BMC Infectious Diseases (2023) 23:820
10.1186/s12879-023-08823-7
The original publication of this article contained 2 incorrect table citations. The incorrect and correct information is listed in this correction article. The original article has been updated.
Incorrect.
However, they were sensitive to Doxycycline (100%) followed by Amikacin (95%) (Table 2). Of the 20 isolates recovered, 85% (n = 17) of them were biofilm producers, and recovery of biofilm-forming and MDR A. baumannii was shown to vary with admission wards (Table 3).
Correct.
However, they were sensitive to Doxycycline (100%) followed by Amikacin (95%) (Table 3). Of the 20 isolates recovered, 85% (n = 17) of them were biofilm producers, and recovery of biofilm-forming and MDR A. baumannii was shown to vary with admission wards (Table 2).
Footnotes
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1186/s12879-023-08823-7.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.