Version Changes
Revised. Amendments from Version 2
The authors have addressed language and formatting concerns. Equations have been improved, references extended.
Abstract
Background
Novel coronavirus disease has been recently a concern for worldwide public health. To determine epidemic rate probability at any time in any region of interest, one needs efficient bio-system reliability approach, particularly suitable for multi-regional environmental and health systems, observed over a sufficient period of time, resulting in a reliable long-term forecast of novel coronavirus infection rate. Traditional statistical methods dealing with temporal observations of multi-regional processes do not have the multi-dimensionality advantage, that suggested methodology offers, namely dealing efficiently with multiple regions at the same time and accounting for cross-correlations between different regional observations.
Methods
Modern multi-dimensional novel statistical method was directly applied to raw clinical data, able to deal with territorial mapping. Novel reliability method based on statistical extreme value theory has been suggested to deal with challenging epidemic forecast. Authors used MATLAB optimization software.
Results
This paper described a novel bio-system reliability approach, particularly suitable for multi-country environmental and health systems, observed over a sufficient period of time, resulting in a reliable long-term forecast of extreme novel coronavirus death rate probability. Namely, accurate maximum recorded patient numbers are predicted for the years to come for the analyzed provinces.
Conclusions
The suggested method performed well by supplying not only an estimate but 95% confidence interval as well. Note that suggested methodology is not limited to any specific epidemics or any specific terrain, namely its truly general. The only assumption and limitation is bio-system stationarity, alternatively trend analysis should be performed first. The suggested methodology can be used in various public health applications, based on their clinical survey data.
Keywords: COVID-19, Epidemic outbreak, Probability forecast, Public health, Mathematical biology
Introduction
Statistical aspects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other similar recent epidemics were receiving much attention in the modern research community. 1 – 11 Generally, it is quite challenging to calculate realistic biological system reliability factors and outbreak probabilities under actual epidemic conditions by using conventional theoretical statistical methods. 12 – 19 The latter is usually due to the fact that dynamic biological and environmental systems possess high number of degrees of freedom (in other words dimensional components), as well as system dependency on location – making bio-system of interest spatio-temporal. In principle, the reliability of a complex biological system may be accurately estimated straightforwardly by having enough measurements or by direct Monte Carlo simulations. 20 – 23 For COVID-19, however, the only available observation numbers are limited as the observations are only available from the beginning of the year 2020 up to now. 20 Motivated by the latter argument, the authors have introduced a novel reliability method for biological and health systems to predict and manage epidemic outbreaks more accurately; this study was focused on COVID-19 epidemics in northern China, with focus on cross-correlations between different provinces within same climatic zone. For other studies related to statistical variations per country see Ref. 24, 25, where spatial lags were addressed. 26 – 29
Statistical modelling of lifetime data or extreme value theory (EVT) is widespread in medicine and engineering. 32 – 40 For example, in Ref. 13, authors employed EVT theory to determine the fitness effect using a Beta-Burr distribution. While in Ref. 14, the author discusses using a bivariate logistic regression model, which was then used to access multiple sclerosis patients with walking disabilities and in a cognitive experiment for visual recognition. Finally, is a paper of relevance, which used EVT to estimate the probability of an influenza outbreak in China. The author demonstrated a forecasting prediction potential amid the epidemic in this paper. While in authors similarly used EVT to predict and detect anomalies of influenza epidemics. 41 – 44 China was chosen to test the methodology proposed in this study, because of its COVID-19 origin and extensive health observations and related research available online. 45 – 50
In this paper epidemic outbreak is viewed as unexpected incident that may occur at any province of a given country at any time, therefore spatial spread is accounted for. Moreover, a specific non-dimensional bio-system failure/hazard factor is introduced to unify various bio-system components having different failure/hazard limits. 51 – 58
Biological systems are subjected to ergodic environmental influences. The other alternative is to view the process as being dependent on specific environmental parameters whose variation in time may be modelled as an ergodic process on its own. 59 – 65 The incidence data of COVID-19 in all provinces of the People's Republic of China (PRC) from February 2020 until end of 2022 was retrieved from the official public PRC health website, for simplicity only northern provinces were selected for this study. As this dataset is organized by province (more than 30 provinces in China), the biological system under consideration can be regarded as a multi-degree of freedom (MDOF) dynamic system with highly inter-correlated regional components/dimensions. Some recent studies have already used statistical tools to predict COVID-19 development, for linear log model see Ref. 25, these studies however did not address fully dynamic space-time dynamic bio-system as this study does. 66 – 72
Note that while this study aims at reducing risk of future epidemic outbreaks by predicting them, it is solely focused on daily registered patient numbers and not on symptoms themselves. For long-lasting COVID-19 symptoms, the so-called “long COVID”, and its risk factors and whether it is possible to predict a protracted course early in the disease, see Ref. 18, for mortality research see Ref. 1.
Gaidai method
This section presents theoretical details of novel Gaidai bio-reliability method. For numerical part authors used commercial software MATLAB, (Mathworks, V 8.6), namely its optimization routines, otherwise authors have used extrapolation code available from modified Weibull. Only the code available from modified Weibull was used to complete all sections of the methods – both numerical part as well as final extrapolation.
Novel Gaidai bio-reliability method introduces MDOF (multi-degree of freedom) health bio-system vector process that was measured over a sufficiently long (representative) period of time . Unidimensional bio-system components global maxima over the entire time span denoted as , , .
Let be time local maxima of the process consequent in time, recorded at discrete time instants that are monotonously increasing in . A similar definition follows for other MDOF bio-system components with and so on. For simplicity, all bio-system components, and therefore its maxima are assumed to be non-negative.
The target is to estimate system failure probability, in other words the probability of exceedance
(1) |
where being the probability of non-exceedance for critical values of response components , , ,…; denotes logical unity operation «or»; and being joint probability density (PDF) of the global maxima over the entire period . However, it is not feasible to estimate the latter joint probability distribution directly due to its high dimensionality and available dataset limitations.
More specifically, the moment when either exceeds , or exceeds , or exceeds , and so on, the system is regarded as immediately failed. Fixed failure levels , , ,… are, of course, individual for each system one-dimensional component. , , , and so on.
Now, bio-system components local maxima time instants are sorted in monotonously non-decreasing order into one single merged time vector . Note that , . In this case represents local maxima of one of MDOF structural response components either or , or and so on. That means that having bio-system time record, one just needs continuously and simultaneously screen for unidimensional response component local maxima and record its exceedance of MDOF limit vector in any of its components In order to unify all three measured time series the following scaling was performed as follows
(2) |
making all bio-system components non-dimensional and having the same failure limit equal to . Unidimensional bio-system component’s local maxima are merged into a single temporal non-decreasing system vector following the merged time vector , see Figure 1. That is to say, each local maxima is, in fact, actual encountered bio-system components local maxima corresponding to either or , or and so on. Finally, the unified limit/hazard bio-system vector is introduced with each component is either , or and so on, depending on which of or , or etc., corresponds to the current local maxima with the running index . In case of simultaneous occurrence of various bio-system components , , , … local maxima at the same time instant t j , the maximum of those limits will be taken, for example - .
Now, the scaling parameter is introduced to, artificially, simultaneously decrease limit values for all bio-system components, namely the new MDOF limit vector with , , , … is introduced, see Ref. 28. The unified limit vector is introduced with each component is either , or and so on. The latter automatically defines probability as a function of , note that from Equation (1). Non-exceedance probability can be introduced as follows
(3) |
Next, cascade of approximations which is based on conditioning is briefly outlined. In practice, 32 – 36 the dependence between the neighboring is not negligible; thus, the following one-step (will be called conditioning level ) memory approximation is introduced
(4) |
for (conditioning level ). The approximation introduced by Equation (3) may be further expressed as
(5) |
where (will be called conditioning level ), and so on. The idea is to monitor each independent failure that happened locally first in time, thus avoiding cascading local inter-correlated exceedances.
Equation (5) exhibits subsequent refinements with respect to the statistical independence assumption. These approximations increasingly accurately approximate statistical dependence between neighboring maxima. Since the original MDOF process has been assumed ergodic and thus stationary, the probability for is independent of , however dependent on the conditioning level . Thus, non-exceedance probability may be approximated as in the average conditional exceedance rate method, see Ref. 28 for more details on exceedance probability
(6) |
Note that Equation (5) follows from Equation (1) if neglecting , as design failure probability must be epsilon order o(1), with . Equation (5) is analogous to the well-known mean up-crossing rate equation for the stochastic process probability of exceedance. 28 There is convergence with respect to , called here conditioning level
(7) |
Note that Equation (6) for is equivalent to a well-known non-exceedance probability relationship with the mean up-crossing rate function
(8) |
where denotes the mean up-crossing rate of the bio-system non-dimensional level for the above assembled non-dimensional vector assembled from scaled MDOF bio-system scaled components . The mean up-crossing rate is given by the Rice's formula, given in Equation (7) with being joint PDF for with being time derivative . Equation (7) relies on the Poisson assumption that is up-crossing events of high levels (in this paper, it is ) can be assumed to be independent. The latter may not be the case for narrowband bio-system components and higher-level dynamical systems that exhibit cascading failures in different dimensions, subsequent in time, caused by intrinsic inter-dependency between extreme events, manifesting itself in the appearance of highly correlated local maxima clusters within the assembled vector .
In the above, the stationarity assumption has been used. However, the proposed methodology can also treat the nonstationary case. For nonstationary case, the scattered diagram of seasonal epidemic conditions, each short-term seasonal state has the probability , so that . Next, let one introduce the long-term equation
(9) |
with being the same function as in Equation (6) but corresponding to a specific short-term seasonal epidemic state with the number .
Note that the accuracy of the suggested approach for a large variety of one-dimensional dynamic systems was successfully verified by authors in previous years. 28 , 29
Implementing modified Weibull extrapolation method
Introduced by Equation (5) functions are regular in the tail, specifically for values of approaching and exceeding . 17 More precisely, for , the distribution tail behaves similar to with being suitably fitted constants for suitable tail cut-on value. Therefore, one can write
(10) |
Next, by plotting versus , often nearly perfectly linear tail behavior is observed. Optimal values of the parameters may also be determined applying sequential quadratic programming (SQP) methods, incorporated in NAG Numerical Library. 30 Methods described above have been applied as described in methods section. Authors used MATLAB (Mathworks, V 8.6) (RRID:SCR_001622) commercial tool as a basis for their numerical purposes. For more specific author developed code routines, related to the extrapolation method by Equation (9), see modified Weibull. Note that modified Weibull is a repository, containing not only the code, but user manual, examples and references. In this study only extrapolation part of modified Weibull was used. In other words, current study presents novel theoretical methodology, but using modified Weibull software previously developed by some of the authors. 31
Ethical consideration
Authors confirm that all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations according to the Declarations of Helsinki.
Use case
Methods described in this paper are novel and state of art. Prediction of influenza type epidemics has long been the focus of attention in mathematical biology and epidemiology. It is known that public health dynamics is a seasonally and spatially varying dynamic system that is always challenging to analyse. This section illustrates the efficiency of the above-described methodology using the new method applied to the real-life COVID-19 data sets, presented as a new daily recorded infected patient time series, spread over different regions.
COVID-19 and influenza are contagious diseases with high transmissibility and ability to spread. Seasonal influenza epidemics caused by influenza A and B viruses typically occur annually during winter, presenting a burden on worldwide public health, resulting in around 3–5 million cases of severe illness and 250,000–500,000 deaths worldwide each year, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). 20
This section presents a real-life application of the above-described method. The statistical data in the present section are taken from the official website of the National Health Commission of the people's Republic of China. The website provides the number of newly diagnosed cases every day in 13 administrative regions in northern China from 22 January 2020 to the end of 2022. Patient numbers from thirteen different Chinese administrative regions were chosen as components thus constituting an example of a thirteen dimensional (13D) dynamic biological system, according to Equation (2). 39 – 41
Failure limits , or in other words, epidemic thresholds, are not set values and must be decided. The simplest choice would be for different countries to set failure limits equal to the percentage per corresponding country population, making equal to percentage of daily infected per country. In this study, however, twice maxima of daily infected per country have been chosen as failure limits. Note that failure limits may be chosen differently for different dynamic bio-systems. Although the latter choice obviously introduces bias (accumulation point) at if the number of countrys is large, in this study the number of regions is not that large (below 20 national regions) and proper extrapolation technique may easily circumvent the above-mentioned accumulation point bias.
Next, all local maxima from three measured time series were merged into one single time series by keeping them in time non-decreasing order: with the whole vector being sorted according to non-decreasing times of occurrence of these local maxima.
Figure 2 presents new daily recorded patients number plotted as a time-space 2D surface using MATLAB. Figure 3 presents the number of new daily recorded patients as a 13D vector , consisting of assembled regional new daily patient numbers. Note that vector does not have physical meaning on its own, as it is assembled of different regional components with different epidemic backgrounds. Index is just a running index of local maxima encountered in a non-decreasing time sequence.
Figure 4 presents 100 years return level extrapolation according to Equation (9) towards epidemic outbreak with 100-year return period, indicated by the horizontal dotted line, and somewhat beyond, cut-on value was used. Dotted lines indicate extrapolated 95% confidence interval according to Equation (10). According to Equation (5) is directly related to the target failure probability from Equation (1). Therefore, in agreement with Equation (5), system failure probability can be estimated. Note that in Equation (5), corresponds to the total number of local maxima in the unified bio-system vector . Conditioning parameter was found to be sufficient due to occurrence of convergence with respect to , see Equation (6). Figure 4 exhibits reasonably narrow 95% CI. The latter is an advantage of the proposed method.
Note that while being novel, the above-described methodology has a clear advantage of utilizing available measured data set quite efficiently due to its ability to treat health system multi-dimensionality and perform accurate extrapolation based on quite limited data set. Note that, predicted non-dimensional level, indicated by star in Figure 4, represents probability of epidemic outbreak at any northern province in China in the years to come.
Discussion
Traditional health bio-systems reliability methods dealing with observed/measured time series do not have the ability to efficiently deal with high dimensionality and cross-correlation between different bio-system components. The main advantage of the introduced methodology is its ability to study high dimensional non-linear dynamic systems reliability.
Despite the simplicity, the present study successfully offers a novel multidimensional modelling strategy and a methodological avenue to implement the forecasting of an epidemic during its course, if it is assumed to be stationary in time. Proper setting of epidemiological alarm limits (failure limits) per province has been discussed, see Section Use case.
This paper studied recorded COVID-19 patient numbers from thirteen different Chinese northern provinces, constituting an example of a thirteen dimensional (13D) and ten-dimensional (10D) dynamic biological system respectively observed in 2020-2022. The novel reliability method was applied to new daily patient numbers as a multidimensional system in real-time.
The main conclusion is that if the public health system under local environmental and epidemiologic conditions in northern China is well managed. Predicted 100-year return period risk level of epidemic outbreak is reasonably low. However, there is an ultra-low risk of a future epidemic outbreak in chosen country of interest, at least in 100 years horizon.
This study outlines a general-purpose, robust and straightforward multidimensional bio-system reliability method. The method introduced in this study has been previously successfully validated by application to a wide range of engineering models, 11 , 12 but only for one and two-dimensional bio-system components and, in general, very accurate predictions were obtained. Both measured and simulated bio-system components time series can be analysed using the proposed method. It is shown that the method produced an acceptable 95% confidence interval, see Figure 4. Thus, the suggested methodology may be used as a tool in various non-linear dynamic biological systems reliability studies. The presented COVID-19 example does not limit potential areas of new method applicability by any means.
Data availability
The datasets analyzed during the current study are publicly available from the daily recorded patient’s dataset in China during 2020-2022 years, are available at http://www.nhc.gov.cn/. Daily recorded patients data was structured per province and per calendar day, namely it was straightforward to extract and systematize joint statistical distribution as a function of both space and time.
Software availability
Source code along with demo and user manual and examples used for extrapolation available from: ACER this third-party software is under license GPL-3.
Acknowledgements
The authors declare no conflict of interest. No funding was received.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
[version 3; peer review: 1 approved
References
- 1. Gaidai O, Xing Y: A novel bio-system reliability approach for multi-state COVID-19 epidemic forecast. Engineered Science. 2022. 10.30919/es8d797 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Gaidai O, Xing Y: A Novel Multi Regional Reliability Method for COVID-19 Death Forecast. Engineered Science. 2022. 10.30919/es8d799 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Gaidai O, Wang F, Yakimov V: COVID-19 multi-state epidemic forecast in India. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy. 2023. 10.1007/s43538-022-00147-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Gaidai O, Wang F, Wu Y, et al. : Offshore renewable energy site correlated wind-wave statistics. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics. 2022;68. 10.1016/j.probengmech.2022.103207 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gaidai O, Cao Y, Xing Y, et al. : Extreme springing response statistics of a tethered platform by deconvolution. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering. 2023. 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2023.100515 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Gaidai O, Xing Y, Balakrishna R, et al. : Improving extreme offshore wind speed prediction by using deconvolution. Heliyon. 2023. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Gaidai O, Xing Y: Prediction of death rates for cardiovascular diseases and cancers. Cancer Innovation. 2023. 10.1002/cai2.47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Xu X, Xing Y, Gaidai O, et al. : A novel multi-dimensional reliability approach for floating wind turbines under power production conditions. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2022;9. 10.3389/fmars.2022.970081 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Gaidai O, Xing Y, Balakrishna R: Improving extreme response prediction of a subsea shuttle tanker hovering in ocean current using an alternative highly correlated response signal. Results in Engineering. 2022;15:100593. 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100593 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Cheng Y, Gaidai O, Yurchenko D, et al. : Study on the Dynamics of a Payload Influence in the Polar Ship. The 32nd International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Paper Number: ISOPE-I-22-342. 2022.
- 11. Gaidai O, Cao Y, Xing Y, et al. : Piezoelectric Energy Harvester Response Statistics. Micromachines. 2023;14(2):271. 10.3390/mi14020271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gaidai O, Cao Y, Loginov S: Global cardiovascular diseases death rate prediction. Current Problems in Cardiology. 2023. 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Joyce P, Abdo Z: Determining the distribution of fitness effects using a generalised Beta-Burr distribution. Theoretical Population Biology. 2018;122:88–96. 10.1016/j.tpb.2017.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kristensen SB, Bibby BM: A bivariate logistic regression model based on latent variables. Statistics in Medicine. 2020;39(22):2962–2979. 10.1002/sim.8587 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Zhang J, Gaidai O, Ji H, et al. : Operational reliability study of ice loads acting on oil tanker bow. Heliyon. 2023. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Thomas M, Rootzen H: Real-time prediction of severe influenza epidemics using Extreme Value Statistics.arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.10788.2019.
- 17. Xing Y, Gaidai O: Multi-regional COVID-19 epidemic forecast in Sweden. Digital Health. 2023:9. 10.1177/20552076231162984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Sudre C, et al. : Attributes and predictors of long COVID. Nature Medicine. 2021;27:626–631. 10.1038/s41591-021-01292-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Chen J, Lei X, Zhang L, et al. : Using Extreme Value Theory Approaches to Forecast the Probability of Outbreak of Highly Pathogenic Influenza in Zhejiang, China. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0118521. 10.1371/journal.pone.0118521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. World Health Organization: Influenza fact sheet. World Health Organization website. Geneva: World Health Organization;2014 Mar [cited 10 June 2014]. 1948 -. [about 2 screens]. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 21. Goldstein E, Cobey S, Takahashi S, et al. : Predicting the epidemic sizes of influenza A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and B: a statistical method. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1001051. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Soebiyanto RP, Adimi F, Kiang RK: Modeling and predicting seasonal influenza transmission in warm regions using climatological parameters. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9450. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Mugglin AS, Cressie N, Gemmell I: Hierarchical statistical modelling of influenza epidemic dynamics in space and time. Statistics in Medicine. 2002;21(18):2703–2721. 10.1002/sim.1217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kim EK, Seok JH, Oh JS, et al. : Use of Hangeul Twitter to track and predict human influenza infection. PLoS One. 2013;8:e69305. 10.1371/journal.pone.0069305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Chu J: A statistical analysis of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in Italy and Spain. PLoS One. 2021. 10.1371/journal.pone.0249037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Gaidai O, Xing Y: COVID-19 Epidemic Forecast in Brazil. Bioinformatics Biology Insights. 2023. 10.1177/11779322231161939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Gaidai O, Xu X, Xing Y: Novel deconvolution method for extreme FPSO vessel hawser tensions during offloading operations. Results in Engineering. 2023;17. 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100828 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Gaidai O, Xu J, Hu Q, et al. : Offshore tethered platform springing response statistics. Scientific Reports. 2022;12. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-25806-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Gaidai O, Xing Y, Xu X: Novel methods for coupled prediction of extreme wind speeds and wave heights. Scientific Reports. 2023. 10.1038/s41598-023-28136-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Numerical Algorithms Group: NAG Toolbox for Matlab. Oxford, UK: NAG Ltd;2010. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Rice SO: Mathematical analysis of random noise. The Bell System Technical Journal. 1944;23:282–332. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Madsen HO, Krenk S, Lind NC: Methods of structural safety. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc;1986. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Ditlevsen O, Madsen HO: Structural reliability methods. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, Inc;1996. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Melchers RE: Structural reliability analysis and prediction. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc;1999. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Choi S-K, Grandhi RV, Canfield RA: Reliability-based structural design. London: Springer-Verlag;2007. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Gaidai O, Xu J, Yan P, et al. : Novel methods for reliability study of multi-dimensional non-linear dynamic systems. Scientific Reports. 2023;13,3817. 10.1038/s41598-023-30704-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Pickands J: Statistical inference using extreme order statistics. Annals of Statistics. 1975;3(1):119–131. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Zhao X: Extreme value modelling with application in finance and neonatal research. PhD Thesis. The University of Canterbury;2010. http://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/10092/4024/1/thesis_fulltext.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 39. Zheng L, Ismail K, Meng XH: Freeway safety estimation using extreme value theory approaches: A comparative study. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2014;62:32–41. 10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. McNeil AJ, Frey R, Embrechts P: Quantitative risk management: Concepts, techniques and tools. America: Princeton University Press;2005. [Google Scholar]
- 41. Gaidai O, Wang F, Xing Y, et al. : Novel Reliability Method Validation for Floating Wind Turbines. Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research. 2023. 10.1002/aesr.202200177 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Sumi A, Kamo KI: MEM spectral analysis for predicting influenza epidemics in Japan. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine. 2012;17:98–108. 10.1007/s12199-011-0223-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Songchitruksa P, Tarko AP: The extreme value theory approach to safety estimation. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2006;38:811–822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Gaidai O, Cao Y, Xu X, et al. : Offloading operation bivariate extreme response statistics for FPSO vessel. Scientific reports. 2023. 10.1038/s41598-023-31533-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Gondauri D, Mikautadze E, Batiashvili M: Research on COVID-19 Virus Spreading Statistics based on the Examples of the Cases from Different Countries. Electronic Journal of General Medicine. 2020;17(4). Article No: em209. 10.29333/ejgm/7869 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. : A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;382:727–733. 10.1056/nejmoa2001017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Wu JT, Leung K, Leung GM: Nowcasting and forecasting the potential domestic and international spread of the 2019-nCoV outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study. Lancet. 2020;1–3. Hopkins Johns. University Center for Systems and Science Engineering. Coronavirus COVID-19 Global Cases. (Accessed March 25, 2020). 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30260-93 Reference Source [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. He F, Deng Y, Li W: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): What we know? Journal of Medical Virology. 2020;92:719–725. 10.1002/jmv.25766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Wu Z, McGoogan JM: Characteristics of and Important Lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323:1236–1239. 10.1001/jama.2020.2648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, et al. : Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020;395(10224):565–574. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, et al. : A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579:270–273. 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Organization WH: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report - 70.30 March 2020. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 53. Wood PHN: The Mathematical Theory of Infectious Diseases and its applications. Immunology. 1978;34(5):955–956. [Google Scholar]
- 54. Bailey NTJ: The total size of a general stochastic epidemic. Biometrika. 1953;40:177–185. 10.1093/biomet/40.1-2.177 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Becker NG, Britton T: Statistical studies of infectious disease incidence. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B. 1999;61(2):287–307. 10.1111/1467-9868.00177 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Lan L, Xu D, Ye G, et al. : Positive RT-PCR Test Results in Patients Recovered from COVID-19. JAMA. 2020 Apr 21;323:1502–1503. 10.1001/jama.2020.2783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Kermack WO, McKendrick AG: A Contribution to the Mathematical Theory of Epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. 1927;115(772):700–721. 10.1098/rspa.1927.0118 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Bailey NTJ: Maximum-likelihood estimation of the relative removal rate from the distribution of the total size of an intra household epidemic. Journal of Hygiene. 1954;52(3):400–402. 10.1017/s0022172400027595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Gaidai O, Xu J, Yakimov V, et al. : Analytical and Computational Modeling for Multi-Degree of Freedom Systems: Estimating the Likelihood of an FOWT Structural Failure. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2023;11(6):1237. 10.3390/jmse11061237 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Sun J, Gaidai O, Xing Y, et al. : On safe offshore energy exploration in the Gulf of Eilat. Quality and Reliability Engineering International. 2023. 10.1002/qre.3402 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Gaidai O, Xu J, Yakimov V, et al. : Liquid carbon storage tanker disaster resilience. Environment Systems and Decisions. 2023. 10.1007/s10669-023-09922-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Yakimov V, Gaidai O, Wang F, et al. : Fatigue assessment for FPSO hawsers. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering. 2023. 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2023.100540 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Yakimov V, Gaidai O, Wang F, et al. : Arctic naval launch and recovery operations, under ice impact interactions. Applications in Engineering Science. 2023. 10.1016/j.apples.2023.100146 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Gaidai O, Yakimov V, Wang F, et al. : Lifetime assessment for container vessels. Applied Ocean Research. 2023. 10.1016/j.apor.2023.103708 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Gaidai O, Wang F, Yakimov V, et al. : Lifetime assessment for riser systems. GRN TECH RES SUSTAIN. 2023;3. 10.1007/s44173-023-00013-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Gaidai O, Yakimov V, Zhang F: COVID-19 spatio-temporal forecast in England. Biosystems. 2023. 10.1016/j.biosystems.2023.105035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Gaidai O, Liu Z, Wang K, et al. : Current COVID-19 Epidemic Risks in Brazil. Epidemiology International Journal. 2023;7(2):1–10. 10.23880/eij-16000259 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Gaidai O, Yakimov V, Balakrishna R: Dementia death rates prediction. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23(691). 10.1186/s12888-023-05172-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Gaidai O, Yakimov V, Wang F, et al. : Floating wind turbines structural details fatigue life assessment. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1). 10.1038/s41598-023-43554-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Gaidai O, Yakimov V, Wang F, et al. : Safety design study for energy harvesters. Sustainable Energy Research. 2023;10(1). 10.1186/s40807-023-00085-w [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Gaidai O, Yakimov V, Loon E: Influenza-type epidemic risks by spatio-temporal Gaidai-Yakimov method. Dialogues Health. 2023;3(2). 10.1016/j.dialog.2023.100157 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Gaidai O, Yakimov V, Niu Y, et al. : Gaidai-Yakimov reliability method for high-dimensional spatio-temporal biosystems. Biosystems. 2023. 10.1016/j.biosystems.2023.105073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]