Abstract
Over the past few decades, significant progress has been made in the development of drugs to combat cancer. It is unfortunate that these drugs can also lead to various kidney injuries and imbalances in electrolyte levels. Nephrotoxicity caused by chemotherapy drugs can impact different parts of the kidneys, including the glomeruli, renal tubules, interstitium, or renal microvessels. Despite the existing knowledge, our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the renal damage caused by antitumoral drugs remains incomplete. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the specific types of kidney injury and the mechanisms responsible for the drug-mediated renal damage, and briefly discuss possible prevention and treatment measures. Sensitive blood and urine biomarkers can provide clinicians with more information about kidney injury detection and reference value for subsequent treatment options. In addition, we emphasize that both oncologists and nephrologists have a responsibility to remain vigilant against the potential nephrotoxicity of the drugs. It’s crucial for experts in both fields to collaborate in early detection, monitoring and prevention of kidney damage.
Keywords: antineoplastic drugs, nephrotoxicity, renal damage, mechanisms, early markers
Introduction
Antitumor drugs are mainly divided into alkylating agents, antitumor antibiotics, antitumor hormones, metal platinum, anti-metabolites, antitumor plants, and molecular targeted drugs, etc. Among them, alkylating agents are simple in synthesis with an important value for tumor treatment, while antibiotic drugs exert a good therapeutic effect on malignant tumors, but with the poor selectivity, extensive adverse reactions and easy development of drug resistance. As new anticancer drugs specifically targeting cancer cells are emerging, the prognosis of cancer patients is slowly improving, but the targeting and toxicity of drugs are two major problems. The kidneys are an important component of xenobiotic metabolism, and nephrotoxicity remains an unavoidable complication that may lead to adjustment or discontinuation of an anticancer therapy, thus affecting patient survival. Many drug-related nephrotoxicities do not have a clear mechanism of injury or pathophysiology, which poses a specific challenge to clinicians in selecting their treatment strategies. For instance, traditional chemotherapy drugs, such as cisplatin and alkylating agent ifosfamide, etc., often act on renal tubules, resulting in acute tubular necrosis or injury. In contrast, molecularly targeted drugs may cause glomerular lesions characterized by podocyte disease or thrombotic microangiopathy. This article provides a comprehensive review of the occurrence and underlying mechanisms of renal function insufficiency associated with the commonly used drugs. A key focus is on reducing the frequency and severity of nephrotoxicity resulting from chemotherapy drugs. To achieve this goal, researchers should emphasize the evaluation of early biomarkers for kidney injury, especially ones obtainable through noninvasive techniques. By employing such noninvasive methods, clinicians can promptly detect kidney damage and intervene accordingly. This proactive approach will contribute to minimizing the incidence and severity of drug-induced nephrotoxicity, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Platinum-derived compounds
Mechanisms and clinical manifestations
Cisplatin is approved for the treatment of many types of cancers (1) and is the most nephrotoxic chemotherapy drug detected early. The most common and important clinical manifestation of cisplatin nephrotoxicity is acute kidney injury(AKI). In the first 24 hours after cisplatin administration, with more than 50% of the drug excreted in the urine, and the concentration of platinum reached in the renal cortex is several times higher than in plasma and other organs. Drugs that accumulate in the urinary system cause renal dysfunction through a variety of mechanisms, including toxicity to tubular epithelial cells, vasoconstriction and proinflammatory effects of renal microvessels (2) ( Figure 1 ). The toxicity to renal tubular cells is mainly reflected in apoptosis and necrosis of the S3 segment of the proximal tubule, distal curved tubule and collecting duct. The expression of proximal tubular organic cation transporter-2 (OCT2) enhances renal uptake, mediating the accumulation of cisplatin in proximal tubular epithelial cells (3). In addition, renal microvasoconstriction is observed after cisplatin injection, resulting in reduced renal blood flow. The renal response to cisplatin also includes the increased expression of proinflammatory cytokines (4, 5). Cisplatin has the ability to decrease the expression and activity of glucose and amino acid transporters that rely on sodium, as well as magnesium and water transporters. Furthermore, it hinders the metabolism of glutathione and cysteine-glycine conjugates, and also suppresses the production of reactive oxygen species. These mechanisms help to explain the manifestation of Fanconi-like syndrome often observed in patients undergoing cisplatin therapy. When cisplatin is used in combination with bleomycin or gemcitabine, thrombotic microangiopathy(TMA) may lead to direct endothelial injury and secondary platelet activation (6–9). Renal impairment is dose-dependent, and we have summarized the incidence of AKI in several studies reported in Table 1 (6, 42, 43). In a recent study of 821 adult cancer patients with multiple tumor types treated with cisplatin, after 6 years of follow-up, 31.5% patients developed AKI, with an estimated initial reduction in median eGFR of 10mL/min/1.73m2. Most patients have a small but permanent decrease in eGFR without progression to end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis (10). Other renal manifestations include hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, sodium depletion, Fanconi-like syndrome, and anemia ( Table 2 ) (7, 44, 52).
Table 1.
Authors, year | Types of study | Sample size | Tumor types | Medications | Nephrotoxicity | Incidence rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sheron Latcha et al. 2016 (10) | Rretrospective study | 821 | Diverse tumor types | Cisplatin | AKI | 31.5% |
Francesco T revisani et al. 2022 (11) | Retrospective, observational cohort study | 292 | NSCLC | Cisplatin (35%), Carboplatin(25%) | AKI | Cisplatin 10.9% |
Carboplatin 6.8% | ||||||
Jori May et al. 2014 (12) | Retrospective Analysis | 194 | Lymphoma (72.8%), sarcoma (21%) | High dose methotrexate | AKI | Lymphoma 9.1% |
Sarcoma 1.5% | ||||||
Tracy Wiczer et al. 2016 (13) | Retrospective, single-center review | 140 | Leukemia or lymphoma | High dose methotrexate | AKI | 38.6% |
Sheron Latcha et al. 2022 (14) | Large adult cohort study | 865 | A variety of malignancies | High dose methotrexate | AKI | Overall group 32.1% |
Survivorship group 37.4% | ||||||
Omar Abdel-Rahman et al. 2014 (15) | Meta-review | 5694 | Solid tumors | Ramucirumab | Proteinuria | All grade proteinuria 5.8 to 17% |
D. Arnold et al. 2017 (16) | Meta-review | 4996 | Gastric/gastroesophageal junction, NSCLS and metastatic colorectal cancers | Ramucirumab | Proteinuria | 3.1%-9.4% |
Ze-Feng Zhang et al. 2014 (17) | Meta -review | 798 | Solid tumors | Pazopanib | Proteinuria | All grade 13.5% |
High grade 2.2% | ||||||
Michael J Sorich et al. 2016 (18) | Pooled secondary analysis |
1392 | mRCC | Pazopanib or Sunitinib | Any grade (1–4) proteinuria |
15.0% |
Grade 3/4 proteinuria |
3.7% | |||||
Eric Van Cutsem et al. 2012 (19) | Prospective multinational, randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm, phase III study |
1226 | Metastatic Colorectal Cancer | Aflibercept plus chemotherapy |
Proteinuria | All grades 62.2% |
Grade 3 7.5% | ||||||
Grade 4 0.3% | ||||||
Ze-Feng Zhang et al. 2014 (17) | Meta -review | 6882 | solid tumors | VEGF-targeted | Proteinuria | All grade 18.7% |
Grade 3 or higher proteinuria 2.4% | ||||||
Ze-Feng Zhang et al. 2014 (17) | Meta-review | 535 | Solid tumors | Axitinib | Proteinuria | All grade 20.2% |
High grade 4.6% | ||||||
Dan Peng et al. 2023 (20) | Meta-review | 510 | Hepatocellular carcinoma | Apatinibversus sorafenib | Proteinuria | Incidence of proteinuria in the apatinib group was higher (RR = 2.58) |
Lars Hofmann 2016 et al. (21) | Multi-center reporting | 496 | Metastatic melanoma | PD-1 monotherapy | IrAEs | 27.8% |
J.D.Wolchok.V et al. 2017 (22) | Prospective (double-blind trial) | 1296 | Advanced melanoma | CTLA-4 in combination with PD-1 | IrAEs Grade≥3 |
96% |
∼59% | ||||||
Jeffrey S. Weber, F et al. 2017 (23) | Pooled Analysis | 576 | Advanced melanoma | Nivolumab monotherapy | IrAEs Grade 3-4 |
71% |
10% | ||||||
Cheng Xu et al. 2018 (24) | Meta-review | 15370 | Mainly lung cancer and melanoma | Both | IrAEs | 54%-76% |
Frank B.Cortazar et al. 2016 (25) | Comprehensive analysis | 3695 | Various | United | AKI | 4.9% |
Roman Shingarev et al. 2019 (26) | Review | 11482 | Various | CTLA-4 in combination with PD-1 | AKI | 2.1% |
Harish Seethapathy et al. 2019 (27) | Retrospective observational cohort study | 1016 | Advanced malignancy | Both | AKI | 17% |
Sandhya Manohar et al. 2019 (28) | Meta-review | 11482 | varied from solid cancer to hematological malignancies | Pembrolizumab or nivolumab | AKI | 2.2% |
Sandhya Manohar 2020 (29) | Cohort study | 1173 | Predominantly metastatic melanoma | Monotherapy (CTLA-4 or PD-1) | AKI | 2% |
Harish Seethapathy et al. 2020 (30) | Retrospective cohort study | 599 | Advanced malignancy | PD-1 | AKI | 17% |
Alejandro Meraz- Muñoz et al. 2020 (31) | Cohort study | 309 | Melanoma 262, lung 31, and genitourinary cancers 12. | Ipilimumab (70.9%) alone or in combination | AKI | 16.5% |
Busra Isik et al. 2021 (32) | Retrospective study | 2143 | The most common are lung cancer, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma | Both | AKI | 17% |
Jonathan D. Sorah et al. 2021 (33) | Retrospective cohort study | 1766 | Predominantly non-small cell lung cancer (28%) | Monotherapy | AKI | 7% |
Maen Abdelrahim et al. 2021 (34) | 10-year single-institution analysis |
1664 | Melanoma | Both | AKI | 3.33%-3.49% |
Clara Garcıá-Carro et al. 2022 (35) | Single-centre retrospective study | 759 | Mainly lung cancer | 56% were receiving PD-1 | AKI | 15.5% |
Megan L Baker et al. 2022 (36) | Observational cohort study | 2207 | Mainly lung cancer and melanoma | Any one of six ICIs | AKI | 25% |
Mehmet Kanbay et al. 2022 (37) | Review | 3767 | Lung cancer and melanoma predominate | Both | AKI | 0-76% |
Fei Liu et al. 2023 (38) | Meta | 51141 | Fifteen different tumor types | Both | AKI | 1.4% |
R Hájek et al. 2017 (39) | Randomized phase III study | 315 | Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma |
Carfilzomib | ARF | Carfilzomib, 8% |
Paul G. Richardson et al. 2014 (40) | Randomized phase 2 study | 221 | Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma | Pomalidomide | Renal failure and increased blood creatinine |
The exact value is unknown |
Harish Seethapathy et al. 2022 (41) | Retrospective cohort study | 199 | Melanoma | Dabrafenib, paired with trametinib | AKI | 21% |
AKI, Acute Kidney Injury; NSCLC, Non-small-cell lung cancer; mRCC, Metastatic renal cell carcinoma; PD-1, programmed death 1; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4; IrAE,Immune-related Adverse Effects; ARF,Acute Renal Failure.
Table 2.
Drugs | Mechanisms | Clinical manifestations | Histopathology | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Platinum-derived compounds | Cisplatin | Toxicity to tubular epithelial cells, vasoconstriction and pro-inflammatory effect of renal microvessels. | AKI, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, sodium depletion, fanconi-like syndrome and anemia. | Apoptosis and necrosis of the S3 segment of the proximal tubule, distal curved tubule, and collecting duct. |
Carboplatin | ||||
Ocaliplatin | ||||
Antimetabolites | Methotrexate | Direct tubular injury with necrosis; decreased glomerular capillary perfusion; Affects folic acid metabolizing enzymes, impairs cellular RNA/DNA synthesis. | AKI, SIADH, hypertension, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and ischemic skin lesions. | ATI,DITMA. |
Chlopharabine | ||||
Pemetrexed | ||||
Gemcitabine | ||||
Pentostatin | ||||
Anti-angiogenesis drugs (VEGF pathway inhibitors and TKI) | Bevacizumab | Endothelial cell dysfunction and dysregulation of podocyte. |
Hypertension, proteinuria and AKI. | Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), glomerular endothelial hyperplasia, cryoglobulinemia nephritis, nonspecific immune complex nephritis and acute interstitial nephritis. |
Sunitinib | ||||
Sorafenib | ||||
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4) | Ipilimumab | It is not clear. There may be multiple mechanisms of cell-mediated immunity and/or underlying autoimmunity. | Nephrotic syndrome, AKI, TMA, electrolyte disturbances. | Acute granulomatous interstitial nephritis and lupus membranous nephropathy. |
Pembrolizumab | ||||
Nivolumab | ||||
Alkylating agents | Cyclophosphamide | Acrylic aldehyde is toxic to the bladder, and chloroacetaldehyde induces glutathione depletion and lipid peroxidation, damaging kidney tissue (7, 9, 44). | Bladder toxicity; proximal tubular acute tubular dysfunction; Fanconi syndrome; SIADH (7, 9). |
Tubular cell damage or necrosis, mitochondrial swelling, and malformations (44). |
ifosphamide | ||||
Antitumor antibiotics | Mitomycin C | Direct damage to the renal endothelium. | Hypertension; Urine sedimentation; Progressive renal failure. |
The most common form is TMA. |
Immunomodulatory drugs | Thalidomide | It is not clear. | Hypercalcemia; Decreased GFR; Nephrolithiasis. |
Cases of acute interstitial nephritis and crystalline nephropathy have been reported. |
Lenalidomide | ||||
Pomalidomide | ||||
Anti-microtubular agents | Vincristine | Affects the synthesis of genetic material such as DNA/RNA. | SIADH. | Kidney biopsy cases are lacking. |
Vinblastine | ||||
Vinorelbine | ||||
EGFR pathway inhibitors | Cituximab | The mechanism of AKI is unknown; Inhibits the distal convoluted tubular EGFR signaling pathway and regulates epithelial transport of magnesium. | AKI, hypokalemia, hypocalcemia, and hypomagnesemia (7, 44). | Kidney biopsy cases are lacking. |
Panitumab | ||||
Nesitumab | ||||
Matuzumab | ||||
HER-2 inhibitors | Trastuzumab | Unclear. | Proteinuria; AKI; Decreased GFR; Electrolyte disturbance; Hypertension. |
Unclear. |
Pertuzumab | ||||
BCL-2 inhibitors | Venetoclax | Tumor lysis syndrome. | AKI, hyperuricemia and hyperphosphatemia. | Kidney biopsy cases are lacking. |
Obituzumab | ||||
Ofatumumab | ||||
ALK inhibitors | Crizotinib | Unclear. | Decreased GFR; Electrolyte disturbance (7, 45, 46). | Kidney biopsy cases are lacking. |
BRAF inhibitors | Vimorafenib | Unclear. | Allergic interstitial diseases, acute tubular necrosis, proximal tubular injury (Fanconi syndrome), non-nephrotic proteinuria, acute/subacute GFR reduction of 20-40%, electrolyte disturbances. | Kidney biopsy cases are lacking. |
Dabrafenib | ||||
Cytokines | IFN-a | The direct effect on podocytes may be promoted through receptor binding and activation: (1) weakening the proliferation and metabolism of podocytes; (2) Increase the oxidation capacity of podocytes and increase the expression of MHC class II antigens (44, 47). | Microvariable disease (MCD), FSGS and thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). | Kidney biopsy cases are lacking. |
IL-2 | Their effects are regulated by activating T cells, regulating receptor binding on T cells, memory T cells, and natural killer cells (7, 47). | Capillary leak syndrome; Cytokine-mediated inflammatory kidney injury. | Kidney biopsy cases are lacking. | |
CAR-T | Cytokines mediate vasodilation and capillary leakage, causing prerenal injury, and CRS-associated hyperthermia and nausea and vomiting induce intravascular hypovolemia; Acute cardiomyopathy caused by CRS promotes hypotension and further aggravates renal hypoperfusion (48–51). | Electrolyte imbalance; Cytokine release syndrome; CRS-associated hyperthermia and nausea and vomiting. | Kidney biopsy cases are lacking. |
AKI, Acute kidney injury; SIADH, Syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone; AIN, Acute interstitial nephritis; TMA, Thrombotic microangiopathy; DITMA, Drug-induced thrombotic microangiopathy; FSGS, Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; GFR, Glomerular filtration rate; MCD, Microvariable disease; CRS, Cytokine release syndrome; IFN-a, Interferon-a; IL-2, Interleukin-2; CAR-T, Chimeric antigen receptor T-Cell immunotherapy.
Treatments
Appropriate fluid therapy, correction of electrolyte abnormalities, prompt diuresis, and monitoring of renal function are particularly important to prevent platinum-based renal injury (53).There is currently no effective way to reverse AKI or tubular dysfunction, and treatment of renal toxic manifestations is primarily supportive with an aim to relieve symptoms. Advanced AKI exhibits uremia, metabolic derangement, and hypervolemia and requires dialysis, but dialysis is not effective in removing cisplatin. Intravenous saline or oral sodium chloride to correct hypovolemia and symptomatic hypomagnesium due to table salt, and intravenous/oral magnesium are necessary. Fanconi syndrome is notoriously difficult to treat (7, 9, 44).
Antimetabolites
Mechanisms and clinical manifestations
Methotrexate is widely used to treat malignancies such as advanced lymphoma, and its high-dose therapy (1-12 g/m2) is known to have an effect on renal function, with nephrotoxicity occurring during long-term therapy at conventional dose (54, 55). Dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors and their metabolites are filtered by the glomeruli and secreted from the proximal tubule to the cleft, and methotrexate favors crystal precipitation in the tubular lumen in a setting of slow urine flow rate and low urine pH, resulting in AKI due to direct tubular injury and necrosis (56). Methotrexate may also lead to a transient decrease in glomerular filtration rate due to a decrease in pressure because of contraction of glomerular capillary surface area and glomerular capillary perfusion, and afferent arteriolar or mesangial contraction. It can even cause syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone(SIADH) (7, 45).
Pemetrexed, a derivative of methotrexate excreted by the kidneys (70 to 90 percent within 24 hours, with a half-life of 3.5 hours), inhibits enzymes involved in purine/pyrimidine metabolism by affecting folate-metabolizing enzymes, impairs cellular RNA/DNA synthesis, and is approved for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma (44, 57) (58). Clofabine is also a purine nucleoside analog approved for the treatment of refractory childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and adult acute myeloid leukemia. It is possible that the inhibition of DNA synthesis, ribonucleotide reductase, and mitochondrial repair processes by clofarabine leads to ATI, while the ultimate understanding of mechanisms still requires renal biopsy. The nucleoside pyrimidine analogue, gemcitabine, is effective in the treatment of certain malignancies, mainly including lung, pancreatic, bladder, and breast cancers. Unfortunately, as with other chemotherapy drugs, many case reports and case series have documented AKI for gemcitabine, primarily TMA, which leads to drug-induced and dose-dependent thrombotic microangiopathy (DITMA) through immuno- and toxicity-mediated mechanisms.
In addition, hypertension, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and ischemic skin lesions may occur. The incidence and cases of renal adverse reactions caused by the antimetabolites above are detailed in Table 1 .
Treatments
Treatment involves the addition of folinic acid salvage to methotrexate to reduce nonmalignant cell damage and cleavage of methotrexate into noncytotoxic metabolites using glucosidase. High-throughput hemodialysis well clears plasma methotrexate (76 percent), but plasma concentrations may rebound after dialysis, and it can be used for severe acute kidney injury and may be unnecessary with the spread of glucosidase (44). In the case of immune-mediated DITMA, the best solution is to avoid the substance in question for life (7, 44).
Anti-angiogenic drugs (VEGF pathway inhibitors and TKI)
Mechanisms and clinical manifestations
The premise of this type of targeted drugs is that tumor growth is highly dependent on local pathological angiogenesis induced by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which promotes tumor development by regulating vascular permeability, endothelial cell migration, proliferation, and survival (44). VEGF is produced by renal visceral epithelial cells and binds to VEGF receptors located on the glomerular endothelium, mesangium, and periductal capillaries, while local VEGF synthesis is responsible for maintaining normal glomerular function and the integrity of the glomerular basement membrane, including damage repair and cell renewal ( Figure 2 ). The most important and dose-dependent renal effects of antiangiogenic therapy are hypertension and kidney-specific impairment, including proteinuria and AKI (57, 59–62). However, the effects of antiangiogenic drugs are predominantly histopathologically manifested as thrombotic microangiopathy ( Figure 2 ). Other lesions described on renal biopsy include focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), parathyroid proliferative nephritis, glomerular endothelial hyperplasia, cryoglobulinaemic nephritis, nonspecific immune complex nephritis, and acute interstitial nephritis (63–65). These drugs are a logically targeted therapy that complements other tumor-targeted therapies. Similar renal TMA-like results can be seen due to the anti-VEGF effects ofTyrosine Kinase Inhibitors(TKIs) (66), and sunitinib or sorafenib can also cause acute and chronic interstitial nephritis, as well as chronic interstitial and endothelial damage, leading to CKD. Multitarget TKIs (eg, imani) and novel TKIs (eg, dasatinib and nilotinib) are associated with renal functional insufficiency and subsequent CKD (7, 9, 67). In animal experiments, the histopathology of the kidney of mice injected with a single dose of anti-VEGF antibody has shown glomerular endothelial cell swelling, vacuolization, detachment, and the rupture of the epithelial septum, while immunohistochemistry has also demonstrated that renin is down-regulated, and that the nephron could be partially restored with recombinant VEGF (68). There are also numerous reports of kidney injury associated with these drugs ( Table 1 ).
Treatments
Therefore, exacerbations in hypertensive patients on such drugs often predict a stronger response to antineoplastic therapy (69), which in turn motivates clinicians to continue antiangiogenic therapy while using antihypertensive drugs to control blood pressure rather than discontinuing antiangiogenic therapy.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4)
Mechanisms and clinical manifestations
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are complementary therapies of cancers and are considered to be the most innovative and promising drugs in cancer treatment, including programmed death 1(PD-1), programmed cell death-Ligand 1(PD-L1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibodies against these suppressor receptors expressed by tumor cells, T cells, and other immune cells. Immune-related Adverse Effects (IrAE) affects all systems, most commonly in the gastrointestinal tracts, endocrine glands, skin, and liver, and less commonly in the central nervous, cardiovascular, pulmonary, musculoskeletal, and hematologic systems (29, 70, 71). Some researchers have reported that ICIs-induced AKI may be caused by a unique mechanism of action involved in immune system reprogramming, leading to loss of tolerance (25). Pembrolizumab has also been reported to cause renal insufficiency (21). Ipilimumab is approved for treating advanced melanoma, and in a retrospective study of rare adverse events caused by ipilimumab, as reported in two cases of acute renal failure in 120 exposed patients, renal biopsy was more useful in examining renal manifestations (72, 73). Nephrotic syndrome, acute tubular injury and other manifestations of acute tubular necrosis in AKI have also been reported. Renal biopsy shows acute granulomatous interstitial nephritis and lupus membranous nephropathy (74). In some reports, steroid therapy has been associated with improved renal function (73, 75), although the mechanisms by which ipilimumab causes kidney disease are not well understood. Dual mechanisms are possible, including cell-mediated immunity (76) and/or underlying autoimmune mechanisms (74) ( Figure 3 ).
Treatments
The basic treatment for IrAEs is steroid medications, prednisone (0.5-1 mg/kg/day) or methylprednisone (1-2mg/kg/day). Of course, hydrocortisone is allowed in exceptional cases. In case reports, treatment with these agents has resulted in partial or complete remission, but relapse has also occurred (53).
Other drugs
Mechanisms and clinical manifestations
Alkylating agents represented by cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide can generate cytotoxicity or nephrotoxicity and give rise to Fanconi syndrome through their metabolites. The antineoplastic antibiotic mitomycin C may cause nephrotoxicity through direct damage to the renal endothelium, which most likely occurs at least six months after treatment, with overall incidence depending on cumulative doses (7, 77). The immunomodulatory drug, thalidomide, and its derivatives are used in the treatment of multiple myeloma and have been reported to cause AKI (7, 45, 78–80). In addition to the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGR), and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), the most commonly used cancer therapies target proteasomes, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), HER2 dimer, v-Raf murine sarcoma virus oncogene homolog B (BRAF), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), mammalian targets of receptor activators (RANKL) and rapamycin (mTOR) of nuclear factor κβ ligands (7, 81). Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, have a 10-fold higher affinity for EGFR than natural ligands and can prevent EGF from binding to its receptor, making them an effective targeted therapy for these cancers. But, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, and hypocalcaemia may occur (7, 44). Trastuzumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against the extracellular domain of HER2, while perstuzumab blocks the dimerization of HER2 required for cell activation and proliferation compared to trastuzumab, which can cause hypertension. Cardiorenal syndrome has been observed when combined with anthracycline antibiotics with cardiotoxicity, while reduced renal function in patients treated with trastuzumab means a higher risk of cardiotoxicity. Nephrotoxic effects also increase when used in combination with cisplatin-based drugs (7, 82). Inhibitors of B-cell lymphoma 2, most commonly used for hematologic tumors, are prone to tumor lysis syndrome with lysis of a large number of tumor cells, resulting in the release of a large amount of nucleic acid, phosphate and potassium into the systemic circulation, formation of nucleic acid metabolite uric acid, hyperuricemia, and uric acid precipitation in the renal tubules. In addition, hyperuricemia can lead to renal vasoconstriction, impaired autoregulation, decreased renal blood flow, and inflammation, resulting in nephrogenic AKI (7). The therapeutic small molecule inhibitor, crizotinib, is mesenchymal lymphoma kinase 1, which is used to treat non-small cell lung cancer. Clazotinib has been associated with a reduced eGFR and an increased risk of renal cyst development and progression (7, 45). Vemurafenib and dabrafenib are potent inhibitors of mutant BRAF kinase domains and are approved for the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma. Wanchoo et al. (83) summarized data of nephrotoxicity for these drugs, in which BRAF is expressed and localized in developing and mature glomerular podocytes in experimental animal models, while in a clinical setting, the putative mechanism of nephrotoxicity is tubular toxicity. Thus, renal biopsy has not yet been performed to elucidate the mechanisms behind the nephrotoxicity of BRAF inhibitors (7, 9, 45). Interferon and high dose IL-2 are the earliest immunotherapies clinically used to treat various malignant tumors, whereas new cancer immunotherapies have emerged in the past decade, such as the above-mentioned immune checkpoint inhibitors that activate quiescent T cells and impair the ability of tumors to turn off activated T cells in the tumor microenvironment. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are also emerging immunotherapies, which can be used to treat various malignant blood diseases and directly bind/destroy cancer cells, thereby overcoming the immune barrier utilized by cancer cells. Of course, nephrotoxicity is inevitable ( Figure 4 ) (47).
Treatments
First, adjusting the dose of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide according to the degree of renal function can reduce nephrotoxicity. Mesna(antidote to acrolein) infusion and appropriate hydration can be used to prevent hemorrhagic cystitis. For complications of mitomycin use, the use of plasmapheresis and steroid therapy may suppress thrombotic microangiopathy without affecting the recovery or improvement of renal function (53).
It is important to emphasize that close monitoring, appropriate hydration, and dose reduction or even suspension of the use of the drug are preferred in these patients.
The patient
The patient’s own baseline characteristics can increase the possibility of drug nephrotoxicity, such as relatively less muscle mass and total body water in women and the elderly, which may lead to drug overdose. These two groups of people have lower serum albumin concentrations, leading to decreased drug binding and thus increased drug free concentrations. In addition to this, other systemic and renal diseases may also increase the risk of nephrotoxicity of drugs. Diseases such as cirrhosis and nephrotic syndrome increase nephrotoxic effects through a variety of mechanisms. Examples include systemic effective volume reduction, renal hypoperfusion, hypoalbuminemia, and renal impairment not exhibiting clinical symptoms. For drugs cleared by the kidney, these complications increase nephrotoxicity through prerenal and renal mechanisms (84).
Preclinical studies of drug-induced renal toxicity
Kidney-on-a-chip technology
In vitro model that mimics kidney physiology and continuous blood flow conditions, can replicate the in vivo environment and predict the nephrotoxicity of certain drugs in the clinical setting (85). Proximal tubular cells cultured in this model show markers of various drug cytotoxicity and have been successfully applied to known nephrotoxins such as cisplatin (86).
Cell- and biomarker-based assays
Biomarkers were added to the preclinical studies. Currently, routine biomarkers, such as serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, are the gold standard for assessing renal function and detecting kidney injury, including reversible increases in renal functional insufficiency and absolute increases in structural damage, although these two substances are not early biomarkers with abnormality measured only after nearly 50% GFR loss, limiting their use in clinics. In addition, their levels are affected by age, gender, food, fluid volume, muscle mass, medication, and other factors. Therefore, there is an urgent need for more sensitive biomarkers for early detection of AKI in the clinic. These potential novel biomarkers include neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipids (NGAL, also known as lipid 2), cluster proteins and kidney damage molecule-1 (KIM-1), polyheparin, albumin, total protein, β-2-microglobulin (B2M), cystinstatin C and trilobite 3 (TFF3), metalloproteinase tissue inhibitor 2 (TIMP2), insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 (IGFBP7), and N-acetyl-d-glucosidase (NAG)( Table 3 ). In fact, pro-inflammatory interleukins, such as IL-6, IL-8, and IL-18, are also considered potential novel biomarkers for the detection of nephrotoxic kidney injury (7, 8, 45).
Table 3.
Markers | Clinical applications | Deficiency |
---|---|---|
Serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen | Reversible increase in functional kidney injury and absolute increase in structural damage. | Late biomarkers, abnormalities can only be measured after nearly 50% GFR loss. |
NGAL | Urinary NGAL protein increases prior to elevated SCr, possibly as a molecule that distinguishes clinical AKI from subclinical or non-AKI patients (87). | Serum NGAL concentrations are weak for cisplatin-induced AKI detection (8). |
Albumin | Patients with glomerular or tubular injury (88). | The accuracy is not strong. |
β-2-M | Detection of β-2-M in urine indicates impaired tubular function. | Underlying malignancy also systematically increases β2-M and is not an accurate predictor of clinical and subclinical AKI. |
NAG | Present in the proximal and distal tubules of rat renal tubules, which are generally not filterable, their presence in urine largely reflects tubular destruction. | There is no clear relationship between NAG changes and clinical diagnosis of AKI [105,107], and the utility of NAG for predicting cisplatin secondary clinical AKI is limited. |
KIM-1 | When cisplatin-induced AKI is clinically detectable, urine KIM-1 concentrations show a time-dependent increase, with peaks occurring earlier than SCr. The predictive value is strong. | The clinical relevance of KIM-1 alterations in subclinical AKI is not fully understood (89). |
Cystatin C | Serum cystine C concentration is an endogenous marker of GFR, and the presence of cystine C in urine also indicates tubular damage. | Glucocorticoids, hyperthyroidism, and disorders affect serum concentrations, cystinstatin C may not be an ideal biomarker for cisplatin AKI (90–92). |
CBP | Two conflicting studies observed an increase or decrease in CBP in the urine of rats treated with cisplatin, as well as an increase in calcium-binding protein in serum (93). | The mechanism of action of CBP in kidney injury is unclear. |
IGFBP7 and metalloproteinase tissue inhibitor-2 | IGFBP7 and metalloproteinase tissue inhibitor-2 are cell cycle inhibitors released into urine during kidney injury (94, 95). | More research is needed to further validate the efficacy of cisplatin therapy in patients in this trial and to find the best time for clinical application in patients at risk of AKI. |
Clusterin | Anti-apoptotic properties are upregulated in renal injury (96, 97). | Not yet mentioned. |
Urine protein MCP-1 | Increased in the proximal tubule and urine of rats following cisplatin injury (98). | Not yet mentioned. |
TFF3 | Only one study quantified urinary TFF3 levels in patients after cisplatin treatment, in which an increase to a twofold increase to baseline was observed in patients not diagnosed with clinical AKI by traditional methods at day 10 (97). | Further studies are needed to understand why human TFF3 protein concentrations increase and rodents decrease after cisplatin exposure (89). |
GST | Moderate elevation of GST-pi in the urine is a hallmark of distal tubular injury in cisplatin therapy without clinical AKI (97, 99). | Not yet mentioned. |
FABP1 | After cisplatin treatment, mouse FABP1 expressing human FABP1 protein was shed into urine, and the content was positively correlated with the degree of damage. | Quantitative studies of FABP1 in the clinical setting of cisplatin-induced AKI remain lacking (100, 101). |
Osteopontine protein | Osteopontin is expected to become a biomarker. | Only one study evaluated the role of osteopontin in cisplatin-treated patients without clinical AKI, and no significant changes were found that warrant further study (102–106). |
RBP | It is used as a diagnostic tool for proximal tubular lesions and renal interstitial disorders such as AIN, and can be used to guide treatment when renal biopsy is contraindicated (32, 107). | Not yet mentioned. |
Urine TNF-α and IL-9 | Distinguishes AIN from other causes of acute kidney disease (AKD) (107, 108). | Not yet mentioned. |
FDG PET-ct | Several case reports of clinical diagnosis of ICPI-AIN on PET scan showed increased uptake of 18f-FDG in the renal cortex. | The reliability of this noninvasive and nonnephrotoxic approach still requires extensive research (107, 109). |
NGAL, Neutropil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; GFR, Glomerular filtration rate; AKI, Acute kidney injury; Scr, Serum creatinine; β -2-M, β -2-Microglobulin; NAG, N-Acetyl-β -d glucosamine; KIM-1, Kidney injury molecule 1; CBP, Calcium-binding protein; IGFBP7, Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-7; MCP-1, monocyte chemotaxis peptide-1; TFF-3, Recombinant human trefoil factor-3; GST, Glutathione transportase; FABP1, Fatty acid-binding protein 1; RBP, Retinol-binding protein; AIN, Acute interstitial nephritis; AKD, Acute kidney disease; FDG, fluorodeoxyglucose.
Kidney-on-a-chip technology, combined with new biomarkers, may give clinicians a better understanding of whether drugs are nephrotoxic. If so, the location of the injury and the underlying mechanism of kidney damage can be further understood.
Conclusions
Oncological nephrology is a rapidly advancing field that demands close collaboration between oncologists and nephrologists. While the use of conventional and targeted therapies has improved patient outcomes, there have been reported complications due to the nephrotoxic effects of these anti-cancer drugs. Therefore, it is essential to gain a comprehensive understanding of the potential adverse effects associated with these treatments, enabling early detection and prevention of further complications. In this regard, it is crucial to emphasize the importance of integrating “omics” strategies, including the exploration of non-invasive biomarkers, such as urine-based markers, that can accurately reflect the severity of kidney injury and assist in risk stratification and prognostic assessment.
Future studies can appropriately focus on the following aspects: 1) the effects of potential renal dysfunction or complications of anti-tumor drugs in cancer patients. This allows a more comprehensive understanding of the risk of kidney injury in different patient populations. 2) Potential novel anti-tumor drugs that can reduce renal toxicity. 3)Further develop and validate biomarkers with high sensitivity and specificity.
Author contributions
JT: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft. NY: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft. SP: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft. PR: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – original draft. MC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. JJ: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. QH: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. YZ: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the editorial support of YZ in the preparation of this manuscript. The authors are fully responsible for all content and editorial decisions for this manuscript.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China (82004116), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LQ20H290006), the Medical Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Provincial Health Commission(2023KY539), the Huadong Medicine Joint Funds of the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LHDMZ22H050001), the Construction of Key Projects by Zhejiang Provincial Ministry (No.WKJ-ZJ-2302), The Key Project of Scientific Research Foundation of Chinese Medicine (2022ZZ002), the “Pioneer” and “Leading Goose” R&D Program of Zhejiang (2023C03075), The Key project of Basic Scientific Research Operating Funds of Hangzhou Medical College (KYZD202002), the Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province (No.2019320552).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1. dos Santos NA, Carvalho Rodrigues MA, Martins NM, dos Santos AC. Cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity and targets of nephroprotection: an update. Arch Toxicol (2012) 86(8):1233–50. doi: 10.1007/s00204-012-0821-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Safirstein R, Miller P, Guttenplan JB. Uptake and metabolism of cisplatin by rat kidney. Kidney Int (1984) 25(5):753–8. doi: 10.1038/ki.1984.86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Filipski KK, Loos WJ, Verweij J, Sparreboom A. Interaction of Cisplatin with the human organic cation transporter 2. Clin Cancer Res (2008) 14(12):3875–80. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ramesh G, Reeves WB. TNF-α mediates chemokine and cytokine expression and renal injury in cisplatin nephrotoxicity. J Clin Invest (2002) 110(6):835–42. doi: 10.1172/JCI200215606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ramesh G, Reeves WB. p38 MAP kinase inhibition ameliorates cisplatin nephrotoxicity in mice. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol (2005) 289(1):F166–74. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00401.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Baek SH, Kim SH, Kim JW, Kim YJ, Lee KW, Na KY. Effects of a DPP4 inhibitor on cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials (2015) 16:239. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0772-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Malyszko J, Kozlowska K, Kozlowski L, Malyszko J. Nephrotoxicity of anticancer treatment. Nephrol Dial Transpl (2017) 32(6):924–36. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Tiong HY, Huang P, Xiong S, Li Y, Vathsala A, Zink D. Drug-induced nephrotoxicity: clinical impact and preclinical in vitro models. Mol Pharm (2014) 11(7):1933–48. doi: 10.1021/mp400720w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Verzicco I, Regolisti G, Quaini F, Bocchi P, Brusasco I, Ferrari M, et al. Electrolyte disorders induced by antineoplastic drugs. Front Oncol (2020) 10:779. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Latcha S, Jaimes EA, Patil S, Glezerman IG, Mehta S, Flombaum CD. Long-term renal outcomes after cisplatin treatment. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2016) 11(7):1173–9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08070715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Trevisani F, Di Marco F, Floris M, Pani A, Minnei R, Scartozzi M, et al. Renal function outcomes in metastatic non-small-cell lung carcinoma patients treated with chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors: an unexpected scenario. Vaccines (Basel) (2022) 10(5):679. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10050679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. May J, Carson KR, Butler S, Liu W, Bartlett NL, Wagner-Johnston ND. High incidence of methotrexate associated renal toxicity in patients with lymphoma: a retrospective analysis. Leuk Lymphoma (2014) 55(6):1345–9. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2013.840780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wiczer T, Dotson E, Tuten A, Phillips G, Maddocks K. Evaluation of incidence and risk factors for high-dose methotrexate-induced nephrotoxicity. J Oncol Pharm Pract (2016) 22(3):430–6. doi: 10.1177/1078155215594417 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Latcha S, Gupta M, Lin IH, Jaimes EA. High dose methotrexate-induced acute kidney injury: incidence, risk factors, and recovery. Kidney Int Rep (2023) 8(2):360–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.10.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Abdel-Rahman O, ElHalawani H. Proteinuria in patients with solid tumors treated with ramucirumab: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chemotherapy (2014) 60(5-6):325–33. doi: 10.1159/000437253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Arnold D, Fuchs CS, Tabernero J, Ohtsu A, Zhu AX, Garon EB, et al. Meta-analysis of individual patient safety data from six randomized, placebo-controlled trials with the antiangiogenic VEGFR2-binding monoclonal antibody ramucirumab. Ann Oncol (2017) 28(12):2932–42. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Lafrenie R, Zhang Z-F, Wang T, Liu L-H, Guo H-Q. Risks of proteinuria associated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One (2014) 9(3):e90135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Sorich MJ, Rowland A, Kichenadasse G, Woodman RJ, Mangoni AA. Risk factors of proteinuria in renal cell carcinoma patients treated with VEGF inhibitors: a secondary analysis of pooled clinical trial data. Br J Cancer (2016) 114(12):1313–7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Van Cutsem E, Tabernero J, Lakomy R, Prenen H, Prausova J, Macarulla T, et al. Addition of aflibercept to fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan improves survival in a phase III randomized trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen. J Clin Oncol (2012) 30(28):3499–506. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.8201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Peng D, Cai Y, Chen G, Hou M, Luo X, Dongzhi Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of apatinib versus sorafenib/placebo in first-line treatment for intermediate and advanced primary liver cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol (2023) 14:1101063. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1101063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hofmann L, Forschner A, Loquai C, Goldinger SM, Zimmer L, Ugurel S, et al. Cutaneous, gastrointestinal, hepatic, endocrine, and renal side-effects of anti-PD-1 therapy. Eur J Cancer (2016) 60:190–209. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.02.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Rutkowski P, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, et al. Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. New Engl J Med (2017) 377(14):1345–56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709684 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Weber JS, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD, Topalian SL, SChadendorf D, Larkin J, et al. Safety profile of nivolumab monotherapy: A pooled analysis of patients with advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol (2017) 35(7):785–92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.66.1389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Xu C, Chen YP, Du XJ, Liu JQ, Huang CL, Chen L, et al. Comparative safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ (2018) 363:k4226. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Cortazar FB, Marrone KA, Troxell ML, Ralto KM, Hoenig MP, Brahmer JR, et al. Clinicopathological features of acute kidney injury associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Kidney Int (2016) 90(3):638–47. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.04.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Shingarev R, Glezerman IG. Kidney complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors: A review. Am J Kidney Diseases (2019) 74(4):529–37. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.03.433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Seethapathy H, Zhao S, Chute DF, Zubiri L, Oppong Y, Strohbehn I, et al. The incidence, causes, and risk factors of acute kidney injury in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2019) 14(12):1692–700. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00990119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Manohar S, Kompotiatis P, Thongprayoon C, Cheungpasitporn W, Herrmann J, Herrmann SM. Programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor treatment is associated with acute kidney injury and hypocalcemia: meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transpl (2019) 34(1):108–17. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Manohar S, Ghamrawi R, Chengappa M, Goksu BNB, KottsChade L, Finnes H, et al. Acute interstitial nephritis and checkpoint inhibitor therapy: single center experience of management and drug rechallenge. Kidney360 (2020) 1(1):16–24. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000152019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Seethapathy H, Zhao S, Strohbehn IA, Lee M, Chute DF, Bates H, et al. Incidence and clinical features of immune-related acute kidney injury in patients receiving programmed cell death ligand-1 inhibitors. Kidney Int Rep (2020) 5(10):1700–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.07.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Meraz-Munoz A, Amir E, Ng P, Avila-Casado C, Ragobar C, Chan C, et al. Acute kidney injury associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: incidence, risk factors and outcomes. J Immunother Cancer (2020) 8(1):e000467. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Isik B, Alexander MP, Manohar S, Vaughan L, KottsChade L, Markovic S, et al. Biomarkers, clinical features, and rechallenge for immune checkpoint inhibitor renal immune-related adverse events. Kidney Int Rep (2021) 6(4):1022–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.01.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Sorah JD, Rose TL, Radhakrishna R, Derebail VK, Milowsky MI. Incidence and prediction of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related nephrotoxicity. J Immunother (2021) 44(3):127–31. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Abdelrahim M, Mamlouk O, Lin H, Lin J, Page V, Abdel-Wahab N, et al. Incidence, predictors, and survival impact of acute kidney injury in patients with melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a 10-year single-institution analysis. OncoImmunology (2021) 10(1):1927313. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2021.1927313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Garcia-Carro C, Bolufer M, Bury R, Castaneda Z, Munoz E, Felip E, et al. Acute kidney injury as a risk factor for mortality in oncological patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors. Nephrol Dial Transpl (2022) 37(5):887–94. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Baker ML, Yamamoto Y, Perazella MA, Dizman N, Shirali AC, Hafez N, et al. Mortality after acute kidney injury and acute interstitial nephritis in patients prescribed immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. J Immunother Cancer (2022) 10(3):e004421. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kanbay M, Copur S, Siriopol D, Yildiz AB, Berkkan M, Popa R, et al. The association between acute kidney injury and outcomes in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Kidney J (2023) 16(5):817–26. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfac194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Liu F, Wang Z, Li X, Zhang Z, Yang Y, Chen J, et al. Comparative risk of acute kidney injury among cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer Commun (Lond) (2023) 43(2):214–24. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Hájek R, Masszi T, Petrucci MT, Palumbo A, Rosiñol L, Nagler A, et al. A randomized phase III study of carfilzomib vs low-dose corticosteroids with optional cyclophosphamide in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (FOCUS). Leukemia (2016) 31(1):107–14. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Richardson PG, Siegel DS, Vij R, Hofmeister CC, Baz R, Jagannath S, et al. Pomalidomide alone or in combination with low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 2 study. Blood (2014) 123(12):1826–32. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-11-538835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Seethapathy H, Lee MD, Strohbehn IA, Efe O, Rusibamayila N, Chute DF, et al. Clinical features of acute kidney injury in patients receiving dabrafenib and trametinib. Nephrol Dial Transpl (2022) 37(3):507–14. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Lebwohl D, Canetta R. Clinical development of platinum complexes in cancer therapy: an historical perspective and an update. Eur J Cancer (1998) 34(10):1522–34. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00224-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Wainford RD, Weaver RJ, Hawksworth GM. The immediate early genes, c-fos, c-jun and AP-1, are early markers of platinum analogue toxicity in human proximal tubular cell primary cultures. Toxicol In Vitro (2009) 23(5):780–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.04.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Perazella MA. Onco-nephrology: renal toxicities of chemotherapeutic agents. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2012) 7(10):1713–21. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02780312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Izzedine H, Perazella MA. Anticancer drug-induced acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Rep (2017) 2(4):504–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2017.02.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Camidge DR, Brosnan EM, DeSilva C, Koo PJ, Chonchol M. Crizotinib effects on creatinine and non-creatinine-based measures of glomerular filtration rate. J Thorac Oncol (2014) 9(11):1634–7. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Perazella MA, Shirali AC. Nephrotoxicity of cancer immunotherapies: past, present and future. J Am Soc Nephrol (2018) 29(8):2039–52. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018050488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Bonifant CL, Jackson HJ, Brentjens RJ, Curran KJ. Toxicity and management in CAR T-cell therapy. Mol Ther Oncolytics (2016) 3:16011. doi: 10.1038/mto.2016.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Fitzgerald JC, Weiss SL, Maude SL, Barrett DM, Lacey SF, Melenhorst JJ, et al. Cytokine release syndrome after chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Crit Care Med (2017) 45(2):e124–e31. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Lee DW, Gardner R, Porter DL, Louis CU, Ahmed N, Jensen M, et al. Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of cytokine release syndrome. Blood (2014) 124(2):188–95. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-05-552729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Frey NV, Porter DL. Cytokine release syndrome with novel therapeutics for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program (2016) 2016(1):567–72. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2016.1.567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Lajer H, Kristensen M, Hansen HH, Nielsen S, Frokiaer J, Ostergaard LF, et al. Magnesium depletion enhances cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2005) 56(5):535–42. doi: 10.1007/s00280-005-1010-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Hałka J, Spaleniak S, Kade G, Antosiewicz S, Sigorski D. The nephrotoxicity of drugs used in causal oncological therapies. Curr Oncol (2022) 29(12):9681–94. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29120760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Perazella MA, Moeckel GW. Nephrotoxicity from chemotherapeutic agents: clinical manifestations, pathobiology, and prevention/therapy. Semin Nephrol (2010) 30(6):570–81. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2010.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Sahni V, Choudhury D, Ahmed Z. Chemotherapy-associated renal dysfunction. Nat Rev Nephrol (2009) 5(8):450–62. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2009.97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Widemann BC, Adamson PC. Understanding and managing methotrexate nephrotoxicity. Oncologist (2006) 11(6):694–703. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-6-694 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Perazella MA, Izzedine H. New drug toxicities in the onco-nephrology world. Kidney Int (2015) 87(5):909–17. doi: 10.1038/ki.2015.30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Glezerman IG, Pietanza MC, Miller V, Seshan SV. Kidney tubular toxicity of maintenance pemetrexed therapy. Am J Kidney Dis (2011) 58(5):817–20. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.04.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Izzedine H, Ederhy S, Goldwasser F, Soria JC, Milano G, Cohen A, et al. Management of hypertension in angiogenesis inhibitor-treated patients. Ann Oncol (2009) 20(5):807–15. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn713 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Izzedine H, Massard C, Spano JP, Goldwasser F, Khayat D, Soria JC. VEGF signalling inhibition-induced proteinuria: Mechanisms, significance and management. Eur J Cancer (2010) 46(2):439–48. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Soria JC, Massard C, Izzedine H. From theoretical synergy to clinical supra-additive toxicity. J Clin Oncol (2009) 27(9):1359–61. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Vigneau C, Lorcy N, Dolley-Hitze T, Jouan F, Arlot-Bonnemains Y, Laguerre B, et al. All anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs can induce 'pre-eclampsia-like syndrome': a RARe study. Nephrol Dial Transpl (2014) 29(2):325–32. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Gurevich F, Perazella MA. Renal effects of anti-angiogenesis therapy: update for the internist. Am J Med (2009) 122(4):322–8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.11.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Izzedine H, Rixe O, Billemont B, Baumelou A, Deray G. Angiogenesis inhibitor therapies: focus on kidney toxicity and hypertension. Am J Kidney Dis (2007) 50(2):203–18. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.04.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Eremina V, Jefferson JA, Kowalewska J, Hochster H, Haas M, Weisstuch J, et al. VEGF inhibition and renal thrombotic microangiopathy. New Engl J Med (2008) 358(11):1129–36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Launay-Vacher V, Aapro M, De Castro G Jr, Cohen E, Deray G, Dooley M, et al. Renal effects of molecular targeted therapies in oncology: a review by the Cancer and the Kidney International Network (C-KIN). Ann Oncol (2015) 26(8):1677–84. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Cosmai L, Gallieni M, Liguigli W, Porta C. Renal toxicity of anticancer agents targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors (VEGFRs). J Nephrol (2017) 30(2):171–80. doi: 10.1007/s40620-016-0311-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Sugimoto H, Hamano Y, Charytan D, Cosgrove D, Kieran M, Sudhakar A, et al. Neutralization of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by anti-VEGF antibodies and soluble VEGF receptor 1 (sFlt-1) induces proteinuria. J Biol Chem (2003) 278(15):12605–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C300012200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. De Stefano A, Carlomagno C, Pepe S, Bianco R, De Placido S. Bevacizumab-related arterial hypertension as a predictive marker in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2011) 68(5):1207–13. doi: 10.1007/s00280-011-1604-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD. Immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint blockade. New Engl J Med (2018) 378(2):158–68. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1703481 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Champiat S, Lambotte O, Barreau E, Belkhir R, Berdelou A, Carbonnel F, et al. Management of immune checkpoint blockade dysimmune toxicities: a collaborative position paper. Ann Oncol (2016) 27(4):559–74. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Izzedine H, Gueutin V, Gharbi C, Mateus C, Robert C, Routier E, et al. Kidney injuries related to ipilimumab. Invest New Drugs (2014) 32(4):769–73. doi: 10.1007/s10637-014-0092-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Voskens CJ, Goldinger SM, Loquai C, Robert C, Kaehler KC, Berking C, et al. The price of tumor control: an analysis of rare side effects of anti-CTLA-4 therapy in metastatic melanoma from the ipilimumab network. PloS One (2013) 8(1):e53745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Fadel F, El Karoui K, Knebelmann B. Anti-CTLA4 antibody-induced lupus nephritis. New Engl J Med (2009) 361(2):211–2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0904283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Forde PM, Rock K, Wilson G, O’Byrne KJ. Ipilimumab-induced immune-related renal failure–a case report. Anticancer Res (2012) 32(10):4607–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Chmiel KD, Suan D, Liddle C, Nankivell B, Ibrahim R, Bautista C, et al. Resolution of severe ipilimumab-induced hepatitis after antithymocyte globulin therapy. J Clin Oncol (2011) 29(9):e237–40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Shah R, Beem E, Sautina L, Zharikov SI, Segal MS. Mitomycin- and calcineurin-associated HUS, endothelial dysfunction and endothelial repair: a new paradigm for the puzzle? Nephrol Dial Transplant (2007) 22(2):617–20. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Batts ED, Sanchorawala V, Hegerfeldt Y, Lazarus HM. Azotemia associated with use of lenalidomide in plasma cell dyscrasias. Leuk Lymphoma (2008) 49(6):1108–15. doi: 10.1080/10428190802023707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Lipson EJ, Huff CA, Holanda DG, McDevitt MA, Fine DM. Lenalidomide-induced acute interstitial nephritis. Oncologist (2010) 15(9):961–4. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Baird P, Leung S, Hoang H, Babalola O, Devoe CE, Wanchoo R, et al. A case of acute kidney injury from crystal nephropathy secondary to pomalidomide and levofloxacin use. J Oncol Pharm Pract (2016) 22(2):357–60. doi: 10.1177/1078155214568581 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Tonooka A, Ohashi R. Current trends in anti-cancer molecular targeted therapies: renal complications and their histological features. J Nippon Med Sch (2022) 89(2):128–38. doi: 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2022_89-221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Cosmai L, Gallieni M, Porta C. Renal toxicity of anticancer agents targeting HER2 and EGFR. J Nephrol (2015) 28(6):647–57. doi: 10.1007/s40620-015-0226-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Wanchoo R, Jhaveri KD, Deray G, Launay-Vacher V. Renal effects of BRAF inhibitors: a systematic review by the Cancer and the Kidney International Network. Clin Kidney J (2016) 9(2):245–51. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfv149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Perazella MA. Pharmacology behind common drug nephrotoxicities. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2018) 13(12):1897–908. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00150118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Wilmer MJ, Ng CP, Lanz HL, Vulto P, Suter-Dick L, Masereeuw R. Kidney-on-a-chip technology for drug-induced nephrotoxicity screening. Trends Biotechnol (2016) 34(2):156–70. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Jang K-J, Mehr AP, Hamilton GA, McPartlin LA, Chung S, Suh K-Y, et al. Human kidney proximal tubule-on-a-chip for drug transport and nephrotoxicity assessment. Integr Biol (2013) 5(9):1119–29. doi: 10.1039/c3ib40049b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Gaspari F, Cravedi P, Mandala M, Perico N, de Leon FR, Stucchi N, et al. Predicting cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury by urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin excretion: a pilot prospective case-control study. Nephron Clin Pract (2010) 115(2):c154–60. doi: 10.1159/000312879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Peterson PA, Evrin PE, Berggård I. Differentiation of glomerular, tubular, and normal proteinuria: determinations of urinary excretion of beta-2-macroglobulin, albumin, and total protein. J Clin Invest (1969) 48(7):1189–98. doi: 10.1172/JCI106083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. George B, Joy MS, Aleksunes LM. Urinary protein biomarkers of kidney injury in patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) (2018) 243(3):272–82. doi: 10.1177/1535370217745302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Bökenkamp A, van Wijk JA, Lentze MJ, Stoffel-Wagner B. Effect of corticosteroid therapy on serum cystatin C and beta2-microglobulin concentrations. Clin Chem (2002) 48(7):1123–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Manetti L, Pardini E, Genovesi M, Campomori A, Grasso L, Morselli LL, et al. Thyroid function differently affects serum cystatin C and creatinine concentrations. J Endocrinol Invest (2005) 28(4):346–9. doi: 10.1007/BF03347201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Risch L, Huber AR. Glucocorticoids and increased serum cystatin C concentrations. Clin Chim Acta (2002) 320(1-2):133–4. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(02)00044-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Takashi M, Zhu Y, Miyake K, Kato K. Urinary 28-kD calbindin-D as a new marker for damage to distal renal tubules caused by cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Urol Int (1996) 56(3):174–9. doi: 10.1159/000282835 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Aregger F, Uehlinger DE, Witowski J, Brunisholz RA, Hunziker P, Frey FJ, et al. Identification of IGFBP-7 by urinary proteomics as a novel prognostic marker in early acute kidney injury. Kidney Int (2014) 85(4):909–19. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Bigg HF, Morrison CJ, Butler GS, Bogoyevitch MA, Wang Z, Soloway PD, et al. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-4 inhibits but does not support the activation of gelatinase A via efficient inhibition of membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase. Cancer Res (2001) 61(9):3610–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Pianta TJ, Pickering JW, Succar L, Chin M, Davidson T, Buckley NA, et al. Dexamethasone modifies cystatin C-based diagnosis of acute kidney injury during cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Kidney Blood Press Res (2017) 42(1):62–75. doi: 10.1159/000469715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. George B, Wen X, Mercke N, Gomez M, O'Bryant C, Bowles DW, et al. Profiling of kidney injury biomarkers in patients receiving cisplatin: time-dependent changes in the absence of clinical nephrotoxicity. Clin Pharmacol Ther (2017) 101(4):510–8. doi: 10.1002/cpt.606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Prodjosudjadi W, Daha MR, Gerritsma JS, Florijn KW, Barendregt JN, Bruijn JA, et al. Increased urinary excretion of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 during acute renal allograft rejection. Nephrol Dial Transpl (1996) 11(6):1096–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Harrison DJ, Kharbanda R, Cunningham DS, McLellan LI, Hayes JD. Distribution of glutathione S-transferase isoenzymes in human kidney: basis for possible markers of renal injury. J Clin Pathol (1989) 42(6):624–8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.42.6.624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Maatman RG, Van Kuppevelt TH, Veerkamp JH. Two types of fatty acid-binding protein in human kidney. Isolation, characterization and localization. Biochem J (1991) 273(Pt 3):759–66. doi: 10.1042/bj2730759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Yan J, Gong Y, She YM, Wang G, Roberts MS, Burczynski FJ. Molecular mechanism of recombinant liver fatty acid binding protein's antioxidant activity. J Lipid Res (2009) 50(12):2445–54. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M900177-JLR200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Fuchs TC, Frick K, Emde B, Czasch S, von Landenberg F, Hewitt P. Evaluation of novel acute urinary rat kidney toxicity biomarker for subacute toxicity studies in preclinical trials. Toxicol Pathol (2012) 40(7):1031–48. doi: 10.1177/0192623312444618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Pianta TJ, Succar L, Davidson T, Buckley NA, Endre ZH. Monitoring treatment of acute kidney injury with damage biomarkers. Toxicol Lett (2017) 268:63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Pinches MD, Betts CJ, Bickerton SJ, Beattie L, Burdett LD, Thomas HT, et al. Evaluation of novel urinary renal biomarkers: biological variation and reference change values. Toxicologic Pathol (2012) 40(3):541–9. doi: 10.1177/0192623311432436 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Vinken P, Starckx S, Barale-Thomas E, Looszova A, Sonee M, Goeminne N, et al. Tissue Kim-1 and urinary clusterin as early indicators of cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury in rats. Toxicol Pathol (2012) 40(7):1049–62. doi: 10.1177/0192623312444765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Wadey RM, Pinches MG, Jones HB, Riccardi D, Price SA. Tissue expression and correlation of a panel of urinary biomarkers following cisplatin-induced kidney injury. Toxicol Pathol (2014) 42(3):591–602. doi: 10.1177/0192623313492044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Sprangers B, Leaf DE, Porta C, Soler MJ, Perazella MA. Diagnosis and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Nephrol (2022) 18(12):794–805. doi: 10.1038/s41581-022-00630-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Moledina DG, Wilson FP, Pober JS, Perazella MA, Singh N, Luciano RL, et al. Urine TNF-alpha and IL-9 for clinical diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis. JCI Insight (2019) 4(10):e127456. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.127456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Qualls D, Seethapathy H, Bates H, Tajmir S, Heidari P, Endres P, et al. Positron emission tomography as an adjuvant diagnostic test in the evaluation of checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute interstitial nephritis. J Immunother Cancer (2019) 7(1):356. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0820-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]