Skip to main content
Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health logoLink to Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health
. 2023 Nov 24;10:e79. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.82

Development of a context-specific trauma scale among a Palestinian adult population living amidst military violence

Fayez Mahamid 1,, Guido Veronese 2, Dana Bdier 1,2
PMCID: PMC10755377  PMID: 38161743

Abstract

The current study aimed to develop a context-specific trauma scale in the Palestinian context. The sample of our study consisted of 490 Palestinian adults – 230 males and 260 females. Our scale ended up with 32 items to measure traumatic symptoms in the Palestinian context. Results of exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis revealed a stable construct of a five-factor structure of the Palestinian specific-context trauma: (1) re-experiencing trauma, (2) avoidance and numbing, (3) hyperarousal, (4) somatic symptoms and (5) psychological symptoms. Reliability of the scale was further established by assessing the test–retest and internal consistency of all subscales. Convergent validity for the context-specific trauma scale was conducted by testing the association between the scale and two existing measures – the WHOQOL-BREF and the Impact of the Event Scale (IES-R). We recommend using our scale in empirical studies incorporating spoken or written disclosure about traumatic experiences. The scale should also be considered when working with clinical and non-clinical groups who have experienced politics-related trauma.

Keywords: context-specific trauma, political trauma, test development, military violence, Palestine

Impact statement

Palestinian people have been facing humanitarian disaster and trauma since 1948. This community urgently requires intensive mental health interventions to help individuals effectively cope with ongoing traumatic events. Developing and validating new measures to assess traumatic symptoms in the Palestinian context will help mental health professionals provide therapeutic and supportive services to those who are continually at risk of developing trauma and other psychological disorders.

Introduction

Since the 1948 war, Palestine has been under military occupation by Israel (Marie et al., 2020). Since the event known as al-Nakba (the catastrophe) that occurred 74 years ago, it is regarded as the start of the disaster and hardship endured by Palestinians, when over 700,000 Palestinian Arabs – representing almost half of prewar Palestine’s Arab population – were forced to flee or evicted from their homes and became refugees living in refugee camps across countries including Lebanon, Jordan, Syria, besides the West Bank and Gaza Strip (Manna’, 2013). For the past 74 years, Palestinians have gone through, and are still going through, multiple traumatic events caused by multiple wars, including invasions, detentions, land seizures, evictions and demolitions (Veronese et al., 2014, 2017).

Palestinians were exposed to different traumatic events whether directly or indirectly, such as witnessing mutilated bodies on TV, being exposed to heavy artillery shelling, seeing evidence of shelling, hearing sonic sounds from jet fighters, witnessing killing of beloved ones and being used as a human shield by Israeli soldiers (Thabet et al., 2014, 2018). Exposure to such traumas made Palestinians susceptible to developing trauma-related symptoms or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as it has been recognized that exposure to war-related traumas will increase chances of developing PTSD, especially when someone experiences the loss of a family member, which is a common occurrence in Palestine (El-Khodary et al., 2020).

PTSD can be defined as a psychiatric disorder that develops after a critical event, a fact that has endangered the health and physical or mental integrity of the individual; it is characterized by particularly disabling symptoms such as intrusion, avoidance and changes in the mood and thoughts (Perrotta, 2019).

From a behavioral standpoint, PTSD can be explained by proposing that when someone is subjected to a life-threatening episode, they may become conditioned to different stimuli that were present during the event (sounds, time of day and smells), through the procedure of classical conditioning; thus, these formerly neutral stimuli become capable of arousing intensive anxiety. Anxiety is evoked not just by stimuli that were present during the trauma, rather via the processes of higher-order conditioning and stimuli generalization (Friedman et al., 2007). From a cognitive perspective, when someone experiences a traumatic event that disrupts their core beliefs, this can lead to negative beliefs that maintain and contribute to the development and exacerbation of PTSD symptoms (Park et al., 2012).

In a systematic review conducted by Marie et al. (2020) and targeting Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, the results showed that PTSD was the most common mental disorders among Palestinian children, adolescents and women. Similarly, a meta-analysis and systematic review of 28 articles in 2021 by Agbaria et al. has revealed that the prevalence of PTSD in Palestinian children and adolescents was 36%, ranging from 6% to 70%. A subgroup analysis suggested that the prevalence of PTSD did not vary based on region (West Bank, Gaza Strip).

Thabet and Vostanis (2017) have investigated the consequences of war-induced trauma on Palestinian adults in Gaza, and the results showed that 42% of them met the full criteria of PTSD. Another study has explored the prevalence and nature of war traumatic events and PTSD among Palestinian adolescents in the Gaza Strip. The results showed that most of the adolescents experienced personal trauma (N = 909, 88.4%), witnessed trauma to others (N = 861, 83.7%) and observed demolition of property (N = 908, 88.3%) during the war on Gaza, and 53.5% of the sample met DSM-V diagnostic criteria of PTSD (El-Khodary et al., 2020). Furthermore, Mahamid et al. (2023) have studied the association between political conflict and posttraumatic stress symptoms among Palestinian adults and found that there was a positive correlation between political violence and signs of trauma.

Several scales have been created in order to evaluate PTSD and trauma. For example, Hansen et al. (2010) have developed a short self-report instrument known as PTSD-8, whose validity and reliability were tested on participants from the Danish culture. In addition, Blevins et al. (2015) have revised the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL) to reflect DSM-5 changes in the PTSD criteria; the scores proved PCL-5 to be a reliable and psychometrically sound measure of PTSD symptoms. Ibrahim et al. (2018) have tested the factorial structure of PCL-5 as a screening instrument for military-related trauma among displaced Kurds. The findings proved the immense worth of PCL-5 as a screening tool to assess traumatic symptoms in Kurdish population.

There has been a shortage of instruments specific to the Palestinian region for determining traumatic symptoms. For example, in a study that explored the longitudinal association of PTSD with health-related quality of life in cardiac patients particularly in conflict-affected settings, the researchers used the PTSD Checklist Specific (PCL-S) to assess PTSD (Allabadi et al., 2021). To examine the relationship between siege stressors, war trauma and PTSD among Palestinian women in the Gaza Strip, PCL (DSM-IV) (Arabic version) was used (Aqel and Thabet, 2018).

Current study

According to studies showing that Palestinians might meet the full criteria of PTSD because of exposure to political traumatic events (Thabet and Vostanis, 2017; El-Khodary et al., 2020; Marie et al., 2020; Agbaria et al., 2021), and because of a lack of context-specific scales to assess PTSD among Palestinian adults, this study aimed to develop a new scale and test its psychometric properties that can fully represent PTSD symptomatic expression in the context of ongoing and unresolvable conflict.

Methodology

Participants and procedures

A survey was carried out in January 2023 focusing on Palestinian adults who were living in the West Bank. Participants were recruited through online advertisements, e-mail campaigns and social media. The aims of this study, along with the procedures, were presented online. Participants responded with an e-mail expressing willingness to take part. Afterwards, every participant received a letter that briefly explained the study’s subject and purpose, along with details on ethical concerns regarding confidentiality, informed consent and voluntary participation. Participants provided informed consent after carefully reading and accepting the conditions stated in the e-mail. In all 490 Palestinian adults took part – 230 males and 260 females. Participants’ age ranged from 22 to 57 years (M = 34.6, SD = 13.21). Most participants (70.7%) were living in the urban regions of West Bank, and the remaining 29.3% from rural regions. Many of them (68.2%) had an academic degree, while 31.8% were non-degree holders. In order to be included in the study, participants were required to be: (1) Palestinians, (2) not to have any previous diagnosis of mental health disorders and (3) native Arabic speakers. The study was approved by An-Najah IRB before data collection began.

Measures

The Impact of the Event Scale (IES-R)

IES-R is a self-report scale designed to test reactions in response to several traumatic events. The instrument consists of 22 items under three subscales: avoidance, intrusions and hyperarousal. The “intrusions” subscale represents items related to nightmares, intrusive thoughts and memories, intrusive imagery and feelings related to traumatic events. The “avoidance” subscale represents items related to avoiding places, people and things related to traumatic experiences. The “hyperarousal” subscale represents items related to anger and irritability, difficult concentration and psychophysiological arousal during exposure to reminders of traumatic experiences (Weiss, 2007).

The WHOQOL-BREF

WHOQOL-BREF is a self-report scale consisting of 26 items designed to test individual’s perspectives of their life satisfaction and health over a two-week period. Individuals respond to items using a five-point Likert scale ranging from (1) not at all to (5) an extreme amount. WHOQOL-BREF is a shorter version of WHOQOL-100. Both scales were developed by the World Health Organization to explore quality of life and health among individuals with and without diseases. Individuals with high scores on WHOQOL-BREF indicated a better quality of life and higher health.

Trauma scale specific to Palestinian context

The Palestinian context-specific trauma scale (PCSTS) is a self-report measure comprising 32 items designed to test traumatic symptoms among Palestinian adults. The scale was developed based on literature related to psychometric instruments designed to test traumatic experiences (Eskin et al., 2020; Bdier et al., 2023; Mahamid, 2020). The scale consists of 32 items under five subscales:

(1) The “re-experiencing trauma” subscale represents five items related to intrusive images, thoughts, dreams and flashbacks related to traumatic experiences.

(2) The “avoidance and numbing” subscale represents nine items related to avoidance of feelings, thoughts, places, individuals and conversations related to traumatic experiences.

(3) The “hyperarousal” subscale represents six items related to insomnia, general irritability and difficulties in concentration due to traumatic experiences.

(4) The “somatic symptoms” subscale represents six items including hyperactivity, lack of energy and other somatic symptoms due to traumatic experiences.

(5) The “psychological symptoms” subscale represents six items related to psychological reactions due to traumatic experiences, such as lack of trust, low self-esteem, hopelessness, anxiety and depressive symptoms.

PCSTS is a five-point Likert scale (always = 5, mostly = 4, sometimes = 3, rarely = 2 and never = 1). A score of 1–1.8 suggests no trauma symptoms, while a score of 1.81–2.6 indicates mild trauma symptoms, 2.61–3.40 indicates moderate trauma symptoms and 3.41–4.2 indicates high trauma symptoms. Finally, a score of 4.21–5 suggests severe trauma symptoms.

Ten experts reviewed the scale for content validity and comprehensiveness; a minimum of 80% agreement between experts was fixed for each item. Certain items in the instrument were modified based on the advice from committee members. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted to explore the stability of the structure of PCSTS.

Data analysis

A five-factor model of PCSTS was tested through EFA and CFA using AMOS 25 software. The model showed indications of goodness of fit (GFI = .98, CFI = .96, NFI = 97, RFI = .95, RMSEA = .04, IFI = .96). Descriptive statistics were used to assess the characteristics of the scale. Independent sample t-test was performed to evaluate differences in traumatic symptoms among participants through demographic variables such as gender, academic status and residence, all of which apply to traumatic symptoms. Concurrent validity was explored by testing the correlation between IES-R, QOL and the present instrument. Finally, Guttmann split-half and Cronbach’s alpha were calculated to assess the internal consistency of the scale along with test–retest reliability.

Findings

Exploratory factor analysis

Results of EFA showed a five-factor solution for the scale among Palestinians (see Table 1 and Figure 1); these five factors explained 69.68% of the cumulative variance. The eigenvalues of the five factors were 44.42, 8.92, 7.07, 5.55 and 3.71.

Table 1.

Covariance of the five-factor construct (n = 490)

Estimate Standardized SE CR p
Re-experiencing trauma .428 .112 3.840 ***
Avoidance and numbing .536 .130 4.111 ***
Hyperarousal .527 .097 5.427 ***
Somatic symptoms .544 .102 5.340 ***
Psychological symptoms .597 .131 4.567 ***

***p significance ≤ .001.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Number of factors and their eigenvalues.

Confirmatory factor analysis

Before proceeding to CFA, an item–total correlation was calculated using all sample data (N = 490) to ensure that all items had a strong correlation to the trauma total score (0.42–0.75). The five trauma factors were re-experiencing trauma (RT), avoidance and numbing (AN), hyperarousal (H), somatic symptoms (SS) and psychological symptoms (PS). The initial model assumed the trauma scale to be multidimensional and consisting of a five-factor structure. Results of CFA (see Figure 2) showed a good fit of our model in assessing traumatic symptoms in the Palestinian context (GFI = .98, CFI = .96, NFI = 97, RFI = .95, RMSEA = .04, IFI = .96).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

CFA of a trauma scale within the Palestinian context.

Concurrent validity

To evaluate the concurrent validity of the trauma scale, a Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between the trauma context, IES-R and QOL scales. Results of concurrent validity are presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

Pearson correlation between trauma, IES-R and QOL scales (n = 490)

Scale 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. Re-experiencing trauma .45** .55** .56** .49** .71** .57** −.32**
2. Avoidance and numbing .77** .64** .58** .85** .64** −.19**
3. Hyperarousal .71** .72** .90** .69** −.31**
4. Somatic symptoms .63** .85** .72** −.22**
5. Psychological symptoms .82** .73** −.39**
6. Trauma total .81** −.34**
7. IES-R −.36**
8. QOL
**

Correlation is significant at 0.01 level (two-tailed).

The findings of correlational analysis showed that RT positively correlated with AN (r = .45, p < .01), H (r = .55, p < .01), SS (r = .56, p < .01), PS (r = 49, p < .01), trauma total (r = 71, p < .01), IES-R (r = 57, p < .01), and negatively correlated with QOL (r = −.32, p < .01). AN positively correlated with H (r = .77, p < .01), SS (r = .64, p < .01), PS (r = .58, p < .01), trauma total (r = .85, p < .01), IES-R (r = .64, p < .01), and negatively correlated with QOL (r = −.19, p < .01). H positively correlated with SS (r = .71, p < .01), PS (r = 49, p < .01), trauma total (r = .90, p < .01), IES-R (r = .69, p < .01), and negatively correlated with QOL (r = −.31, p < .01). SS positively correlated with PS (r = .63, p < .01), trauma total (r = .85, p < .01), IES-R (r = .72, p < .01), and negatively correlated with QOL (r = −.22, p < .01). PS positively correlated with trauma total (r = .82, p < .01), IES-R (r = .73, p < .01), and negatively correlated with QOL (r = −.39, p < .01). In addition, trauma total positively correlated with IES-R (r = .81, p < .01) and negatively correlated with QOL (r = −.34, p < .01). Finally, IES-R negatively correlated with QOL (r = −.34, p < .01).

Reliability of the scale

To test the reliability of trauma context scale, test–retest, Cronbach’s alpha and Guttmann split-half were calculated as shown in Table 3.

Table 3.

Reliability analysis of the trauma scale (n = 490)

Item No. Items Cronbach’s alpha if item deleted Total correlation Test–retest Guttmann split-half α
1 Images of arrests dominate my thoughts .91 .61 .84
2 I recall thoughts and painful memories about those wounded and/or killed .90 .56 .83
3 Images of soldiers’ incursions penetrate my mind .84 .58 .83
4 I suffer from nightmares after witnessing arrests by soldiers .90 .61 .82
5 I cannot prevent myself from thinking of the armed clashes and/or shootings .83 .59 .80
6 I avoid things that remind me of night raids and/or shootings .82 .50 .81
7 I turn off the TV, mobile and/or radio when they broadcast news related to armed attacks .86 .39 .81
8 I stop myself from thinking of the storming of homes by soldiers .91 .53 .82
9 I feel isolated after watching the demolitions of homes by soldiers .88 .76 .85
10 I become lesser communicative with others after witnessing arrests made by soldiers .90 .66 .83
11 I become less interested in activities, which I was interested in before, after night incursions and the spread of military checkpoints .87 .71 .85
12 I avoid places that remind me of incidents of shootings and/or military incursions .89 .66 .81
13 I avoid people who remind me of painful events related to political conflict .91 .48 .82
14 I feel emotionless after watching assassinations and/or killings perpetrated by soldiers .93 .44 .81
15 I become easily distressed after experiencing daily military events .92 .64 .84
16 I become easily frustrated after witnessing shooting incidents and/or military incursions .91 .64 .83
17 I face difficulty with concentration after witnessing the storming of schools and shooting by soldiers .90 .76 .84
18 I have difficulty recalling painful images that I have seen .90 .56 .82
19 I have difficulty sleeping after the storming of our area by soldiers .91 .73 .81
20 I have difficulty accomplishing tasks I perform after closures and/or intrusions that our area has been subjected to .81 .68 .80
21 My heart beats faster when I recall images of destruction and/or killing .87 .75 .83
22 I feel trembling in my body when I recall images of military vehicles entering my area .86 .72 .84
23 I suffer from a lack of appetite when I remember painful images .86 .71 .82
24 I suffer from headaches when I remember painful images .87 .70 .86
25 I have pains in my abdomen after watching painful events .89 .68 .82
26 I have difficulty breathing when I recall painful images .79 .69 .84
27 I feel hopeless after witnessing military incursions . 81 .59 .81
28 I feel helpless after experiencing painful events .80 .60 .82
29 I lose trust in others after witnessing painful events .82 .69 .83
30 I feel terrified after experiencing painful events .83 .74 .81
31 I feel sad after experiencing military invasions and/or incursions .84 .46 .82
32 I feel worried about the future after the current events in this political climate .83 .66 .84
Re-experiencing trauma .87 .87 .91
Avoidance and numbing .85 .86 .92
Hyperarousal .86 .88 .93
Somatic symptoms .84 .85 .91
Psychological symptoms .83 .84 .94
Trauma total .86 .90 .95

The results of Cronbach’s alpha showed a high level of reliability (α = .95). In addition, split-half yielded a high level of internal reliability (.90). Test–retest was calculated by re-administering the scale on 100 participants 3 weeks after the first administration. The correlation between the first and the second was 0.86, which shows that our trauma context scale is reliable in assessing traumatic symptoms in the Palestinian context.

The results of independent samples t-test showed significant differences in traumatic symptoms between males and females, and in favor of females (t = 9.15, p < .01). Significant differences were found in trauma symptoms between academic degree holders and non-degree holders, in favor of non-degree holders (t = 7.64, p < .01). Finally, significant differences were noted between urban and rural residents (t = 8.43, p < .01), in favor of urban residents.

Discussion

The current study aimed to develop an instrument to evaluate traumatic symptoms in the Palestinian context. Our findings showed that PCSTS is a valid and reliable scale for assessing traumatic symptoms. They also revealed a positive association between PCSTS and the IES-R scales. In addition, a negative association was found between QOL and PCSTS, which indicates the soundness and trustworthiness of our scale. CFA confirmed a stable construct of the five-factor structure of PCSTS: (1) re-experiencing trauma, (2) avoidance and numbing, (3) hyperarousal, (4) somatic symptoms and (5) psychological symptoms. Research has indicated the importance of these domains in assessing traumatic symptoms among different populations. LeBeau et al. (2014) have evaluated the factorial structure of the NSESSS-PTSD scale among clinical and non-clinical groups, which revealed multiple dominant constructs of the scale: avoidance, re-experiencing, negative alterations in cognitions or mood and hyperarousal. Gootzeit et al. (2015) have developed the Iowa Traumatic Response Inventory to evaluate symptoms related to PTSD, whose findings indicated that intrusions and avoidance are positively correlated and are specific to PTSD. Wigham et al. (2011) have developed the Lancaster and Northgate Trauma Scales (LANTS) to test traumatic life events, whose results indicated that LANTS is a valid instrument for assessing PTSD symptoms (Table 4).

Table 4.

Differences in trauma symptoms by academic status, gender and residence (n = 490)

Dependent variable Variable Gender Academic status Residence
Female Male Degree holders Non-degree holders Urban Rural
Trauma total Mean (SD) 2.59 (.72) 3.21 (.74) 2.70 (.69) >3.12 (.79) 3.33 (.64) 2.64 (.82)

The long-standing Israeli–Palestinian conflict continues to manifest negative mental health outcomes among Palestinians. Palestinians living in East Jerusalem, West Bank and Gaza Strip are at risk of developing mental health problems due to the prolonged traumatic and stressful experiences. The Israeli military occupation of West Bank and Gaza Strip has resulted in continued threats of beating, arrests and possible home demolitions. In addition, the spread of checkpoints and road closures in the West Bank limited the mobility of Palestinians (Mahamid, 2020). Therefore, there is pressing need for assessing trauma and related disorders among Palestinians.

Developing new tools to diagnose traumatic symptoms in the Palestinian society will help improve mental health care for people who are experiencing the most tragic acts including demolitions of houses, confiscation of land, arrests, pursuits and other forms of violence (Banat et al., 2018).

Our findings showed significant differences in trauma symptoms between males and females, in favor of male participants. As a characteristic of Palestinian society, women engage too little with activities outside of home, while cases of torture and murder perpetrated by assailants were rampant and most of the victims comprised men. It is therefore possible that males may have experienced more political trauma than females. These findings are similar to Yasan et al. (2009), who found that men experiencing military conflicts are more at risk of developing trauma than women.

Regarding academic status, our study revealed that non-degree holders reported more traumatic symptoms than degree holders. This supports the research conducted in northeast Iran by Modaghegh et al. (2013), who found that the level of trauma was greater among uneducated general population and primary-educated population compared to educated people. One possible explanation for this result is that education could improve people’s abilities to deal with traumatic experiences. Education can stimulate resilience, nurture learners’ social and emotional development, give individuals and communities hope for the future, and in the long term encourage social cohesion, reconciliation and peacebuilding (Morton, 2018).

Our study showed that urban residents reported greater traumatic behaviors than rural residents. In the last few months, most urban Palestinian regions, including displacement camps, witnessed several political traumatic events, represented by night raids, house demolitions, killings and arrests by the Israeli security forces. Our results are in line with other studies showing a higher prevalence of traumatic symptoms among adolescents living in Palestinian cities compared to those living in towns and villages (Giacaman et al., 2007).

Limitations of the study

The construction of psychological tools is a continuing procedure. First, our study used convenience and snowballing sampling to recruit Palestinian adults via online self-reports. It is paramount to evaluate the trauma scale with various cohorts, particularly those exposed to critical traumatic occurrences. Second, we developed our scale during a difficult period characterized by high levels of political violence, arrests and nighttime incursions into various areas of the West Bank. The political conflict may have augmented trauma symptoms among Palestinians, which could have impacted the factor structure of the scale. Further research is necessary to assess the psychometric characteristics of the trauma scale at different points in time. Third, the sample is not totally representative of different Palestinians groups, such as battered women, lower socio-economic groups, former prisoners and victims of political conflicts. Therefore, it is recommended to test the psychometric properties of the trauma scale with specific groups, especially victims of political violence and those at risk of exposure to political traumas. Finally, the concurrent validity of the trauma scale was tested against different scales but whose validation within the present Palestinian context is yet to be determined.

Conclusions

The present study aimed to develop and validate a context-specific trauma scale. It showed a stable five-factor construct of PCSTS in assessing traumatic symptoms among Palestinian adults: (1) re-experiencing trauma, (2) avoidance and numbing, (3) hyperarousal, (4) somatic symptoms and (5) psychological symptoms. Moreover, a positive association was found between IES-R and PCSTS, confirming the latter’s validity. Developing and validating new instruments to test traumatic symptoms in the Palestinian context will help health providers develop several interventions targeting individuals and groups who are at risk of trauma and related disorders.

Open peer review

To view the open peer review materials for this article, please visit http://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2023.82.

Data availability statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and are also available in the OSF repository (https://osf.io/xw87t/files/osfstorage).

Author contribution

All authors contributed equally to this article, Dr. Bdier prepared the literature review section, Dr. Mahamid prepared methodology and analysis sections. Finally, Dr. Veronese prepared the discussion section.

Financial support

No funding was received for this study.

Competing interest

The authors declare none.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of An-Najah National University IRB, the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010) and the Helsinki Declaration (2013). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The protocol of our study received ethical approval from An-Najah National University IRB.

References

  1. Agbaria N, Petzold S, Deckert A, Henschke N, Veronese G, Dambach P, … Winkler V (2021) Prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder among Palestinian children and adolescents exposed to political violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 16(8), e0256426. 10.1371/journal.pone.0256426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allabadi H, Alkaiyat A, Zahdeh T, Assadi A, Ghanayim A, Hasan S, … Probst-Hensch N (2021) Posttraumatic stress disorder predicts poor health-related quality of life in cardiac patients in Palestine. PLoS One 16(7), e0255077. 10.1371/journal.pone.0255077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aqel NA and Thabet AM (2018) The relationship between siege stressors, war trauma, and PTSD among Palestinian women in Gaza Strip. BAOJ Psycho 3, 41. Available at https://www.academia.edu/download/58523623/The_relationship_between_siege_stressors__war_trauma__and_PTSD_working_women.pdf (accessed 14 Aug 2023). [Google Scholar]
  4. Banat B, Entrena-Durán F, and Dayyeh J (2018) Palestinian refugee youth: reproduction of collective memory of the Nakba. Asian Social Science 14(12), 147–155. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bdier D, Mahamid F, Fallon V et al. (2023) Posttraumatic stress symptoms and postpartum anxiety among palestinian women: the mediating roles of self-esteem and social support. BMC Women’s Health 23, 420 (2023). 10.1186/s12905-023-02567-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blevins CA, Weathers FW, Davis MT, Witte TK and Domino JL (2015) The posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation. Journal of Traumatic Stress 28(6), 489–498. 10.1002/jts.22059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. El-Khodary B, Samara M and Askew C (2020) Traumatic events and PTSD among Palestinian children and adolescents: The effect of demographic and socioeconomic factors. Frontiers in Psychiatry 11, 1–11. 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eskin M (2020) Suicidal behavior in the Mediterranean countries. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health 16(Suppl-1), 93–100. 10.2174/1745017902016010093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Friedman MJ, Keane TM and Resick PA (2007) Handbook of PTSD: Science and Practice. New York: Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. Giacaman R, Shannon HS, Saab H, Arya N and Boyce W (2007) Individual and collective exposure to political violence: Palestinian adolescents coping with conflict. The European Journal of Public Health 17(4), 361–368. 10.1093/eurpub/ckl260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gootzeit J, Markon K and Watson D (2015) Measuring dimensions of posttraumatic stress disorder: The Iowa traumatic response inventory. Assessment 22(2), 152–166. 10.1177/1073191114540747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hansen M, Andersen TE, Armour C, Elklit A, Palic S and Mackrill T (2010) PTSD-8: A short PTSD inventory. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health: CP & EMH 6, 101–108. 10.2174/1745017901006010101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ibrahim H, Ertl V, Catani C, Ismail AA and Neuner F (2018) The validity of posttraumatic stress disorder checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) as screening instrument with Kurdish and Arab displaced populations living in the Kurdistan region of Iraq. BMC Psychiatry 18(1), 1–8. 10.1186/s12888-018-1839-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. LeBeau R, Mischel E, Resnick H, Kilpatrick D, Friedman M and Craske M (2014) Dimensional assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder in DSM-5. Psychiatry Research 218(1–2), 143–147. 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.03.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mahamid FA (2020) Collective Trauma, Quality of Life and Resilience in Narratives of Third Generation Palestinian Refugee Children. Child Indicators Research 13, 2181–2204. 10.1007/s12187-020-09739-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mahamid F, Veronese G and Bdier D (2023) Political violence and posttraumatic stress symptoms among Palestinians: The mediating roles of sense of belongingness and loneliness. International journal of psychology 58(5), 433–442. 10.1002/ijop.12918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Manna’ A (2013) The Palestinian Nakba and its continuous repercussions. Israel Studies 18(2), 86–99. 10.2979/israelstudies.18.2.86. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Marie M, SaadAdeen S and Battat M (2020) Anxiety disorders and PTSD in Palestine: A literature review. BMC Psychiatry 20(1), 1–18. 10.1186/s12888-020-02911-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Modaghegh MHS, Saremi E, Mohamadian M and Jafarzadeh R (2013) Characteristics of trauma in North East Iran and the prevention strategies. Archives of Iranian Medicine 16(10), 576–579. Available at http://aimjournal.ir/Article/551 (accessed 14 Aug 2023). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Morton BM (2018) The grip of trauma: How trauma disrupts the academic aspirations of foster youth. Child Abuse & Neglect 75, 73–81. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Park CL, Mills MA and Edmondson D (2012) PTSD as meaning violation: Testing a cognitive worldview perspective. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy 4(1), 66–73. 10.1037/a0018792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Perrotta G (2019) Post-traumatic stress disorder: Definition, contexts, neural correlations and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Journal of Public Health Catalog 2, 40–47. Available at https://aztrauma.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Post-traumatic-stress-disorder.pdf (accessed 14 Aug 2023). [Google Scholar]
  23. Thabet A, El-Buhaisi O and Vostanis P (2014) Trauma, PTSD, anxiety and coping strategies among Palestinians adolescents exposed to war in Gaza. The Arab Journal of Psychiatry 44(1152), 1–24. 10.12816/0004117. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Thabet AM, Thabet S and Vostanis P (2018) The relationship between trauma due to war, post-traumatic stress disorder and fears among Palestinian children. EC Paediatrics 7(3), 171–178. Available at https://www.academia.edu/download/58523609/The_relationship_between_Trauma__due_to_war___post_traumatic_stress_disorder_and_Fear-new.pdf (accessed 14 Aug 2023). [Google Scholar]
  25. Thabet AAM and Vostanis P (2017) Relationships between traumatic events, religious coping style, and posttraumatic stress disorder among Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. Journal of Nursing and Health Studies 2(1), 1–9. 10.21767/2574-2825.1000002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Veronese G, Fiore F, Castiglioni M and Natour M (2014) Family quality of life and child psychological well-being in Palestine: A pilot case study. Journal of Social Work 14(6), 553–575. 10.1177/1468017314549690. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Veronese G, Pepe A, Jaradah A, Murannak F and Hamdouna H (2017) We must cooperate with one another against the enemy”: Agency and activism in school-aged children as protective factors against ongoing war trauma and political violence in the Gaza Strip. Child Abuse & Neglect 70, 364–376. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.06.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Weiss DS (2007) The impact of event scale: Revised. In Wilson JP and So-Kum Tang C (eds.), Cross-Cultural Assessment of Psychological Trauma and PTSD. New York: Springer, pp. 219–238. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wigham S, Hatton C and Taylor JL (2011) The Lancaster and Northgate trauma scales (LANTS): The development and psychometric properties of a measure of trauma for people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 32(6), 2651–2659. 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yasan A, Saka G, Ozkan M and Ertem M (2009) Trauma type, gender, and risk of PTSD in a region within an area of conflict. Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies 22(6), 663–666. 10.1002/jts.20459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.82.pr1

Author comment: Development of a context-specific trauma scale among a Palestinian adult population living amidst military violence — R0/PR1

Fayez Mahamid 1

Dear Editors,

We are glad to submit our paper entitled “Development of a context-specific trauma scale among a Palestinian adult population living amidst military violence”. This is an important study testing the development of a context-specific trauma scale in a context characterized by a high level of stress and ongoing trauma. Hoping the manuscript can be interesting for the readers of Global Mental Health Journal. All authors declare no conflicts of interest and agree for submitting to the journal.

Thank you for your gentle understanding,

Yours Sincerely,

Fayez Mahamid (on behalf of the co-authors).

Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.82.pr2

Review: Development of a context-specific trauma scale among a Palestinian adult population living amidst military violence — R0/PR2

Reviewed by: Anonymous

The paper is very interesting, written in a very clear, concise and outlined manner. It deals with a crucial issue of international interest.

I have just a few minor comments:

- Method

Authors stated “The study sample was recruited using online tools”. Can you describe it better?

Moreover, there are no information regarding the age of your participants.

Can you provide Mean, SD?

p.3, line 26: check the language. ‘the Marie et al literature review”

p.4 line 55 – check references

p.12, line 47 cut the sentence. …. . Moreover,…

p.14. Discussing the difference among educated and less educated people, maybe you can add a discussion about class and economic factors? It could be a factor that have a crucial part in diminishing feeling of insecurity or enhancing it.

Maybe you can discuss about it in the limitation section

Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.82.pr3

Review: Development of a context-specific trauma scale among a Palestinian adult population living amidst military violence — R0/PR3

Reviewed by: Marwan Diab1

Thank you for a good article. Please review the references once again for APA formatting.

otherwise, a well-written and appropriate article. This scale is much needed in the context. congratulations.

Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.82.pr4

Recommendation: Development of a context-specific trauma scale among a Palestinian adult population living amidst military violence — R0/PR4

Editor: Sara Romero1

No accompanying comment.

Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.82.pr5

Decision: Development of a context-specific trauma scale among a Palestinian adult population living amidst military violence — R0/PR5

Editor: Judith Bass1

No accompanying comment.

Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.82.pr6

Author comment: Development of a context-specific trauma scale among a Palestinian adult population living amidst military violence — R1/PR6

Fayez Mahamid 1

Dear Editors,

We are glad to submit our paper entitled “Development of a context-specific trauma scale among a Palestinian adult population living amidst military violence”. This is an important study testing the development of a context-specific trauma scale in a context characterized by a high level of stress and ongoing trauma. Hoping the manuscript can be interesting for the readers of Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health Journal. All authors declare no conflicts of interest and agree for submitting to the journal.

Thank you for your gentle understanding,

Yours Sincerely,

Fayez Mahamid (on behalf of the co-authors).

Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.82.pr7

Review: Development of a context-specific trauma scale among a Palestinian adult population living amidst military violence — R1/PR7

Reviewed by: Anonymous

I thank the authors for listening to my suggestions and integrating them into the text. good work!

Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.82.pr8

Review: Development of a context-specific trauma scale among a Palestinian adult population living amidst military violence — R1/PR8

Reviewed by: Marwan Diab1

Thank you for addressing my comments.

Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.82.pr9

Recommendation: Development of a context-specific trauma scale among a Palestinian adult population living amidst military violence — R1/PR9

Editor: Sara Romero1

No accompanying comment.

Glob Ment Health (Camb). doi: 10.1017/gmh.2023.82.pr10

Decision: Development of a context-specific trauma scale among a Palestinian adult population living amidst military violence — R1/PR10

Editor: Judith Bass1

No accompanying comment.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and are also available in the OSF repository (https://osf.io/xw87t/files/osfstorage).


    Articles from Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

    RESOURCES