Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1985 Sep;79(1):153–158. doi: 10.1104/pp.79.1.153

Direct Observation of Reversible and Irreversible Stomatal Responses of Attached Sunflower Leaves to SO2

Kenji Omasa 1,2,3, Yasushi Hashimoto 1,2,3, Paul J Kramer 1,2,3, Boyd R Strain 1,2,3, Ichiro Aiga 1,2,3, Jiro Kondo 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC1074843  PMID: 16664361

Abstract

The effects of SO2 on stomatal aperture of attached sunflower leaves were observed with a remote-control light microscope system that permitted continuous observation of stomatal responses over periods of several hours. The relationship between actual stomatal aperture and stomatal conductance, measured with a porometer, also was examined on leaves before and after exposure to SO2.

A distinction between uninjured and injured regions was clearly visible on leaves after exposure to 1.5 microliters per liter SO2 for less than an hour. During the exposure, the mean value of apertures for many stomata, which indicates stomatal conductance and transpiration rate, tended to decrease simultaneously in the uninjured and injured regions. However, the rate of decrease in the injured region was slower than that in the uninjured region because of a transient opening induced by water-soaking in the injured region. The transient opening was less common in stomata near veins and veinlets.

There was a good correlation between pore width and stomatal conductance measured with a porometer before exposure to SO2. This correlation continued in leaves exposed to SO2 until visible, irreversible injury occurred, but then it disappeared.

The results of these experiments indicate the necessity of continuous observation of individual stomata under the microscope to understand the effects of air pollutants such as SO2 on stomatal behavior.

Full text

PDF
153

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hill A. C. Vegetation: a sink for atmospheric pollutants. J Air Pollut Control Assoc. 1971 Jun;21(6):341–346. doi: 10.1080/00022470.1971.10469535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Olszyk D. M., Tibbitts T. W. Stomatal Response and Leaf Injury of Pisum sativum L. with SO(2) and O(3) Exposures : I. INFLUENCE OF POLLUTANT LEVEL AND LEAF MATURITY. Plant Physiol. 1981 Mar;67(3):539–544. doi: 10.1104/pp.67.3.539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rao I. M., Amundson R. G., Alscher-Herman R., Anderson L. E. Effects of SO(2) on Stomatal Metabolism in Pisum sativum L. Plant Physiol. 1983 Jun;72(2):573–577. doi: 10.1104/pp.72.2.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Taylor G. E., Tingey D. T. Sulfur Dioxide Flux into Leaves of Geranium carolinianum L. : Evidence for a Nonstomatal or Residual Resistance. Plant Physiol. 1983 May;72(1):237–244. doi: 10.1104/pp.72.1.237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES