Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2023 Nov 15;89(12):e01474-23. doi: 10.1128/aem.01474-23

NADP+ or CO2 reduction by frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase through interaction with formate dehydrogenase 3 in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus onnurineus NA1

Ji-in Yang 1,2, Hae-Chang Jung 1,3, Hyun-Myung Oh 3, Bo Gyoung Choi 1, Hyun Sook Lee 1,2,, Sung Gyun Kang 1,2,
Editor: Haruyuki Atomi4
PMCID: PMC10734459  PMID: 37966269

ABSTRACT

It has been reported that the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase from Thermococcus onnurineus NA1 is homologous to the F420-reducing hydrogenase from methanogens and can reduce thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) via direct electron transfer from H2 oxidation. In this study, to find other interaction targets of frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase, we searched for structural homologs of TrxR using the Position-Specific Iterative Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (PSI-BLAST) protein database search program and AlphaFold Protein Structure Database. Fdh3B (TON_0542), a subunit of the formate dehydrogenase 3 (Fdh3), showed the most similar structure to TrxR in its domains. The interaction potential of Fdh3B with frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase was demonstrated by measuring H2-dependent NADP+ reduction by a mixture of purified proteins. Similarly, the H2-dependent NADP+-reducing activity of Fdh3 whole complex and two other TrxR homologs encoded by TON_0702 and TON_1376 was determined. It was also demonstrated that the Fdh3 complex could reduce CO2 to formate in the presence of the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase and H2, as shown for the H2-dependent CO2 reductase (HDCR) of acetogen. The in vivo contribution of the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase and Fdh3 to H2-dependent CO2 reduction was investigated using a resting cell assay, and formate production was significantly decreased in fdh3A or frhA deletion mutants. In conclusion, the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase was identified to directly transfer electrons to Fdh3 without an electron carrier, similar to the mechanism observed for TrxR. These results expand our understanding of the functional role of the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase in non-methanogenic Thermococcus species.

IMPORTANCE

The strategy using structural homology with the help of structure prediction by AlphaFold was very successful in finding potential targets for the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase of Thermococcus onnurineus NA1. The finding that the hydrogenase can interact with FdhB to reduce the cofactor NAD(P)+ is significant in that the enzyme can function to supply reducing equivalents, just as F420-reducing hydrogenases in methanogens use coenzyme F420 as an electron carrier. Additionally, it was identified that T. onnurineus NA1 could produce formate from H2 and CO2 by the concerted action of frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase and formate dehydrogenase Fdh3.

KEYWORDS: frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase, formate dehydrogenase, protein–protein interaction, NADP+ reduction, CO2 reduction, Thermococcus onnurineus NA1

INTRODUCTION

Strains of the order Thermococcales, known as hyperthermophilic heterotrophs, can survive on a variety of peptides or carbohydrates, producing H2S in the presence of sulfur or H2 in the absence of sulfur (1). [NiFe]-hydrogenases containing orthologs of cytoplasmic SulfI hydrogenase and membrane-bound hydrogenase (Mbh) are commonly found in Thermococcales strains, including Pyrococcus furiosus (2), Pyrococcus horikoshii (3), Thermococcus kodakarensis KOD1 (4), Thermococcus onnurineus NA1 (5, 6), and Thermococcus gammatolerans (7). Some strains, including T. onnurineus NA1 (6), Thermococcus barophilus Ch5 (8), and Thermococcus paralvinellae (9), have additional [NiFe]-hydrogenases such as membrane-bound CO-dependent hydrogenase (Mch), membrane-bound formate-dependent hydrogenase (Mfh) (10), and cytoplasmic frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase (FrhAGB) (10). Mch and Mfh were identified to play key roles in energy conservation from CO and formate utilization in T. onnurineus NA1, respectively (11, 12).

F420-reducing hydrogenase (FrhABG) from methanogens reduces coenzyme F420, which supplies four electrons for CO2 reduction and plays an essential role during methanogenesis (13, 14). The frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase in Thermococcales strains was assumed to have a unique role distinct from FrhABG from methanogens. The frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase of T. onnurineus NA1 has a large subunit FrhA with a binuclear [NiFe]-center, a small subunit FrhG with three [4Fe4S] clusters, and a flavoprotein FrhB with a [4Fe4S] cluster and FAD-binding site, as found in F420-reducing hydrogenase from methanogens (1416). However, the F420-binding site of FrhB subunit of methanogens is not well conserved in the corresponding subunit of frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase, and F420-reducing activity was not detected in the purified frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase (17). The co-immunoprecipitation assay and affinity pull-down assay suggested that the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase could interact with thioredoxin reductase (TrxR). The redox cascade from the hydrogenase down to a protein disulfide oxidoreductase (Pdo) followed by a sulfur response regulator (SurR) was identified in T. onnurineus NA1 (18, 19). Deletion or overexpression of the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase gene showed distinct phenotypes, indicating that the enzyme may be involved in the transcriptional regulation of various genes (20, 21). However, the mechanism of action of the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase is not yet clearly understood.

In this study, we searched for interaction partners other than TrxR to understand better the function of frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase in T. onnurineus NA1. Sequence- and structure-based homologs of TrxR were targeted as interaction partners of the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase, and three candidates (Fdh3B, TON_0702, and TON_1376) were selected through homology search and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted structural modeling. The interaction and direct electron transfer between frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase and TrxR homologs were experimentally evaluated. The significance of the activity of the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase through interaction with Fdh3 was investigated in an in vivo gene deletion experiment.

RESULTS

In silico prediction of interaction partners for frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase

To search for other interaction partners of the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase, homologs of thioredoxin reductase (TrxR, TON_1603) were analyzed using the Position-Specific Iterative Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (PSI-BLAST) (Table 1). Eleven proteins were selected based on the E-values. Homologous proteins had very low sequence similarity with 23%–33% identity ranges. Multiple sequence alignment of these homologs showed that the active site (CXXC) of TrxR was not present in the other homologs but that the flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD)-binding or nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)-binding residues are well conserved (Fig. S1) (22, 23). To determine the structural similarities between TrxR and its sequence homologs, structural models were retrieved from the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database (24). First of all, the structural model of TrxR of T. onnurineus NA1 was found to be highly similar to the TrxR structures of Bacillus cereus and Sulfolobus solfataricus (25, 26), with root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values (27) of less than 1 Å for FAD and NADPH-binding domains. Then, the structural similarity between TrxR and its homologs was compared based on the RMSD values for the two domains (Fig. 1). TON_0542 was predicted to be most similar to TrxR among the homologs, an NADPH domain with an RMSD value of 0.601 Å and a FAD domain with an RMSD value of 1.545 Å. Several other gene products encoded by TON_0702, TON_1336, TON_0057, TON_0129, TON_0305, and TON_1265 were also similar to TrxR with RMSD values less than 2 Å. However, TON_1376, TON_0204, TON_0865, and TON_1271 were similar to TrxR in one of the FAD or NADPH domains, but less similar in the other. Therefore, TON_0542, TON_0702, and TON_1376 were selected as candidates to test their interaction with the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase.

TABLE 1.

Thioredoxin reductase (TrxR, TON_1603) homologs from T. onnurineus NA1 based on PSI-BLAST analysis

Locus tag Annotation Coverage (%) E-value Identity (%) Accession numbera
TON_0129 FAD-dependent oxidoreductase 84 6e−25 31.74 WP_012571087.1
TON_1336 NADPH-dependent glutamate synthase 96 5e−22 29.34 WP_012572298.1
TON_1265 FAD-dependent oxidoreductase 92 4e−16 27.38 WP_012572225.1
TON_1376 NADPH-dependent glutamate synthase 90 e −15 27.63 WP_012572338.1
TON_0057 NADPH-dependent glutamate synthase 93 e −12 27.25 WP_012571014.1
TON_0204 FAD-dependent oxidoreductase 93 3e−12 29.25 WP_048055134.1
TON_0542 FAD-dependent oxidoreductase (Fdh3B) 48 2e−11 32.79 WP_012571501.1
TON_0305 CoA-disulfide reductase 72 3e−10 28.35 WP_012571262.1
TON_1271 FAD-dependent oxidoreductase 86 e −6 23.03 WP_012572231.1
TON_0702 FAD-dependent oxidoreductase 94 2e−5 28.57 WP_012571662.1
TON_0865 FAD-dependent oxidoreductase 58 2e−5 27.59 WP_012571825.1
a

GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) accession numbers were used.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Structure models of three TrxR homologs of T. onnurineus NA1, obtained from the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database. RMSD values for two domains, FAD domain and NADPH domain, were compared with the TrxR (TON_1603) model, and the numbers of calculated atoms are presented.

In vitro experiments on the interaction between frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase and Fdh3

In our previous report, TON_0542 (Fdh3B) was identified as the NAD(P)-binding subunit of the whole Fdh3 complex, which includes a tungsten-containing catalytic subunit (Fdh3A) and two Fe-S proteins (Fdh3G1 and Fdh3G2) (28). Since the Fdh3 complex can reduce NAD(P)+ by coupling with formate oxidation, it was assumed that electrons derived from H2 oxidation by the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase might be transferred to Fdh3B for NAD(P)+ reduction. To evaluate this possibility, in vitro assays were performed. The frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase in the form of a three-subunit complex, FrhAGB, and Fdh3 complex was purified from T. onnurineus NA1, and Fdh3B subunit alone was heterologously expressed and purified in Escherichia coli (Fig. S2). Fdh3B mixed with FrhAGB clearly displayed NADP+-reducing activity in the presence of H2 (Fig. 2A), and the activity was measured to be 25.5±14.4 U/µmol. The H2-dependent NADP+-reducing activity of the reaction mixture of FrhAGB and Fdh3 (211.1±36.2 U/µmol) (Fig. 2D) was eightfold higher than that of FrhAGB and Fdh3B (25.5±14.4 U/µmol), which is consistent with the pull-down assay results for FrhAGB and Fdh3 (Fig. S3). In addition to Fdh3B, other subunits of Fdh3 appear to contribute to the interaction with FrhAGB. To investigate whether other TrxR homologs interact with FrhAGB, the proteins encoded by TON_0702 and TON_1376 were additionally purified (Fig. S2), and their activities were determined (Fig. 2B and C). Despite their structural similarities to Fdh3B (Fig. 1), the H2-dependent NADP+-reducing activities of TON_0702 (2.4±0.02 U/µmol) and TON_1376 (3.1±0.17 U/µmol) with FrhAGB were estimated to be about 10-fold lower than that of Fdh3B. Nevertheless, the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase can clearly transfer electrons from H2 to the three TrxR homologs.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

H2-dependent NADP+ reduction by interactions between FrhAGB and TrxR homologs, Fdh3B (TON_0542) (A), TON_0702 (B), TON_1376 (C), and Fdh3 complex (D). Each line represents FrhAGB alone purged with H2 (yellow), TrxR homolog alone purged with H2 (blue), TrxR homolog alone purged with N2 (green), FrhAGB and TrxR homolog purged with H2 (red), and FrhAGB and TrxR homolog purged with N2 (black).

Previously, it was also reported that Fdh3 of T. onnurineus NA1 could reduce CO2 with NADPH or reduced ferredoxin (28). Therefore, we wondered if Fdh3 interacting with FrhAGB could reduce CO2 through the direct transfer of electrons derived from H2 oxidation by FrhAGB. To address this issue, FrhAGB and Fdh3 were mixed in the presence of H2/CO2 (80:20, vol/vol) without an electron mediator, and formate production was measured. As a result, formate was detected in the reaction mixture of FrhAGB and Fdh3 (Fig. 3). Since the FrhB subunit of FrhAGB was not absolutely required for TrxR interaction (19), formate production was also tested with a combination of FrhAG and Fdh3. Clearly, the reaction mixture of FrhAG and Fdh3 could generate formate. Comparing the formate-producing activity, the initial activity measured after 1-hour incubation was very similar. FrhAGB-Fdh3 and FrhAG-Fdh3 produced 0.357±0.174 mmol/L/h and 0.338±0.031 mmol/L/h of formate, respectively. However, they showed some differences over time. The FrhAG–Fdh3 showed 43.5% less formate-producing activity than FrhAGB-Fdh3 at 2 hours.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

H2-dependent CO2 reduction by interaction between FrhAG(B) and Fdh3. FrhAGB and Fdh3 purged with H2/CO2 (▲); FrhAGB and Fdh3 purged with N2 (△); FrhAG and Fdh3 purged with H2/CO2 (◆); FrhAG and Fdh3 purged with N2 (◇); Fdh3 purged with H2/CO2 (○); FrhAGB purged with H2/CO2 (■); FrhAG purged with H2/CO2 (□); blank purged with H2/CO2 (●).

Table 2 shows the electron transfer activity of the combination of FrhAGB and Fdh3 (or Fdh3B) compared to other enzymes. It is worth noting that the activity appeared at a similar rate to the Pdo reduction by FrhAGB and TrxR (19). The H2-dependent NADP+-reducing activity of the combination of FrhAGB and Fdh3 (or Fdh3B) was significantly lower than those of SulfI hydrogenases from T. kodakarensis or P. furiosus, but comparable to that of SulfII hydrogenase from P. furiosus (29, 30). The H2-dependent CO2-reducing activity of FrhAGB–Fdh3 was shown to be similar to that of formate hydrogenlyase (FHL) from E. coli (31), but significantly lower than those of other CO2-reducing enzymes such as HDCR from Thermoanaerobacter kivui or Acetobacterium woodii and electron-bifurcating NADP- and ferredoxin-dependent [FeFe] hydrogenase in complex with formate dehydrogenase (Hyt-Fdh) from Clostridium autoethanogenum (32, 33).

TABLE 2.

Comparison of H2-dependent NADP+- or CO2-reducing activity

Electron acceptor Hydrogenase Organisma Specific activity (Ub/mg) Reference
NADP+ FrhAGB and Fdh3 T. onnurineus NA1 0.78 ± 0.1 This study
FrhAGB and Fdh3B T. onnurineus NA1 0.19 ± 0.1 This study
FrhAGB and TON_0702 T. onnurineus NA1 0.018 ± 0.001 This study
FrhAGB and TON_1376 T. onnurineus NA1 0.021 ± 0.001 This study
SulfI T. kodakarensis KOD1 48.7 (29)
SulfI P. furiosus 75 (30)
SulfII P. furiosus 0.3 (30)
CO2 FrhAGB and Fdh3 T. onnurineus NA1 0.011 ± 0.005 This study
HDCR Th. kivui 900 (32)
HDCR A. woodii 10 (32)
FHL E. coli 0.03 (31)
Hyt-Fdh C. autoethanogenum 41 (33)
Pdo FrhAGB and TrxR T. onnurineus NA1 0.011 (19)
a

T, Thermococcus; P, Pyrococcus; Th, Thermoanaerobacter; A, Acetobacterium; E, Escherichia; C, Clostridium.

b

One unit (U) is equivalent to the transfer of 2 μmol of electrons per minute.

In vivo assay for H2-dependent CO2-reducing activity

To determine whether FrhAGB and Fdh3 are involved in the H2-dependent CO2-reducing activity of T. onnurineus NA1 in vivo, deletion mutants of the frhA or fdh3A genes were constructed. The H2-dependent CO2-reducing activities of wild-type strain and two mutants were measured using resting cells. Whereas the wild-type strain produced 1.42±0.12 mmol/L/h of formate, the ΔfrhA and Δfdh3A mutants produced 0.13±0.03 mmol/L/h and 0.8±0.03 mmol/L/h, respectively, indicating that FrhAGB and Fdh3 might contribute to formate production in T. onnurineus NA1 (Fig. 4). More experiments are needed to determine whether this result is due to the actual interaction between frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase and Fdh3 in vivo.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

H2-dependent CO2 reduction in the wild-type and mutant strains. The genotypes of mutant strains are described in Table 3. Formate production was quantified after incubating resting cells at 80°C for 1 hour (upper panel). Expression of Fdh3A and FrhA proteins was detected by Western blot (lower panels).

DISCUSSION

A number of biochemical or genetic methods have been used for screening protein interactions, such as co-immunoprecipitation, tandem affinity purification, chemical cross-linking, two-hybrid screen, and phage display (34, 35). In our previous study, the interaction between frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase and TrxR was identified via co-immunoprecipitation, and direct electron transfer between the proteins could be demonstrated in T. onnurineus NA1 (19). In this study, we tried to find a new target protein for direct electron transfer to broaden our understanding of the function of frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase. If the protein structures of frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase and TrxR had been determined through X-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), or cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), the interaction partner of frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase could have been easily predicted using computational methods such as protein–protein docking, based entirely on three-dimensional protein structures (36, 37). However, their protein structures have not yet been determined. Therefore, we envisioned that proteins with TrxR-mimetic structures could interact with frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase. Two sequential analyses were attempted to select amino acid sequence homologs via PSI-BLAST and then structure homologs via AlphaFold (24, 38). Our simple premise has allowed us to find new combinations of hydrogenase and NADP+-reducing protein either alone (Fdh3B) or as a subunit of formate dehydrogenase (Fdh3).

Our previous report showed that frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase can interact with TrxR and directly transfer electrons from H2 to TrxR and that the TrxR/Pdo redox cascade can reduce SurR, a sulfur-responsive transcription factor (Fig. 5), suggesting a new transcriptional regulatory role for the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase in T. onnurineus NA1 (18, 19). Transcriptome analysis of hydrogenase gene deletion or overexpression mutants supported the possibility (20, 21). Nevertheless, many questions remained about the role of frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase in vivo, such as whether the redox cascade of the hydrogenase is restricted to the TrxR/Pdo/SurR cascade. In this regard, novel combinations of the hydrogenase and NADP+-reducing proteins may provide clues to the role of the hydrogenase. In particular, it is intriguing to note that direct electron transfer from frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase to Fdh3B or Fdh3 resulted in NAD(P)+ reduction or CO2 reduction, respectively, whereas frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase itself did not show NAD(P)+ or CO2 reduction (17 and Fig. 2). Based on transcriptomic and proteomic analysis data, frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase is constitutively expressed in a variety of culture media including formate medium in T. onnurineus NA1 (3941). In addition, it seems that there might be a correlation between the presence of frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase and formate dehydrogenases in many Thermococcus strains (42), suggesting that frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase probably plays an important role along with formate hydrogenase. For example, the interaction and electron relay between frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase and Fdh3 whole complex suggest that a role for the hydrogenase in reducing-equivalent disposal seems possible. During the heterotrophic growth of Thermococcales strains, as with most anaerobes, reducing equivalent disposal is a key issue for sustained growth. Thermococcales strains mostly use elemental sulfur (S0) or proton as electron acceptors, producing H2S or H2, respectively (1). Mbh plays a key role in recycling reduced ferredoxins generated from carbohydrate or peptide breakdown (4345). CO-dependent membrane-bound hydrogenase (CODH-Mch-Mnh3) and formate-dependent membrane-bound hydrogenase (Fdh2-Mfh2-Mnh2) also play important roles in carboxydotrophic and formatotrophic growth, respectively (11, 12, 46). Since energy conservation by these enzymes correlates with H2 production, excessive accumulation of H2 gradually inhibits the use of protons as an electron acceptor thermodynamically (47, 48). In situations where the H2 partial pressure is high and electron acceptors are limited, H2-dependent CO2-reducing activity to ameliorate H2 partial pressure will be undoubtedly beneficial for cell growth. The decrease in H2-dependent CO2-reducing activity in ΔfrhA or Δfdh3A mutants indicates that frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase and Fdh3 are actually involved in formate generation in vivo. However, formate generation was still detected in Δfdh3A or ΔfrhA mutants. So, considering redundant gene copies encoding formate dehydrogenase and hydrogenase in T. onnurineus NA1, it is worth noting that the combination of other FDHs (Fdh1 or Fdh2) and hydrogenases might be also involved in H2-dependent CO2-reducing activity (5).

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Proposed model for direct electron transfer between FrhAGB and its interaction partners.

The H2-dependent CO2-reducing activity of T. onnurineus NA1 determined in this study was much lower than those of the H2-dependent CO2-reducing enzymes. Among the known enzymes, HDCR is composed of four subunits: formate dehydrogenase, hydrogenase, and two iron–sulfur (Fe-S) cluster proteins, and catalyzes reversible H2-dependent CO2 reduction to formate by electron transfer between the two catalytic subunits (32, 49). The enzyme of Th. kivui is a highly active enzyme that reduces CO2 to formate with a specific activity of 900 U/mg and produces H2 and CO2 from formate with a specific activity of 930 U/mg (32). The Hyt-Fdh from C. autoethanogenum catalyzes H2-dependent CO2 reduction and also NADPH- and ferredoxin-dependent confurcating CO2 reduction to formate (33). Recently, FHL-1 from E. coli, consisting of soluble formate dehydrogenase (FDH-H), two Fe-S cluster proteins, and a nickel-dependent hydrogenase module (Hyd-3), has been shown to work in reverse and exhibit H2-dependent CO2 reductase activity (31, 50). Structural features of these enzymes lead us to wonder how FrhAGB transfers electrons to Fdh3 for CO2 reduction, as the interaction between FrhAGB and Fdh3B does not necessarily mean that Fdh3 can only interact with FrhAGB through Fdh3B subunit. There may be other routes for electron transfer. The question of how FrhAGB and Fdh3 can interact together or how electrons can be transferred from FrhAGB to Fdh3 awaits further study.

It is worth noting that SulfI hydrogenase is known to reduce NADP+ in T. kodakarensis KOD1 and P. furiosus (29, 30). Their homologs, SulfI (TON_0534 to 0537) and SulfII (TON_0052 to 0055), are found in T. onnurineus NA1. The NADP+-reducing activity of FrhAGB and Fdh3 is much less than that of SulfI. Therefore, it is unlikely that FrhAGB and Fdh3 play a major role in NADP+ reduction in the presence of SulfI or SulfII. However, SulfI, SulfII, and FrhAGB showed different expression patterns depending on the growth substrate (39, 40). Therefore, it is assumed that FrhAGB and Fdh3 may provide redundancy in reducing NADP+, especially in the absence of SulfI and SulfII.

It is not easy to pinpoint the reason for the increase in absorbance above baseline at 340 nm using FrhAGB and Fdh3 purged with N2 (black line) or Fdh3 alone (blue line) in Fig. 2. H2 present in the anaerobic chamber may be dissolved in the buffer during the experiment, or the purified Fdh3 may be contaminated with trace amounts of hydrogenase. Nevertheless, it was very clear that NADP+ reduction activity was maintained for longer in the presence of H2 and was higher when FrhAGB was added.

In this study, efforts were made to find more interaction targets for electron transfer by frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase. Fdh3B, TON_0702, and TON_1376 were selected among TrxR homologs, and their H2-dependent NADP+-reducing activity was assayed. As a result of the in vitro and in vivo assay, new functions of FrhAGB were identified: NADP+ reduction and CO2 reduction through protein–protein interaction with Fdh3B and its whole complex, Fdh3. Other TrxR homologs may be direct targets of FrhAGB or intermediates in the redox cascade. Further studies will expand our understanding of the functional role of the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase in T. onnurineus NA1.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Culture media

T. onnurineus NA1 wild-type and mutant strains were cultivated as previously described with slight modifications (11). The MM1 medium routinely used in this study contained 1 g yeast extract, 35 g NaCl, 0.7 g KCl, 3.9 g MgSO4, 0.4 g CaCl2∙H2O, 0.3 g NH4Cl, 0.15 g Na2HPO4, 0.03 g Na2SiO3, 0.5 g NaHCO3, 0.5 g cysteine-HCl, 1 mL of trace element solution, 2 mL of 500X Fe-EDTA solution (51), 1 mL of vitamin solution (52), and 1 mL of 5% (wt/vol) Na2S∙9H2O solution per liter. For protein purification, 5 g/L of maltodextrin and 0.1 M Bis-Tris (pH 6.5) were added to the MM1 medium, and yeast extract was increased to 4 g/L supplemented. To prepare cell suspensions, 5 g/L of sodium pyruvate was added to the MM1 medium.

Construction of mutants

All mutants were created by applying the gene disruption and gene introduction system as previously described with slight modifications (53). The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase gene from P. furiosus (hmgpfu) was integrated into the genome with a strong promoter of TON_0157 (P0157) as a selection marker.

The TON_0542, TON_0702, and TON_1376 genes were amplified from the genomic DNA of T. onnurineus NA1 and then inserted into the pET-28a(+) vector (Merck KgaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Each recombinant plasmid was transformed into the E. coli Rosetta (DE3) strain (Merck KgaA, Darmstadt, Germany) to obtain strains RTN0542, RTN0702, and RTN1376, respectively. The strains used in this study are summarized in Table 3, and the primers used in this study are given in Table 4.

TABLE 3.

Strains and their genotypes

Strain Parent strain Genotype Reference
Thermococcus onnurineus NA1
 Δfdh3A Wild type Δfdh3A This study
 ΔfrhA Wild type ΔfrhA::bPgdh-chmgpfu (20)
 MF01 DF01 aP0157-hmgpfu-fdh3 (28)
 FrhAGB-overexpressing strain Wild type P 1559 ::P 0157 -hmg pfu (19)
 FrhAG-overexpressing strain ΔfrhB strain P 1559 ::P 0157 -hmg pfu (19)
Escherichia coli
 RTN0542 Rosetta (DE3) fdh3B gene cloned in pET-28a(+) This study
 RTN0702 Rosetta (DE3) TON_0702 gene cloned in pET-28a(+) This study
 RTN1376 Rosetta (DE3) TON_1376 gene cloned in pET-28a(+) This study
a

P0157, promoter of TON_0157 gene of T. onnurineus NA1.

b

Pgdh, promoter of glutamate dehydrogenase gene of T. kodakarensis KOD1.

c

hmgpfu, HMG-CoA reductase gene from P. furiosus.

TABLE 4.

Primers used in this study

Mutant Primer Sequence (5' → 3')
Δfdh3A fdh3A_LA_F AATTCGAGCTCGGTACCCGGCTGGTGCATACATAGCCTTTGGATT
fdh3A_LA_R CCAAGCTTGCATGCCTGCAGATACGGCTCTATTCCTATGGGCTGC
fdh3A_RA_F CCATAGGAATAGAGCCGTATGGGGCCAATATACTCACGAACGATG
fdh3A_RA_R CCAAGCTTGCATGCCTGCAGCAAACCTCATCCCGCTCATACTCAT
RTN0542 pET_TON0542_F GCGCGGCAGCCATATGAGCGGGATGAGGTTTGCG
pET_TON0542_R GCTCGAATTCGGATCCTCACCTCCCCATCAGCCA
RTN0702 pET_TON0702_F GTGCCGCGCGGCAGCCATATGGTGAGGTTCTACATCTGTGAG
pET_TON0702_R GGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGCTCGAGGCACTTACCGCTGAGAACC
RTN1376 pET_TON1376_F GTGCCGCGCGGCAGCCATATGATGGCGAGAGCCAAACCTAAG
pET_TON1376_R GTGGTGGTGGTGGTGCTCGAGAGCGTTCGCCTTCTTGGC

Protein purification

Fdh3 whole complex was purified from strain MF01 (28) by TALON immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) as previously described. Fdh3B subunit and the proteins encoded by TON_0702 and TON_1376 were purified from strains RTN0542, RTN0702, and RTN1376, respectively. FrhAGB and FrhAG proteins were purified from FrhAGB- and FrhAG-overexpressing strains, respectively, as previously described (19).

H2-dependent NADP+- or CO2-reducing assay

H2-dependent NADP+-reducing activity was assessed using 1 µM of Fdh3B, TON_0702, or TON_1376 in the presence of 1 µM FrhAGB and 2 mM NADP+ dissolved in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5 M KCl, and 75 mM NaCl. In addition, combinations of 0.2 µM Fdh3 or FrhAGB were estimated with H2-dependent NADP+-reducing activity. Three bars of H2 gas was filled in a 2 mL sealed cuvette and incubated at 70°C. Absorbance change according to NADPH generation was monitored at 340 nm (εNADPH=6.22 mM−1 cm−1) (54) using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (UV-2600, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). To confirm that the NADP+ reduction activity depends on H2 consumption, the buffer charged with N2 was tested as a negative control.

The H2-dependent CO2-reducing activity of the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase and Fdh3 was evaluated using 2 µM of each enzyme dissolved in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.5 M KCl, and 75 mM NaCl. After charging 3 bar of H2/CO2 (80:20) gases, all serum vials were incubated at 70°C for 1–5 hours. Formate production was quantified using the Formate Assay Kit (ab111748, Abcam, Cambridge, UK).

Resting cell assay

To prepare cell suspensions, the cells were cultivated and harvested by centrifugation at 4,426 × g for 20 min at 10°C in an anaerobic chamber. Cells were washed twice and resuspended to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600 nm) of 1.0 with modified buffer A containing 50 mM imidazole-HCl (pH 6.5), 600 mM NaCl, 30 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM KCl (55). One milliliter of the cell suspension was placed in a 9 mL serum vial and charged with 2 bar of H2/CO2 (80:20) gas. All vials were then incubated at 80°C for 1 hour. Formate production was quantified using the Formate Assay Kit (ab111748, Abcam, Cambridge, UK).

Western blot analysis

Western blot analysis of protein expression was performed as previously described (19) using rabbit polyclonal anti-FrhA or anti-Fdh3A antibodies (Ab Frontier, Seoul, Republic of Korea). Blots were visualized with a Clarity Western ECL substrate (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA). Chemiluminescent signals were visualized using a ChemiDoc MP imaging system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA).

Protein structure models

The sequence homologs of TrxR were determined by the PSI-BLAST at NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Multiple sequence alignment of TrxR homologs was performed by Clustal Omega (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/). Protein structure models were compiled from the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database (https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/). Structural visualization and alignment were performed using the PyMOL program (https://pymol.org/2/).

Pull-down assay

Protein–protein interactions were validated using the pull-down approach as described by Jung et al. (19). Briefly, after attaching purified His-tagged Fdh3 or Fdh3B to Dynabeads His-Tag Isolation and Pull-down kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, USA), purified strep-tagged FrhAGB was applied and washed four times. Eluted proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot by using anti-FrhAGB antibody (Ab Frontier, Seoul, Republic of Korea).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors want to acknowledge Dr. Yun Jae Kim (KIOST) for providing a mutant strain and Dr. Young Jun An (KIOST) for supporting structural analysis.

This work is supported by the Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST) in-house program (EA0122) and Development of Biohydrogen Plant Operation Optimization System supported by the Korea Institute of Marine Science and Technology Promotion (KIMST) funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries in the Republic of Korea (PM63790).

S.G.K. and H.S.L. designed the research; J.-I.Y., H.-C.J., and B.G.C. carried out experiments, J.-I.Y. and H.-M.O. interpreted bioinformatic and experimental data analysis, and J.-I.Y., S.G.K., and H.S.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Contributor Information

Hyun Sook Lee, Email: leeh522@kiost.ac.kr.

Sung Gyun Kang, Email: sgkang@kiost.ac.kr.

Haruyuki Atomi, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01474-23.

Fig. S1 to S3. aem.01474-23-s0001.docx.

Supplementary Figures.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.01474-23.SuF1

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Stetter KO. 1996. Hyperthermophilic procaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 18:149–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1996.tb00233.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bryant FO, Adams MW. 1989. Characterization of hydrogenase from the hyperthermophilic archaebacterium, Pyrococcus furiosus. J Biol Chem 264:5070–5079. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kawarabayasi Y, Sawada M, Horikawa H, Haikawa Y, Hino Y, Yamamoto S, Sekine M, Baba S, Kosugi H, Hosoyama A, Nagai Y, Sakai M, Ogura K, Otsuka R, Nakazawa H, Takamiya M, Ohfuku Y, Funahashi T, Tanaka T, Kudoh Y, Yamazaki J, Kushida N, Oguchi A, Aoki K, Kikuchi H. 1998. Complete sequence and gene organization of the genome of a hyper-thermophilic archaebacterium, Pyrococcus horikoshii OT3. DNA Res 5:147–155. doi: 10.1093/dnares/5.2.147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Fukui T, Atomi H, Kanai T, Matsumi R, Fujiwara S, Imanaka T. 2005. Complete genome sequence of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1 and comparison with Pyrococcus genomes. Genome Res 15:352–363. doi: 10.1101/gr.3003105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bae SS, Kim YJ, Yang SH, Lim JK, Jeon JH, Lee HS, Kang SG, Kim SJ, Lee JH. 2006. Thermococcus onnurineus sp. nov., a hyperthermophilic archaeon isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent area at the PACMANUS field. J Microbiol Biotechnol 16:1826–1831. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Lee HS, Kang SG, Bae SS, Lim JK, Cho Y, Kim YJ, Jeon JH, Cha SS, Kwon KK, Kim HT, Park CJ, Lee HW, Kim SI, Chun J, Colwell RR, Kim SJ, Lee JH. 2008. The complete genome sequence of Thermococcus onnurineus NA1 reveals a mixed heterotrophic and carboxydotrophic metabolism. J Bacteriol 190:7491–7499. doi: 10.1128/JB.00746-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Zivanovic Y, Armengaud J, Lagorce A, Leplat C, Guérin P, Dutertre M, Anthouard V, Forterre P, Wincker P, Confalonieri F. 2009. Genome analysis and genome-wide proteomics of Thermococcus gammatolerans, the most radioresistant organism known amongst the archaea. Genome Biol 10:R70. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-6-r70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Oger P, Sokolova TG, Kozhevnikova DA, Taranov EA, Vannier P, Lee HS, Kwon KK, Kang SG, Lee JH, Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA, Lebedinsky AV. 2016. Complete genome sequence of the hyperthermophilic and piezophilic archaeon Thermococcus barophilus Ch5, capable of growth at the expense of hydrogenogenesis from carbon monoxide and formate. Genome Announc 4:e01534-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01534-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hensley SA, Moreira E, Holden JF. 2016. Hydrogen production and enzyme activities in the hyperthermophile Thermococcus paralvinellae grown on maltose, tryptone, and agricultural waste. Front Microbiol 7:167. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Rittmann S, Lee HS, Lim JK, Kim TW, Lee JH, Kang SG. 2015. One-carbon substrate-based biohydrogen production: microbes, mechanism, and productivity. Biotechnol Adv 33:165–177. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kim YJ, Lee HS, Kim ES, Bae SS, Lim JK, Matsumi R, Lebedinsky AV, Sokolova TG, Kozhevnikova DA, Cha SS, Kim SJ, Kwon KK, Imanaka T, Atomi H, Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA, Lee JH, Kang SG. 2010. Formate-driven growth coupled with H2 production. Nature 467:352–355. doi: 10.1038/nature09375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kim MS, Bae SS, Kim YJ, Kim TW, Lim JK, Lee SH, Choi AR, Jeon JH, Lee JH, Lee HS, Kang SG. 2013. CO-dependent H2 production by genetically engineered Thermococcus onnurineus NA1. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:2048–2053. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03298-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Thauer RK, Kaster AK, Seedorf H, Buckel W, Hedderich R. 2008. Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:579–591. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1931 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Thauer RK, Kaster AK, Goenrich M, Schick M, Hiromoto T, Shima S. 2010. Hydrogenases from methanogenic archaea, nickel, a novel cofactor, and H2 storage. Annu Rev Biochem 79:507–536. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.030508.152103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Allegretti M, Mills DJ, McMullan G, Kühlbrandt W, Vonck J. 2014. Atomic model of the F420-reducing [NiFe] hydrogenase by electron cryo-microscopy using a direct electron detector. Elife 3:e01963. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Vitt S, Ma K, Warkentin E, Moll J, Pierik AJ, Shima S, Ermler U. 2014. The F420-reducing [NiFe]-hydrogenase complex from Methanothermobacter marburgensis, the first X-ray structure of a group 3 family member. J Mol Biol 426:2813–2826. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.05.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Jeon JH, Lim JK, Kim MS, Yang TJ, Lee SH, Bae SS, Kim YJ, Lee SH, Lee JH, Kang SG, Lee HS. 2015. Characterization of the frhAGB-encoding hydrogenase from a non-methanogenic hyperthermophilic archaeon. Extremophiles 19:109–118. doi: 10.1007/s00792-014-0689-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Lim JK, Jung HC, Kang SG, Lee HS. 2017. Redox regulation of SurR by protein disulfide oxidoreductase in Thermococcus onnurineus NA1. Extremophiles 21:491–498. doi: 10.1007/s00792-017-0919-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Jung HC, Lim JK, Yang TJ, Kang SG, Lee HS. 2020. Direct electron transfer between the frhAGB-encoded hydrogenase and thioredoxin reductase in the nonmethanogenic archaeon Thermococcus onnurineus NA1. Appl Environ Microbiol 86:e02630-19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02630-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lee SH, Kim MS, Kim YJ, Kim TW, Kang SG, Lee HS. 2017. Transcriptomic profiling and its implications for the H2 production of a non-methanogen deficient in the frhAGB-encoding hydrogenase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101:5081–5088. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8234-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lee SH, Kim MS, Kang SG, Lee HS. 2019. Biohydrogen production of obligate anaerobic archaeon Thermococcus onnurineus NA1 under oxic conditions via overexpression of frhAGB-encoding hydrogenase genes. Biotechnol Biofuels 12:24. doi: 10.1186/s13068-019-1365-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Buey RM, Schmitz RA, Buchanan BB, Balsera M. 2018. Crystal structure of the apo-form of NADPH-dependent thioredoxin reductase from a methane-producing archaeon. Antioxidants (Basel) 7:166. doi: 10.3390/antiox7110166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Valette O, Tran TTT, Cavazza C, Caudeville E, Brasseur G, Dolla A, Talla E, Pieulle L. 2017. Biochemical function, molecular structure and evolution of an atypical thioredoxin reductase from Desulfovibrio vulgaris. Front Microbiol 8:1855. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Tunyasuvunakool K, Adler J, Wu Z, Green T, Zielinski M, Žídek A, Bridgland A, Cowie A, Meyer C, Laydon A, Velankar S, Kleywegt GJ, Bateman A, Evans R, Pritzel A, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, Bates R, Kohl SAA, Potapenko A, Ballard AJ, Romera-Paredes B, Nikolov S, Jain R, Clancy E, Reiman D, Petersen S, Senior AW, Kavukcuoglu K, Birney E, Kohli P, Jumper J, Hassabis D. 2021. Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome. Nature 596:590–596. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Shoor M, Gudim I, Hersleth H-P, Hammerstad M. 2021. Thioredoxin reductase from Bacillus cereus exhibits distinct reduction and NADPH-binding properties. FEBS Open Bio 11:3019–3031. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ruggiero A, Masullo M, Ruocco MR, Grimaldi P, Lanzotti MA, Arcari P, Zagari A, Vitagliano L. 2009. Structure and stability of a thioredoxin reductase from Sulfolobus solfataricus: a thermostable protein with two functions. Biochim Biophys Acta 1794:554–562. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2008.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Kufareva I, Abagyan R. 2012. Methods of protein structure comparison. Methods Mol Biol 857:231–257. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-588-6_10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Yang JI, Lee SH, Ryu JY, Lee HS, Kang SG. 2022. A novel NADP-dependent formate dehydrogenase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus onnurineus NA1. Front Microbiol 13:844735. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.844735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kanai T, Ito S, Imanaka T. 2003. Characterization of a cytosolic NiFe-hydrogenase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1. J Bacteriol 185:1705–1711. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.5.1705-1711.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Ma K, Adams MWW. 2001. Hydrogenases I and II from Pyrococcus furiosus. Methods Enzymol 331:208–216. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(01)31059-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Pinske C, Sargent F. 2016. Exploring the directionality of Escherichia coli formate hydrogenlyase: a membrane-bound enzyme capable of fixing carbon dioxide to organic acid. Microbiologyopen 5:721–737. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Schwarz FM, Schuchmann K, Müller V. 2018. Hydrogenation of CO2 at ambient pressure catalyzed by a highly active thermostable biocatalyst. Biotechnol Biofuels 11:237. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1236-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wang S, Huang H, Kahnt J, Mueller AP, Köpke M, Thauer RK. 2013. NADP-specific electron-bifurcating [FeFe]-hydrogenase in a functional complex with formate dehydrogenase in Clostridium autoethanogenum grown on CO. J Bacteriol 195:4373–4386. doi: 10.1128/JB.00678-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Wang S, Wu R, Lu J, Jiang Y, Huang T, Cai YD. 2022. Protein-protein interaction networks as miners of biological discovery. Proteomics 22:2100190. doi: 10.1002/pmic.202100190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Liang CT, Roscow OMA, Zhang W. 2021. Recent developments in engineering protein-protein interactions using phage display. Protein Eng Des Sel 34:1–13. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzab014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Siebenmorgen T, Zacharias M. 2020. Computational prediction of protein–protein binding affinities. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 10. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1448 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Marchand A, Van Hall-Beauvais AK, Correia BE. 2022. Computational design of novel protein–protein interactions – an overview on methodological approaches and applications. Curr Opin Struct Biol 74:102370. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Varadi M, Anyango S, Deshpande M, Nair S, Natassia C, Yordanova G, Yuan D, Stroe O, Wood G, Laydon A, Žídek A, Green T, Tunyasuvunakool K, Petersen S, Jumper J, Clancy E, Green R, Vora A, Lutfi M, Figurnov M, Cowie A, Hobbs N, Kohli P, Kleywegt G, Birney E, Hassabis D, Velankar S. 2022. AlphaFold protein structure database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D439–D444. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Moon Y-J, Kwon J, Yun S-H, Lim HL, Kim M-S, Kang SG, Lee J-H, Choi J-S, Kim SI, Chung Y-H. 2012. Proteome analyses of hydrogen-producing hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus onnurineus NA1 in different one-carbon substrate culture conditions. Mol Cell Proteomics 11:M111. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.015420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Moon YJ, Kwon J, Yun SH, Lim HL, Kim J, Kim SJ, Kang SG, Lee JH, Kim SI, Chung YH. 2015. Proteomic insights into sulfur metabolism in the hydrogen-producing hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus onnurineus NA1. Int J Mol Sci 16:9167–9195. doi: 10.3390/ijms16059167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Cho S, Kim MS, Jeong Y, Lee BR, Lee JH, Kang SG, Cho BK. 2017. Genome-wide primary transcriptome analysis of H2-producing archaeon Thermococcus onnurineus NA1. Sci Rep 7:43044. doi: 10.1038/srep43044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Holden JF, Sistu H. 2023. Formate and hydrogen in hydrothermal vents and their use by exteremely thermophilic methanogens and heterotrophs. Front Microbiol 14:1093018. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1093018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Kanai T, Matsuoka R, Beppu H, Nakajima A, Okada Y, Atomi H, Imanaka T. 2011. Distinct physiological roles of the three [NiFe]-hydrogenase orthologs in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakarensis. J Bacteriol 193:3109–3116. doi: 10.1128/JB.01072-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Sapra R, Bagramyan K, Adams MWW. 2003. A simple energy-conserving system: proton reduction coupled to proton translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:7545–7550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1331436100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Yu H, Wu CH, Schut GJ, Haja DK, Zhao G, Peters JW, Adams MWW, Li H. 2018. Structure of an ancient respiratory system. Cell 173:1636–1649. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Lim JK, Mayer F, Kang SG, Müller V. 2014. Energy conservation by oxidation of formate to carbon dioxide and hydrogen via a sodium ion current in a hyperthermophilic archaeon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:11497–11502. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407056111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Topçuoğlu BD, Meydan C, Orellana R, Holden JF. 2018. Formate hydrogenlyase and formate secretion ameliorate H2 inhibition in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus paralvinellae. Environ Microbiol 20:949–957. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Le Guellec S, Leroy E, Courtine D, Godfroy A, Roussel EG. 2021. H2-dependent formate production by hyperthermophilic Thermococcales: an alternative to sulfur reduction for reducing-equivalents disposal. ISME J 15:3423–3436. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01020-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Schuchmann K, Müller V. 2013. Direct and reversible hydrogenation of CO2 to formate by a bacterial carbon dioxide reductase. Science 342:1382–1385. doi: 10.1126/science.1244758 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Roger M, Reed TCP, Sargent F. 2021. Harnessing Escherichia coli for bio-based production of formate under pressurized H2 and CO2 gases. Appl Environ Microbiol 87:e00299–21. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00299-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Holden JF, Takai K, Summit M, Bolton S, Zyskowski J, Baross JA. 2001. Diversity among three novel groups of hyperthermophilic deep-sea Thermococcus species from three sites in the northeastern Pacific Ocean. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 36:51–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00825.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Wolin EA, Wolin MJ, Wolfe RS. 1963. Formation of methane by bacterial extracts. J Biol Chem 238:2882–2886. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)67912-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Kim MS, Choi AR, Lee SH, Jung HC, Bae SS, Yang TJ, Jeon JH, Lim JK, Youn H, Kim TW, Lee HS, Kang SG. 2015. A novel CO-responsive transcriptional regulator and enhanced H2 production by an engineered Thermococcus onnurineus NA1 strain. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:1708–1714. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03019-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Elia AC, Galarini R, Taticchi MI, Dörr AJM, Mantilacci L. 2003. Antioxidant responses and bioaccumulation in Ictalurus melas under mercury exposure. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 55:162–167. doi: 10.1016/s0147-6513(02)00123-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Jung HC, Lee SH, Lee SM, An YJ, Lee JH, Lee HS, Kang SG. 2017. Adaptive evolution of a hyperthermophilic archaeon pinpoints a formate transporter as a critical factor for the growth enhancement on formate. Sci Rep 7:6124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05424-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig. S1 to S3. aem.01474-23-s0001.docx.

Supplementary Figures.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.01474-23.SuF1

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES