Skip to main content
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2023 Dec 14;28(24):8095. doi: 10.3390/molecules28248095

Synthesis and Pro-Apoptotic Effects of Nitrovinylanthracenes and Related Compounds in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL) and Burkitt’s Lymphoma (BL)

Andrew J Byrne 1, Sandra A Bright 2, James P McKeown 1, Adam Bergin 1, Brendan Twamley 3, Anthony M McElligott 4, Sara Noorani 1, Shubhangi Kandwal 2, Darren Fayne 2, Niamh M O’Boyle 1,*, D Clive Williams 2, Mary J Meegan 1
Editor: Kyoko Nakagawa-Goto
PMCID: PMC10746112  PMID: 38138584

Abstract

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is a malignancy of the immune B lymphocyte cells and is the most common leukaemia diagnosed in developed countries. In this paper, we report the synthesis and antiproliferative effects of a series of (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes and related nitrostyrene compounds in CLL cell lines and also in Burkitt’s lymphoma (BL) cell lines, a rare form of non-Hodgkin’s immune B-cell lymphoma. The nitrostyrene scaffold was identified as a lead structure for the development of effective compounds targeting BL and CLL. The series of structurally diverse nitrostyrenes was synthesised via Henry–Knoevenagel condensation reactions. Single-crystal X-ray analysis confirmed the structure of (E)-9-chloro-10-(2-nitrobut-1-en-1-yl)anthracene (19f) and the related 4-(anthracen-9-yl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole (30a). The (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes 19a, 19g and 19i–19m were found to elicit potent antiproliferative effects in both BL cell lines EBVMUTU-1 (chemosensitive) and EBV+ DG-75 (chemoresistant) with >90% inhibition at 10 μM. Selected (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes demonstrated potent antiproliferative activity in CLL cell lines, with IC50 values of 0.17 μM (HG-3) and 1.3 μM (PGA-1) for compound 19g. The pro-apoptotic effects of the most potent compounds 19a, 19g, 19i, 19l and 19m were demonstrated in both CLL cell lines HG-3 and PGA-1. The (E)-nitrostyrene and (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracene series of compounds offer potential for further development as novel chemotherapeutics for CLL.

Keywords: nitrostyrene, anthracene, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), Burkitt’s lymphoma (BL), antiproliferative

1. Introduction

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is a B-cell malignancy and is the most common form of leukaemia of the adult population in developed countries, accounting for 25% of all cases of leukaemia and 1.3% of all cancers [1]. CLL is largely a disease of the elderly [2,3], with greater than 70% of patients aged over 65 years at time of clinical diagnosis. However, the disease is now increasingly common in younger patients [4]. Ireland (along with Australia, Italy and the US) shows the highest incidence rates for CLL worldwide [5] of approximately 4.5 per 100,000 in males and 2 per 100,000 in females [6,7,8]. CLL is a clinically heterogeneous lymphoproliferative disorder characterised by the clonal expansion of CD5+ mature B-lymphocytes, usually involving the bone marrow, spleen, lymph nodes and peripheral blood [9,10,11]. The disease is clinically classified according to the mutational status of the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene (IGVH); CLL patients with mutated IGVH (M-IGVH) usually have an indolent form of the disease, while unmutated IGVH (UM-IGVH) is associated with a more aggressive disease course [12]. The confirmation of a clonal population of B cells greater than 5000/mL of blood is diagnostic in most cases of CLL together with the expression of surface CD5 and CD23. Genomic and molecular markers are useful in assessing CLL prognosis; TP53 mutations, UM-IGVH, del(17p) and del(11q), together with complex karyotype, are associated with a poor prognosis. A favorable CLL prognosis is associated with del(13q), while normal karyotype and trisomy 12 are regarded as intermediate prognostic factors for CLL. A number of emerging prognostic markers for CLL are now identified, including mutations in Notch receptor 1 (NOTCH1), splicing factor 3B subunit 1 (SF3B1), baculoviral IAP repeat-containing 3 (BIRC3) and ATM serine/threonine kinase (ATM) [13,14,15].

Chemotherapeutic drugs used for CLL include the cytostatic nucleoside prodrug fludarabine phosphate 1 (Figure 1) and the alkylating agents cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil and bendamustine [16]; however, a number of very effective oral targeted therapies (such as ibrutinib 2, idelalisib 3 and venetoclax 4) are now available. Ibrutinib 2, a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor approved for CLL [17], forms a covalent bond with cysteine residue Cys481 at the ATP binding site of BTK. Idelalisib 3 is a phosphoinositide 3-kinase δ (PI3Kδ) inhibitor, which inhibits B-cell receptor signalling and is approved for the treatment of relapsed CLL [18] and mantle cell lymphoma [19]. Venetoclax 4 is a highly potent, orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of the anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma-2 protein (Bcl-2) [20]. Many non-covalent BTK inhibitors have been reported to be effective in CLL and multiple other B-cell malignancies, e.g., GDC-0853 [21] and pirtobrutinib 5 [22]. The second-generation BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib 6 forms a covalent bond with the key cysteine residue (Cys481) of BTK, resulting in inhibition of BTK. [23] Zanubrutinib 7, a next-generation BTK inhibitor, was approved by the FDA in 2023 for treatment of patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) [24]. Immunotherapies such as the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies rituximab, obinutuzumab, ofatumumab and the anti-CD52 antibody alemtuzumab have proven successful in treating CLL [16,25,26]. Richter’s transformation (RT) of CLL to an aggressive B-cell lymphoma is a complication of CLL; however, the introduction of the PD-1-blocking antibodies pembrolizumab and nivolumab [27] show selective efficacy in CLL patients with RT [28].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Drugs used in the treatment of CLL: 1 fludarabine, 2 ibrutinib, 3 idelalisib, 4 venetoclax, 5 pirtobrutinib, 6 acalabrutinib and 7 zanubrutinib.

Despite the recent advancements in the targeted clinical treatment of CLL, there still remains an urgent requirement for the discovery and development of novel therapeutic agents to combat acquired disease resistance as opposed to maintenance alone [29]. Examples of preclinical development of CLL-directed small-molecule therapies include the novel tubulin-targeting agent pyrrolo-1,5-benzoxazepine-15 (PBOX-15), which induces apoptosis in poor prognostic subgroups of CLL patients [30], while 25-hydroxyvitamin d-24-hydroxylase (CYP24A1) inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in primary chronic CLL cells [31].

Burkitt’s lymphoma (BL) is a rare, aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) that affects B-lymphocytes. The endemic form has a high incidence in equatorial Africa [32], whereas the sporadic form is identified in 1–2% of adult lymphomas globally and up to 40% of pediatric lymphomas in US and western Europe [33]. Treatments for BL include a combination of rituximab with chemotherapeutics such as vincristine, methotrexate, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide [34,35]. With increased reports of immunodeficient HIV-linked BL [36] and the association of endemic BL with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) [37], selective and potent treatments for BL are required as prognosis for relapsed BL is extremely poor [38].

Previous studies by our research group have shown that nitrostyrenes [39] and related (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)-9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthracene compounds such as 8 (designed from the tetracyclic scaffold structure of the antidepressant maprotiline 9) [40] have potent antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects in BL cell lines MUTU-I (chemosensitive) and DG-75 (chemoresistant), as shown in Figure 2 [41]. These compounds were initially investigated in relation to the role of serotonin transporter (SERT) in B-cell malignancies including BL and demonstrated the anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of nitrostyrene amphetamine-related compounds [42,43,44].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Structures of (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)-9,10-dihydro-9,10-ethanoanthracene 8, maprotiline 9, (E)-4-bromo-1-methoxy-2-(2-nitrobut-1-en-1-yl)benzene 10a, 3-nitrochromene 10b and 1,3-bis(aryl)-2-nitro-1-propene 10c.

The nitrostyrene-containing compounds such as 10a–c reduced cell viability effectively in both BL and CLL cell lines and were superior to the clinical drugs fludarabine phosphate and taxol [39,45]. The IC50 values in the CLL cell lines were in the low-micromolar range (2–5 μM) irrespective of IGVH mutational status (I83 and PGA-1: mutated-IGVH; HG-3 and CII: unmutated-IGVH). This result compared favourably with IC50 values of 20–50 μM obtained for fludarabine phosphate (a current CLL frontline treatment) in these cell lines. We also identified the related (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracene 19a as a potent antiproliferative agent in the BL cell lines MUTU-I (IC50 = 3 µM) and DG-75 (IC50 = 1.5 µM), which induced apoptosis in both BL cell lines [41,42]. The (E)-(2-nitrovinyl)benzene pharmacophore was thus identified as a scaffold that has demonstrated relevant anticancer activity [45]. The biological macromolecular target(s) of these compounds, driving the antiproliferative response, is as yet unknown, so we focussed our work on phenotypic cellular responses. We wished to investigate the preclinical potential of a panel of related (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes as antiproliferative compounds in CLL, which is a more common but related B-cell malignancy. Nitro-group-containing compounds may induce selective cancer cell toxicity by diverse mechanisms [46] such as topoisomerase inhibition [47], histone deacetylase inhibition [48], DNA alkylation [49] or tubulin polymerisation inhibition [50,51,52], while anthracene-containing compounds are reported to interact selectively with G-quadruplex structures and inhibit telomerase [53].

The objective of this research was the investigation of a series of (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes and related nitrostyrene compounds for antiprolifertive evaluation in BL and CLL cell lines and is arranged as follows:

  • i.

    The synthesis of a panel of nitrovinylanthracenes for initial BL evaluation to optimise the core structure for further CLL investigation;

  • ii.

    The identification of a focussed panel of nitrostyrenes to confirm the efficacy of nitrostyrene pharmacophore in CLL;

  • iii.

    The evaluation and optimisation of the antiproliferative activity of the selected nitrovinylanthracenes in CLL and related cell lines;

  • iv.

    The determination of the pro-apoptotic effects of nitrovinylanthracenes in CLL cells.

In this work, we initially prepared a series of novel halogenated nitrostyrenes for evaluation in BL to confirm the requirement of the nitrostyrene pharmacophore for antiproliferative activity in CLL, based on our previous investigations [39]. Subsequently, a series of substituted 9-anthraldehydes were synthesised from the appropriate anthracenes, anthrones and anthraquinones including chloro, bromo, methyl, phenyl, methoxy and isopropyl substitutions at C-10, from which the required (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes were synthesised. The reduction of (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracene was also investigated together with inclusion of the phenanthrene system and the extension of carbon chain between the nitrovinyl unit and the anthracene ring. Other unsaturated systems introduced at C-9 include oximes, cyanovinyl and nitrone systems to assess their effect on the activity of the series. The target substituted anthracene structures identified for investigation are summarised in Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Target nitrostyrene, nitrovinylanthracene and related compounds.

2. Chemistry

The (E)-(2-nitroprop-1-en-1-yl)benzenes and (E)-(2-nitrobut-1-en-1-yl)benzenes (11a–l) were prepared by the microwave assisted Henry–Knoevenagel condensation reaction of nitroethane or nitropropane with the appropriately chloro- and fluoro-substituted aryl aldehydes catalysed by cyclohexylamine (31–65%) as reported in [39] (Scheme 1). Nitrostyrenes in common with many alkene systems can exist as either cis (Z) or trans (E) isomers. However, in these Henry–Knoevenagel condensation reactions, the trans (E) configuration is sterically favoured, and the related cis (Z) isomer was not isolated in these products [39].

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Preparation of nitrostyrenes 11a–l: scheme reagents and conditions: (a) nitroalkane (CH3CH2NO3, CH3CH2CH2NO2), CH3CO2H, cyclohexylamine, microwave, 120 °C, 25 min; (31–65%).

A panel of diversely substituted (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes and related compounds was next prepared for evaluation. The appropriate substituted-9-anthraldehydes were first synthesised from the corresponding anthracenes, anthrones and anthraquinones (Scheme 2) [54]. The Grignard reaction of alkyl or aryl magnesium bromides with anthrone 12 was exploited to prepare the required substituted anthracenes [55] and gave 9-substituted anthracenes 13a–c in excellent yields (step a, 76–84%). These substituted anthracenes were subsequently formylated using the Vilsmeier–Haack reagent to give 10-substituted-9-anthraldehydes 14a–c in yields of 70–80%, including the novel 14b (step b, Scheme 2). 9-Methoxyanthracene 13d was synthesised from anthrone in an acid-catalysed one-pot methylation reaction with trimethylorthoformate [56] (step c, 76% yield), and subsequently formylated to give 14d as above. The 9-methylanthracene analogue 13e was prepared from 9-anthraldehyde using a Wolff-Kishner reaction of 9-anthraldehyde with hydrazine and potassium hydroxide, (step f 84% yield). Vilsmeier-Haack reaction of 13e gave 10-substituted-9-anthraldehyde 14e (step b, Scheme 2). Other formylation systems previously used for the formylation of anthracene derivatives include the substitution of halides using N-methylformanilide/n-butyllithium [57] and nucleophilic attack of the imine intermediate produced by aluminum trichloride/tin (IV) chloride [58].

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Synthesis of substituted 9-anthraldehydes. Scheme reagents and conditions: (a) (step 1) for compounds 13a–c: RMgBr, toluene, reflux, 3 h; (step 2) HCl (20%), ice, (76–84%); (b) N-methylformanilide, POCl3, 100 °C, 1.5 h, (60–80%); (c) for compound 13d: triethylorthoformate, H2SO4, benzene, methanol, reflux, 72 h (76%); (d) CH3OCH2P(Ph3)Cl, THF, KOtBu, 0–25 °C, 2 h, (60%); (e) NaI, TMSCl, CH3CN, 10 min, (83%); (f) NH2NH2, KOH, diethylene glycol 200 °C, pressure tube, 1 h, (84%); (g) bromine, DCM, RT, 4 h, (90%); (h) N-Methylformanilide, n-BuLi, 90 °C, 50 min, (72%); (i) (step 1) Zn dust, ammonia, 75 °C, 4 h; (step 2) HCl, isopropanol, 3 h, reflux, (57%); (j) dichloromethyl methyl ether, AlCl3, DCM, 1 h, (30%).

10-Bromoanthracene-9-carbaldehyde 14f was prepared via a two-step synthetic route from anthracene; 9,10-dibromination of anthracene with bromine in dichloromethane afforded 15 (step g) [59]. A subsequent lithium–halogen exchange/formylation reaction with n-butyllithium and N-methylformanilide [57] afforded 10-bromoanthracene-9-carbaldehyde 14f in a 72% yield (step h, Scheme 2). 9-Anthraldehyde can also be selectively brominated with N-bromosuccinimide [60]. 4,5-Dichloroanthracene-9-carbaldehyde 14g was prepared via a two-step synthetic route, which required the reduction of 1,8-dichloroanthracene-9,10-dione to 1,8-dichloroanthracene 16 with a zinc/ammonia system (step i) followed by acidification of the reaction product in a 30% yield. Formylation of 16 gave the desired 4,5-dichloroanthracene-9-carbaldehyde 14g (step j, Scheme 2). 2-(Anthracen-9-yl)acetaldehyde 18 was prepared as an E/Z mixture in two steps from 9-anthraldehyde. A Wittig reaction with (methoxymethyl)triphenylphosphonium chloride, yielded 60% of the enol ether 9-(2-methoxyvinyl)anthracene 17 (step d). Cleavage of 17 afforded the 2-(anthracen-9-yl)acetaldehyde 18 in a 83% yield (step e, Scheme 2) [61].

A series of diversely substituted (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes were prepared from the substituted-9-anthraldehyde library described above, together with some related commercially available anthracene aldehydes (Scheme 3). A piperidine-catalysed Henry–Knoevenagel condensation reaction was utilised to obtain the panel of (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes 19a–m (piperidine acetate, excess nitroalkane, 1.5 h 90 °C) with a significant increase in the product yield (up to 99%) when compared with the alternative method (cyclohexylamine, acetic acid, excess nitroalkane, 20 min, MW) [62] and was particularly useful for preparation of 19c. The yields for compounds 19a, 19b and 19c for the piperidine-catalysed method were 99%, 73% and 60% compared with 25%, 10% and trace, respectively, for the microwave method. The (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes 19a–m included a range of C-9 and C-10 halogen, alkyl and aryl substitutions and the previously unreported compounds 19h–m. In the 1H NMR spectrum of 19f, the downfield singlet occurring at δ 8.49 ppm was characteristic of H-1′, the proton on C-1′ of the nitrovinyl group. In the 13C NMR spectrum, the signal at 130.1 ppm was allocated to the nitrovinyl C-1′, while the quaternary signal at 157.0 ppm was assigned to C-2′ due to the adjacent electron-withdrawing nitro group (Supplementary Information, Figures S6–S8).

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Synthesis of (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes, (E)-9-(3-nitroallyl)anthracenes and (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)phenanthrene. Scheme reagents and conditions: (a) R-NO2, piperidine acetate, 90 °C, 1.5 h, R = H, CH3, CH2CH3; or R-NO2, cyclohexylamine, acetic acid, 20 min MW; (10–99%); (b) NaBH4, DCM, 20 °C, 24 h, 85%.

Alkyl substituents (methyl and ethyl) were introduced at C-2′ by using nitroethane and nitrobutane, respectively, in the Henry–Knoevenagel condensation reaction to afford 19b, 19c, 19e and 19f, while the reaction of the 2-(anthracen-9-yl)acetaldehyde with nitromethane and nitroethane allowed the introduction of an additional carbon linker in novel compounds 20a and 20b (Scheme 3). In the 1H NMR spectrum of (E)-9-(3-nitroallyl)anthracene 20a, the C-1′ protons were identified as a doublet at δ 4.58 (J = 6.1 Hz), the nitrovinyl H-3′ at δ 6.62 (dd, J = 13.4, 1.8 Hz), the large J value indicating trans coupling for the nitrovinyl protons and the alkene H-2′ as a multiplet δ 7.66–7.77. In the 13C NMR spectrum of 20a, the C-1′ methylene signal at 27.0 ppm was inverted in the DEPT 135 NMR spectrum. A C-H COSY experiment confirmed the correlation of the CH resonances at 140.7 ppm and 141.1 ppm to the multiplet at δ 7.66–7.77 and the double doublet at δ 6.62 in the 1H NMR spectrum (see Supplementary Information, Figures S11 and S12). The signals at 140.7 ppm and 141.1 ppm were assigned to the nitrovinyl C-2′ and C-3′, respectively. (E)-9-(2-Nitrovinyl)phenanthrene 21 was obtained by the Henry–Knoevenagel condensation of 9-phenanthraldehyde and nitromethane in a 15% yield [63], while reduction of the nitrovinyl compound 19a with sodium borohydride afforded the novel nitroethylanthracene 22, (Scheme 3).

The X-ray structure of 9-chloro-10-(2-nitrobut-1-en-1-yl)anthracene 19f was determined (Figure 4); in the asymmetric unit, the (E)-configuration of the nitrovinyl unit was observed. Figure 4B represents the molecular structure of compound 19f and confirmed the (E)-configuration of the nitrovinyl group together with the π-π stacking interactions (Figure 4C). The bond distances and torsional angles determined for the aromatic ring and the nitrobutene substituents in compound 19f were in close agreement with the reported values for related β-methyl-β-nitrostyrenes [39,64,65]. The nitrostyrene C=C bond was observed at 1.323(3)Å for compound 19f (C(15)-C(16)), similar to 1.332(2) Å reported for the (E)-1-(3,4-methylene-dioxy-6-fluorophenyl)-2-nitropropene [64]. The nitro and ethyl substituents on the alkene were out of the plane of the anthracene ring, with a torsional angle for C(7)-(C8)-(C15)-(C16) of 108.8(3)° (Figure 4 and Supplementary Information, Figure S21). The crystal and experimental data for compound 19f are shown in Table 1.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

(A) Molecular structure of 19f. (B) Molecular structure of 19f with atomic displacement shown at 50% probability with only heteroatoms labelled. (C) π-π interaction orientation with a perpendicular distance of 3.4278 Å, with a slippage of 1.630 Å from the centroid of the central rings.

Table 1.

Crystal data and structure refinement for compounds 19f and 30a.

Identification Code 19f 30a
CCDC No. 2171050 2171051
Empirical formula C18H14ClNO2 C16H11N3
M (g/mol) 311.75 245.28
T (K) 100(2) 100(2)
Crystal system Triclinic Monoclinic
SG P-1 I2/a
a (Å) 7.6352(6) 19.6948(8)
b (Å) 9.2984(7) 8.6231(4)
c (Å) 10.9972(8) 28.1601(16)
α (°) 75.948(2) 90
β (°) 73.807(3) 96.109(3)
γ (°) 73.774(3) 90
V3) 708.31(9) 4755.3(4)
Z 2 16
Dcalc (g/cm3) 1.462 1.370
μ (mm−1) 0.276 0.661
F(000) 324.0 2048.0
Crystal size (mm3) 0.538 × 0.193 × 0.034 0.21 × 0.05 × 0.03
Radiation Mo Kα
(λ = 0.71073)
Cu Kα
(λ = 1.54178)
Reflections collected 19,022 23,858
Independent reflections 3423
Rint = 0.0613,
Rsigma = 0.0440
4475
Rint = 0.1027,
Rsigma = 0.1008
Data/restraints/parameters 3423/0/200 4475/264/502
Goodness-of-fit on F2 (S) 1.041 0.947
Final R indexes (I ≥ 2σ (I)) * R1 = 0.0501,
wR2 = 0.1194
R1 = 0.0742,
wR2 = 0.1939
Final R indexes (all data) R1 = 0.0809,
wR2 = 0.1361
R1 = 0.1678,
wR2 = 0.2666
Largest diff. peak/hole (eÅ−3) 0.84/−0.31 0.34/−0.31

* R1 = ∑||Fo| − |Fc||/∑|Fo|, wR2 = [∑w(Fo2Fc2)2/∑w(Fo2)2]1/2.

The 3-(anthracen-9-yl)acrylonitrile derivatives 23a–c were obtained in 40–95% yields, respectively, on reaction of the 9-anthraldehydes with activated methylenecyano compounds via the base-catalysed Knoevenagel condensation reaction (step a and b, Scheme 4). In the 1H NMR spectrum of novel compound 23b, the downfield singlet at δ 8.91 was assigned to the cyanovinyl H-1′. The 13C NMR spectrum confirmed quaternary signals at 93.4 ppm, 111.1 ppm and 112.7 ppm for the cyanovinyl carbons C-2′, C-1″ and C-2″; the downfield signal at 160.2 ppm was assigned to the cyanovinyl C-1′. In further reactions, condensation of 9-anthraldehyde and acetone afforded 4-(anthracen-9-yl)but-3-en-2-one 24 (step c) [66], while 25 was isolated upon reaction of 9-anthraldehyde with Meldrum’s acid (step d) [67] (Scheme 4). The nitrile 28 [68] was obtained by reduction of 9-anthraldehyde to the anthracen-9-ylmethanol 26 (step e) [69], followed by chlorination (step f) and subsequent treatment of the chloride 27 with potassium cyanide (step g). The (anthracen-9-yl)methylamines 29a–d were prepared by nucleophilic substitution of 9-(chloromethyl)anthracene 27 with selected amines with a 75–90% yield (step h, Scheme 4).

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4

Synthesis of 3-(anthracene-9-yl)acrylonitriles, 4-(anthracen-9-yl)but-3-en-2-one, 9-(chloromethyl)anthracene, 2-(anthracen-9-yl)acetonitrile, (anthracen-9-yl)methylamines and related compounds. Scheme reagents and conditions: (a) piperidine, CH2(CN)2, 90 °C, 0.5 h, (90–95%); (b) CNCH2CO2H, morpholine, 90 °C, 6 h, (40%); (c) acetone, MeOH, 20 °C, 3 h (70%); (d) Meldrum’s acid, piperidine, 20 °C, 6 h (60%); (e) NaBH4, EtOH, 20 °C, 30 min, (90%); (f) SOCl2, dioxane, reflux, 6 h, (93%); (g) KCN, ACN, reflux, 2 h, (93%); (h) R2NH, DCM, 20 °C, 24 h, (75–90%).

The anthracene-based 4-(anthracen-9-yl)-1H-1,2,3-triazoles 30a and novel 30b were obtained by reaction of the (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes 19a and 19b with sodium azide in DMSO (Scheme 5). However, during attempts to optimise this reaction for 30a, an unexpected novel product was isolated: 4-(anthracen-9-yl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-1,2,3-triazole 31 in a 90% yield. This triazole is a reduced version of the expected product 30a. It is possible that increasing the reaction time from 1 to 12 h allowed for a slower reduction reaction to occur in the presence of DMSO and sodium azide. Reductive conditions of hot DMSO and sodium azide solutions have been previously reported with the sodium metal required for the triazole reduction provided by the azide salt [70]. 4-(Anthracen-9-yl)-1H-1,2,3-triazoles have been synthesised from 9-ethynlyanthracene, trimethylsilyl azide and copper iodide [71], and also by ZrCl4-mediated conversion of vinyl nitrates to 1,2,3-triazoles [72]. In the 1H NMR spectrum of 31, the doublet (δ 4.64, J = 4.9 Hz) was assigned to the H-5′ protons, the triplet (δ 6.68, J = 5.2 Hz) was assigned to the H-4′ and the downfield singlet δ 11.40 corresponded to the triazole NH.

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5

Synthesis of 4-(anthracene-9-yl)-1H-1,2,3-triazoles, imines and amides. Scheme reagents and conditions: (a) NaN3, DMSO, 90 °C, 1–12 h, (45–92%); (b) NH2NH2, NH2OH, NH2OCH3, DCM, RT-reflux, 3–14 h, (20–90%); (c) R2NH, 2-chloro-1-methylpyridinium iodide, TEA, (84–86%).

X-ray crystallography confirmed the structure of 4-(anthracen-9-yl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole 30a, (Figure 5 and Supplementary Information, Figures S22 and S23). The triazole bond lengths and angles were within the reported ranges [73]. The 1,2,3-triazole N=N bond N(2)-N(3) was observed at 1.31(4) Å, N(1)-C(5) at 1.345(11) Å, N(1)-N(2) at 1.354(16) Å, N(3)-C(4) at 1.373(5) Å and the C(4)-C(5) C=C bond at 1.374(11) Å. The C6-C4 bond linking the triazole to the anthracene was 1.475(6) Å, with a torsional angle of −110.7°. The triazole ring N1-N2-N3-C4-C5 made a dihedral angle of ca. 110.8° with the anthracene ring C6-C19. The crystal and experimental data for compound 30a are shown in Table 1.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

(A) Molecular structure of compound 30a. (B) Asymmetric unit of compound 30a showing two independent molecules, with one completely disordered. Atomic displacement shown at 50% probability and heteroatoms labelled only. (C) π-π interactions indicated by dashed lines to plane centroids in 30a with A = 4.1284 Å with slippage 2.230 Å and B = 3.4176 Å, slippage 1.944 Å. Similar interactions were seen for the disordered molecule.

To assess the antiproliferative effect of alternative isosteric imine systems to replace the nitrostyrene, the anthracen-9-ylmethanimines 32a–d were prepared by reaction of 9-anthraldehyde, 9-chloroanthraldehyde or 2-(anthracen-9-yl)acetaldehyde 18 with the appropriate amine in yields of 85–90%, (Scheme 5). A series of anthracene amides 33a–f were obtained by coupling anthracene-9-carboxylic acid and selected amines using the Mukaiyama reaction (75–90%), as shown in Scheme 5. In the 1H NMR spectrum of the novel anthracen-9-yl(azepan-1-yl)methanone 33c, a triplet at δ 3.09 (J = 6.1 Hz) and a multiplet (δ 4.02) were assigned to the C1′ and C6′ methylene protons due to the non-equivalent nature of these homopiperidine protons, with signals at 45.1 ppm and 49.0 ppm in the 13C NMR spectrum assigned to C1′ and C6′ (see Supplementary Information Figures S19 and S20).

In total, a panel of 58 anthracene-based compounds and 12 halo-substituted nitrostyrenes were designed and synthesised for this study. Reaction of a number of substituted anthraldehydes with the required nitroalkanes in a Henry–Knoevenagel condensation reaction afforded a series of 16 substituted (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes and phenanthrenes. Anthracene ring substitutions included methoxy, isopropy, alkyl (methyl, ethyl), phenyl and halogen (chlorine and bromine). The alkyl substituent at C-2 was varied by using different nitroalkanes (nitromethane, nitroethane and nitropropane). Extension of the carbon linker between the vinyl unit and the anthracene moiety was also achieved using a Wittig reaction. Related vinyl functionalities were introduced on the anthracene including cyanovinyl, oxime, hydrazone and alkyl analogues, together with a selection of amines and amides. The compounds synthesised were initially screened for biological activity in the BL cell lines DG-75 and MUTU-I with subsequent screening of the more potent compounds in the CLL cell lines PGA-1 and HG-3. The results of this preliminary screen are discussed in the following section.

2.1. In Vitro Antiproliferative Activity of Nitrosytrenes, Nitrovinylanthracenes and Related Compounds in Burkitt Lymphoma

A panel of 58 anthracene-based compounds were initially evaluated for anti-proliferative activity in the Burkitt lymphoma EBV MUTU-I (chemosensitive) and EBV+ DG-75 (chemoresistant) cell lines at 10 µM and 1 µM using an alamarBlue viability assay to determine the structure–activity relationships for these anthracene compounds and to identify the most potent compounds for further investigation. We previously reported the anti-proliferative effects of a panel of nitrovinylstyrenes in the BL MUTU-I and DG-75 cell lines and identified halogenated compounds 11c, 11f–l with cell viability at 10 µM in the range 2–26% and 0–16%, respectively, and with IC50 values in the range 0.82–2.18 µM (MUTU-I) and 2.05–3.11 µM (DG-75) [39] (Supplementary Information Table S7), suggesting that the nitrovinylstyrene pharmacophore may be suitable for further study. In this work, the antiproliferative activity of the more potent selected nitrostyrene compounds 11i, 11h, 11g and 11j was further investigated in the following BL cell lines: Ramos (BL, EBV-negative) and Bjab (BL, EBV-negative) together with HeLa (cervical), MCF-7 (ER-positive breast cancer) and HL-60 (promyelocytic leukaemia) cell lines (Table 2). The compounds elicited good anti-proliferative effects at a 10 µM concentration in all cell lines, e.g., 4.4–13.9% viability in the BL Ramos and 6.5–16.55% in the leukaemia HL60 cell line, exerting a more potent effect than taxol in all of these cell lines, apart from MUTU-I. (E)-1-Chloro-2-(2-nitrobut-1-en-1-yl)benzene 11j was particularly potent at 10 µM in the Ramos BL cell line (4.4% cell viability) and 9.1% viability in the HL60 cell line.

Table 2.

In vitro antiproliferative activity of nitrostyrene compounds 11g, 11h, 11i and 11j in HeLa, MCF-7, HL-60, Ramos, Bjab, MUTU-I and DG-75 cell lines a.

graphic file with name molecules-28-08095-i001.jpg

% Viable Cells Remaining
HeLa
24 h
MCF-7
72 h
Ramos
24 h
Bjab
24 h
HL60
24 h
MUTU-1 b
24 h
DG-75 b
48 h
10
µM
1
µM
10
µM
1
µM
10
µM
1
µM
10
µM
1
µM
10
µM
1
µM
10
µM
1
µM
10
µM
1
µM
11g 34.2 87.1 41.7 81.4 7.7 53.4 51.9 82.2 16.5 73.4 14.91 44.16 −0.08 75.86
11h 23.2 90.6 29.7 94.3 5.1 27.2 46.2 90.1 6.8 78.2 10.28 39.80 0.38 84.50
11i 17.7 93.0 37.1 102.7 13.9 62.6 50.8 100.5 6.5 103.8 10.53 67.22 0.72 88.76
11j 21.8 95.3 20.7 98.1 4.4 66.9 68.9 102.4 9.1 99.8 10.27 64.31 15.89 79.77
Taxol 48.4 86.9 75.0 100.8 24.9 69.3 80.2 97.6 69.7 97.6 7.0 32.0 40.0 >90

a Cell proliferation of HeLa, MCF-7, HL-60, Ramos, Bjab, MUTU-I and DG-75 cells was determined with an alamarBlue assay. Compound concentrations of either 1 μM or 10 μM for 24 h (HeLa, Ramos, Bjab, HL60 and MUTU-I) or 48 h (DG-75) or 72 h (MCF-7) were used to treat the cells (in triplicate) with control wells containing vehicle ethanol (1% v/v). The mean value for three independent experiments is shown b [39].

2.2. Effect of Nitrostyrene 11h on the Viability of PBMCs

The nitrostyrene 11h was evaluated for its cytotoxic effect on healthy donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) to determine the selective toxicity of compounds containing the nitrostyrene pharmacophore on malignant BL cell lines over normal blood cells. Compound 11h was evaluated at 1 μM and 10 μM concentrations over a 24 h treatment time (Supplementary Information, Table S8). Compound 11h demonstrated a low toxicity in PBMCs at 1 μM (74% viable cells remaining). In comparison, compound 11h induced a significant anti-proliferative effect in MUTU-I cells, with 39.8% viable cells remaining at 1 μM. A similar response was observed in DG-75 cells at the higher concentration (10 μM); a potent anti-proliferative effect (0.038% viable cells remaining) was observed, in comparison to 34.1% of viable PBMCs, indicating that compound 11h is selectively toxic to these BL cell lines.

2.3. Effect of Pre-Treatment with N-Acetylcysteine and Caspase Inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK on Induction of Apoptosis by Compound 11h

Additional annexin V/PI FACS analysis was carried out in the presence of a reactive oxygen species (ROS) inhibitor (N-acetylcysteine) and a pan-caspase inhibitor (Z-VAD-FMK) in order to study their effects (if any) on the pro-apoptotic effects of 11h (Figure 6). In the presence of NAC (5 μM), the apoptosis induced by compound 11h decreased from 68% to 21% at 2.5 µM and from 88% to 33% at 5 µM in the PGA1 cell line. Similar results were obtained in the HG-3 cell line at 2.5 µM (90% to 31%) and 5 µM of 11h (84% to 51%). In the presence of the caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK (5 μM), the apoptosis induced by compound 11h decreased from 63% to 25% at 2.5 µM and from 79% to 43% at 5 µM in the PGA1 cell line. Similar results were obtained in the HG-3 cell line at 2.5 µM (84% to 29%) and 5 µM (74% to 50%). These findings indicate that both caspases and ROS may be involved in the mechanism of apoptosis for compound 11h.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Inhibitor studies: Compound 11h in HG-3 and PGA-1 CLL cell lines—Annexin V/PI FACS analysis (48 h). The HG-3 and PGA-1 CLL cells (5 × 104 cells/mL) were pre-treated at 37 °C with either 5 mM N-acetylcysteine (NAC) for 1 h or 40 μM caspase inhibitor C (Z-VAD-FMK) for 4 h prior to 5 μM compound treatment for 48 h.

2.4. In Vitro Antiproliferative Activity of the Nitrovinylanthracenes and Related Compounds in Burkitt’s Lymphoma

As a further development, the anticancer effects of the panel of nitrovinylanthracene and related compounds synthesised together with the C-9 substituted anthracenes such as amines, carboxamides, cyanovinyl and hydrazone derivatives were investigated. The effects of additional C-10 substitution (e.g., alkyl, alkoxy, halogen, aryl) on the anti-proliferative effects of the anthracene compounds were also evaluated and are discussed by structural type. The results obtained from this preliminary screen in the MUTU-I and DG-75 cell lines (at 10 μM and 1 μM) are displayed in Figure 6 and Figure 7, with maprotiline and taxol used as the positive controls. Maprotiline induced a modest anti-proliferative effect at 10 μM in the MUTU-I and DG-75 BL cell lines (72% and 65% viable cells, respectively). Treatment with taxol resulted in a 7% cell viability at 10 μM and 32% at 1 μM in MUTU-I cell line, while a 40% and >90% cell viability was observed at 10 and 1 μM treatment concentrations, respectively, in the more chemoresistent DG-75 cells. The lead nitrovinylanthracene compound 19a (IC50 2.57 µM in MUTU-I and 2.08 µM in DG-75) was more potent than maprotiline (IC50 values of 15.8 µM (MUTU-I) and 37.5 µM (DG-75)) in both BL cell lines and compared favourably with taxol in these cell lines (IC50 0.32 µM in MUTU-I and 1.32 µM in DG-75) [41] (Figure 7A,B). The 10-substituted (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes 19g–m were found to elicit similar potent anti-proliferative effects to lead compound 19a in both the MUTU-I and DG-75 BL cell lines at both concentrations, with <20% cells remaining. This compared well to maprotiline (>60% viable cells remaining in both cell lines at 10 µM) and resulted in the identification of a potent series of active compounds for further investigation. Extension of the alkyl chain (methyl, ethyl) at C-2 of the nitrovinyl unit deactivated the (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracene pharmacophore (>80% viability), and this trend was observed in compounds (19a, 19b, 19c) and (19d, 19e, 19f). Introduction of C-10 chloro (compound 19d) increased the inhibition of MUTU-I cell growth at 1 µM when compared to 19a (<20%) but reduced the anti-proliferative effect in the DG-75 cell line, an effect also observed for the C-9 bromo compound 19h (Figure 7A,B). Introduction of the phenanthrene moiety 21 reduced the anticancer effect in the DG-75 cell line to 60% cell viability. The extended-chain nitrovinyl analogues 20a and 20b induced good activity at 10 µM in the MUTU-I cell line (~15–40%); however, a reduction in activity was observed in the DG-75 cell line (79–97% viability). Reduction of the vinyl unit of compound 19a to give compound 22 was detrimental to the anticancer effects with activity lost in both BL cell lines (>85%) (Figure 7A,B). It was concluded that the nitrovinyl unit was required for optimal anti-proliferative activity.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Figure 7

Preliminary cell viability data for nitrovinylanthracenes, 3-(anthracen-9-yl)acrylonitriles, 4-(anthracen-9-yl)-1H-1,2,3-triazoles and related compounds in MUTU-I (Panel A) and DG-75 (Panel B) Burkitt’s lymphoma cell lines. The cell proliferation of MUTU-I and DG-75 cells was determined with an alamarBlue assay (seeding density 1–5 × 104 cells/mL per well for 96-well plates). Compound concentrations of either 1 μM or 10 μM for 24 h (MUTU-I) or 48 h (DG-75) were used to treat the cells (in triplicate) with control wells containing vehicle ethanol (1% v/v). The mean value for three independent experiments is shown. * Indicates a p value between 0.01 and 0.05; ** indicates a p value between 0.001 and 0.01; *** indicates a p value between 0.0001 and 0.001; and **** indicates a p value < 0.0001.

The (E)-3-(anthracen-9-yl)acrylonitriles 23a and c and 2-(anthracen-9-yl)acetonitrile 28 (Figure 7A,B), (anthracen-9-yl)methylamines 29a–d and their precursors 26 and 27 (Figure 8A,B), anthracen-9-ylmethanimines 32a–e (including hydrazones, oximes and nitrones) (Figure 8A,B) and anthracene amides 33a–f (Figure 8A,B) exhibited poor anti-proliferative effects in the MUTU-I and DG-75 cell lines at 10 µM (>80% and >60% viability, respectively), indicating the requirement of the nitrovinyl functionality for activity. The 4-(anthracen-9-yl)-1H-1,2,3-triazoles 30a, 30b and 31 with a constrained (E)-configuration for the vinyl system and compounds 24 and 25 with alternative vinyl functionalities were inactive in both the BL cell lines (>90% viability) (Figure 7A,B). However, the C-9 dicyanovinyl compound 23b (synthesised to evaluate the effects of alternative substituents at the C-2 carbon of the vinyl unit) was effective at 10 µM in the MUTU-I cell line (~20% viability) with moderate activity at 10 µM in the DG-75 cell line (~55%) Figure 7A,B). (See Supplementary Information, Tables S3–S6 for complete cell viability data for all compounds).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Figure 8

Preliminary cell viability data for (anthracene-9-yl)methylamines, (anthracene-9-yl)methylimines and (anthracene-9-yl)caboxamines in MUTU-I (Panel A) and DG-75 (Panel B) Burkitt’s lymphoma cell lines. The cell proliferation of MUTU-I and DG-75 cells was determined with an alamarBlue assay (seeding density 1–5 × 104 cells/mL per well for 96-well plates). Compound concentrations of either 1 μM or 10 μM for 24 h (MUTU-I) or 48 h (DG-75) were used to treat the cells (in triplicate) with control wells containing vehicle ethanol (1% v/v). The mean value for three independent experiments is shown.

2.5. Physicochemical, ADME, Pharmacokinetic and Stability Properties of (E)-9-(2-Nitrovinyl)Anthracenes and Related Compounds

The physicochemical, ADME and pharmacokinetic properties of the most potent synthesised compounds (19a–19m, 20b, 21, 22, 23a, 23b) were initially investigated using Pipeline Pilot Professional [74] (see Supplementary Information for details of the Tier 1 profiling screen, Tables S1 and S2). These anthracene compounds complied with Lipinski and Veber rules with a molecular weight less of than 500 Da (within the range of 249–328 Da) and with fewer than 10 rotatable bonds, fewer than 10 hydrogen bond acceptors, fewer than 5 hydrogen bond donors and a logP of less than 5 (in the range 2.68–4.00) (Supplementary Information, Table S2). The topological polar surface area (TPSA) of the compounds was found in the range 45.82–47.58 Å2, within the desirable limit of 140 Å2 for good intestinal absorption. The compounds were predicted not to inhibit CYP2D6, while high blood–brain barrier (BBB) absorption levels and good plasma protein binding properties (greater than 90%) were predicted for all compounds (Supplementary Information, Tables S1 and S2). The synthesised compounds 19a–19m, 20b, 21, 23a and 23b are predicted to be un-ionised at physiological pH, with the theoretical pKaH value for compound 22 calculated with a Marvin of 8.22. However, low aqueous solubility is predicted for the panel of compounds in the range logSw = −7.0840 to −5.3960, e.g., the 10-methoxy compound 19g is predicted with greatest solubility in the series (logSw = −5.3960 mol/L) (see Supplementary Information, Table S1). The nitrovinylanthracene compounds 19a–19m, 20b, 21, 22, 23a and 23b were not signalled in a filter for pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS) [75] and are predicted to have good drug-like physicochemical properties within the appropriate range for oral bioavailability [76,77]. Additional biochemical studies are described in the following sections to determine their mechanism of action.

A preliminary HPLC stability study was performed on a representative nitrovinylanthracene compound 19m (isopropyl) in various biologically relevant pH systems (acidic pH 4 found in the stomach, basic pH 9 found in the intestine and pH 7.4 in the plasma). The half-life (t1⁄2) was determined to be 19 h at pH 9 (42% remaining at 24 h) and greater than 24 h at both pH 4 and pH 7.4, with 55% and 56% remaining, respectively. Based on the results of this stability study, the compound 19m was determined to be suitable for further preclinical investigation.

2.6. Evaluation of In Vitro Antiproliferative Activity of Nitrostyrenes and Anthracene-Based Maprotiline Analogues in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL)

The panel of nitrostyrenes and anthracene-based maprotiline analogues was next evaluated for in vitro anti-proliferative activity in CLL. The HG-3 cell line was established from an in vitro EBV (Epstein–Barr virus) infection from an IGVH1–2 unmutated B1 lymphocyte origin CLL patient clone and is representative of poor patient prognosis [78]. The PGA-1 cell line is a cell line that was established from leukemic B cells of a Caucasian male with CLL with a mutated IGVH1-2 and is representative of good patient prognosis [79]. Fludarabine phosphate was used as a comparative control for CLL cell lines [45] (IC50 values of 28.1 μM and 32.0 μM in HG-3 and PGA-1 cell lines, respectively, with cell viability of HG-3 60%, PGA-1 65% at 10 μM concentration). From our previous work, we have identified a number of nitrostyrene-containing compounds demonstrating antiproliferative activity in BL cells, e.g., compounds (10a–c), with IC50 values of 0.45, 0.47 and 2.97 μM in MUTU-I and IC50 values of 1.41, 1.92 and 6.39 μM in DG-75, respectively, while anthracene (19a) also demonstrated activity in BL cell lines with IC50 values of 3.0 μM (MUTU) and 1.5 μM (DG75) [41], suggesting that the nitrostyrene pharmacophore is relevant in the antiproliferative activity of the series.

2.7. Antiproliferative Activity of Nitrostyrenes in HG-3 and PGA-1 CLL Cell Lines

The halogenated nitrostyrenes 11a–l were initially screened in CLL cells PGA-1 and HG-3 at 1 and 10 μM together with lead nitrostyrene compound 10a from our previous study in BL. All compounds displayed low PGA1 and HG3 viability at 10 μM, while the control drug fludarabine 1 demonstrated 89% (HG-3) and 94% (PGA-1) viability at 10 μM. The (E)-(2-nitrovinyl)benzenes) 11a–l confirmed the nitrostyrene moiety as a promising pharmacophore for CLL activity and facilitated a comparison of the effects of halogen (ortho, para and meta Cl or F) and alkyl substituents (C-1 methyl or ethyl) on cell viability. All compounds displayed good antiproliferative activity in the HG-3 cell line at 10 μM with 0.11–11.15% viability (Figure 9A) and also in PGA-1 (0.018–7.05% viability) (Figure 9B), with the fluoro-substituted compounds being more active than the corresponding chloro compounds. For the fluoro-substituted fluoro-(2-nitrobut-1-en-1-yl)benzenes 11d–f, the ortho-substituted 11d showed the greatest antiproliferative activity (0.24% cell viability at 10 μM and 14.5% at 1 μM). The meta-substituted 11k (E)-2-chloro-(2-nitrobut-1-en-1-yl)benzene was identified as the most potent of the chloro series in the HG-3 cell line with cell viabilities of 0.34% (10 μM) and 60.7% (1 μM) (Figure 9A). Cell viability values in the PGA-1 cell line were approximately 20% lower than those observed in the HG-3 cells, with the chloro-substituted (E)-(2-nitrovinyl)benzenes displaying greater potency than the fluoro-substituted series in the PGA-1 cell line. The (2-nitrobut-1-en-1-yl)benzene compounds 11j and 11k were identified as the most potent in the series (0.43% and 0.15% cell viability at 10 μM and 6.31% and 3.26% at 1 μM, respectively), showing superior activity when compared with the lead compound 10a with a cell viability of 96.4% (1 μM) and 0.97% (10 μM), see Figure 9B.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Preliminary cell viability data for nitrostyrenes in CLL (A) HG-3 and (B) PGA-1 cells. Cell proliferation of HG-3 and PGA-1 cells was determined with an alamarBlue assay. Compound concentrations of either 1 μM or 10 μM for 24 h were used to treat the cells (in triplicate) with control wells containing vehicle ethanol (1% v/v). The mean value for three independent experiments is shown. (Map = maprotiline). Statistical significance was evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis test. * Indicates a p value between 0.01 and 0.05; ** indicates a p value between 0.001 and 0.01; *** indicates a p value between 0.0001 and 0.001.

2.8. Antiproliferative Activity of Anthracene-Based Maprotiline Analogues in HG-3 CLL Cell Line

The most potent (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes identified from the BL screen (19a–j, 19l, 19m, 20b, 21, 22, 23a, 23b) were next evaluated in CLL HG-3 cells at 1 and 10 μM concentrations (Figure 10). Compounds 19a, 19g 19i, 19l and 19m were very effective in the HG-3 cells, with a 0.5–8.3% viability demonstrated at a 10 µM treatment concentration (Figure 10A). The 10-ethyl (19l) and 10-isopropylanthracene (19m) compounds were identified as the most potent compounds, with a 0.5% and 0.9% viability at 10 µM and 78% and 82% viability at 1 μM, respectively (Figure 10A). Reduction of the nitrovinyl group of 19a to the nitroethane compound 22 resulted in a fifteen-fold significant loss in potency (76% cell viability). The remaining (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracene derivatives with aryl substituents at C-10 were significantly less potent in the HG-3 cell line and are shown in Figure 10A. At the 10 µM treatment concentration, the most effective compound of this remaining group was identified as the phenanthrene derivative 21 (29% viability), while the 10-chloro compounds 19d (10-chloro-2-nitrovinyl derivative) and 19e (10-chloro-3-propenyl derivative) demonstrated very poor activity (97% and 87% viability, respectively). The introduction of an alkyl substituent on the nitrovinyl group generally resulted in a significant reduction in activity for the compounds, e.g., comparing the activity of extension of the alkyl chain on the 2-nitrovinyl unit resulted in a dramatic decrease in activity (compounds 19a, 19b and 19c with 8%, 82% and 72% cell viability, respectively, at 10 µM). A similar trend was observed with compounds 19d, 19e and 19f. Introduction of the 10-chloro substitution on 19d resulted in a loss in activity (97% cell viability) when compared to the unsubstituted analogue 19a (cell viability 8%).

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Figure 10

Preliminary cell viability data for nitrovinylanthracenes and related compounds in CLL: (A) HG-3 cells (1 and 10 μM) and (B) PGA-1 cells (1 and 10 μM). Cell proliferation of HG-3 and PGA-1 cells was determined with an alamarBlue assay. Compound concentrations of either 1 μM or 10 μM for 24 h were used to treat the cells (in triplicate) with control wells containing vehicle ethanol (1% v/v). Map = maprotiline, Flu = fludarabine The mean value for three experiments is shown. Statistical significance was evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis test. * Indicates a p value between 0.01 and 0.05; ** indicates a p value between 0.001 and 0.01.

2.9. Antiproliferative Activity of Anthracene-Based Maprotiline Analogues in PGA-1 CLL Cell Line

The cell viability results of the (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes in the PGA-1 cell line are shown in Figure 10B. At the 10 µM treatment concentration, all compounds 19a, 19g, 19i, 19l, 19m and 21 were very effective, with 19g (10-methoxy 1.21%), 19l (10-ethyl, 2.7%) 19m (10-isopropyl, 2.9%) and 19i (10-methyl, 2.9%) being identified as the most potent with the unsubstituted compound 19a (5.1%) and the phenanthrene derivative 21 demonstrating an 11.8% cell viability, while compounds 19h (10-bromo) and 19d (9-chloro) demonstrated reduced activity with cell viability values of 36.9% and 51.8%, respectively. The remaining compounds in the series, including the reduced 22 (75% viability), 9-(3-nitroallyl)anthracene 20a and acrylonitriles 22a and 22b, demonstrated poor activity with viability >50%. These results indicate the requirement for the intact double bond of the nitrostyrene for the antiproliferative activity. At the 1 µM treatment concentration, the 10-methoxy 19g compound was also the most active (43% viability). As observed in the HG-3 cell line, introduction of a methyl or ethyl substituent on the nitrovinyl group resulted in significant decrease in activity (compounds 19a, 19b and 19c with 5.1%, 81% and 66% cell viability values, respectively, at 10 µM), with a similar effect for compounds 19d, 19e and 19f. Introduction of the ring Cl at C-10 of the anthracene series, e.g., compounds 19d–f, resulted in a significant decrease in activity in both cell lines (cell viability in the range 86–100% at 10 μM in HG-3 and 51–100% at 10 μM in PGA-1 cells) when compared with the chloro-substituted nitrostyrenes 11g–l (cell viability 0.1–6% at 10 μM in HG-3 and 0.1–0.5% at 10 μM in PGA-1 cells).

The most potent compounds from the series 19a, 19g, 19i, 19l and 19m were chosen for IC50 determination and evaluation in the CLL cell lines PGA-1 and HG-3.

2.10. In Vitro IC50 Determination of the Most Potent (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracene Derivatives in HG-3 Cells and PGA-1 Cells

The IC50 values at 24 h for the selected (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracene compounds 19a, 19g, 19i, 19l and 19m in HG-3 cells and PGA-1 cells were determined using a concentration range of 10 μM–0.01 μM (Table 3). The compounds demonstrated a more potent effect than the fludarabine control (5–40 fold greater in the HG-3 cells; 4–25 fold greater in the PGA-1 cells) across both the HG-3 and PGA-1 cell lines with IC50 ranges of 0.70–3.85 μM and 1.29–9.10 μM, respectively. In the HG-3 cells, the most potent compounds identified were the 10-methoxy derivative 19g (IC50 0.17 μM) and the 10-isopropyl derivative 19m (IC50 0.70 μM), while in the PGA-1 cells, the most potent compounds were 19g (IC50 1.29 μM) and the 10-ethyl derivative 19l (IC50 1.30 μM). These results suggest that alkyl and alkoxy substituents present at the C-10 position on the anthracene core can lead to a greater anti-proliferative activity in CLL compared to the unsubstituted 19a. The 10-isopropyl substituent of 19m was selective, causing a 13-fold greater response in the HG-3 as opposed to PGA-1 cells (0.7 μM vs. 9.1 μM, possibly due to increased lipophilic/steric effects) and approximately a 3.5-fold increased activity compared to 19a in both cell lines. Furthermore, 19g (10-methoxy) resulted in a 7.8-fold improvement in the IC50 value in the HG-3 compared to PGA-1 cells and a similar activity to 19l (10-ethyl) in the PGA-1 cells (IC50 = 1.29 μM). These results suggest the potential for similar, yet distinct, compound attributes for potent antiproliferative activity in the main two CLL disease cell subtypes.

Table 3.

IC50 values of (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracene compounds 19a, 19g, 19i, 19l and 19m in HG-3 and PGA-1 CLL cell lines.

graphic file with name molecules-28-08095-i002.jpg
Compound
Number
HG-3
IC50 (µM) a
PGA-1
IC50 (µM) a
logP b
19a 2.43 3.10 4.57
19g 0.17 1.29 4.49
19i 3.85 4.40 5.07
19l 5.40 1.30 5.59
19m 0.70 9.10 5.99
Fludarabine 28.1 32.0 −2.5 b

a IC50 values are half-maximal inhibitory concentrations required to block the growth stimulation of HG3 and PGA-1 cells. Values represent the mean ± SEM (error values × 10−6) for at least three experiments performed in triplicate at 24 h. Treatment at eight different concentrations (0.001–50 μM) was used for the determination of the IC50 values for each compound. b Predicted property using Chemaxon.

2.11. In Vitro Antiproliferative Activity of Nitrovinylanthracenes in Estrogen-Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Cell Lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231

Selected compounds were also evaluated in the estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer cell line MCF-7 and the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell line MDA-MB-231. TNBC accounts for 10–15% of breast cancers that do not express estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR) and are HER2-negative. TNBCs are not responsive to hormone therapies, e.g., the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen, the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole or the monoclonal antibody herceptin, which targets the HER2 receptor (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2). Fewer treatment options are available for TNBC compared with ER+, PR+ and HER2+ breast cancers, and the outcome is uncertain [80]. Five compounds were screened in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells at 1 and 10 μM concentrations (Figure 11), and based on the results, the IC50 values for three of the five compounds were determined (Table 4). The nitrovinylanthracenes 19a, 19g and 19i were found to display moderate antiproliferative activity in MCF-7 breast cancer cells with an IC50 value of 1.85 μM for the most potent example 19a, which compared favourably with tamoxifen (IC50 = 4.12 μM). The compounds also displayed a low micromolar activity when evaluated in the TNBC cell line MDA-MB-231 with IC50 values in the range 3.26–3.82 μM, suggesting that they were not selective for ER+ breast cancer cells.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Antiproliferative effects of selected nitrovinylanthracenes 19a, 19g, 19i, 19l and 19m in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cell lines. Cell proliferation of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells was determined with an alamarBlue assay. Compound concentrations of either 1 μM or 10 μM for 72 h (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231) were used to treat the cells (in triplicate) with control wells containing vehicle ethanol (1% v/v). Values represent the mean ± SEM for three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Statistical significance was evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis test. * Indicates a p value between 0.01 and 0.05; ** indicates a p value between 0.001 and 0.01.

Table 4.

Antiproliferative effects of selected nitrovinylanthracenes 19a, 19g and 19i in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cell lines.

graphic file with name molecules-28-08095-i003.jpg
Compound MCF-7
IC50 (μM) a
MDA-MB-231
IC50 (μM) a
19a 1.85 3.82
19g 5.31 3.78
19i 2.11 3.26
Tamoxifen b 4.12 20

a IC50 values are half-maximal inhibitory concentrations required to block the growth stimulation of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells. Treatment at eight different concentrations (0.001–50 μM) was used for the determination of the IC50 values for each compound. Values represent the mean ± SEM (error values × 10−6) for three independent experiments performed in triplicate. b The IC50 values for tamoxifen were in good agreement with the reported IC50 values in MCF-7 cells [81] and MDA-MB-231cells [82,83].

2.12. Pro-Apoptotic Effects of Nitrostyrene Compounds 11g, 11h, 11i, 11j, 11k and 11l in MUTU-I and DG-75 BL Cell Lines

To examine the potential anti-proliferative effects of these nitrostyrene-type compounds, the ability of the most potent compounds identified from the cell viability study to induce apoptosis in the MUTU-I and DG-75 cell lines was investigated using Annexin V and propidium iodide staining at a 10 μM concentration. The chemotherapeutic drug taxol was used as a positive control. The pro-apoptotic effects of the selected nitrostyrene compounds 11g, 11h, 11i, 11j, 11k and 11l (10 μM) were determined using FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate), Annexin V/PI (propidium iodide) staining and FACS (fluorescence-activated cell sorting) analysis to characterise the mode of cellular death induced by the synthesised compounds. Four populations were produced in this assay: Annexin-V- and PI-negative (Q4, healthy cells), Annexin-V-positive and PI-negative (Q3, early apoptosis), Annexin-V- and PI-positive (Q2, late apoptosis) and Annexin-V-negative and PI-positive (Q1, necrosis), which were easily identified and quantified. Apoptosis was assessed as % total apoptosis by a combination of early and late apoptosis (Q3 and Q2, respectively). In the MUTU-I cell line, the selected nitrostyrene compounds 11g, 11h, 11i, 11j, 11k and 11l demonstrated a significant increase in apoptosis (80–91%), with the most potent effect being observed for the 3-chloro compound 11k (91%) and was comparable to the effect induced by taxol (87%) at the same concentration (Table 5). In the DG-75 cell line, the 3-chloro compound 11h (10 μM) produced a significant increase in apoptosis (92%), while a significant increase in apoptosis (70–92%) in the DG-75 cells was observed upon treatment with the compounds 11g, 11h, 11i, 11j, 11k and 11l and compared favourablely with taxol (72.7%) at 10 μM. The identification of compounds that can induce apoptosis in cancer cells is required in the development of potential lead structures for anticancer drugs.

Table 5.

Pro-apoptotic effects of nitrostyrene compounds 11g, 11h, 11i, 11j, 11k and 11l in MUTU-I and DG-75 BL cell lines a.

Compound Concentration MUTU-I DG-75
(µM) Apoptosis (%) Apoptosis (%)
11g 10 80.9 70.6
11h 10 82.6 92.0
11i 10 84.5 86.4
11j 10 88.3 72.3
11k 10 91.5 90.7
11l 10 91.3 85.0
Taxol 10 87.3 72.8
Taxol 1 62.8 20.7
Vehicle Ethanol 13.7 1.05

a MUTU-I and DG-75 BL cells were treated with compounds 11g, 11h, 11i, 11j, 11k and 11l (10 µM), taxol (10 µM and 1 µM) and control vehicle (1% EtOH (v/v)) for 24 h (MUTU-I) and 48 h (DG-75). The percentage of apoptotic cells was determined by staining with Annexin V-FITC and PI. The experiment was performed as individual replicates on three independent days.

2.13. Pro-Apoptotic Effects of Nitrovinylanthracene Compounds 19a, 19g, 19i, 19l and 19m in HG-3 and PGA-1 CLL Cell Lines

The pro-apoptotic effects of the selected nitrovinylanthracene compounds 19a, 19g, 19i, 19l and 19m after 48 h were next determined using FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate), Annexin V/PI (propidium iodide) staining and FACS (fluorescence-activated cell sorting) analysis to characterize the mode of cellular death induced. Apoptosis was assessed as above using the cell lines HG-3 and PGA-1 and using nitrovinylanthracene compound treatment concentrations of 1 µM and 10 µM. We previously reported that fludarabine phosphate (50 μM) induces an increase of 24.6% in apoptosis of cancer cells isolated from CLL patients [45].

The results from the Annexin V/PI studies of the lead (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracene compound 19a (10 µM, 5 µM and 1 µM) and 19g, 19i, 19l and 19m (10 μM and 1 μM) concentrations are shown in Figure 12. In the HG-3 cells, all the compounds tested produced a marked proapoptotic effect. Compound 19a produced significant concentration-dependent apoptosis, with 93% apoptosis at a 10 μM concentration, 69% apoptosis at 5 μM and 21% apoptosis at 1 μM. Compound 19l (10-ethyl) produced a 74% apoptotic response at 10 μM followed by 19i (10-methyl) and 19m (10-isopropyl) producing 70% and 69% total apoptosis, respectively. Compound 19g (10-methoxy) produced the lowest pro-apoptotic response at 10 μM, with 54% total apoptosis. In the PGA-1 cells, all the compounds tested also produced a marked concentration-dependent pro-apoptotic effect: 19a produced 94% apoptosis (10 μM), 67% apoptosis (5 μM) and 40% apoptosis at a 1 μM concentration. Compounds 19i (10-methyl) and 19l (10-isopropyl) demonstrated 80% and 82% total apoptosis, respectively, at 10 μM, followed by 19m (74%) and 19g (52%) (Figure 12). In both cell lines, alkyl substitution at position 10 of the anthracene scaffold structure was observed to promote a more favourable pro-apoptotic action in the CLL cell lines. The introduction of a methoxy group at C-10 in 19g compared to the alkyl substituent of 19l suggests the potential role of hydrophobic groups to increase biological activity (30% activity decrease in PGA-1; 20% activity decrease in HG-3 cells). At a lower concentration (1 μM), 19m was the most potent compound in the HG-3 cell line by a 14% margin in total apoptosis induced (25% apoptosis), followed by 19a (21% apoptosis) and 19g (11% apoptosis). Furthermore, decreasing the steric size of the hydrophobic alkyl group resulted in decreasing the pro-apoptotic effect (19m (isopropyl) > 19l (ethyl) > 19i (methyl)) at the lower compound concentration in both cell lines. Examples of the quadrant diagrams generated by compounds 19a and 19m at 10 μM and 1 μM in the HG-3 cells are illustrated in Figure 13. The observed results in the CLL cell lines HG-3 and PGA-1 suggest that these compounds act by a pro-apoptotic mechanism that is concentration-dependent.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Nitrovinylanthracene compounds 19a, 19g, 19i, 19l and 19m potently induce apopotosis in HG-3 and PGA-1 cell lines (Annexin V/PI FACS). HG-3 and PGA-1 leukaemia cells were treated with 19a, 19g, 19i, 19l and 19m (1 and 10 µM) and control vehicle (1% DMSO (v/v)) at 48 h. The % of apoptotic cells was determined by staining with Annexin V-FITC and PI. The experiment was performed individually and replicated on three independent days.

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Compounds 19a and 19m induced cell apoptosis in HG-3 and PGA-1 leukaemia cells. HG-3 and PGA-1 leukaemia cells were treated with 19a and 19m (10 and 1.0 µM) and control vehicle (1% DMSO (v/v)) at 48 h. (A) Compound 19a (10 µM concentration) treatment in HG-3 cells; (B) compound 19a (1 µM concentration) treatment in HG-3 cells; (C) HG-3 cells treatment with vehicle 1% DMSO; (D) compound 19m (10 µM concentration) in PGA-1 cells; (E) compound 19m (1 µM concentration) in PGA-1 cells; (F) PGA-1 cells treatment with vehicle 1% DMSO. The % of apoptotic cells was determined by staining with Annexin V-FITC and PI. The lower left quadrant shows cells that are negative for both Annexin V-FITC and PI, and upper left shows only PI cells that are necrotic. The lower right quadrant shows Annexin-positive cells that are in the early apoptotic stage, and the upper right shows cell lines that are both Annexin- and PI-positive, which are in the late apoptosis stage.

2.14. Molecular Modelling

The designed 9-nitrovinylanthracenes 19a–m and related compounds are structurally related to maprotiline and may drive their cellular antiproliferative effect through a similar mechanism of action. In order to examine the structural similarity in more detail, all the compounds described in this work were overlaid on maprotiline using two separate but complementary methodologies. MOE flexible alignment [84] was used in our previous work [85] and is based on several similarity terms, such as hydrogen bond donor/acceptor, aromaticity and partial charge. A stochastic search procedure was used to flexibly align and superimpose similar functional groups in each molecule while sampling the full conformational flexibility of each structure. OpenEye fastROCS [86] is a GPU-based 3D shape similarity method that takes a low-energy conformation of maprotiline as the query molecule and aligns to it each conformation of the compounds in this paper by a solid body optimisation process to maximise the volume overlap. Both colour (feature) and shape similarity were measured with a Tanimoto score with a maximum (best) score of 1, and the overall overlay quality was giving by the Tanimoto combo (Tc) score, which is the sum of these two scores with a maximum (best) value of 2. All databases and reference structures are provided in the Supplementary Information as sdf or mdb files.

The overlay results obtained for all the compounds in this study are inconclusive but generally indicate that the compounds in this paper may have a similar mechanism of action as maprotiline (Supplementary Information, Tables S9 and S10). In the fastROCS study, considering the cell viability of the BL MUTU-1 cell lines treated at 10 μM, only 5 of the top 12 overlaid compounds decreased the cell viability by over 50% (Supplementary Information, Table S9). A similar result was obtained in the analysis of the CLL HG-3 cell viability. The MOE flexible alignment also demonstrated a lack of correlation between the lowest (best) scored compounds and those with the most promising cellular data, both for the CLL and BL cell lines (Supplementary Information, Tables S9 and S10).

A selection of the best (lowest)-scored overlaid structures for the most potent anthracene compounds 19a, 19g, 19i, 19l and 19m (displayed as green in their respective overlays) with the lead compound maprotiline 9 (pink) is provided in Table 6, together with the antiproliferative activity in CLL cells. Shared molecular features were clearly identified, e.g., the (E)-configuration nitrovinyl pharmacophore located at C-9 that overlays with the methylpropylamine-containing substituent of maprotiline, and the aromatic anthracene structure that overlays with the 9,10-dihydroanthracene core structure of maprotiline. A selection of the best-scored overlaid structures for the most potent nitrostyrene compounds 11c, 11d, 11j and 11k is provided in Table 7. The nitrostyrenes mapped closely to the cyclic core of maprotiline rather than to the central ring and along the sidechain as for the anthracenes; again, the correlation with cellular activity in CLL cell lines was not conclusive (See Supplementary Information, Tables S9 and S10).

Table 6.

Overlay of potent anthracene compounds on maprotiline with their overlay scores.

Compound Number Overlay of Anthracene Compounds (Green) with Maprotiline (Pink) Overlay (F) Score a Overlay (S) Score a IC50 (μM) HG-3
Cell Line b
IC50 (μM) PGA-1 Cell Line b
19a graphic file with name molecules-28-08095-i004.jpg −137.5 −55.7 2.43 3.1
19g graphic file with name molecules-28-08095-i005.jpg −133.8 −43.0 0.17 1.29
19i graphic file with name molecules-28-08095-i006.jpg −140.4 −52.4 3.85 4.40
19l graphic file with name molecules-28-08095-i007.jpg −140.2 −52.0 5.40 1.3
19m graphic file with name molecules-28-08095-i008.jpg −140.4 −47.3 0.70 9.10

a Overlay of most potent nitrovinylanthracene compound series 19a, 19g, 19i, 19l and 19m on maprotiline 9 with their overlay scores (F and S) in MOE 2022 and 2D images. The F column contains the similarity score (the lower the better) of the alignment. The S column has the sum of the U (not shown but is the average internal energy of the ligand) and F values. b The compounds shown represent those with the best IC50 or percentage viability values on the HG-3 and PGA-1 cell lines.

Table 7.

Overlay of potent nitrostyrene compound series on maprotiline with overlay scores.

Compound Number Overlay of Nitrostyrene Compounds (Green) with Maprotiline (Pink) Overlay (F) Score a Overlay (S) Score b % Viability
HG-3
(10 μM) b
% Viability PGA-1
(10 μM) b
11c graphic file with name molecules-28-08095-i009.jpg −102.8 −39.3 8.76 3.70
11d graphic file with name molecules-28-08095-i010.jpg −108.9 −44.7 0.66 0.02
11j graphic file with name molecules-28-08095-i011.jpg −107.2 −41.5 5.61 0.53
11k graphic file with name molecules-28-08095-i012.jpg −103.1 −41.8 0.11 4.34

a Overlay of most potent nitrostyrene compound series on maprotiline with their overlay scores (F and S) in MOE 2022 and 2D images. The F column contains the similarity score (the lower the better) of the alignment. The S column has the sum of the U (not shown but is the average internal energy of the ligand) and F values. b The compounds shown represent those with the best IC50 or percentage viability values on the HG-3 and PGA-1 cell lines.

3. Experimental Section

Uncorrected melting points were measured on a Gallenkamp apparatus. Infra-red (IR) spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer Spectrum FT-IR 100 spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA). 1H, 13C and 19F nuclear magnetic resonance spectra (NMR) were recorded at 27 °C on a Bruker DPX 400 spectrometer (Bruker UK Limited, Coventry, UK) (400.13 MHz, 1H; 100.61 MHz, 13C; 376.47 MHz, 19F) in either CDCl3 (internal standard tetramethylsilane (TMS)) or CD3OD or DMSO-d6. For CDCl3, 1H-NMR spectra were assigned relative to the TMS peak at 0.00 ppm, and 13C-NMR spectra were assigned relative to the middle CDCl3 peak at 77.0 ppm. For CD3OD, 1H and 13C-NMR spectra were assigned relative to the center peaks of the CD3OD multiplets at 3.30 ppm and 49.00 ppm, respectively. Coupling constants are reported in Hertz. For 1H-NMR assignments, chemical shifts are reported as the shift value (number of protons, description of absorption and coupling constant(s), where applicable). Electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) was performed in the positive ion mode on a liquid chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Micromass LCT, Waters Ltd., Manchester, UK). The samples were introduced to the ion source by an LC system (Waters Alliance 2795, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) in acetonitrile: water (60:40% v/v) at 200 µL/min. The capillary voltage of the mass spectrometer was at 3 kV. The sample cone (de-clustering) voltage was set at 40 V. For exact mass determination, the instrument was externally calibrated for the mass range from m/z 100 to m/z 1000. A lock (reference) mass (m/z 556.2771) was used. Mass measurement accuracies of <±5 ppm were obtained. Rf values are quoted for thin-layer chromatography on silica gel Merck F-254 plates unless otherwise stated. Flash column chromatography was carried out on Merck Kieselgel 60 (particle size 0.040–0.063 mm). Microwave experiments were carried out using a Discover CEM microwave synthesiser on the standard power setting (300 watts) unless otherwise stated. See Supplementary Information for preparation and characterisation of compounds previously reported: 11a–l, 13a–e, 14a, 14c–e, 14f–g, 15, 16, 18, 19a–g, 21, 23c, 24–28, 29a–d, 30a, 32a–e, 33a, 33d–f [39,40,55,57,58,66,67,71,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115].

3.1. 10-Isopropylanthracene-9-carbaldehyde (14b)

N-methylformanilide (2.03 g, 15 mmol) was added to a cooled, stirred solution of 9-isopropylanthracene (1.76 g, 8 mmol) in phosphorus oxychloride (2.30 g, 15 mmol). The flask was heated to 100 °C for 1.5 h. The solution was then allowed to cool to room temperature and quenched by adding a solution of sodium acetate (8.3 g) in water (15 mL). The reaction mixture was then extracted with dichloromethane, washed with water and brine and subsequently dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo. The product was purified by column chromatography (dichloromethane: hexane (1:4)). The product was obtained as a dark brown resin weighing 1.19 g (60%). IRVmax (ATR): 3077, 2950 (C-H), 1622 (C=C), 1520, 1445 (C=C) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.77 (d, J = 7.32 Hz, 6 H, 2 × CH3), 4.52–4.62 (m, 1 H, CH), 7.50–7.55 (m, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 7.58–7.65 (m, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.53 (d, J = 9.16 Hz, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.93 (d, J = 9.16 Hz, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 11.46 (s, 1 H, CHO). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) ppm 21.3 (CH3), 22.1 (CH), 121.6 (CH), 123.5 (CH), 124.2 (CH), 125.0 (CH), 125.6 (CH), 125.7 (CH), 127.3 (CH), 128.3 (CH), 128.7, 129.1 (CH), 129.2 (CH), 131.8, 135.2 (CH), 146.1, 195.4 (CHO). HRMS (APCI) calculated for C18H17O [M+ + H] 249.1279: found 249.1276.

3.2. 9-(2-Methoxyvinyl)anthracene (17)

Potassium tert-butoxide (1 M solution in THF, 13 mL) was added dropwise to a suspension of (methoxymethyl)triphenylphosphonium chloride (4.46 g, 13 mmol) in THF (25 mL) under nitrogen at 0 °C. The resultant mixture was stirred for 1 h. After 1 h, a solution of anthraldehyde (10 mmol) in THF (20 mL) was added. The reaction was stirred at 0 °C for 5 min and then allowed to heat to room temperature, after which the reaction was allowed to stir for 2 h. The reaction was then filtered through a short column of silica and eluted with diethyl ether. Solvent was removed in vacuo. The product was purified by column chromatography (hexane: dichloromethane (3:2)) to afford a mixture of E/Z methylenol ethers. The product was obtained as an orange resin weighing 1.83 g (60%). IRVmax (ATR): 2981, 2924 (C-H), 1622 (C=C), 1524, 1445 (C=C) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.66 (s, 3 H, Z CH3), 3.96 (s, 3 H, E CH3), 6.04 (d, J = 6.71 Hz, 1 H, Z =CH), 6.46 (d, J = 13.43 Hz, 1 H, E =CH), 6.61 (d, J = 7.32 Hz, 1 H, Z =CH), 6.81 (d, J = 12.82 Hz, 1 H, E =CH), 7.46–7.58 (m, 6 H), 7.99–8.09 (m, 3 H), 8.36–8.49 (m, 3 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) ppm 56.5, 59, 98.9, 101.3, 124.9, 125.0, 125.1, 125.7, 126.1, 126.2, 126.7, 128.4, 128.5, 128.6, 128.7, 129.4, 129.6, 130.1, 130.5, 131.4, 131.5, 133.6, 133.8, 148.5, 152.8. HRMS (APCI) calculated for C17H15O [M+ + H] 235.1123: found 235.1115.

3.3. General Procedure for the Preparation of Nitrovinyl Anthracene Derivatives (19h-m, 20a, 20b)

Piperidinium acetate (1.5 g, 10.3 mmol) was added to a solution of 9-anthraldehyde (2 g, 9.7 mmol) in the appropriate nitroalkane (15 mL). Piperidinium acetate was prepared from piperidine (6.6 mL) and acetic acid (3 mL). The solution was heated at 90 °C for 1.5 h under nitrogen gas. After one hour, the reaction was cooled to room temperature and poured onto ice-cold H2O (100 mL). The resultant mixture was extracted into DCM and washed with brine, and the organic layers were combined, dried over Na2SO4 and the solvent removed in vacuo. The product was recrystallised from an appropriate solvent.

3.3.1. (E)-9-Bromo-10-(2-Nitrovinyl)Anthracene (19h)

(E)-9-Bromo-10-(2-nitrovinyl) anthracene was prepared from 10-bromoanthracene-9-carbaldehyde (1.7 mmol, 0.5 g) and nitromethane (5.1 mL) according to the general procedure above. The product was purified by column chromatography using a mobile phase of dichloromethane: hexane, 1:2, and obtained as an orange solid weighing 311 mg (56%), Mp. 227–230 °C. IRVmax (ATR): 3101, 3048 (C-H), 1626, 1508, (C=C), 1543, 1347 (NO2), 1251 (C-N) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 7.71 (br. s., 2 H, 2 × ArH), 7.80 (br. s., 2 H, 2 × ArH), 7.92 (d, J = 13.27 Hz, 1 H, H1′), 8.31 (d, J = 7.46 Hz, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.54 (d, J = 7.46 Hz, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.94 (d, J = 13.68 Hz, 1 H, H2′). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm 109.5, 126.0 (CH), 127.4 (CH), 127.5 (CH), 128.2 (CH), 129.4 (CH), 129.6 (CH), 135.1, 137.6, 144.5, 148.3 (C2′). HRMS (APCI) calculated for C16H11Br79NO2 [M+ + H] 327.9973: found 327.9966.

3.3.2. (E)-9-Methyl-10-(2-Nitrovinyl)Anthracene (19i)

(E)-9-Methyl-10-(2-nitrovinyl) anthracene was prepared from 10-methylanthracene-9-carbaldehyde (2.2 mmol, 0.5 g) and nitromethane (6.6 mL) according to the general procedure above. The product was purified by column chromatography (dichloromethane: hexane, 1:2). The product was recrystallised from methanol and diethyl ether as a bright orange solid weighing 175 mg (30%), Mp. 140–142 °C. IRVmax (ATR): 3100, 2981 (C-H), 1624 (C=C), 1549, 1332 (NO2), 1504, 1461 (C=C) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.08 (s, 3 H, CH3), 7.45 (d, J = 13.43 Hz, 1 H, H1′), 7.51–7.61 (m, 4 H, 4 × ArH), 8.08–8.17 (m, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.23–8.34 (m, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.88 (d, J = 14.04 Hz, 1 H, H2′). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) ppm 14.6 (CH3), 121.7, 124.9 (CH), 125.4 (CH), 125.5 (CH), 126.8 (CH), 129.4, 129.6, 134.6, 136.2 (CH), 142.5 (C2′). HRMS (APCI) calculated for C17H14NO2 [M+ + H] 264.1019: found 264.1006.

3.3.3. (E)-9-(2-Nitrovinyl)-10-Phenylanthracene (19j)

(E)-9-(2-Nitrovinyl)-10-phenyl anthracene was prepared from 10-phenylanthracene-9-carbaldehyde (1.7 mmol, 0.5 g) and nitromethane (5.1 mL) according to the general procedure above. The product was purified by column chromatography (dichloromethane: hexane, 1:1). The product was recrystallised from methanol and diethyl ether as an orange solid weighing 332 mg (60%), Mp. 119–121 °C. IR Vmax (ATR): 3094, 2981 (C-H), 1630 (C=C), 1510, 1437 (C=C), 1542, 1331 (NO2) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.43 (t, J = 7.02 Hz, 4 H, 4 × ArH), 7.55–7.66 (m, 6 H, 5 × ArH and H1′), 7.73 (d, J = 8.55 Hz, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.25 (d, J = 9.16 Hz, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 9.08 (d, J = 14.04 Hz, 1 H, H2′). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) ppm 123.3, 124.4 (CH), 125.5 (CH), 127.1 (CH), 127.9 (CH), 128.5 (CH), 129.6, 129.9, 130.9 (CH), 136.1 (CH), 138.1, 140.9, 142.9 (C2′). HRMS (APCI) calculated for C22H16NO2 [M+ + H] 326.1181: found 326.1177.

3.3.4. (E)-1,8-Dichloro-10-(2-Nitrovinyl)Anthracene (19k)

(E)-1,8-Dichloro-10-(2-nitrovinyl) anthracene was prepared from 4,5-dichloroanthracene-9-carbaldehyde (1.8 mmol, 0.5 g) and nitromethane (5.1 mL) according to the general procedure above. The product was purified by column chromatography (dichloromethane: hexane, 1:1) and obtained as a yellow solid weighing 58 mg (10%), Mp. 206–209 °C. IRVmax (ATR): 2981, 2889 (C-H), 1631 (C=C), 1510, 1437 (C=C), 1543, 1361 (NO2) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.40–7.63 (m, 3 H, 2 × ArH and H1′), 7.71 (d, J = 7.32 Hz, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.08 (d, J = 8.55 Hz, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.91 (d, J = 14.04 Hz, 1 H, H2′), 9.47 (s, 1 H, H9). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) ppm 123.6 (CH), 124.3 (CH), 126.3, 126.5, 127.5 (CH), 129.0, 130.7, 133.5, 135.3 (CH), 143.6 (C2′). HRMS (APCI) calculated for C16H935Cl2NO2 [M+] 317.0010: found 317.0009.

3.3.5. (E)-9-Ethyl-10-(2-Nitrovinyl)Anthracene (19l)

(E)-9-Ethyl-10-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracene was prepared from 10-ethylanthracene-9-carbaldehyde (4.4 mmol, 1.1 g) and nitromethane (12 mL) according to the general procedure above. The product was purified by column chromatography dichloromethane: hexane (1:1), and recrystallised from methanol and diethyl ether as an orange solid weighing 733 mg (60%), Mp. 130–134 °C. IRVmax (ATR): 3087, 2976 (C-H), 1629 (C=C), 1554, 1338 (NO2), 1539, 1442 (C=C) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.49 (t, J = 7.63 Hz, 3 H, CH3), 3.68 (q, J = 7.32 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 7.46–7.66 (m, 5 H, 4 × ArH, H1′), 8.14–8.25 (m, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.30–8.42 (m, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.98 (d, J = 13.43 Hz, 1 H, H2′). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) ppm 15.5 (CH3), 21.6 (CH2), 122.0, 124.3 (CH), 125.1 (CH), 125.2 (CH), 125.7 (CH), 125.7 (CH), 126.8 (CH), 127.5 (CH), 128.8, 129.2 (CH), 129.8, 136.4 (CH), 140.9, 142.6 (C2′). HRMS (APCI) calculated for C18H16NO2 [M+ + H] 278.1181: found 278.1178.

3.3.6. (E)-9-Isopropyl-10-(2-Nitrovinyl)Anthracene (19m)

(E)-9-Isopropyl-10-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracene was prepared from 10-isopropylanthracene-9-carbaldehyde (4.4 mmol, 1.1 g) and nitromethane (12 mL) according to the general procedure above. The product was purified by column chromatography dichloromethane: hexane (1:1) and isolated from methanol and diethyl ether as a dark red resin weighing 873 mg (68%). IRVmax (ATR): 3087, 2962 (C-H), 1628 (C=C), 1552, 1333 (NO2), 1514, 1443 (C=C) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.80 (m, 6 H, 2 × CH3), 4.52–4.71 (m, 1 H, CH), 7.43–7.62 (m, 5 H, 4 × ArH, H1′), 8.12–8.24 (m, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.47–8.63 (m, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.99 (dd, J = 13.43, 1 H, H2′). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) ppm 22.9 (CH3), 28.8 (CH), 122.5, 124.3 (CH), 125.1, 125.4 (CH), 125.6 (CH), 125.8 (CH), 126.4 (CH), 127.5 (CH), 129.0, 129.0, 129.2 (CH), 129.9, 130.0, 136.5 (CH), 142.8 (C2′), 144.7. HRMS (APCI) calculated for C19H18NO2 [M+ + H] 292.1338: found 292.1334.

3.3.7. 9-(3-Nitroallyl)Anthracene (20a)

9-(3-Nitroallyl)anthracene was prepared from 2-(anthracen-9-yl)acetaldehyde (6.7 mmol, 1.5 g) and nitroethane (15 mL) according to the general procedure above. The product was purified by column chromatography (eluent 3:1 dichloromethane: hexane) and obtained as a dark orange oil weighing 566 mg (32%). IRVmax (ATR): 3089, 2928 (C-H), 1667 (C=C), 1551, 1356 (NO2), 1514, 1444 (C=C) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.58 (d, J = 6.10 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 6.62 (dd, J = 13.43, 1.83 Hz, 1 H, H3′), 7.49–7.61 (m, 4 H, 4 × ArH), 7.66–7.77 (m, 1 H, H2′), 8.07 (d, J = 8.55 Hz, 4 H, 4 × ArH), 8.49 (s, 1 H, H10). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) ppm 27.0 (CH2), 123.3 (CH), 125.2 (CH), 126.8 (CH), 127.8 (CH), 129.5 (CH), 129.8, 131.5, 140.7 (C2′), 141.1. HRMS (APCI) calculated for C17H14NO2 [M+ + H] 264.1025: found 264.1023.

3.3.8. 9-(3-Nitrobut-2-en-1-yl)Anthracene (20b)

9-(3-Nitrobut-2-en-1-yl)anthracene was prepared from 2-(anthracen-9-yl)acetaldehyde (6.7 mmol, 1.5 g) and nitroethane (15 mL) according to the general procedure above. The product was purified by column chromatography (eluent 3:1 dichloromethane: hexane) and obtained as a brown oil weighing 372 mg (20%). IRVmax (ATR): 3088, 2951 (C-H), 1667 (C=C), 1545, 1360 (NO2), 1513, 1473 (C=C) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 2.54 (s, 3 H, CH3), 4.53 (d, J = 6.71 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 7.49–7.60 (m, 5 H, 4 × ArH and H2′), 8.05–8.13 (m, 4 H, 4 × ArH), 8.47 (s, 1 H, H10). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) ppm 13.1 (CH3), 26.7 (CH2), 123.4 (CH), 125.1 (CH), 126.5 (CH), 127.5 (CH), 128.5, 129.6 (CH), 129.8, 131.6, 134.9 (C2′). HRMS (APCI) calculated for C18H16NO2 [M+ + H] 278.1181: found 278.1177.

3.4. 9-(2-Nitroethyl)Anthracene (22)

Sodium borohydride (60 mg, 1.6 mmol) was added to a solution of (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracene (100 mg, 0.4 mmol) in dichloromethane (10 mL) and isopropanol (2 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 h and neutralised using 1 M HCl. The solution was extracted with dichloromethane, dried with sodium sulfate and the solvent removed in vacuo. The product was recrystallised from methanol and diethyl ether as orange crystals weighing 85 mg (85%), Mp. 147–149 °C. IRVmax (ATR): 3053, 2974 (C-H), 1622, 1493 (C=C), 1546, 1377 (NO2), 1137 (C-N) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.35–4.44 (m, 2 H, CH2), 4.70–4.78 (m, 2 H, CH2), 7.48–7.56 (m, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 7.57–7.65 (m, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.06 (d, J = 8.55 Hz, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.25 (d, J = 9.16 Hz, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.46 (s, 1 H, C10). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) ppm 26.1 (C2′), 74.7 (C1′), 122.9 (CH), 125.2 (CH), 126.2, 126.9 (CH), 127.8, 129.6 (CH), 129.9, 131.5. HRMS (APCI) calculated for C16H12NO2 [M+ − H] 250.0874: found 250.0874.

3.5. 2-((10-Chloroanthracen-9-yl)Methylene)Malononitrile (23b)

One drop of piperidine was added to a solution of 10-chloro-9-anthraldehyde (0.458 g, 1.91 mmol) and malonitrile (0.372 g. 6.11 mmol) in ACN (50 mL). The solution was heated at 90 °C for 0.5 h. The solution was then concentrated in vacuo, and the residual solid was dissolved in DCM and washed with HCl (10%), water and brine. The organic phases were combined and dried over sodium sulfate and the solvent removed in vacuo. The product was obtained as orange crystals weighing 495 mg (90%), Mp. 196–198 °C. IRVmax (ATR): 3088, 2965 (C-H), 2228 (CN), 1621 (C=C), 1574, 1445 (C=C) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.68–7.76 (m, 4 H, 4 × ArH), 7.91–7.97 (m, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.61–8.71 (m, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.91 (s, 1 H, C1′). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) ppm 93.4 (C2′), 111.1 (CN), 112.7 (CN), 122.9, 124.2 (CH), 126.2 (CH), 127.2, 127.4 (CH), 128.4, 128.5 (CH), 129.3, 160.2 (C1′). HRMS (APCI) calculated for C18H9N2Cl35 [M+] 288.0454: found 288.0466.

3.6. 4-(Anthracen-9-yl)-5-Methyl-1H-1,2,3-Triazole (30b)

Sodium azide (2 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of (E)-9-(2-nitroprop-1-en-1-yl)anthracene (1 mmol, 0.25 g) in DMSO (2 mL). The reaction was stirred at 90 °C for 90 min. After allowing the reaction to cool to room temperature, deionised water (10 mL) was added, and the aqueous mix was extracted into diethyl ether. The organic layer was washed with water and brine and dried over sodium sulfate. The solvent was removed in vacuo to afford a crude product. The product was purified by column chromatography (gradient dichloromethane–methanol) and recrystallised from ethanol as a yellow solid weighing 117 mg (45%), Mp. 231–232 °C. IRVmax (ATR): 3082, 3026 (C-H), 1623, 1587 (C=C), 1249 (C-N) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) d 2.01 (s, 3 H, CH3), 7.40–7.63 (m, 6 H, 6 × ArH), 8.17 (d, J = 8.29 Hz, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.76 (s, 1 H, H10). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm 9.3 (CH3), 125.5 (CH), 126.4 (CH), 128.6 (CH), 130.5, 130.8. HRMS (APCI) calculated for C17H14N3 [M+ + H] 260.1188: found 260.1181.

3.7. 4-(Anthracen-9-yl)-4,5-Dihydro-1H-1,2,3-Triazole (31)

Sodium azide (2 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracene (1 mmol, 0.25 g) in DMSO (2 mL). The reaction was stirred at 90 °C for 12 h. After allowing the reaction to cool to room temperature, deionised water (10 mL) was added, and the aqueous mix was extracted into diethyl ether. The organic layer was washed with water and brine and dried over sodium sulfate. The solvent was removed in vacuo to afford a crude product. The product was purified by column chromatography (gradient dichloromethane–methanol) and recrystallised from ethanol as yellow crystals weighing 222 mg (90%), Mp. 266–268 °C. IRVmax (ATR): 3054, 2920 (C-H), 1614, 1488 (C=C), 1220 (C-N) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 4.64 (d, J = 4.88 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 6.68 (t, J = 5.19 Hz, 1 H, CH), 7.45–7.70 (m, 4 H, 4 × ArH), 8.11 (d, J = 8.55 Hz, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.31 (d, J = 9.16 Hz, 2 H, 2 × ArH), 8.56 (s, 1 H, H10), 11.40 (s, 1 H, NH). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) ppm 24.0 (CH2), 124.3 (CH), 125.2 (CH), 126.2 (CH), 126.3 (CH), 129.0 (CH), 129.3, 129.7, 131.1, 147.9 (CH). HRMS (APCI) calculated for C16H13N3 [M+] 247.1109: found 247.1118.

3.8. Anthracen-9-yl(Azepan-1-yl)Methanone (33c)

Chloro-1-methylpyridinium iodide (0.76 g, 3 mmol) was added to a suspension of anthracene-9-carboxylic acid (0.22 g, 1 mmol) in anhydrous dichloromethane (10 mL). The solution turned yellow and was stirred for a further 5 min. Homopiperidine (0.113 mL, 1 mmol) was added to this followed by the addition of trimethylamine (0.7 mL, 5 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h and was then diluted with 10% hydrochloric acid (10 mL) followed by extraction with dichloromethane (10 mL). The organic layer was washed with 10% sodium hydroxide solution, water and brine. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was purified by column chromatography (eluent: dichloromethane) and recrystallised from ethanol as a brown solid weighing 261 mg (86%), Mp. 134–137 °C. IRVmax (ATR): 3048, 2929 (C-H), 1615, 1486.60 (C=C), 1263 (C-N) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.31–1.43 (m, 2 H, CH2), 1.47–1.59 (m, 2 H, CH2), 1.75 (dt, J = 11.75, 6.03 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 1.94–2.12 (m, 2 H, CH2), 3.09 (t, J = 6.10 Hz, 2 H, CH2), 3.95–4.06 (m, 2 H, CH2), 7.42–7.57 (m, 4 H, 4 × ArH), 7.90–8.06 (m, 4 H, 4 × ArH), 8.45 (s, 1 H, H10). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) ppm 26.5 (C5″/C4″), 28.1 (C5″/C4″), 28.3 (C3″/C6″), 28.8 (C3″/C6″), 45.1 (C7″/C2″), 49.0 (C7″/C2″), 125.0 (CH), 125.4 (CH), 126.5 (CH), 127.3 (CH), 127.5, 128.6 (CH), 131.2, 131.7, 170.1 (C1′). HRMS (APCI) calculated for C21H22NO [M+ + H] 304.1701: found 304.1688.

4. Biochemistry

4.1. Materials

The MUTU-I (c179), DG-75, BJAB and Ramos BL cell lines were gifts from Dr. Dermot Walls (School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland). The EBV-transformed CLL PGA-1 (M-IGVH, good prognosis) and HG-3 (UM-IGVH, poor prognosis) cell lines were provided by Professor Anders Rosén (Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden) [116]. The MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cells were purchased from the European Collection of Animal Cell Cultures (ECACC). The MDA-MB-231 human breast carcinoma cell line was a gift from Dr. Susan McDonnell, School of Chemical and Bioprocess Engineering, University College Dublin. Other cell lines were sourced as follows: HL-60 promyelocytic leukaemia cells (cat. no. 98070106; ECACC, Salisbury, UK) and HeLa cervical cancer cells (cat. no. 93021013; ECACC). alamarBlue was obtained from BioSource, Nivelles, Belgium, and foetal bovine serum (FBS) was sourced from Invitrogen, U.K. RPMI 1640 medium, DMEM, HEPES, sodium pyruvate, Gentamycin (G418) and glutamine were sourced from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Dun Laoghaire, Ireland. Cell culture consumables were obtained from Greiner Bio-One Ltd., Stonehouse, U.K., while all other reagents used were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (now Merck), Arklow, Ireland.

4.2. Cell Culture

The MUTU-I and chemoresistant DG-75 BL cell lines were grown in RPMI 1640 (Glutamax) medium containing phenol red and supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, L-glutamine (2 mM), 50 U/mL penicillin and 50 μg/mL streptomycin. The MUTU-I cell line also required supplements of sodium pyruvate (100 mM), alpha-thioglycerol (5 mM in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 20 μM bathocuprione disulfonic acid) and HEPES (1 mM). The CLL PGA-1 and HG-3 and HL-60 leukaemia cell lines were grown in RPMI-1640 (Glutamax; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Dun Laoghaire, Dublin, Ireland) medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 50 μg/mL streptomycin and 50 U/mL penicillin and seeded at a density of 2 × 105 cells/mL. MCF-7 cells were maintained in Eagle’s minimum essential medium (MEM) supplemented with 10% (v/v) foetal bovine serum (FBS), L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin/streptomycin (100 μg/mL) and non-essential amino acids (1% (v/v). The MDA-MB-231 cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (D-MEM) supplemented with FBS, (10% (v/v)), l-glutamine (2 mM) and penicillin/streptomycin (100 μg/mL). HeLa cervical cancer cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS and 50 μg/mL penicillin/streptomycin and seeded at a density of 5 × 104 cells/mL. All cell cultures were maintained at 37 °C under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% O2 and were passaged at least twice weekly depending on their levels of confluency.

4.3. AlamarBlue Cell Viability Assay

Cells were seeded at a density of 2.5 × 104 cells/well (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 cells), 1 × 104 cells/well (HL-60 cells), 1–5 × 104 cells per well (BL MUTU-I, DG-75 cells) and 2 × 105 cells/well [HG-3, PGA-1 (CLL cells)], Ramos, BJAB (BL cells) (200 μL per well), in 96-well plates. Cells were treated with the desired drug concentration for the appropriate time for each cell type, and the samples were incubated as required. alamarBlue (20 μL) was then added to each well and the samples further incubated in the dark at 37 °C for 4 h. Wells containing only reagent and cell culture medium in the absence of cells were used as blank controls. Ethanol was used as a vehicle, and cells were treated with 1% ethanol (v/v) in all experiments. The 96-well plates were analysed on a fluorescence plate reader (SpectraMax Gemini, Molecular Devices) (emission and excitement wavelengths of 590 nm and 544 nm, respectively), and the fluorescence was recorded. The decrease in cell viability was then calculated with reference to the vehicle samples (100% viability). EMEM medium with the addition of alamarBlue was used as a blank. Vehicle-treated cells were considered to be 100% viable, and the viabilities of each compound was calculated accordingly. The transformed data (Final Concentration = Log (Final Concentration)) was used to plot a non-linear, sigmoidal dose–response curve, and the concentration of drug resulting in a 50% reduction in cell survival (IC50 values) was obtained using the software package Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Taxol (10 μM) was used as an internal standard and resulted in a 90% cytotoxicity in each of the cell lines. All biochemical assays were performed in triplicate on at least three independent occasions, and the mean values were determined.

4.4. Generation of Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs)

Peripheral blood was obtained from healthy donors (n = 2) after informed consent was received. The blood was then placed into a 50 mL falcon tube and diluted with an equal volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). PBMCs were isolated using density gradient centrifugation using LymphoPrep as described previously [117] Approval for this study was obtained from the School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Trinity College Dublin Research Ethics Committee (2020-06-01-MS).

4.5. Annexin V/PI Apoptotic Assay

The BL cells DG-75 and MUTU-I (750,000) were treated at 37 °C with either vehicle (0.1% (v/v) EtOH), the nitrostyrene compounds 11i, 11h, 11g, 11l, 11j and 11k at 10 μM concentration or the positive control drug taxol (10 μM) and incubated for 24 h (MUTU-1) or 48 h (DG-75). The CLL cells PGA1 and HG3 (1 × 106 cells/mL) were treated at 37 °C with either vehicle (1% (v/v) DMSO) or the nitrostyrene compounds 19a (10 μM, 5 μM and 1 μM) and 19g, 19i, 19l and 19m (10 μM and 1 μM) for 48 h. The cells were then harvested by centrifugation at 400× g in a temperature-controlled Sorvall centrifuge and rinsed with 0.5 mL of Ca2+ Annexin-V-binding buffer (0.1 M HEPES, pH 7.4; 0.14 M NaCl; 25 mM CaCl2). The samples were resuspended in 50 µL FITC Annexin V (diluted 1:33 in Ca2+ Annexin V-binding buffer), incubated on ice for 10 min (protected from light), washed with Annexin-V-binding buffer and re-suspended in 500 µL of propidium iodide (PI) solution (0.5 µg/mL). The samples were analysed within 1 h using a BD Accuri C6 flow cytometer counting 10,000 cells and analysed using the FlowJo software (FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR, USA) package.

4.6. Inhibitor Studies

The HG-3 and PGA-1 CLL cells (5 × 104 cells/mL) were pre-treated at 37 °C with either 5 mM N-acetylcysteine (NAC) for 1 h or 40 μM caspase inhibitor (Z-VAD-FMK; MBL International, Co., Woburn, MA, USA) for 4 h prior to treatment with (11 h at 5 μM) for 48 h. Annexin V/PI FACS analysis was then carried out as described above in Section 4.5.

4.7. X-ray Experimental Procedure

Data for 19f were measured on a Bruker D8 Quest ECO device using Mo Ka radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å) with an Oxford Cryostream low-temperature device, and data for 30a were collected on a Bruker APEX DUO device using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54178 Å). Each sample was mounted on a MiTeGen cryoloop, and data were collected at 100(2) K. The Bruker APEX [118] software was used to collect and reduce data. Absorption corrections were applied using SADABS [119]. Structures were solved with the SHELXT structure solution program [120] using Intrinsic Phasing. All were refined using the least squares method on F2 with SHELXL [121]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydrogen atoms were assigned to calculated positions using a riding model with appropriately fixed isotropic thermal parameters. Molecular graphics were generated using OLEX2 [122]. Crystal data, details of data collection and refinement are given in Table S1.

Compound 30a was a weakly diffracting sample, especially at high angle, and it had two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit. One complete anthracene-triazole molecule was disordered over two locations (50% occupancy) and modelled with displacement restraints (SIMU).

Crystallographic data for the structures in this paper have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publication nos. 2171050-2171051. Copies of the data can be obtained, free of charge, on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK, (fax: +44-(0)1223-336033 or e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk).

4.8. Computational Overlay Study

For the MOE 2022.02 work, all the compounds were opened in a database viewer. The compounds were washed with default values and explicit hydrogens were added. For each compound, MMFF94x partial charges were calculated, and each was minimised to a gradient of 0.001 kcal/mol/Å. The compounds were then overlaid individually on 3D structure of maprotiline using flexible alignment on MOE with default values. In the fastROCS [86] 3D similarity study, 200 conformations were generated for each compound using OpenEye Omega [84,123]. This conformation file was then used to search for compound conformations that map to a low-energy conformation of maprotiline. The output hit list was sorted according to the combined Tanimoto scores.

5. Conclusions

The treatment of hematological malignancies such as CLL is evolving as the underlying mechanisms of disease are understood and new immune pathways are discovered. Patients with CLL do not need treatment with chemotherapy until they become symptomatic or display evidence of rapid progression of the disease. The drug treatments available for patients with CLL has improved considerably and now include very effective oral targeted therapies (such as ibrutinib 2, idelalisib 3 and venetoclax 4). While immunotherapies such as obinutuzumab have proven successful in treating CLL, more research is required to optimise the current chemotherapies and immunotherapies for blood cancers, the combination and sequencing of treatments and the development of personalised and targeted agents. Many recent developments have been reported in the targeted clinical treatment of CLL; however, the discovery of novel therapeutic agents that are designed to be effective in acquired disease resistance and provide a curative treatment rather than maintenance alone is required.

We investigated the synthesis, structure−activity relationship (SAR) studies and biological activity of a series of nitrostyrenes and nitrovinylanthracenes in a phenotypic drug discovery approach. Potential preclincial applications of the novel anthracene nitrostyrene compounds in BL and CLL (a more translational but related B-cell malignancy) were identified. A library of 58 anthracene-based compounds structurally related to maprotiline were initially evaluated for antiproliferative activity in the BL EBVMUTU-I (chemosensitive) and EBV+DG-75 (chemoresistant) cell lines. The selected (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes demonstrated potent antiproliferative activity in the CLL cell lines, with IC50 values of 0.17 μM (HG-3) and 1.3 μM (PGA-1) for compound 19g, superior to the chemotherapeutic drug fludarabine with IC50 values of 28.1 μM (HG-3) and 32.0 μM (PGA-1). The pro-apoptotic effects of the most potent compounds 19a, 19g, 19i, 19l and 19m were demonstrated in both the CLL cell lines. The mechanism of cell death in these cell lines was identified as apoptotic, and the lead compounds elicited significant apoptotic effects which were comparable to taxol in the BL cell lines MUTU-I and DG-75 and fludarabine in the CLL cell lines HG-3 and PGA-1. The nitroalkenes reported in this study are attractive substrates for Michael addition reactions with nucleophiles present in biological systems. A molecular modelling study demonstrated close correspondence between overlays of these compounds with maprotiline with shared molecular features; however, correlation with cellular activity was inconclusive. The (E) nitrostyrene and (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracene series of compounds offer potential for further development as novel chemotherapeutics for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) and suggest the suitability of this group of selected (E)-9-(2-nitrovinyl)anthracenes compounds for further preclinical development.

Acknowledgments

Postgraduate research scholarships from Trinty College Dublin (AJB, JPMcK) and Irish Research Council Postgraduate Fellowship (GOIPG/2021/954; SK and DF) are gratefully acknowledged. We thank John O’Brien and Manuel Ruether for NMR spectroscopy. We thank Barry Moran for assistance with flow cytometry, Thomas Fraisse for analytical contribution to the stability study and Peadar Grant for manuscript preparation. The Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute (TBSI) is supported by a capital infrastructure investment from Cycle 5 of the Irish Higher Education Authority’s Programme for Research in Third-Level Institutions (PRTLI). This study was also co-funded under the European Regional Development Fund. DF thanks the software vendors for their continuing support of academic research efforts, in particular the contributions of the Chemical Computing Group, Biovia and OpenEye Scientific. The support and provisions of Dell Ireland, the Trinity Centre for High-Performance Computing (TCHPC) and the Irish Centre for High-End Computing (ICHEC) are also gratefully acknowledged.

Abbreviations

BBB Blood–brain barrier
BTK Bruton’s tyrosine kinase
BL Burkitt’s Lymphoma
CLL Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
CLL-IPI CLL-international prognostic index
COSY Correlated spectroscopy
DEPT Distortionless enhancement by polarisation transfer
D-MEM Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
DMSO Dimethylsulfoxide
EBV Epstein–Barr virus
ECACC European Collection of Animal Cell Cultures
ER Estrogen receptor
FACS Fluorescence-activated cell sorting
FBS Foetal bovine serum
FDA The United States Food and Drug Administration
FITC Fluorescein isothiocyanate
HEPES N-2-Hydroxyethylpiperazine-N′-2-ethanesulfonic acid
HER2 Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
HRMS High-resolution mass spectrometry
IC50 Half-maximal inhibitory concentration
IGVH Immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene
IR Infrared
MEM Eagle’s minimum essential medium
4-MTA 4-Methylthioamphetamine
NHL Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance
PBMCs Peripheral blood mononuclear cells
PI Propidium iodide
PR Progesterone receptor
RPMI 1640 Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium
RT Richter’s transformation
SERT Serotonin transporter
TBNC Triple-negative breast cancers
TPSA Topological polar surface area

Supplementary Materials

The following supplementary information is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28248095/s1: Experimental details for preparation of nitrovinylanthracenes and related compounds; 1H NMR, 13C NMR, DEPT-90, HSQC and HMBC for nitrovinylanthracenes and related compound, Figures S1–S20; X-ray data for compounds 19f and 30a, Figures S21–S23; Tier-1 profiling screen, ADMET and Lipinski properties of selected nitrovinylanthracenes and related compounds (Tables S1 and S2); Preliminary cell viability data for nitrovinylanthracenes and related compounds in MUTU-I and DG-75 Burkitt’s lymphoma cell lines, Tables S3–S6; in vitro anti-proliferative activity of nitrostyrene compounds 11g–11k in MUTU-I and DG-75 cell lines, Table S7; in vitro anti-proliferative activity of nitrostyrene compound 11h in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), Table S8; Overlay of all nitrostyrene and nitrovinylanthracene compounds on maprotiline with their overlay scores (Tables S9 and S10).

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, S.A.B., A.M.M., D.C.W. and M.J.M.; formal analysis, A.J.B., S.A.B., J.P.M., B.T., D.F., D.C.W. and M.J.M.; funding acquisition, M.J.M.; investigation, A.J.B., S.A.B., J.P.M., A.B., B.T., A.M.M., S.N., S.K. and D.F.; methodology, A.J.B., S.A.B., J.P.M., A.B., S.K. and D.F.; project administration, M.J.M.; resources, A.M.M.; supervision, S.A.B., A.M.M., D.F., N.M.O., D.C.W. and M.J.M.; writing—original draft, A.J.B., J.P.M. and M.J.M.; writing—review and editing, A.J.B., J.P.M., B.T., D.F., N.M.O. and M.J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Approval for this study was obtained from the School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Trinity College Dublin Research Ethics Committee (2020-06-01-MS).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

Research conducted in this publication was funded by the Irish Research Council Postgraduate Fellowship (GOIPG/2021/954; S.K. and D.F.) and Trinity College Dublin Postgraduate research scholarships (A.J.B., J.P.M.).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fuchs H.E., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022;72:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hallek M., Cheson B.D., Catovsky D., Caligaris-Cappio F., Dighiero G., Döhner H., Hillmen P., Keating M.J., Montserrat E., Rai K.R. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: A report from the international workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia updating the National Cancer Institute–Working group 1996 guidelines. Blood. 2008;111:5446–5456. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-093906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Devereux S., Cuthill K. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Medicine. 2017;45:292–296. doi: 10.1016/j.mpmed.2017.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Scarfò L., Ferreri A.J.M., Ghia P. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol. 2016;104:169–182. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Redaelli A., Laskin B.L., Stephens J.M., Botteman M.F., Pashos C.L. The clinical and epidemiological burden of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Eur. J. Cancer Care. 2004;13:279–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2004.00489.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. [(accessed on 18 October 2023)]; Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/statistics-network/
  • 7.Miranda-Filho A., Pineros M., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Monnereau A., Bray F. Epidemiological patterns of leukaemia in 184 countries: A population-based study. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5:e14–e24. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30232-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Molica S. Sex differences in incidence and outcome of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients. Leuk. Lymphoma. 2006;47:1477–1480. doi: 10.1080/10428190600555819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.García-Escobar I., Sepúlveda J., Castellano D., Cortés-Funes H. Therapeutic management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol. 2011;80:100–113. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Puente X.S., Pinyol M., Quesada V., Conde L., Ordonez G.R., Villamor N., Escaramis G., Jares P., Bea S., Gonzalez-Diaz M., et al. Whole-genome sequencing identifies recurrent mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Nature. 2011;475:101–105. doi: 10.1038/nature10113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hallek M., Shanafelt T.D., Eichhorst B. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Lancet. 2018;391:1524–1537. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30422-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Agathangelidis A., Chatzidimitriou A., Chatzikonstantinou T., Tresoldi C., Davis Z., Giudicelli V., Kossida S., Belessi C., Rosenquist R., Ghia P., et al. Immunoglobulin gene sequence analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: The 2022 update of the recommendations by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL. Leukaemia. 2022;36:1961–1968. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01604-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lee J., Wang Y.L. Prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. J. Mol. Diagn. 2020;22:1114–1125. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moia R., Patriarca A., Schipani M., Ferri V., Favini C., Sagiraju S., Al Essa W., Gaidano G. Precision medicine management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Cancers. 2020;12:642. doi: 10.3390/cancers12030642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cohen J.A., Bomben R., Pozzo F., Tissino E., Harzschel A., Hartmann T.N., Zucchetto A., Gattei V. An updated perspective on current prognostic and predictive biomarkers in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in the context of chemoimmunotherapy and novel targeted therapy. Cancers. 2020;12:894. doi: 10.3390/cancers12040894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hallek M. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment. Am. J. Hematol. 2019;94:1266–1287. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Roskoski R., Jr. Ibrutinib inhibition of Bruton protein-tyrosine kinase (BTK) in the treatment of B cell neoplasms. Pharmacol. Res. 2016;113:395–408. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sharman J.P., Coutre S.E., Furman R.R., Cheson B.D., Pagel J.M., Hillmen P., Barrientos J.C., Zelenetz A.D., Kipps T.J., Flinn I.W., et al. Final results of a randomized, phase III study of rituximab with or without idelalisib followed by open-label idelalisib in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019;37:1391–1402. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Somoza J.R., Koditek D., Villasenor A.G., Novikov N., Wong M.H., Liclican A., Xing W., Lagpacan L., Wang R., Schultz B.E., et al. Structural, biochemical, and biophysical characterization of idelalisib binding to phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:8439–8446. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.634683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Souers A.J., Leverson J.D., Boghaert E.R., Ackler S.L., Catron N.D., Chen J., Dayton B.D., Ding H., Enschede S.H., Fairbrother W.J., et al. ABT-199, a potent and selective BCL-2 inhibitor, achieves antitumor activity while sparing platelets. Nat. Med. 2013;19:202–208. doi: 10.1038/nm.3048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Crawford J.J., Johnson A.R., Misner D.L., Belmont L.D., Castanedo G., Choy R., Coraggio M., Dong L., Eigenbrot C., Erickson R., et al. Discovery of GDC-0853: A potent, selective, and noncovalent Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor in early clinical development. J. Med. Chem. 2018;61:2227–2245. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mato A.R., Shah N.N., Jurczak W., Cheah C.Y., Pagel J.M., Woyach J.A., Fakhri B., Eyre T.A., Lamanna N., Patel M.R., et al. Pirtobrutinib in relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies (BRUIN): A phase 1/2 study. Lancet. 2021;397:892–901. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00224-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Abbas H.A., Wierda W.G. Acalabrutinib: A selective bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of B-cell malignancies. Front. Oncol. 2021;11:668162. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.668162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Brown J.R., Eichhorst B., Hillmen P., Jurczak W., Kazmierczak M., Lamanna N., O’Brien S.M., Tam C.S., Qiu L., Zhou K., et al. Zanubrutinib or ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023;388:319–332. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2211582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Freeman C.L., Gribben J.G. Immunotherapy in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) Curr. Hematol. Malig. Rep. 2016;11:29–36. doi: 10.1007/s11899-015-0295-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Parikh S.A. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treatment algorithm 2018. Blood Cancer J. 2018;8:93. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0131-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Younes A., Brody J., Carpio C., Lopez-Guillermo A., Ben-Yehuda D., Ferhanoglu B., Nagler A., Ozcan M., Avivi I., Bosch F., et al. Safety and activity of ibrutinib in combination with nivolumab in patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: A phase 1/2a study. Lancet Haematol. 2019;6:e67–e78. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30217-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ding W., LaPlant B.R., Call T.G., Parikh S.A., Leis J.F., He R., Shanafelt T.D., Sinha S., Le-Rademacher J., Feldman A.L., et al. Pembrolizumab in patients with CLL and Richter transformation or with relapsed CLL. Blood. 2017;129:3419–3427. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-02-765685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Skånland S.S., Mato A.R. Overcoming resistance to targeted therapies in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Blood Adv. 2021;5:334–343. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McElligott A.M., Maginn E.N., Greene L.M., McGuckin S., Hayat A., Browne P.V., Butini S., Campiani G., Catherwood M.A., Vandenberghe E., et al. The novel tubulin-targeting agent pyrrolo-1,5-benzoxazepine-15 induces apoptosis in poor prognostic subgroups of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Cancer Res. 2009;69:8366–8375. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-0131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ferla S., Aboraia A.S., Brancale A., Pepper C.J., Zhu J., Ochalek J.T., DeLuca H.F., Simons C. Small-molecule inhibitors of 25-hydroxyvitamin D-24-hydroxylase (CYP24A1): Synthesis and biological evaluation. J. Med. Chem. 2014;57:7702–7715. doi: 10.1021/jm5009314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dozzo M., Carobolante F., Donisi P.M., Scattolin A., Maino E., Sancetta R., Viero P., Bassan R. Burkitt lymphoma in adolescents and young adults: Management challenges. Adolesc. Health Med. Ther. 2017;8:11–29. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S94170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Della Rocca A.M., Leonart L.P., Ferreira V.L., Tonin F.S., Steffenello-Durigon G., Del Moral J.A.G., Fernandez-Llimos F., Pontarolo R. Chemotherapy treatments for Burkitt lymphoma: Systematic review of interventional studies. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021;21:514–525. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Phase II Study of Dose-Adjusted Epoch-Rituximab in Adults with Untreated Burkitt Lymphoma and c-MYC+ Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma-Full Text view-clinicaltrials.gov. [(accessed on 9 October 2023)]; Available online: http://clinicaltrials.Gov/ct2/show/nct01092182?Term=burkitt+lymphoma&rank=1.
  • 35.Chemotherapy Plus Rituximab Combination for Adult Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (B-ALL) and Burkitt’s Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma-Full Text view-clinicaltrials.gov. [(accessed on 9 October 2023)]; Available online: http://clinicaltrials.Gov/ct2/show/nct01290120?Term=burkitt+lymphoma&rank=2.
  • 36.Guech-Ongey M., Simard E.P., Anderson W.F., Engels E.A., Bhatia K., Devesa S.S., Mbulaiteye S.M. AIDS-related Burkitt lymphoma in the United States: What do age and CD4 lymphocyte patterns tell us about etiology and/or biology? Blood. 2010;116:5600–5604. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-03-275917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Anderton E., Yee J., Smith P., Crook T., White R.E., Allday M.J. Two Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) oncoproteins cooperate to repress expression of the proapoptotic tumour-suppressor Bim: Clues to the pathogenesis of Burkitt’s lymphoma. Oncogene. 2008;27:421–433. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Johnson P.C., Abramson J.S. Current treatment of Burkitt lymphoma and high-grade b-cell lymphomas. Oncology. 2022;36:499–505. doi: 10.46883/2022.25920970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Byrne A.J., Bright S.A., Fayne D., McKeown J.P., McCabe T., Twamley B., Williams C., Meegan M.J. Synthesis, antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of nitrostyrenes and related compounds in Burkitt’s lymphoma. Med. Chem. 2018;14:181–199. doi: 10.2174/1573406413666171002123907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Byrne A.J., Bright S.A., McKeown J.P., O’Brien J.E., Twamley B., Fayne D., Williams D.C., Meegan M.J. Design, synthesis and biochemical evaluation of novel ethanoanthracenes and related compounds to target Burkitt’s lymphoma. Pharmaceuticals. 2020;13:16. doi: 10.3390/ph13010016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.McNamara Y.M., Bright S.A., Byrne A.J., Cloonan S.M., McCabe T., Williams D.C., Meegan M.J. Synthesis and antiproliferative action of a novel series of maprotiline analogues. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014;71:333–353. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.10.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.McNamara Y.M., Cloonan S.M., Knox A.J., Keating J.J., Butler S.G., Peters G.H., Meegan M.J., Williams D.C. Synthesis and serotonin transporter activity of 1,3-bis(aryl)-2-nitro-1-propenes as a new class of anticancer agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011;19:1328–1348. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.11.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cloonan S.M., Keating J.J., Butler S.G., Knox A.J., Jorgensen A.M., Peters G.H., Rai D., Corrigan D., Lloyd D.G., Williams D.C., et al. Synthesis and serotonin transporter activity of sulphur-substituted alpha-alkyl phenethylamines as a new class of anticancer agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009;44:4862–4888. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Cloonan S.M., Williams D.C. The antidepressants maprotiline and fluoxetine induce type ii autophagic cell death in drug-resistant Burkitt’s lymphoma. Int. J. Cancer. 2011;128:1712–1723. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bright S.A., Byrne A.J., Vandenberghe E., Browne P.V., McElligott A.M., Meegan M.J., Williams D.C. Selected nitrostyrene compounds demonstrate potent activity in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells, including those with poor prognostic markers. Oncol. Rep. 2019;41:3127–3136. doi: 10.3892/or.2019.7068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Noriega S., Cardoso-Ortiz J., Lopez-Luna A., Cuevas-Flores M.D.R., Flores De La Torre J.A. The diverse biological activity of recently synthesized nitro compounds. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15:717. doi: 10.3390/ph15060717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Morrell A., Placzek M., Parmley S., Antony S., Dexheimer T.S., Pommier Y., Cushman M. Nitrated indenoisoquinolines as topoisomerase I inhibitors: A systematic study and optimization. J. Med. Chem. 2007;50:4419–4430. doi: 10.1021/jm070361q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tan S., He F., Kong T., Wu J., Liu Z. Design, synthesis and tumor cell growth inhibitory activity of 3-nitro-2H-cheromene derivatives as histone deacetylaes inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2017;25:4123–4132. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.05.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhu R., Liu M.C., Luo M.Z., Penketh P.G., Baumann R.P., Shyam K., Sartorelli A.C. 4-nitrobenzyloxycarbonyl derivatives of O(6)-benzylguanine as hypoxia-activated prodrug inhibitors of O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT), which produces resistance to agents targeting the O-6 position of DNA guanine. J. Med. Chem. 2011;54:7720–7728. doi: 10.1021/jm201115f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zheng Y.B., Gong J.H., Liu X.J., Wu S.Y., Li Y., Xu X.D., Shang B.Y., Zhou J.M., Zhu Z.L., Si S.Y., et al. A novel nitrobenzoate microtubule inhibitor that overcomes multidrug resistance exhibits antitumor activity. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:31472. doi: 10.1038/srep31472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Winn B.A., Shi Z., Carlson G.J., Wang Y., Nguyen B.L., Kelly E.M., Ross R.D.t., Hamel E., Chaplin D.J., Trawick M.L., et al. Bioreductively activatable prodrug conjugates of phenstatin designed to target tumor hypoxia. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2017;27:636–641. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.11.093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mohan R., Rastogi N., Namboothiri I.N., Mobin S.M., Panda D. Synthesis and evaluation of alpha-hydroxymethylated conjugated nitroalkenes for their anticancer activity: Inhibition of cell proliferation by targeting microtubules. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006;14:8073–8085. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.07.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Coban T., Robertson C., Schwikkard S., Singer R., LeGresley A. Synthesis and evaluation of bis(imino)anthracene derivatives as G-quadruplex ligands. RSC Med. Chem. 2021;12:751–757. doi: 10.1039/D0MD00428F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Baviera G.S., Donate P.M. Recent advances in the syntheses of anthracene derivatives. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2021;17:2028–2050. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.17.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ikeda T., Lee B., Tazuke S., Takenaka A. Time-resolved observation of excitation hopping between two anthryl moieties attached to both ends of alkanes: Simulation based on conformational analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990;112:4650–4656. doi: 10.1021/ja00168a004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Pirkle W.H., Finn J.M. Useful routes to 9-anthryl ethers and sulfides. J. Org. Chem. 1983;48:2779–2780. doi: 10.1021/jo00164a034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kuhn R., Fischer H. Cumulenes. XIII. Amalgam-hydrogenation of cumulenes and prototropic rearrangements. Chem. Ber. 1961;94:3060–3071. doi: 10.1002/cber.19610941136. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Stogryn E.L. Synthesis and antimalarial activity of anthracene amino alcohols. J. Med. Chem. 1974;17:563–565. doi: 10.1021/jm00251a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Stern D., Finkelmeier N., Stalke D. Assessment of the lix salt-effect in anthracenyl lithiums. Chem. Commun. 2011;47:2113–2115. doi: 10.1039/C0CC02772C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ooyama Y., Uenaka K., Matsugasako A., Harima Y., Ohshita J. Molecular design and synthesis of fluorescence PET (photo-induced electron transfer) sensors for detection of water in organic solvents. RSC Adv. 2013;3:23255–23263. doi: 10.1039/c3ra42833h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jiang H., Rodriguez-Escrich C., Johansen T.K., Davis R.L., Jorgensen K.A. Organocatalytic activation of polycyclic aromatic compounds for asymmetric Diels-Alder reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2012;51:10271–10274. doi: 10.1002/anie.201205836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Parker M.A., Kurrasch D.M., Nichols D.E. The role of lipophilicity in determining binding affinity and functional activity for 5-HT2A receptor ligands. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008;16:4661–4669. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.02.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Reichert B., Wegner E. Β-nitrodicarboxylic esters and their conversion into oxidopyrrolidines. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. B. 1938;71B:1254–1259. doi: 10.1002/cber.19380710622. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Guillon J., Ronga L., Marchivie M., Moreau S. Crystal structure of (E)-1-(3,4-methylenedioxy-6-fluorophenyl)-2-nitropropene. X-ray Struct. Anal. Online. 2016;32:23–24. doi: 10.2116/xraystruct.32.23. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hamdellou L., Hernandez O., Meinnel J. 4-Dimethylamino-beta-nitrostyrene and 4-dimethylamino-beta-ethyl-beta-nitro-styrene at 100 k. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C-Cryst. Struct. Commun. 2006;62:O557–O560. doi: 10.1107/S0108270106025819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kumar N.N.B., Chakravarty M., Kumar N.S., Sajna K.V., Swamy K.C.K. Allenylphosphonates with a 1,3,2-dioxaphosphorinane ring: Synthesis, structures, stability and utility. J. Chem. Sci. 2009;121:23–36. doi: 10.1007/s12039-009-0003-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Andrews S.P., Ladlow M. Convenient preparation and use of a new analytical construct for the analysis and development of solid-phase chemistries. J. Org. Chem. 2003;68:5525–5533. doi: 10.1021/jo034340p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wawzonek S., Hallum J.V. Abnormal Beckmann rearrangement of 9,10-dihydro-9,10-(11-oxoethano)anthracene oxime. J. Org. Chem. 1959;24:364–366. doi: 10.1021/jo01085a022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mase N., Takabe K., Tanaka F. Fluorogenic probes for chemical transformations: 9-anthracene derivatives for monitoring reaction progress by an increase in fluorescence. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013;54:4306–4308. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2013.06.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Smith P.A. Azides and Nitrenes: Reactivity and Utility. Academic Press Inc.; Orlando, FL, USA: 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Daniele M.A., Bandera Y.P., Foulger S.H. Manipulation of Forster energy transfer of coupled fluorophores through biotransformation by Pseudomonas resinovorans CA10. Photochem. Photobiol. 2012;88:129–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.01023.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Sridhar G., Somnath M., Sharma G.V.M., Prashanth T. ZrCl4-mediated synthesis of 1,2,3-triazoles from vinyl nitrates and their biological evaluation. Synth. Commun. 2017;47:551–556. doi: 10.1080/00397911.2016.1270324. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gupta M., Gupta M., Paul S., Kant R., Gupta V.K. One-pot synthesis of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles via Huisgen 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition catalysed by SiO2-Cu(I) oxide and single crystal x-ray analysis of 1-benzyl-4-phenyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole. Monatshefte Chem. 2015;146:143–148. doi: 10.1007/s00706-014-1285-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) Chemical Computing Group Inc.; Montreal, QC, Canada: 2022. version 2022.02. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Baell J.B., Nissink J.W.M. Seven year itch: Pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS) in 2017-utility and limitations. ACS Chem. Biol. 2018;13:36–44. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Davis A., Ward S.E. The Handbook of Medicinal Chemistry: Principles and Practice. Royal Society of Chemistry; London, UK: 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Shultz M.D. Two decades under the influence of the rule of five and the changing properties of approved oral drugs. J. Med. Chem. 2019;62:1701–1714. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Rosen A., Bergh A.C., Gogok P., Evaldsson C., Myhrinder A.L., Hellqvist E., Rasul A., Bjorkholm M., Jansson M., Mansouri L., et al. Lymphoblastoid cell line with B1 cell characteristics established from a chronic lymphocytic leukaemia clone by in vitro EBV infection. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1:18–27. doi: 10.4161/onci.1.1.18400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Lewin N., Aman P., Mellstedt H., Zech L., Klein G. Direct outgrowth of in vivo Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-infected chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) cells into permanent lines. Int. J. Cancer. 1988;41:892–895. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910410621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Yin L., Duan J.J., Bian X.W., Yu S.C. Triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtyping and treatment progress. Breast Cancer Res. 2020;22:61. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01296-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Reddel R.R., Murphy L.C., Hall R.E., Sutherland R.L. Differential sensitivity of human breast cancer cell lines to the growth-inhibitory effects of tamoxifen. Cancer Res. 1985;45:1525–1531. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Keely N.O., Carr M., Yassin B., Ana G., Lloyd D.G., Zisterer D., Meegan M.J. Design, synthesis and biochemical evaluation of novel selective estrogen receptor ligand conjugates incorporating an endoxifen-combretastatin hybrid scaffold. Biomedicines. 2016;4:15. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines4030015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Samadi N., Ghanbari P., Mohseni M., Tabasinezhad M., Sharifi S., Nazemieh H., Rashidi M.R. Combination therapy increases the efficacy of docetaxel, vinblastine and tamoxifen in cancer cells. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2014;10:715–721. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.139152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Omega 4.2.2.0. Openeye, Cadence Molecular Sciences, Santa Fe, NM, USA. [(accessed on 25 September 2023)]. Available online: http://www.eyesopen.com.
  • 85.Cloonan S.M., Drozgowska A., Fayne D., Williams D.C. The antidepressants maprotiline and fluoxetine have potent selective antiproliferative effects against Burkitt lymphoma independently of the norepinephrine and serotonin transporters. Leuk. Lymphoma. 2010;51:523–539. doi: 10.3109/10428190903552112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.FastROCS. [(accessed on 25 September 2023)]. Available online: http://www.eyesopen.com/fastrocs.
  • 87.Itamar W., Halpern M. Alkylation via aromatization of ketones by phase-transfer catalysis. Synthesis. 1979;3:177. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Cox P.J., Sim G.A. X-ray diffraction studies of 9-methylanthraecene and 5-methylnaphthacene. Acta Cryst. 1979;B35:404–410. doi: 10.1107/S0567740879003642. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Vila C., Giannerini M., Hornillos V., Fananas-Mastral M., Feringa B.L. Palladium-catalysed direct cross-coupling of secondary alkyllithium reagents. Chem. Sci. 2014;5:1361. doi: 10.1039/c3sc53047g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Iwahara H., Kushida T., Yamaguchi S. A planarized 9-phenylanthracene: A simple electron-donating building block for fluorescent materials, S. Chem. Commun. 2016;52:1124. doi: 10.1039/C5CC08259E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Martin V.H. Bulletin des Societes Chimiques Belges. Volume 61. Sociétés Chimiques; Brussels, Belgium: 1952. pp. 504–511. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Norman R.O.C., Waters W.A. Action of the phenyl radical on anthracene and meso-substituted anthracenes. J. Chem. Soc. 1958:167–170. doi: 10.1039/jr9580000167. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Jayachitra K., JobePrabakar P.C., Ramalingam S. Vibrational, NMR and UV–Visible spectroscopic investigation on 10-methylanthracene 9-carbaldehyde using computational calculations. J. Mol. Struct. 2020;1217:128435. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.128435. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Jones S., Atherton J.C.C. An improved procedure for the preparation of 9,10-dibromoanthracene. Synth. Commun. 2001;31:1799–1802. doi: 10.1081/SCC-100104326. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.House H.O., Ghali N.I., Haack J.L., VanDerveer D. Reactions of the 1,8-diphenylanthracene system. J. Org. Chem. 1980;45:1807–1817. doi: 10.1021/jo01298a013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Becker H.D., Hansen L., Andersson K. Synthesis and photochemical isomerization of 1,2-di-9-anthrylethanol and 1,2-di-9-anthrylethanone. J. Org. Chem. 1986;51:2956–2961. doi: 10.1021/jo00365a019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Koremura M., Oku H., Shono T., Nakanishi T. Relation between chemical structure and antimicrobial and insecticidal activities in organonitro compounds. VIII. Synthesis of heterocyclic nitroalkene derivatives and their activities. Takamine Kenkyusho Nenpo. 1961;13:216–221. [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Becker H.D., Skelton B.W., Sorensen H., White A.H. Photochemical cis-trans Isomerization of 2-Substituted 9-(2-nitroethenyl)anthracenes. X-ray structure analyses of (E)- and (Z)-9-(2-nitro-2-phenylethenyl)anthracene. Aust. J. Chem. 1989;42:593–601. doi: 10.1071/CH9890593. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Nakajima S., Osuka A. Synthesis of a tetrakis(9-anthryl) substituted porphyrin and intramolecular charge-transfer emission in its dication. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995;36:8457–8460. doi: 10.1016/0040-4039(95)01821-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Misra R., Sharma R., Bhattacharyya S.P. Exploring NLO response of 9,10-donor-acceptor substituted bichromophoric anthracene derivatives. J. Comput. Methods Sci. Eng. 2010;10:149–164. doi: 10.3233/JCM-2010-0316. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Zee-Cheng K.-Y., Cheng C.C. Experimental tumor inhibitors. Antitumor activity of esters of ω-aryl-y-nitro-y-alken-1-ol and related compounds. J. Med. Chem. 1969;12:157–161. doi: 10.1021/jm00301a042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Lock G., Stach K. Catalytic decomposition of hydrazones. I. Aromatic aldehyde hydrazones. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. B. 1943;76B:1252–1256. doi: 10.1002/cber.19430761216. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Zhang X.M., Bordwell F.G., Bares J.E., Cheng J.P., Petrie B.C. Homolytic bond dissociation energies of the acidic carbon-hydrogen bonds in alpha-substituted and 10-substituted 9-methylanthracenes and their related radical anions. J. Org. Chem. 1993;58:3051–3059. doi: 10.1021/jo00063a025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Rescifina A., Chiacchio M.A., Corsaro A., De Clercq E., Iannazzo D., Mastino A., Piperno A., Romeo G., Romeo R., Valveri V. Synthesis and biological activity of isoxazolidinyl polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Potential DNA intercalators. J. Med. Chem. 2006;49:709–715. doi: 10.1021/jm050772b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Kabalka G.W., Goudgaon N.M. A facile aldoxime preparation via the reduction of α,β-unsaturated nitroalkenes using tin(II) chloride. Synth. Commun. 1988;18:693–697. doi: 10.1080/00397918808077358. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Jiang L., Fu Y., Li H., Hu W. Single-crystalline, size, and orientation controllable nanowires and ultralong microwires of organic semiconductor with strong photoswitching property. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:3937–3941. doi: 10.1021/ja077600j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Hann R.A. Use of dimethylformamide as a solvent for the Knoevenagel reaction. J.Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1974:1379–1380. doi: 10.1039/p19740001379. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Metayer M. Hydrogenation of 9-anthraldehyde. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1954:614–615. [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Zhang J.-Q., Liu J., Hu D., Song J., Zhu G., Ren H. Rapid and simple access to α-(hetero)arylacetonitriles from gem- difluoroalkenes. Org. Lett. 2022;24:786–790. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c04336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Mathew R., Mallia R.R., Haridas S., Jacob J.P. Effect of substituents on the fluorescence quenching of a few (anthracen-9-yl)methanamines. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2020;397:112552. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112552. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Clayden J., Frampton C.S., McCarthy C., Westlund N. Perilithiation and the synthesis of 8-substituted-1-naphthamides. Tetrahedron. 1999;55:14161–14184. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4020(99)00881-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Karthikeyan J., Yoshikai N. Rhodium(III)-catalyzed directed peri-C-H alkenylation of anthracene derivatives. Org. Lett. 2014;16:4224–4227. doi: 10.1021/ol501926b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Lo K., Cornell H., Nicoletti G., Jackson N., Hügel H. A study of fluorinated β-nitrostyrenes as antimicrobial agents. Appl. Sci. 2012;2:114–128. doi: 10.3390/app2010114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Si T., Kim H.Y., Oh K. Substrate promiscuity of ortho-naphthoquinone catalyst: Catalytic aerobic amine oxidation protocols to deaminative cross-coupling and N-nitrosation. ACS Catal. 2019;9:9216–9221. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.9b03442. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Sen P.K., Sikha L., Chattopadhyay G., Mandal D.K. Oxidation of 10-methoxy-9-anthraldehyde with various oxidizing agents in protic and aprotic media. Indian J. Chem. 1989;28B:978–979. doi: 10.1002/chin.199009134. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Lanemo Myhrinder A., Hellqvist E., Sidorova E., Soderberg A., Baxendale H., Dahle C., Willander K., Tobin G., Backman E., Soderberg O., et al. A new perspective: Molecular motifs on oxidized LDL, apoptotic cells, and bacteria are targets for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia antibodies. Blood. 2008;111:3838–3848. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-11-125450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Brophy S., Amet R., Foy-Stones H., Gardiner N., McElligott A.M. Isolation and cryopreservation of mononuclear cells from peripheral blood and bone marrow of blood cancer patients. Methods Mol. Biol. 2023;2645:179–187. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3056-3_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Bruker AXS Inc.; Madison, WI, USA: Apex3 and Apex4, Bruker (2017) and Bruker (2021) [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Krause L., Herbst-Irmer R., Sheldrick G.M., Stalke D. Comparison of silver and molybdenum microfocus X-ray sources for single-crystal structure determination. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2015;48:3–10. doi: 10.1107/S1600576714022985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Sheldrick G.M. SHELXT-integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. A Found. Adv. 2015;71:3–8. doi: 10.1107/S2053273314026370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Sheldrick G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. C Struct. Chem. 2015;71:3–8. doi: 10.1107/S2053229614024218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Dolomanov O.V., Bourhis L.J., Gildea R.J., Howard J.A.K., Puschmann H. Olex2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009;42:339–341. doi: 10.1107/S0021889808042726. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Hawkins P.C., Skillman A.G., Warren G.L., Ellingson B.A., Stahl M.T. Conformer generation with OMEGA: Algorithm and validation using high quality structures from the protein databank and Cambridge structural database. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010;50:572–584. doi: 10.1021/ci100031x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.


Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES