Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1986 Jul;81(3):865–868. doi: 10.1104/pp.81.3.865

Stomatal Responses to Light and Leaf-Air Water Vapor Pressure Difference Show Similar Kinetics in Sugarcane and Soybean 1

David A Grantz 1,2, Eduardo Zeiger 1
PMCID: PMC1075441  PMID: 16664916

Abstract

Stomatal responses to light and humidity (vapor pressure difference, VPD) are important determinants of stomatal conductance. Stomatal movements induced by light are the result of a transduction of the light stimulus into modulated ion fluxes in guard cells and concomitant osmotic adjustments and turgor changes. It is generally assumed that this transduction process is a general stomatal property, with different environmental stimuli integrated into guard cell metabolism through their modulation of ion fluxes. In contrast with this notion, the VPD response, which is unique because both its triggering signal and the turgor changes required for aperture modulations involve water molecules, has been considered to be hydropassive and thus independent of guard cell metabolism. We used a kinetic approach to compare the light and VPD responses in order to test the hypothesis that hydropassive changes in guard cell turgor could be faster than the metabolism-dependent light responses. Changes in stomatal conductance in intact leaves of sugarcane and soybean were measured after application of step changes in VPD and in light. In spite of a 5-fold difference in overall rates between the two species, the response rates following light or VPD steps were similar. Although a coincidental kinetic similarity between two mechanistically different responses cannot be ruled out, the data suggest a common mechanism controlling stomatal movements, with the VPD stimulus inducing metabolic modulations of ion fluxes analogous to other stomatal responses.

Full text

PDF
865

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Iino M., Ogawa T., Zeiger E. Kinetic properties of the blue-light response of stomata. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(23):8019–8023. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.23.8019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sharkey T. D., Raschke K. Effect of Light Quality on Stomatal Opening in Leaves of Xanthium strumarium L. Plant Physiol. 1981 Nov;68(5):1170–1174. doi: 10.1104/pp.68.5.1170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES