Abstract
After Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection, many effector T cells traffic to the lungs, but few become activated. Here we use an antigen receptor reporter mouse (Nur77-GFP) to identify recently activated CD4 T cells in the lungs. These Nur77-GFPHI cells contain expanded TCR clonotypes, have elevated expression of co-stimulatory genes such as Tnfrsf4/OX40, and are functionally more protective than Nur77-GFPLO cells. By contrast, Nur77-GFPLO cells express markers of terminal exhaustion and cytotoxicity, and the trafficking receptor S1pr5, associated with vascular localization. A short course of immunotherapy targeting OX40+ cells transiently expands CD4 T cell numbers and shifts their phenotype towards parenchymal protective cells. Moreover, OX40 agonist immunotherapy decreases the lung bacterial burden and extends host survival, offering an additive benefit to antibiotics. CD4 T cells from the cerebrospinal fluid of humans with HIV-associated tuberculous meningitis commonly express surface OX40 protein, while CD8 T cells do not. Our data thus propose OX40 as a marker of recently activated CD4 T cells at the infection site and a potential target for immunotherapy in tuberculosis.
Subject terms: Tuberculosis, CD4-positive T cells, Mucosal immunology, Lymphocyte activation, Gene regulation in immune cells
Marking of recently activated T cells may help further our understanding of immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). Here the authors use Nur77-GFP reporter mice infected with Mtb and systems data approaches to implicate OX40 as a marker for recently activated, functionally and transcriptome-wise distinct CD4 T cells, and as a potential target for immunotherapy.
Introduction
Tuberculosis (TB) is a leading infectious cause of death worldwide, and an estimated one-quarter of the global population is infected1. Despite the widespread prevalence and health burden of TB, we still lack efficacious vaccines and efficient drug treatment regimens. The current antibiotic regimen for TB disease is months-long, contributing to multiple challenges of successful TB treatment2. One opportunity for improved TB drug development is to harness the potential of the adaptive immune response, specifically targeting CD4 T cells, which play an essential protective role in both mouse models3,4 and humans with TB5.
During the adaptive immune response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), millions of CD4 T cells traffic to the site of infection, but relatively few find antigen and become activated to carry out effector functions6,7. Prior studies have identified various phenotypes of CD4 T cells recruited to the lungs of Mtb-infected mice, based on lung compartmental localization, expression of transcription factors and surface markers, and secretion of effector cytokines8–11. CD4 T cells specific for a highly abundant Mtb antigen, ESAT-6, frequently express the surface markers CX3CR1 and KLRG1 and secrete IFN-γ, but primarily localize to the lung vasculature8,9. These terminally differentiated, vascular, Th1 effector cells are less protective and phenotypically distinct from CD4 T cells expressing CXCR3 that localize to the lung parenchyma8,9. However, the diverse expression profiles of these subsets have not been broadly defined in relation to their activation status in vivo, due to reliance on targeted flow cytometry panels and intracellular cytokine staining, a technique that requires fixation preventing downstream transcriptional profiling and live cell assays.
In this study, we used the Nur77-GFP mouse, which provides temporally-restricted, antigen-dependent green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression after T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation12, to discriminate recently activated Mtb-specific CD4 T cells (Nur77-GFPHI) and not recently activated cells (Nur77-GFPLO). We hypothesize that activated CD4 T cells coordinate diverse effector mechanisms during TB that could be harnessed for development of host-directed immunotherapies. Using traditional targeted assays and high-resolution bulk and single-cell transcriptomics, we find that activated CD4 T cells at the site of Mtb infection encompass multiple phenotypic types that express an array of costimulatory markers, including OX40 and are functionally superior to non-activated cells. By studying cells recruited to the site of human TB meningitis infection, we observe that OX40 expression is conserved across species among a sub-population of effector CD4 T cells bearing expression hallmarks of antigen receptor activation. Targeting OX40+ cells with an agonist monoclonal antibody during early stages of mouse Mtb infection results in a lasting immunotherapeutic benefit, in contrast to the adverse impacts of PD-1 deficiency or blockade13–16. Our study adds an additional approach to others demonstrating the success of T cell-targeted immunotherapies on improving TB outcomes in mice6,17–19.
Results
CD4 T cells express Nur77-GFP with antigen recognition in Mtb infection
We first characterized Nur77-GFP reporter expression by T cells in the lungs after aerosol infection with Mtb. Among CD44+ effector CD4+ T cells in the lungs, we observed a continuum of Nur77-GFP expression ranging between 10-25% Nur77-GFPHI between individuals and experiments (Fig. S1a and b). This suggested a range of TCR signal strength among effector T cells and asynchronous antigen recognition with transient expression of the reporter, which becomes downregulated within 48 hours after TCR stimulus12. We found that Nur77-GFP expression was more common among CD44+ effector CD4 T cells when compared to CD8 T cells, but that the activated cell population peaked at Day 28 postinfection for both cell types (Fig. S1c and d). For subsequent analyses of the Nur77-GFP mouse we focused on Day 28, a time point when robust T cell responses contribute to curtailing Mtb growth in vivo, similar to what has been observed in wild type C57BL/6 mice (Fig. S1c)4. At this time point, infected Nur77-GFP mice had a higher percentage of effector CD4 T cells expressing Nur77-GFP than uninfected Nur77-GFP, uninfected wildtype, and infected wildtype mice (Fig. 1a), consistent with T cell activation in response to Mtb. To confirm that Nur77-GFP expression is due to direct, recent Mtb antigen recognition instead of antigen-independent activation, we included injection of the Mtb peptide Ag85B240-254 six hours prior to harvest. Ag85B240-254 peptide injection resulted in a clear increase in Nur77-GFP expression in only the Ag85B-specific CD4 T cells (Fig. 1b). These results suggest that Nur77-GFP mice can discriminate Mtb-specific T cells recently activated by antigen receptor stimulation (Nur77-GFPHI) from other (Nur77-GFPLO) CD4 T cells not recently activated and determine what distinguishes these populations.
Nur77-GFPLO and Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cells are phenotypically distinct but overlapping
To compare these populations, we limited all our subsequent analysis to CD44+ CD4 T cells, because CD44 expression implies that cells previously received antigen receptor stimulation leading to clonal expansion and differentiation into effector cells. By focusing on CD44+ cells, it is therefore less likely that Nur77-GFPLO population represents cells that are not Mtb-specific. Instead, we hypothesized that most Nur77-GFPLO CD44+ CD4 T cell population are Mtb-specific effector cells expanded upon infection, but that have not recently been activated at the time of the harvest. These cells are likely a diverse population, including those that are either: spatially isolated from their cognate antigen, specific for an antigen that is not readily available at the time of harvest, or which express T cell receptors (TCR) with relatively low affinity for an Mtb peptide.
In contrast, we hypothesized that the Nur77-GFPHI population is enriched for cells with particular, important phenotypic characteristics, spatial localization, and antigen specificity or affinity that increase the likelihood of antigen-specific CD4 effector T cell activation. To test this, we used flow cytometry to compare the two populations from the same mouse, comprising the highest and lowest ~1/3 of GFP expression. We chose this GFP gating strategy as an unbiased method due to the variability of GFP expression across both mice and experiments (Fig. S1a and b). Mice received an intravenous injection of fluorescent CD45 antibody immediately before harvest to distinguish cells localizing to the lung vasculature or parenchyma. Nur77-GFPLO CD4 T cells included a larger population of vascular cells and cells expressing CX3CR1 and KLRG1 (Fig. 1c), markers of terminally differentiated CD4 T cells in TB and other chronic bacterial infections8,9,20. Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cells rarely localized to the vasculature, were more often CX3CR1-, KLRG1- and contained more cells recognizing the Mtb antigens Ag85B and ESAT-6 (Fig. 1c). These differing CX3CR1, KLRG1, and tetramer specificity phenotypes were observed not only for bulk effector CD4 T cells in the lungs, but also among the subset of lung parenchymal (IV-) cells (Fig. S1e). These data indicate that activated CD4 T cells are phenotypically distinct from not recently activated cells and identify lung compartmental localization as a key determinant of CD4 T cell activation in TB.
Nur77-GFPHI cells are more functionally protective against Mtb infection
To compare the functional protective capacity of recently activated vs other CD4 T cells, we sorted the two populations from the lungs of infected Nur77-GFP mice and performed adoptive transfer into α/β T cell-deficient (TCRα-/-) recipients at one-week postinfection, an approach used previously to compare the relative protective capacity of lung CD4 T cell subsets in TB13,21,22. (Figs. 1d, S2). Both Nur77-GFPHI and Nur77-GFPLO CD4 T cell transfers extended survival compared to TCRα-/- mice receiving no adoptive transfer (median of 130 vs 70 vs 50 days, respectively Fig. 1e), but Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cell transfer conferred a longer median survival time than Nur77-GFPLO (Fig. 1e). Both donor populations were inferior to the maximal observed potential of total bulk effector CD4 T cell population transfer (1 × 107 cells per mouse, 236 days) (Fig. 1e). These data suggest that the population of activated Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cells have superior protective capacity when compared to non-activated cells, but that each population may partially contribute to control of the infection.
We also observed differential protection by these two donor populations when endogenous α/β T cell responses are present in the recipient. We transferred either Nur77-GFPLO or Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cell populations into infection time point matched, congenically distinct wildtype mice (CD45.1) at four weeks post-infection (Fig. 1f). Compared to mice receiving Nur77-GFPLO cells, Nur77-GFPHI recipient mice had a significantly reduced lung bacterial burden at one week after transfer (Fig. 1h). However, Nur77-GFPLO cells also significantly reduced bacterial load when compared to mice that did not receive a cell transfer, again suggesting that both populations contribute to infection control. Flow cytometry revealed no difference in the number of donor Nur77-GFPLO and Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cells infiltrating the lung parenchyma of the recipients (Fig. 1g). This suggests that the greater protection of Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cells is not due to a difference in surviving cell numbers accessing the infection site, but instead to functional characteristics enriched in the activated Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cell population.
Nur77-GFPLO and Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cells have distinct gene expression profiles
To investigate which characteristics of recently activated CD4 T cells in TB might underlie this differential protection, we performed bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) on Nur77-GFPHI and Nur77-GFPLO effector CD4 T cells sorted from the lungs of Mtb infected mice (Supplementary Data S1). Among the differentially expressed genes that were most significantly upregulated in activated Nur77-GFPHI cells were costimulatory (Tnfrsf4, Tnfrsf9) and coinhibitory receptors (Lag3). Interestingly neither Ifng nor Tnf were differentially expressed at the transcriptional level, but Il21, a cytokine required for optimal protection against TB23, was upregulated in recently activated cells. Despite excellent purity of Nur77-GFPHI and LO cells postsorting (Fig. S2), Nr4a1 was not significantly differentially expressed between the two populations, likely reflecting a difference in the temporal expression pattern of Nr4a1 transcript and Nur77GFP-reporter protein, with an expectation for shorter duration of expression of the transcript and a somewhat longer duration of the reporter protein. Consistent with our flow cytometry data, Nur77-GFPLO CD4 T cells differentially expressed markers of terminally differentiated cells (Cx3cr1), with a cytotoxic characteristic (Gzma), notable for expression of the transcription factors Zeb2 and Klf3. (Fig. 2a and b). Nur77-GFPLO cells also expressed markers of signaling (Ptpn4, Rap1b), migration (Ccr2, Itga4, S1pr5), and survival (Il7r) (Fig. 2b). Other studies have identified Zeb2-mediated S1pr5 expression as a mechanism of vascular migration among tissue-resident T cells24, suggesting that some Nur77-GFPLO cells may have been previously activated in the lung parenchyma and subsequently migrated into the vasculature.
Single-cell RNA-Sequencing reveals distinct populations of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells
To further interrogate the diverse expression profiles and phenotypes present in the Mtb-specific CD4 T cell population, we performed single-cell RNA-Sequencing (scRNA-Seq) on Ag85B- and ESAT-6-tetramer enriched25 lung CD4 T cells from infected Nur77-GFP mice (Supplementary Data S2). The enriched Mtb-specific CD4 T cell population included naïve (Ccr7+), proliferating (Mki67+), and two effector (Nkg7+) clusters (Fig. 2c and d). The effector clusters were split into conventional (Tconv) effector and differentiated cytotoxic (Gzma+, Cx3cr1+) clusters (Fig. 2c and d). The cytotoxic CD4 T cell cluster co-clustered with a small population of residual CD8 T cells that remained after tetramer enrichment, supporting the idea that these CD4 T cells share transcriptional programs with CD8 T cells (Fig. 2d).
Tnfrsf4, encoding the costimulatory receptor OX40, was highly and specifically expressed on Tconv effectors, unlike the effector cytokine Ifng which was broadly expressed throughout effector clusters (Fig. 2d). As expected, Nr4a1 (encoding Nur77) and the EGFP reporter gene were co-expressed in cells across effector cell populations, including a subpopulation of population of cells where Tnfrsf4 was most abundant (Fig. 2d). These data illustrate the phenotypic heterogeneity of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells in the lungs, potentially representing successive states of differentiation.
Nur77-GFPLO and Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cells encompass diverse populations
Among the subtypes we observed in Mtb-specific lung CD4 T cells, we hypothesized that differential abundance of certain phenotypes contributes to the different protective capacities of recently activated and other CD4 T cells. We therefore performed scRNA-Seq on populations of CD44+ effector Nur77-GFPLO or Nur77-GFPHI effector CD4 T cells sorted from the lungs of the same infected mouse and compared the phenotypic composition of each group (Supplementary Data S3 and S4). To identify vascular cells, we used an oligonucleotide labeled CD45 antibody injected intravenously prior to harvest. Nur77-GFPLO and Nur77-GFPHI samples included similar frequencies of proliferating cells (Mki67+; 3.0% vs 2.2%), but vascular differentiated cytotoxic T cells (Gzma+, Cx3cr1+, S1pr5+, IV+) were more frequent in the Nur77-GFPLO sample (11.7% vs 5.8%). Parenchymal T cells (Cx3cr1-, IV-) were slightly less prevalent in the Nur77-GFPLO sample compared to Nur77-GFPHI (85.3% vs 92.0%) (Fig. 3a and b). These data suggest that all effector cell phenotypes observed are capable of being activated during infection. Interestingly, the Nur77-GFPHI population also includes a cluster of cells (4.7%) marked by the expression of Foxp3, consistent with regulatory T cells (Tregs) (Fig. 3a and b), suggesting that this phenotype commonly expresses Nur77-GFP in the periphery and is activated by antigen receptor stimulation in the lungs.
Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cells have increased expression of costimulatory molecules
Although we observed overlap between the composition of the Nur77-GFPLO and Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cell populations, there were clear distinctions between the expression profiles of their effector cells. As seen in our bulk RNA-seq and tetramer-enriched scRNA-Seq experiments (Fig. 2a and d), Tnfrsf4 was more commonly expressed by activated effector cells (Fig. 3b, Supplementary Data S4) (22% GFPLO vs 59% GFPHI), along with other costimulatory and coinhibitory marker genes (e.g. Tnfrsf18, Tnfrsf9, Ctla4) (Fig. 3c and d, Supplementary Data S4). We used flow cytometry to confirm that OX40 surface protein expression is significantly enriched in Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cells, in both the total effector CD4 population, as well as the subset of parenchymal (IV-) Mtb-tetramer staining population (Fig. 3e). The exception to this finding is Nur77-GFPHI vascular effector T cells, which express relatively low levels of costimulatory and inhibitory receptors (Fig. 3c). The increased expression of costimulatory and inhibitory receptors in Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cells further suggests that these receptors may contribute to protection against TB.
Single-cell TCR sequencing reveals preferential activation of expanded clonotypes
Using single-cell TCR sequencing, we tested the hypothesis that Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cells are more protective than Nur77-GFPLO cells due to differential Mtb antigen specificity of the two populations. The proportion of the most highly expanded TCR clonotypes was similar between Nur77-GFPLO and Nur77-GFPHI cells (Fig. 4a), likely reflecting the transient nature of Nur77-GFP expression- within 6-48 hours of antigen receptor stimulation and suggesting that TCR specificity is not the sole explanation for better protective capacity of Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cells. However, we found that the top three most highly expressed clonotypes in both populations (1, 2, and 3) were over-represented in the Nur77-GFPHI population (Fig. 4b), suggesting that T cells with these specificities are more likely to be activated. By overlaying the distribution of each expanded clonotype on gene expression clusters for Nur77-GFPLO cells, we found that all three clonotypes were present in both vascular and parenchymal clusters. However, among activated Nur77-GFPHI cells, clonotypes 2 and 3 were only present in the parenchymal Nur77-GFPHI effector cell clusters (Fig. 4c), suggesting that T cells of these specificities are more likely to bear a parenchymal Tconv cell phenotype.
OX40 agonism of CD4 T cells in Mtb-infected mice results in improved outcomes
Tnfrsf4/OX40 was among the most highly expressed markers in bulk-activated Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cells and Mtb-specific CD4 T cells (Figs. 2a, b and 3c, d). Although OX40 contributes to CD8 T cell protection in mouse infection models with some viruses and Listeria26–30, we found that it is predominantly expressed by CD4 T cells and rarely by CD8 T cells in the lungs after Mtb infection (Fig. 5a). Because it is highly expressed by activated CD4 T cells, we hypothesized that OX40 stimulation may contribute to their enhanced protective capacity. To test this hypothesis, we examined the impact of enhanced OX40 stimulation on Mtb infection outcomes, using an agonist monoclonal antibody.
We found that a two-week course of OX40 agonist antibody treatment at the first month of infection extended long-term survival of wild type mice (Figs. 5b and S3a) and had no apparent detrimental impact on host health (Fig. S3b). This was in stark contrast to treatment with a PD-1 blocking antibody, which resulted in several cases of early mortality after treatment and no extension of survival compared to isotype control (Fig. S3c). Wild-type mice that received OX40 agonist treatment for two weeks also had a ~50% reduction in lung bacterial load compared to isotype control and PD-1 blocking antibody (Fig. 5c). These data are consistent with existing evidence regarding the detrimental effect of PD-1 deficiency or blockade in tuberculosis13,14 and suggest that different approaches to T cell targeted immunotherapy can have divergent effects on Mtb infection outcomes.
Notably, OX40 agonist treatment did not affect survival of TCRα-/- mice (Fig. S3a), suggesting that this beneficial effect is mediated by α/β T cells. OX40 agonism survival extension after only two weeks of treatment during early infection suggests that this treatment causes long-term changes in CD4 T cells that can continue to improve infection outcomes months after treatment has ended.
OX40 agonism alters lung inflammation
To determine whether the change in survival was accompanied by changes in structural disease, we analyzed histopathology in OX40 agonist, PD-1 blockade, and isotype control-treated lungs. We found in all treatment groups that regions of inflammation were patchy to coalescing (Fig. S4a). However, OX40 agonism-treated lungs had more extensive inflammation characterized primarily by multifocal to coalescing cellular aggregates that were on average larger in size than those from mice receiving isotype control or PD-1 blockade (Fig. S4a–c). Although cellular inflammation in all samples was principally composed of either macrophages or lymphoid cells, due to the coalescing nature of cellular inflammation in OX40 agonist-treated mice, these lungs had less discrete macrophage and lymphoid aggregates (Fig. S4c). In addition OX40 agonist-treated lungs were further characterized by extensive regions of pulmonary edema (eosinophilic fluid in airspaces) in contrast to the rare and focal edema in PD-1 blockade and isotype control-treated mice (Fig. S4c and d). We also found that, across treatment groups, acid-fast bacteria (AFB) were not seen in all macrophage aggregates and the number of AF+ bacteria within individual macrophages was highly variable (Fig. S4e). Visual analysis suggested that both isotype control and PD-1 blockade-treated mice had discrete AF+ macrophage aggregates with high densities of bacteria while OX40 agonist-treated mice had more scattered and less discrete AF+ aggregates (Fig. S4e). However, measurement of the largest AF+ macrophage aggregates (n = 5) found no significant difference between treatment groups (Fig. S4f). In conclusion, OX40 agonism-treated lungs have increased cellular inflammation characterized by coalescing macrophage and lymphoid aggregates of greater average size, as well as increased pulmonary edema suggesting more robust lung inflammation.
OX40 agonism expands CD4 T cell populations in the lung
OX40 stimulation has been demonstrated to potentiate TCR signals in other contexts31–33, and incorporation of OX40 signaling domains in chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapies is used to improve cell survival, proliferation, and function34. We therefore hypothesized that OX40 agonism improved TB outcomes by expanding the lung CD4 T cell population size and phenotype. We found that OX40 agonist treatment significantly increased the number of polyclonal and Mtb-specific lung CD4 T cells, but not CD8 T cells (Fig. 5d and e). In contrast, PD-1 blockade did not affect the population size of either cell type (Fig. 5c and d). With OX40 agonism, we observed an increase in the total number of proliferating CD4 T cells but no significant change in the frequency of either CD4 T cells expressing proliferation (Ki-67+) or apoptotic (Caspase-3/7+) markers (Fig. S5a and b). These data suggested that other changes in T cells, such as cell phenotype and localization, may predominantly underlie the beneficial effect of OX40 agonism.
OX40 agonism induces lasting phenotypic effects on CD4 T cells
To determine how OX40 agonism persistently affects the Mtb infection after the cessation of antibody treatment, we investigated the lasting effects on bacterial burden and CD4 T cells at one-month post-treatment (Fig. 6a). We found that the reduction of bacterial burden and increase in CD4 T cell number observed immediately after two weeks of OX40 agonism began to normalize at 42 days post-antibody treatment (Fig. 6b and c). Interestingly, we also observed a change in the localization and phenotype of CD4 T cells after OX40 agonism, with this treatment driving an increase in the percentage of cells localizing to the lung parenchyma (Fig. 6d and e) and a decrease in the fraction of bulk polyclonal and Mtb-tetramer binding cells expressing the terminal differentiation markers KLRG1 and CX3CR1 (Figs. 6f, g, S5d). Although the change in CD4 T cell parenchymal localization was transient, the change in phenotype was persistent, with fewer CD4 T cells in OX40-treated mice expressing KLRG1 and CX3CR1 at one-month post-treatment (Fig. 6g). In addition to these phenotypic changes, we also observed that the percentage of lung CD4 T cells expressing FOXP3 slightly increased immediately post-treatment, (Fig. S5c). Foxp3 transcript was also specifically and highly expressed in Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cell bulk RNA-seq (Fig. 2a) and scRNA-seq (Fig. 3b) datasets, making up approximately 5% of the total cells from this population. These data suggest that OX40 agonism causes both transient and lasting shifts in CD4 T cell localization and phenotype that may underlie that the increased survival of mice undergoing this treatment.
OX40 agonism offers additive benefit to antibiotic treatment
The future potential of immunotherapies in TB treatment could include the combination of therapeutic antibodies with current TB antibiotics, so we next tested whether there is a benefit of adding OX40 agonist treatments to antibiotic treatment. We treated Mtb-infected mice beginning at day 28 post-infection; OX40 agonist antibodies were injected twice weekly for two weeks and antibiotics were given continuously in water until harvest (Fig. 7a). We observed that OX40 agonism significantly reduced bacterial load immediately after the antibody treatment not only as an individual treatment, but also in combination with antibiotics (Fig. 7b). This suggests that OX40 agonism may have beneficial additive effects to current TB antibiotic treatment regimens.
To determine the lasting impact of short-term host-directed immunotherapy with OX40 agonist in combination with antibiotics, we studied later timepoints after antibody treatment had ended but antibiotic treatment continued. We observed that the bacterial load reduction caused by OX40 agonism and antibiotic combination treatment lasted until at least 42 days post-antibody treatment but waned by 76 days post-treatment (Fig. 7c), suggesting that early OX40 agonism can cause long-term effects when given alongside antibiotics. In contrast, the increased CD4 T cell number caused by OX40 agonism and antibiotic combination treatment persisted, lasting until at two months post-treatment (Fig. 7d). Furthermore, OX40 agonism resulted in a robust change in CD4 T cell phenotype, both without and with combination antibiotics, reducing the percentage of terminally differentiated, CX3CR1/KLRG1-expressing cells at 42 days after the initiation of treatment (Fig. 7e). The predominance of CX3CR1-, KLRG1- CD44+ effector CD4 T cells at this late post-treatment time point is suggestive of a more functional T cell population persisting during antibiotic therapy, which may have important implications for adjunctive host-directed therapies and warrants further study.
Human CD4 T cells express OX40 at the site of TB infection
To determine whether OX40 expression among T cells at the site of TB infection is conserved across species, we isolated cells from the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of human participants diagnosed with HIV-associated TB meningitis. From a single individual with CSF culture positive for Mtb, we performed single-cell RNA-Sequencing on live sorted CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. CD4 T cells formed 4 transcriptional sub-clusters (Fig. 8a). The dominant CD4 T cell cluster was characterized by evidence of TCR stimulus, expressing the transcription factors FOS and JUNB, as well as TNFRSF4 and other costimulatory markers (Fig. 8b and c). One subdominant CD4 cluster showed a cytotoxic phenotype with GZMA and CCL5 expression. These two major CD4 clusters closely mirrored phenotypes we observed among Mtb-specific T cells from the lungs of infected mice (Fig. 2). A second, subdominant CD4 cluster, also expressing TNFRSF4 and FOS co-expressed both type I interferon-stimulated genes (MX1) as well as FOXP3 (Fig. 8c). We found that the final CD4 T cell cluster had the highest density of transcripts aligning to the HIV viral genome and likely represented cells productively infected with HIV. We observed widespread expression of the antiviral defense mediator ADAR across all cell types, with the densest expression localizing to the HIV cluster. These data indicated that phenotypes of infection-site CD4 T cells are conserved across species, with a sub-population expressing TNFRSF4, likely reflecting recently activated cells. The interferon signature observed among human CSF T cells may reflect the impact of severe HIV co-infection on cellular states at the infection site.
Finally, we used flow cytometry to assess the surface protein expression of OX40 among CD4 and CD8 T cells in the CSF of individuals treated for HIV-associated TBM. Similar to observations in the mouse, we found that OX40 was predominantly expressed on CD4+ T cells, with far less frequent expression on CD8 T cells at the site of infection (Fig. 8d).
Discussion
Effector CD4 T cells are an essential component of protective immunity against TB. Much is already known about mediators required for their functional benefit in controlling Mtb infection, but prior studies have been technically limited in a few important ways. The first is the reliance on relatively low-resolution techniques like flow cytometry that require a priori knowledge of presumed pathways of importance, which can impede the discovery of novel mediators of protection. The second is the inability to identify the sub-population of CD4 T cells that are actively engaged with antigen at the time of cell collection, and which presumably actively contribute to protection. Although prior studies have used either TCR-Tg T cells or MHCII tetramers to focus analyses on the antigen-specific T cell response, these approaches limit the study of CD4 T cell function to a few dominant epitope-specificities, which may or may not be representative of the broader polyclonal response. This is of importance since CD4 T cell responses targeted against different Mtb antigens can have different phenotypic characteristics6,17. While restimulation using large peptide pools of Mtb epitopes have partially mitigated this issue35, this approach does not capture the activity of cells in situ. The use of ex vivo cytokine production as a readout to identify Mtb-specific cells may also be biased towards previously known effector phenotypes (e.g. production of IFN-γ, TNF, and IL-2) and requires cell fixation, which prevents downstream applications that require live cell inputs, including functional and transcriptomic analyses. There has been no way to identify the subset of Mtb antigen-specific effector CD4 T cells actively responding at the site of infection and learn with an unbiased approach what distinguishes this population phenotypically and functionally.
To address these limitations, we used the Nur77-GFP lymphocyte activation reporter mouse to investigate the effector phenotypes of activated Mtb-specific CD4 T cells in the lungs. In addition to traditional flow cytometry, this allowed us to perform live-cell functional assays and both bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing. While other reporter mice exist that are capable of detecting even more recently activated lymphocytes36, we favored this Nur77-GFP model for its ability to capture cells receiving antigen receptor stimulation within 6-48 hours prior to tissue harvest12. We hypothesized that this approach could identify new effector functions, immunotherapy targets, and cellular phenotypes within the broader CD4 T cell population. Our study adds further dimensions to prior work by defining the transcriptomic phenotypic heterogeneity of Mtb-specific CD4 T cells in the lungs. Importantly, we found that the sub-population of activated CD4 T cells is enriched for certain phenotypes, including parenchymal T conventional effectors and T regulatory cells. In line with prior studies, we found that Foxp3+ cells in the periphery were commonly Nur77-GFPHI37, likely reflecting both high-affinity epitope-TCR interactions that characterize Tregs12, as well as the direct transcriptional relationship of Nr4a1 and Foxp338. Although use of this particular lymphocyte activation reporter ensures a more comprehensive capture of the activated population, one potential caveat is that it may also include strongly autoreactive cells. Whether these activated Tregs are specific for self or Mtb antigens, is an important topic for future study. In contrast, we observed that cells expressing a transcriptional profile of terminal differentiation and cytotoxicity were more likely to localize to the vasculature and more likely to be Nur77-GFPLO at the time of harvest. Using CITE-Seq with an oligonucleotide-labeled antibody injected intravenously immediately prior to the harvest, we identified genes strongly associated with this vascular CD4 T cell population, including the transcription factor Zeb2 and the trafficking receptor S1pr5, both shown by others to contribute to vascular localization of tissue-resident memory T cells24. Prior to this study, others had demonstrated this vascular population in the Mtb-infected mouse lung, which is enriched for cells expressing CX3CR1 and KLRG1, as we have observed here8. Our approach offers further insight into the mechanism that likely underlies the localization of this population, which is not commonly activated, presumably due to its spatial isolation from Mtb-infected antigen-presenting cells in the lung parenchyma.
A key characteristic of the Nur77-GFPHI-activated CD4 T cell population is the expression of multiple costimulatory and coinhibitory markers. This finding validated our approach because expression of many of these markers is induced shortly after antigen receptor stimulation, leading to their use as “Activation Induced Markers” in ex vivo restimulation assays39. Costimulatory markers differentially expressed by Nur77-GFPHI activated cells included several already known to participate in the immune response to Mtb, including Tnfrsf18 (CD153) and Pdcd1 (PD-1), both of which are required for optimal protection against Mtb13,40. We also found that Tnfrsf4 (CD134/OX40) was among the most differentially expressed by activated cells in our flow cytometry, bulk, and single-cell transcriptional analyses. While we did not observe exact concordance of expression of Nr4a1/Nur77-GFP and Tnfrsf4/OX40, potentially reflecting differences in their temporal expression pattern, we consistently observed that recently activated cells were enriched for cells expressing Tnfrsf4/OX40. These repeated results identifiedTnfrsf4/OX40 as a potentially useful marker gene for activated, parenchymal effector CD4 T cells at the site of infection.
Interestingly, key functional mediators like Ifng and Tnf were not differentially expressed by activated cells at the transcriptional level; perhaps a consequence of post-transcriptional regulation of these cytokines. Nur77-GFPHI cells did express more Il21 than Nur77-GFPLO cells, consistent with the requirement of this cytokine for optimal protection in the mouse model of TB23 and suggesting an important role for IL-21 signaling at the site of infection. One important technical limitation of our study is that protein level validation of cytokine expression differences was not possible, because measurement of cytokine production requires ex vivo restimulation.
We found several lines of evidence suggesting that antigen specificity is an important determinant of CD4 T cell activation at the site of infection. We observed that the activated population was enriched for Ag85B and ESAT-6-specific cells, and that expanded TCR clonotypes were relatively more abundant among the Nur77-GFPHI TCR repertoire. Among three dominant T cell clones, we identified two that were restricted in the Nur77-GFPHI population to parenchymal T conventional cell clusters, rather than the vasculature. Future studies to identify the antigen specificities of these TCRs could help illuminate which antigens are more likely to elicit vaccine-induced protective, lung-homing CD4 T cell responses. One limitation of the present study is our focus on a single, important time point in the infection, when adaptive immunity curtails Mtb growth in the lungs. More work is needed to investigate the plasticity of CD4 T cell phenotypes in relation to activation states over the course of Mtb infection.
Although little is known about the role of OX40 in TB immunity, it is an important target for immunotherapy against cancer. Agonism of costimulatory receptors like OX40, 4-1BB, and GITR have shown success in several cancer studies41–43 and are an emerging alternative to blockade of inhibitory receptors like PD-1. Importantly, the mechanism of action of OX40 agonism may differ from checkpoint blockade, shifting T cell phenotype and localization, rather than increasing cytokine production. In mice with TB, treatment with a recombinant OX40 ligand enhanced the protective effects of BCG vaccination44,45, and OX40 deficient mice had a modest though statistically significant reduction in survival after Mtb infection40. Prior human studies have used OX40 expression after ex vivo restimulation to identify Mtb-specific T cells46, but none have evaluated the expression of this marker by T cells at the site of TB infection. Importantly, we found that at the site of human TB infection, OX40 expression was common among CD4 T cells. TNFRSF4 was also highly expressed by CD4 T cells in the granulomas of non-human primates infected with Mtb47 and was among a module of genes differentially expressed by airway CD4 T cells responding to high dose IV BCG vaccination, associated with sterilizing protection against subsequent Mtb challenge48. We therefore propose that this marker may be a useful way of identifying activated Mtb antigen-specific cells at TB infection sites across species. Surprisingly, we found that few CD8 T cells in the Mtb-infected mouse lung or human CSF express OX40, in contrast to other infections26–30. This finding may suggest that CD8 T cell activation at the site of Mtb infection relies less on antigen receptor stimulation, and more on cytokine-driven responses7,49. While few CD8 T cells expressed OX40, we could not completely rule out whether CD8 T cells have some effect on improving TB outcomes after OX40 agonism as our survival studies examined completely T cell-deficient TCRα-/- mice.
Our study of human CSF T cells in HIV-associated TB meningitis helps to corroborate both the single-cell transcriptional T cell phenotypes observed in the mouse lung, as well as the expression of TNRSF4/OX40 among a sub-population of CD4 T cells at the site of infection. It is not yet clear how directly comparable cells from the site of human extra-pulmonary TB infection are to cells from the lungs of mice infected with pulmonary Mtb infection. However, the similarity of the transcriptional clusters we observed across species, and the rare opportunity to study human cells from the site of infection while detecting cells expressing high levels of HIV transcripts demonstrates a technical benefit of single cell RNA-sequencing approaches in human TB immunology. We also observed some differences: notably that FOXP3 expression and type I IFN responsive transcriptional signatures may be a hallmark of effector T cells in HIV-TB coinfection. Future studies should aim to determine whether these unique findings represent common features of CD4 T cells at TB disease sites in humans and whether TNFRSF4-expressing CD4 T cells featuring these transcriptional profiles contribute unique roles in HIV-associated and extrapulmonary TB disease.
Based on its preliminary success as a preclinical cancer immunotherapy target, we investigated whether OX40 agonism also had beneficial effects in the mouse model of TB. We found that immunotherapy targeting OX40 + T cells was well-tolerated by Mtb-infected mice and resulted in improved survival, reduced lung bacterial load, and increased CD4 T cell numbers. OX40 agonism also caused a marked change in lung inflammation, shifting granuloma structure and increasing both average lesion size and surrounding areas of pulmonary edema. These data suggest that OX40 agonism has a fundamentally different effect on Mtb-specific T cell function than PD-1 blockade, which is detrimental due to the dysregulation of IFN-γ production14–16,50. We observed that OX40 agonism increased CD4 T cell numbers in the lung; however, the percentage of Ki67 + CD4 T cells was not significantly impacted, suggesting that other changes may underlie its protective benefit. OX40 agonism also transiently increased the fraction of parenchymal CD4 T cells, and significantly shifted CD4 T cell phenotypes towards those expressing FOXP3 and away from terminal differentiation (CX3CR1, KLRG1), suggesting that the lack of adverse effects may be due to expansion of both effector and regulatory cell populations which can maintain inflammatory balance during infection. It will be important to determine whether the beneficial effects of short-term OX40 agonist immunotherapy during early infection can be improved upon with extended treatments during chronic infection, or on the contrary, if repeated stimulation is detrimental, potentially by driving T cell exhaustion or immunopathology. Future studies should tease out other potential effects of OX40 agonism on CD4 T cells, including improved cell survival, cytokine production, and memory cell generation, to discover potential protective biomarkers, as well as to understand the lasting impact of OX40 agonism on histopathology and T cell function that confers enhanced long-term survival despite persistent chronic infection. Our findings support the need to further investigate OX40 agonism and other T cell-targeted immunotherapies as adjuncts to antibiotic treatment for human TB. This dual approach to TB therapy could allow the targeted expansion of functional CD4 T cells with immunotherapy despite the rapid reduction of antigenic bacterial load that occurs with antibiotics, potentially leading to more efficient treatment regimens for TB and enhancing protection against re-infection.
Methods
Mouse aerosol infection
Prior to infection, mice were housed in a specific pathogen-free facility. Control animals for infections were co-housed in the same facility. Mice in equal numbers from both male and female sexes were infected at 8-16 weeks of age with a standard dose of aerosolized Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv, targeting 100-200 CFUs, using an Inhalation Exposure Unit (Glas-Col). Nur77-GFP (strain 016617) and TCRa-/- (strain 002116) mice were initially purchased from Jackson Labs, then bred in house. Following infection, mice in both experimental groups and controls were housed in the same ABSL3-specific pathogen-free facility. Inoculum size for each infection was confirmed with harvest of 3 C57BL/6 J (Jackson Labs strain 000664) mice 24 hours post-infection. Lungs were homogenized in PBS with Tween 80, then plated on 7H10 agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 3-4 weeks prior to counting colony-forming units. Schematic diagrams in Figs. 1, 6, and 7 representing mouse experimental infections were partially created with BioRender.com.
Lung tissue harvest for flow cytometry and CFU plating
For experiments involving in vivo peptide stimulation, mice were injected via the tail vein with 100 μg synthetic Ag85B240-254 (FQDAYNAAGGHNAVF) peptide 6 hours before euthanasia. For identification of vascular cells during flow cytometry, mice were injected via the tail vein with 3 μg CD45 rF710 (Tonbo Biosciences) immediately before euthanasia. Mice were euthanized with CO2 and lungs were suspended in a digestion buffer containing DMEM, FBS, Collagenase D, DNase, Heparin, CaCl2, and MgCl2. Lungs were incubated at 37 °C for 30 minutes and dissociated with a gentleMACS dissociator (Miltenyi Biotec 130-093-235), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. To isolate cells, lung suspensions were filtered through a 70 μm cell strainer. For experiments with CFU plating, a lung suspension aliquot was taken after cell filtration, serially diluted in PBS with Tween 80, and plated on 7H10 agar plates. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 3-4 weeks then CFUs were calculated by counting single colonies. For experiments with flow cytometry, red blood cells were removed by incubating cells in ACK lysis buffer for 5 minutes. For tetramer staining, cells were incubated in 50 nM dasatinib (Sigma-Aldrich SML2589) for 15 minutes, tetramer (NIH Tetramer Core Facility) was added at 1:100 dilution, then cells were incubated for one hour at room temperature or 37 C. For surface marker staining, cells were incubated with fluorescently labeled antibodies at 4 °C for 30 minutes. Antibodies used for flow cytometry are found in Supplementary Table S1. Precision count beads (BioLegend 424902) were added immediately before flow cytometry to enable cell enumeration. Flow cytometry was performed with a BD Fortessa H1770 (BD Biosciences) or LSR Fortessa X-20 (BD Biosciences) at the University of Minnesota Flow Cytometry Resource. Data analysis was performed using FlowJo software.
Sorting for adoptive transfer and RNA sequencing
Sorting for the tetramer-enriched scRNA-Seq was performed using a CD4+ T cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec 130-104-454) followed by tetramer staining and enrichment of tetramer-specific cells with anti-PE microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec 130-048-801). All other scRNA-Seq and adoptive transfer experiments used fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Cells from lung suspensions were prepared and stained for flow cytometry as above, then sorted on a MA900 Multi-Application Cell Sorter (Sony Biotechnology) into DMEM with 40% FBS for post-sort adoptive transfer or scRNA-Seq, or into TRI Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich T9424) for RNA sequencing. All sorted samples were pre-gated on CD3+, CD4+, CD8-, CD44+ live, single-cells with the exception of bulk CD4 T cells magnetically sorted for adoptive transfer which were not stained with CD3. To isolate recently activated and not recently activated CD4 T cell populations from Nur77-GFP reporter mice, samples were also sorted based on the highest and lowest ~30% of GFP fluorescence intensity. Cells for adoptive transfer were injected via the tail vein into recipient mice. Adoptive transfer to determine Nur77-GFPLO and Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cell protection included 2-5 × 105 cells per mouse. Sorting of Nur77-GFPLO and Nur77-GFPHI CD4 T cells for RNA sequencing yielded 1–2 × 105 cells per sample.
Human cerebrospinal fluid cells
Cells from the CSF of individuals treated for HIV-associated TB meningitis were obtained from participants who provided informed consent for CSF specimen collection for research purposes (UMN IRB: 0308M51329). Cells were obtained on either the day of study enrollment prior to treatment or on day 1 of TBM therapy. CSF samples were initially stored at 4 °C and cells were isolated by centrifugation at 300x g for 10 minutes within 6 hours of collection. Cell pellets for flow cytometry analysis were resuspended in TransFix fixative (Cytomark TFB-01-1) for 24-72 hours, as per manufacturer’s instructions, then stained with antibodies prior to analysis on a Cytoflex flow cytometer. Antibodies and other reagents used for flow cytometry are found in Supplementary Table S1. The CSF cell pellet used for scRNA-Seq was resuspended in freezing medium (FCS with 10% DMSO) prior to cryopreservation at −80 °C using a Mr. Frosty and final storage at −150 °C. Within 6 months of cryopreservation, cells were transported at −50 °C, cryo-recovered in batch, washed with complete RPMI medium, and labeled with a fluorescent viability dye and antibodies for sorting on a MA900 Multi-Application Cell Sorter (Sony Biotechnology) into DMEM with 40% FBS. All sorted samples were pre-gated on CD3+, CD4+ or CD8+, live, single-cells. 5,000 sorted cells from each CD4+ and CD8+ population were pooled and used for scRNA-Seq analysis as below.
RNA extraction and bulk RNA-Seq
RNA extraction was used to prepare sorted cells suspended in TRI Reagent for submission for RNA sequencing. Samples in TRI Reagent were centrifuged at 1000 x g for 10 minutes. Samples were resuspended in chloroform and incubated for 3 minutes then centrifuged at 12,000x g for 15 minutes. The supernatant was collected, isopropyl alcohol added, incubated for 10 minutes, then centrifuged at 7500x g for 5 minutes. The supernatant was discarded then samples were air dried before resuspension in RNase-free water. RNA was submitted to GeneWiz from Azenta Life Sciences for RNA sequencing and differential gene expression analysis using DeSeq2. Data visualizations were prepared using EnhancedVolcano and pheatmap for scaled gene expression analysis, using R version 1.4.
Single-cell RNA-sequencing
Cells sorted into DMEM with 40% FBS were used for scRNA-Seq sample preparation. After sorting, cell number was confirmed with the Luna II (Logos Biosystems). The appropriate number of cells necessary to achieve a target cell input of 2-10,000 cells was resuspended and used to generate GEMs (Gel Bead-In Emulsion). The Chromium Next GEM Single-cell 5’ Gel beads v2 kit (10X Genomics) was used and manufacturer instructions were followed for GEM generation through cDNA synthesis. A Chromium Control was used for GEM generation and barcoding then a thermocycler was used for cDNA synthesis. cDNA was submitted to the University of Minnesota Genomics Center for scRNA-Seq. Tetramer-enriched scRNA-seq data pooled from three biological replicates. Nur77-GFPHI and Nur77-GFPLO scRNA-seq data representative of four biological replicates.
Mouse single-cell RNA-sequencing data analysis
Mouse scRNA-Seq raw expression data was mapped with Cell Ranger (version 7.0.0) for alignment to a custom reference comprised of the mouse genome with an additional EGFP reporter gene. The resultant raw count matrix was imported into a R pipeline with Seurat version 4.0.651. Cells were filtered for a minimum of 200 and maximum of 2,500 genes per cell, mitochondrial genes less than 10%, ribosomal genes less than 20%, and expression of Cd3e over 2 counts. The Seurat default methods were used, with SCtransform for data normalization and scaling, selection of variable genes for PCA and clustering analysis, and regression of mitochondrial and ribosomal genes. For single-cell TCR-sequencing analysis, TCR sequences were also regressed during SCtransform, to minimize impact on gene expression clustering. To assess the relationships between cells, cells were clustered with FindClusters using a resolution 0.3 for GFPHI samples and 0.25 for GFPLO samples to remove redundant clustering. To compare the percentage of Nur77-GFPLO and HI T cells expressing a gene of interest, the percent of cells per each sample from four individual mice, with at least one read was calculated and percentages compared using a paired t-test with adjustment for multiple hypothesis testing Seurat functions and methods were used for gene expression results visualization. For analysis of TCR sequencing data, clonotype data was merged with the Seurat dataset using a R pipeline with scRepertoire version 1.6.052. scRepertoire functions and methods were used for TCR expression results visualization.
Human single-cell RNA-aequencing data analysis
Human scRNA-Seq raw expression data were mapped with Cell Ranger (version 7.0.0) for alignment to a custom reference comprised of the human genome with segments of an Ugandan HIV pro-viral genome (GenBank: AB098330.1), relevant to the geographic region from which the specimens were originally isolated53. The resultant raw count matrix was imported into an R pipeline with Seurat version 4.0.6. Cells were filtered for a minimum of 200 and maximum of 3,000 genes per cell, mitochondrial genes less than 25%, ribosomal genes less than 40%. The Seurat default methods were used, with SCtransform for data normalization and scaling, selection of variable genes for PCA and clustering analysis, and regression of mitochondrial and ribosomal genes. To assess the relationships between cells, cells were clustered with FindClusters using a resolution of 1.0. Dimensionality and violin plots were generated using Seurat, while density plots were generated with Nebulosa54.
Mouse treatments
Mice were treated with OX40 agonist (OX-86, Cat# BE0031), PD-1 blockade (29 F.1A12, Cat# BE0273), and isotype control antibodies (HRPN, Cat# BE0088) obtained from BioXCell, and the antibiotics isoniazid (ThermoFisher 11-101-4575) and rifampin (Sigma-Aldrich R3501) in various experiments. In vivo antibody treatments were performed with intraperitoneal injections of 100 μg per dose every 3-4 days. Antibiotic treatments were performed by adding 0.1 g/L rifampin and 0.1 g/L isoniazid to a water bottle and replaced weekly.
Histopathology
Mice were euthanized with CO2 and lungs were suspended in 10% formalin at 4 °C for 24 hours. Fixed lungs were submitted to the University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute for paraffin embedding, sectioning, staining with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and acid fast (AF) stains. Stained lungs on glass slides were then given to the Comparative Pathology Laboratory at the University of Iowa for evaluation. Stained tissue sections were evaluated and scored by a boarded comparative veterinary pathologist using a post examination method of masking the observer to group assignment55,56. Tissues were ordinally scored for pulmonary edema (eosinophilic fluid in airspaces) and cellular inflammation on extent of lung involvement for each lung. Involvement scores range from: 0, none; 1, <25%; 2, 26-50%; 3, 51-75%; and 4, >75% of lung fields. Inflammatory aggregates were identified, and the minor axis diameter assessed in a masked manner. The number of aggregates, the average diameter in microns and the sum distance (mm) of all foci were assessed as metrics of the severity of cellular inflammation. The maximal size of macrophage aggregates containing AF+ bacteria were evaluated by quantifying the least dimensional diameter (microns) in the five largest aggregates.
Statistics
For flow cytometry experiments comparing the percentage or total number of cells gated from a population, a two-tailed student’s t test was used, assuming a normal distribution among biological replicates, to calculate p values with a threshold for statistical significance of p < 0.05. In instances where two populations were compared from the same individual, a paired t test was used. To compare means of three different treatment groups, one-way ANOVA was used, with post hoc unpaired t testing. To compare two treatment groups at each of several time points, unpaired two-tailed t tests were used, with p value adjustment for multiple comparisons. To compare treatment with antibiotics and OX40 agonism, either in isolation or as combination therapy, two-way ANOVA was used to determine the contribution of each treatment to variance in the model and whether an interaction between existed. To compare the effect of OX40 agonism on CFUs or cell surface marker expression with or without antibiotics, unpaired t tests were used with adjustment for multiple comparisons. To compare differences observed in mouse survival after Mtb infection, p values were calculated with a Mantel-Cox test, with a threshold for statistical significance of p < 0.05. For bulk RNA-Sequencing, DeSeq2 was used to identify genes with a log2 fold change > 1 and -log adjusted p value > 1 as differentially expressed between populations. For single cell RNA-Sequencing analysis comparing the percentage of cells expressing genes of interest among Nur77-GFPHI and LO cell populations, multiple paired t tests were used, with a threshold for statistical significance, adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing, of q < 0.05. For all figures, error bars indicate standard deviation.
Study approval
Approval for mouse studies was received by the University of Minnesota Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Studies involving specimens from human participants were approved by the University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent for research on these specimens was received prior to participation.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
We thank the University of Minnesota Biosafety Level 3 laboratory program, Flow Cytometry core facility, and Genomics Center, as well as the Infectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University, Meningitis Research Team. This work was funded by K08AI150425 (TDB), R01 R01AI173780 (TDB), T32HL007741 (ARG), T32AI055433 (JMT), and R01AI162786 (DRB and DBM).
Author contributions
A.R.G: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Data curation, Software, Formal Analysis, Visualization, Writing – original draft. C.E.R: Methodology, Data curation, Project administration. T.V.M.: Methodology, Data curation, Software. J.M.T.: Methodology, Data curation, Software. D.K.M.: Methodology, Formal Analysis, Visualization, Writing. K.S.: Methodology. J.S.: Project administration, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Data curation. S.O.: Project administration, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Data curation. D.B.M.: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision. F.V.C.: Project administration, Resources, Data curation. D.R.B.: Project administration, Data curation, Funding acquisition. T.D.B.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Maziar Divangahi, David Bending and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
Source data are provided with this paper. The data that support the findings of this study have been deposited at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with accession GSE235800. All other data are available in the article and its Supplementary files or from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The code used to process and analyze single cell RNA-Sequencing experiments has been posted at https://github.com/tylerbold/Activated_CD4_T_cells_in_tuberculosis_express_OX40_a_target_for_host_directed_immunotherapy, assigned: 10.5281/zenodo.10076323.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-44152-8.
References
- 1.World Health Organization. GLOBAL TUBERCULOSIS REPORT 2021. (2021).
- 2.Dartois VA, Rubin EJ. Anti-tuberculosis treatment strategies and drug development: challenges and priorities. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022;20:685–701. doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00731-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Leveton C, et al. T-Cell-Mediated Protection of Mice against Virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 1989;57:390–395. doi: 10.1128/iai.57.2.390-395.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mogues T, Goodrich ME, Ryan L, LaCourse R, North RJ. The relative importance of T cell subsets in immunity and immunopathology of airborne Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice. J. Exp. Med. 2001;193:271–280. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.3.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chamie G, et al. Significant variation in presentation of pulmonary tuberculosis across a high resolution of CD4 strata. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2010;14:1295–1302. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bold, T. D., Banaei, N., Wolf, A. J. & Ernst, J. D. Suboptimal activation of antigen-specific cD4+ effector cells enables persistence of M. tuberculosis in vivo. PLoS Pathog. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002063 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7.Bold, T. D. & Ernst, J. D. CD4 + T Cell-Dependent IFN-γ Production by CD8 + Effector T Cells in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection. J. Immunol. 10.4049/jimmunol.1200994 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.Sallin, M. A. et al. Th1 Differentiation Drives the Accumulation of Intravascular, Non-protective CD4 T Cells during Tuberculosis. Cell Rep. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.007 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 9.Reiley WW, et al. Distinct functions of antigen-specific CD4 T cells during murine Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 2010;107:19408–19413. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006298107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Filipe-Santos O, et al. Inborn errors of IL-12/23- and IFN-γ-mediated immunity: molecular, cellular, and clinical features. Semin. Immunol. 2006;18:347–361. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2006.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Green AM, DiFazio R, Flynn JL. IFN-γ from CD4 T Cells Is Essential for Host Survival and Enhances CD8 T Cell Function during Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection. J. Immunol. 2013;190:270–277. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Moran, A. E. et al. T cell receptor signal strength in Treg and iNKT cell development demonstrated by a novel fluorescent reporter mouse. J. Exp. Med. 10.1084/jem.20110308 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Barber DL, Mayer-Barber KD, Feng CG, Sharpe AH, Sher A. CD4 T Cells Promote Rather than Control Tuberculosis in the Absence of PD-1–Mediated Inhibition. J. Immunol. 2011;186:1598–1607. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Barber DL, et al. Tuberculosis following PD-1 blockade for cancer immunotherapy. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019;11:eaat2702. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat2702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lázár-Molnár E, et al. Programmed death-1 (PD-1)-deficient mice are extraordinarily sensitive to tuberculosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 2010;107:13402–13407. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007394107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kauffman KD, et al. PD-1 blockade exacerbates Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in rhesus macaques. Sci. Immunol. 2021;6:eabf3861. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abf3861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Moguche, A. O. et al. Antigen Availability Shapes T Cell Differentiation and Function during Tuberculosis. Cell Host Microbe10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.012 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 18.Ernst JD, Cornelius A, Desvignes L, Tavs J, Norris BA. Limited Antimycobacterial Efficacy of Epitope Peptide Administration Despite Enhanced Antigen-Specific CD4 T-Cell Activation. J. Infect. Dis. 2018;218:1653–1662. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jayaraman, P. et al. TIM3 Mediates T Cell Exhaustion during Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection. PLoS Pathog. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005490 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 20.Goldberg MF, et al. Salmonella Persist in Activated Macrophages in T Cell-Sparse Granulomas but Are Contained by Surrounding CXCR3 Ligand-Positioned Th1 Cells. Immunity. 2018;49:1090–1102.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sakai S, et al. Control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection by a subset of lung parenchyma homing CD4 T cells. J. Immunol. 2014;192:2965. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Barber, D. L. et al. CD4 T Cell-Derived IFN-γ Plays a Minimal Role in Control of Pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Must Be Actively Repressed by PD-1 to Prevent Lethal Disease. PLOS Pathog. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005667 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.Booty MG, et al. IL-21 signaling is essential for optimal host resistance against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:36720. doi: 10.1038/srep36720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Evrard M, et al. Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 5 (S1PR5) regulates the peripheral retention of tissue-resident lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 2022;219:e20210116. doi: 10.1084/jem.20210116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Moon, J. J. et al. Tracking epitope-specific T cells. Nat. Protoc. 10.1038/nprot.2009.9 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Salek-Ardakani S, Moutaftsi M, Crotty S, Sette A, Croft M. OX40 drives protective vaccinia virus-specific CD8 T cells. J. Immunol. 2008;181:7969–7976. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.11.7969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mousavi SF, et al. OX40 costimulatory signals potentiate the memory commitment of effector CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 2008;181:5990–6001. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.9.5990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee S-W, et al. Functional dichotomy between OX40 and 4-1BB in modulating effector CD8 T cell responses. J. Immunol. 2006;177:4464–4472. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.7.4464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hendriks J, et al. During viral infection of the respiratory tract, CD27, 4-1BB, and OX40 collectively determine formation of CD8+ memory T cells and their capacity for secondary expansion. J. Immunol. 2005;175:1665–1676. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.3.1665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Humphreys IR, et al. OX40 costimulation promotes persistence of cytomegalovirus-specific CD8 T Cells: A CD4-dependent mechanism. J. Immunol. 2007;179:2195–2202. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.4.2195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rogers PR, Song J, Gramaglia I, Killeen N, Croft M. OX40 promotes Bcl-xL and Bcl-2 expression and is essential for long-term survival of CD4 T cells. Immunity. 2001;15:445–455. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00191-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Weatherill AR, Maxwell JR, Takahashi C, Weinberg AD, Vella AT. OX40 ligation enhances cell cycle turnover of Ag-activated CD4 T cells in vivo. Cell. Immunol. 2001;209:63–75. doi: 10.1006/cimm.2001.1783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gramaglia I, et al. The OX40 costimulatory receptor determines the development of CD4 memory by regulating primary clonal expansion. J. Immunol. 2000;165:3043–3050. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.6.3043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang H, et al. A chimeric antigen receptor with antigen-independent OX40 signaling mediates potent antitumor activity. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021;13:eaba7308. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aba7308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lindestam Arlehamn, C. S. et al. A Quantitative Analysis of Complexity of Human Pathogen-Specific CD4 T Cell Responses in Healthy M. tuberculosis Infected South Africans. PLoS Pathog. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005760 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.Jennings E, et al. Nr4a1 and Nr4a3 Reporter Mice Are Differentially Sensitive to T Cell Receptor Signal Strength and Duration. Cell Rep. 2020;33:108328. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Spence, A. et al. Revealing the specificity of regulatory T cells in murine autoimmune diabetes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 115, (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 38.Sekiya T, et al. Nr4a receptors are essential for thymic regulatory T cell development and immune homeostasis. Nat. Immunol. 2013;14:230–237. doi: 10.1038/ni.2520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Reiss, S. et al. Comparative analysis of activation induced marker (AIM) assays for sensitive identification of antigen-specific CD4 T cells. PLoS One10.1371/journal.pone.0186998 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 40.Sallin, M. A. et al. Host resistance to pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection requires CD153 expression. Nature Microbiology10.1038/s41564-018-0231-6 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 41.Garber K. Immune agonist antibodies face critical test. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2020;19:3–5. doi: 10.1038/d41573-019-00214-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Duhen R, et al. Neoadjuvant anti-OX40 (MEDI6469) therapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma activates and expands antigen-specific tumor-infiltrating T cells. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:1047. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21383-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Li W, et al. Biomimetic nanoparticles deliver mRNAs encoding costimulatory receptors and enhance T cell mediated cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:7264. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27434-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Barham MS, et al. Activation-Induced Marker Expression Identifies Mycobacterium tuberculosis –Specific CD4 T Cells in a Cytokine-Independent Manner in HIV-Infected Individuals with Latent Tuberculosis. ImmunoHorizons. 2020;4:573–584. doi: 10.4049/immunohorizons.2000051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Snelgrove RJ, et al. OX40 ligand fusion protein delivered simultaneously with the BCG vaccine provides superior protection against murine Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2012;205:975–983. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.McCambridge, A., Peikert, T., Van Keulen, V., Erskine, C. & Escalante, P. Flow cytometric immune profiling in a patient with culture-negative tuberculosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 195, (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Foreman TW, et al. CD30 co-stimulation drives differentiation of protective T cells during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J. Exp. Med. 2023;220:e20222090. doi: 10.1084/jem.20222090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Darrah PA, et al. Prevention of tuberculosis in macaques after intravenous BCG immunization. Nature. 2020;577:95–102. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1817-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lu YJ, et al. CD4 T cell help prevents CD8 T cell exhaustion and promotes control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Cell Rep. 2021;36:109696. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sakai, S. et al. CD4 T Cell-Derived IFN-γ Plays a Minimal Role in Control of Pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Must Be Actively Repressed by PD-1 to Prevent Lethal Disease. PLoS Pathog. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005667 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 51.Hao Y, et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell. 2021;184:3573–3587.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Borcherding N, Bormann NL, Kraus G. scRepertoire: An R-based toolkit for single-cell immune receptor analysis. F1000Research. 2020;9:47. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22139.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.León-Rivera, R., Morsey, B., Niu, M., Fox, H. S. & Berman, J. W. Interactions of Monocytes, HIV, and ART Identified by an Innovative scRNAseq Pipeline: Pathways to Reservoirs and HIV-Associated Comorbidities. MBio10.1128/mBio.01037-20 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 54.Alquicira-Hernandez J, Powell JE. Nebulosa recovers single-cell gene expression signals by kernel density estimation. Bioinformatics. 2021;37:2485–2487. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Meyerholz DK, Beck AP. Principles and approaches for reproducible scoring of tissue stains in research. Lab Invest. 2018;98:844–855. doi: 10.1038/s41374-018-0057-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gress, A.R. et al. Activated CD4 T cells in tuberculosis express OX40 as a target for host-directed immunotherapy, Github, 10.5281/zenodo.10076323 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Source data are provided with this paper. The data that support the findings of this study have been deposited at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with accession GSE235800. All other data are available in the article and its Supplementary files or from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
The code used to process and analyze single cell RNA-Sequencing experiments has been posted at https://github.com/tylerbold/Activated_CD4_T_cells_in_tuberculosis_express_OX40_a_target_for_host_directed_immunotherapy, assigned: 10.5281/zenodo.10076323.