Skip to main content
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1996 Aug;61(2):176–180. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.61.2.176

Defective imitation of gestures in patients with damage in the left or right hemispheres.

G Goldenberg 1
PMCID: PMC1073992  PMID: 8708686

Abstract

OBJECTIVES--Defective imitation of meaningless gestures has repeatedly been demonstrated in patients with apraxia and has been interpreted as being due to a deficit of motor execution. There is, however, controversy as to whether some impairment of imitation also occurs in patients with right brain damage. The aim was to compare defective imitation in patients with left and right brain damage and to explore whether there are qualitative differences between them. METHODS--Imitation was examined in 80 patients with left brain damage (LBD) and aphasia, 40 patients with right brain damage (RBD), and 60 controls for three types of gestures:hand positions, finger configurations, and combined gestures which required a defined hand position as well as a defined configuration of the fingers. RESULTS--Regardless of whether imitation of hand positions and finger configurations were tested each on their own or together, they showed differential susceptibility to RBD and LBD. Whereas imitation of finger configurations was about equally impaired in RBD and LBD, defective imitation of hand positions occurred almost exclusively in patients with LBD, and whereas controls as well as patients with RBD committed less errors with hand positions than with finger configurations, the reverse was the case in patients with LBD. CONCLUSIONS--The pattern of results goes against a deficit of motor execution as being the cause of defective imitation in patients with LBD, as it is difficult to see why such a deficit should affect proximal movements necessary for reaching hand positions more than differential finger movements. An alternative explanation would be that in patients with LBD errors are due to defective mediation by knowledge about the human body whereas in patients with RBD they stem from faulty visuospatial analysis of the demonstrated gesture.

Full text

PDF
176

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barbieri C., De Renzi E. The executive and ideational components of apraxia. Cortex. 1988 Dec;24(4):535–543. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(88)80047-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. De Renzi E., Motti F., Nichelli P. Imitating gestures. A quantitative approach to ideomotor apraxia. Arch Neurol. 1980 Jan;37(1):6–10. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1980.00500500036003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gainotti G., Cianchetti C., Tiacci C. The influence of the hemispheric side of lesion on non verbal tasks of finger localization. Cortex. 1972 Dec;8(4):364–377. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(72)80002-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goldenberg G., Hermsdörfer J., Spatt J. Ideomotor apraxia and cerebral dominance for motor control. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 Mar;3(2):95–100. doi: 10.1016/0926-6410(95)00034-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldenberg G. Imitating gestures and manipulating a mannikin--the representation of the human body in ideomotor apraxia. Neuropsychologia. 1995 Jan;33(1):63–72. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)00104-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kimura D., Archibald Y. Motor functions of the left hemisphere. Brain. 1974 Jun;97(2):337–350. doi: 10.1093/brain/97.1.337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lehmkuhl G., Poeck K., Willmes K. Ideomotor apraxia and aphasia: an examination of types and manifestations of apraxic symptoms. Neuropsychologia. 1983;21(3):199–212. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(83)90038-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Roy E. A., Square-Storer P., Hogg S., Adams S. Analysis of task demands in apraxia. Int J Neurosci. 1991 Jan-Feb;56(1-4):177–186. doi: 10.3109/00207459108985414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Semenza C., Goodglass H. Localization of body parts in brain injured subjects. Neuropsychologia. 1985;23(2):161–175. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(85)90101-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sirigu A., Grafman J., Bressler K., Sunderland T. Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge processing. Evidence from a case of autotopagnosia. Brain. 1991 Feb;114(Pt 1B):629–642. doi: 10.1093/brain/114.1.629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES