Abstract
Objective:
Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection (PA-BSI) and COVID-19 are independently associated with high mortality. We sought to demonstrate the impact of COVID-19 coinfection on patients with PA-BSI.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting:
Veterans Health Administration.
Patients:
Hospitalized patients with PA-BSI in pre-COVID-19 (January 2009 to December 2019) and COVID-19 (January 2020 to June 2022) periods. Patients in the COVID-19 period were further stratified by the presence or absence of concomitant COVID-19 infection.
Methods:
We characterized trends in resistance, treatment, and mortality over the study period. Multivariable logistic regression and modified Poisson analyses were used to determine the association between COVID-19 and mortality among patients with PA-BSI. Additional predictors included demographics, comorbidities, disease severity, antimicrobial susceptibility, and treatment.
Results:
A total of 6,714 patients with PA-BSI were identified. Throughout the study period, PA resistance rates decreased. Mortality decreased during the pre-COVID-19 period and increased during the COVID-19 period. Mortality was not significantly different between pre-COVID-19 (24.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 23.3–28.6) and COVID-19 period/COVID-negative (26.0%, 95% CI 23.5–28.6) patients, but it was significantly higher in COVID-19 period/COVID-positive patients (47.2%, 35.3–59.3). In the modified Poisson analysis, COVID-19 coinfection was associated with higher mortality (relative risk 1.44, 95% CI 1.01–2.06). Higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, higher modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score, and no targeted PA-BSI treatment within 48 h were also predictors of higher mortality.
Conclusions:
Higher mortality was observed in patients with COVID-19 coinfection among patients with PA-BSI. Future studies should explore this relationship in other settings and investigate potential SARS-CoV-2 and PA synergy.
Introduction
Invasive infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) are challenging to treat among hospitalized patients due to the organism’s high virulence and complex patterns of antimicrobial resistance, including decreased outer membrane permeability, efflux pump systems, and antibiotic-inactivating enzymes.1–3 The acquisition of resistance genes via horizontal transfer or spontaneous mutation can also induce additional mechanisms of resistance, either due to exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics or nosocomial transmission.4 Mortality associated with PA is high, particularly in the bloodstream, with an estimated 30-d mortality rate for PA bloodstream infection (PA-BSI) between 24% and 32%.5–7
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published encouraging data in 2019 indicating a decrease in multidrug-resistant (MDR) PA from 46,000 estimated cases and 3,900 deaths in 2012 to 32,600 cases and 2,700 deaths in 2017.8 However in 2022, CDC reported a 32% increase in rates of MDR PA from 2019 to 2020, largely attributed to antibiotic overuse in patients with COVID-19.9 In addition to observed higher rates of MDR PA, several studies have identified a recent rise in PA-BSI incidence. A retrospective analysis of English National Health Service acute trusts between August 2020 and February 2021 observed an increase both in incidence of hospital-onset PA-BSI (4.9–6.2 cases per 100,000 bed-days) and in percentage of patients with PA-BSI and concomitant COVID-19 infection (0.7–34.1% among PA-BSI cases).10 A study performed within the Ascension health system additionally noted a 28% increase in hospital-onset PA-BSI and approximately five times higher rate of PA-BSI among patients with COVID-19 compared to patients without COVID-19.11 Other published reports have demonstrated similar findings.12,13 While these studies collectively suggest that the rise in observed PA-BSI coincides with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, outcomes of patients with PA-BSI and COVID-19 coinfection have not been evaluated.
In this study, we aimed to use the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) population to study the impact of concomitant COVID-19 infection on all-cause mortality in patients with PA-BSI. We hypothesized that patients with PA-BSI and COVID-19 coinfection would have a higher risk of mortality compared with patients with PA-BSI only. Further, we hypothesized that patients with PA-BSI diagnosed during the COVID-19 pandemic period would have higher mortality than those with PA-BSI prior to this period, regardless of COVID-19 coinfection status.
Materials and methods
Data source and population
Clinical data were extracted from the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW), which serves as a repository for patient data recorded in the electronic health record for all patients throughout the VHA system. The VHA is the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States and provides care to a heterogeneous population of over 9 million Veterans distributed among both urban and rural settings throughout the country.14,15 Patients ≥18 yr with at least one hospital admission to a VHA facility as of January 1, 2006 were eligible to be included in this analysis. We defined a case of PA-BSI as a positive blood culture collected from a patient from January 1, 2009 through June 30, 2022. We excluded eligible cases 1) among patients with unknown mortality status 30 d from the index culture; 2) without hospitalization; and 3) in which the blood culture was collected greater than 7 d before or 30 d after the date of hospital admission. Multiple blood cultures with PA collected within 30 d from the same patient were included as one case. If a patient had multiple PA-BSIs that met our inclusion criteria collected more than 30 d apart, we only included the first episode of PA-BSI; thus, each case represented a unique patient. We defined the pre-COVID-19 period as January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2019 and the COVID-19 period as January 1, 2020 through June 30, 2022. Cases during the COVID-19 period were identified as having COVID-19 coinfection if a positive test result for COVID-19 was documented during the associated hospitalization.
We collected clinical information for each case-patient including age, sex, race, ethnicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and modified Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (mAPACHE) score.16 mAPACHE score was based on clinical information collected within 48 h following the blood culture collection corresponding to the index PA-BSI occurrence for each case. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results were obtained from laboratory reports within the CDW; individual laboratory susceptibility testing methods and standards were not available. We collected information regarding treatment against the identified PA isolate administered within 48 h of the index positive culture. Targeted treatment was defined as administration of an agent with in vitro activity against the identified PA isolate on at least one day between days 0 and 2 from the date of index positive blood culture collection.
We defined four resistance phenotype classifications: (1) difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR); (2) MDR; (3) other unclassified resistant (OUR); and (4) expected resistant (ER). DTR was defined as in vitro resistance or intermediate resistance to all tested agents within the beta-lactam and fluoroquinolone classes (and aztreonam if tested).17 DTR determination required in vitro testing results for ≥1 expanded-spectrum cephalosporin, ≥1 carbapenem, and ≥1 fluoroquinolone. MDR was assigned for isolates not meeting criteria for DTR and with in vitro resistance or intermediate resistance to ≥1 drug in at least three categories including piperacillins, expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, carbapenems, and aminoglycosides.18,19 OUR was any other pattern of in vitro resistance not otherwise classified as DTR or MDR. We classified cases as ER if there was no resistance detected to any tested agent within the piperacillin, expanded-spectrum cephalosporin, fluoroquinolone, carbapenem, aminoglycoside, monobactam, or polymyxin classes.
Analysis
We performed a descriptive analysis characterizing all PA-BSI cases by resistance phenotype, targeted antimicrobial treatment, and 30-d mortality rate by year. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to characterize the independent association between the primary predictors of COVID-19 coinfection and COVID-19 period and the primary outcome of 30-d mortality, as defined by the odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) estimates. Relative risk (RR) was calculated by modified Poisson regression using a sandwich estimator to model robust error variance.20 Models both with and without COVID-19 coinfection as a predictor were estimated. The pre-COVID-19 period was additionally divided into early (2009–2016) and late (2017–2019) periods in the model for better characterization of possible changing mortality trends over the study period. The late-pre-COVID-19 period (2017–2019) was limited to 3 yr to create a more comparable cohort to the 3-yr COVID-19 period (2020–2022). For categorical variables that were missing at least 15% or more of the observations, the missing values were recoded to a new category, “missing data.” Data for variables with a smaller proportion of missing observations were completed with multiple imputation using the mice package (version 3.15.0) with 10 imputations. Continuous predictor variables were rescaled (e.g., age in decades) or considered as categorical terms to allow for more interpretable assessment of effect size. Sensitivity analyses were performed using a complete case analysis and uncategorized continuous data. Due to concern that the estimated effect of targeted antimicrobial treatment administered within 48 h could be biased by death prior to this timepoint, analyses were also performed with and without targeted treatment within 48 h and mAPACHE score before and after excluding patients with death within 48 h. All analyses were performed in R version 4.1.2.
Ethics
Data were obtained as part of a protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center to study MDR organisms in hospitalized patients.
Results
Characteristics of the study population
Among 7,804 PA-BSIs identified from January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2022, 6,714 PA-BSIs met our case definition (Figure 1). Among these, 5,484 (82%) were included from the pre-COVID-19 period, 1,158 (17%) were included from the COVID-19 period without COVID-19 coinfection, and 72 (1%) were included from the COVID-19 period with COVID-19 coinfection (Table 1). A majority of the case-patients were male, ≥70 yr old, white, and non-Hispanic, with multiple chronic comorbid medical conditions including uncomplicated diabetes mellitus (n = 2,892, 43.1%), cancer without metastases (n = 2,825, 42.1%), chronic pulmonary disease (n = 2,670, 39.8%), and chronic renal disease (n = 2,294, 34.2%).
Table 1.
Pre-COVID-19 period (n = 5484) | COVID-19 period | Total (n = 6714) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
COVID-19 negative (n = 1158) | COVID-19 positive (n = 72) | |||
Male sex, n (%) | 5,346 (97.5) | 1,125 (97.2) | 71 (98.6) | 6,542 (97.4) |
Race, n (%)a | ||||
White | 3,885 (70.8) | 808 (69.8) | 47 (65.3) | 4,740 (70.6) |
Black | 1,190 (21.7) | 264 (22.8) | 19 (26.4) | 1,473 (21.9) |
Other | 64 (1.2) | 16 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 80 (1.2) |
Hispanic ethnicity, n (%)b | 437 (8.0) | 111 (9.6) | 9 (12.5) | 557 (8.3) |
Age, median (IQR) | 70 (63–79) | 74 (68–79) | 73 (66.8–83) | 71 (64–79) |
Charlson Comorbidity Index, median (IQR) | 4 (2–6) | 4 (2.3–7) | 5 (3–7) | 4 (2–6) |
Modified APACHE score, median (IQR) | 52 (41–65) | 51 (40–63) | 58 (44–71.5) | 52 (41–65) |
DTR phenotype, n (%) | 188 (4.1) | 18 (1.9) | 0 (0) | 206 (3.7) |
Note. IQR, interquartile range; DTR, difficult-to-treat resistant.
Excludes 421 patients with missing race data.
Excludes 278 patients with missing ethnicity data.
Antimicrobial resistance
Antimicrobial susceptibility information sufficient for classification into the defined resistance phenotypes was available for 5,537 PA-BSI cases (82%). Throughout the study period, antimicrobial resistance decreased, with a downward trend observed for both MDR and DTR phenotypes and a steady increase in the proportion of PA isolates with ER; the proportion of PA isolates with OUR remained relatively unchanged (Figure 2). Among PA-BSI cases with COVID-19 coinfection, no DTR isolates were identified, though the proportion of MDR resistance in patients with COVID-19 was higher in 2021 and 2022 than in patients without COVID-19 coinfection during the same years.
Antimicrobial treatment data were available for 6,620 PA-BSI case-patients (99%). Throughout the study period, the proportion of case-patients who received targeted treatment for PA-BSI increased (Figure 2). The proportion of case-patients who received targeted treatment within 48 h was lowest among the DTR and MDR groups (20.6% and 53.4%, respectively) compared with the OUR and ER groups (78.4% and 89.8%, respectively).
COVID-19 period and coinfection
Overall, 30-d all-cause mortality decreased among case-patients during the pre-COVID-19 period; conversely, we observed an increase in 30-d mortality among all case-patients during the COVID-19 period (not stratified by COVID-19 coinfection status) (Figure 3). Case-patients identified in either period were similar in terms of age, comorbidities, and severity of illness (characterized by the mAPACHE score) (Figure 4a–c). Case-patients with COVID-19 coinfection in the COVID-19 period had a 30-d mortality rate of 47.2%, whereas case-patients without COVID-19 during the COVID-19 period and case-patients in the pre-COVID-19 period had similar, lower mortality rates of approximately 25% (Figure 4d).
The pre-COVID-19 periods were associated with lower mortality among all patients with PA-BSI in the unadjusted analyses; however, this association was no longer significant after adjusting for the presence of COVID-19 coinfection (Table 2). After adjusting for potential confounders, patients with PA-BSI and COVID-19 coinfection were associated with higher mortality compared to patients with PA-BSI without COVID-19 in both the logistic regression (odds ratio 2.15, 95% CI 1.26–3.68) and modified Poisson (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.01–2.06) models (Table 2). Higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, higher mAPACHE score, and lack of targeted treatment for PA-BSI within 48 h were also associated with higher risk of mortality in both analyses (Figure 5).
Table 2.
Logistic regression | Modified Poisson | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unadjusted OR | 95% CI | Adjusted OR | 95% CI | Unadjusted RR | 95% CI | Adjusted RR | 95% CI | |
COVID-19 coinfection | NA | NA | 2.15 | 1.26–3.68 | NA | NA | 1.44 | 1.01–2.06 |
Period | ||||||||
COVID-19 period | Reference | |||||||
Early pre-COVID-19 period | 0.85 | 0.72–0.99 | 0.89 | 0.76–1.05 | 0.91 | 0.80-1.03 | 0.94 | 0.82–1.07 |
Late pre-COVID-19 period | 0.78 | 0.64–0.94 | 0.82 | 0.67–1.00 | 0.86 | 0.73–1.00 | 0.88 | 0.75–1.04 |
Sex | ||||||||
Female | Reference | |||||||
Male | 0.83 | 0.56–1.23 | 0.83 | 0.56–1.23 | 0.90 | 0.66–1.22 | 0.90 | 0.66–1.22 |
Age | ||||||||
Age in decades over 40 | 1.07 | 1.01–1.13 | 1.07 | 1.02–1.13 | 1.04 | 1.00–1.09 | 1.04 | 1.00–1.09 |
Race | ||||||||
White | Reference | |||||||
Black | 1.03 | 0.88–1.20 | 1.03 | 0.88–1.20 | 1.02 | 0.91–1.15 | 1.02 | 0.91–1.14 |
Other | 0.72 | 0.40–1.29 | 0.73 | 0.40–1.30 | 0.82 | 0.52–1.30 | 0.83 | 0.52–1.31 |
Ethnicity | ||||||||
Non-Hispanic/Latino | Reference | |||||||
Hispanic/Latino | 1.02 | 0.82–1.27 | 1.02 | 0.82–1.27 | 1.01 | 0.86–1.20 | 1.01 | 0.85–1.20 |
Charlson Comorbidity Index | ||||||||
0–2 | Reference | |||||||
3–5 | 1.45 | 1.23–1.72 | 1.45 | 1.23–1.72 | 1.29 | 1.13–1.49 | 1.29 | 1.13–1.49 |
6+ | 2.11 | 1.78–2.50 | 2.11 | 1.78–2.50 | 1.62 | 1.41–1.86 | 1.62 | 1.41–1.86 |
Modified APACHE score | ||||||||
<50 | Reference | |||||||
50–59 | 2.37 | 1.91–2.95 | 2.36 | 1.90–2.93 | 2.15 | 1.76–2.63 | 2.15 | 1.76–2.62 |
60–74 | 4.26 | 3.48–5.22 | 4.25 | 3.47–5.20 | 3.35 | 2.79–4.02 | 3.34 | 2.79–4.02 |
75–84 | 10.89 | 8.40–14.13 | 10.89 | 8.39–14.13 | 5.77 | 4.69–7.08 | 5.76 | 4.69–7.07 |
85+ | 22.13 | 16.78–29.19 | 21.95 | 16.63–28.96 | 7.59 | 6.24–9.23 | 7.53 | 6.19–9.16 |
Missing | 7.52 | 6.22–9.08 | 7.48 | 6.19–9.04 | 4.80 | 4.06–5.68 | 4.79 | 4.05–5.66 |
Treatment administered within 48 h | ||||||||
Targeted treatment | Reference | |||||||
No targeted treatment | 1.84 | 1.59–2.13 | 1.84 | 1.59–2.13 | 1.43 | 1.29–1.60 | 1.43 | 1.28–1.60 |
Note. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk.
In a sensitivity analysis, the DTR resistance phenotype was associated with higher mortality when the results were not adjusted for targeted antimicrobial treatment administered within 48 h (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.10–1.58). Analyses including cases with no missing data, consideration of Charlson Comorbidity Index and mAPACHE as continuous variables, and exclusion of patients with death in less than 48 h did not substantially alter the relationship between the primary predictors and the primary outcome.
Discussion
In this study of hospitalized adult patients with PA-BSI identified within the VHA system, we observed approximately 50% greater adjusted risk of 30-d all-cause mortality in patients with PA-BSI and COVID-19 coinfection compared with patients with PA-BSI only. Increased mortality was additionally observed in patients with higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, higher mAPACHE score, and no targeted antibiotic treatment administered within 48 h relative to patients without these features. The Charlson Comorbidity Index and mAPACHE score remained stable between the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods; however, the proportion of patients who received targeted treatment for PA-BSI increased. Decreasing rates of PA resistance were also observed throughout the full study period (2009–2022). While the mortality rate among case-patients increased during the COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID-19 period, the COVID-19 period itself did not appear to be associated with increased mortality independent of COVID-19 coinfection. This remained true even when isolating the late-pre-COVID-19 period corresponding to the 3 years immediately preceding the COVID-19 period with the lowest observed mortality rate of the entire study period. These results suggest that COVID-19 coinfection may account for the increased PA-BSI mortality observed during the COVID-19 period.
To our knowledge, our study is the first description of the direct relationship between COVID-19 and mortality in patients with PA-BSI. Our findings are consistent with previous reports of poor outcomes among hospitalized patients with any BSI type and COVID-19 coinfection. A multicenter study of adults with BSI and COVID-19 coinfection in 271 US facilities showed higher rates of intensive care unit admission (73% versus 55%), longer length of stay (35 d versus 26 d), and higher rates of ventilator use (53% versus 22%) compared with patients in the prepandemic period.20 Multiple studies have also identified higher mortality in patients with COVID-19 and BSI.21–23 Zhu et al. noted 27% higher mortality and 20 excess days of hospital stay in patients with hospital-acquired BSI during the COVID-19 pandemic period, regardless of COVID-19 coinfection status.21
Several factors could account for the increased mortality among patients coinfected with BSI and COVID-19. Excessive focus on the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection may delay recognition and workup of coexisting or secondary processes, thereby delaying initiation of appropriate treatment.24 Logistical barriers could affect management and subsequent outcomes in patients with COVID-19 related to isolation procedures and need for personal protective equipment.25,26 Additionally, circumstances at the institutional level related to the pandemic period, such as nursing- or provider-to-patient ratio, hospital volume, and availability of infectious diseases expertise, could impact outcomes on an individual level. Finally, the interaction of the two infectious processes could lead to a synergistic or additive effect on infectivity and the host response. Respiratory viruses have been found to alter pulmonary tissue innate immune function and promote bacterial growth through an increased burden on macrophages and decreased dendritic cell and macrophage antigen-presenting capabilities.27,28 The inflammation and fluids, which accumulate within the alveoli secondary to SARS-CoV-2 virus infection in particular, are thought to serve as good substrates for PA and other bacterial respiratory pathogens.29 Alteration of the respiratory tract microbiome may also play a role.30
Our study has several limitations. The retrospective study design generated potential biases, particularly for mAPACHE score and resistance phenotype. Missing data may have been secondary to factors undefined within our data set, such as intensive care unit admission and differences in antimicrobial susceptibility testing protocols between facilities. Other factors not included but potentially relevant to the primary outcome were source of PA-BSI, other concomitant infections, COVID-19 treatment, indication of recurrent versus initial COVID-19 infection, ventilatory support, facility complexity, and ratio of staff support to hospital volume. Focusing on PA-BSI may limit the generalizability of the results to other types of BSI, though this must be weighed against the potential risk of diluting the results with inclusion of other BSI types involving different patient populations, settings, sources of infection, and risk factors. The mAPACHE score may not be the best measure of disease severity in context of PA-BSI, but it is more readily available relative to other measures such as the Pitt bacteremia score, which rely on more resource-intensive data collection or natural language processing tools. The small number of COVID-19 positive cases also represented a potential limitation, and it is unknown whether patients in this study with detectable SARS-CoV-2 virus had a clinical syndrome consistent with COVID-19 infection, though asymptomatic COVID-19 infection could still pose immunologic effects. Finally, this study focused on the VHA population, which may not capture the full spectrum of patients at high risk for PA infection, such as individuals with cystic fibrosis.
There are also notable strengths. This is the first study to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on outcomes for patients with PA-BSI. The VHA CDW serves as a rich database for this study, capturing data from over 150 medical centers throughout the continental United States and Puerto Rico and spanning a period of almost 20 yr.14 Moreover, the VHA data regarding resistance trends generally align with CDC data in that rates of MDR PA infection were observed to decrease in the last decade until 2020 when an increase was observed; in our VHA cohort, the increase from 12 MDR/DTR cases in 2019 (2.6%) to 21 cases in 2020 (4.2%) represents approximately a 60% increase. Another strength is that while the subset of patients with concomitant COVID-19 infection was modest in size, this study included data for nearly 7,000 unique patients, thereby serving as one of the largest studied cohorts of patients with PA-BSI.
Our findings lay the groundwork for many potential future studies. The relationship between COVID-19 and PA should be explored in more detail to determine whether characteristics of either pathogen enhance the infectivity of the other or work synergistically against the host immune response, and inclusion of observations of patients with COVID-19 with and without PA-BSI could be helpful to this end. More features related to the COVID-19 period would also be worthwhile to investigate, such as impact of staffing, hospital volume, and resources on PA-BSI-associated outcomes. Utilizing alternative measures of disease severity and complexity such as Pitt bacteremia score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, or the Veterans Health Administration COVID-19 Index (VACO) for COVID-19 mortality could enhance these types of analyses. Further, novel disease severity scores relevant to PA-BSI with inclusion of COVID-19 infection status should be validated for inclusion in future analyses. Finally, interventions that represent innovative measures to improve care and outcomes of patients with PA-BSI, including those with concomitant infections such as COVID-19, would be hugely impactful given the prevalence and poor outcomes associated with these conditions.
Conclusions
Patients with PA-BSI had higher 30-d mortality during the COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID period. No targeted PA treatment within 48 h, higher mAPACHE score, and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index were also associated with higher mortality among all patients with PA-BSIs.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Veterans Affairs Science and Health Initiative to Combat Infectious and Life-Threatening Diseases (VA SHIELD) for their support of this work.
Financial support
This work was in part supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01 AI063517-13 to RAB) and the Veterans Affairs Merit Review Program (BX001974 to RAB).
Competing interests
FP receives grant funding and research support from Accelerate, Merck, and Pfizer. RAB receives grant funding and research support from NIH, VA, VenatoRx, Merck, Wockhardt, Entasis, and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1. Rice LB. Federal funding for the study of antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial pathogens: No ESKAPE. J Infect Dis 2008;197:1079–1081. doi: 10.1086/533452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Pang Z, Raudonis R, Glick BR, Lin TJ, Cheng Z. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol Adv 2019;37:177–192. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Breidenstein EBM, de la Fuente-Núñez C, Hancock REW. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: All roads lead to resistance. Trends Microbiol 2011;19:419–426. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2011.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Berrazeg M, Jeannot K, Ntsogo Enguéné VY, et al. Mutations in β-Lactamase AmpC increase resistance of pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates to antipseudomonal cephalosporins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015;59:6248–6255. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00825-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gerver SM, Nsonwu O, Thelwall S, Brown CS, Hope R. Trends in rates of incidence, fatality and antimicrobial resistance among isolates of Pseudomonas spp. causing bloodstream infections in England between 2009 and 2018: results from a national voluntary surveillance scheme. J Hosp Infect 2022;120:73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kang CI, Kim SH, Kim HB, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: risk factors for mortality and influence of delayed receipt of effective antimicrobial therapy on clinical outcome. Clin Infect Dis 2003;37:745–751. doi: 10.1086/377200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Lodise TP, Patel N, Kwa A, et al. Predictors of 30-day mortality among patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections: impact of delayed appropriate antibiotic selection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007;51:3510–3515. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00338-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.), National Center for Emerging Zoonotic and Infectious Diseases (U.S.), 2019. Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion. Antibiotic Resistance Coordination and Strategy Unit. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/82532.
- 9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, 2022. COVID-19: U.S. Impact on Antimicrobial Resistance, Special Report 2022. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/117915.
- 10. Sloot R, Nsonwu O, Chudasama D, et al. Rising rates of hospital-onset Klebsiella spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteraemia in NHS acute trusts in England: a review of national surveillance data, August 2020-February 2021. J Hosp Infect 2022;119:175–181. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.08.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Sturm LK, Saake K, Roberts PB, Masoudi FA, Fakih MG. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on hospital onset bloodstream infections (HOBSI) at a large health system. Am J Infect Control 2022;50:245–249. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.12.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Giacobbe DR, Battaglini D, Ball L, et al. Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Eur J Clin Invest 2020;50:e13319. doi: 10.1111/eci.13319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Buetti N, Tabah A, Loiodice A, et al. Different epidemiology of bloodstream infections in COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 critically ill patients: a descriptive analysis of the Eurobact II study. Crit Care 2022;26:319. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04166-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Administration VH. VA.gov | Veterans Affairs. https://www.va.gov/health/aboutvha.asp. Accessed January 6, 2023.
- 15. Chang ET, Yoon J, Esmaeili A, et al. Outcomes of a randomized quality improvement trial for high-risk Veterans in year two. Health Serv Res 2021;56:1045–1056. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Fortis S, O’Shea AMJ, Beck BF, et al. An automated computerized critical illness severity scoring system derived from APACHE III: modified APACHE. J Crit Care 2018;48:237–242. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kadri SS, Adjemian J, Lai YL, et al. Difficult-to-treat resistance in gram-negative bacteremia at 173 US hospitals: Retrospective cohort analysis of prevalence, predictors, and outcome of resistance to all first-line agents. Clin Infect Dis 2018;67:1803–1814. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. A.R. & Patient Safety Portal. https://arpsp.cdc.gov/. Accessed November 30, 2022.
- 19. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012;18:268–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Bauer KA, Puzniak LA, Yu KC, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of culture-positive bloodstream pathogens prior to and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: A multicenter evaluation. BMC Infect Dis 2022;22:841. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07810-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zhu NJ, Rawson TM, Mookerjee S, et al. Changing patterns of bloodstream infections in the community and acute care across 2 coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic waves: A retrospective analysis using data linkage. Clin Infect Dis 2022;75:e1082–e1091. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab869 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Rebold N, Alosaimy S, Morrisette T, et al. Clinical Characteristics associated with bacterial bloodstream coinfection in COVID-19. Infect Dis Ther 2022;11:1281–1296. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00636-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Samantaray S, Karan P, Sharma A, et al. Prevalence, presentation and outcome of secondary bloodstream infections among COVID-19 patients. Infect Disord Drug Targets 2022;22:77–84. doi: 10.2174/1871526522666220418093450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Miyagami T, Uehara Y, Harada T, et al. Delayed treatment of bacteremia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Diagnosis (Berl). 2021;8:327–332. doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Istanboulian L, Rose L, Yunusova Y, Dale C. Barriers to and facilitators for supporting patient communication in the adult ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. J Adv Nurs 2022;78:2548–2560. doi: 10.1111/jan.15212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Petry H, Pelzelmayer K, Ernst J, Thuerlimann E, Naef R. Nurse-patient interaction during the Covid-19 pandemic: Creating and maintaining an interactive space for care. J Adv Nurs 2023;79:281–296. doi: 10.1111/jan.15486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Lucien MAB, Canarie MF, Kilgore PE, et al. Antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance in the COVID-19 era: Perspective from resource-limited settings. Int J Infect Dis 2021;104:250–254. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.12.087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Morgan DJ, Casulli J, Chew C, et al. Innate immune cell suppression and the link with secondary lung bacterial pneumonia. Front Immunol 2018;9:2943. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Manohar P, Loh B, Athira S, et al. Secondary bacterial infections during pulmonary viral disease: Phage therapeutics as alternatives to antibiotics? Front Microbiol 2020;11:1434. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01434 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Hanada S, Pirzadeh M, Carver KY, Deng JC. Respiratory viral infection-induced microbiome alterations and secondary bacterial pneumonia. Front Immunol 2018;9:2640. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]