Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1995 Jul;59(1):50–54. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.59.1.50

Cerebral and callosal organisation in a right hemisphere dominant "split brain" patient.

H L Lutsep 1, C M Wessinger 1, M S Gazzaniga 1
PMCID: PMC1073601  PMID: 7608710

Abstract

Patients described in previous reports who have undergone corpus callostomy for control of seizures have been left hemisphere dominant for language. To determine the hemispheric localisation (and possible coexistence) of language and traditional right hemisphere skills in reversed dominance, the first right hemisphere dominant corpus callostomy patient was studied. Localisation of callosal functions was also investigated, as MRI showed 1.5 cm of spared callosal body. The patient, KO, a 15 year old girl with familial left handedness, underwent two stage callosotomy in 1988. Lateralised visually presented stimuli requiring same or different comparisons between visual fields showed chance performance. Oral naming and reading showed better performance by the right hemisphere than the left, whereas both hemispheres were proficient in auditory comprehension. Active voice syntax was above chance only in the right hemisphere. Face recognition was significantly better in the right hemisphere than in the left. Tasks requiring tactile comparisons between hands showed above chance performance except in the instance in which the non-dominant right hand was stimulated first in a point localisation task between hands. This case showed hemispheric coexistence of language and traditional right hemispheric skills in a corpus callosotomy patient with reversed language dominance. Tactile transfer was localised to the mid-posterior callosal body.

Full text

PDF
50

Images in this article

51Image
on p.51
53Image
on p.53
53Image
on p.53

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bentin S., Sahar A., Moscovitch M. Intermanual information transfer in patients with lesions in the trunk of the corpus callosum. Neuropsychologia. 1984;22(5):601–611. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(84)90024-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bishop D. V. Linguistic impairment after left hemidecortication for infantile hemiplegia? A reappraisal. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1983 Feb;35(Pt 1):199–207. doi: 10.1080/14640748308402125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dimond S. J., Scammell R. E., Brouwers E. Y., Weeks R. Functions of the centre section (trunk) of the corpus callosum in man. Brain. 1977 Sep;100(3):543–562. doi: 10.1093/brain/100.3.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fischer R. S., Alexander M. P., Gabriel C., Gould E., Milione J. Reversed lateralization of cognitive functions in right handers. Exceptions to classical aphasiology. Brain. 1991 Feb;114(Pt 1A):245–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gazzaniga M. S., Bogen J. E., Sperry R. W. Observations on visual perception after disconnexion of the cerebral hemispheres in man. Brain. 1965 Jun;88(2):221–236. doi: 10.1093/brain/88.2.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gazzaniga M. S., Freedman H. Observations on visual processes after posterior callosal section. Neurology. 1973 Oct;23(10):1126–1130. doi: 10.1212/wnl.23.10.1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gazzaniga M. S., Hillyard S. A. Language and speech capacity of the right hemisphere. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Sep;9(3):273–280. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90022-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gazzaniga M. S., Smylie C. S., Baynes K., Hirst W., McCleary C. Profiles of right hemisphere language and speech following brain bisection. Brain Lang. 1984 Jul;22(2):206–220. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(84)90090-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gazzaniga M. S., Smylie C. S. Facial recognition and brain asymmetries: clues to underlying mechanisms. Ann Neurol. 1983 May;13(5):536–540. doi: 10.1002/ana.410130511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Geschwind N., Galaburda A. M. Cerebral lateralization. Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology: I. A hypothesis and a program for research. Arch Neurol. 1985 May;42(5):428–459. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1985.04060050026008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gopnik M., Crago M. B. Familial aggregation of a developmental language disorder. Cognition. 1991 Apr;39(1):1–50. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90058-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gopnik M. Feature-blind grammar and dysphagia. Nature. 1990 Apr 19;344(6268):715–715. doi: 10.1038/344715a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hécaen H., De Agostini M., Monzon-Montes A. Cerebral organization in left-handers. Brain Lang. 1981 Mar;12(2):261–284. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(81)90018-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jeeves M. A., Simpson D. A., Geffen G. Functional consequences of the transcallosal removal of intraventricular tumours. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1979 Feb;42(2):134–142. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.42.2.134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Leiguarda R., Starkstein S., Berthier M. Anterior callosal haemorrhage. A partial interhemispheric disconnection syndrome. Brain. 1989 Aug;112(Pt 4):1019–1037. doi: 10.1093/brain/112.4.1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Levy J., Trevarthen C., Sperry R. W. Reception of bilateral chimeric figures following hemispheric deconnexion. Brain. 1972;95(1):61–78. doi: 10.1093/brain/95.1.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pandya D. N., Karol E. A., Heilbronn D. The topographical distribution of interhemispheric projections in the corpus callosum of the rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 1971 Sep 10;32(1):31–43. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90153-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Satomi K., Kinoshita Y., Hirakawa S. Disturbances of cross-localization of fingertips in a callosal patient. Cortex. 1991 Jun;27(2):327–331. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80138-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sidtis J. J., Volpe B. T., Wilson D. H., Rayport M., Gazzaniga M. S. Variability in right hemisphere language function after callosal section: evidence for a continuum of generative capacity. J Neurosci. 1981 Mar;1(3):323–331. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.01-03-00323.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Snodgrass J. G., Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 Mar;6(2):174–215. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.6.2.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES