ABSTRACT
Two-component systems (TCSs) widely exist in bacteria and assist bacteria in adjusting behaviors to adapt to environmental changes after sensing environmental signals and transducing information into cells. As a member of TCSs in Escherichia coli, after sensing signals, EvgS/EvgA mainly induces multiple resistances, such as acid and multidrug resistance, and increases bacterial adherence. Notably, the EvgS is one of the five unorthodox sensors in E. coli, which has an internal phosphorelay based on the structure with extra domains different from other orthodox sensors. Here, we summarize research on EvgS and EvgA published since 1994. This review includes comprehensive knowledge of EvgS/EvgA and focuses on the EvgS structure and the multiple resistance conferred by EvgS/EvgA. Furthermore, we discuss the unsolved questions of EvgS/EvgA and propose assumptions and inferences on the EvgS structure and the EvgS/EvgA function.
IMPORTANCE
EvgS/EvgA, one of the five unorthodox two-component systems in Escherichia coli, plays an essential role in adjusting bacterial behaviors to adapt to the changing environment. Multiple resistance regulated by EvgS/EvgA endows bacteria to survive in adverse conditions such as acidic pH, multidrug, and heat. In this minireview, we summarize the specific structures and regulation mechanisms of EvgS/EvgA and its multiple resistance. By discussing several unresolved issues and proposing our speculations, this review will be helpful and enlightening for future directions about EvgS/EvgA.
KEYWORDS: EvgS/EvgA, two-component system, acid resistance, multidrug resistance, signal transduction
INTRODUCTION
Two-component systems (TCSs) of bacteria transduce signals sensed from the environment and assist in inducing adaptive responses through phosphorylation and phosphate group transferring (1–3). Commonly, proteins in TCSs are divided into histidine kinase (HK) sensors perceiving external and internal stimuli and response regulators (RRs) effecting cellular responses to alter the bacteria’s status (4). The unorthodox sensor contains two histidines that can be phosphorylated instead of one in the orthodox sensor, leading to the distinction in the phosphorelay way (4–6). Five unorthodox HK sensors occur in Escherichia coli, including ArcB, BarA, TorS, YojN, and EvgS (7). In addition, EvgA in this TCS is a typical RR.
Hitherto, EvgS/EvgA can only be found and conserved in E. coli and Shigella (7, 8). The EvgS and EvgA identification is through the homologous proteins BvgS and BvgA in Bordetella pertussis (9). BvgS/BvgA, also belonging to the unorthodox TCSs, modulates the virulence factor expression to control the transition between the virulent and avirulent phases (10–12). Moreover, EvgS/EvgA in E. coli is homologous to KvgS/KvgA in Klebsiella pneumoniae (8). KvgS/KvgA contributes to countering free radical stresses along with sensing iron-limiting conditions and only exists in virulent strains (8, 13).
By regulating multiple genes, activated EvgS/EvgA endows E. coli resistance to survive in adverse environments such as acidic conditions, multidrug use, and heat. Genes induced by EvgS activation mainly depend on phosphorylated EvgA transcription factor activity (14). They are regulated by their direct interaction with EvgA or by other genes regulated by EvgA. The deletion of EvgA is usually concomitant with phenotypes losing acid and multidrug resistance. EvgS/EvgA also modulates genes in establishing connections with other TCSs (15–17). Therefore, this review mainly focuses on the specific structures of EvgS and the multiple resistances induced by EvgS and EvgA.
THE PRODUCTION AND ACTIVATION OF EVGS/EVGA
The evgAS genes encode EvgS and EvgA, and their expressions are regulated by EvgA and other molecules (Fig. 1A). In neutral pH, the unphosphorylated EvgA upregulates the evgAS expression by directly binding its upstream (18). Therefore, an autoregulatory loop is formed. However, the EvgA binding profile might depend on the phosphorylated state of EvgA (19). Burton et al. found that the phosphorylated EvgA has mild repression of its expressions (20). We speculate that the binding differential between EvgA and the phosphorylated EvgA can balance the cellular response regulated by EvgS/EvgA. H-NS, a nucleoid-associated protein regulating acid resistance, represses the expression of evgAS (21) (Fig. 1A). Norepinephrine upregulates their expression levels, leading to an increase in enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) O157:H7 survival in acidic conditions (22) (Fig. 1A). Yang et al. revealed that nicotinamide upregulates evgAS expression, leading to the promotion of the adherence and colonization of EHEC O157:H7 (23) (Fig. 1A). Carbon monoxide-releasing molecule-2, a novel antibacterial agent, downregulates the evgA expression in multidrug-resistant extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing uropathogenic E. coli (24) (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, some cellular factors influence the existence or function of EvgS. Lacking YfgM, a periplasmic chaperone relevant to the correctness of membrane protein folding, targeting, or turnover, results in an EvgS decrease (25) (Fig. 1A). Indole can inhibit the EvgS operation by directly or indirectly interacting with EvgS, leading to the abolishment of acid resistance in E. coli (26) (Fig. 1A). In addition, the inhibition can be alleviated by expressing the constitutively active EvgS protein (26). Hence, by regulating the existence or operation of EvgS/EvgA, multiple molecules regulate the acid resistance and adherence phenotype, indicating that EvgS/EvgA plays a critical role in these processes.
FIG 1.
The structure and production of EvgS/EvgA. (A) Factors regulate EvgS/EvgA in a positive or negative way. (B) The structure and transphosphorylation of EvgS/EvgA. (C) Genes containing the EvgA-binding motif can interact with the phosphorylated EvgA directly.
EvgS senses signals such as alkali metals, the redox state in the mild acidic condition (pH 5.0–6.0), and nicotinamide, thereby activating EvgS/EvgA and triggering the subsequent reaction (8, 23, 27) (Fig. 1B). The optimum pH for EvgS/EvgA activation is 5.5–5.7 (20, 27). In pH 5.5, the exponential-phase cells activate EvgS/EvgA in the minimal medium but not in the rich medium (20, 28, 29). No activation was found at the same pH until adding the alkali metals such as K+ and Na+ (27) (Fig. 1B). However, under anaerobic conditions, EvgS/EvgA is inactive, and the overproduction of EvgA activates EvgS/EvgA, indicating that EvgS responds to the redox state and that its activation requires oxidation (8). Ubiquinone (UQ) is one of three kinds of quinones (the other two are demethylmenaquinone and menaquinone) (8). Notably, the effect of UQ on EvgS is controversial. In 2002, using EvgS without the periplasmic and transmembrane regions in in vitro phosphorylation assays, Bock and Gross found that oxidized ubiquinone-0 can significantly inhibit the EvgS autophosphorylation activity, which decreases the HK activity instead of intrinsic phosphatase activity (30). However, research in 2021 showed that UQ is required for EvgS activation (8) (Fig. 1A). Inada et al. found that EvgS in ΔubiA (ubiA is responsible for UQ biosynthesis) occurs without activation under any redox conditions (8). Also, with the evgS overexpression, it can be activated without UQ, therefore presumably requiring other quinones, for it is still inactive under anaerobic conditions (8). Research in 2023 reported that nicotinamide, derived from microbiota and sensed by EvgS, activates EvgS/EvgA to upregulate virulence gene expressions, helping EHEC O157:H7 colonize in the mouse intestinal tract (23) (Fig. 1B). Hence, exploring whether other substances in the intestine might be sensed by EvgS is required. Signals activating EvgS in different bacteria are listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Signals activating the EvgS in different bacteria
THE STRUCTURE OF EVGS
EvgS, which forms a dimer, consists of a rather large N-terminal periplasmic region, a C-terminal cytoplasmic region, as well as a transmembrane region connecting these two parts (5, 7, 9, 32) (Fig. 1B). In the cytoplasmic region, compared to the typical sensor with one HK domain, EvgS additionally includes a Per-ARNT-Sim (PAS) domain between the transmembrane part and the HK domain, a receiver, and an output domain containing the his-containing phosphotransfer module (HPt) domain (8, 33–35) (Fig. 1B). Here, we divide these domains into two parts depending on their function.
Domains related to signal recognition and EvgS activation
In EvgS, the periplasmic region, transmembrane helix, and PAS domain are related to the signal recognition and activation of EvgS (7, 8, 27, 36).
The periplasmic region participates in sensing low pH and alkali metals. Johnson et al. first proved that this region participates in the EvgS response to low pH by removing 148 amino acids (7). Eguchi and Utsumi found that L152, which is highly conserved among E. coli and Shigella, is required for the EvgS activation because the EvgS with L152Y shows no activation in KCl-supplemented M9 medium (pH 5.5) (27) (Table 2). To further investigate the signal response in this region, Sen et al. built a high-fidelity model of this region based on the BvgS (36). Similar to BvgS, the periplasmic region in EvgS contains two tandem Venus flytrap (VFT) domains, one of which is a bacterial periplasmic solute-binding protein domain belonging to the periplasmic sensor domain (27, 36, 37) (Fig. 1B). With two jaws opening and closing, the VFT domain binds the specific ligand to import material or transduce signals (38–40). It can be inferred that the VFT domains in EvgS are responsible for signal sensing. Based on this model, Sen et al. found amino acids in EvgS related to its activation (36). In the EvgS dimer, H226 from one protomer is close to P522, which is in another protomer (36). In EvgS with H226Q and P522A, no activation of EvgS is detected under pH 5.6 (36) (Table 2). Furthermore, they found that VFT1 in EvgS is unlikely to bind amino acid-like ligands (36). Interestingly, H63 is responsible for targeting EvgS to the membrane; EvgS with H63A cannot be detected in the membrane fraction (36) (Table 2). Sen et al. mainly focused on VFT1 in EvgS rather than VFT2, predicted to be a close conformation (36). However, in BvgS, VFT2 can bind nicotinate or related molecules, and the dynamics of VFT1 are responsible for the BvgS kinase activity (38, 41–43). Hence, further research on the VFT2 function in EvgS is needed.
TABLE 2.
Amino acids and their function in EvgS/EvgA
Proteins | Amino acids | Function | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
EvgS | H63 | Targeting of EvgS to the membrane | (36) |
H226 | Involved in EvgS activation | ||
P522 | Transduction of the inducing signal across the membrane | ||
L152 | Involved in EvgS activation | (27) | |
R564 | Related to acid and heat resistance | (44) | |
C671 | Related to EvgS activation in redox conditions | (8) | |
C683 | |||
H721 | Three phosphorylation sites in EvgS | (45, 46) | |
D1009 | |||
EvgA | D52 | Receiving the phosphoryl group from EvgS and related to thermal resistance | (45, 47) |
Signal sensing in EvgS requires the transmembrane region. Eguchi and Utsumi found that the periplasmic and/or transmembrane regions play a role in sensing K+ (27). Sen et al. discovered that P522 is likely to cap the predicted transmembrane helix, and EvgS with P522A leads to no activation under low pH, suggesting that the transmembrane region contributes to transducing the information to the cytoplasmic region (36) (Table 2). In 2021, Inada et al. found that the transmembrane region is essential for sensing redox signals; the cytoplasmic region, without anchoring to the membrane, cannot sense the change in the redox state (8).
The PAS domain in the EvgS cytoplasmic region is critical in sensing redox state and low pH. Nearly 33% of HK sensors contain at least one PAS domain having structural plasticity and an inclination for protein-protein interaction (4). EvgS is predicted to have a PAS fold similar to BvgS (7). It has been reported that the PAS domain senses changes such as redox potential, oxygen, and light (4, 48). In 2021, Inada et al. found key mutations (C671 and C683) in the PAS domain related to EvgS activation in redox conditions (8). C671 and C683 are conserved in E. coli and Shigella, which do not exist in the same position in BvgS (8) (Table 2). However, Sen et al. found that the PAS domain in EvgS also participates in the response to both external and internal low pH (36). It modulates the EvgS dimer from the tight, inactive status to the weak, active status (36). This result is consistent with previous research conducted by Johnson et al., who found that EvgS becomes active as an autokinase by altering the EvgS dimer interaction during activation (7).
Since regulating the EvgS activity can be achieved by modulating the dimerization through the PAS domain, mutations in this domain are more likely to form EvgS constitutive mutants at pH 7.0 (7, 36, 49). In the evolutionary experiment, spontaneous mutations in exponential-phase E. coli survived at pH 2.5 and are in this domain (7). In 2022, Van Riet et al. found that a mutant lacking R564 within the PAS domain survived cid shock (pH 2.5, 1 h) (44) (Table 2). Although EvgS is activated at pH 5.0–6.0, these results indicate that the PAS domain in EvgS connects with the evolution of E. coli to adapt to the more robust acidic condition.
Currently, most research on the signal sensing and activation of EvgS is done through mutating analyses. Mechanisms of these domain sensing signals and their dynamics are waiting to be explored.
Domains related to the EvgS phosphorelay
In the cytoplasmic region, the HK domain, receiver, and Hpt domain contribute to the EvgS phosphorelay. Here, we introduce their own specificities. The HK domain in EvgS contains an ATP-binding subdomain (CA domain) and a dimerization-inducing subdomain (DHp domain) with a His residue (45) (Fig. 1B). The receiver contains an Asp in EvgS and lacks phosphatase activity, which is different from the homologous BvgS receiver (50, 51). In addition, the Hpt domain possesses specificity (52). It has the ability to distinguish between the different RRs and confer specificity to the system (50). These domains all contribute to the EvgS phosphorelay, which is different from the regular sensor kinases and is illustrated in the later section (Fig. 1B).
THE STRUCTURE OF EVGA
EvgA contains an N-terminal receiver and a DNA-binding domain called the output domain in the C-terminal (9, 53) (Fig. 1B). However, controversy exists about whether EvgA forms a dimer. In 1998, Tanabe et al. found that the signals of the interaction between EvgA and EvgA were not detected in surface plasmon resonance, indicating that both unphosphorylated and phosphorylated EvgA do not interact with each other in a multimeric way (15). In contrast, Perraud et al. found that the unphosphorylated proteins EvgA form dimers in the solution, as proven by the analytical sedimentation equilibrium ultracentrifugation, the native polyacrylamide gradient gels, and gel permeation experiments in 2000 (54) (Fig. 1B). Interestingly, this phenomenon is different with most RRs, which form dimer after phosphorylation (4).
The receiver of EvgA contributes to the specific interaction between EvgA and EvgS (50). In addition, the receiver alone can transfer the phosphoryl group by acting as an active enzyme, and the D52 of this domain is responsible for receiving the phosphoryl group from EvgS (15, 46, 55). D52 can also be phosphorylated by acetyl phosphate (45, 56) (Fig. 1A). Specific interactions between the output domain and the receiver are possibly required in the activation of EvgA (55). The linker between the two domains is sensitive to the thermolysin and extends from L127 to S133, which resembles the linker part in NarL (55, 57). NarL is a nitrate-dependent RR in the NarX/NarL TCS (58). Based on DNA-binding motifs, EvgA is classified into the NarL family, which contains eight other RRs such as FimZ, NarL, and RcsB (59). Genes containing the EvgA-binding motif are regulated by directly binding with EvgA (Fig. 1C). The affinity and specificity of the bound DNA are increased after the EvgA phosphorylation, even using acetyl phosphate as a phosphoryl donor (55, 60). The structure of the putative positive transcription regulator (sensor EvgS) from Shigella flexneri is released in the RSCB PDB (https://www.rcsb.org/structure/5F64). The crystal structure of the N-terminal domain of the positive transcription regulator EvgA from E. coli is also released (https://www.rcsb.org/structure/3F6C).
THE MULTISTEP TRANSPHOSPHORYLATION OF EVGS/EVGA
Through phosphotransfer from the HK sensor to the RR, TCS helps bacteria adapt to the environment after sensing signals (4). EvgS has a unique phosphorelay resulting from three phosphorylation sites in the cytoplasmic region rather than one in the typical sensor. EvgS belongs to the tripartite sensor kinases (TSK), indicating that EvgS has a His-Asp-His phosphorelay pattern (61, 62) (Fig. 1B). This sensor contains three phosphorylation sites on H721 in the DHp domain, D1009 in the receiver, and H1137 in the HPt domain (45, 46) (Fig. 1B) (Table 2). The activating CA domain catalyzes the transfer of the ATP γ-phosphate to H721 (45) (Fig. 1B). Then, the phosphoryl group is transferred to the D1009 and, after that, to the H1137 (45) (Fig. 1B). Besides, D1009 can be directly autophosphorylated by acetyl phosphate (45) (Fig. 1B). The three-step phosphorelay of EvgS above proceeds in an intramolecular reaction in cis-cis-cis mode, despite the autophosphorylation mode of BvgS being a trans mode (45, 62, 63) (Fig. 1B). Autophosphorylation modes are different in TSKs depending on the need to form a homodimer, which usually contains phosphate group transfer in the dimer (64). However, the EvgS autophosphorylation deviates from the usual model, which does not involve the interaction in the homodimer (62) (Fig. 1B).
In EvgS/EvgA, the HK sensor and the RR form a complex to function in bacteria, and the phosphoryl group delivered by the H721-D1009-H1137 way in the HPt domain of EvgS is transmitted to the D52 of EvgA (46, 50) (Fig. 1B) (Table 2). The receiver containing D52 acts like the phosphotransferase and catalyzes phosphorylated H1137 to obtain the phosphoryl group (45, 55). EvgA forms as a dimer to interact with EvgS in biosensor experiments (54) (Fig. 1B). EvgS and EvgA directly interact with each other, and the arrest of the phosphorylation of the functional domains disrupts the formation of the EvgS/EvgA complex (15). In multistep transphosphorylation, the intermediate steps in HK signaling show ultrasensitivity, which leads to reaching the same output levels and responding to signals in a tighter range than in common two-step transphosphorylation (5, 65). Therefore, we speculate that the multistep transphosphorylation of EvgS/EvgA results in responding to the slight pH change (from neutral to 5.0–6.0).
EVGS/EVGA REGULATES BACTERIAL ADAPTABILITY TO MULTIPLE ENVIRONMENTS
Living in conditions with rapidly changing characteristics, bacteria develop various TCSs to sense signals and adjust their behavior to adapt to the environment (4). Here, we illustrate that EvgS/EvgA regulates multiple gene expressions to improve their adaptability.
EvgS/EvgA confers acid resistance on bacteria
The capacity to grow under acidic conditions is essential for enteric bacteria to colonize mammals (66). EvgS/EvgA mainly confers acid resistance in the exponential-phase cells (14, 67) (Fig. 2). After exposure to the pH 2.5 medium for 1 h, the survival rates of mutants that overexpress evgA or constitutively express evgS are 100-fold higher than those of wild-type cells (14, 67). Although EvgS is activated in pH 5.0–6.0, responses induced by EvgS and EvgA confer bacteria’s ability to survive under pH 2.5. Generally, EvgS/EvgA alone and its connection with the PhoQ/PhoP TCS participate in the acid resistance (AR) system 2, requiring glutamic acid to improve the adaptability of bacteria in acidic conditions. It also confers acid resistance in an amino acid-independent way (67). Genes induced by EvgS activation mainly depend on EvgA (14). EvgA upregulates the expression levels of gadA, gadBC, gadE, ydeO, hdeAB, and ydeP (67) (Fig. 2).
FIG 2.
Acid resistance is conferred by EvgS and EvgA. yfdXWUVE encodes YfdW (a formyl-CoA:oxalate CoA-transferase), YfdU (an oxalyl-CoA decarboxylase), and YfdE belonging to a class III CoA-transferase, inducing the oxalate tolerance (68, 69).
Four AR systems are responsible for the survival of E. coli at pH 2.5 (29, 70). The AR system 2 has the major responsibility for the acid resistance in E. coli (71). EvgS/EvgA only participates in AR system 2, requiring glutamic acid by upregulating the expression of genes related to the system (29). It indicates that EvgS/EvgA is crucial to the survival of E. coli under acidic conditions. GadA and GadBC function in AR system 2 (72). GadA and GadB are isozymes of glutamate decarboxylase (GAD) (73). GadC is the glutamate/γ-aminobutyric acid antiporter on the membrane (70, 72). GadE is the activator of the gadA and gadBC expressions (74, 75) (Fig. 2). Moreover, YdeO, directly regulated by EvgA, is a transcriptional regulator belonging to the AraC/XylS family (18, 76) (Fig. 2). EvgA, YdeO, and GadE are able to directly bind the GadE promoter (29) (Fig. 2). Furthermore, PhoQ/PhoP can raise the amount of a stress-induced sigma factor called RpoS, which can initiate gadE to enhance acid resistance (77, 78) (Fig. 3). Through the membrane protein SafA (formerly named B1500), PhoQ/PhoP can be activated by EvgS/EvgA (16) (Fig. 3). The specific mechanism is illustrated in the following context. Notably, the GAD production mainly depends on the EvgA-YdeO-GadE circuit and the connection between EvgS/EvgA and PhoQ/PhoP by SafA (29, 77) (Fig. 2 and 3). Besides, both GadE and PhoP can initiate hdeAB (20, 77, 79) (Fig. 2 and 3). HdeA and HdeB are periplasmic chaperones that can prevent the proteins in the periplasm from aggregating in acidic conditions (80) (Fig. 2). In acid-sensitive strains with YdeO and SafA intact loci, evgAS form E. coli K-12 can confer E. coli Nissle 1917 and UTI89 resistance to acid shock (17, 20, 77, 79). However, E. coli MP1 without ydeO and safA loses acid resistance in the exponential phase, even after adding evgAS (17). It indicates that YdeO and SafA are essential for the acid resistance conferred by EvgS and EvgA.
FIG 3.
Signal transduction between EvgS/EvgA and other TCSs. Through SafA, EvgS/EvgA connects with PhoQ/PhoP to regulate downstream genes (16). EvgS/EvgA contributes to bacterial osmoregulation through the cross-talk between EvgS and OmpR (15).
In an amino acid-independent way, EvgA directly regulates YdeP (an oxidoreductase), and this process does not involve AR system 2 (18, 20) (Fig. 2). YdeP might contribute to the survival of E. coli under pH 2.4 for 2 h (29). In addition, E. coli with YdeP losing the oxidoreductase domain cannot develop constitutive resistance to acid pH (7). In S. flexneri, inhabiting the ydeP expression by repressing evgA is related to acid sensitivity (81). In addition, EvgA upregulates the transcription of yfdXWUVE, inducing the acid tolerance response of oxalate (18) (Fig. 2).
EvgS/EvgA confers multidrug resistance on bacteria
In E. coli, among open reading frames that developed single-drug or multidrug resistance, the most significant drug resistance to multiple compounds was conferred by the evgA expression (82, 83). When evgA is overexpressed, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of multiple drugs, such as doxorubicin, erythromycin, and benzalkonium, is approximately increased by 4, even 100-fold (83). In addition, evgS overexpression confers resistance to ciclopirox (84, 85). The MIC of sodium deoxycholate in evgS constitutively active mutants is eightfold higher than that in the wild type (86). In 2022, Naha and Ramaiah found that the evgS deletion results in interrupting the interaction of genes in antimicrobial resistance networks because EvgS has the highest number of interactions (71.6%) in the networks (87). These results indicate that EvgS/EvgA has a critical role in the multidrug resistance of E. coli.
To develop multidrug resistance in E. coli, EvgS/EvgA activates katE and efflux-related genes including emrKY, mdtEF (formerly named yhiUV), tolC, acrAB, and mdfA in direct or indirect manners through mediators such as other proteins or TCSs (77, 83, 86, 88) (Fig. 4). In addition, it requires phosphorylated EvgA (83).
FIG 4.
Resistance to multidrug and host immune responses conferred by EvgS/EvgA in E. coli and S. flexneri. The regulation mechanism by which EvgS/EvgA endows the ability of bacteria to survive in macrophages and multidrug resistance to bacteria.
EvgS/EvgA upregulates the expression of multidrug efflux pump genes. EmrKY, which is directly induced by EvgA, effluxes sodium deoxycholate and eliminates toxic metabolites produced by DNA damage in E. coli (86, 88, 89) (Fig. 1C and 4). In E. coli OCL62, EmrKY and EvgS/EvgA contribute to antibiotic resistance during the biofilm formation process (90, 91). Moreover, EvgA induces mdtEF expression through YdeO (67) (Fig. 4). The mdtEF gene encodes the multidrug resistance pump (92) (Fig. 4). Interestingly, the resistance induced by the evgA overexpression is similar to the mdtEF overexpression, indicating that mdtEF is essential for the multidrug resistance developed by EvgA (83). Notably, both EmrK and MdtE are members of the membrane fusion protein family, and their normal function requires the outer membrane channel TolC (83, 93–95) (Fig. 4). TolC production can be increased by the evgA overexpression and the signal transduction between EvgS/EvgA and PhoQ/PhoP (88) (Fig. 3). Furthermore, EvgA upregulates the acrAB and mdfA expressions in an indirect way (88) (Fig. 4). MdfA, a multidrug transporter, recognizes an exceedingly broad spectrum of drugs (96, 97). In E. coli, AcrAB and TolC compose a multidrug efflux transporter, contributing to the resistance to β-lactams (98, 99).
In addition, katE, which encodes a catalase HPII repressing ROS, is upregulated by the connection between EvgS/EvgA and PhoQ/PhoP (77, 100) (Fig. 3). Gallium nitrate is an antimicrobial agent that disrupts the iron metabolism in bacteria (101). In research conducted in 2021, EvgS constitutively active mutants induce a reduction in gallium nitrate killing rate without changing the MIC, raising the tolerance to gallium nitrate (102). The tolerance is developed by initiating the EvgA-YdeO-GadE circuit and KatE, then suppressing the surge of intracellular ROS mediated by gallium (102) (Fig. 3 and 4).
The multidrug resistance and acid resistance phenotypes occur at the same time when EvgS/EvgA influences the regulation network of multiple genes (28).
EvgS/EvgA confers resistance to host immune responses on bacteria
In S. flexneri, EmrKY induced by EvgS/EvgA contributes to the infection of macrophages and responds to mildly acidic conditions with high-level K+ concentrations (31) (Fig. 4). It might be because the intracellular condition of macrophages turns into an environment that coincides with the signals activated by EvgS in E. coli after the S. flexneri infection (103). Furthermore, in adherent invasive E. coli strain LF82, knockouts of evgAS, phoP, and ydeO lead to the proportion of viable bacteria in macrophages decreasing by half or more (104). Also, in 2020, Fanelli et al. found that MdtEF contributes LF82 to surviving in macrophages, where the expression is increased (105).
EvgS/EvgA confers heat resistance on bacteria
EvgS/EvgA is also related to the heat resistance of bacteria, which might become a potential risk to food processing. LHR is a locus conferring exceptional heat resistance to E. coli, whose expression depends on the evgA chromosomal copy (106–108) (Fig. 5). In E. coli W3100, EvgA contributes to significantly enhancing the thermal resistance to temperatures higher than 50℃ (47). Compared to E. coli K-12, EvgS constitutively active mutant obtains a slight but reproducible improvement in surviving at 51°C (7). Under heat shock (52°C, 20 min), the absence of R564 in EvgS also imported resistance to heat in E. coli K-12 (44) (Table 2). In the evgSΔ564 mutant, the deletion of safA, a membrane protein connecting EvgS/EvgA and PhoQ/PhoP, results in retrieving the sensibility to heat (44).
FIG 5.
Other resistance and functions conferred by EvgS/EvgA. EvgS/EvgA endows the bacteria with heat resistance, adherence, and other functions.
EvgS/EvgA is related to high osmolarity resistance in bacteria
The expression of treA (also called osmA) and osmC, which products respond to the osmotic stress, can be induced by EvgA overproduction (109–111) (Fig. 5). ompC, expressed in high osmolarity, is regulated by the cross-talk between EvgS/EvgA and the EnvZ/OmpR TCS, which is explained in the following section (15, 112) (Fig. 3).
EvgS/EvgA contributes to E. coli adherence and colonization
Under the nicotinamide treatment, only half the amounts of ΔevgS and ΔevgA are recovered in the Hela cell adhesion assay, in contrast with the EHEC O157:H7 wild type (23). In ΔevgS and ΔevgA, the levels of proteins for intimate adherence are significantly decreased (23).
Through phosphorylated EvgA directly binding with ler, EvgS/EvgA upregulates the expression of the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) genes (23). LEE with the ler promoter encodes components in the type III secretion system (T3SS) and adhesin-related proteins, contributing to the attaching and effacing lesions of EHEC O157:H7 (113). These results indicate that EvgS/EvgA plays a critical role in promoting EHEC O157:H7 adherence and colonization by upregulating LEE expression in the presence of nicotinamide (23) (Fig. 5).
Interestingly, EvgS/EvgA has a contradictory influence on T3SS. Except for upregulating the LEE expression, the evgA overexpression might relate to upregulating T3SS by inducing the dctR expression, for DctR upregulates the core gene expression of T3SS in avian pathogenic E. coli (114, 115) (Fig. 5). However, in enteropathogenic E. coli, the EvgS/EvgA activation results in T3SS inhibition by the coaction of YdeO and YdeP, both activated by EvgA, inhibiting the expression of T3SS genes in direct or indirect manners (116).
Other bacterial behaviors regulated by EvgS/EvgA
The evgA overexpression slows down the bacterial growth rate and increases the yield of the heterologous polyketide 6-deoxyerythronolide B (18, 87, 89, 117). It can also induce hdeD and slp expression (114) (Fig. 5). HdeD reduces the flagellar filaments by activating the lrhA promoter (118) (Fig. 5). Slp, a carbon starvation-inducible lipoprotein, maintains the outer membrane’s stability (119). Furthermore, YdeO indirectly enhances poly-β-1,6-N-acetylglucosamine synthesis, contributing to biofilm formation (120). In addition, the ydeO expression level is different between species depending on their differential biofilm formation ability (121).
THE SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION BETWEEN EVGS/EVGA AND OTHER TCSS
In previous content, EvgS/EvgA confers multiple resistances on bacteria by connecting with other TCSs. Notably, the relationship between EvgS/EvgA and RcsC/RcsD/RcsB, a three-component system participating in GadE-related acid resistance, is interesting (122). EvgS/EvgA cannot be activated in ΔrcsB, and the process of activating EvgS/EvgA by RcsB (RR) does not require the HK sensors (RcsC and RcsD) (27). Here, we focus on two types of signal transduction between EvgS/EvgA and other TCSs.
EvgS/EvgA connects with other TCSs through SafA
EvgS/EvgA and PhoQ/PhoP are connected by the small inner membrane protein SafA (16) (Fig. 3). In the EvgS/EvgA constitutively active mutant, 14 genes upregulated by the PhoQ/PhoP two-component system are activated through PhoP enhanced by the evgA overexpression (123, 124) (Fig. 3). It can even activate genes at high Mg2+ levels, which usually inactivate PhoQ and PhoP (123). All these genes cannot directly bind with EvgA. Among the 14 genes, nine of them belong to the Mg2+ stimulon, and the mgtA expression is enhanced by the evgS overexpression but not the phoP expression (125). Notably, Eguchi et al. identified that EvgA can activate safA expression through direct binding with the promoter of safA that composes an operon with ydeO (14, 16, 18) (Fig. 1C and 3).
SafA directly interacts with PhoQ (126). The R53 in SafA and the D179 in the internal cavity of the PhoQ sensory domain are essential for the PhoQ activation by SafA (126, 127). The periplasmic part of SafA alone is able to activate PhoQ by interacting with a cavity in the central core of PhoQ in a way that is different from the PhoQ activation through Mg2+ (126, 127). In this process, signal transduction is functioning in the EvgS/EvgA-SafA-PhoQ/PhoP-regulated genes (16). Interestingly, through PhoQ/PhoP, SafA confers acid resistance by enhancing the transcription of the gadE promoter, which is related to the RR RssB (77) (Fig. 3). PhoQ/PhoP activated by SafA can be connected with RssB by activating the production of IraM, an anti-adaptor of RssB (77, 78, 128). The RssB bond with IraM loses the ability to interact with RpoS, resulting in increasing RpoS stability (78) (Fig. 3). In addition, RpoS initiates gadE and katE, indicating that EvgS/EvgA enhances multidrug resistance by connecting with multiple TCSs (77, 129) (Fig. 3). Furthermore, because the normal function of EmrK and MdtE requires TolC (83, 93–95), EvgS/EvgA-SafA-PhoQ/PhoP can contribute to multidrug resistance by regulating tolC; the tolC promoter contains the binding box of PhoP (16, 88) (Fig. 3). Also, in E. coli ATCC 25922, the colistin resistance may be developed by EvgS/EvgA-SafA-PhoQ/PhoP (130).
EvgS/EvgA connects with other TCS by cross-talk
In E. coli, EvgS/EvgA connects with EnvZ/OmpR through cross-talk (15) (Fig. 3). EnvZ/OmpR regulates ompC expressed in high osmolarity (112). However, in ΔenvZ with a multicopy plasmid expressing EvgS/EvgA, the ompC expression was induced and regulated by MgSO4, low temperature, and nicotinic acid (9). Furthermore, EvgS can interact with OmpR, as proven by surface plasmon resonance, indicating that EvgS is able to transduce the signals to OmpR acting on the ompC expression (15, 131) (Fig. 3).
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS
Multiple resistances and main proteins regulated by EvgS and EvgA are summarized in Fig. 6. Recently, EvgS and EvgA have been found to sense nicotinamide derived from the intestinal microbiota and upregulate bacterial adherence (23). It is reasonable to infer that more potential signals in intestine sensing by EvgS and more bacterial survival behaviors regulated by EvgS/EvgA are waiting to be explored.
FIG 6.
The signal transduction process and the main genes and proteins regulated by EvgS/EvgA. (A) EvgS/EvgA conferred multi-function through the signal transduction system. (B) EvgS/EvgA directly or indirectly regulates various genes and proteins to function.
The specific mechanism by which EvgS detects the environmental alternation is still unknown. To verify the VFT2 simulated as a close conformation, the specific structure needs to be further analyzed. In BvgS activated by molecules with a planar aromatic ring structure and carboxylate group, VFT2 can bind nicotinate but not nicotinamide (23, 38, 43, 132, 133). Due to the structural similarity between EvgS and BvgS, we speculate that VFT2 in EvgS might relate to binding nicotinamide. Interestingly, BvgS/BvgA is active until binding nicotinate because VFT2 is close and active without binding with a ligand (38). However, EvgS is activated after sensing signals, indicating the activation mechanism of EvgS would be different from BvgS. Notably, the interaction between signals and EvgS demands direct evidence by conducting further experiments. Moreover, the biological significance of the fact that EvgSs tend to self-associate and cluster with each other in the cell is still unknown (134).
In EvgS autophosphorylation after sensing signals, EvgS with three phosphorylation sites transfers the group in a three-step way. Although the unactive EvgSs form a homodimer, the three phosphorylation steps in EvgS are conducted in cis-cis-cis mode, indicating that the active EvgS works in a monomeric way (62). We speculate that the autophosphorylation of two EvgS in one dimer might be together or separately, and different signals might lead to a different phosphorylation mode.
To colonize in the intestine, E. coli demands abilities to adapt to multiple conditions in the digestive tract and survive in the stomach with acidic pH. Benefiting from the multistep transphosphorylation, EvgS/EvgA can respond to pH changes in a tight range (pH 5.0–6.0) and activate multiple genes to help the bacteria survive in pH 2.5. It indicates that bacteria might sense the possibility of environmental deterioration and prepare for it. Furthermore, exposure to acid shock can lead to acid resistance through spontaneous mutations in EvgS (7, 44). It suggests that EvgS/EvgA plays a major role in conferring acid resistance on bacteria and the evolution of E. coli in acid resistance is related to EvgS/EvgA.
In addition, belonging to multidrug resistance genes, EvgS, which has numerous copies in some rickettsiae, shows a high prevalence in the industrial park wastewater and gut microbial communities of various animals, such as sea turtles and agricultural animals (135–139). Also, as time goes by, EvgS and EvgA can accumulate in the intestinal microorganisms of seagulls (140). Furthermore, exposure to phorate (an organophosphorus insecticide) significantly upregulates evgS expression in the intestinal microbiota of mice (141). All of the above indicate that EvgS and EvgA are prevalent in the environment and are a potential threat to public health and rising global antibiotic resistance. Combining its significant impact on multiple resistance, adherence, and colonization of bacteria, it is constructive to consider EvgS and EvgA as drug targets.
EvgS/EvgA also regulates other TCSs through proteins or cross-talk (15, 16, 78). It indicates that EvgS/EvgA is a part of the complex signal transduction regulatory network composed of TCSs and regulated genes. In addition, we speculate that EvgS/EvgA is related to the QseC/QseB TCS. QseC/QseB is able to sense norepinephrine produced by the adrenergic neurons in the gut (142, 143). In EHEC O157:H7, norepinephrine can induce acid resistance by increasing evgAS expression (22). We infer that upregulating their expressions mediated by norepinephrine is done through QseC/QseB. Therefore, QseC/QseB may participate in the process of regulating bacterial behaviors by EvgS/EvgA with multiple TCSs. Further research can focus on the regulatory relationship between QseC/QseB and EvgS/EvgA.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This review is financially supported by the Science & Technology Innovation Project of Laoshan Laboratory (No. LSKJ202203205), the Young Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province (No. tsqn202103029), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 42176108, 31870023, 32370030), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos. 202172002, 201941009).
Contributor Information
Yan Wang, Email: wangy12@ouc.edu.cn.
Christopher A. Elkins, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
REFERENCES
- 1. Hoch JA. 2000. Two-component and phosphorelay signal transduction. Curr Opin Microbiol 3:165–170. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5274(00)00070-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Li Y, Feng T, Wang Y. 2022. The role of bacterial signaling networks in antibiotics response and resistance regulation. Mar Life Sci Technol 4:163–178. doi: 10.1007/s42995-022-00126-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Zhu Y, Dou Q, Du L, Wang Y. 2023. QseB/QseC: a two-component system globally regulating bacterial behaviors. Trends Microbiol 31:749–762. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2023.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Gao R, Stock AM. 2009. Biological insights from structures of two-component proteins. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:133–154. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kim J-R, Cho K-H. 2006. The multi-step phosphorelay mechanism of unorthodox two-component systems in E. coli realizes ultrasensitivity to stimuli while maintaining robustness to noises. Comput Biol Chem 30:438–444. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2006.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Song H, Li Y, Wang Y. 2023. Two-component system GacS/GacA, a global response regulator of bacterial physiological behaviors. Eng Micro 3:100051. doi: 10.1016/j.engmic.2022.100051 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Johnson MD, Bell J, Clarke K, Chandler R, Pathak P, Xia Y, Marshall RL, Weinstock GM, Loman NJ, Winn PJ, Lund PA. 2014. Characterization of mutations in the PAS domain of the EvgS sensor kinase selected by laboratory evolution for acid resistance in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 93:911–927. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Inada S, Okajima T, Utsumi R, Eguchi Y. 2021. Acid-sensing histidine kinase with a redox switch. Front Microbiol 12:652546. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.652546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Utsumi R, Katayama S, Taniguchi M, Horie T, Ikeda M, Igaki S, Nakagawa H, Miwa A, Tanabe H, Noda M. 1994. Newly identified genes involved in the signal transduction of Escherichia coli K-12. Gene 140:73–77. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90733-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Uhl MA, Miller JF. 1994. Autophosphorylation and phosphotransfer in the Bordetella pertussis BvgAS signal transduction cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:1163–1167. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.3.1163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Aricó B, Miller JF, Roy C, Stibitz S, Monack D, Falkow S, Gross R, Rappuoli R. 1989. Sequences required for expression of Bordetella pertussis virulence factors share homology with prokaryotic signal transduction proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86:6671–6675. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.17.6671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Stockbauer KE, Fuchslocher B, Miller JF, Cotter PA. 2001. Identification and characterization of BipA, a Bordetella Bvg-intermediate phase protein. Mol Microbiol 39:65–78. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02191.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Lai Y-C, Lin G-T, Yang S-L, Chang H-Y, Peng H-L. 2003. Identification and characterization of KvgAS, a two-component system in Klebsiella pneumoniae CG43. FEMS Microbiol Lett 218:121–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2003.tb11507.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Itou J, Eguchi Y, Utsumi R. 2009. Molecular mechanism of transcriptional cascade initiated by the EvgS/EvgA system in Escherichia coli K-12. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 73:870–878. doi: 10.1271/bbb.80795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Tanabe H, Masuda T, Yamasaki K, Katoh A, Yoshioka S, Utsumi R. 1998. Molecular interaction between proteins involved in EvgAS signal transduction of Escherichia coli. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 62:78–82. doi: 10.1271/bbb.62.78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Eguchi Y, Itou J, Yamane M, Demizu R, Yamato F, Okada A, Mori H, Kato A, Utsumi R. 2007. B1500, a small membrane protein, connects the two-component systems EvgS/EvgA and PhoQ/PhoP in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:18712–18717. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705768104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Roggiani M, Yadavalli SS, Goulian M. 2017. Natural variation of a sensor kinase controlling a conserved stress response pathway in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet 13:e1007101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Masuda N, Church GM. 2003. Regulatory network of acid resistance genes in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 48:699–712. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03477.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Tanabe H, Yamasaki K, Katoh A, Yoshioka S, Utsumi R. 1998. Identification of the promoter region and the transcriptional regulatory sequence of the evgAS operon of Escherichia coli. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 62:286–290. doi: 10.1271/bbb.62.286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Burton NA, Johnson MD, Antczak P, Robinson A, Lund PA. 2010. Novel aspects of the acid response network of E. coli K-12 are revealed by a study of transcriptional dynamics. J Mol Biol 401:726–742. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.06.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Krin E, Danchin A, Soutourina O. 2010. Decrypting the H-NS-dependent regulatory cascade of acid stress resistance in Escherichia coli . BMC Microbiol 10:273. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Sharma VK, Akavaram S, Bayles DO. 2022. Genomewide transcriptional response of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to norepinephrine. BMC Genomics 23:107. doi: 10.1186/s12864-021-08167-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Yang W, Sun H, Yan J, Kang C, Wu J, Yang B. 2023. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli senses microbiota-derived nicotinamide to increase its virulence and colonization in the large intestine. Cell Rep 42:112638. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Sahlberg Bang C, Demirel I, Kruse R, Persson K. 2017. Global gene expression profiling and antibiotic susceptibility after repeated exposure to the carbon monoxide-releasing molecule-2 (CORM-2) in multidrug-resistant ESBL-producing uropathogenic Escherichia coli. PLoS One 12:e0178541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Götzke H, Muheim C, Altelaar AFM, Heck AJR, Maddalo G, Daley DO. 2015. Identification of putative substrates for the periplasmic chaperone YfgM in Escherichia coli using quantitative proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 14:216–226. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M114.043216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Boon N, Kaur M, Aziz A, Bradnick M, Shibayama K, Eguchi Y, Lund PA. 2020. The signaling molecule indole inhibits induction of the AR2 acid resistance system in Escherichia coli Front Microbiol 11:474. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Eguchi Y, Utsumi R. 2014. Alkali metals in addition to acidic pH activate the EvgS histidine kinase sensor in Escherichia coli . J Bacteriol 196:3140–3149. doi: 10.1128/JB.01742-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Eguchi Y, Utsumi R. 2008. Introduction to bacterial signal transduction networks. Adv Exp Med Biol 631:1–6. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-78885-2_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Ma Z, Masuda N, Foster JW. 2004. Characterization of EvgAS-YdeO-GadE branched regulatory circuit governing glutamate-dependent acid resistance in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 186:7378–7389. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.21.7378-7389.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Bock A, Gross R. 2002. The unorthodox histidine kinases BvgS and EvgS are responsive to the oxidation status of a quinone electron carrier. Eur J Biochem 269:3479–3484. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03029.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Pasqua M, Grossi M, Scinicariello S, Aussel L, Barras F, Colonna B, Prosseda G. 2019. The MFS efflux pump EmrKY contributes to the survival of Shigella within macrophages. Sci Rep 9:7912. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44357-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. 2011. Signalp 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods 8:785–786. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Nambu JR, Lewis JO, Wharton KA, Crews ST. 1991. The Drosophila single-minded gene Encodes a helix-loop-helix protein that acts as a master regulator of CNS midline development. Cell 67:1157–1167. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90292-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Ishige K, Nagasawa S, Tokishita S, Mizuno T. 1994. A novel device of bacterial signal transducers. EMBO J 13:5195–5202. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06850.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Perraud AL, Weiss V, Gross R. 1999. Signalling pathways in two-component phosphorelay systems. Trends Microbiol 7:115–120. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(99)01458-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Sen H, Aggarwal N, Ishionwu C, Hussain N, Parmar C, Jamshad M, Bavro VN, Lund PA. 2017. Structural and functional analysis of the Escherichia coli acid-sensing histidine kinase EvgS. J Bacteriol 199:e00310-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00310-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Quiocho FA, Ledvina PS. 1996. Atomic structure and specificity of bacterial periplasmic receptors for active transport and chemotaxis: variation of common themes. Mol Microbiol 20:17–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02484.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Herrou J, Bompard C, Wintjens R, Dupré E, Willery E, Villeret V, Locht C, Antoine R, Jacob-Dubuisson F. 2010. Periplasmic domain of the sensor-kinase Bvgs reveals a new paradigm for the Venus flytrap mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:17351–17355. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006267107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Oh BH, Pandit J, Kang CH, Nikaido K, Gokcen S, Ames GF, Kim SH. 1993. Three-dimensional structures of the periplasmic lysine/arginine/ornithine-binding protein with and without a ligand. J Biol Chem 268:11348–11355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Trakhanov S, Vyas NK, Luecke H, Kristensen DM, Ma J, Quiocho FA. 2005. Ligand-free and -bound structures of the binding protein (LivJ) of the Escherichia coli ABC leucine/isoleucine/valine transport system: trajectory and dynamics of the interdomain rotation and ligand specificity. Biochemistry 44:6597–6608. doi: 10.1021/bi047302o [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Lesne E, Dupré E, Locht C, Antoine R, Jacob-Dubuisson F. 2017. Conformational changes of an interdomain linker mediate mechanical signal transmission in sensor kinase BvgS. J Bacteriol 199:e00114-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00114-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Dupré E, Herrou J, Lensink MF, Wintjens R, Vagin A, Lebedev A, Crosson S, Villeret V, Locht C, Antoine R, Jacob-Dubuisson F. 2015. Virulence regulation with venus flytrap domains: structure and function of the periplasmic moiety of the sensor-kinase BvgS. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004700. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Dupré Elian, Lesne E, Guérin J, Lensink MF, Verger A, de Ruyck J, Brysbaert G, Vezin H, Locht C, Antoine R, Jacob-Dubuisson F. 2015. Signal transduction by BvgS sensor kinase: binding of modulator nicotinate affects the conformation and dynamics of the entire periplasmic moiety. J Biol Chem 290:23307–23319. doi: 10.1074/jbc.A115.655720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Van Riet S, Tadesse W, Mortier J, Schlegel S, Simoens K, Bernaerts K, Dal Co A, Aertsen A. 2022. Heterogeneity and evolutionary tunability of Escherichia coli resistance against extreme acid stress. Microbiol Spectr 10:e0375722. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03757-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Kinoshita-Kikuta E, Kinoshita E, Eguchi Y, Yanagihara S, Edahiro K, Inoue Y, Taniguchi M, Yoshida M, Yamamoto K, Takahashi H, Sawasaki T, Utsumi R, Koike T. 2015. Functional characterization of the receiver domain for phosphorelay control in hybrid sensor kinases. PLoS One 10:e0132598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Utsumi R, Kawamoto K, Yamazaki K, Taniguchi M, Yoshioka S, Tanabe H. 1996. Characterization of the signal transduction via EvgS and EvgA in Escherichia coli. J Gen Appl Microbiol 42:155–162. doi: 10.2323/jgam.42.155 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Christ D, Chin JW. 2008. Engineering Escherichia coli heat-resistance by synthetic gene amplification. Protein Eng Des Sel 21:121–125. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzm085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Taylor BL, Zhulin IB. 1999. PAS domains: internal sensors of oxygen, redox potential, and light. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63:479–506. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.63.2.479-506.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Möglich A, Ayers RA, Moffat K. 2009. Structure and signaling mechanism of Per-ARNT-Sim domains. Structure 17:1282–1294. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2009.08.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Perraud AL, Kimmel B, Weiss V, Gross R. 1998. Specificity of the BvgAS and EvgAS phosphorelay is mediated by the C-terminal HPt domains of the sensor proteins. Mol Microbiol 27:875–887. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00716.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Uhl MA, Miller JF. 1996. Central role of the BvgS receiver as a phosphorylated intermediate in a complex two-component phosphorelay. J Biol Chem 271:33176–33180. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.52.33176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Beier D, Schwarz B, Fuchs TM, Gross R. 1995. In vivo characterization of the unorthodox BvgS two-component sensor protein of Bordetella pertussis. J Mol Biol 248:596–610. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Boucher PE, Menozzi FD, Locht C. 1994. The modular architecture of bacterial response regulators. insights into the activation mechanism of the BvgA Transactivator of Bordetella pertussis. J Mol Biol 241:363–377. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Perraud AL, Rippe K, Bantscheff M, Glocker M, Lucassen M, Jung K, Sebald W, Weiss V, Gross R. 2000. Dimerization of signalling modules of the EvgAS and BvgAS phosphorelay systems. Biochim Biophys Acta 1478:341–354. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(00)00052-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Bock A, Bantscheff M, Perraud AL, Rippe K, Weiss V, Glocker MO, Gross R. 2001. Rational design and molecular characterization of a chimaeric response regulator protein. J Mol Biol 310:283–290. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Lukat GS, McCleary WR, Stock AM, Stock JB. 1992. Phosphorylation of bacterial response regulator proteins by low molecular weight phospho-donors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:718–722. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.2.718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Baikalov I, Schröder I, Kaczor-Grzeskowiak M, Cascio D, Gunsalus RP, Dickerson RE. 1998. NarL dimerization? suggestive evidence from a new crystal form. Biochemistry 37:3665–3676. doi: 10.1021/bi972365a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Darwin AJ, Stewart V. 1996. The NAR Modulon systems: Nitrate and nitrite regulation of anaerobic gene expression, p 343–359. In Lin EC, Lynch AS (ed), Regulation of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Chapman & Hall, New York. [Google Scholar]
- 59. Ishihama A. 2012. Prokaryotic genome regulation: a revolutionary paradigm. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci 88:485–508. doi: 10.2183/pjab.88.485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Yoshida M, Ishihama A, Yamamoto K. 2015. Cross talk in promoter recognition between six NarL-family response regulators of Escherichia coli two-component system . Genes to Cells 20:601–612. doi: 10.1111/gtc.12251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Dutta R, Qin L, Inouye M. 1999. Histidine Kinases: diversity of domain organization. Mol Microbiol 34:633–640. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01646.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Kinoshita-Kikuta E, Kinoshita E, Eguchi Y, Koike T. 2016. Validation of Cis and Trans modes in multistep phosphotransfer signaling of bacterial tripartite sensor kinases by using Phos-Tag SDS-PAGE. PLoS One 11:e0148294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Cotter PA, Jones AM. 2003. Phosphorelay control of virulence gene expression in Bordetella. Trends Microbiol 11:367–373. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(03)00156-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Stock AM, Robinson VL, Goudreau PN. 2000. Two-component signal Transduction. Annu Rev Biochem 69:183–215. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Csikász-Nagy A, Cardelli L, Soyer OS. 2011. Response dynamics of phosphorelays suggest their potential utility in cell signalling. J R Soc Interface 8:480–488. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Bearson S, Bearson B, Foster JW. 1997. Acid stress responses in enterobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 147:173–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb10238.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Masuda N, Church GM. 2002. Escherichia coli gene expression responsive to levels of the response regulator EvgA. J Bacteriol 184:6225–6234. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.22.6225-6234.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Fontenot EM, Ezelle KE, Gabreski LN, Giglio ER, McAfee JM, Mills AC, Qureshi MN, Salmon KM, Toyota CG. 2013. YfdW and YfdU are required for oxalate-induced acid tolerance in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 195:1446–1455. doi: 10.1128/JB.01936-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Mullins EA, Sullivan KL, Kappock TJ. 2013. Function and X-ray crystal structure of Escherichia coli YfdE. PLoS One 8:e67901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Castanie-Cornet MP, Penfound TA, Smith D, Elliott JF, Foster JW. 1999. Control of acid resistance in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 181:3525–3535. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.11.3525-3535.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Yamanaka Y, Ishihama A, Yamamoto K. 2012. Induction of YdeO, a regulator for acid resistance genes, by ultraviolet irradiation in Escherichia coli. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 76:1236–1238. doi: 10.1271/bbb.120041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Hersh BM, Farooq FT, Barstad DN, Blankenhorn DL, Slonczewski JL. 1996. A glutamate-dependent acid resistance gene in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 178:3978–3981. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.13.3978-3981.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Smith DK, Kassam T, Singh B, Elliott JF. 1992. Escherichia coli has two homologous glutamate decarboxylase genes that map to distinct loci. J Bacteriol 174:5820–5826. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.18.5820-5826.1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Hommais F, Krin E, Coppée J-Y, Lacroix C, Yeramian E, Danchin A, Bertin P. 2004. GadE (YhiE): a novel activator involved in the response to acid environment in Escherichia coli. Microbiology 150:61–72. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26659-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Ma Z, Gong S, Richard H, Tucker DL, Conway T, Foster JW. 2003. GadE (YhiE) activates glutamate decarboxylase-dependent acid resistance in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol 49:1309–1320. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03633.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Gallegos MT, Schleif R, Bairoch A, Hofmann K, Ramos JL. 1997. Arac/XyLS family of transcriptional regulators. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:393–410. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.61.4.393-410.1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Eguchi Y, Ishii E, Hata K, Utsumi R. 2011. Regulation of acid resistance by connectors of two-component signal transduction systems in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 193:1222–1228. doi: 10.1128/JB.01124-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Bougdour A, Cunning C, Baptiste PJ, Elliott T, Gottesman S. 2008. Multiple pathways for regulation of sigmaS (RpoS) stability in Escherichia coli via the action of multiple anti-adaptors. Mol Microbiol 68:298–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06146.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Zwir I, Shin D, Kato A, Nishino K, Latifi T, Solomon F, Hare JM, Huang H, Groisman EA. 2005. Dissecting the PhoP regulatory network of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:2862–2867. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408238102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Hong W, Wu YE, Fu X, Chang Z. 2012. Chaperone-dependent mechanisms for acid resistance in enteric bacteria. Trends Microbiol 20:328–335. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2012.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Oglesby AG, Murphy ER, Iyer VR, Payne SM. 2005. Fur regulates acid resistance in Shigella flexneri via Ryhb and ydeP. Mol Microbiol 58:1354–1367. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04920.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Hirakawa H, Nishino K, Hirata T, Yamaguchi A. 2003. Comprehensive studies of drug resistance mediated by overexpression of response regulators of two-component signal transduction systems in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 185:1851–1856. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.6.1851-1856.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Nishino K, Yamaguchi A. 2002. Evga of the two-component signal transduction system modulates production of the yhiUV multidrug transporter in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 184:2319–2323. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.8.2319-2323.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Shin J, Cho H, Kim S, Kim K-S. 2018. Role of acid responsive genes in the susceptibility of Escherichia coli to ciclopirox. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 500:296–301. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.04.063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Carlson-Banning KM, Chou A, Liu Z, Hamill RJ, Song Y, Zechiedrich L. 2013. Toward Repurposing ciclopirox as an antibiotic against drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. PLoS One 8:e69646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Kato A, Ohnishi H, Yamamoto K, Furuta E, Tanabe H, Utsumi R. 2000. Transcription of emrKY is regulated by the EvgA-EvgS two-component system in Escherichia coli K-12. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 64:1203–1209. doi: 10.1271/bbb.64.1203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Naha A, Ramaiah S. 2022. Structural chemistry and molecular-level Interactome reveals histidine kinase EvgS to subvert both antimicrobial resistance and virulence in Shigella flexneri 2a str. 3 Biotech 12:258. doi: 10.1007/s13205-022-03325-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Eguchi Y, Oshima T, Mori H, Aono R, Yamamoto K, Ishihama A, Utsumi R. 2003. Transcriptional regulation of drug efflux genes by EvgAS, a two-component system in Escherichia coli. Microbiology 149:2819–2828. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26460-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Han X, Dorsey-Oresto A, Malik M, Wang J-Y, Drlica K, Zhao X, Lu T. 2010. Escherichia coli genes that reduce the lethal effects of stress. BMC Microbiol 10:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Reuter A, Virolle C, Goldlust K, Berne-Dedieu A, Nolivos S, Lesterlin C. 2020. Direct visualisation of drug-efflux in live Escherichia coli cells. FEMS Microbiol Rev 44:782–792. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuaa031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. May T, Ito A, Okabe S. 2009. Induction of multidrug resistance mechanism in Escherichia coli biofilms by interplay between tetracycline and ampicillin resistance genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:4628–4639. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00454-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Yasufuku T, Shigemura K, Shirakawa T, Matsumoto M, Nakano Y, Tanaka K, Arakawa S, Kinoshita S, Kawabata M, Fujisawa M. 2011. Correlation of overexpression of efflux pump genes with antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli strains clinically isolated from urinary tract infection patients. J Clin Microbiol 49:189–194. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00827-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Fralick JA. 1996. Evidence that TolC is required for functioning of the Mar/AcrAB efflux pump of Escherichia coli . J Bacteriol 178:5803–5805. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.19.5803-5805.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Kobayashi N, Nishino K, Yamaguchi A. 2001. Novel macrolide-specific ABC-type efflux transporter in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 183:5639–5644. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.19.5639-5644.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Lomovskaya O, Lewis K. 1992. Emr, an Escherichia coli locus for multidrug resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:8938–8942. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.19.8938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Edgar R, Bibi E. 1997. MdfA, an Escherichia coli multidrug resistance protein with an extraordinarily broad spectrum of drug recognition. J Bacteriol 179:2274–2280. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.7.2274-2280.1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Wu H-H, Symersky J, Lu M. 2019. Structure of an engineered multidrug transporter MdfA reveals the molecular basis for substrate recognition. Commun Biol 2:210. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0446-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Hayashi K, Nakashima R, Sakurai K, Kitagawa K, Yamasaki S, Nishino K, Yamaguchi A. 2016. AcrB-AcrA fusion proteins that act as multidrug efflux transporters. J Bacteriol 198:332–342. doi: 10.1128/JB.00587-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Mazzariol A, Cornaglia G, Nikaido H. 2000. Contributions of the AmpC β-lactamase and the AcrAB multidrug efflux system in intrinsic resistance of Escherichia coli K-12 to β-Lactams. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:1387–1390. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.5.1387-1390.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Mulvey MR, Sorby PA, Triggs-Raine BL, Loewen PC. 1988. Cloning and physical characterization of katE and katF required for catalase HPII expression in Escherichia coli. Gene 73:337–345. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90498-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Olakanmi O, Britigan BE, Schlesinger LS. 2000. Gallium disrupts iron metabolism of mycobacteria residing within human macrophages. Infect Immun 68:5619–5627. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.10.5619-5627.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Zeng J, Wu L, Liu Z, Lv Y, Feng J, Wang W, Xue Y, Wang D, Li J, Drlica K, Zhao X. 2021. Gain-of-function mutations in acid stress response (evgS) protect Escherichia coli from killing by gallium nitrate, an antimicrobial candidate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65:e01595-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01595-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Pasqua M, Coluccia M, Eguchi Y, Okajima T, Grossi M, Prosseda G, Utsumi R, Colonna B. 2022. Roles of two-component signal transduction systems in Shigella virulence. Biomolecules 12:1321. doi: 10.3390/biom12091321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Demarre G, Prudent V, Schenk H, Rousseau E, Bringer M-A, Barnich N, Tran Van Nhieu G, Rimsky S, De Monte S, Espéli O. 2019. The crohn’s disease-associated Escherichia coli strain LF82 relies on SOS and stringent responses to survive, multiply and tolerate antibiotics within macrophages. PLoS Pathog 15:e1008123. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Fanelli G, Pasqua M, Colonna B, Prosseda G, Grossi M. 2020. Expression profile of multidrug resistance efflux pumps during intracellular life of adherent-invasive Escherichia coli strain LF82. Front Microbiol 11:1935. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Mercer RG, Zheng J, Garcia-Hernandez R, Ruan L, Gänzle MG, McMullen LM. 2015. Genetic determinants of heat resistance in Escherichia coli. Front Microbiol 6:932. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Mercer R, Nguyen O, Ou Q, McMullen L, Gänzle MG. 2017. Functional analysis of genes comprising the locus of heat resistance in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e01400-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01400-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Li H, Gänzle M. 2016. Some like it hot: heat resistance of Escherichia coli in food. Front Microbiol 7:1763. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Oh JT, Van Dyk TK, Cajal Y, Dhurjati PS, Sasser M, Jain MK. 1998. Osmotic stress in viable Escherichia coli as the basis for the antibiotic response by polymyxin B. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 246:619–623. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Wang Y. 2002. The function of OmpA in Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 292:396–401. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2002.6657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Nishino K, Inazumi Y, Yamaguchi A. 2003. Global analysis of genes regulated by EvgA of the two-component regulatory system in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 185:2667–2672. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.8.2667-2672.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Alphen WV, Lugtenberg B. 1977. Influence of osmolarity of the growth medium on the outer membrane protein pattern of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 131:623–630. doi: 10.1128/jb.131.2.623-630.1977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Liu Y, Liu B, Yang P, Wang T, Chang Z, Wang J, Wang Q, Li W, Wu J, Huang D, Jiang L, Yang B. 2019. LysR-type transcriptional regulator OvrB encoded in O Island 9 drives enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 virulence. Virulence 10:783–792. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2019.1661721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Tucker DL, Tucker N, Conway T. 2002. Gene expression profiling of the pH response in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 184:6551–6558. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.23.6551-6558.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Zhang Y, Wang Y, Zhu H, Yi Z, Afayibo DJA, Tao C, Li T, Tian M, Qi J, Ding C, Yu S, Wang S. 2021. Dctr contributes to the virulence of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli through regulation of type III secretion system 2 expression. Vet Res 52:101. doi: 10.1186/s13567-021-00970-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Nadler C, Shifrin Y, Nov S, Kobi S, Rosenshine I. 2006. Characterization of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Mutants that fail to disrupt host cell spreading and attachment to substratum. Infect Immun 74:839–849. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.2.839-849.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Yang J, Xiong Z-Q, Song S-J, Wang J-F, Lv H-J, Wang Y. 2015. Improving heterologous polyketide production in Escherichia coli by transporter engineering. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:8691–8700. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6718-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Yamanaka Y, Aizawa S-I, Yamamoto K. 2022. The hdeD gene represses the expression of flagellum biosynthesis via LrhA in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 204:e0042021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Alexander DM, St John AC. 1994. Characterization of the carbon starvation-inducible and stationary phase-inducible gene Slp encoding an outer membrane lipoprotein in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 11:1059–1071. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00383.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Ma Z, Richard H, Foster JW. 2003. pH-dependent modulation of cyclic AMP levels and GadW-dependent repression of RpoS affect synthesis of the GadX regulator and Escherichia coli acid resistance. J Bacteriol 185:6852–6859. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.23.6852-6859.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Bhowmik P, Rajagopal S, Hmar RV, Singh P, Saxena P, Amar P, Thomas T, Ravishankar R, Nagaraj S, Katagihallimath N, Sarangapani RK, Ramachandran V, Datta S. 2022. Validated in Silico model for Biofilm formation in Escherichia coli. ACS Synth Biol 11:713–731. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.1c00445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Castanié-Cornet M-P, Cam K, Bastiat B, Cros A, Bordes P, Gutierrez C. 2010. Acid stress response in Escherichia coli: Mechanism of regulation of gadA transcription by RcsB and GadE. Nucleic Acids Res 38:3546–3554. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Eguchi Y, Okada T, Minagawa S, Oshima T, Mori H, Yamamoto K, Ishihama A, Utsumi R. 2004. Signal transduction cascade between EvgA/EvgS and PhoP/PhoQ two-component systems of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 186:3006–3014. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.10.3006-3014.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Eguchi Y, Utsumi R. 2005. A novel mechanism for connecting bacterial two-component signal-transduction systems. Trends Biochem Sci 30:70–72. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2004.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Minagawa S, Ogasawara H, Kato A, Yamamoto K, Eguchi Y, Oshima T, Mori H, Ishihama A, Utsumi R. 2003. Identification and molecular characterization of the mg2+ Stimulon of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 185:3696–3702. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.13.3696-3702.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Eguchi Y, Ishii E, Yamane M, Utsumi R. 2012. The connector SafA interacts with the multi-sensing domain of PhoQ in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 85:299–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08114.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Yoshitani K, Ishii E, Taniguchi K, Sugimoto H, Shiro Y, Akiyama Y, Kato A, Utsumi R, Eguchi Y. 2019. Identification of an internal cavity in the PhoQ sensor domain for PhoQ activity and SafA-mediated control. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 83:684–694. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2018.1562879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Mitrophanov AY, Groisman EA. 2008. Signal integration in bacterial two-component regulatory systems. Genes Dev 22:2601–2611. doi: 10.1101/gad.1700308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Mukhopadhyay S, Schellhorn HE. 1994. Induction of Escherichia coli hydroperoxidase I by acetate and other weak acids. J Bacteriol 176:2300–2307. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.8.2300-2307.1994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Wan F, Xu L, Ruan Z, Luo Q. 2021. Genomic and transcriptomic analysis of colistin-susceptible and colistin-resistant isolates identify two-component system EvgS/EvgA associated with colistin resistance in Escherichia coli Infect Drug Resist 14:2437–2447. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S316963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Pratt LA, Silhavy TJ. 1995. Porin regulon of Escherichia coli, p 105–127. In Hoch JA, Silhavy TJ(ed), Two-component signal Transduction. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
- 132. Schneider DR, Parker CD. 1982. Effect of pyridines on phenotypic properties of Bordetella pertussis. Infect Immun 38:548–553. doi: 10.1128/iai.38.2.548-553.1982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Melton AR, Weiss AA. 1993. Characterization of environmental regulators of Bordetella pertussis. Infect Immun 61:807–815. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.3.807-815.1993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Sommer E, Koler M, Frank V, Sourjik V, Vaknin A. 2013. The sensory histidine kinases TorS and EvgS tend to form clusters in Escherichia coli cells. PLoS One 8:e77708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Suriyaphol P, Chiu JKH, Yimpring N, Tunsagool P, Mhuantong W, Chuanchuen R, Bessarab I, Williams RBH, Ong R-H, Suriyaphol G. 2021. Dynamics of the fecal microbiome and antimicrobial resistome in commercial piglets during the weaning period. Sci Rep 11:18091. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97586-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Chen Y, Xia Z, Li H. 2022. Metagenomic comparison of gut communities between hawksbills (Eretmochelys Imbricata) and green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas). Arch Microbiol 204:450. doi: 10.1007/s00203-022-03073-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Rui Y, Qiu G. 2022. Analysis of gut microbial communities and resistance genes in pigs and chickens in central China. Animals 12:3404. doi: 10.3390/ani12233404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Rao RSP, Ghate SD, Shastry RP, Kurthkoti K, Suravajhala P, Patil P, Shetty P. 2023. Prevalence and heterogeneity of antibiotic resistance genes in Orientia tsutsugamushi and other rickettsial genomes. Microb Pathog 174:105953. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Wu Y, Gong Z, Wang S, Song L. 2023. Occurrence and prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes and pathogens in an industrial park wastewater treatment plant. Sci Total Environ 880:163278. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Liao F, Qian J, Yang R, Gu W, Li R, Yang T, Fu X, Yuan B, Zhang Y. 2023. Metagenomics of gut microbiome for migratory seagulls in kunming city revealed the potential public risk to human health. BMC Genomics 24:269. doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09379-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Cao T, Guo Y, Wang D, Liu Z, Huang S, Peng C, Wang S, Wang Y, Lu Q, Xiao F, Liang Z, Zheng S, Shen J, Wu Y, Lv Z, Ke Y. 2022. Effect of phorate on the development of hyperglycaemia in mouse and resistance genes in intestinal microbiota. Antibiotics 11:1584. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Moreira CG, Russell R, Mishra AA, Narayanan S, Ritchie JM, Waldor MK, Curtis MM, Winter SE, Weinshenker D, Sperandio V. 2016. Bacterial adrenergic sensors regulate virulence of enteric pathogens in the gut. mBio 7:e00826-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00826-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Furness JB. 2000. Types of neurons in the enteric nervous system. J Auton Nerv Syst 81:87–96. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1838(00)00127-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]