Graphical Abstract
Keywords: gellan gum, magnesium ion, polyacrylamide, skin wounds, hydrogel
In the published article, there was an error in Affiliation 2. Instead of “Gungdong provincial engineering technology research center for sports assistive devices, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.”, it should be “Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center for Sports Assistive Devices, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.”
In the published article, there was an error in the order of “Graphical Abstract, Scheme 1, and Figure 1”, and in the legend for “Scheme 1, Figure 1” as published. The corrected order and legend appears below.
SCHEME 1.
Schematic illustration of synthesis procedure for Mg2+@GG/PAM hydrogel and the repair mechanism of Mg2+ ions from Mg2+@GG/PAM hydrogel in the burn wound.
FIGURE 1.
Characterization of Mg2+@GG/PAM hydrogel (A) SEM (B) FT-IR (C) EDS analysis (D) TGA (E) Water vapor transmission rate (F–G) Swelling ratio.
In the published article, there was an error in Figure 6 as published. The corrected Figure 6 and its caption appear below.
FIGURE 6.
Macroscopic observation (A), statistical analysis (B), and weight changes (C) of wound healing process at 3, 7, 14, and 21 days, after treatment with PBS (control), GG, GG/PAM, and Mg2+@GG/PAM. The values are represented as mean ± SD (n = 6). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs control.
The authors apologize for these error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.




