Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1997 Apr;62(4):334–340. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.62.4.334

Pathogenesis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

D N Levine 1
PMCID: PMC1074087  PMID: 9120444

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether either of two mechanical theories predicts the topographic pattern of neuropathology in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). The compression theory states that the spinal cord is compressed between a spondylotic bar anteriorly and the ligamenta flava posteriorly. The dentate tension theory states that the spinal cord is pulled laterally by the dentate ligaments, which are tensed by an anterior spondylotic bar. METHODS: The spinal cord cross section, at the level of a spondylotic bar, is modelled as a circular disc subject to forces applied at its circumference. These forces differ for the two theories. From the pattern of forces at the circumference the distribution of shear stresses in the interior of the disc-that is, over the transverse section of the spinal cord-is calculated. With the assumption that highly stressed areas are most subject to damage, the stress pattern predicted by each theory can be compared to the topographic neuropathology of CSM. RESULTS: The predicted stress pattern of the dentate tension theory corresponds to the reported neuropathology, whereas the predicted stress pattern of the compression theory does not. CONCLUSIONS: The results strongly favour the theory that CSM is caused by tensile stresses transmitted to the spinal cord from the dura via the dentate ligaments. A spondylotic bar can increase dentate tension by displacing the spinal cord dorsally, while the dural attachments of the dentate, anchored by the dural root sleeves and dural ligaments, are displaced less. The spondylotic bar may also increase dentate tension by interfering locally with dural stretch during neck flexion, the resultant increase in dural stress being transmitted to the spinal cord via the dentate ligaments. Flexion of the neck increases dural tension and should be avoided in the conservative treatment of CSM. Both anterior and posterior extradural surgical operations can diminish dentate tension, which may explain their usefulness in CSM. The generality of these results must be tempered by the simplifying assumptions required for the mathematical model.

Full text

PDF
334

Images in this article

335Image
on p.335
337Image
on p.337

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams C. B., Logue V. Studies in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. I. Movement of the cervical roots, dura and cord, and their relation to the course of the extrathecal roots. Brain. 1971;94(3):557–568. doi: 10.1093/brain/94.3.557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alsharif H., Ezzat S., Hay A., Motty N. A., Malek S. A. The results of surgical treatment of spondylotic radiculomyelopathy with complete cervical laminectomy and posterior foramen magnum decompression. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1979;48(1-2):83–100. doi: 10.1007/BF01406022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BEDFORD P. D., BOSANQUET F. D. Degeneration of the spinal cord associated with cervical spondylosis. Lancet. 1952 Jul 12;2(6724):55–59. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(52)92103-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. BRAIN W. R., NORTHFIELD D., WILKINSON M. The neurological manifestations of cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1952 Jun;75(2):187–225. doi: 10.1093/brain/75.2.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bakay L. Postoperative myelography in spondylotic cervical myelopathy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1973;28(3):123–133. doi: 10.1007/BF01432225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bishara S. N. The posterior operation in treatment of cervical spondylosis with myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1971 Aug;34(4):393–398. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.34.4.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Breig A., Turnbull I., Hassler O. Effects of mechanical stresses on the spinal cord in cervical spondylosis. A study on fresh cadaver material. J Neurosurg. 1966 Jul;25(1):45–56. doi: 10.3171/jns.1966.25.1.0045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Breig A., el-Nadi A. F. Biomechanics of the cervical spinal cord. Relief of contact pressure on and overstretching of the spinal cord. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1966 Nov;4(6):602–624. doi: 10.1177/028418516600400602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. CAMPBELL A. M., PHILLIPS D. G. Cervical disk lesions with neurological disorder. Differential diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Br Med J. 1960 Aug 13;2(5197):481–485. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5197.481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cusick J. F., Ackmann J. J., Larson S. J. Mechanical and physiological effects of dentatotomy. J Neurosurg. 1977 Jun;46(6):767–775. doi: 10.3171/jns.1977.46.6.0767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. González-Feria L. The effect of surgical immobilization after laminectomy in the treatment of advanced cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1975;31(3-4):185–193. doi: 10.1007/BF01406291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gorter K. Influence of laminectomy on the course of cervical myelopathy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1976;33(3-4):265–281. doi: 10.1007/BF01886675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. MAIR W. G. P., DRUCKMAN R. The pathology of spinal cord lesions and their relation to the clinical features in protrusion of cervical intervertebral discs; a report of four cases. Brain. 1953 Mar;76(1):70–91. doi: 10.1093/brain/76.1.70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nurick S. The natural history and the results of surgical treatment of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1972;95(1):101–108. doi: 10.1093/brain/95.1.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ogino H., Tada K., Okada K., Yonenobu K., Yamamoto T., Ono K., Namiki H. Canal diameter, anteroposterior compression ratio, and spondylotic myelopathy of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983 Jan-Feb;8(1):1–15. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198301000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Oiwa T., Hirabayashi K., Uzawa M., Ohira T. Experimental study on postlaminectomy deterioration of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Influences of intradural surgery and persistent spinal block. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1985 Oct;10(8):717–721. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198510000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. REID J. D. Effects of flexion-extension movements of the head and spine upon the spinal cord and nerve roots. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Aug;23:214–221. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.3.214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rowland L. P. Surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: time for a controlled trial. Neurology. 1992 Jan;42(1):5–13. doi: 10.1212/wnl.42.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. STOLTMANN H. F., BLACKWOOD W. THE ROLE OF THE LIGAMENTA FLAVA IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF MYELOPATHY IN CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS. Brain. 1964 Mar;87:45–50. doi: 10.1093/brain/87.1.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Scoville W. B., Dohrmann G. J., Corkill G. Late results of cervical disc surgery. J Neurosurg. 1976 Aug;45(2):203–210. doi: 10.3171/jns.1976.45.2.0203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. TAYLOR A. R. The mechanism of injury to the spinal cord in the neck without damage to vertebral column. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951 Nov;33-B(4):543–547. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.33B4.543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. TAYLOR A. R. VASCULAR FACTORS IN THE MYELOPATHY ASSOCIATED WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS. Neurology. 1964 Jan;14:62–68. doi: 10.1212/wnl.14.1.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tencer A. F., Allen B. L., Jr, Ferguson R. L. A biomechanical study of thoracolumbar spine fractures with bone in the canal. Part III. Mechanical properties of the dura and its tethering ligaments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1985 Oct;10(8):741–747. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198510000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tunturi A. R. Elasticity of the spinal cord, pia, and denticulate ligament in the dog. J Neurosurg. 1978 Jun;48(6):975–979. doi: 10.3171/jns.1978.48.6.0975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. WILKINSON M. The morbid anatomy of cervical spondylosis and myelopathy. Brain. 1960 Dec;83:589–617. doi: 10.1093/brain/83.4.589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES