introducing technological advancement through fifth-generation (5G) is expected to expand the mobile communication sector further1. The data usage for 5G was anticipated to increase between 1.7 to 2.7 times that of 4G in six central South Korea, Japan, Germany, USA, UK, and Australia2. 5G is anticipated to deliver new business improvements and opportunities due to its innovative features and technological standards. It reshaped how individuals communicate, access information, and interact with the world3. In recent years, the emergence of 5G wireless technology has garnered considerable attention due to its potential to revolutionize connectivity and enable a wide range of innovative applications4. Being at the forefront of technological advancements, China has made significant strides in deploying and adopting 5G technology. However, as with any technological transition, the intention to use 5G (ITU5G) among different user groups, particularly university students, is influenced by various factors5. China's rapid economic growth and extensive digital infrastructure have laid a solid foundation for adopting 5G technology.
The Chinese government has firmly committed to developing and implementing 5G technology nationwide. This commitment is reflected in China's aggressive deployment of 5G infrastructure, making it one of the largest and fastest-growing 5G markets globally6. The Chinese government has made substantial advancements in telecommunications and has several leading technology companies driving the development and deployment of 5G networks and devices7. Huawei, ZTE, and other Chinese companies have been instrumental in developing 5G technologies, contributing to their adoption in the country. Consumers in China have demonstrated an excellent desire for cutting-edge technology and mobile connectivity. Many people want quicker internet, better data services, and better user experiences. Telecommunications companies have been encouraged by this consumer demand to invest in 5G networks to fulfill their customers' rising expectations8.
Universities can play a crucial role in disseminating accurate information to raise awareness and understanding among students. 5G technology helps in creating ease for the student's learning. It provides quick access to reliable information sources. When students believe in the benefits, applications, and potential of 5G, they are more likely to adopt it. Peer influence, recommendations from friends, and social media significantly shape individuals' attitudes and attitudes toward technology adoption7. In China, where social connections and networks hold immense importance9, the opinions and experiences shared by peers can significantly impact an individual's decision to adopt 5G technology. Positive word-of-mouth, social endorsements, and influencers promoting the benefits of 5G can create a sense of social norm and encourage students to embrace technology10. Students' awareness of the environmental impact of technology can influence their decision to adopt 5G. If they perceive 5G technology as environmentally friendly or as having the potential to support sustainable practices, it may encourage them to embrace it11. Nowadays, safety is a critical concern when adopting any new technology. If students perceive 5G technology as safe, with robust security measures and safeguards in place, they are more likely to embrace it. Universities and technology providers should prioritize addressing safety concerns and providing evidence of the security measures implemented in 5G infrastructure12.
Trust plays a vital role in adopting 5G technology and has the potential for transformative applications and services. Students may be more inclined to adopt 5G technology if they trust the institutions, organizations, and companies involved in its deployment and operation13. 5G technology enables the Internet of Things (IoT), augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and other innovative applications that have the potential to reshape various sectors, including education, healthcare, entertainment, and transportation14. Accessing advanced educational tools, immersive learning experiences, and remote collaboration opportunities through 5G networks can be highly appealing for university students. The promise of new and exciting possibilities through 5G technology motivates students to adopt and explore its potential benefits15. The support and regulatory framework provided by the government can significantly influence the adoption of 5G technology. The Chinese government actively promotes and supports the deployment of 5G infrastructure, including providing incentives, favorable policies, and regulatory frameworks; it can create an environment conducive to adoption among university students5.
One key factor driving the adoption of 5G technology among university students is the increased demand for faster and more reliable connectivity16. With the proliferation of smart devices and data-intensive applications, university students rely heavily on Internet connectivity for online learning, research, social networking, and entertainment17. The enhanced network capabilities of 5G technology offer the potential to deliver significantly faster download and upload speeds, reduced latency, and increased network capacity. These benefits can substantially enhance the user experience and enable seamless access to resource-intensive applications, thereby meeting the growing demands of tech-savvy university students7.
Prior research has examined the factors influencing consumers' intentional and actual usage decisions to adopt technology18–20. Only a few studies examined the factors influencing consumers' intentions to adopt 5G technology7,21, while very few researchers also discuss the actual use of 5G (AU5G) and provide theoretical explanation relating to the goal and application of existing technology22,23. Although these ideas offer a perception of the technological factors that encourage technology adoption, they only provide a limited understanding that supports the usage of new 5G technology. Considering the risk associated with 5G technology, safety, trust, and environmental factors will influence future consumers' AU5G. This study examines customers' attitudes toward 5G technology to understand the factors influencing acceptability and usage. This study addresses the two research questions. First, do trustworthiness and ITU5G significantly mediate the relationship between social influence, environmental awareness, and safety affordance on Chinese university students' AU5G technologies? Second, do facilitation conditions significantly moderate the relationship between trustworthiness and ITU5G?
This comprehensive analysis significantly contributed to the literature on technology adoption and UTAUT2 models. First, it advances adoption research by providing a theoretical model to analyze factors impacting user acceptability of 5G technology products and services. Second, based on the methodology, this research aims to explore the factors such as social influence, environmental awareness, safety affordance, trustworthiness, and ITU5G that affect the adoption of 5G technology among university students in China. This will fill the gap suggested by5,24. Third, it uses the structural equation modelling (SEM) method to examine the links' empirical robustness in the established framework. The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2) posits that individuals are more likely to adopt a technology if they perceive it as useful and easy to use12,23. For university students, the perceived usefulness of 5G technology could be evaluated based on how well it aligns with their academic and personal needs. Students perceive 5G as a valuable tool for enhancing their educational experience, facilitating research, or supporting their daily activities, and they are likelier to adopt it23. In this way, it will theoretically make a contribution.
Literature review with hypothesis development
Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2)
After incorporating innovative components into the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2), we proposed a novel model to explain better how people use the internet and what factors affect their choice to use 5G technology25. The goal of26, is to evaluate and contrast several current theories, develop an adoption approach, and empirically support it. The upgraded version of UTAUT, introduced in 2003 by26, is called UTAUT2. It is one of the most well-known and extensively used models for technology adoption. It is the most relevant model for our study because it used to adopt mobile internet in 2012. Its additional significant characteristics can be found in further studies, enabling UTAUT2 to be employed in a wider variety of consumer technology adoption. The goal and behavioral expansions of the UTAUT2 model require more investigation5. The major measurement models of the study, such as social influence, environmental awareness, safety affordance, trustworthiness, facilitation conditions, ITU5G and AU5G, were validated. Our study used two parameters of the UTAUT2 theory, such as social influence and facilitation conditions, to support our conceptual framework.
In addition, UTAUT2 requested internet access to send SMS and MMS, download ringtones and logos, play Java games, use mobile email, and other things12. Utilizing mobile internet while maintaining the speed and quality of internet services was a cutting-edge feature at the time. Today, mobile internet is used for much more than just this, including social media browsing, online shopping, e-payments, navigation, attending conferences, and presenting work27. In summary, we can say that internet usage, as well as the perceived and actual advantages and uses of it, are significantly more complex than they have ever been. Close relationships and a creative attitude frequently influence the effectiveness and simplicity of a tool28. We think individual traits, including economic and social aspects, impact how people perceive and absorb innovations. According to7, it is crucial to consider particular psychological elements influencing decision-making while considering technology adoption. For a new technology marketing campaign to be successful, researchers advised including these elements12,29. We, therefore, created a model customized for the requirements of 5G internet technology to aid in the present research. Finding the antecedent thoughts from the past study30 and individual intentions and goals is prioritized and supports our model.
Mediating role of trustworthiness and ITU5G
University students are essential to consider when investigating the use of 5G, as they are tech-savvy and early adopters of new technologies. The 5G technology encompasses understanding the technical aspects, benefits, and potential impact on the education industry31. Understanding the features and advantages of 5G, such as faster download and upload speeds, lower latency, and greater network capacity, can generate positive attitudes toward its usage32. Additionally, being informed about the potential applications of 5G in areas like healthcare, autonomous vehicles, smart cities, and the Internet of Things (IoT) can spark interest and curiosity among students27. Students with comprehensive knowledge of 5G are more likely to recognize its potential to improve their academic and research activities, enhance communication and collaboration, and provide opportunities for innovative applications in their fields of study33. Information acquisition helps address concerns and skepticism surrounding 5G technology. The spread of misinformation and misconceptions about potential health risks, privacy issues, and security vulnerabilities associated with 5G can create doubts and hesitations. However, when students actively seek accurate and reliable information from credible sources, they can make informed decisions and alleviate their concerns34, increasing their ITU5G and leading to AU5G.
The social influence of 5G technologies positively impacted the AU5G. By knowing about 5G, students can disseminate accurate information to their peers, promoting positive perceptions and intentions to use the technology10. This influence can further enhance the adoption of 5G among university students in China. Universities and educational institutions can organize workshops, seminars, and courses to educate students about 5G. These initiatives can cover the technical aspects of 5G, its applications across various domains, and its potential impact on future career prospects. Inviting industry experts and practitioners to share their insights can give students valuable knowledge and real-world examples7. Collaborative efforts between telecommunications companies, government agencies, and educational institutions can be instrumental in raising awareness about 5G. These campaigns can utilize various channels, such as social media, campus events, and informative websites, to disseminate accurate information and address common misconceptions35. Developing engaging and interactive content, such as videos, infographics, and case studies, can enhance students' interest in acquiring information about 5G. When individuals gather relevant information about 5G, its benefits, and potential applications, they can make more informed decisions about adopting and utilizing the technology36.
People's propensity to adopt and use new technologies, particularly 5G, is greatly influenced by their trust in the technology. When individuals perceive a technology or its providers as trustworthy, they are more likely to embrace and utilize it12. Trustworthy 5G providers establish a reputation for reliability and consistent service quality. Users believe that 5G will regularly supply fast and dependable connectivity and are more likely to accept and use it37. A past study38 highlighted trustworthy 5G networks prioritize security measures to protect user data and privacy. When people trust that their personal information is secure on the 5G network, they are more willing to engage with the technology. Transparent communication from 5G providers about network capabilities, coverage, and potential limitations builds trust among users18. When users clearly understand what to expect from 5G, they are more likely to develop positive intentions toward its use.
Trustworthy 5G providers adhere to ethical practices and demonstrate responsible behaviour. This includes addressing potential health concerns, respecting user rights, and ensuring equitable access to 5G services39. When users trust that the technology is developed and deployed responsibly, their intention to use it increases. Trustworthy 5G providers prioritize user experience and actively seek feedback to improve their services7. By valuing user satisfaction and continuously enhancing the 5G experience, providers can cultivate trust among users, leading to a higher intention to use the technology. Trustworthiness significantly shapes users' intentions to adopt and utilize 5G technology40. Individuals observe 5G technology and its providers as trustworthy; they are more likely to develop positive attitudes and intentions toward its use. Trustworthiness is closely associated with the reliability of 5G technology and its providers28. Users believe that 5G technology is reliable and consistently delivers the promised benefits; they are likelier to trust and develop an intention to use it.
Trustworthiness encompasses aspects such as network stability, signal strength, and consistent high-speed connectivity, which are crucial factors in adopting 5G41. Trust in 5G technology also relates to security and privacy concerns. Users are more inclined to use 5G because they trust that their personal information and data will be adequately protected. Assurance of secure connections and data encryption can enhance trustworthiness, increasing people's intention to adopt technology42. Open and transparent communication from 5G providers can contribute to trustworthiness. The experiences and opinions of others can also influence trust. Users observe their peers or authoritative figures using 5G technology, and having positive experiences can enhance their trust and ITU5G43. Trustworthy 5G providers offer reliable customer support and service. Past studies7,18 highlighted individuals believe that their concerns will be promptly addressed, which enhances their trust in the 5G technology. Supportive services, such as technical assistance, troubleshooting, and responsiveness to user feedback, contribute to a positive perception of trustworthiness14. Reliability, security, transparency, positive social influence, and quality service are all factors that contribute to trust in 5G technology and its providers44. Building and maintaining trustworthiness can help promote the adoption and successful implementation of 5G among university students45. Hence, we hypothesize that,
Hypothesis 1
Trustworthiness and ITU5G significantly mediate the relationship between social influence and AU5G.
As society becomes more aware of environmental issues and the need for sustainable practices, individuals are increasingly considering the environmental implications of their choices, including adopting new technologies like 5G46. Environmental awareness prompts individuals to seek information about what is going on in their surroundings. Concerns about climate change and energy consumption may lead people to prioritize technologies with a lower environmental impact. Regarding 5G, users may be interested in understanding the energy efficiency of the infrastructure and devices associated with the technology21. If they perceive 5G to be more energy-efficient than previous technologies, it may positively influence their intention to use it. The deployment of 5G networks involves the installation of additional infrastructure, such as small cell towers and base stations. Environmental awareness may drive individuals to consider the ecological impact of this infrastructure47. They may support 5G deployment plans that prioritize minimizing the environmental footprint, such as using renewable energy sources, considering wildlife habitats, and employing responsible waste management practices.
The proliferation of new technologies often increases electronic waste (e-waste) as older devices are replaced. Environmental awareness can make individuals more conscious of the e-waste generated by upgrading to 5G-compatible devices. They may consider factors like device durability, repairability, and recyclability before embracing 5G technology48. Environmental awareness can also influence the perception of the benefits that 5G can bring to sustainability efforts. It may create a trustworthy relationship between the technology provider and the user. For instance, 5G enables advancements in various sectors, such as smart cities, transportation, and agriculture, which can reduce greenhouse gas emissions, optimize resource utilization, and enhance environmental monitoring49. Highlighting these green applications can positively impact the intention to use 5G among environmentally conscious individuals. It creates trustworthy relationships between parties that ultimately increase the AU5G technology.
Ecologically aware students may consider the environmental impact of 5G technology. They may be concerned about the energy consumption and carbon emissions associated with the infrastructure required to support 5G networks50. Environmental awareness can make students more conscious of electronic waste and the ecological consequences of increased electronic consumption. Some environmentally conscious students may prioritize using eco-friendly alternatives over adopting new technologies. Environmental awareness played a significant role in telling the advantages of this new technology, such as speed and easy availability51. Although evidence from past studies37 suggested that 5G is safe, concerns about electromagnetic radiation and its impact on human health can influence students' intentions to use 5G. Environmental campaigns and awareness-raising initiatives can shape public opinion and influence attitudes toward 5G technology24. In past studies, it is essential to note that environmental awareness led to positive ITU5G, which may lead towards AU5G. Transparent communication and access to reliable research on these topics can help alleviate concerns and foster trust in the 5G technology52, which enhances ITU5G and positively increases the AU5G technologies among Chinese students. Hence, we hypothesize that,
Hypothesis 2
Trustworthiness and ITU5G significantly mediate the relationship between environmental awareness and AU5G.
Safety affordance refers to the perceived level of safety and security provided by a particular technology7. Regarding 5G technology, the perception of safety affordance can significantly impact users' intention to adopt and use it36. One of the primary factors influencing people's perception of safety affordance in 5G technology is the concern about potential health risks13. Some individuals may worry about the increased electromagnetic radiation associated with 5G networks and its impact on human health. People perceive 5G technology as a potential threat to their well-being; they may be less inclined to use it53. That is why trustworthiness is an important element built when users believe the company adopts sufficient safety measures before launching a new technology. It is supported by a previous study54 that 5G technology has no harmful effect on health. Due to 5G's ability to facilitate the proliferation of the Internet of Things (IoT) devices and connected infrastructure, safety affordance also extends to data security and privacy concerns, which increases trustworthiness.
Users of 5G technology know about security measures, so they are willing to adopt the technology without fearing data breaches or unauthorized access to their personal information. Safety affordance in the context of 5G also encompasses network reliability and resilience. Users want a seamless and uninterrupted experience when using 5G services55. Users' trust also influences the perceived safety affordance of 5G technology in the technology providers and network operators. To enhance the ITU5G technology, stakeholders such as telecommunication companies, regulatory bodies, and governments must address these safety affordance concerns56. Safety affordance is achieved through transparent communication about the technology's safety measures, addressing health concerns with scientific evidence, implementing security protocols, ensuring network reliability, and fostering trust through responsible practices57.
Safety affordance refers to the perception of safety features or measures in a technological system that influences users' ITU5G technology. Safety affordance in 5G technology enhances trust and reliability among users. Individuals who use 5G technology with robust safety measures, such as secure networks and protection against cybersecurity threats, are more likely to trust the technology and have confidence in its reliability58. People secure their personal information and adequately protect their data while using 5G technology with safety affordance; as a result, individuals are more likely to feel comfortable and willing to adopt it54. Safety affordance can also provide users with the necessary training and support to effectively and safely use 5G technology. This can involve educational programs, user manuals, or customer support services. When students feel adequately informed and supported, their ITU5G technology increases as they perceive a lower risk of encountering safety-related issues. Safety affordance can empower users by giving them a sense of control over the 5G technology59. When students believe they have control over the safety features and settings of 5G technology, such as the ability to customize privacy settings or limit data sharing, they are more likely to perceive it as safe and be motivated to use it30. A past study60 promoted the ITU5G technology among university students in China, it is essential for technology providers and stakeholders to prioritize safety affordance. Hence, we hypothesize that,
Hypothesis 3
Trustworthiness and ITU5G significantly mediate the relationship between safety affordance and AU5G.
Moderating role of facilitation conditions
Facilitation conditions can create a favourable environment for telecommunication companies to invest in 5G infrastructure. It includes support from the government and other regulatory authorities, which is crucial for implementing the 5G technologies. Regulatory approval includes streamlining the licensing process, providing tax incentives, and reducing bureaucratic hurdles4. Supportive regulatory bodies facilitate investment in building and expanding 5G networks, increasing the availability and coverage. Facilitation conditions play a crucial role in allocating and managing spectrum, the radio frequencies used for wireless communication61. By ensuring sufficient and appropriate range is available for 5G deployment, regulators enable network operators to provide high-quality and reliable 5G services. When efficiently managed spectrum resources, it facilitates the deployment of 5G networks, leading to improved user experience and increased usage of 5G technology62.
5G technology brings new security and privacy challenges due to its increased complexity and connectivity63. The standards and guidelines are established due to favourable facilitation conditions that address these concerns and ensure that adequate security measures are adopted by network operators21. Regulatory support helps to create a competitive market for 5G services, leading to better pricing, service quality, and innovation. Effective supporting systems can facilitate implementation and prevent anti-competitive practices, such as monopolies or unfair market dominance, ensuring consumers have various choices and high-quality services. Users distinguish a competitive market with consumer protection measures in place; they are more likely to embrace 5G technology64.
Regulatory bodies can foster stakeholder collaboration, including industry players, academia, and standardization organizations65. By encouraging partnerships and cooperation, regulators promote the development of common standards and interoperability, which is vital for successfully implementing 5G technology. Individuals seeking information about 5G more actively may better understand its benefits and potential risks66. Regulatory bodies gather data about relevant concerns and collect information about 5G technology. Using 5G technology creates environmental awareness, such as energy consumption, electronic waste, and potential effects on ecosystems. This collaborative approach enhances the AU5G, ensuring seamless integration of devices, applications, and services across different networks and providers67.
Facilitation condition plays a crucial role in shaping the 5G ecosystem. By facilitating investment, ensuring spectrum availability, addressing security concerns, promoting fair competition, and fostering collaboration, regulators can positively influence the ITU5G technology among consumers and industry players. Regulatory authorities ensure safety affordance and the perceived level of safety and security that 5G technology provides to users28. Users considering 5G a safe and reliable technology are likelier to use it. Trust developed by government authorities as they provided a perception of reliability, credibility, and ethical practices associated with 5G technology. Trustworthy networks and service providers are more likely to gain users' trust with the help of regulatory support68.
Regulatory support can facilitate the deployment and expansion of 5G networks, ensuring broader coverage and accessibility in university campuses and surrounding areas. When students perceive that 5G is readily available and offers a seamless connectivity experience, they are more likely to embrace the technology and consider it for their day-to-day activities1. Regulations that mandate service providers to maintain a certain level of quality and performance in their 5G networks can enhance user experience. Students who experience faster speeds, lower latency, and better network reliability are more inclined to use 5G for bandwidth-intensive activities like streaming, online gaming, virtual reality, or accessing cloud-based resources, thereby increasing their ITU5G technology41.
Facilitation conditions foster an environment conducive to innovation and can encourage the development of new applications, services, and use cases that leverage the capabilities of 5G technology69. They can play a role in promoting fair pricing, competition, and affordability of 5G services. 5G plans and devices are reasonably priced and offer value for money; students are more likely to perceive them as a worthwhile investment and be more willing to adopt the 5G technology70. The previous studies stated that UTAUT2 models improve the explanatory power of the behavioural intention and use of 5G25. The organizational supportive facilitation conditions can strengthen the relationship between trustworthiness and ITU5G. So that universities with more facilitation conditions for 5G technologies can build stronger trustworthiness that enhances the students’ ITU5G. Therefore, we hypothesize that:
Hypothesis 4
Facilitation conditions strengthen the relationship between trustworthiness and ITU5G in university students.
Figure 1 explains the research model below, which depicts the literature review mentioned above.
Figure 1.
Conceptual framework.
Measure and methods
The rapid advancement of technology has brought forth the emergence of 5G wireless network technology71, promising unprecedented speed, connectivity, and transformative potential across various sectors. 5G has gained significant attention in China, with its implementation and development being a national priority. As the usage of 5G technology becomes increasingly pervasive, it is essential to understand the factors influencing individuals' intention to use it12. The world's largest market for mobile communications is in China. In their major provinces, they are testing 5G. According to projections, 28% of mobile networks in China, or nearly one-third of all 5G connections worldwide, will use 5G technology by 202511. As a result, Beijing will become the nation's leader in 5G usage. Therefore, an online poll was used to gather information from Chinese students from the top six universities in Beijing, including undergraduates, postgraduates, and researcher scholars. The study will use PLS-SEM to conduct a quantitative research design analysis of the correlations between the factors affecting the ITU5G. The survey will be available online in the last quarter of 2023 through various social media channels, email distribution lists, and personal relationships. We also collected the data from multiple sources, such as Wenjuanxing and Josump platforms. The researcher25 argues that an online survey for data collection provides a more rapid, efficient, and high-quality answer than an offline survey while reaching a target audience that would otherwise be challenging. 440 participants responded by sending in their submissions. 76 surveys were rejected because they were either incomplete or contained missing values. Finally, 364 (82%) responses were collected and used for analysis. According to Kline, this sample size is appropriate for SEM analysis72. Similarly, according to Roscoe's, a sample size greater than 30 and less than 500 is most suitable for behavioral and marketing research73. So, we have chosen a sample size within a range of 30–500 to get the authenticity of the current study. Further, the current study was assessed through a self-administered questionnaire that shows the relationship among variables. For this purpose, the questionnaire is divided into two sections: the first part represents the demographic information, which includes age, education, gender, locality, and specialization. All details of demographic profiles are given in Table 1.
Table 1.
Demographic details.
| Demographics | Distribution | n = 364 |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 206 (57%) |
| Female | 158 (43%) | |
| Age | 16–22 years | 72 (20%) |
| 23–29 years | 186 (51%) | |
| Above than 29 years | 106 (29%) | |
| Qualification | Bachelors | 97 (27%) |
| Maters | 179 (49%) | |
| PhD | 88 (24%) | |
| Locality | Beijing | 193 (53%) |
| Shenzhen | 71 (20%) | |
| Shanghai | 66 (18%) | |
| Others | 34 (9%) | |
| Specializations | Management sciences | 111 (31%) |
| Business administration | 124 (34%) | |
| Tourism management | 129 (35%) |
The second of the questionnaire is taken from previous research. To fit the context of our study, we changed the context of each item. A five-point Likert scale was used to evaluate each construct (strongly disagree = 1, strongly agree = 5). We conducted pilot research with 39 replies to confirm the item's validity and reliability. Further adjustments were made in light of the researchers' recognized reaction. Depending on the responders, all items were translated into English or Chinese. ITU5G, four items were occupied by74 and slightly modified. The five items of trustworthiness (TW) suggested by18. Four items about AU5G were taken from23. Safety affordance (SA) was calculated by five items taken from7 and used after minor modifications. The six items for social influence (SI) were collected from10. Environmental awareness (EA) of five items adapted from5. Facilitation conditions (FC) were assessed by four items taken from12. For data collection, a convenient sampling technique was used as an effective medium to get the appropriate results with ease of accessing the respondents75. Despite the less generalizability of results, the convenience sampling method is used due to easy access to the respondents and its relevance to the measurement item76. Hence, convenience sampling is not a major concern for our study. This study is free from common method bias as we have applied the CFA (confirmatory factor analysis) techniques to minimize the bias effect.
Ethics statements and declarations
We confirm that all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Humans who participated in this study are aware of the purpose of the study, and their confidential information has not to be shared with anyone. All study participants provided their written informed consent. Study data is used after the consent of participants. The questionnaire used in this study started with the declaration and purpose of the study. Experimental protocol was approved by the ethical review board of the Beijing university of technology.
Analytical framework and results
SEM was used for data analysis due to its component-centered nature; this method assessed all variables' relationships77,78. The researcher chose PLS-SEM for this inquiry because of its widespread use and applicability; later research10 offered evidence. Structural equation modelling (SEM) outperforms traditional statistical analysis methods. It improves statistical analysis's effectiveness, simplicity, and precision79. SEM is a multivariate analysis method that can help with the simultaneous evaluation of many variables concurrently. The SEM technique is becoming increasingly well-liked in business research because it can handle different interactions simultaneously80. A strong statistical method is required for the administration and social discipline investigation81. Inappropriate application of analytical techniques may lead to incorrect conclusions. Two phases of PLS-SEM analysis, such as measurement and structural models, have been considered by two stages of measurement findings82.
The measurement assessment model used in this study included estimations of the inner prototypical and consistency and rationality tests for different factors that influence people's ITU5G. The validity is determined by the item correlation by the Cronbach alpha, the composite reliability, and the item loading76. Nevertheless, discriminant validity pertains to the relationship between variables examined using cross-loading, Heterotrait-Monotrait ratio, and Fornell-Larcker83. The measurement model also incorporates the research analysis described in the section on outcomes and route analysis for testing hypotheses. The correlations between the components explored in this research have been identified by path analysis. The findings showed that social influence, environmental awareness and safety affordance positively impact AU5G through trustworthiness, supporting hypotheses H1a, H1b and H1c. Additionally, the results showed that facilitation conditions significantly moderate the relationship between trustworthiness and ITU5G in university students, which leads to AU5G accepting H2.
Common method bias
In research methodologies based on surveys and including data gathered from a single source, common method variance (CMB) could be an important aspect to take into account84. The selection of the respondents was specifically based on their familiarity with the use of 5G. Because the survey questions were carefully designed and respondents answered them based on their opinions, it was less likely that respondents would provide thoughtless answers. Harman's one-factor test, as employed by85, was also used in this study to show that common method bias was absent. According to the results of the exploratory component analysis on all items for the variables, the single factor variance in our study was 33.4%, which is below the 50% criterion. This suggests that there was no evidence of a common method bias issue in the survey responses. Additionally, the86 technique—which postulates that a stronger correlation between the research variables would indicate the presence of common method bias—was also employed to demonstrate robustness in identifying common method bias. We used Smart-PLS in this study to measure inter-construct correlations, however there is no indication of common technique bias. Next, we examined the variance inflation factor (VIF) in this study using a modern method that was suggested by87. Every measured VIF value fell between less than five.
Measurement assessment model
The measurement model examines the discriminant, reliability, and convergent validity among the defined constructs80. The measuring model validates the constructs' dependability and factor loadings and validates the constructs' validity79. The measurement assessment method is consistent across reliability and validity evaluations (convergent and discriminant validity). The average variance extracted (AVE), composite reliability (CR), Cronbach's alpha (α) and outer loading were used in this study to evaluate convergent validity, internal consistency reliability, and item reliability68. The item loadings are more than the criteria value of 0.7, as shown in Table 2. Every reflection was subsidized to the new variable, and the average factor loadings were more than 0.7088. AVE is higher than the suggested value of 0.589. Each standard has an overall dependability rating greater than 0.70, which denotes accurate measurements. The results of the currently chosen 5G variables facilities show that all AVE values vary between 0.716 and 0.926. The CR values for all 5G constructs range between 0.909 and 0.984. The Cronbach's alpha values for all 5G constructs range between 0.865 and 0.980. While outer loadings of each construct range from 0.722 to 0.981. Tables 2 and 3 display this measurement model's validated reliability and validity values. Since all factor loading values are greater than 0.7, all items in the measurement assessment model have good convergent validity. The variable factor loadings and measurement assessment model are shown in Fig. 2.
Table 2.
Factor loadings.
| Construct | Item | FL | α | CR | AVE | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intention to use 5G (ITU5G) | 0.865 | 0.909 | 0.716 | 74 | |||
| ITU5G1 | I am looking forward to the massive use of 5G networks | 0.825 | |||||
| ITU5G2 | I look forward to emerging 5G related products on the market | 0.840 | |||||
| ITU5G3 | I would like to learn how to use a 5G network | 0.885 | |||||
| ITU5G4 | I will try to use 5G related products | 0.796 | |||||
| Actual use of 5G (AU5G) | 0.858 | 0.904 | 0.701 | 23 | |||
| AU5G1 | I will continue to keep using 5G technology | 0.722 | |||||
| AU5G2 | I have used 5G technology which gives me benefits | 0.860 | |||||
| AU5G3 | As far as I know, 5G services are useful | 0.928 | |||||
| AU5G4 | I would recommend other people to use 5G | 0.863 | |||||
| Social influence (SI) | 0.941 | 0.953 | 0.771 | 10 | |||
| SI1 | I acquired information about 5G technology through websites, social media, and seminars | 0.894 | |||||
| SI2 | I gained information and understand the benefits in various domains | 0.873 | |||||
| SI3 | I feel understating the positive use of 5G reduction in perceived risks, such as privacy concerns | 0.883 | |||||
| SI4 | I assess more information of 5G are more likely to have the intention to use it in their daily lives | 0.929 | |||||
| SI5 | I get information about 5G is reliable from different social media platforms | 0.865 | |||||
| SI6 | I find the available information sources reliable, comprehensive, and accessible | 0.821 | |||||
| Environmental awareness (EA) | 0.980 | 0.984 | 0.926 | 5 | |||
| EA1 | I consider the potential environmental impact of my actions when making my decisions | 0.944 | |||||
| EA2 | I would like to describe myself as environmentally responsible | 0.969 | |||||
| EA3 | I am worried about wasting and destroying the earth's resources | 0.981 | |||||
| EA4 | Even if I feel inconvenient, I would like to take more environmentally friendly actions | 0.965 | |||||
| EA5 | I am very knowledgeable about 5G radiation and its related environmental issues | 0.952 | |||||
| Safety affordance (SA) | 0.913 | 0.935 | 0.744 | 7 | |||
| SA1 | I am anxious about 5G technology safety | 0.744 | |||||
| SA2 | I am concerned with the information about the 5G that I used | 0.883 | |||||
| SA3 | I frequently read about 5G technology | 0.925 | |||||
| SA4 | The superiority and safety of 5G these days alarms me | 0.884 | |||||
| SA5 | 5G technology vendors can provide me with the knowledge to ensure good health | 0.865 | |||||
| Trustworthiness (TW) | 0.939 | 0.954 | 0.805 | 18 | |||
| TW1 | Based on my experience with the 5G services will have integrity | 0.838 | |||||
| TW2 | Based on my experience with the 5G services will be reliable | 0.841 | |||||
| TW3 | I trust that the 5G services will be displayed as expected | 0.926 | |||||
| TW4 | I trust that the 5G providers will provide enough safeguards to protect me from liability for damages | 0.944 | |||||
| TW5 | I believe that 5G vendors wish to be known for keeping promises | 0.931 | |||||
| Facilitation conditions (FC) | 0.927 | 0.948 | 0.821 | 12 | |||
| FC1 | I feel regulatory agencies keep my best interests in mind | 0.892 | |||||
| FC2 | I trust that the regulatory bodies will pass legislation for individual privacy concerns | 0.846 | |||||
| FC3 | I am confident that the government will protect my interaction with 5G services | 0.942 | |||||
| FC4 | I trust that the networking companies will improve services to serve me better | 0.940 | |||||
FL: Factor loadings, VIF: Variance inflation factor, CR: Composite reliability, AVE: Average variance extracted, α: Cronbach's alpha.
Table 3.
Discriminant validity.
| Constructs | AU5G | EA | FC | ITU5G | SA | SI | TW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fornell–Larcker criterion | |||||||
| AU5G | 0.943 | ||||||
| EA | 0.105 | 0.859 | |||||
| FC | 0.557 | 0.126 | 0.962 | ||||
| ITU5G | 0.710 | 0.126 | 0.745 | 0.830 | |||
| SA | 0.734 | 0.164 | 0.814 | 0.817 | 0.849 | ||
| SI | 0.305 | 0.197 | 0.268 | 0.359 | 0.338 | 0.875 | |
| TW | 0.339 | 0.047 | 0.349 | 0.457 | 0.409 | 0.376 | 0.899 |
| Heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT) | |||||||
| AU5G | |||||||
| EA | 0.110 | ||||||
| FC | 0.576 | 0.136 | |||||
| ITU5G | 0.780 | 0.140 | 0.818 | ||||
| SA | 0.790 | 0.182 | 0.739 | 0.817 | |||
| SI | 0.317 | 0.219 | 0.275 | 0.393 | 0.364 | ||
| TW | 0.355 | 0.047 | 0.365 | 0.511 | 0.441 | 0.394 | |
EA: Environmental awareness, SI: Social influence, ITU5G: Intention to use 5G, FC: Facilitation conditions, SA: Safety affordance, TW: Trustworthiness, AU5G: Actual use of 5G.
Square root of AVE is displayed on the diagonal and bold values.
Figure 2.
Measurement assessment model.
The study research90 confirmed that the benchmark of the values of discriminant validity is less than 0.85 or 0.90, that reflect complete standards are less than 0.90. This study has also shown that the link between components has discriminant validity. The outcomes of this study also analyze the relationship between variables deemed to have discriminant validity. Initially, the Fornell-Larcker and cross-loading procedures were used to assess the discriminant validity in Table 3. These data indicated a weak correlation between variables and supported the selection of all 5G as discriminant valid. Table 3's bold values show that overall influences have strong links with some other components but substantial correlations with others87. The bold values of the cross-loadings table were contrasted with other factors in each column for the test discriminant validity24. This study analysis shows strong discriminant validity and is more significant than row-wise other components. Second, the HTMT ratio and other cutting-edge techniques have been used to test discriminant validity. The data shows that the HTMT ratio is less than 0.8579. These findings in Table 3 indicate a valid relationship between factors and discriminant validity.
Structural assessment model
The measurement model is the initial step of the SmartPLS and is followed by the structural assessment model. The second stage was conducted in this instance, examining the relationship between exogenous and endogenous variables. Numerous statistical data, including effect size (f2), t values, predictive relevance (Q2), coefficient of determination (R2), and path coefficient (values), are presented by the structural assessment model90. Similarly, the variance inflation factor (VIF) is evaluated for more appropriate results, which displays the multicollinearity among constructs. The acceptable range of multicollinearity is less than 5, which shows that all the variables in the study are highly correlated. Criteria for rating hypotheses and estimating the significance of path coefficients are provided in the PLS-SEM literature. 5000 subsamples were used in a bootstrapping method with a 5% significance level (one-tailed) to assess the importance of the hypotheses. Similarly, t values greater than 1.64 indicate a significant relationship between the variables in the model83. The values of all variables are positive indicators in the structural assessment model for AU5G and have a significant association.
On the other hand, according to83, the R2 value is not a suitable and efficient technique for assisting a model. The analytical significance dimension Q2 of the prototype is thus an applicable technique. The dormant exogenous values with disproportionate prognostic importance7 show that the value of Q2 is more complex than zero. The Q2 result of 0.522 demonstrates the model's high level of predictive power and the fact that it is increasing the 5G facilities among individuals. According to91, typical values for f2 are 0.061, 0.204, and 1.450, which denote mild, medium, and considerable impacts. The value of f2 was calculated assuming that the effect size ranges from moderate to large.
Moreover, the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) is the difference between the studied interrelationship and the model indirect interrelationship matrix. An excellent match in SRMR is indicated by values less than 0.10 or 0.08. SmartPLS is used to generate the structural model, and model fitness is assessed. The fitness indices' findings often indicate that the model fits well. The values listed below serve as an example: SRMR = 0.061, Chi-square = 2311.134, and NFI = 0.817. A list of several statistical techniques is provided in Table 4.
Table 4.
Model fit.
| Saturated Model | Estimated Model | |
|---|---|---|
| SRMR | 0.061 | 0.135 |
| d_ULS | 2.059 | 10.163 |
| d_G | 1.352 | 1.675 |
| Chi-Square | 2311.134 | 2620.447 |
| NFI | 0.817 | 0.792 |
The hypothesis testing outcomes showed that trustworthiness and ITU5G positively mediate the relationship between social influence and AU5G with values (β = 0.094, t = 4.673, and p < 0.05). In the same way, trustworthiness and ITU5G positively mediate the relationship between environmental awareness and AU5G with values (β = 0.060, t = 3.705, and p < 0.05). Similarly going forward, trustworthiness and ITU5G positively mediate the relationship between safety affordance and AU5G with values (β = 0.138, t = 4.946, and p < 0.05). Therefore, H1a, H1b and H1c are accepted. For moderation results, findings reveal that facilitation conditions significantly moderate the relationship between trustworthiness and ITU5G in university students (β = 0.174, t = 3.543, and p < 0.05). Thus, H2 is accepted. The R2 value for TW, ITU5G, and AU5G is 0.340, 0.301, and 0.592, showing that the model can considerably enhance use of 5G as output in Table 5.
Table 5.
Hypothesis testing.
| Hypothesis and relationship | β-values | STDEV | t-values | p-values | Decisions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Panel A. Main effects | |||||
| SI → TW | 0.283 | 0.054 | 5.258 | 0.000 | Supported |
| EA → TW | 0.179 | 0.051 | 3.503 | 0.001 | Supported |
| SA → TW | 0.414 | 0.047 | 8.753 | 0.000 | Supported |
| TW → ITU5G | 0.433 | 0.046 | 9.366 | 0.000 | Supported |
| ITU5G → AU5G | 0.769 | 0.029 | 26.834 | 0.000 | Supported |
| FC → ITU5G | 0.219 | 0.045 | 4.825 | 0.000 | Supported |
| Panel B. Mediating effects | |||||
| SI → TW → ITU5G → AU5G (H1a) | 0.094 | 0.020 | 4.673 | 0.000 | Supported |
| EA → TW → ITU5G → AU5G (H1b) | 0.060 | 0.016 | 3.705 | 0.000 | Supported |
| SA → TW → ITU5G → AU5G (H1c) | 0.138 | 0.028 | 4.946 | 0.000 | Supported |
| Panel C. Moderating effects | |||||
| TW*FC → ITU5G (H2) | 0.174 | 0.049 | 3.543 | 0.000 | Supported |
| Panel D. R2 | |||||
| TW R2 = 0.340 | |||||
| ITU5G R2 = 0.301 | |||||
| AU5G R2 = 0.592 | |||||
EA: Environmental awareness, SI: Social influence, ITU5G: Intention to use 5G, FC: Facilitation conditions, SA: Safety affordance, TW: Trustworthiness, AU5G: Actual use of 5G.
Discussion and recommendations
This study identifies statistically important social, environmental, psychological, and intrinsic elements that influence the intention of individuals to use 5G technology. Understanding consumer intention and behavior in technology adoption might start with these elements. The five main factors of 5G adoption are information acquisition, environmental awareness, safety affordance, trustworthiness, and regulatory support, which contribute to catching people's ITU5G. This study suggests that these components can be improved if carefully developed and significantly impact adopting 5G in Chinese university students. To increase sales or the rate of 5G adoption, stakeholders must direct their attention appropriately. This study examined the relationship between social influence, environmental awareness and safety affordance through trustworthiness and ITU5G and ultimately challenged the AU5G. Additionally, this study examined the moderating role of facilitation conditions to measure the strength of ITU5G when a trustworthy relationship is developed among the users (Chinese students). 364 participants of university students empirically test the foundations of the concept. The investigation came to four important conclusions.
Firstly, this research study has inspected the mediating role of trustworthiness and ITU5G between social influence and AU5G. The findings proved that social influence is positively associated with the AU5G, supported by many past studies9,10, but its mediating role in terms of trustworthiness and ITU5G is not yet been explored in any prior studies39,40. However, the results suggested that social influence such as peer feedback, student reviews of technology usage, online communities and social media platforms are the main sources that help build trust among Chinese students regarding the intention to adopt the 5G technology. A past study15 highlighted individuals have a positive attitude toward using 5G and express a desire to adopt it; they are more likely to actively seek out information about its features, benefits, and implementation. Individuals are aware of China's advancements in 5G and the associated benefits; it can create a sense of national pride and a desire to be part of the technological progress, thus positively influencing their ITU5G. A prior study5 argued that social influence helps individuals become aware of the capabilities, benefits, and potential applications of 5G technology. People are more likely to adopt a positive attitude toward utilizing 5G if they know its benefits, which include faster data rates, reduced latency, and support for cutting-edge technology like the Internet of Things and driverless vehicles34. Recent research37 also focused on the trustworthy factor of 5G technology usage, which ultimately improves communication, enhanced productivity, better access to services, and transformative applications in various sectors like healthcare, transportation, and entertainment. China has been actively promoting the development and adoption of 5G technology. Through government initiatives and facilities, there is a strong focus on creating an ecosystem that supports 5G infrastructure and services92.
Secondly, this research study has inspected the mediating role of trustworthiness and ITU5G between environmental awareness and AU5G. The findings proved that environmental awareness is positively associated with trust to use the technology, supported by many past studies46,47, while its mediating role in terms of trustworthiness and ITU5G is not discussed yet in the above context7. This finding implies that individuals concerned about the environment may view 5G technology as a means to promote sustainability or reduce environmental impact. A prior study70 focused on the potential benefits of 5G, such as its ability to enable smart city initiatives, improve energy efficiency, and enhance environmental monitoring and management. 5G technology is a critical enabler of various smart solutions, such as smart grids, smart transportation systems, and smart buildings93. These solutions promote sustainability by optimizing resource utilization, reducing emissions, and improving efficiency. Similarly, another researcher5 expressed that as 5G technology can enable these eco-friendly technologies, environmentalists may be more likely to adopt them. The pandemic has highlighted the importance of remote connectivity with 5G technology; people can access high-speed internet and perform bandwidth-intensive tasks from remote locations. This capability reduces the need for commuting and physical travel, contributing to decreased carbon emissions48. Real-time data collection, analysis, and transmission are made possible by 5G technology, improving environmental monitoring systems, tracking wildlife, and natural resource management. Environmentally conscious people may appreciate the usefulness of 5G technology in advancing environmental conservation initiatives6.
Thirdly, the current study has examined the mediating role of trustworthiness and ITU5G between safety affordance and AU5G. The findings proved that safety affordance is positively associated with the AU5G, supported by many past studies7,36, and its direct association with trust in terms of 4G technology usage is also discussed in earlier research7,23. Although safety affordance is measured in multiple contexts in technology literature54 its role in the context of 5G technology actual usage is under-researched. In a past study70, the term safety affordance described the capabilities and attributes of a given technology that are considered safe. Security precautions, data security, privacy restrictions, and general technology reliability are some of these qualities. Safety affordance positively influences ITU5G, showing that people are more likely to have a good attitude toward and express an intention to utilize 5G technology when they believe it to be safe and secure94. This finding aligns with the general understanding that perceived risks and concerns associated with new technologies can be significant barriers to adoption. According to earlier research37 by providing users with safety features like strong security safeguards and open privacy rules, technology providers can increase their trust and confidence, increasing their desire to use the technology. Safety affordances that address these concerns, such as adhering to established safety guidelines and regulations, conducting thorough risk assessments, and transparently communicating the safety measures taken, can help alleviate fears and increase users' confidence in using 5G95. Safety features that allow consumers to manage their exposure to 5G radiation, such as changeable power levels or signal strength information, can improve user impression of safety. Users' willingness to adopt and use 5G technology may rise if they feel in control of their exposure and can adjust their settings to their comfort level63.
Fourthly, this research study has examined the moderating association of facilitation conditions between trustworthiness and ITU5G. The findings proved that facilitation conditions are positively moderated between trustworthiness and ITU5G argument supported by multiple studies12,95. A past study96 discussed that information acquisition in the context of 5G technology refers to learning about and comprehending its characteristics, advantages, and potential drawbacks. Users can gain trustworthy information with the support of clear guidelines, regulations, and communication from regulatory organizations, which may favourably impact their decision to use 5G53. Users should consider environmental issues, including the effect on humans, electromagnetic radiation, or energy usage, when deploying and using 5G networks. Establishing standards and guidelines for environmentally sustainable 5G infrastructure can alleviate these worries. In Chinese universities familiar with technological breakthroughs, it is difficult to highlight the conditions that moderate the trustworthiness-ITU5G relationship is crucial. A university with vigorous facilitation conditions, such as innovative infrastructure and educational programs focused on 5G, may increase the trustworthiness and acceptance of the technology among its students. A prior study7 established that safety affordance describes a technology's perceived capacity to offer a secure and safe user experience. By defining standards and regulations for network infrastructure, data protection, and privacy, regulatory assistance plays a crucial role in assuring the security and safety of 5G networks55. Users' level of trust in the 5G ecosystem's dependability, security, and integrity is their level of trustworthiness68. Users' faith in 5G technology increases when they believe the regulatory framework is solid and reliable, positively impacting their desire to use it.
Theoretical and practical implications
The theoretical and practical implications provide valuable insights for policymakers, communication strategists, and technology providers seeking to promote the acceptance and adoption of 5G technologies. Regarding theoretical implications, this research emphasizes the importance of facilitation conditions as a moderating variable in the context of 5G adoption. By building confidence, addressing safety issues, and guaranteeing environmental sustainability, regulatory organizations help to facilitate the acceptance and use of new technologies. The fact that environmental consciousness is now considered a factor in 5G intention demonstrates the growing significance of sustainability in technological adoption. This study highlights the importance of considering ecological considerations when developing technological acceptance models and any potential environmental advantages or dangers of 5G. Reliability and safety affordance are important variables influencing the intention to utilize 5G. This study adds to our understanding of how trust develops in the context of new technologies by emphasizing the need for a dependable and secure 5G infrastructure to promote user acceptance. This study contributes to expanding the UTAUT2 paradigm by including social influence, environmental awareness, safety affordance and trustworthiness as factors of intention to utilize 5G. It deepens our comprehension of the intricate forces influencing people's attitudes and behavioural intentions toward developing technologies.
This study has some practical implications. The findings highlight the need for regulatory organizations to offer assistance and direction to guarantee a seamless and effective deployment of 5G. Policymakers can use the results of this study to create rules that handle safety issues, ensure environmental sustainability, and promote user trust, all of which will help 5G technology become more widely used. Effective communication strategies should concentrate on giving precise and easily accessible information about the technology's advantages, safety precautions, and environmental impact to increase people's intention to adopt 5G. Stakeholders, such as tech companies and regulatory bodies, can work together to communicate accurate information and address any misunderstandings or worries about 5G. This study emphasizes the value of putting money into a reliable and secure 5G infrastructure to win over potential users. Prioritizing safety and security procedures can help service providers deliver the benefits of technology while limiting risks and vulnerabilities. The study emphasizes the importance of considering environmental elements while developing and deploying 5G networks. Collaboration between technology providers and authorities is necessary to implement eco-friendly procedures and spread knowledge about the potential benefits of 5G for sustainability. Regulators and policymakers need to understand how important it is for them to support the introduction of 5G technology. The study examined the need to encourage regulatory regimes that balance environmental concerns, consumer protection, and innovation. These frameworks should support ethical business practices, safeguard personal information, and set up systems for monitoring and enforcing compliance. Additionally, exploring the factors that may hinder or facilitate the adoption and use of 5G technologies in real-world settings would contribute to developing targeted interventions and strategies to promote its acceptance and usage.
Conclusion and policy recommendations
This study investigated the impact of social influence, environmental awareness, and safety affordance on actual use of 5G among Chinese university students through trustworthiness and intention to use 5G and the moderating role of facilitation conditions. This research shed light on the factors influencing the acceptance and adoption of 5G technology in the Chinese context. The results revealed four significant findings. Firstly, trustworthiness and ITU5G positively mediate the relationship between social influence and AU5G. This study suggests that when Chinese university students get positive feedback from social media platforms and peers about adopting 5G technology, they are likelier to develop a positive attitude towards its actual usage. Secondly, trustworthiness and ITU5G positively mediate the relationship between environmental awareness and AU5G. Environmental awareness about technology usage develops trust among Chinese university students to adopt and utilize the 5G. It is derived from the current study that Chinese university students who understand the potential environmental benefits of 5G technology are more willing to perceive it as advantageous and express a stronger intention to use it. Thirdly, trustworthiness and ITU5G positively mediate the relationship between safety affordance and AU5G. This suggests that when Chinese university students perceive 5G technologies as safe and secure, they feel trustworthy and reliable and are more inclined to adopt AU5G. Fourthly, facilitation conditions were found to significantly moderate the relationships between trustworthiness and ITU5G in shaping the AU5G among Chinese university students. This implies that the influence of information acquisition, environmental awareness, safety affordance, and trustworthiness on the intention to and real-time usage of 5G technology is contingent upon the level of facilitating conditions provided by the government and regulatory authorities. When government facilities are satisfactory, the positive effects of these factors on the ITU5G are strengthened. By considering these factors and providing facilitating conditions, policymakers and stakeholders can foster a favourable environment for the adoption and usage of 5G technologies among university students in China.
Limitations and future directions of this study
This study has some limitations and future directions. Firstly, this study focused solely on Chinese university students, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other populations, such as non-students or individuals from different cultural backgrounds. Future studies should consider including a more diverse sample to enhance the external validity of the findings. Secondly, this study employed a cross-sectional design, which captured data at a single point in time. This limits the ability to establish causal relationships between the variables. Future research could adopt a longitudinal design to examine the changes in ITU5G technologies over time and better understand the variables' causal relationships. Thirdly, this study relied on self-reported measures subject to response biases such as social desirability and memory recall. Future studies could incorporate objective measures or observational data to enhance the reliability and validity of the findings. Fourthly, we have collected data and conducted a comparative analysis of Chinese university students' ITU5G. Future studies would provide valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners in tailoring strategies to promote AU5G across different cultural contexts or countries. Fifthly, in this study, we have used moderators such as facilitating conditions that could influence the relationships between the variables. Future studies may focus on additional moderators, such as regulatory environment technological literacy. Lastly, we used a questionnaire to inspect all variables in this study. Future research employing mixed-methods approaches, combining qualitative and quantitative data, could provide a richer and more nuanced understanding of the factors influencing the intention to use.
Author contributions
M.F.S.: conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, methodology, software, formal analysis and project administration. S.X.: investigation, writing—review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition and validation. K.I.K.: investigation, writing—review and editing, visualization and resources. M.F.H.: writing—review and editing, investigation and collection of data. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work received financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant numbers 72074014 and 72174016.
Data availability
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation. Data can be obtained upon reasonable request by Co-author, Muhammad Farrukh Shahzad (farrukhshahzad207@gmail.com).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
The original online version of this Article was revised: The original version of this Article contained errors in Table 2, in the Reference list and in the in-text Reference citations. Full information regarding the corrections made can be found in the correction for this Article.
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Change history
4/11/2024
A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1038/s41598-024-58938-3
Contributor Information
Muhammad Farrukh Shahzad, Email: farrukhshahzad207@gmail.com.
Shuo Xu, Email: xushuo@bjut.edu.cn.
References
- 1.da Ponte A, Leon G, Alvarez I. Technological sovereignty of the EU in advanced 5G mobile communications: An empirical approach. Telecomm. Policy. 2023;47(1):102459. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102459. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rizzato, F. 5G users on average consume up to 2.7x more mobile data compared to 4G users (2020).
- 3.Ramezanpour K, Jagannath J, Jagannath A. Security and privacy vulnerabilities of 5G/6G and WiFi 6: Survey and research directions from a coexistence perspective. Comput. Netw. 2023;221:109515. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109515. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Matinmikko M, Latva-aho M, Ahokangas P, Seppänen V. On regulations for 5G: Micro licensing for locally operated networks. Telecomm. Policy. 2018;42(8):622–635. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2017.09.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Shah SK, Zhongjun T, Sattar A, XinHao Z. Consumer’s intention to purchase 5G: Do environmental awareness, environmental knowledge and health consciousness attitude matter? Technol. Soc. 2021;65:101563. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101563. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.He T, et al. 5G-based telerobotic ultrasound system improves access to breast examination in rural and remote areas: A prospective and two-scenario study. Diagnostics. 2023 doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shah SK, Zhongjun PT, Oláh J, Popp J, Acevedo-Duque Á. The relationship between 5G technology affordances, consumption values, trust and intentions: An exploration using the TCV and S-O-R paradigm. Heliyon. 2023 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Abdulqadder IH, Zou D, Aziz IT. The DAG blockchain: A secure edge assisted honeypot for attack detection and multi-controller based load balancing in SDN 5G. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2023;141:339–354. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2022.11.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wu Z, Zhou C. 5G embedded sensor network system for sports information service hotspot recommendation. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2022 doi: 10.1155/2022/8134290. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Irfan M, Ahmad M. Modeling consumers’ information acquisition and 5G technology utilization: Is personality relevant? Pers. Individ. Dif. 2022 doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111450. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fu M, et al. Deep CNN-based materials location and recognition for industrial multi-crane visual sorting system in 5G network. Appl. Sci. 2023 doi: 10.3390/app13021066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cheng LK, Huang HL, Yang SY. Attitude toward 5G: The moderating effect of regulatory focus. Technol. Soc. 2021;67:101795. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101795. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang XV, Wang L. A literature survey of the robotic technologies during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021;60(February):823–836. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nieto A, Acien A, Fernandez G. Crowdsourcing analysis in 5G IoT: Cybersecurity threats and mitigation. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2019;24(3):881–889. doi: 10.1007/s11036-018-1146-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xiao X, Borah P, Su Y. The dangers of blind trust: Examining the interplay among social media news use, misinformation identification, and news trust on conspiracy beliefs. Public Underst. Sci. 2021;30(8):977–992. doi: 10.1177/0963662521998025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barrios-Ulloa A, Cama-Pinto D, Mardini-Bovea J, Díaz-Martínez J, Cama-Pinto A. Projections of iot applications in colombia using 5g wireless networks. Sensors. 2021;21(21):1–26. doi: 10.3390/s21217167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li J, et al. Application of improved robot-assisted laparoscopic telesurgery with 5G technology in urology. Eur. Urol. 2023;83(1):41–44. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Akbari M, Rezvani A, Shahriari E, Zúñiga MA, Pouladian H. Acceptance of 5 G technology: Mediation role of trust and concentration. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. - JET-M. 2020;57:101585. doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101585. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kaur P, Dhir A, Bodhi R, Singh T, Almotairi M. Why do people use and recommend m-wallets? J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020;56:102091. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Atulkar S, Singh AK. Role of psychological and technological attributes on customer conversion to use food ordering apps. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2021;49(10):1430–1446. doi: 10.1108/IJRDM-09-2020-0349. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Maeng K, Kim J, Shin J. Demand forecasting for the 5G service market considering consumer preference and purchase delay behavior. Telemat. Inform. 2020;47:101327. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2019.101327. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Koh TH, Choi JW, Seo M, Do Choi H, Kim KH. Factors affecting risk perception of electromagnetic waves from 5G network base stations. Bioelectromagnetics. 2020;41(7):491–499. doi: 10.1002/bem.22290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mustafa S, Zhang W, Anwar S, Jamil K, Rana S. An integrated model of UTAUT2 to understand consumers’ 5G technology acceptance using SEM-ANN approach. Sci. Rep. 2022;12(1):1–19. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24532-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yu Z, Jin D. Determinants of users’ attitude and intention to intelligent connected vehicle infotainment in the 5g-v2x mobile ecosystem. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021 doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Merhi M, Hone K, Tarhini A. A cross-cultural study of the intention to use mobile banking between Lebanese and British consumers: Extending UTAUT2 with security, privacy and trust. Technol. Soc. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101151. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2003;27(3):425–478. doi: 10.2307/30036540. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tasmin R, Yi LJ, Bakar SA. Cyberjaya Malaysia: Bridging the gap between user acceptance and the 5G technology readiness. Res. Manag. Technol. Business. 2023;4(1):822–834. doi: 10.3088/rmtb.2023.04.01.056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chan WM, Lee JWC. 5G connected autonomous vehicle acceptance: The mediating effect of trust in the technology acceptance model. Asian J. Bus. Res. 2021;11(1):40–60. doi: 10.14707/ajbr.210098. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Stojanović M, Radenković M, Popović S, Mitrović S, Bogdanović Z. A readiness assessment framework for the adoption of 5G based smart-living services. Inf. Syst. E-bus. Manag. 2023;21(2):389–413. doi: 10.1007/s10257-023-00625-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Biswas S, Sanyal A, Božani D. Critical success factors for 5G technology adaptation in supply chains. Sustain. 2023 doi: 10.3390/su15065539. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Moore GJ. Huawei, cyber-sovereignty and liberal norms: China’s challenge to the west/democracies. J. Chinese Polit. Sci. 2023;28(1):151–167. doi: 10.1007/s11366-022-09814-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yang H, Yang J, Zhao W, Liu C. On-demanding information acquisition in multi-UAV-assisted sensor network: A satisfaction-driven perspective. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021 doi: 10.1155/2021/2717733. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Xie X, Zang Z, Ponzoa JM. The information impact of network media, the psychological reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic, and online knowledge acquisition: Evidence from Chinese college students. J. Innov. Knowl. 2020;5(4):297–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2020.10.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jolley D, Paterson JL. Pylons ablaze: Examining the role of 5G COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and support for violence. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 2020;59(3):628–640. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang R, Li M. Power equipment fault information acquisition system based on internet of things. Eurasip J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2021;1:2021. doi: 10.1186/s13638-021-01942-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Singh R, et al. Highway 4.0: Digitalization of highways for vulnerable road safety development with intelligent IoT sensors and machine learning. Saf. Sci. 2021;143:105407. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shah SK, Tang Z, Gavurova B, Oláh J, Acevedo-Duque Á. Modeling consumer’s innovativeness and purchase intention relationship regarding 5G technology in China. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022;10(September):1–15. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1017557. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gaba GS, Kumar G, Kim TH, Monga H, Kumar P. Secure Device-to-Device communications for 5G enabled Internet of Things applications. Comput. Commun. 2021;169(January):114–128. doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2021.01.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liyanage M, et al. A survey on zero touch network and service management (ZSM) for 5G and beyond networks. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2022;203:103362. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2022.103362. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hireche O, Benzaïd C, Taleb T. Deep data plane programming and AI for zero-trust self-driven networking in beyond 5G. Comput. Netw. 2022;203:108668. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108668. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Borgaonkar R, Anne Tøndel I, Zenebe Degefa M, Gilje Jaatun M. Improving smart grid security through 5G enabled IoT and edge computing. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 2021;33(18):1–16. doi: 10.1002/cpe.6466. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Soothar P, Wang H, Dayo ZA, Quan Y. A new CPW-Fed semicircular inverted triangular shaped antenna based on mixed-alternate approach for 5G millimeter-wave wireless applications. Micromachines. 2023 doi: 10.3390/mi14010220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li X. Brand design in the era of 5g new media and its impact on consumers’ emotional experience. Front. Psychol. 2022;13(September):1–10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.956490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Abubakar HS, Zhao Z, Wang B, Kiani SH, Parchin NO, Hakim B. Eight-port modified E-Slot MIMO antenna array with enhanced isolation for 5G mobile phone. Electron. 2023 doi: 10.3390/electronics12020316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Xie Y, Zhou R, Chan AHS, Jin M, Qu M. Motivation to interaction media: The impact of automation trust and self-determination theory on intention to use the new interaction technology in autonomous vehicles. Front. Psychol. 2023;14:1–14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1078438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Li D, Huang Y, Qian L. Potential adoption of robotaxi service: The roles of perceived benefits to multiple stakeholders and environmental awareness. Transp. Policy. 2022;126:120–135. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.07.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yu Y, Han X, Hu G. Optimal production for manufacturers considering consumer environmental awareness and green subsidies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016;182:397–408. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.09.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chang D, Gao D, Wang X, Men X, Zhang P, Zhang Z. Influence mechanisms of the national pollution source census on public participation and environmental consciousness in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2022;363:132397. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132397. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rosano M, Cagliano AC, Mangano G. Investigating the environmental awareness of logistics service providers. The case of Italy. Clean. Logist. Supply Chain. 2022;5:100083. doi: 10.1016/j.clscn.2022.100083. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang D, Chen W, Zheng X, Li Y. Mechanism of undergraduate students’ waste separation behavior in the environmentally friendly higher education mega center of Guangzhou. J. Environ. Public Health. 2019;2022(February):2022. doi: 10.1155/2022/4475245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Huang X, Lin Y, Lim MK, Tseng ML, Zhou F. The influence of knowledge management on adoption intention of electric vehicles: Perspective on technological knowledge. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2021;121(7):1481–1495. doi: 10.1108/IMDS-07-2020-0411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Abbas K, Afaq M, Khan TA, Rafiq A, Song WC. Slicing the core network and radio access network domains through intent-based networking for 5G networks. Electron. 2020;9(10):1–25. doi: 10.3390/electronics9101710. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yu C, Chen S, Wang F, Wei Z. “Improving 4G/5G air interface security: A survey of existing attacks on different LTE layers. Comput. Netw. 2021;201:108532. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108532. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nguyen DC, Pathirana PN, Ding M, Seneviratne A. Blockchain for 5G and beyond networks: A state of the art survey. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2020;166:102693. doi: 10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102693. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tabone W, et al. Vulnerable road users and the coming wave of automated vehicles: Expert perspectives. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 2021;9:100293. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100293. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yu K, Lin L, Alazab M, Tan L, Gu B. Deep learning-based traffic safety solution for a mixture of autonomous and manual vehicles in a 5G-enabled intelligent transportation system. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021;22(7):4337–4347. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2020.3042504. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lai PC, Liew EJY. Towards a cashless society: The effects of perceived convenience and security on gamified mobile payment platform adoption. Australas. J. Inf. Syst. 2021;25:1–25. doi: 10.3127/AJIS.V25I0.2809. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ancans G, Bobrovs V, Ancans A, Kalibatiene D. Spectrum considerations for 5G mobile communication systems. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2016;104:509–516. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.01.166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lemstra W. Leadership with 5G in Europe: Two contrasting images of the future, with policy and regulatory implications. Telecomm. Policy. 2018;42(8):587–611. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2018.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rao SK, Prasad R. Impact of 5G technologies on smart city implementation. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2018;100(1):161–176. doi: 10.1007/s11277-018-5618-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Harrington CM, et al. Integration and sustainability of electronic surgical logbooks in sub-saharan Africa. World J. Surg. 2020;44(10):3259–3267. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05613-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Forge S, Vu K. Forming a 5G strategy for developing countries: A note for policy makers. Telecomm. Policy. 2020;44(7):101975. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101975. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.O’Connell E, Moore D, Newe T. Challenges associated With implementing 5G in manufacturing. Telecom. 2020;1(1):48–67. doi: 10.3390/telecom1010005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Morgado A, Huq KMS, Mumtaz S, Rodriguez J. A survey of 5G technologies: Regulatory, standardization and industrial perspectives. Digit. Commun. Networks. 2018;4(2):87–97. doi: 10.1016/j.dcan.2017.09.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Liu F, Gong Q, Zhou J. Reform of the practice teaching system of entrepreneurship education based on 5G fog computing in colleges and universities. Sci. Program. 2021 doi: 10.1155/2021/2466441. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Singh R, et al. Analysis of network slicing for management of 5G networks using machine learning techniques. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2022 doi: 10.1155/2022/9169568. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Chitimira H, Ncube P. The regulation and use of artificial intelligence and 5g technology to combat cybercrime and financial crime in south african banks. Potchefstroom Electron. Law J. 2021 doi: 10.17159/1727-3781/2021/V24I0A10742. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Farrukh M, Xu S, Baheer R, Ahmad W. Unveiling the role of supply chain parameters approved by blockchain technology towards firm performance through trust: The moderating role of government support. Heliyon. 2023;9(11):e21831. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Matinmikko M, Latva-aho M, Ahokangas P, Yrjölä S, Koivumäki T. Micro operators to boost local service delivery in 5G. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2017;95(1):69–82. doi: 10.1007/s11277-017-4427-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Attaran M. The impact of 5G on the evolution of intelligent automation and industry digitization. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2021;14(5):5977–5993. doi: 10.1007/s12652-020-02521-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Xie Y, Jiang X, Gong G, Jiang Z, Jin G, Chen H. Yinker: A flexible BBR to achieve the high-throughput and low-latency data transmission over Wi-Fi and 5G networks. Comput. Netw. 2023;222:109530. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109530. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kline C. Admixture analysis of a rural population of the state of Guerrero, Mexico. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2005;128(4):861–869. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.20227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Roscoe AM, Lang D, Sheth JN. Follow-up methods, questionnaire length, and market differences in mail surveys. J. Mark. 1975;39(2):20. doi: 10.2307/1250111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ke Z, Jiayi H, Long C. The effects of expectancies and patriotism on Chinese use intention of 5G network. Front. Psychol. 2022;13(August):1–11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.946000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Stratton SJ. Population research: Convenience sampling strategies. Prehosp. Disaster Med. 2021;36(4):373–374. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21000649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Shahzad MF, Xu S, Rehman O, Javed I. Impact of gamification on green consumption behavior integrating technological awareness, motivation, enjoyment and virtual CSR”. Sci. Rep. 2023 doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48835-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Shahzad, M. F., Khan, K. I., Saleem, S. and Rashid, T. What factors affect the entrepreneurial intention to start-ups? The role of entrepreneurial skills, propensity to take risks, and innovativeness in open business models,” (2021), 10.3390/joitmc7030173.
- 78.Shahzad F, Shahzad MF, Dilanchiev A, Irfan M. Modeling the influence of paternalistic leadership and personality characteristics on alienation and organizational culture in the aviation industry of Pakistan: The mediating role of cohesiveness”. Sustain. 2022 doi: 10.3390/su142215473. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Voorhees CM, Brady MK, Calantone R, Ramirez E. Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2016;44(1):119–134. doi: 10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Martins JM, Shahzad MF, Xu S. Factors influencing entrepreneurial intention to initiate new ventures: Evidence from university students. J. Innov. Entrep. 2023 doi: 10.1186/s13731-023-00333-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015;43(1):115–135. doi: 10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Martins, J. M. Muhammad, F. S. and Shuo X., Examining the factors influencing entrepreneurial intention to initiate new ventures: Focusing on knowledge of entrepreneurial skills, ability to take risk and entrepreneurial innovativeness in open innovation business model., Res. Sq., 1125–1146, 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2664778/v1 (2023).
- 83.Hair JF, Howard MC, Nitzl C. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2020;109(2019):101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Howard MC, Henderson J. A review of exploratory factor analysis in tourism and hospitality research: Identifying current practices and avenues for improvement. J. Bus. Res. 2023;154(2022):113328. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113328. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Bagozzi, R. P. and Edwards, J. R. “Organizational Research Methods,”10.1177/109442819800100104 (1998).
- 87.Farrukh M, Xu S, Naveed W, Nusrat S. Investigating the impact of artificial intelligence on human resource functions in the health sector of China: A mediated moderation model. Heliyon. 2023;9(11):e21818. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Martins JM, Shahzad MF, Javed I. Assessing the impact of workplace harassment on turnover intention: Evidence from the banking industry. Emerg. Sci. J. 2023;7(5):1699–1722. doi: 10.2899/ESJ-2023-07-05-016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Hamdollah, R. and Baghaei, P. Partial least squares structural equation modeling with R, Pract. Assessment, Res. Eval., 21(1), 1–16, 10.7275/d2fa-qv48 (2016).
- 90.Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981;18(1):39. doi: 10.2307/3151312. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M. and Hair, J. F. “Partial least squares structural equation modeling,” in Handbook of Market Research, Springer, Cham, 2022, pp. 587–632. 10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15.
- 92.Butt AA, Chughta GR, Kabir A, Mahmood Z, Jaffri ZUA, Oláh J. Analysis of key establishment techniques for secure D2D communication in emerging 5G cellular networks. Acta Montan. Slovaca. 2021;26(3):395–403. doi: 10.46544/AMS.v26i3.01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Leclercq-Machado L, et al. Sustainable fashion and consumption patterns in peru: An environmental-attitude-intention-behavior analysis. Sustain. 2022;14(16):1–18. doi: 10.3390/su14169965. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Yan H, Pan K. Examining mobile payment user adoption from the perspective of trust transfer. Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organ. 2015;15(2–3):136–151. doi: 10.1504/IJNVO.2015.070423. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Strielkowski W, Kovaleva O, Efimtseva T. Impacts of digital technologies for the provision of energy market services on the safety of residents and consumers. Sustain. 2022;14(5):1–18. doi: 10.3390/su14052934. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 96.McBride SK, et al. Latency and geofence testing of wireless emergency alerts intended for the ShakeAlert® earthquake early warning system for the West Coast of the United States of America. Saf. Sci. 2023;157:105898. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105898. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation. Data can be obtained upon reasonable request by Co-author, Muhammad Farrukh Shahzad (farrukhshahzad207@gmail.com).


