Skip to main content
Journal of Fungi logoLink to Journal of Fungi
. 2023 Dec 8;9(12):1179. doi: 10.3390/jof9121179

Morphology and Molecular Phylogeny Reveal Five New Species of Laccaria (Hydnangiaceae, Agaricales) from Southern China

Ming Zhang 1,*, Xue-Lian Gao 1, Li-Qin Mu 2, Wang-Qiu Deng 1,*
Editors: Sajeewa Maharachchikumbura, Jie Chen, Komsit Wisitrassameewong
PMCID: PMC10744585  PMID: 38132780

Abstract

The genus Laccaria is a type of cosmopolitan and ecologically important fungal group. Members can form ectomycorrhizal associations with numerous trees, and some species are common edible fungi in local markets. Although some new species from China are recently published, the species diversity of Laccaria is still unclear in China. In this study, some samples of Laccaria were collected from southern China, and morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses based on the multilocus dataset of ITS-LSU-tef1-rpb2 confirmed five new species. Laccaria miniata, L. nanlingensis and L. neovinaceoavellanea were collected from subtropical broad-leaved forests, and L. rufobrunnea and L. umbilicata were collected from subtropical mixed forests of southwest China. Full descriptions, illustrations, comparisons with similar species and phylogenetic analysis are provided.

Keywords: fungal diversity, molecular systematics, morphology, novel taxa, taxonomy

1. Introduction

Laccaria Berk. & Broome (Agaricales, Hydnangiaceae) is an important fungal group with high ecological and economic values. Species in Laccaria are widely reported from every continent except Antarctica and can form ectomycorrhizal (ECM) relationships with a wide range of trees, such as Betulaceae, Fagaceae, Myrtaceae, Pinaceae and Salicaceae [1,2]. Laccaria is considered a model genus for understanding ectomycorrhizal (ECM) ecology and evolution; some species are reported that can act as pioneer species and can be frequently found in recently disturbed sites and young forest stands, play important roles in primary and secondary succession, and are useful for ecological protection and restoration [1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. In addition, some Laccaria species are edible and common in local markets [12]; for example, L. aurantia, L. bicolor, L. moshuijun and L. vinaceoavellanea are commercial mushrooms in Sichuan Province, China [13].

In general, Laccaria members are mainly characterized by the collybioid to omphaloid basidiocarp; the convex to plane or umbilicate, and usually dry pileus; thick, waxy, sinuate to subdecurrent, often widely spaced lamellae, echinulate basidiospores, the hymenium typically devoid of pleurocystidia, and the clamped hyphae [8,14,15,16,17,18]. It is not difficult to recognize the genus Laccaria due to its distinct morphological characteristics; however, infrageneric species identification is difficult in many instances due to the overlapping morphological features [18,19,20]. Recent studies show that molecular data are helpful in species identification of this genus [1,2,17,18,20,21,22]. The discovery of Laccaria new species has been rapidly increasing in recent years [23]. To date, about 110 species have been reported worldwide [2,23], but most of them were originally described from Europe and North America [1,8,20,24,25,26,27,28,29]. In China, 25 Laccaria species have been reported, including 17 species originally described from China [1,2,17,22,30,31,32,33,34].

During the survey of macrofungi in southern and southwestern China, some distinct Laccaria samples were collected. Based on morphological feature studies and multilocus phylogenetic analyses, five species are confirmed as new to science. Therefore, they are formally introduced herein, containing the full morphological descriptions, color photographs, line drawings, comparison with similar species, and a phylogenetic tree to show their placement and uniqueness.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Morphological Studies

Photographs of fresh basidiocarps were taken in the field. Specimens were dried and deposited in the Fungarium of Guangdong Institute of Microbiology (GDGM). Descriptions of macro-morphological characters and habitats were obtained from photographs and field notes. Color codes follow Kornerup and Wanscher [35]. Microscopic observations were carried out on tissue sections stained with 5% KOH and 1% aqueous Congo red under a light microscope (Olympus BX51, Tokyo, Japan) with magnification up to 1000×. For basidiospore descriptions, the abbreviation [n/m/p] denotes n spores measured from m basidiomata of p collections; the notation (a–)b–c(–d) describes basidiospore dimensions, where the range b–c represented 90% or more of the measured values and ‘a’ and ‘d’ were the extreme values; ‘av.’ represents the mean range of basidiospore length × width. Q referred to the length/width ratio of an individual basidiospore, and Qm referred to the average Q value of all basidiospores ± sample standard deviation. All microstructure line drawings were made based on rehydrated materials.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was applied to observe the surface of basidiospores. Lamellar fragments of the dried specimens were fastened to aluminum stubs and coated with gold palladium. Then, they were observed using a field emission scanning electron microscopy (Thermo Scientific Apreo 2S HiVac, Brno, Czech Republic) with an accelerating rate of 5 kV.

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification and Sequencing

Genomic DNA samples were extracted from voucher specimens using the Sangon Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primer pairs ITS1F/ITS4 [36], LR0R/LR7 [37], EF1-983F/EF1-1967R [38] and bRPB2-6F/bRPB2-7.1R [39] were used to amplify ITS, LSU, tef1 and rpb2, respectively. PCR reactions were performed in a total volume of 25 μL containing 0.5 μL template DNA, 11 μL sterile deionized water, 0.5 μL of each primer and 12.5 μL 2× PCR mix (DreamTaqtm Green PCR Master Mix, Fermentas, MA, USA). Amplification reactions were performed in a TProfessional Standard Thermocycler (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany) under the following conditions: 95 °C for 4 min; then 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 60 s, annealing at 53 °C (ITS, LSU)/50 °C (tef1)/52 °C (rpb2) for 60 s, extension at 72 °C for 60 s and a final extension at 72 °C for 8 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed on 1% agarose gels and then sent for sequencing on an ABI Prism® 3730 Genetic Analyzer (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA) at the Beijing Genomic Institute (BGI) using the same PCR primers. The raw sequences were assembled and checked with SeqMan implemented in Lasergene v7.1 (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA). The newly generated sequences in this study were submitted to GenBank.

2.3. Phylogenetic Analyses

Sequences generated in this study and those downloaded from GenBank were combined and used for phylogenetic reconstruction. Detailed information of specimens included in this study was given in Table 1. Sequence matrices of ITS, LSU, tef1 and rpb2 were aligned separately with software MAFFT v7 using the E-INS-i strategy [40] and manually adjusted in MEGA 6 [41]. The ambiguously aligned regions and introns of the two protein-coding genes of tef1 and rpb2 were retained in the final analyses. Phylogenetic analyses were performed in PhyloSuite [42]. Maximum likelihood phylogenies were inferred using IQ-TREE [43] under the Edge-linked partition model (TPM2u+F+R4 for ITS and rpb2, TN+F+R3 for LSU, and TIM2e+G4 for tef1) for 5000 ultrafast bootstraps [44], as well as the Shimodaira–Hasegawa-like approximate likelihood-ratio test [45]. Bayesian Inference (BI) phylogenies were inferred using MrBayes 3.2.6 [46], and the best models of the multilocus datasets were searched via PartitionFinder 2 [47] for each locus, i.e., GTR+F+I+G4 for ITS and tef1, K80 + I + G for LSU, and SYM + I + G4 for rpb2. BI analysis using four chains was conducted by setting generations to 200,000 and the stoprul command with the value of stopval set to 0.01; trees were sampled every 1000 generations, the initial 25% of sampled data were discarded as burn-in and posterior probabilities (PP) were then calculated from the posterior distribution of the retained Bayesian trees. The phylogenetic trees were visualized in FigTree v1.4.23.

Table 1.

Taxa included in molecular phylogenetic analyses and their GenBank accession numbers. Accession numbers in bold indicate newly generated sequences in this study. Taxa marked with T represent type specimens.

Taxa Specimens Locality GenBank Accession Nos. References
ITS LSU tef1 rpb2
Laccaria acanthospora (T) AWW485 Tibet, China JX504102 JX504186 KU686073 KU685916 [21]
L. acanthospora HKAS45998 Tibet, China JX504161 KU685870 _ KU686069 [1]
L. affinis GMM7618 France KM067852 _ _ _ [48]
L. affinis GMM7619 France KM067853 _ _ _ [48]
L. affinis GMM7602 France KM067842 _ _ _ [48]
L. alba GMM6131 China JX504131 JX504210 KU686079 KU685930 [21]
L. alba KUN 20120807-69 China MG519542 MG519583 MG551649 MG551616 [1]
L. alba AWW438 China JX504094 JX504178 KU686072 KU685912 [1]
L. amethysteo-occidentalis AWW557 USA MT279220 MT279200 MT436061 MT431174 [49]
L. amethysteo-occidentalis AWW556 Canada JX504107 JX504191 _ KU685919 [1]
L. amethystina GMM7633 France JX504154 JX504228 _ _ [21]
L.  angustilamella GMM6171 France JX504132 _ _ [21]
L.  angustilamella HKAS58714 Tibet, China JX504168 JX504244 _ _ [21]
L.  anglica AngFr France GQ406459 _ _ _ [49]
L.  anglica ScoFr France GQ406468 _ _ _ [49]
L. araneosa (T) KNU20120912-40 Korea MG519548 MG519588 MG551654 MG551621 [50]
L.  araneosa KUN20120912-25 Korea MG519550 MG519590 MG551656 MG551623 [1]
L.  araneosa SFC20130917-21 Korea MG519549 MG519589 _ MG551622 [1]
L. aurantia (T) KUN-F78557 Yunnan, China JQ670895 _ _ _ [22]
L.  aurantia HKAS122365 Yunnan, China ON794252 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. aurantia MB-FB-001106 Yunnan, China JQ670895 _ _ _ [22]
L.  bicolor BicSer France GQ406463 _ _ _ [49]
L.  bicolor LbC United Kingdom MF958447 _ _ _ [51]
L.  bicolor AWW585 USA JX504111 _ _ _ [21]
L.  bicolor CBS:559.96 Netherlands MH862598 _ _ _ [52]
L. bullipellis (T) AWW465 Tibet, China JX504100 JX504184 _ KU685914 [21]
L. canaliculata GMM7222 Australia KU685664 KU685807 _ KU685950 [1]
L. canaliculata GMM7264 Australia KU685674 KU685817 _ KU685957 [1]
L. canaliculata GMM7267 Australia JX504137 JX504213 KU686093 KU685960 [1]
L. canaliculata GMM7251 Australia KU685669 KU685812 KU686090 KU685955 [1]
L. dallingii Corrales 543 Panama MT279238 MT279213 MT436076 MT431187 [53]
L. dallingii (T) Corrales 571 Panama MT279240 MT279214 _ _ [53]
L. diospyricola SN 10 India MK776767 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. fagacicola (T) HKAS90435 Yunnan, China MW540806 _ _ _ [2]
L.  fagacicola HKAS107731 Yunnan, China MW540807 _ _ _ [2]
L. fengkaiensis (T) HKAS106739 Guangdong, China MN585657 _ _ _ [33]
L.  fengkaiensis HKAS106741 Guangdong, China MN585658 _ _ _ [33]
L.  fengkaiensis LF 1841 China MT822919 _ _ _ [54]
L. fibrillosa GMM7508 New Zealand KU685706 KU685847 _ KU685989 [1]
L. fibrillosa GMM7562 New Zealand KU685714 KU685855 _ KU685996 [1]
L. fortunensis Corrales 74 Panama MT279246 _ _ _ [53]
L. fortunensis Corrales 75 Panama MT279247 _ _ _ [53]
L. fortunensis Corrales 25 Panama MT279245 _ _ _ [53]
L. fulvogrisea (T) KUN-F78556 Yunnan, China JQ670896 _ _ _ [22]
L.  fulvogrisea KUN-FB-101105 Yunnan, China JQ681210 _ _ _ [22]
L.  fulvogrisea MB-FB-001101 Yunnan, China JQ670896 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. galerinoides F1081213 Chile KU685634 KU685778 KU686078 KU685929 [1]
L. galerinoides F1080983 Argentina KU685632 KU685776 KU686077 KU685927 [1]
L. gomezii F1102433 Costa Rica _ MT279205 _ MT431180 [1]
L. gomezii GMM7173 Costa Rica MT279227 MT279207 MT436071 MT431182 [51]
L. griseolilacina SFC20190919-48 South Korea MT322981 MT322983 MT333269 MT333266 [23]
L. himalayensis (T) AWW484 Tibet, China JX504101 JX504185 _ KU685915 [21]
L.  himalayensis AWW445 Tibet, China JX504096 JX504180 _ _ [21]
L.  himalayensis AWW463 Tibet, China JX504098 JX504182 _ KU685913 [21]
L. indo himalayana KD 17-46 India MK575505 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. indohimalayana (T) KD 17-20 India MK584157 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. indo himalayana CAL 1754 India NR_171835 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. japonica (T) TNS-F64167 Honshu, Japan KU962988 _ _ _ [32]
L.  japonica SFC20130704-34 Korea MG519521 MG519568 MG551596 MG551598 [55]
L.  japonica SFC20130928-07 Japan KU962975 MG519565 MG551632 MG551594 [55]
L.  japonica SFC20120726-28 Japan MG519520 MG519567 MG551634 MG551597 [1]
L. laccata SMI199 Canada FJ845416 _ _ _ [56]
L. laccata L16 Mexico MF039229 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. laccata DAVFP:26723 Canada JF899561 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. laccata Sporome Mexico KY969630 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. laccata var. pallidifolia HMJAU26932 China KM246792 _ _ _ [20]
L. laccata var. pallidifolia GMM7605 France JX504146 KU685901 KU686154 KU686048 [21]
L. laccata var. pallidifolia lac 1370 USA DQ149849 _ _ _ [20]
L. lateritia GMM7531 Australia KU685709 KU685850 KU686118 KU685992 [1]
L. lateritia GMM7221 Australia KU685663 KU685806 _ KU685949 [1]
L. lateritia GMM7250 Australia KU685668 KU685811 _ KU685954 [1]
L. longipes MQ 18R253-QFB30769 Canada MN992191 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. longipes HMJAU26933 China KM246793 _ _ _ [31]
L.  macrobasidia HBAU15557 China MW871602 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L.  macrocystidia GMM7616 France KM067850 KU685863 KU686004 [48]
L.  macrocystidia GMM7612 France KM067841 KU685861 KU686122 KU686002 [48]
L.  macrocystidia GMM7626 France KM067856 KU685865 KU686125 KU686006 [48]
L.  masoniae GMM7443 Australia JX504139 JX504215 _ _ [21]
L.  masoniae GMM7240 Australia KU685667 KU685810 _ KU685953 [21]
L.  masoniae GMM7200 Australia KU685656 KU685799 KU686084 KU685941 [21]
L.  miniata  (T) GDGM76043 Guangdong, China OR689440 OR785476 _ _ This study
L.  montana C5442 Switzerland OR419936 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L.  montana M5464 Switzerland OR419935 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L.  montana TWO 319 USA DQ149862 _ _ _ [32]
L. moshuijun (T) HKAS93732 Yunnan, China KU962989 _ _ _ [32]
L.  moshuijun MB-001113 China KU962985 _ _ _ [32]
L. moshuijun HMAS 131870  China ON877154 _ _ _ [32]
L.  murina Nara_LaM90 Japan AB211271 _ _ _ [55]
L.  murina FBSR-535 Pakistan OQ881021 _ _ _ [57]
L.  murina ASIS24249 Korea MG519552 MG519592 MG551658 MG551625 [55]
L.  nanlingensis GDGM84949 Guangdong, China OR689441 OR785477 OR826274 OR835198 This study
L.  nanlingensis  (T) GDGM84954 Guangdong, China OR689442 OR785478 OR826273 OR835199 This study
L. negrimarginata (T) BAP360 Tibet, China JX504120 [21])
L. negrimarginata GMM7631 Tibet, China JX504153 JX504227 KU686130 KU686011 [21]
L. negrimarginata HMAS272239 Tibet, China ON877189 _ _ _ [30]
L.  neovinaceoavellanea  (T) GDGM52852 Jiangxi, China OR689447 OR785479 _ _ This study
L. neovinaceoavellanea GDGM53063 Jiangxi, China OR689448 OR785480 _ _ This study
L. neovinaceoavellanea GDGM89621 Yunnan, China OR689449 OR785481 _ _ This study
L.  nitrophila Corrales 467 Panama MT279233 _ _ _ [51]
L.  nitrophila Corrales 595 Panama MT279236 MT279211 MT436074 MT431186 [51]
L.  nitrophila Corrales 423 Panama MT279235 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L.  nobilis nob1469 USA DQ149854 _ _ _ [20]
L.  nobilis  nob42527 USA DQ149861 _ _ _ [20]
L.  nobilis F1091206 USA KU685636 KU685779 _ _ [1]
L.  ohiensis GMM7564 New Zealand KU685715 KU685856 _ KU685997 [1,21]
L.  ohiensis GMM7593NZ New Zealand KU685718 KU685860 KU686121 KU685994 [1]
L.  oblongospora OblFr France GQ406466 _ _ _ [49]
L.  ochropurpurea JMP0038 USA EU819479 _ _ _ [58]
L. ochropurpurea PRL3777 USA JX504169 JX504246 _ KU686024 [21]
L. ochropurpurea PRL4777 USA KU685721 KU685883 _ KU686025 [21]
L. pallidorosea (T) HKAS107730 Yunnan, China MW540808 _ _ _ [2]
L. pallidorosea HKAS53170 Yunnan, China MW540809 _ _ _ [2]
L. paraphysata PDD:80007 New Zealand KM975424 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. paraphysata PDD:95230 New Zealand KM975427 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. parva (T) SFC20120919-05 Korea MG519529 MG519573 MG551640 MG551604 [59]
L. parva SFC20121001-08 Korea MG519530 MG519574 _ _ [59]
L. parva SFC20120906-01 Korea MG519527 MG519572 MG551639 MG551602 [59]
L. populina (T) GDOR411 Italy Mn871894 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. prava (T) HKAS106742 Guangdong, China MN585660 _ _ _ [33]
L. prava HKAS106745 Guangdong, China MN585661 _ _ _ [33]
L. proxima GMM7584 Russia KU685717 KU685858 KU686120 KU685999 [1]
L. proxima GMM7596 France JX504142 JX504217 KU686151 KU686045 [1]
L. proxima GMM7631 France JX504152 JX504226 _ _ [1]
L. pseudomontana Cripps 1771 USA DQ149870 _ _ _ [20]
L. pseudomontana (T) Cripps 1625 USA DQ149871 _ _ _ [20]
L. pumila GMM7637 France JX504156 JX504229 KU686158 _ [21]
L. pumila GG125_86 Netherlands GU234161 _ _ _ [60]
L. roseoalbescens LM5042 Mexico KJ874327 KJ874330 _ _ [18]
L. roseoalbescens LM5099 Mexico KJ874328 KJ874331 _ _ [18]
L. roseoalbescens VB4678 Mexico KJ590509 KJ590510 _ _ [18]
L. roseoalbescens VB4677 Mexico KJ590508 KJ590511 _ _ [18]
L. rubroalba HKAS90766 Yunnan, China KX449359 _ _ _ [17]
L. rubroalba HKAS90751 Yunnan, China KX449360 _ _ _ [17]
L. rubroalba HMAS131833 China ON877153 _ _ _ [17]
L. rufobrunnea  (T) GDGM82878 Yunnan, China OR689443 OR785482 OR826272 OR835197 This study
L. rufobrunnea GDGM89627 Yunnan, China OR689444 OR785483 This study
L. salmonicolor (T) GMM7596tibet Tibet, China JX504143 JX504218 KU686151 KU686045 [21]
L. salmonicolor GMM7602 Tibet, China JX504145 JX504220 _ _ [21]
L. squarrosa DM63 Mexico MF669958 MF669965 _ _ [61]
L. squarrosa DM121 Mexico MF669960 MF669967 _ _ [61]
L. squarrosa DM93 Mexico MF669959 MF669966 _ _ [61]
L. stellata SYC 207 Panama KP877339 _ _ _ [62]
L. stellata SYC 109  Panama KP877340 _ _ _ [62]
L. stellata Corrales 27 Panama MT279231 MT279210 _ MT431185 [51]
L. striatula HMJAU59796 China OR468697 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. striatula 1475 PREMIX USA OQ612526 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. striatula CNV105 USA MT345281 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. tetraspora F1080957  Argentina KU685631 KU685775 _ _ [1]
L. tetraspora CT-4259 Argentina MH930294 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. torosa SFC20150902-17 France MG519561 _ _ _ [50]
L. torosa KA12-1306 France MG519562 _ _ _ [50]
L. tortilis (T) ASIS22273 Korea MG519533 _ _ _ [50]
L. tortilis GMM7635 France JX504155 KU685906 KU686156 KU686053 [21]
‘L. tortilis’ AWW545 USA JX504106 JX504190 _ KU685917
‘L. tortilis’ F1116205 USA KU685641 KU685785 _ _ [1]
L.  trichodermophora GO-2010-082  Mexico KC152152 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L.  trichodermophora HC-PNNT-099 Mexico KT875034 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L.  trullisata  PRL7587 Tibet, China JX504170 JX504247 KU686153 KU686047 [21]
L.  trullisata WCG2075 KM067894 _ _ _ [48]
L.  umbilicata GDGM82883 Yunnan,China OR689445 OR785485 OR826270 OR835194 This study
L.  umbilicata  (T) GDGM82911 Yunnan,China OR689446 OR785486 OR826268 OR835192 This study
L. versiforma (T) SFC20120926-01 Korea MG519556 MG519594 MG551660 MG551627 [50]
L.  versiforma ASIA20939 Korea MG519557 MG519595 MG551661 MG551628 [50]
L.  versiforma KUN20120924-82 China MG519559 MG519596 MG551662 MG551629 [50]
L.  violaceonigra GMM7520 New Zealand KU685707 KU685848 _ KU685990 [1]
L.  violaceonigra GMM7580  New Zealand KU685716 KU685857 _ KU685998 [1]
L.  violaceonigra GMM7533 New Zealand KU685710 KU68585 _ KU685993 [1]
L.  vinaceoavellanea SFC201200907-18 Korea MG519536 MG519578 _ MG551611 [50]
L.  vinaceoavellanea ASIS23860 Korea MG519538 _ MG551645 MG551613 [50]
L.  vinaceoavellanea SFC20120907-10 Korea MG519539 MG519580 MG551646 MG551614 [50]
L.  vinaceoavellanea TNS A2986 Korea JN942810 _ _ JN993520 Direct Submission
L.  vinaceobrunnea GO-2009-360 Mexico KC152154 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L.  vinaceobrunnea GO-2009-316 Mexico KC152155 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L.  vinaceobrunnea GO-2009-308 Mexico KC152153 _ _ _ Direct Submission
L. yunnanensis (T) KUN-F78558 Yunnan, China JQ670897 _ _ _ [22]
L. yunnanensis HMAS271371 Yunnan, China ON877187 _ _ _ [22]
L. yunnanensis HMAS264310 China KX496978 _ _ _ Direct Submission
Mythicomyces corneipes AFTOL972 Germany DQ404393 AY745707 DQ029197 DQ447929 Direct Submission
M. corneipes DAOM178138 Germany _ _ _ _ Direct Submission

3. Results

3.1. Molecular Phylogeny

The combined dataset (ITS+LSU+tef1+rpb2) used for phylogenetic analyses consisted of 378 sequences from 185 collections, including 30 sequences (10 for ITS, 10 for nrLSU, 5 for tef1 and 5 for rpb2) newly generated in the present study. The final alignment contained 2802 characters (704, 889, 614 and 595 for ITS, LSU, tef1 and rpb2, respectively). Mythicomyces corneipes (Fr.) Redhead & A.H. Sm. was selected as the outgroup based on recent studies [2,33]. The phylogeny tree derived from the ML analysis with both PP and BS support values is shown in Figure 1. Phylogenetic analyses showed that Laccaria is a well-supported monophyletic group; specimens collected from China in the current study formed five highly supported monophyletic lineages within the genus. Three new species, L. neovinaceoavellanea, L. rufobrunnea and L. umbilicata, clustered together with L. diospyricola, L. fengkaiensis, L. prave, L. vinaceoavellanea, L. violaceotincta and L. yunnanensis, and formed a well-supported subclade. Laccaria miniata showed a close relationship with L. glabripes, L. paraphysata and L. ohiensis. Two specimens named L. nanlingensis formed a monophyletic clade.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of Laccaria generated from the ITS-LSU-tef1-rpb2 dataset. Bootstrap values (ML ≥ 70%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP ≥ 0.95) are shown around branches. Sequences from type specimens are marked with (T), and the new species is indicated in bold and blue area.

3.2. Taxonomy

Laccaria miniata Ming Zhang, sp. nov.; Figure 2a,b, Figure 3a,b and Figure 4.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Fresh basidiomata of five new species of Laccaria. (a,b) L. miniata (Type, GDGM76043). (c,d) L. nanglingensis ((c). GDGM84949; (d). Type, GDGM84954). (e,f) L. neovinaceoavellanea ((e). Type, GDGM52852; (f). GDGM89621). (g,h) L. rufobrunnea ((g). Type, GDGM82787, (h). GDGM89627). (i,j) L. umbilicata ((i). Type GDGM82911, (j). GDGM82851). Bars: (a,b) = 20 mm, (cj) = 50 mm.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Basidiospores of the five new Laccaria species under SEM. (a,b) L. miniata (GDGM76043). (c) L. nanglingensis (GDGM84954). (d,e) L. neovinaceoavellanea (GDGM52852). (f) L. rufobrunnea (f. GDGM82787). (g,h) L. umbilicata (GDGM82911). Bars: (ah) = 4 μm.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Microscopic features of Laccaria miniata (GDGM76043, Holotype). (a) Basidia. (b) Baisidiospores (c) Pileipellis. Bars: (a,c) = 20 μm, (b) = 10 μm.

Fungal Name: FN571672

Diagnosis—Laccaria miniata is distinguished by its small red basidiocarps with relatively longer stipes, longer basidia usually with two sterigmata (up to 11 μm long), globose to subglobose basidiospores, and the absence of cheilocystidia and caulocystidia.

Etymology—‘miniata’ refers to the red basidiocarp.

Type—CHINA. Guangdong Province, Guangzhou City, Huadu District, Hongxiuquan Reservoir, elevation of 150 m, in a broad-leaved forest mainly dominated by Fagaceae trees, 23°27′ N, 113°12′ E, elevation of 100 m, 14 March 2019, Ming Zhang (GDGM76043), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689440, 28S = OR785476.

Basidiocarps small, omphalinoid. Pileus 10–15 mm broad, convex to applanate, hygrophanous, glabrous to subtomentose, red (9A7–11A7), with a deep red (10C8–11C8) center, gradually fading to reddish orange to yellowish red (7A7–8A7) toward margin; margin entire, translucent-striate; context pale red (9A3–11A3). Lamellae sinuate to adnate, distant, pastel red (8A4–10A4), pastel pink (11A4) to red (9A6); lamellulae attenuate. Stipe 35–60 mm long, 1.5–2 mm thick, subcylindrical, subglabrous to fibrillose, sometimes slightly longitudinally striate, red (9A7–11A7) to deep red (10C8–11C8); basal mycelium white to grayish white (1A1–1A2). Odor and taste unknown.

Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [60/3/2] 8–10.5(11) × 8–10 μm, av. 9.37 ± 0.83 × 8.80 ± 0.60, Q = 1–1.11, Qm = 1.06 ± 0.04, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, crowded; spines 0.5–1 μm long. Basidia 40–58 × 8–15 μm, clavate, hyaline, mostly two-spored, occasionally four-spored; sterigmata 6–11 μm long. Pleurocystidia and cheilocystidia not observed. Pileipellis, a cutis, composed of appressed, thin to slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm) filamentous hyphae 5–15 μm wide, colorless to slightly brownish. Lamellar trama regular, composed of thin-walled filamentous hyphae 5–12 μm wide. Stipitipellis is composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin-walled, colorless hyphae 3–15 μm wide. Caulocystidia lacking. Clamp connections present.

Habitat and distribution—Single, scattered or in groups on soil in subtropical broad-leaved forests dominated by Fagaceae (Castanopsis fissa, C. spp.) trees. Currently known to be from southern China.

Notes—Laccaria miniata is mainly characterized by its tiny pileus, relatively slender stipe (stipe length 3–5 times that of pileus diameter), and the absence of pleurocystidia and cheilocystidia. On the base of the morphological features given above, the new species can be placed either in sect. Laccata or in sect. Bisporae of Laccaria [29].

Laccaria pumila Fayod, originally reported from France, is similar to L. miniata for having small basidiocarps; however, the former differs by its red-brown to orange-brown pileus usually fading to buff, pinkish flesh lamellae, interwoven pileipellis hyphae, larger basidiospores measuring (10)11–16.5(20) × (7.8)10–14.5(16) µm, and the north temperate habitations [55]. Laccaria laccata (Scop.) Cooke differs by the relatively larger basidiocarps, broadly elliptical basidiospores (8.5–9.5 × 6.7–8 μm), and the north temperate habitations [63,64]. Laccaria longipes G.M. Muell., originally reported from North America, also has long stipes; however, L. longipes differs by its larger basidiocarp, orange-brown to buff pileus, and subglobose to broadly elliptical basidiospores (av. 7.6–7.8 × 6.8–7.2 μm in size) [63].

Phylogenetic analysis shows L. miniata is close to L. glabripes McNabb, L. ohiensis (Mont.) Singer and L. paraphysata (McNabb) J.A. Cooper. Laccaria glabripes, originally reported from New Zealand, differs from L. miniata by its flesh pink to reddish brown pileus with a darker center, more robust stipe, and shorter four-spored basidia (32–48 × 7–10.5 μm) [65]; Laccaria ohiensis, originally reported from North America, differs by its relatively larger basidiocarp (pileus up to 35–50 mm in diameter), reddish brown to dark reddish brown pileus with finely furfuraceous tomentum on surface, larger basidiospores (9.5–12.5 µm in diameter) and two-spored basidia [59,65]; L. paraphysata differs by its relatively larger basidiocarp (pileus up to 35 mm broad), reddish brown to dark reddish brown pileus, irregularly shaped and simple branched paraphyses, and the presenting of cheilocystidia [65]. In addition, L. paraphysata is currently only known to be from New Zealand and grows under native bush and scrub dominated by Leptospermum spp. [65].

Laccaria nanlingensis Ming Zhang, sp. nov.; Figure 2c,d, Figure 3c and Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Microscopic features of Laccaria nanlingensis (GDGM84954, Holotype). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia. (c) Cheilocystidia. (d) Stipitipellis and caulocystidia. (e) Pileipellis Bars: (a,c,d) = 10 μm; (b,e) = 20 μm.

Fungal Name: FN571673

Etymology—‘nanlingensis’ refers to the locality of the type species in Nanling National Nature Reserve.

Diagnosis—Laccaria nanlingensis is characterized by its relatively larger basidiocarp, orange to brownish red pileus, pale red to grayish red lamellae, and small basidiospores (6.5–7.5 × 6–7 μm).

Type—CHINA. Guangdong Province, Shaoguan City, Nanling National Nature Reserve, 24°56′ N, 113°3′ E, elevation of 1000 m, 27 March 2021, Ming Zhang (GDGM84954), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689442, 28S = OR785478, tef1 = OR826273, rpb2 = OR835199.

Basidiocarps small to medium, omphalinoid. Pileus 30–55 mm broad, convex to applanate, with a shallowly depressed center, dry or hygrophanous, glabrous, orange, reddish orange, orange-red, brownish orange to brownish red (5A6–8A6, 6C6–8C6), slightly fading to light orange to pale orange when dry, with obviously radial translucent striate, especially toward margin; margin entire, involute when young, applanate to wavy when old; context pinkish white to purplish white (13A2–14A2). Lamellae sinuate to adnate, distant, concolorous with pileus or darker to pale red to grayish red (9A4–10A4, 9C4–10C4); lamellulae attenuate. Stipe 25–70 mm long, 2–5 mm thick, cylindrical, subglabrous, occasionally slightly longitudinally striate, concolorous with pileus; basal mycelium white. Odor and taste unknown.

Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [60/3/2] 6.5–7.5 × 6–7 μm, av. 6.95 ± 0.15 × 6.37 ± 0.45, Q = 1–1.16, Qm = 1.09 ± 0.07, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, not crowded, distant; spines 0.5–1 μm long. Basidia 35–48 × 8–12 μm, clavate, hyaline, four-spored; sterigmata 6–10 μm long. Pleurocystidia lacking. Cheilocystidia 40–60 × 4–6 μm, filamentous to narrowly clavate, thin-walled, colorless and hyaline, abundant. Pileipellis a cutis with repent hyphae, thin to slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm) filamentous hyphae 5–13 μm wide, colorless to slightly brownish. Lamellar trama regular, composed of thin-walled filamentous hyphae 5–10 μm wide. Stipitipellis is composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin to slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm), colorless to yellow-brown hyphae 4–8 μm wide. Caulocystidia 50–67 × 7–9 μm, clavate, scarce, sometimes subcapitate to irregularly shaped, slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm), colorless to yellow-brown, scattered. Clamp connections present.

Habitat and distribution—Single, scattered or in groups on soil in subtropical broad-leaved forests mainly dominated by Fagaceae trees. Currently known to be from southern China.

Additional specimens examined—China. Guangdong Province, Shaoguan City, Ruyuan County, Nanling National Nature Reserve, 24°56′ N, 113°3′ E, elevation of 1000 m, 27 March 2017, Ming Zhang (GDGM84949), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689441, 28S = OR785477, tef1 = OR826274, rpb2 = OR835198.

Notes—Laccaria fagacicola Yang-Yang Cui, Qing Cai & Zhu L. Yang, L. himalayensis A.W. Wilson & G.M. Muell. and L. yunnanensis Popa, Rexer, Donges, Zhu L. Yang & G. Kost are similar to L. nanlingensis. However, L. fagacicola differs from L. nanlingensis by its brownish orange to brownish pileus, relatively larger basidiospores (7–9 × 6.5–8 μm) and basidia (45–60 × 9–12 μm) [2]. Laccaria himalayensis differs by its larger basidiospores (av. 8.1–9.0 μm) and growing in mixed-temperate alpine conifer forests with Abies, Acer, Larix, Pinus and Salix [1]. Laccaria yunnanensis differs in having larger basidiocarps, brownish to flesh-colored pileus, flesh-colored lamellae, relatively larger basidiospores (8–9 × 8–10 μm), and the presence of pleurocystidia (55–65 ×15–25 μm) [22]. In addition, L. torosa H.J. Cho & Y.W. Lim also resembles L. nanlingensis; however, L. torosa, reported from Korea, differs in having larger basidiocarps, orange-brown to brown pileus fading to pale orange buff when dry or old, and larger basidiospores (8–9×8–9.5 μm) [50].

Phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1) showed that two specimens labeled as L. nanlingensis clustered together as an independent clade in the genus Laccaria, although its relationship to other Laccaria species is unclear.

Based on the morphological features, such as the dry or hygrophanous and reddish orange to brownish red pileus, the brownish red to grayish red lamellae, globose basidiospores with Q = 1–1.16, and the four-spored basidia, L. nanlingensis can be placed in the Laccaria sect. Laccata [29].

Laccaria neovinaceoavellanea Ming Zhang & X.L. Gao, sp. nov.; Figure 2i, Figure 3d,e and Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Microscopic features of Laccaria neovinaceoavellanea (GDGM52852, Holotype). (a) Basidispores. (b) Basidia. (c) Cheilocystidia. (d) Caulocystidia. (e) Pileipellis. (f) Stipitipellis. Bars: (a,e) = 10 μm; (bd,f) = 20 μm.

Fungal Name: FN571685

Diagnosis—Laccaria neovinaceoavellanea is distinctive by its pastel pink to pale violet pileus with a depressed center, globose to subglobose basidiospores with spines up to 2 μm long, and the presence of clavate, subcapitate to irregularly shaped caulocystidia.

Etymology—‘neovinaceoavellanea’ refers to the species similar to L. vinaceoavellanea.

Type—CHINA. Jiangxi Province, Ganzhou City, Congyi County, Yangling National Forest Park, 25°37′ N, 114°19′ E, elevation of 400 m, 31 August 2016, Ming Zhang (GDGM52852), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689447, 28S = OR785479.

Basidiocarps small, omphalinoid. Pileus 15–40 mm broad, convex to applanate, with a depressed center, dry or hygrophanous, subglabrous to subtomentosus, pastel pink, rose, purplish pink to pale violet (11A3–16A3) at mass, grayish magenta to dull violet (13D3–15D3) at center, with obviously radial translucent-striate, especially toward margin; margin entire, involute when young, applanate to wavy when old; context white to pinkish white or purplish white (13A2–14A2). Lamellae sinuate to adnate, distant, concolorous with pileus or paler; lamellulae attenuate. Stipe 30–70 mm long, 2–5 mm thick, cylindrical, subglabrous to fibrillose, occasionally slightly longitudinally striate, pastel red, rose to purplish pink (8A4–14A4); basal mycelium white. Odor and taste unknown.

Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [30/2/2] 7–8 × 7–8 μm, av. = 7.6 ± 0.4 × 7.35 ± 0.42, Q = 1–1.14, Qm = 1.04 ± 0.04, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, crowded; spines 1–2 μm long, 0.8–1.5 μm wide at base. Basidia 30–50 × 10–14 μm, clavate, hyaline, four-spored; sterigmata 4–6 μm long. Pleurocystidia lacking. Cheilocystidia 25–50 × 4–8 μm, filamentous to narrowly clavate, thin-walled, colorless and hyaline, abundant. Pileipellis a cutis with repent and occasionally suberect, thin to slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm) filamentous hyphae 6–18 μm wide, colorless to slightly brownish. Lamellar trama regular, composed of thin-walled filamentous hyphae 5–10 μm wide. Stipitipellis composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin to slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm), colorless to yellow-brown hyphae 3–8 μm wide. Stipe trama composed of longitudinally arranged, infrequently branching, simple septate, thin-walled, colorless hyphae 3–8 μm wide. Caulocystidia 30–50 × 5–10 μm, clavate, sometimes subcapitate to irregularly shaped, slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm), colorless to yellow-brown, scattered. Clamp connections present.

Habitat and distribution—Single, scattered or in groups on soil in subtropical broad-leaved forests mainly dominated by Fagaceae. Currently known to be from southwestern and southern China.

Additional specimens examined—China. Jiangxi Province, Ganzhou City, Congyi County, Yangling National Forest Park, 25°37′ N, 114°19′ E, elevation of 400 m, 2 September 2016, Ming Zhang (GDGM53063), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689448, 28S = OR785480; Yunnan Province, Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Lufeng County, Guangtong Town, elevation of 2200 m, 29 August 2022, Xue-lian Gao 16 (GDGM89621), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689449, 28S = OR785481.

Notes—Laccaria amethystina Cooke and L. vinaceoavellanea Hongo are morphologically similar to L. neovinaceoavellanea. Laccaria amethystina is different by an initially purple pileus gradually fading to buff or brownish, dark purple lamellae, finely to coarsely hairy or scaly stipe concolorous with pileus, and relatively larger basidiospores (7–10 μm in diameter) ornamented with longer spines (1.5–3 μm long) [8,28,66,67]. Laccaria vinaceoavellanea differs by a larger basidiocarp (pileus up to 60 mm broad), grayish buff, brownish vinaceous to vinaceous-buff pileus with furfuraceous at the margin, and relatively larger basidiospores (7.4–9.2 × 7.4–9.2 µm) [8,68].

Phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1) showed that L. neovinaceoavellanea is closely related to L. vinaceoavellanea, L. violaceotincta K.P.D. Latha, K.N.A. Raj & Manim. and L. yunnanensis. However, L. violaceotincta, originally reported from India, differs by its strongly hygrophanous and glabrous pileus, reddish gray or violet grays stipe covered with fine fibrils, and the presence of both two- and four-spored basidia [59]. Laccaria yunnanensis differs by its brownish to flesh-colored basidiocarp, flesh-colored lamellae, and larger basidiospores measuring (7.5)8–9 × (7.5)8–10 μm [22].

Based on the morphological features, such as the purplish pink to pale violet basidiocarps, globose basidiospores with Q = 1–1.14, four-spored basidia, and the colorless to slightly brownish pileipellis hyphae, L. neovinaceoavellanea can be placed in the Laccaria sect. Violaceae [29].

Laccaria rufobrunnea Ming Zhang & X.L. Gao, sp. nov.; Figure 2e,f, Figure 3f and Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Microscopic features of Laccaria rufobrunnea (GDGM82878, Holotype). (a) Basidiospores. (b) Basidia. (c) Cheilocystidia; (d) Pileipellis. Bars: (a,c) = 10 μm; (b,d) = 20 μm.

Fungal Name: FN571674

Diagnosis—Laccaria rufobrunnea is distinctive in the genus Laccaria by its brownish orange to brownish red pileus, pastel red to purplish pink lamellae, white to pinkish white stipe, and the absence of caulocystidia.

Etymology—‘rufobrunnea’ refers to the brownish-red pileus color.

Type: China. Yunnan Province, Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Nanhua County, 25°15′N, 101°16′ E, elevation of 1900 m, 26 August 2020, Ming Zhang (GDGM82878), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689443, 28S = OR785482, tef1 = OR826272, rpb2 = OR835197.

Basidiocarps small, omphalinoid. Pileus 12–35 mm broad, convex to subapplanate, hygrophanous, glabrous, brownish orange to brownish red (6C7–9C7), with a darker center, usually fading to brownish yellow (5C7) in dry condition; margin entire, involute to incurved when young, incurved to decurved when old, obscurely translucent-striate; context brownish gray (5C2–8C2). Lamellae sinuate to adnate, distant, pastel red, pink to purplish pink (10A4–14A4), usually changing pinkish white to purplish white in dry condition or old (10A2–14A2); lamellulae attenuate. Stipe 20–40 mm long, 3–5 mm thick, cylindrical, subglabrous, occasionally slightly longitudinally striate, white to pinkish white (7A2–10A2); basal mycelium white. Odor and taste unknown.

Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [60/3/2] 8–9 × 7–8 μm, av. 8.15 ± 0.23 × 7.57 ± 0.5, Q = 1–1.14, Qm = 1.08 ± 0.06, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, not crowded, subdistant; spines 1–2 μm long. Basidia 40–54 × 10–15 μm, clavate, hyaline, four-spored; sterigmata 5–7 μm long. Pleurocystidia lacking. Cheilocystidia 35–50 × 3–7 μm, filamentous to narrowly clavate, thin-walled, colorless and hyaline, abundant. Pileipellis a cutis with repent hyphae, thin to slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm) filamentous hyphae 5–12 μm wide, colorless to slightly brownish. Lamellar trama regular, composed of filamentous hyphae 3–6 μm wide. Stipitipellis composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin to slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm), colorless to yellow-brown hyphae 3–9 μm wide. Stipe trama composed of longitudinally arranged, infrequently branching, simple septate, thin-walled, colorless hyphae 3–9 μm wide. Caulocystidia lacking. Clamp connections present.

Habitat and distribution—Single, scattered or in groups on soil in subtropical mixed forests mainly dominated by Fagaceae trees (such as Quercus yunnanensis, Q. variabilis, Castanopsis hystrix, Castanopsis spp.) and pine trees (such as Pinus khasys, Pinus yunnanensis). Currently known to be from southwestern China.

Additional specimen examined—China. Yunnan Province, Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Lufeng County, Guangtong Town, elevation of 2200 m, 29 August 2022, Xue-lian Gao 26 (GDGM89627), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689444, 28S = OR785483.

Notes—Laccaria rufobrunnea is characterized by its brownish orange to brownish red pileus, pastel red to purplish pink lamellae, white to pinkish white stipe, and the absence of caulocystidia. On the basis of the morphological features described above, L. rufobrunnea can be placed in Laccaria sect. Violaceae [29].

Phylogenetic analysis supported L. rufobrunnea as a distinct lineage in Laccaria, and close to L. prava Fang Li and L. umbilicata Ming Zhang. However, L. prava differs by its larger basidiocarp (pileus up to 7.5 cm broad), reddish white to pastel red pileus with strongly striate or rugulose-sulcate, reddish white to grayish red lamellae, longer stipe and smaller basidiospores measuring 6.5–7.5 × 7–8 μm [33]; L. umbilicata differs by its pale orange to light orange pileus, orange white to pinkish white lamellae without purple tinge, broader basidiospores (8–10 μm in diameter) and the present of caulocystidia (present study).

Laccaria umbilicata Ming Zhang, sp. nov.; Figure 2g,h, Figure 3g,h and Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Microscopic features of Laccaria umbilicata (GDGM82911, Holotype). (a) Basidia. (b) Cheilocystidia. (c) Basidiospores. (d) Caulocystidia. (e) Stipitipellis and caulocystidia. (f) Pileipellis Bars: (a,b,d) = 20 μm; (c,e,f) = 10 μm.

Fungal Name: FN 571682

Diagnosis—Laccaria umbilicata is characterized by a pale orange to light orange colored pileus, white to orange-white stipe, globose to subglobose basidiospores (7)8–10 × (7)8–10 μm, and the absence of pleurocystidia.

Etymology—‘umbilicata’ refers to the umbilicate pileus.

Type—China. Yunnan Province, Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Nanhua County, 25°15′ N, 101°16′ E, elevation of 1990 m, 26 August 2020, Ming Zhang (GDGM82911), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689446, 28S = OR785486, tef1 = OR826268, rpb2 = OR835192.

Basidiocarps small, omphalinoid. Pileus 10–28 mm broad, convex to applanate, a depressed center, dry or hygrophanous, glabrous, pale yellow, pale orange to light orange (4A3–6A3, 4A5–6A5), slightly changing light brown to brown (5D7–6D7) when in dry condition, especially toward margin; margin entire, involute when young, applanate when old, with obscurely translucent-striate; context white to orange white (5A1–5A2). Lamellae sinuate to adnate, distant, orange-white, to pinkish white (5A2–7A2), sometimes pale orange to pastel red in dry conditions (5A3–7A3); lamellulae attenuate. Stipe 20–40 mm long, 2–3 mm thick, cylindrical, subglabrous, occasionally slightly longitudinally striate, white, yellowish white to orange-white (4A2–5A2); basal mycelium white. Odor and taste unknown.

Basidiospores (excluding ornamentation) [60/3/2] (7)8–10 × (7)8–10 μm, av. 9.03 ± 0.75 × 8.67 ± 0.82, Q = 1–1.125, Qm = 1.04 ± 0.06, globose to subglobose, hyaline, echinulate, not crowded, subdistant; spines 1.5–3 μm long, up to 2 μm wide at base. Basidia 40–45 × 10–14 μm, clavate, hyaline, four-spored; sterigmata 6–10 μm long. Pleurocystidia lacking. Cheilocystidia 30–47 × 3–8 μm, filamentous to narrowly clavate, thin-walled, colorless and hyaline, abundant. Lamellar trama subregular, composed of thin-walled filamentous hyphae 3–6 μm wide. Pileipellis a cutis with repent and occasionally suberect, thin to slightly thick-walled (ca. 0.5–1 μm) filamentous hyphae 3–18 μm wide, colorless to slightly brownish. Subhymenium composed of filamentous hyphae 3–10 μm wide. Stipitipellis composed of appressed, parallel, simply septate, thin to slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm), colorless to yellow-brown hyphae 3–8 μm wide. Stipe trama composed of longitudinally arranged, infrequently branching, simple septate, thin-walled colorless hyphae 3–8 μm wide. Caulocystidia 28–38 × 4–6 μm, clavate, sometimes subcapitate, slightly thick-walled (0.5 μm), colorless to yellow-brown, scattered. Clamp connections present.

Habitat and distribution—Single, scattered or in groups on soil in subtropical mixed forests mainly dominated by Pinus yunnanensis Franchet, mixed with a small number of Fagaceae trees. Currently, it is only known to be from southwestern China.

Additional specimens examined—China. Yunnan Province, Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Nanhua County, 25°15′ N, 101°16′ E, elevation of 2000 m, 26 August 2020, Ming Zhang (GDGM82883), GenBank accession nos.: ITS = OR689445, 28S = OR785485, tef1 = OR826270, rpb2 = OR835194; same locality and data (GDGM82851), GenBank accession nos.: 28S = OR785484, tef1 = OR826271, rpb2 = OR835195.

Notes—Laccaria umbilicata can be easily distinguished from other Laccaria species by its pale orange to light orange pileus with a depressed center, orange-white to pinkish white lamellae, white to orange-white stipe, and the absence of pleurocystidia. Based on the morphological features described above, the new species can be placed in the Laccaria sect. Laccata [29].

Laccaria alba Zhu L. Yang & Lan Wang is morphologically similar to L. umbilicata; however, L. alba differs by its white to whitish basidiocarp, pinkish lamellae and smaller caulocystidia measuring 10–15 × 4–6 µm [30].

Phylogenetically, three specimens named L. umbilicata formed a distinct lineage in Laccaria, and sister to L. prava; however, L. prava can be easily distinguished by its larger basidiocarps (pileus up to 7.5 cm broad) and smaller basidiospores (6.5–7.5 × 7–8 μm) [33]. The two species together with L. diospyricola, L. fengkaiensis, L. neovinaceoavellanea, L. rufobrunnea, L. violaceotincta, L. vinaceoavellanea and L. yunnanensis formed a well-supported Asian distribution subclade (BS/BPP=100%/1), among which, L. diospyricola and L. violaceotincta originally reported from southwestern India, L. vinaceoavellanea reported from Japan, and the others from China.

4. Discussion

Laccaria is a monophyletic group in the family Hydnangiaceae [2,23,69]. Five species-level lineages representing five new species from China were uncovered in the Laccaria clade.

Previous studies based on morphological characteristics divided Laccaria into several different infrageneric classifications [14,29,70,71]. For example, Bon [70] and Ballero and Contu [71] divided the genus Laccaria into three sections (sect. Maritimae, sect. Amethystinae and sect. Laccata), and the section Laccata was further divided into several subgroups. Singer [14] recognized five stirps (stirp Trullissata, stirp Amethystina, stirp Laccata, stirp Galerinoides, and stirp Purpureobadia) in Laccaria. However, Pázmány [48] established two subgenera (subg. Maritimae and subg. Laccata ‘as Laccaria’) in the genus Laccaria, and the subg. Laccata was further divided into five sections (sect. Bisporae, sect. Laccata, sect. Obscurae, sect. Purpureobadia and sect. Violaceae). However, those systematic arrangements were often unstable, unnatural and contradictory, and were not supported by phylogenetic studies based on DNA sequences. Thus, the infrasubgeneric classification of Laccaria is still unclear, and more studies are needed to improve it.

Because the species in Laccaria are very similar in morphology, and the characters of some species change greatly in different growth stages and humidity conditions, there can be difficulties in terms of species identification. The basidiospore dimensions play a crucial role in species identification in most macrofungi groups, but in Laccaria, this characteristic may be confusing because some species share similar size and shape basidiospores. For example, the five new species described above all share with globose to subglobose basidiospores with a Q-value between 1 to 1.1 and the size of basidiospores between 7–10 μm in diameter, except L. nanlingensis. However, the length and density of spines on the spore surface can be a useful distinguishing feature; for example, L. acanthospora, L. alba and L. angustilamella have longer spines that can reach up to 5–6 μm long, while L. miniata and L. prava have shorter spines that are less than 1 μm long (see Table 2); L. miniata, L. neovinaceoavellanea and L. umbilicata have relatively more crowded spines than L. nanlingensis, and L. rufobrunnea (see Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8). In the description of the above five species, the words ‘crowded’, ‘subdistant’, and ‘distant’ were used to distinguish the different densities of spines on basidiospores surfaces.

Table 2.

A morphological comparison of species in Laccaria described from China.

Species Habit Pileus Diameter Pileus Color Lamellae Color Spores Size References
L. acanthospora On sandy banks in mixed temperate alpine forest. Distributed in Tibet. 4–15 mm Orange Light orange 7–10 × 7–10 µm (av. 8.3–8.4 × 8.9–9.2 µm); spines 2–6 µm long [21]
L. alba In mixed forests with Abies, Betula, Fraxinus, Picea, Pinus, Quercus, Tilia and Ulmus. Distributed in Yunnan. 7–32 mm Reddish brown to orange, fading to buff Pink-salmon 7–10 × 7–11 µm (av. 8.5 × 8.6 µm); spines 1–5 (–6) µm [21]
L.  angustilamella In forests dominated by Quercus and Lithocarpus. Distributed in Yunnan. 20–30 mm Pinkish flesh-colored, slightly darker on radial striations, fading to buff with age or on drying Pinkish (8)8.5–11.5(12) × (7.5)8–11 µm (av. 9.2 ± 0.8 × 8.6 ± 0.8 µm); spines (2.0) 2.5–5 µm long [30]
L.  anthracina In mixed forest, near Pinus wallichiana. Distributed in Tibet. 25–65 mm Dark grayish brown, dark brownish gray to brownish black, fading to grayish brow after drying Pinkish brown (6.5)7–9.5(11) × (6.5)7–9(10.5) μm; spines 1.5–2.5 μm long [34]
L.  aurantia In mixed broad-leaved forests dominated by Quercus and Lithocarpus. Distributed in Yunnan. 35–40 mm Vividly orange Orange (8)9–10 (11) × (7) 8–10 μm; spines (0.75) 1–1.5 (1.75) μm [22]
L.  bullipellis In mixed temperate alpine conifer forest with Abies, Picea, Pinus, Rhododendron, Sorbus and Gamblea. Distributed in Tibet. 22 mm Brown to orange-brown Brown to orange-brown 6–9 × 6–10 µm (av. 8.3 µm); spines 1–2 µm long [21]
L.  fagacicola In subtropical broad-leaved forests with trees of Fagaceae. Distributed in Yunnan. 20–45 mm Brownish orange to brownish Brownish orange (6.5)7–9(10) × 6.5–8(9) μm, (av. 7.7 ± 0.6 × 7.4 ± 0.5); spines 1–2(2.5) μm long [2]
L. fengkaiensis In broad-leaved forests dominated by Fagaceae, such as Lithocarpus haipinii, L. litseifolius, L. glaucus, L. uvariifolius, Castanopsis fissa, and C. faberi. Distributed in Guangdong. 50–90 mm Orange-white, pale orange when young, light orange to pale red, pastel red with age Pastel red to grayish red 5.2–6.3 × 5.1–6.3 μm; spines 0.5–1.2 μm long [33]
L.  fulvogrisea In mixed broad-leaved forests with Quercus, Eucalyptus, Lithocarpus and Ficus. Distributed in Yunnan. <30 mm Gray with a violet to reddish brown tinge Initially whitish, grayish to brownish with age (7.5) 8–10 × 8–11 (7.5) μm; spines (1.5) 1.7–2.5 μm long [22]
L. himalayensis In mixed temperate alpine conifer forest with Abies, Acer, Larix, Pinus and Salix. Distributed in Tibet. 6–34 mm Brown at disk, orange-pink toward the margin Orange-pink 6.5–10 µm (av. 8.1–9 µm); spines (0.5–) 1–3 µm [21]
L.  miniata In subtropical mixed forests with trees of Fagaceae (Castanopsis fissa, C. spp.) and Pinaceae (Pinus massoniana). Distributed in Guangdong. 10–15 mm Red at mass, with a deep red center, fading to reddish orange to yellowish red toward the margin Pastel red, pastel pink to red 8–10.5(11) × 8–10 μm, (av. 9.37 ± 0.83 × 8.8 ± 0.6); spines 0.5–1 μm long Present study
L.  moshuijun In subtropical mixed forests with Piuns yunnanensis, Cunninghamia lanceolata and other broad-leaved trees. Distributed in Guizhou. Up to 30 mm Violet to bluish with a brown tinge at the center Deep violet (7.5)8–9 × (8)9–10 μm; spines 1-1.5 μm [32]
L.  nanlingensis In subtropical, broad-leaved forests mainly dominated by Fagaceae trees. Distributed in Guangdong. 30–55 mm Orange, reddish orange, orange-red, brownish orange to brownish red, fading to light orange to pale orange when dry Concolorous with pileus or darker to pale red to grayish red 6.5–7.5 × 6–7 μm, av. 6.95 ± 0.15 × 6.37 ± 0.45; spines 0.5–1 μm long. Present study
L.  negrimarginata In mixed temperate alpine conifer forest with Abies, Acer, Larix, Pinus, Quercus and Salix. Distributed in Tibet. 5–15 mm Orange-brown fading to buff; squamules dark blackish brown to dark brown. Pale pink to pinkish
Gray
7–10 × 6–10 µm
(av. 7.8–9 × 7.4–8.9 µm); spines up to 2 µm
[21]
L.  pallidorosea In subtropical broad-leaved forests with trees of Fagaceae. Distributed in Yunnan. 10–25 mm Brownish to pinkish at center, becoming cream to white towards margin White to pinkish (6)7–9(10) × (6)6.5–8.5(9) μm, (av. 8 ± 0.7 × 7.75 ± 0.6); spines 1.5–2 (3) μm long [2]
L.  prava In broad-leaved forests dominated by Fagaceae, such as Lithocarpus glaber, L. corneus, Cyclobalanopsis pachyloma, Castanopsis faberi and C. fissa. Distributed in Guangdong. 30–75 mm Pastel red, pale red to reddish white, even to white with age or on drying. Reddish white to grayish red 6.5–7.5 × 7–8 μm; spines 0.5–1 μm long [33]
L.  rubroalba In a tropical forest dominated by Fagaceae and other broad-leaf trees. Distributed in Yunnan. 22–40 mm Reddish white when moist or young, becoming white to paler when dry Flesh-colored (5) 6–9 (10) × 5–7 (8) μm; spines 1.2–2.7 μm long [17]
L.  rufobrunnea In subtropical mixed forests mainly dominated by Fagaceae trees and pine trees. Distributed in Yunnan. 12–35 mm Brownish orange to brownish red, usually fading to brownish yellow in dry condition Pastel red, pink to purplish pink, usually changing pinkish white to purplish white in dry condition 8–9 × 7–8 μm, av. 8.15 ± 0.23 × 7.57 ±0.5; spines 1–2 μm long Present study
L.  salmonicolor In mixed temperate alpine forests with Betula, Larix and Picea. Distributed in Tibet. 10–35 mm Reddish brown, to pale brown-buff Pinkish salmon 7.5–10 µm (av. 8.5 µm); spines 1–3 µm long [21]
L.  umbilicata In subtropical mixed forests mainly dominated by Pinus yunnanensis, mixed with a small number of Fagaceae trees. Distributed in Yunnan. 10–28 mm Pale yellow, pale orange to light orange, changing light brown to brown when in dry condition Orange-white, to pinkish white, sometimes pale orange to pastel red in dry conditions (7)8–10 × (7)8–10 μm, av. 9.03 ± 0.75 × 8.67 ± 0.82; spines 1.5–2 (2.5) μm long Present study
L. neovinaceoavellanea In subtropical broad-leaved forests dominated by Fagaceae. Distributed in Jiangxi. 15–40 mm Pastel pink, rose, purplish pink to pale violet at mass, grayish magenta to dull violet at center Concolorous with pileus or paler 7–8 × 7–8 μm, av. 7.6 ± 0.4 × 7.35 ± 0.42; spines 1–2 μm long Present study
L.  yunnanensis In subtropical forests. Distributed in Yunnan. 60–100 mm Brownish to flesh-colored Flesh-colored (7.5)8–9 × (7.5)8–10 μm; spines 1–1.5 μm long [22]

In addition, basidia size and whether they are two- or four-spored can be useful distinguishing features. Most species of Laccaria have four-spored basidia, while L. echinospora, L. fraterna and L. nigra have two-spored basidia, L. aurantia, and the new species L. miniata have both two- and four-spored basidia, which are infrequent in Laccaria.

Additionally, ecological information such as host plant species and habitat are also important and can provide useful clues for species identification. Laccaria miniata and L. nanlingensis collected from subtropical broad-leaved forests of southern China and could be associated with trees of Fagaceae; L. rufobrunnea and L. umbilicata distributed in subtropical mixed forests (which mainly dominated by Fagaceae trees and pine trees) of southwest China; and L. neovinaceoavellanea can naturally distributed in subtropical broad-leaved forests of southern and southwestern China, and can form symbiotic relationship with Fagaceae trees. On the basis of our study, the main morphological characters and ecological information of each species in Laccaria described from China are summarized in Table 2.

Although many species of Laccaria have been reported in China, most species are mainly reported from southwestern regions, and the species recognition of Laccaria in China is still in its infancy, especially in tropical and subtropical areas. In the past, many Chinese samples of Laccaria were inaccurately labeled as L. laccata, L. bicolor, L. amethystea and L. vinaceoavellanea [72,73,74,75]. Phylogenetic studies have made some species well-understood in China, and the discovery of new species in Laccaria is rapidly increasing [2,17,21,22,31,32,33,34,50]. However, the distribution of L. amethystea, L. bicolor and L. laccata in China still needs to be investigated. A broader taxon sampling coupled with both molecular and morphological data is needed to fully understand the species diversity of Laccaria in China.

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to Li-Qiang Wu and Xi-Shen Liang for their help during field collections. Thanks are given to Xue-Jiao You for her help with the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of basidiospores.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Z.; methodology, M.Z.; performing the experiment, M.Z.; formal analysis, M.Z.; validation, M.Z., X.-L.G., L.-Q.M. and W.-Q.D.; resources, M.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z.; writing—review and editing, M.Z., X.-L.G. and L.-Q.M.; visualization, M.Z.; supervision, M.Z.; project administration, M.Z.; funding acquisition, M.Z. and W.-Q.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, and https://nmdc.cn/fungalnames/. (accessed on 1 November 2023).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 32070020, 31970024), the Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program (Grant No.2022FY100500), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Forestry Bureau (LC-2021124), and the Chuxiong State Financial Market Supervision and Management special fund project (Chu Caixing [2020] 91-2130106).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Wilson A.W., Hosaka K., Mueller G. Evolution of ectomycorrhizas as a driver of diversification and biogeographic patterns in the model mycorrhizal mushroom genus Laccaria. New Phytol. 2017;213:1862–1873. doi: 10.1111/nph.14270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cui Y.Y., Cai Q., Li J., Yang Z.L. Two new Laccaria species from China based on molecular and morphological evidence. Mycol. Pro. 2021;20:567–576. doi: 10.1007/s11557-021-01698-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Singer R., Moser M. Forest Mycology and forest communities in South America. Mycopathol. Mycol. Appl. 1965;26:129–191. doi: 10.1007/BF02049773. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Watling R. Relationships between the Development of Higher Plants and Fungal Communities. University of South Florida; Tampa, FL, USA: 1977. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Danielson R.M. Ectomycorrhizal associations in jack pine stands in northeastern Alberta. Can. J. Bot. 1984;62:932–939. doi: 10.1139/b84-132. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dighton J., Mason P.A. Mycorrhizal dynamics during forest tree development. In: Moore D., Casselton L.A., Wood D.A., Frankland J.C., editors. Developmental Biology of Higher Fungi. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 1985. pp. 117–139. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dighton J., Poskitt J.M., Howard D.M. Changes in occurrence of basidiomycete fruit bodies during forest stand development with specific reference to mycorrhizal species. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1986;87:163–171. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1536(86)80017-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mueller G.M. Systematics of Laccaria (Agaricales) in the continental United States and Canada, with discussions on extralimital taxa and descriptions of extant types. Fieldiana Bot. 1992;30:1–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kropp B.R., Mueller G.M. Laccaria. In: Cairney J.W.G., Chambers S.M., editors. Ectomycorrhizal Fungi: Key Genera in Profile. Springer Press; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 1999. pp. 65–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kjøller R. Disproportionate abundance between ectomycorrhizal root tips and their associated mycelia. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2006;58:214–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00166.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Martin F., Aerts A., Ahrén D., Brun A., Danchin E.G.J., Duchaussoy F., Gibon J., Kohler A., Lindquist E., Pereda V., et al. The genome of Laccaria bicolor provides insights into mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nature. 2008;452:88–92. doi: 10.1038/nature06556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wu F., Zhou L.W., Yang Z.L., Bau T., Li T.H., Dai Y.C. Resource diversity of Chinese macrofungi: Edible, medicinal and poisonous species. Fungal Divers. 2019;98:1–76. doi: 10.1007/s13225-019-00432-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.He X.L., Peng W.H., Wang D. An Illustration of Important Wild Edible Fungi in Sichuan. Science Press; Beijing, China: 2021. pp. 1–206. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Singer R. The Agaricales in Modern Taxonomy. Koeltz Scientific Books; Koenigstein, Germany: 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vellinga E.C. Some species of Laccaria from India. Sydowia. 1986;39:224–229. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vellinga E.C. Tribus Laccarieae (Jülich) Bas. In: Bas C., Kuyper T.W., Noordeloos M.E., Vellinga E.C., editors. Flora Agaricina Neerlandica 3. Balkema; Rotterdam, The Netherlands: 1995. pp. 96–103. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Luo X., Ye L., Chen J., Karunarathna S.C., Xu J.C., Hyde K.D., Mortimer P.E. Laccaria rubroalba sp. nov. (Hydnangiaceae, Agaricales) from Southwestern China. Phytotaxa. 2016;284:041–050. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.284.1.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Popa F., Jimenéz S.Y.C., Weisenborn J., Donges K., Rexer K.H., Piepenbring M. A new Laccaria species from cloud forest of Fortuna, Panama. Mycol. Prog. 2016;15:19. doi: 10.1007/s11557-015-1139-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mueller G.M., Vellinga E.C. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on Laccaria B. & Br.: Laccaria amethystea, L. fraterna, L. laccata, L. pumila, and their synonyms. Persoonia. 1986;13:27–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Osmundson T.W., Cripps C.L., Mueller G.M. Morphological and molecular systematics of Rocky Mountain alpine Laccaria. Mycologia. 2005;97:949–972. doi: 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wilson A.W., Hosaka K., Perry B.A., Mueller G.M. Laccaria (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota) from Tibet (Xizang Autonomous Region, China) Mycoscience. 2013;54:406–419. doi: 10.1016/j.myc.2013.01.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Popa F., Rexer K.H., Donges K., Yang Z.L., Kost G. Three new Laccaria species from Southwest China (Yunnan) Mycol. Prog. 2014;13:1105–1117. doi: 10.1007/s11557-014-0998-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cho H.J., Lee H., Park M.S., Park K.H., Park J.H., Cho Y., Kim C., Lim Y.W. Two new species of Laccaria (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) from Korea. Mycobiology. 2020;48:1786961. doi: 10.1080/12298093.2020.1786961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Singer R. Notes sur le genre Laccaria. Bull. Trimest. Société Mycol. Fr. 1967;83:104–123. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Besson M., Kühner R. Ultrastructure de la paroi sporique des Laccaria Berk. et Br. (Agaricales) C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 1971;272:1078–1081. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lahaie D.G. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Toronto; Toronto, ON, Canada: 1981. The Genus Laccaria in the Boreal Forest of Eastern Canada. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mueller G.M., Sundberg W.J. A floristic study of Laccaria (Agaricales) in southern Illinois. Nova Hedwig. 1981;34:577–597. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mueller G.M. New North American species of Laccaria (Agaricales) Mycotaxon. 1984;20:101–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pázmány D. Zur Systematik der Gattung Laccaria Bk. et Br. Z. Mykol. 1994;60:5–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang L., Yang Z.L., Liu J.H. Two new species of Laccaria (Basidiomycetes) from China. Nova Hedwig. 2004;79:511–517. doi: 10.1127/0029-5035/2004/0079-0511. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mu L., Bau T. Three new records of Laccaria from Greater Khingan Mountains of Inner Mongolia in China. Mycosystema. 2016;35:355–359. doi: 10.13346/j.mycosystema.140271. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Vincenot L., Popa F., Laso F., Donges K., Rexer K.H., Kost G., Yang Z.L., Nara K., Selosse M.A. Out of Asia: Biogeography of fungal populations reveals Asian origin of diversification of the Laccaria amethystina complex, and two new species of violet Laccaria. Fungal Biol. 2017;121:939–955. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2017.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Li F. Two new species of Laccaria from South China, with a note on Hodophilus glaberipes. Mycol. Prog. 2020;19:525–539. doi: 10.1007/s11557-020-01573-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang K., Liu D.M., Li G.J., Liu T.Z., Xie M.L., Du Z., Wei T.Z. Taxonomy of Laccaria in China Based on the Specimens Collected in the HMAS. J. Fungal Res. 2023;20:271–284. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kornerup A., Wanscher J.H. Methuen Handbook of Colour. Eyre Methuen; London, UK: 1978. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.White T.J., Bruns T.D., Lee S.B., Taylor J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis M.A., Gelfand D.H., Sninsky J.J., White T.J., editors. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press; New York, NY, USA: 1990. pp. 315–322. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vilgalys R., Hester M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990;172:4238–4246. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rehner S.A., Buckley E.A. Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-a sequences: Evidence for cryptic diver sification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia. 2005;97:84–98. doi: 10.3852/mycologia.97.1.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Matheny P.B. Improving phylogenetic inference of mushrooms with RPB1 and RPB2 nucleotide sequences (Inocybe, Agaricales) Mol. Phylogenet Evol. 2005;35:1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Katoh K., Kuma K.I., Toh H., Miyata T. MAFFT version5: Improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:511–518. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011;28:2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhang D., Gao F.L., Li W.X., Jakovlić I., Zou H., Zhang J., Wang G.T. PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020;20:348–355. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nguyen L.T., Schmidt H.A., von Haeseler A., Minh B.Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015;32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Minh B.Q., Nguyen M.A., von Haeseler A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013;30:1188–1195. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Guindon S., Dufayard J.F., Lefort V., Anisimova M., Hordijk W., Gascuel O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010;59:307–321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Effificient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012;61:539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lanfear R., Frandsen P.B., Wright A.M., Senfeld T., Calcott B. PartitionFinder 2: New methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017;34:772–773. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hofstetter V., Buyck B., Eyssartier G., Schnee S., Gindro K. The unbearable lightness of sequenced-based identification. Fungal Diver. 2019;96:243–284. doi: 10.1007/s13225-019-00428-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hazard C., Kruitbos L., Davidson H., Mbow F.T., Taylor A.F.S., Johnson D. Strain Identity of the Ectomycorrhizal Fungus Laccaria bicolor Is More Important than Richness in Regulating Plant and Fungal Performance under Nutrient Rich Conditions. Front. Microbiol. 2017;26:1874. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cho H.J., Park M.S., Lee H., Oh S.Y., Wilson A.W., Mueller G.M., Lim Y.W. A systematic revision of the ectomycorrhizal genus Laccaria from Korea. Mycologia. 2018;110:948–961. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2018.1507542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Corrales A., Wilson A.W., Mueller G.M., Ovrebo C. Novel Laccaria Species from Juglandaceae Forest in Panama With Notes on Their Ecology. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:1597. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Vu D., Groenewald M., de Vries M., Gehrmann T., Stielow B., Eberhardt U., Al-Hatmi A., Groenewald J.Z., Cardinali G., Houbraken J., et al. Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation. Stud Mycol. 2019;92:135–154. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2018.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Teasdale S.E., Beulke A.K., Guy P.L., Orlovich D.A. Environmental barcoding of the ectomycorrhizal fungal genus Cortinarius. Fungal Diver. 2013;58:299–310. doi: 10.1007/s13225-012-0218-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kranabetter J.M., Friesen J., Gamiet S., Kroeger P. Epigeous fruiting bodies of ectomycorrhizal fungi as indicators of soil fertility and associated nitrogen status of boreal forests. Mycorrhiza. 2009;19:535–548. doi: 10.1007/s00572-009-0255-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kuo M. Laccaria pumila. 2010. [(accessed on 20 October 2023)]. Available online: http://www.mushroomexpert.com/laccaria_pumila.html.
  • 56.Baird R., Stokes C.E., Frampton J., Smith B., Watson C., Pilhrim C., Scruggs M. Diversity and density of the EM fungal community present in high elevation Fraser fir forests of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. N. Am. Fungi. 2014;9:1–21. doi: 10.2509/naf2014.009.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Palmer J.M., Lindner D.L., Volk T.J. Ectomycorrhizal characterization of an American chestnut (Castanea dentata)-dominated community in Western Wisconsin. Mycorrhiza. 2008;19:27–36. doi: 10.1007/s00572-008-0200-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Geml J., Timling I., Robinson C.H., Lennon N., Nusbaum H.C., Brochmann C., Noordeloos M.E., Taylor D.L. An arctic community of symbiotic fungi assembled by long-distance dispersers: Phylogenetic diversity of ectomycorrhizal basidiomycetes in Svalbard based on soil and sporocarp DNA. J. Biogeogr. 2012;39:74–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02588.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Montagne J.P.F.C. In: Sylloge Generum Specierumque Cryptogamarum, quas in Variis Operibus Descriptas Iconibusque Illustratas, nunc ad Diagnosim Reductas, Nonnullasque novas Interjectas. Parisiis J.-B., editor. 1856. [(accessed on 25 January 2008)]. pp. 1–498. Baillire, France. Available online: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/5403. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ramos A., Bandala V.M., Montoya L. A new species and a new record of Laccaria (Fungi, Basidiomycota) found in a relict forest of the endangered Fagus grandifolia var. mexicana. MycoKeys. 2017;27:77–94. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.27.21326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lee W.D., Lee H., Fong J.J., Oh S.Y., Park M.S., Quan Y., Jung P.E., Lim Y.W. A checklist of the basidiomycetous macrofungi and a record of five new species from Mt. Oseo in Korea. Mycobiology. 2014;42:132–139. doi: 10.5941/MYCO.2014.42.2.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Schoch C.L., Seifert K.A., Huhndorf S., Robert V., Spouge J.L., Levesque C.A. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:6241–6246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117018109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mueller G.M. Laccaria longipes, a new North America species of the Laccaria laccata complex. Mycotaxon. 1991;40:145–150. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kuo M. Laccaria laccata. 2010. [(accessed on 20 October 2023)]. Available online: http://www.mushroomexpert.com/laccaria_laccata.html.
  • 65.McNabb R.F.R. The tricholomataceae of New Zealand 1. Laccaria Berk. & Br. New Zealand J. Bot. 1972;10:461–484. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Imamura A. Report on Laccaria amethystina, newly confirmed as an ammonia fungus. Mycoscience. 2001;42:623–625. doi: 10.1007/BF02460961. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kuo M. Laccaria amethystina. 2010. [(accessed on 20 October 2023)]. Available online: http://www.mushroomexpert.com/laccaria_amethystina.html.
  • 68.Hongo T. Notulae mycologicae. Mem. Shiga. Univ. 1971;21:62–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Deepna Latha K.P., Anil Raj K.N., Manimohan P. Laccaria violaceotincta: A new species from tropical India based on morphology and molecular phylogeny. Phytotaxa. 2019;392:140–146. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.392.2.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Bon M. Tricholomataceae de Franee et d’Europe oeeidentale. Tribu Clitocybeae Fay. Doc. Mycol. 1983;51:1–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ballero M., Contu M. Tassonomia ed eeologia del genere Laccaria Berk. et Br. in Sardegna. Candollea. 1989;42:601–611. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bi Z.S., Zheng G.Y., Li T.H. The Macrofungus Flora of China’s Guangdong Province. Chinese University Press; Hong Kong, China: 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yuan M.S., Sun P.Q. Mushrooms of Sichuan. Sichuan Science and Technology Press; Chengdu, China: 1995. pp. 1–737. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mao X.L. The Macrofungi in China. Henan Science and Technology Press; Zhengzhou, China: 2000. pp. 1–719. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Li Y., Li T.H., Yang Z.L., Bau T., Dai Y.C. Atlas of Chinese Macrofungal Resources. Central China Farmer’s Publishing House; Zhengzhou, China: 2015. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, and https://nmdc.cn/fungalnames/. (accessed on 1 November 2023).


Articles from Journal of Fungi are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES