Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1998 Sep;180(18):4903–4911. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.18.4903-4911.1998

Two Functionally Distinct Regions Upstream of the cbbI Operon of Rhodobacter sphaeroides Regulate Gene Expression

James M Dubbs 1, F Robert Tabita 1,*
PMCID: PMC107516  PMID: 9733694

Abstract

A number of cbbFI::lacZ translational fusion plasmids containing various lengths of sequence 5′ to the form I (cbbI) Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle operon (cbbFIcbbPIcbbAIcbbLIcbbSI) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides were constructed. Expression of β-galactosidase was monitored under a variety of growth conditions. It was found that 103 bp of sequence upstream of the cbbFI transcription start was sufficient to confer low levels of regulated cbbI promoter expression; this activity was dependent on the presence of an intact cbbR gene. Additionally, R. sphaeroides CbbR was shown to bind to the region between 9 and 100 bp 5′ to the cbbFI transcription start. Inclusion of an additional upstream sequence, from 280 to 636 bp 5′ to cbbFI, resulted in a significant increase in regulated cbbI promoter expression under all growth conditions tested. A 50-bp region responsible for the majority of this increase occurs between 280 and 330 bp 5′ to cbbFI. The additional 306 bp of upstream sequence from 330 to 636 bp also appears to play a positive regulatory role. A 4-bp deletion 281 to 284 bp 5′ to cbbFI significantly reduced cbbI expression while the proper regulatory pattern was retained. These studies provide evidence for the presence of two functionally distinct regions of the cbbI promoter, with the distal domain providing significant regulated promoter activity that adheres to the normal pattern of expression.


Nonsulfur purple bacteria are capable of growth under a variety of physiological conditions (26). Under growth conditions where CO2 functions as the sole carbon source (i.e., chemo- and photoautotrophic conditions), the Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle is essential for providing virtually all cellular carbon (39). When fixed carbon sources are available, the CBB cycle functions as a minor carbon assimilatory pathway, with CO2 used primarily as a terminal electron acceptor (43). Rhodobacter sphaeroides is an excellent model system to study the control of CBB cycle (cbb) gene expression due to the fact that this organism reversibly regulates the expression of two major cbb operons. The form I (cbbI) and form II (cbbII) operons (12, 17) are located on two separate genetic elements (chromosome I and chromosome II, respectively) of this organism (36, 37). The cbbI operon is comprised of the cbbFPALS structural genes that encode, respectively, the CBB cycle enzymes fructose 1,6-sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphatase (cbbFI), phosphoribulokinase (cbbPI), and fructose 1,6-sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphate aldolase (cbbAI), as well as the large- and small-subunit genes of form I (L8S8) ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase (RubisCO) (cbbLIcbbSI) (15). The cbbII operon is similar to the cbbI operon, but in addition to similar, but not identical, copies of the F, P, and A genes, this cluster contains genes encoding transketolase (cbbTII) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (cbbGII) and the gene encoding the single large-type subunit of the distinct form II-type RubisCO (cbbMII) (4). Mutagenesis studies indicate that the genes of the cbbI and cbbII clusters are each controlled by single promoters 5′ to the first gene of the respective operon (4, 14, 15). Studies at the protein level have shown that regulation of expression of these structural genes is complex in R. sphaeroides. During aerobic chemoheterotrophic growth, the expression of both cbb operons is repressed. Under photosynthetic growth conditions, expression of both the cbbI and cbbII operons is derepressed, with each operon independently responding to a number of environmental signals such as the CO2 concentration and the redox state of the fixed carbon compounds supplied for growth (8, 13, 19, 20, 22). Photoheterotrophic growth results in expression of both operons with the cbbII gene products generally predominating, resulting in a form I-to-form II RubisCO ratio of approximately 1:2 (22). The overall level of gene expression during photoheterotrophic growth is affected by the redox state of the carbon source supplied for growth, with more-reduced carbon sources resulting in higher levels of cbb gene expression (38). Maximal expression from both operons occurs under photoautotrophic conditions (in a 1.5% CO2–98.5% H2 atmosphere); however, under these conditions expression of the cbbI operon predominates over that of the cbbII operon. This differential expression of the two operons led to the proposal that form II RubisCO functions primarily as a terminal electron acceptor, maintaining the redox balance of the cell, while the function of the form I enzyme is to provide the cell with fixed carbon (17, 19, 43). While both the cbb operons display independent regulation, results of mutagenesis studies indicate that there is communication between the two operons. Insertional mutagenesis of genes in either operon gives rise to a compensatory increase in the expression of the unaffected operon, resulting in enzyme levels that are equal to or higher than those of wild-type cells (8, 15, 19, 20). This compensatory effect is mediated by the cbbR gene, which is divergently transcribed from cbbFI (16). CbbR was thus found to be a positive regulator of both operons. cbb gene expression in a number of other aerobic and anaerobic autotrophic bacteria has also been shown to be influenced by the product of the cbbR gene (10, 24, 28, 40, 42, 46), and CbbR was found to bind specifically to AT-rich sites within the cbbR-cbbL intergenic regions of Ralstonia eutropha (Alcaligenes eutrophus) (25) and Xanthobacter flavus (41) as well as Chromatium vinosum (42) and Thiobacillus ferrooxidans (24).

As a first step in the identification of DNA sequences involved in the regulation of cbbI operon expression, we have constructed cbbI::lacZ translational fusions and monitored their expression under a variety of growth conditions. In this communication, we identified a region of sequence 5′ to cbbFI involved in cbbR-dependent regulation of the cbbI operon. We show that CbbR binds to this region in vitro. We also demonstrate that an additional upstream region is necessary for high levels of cbbI expression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and culture conditions.

All bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are described in Table 1. Escherichia coli JM109 was used to maintain all plasmids, with the exception of pRK2013, which was maintained in E. coli MM294. E. coli BL21(DE3) (35) was used as the host for expression of R. sphaeroides CbbR from the plasmid pET11R-11. Anaerobic growth of E. coli was achieved under an atmosphere of 100% argon. R. sphaeroides strains were grown photoheterotrophically and photoautotrophically under a 1.5% CO2–98.5% H2 atmosphere as previously described (22). Aerobic chemoheterotrophic growth was performed with Omerod’s medium (29) supplemented with 0.4% malate while the culture was shaken vigorously in the dark at 30°C. Chemoautotrophic cultures received a gas atmosphere of 5% CO2–45% H2–50% air. Antibiotics were added to the medium, as required, at the indicated concentrations (micrograms per milliliter): for E. coli, ampicillin (100), tetracycline (12.5), and kanamycin (50); for R. sphaeroides, tetracycline (12.5), kanamycin (50), and trimethoprim (200).

TABLE 1.

Strains and plasmids

Plasmid or strain Relevant characteristics Reference or source
pK18 Knr; derivative of pUC18 32
pKC1-5 Knr; pK18 containing the 719-bp EcoRI-AvaII fragment of pUC12EH This study
pKC1ΔXho Knr; pKC1-5 containing a 4-bp deletion at the XhoI site within the insert This study
p12EH Apr; pUC9 carrying a 1.8-kbp EcoRI-HindIII fragment containing cbbR 16
pMC1403 Apr; LacZ translational fusion vector 34
pMC1H1 Apr; pMC1403 carrying the 187-bp BssHII-BamHI fragment of pKC1-5 This study
pMCB1 Apr; pMC1403 carrying the 363-bp XhoI-BamHI fragment of pKC1-5 This study
pMCG1 Apr; pMC1403 carrying the 413-bp PflMI-BamHI fragment of pKC1-5 This study
pMCG1ΔXho Apr; pMCG1 carrying a 4-bp deletion at the XhoI site This study
pMCF1 Apr; pMC1403 carrying the 584-bp DraIII-BamHI fragment of pKC1-5 This study
pMCE1 Apr; pMC1403 carrying the 674-bp NarI-BamHI fragment of pKC1-5 This study
pMCC1 Apr; pMC1403 carrying the 719-bp EcoRI-BamHI fragment of pKC1-5 This study
pMCC1ΔXho Apr; pMCC1 carrying a 4-bp deletion at the XhoI site This study
pMCD1 Apr; pMC1403 carrying the 1,323-bp HindIII-AvaII fragment of p12EH This study
pVK101 Knr Tcr; broad-host-range vector 23
pVK1403 Apr; pVK101 containing pMC1403 inserted in the EcoRI site This study
pVKH1 Knr Tcr Apr; pVK101 carrying pMCH1 inserted in the EcoRI site This study
pVKB1 Knr Tcr Apr; pVK101 carrying pMCB1 inserted in the EcoRI site This study
pVKG1 Knr Tcr Apr; pVK101 carrying pMCG1 inserted in the EcoRI site This study
pVKG1ΔXho Knr Tcr Apr; pVK101 carrying pMCG1ΔXho inserted in the EcoRI site This study
pVKF1 Knr Tcr Apr; pVK101 carrying pMCF1 inserted in the EcoRI site This study
pVKE1 Knr Tcr Apr; pVK101 carrying pMCE1 inserted in the EcoRI site This study
pVKC1 Knr Tcr Apr; pVK101 carrying pMCC1 inserted in the EcoRI site This study
pVKC1ΔXho Knr Tcr Apr; pVK101 carrying pMCC1ΔXho inserted in the EcoRI site This study
pVKD1 Knr Tcr Apr; pVK101 carrying pMCD1 inserted in the EcoRI site This study
pRK2013 Knr; conjugative helper plasmid 11
pET11a Apr; E. coli expression vector 7
pET11R-11 Apr; pET11a carrying a 1,045-bp NdeI-BamHI fragment spanning cbbR This study
R. sphaeroides strains
 HR Wild type; Smr 44
 1312 cbbR::Tpr 16
 CAC Chemoautotrophic-competent variant of R. sphaeroides HR 31
E. coli strains
 JM109 47
 MM294 11
 BL21(DE3) Expression strain carrying an IPTG-inducible T7 RNA polymerase gene 35

DNA manipulations and sequencing.

Plasmid isolations and transformations were performed by standard procedures. DNA sequencing of plasmid subclones was performed by the dideoxy chain termination method on base denatured plasmid templates as described elsewhere (3). Plasmid templates were purified by CsCl-ethidium bromide centrifugation (27).

Construction of cbbFI::lacZ fusion plasmids.

All fusion plasmid constructions made use of the AvaII site located at a position 56 bp within cbbFI in plasmid p12EH, as well as a number of upstream sites (see Fig. 2). Each fragment was isolated, and either it was digested with mung bean nuclease (BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.) to remove overhanging ends or the ends were filled in with Klenow polymerase and deoxynucleoside triphosphates. The fragment was then ligated into the translational fusion vector pMC1403 (34) to generate an in-frame fusion of cbbFI with lacZ. The pMC1403-cbbFI fusion was then linearized by digestion with EcoRI and ligated into the EcoRI site of the conjugative plasmid pVK101 (23). This final construct could then be mated into R. sphaeroides. The 4-bp deletion of plasmid pVKC1ΔXho was constructed by digestion of plasmid pKC1-5 with XhoI followed by digestion with mung bean nuclease and religation to create plasmid pKC1ΔXho. The EcoRI/BamHI insert of pKC1ΔXho was then cloned into pMC1403, followed by ligation into the EcoRI site of pVK101. The copy number of pVK101 in R. sphaeroides is not known; however, the copy number of the related RK2 derivative pRK404 has been reported as four to six copies per chromosome, under phototrophic growth conditions (5).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

β-Galactosidase and RubisCO assay results for R. sphaeroides HR::lacZ::cbbFI translational fusion strains. Maps depicting the sequences used to construct each fusion plasmid are shown. Multiple assays of several independent growth experiments were performed, and the standard deviations for each determination are denoted by the line above each bar. The average value for these determinations is also shown above each bar. The β-galactosidase (A, C, and E) and RubisCO (B, D, and F) activities for R. sphaeroides HR containing various cbbFI::lacZ translational fusion plasmids grown under chemoheterotrophic (A and B), photoheterotrophic (C and D), and photoautotrophic (E and F) conditions are shown. The average β-galactosidase activities (two independent experiments) for the negative control strain HR::pVK1403 were 0.0 nmol/min/mg under chemoheterotrophic and photoheterotrophic growth conditions and 0.5 nmol/min/mg under photoautotrophic growth conditions. The average RubisCO activities for HR::pVK1403 were 1.0, 38, and 295 nmol/min/mg under chemoheterotrophic, photoheterotrophic, and photoautotrophic growth conditions, respectively.

Immunological techniques and RubisCO assays.

Cell extracts were prepared as previously described (9), and RubisCO activity was determined by a radiometric method (45). Rocket immunoelectrophoresis was performed as previously described (22) with antibodies directed against form I and form II RubisCO. Total protein was determined with the Bio-Rad protein assay dye binding reagent (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.).

β-Galactosidase assays.

Cultures of R. sphaeroides were grown to mid- to late exponential phase (optical density at 660 nm [OD660] of 0.7 to 1.1). Cells were harvested and washed, and the cell pellet was then resuspended in 1 to 5 ml of cold sonication buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.0], 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol) and sonicated (four 30-s bursts) on ice. The lysate was then centrifuged for 15 min at 10,000 × g, the supernatant was collected, and the protein concentration was determined. β-Galactosidase assays were performed by mixing the desired volume of extract with 1 ml of Z buffer (50 mM sodium phosphate [pH 7.0], 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4 · 7H2O, 50 mM β-mercaptoethanol) in a cuvette. To this cuvette, 0.2 ml of a 4-mg/ml solution of o-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactopyranoside in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0 to 7.5) was added. The change in absorbance over time was then monitored with a Beckman DU-70 spectrophotometer. The β-galactosidase activity (i.e., the amount of o-nitrophenol produced per minute per milligram of protein) was then calculated from the extinction coefficient of o-nitrophenol.

RNA isolation and primer extension.

Total RNA from R. sphaeroides HR and R. sphaeroides HR::pVKC1 was isolated from 300-ml cultures grown to mid-exponential phase (OD660 of 0.6 to 0.8) under photoautotrophic, photoheterotrophic, and chemoheterotrophic conditions, by a method previously described (6). Primer extension mapping of the 5′ endpoints of mRNA was performed by the method described by Ausubel et al. (1) and employed avian myoblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Ind.). The aqueous hybridization option recommended for oligonucleotide primers was used. The hybridization solution contained 0.3 M NaCl, 0.5 M HEPES (pH 7.5), and 1 mM EDTA. Oligonucleotide primers with the sequences 5′-GTATGGCATCGGGGTGGGTG-3′ (cbbF1-ex), 5′-TGCGGCTCGATGCGATCACC-3′ (cbb1-10), and 5′-CCGAGACGGGCTCCTTCACG-3′ (cbb1-C) (see Fig. 1A) were used in experiments employing R. sphaeroides HR RNA. A lacZ complementary primer with the sequence 5′-CGCCAGGGTTTTCCCAG-3′ (PMC1) (see Fig. 1A) was used in experiments employing R. sphaeroides HR::pVKC1 RNA.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

FIG. 1

Nucleotide sequence of the region used for construction of cbbFI::lacZ translational fusion plasmid pVKC1. (A) The nucleotide sequence of the 718-bp AvaII fragment was used to construct plasmid pVKC1, spanning 571 bp of the cbbR gene, the cbbR-cbbFI intergenic region, and 57 bp of cbbFI. Potential cbbFI mRNA start sites at +1 and +9 bp, as well as the +4-bp start site determined for the LacZ fusion pVKC1, are indicated by vertical arrows and are described in the text. The sequence is numbered relative to the distal mRNA start at +1 bp. Two imperfect inverted repeat sequences containing LysR-type binding motifs (T-N11-A) are indicated. (B) Primer extension mapping of the R. sphaeroides cbbFI transcript 5′ endpoint(s). Shown are results of primer extension experiments with total RNA extracted from photoautotrophically grown R. sphaeroides HR (lane 1) and a synthetic oligonucleotide of the sequence 5′-GTATGGCATCGGGGTGGGTG-3′ (cbbF1-ex). The extension products are sized against a sequencing ladder with the same oligonucleotide primer and plasmid p12EH as template. The initiation points of the extension products are indicated by arrows.

Construction of an R. sphaeroides cbbR expression plasmid.

A 1,045-bp DNA fragment containing the R. sphaeroides cbbR was generated via PCR in which an NdeI site, overlapping the cbbR start codon, was introduced along with a BamHI site 115 bp downstream of the cbbR translation stop. The PCR fragment was subcloned into pBS(SK−) and sequenced. The NdeI-BamHI fragment was then ligated into NdeI-BamHI-digested pET11a (7) to generate the plasmid pET11R-11.

Synthesis of R. sphaeroides CbbR in E. coli and preparation of extracts.

A 300-ml culture of E. coli BL21(DE3) (35) carrying pET11R-11 was grown anaerobically at room temperature in Terrific broth (1.2% [wt/vol] tryptone, 2.4% [wt/vol] yeast extract in 89 mM potassium phosphate buffer [pH 7.5] supplemented with 0.4% [wt/vol] fumarate, 0.1% glycerol, and 200 μg of ampicillin per ml) to an OD660 of 0.6. CbbR expression was induced with the addition of IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside) (1 mM) followed by continued incubation for 12 h. Preparation of CbbR extracts was then performed by a modification of a previously described method (2) as follows. The cells were pelleted and washed with 50 mM MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid)–KOH (pH 7.0) and frozen at −70°C. The cells were thawed and resuspended in 5 ml of buffer B (300 mM potassium glutamate, 10 mM Tris [pH 8.5], 30% glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol). Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (1 mM) was added immediately prior to lysis via passage through a French pressure cell. Cell debris was removed via centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 15 min. Nucleic acids were removed from the cleared lysate through the addition of polyethyleneimine, at a ratio of 0.2 g of polyethyleneimine/g of protein, and incubation at 0°C for 10 min. The sample was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 20 min, and the supernatant was subjected to ammonium sulfate precipitation at 70% saturation. The precipitated pellet was resuspended in 2 ml of buffer A (10 mM Tris-borate [pH 8.0], 10% glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol) containing 500 mM NaCl (A-500) and dialyzed against buffer A containing 50 mM NaCl (A-50) until a white precipitate formed. The precipitate was collected via centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 20 min. The pellet was resuspended in 0.5 ml of buffer A-500 and resolubilized with the addition of 2 ml of buffer A containing 1.65 M guanidine-HCl. The sample was then dialyzed exhaustively against buffer B. The sample was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min, and the supernatant was stored for short periods at 4°C or for longer periods at −20°C.

Gel mobility shift assays.

Gel mobility shift assays were performed as described by Ausubel et al. (1) with the high-ionic-strength Tris-glycine gel system. CbbR-containing extract and competitor DNA were mixed in a total volume of 50 μl of buffer B and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Radiolabeled probe DNA (∼10,000 cpm) was then added, and the reaction was incubated for an additional 20 min at room temperature. Following electrophoresis, the gels were dried and the bands were visualized by a Storm 840 PhosphorImager and ImageQuant version 4.2 software (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, Calif.).

RESULTS

Mapping of the cbbFI mRNA start site.

Primer extension mapping experiments, with total RNA extracted from late-exponential-phase R. sphaeroides HR grown under photoautotrophic conditions and the oligonucleotide cbbF1-ex, indicated potential mRNA start sites at positions 27 and 19 bp upstream of the first codon of cbbFI (Fig. 1). Experiments with RNA extracted from chemoheterotrophically and photoheterotrophically grown cells yielded a start point at 19 bp 5′ to cbbFI (data not shown). No additional upstream start points that would indicate the existence of a second promoter (data not shown) could be identified with primers cbb1-10 and cbb1-C (Fig. 1A). Experiments with the lacZ complementary primer PMC1 (Fig. 1A) and R. sphaeroides HR::pVKC1 RNA detected a single mRNA start 24 bp 5′ to cbbFI, indicating that transcription of the cbbI::lacZ fusion construct initiates from approximately the same point as does that of the chromosomal cbbI operon (data not shown).

Regulation of cbbFI::lacZ translational fusion plasmids in R. sphaeroides HR.

In order to delimit the DNA sequence required for transcriptional regulation of the cbbI operon, a series of lacZ translational fusion plasmids containing from 103 to 1,242 bp of DNA upstream of the cbbFI transcription start were constructed (Fig. 2). These plasmids were introduced into R. sphaeroides HR, and the resulting strains were assayed for β-galactosidase activity under chemoheterotrophic, photoheterotrophic, and photoautotrophic growth conditions (Fig. 2A, C, and E, respectively). In all cases, there was a dramatic increase in β-galactosidase activity in cells grown under photosynthetic conditions, with CO2 as the sole source of carbon (Fig. 2E), while photosynthetic growth in the presence of malate resulted in significantly lower activity (Fig. 2C). Aerobic growth in the malate medium yielded the lowest levels of lacZ expression with all plasmids (Fig. 2A). Close scrutiny of the results with each of the lacZ constructs suggested that the cbbI promoter was comprised of three domains: one within 103 bp 5′ to the cbbFI transcription start that confers the proper pattern of regulation, and a more distal region, possibly comprised of two domains, that is necessary for high levels of cbbI expression. The first putative domain is situated at or around the XhoI site, with the second domain being located between the PflMI and AvaII restriction sites.

With regard to the promoter-proximal upstream activating sequence (UAS), addition of 50 bp to plasmid pVKB1, between 280 and 330 bp upstream of the cbbFI transcription start, to create fusion plasmid pVKG1, resulted in large increases in expression under photoheterotrophic and photoautotrophic growth conditions, 9- and 14-fold, respectively. Previously, it had been shown that a trimethoprim resistance cartridge inserted into the XhoI site within cbbR blocked expression of the cbbI genes (16). Since the region of sequence between −280 bp (pVKB1) and −330 bp (pVKG1) was shown to play an important role in high-level expression of the cbbI operon, a 4-bp deletion, from −281 to −284 bp, was introduced into plasmid pVKG1, generating the deletion plasmid pVKG1ΔXho. R. sphaeroides HR::pVKG1ΔXho showed drastically reduced levels of lacZ expression compared to those observed for HR::pVKG1 under photoheterotrophic and photoautotrophic growth conditions, suggesting either that this sequence is position sensitive or that the XhoI site constitutes part of the activating (binding) sequence. A second potential UAS was located upstream of the PflMI site, since inclusion of an additional 306 bp of upstream sequence in plasmid pVKC1 resulted in slightly over a twofold increase in expression over that of pVKG1 under both photoheterotrophic and photoautotrophic growth conditions. The XhoI deletion was also introduced into plasmid pVKC1 to determine its effect on the more distal activating sequence. R. sphaeroides HR::pVKC1ΔXho also showed significant decreases in lacZ expression under photoheterotrophic and photoautotrophic growth conditions relative to that of the strain containing the parent fusion plasmid, HR::pVKC1. Interestingly, under photoheterotrophic and photoautotrophic conditions, lacZ expression in HR::pVKC1ΔXho was significantly higher than that of HR::pVKG1ΔXho, reinforcing the idea that a second UAS is present upstream of the PflMI site. The reduction in activity in HR::pVKC1ΔXho could be due to loss of the promoter-proximal activating sequence, suggesting that the more distal activating sequence is relatively insensitive to positional effects.

RubisCO activity was also monitored during the course of each experiment (Fig. 2B, D, and F). RubisCO activities obtained for each of the fusion-containing strains displayed a normal pattern of RubisCO induction among the three growth regimens, indicating that the presence of the fusion plasmid did not interfere with normal cbb regulation. For a given growth condition, the RubisCO activities of the fusion strains showed some variability, which is consistent with the normal variability observed in measuring RubisCO activity in crude cell extracts.

Regulation of cbbFI::lacZ translational fusions pVKB1, pVKC1, and pVKC1ΔXho in R. sphaeroides CAC.

The presence or absence of O2 appears to be an important regulatory signal for cbb expression in R. sphaeroides HR. R. sphaeroides CAC, a spontaneous mutant of R. sphaeroides HR, has gained the ability to grow chemoautotrophically under aerobic CO2-fixing conditions in which the atmospheric O2 concentration is as high as 10% (i.e., in minimal medium bubbled with 5% CO2–45% H2–50% air) (31). We examined cbbI expression in this strain in order to determine if the cbbI promoter is regulated normally under chemoheterotrophic, photoheterotrophic, and photoautotrophic conditions. We also wanted to determine if the same regulatory regions important for cbbI regulation in strain HR are necessary for cbbI expression under aerobic chemoautotrophic growth conditions. The regulation of lacZ expression from pVKB1, pVKC1, and pVKC1ΔXho was examined in R. sphaeroides CAC grown under chemoheterotrophic, photoheterotrophic, and photoautotrophic conditions as well as under chemoautotrophic aerobic CO2-fixing conditions (i.e., in minimal medium bubbled with 5% CO2–45% H2–50% air). In general, the pattern of regulation and the levels of β-galactosidase expression observed for CAC::pVKC1, CAC::pVKB1, and CAC::pVKC1ΔXho were comparable to results obtained with these plasmids in R. sphaeroides HR (Table 2). The upstream activating region 5′ to −280 bp functions normally in R. sphaeroides CAC. As was the case in R. sphaeroides HR, the absolute level of lacZ expression from CAC::pVKC1 was significantly higher than that obtained for CAC::pVKB1 under all the growth conditions tested. In CAC::pVKC1ΔXho, the level of lacZ expression under each of the growth conditions was intermediate between those of CAC::pVKB1 and CAC::pVKC1. O2 did not negatively regulate the cbbI promoter under aerobic CO2-fixing conditions. When strains were grown under chemoautotrophic conditions, lacZ expression in CAC::pVKC1, CAC::pVKB1, and CAC::pVKC1ΔXho was comparable to that observed for the same strain grown photoautotrophically. This result also indicates that, in R. sphaeroides CAC, the upstream activating region is also necessary for maximal cbbI expression under chemoautotrophic growth. The RubisCO activities determined for each of these strains were similar to those determined for R. sphaeroides HR carrying the same plasmids. The lower level of RubisCO activity under chemoautotrophic conditions than under photoautotrophic growth conditions reflects the fact that the level of CO2 and O2 supplied to these cells was not optimized in these experiments (31a).

TABLE 2.

β-Galactosidase and RubisCO activitiesa in R. sphaeroides CAC and 1312, carrying various fusion plasmid constructs

Strain and plasmid Value for growth condition:
Chemoheterotrophy (malate-air) Photoheterotrophy (malate-argon) Photoautotrophy (1.5% CO2–H2) Chemoautotrophy (5% CO2–45% H2–50% air)
CAC
 pVKB1 3.9 (2.1) 32 (46) 467 (392) 273 (82)
 pVKC1 92 (1.3) 1,079 (54) 7,640 (332) 12,635 (66)
 pVKC1ΔXho 25 (1.1) 295 (48) 3,192 (183) 3,330 (73)
 pVK1403 0.0 (1.5) 3.0 (66) 3.4 (338) 0.0 (110)
1312
 pVKH1 0.7 (1.8) 2.5 (5.8) No growth
 pVKB1 1.7 (2.1) 2.7 (8.1) No growth
 pVK1403 0.0 (2.0) 0.2 (8.9) No growth
a

All enzyme activities are expressed in nanomoles per minute per milligram of protein. All values represent the averages of two to three independent determinations of multiple assays. Values in parentheses represent RubisCO activities in nanomoles of CO2 fixed per minute per milligram of protein. 

Regulation of the cbbFI::lacZ translational fusion plasmids in the cbbR insertion mutant R. sphaeroides 1312.

In order to explore the role that the trans-acting transcriptional activator cbbR plays in cbbI operon regulation, the cbbFI fusion plasmids pVKH1 and pVKB1 were introduced into the cbbR insertion mutant, R. sphaeroides 1312 (Table 2). This strain contains an inactivated cbbR gene generated via the insertion of a trimethoprim resistance cartridge within the cbbR coding sequence at the XhoI site at −280 bp. This strain does not express form I RubisCO and expresses form II RubisCO at a low level compared to that of wild-type strain HR. Strain 1312 is capable of growth under chemoheterotrophic and photoheterotrophic conditions but not under photoautotrophic conditions (16). The results of these experiments indicate that cbbR is necessary for regulated expression in 1312::pVKH1 and 1312::pVKB1, as no induction of β-galactosidase was observed under photoheterotrophic conditions. We were not able to analyze fusion plasmids that contained sequences beyond the XhoI site in strain 1312 due to the fact that these plasmids underwent rapid recombination with the chromosome to regenerate cbbR.

Binding of CbbR to the cbbI promoter.

The R. sphaeroides HR cbbR gene was placed under the control of a phage T7 promoter via cloning into the expression plasmid pET11a (7), forming the CbbR expression plasmid pET11R-11. This plasmid was then transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) (35). This strain [BL21(DE3)::pET11R-11] produced an IPTG-inducible protein of approximately 35 kDa (data not shown). N-terminal sequencing showed the first 10 amino acids of this protein to be identical to the deduced sequence for R. sphaeroides HR CbbR. Gel mobility shift assays were performed with extracts of IPTG-induced cultures of BL21(DE3)::pET11R-11 and a cbbI promoter probe consisting of the 190-bp BssHII-BamHI fragment of pKC1-5 (Fig. 3A). Promoter binding activity was detected as a single shifted band and was sensitive to both boiling and proteinase K treatment (Fig. 3B, lanes 2 to 4). No binding activity was detected in binding assay mixtures containing either no protein (Fig. 3B, lane 1) or an equivalent amount of extract of E. coli BL21(DE3) containing the parent vector pET11a (Fig. 3B, lane 9). Competition with a 100-fold excess of cold probe DNA resulted in the loss of the shifted signal, while addition of a 200-fold excess of salmon sperm DNA had no effect (Fig. 3B, lanes 5 and 6). In order to further narrow down the site of CbbR binding, the 92-bp BssHII-SacII and 98-bp SacII-BamHI fragments of pKC1-5 were used as competitors in gel mobility shift assays. Addition of a 100-fold molar excess of the 92-bp BssHII-SacII fragment resulted in the disappearance of the shifted band (Fig. 3B, lane 7), while the addition of a 100-fold molar excess of the 98-bp SacII-BamHI fragment had no effect (Fig. 3B, lane 8). This indicates that CbbR binds the cbbI promoter somewhere between 9 and 100 bp 5′ to the cbbFI transcription start. Gel mobility shift experiments with restriction fragments spanning up to 636 bp of sequence upstream of the cbbFI transcription start detected no additional CbbR binding sites (data not shown).

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3

Binding of CbbR to the cbbI promoter. Shown is the phosphorimage of a gel mobility shift assay (B) with the 190-bp BssHII-BamHI fragment (A) of pKC1-5 as a probe and extracts (2 μg) of BL21(DE3) containing either pET11R-11 (11R) or pET11a (11A). Lane 1, no extract added; lane 2, 11R plus 5 min of incubation at 100°C; lane 3, 11R plus proteinase K; lane 4, 11R; lane 5, 11R plus 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled probe; lane 6, 11R plus 200-fold excess of salmon sperm DNA; lane 7, 11R plus 100-fold molar excess of the 92-bp BssHII-SacII fragment; lane 8, 11R plus 100-fold molar excess of the 98-bp SacII-BamHI fragment; lane 9, 11A. All binding reaction mixtures contained 3 μg of poly(dI-dC) · poly(dI-dC). The arrow indicates the position of the unbound DNA (B). Putative CbbR binding sites (>>---<<) and transcription start sites (->) are indicated (A). The phosphorimage was generated with a Storm 840 PhosphorImager in conjunction with ImageQuant version 4.2 software (Molecular Dynamics, Inc.).

DISCUSSION

The results of expression studies with cbbI::lacZ promoter fusions indicated that 103 bp (plasmid pVKH1) of sequence 5′ to the R. sphaeroides HR cbbFI transcription start is sufficient to support detectable levels of regulated cbbI expression (i.e., low levels under chemoheterotrophic conditions, intermediate levels under photoheterotrophic conditions, and high levels under photoautotrophic conditions). This level of promoter activity is relatively unchanged with the addition of up to 280 bp of upstream sequence (plasmid pVKB1). Regulated expression from this region is dependent on the presence of an intact cbbR gene, since 1312::pVKH1 and 1312::pVKB1 cells grown in malate medium under aerobic or anaerobic growth conditions exhibited no differences in lacZ expression. These results suggested that the 103 bp of sequence 5′ to cbbFI, which spans the cbbR-ccbFI intergenic region, contains regulatory sites necessary for CbbR-mediated regulation of the cbbI operon promoter. Gel mobility shift binding assays show that CbbR does bind within this stretch of sequence between 9 and 100 bp 5′ to the cbbFI transcription start. This region contains two imperfect inverted repeat elements, each of which contains the CbbR/LysR-type consensus binding motif T-N11-A (18). These T-N11-A motifs probably represent the site of CbbR binding, as they show a high degree of sequence similarity with the corresponding region of the X. flavus cbb promoter (Fig. 4), in which the T-N11-A motifs are known to bind CbbR (40, 41). This arrangement of duplicated T-N11-A sequences occurs within the intergenic regions between the divergently transcribed cbbR gene and the cbb operons of a number of phototrophic and autotrophic bacteria (24, 30, 41, 46). In the autotrophic bacteria T. ferrooxidans and R. eutropha, CbbR (or RbcR) has also been shown to bind specifically to a similar region of dyad symmetry containing two T-N11-A repeats (24, 25). Mutations within this region of dyad symmetry in T. ferrooxidans reduced the ability of RbcR to bind in vitro (24).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4

Comparison of the cbbFI-cbbR intergenic region of R. sphaeroides with that of the X. flavus cbb operon. Vertical arrows represent mapped putative transcription start sites. Vertical lines represent nucleotides conserved between the two sequences. Putative CbbR binding sites (>>---<<) in the R. sphaeroides sequence are indicated. The underlined sequence is the site of CbbR binding to the X. flavus cbbL promoter. Hyphens indicate gaps inserted to maximize sequence identity. Bold-face italic sequences are mentioned in the text. Numbers refer to the distance upstream from the transcription start of R. sphaeroides cbbFI.

In R. sphaeroides HR, our cbbI::lacZ promoter fusion results indicate the presence of sequence elements upstream of −103 bp that exert a positive effect on cbbI promoter function under all growth conditions tested. The positive regulatory region resides, roughly, between −280 bp (pVKB1) and −636 bp (pVKC1) and is probably made up of at least two elements or UASs. The first promoter-proximal UAS is found either within or overlapping the 50-bp sequence between −280 bp (pVKB1) and −330 bp (pVKG1) and accounts for the majority of the observed enhancement under photoheterotrophic and photoautotrophic conditions (9- and 14-fold, respectively). The second promoter-distal UAS is probably located between −330 bp (pVKG1) and −636 bp (pVKC1). The presence of two UASs is suggested by the results obtained when the same 4-bp XhoI deletion (−281 to −284 bp) is introduced into pVKC1 and pVKG1, yielding pVKC1ΔXho and pVKG1ΔXho, respectively. In both cases the XhoI deletion results in a sharp decrease in expression. If the XhoI deletion disrupts a site that is solely responsible for the enhancement of cbbI expression, then the lacZ expression levels for pVKC1ΔXho and pVKG1ΔXho would be expected to be similar. This is not the case. Under photoheterotrophic and photoautotrophic growth conditions, the presence of the 306 bp of additional sequence upstream in pVKC1ΔXho results in a four- to fivefold increase in lacZ expression relative to that in pVKG1ΔXho. These results indicate that the promoter-distal region plays a role in cbbI activation.

R. sphaeroides CAC (for chemoautotrophic competent) is a variant of R. sphaeroides HR that has gained the capacity to grow as a chemoautotroph by using CO2 as sole carbon source, H2 as an electron donor, and O2 as a terminal electron acceptor (31). The fact that this strain expresses RubisCO at high levels in the presence of O2 led us to introduce the cbbI::lacZ fusion plasmids pVKB1, pVKC1ΔXho, and pVKC1 into strain CAC in order to determine if this strain showed any alterations in cbbI expression. The lacZ expression levels for each strain, grown chemoheterotrophically, photoheterotrophically, and photoautotrophically, were consistent with those determined in strain HR. Thus, the same expression-enhancing effect of the region upstream of −280 bp was noted. The lacZ expression levels for each of the plasmid-containing strains, grown under aerobic chemoautotrophic conditions, indicate that this promoter is not subject to negative oxygen regulation under these growth conditions. The results also suggest that the mutation that allows R. sphaeroides CAC to grow chemoautotrophically is probably not a mutation in the cbbI promoter.

The basis for the observed expression-enhancing effect of sequences upstream of bp position −280 is unknown. We could detect no additional mRNA start points near this region that would indicate the presence of a second promoter. The enhancement is more likely due to the presence of additional binding sites for a positive regulatory factor(s) acting on the downstream promoter. It seems unlikely that CbbR binds to the UASs, as we were unable to detect CbbR binding to this region in gel mobility shift assays. One potential candidate for this role is the response regulator (RegA/PrrA) of the two-component regulatory system RegB/PrrB-RegA/PrrB, which has previously been implicated in activation of cbb expression (33). Joint transcriptional control of gene expression by a two-component response regulatory system and a LysR-type transcriptional activator has previously been observed for xpsR in Ralstonia solanacearum (21). As with the cbbI promoter, the xpsR promoter consists of a promoter-proximal region, within 117 bp of xpsR, that confers low-level regulated expression and binds the LysR-type transcriptional activator PhcA. An additional 14-bp upstream element, centered at 315 bp 5′ to xpsR, is necessary for full activation of expression and is dependent on the response regulator VsrD.

Unlike with other cbb operons previously studied, our results firmly establish that there is an additional regulatory domain distal to cbbFI that functions to enhance cbbI promoter activity under all growth conditions tested. Work to identify those sequences in each domain responsible for the observed regulation as well as to characterize the binding sites for CbbR is now under way.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank D. A. Bryant for plasmid pMC1403 and J. L. Gibson for help in editing the manuscript.

This work was supported by Public Health Service grant GM 45404 from the National Institutes of Health.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Ausubel F M, Brent R, Kingston R E, Moore D D, Seidman J G, Smith J A, Struhl K. Current protocols in molecular biology. Vol. 1. New York, N.Y: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bishop R E, Weiner J H. Overproduction, solubilization, purification and DNA-binding properties of AmpR from Citrobacter freundii. Eur J Biochem. 1993;213:405–412. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17775.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cantrell A, Bryant D A. Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of the psaA and psaB genes of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002. Plant Mol Biol. 1987;9:453–468. doi: 10.1007/BF00015877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen J-H, Gibson J L, Macue L A, Tabita F R. Identification, expression, and deduced primary structure of transketolase and other enzymes encoded within the form II CO2 fixation operon of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:20447–20452. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Davis J, Donohue T J, Kaplan S. Construction, characterization, and complementation of a Puf− mutant of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:320–329. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.1.320-329.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dubbs J M, Bryant D A. Molecular cloning and transcriptional analysis of the cpeBA operon of the cyanobacterium Pseudanabaena sp. PCC 7409. Mol Microbiol. 1991;5:3073–3085. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb01867.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dubendorff J W, Studier F W. Controlling basal expression in an inducible T7 expression system by blocking the target T7 promoter with lac repressor. J Mol Biol. 1991;219:45–59. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90856-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Falcone D L, Tabita F R. Expression of endogenous and foreign ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (RubisCO) genes in a RubisCO deletion mutant of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:2099–2108. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.6.2099-2108.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Falcone D L, Quivey R G, Jr, Tabita F R. Transposon mutagenesis and physiological analysis of a strain containing inactivated form I and form II ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase genes in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:5–11. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.1.5-11.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Falcone D L, Tabita F R. Complementation analysis and regulation of CO2 fixation gene expression in a ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase deletion strain of Rhodospirillum rubrum. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:5066–5077. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.16.5066-5077.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Figurski D, Helinsky D R. Replication of an origin-containing derivative of the plasmid RK2 dependent on a plasmid function provided in trans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979;76:1648–1652. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.4.1648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gibson J L. Genetic analysis of CO2 fixation genes. In: Blankenship R E, Madigan M T, Bauer C E, editors. Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995. pp. 1107–1124. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gibson J L, Tabita F R. Different molecular forms of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. J Biol Chem. 1977;252:943–949. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gibson J L, Chen H-J, Tower P A, Tabita F R. The form II fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase and phosphoribulokinase genes form part of a large operon in Rhodobacter sphaeroides: primary structure and insertional mutagenesis. Biochemistry. 1990;29:8085–8093. doi: 10.1021/bi00487a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gibson J L, Falcone D L, Tabita F R. Nucleotide sequence, transcriptional analysis and expression of genes encoded within the form I CO2 fixation operon of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:14646–14653. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gibson J L, Tabita F R. Nucleotide sequence and functional analysis of CbbR, a positive regulator of the Calvin cycle operons of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:5778–5784. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.18.5778-5784.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gibson J L, Tabita F R. The molecular regulation of the reductive pentose phosphate pathway in proteobacteria and cyanobacteria. Arch Microbiol. 1996;166:141–150. doi: 10.1007/s002030050369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Goethals K, Van Montague M, Holsters M. Conserved motifs in a divergent nod box of Azorhizobium caulinodans ORS571 reveal a common structure in promoters regulated by LysR-type proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:1646–1650. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.5.1646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hallenbeck P L, Lerchen R, Hessler P, Kaplan S. Roles of CfxA, CfxB, and external electron acceptors in regulation of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:1736–1748. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.4.1736-1748.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hallenbeck P L, Lerchen R, Hessler P, Kaplan S. Phosphoribulokinase activity and regulation of CO2 fixation critical for photosynthetic growth of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:1749–1761. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.4.1749-1761.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jianzhong H, Yindeeyoungyeon W, Garg R P, Denny T P, Schell M A. Joint transcriptional control of xpsR, the unusual signal integrator of the Ralstonia solanacearum virulence gene regulatory network, by a response regulator and a LysR-type transcriptional activator. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:2736–2743. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.10.2736-2743.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jouanneau Y, Tabita F R. Independent regulation of synthesis of form I and form II ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase in Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. J Bacteriol. 1986;165:620–624. doi: 10.1128/jb.165.2.620-624.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Knauf V C, Nester W N. Wide host range cloning vectors: a cosmid clone bank of an Agrobacterium Ti plasmid. Plasmid. 1982;8:45–54. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(82)90040-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kusano T, Sugawara K. Specific binding of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans RbcR to the intergenic sequence between the rbc operon and the rbcR gene. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:1019–1025. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.4.1019-1025.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kusian B, Bowein B. Operator binding of the CbbR protein, which activates the duplicate cbb CO2 assimilation operons of Alcaligenes eutrophus. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:6568–6574. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.22.6568-6574.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Madigan M T, Gest H. Growth of the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas capsulata chemoautotrophically in the darkness with H2 as the energy source. J Bacteriol. 1979;137:524–530. doi: 10.1128/jb.137.1.524-530.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Maniatis T, Fritsch E F, Sambrook J. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1982. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Meijer W, Arnberg A C, Enequist H G, Terpstra P, Lindstrom M E, Dijkhuizen L. Identification and organization of carbon dioxide fixation genes in Xanthobacter flavus H4-14. Mol Gen Genet. 1991;225:320–330. doi: 10.1007/BF00269865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Omerod J G, Omerod K D, Gest H. Light dependent utilization of organic compounds and photoproduction of hydrogen by photosynthetic bacteria: relationship with nitrogen metabolism. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1961;94:449–463. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(61)90073-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Paoli G C, Morgan S M, Tabita F R, Shively J M. Expression of the cbbLcbbS and cbbM genes and distinct organization of the cbb Calvin cycle structural genes of Rhodobacter capsulatus. Arch Microbiol. 1995;164:396–405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Paoli G C, Tabita F R. Aerobic lithoautotrophic growth and RubisCO function in Rhodobacter capsulatus and a spontaneous gain of function mutant of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Arch Microbiol. 1998;170:8–17. doi: 10.1007/s002030050609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31a.Paoli, G. C., and F. R. Tabita. Unpublished results.
  • 32.Pridmore R D. New and versatile cloning vectors with kanamycin resistance marker. Gene. 1987;56:309–312. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90149-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Qian Y, Tabita F R. A global signal transduction system regulates aerobic and anaerobic CO2 fixation in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:12–18. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.1.12-18.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shapira S K, Chou J, Richaud F V, Casadaban M J. New versatile plasmid vectors for expression of hybrid proteins coded by a cloned gene fused to lacZ gene sequences encoding an enzymatically active carboxy-terminal portion of β-galactosidase. Gene. 1983;25:71–82. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(83)90169-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Studier F W, Rosenberg A H, Dunn J J, Dubendorff J W. Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. Methods Enzymol. 1990;185:60–89. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)85008-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Suwanto A, Kaplan S. Physical and genetic mapping of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides genome: presence of two unique circular chromosomes. J Bacteriol. 1989;171:5858–5859. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.11.5850-5859.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Suwanto A, Kaplan S. Chromosome transfer in Rhodobacter sphaeroides: Hfr formation and genetic evidence for two unique circular chromosomes. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:1135–1145. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.4.1135-1145.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tabita F R. Molecular and cellular regulation of autotrophic carbon dioxide fixation in microorganisms. Microbiol Rev. 1988;52:155–189. doi: 10.1128/mr.52.2.155-189.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tabita F R. The biochemistry and metabolic regulation of carbon metabolism and CO2 fixation in purple bacteria. In: Blankenship R E, Madigan M T, Bauer C E, editors. Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995. pp. 885–914. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.van den Berg E R E, Dijkhuizen L, Meijer W G. CbbR, a LysR-type transcriptional activator, is required for expression of the autotrophic CO2 fixation enzymes of Xanthobacter flavus. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:6097–6104. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.19.6097-6104.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.van Keulen G, Girbal L, van den Berg E R, Dijkhuizen L, Meijer W G. The LysR-type transcriptional regulator CbbR controlling autotrophic CO2 fixation by Xanthobacter flavus is an NADPH sensor. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:1411–1417. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.6.1411-1417.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Viale A M, Kobayashi H, Akazawa T, Henikoff S. rbcR, a gene coding for a member of the LysR family of transcriptional regulators, is located upstream of the expressed set of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase genes in the photosynthetic bacterium Chromatium vinosum. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:5224–5229. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.16.5224-5229.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wang X, Falcone D L, Tabita F R. Reductive pentose phosphate-independent CO2 fixation in Rhodobacter sphaeroides and evidence that ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activity serves to maintain the redox balance of the cell. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:3372–3379. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.11.3372-3379.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Weaver K E, Tabita F R. Isolation and partial characterization of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides mutants defective in regulation of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase. J Bacteriol. 1983;156:507–515. doi: 10.1128/jb.156.2.507-515.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Whitman W, Tabita F R. Inhibition of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase by pyridoxal 5-phosphate. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1976;71:1034–1039. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(76)90758-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Windhovel U, Bowein B. Identification of cfxR, an activator gene of autotrophic CO2 fixation in Alcaligenes eutrophus. Mol Microbiol. 1991;5:2695–2705. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb01978.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yanisch-Perron C, Vieira J, Messing J. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene. 1985;33:103–119. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(85)90120-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES