Abstract
Objective
This study aims to measure the prevalence of mental health disorders in low-resource settings through telepsychiatry and evaluate data from Pakistan’s Sehat Kahani nurse-assisted online clinics serving low-income communities. This will help to understand the magnitude and nature of the demand for contextual therapies to promote mental health. The paper will discuss the challenges faced in these settings, such as limited access to mental health facilities, stigma and opportunities telemedicine brings.
Design
An observational cross-sectional study of telepsychiatry consultations using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 to screen for depression and anxiety was conducted between October and December 2022.
Setting
This research was conducted at Dadar Mansehra e-health clinics of Sehat Kahani with telepsychiatry services in Pakistan.
Participants
The study included 2660 participants who visited Sehat Kahani e-health clinics between October and December 2022 and voluntarily completed the questionnaire for data collection.
Results
The study was comprised of 2660 participants with a mean age of 34.3 years. The study findings show that the majority of participants were females (98.4%), 16.9% of participants had moderate depression, and 20.8% had severe depression. Furthermore, the participants who were widowed/divorced were more likely to have depression than those who were single (OR=3.3, 95% CI (2.0 to 5.2)).
Conclusions
Based on the findings, most study participants were female, and their mental health was negatively impacted. Women in Pakistan are disproportionately affected by the rising rates of depression and anxiety, and telepsychiatry therapies effectively respond to this growing need. Potentially, it is a game-changer for dealing with mental health problems. Telepsychiatry can help policymakers and mental health professionals to develop effective low-income mental health initiatives.
Keywords: telemedicine, mental health, health services accessibility
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY.
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 can effectively screen and detect common mental health disorders, especially in constrained settings and with low resources.
The research confirmed that eliminating geographical barriers enabled telepsychiatry to provide better initial screening in disadvantaged locations.
Observational cross-sectional designs can assess mental health prevalence over a specific period, providing valuable insights for developing interventions.
The study’s cross-sectional design limits the capacity to monitor longitudinal changes in mental health status.
Telepsychiatry services may exclude people with limited access to technology or technological competency, which can introduce a bias in the study’s findings.
Introduction
The Islamic Republic of Pakistan, a developing Muslim nation, faces a significant challenge in mental disorders, characterised by a notable deficiency in the prompt identification and efficient treatment of such conditions. Around 10%–16% of the population in Pakistan struggle with mental illnesses. This significant prevalence of mental disorders contributes substantially to the overall burden of disease. However, it is concerning that mental illness continues to be disregarded when establishing national priorities.1
While the provision of mental health services is widely recognised as an essential component of effective healthcare systems, many low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) struggle to adequately meet the requirements of vulnerable populations.2 Pakistan needs to address this urgent issue because it affects about 24 million people. Estimates show that Pakistan is currently short on mental healthcare providers. The exact breakdown is as follows: 342 psychiatrists, 478 psychologists, 3145 social workers, 22 occupational therapists, 13 643 nurses, 102 597 other health or mental health workers and 25 782 general practitioners not specialising in psychiatry. There is a wide gap in access to mental health services as a result of how mental health practitioners are dispersed. Pakistan reportedly has the lowest psychiatric density in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region, at 0.19 per 100 000 people.3 4
Social stigma and people’s unwillingness to seek help for their health problems compound an already dire situation in Pakistan’s mental healthcare system. Telepsychiatry, which uses tools like phone calls and virtual meetings to provide mental healthcare to people in remote areas, is one potential solution. With the rise of telepsychiatry, patients now have an advanced option that increases their accessibility to qualified mental healthcare professionals at a reduced time and financial investment.5
Telepsychiatry: a successful form of telemedicine
The adoption of telepsychiatry treatment has the capacity to optimise the allocation of mental health resources, allowing for a broader reach to a more significant number of patients. Consequently, mental health professionals can exert a more substantial influence at a population level when compared with the conventional approach of inperson consultations.6 Multiple comprehensive reviews have found substantial evidence supporting the effectiveness of interactive video and audio consultations as a means of connecting patients in primary care settings with specialists.7–11 Further evidence suggests that telehealth-based psychotherapy could be a viable substitute for inperson psychotherapy in addressing less prevalent mental health disorders and physical illnesses that necessitate psychological intervention.12
Telepsychiatry has the potential to readily enhance the already existing infrastructure of mental healthcare delivery in LMICs and, therefore, can serve as a crucial step in lowering healthcare access discrepancies. Telecommunication innovations like telepsychiatry have the potential to streamline access to specialists and facilitate referrals, thereby addressing access gaps in mental healthcare in LMICs.13 The anticipated outcome of this study is to assess the efficacy of telepsychiatry services in measuring the prevalence and diagnosing mental health disorders, including depression and anxiety, within low-income areas in Pakistan.
Materials and methods
This study employed a cross-sectional observational design, utilising data obtained from 2660 telepsychiatry consultations conducted by Sehat Kahani (Sehat Kahani’s one window digital healthcare platform connects a network of globally recognised and highly qualified online doctors to patients for online chat-enabled, audio-enabled and video-enabled instant/on-appointment consultations, online diagnostics and at-home pharmacy services. Our service lines allow individual consumers, corporate employees and patients in hard-to-reach underserved areas to access doctors via a mobile application and intermediary assisted telemedicine facilitation centres.) during the period comprising from October 2022 to December 2022 at Dadar Mansehra e-clinic of Sehat Kahani. The patients received medical care at the Sehat Kahani e-clinic for their scheduled sessions, during which a nurse assessed their vital signs and body mass index (BMI). Following this, the patients were linked to a telepsychiatry professional through the utilisation of a laptop at the e-clinic, where their counselling sessions were carried out.
Sehat Kahani has emerged as the leading telepsychiatry platform in Pakistan since its inception in 2017. The organisation places significant emphasis on providing medical care as a fundamental human right and actions to make dedicated efforts in accommodating those it serves. The organisation strongly supports Sustainable Developmental Goal 3 (SDG-3), Good Health and Well-Being, which endeavours to guarantee universal access to quality healthcare and promote well-being for all individuals.
This study followed a strict methodology to introduce and illustrate the consent procedure. It was clear to the participants that their anonymity would be protected at all costs. The telepsychiatry specialist would use an online data collection form to gather information from the patient during the consultation. The individuals that were included in the study were chosen according to predetermined criteria that are described as follows: ‘Patients seeking treatment at the Sehat Kahani clinic, those who willingly agree to partake in mental health evaluations and online consultations with psychiatric consultants. Excluded from the study were people with serious medical illnesses that would make video conferencing difficult and those who were already under the care of a psychiatrist for their mental health issues’.
Data collection tool
The tool used for data collection in this study included the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale for screening and assessing depression and anxiety symptoms. The combination of these questions allowed for a comprehensive assessment of the patient’s mental and physical health status and their general habits and risk factors for developing mental health disorders. The PHQ-9 and GAD-7 questionnaires are widely used and validated tools for screening and assessing depression and anxiety symptoms. Including additional questions on demographics, habits and comorbidities further enhanced the tool’s ability to capture a complete picture of the patient’s health status. Overall, the tool provided a thorough and standardised approach to collecting patient data during telepsychiatry consultations.
Statistical analysis
Data was analysed by using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences V.22. The frequencies and percentages were calculated to determine the descriptive statistics of the sociodemographic variables. Mean depression and anxiety scores were compared between the participants' sociodemographic characteristic categories using two independent sample t-test/one-way analysis of variance. Scores were categorised, then binary logistics regression analysis was applied, and ORs with 95% CIs were reported to estimate the effects of important covariates on depression and anxiety levels. Multivariate model was adjusted for those covariates whose p values were less than 0.25 in univariate regression model. Statistical significance was considered at a p value less than or equal to 0.05.
Patient and public involvement
None.
Results
The study comprised 2660 participants with a mean (±SD) age of 34.3 (±9.1) years. The majority of them were females (n=2618, 98.4%), uneducated (n=1624, 61.1%), married (n=2165, 81.4%) and earned household income less than 20 000 (n=1513, 56.9%). The most common comorbidity among the participants was hypertension (n=774, 29.1%). Overall, mean (±SD) score of depression and anxiety was 8.6 (±6.1) and 7.2 (±5.2), respectively. Average depression scores were higher in those participants who were widow/divorced (10.9±5.4, p value <0.001), students (10.6±7.4, p value <0.001), used any drug (18.7±1.9, p value <0.001) and had a history of cardiovascular disease (16.9±4.6, p value <0.001) than in other respective groups. Age (p value=0.011), BMI (p value=0.002), education level (p value <0.001) and sleeping hours (p value=0.007) were also significantly associated with depression scores. Average anxiety scores were found higher in those participants who used any kind of drug (15.8±1.5, p value <0.001) and had history of cardiovascular disease (13.2±4.5, p value <0.001). Age (p value <0.001), education level (p value <0.001), work status (p value=0.044) and sleeping hours (p value=0.037) were also significantly associated with anxiety scores (table 1).
Table 1.
General characteristic of participants (n=2660)
| Variables | Total | PHQ-9 | P value* | GAD-7 | P value* |
| Age group, year | |||||
| <25 | 340 (12.8) | 7.7±6.2 | 0.011 | 6.7±5.2 | <0.001 |
| 25–34 | 1087 (40.9) | 8.7±6.3 | 7.6±5.2 | ||
| 35–44 | 846 (31.8) | 8.9±6.0 | 7.4±5.2 | ||
| >45 | 387 (14.5) | 8.3±5.4 | 5.8±4.6 | ||
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 42 (1.6) | 7.6±5.5 | 0.295 | 6.9±4.9 | 0.764 |
| Female | 2618 (98.4) | 8.6±6.1 | 7.2±5.2 | ||
| BMI, kg/m2 | |||||
| Underweight (<18.5) | 94 (3.5) | 8.1±5.7 | 0.002 | 6.9±5.0 | 0.665 |
| Normal weight (18.5–22.9) | 684 (25.7) | 8.2±5.7 | 7.4±4.8 | ||
| Overweight (23–27.4) | 1119 (42.1) | 8.4±6.1 | 7.1±5.3 | ||
| Obese (≥27.5) | 763 (28.7) | 9.3±6.2 | 7.1±5.3 | ||
| Education level | |||||
| No education | 1624 (61.1) | 8.4±5.8 | <0.001 | 6.9±5.1 | <0.001 |
| Primary | 331 (12.4) | 10.1±6.8 | 8.7±5.7 | ||
| Secondary | 568 (21.4) | 8.5±6.3 | 7.6±5.0 | ||
| Tertiary | 137 (5.2) | 7.8±5.7 | 5.4±4.4 | ||
| Marital status | |||||
| Single | 313 (11.8) | 7.7±6.3 | <0.001 | 6.9±5.5 | 0.577 |
| Married | 2165 (81.4) | 8.5±6.0 | 7.2±5.1 | ||
| Widow/divorced/separated | 182 (6.8) | 10.9±5.4 | 7.1±5.0 | ||
| Work status | |||||
| Employed | 193 (7.3) | 7.5±5.2 | <0.001 | 7.4±3.9 | 0.044 |
| Self-employed | 280 (10.5) | 9.9±5.5 | 7.0±4.9 | ||
| Unemployed | 260 (9.8) | 7.2±5.2 | 6.8±5.3 | ||
| Student | 90 (3.4) | 10.6±7.4 | 8.7±6.2 | ||
| Housewife | 1837 (69.1) | 8.6±6.2 | 7.2±5.2 | ||
| Household income, PKR | |||||
| <20 000 | 1513 (56.9) | 8.5±6.0 | 0.381 | 7.1±5.2 | 0.193 |
| 20 000–30 000 | 853 (32.1) | 8.8±6.2 | 7.4±5.2 | ||
| >30 000 | 294 (11.1) | 8.3±5.9 | 6.9±4.9 | ||
| Habits | |||||
| None | 2109 (79.3) | 7.5±5.3 | <0.001 | 6.0±4.5 | <0.001 |
| Smoking | 146 (5.5) | 8.1±5.6 | 8.6±4.5 | ||
| Use of any kind of drugs | 74 (2.8) | 18.7±1.9 | 15.8±1.5 | ||
| Naswar/gutkha/paan/chalia | 331 (12.4) | 13.5±6.9 | 12.1±5.3 | ||
| Comorbidity | |||||
| None | 1598 (60.1) | 7.5±5.7 | <0.001 | 6.5±4.9 | <0.001 |
| Hypertension | 774 (29.1) | 10.4±6.2 | 8.0±5.5 | ||
| Diabetes miletus | 168 (6.3) | 7.3±4.5 | 7.7±4.1 | ||
| Obesity | 86 (3.2) | 10.5±7.0 | 9.4±4.8 | ||
| History of cardiac disease | 34 (1.3) | 16.9±4.6 | 13.2±4.5 | ||
| Sleeping hours | |||||
| ≤6 | 1866 (70.2) | 8.4±6.0 | 0.007 | 7.0±5.1 | 0.037 |
| >6 | 794 (29.8) | 9.1±6.1 | 7.5±5.3 |
n (%) and mean±SD are reported.
*P value was calculated by two independent sample t-test/one-way analysis of variance.
BMI, body mass index; GAD-7, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
Depression and anxiety scores were categorised based on the cut-off values of ≥5 (mild), ≥10 (moderate) and ≥15 (severe). Of all participants, 449 (16.9%) were observed with moderate depression and 554 (20.8%) with severe depression, whereas 386 (14.5%) were found to have moderate anxiety and 373 (14.0%) had severe anxiety (table 2).
Table 2.
Depression and anxiety levels among participants (n=2660)
| PHQ-9 depression | n | % |
| PHQ-9 score (0–4) | 881 | 33.1 |
| Mild depression (5–9) | 776 | 29.2 |
| Moderate depression (10–14) | 449 | 16.9 |
| Severe depression (15–27) | 554 | 20.8 |
| GAD-7 anxiety | ||
| Minimal anxiety (0–4) | 1012 | 38.0 |
| Mild anxiety (5–9) | 889 | 33.4 |
| Moderate anxiety (10–14) | 386 | 14.5 |
| Severe anxiety (15–21) | 373 | 14.0 |
GAD-7, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
Binary logistic regression analysis was carried out to estimate the risk of depression (score ≥10 vs <10) and anxiety (score ≥10 vs <10). Multivariate regression model indicated that those who were widow/divorced were more likely to have depression than those who were single (OR=3.3, 95% CI (2.0 to 5.2)). Students (OR=4.9, 95% CI (2.6 to 9.2)) and self-employed participants (OR=2.9, 95% CI (1.9 to 4.4)) were more likely to have depression as compared with those participants who were employed. Those who were comorbid with cardiac disease (OR=14.5, 95% CI (5.0 to 41.9)) showed more chances of having depression than participants with no other comorbidity. Multivariate logistic regression model for anxiety revealed that students (OR=4.6, 95% CI (2.5 to 8.4)) and unemployed participants (OR=2.4, 95% CI (1.5 to 3.8)) were more likely to have anxiety as compared with those participants who were employed. Similarly, those who had history of cardiac disease (OR=16.1, 95% CI (6.5 to 40.2)) had more chances to be anxious as compared with those who had no other medical condition (table 3).
Table 3.
Multivariable logistic regression analysis of depression and anxiety by important risk factors
| Characteristics | PHQ-9 depression ≥10 | GAD-7 anxiety ≥10 | ||
| OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | |
| Age group, year | ||||
| <25 | Ref | Ref | ||
| 25–34 | 1.29 (0.94 to 1.78) | 0.110 | 1.62 (1.16 to 2.24) | 0.004 |
| 35–44 | 1.43 (1.02 to 1.98) | 0.035 | 1.45 (1.03 to 2.05) | 0.034 |
| >45 | 0.79 (0.53 to 1.16) | 0.229 | 0.61 (0.40 to 0.93) | 0.022 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | ||||
| Underweight (<18.5) | Ref | – | ||
| Normal weight (18.5–22.9) | 1.12 (0.69 to 1.79) | 0.637 | – | |
| Overweight (23–27.4) | 1.17 (0.74 to 1.87) | 0.494 | – | |
| Obese (≥27.5) | 1.55 (0.97 to 2.47) | 0.068 | – | |
| Education level | ||||
| No education | Ref | Ref | ||
| Primary | 1.68 (1.30 to 2.15) | <0.001 | 1.79 (1.38 to 2.32) | <0.001 |
| Secondary | 0.98 (0.78 to 1.23) | 0.870 | 1.05 (0.83 to 1.33) | 0.698 |
| Tertiary | 1.13 (0.77 to 1.67) | 0.534 | 0.45 (0.27 to 0.76) | 0.003 |
| Marital status | ||||
| Single | Ref | – | ||
| Married | 1.27 (0.87 to 1.86) | 0.207 | – | |
| Widow/divorced/separated | 3.27 (2.04 to 5.23) | <0.001 | – | |
| Work status | ||||
| Employed | Ref | Ref | ||
| Self-employed | 2.88 (1.88 to 4.41) | <0.001 | 1.61 (1.02 to 2.56) | 0.043 |
| Unemployed | 1.45 (0.91 to 2.30) | 0.121 | 2.38 (1.49 to 3.81) | <0.001 |
| Student | 4.92 (2.63 to 9.18) | <0.001 | 4.58 (2.48 to 8.43) | <0.001 |
| Housewife | 1.67 (1.16 to 2.39) | 0.006 | 1.67 (1.13 to 2.46) | 0.011 |
| Comorbidity | ||||
| None | Ref | Ref | ||
| Hypertension | 1.85 (1.53 to 2.23) | <0.001 | 2.04 (1.67 to 2.49) | <0.001 |
| Diabetes miletus | 0.72 (0.49 to 1.06) | 0.095 | 1.49 (1.03 to 2.17) | 0.036 |
| Obesity | 1.78 (1.13 to 2.81) | 0.013 | 2.19 (1.37 to 3.49) | 0.001 |
| History of cardiac disease | 14.54 (5.04 to 41.95) | <0.001 | 16.15 (6.48 to 40.25) | <0.001 |
| Sleeping hours | ||||
| ≤6 | Ref | Ref | ||
| >6 | 1.30 (1.09 to 1.55) | 0.004 | 1.22 (1.01 to 1.47) | 0.040 |
OR adjusted for variables had p value ≤0.250 in univariate analysis.
BMI, body mass index; GAD-7, Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
Distribution of depression and anxiety levels with responses of ‘patient referred to any tertiary care facility’ was plotted in figures 1 and 2, respectively. The figures depict that participants who were observing mild to severe depression (64.5%) and those who had mild to severe anxiety (83.6%) were referred to any tertiary care facility.
Figure 1.
Association of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 depression score categories and patient referred to any tertiary care facility (χ2=115.6, p value <0.001).
Figure 2.
Association of Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 anxiety score categories and patient referred to any tertiary care facility (χ2=664.1, p value <0.001).
Discussion
The current research examines the mental health problems that bring people to Sehat Kahani clinics. There are 2660 people who have been found to have mental health issues that require treatment. The patient’s symptoms were categorised into depression and anxiety using the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 questionnaires. The study’s overarching goal was to assess the extent to which members of a socioeconomic group with low income and limited financial means struggle with mental health difficulties. The results of this study confirmed the presence of depressive and anxious conditions. Telepsychiatry has the potential to enhance mental health outcomes and mitigate the burden of such mental health disorders.
The present study showed that out of 2660 participants, the majority were females (2618, 98.4%), married (2165, 81.4%), unemployed (260, 9.8%), housewife (1837, 69.1%) and uneducated (1624, 61.1%) women with low household income 1513 (56.9%) who were mainly suffering from mental disorder. This result corresponds with the other cross-sectional studies from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, where primarily females (71%), married (68.5%) and unemployed (8.6%) women with low sociodemographic status were suffering from anxiety disorder as well.14
Similarly, the findings of a study conducted in Iran, when comparing the adjusted OR (AOR) of both studies, indicate that a significant number of participants were women who were married (AOR 1.06), widowed (AOR 1.30), overweight or obese (AOR 1.07) and hypertensive (AOR 1.25). These factors were found to be positively correlated with anxiety, with the exception of hypertension, which did not show any association with depression. In the present study, however, it was observed that being married (AOR 1.27), widowed (AOR 3.27), overweight or obese (AOR 1.17) and hypertensive (AOR 1.85 for depression and AOR 2.04 for anxiety) were associated with both anxiety and depression.15
Numerous studies have provided evidence suggesting that the experience of losing a spouse is linked to a range of negative health consequences. These consequences encompass a decline in physical well-being and a deterioration in cognitive and functional health when compared with individuals who are still married. The demise of a spousal partner is often associated with a rapid decline in mental health.16 17 This outcome can be attributed to the observation that women tend to experience positive and negative emotions with a higher degree of intensity than that of men.18
Persistent sleeplessness is the most commonly observed residual symptom among individuals with depression. This symptom is considered a significant predictor of relapse into depression and has the potential to negatively impact clinical outcomes, leading to unsatisfactory results.19–22 According to the present study’s findings, a significant proportion of the participants, specifically 70.2%, reported experiencing a duration of sleep that is less than or equal to 6 hours. A study conducted in Tanzania found that 16% of the participants encountered difficulties in sleeping.23
The result of this current study also found that women who had symptoms of severe anxiety (15–21) were 373 (14.0%) between the age of 25 and 34. This result is consistent with the other research study that women who had symptoms of a severe anxiety disorder (16.6%) suffered at age 34.24
Moreover, the results of this current study showed that overall GAD scores were significantly associated with those women who were unemployed (OR 2.38, 95% CI (1.49 to 3.81)). When compared with the Watterson study, it showed that GAD was higher than the other research study (OR 1.9, 95% CI (1.5 to 2.5)).25
Depression and anxiety are common among substance abusers seeking treatment. In this study, 2.8% of individuals used drugs. Due to their prevalence and negative effects, depression and drug addiction are major challenges. Mental health issues and substance misuse often cause severe morbidity, disability and unsatisfactory treatment effects.26 27
Conclusion
The findings of this study provide vital insights into the mental health challenges faced by a substantial portion of the female population. Specifically, the study investigated the potential benefits of telepsychiatry consultation in addressing these challenges. This inquiry pertains to the impact of geographical isolation on mental health within various regions of Pakistan. Furthermore, this can serve as a foundation for policymakers and mental health practitioners to formulate efficacious mental health interventions that specifically address the distinctive requirements of low-income communities where access to mental well-being experts is minimal. It is crucial to conduct additional research and allocate appropriate resources to accurately represent the prevalence of mental health disorders in these regions. Additionally, it is important to implement innovative strategies, such as telepsychiatry, to address the growing demand for mental health interventions within marginalised populations. In order to effectively cater to the requirements of the low-to-middle-income demographic, it is essential to devise customised strategies and interventions.
Limitations
Anxiety and depression were the only psychiatric conditions looked at in depth; other disorders were not addressed.
The study relied primarily on demographic information to predict cases of mental illness. Other factors may also play a role in the onset of mental health problems.
Establishing a strong rapport with a patient constitutes a crucial component in delivering efficacious mental healthcare. Performing psychiatric evaluations in a telepsychiatry context presents additional challenges due to the absence of face-to-face interaction between the patient and the psychiatrist.
Both questionnaires are self-administered and the patient may not be able or willing to answer the questions accurately and truthfully.
Recommendations
Raise awareness and promote the use of telepsychiatry. One way to achieve this goal is to make telepsychiatry consultations accessible via government healthcare facilities and provide financial support to mental health specialists who wish to establish such practices.
Inform the general people about telepsychiatry. Educating the public and medical professionals on the benefits of telepsychiatry constitutes an additional approach.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Umar Farooq (Tech Valley Pakistan) for support. Management of Dadar Mansehra Mental Hospital, for enabling us for setting telemedicine clinics. Dr Waseema Sheikh for facilitation of Sehat Kahani clinic. To all the patient advisors.
Footnotes
Contributors: IZA developed the study’s framework and methodology. Data was gathered and organised by MK and MM. SH did the analysis and interpretation. The manuscript was initially drafted by IZA and MK and finished by MM. The manuscript was edited for clarity and accuracy by SSK and KS. IZA, as guarantor, IZA accepts the full responsibility of work and/or the conduct of the study. All authors have critically reviewed and approved the final draft.
Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests: None declared.
Patient and public involvement: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement
No data are available.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Ethics approval
Ethical approval was given by Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi IRB reference number IRB-2220/DUHS/2021. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.
References
- 1.Ansari I. Mental health Pakistan: optimizing brains. Int J Emerg Ment Health 2015;17:288. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sharpe I, Davison CM. Climate change, climate-related disasters and mental disorder in low-and middle-income countries: a Scoping review. BMJ Open 2021;11:e051908. 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Administrator . WHO Pakistan celebrates World Mental Health Day. World Health Organization - Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Available: http://www.emro.who.int/pak/pakistan-news/who-pakistan-celebrates-world-mental-health-day.html
- 4.World Health Organization . WHO MiNDbank - WHO-AIMS Report on Mental Health System in Pakistan. WHO MiNDbank - WHO-AIMS Report on Mental Health System in Pakistan. Available: https://extranet.who.int/mindbank/item/1305 [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ali NA, Khoja A. Digital innovation: Telepsychiatry for measuring psychiatric disorders. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2020;30:233–4. 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.03.233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fortney JC, Pyne JM, Turner EE, et al. Telepsychiatry integration of mental health services into rural primary care settings. Int Rev Psychiatry 2015;27:525–39. 10.3109/09540261.2015.1085838 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hilty DM, Rabinowitz T, McCarron RM, et al. An update on Telepsychiatry and how it can leverage collaborative, stepped, and integrated services to primary care. Psychosomatics 2018;59:227–50. 10.1016/j.psym.2017.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hilty DM, Sunderji N, Suo S, et al. Telepsychiatry and other technologies for integrated care: evidence base, best practice models and competencies. Int Rev Psychiatry 2018;30:292–309. 10.1080/09540261.2019.1571483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ratzliff A, Sunderji N. Tele-behavioral health, collaborative care, and integrated care: learning to leverage scarce psychiatric resources over distance, populations, and time. Acad Psychiatry 2018;42:834–40. 10.1007/s40596-018-0984-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sanchez Gonzalez ML, McCord CE, Dopp AR, et al. Telemental health training and delivery in primary care: A case report of Interdisciplinary treatment. J Clin Psychol 2019;75:260–70. 10.1002/jclp.22719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Waugh M, Calderone J, Brown Levey S, et al. Using telepsychiatry to enrich existing integrated primary care. Telemed J E Health 2019;25:762–8. 10.1089/tmj.2018.0132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Greenwood H, Krzyzaniak N, Peiris R, et al. Telehealth versus face-to-face psychotherapy for less common mental health conditions: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JMIR Ment Health 2022;9:e31780. 10.2196/31780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Junaid Tahir M, Waheed S, Ullah I, et al. Telepsychiatry and mental Healthcare referrals: recommendations for low‐and middle‐income countries. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2021;57:2035–6. 10.1111/ppc.12732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lugova H, Andoy-Galvan JA, Patil SS, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of the severity of depression, anxiety and stress among low-income community-dwelling adults in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Community Ment Health J 2021;57:1489–98. 10.1007/s10597-020-00765-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Najafipour H, Shahrokhabadi MS, Banivaheb G, et al. Trends in the prevalence and incidence of anxiety and depressive symptoms in Iran: findings from KERCADRS. Fam Med Community Health 2021;9:e000937. 10.1136/fmch-2021-000937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jadhav A, Weir D. Widowhood and depression in a cross-national perspective: evidence from the United States, Europe, Korea, and China. The Journals of Gerontology 2018;73:e143–53. 10.1093/geronb/gbx021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vable AM, Subramanian SV, Rist PM, et al. “Does the "widowhood effect" precede spousal bereavement? results from a nationally representative sample of older adults”. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2015;23:283–92. 10.1016/j.jagp.2014.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Veytia-López M, Calvete E, Sánchez-Álvarez N, et al. Relationship between stressful life events and emotional intelligence in Mexican adolescents: male vs. female comparative study. Salud Ment 2019;42:261–8. 10.17711/SM.0185-3325.2019.034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jaussent I, Bouyer J, Ancelin M-L, et al. Insomnia and daytime Sleepiness are risk factors for depressive symptoms in the elderly. Sleep 2011;34:1103–10. 10.5665/SLEEP.1170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lauer CJ, Schreiber W, Holsboer F, et al. In quest of identifying vulnerability markers for psychiatric disorders by all-night Polysomnography. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995;52:145–53. 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950140063009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hinkelmann K, Moritz S, Botzenhardt J, et al. Changes in Cortisol secretion during antidepressive treatment and cognitive improvement in patients with major depression: a longitudinal study. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2012;37:685–92. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Benca RM, Peterson MJ. Insomnia and depression. Sleep Med 2008;9 Suppl 1:S3–9. 10.1016/S1389-9457(08)70010-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Smith Fawzi MC, Ngakongwa F, Liu Y, et al. Validating the patient health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening of depression in Tanzania. Neurology, Psychiatry and Brain Research 2019;31:9–14. 10.1016/j.npbr.2018.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Terlizzi EP, Villarroel MA. Symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder among adults: United States 2019. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Watterson RA, Williams JVA, Lavorato DH, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of generalized anxiety disorder in Canada. Can J Psychiatry 2017;62:24–9. 10.1177/0706743716645304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Begg S, Vos T, Barker B, et al. The burden of disease and injury in Australia. 2003.
- 27.Najt P, Fusar-Poli P, Brambilla P. Co-occurring mental and substance abuse disorders: a review on the potential predictors and clinical outcomes. Psychiatry Res 2011;186:159–64. 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.07.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
No data are available.


