Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1995 Jul;59(1):4–15. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.59.1.4

Vision.

J F Acheson 1, M D Sanders 1
PMCID: PMC1073593  PMID: 7608708

Full text

PDF
4

Images in this article

5Image
on p.5
12Image
on p.12

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arden G. B., Jacobson J. J. A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity: preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1978 Jan;17(1):23–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck R. W. Automated perimetry: principles and practice. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1986 Winter;26(4):163–173. doi: 10.1097/00004397-198602640-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beck R. W., Bergstrom T. J., Lichter P. R. A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter. Ophthalmology. 1985 Jan;92(1):77–82. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(85)34065-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berninger T. A., Arden G. B., Hogg C. R., Frumkes T. Separable evoked retinal and cortical potentials from each major visual pathway: preliminary results. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989 Jul;73(7):502–511. doi: 10.1136/bjo.73.7.502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berninger T. A., Arden G. B. The pattern electroretinogram. Eye (Lond) 1988;2 (Suppl):S257–S283. doi: 10.1038/eye.1988.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ferris F. L., 3rd, Kassoff A., Bresnick G. H., Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982 Jul;94(1):91–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferris F. L., 3rd, Sperduto R. D. Standardized illumination for visual acuity testing in clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982 Jul;94(1):97–98. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(82)90198-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Frederiksen J. L., Larsson H. B., Ottovay E., Stigsby B., Olesen J. Acute optic neuritis with normal visual acuity. Comparison of symptoms and signs with psychophysiological, electrophysiological and magnetic resonance imaging data. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1991 Jun;69(3):357–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1991.tb04828.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Frisén L., Frisén M. How good is normal visual acuity?. A study of letter acuity thresholds as a function of age. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1981;215(3):149–157. doi: 10.1007/BF00413146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Glovinsky Y., Quigley H. A., Bissett R. A., Miller N. R. Artificially produced quadrantanopsia in computed visual field testing. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990 Jul 15;110(1):90–91. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76947-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Halliday A. M., Halliday E., Kriss A., McDonald W. I., Mushin J. The pattern-evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways. Brain. 1976 Jun;99(2):357–374. doi: 10.1093/brain/99.2.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hart W. M., Jr Acquired dyschromatopsias. Surv Ophthalmol. 1987 Jul-Aug;32(1):10–31. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(87)90070-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hitchings R. A., Migdal C. S., Wormald R., Poinooswamy D., Fitzke F. The primary treatment trial: changes in the visual field analysis by computer-assisted perimetry. Eye (Lond) 1994;8(Pt 1):117–120. doi: 10.1038/eye.1994.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Holder G. E. Significance of abnormal pattern electroretinography in anterior visual pathway dysfunction. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987 Mar;71(3):166–171. doi: 10.1136/bjo.71.3.166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Keltner J. L., Johnson C. A. Current status of automated perimetry. Is the ideal automated perimeter available? Arch Ophthalmol. 1986 Mar;104(3):347–349. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1986.01050150047023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lorenz R., Dodt E., Heider W. Pattern electroretinogram peak times as a clinical means of discriminating retinal from optic nerve disease. Doc Ophthalmol. 1989 Mar;71(3):307–320. doi: 10.1007/BF00170979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mills R. P. Automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmology. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1991 Fall;31(4):51–70. doi: 10.1097/00004397-199103140-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Plant G. T., Hess R. F., Thomas S. J. The pattern evoked electroretinogram in optic neuritis. A combined psychophysical and electrophysiological study. Brain. 1986 Jun;109(Pt 3):469–490. doi: 10.1093/brain/109.3.469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Regan D., Neima D. Low-contrast letter charts as a test of visual function. Ophthalmology. 1983 Oct;90(10):1192–1200. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(83)34407-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ryan S., Arden G. B. Electrophysiological discrimination between retinal and optic nerve disorders. Doc Ophthalmol. 1988 Mar-Apr;68(3-4):247–255. doi: 10.1007/BF00156431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Safran A. B., Glaser J. S. Statokinetic dissociation in lesions of the anterior visual pathways. A reappraisal of the Riddoch phenomenon. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980 Feb;98(2):291–295. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1980.01020030287009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sanabria O., Feuer W. J., Anderson D. R. Pseudo-loss of fixation in automated perimetry. Ophthalmology. 1991 Jan;98(1):76–78. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32338-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sanders E. A., Volkers A. C., van der Poel J. C., van Lith G. H. Visual function and pattern visual evoked response in optic neuritis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987 Aug;71(8):602–608. doi: 10.1136/bjo.71.8.602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Travis D., Thompson P. Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity and colour vision in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 1989 Apr;112(Pt 2):283–303. doi: 10.1093/brain/112.2.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Essen D. C., Anderson C. H., Felleman D. J. Information processing in the primate visual system: an integrated systems perspective. Science. 1992 Jan 24;255(5043):419–423. doi: 10.1126/science.1734518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Verplanck M., Kaufman D. I., Parsons T., Yedavally S., Kokinakis D. Electrophysiology versus psychophysics in the detection of visual loss in pseudotumor cerebri. Neurology. 1988 Nov;38(11):1789–1792. doi: 10.1212/wnl.38.11.1789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wellings P. C. Detection and recognition of visual field defects resulting from lesions involving the visual pathways. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1989 Nov;17(4):331–335. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1989.tb00550.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES