Abstract
The central aim of this research endeavor was to delve into the profound influence of affective learning experiences on the cognitive and psychomotor domains. Concurrently, the study sought to discern the effects of these experiences on students' academic accomplishments within the three domains. This differentiation was predicated upon the interplay between pedagogical resources and the multifaceted dimensions of cognitive, affective, and social contexts for learning.
Over the course of four consecutive semesters, data were meticulously collected from a cohort of 140 undergraduates enrolled at a private-sector university. The experimental cohorts 1, 2 and 3, comprising 35, 46, and 31 students, respectively, were instructed through distinct methodologies – namely, activity learning, reflective learning, and collaborative learning. In parallel, the control group, composed of 28 students, received instruction via the discussion method. The findings eloquently established a robust and affirmative linear correlation between affective experiences and achievements within the cognitive and psychomotor domains. This correlation notably underscored the far-reaching influence of the affective domain upon its cognitive and psychomotor counterparts. Furthermore, the variable of emotional context for learning emerged as a conspicuously noteworthy determinant of students' achievements across all three domains. In contrast, the remaining independent variables – namely, pedagogical resources, cognitive learning context, and social learning context – did not exhibit a substantial contribution. However, it was observed that the amalgamation of all four independent variables yielded a statistically significant relationship with achievements within the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. This underscored the imperative nature of accounting for all pertinent factors when formulating instructional approaches that yield optimal outcomes.
Keywords: Emotionalized learning experiences, Emotional setting for learning, Social setting for learning, Cognitive setting for learning, Affective connections
1. Introduction
The teaching-learning process operates within a triad of interconnected domains: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. Achieving optimal learning outcomes necessitates the seamless integration of these three domains [1]. However, the affective domain, often sidelined, represents a critical facet in education [2]. Scholarly discourse by Pishghadam et al. [3] accentuates emotions' pivotal role in shaping learning outcomes, underscoring the potency of positive emotions like pleasure, desire, and satisfaction in augmenting learning effectiveness. Regrettably, the disregard for emotional dimensions within subject matters can precipitate hurdles in cognitive intelligence and behavioral spheres [[4], [5], [6]].
Intrinsic to the affective domain are the emotional experiences of learners, encapsulating attitudes, beliefs, impressions, and sentiments [7] alongside behavioral attitudes such as empathy, interest, and responsibility I-TECH,. The adept prioritization of the affective domain in pedagogical strategies enables educators to mold learners' value systems and beliefs, fostering affective rapport [8], [9]. A pioneering concept, as proposed by Patel [10] who introduced the concept of “emotionalized learning experiences,” encompassing pedagogical encounters that forge emotional connections with students, imbuing positive attitudes and values that steer their conduct.
Delving further into the affective domain reveals its manifold constituents, spanning physiological sensations, cognitive processes, behavioral attitudes, emotional acumen, emotional expression, emotional resonance, and emotional management [11], [12]. These components emerge as the linchpins in fostering meaningful bonds with learners, thereby amplifying the efficacy of the learning process.
Historically, emotions languished in the shadow of reason within educational paradigms, owing to their perceived capriciousness and impracticality. This dismissive stance towards emotions contributed to waning enthusiasm and commitment amongst both educators and students [13]. The irony lies in the scarcity of research centered on the affective domain in Pakistan, despite extensive studies touching on curriculum design, evaluation systems, instructional techniques, and related spheres [14], the call for action resonates with the necessity for probing into the incorporation of affective education and emotionalized learning experiences in tertiary education, echoing the clarion call for further exploration into the untapped potential and indispensability of the affective domain within the educational milieu, propagating and endorsing continued research endeavors within this domain surfaces as a categorical imperative.
The scholastic arena is rife with instances where pedagogical approaches disproportionately emphasize the cognitive and psychomotor domains, relegating the affective domain to the periphery. Patel's observation elucidates the predicaments educators face in evaluating affective objectives due to inadequate assessment methodologies, which pale in comparison to the scrutiny directed towards assessing knowledge and skills. The transition from a construct of “teacher professionalism” to that of a “teacher-as-a-technician,” as argued by Flanagan [15] has ushered in an era where the affective domain bears the brunt of negligence, his view was further supported by Kinuthia [16]. This transition according to Ref. [17] paints a landscape where educators adhere to predefined sequences, failing to account for individual differences among students. This regimented approach predicates cognitive development while relegating affective growth.
A plethora of reasons underscores the neglect of the affective domain. The intrinsic impulsiveness and erratic nature of emotions render them challenging to manage and instruct. Furthermore, the task of teaching and evaluating feelings and acceptance presents formidable challenges. A paucity of tools tailored to gauge affective outcomes compounds the issue, exacerbating the limited expertise educators wield in shaping students' attitudes and convictions [18]. The tapestry of student diversity interwoven with their value systems poses another layer of complexity, rendering emotionally charged classrooms laborious to manage [19,20].
The affective domain, though overlooked, constitutes an indispensable facet of education essential to fostering effective learning. Its pivotal status notwithstanding, the ascendancy of cognitive and psychomotor domains often relegates the affective sphere to the background, constricting the integration of affective objectives within curricula [21]. The achievement of affective learning objectives stands as a linchpin in safeguarding the longevity of higher education [22,23] enabling learners to be active participants in learning and conduits for their beliefs, attitudes, and values. Neglecting the affective domain engenders teacher-centric classrooms that pivot exclusively on cognitive aims [24,25] birthing graduates ill-equipped in social engineering skills, devoid of social responsibility, and bereft of affirmative attitudes [26].
The repercussions of educational lapse resonates in the clamor for heightened acquisition of soft skills, encompassing personal insight, leadership acumen, effective communication, and problem-solving proficiencies, indispensable for thriving in professional realms [27,28]. Studies unequivocally spotlight the necessity for the Pakistani educational framework to redress its deficiency in addressing affective outcomes, a predicament that births graduates steeped in ambiguity concerning conduct and personal ethics [29,30]. The affective domain materializes as a cornerstone underpinning a robust and holistic educational model, one that seamlessly integrates cognitive and affective domains to chisel graduates into multifaceted individuals [31]. A curriculum shsorn of affective outcomes stands incomplete, a superficial facade [32,33].
The dimensions of emotionalized learning experiences unravel as fundamental to this discourse, manifesting as pivotal components shaping their efficacy. These dimensions encompass the cognitive landscape, emotional climate, social milieu, and the scaffolding provided by teaching resources [34] constructing a thriving cognitive setting hinges on diverse factors. Foremost, learners should perceive their learning journey as relevant and intimately linked to their prior knowledge. Active engagement and consensus-building foster a participatory atmosphere, broadening horizons and supplying opportunities for practice [35,36]. Leveraging Malcolm Knowles's assumptions on adult learning unveils valuable strategies. The “need to know” assumption warrants an incisive overview of the topic's significance before delving into content and elucidating its relevance [37] “Readiness to learn” underscores the importance of aligning content with learners' personal and professional lives, necessitating task-oriented activities [38] “Orientation to learning” magnifies the craving for practical, performance-driven learning, endowing learning with tangible applications.
Instituting an emotional setting for learning mandates educators to forge emotional connections with learners, enveloping them in a cocoon of continuous support and guidance. Positive thinking, team-building activities, counseling, and group therapy sessions emerge as tools benefiting learners who have encountered prior learning failures or are propelled to learn as a response to life's upheavals [39]. Such an environment reverberates with appreciation for individual disparities, the value of diversity, the salience of constructive feedback, and the imperative of active participation [40].
Creating a social setting amplifies the learning experience manifold. Interaction, shared experiences, and mutual learning assume pivotal roles. Ergonomics govern the physical classroom environment, encapsulating room dimensions, seating arrangement, temperature control, lighting, color, aesthetics, décor, ventilation and acoustics [41].
In summation, crafting an environment conducive to adult learning mandates attention to relevance, active involvement, and consensus-building. Melding Malcolm Knowles's principles accentuate the learner's need to understand, readiness to learn, and inclination toward practical orientation. An emotional ambiance necessitates emotional bonds, positive thinking, and group activities. A social milieu thrives on interaction and shared experiences. The symbiotic amalgamation of these dimensions begets a holistic learning environment.
Anchoring academic achievement assessment in the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains is paramount [42]. Test construction thrives on meticulous planning, covering critical content aspects and marrying items to learning objectives [43,44]. Conformity between test items and learning objectives is essential [[45], [46], [47]].
In the grand tapestry of education, the affective domain surfaces as a potent force, a treasure trove of emotional resonance and human connection. Its integration is indispensable, fostering well-rounded graduates equipped with cognitive prowess, emotional intelligence, and behavioral acumen. The call to embrace the affective domain resounds as a clarion call for comprehensive education and holistic human development.
2. Related studies
There are very less research available on the topic, few are being quoted here as, Madsgaard [48] found that facilitators in simulation-based education recognize and accommodate students' emotions, both positive and negative, as crucial elements in the affective domain. They adapt their strategies to create a psychologically safe learning environment that acknowledges emotions' impact on learning outcomes.
The study by Zach [49] revealed that participants reported a gradual development of awareness concerning the role of emotions in their teaching practice. Beyond personal growth, participants noted an increase in empathy, particularly towards their students. The results underscore the significant impact of the affective learning-based program on enhancing novice physical educators' social-emotional orientation. Wu and Yu [50] found the effects of achievement emotions on various online learning outcomes, which are closely related to the affective domain of learning. The study examines the impact of emotions like enjoyment, pride, relaxation, and negative achievement emotions on factors such as motivation, performance, engagement, satisfaction, and achievement in online learning. These outcomes are integral to the affective domain, which encompasses emotional aspects, attitudes, beliefs, and behavioral attitudes related to learning.
The study, “Exploring the Impact of Emotionalized Learning Experiences on the Affective Domain,” holds immense significance in the realm of education. In an era where traditional teaching methodologies often prioritize cognitive and psychomotor domains, this research sheds light on a pivotal yet frequently overlooked aspect—the affective domain. By delving into the effects of emotionalized learning experiences, this study addresses a critical gap in educational research, offering insights that can reshape pedagogical practices and educational outcomes.
The affective domain, encompassing emotions, attitudes, beliefs, and behavioral aspects, plays an integral role in shaping individuals' holistic development. Despite its profound influence, emotional dimensions have long been marginalized in educational frameworks. This study's significance lies in its determination to unravel the transformative potential of emotionalized learning experiences, which foster emotional connections, positive attitudes, and values among learners. By recognizing and nurturing the affective domain, educators can pave the way for more comprehensive, empathetic, and socially responsible graduates.
The research also takes into account the current educational landscape's challenges, where standardized teaching often neglects individual differences and diverse value systems. By exploring the impact of emotionalized learning experiences, educators and policymakers can gain actionable insights into how to address these challenges. This study's findings hold the promise of not only enhancing learning efficacy but also equipping students with the essential soft skills required to succeed in an increasingly interconnected and dynamic world.
Furthermore, this study has implications beyond the classroom. As the professional landscape evolves, employers increasingly emphasize emotional intelligence, teamwork, adaptability, and communication skills—qualities nurtured through affective learning experiences. By examining the effects of emotionalized learning, the research contributes to bridging the gap between educational outcomes and real-world demands, ensuring that graduates are well-prepared for both their careers and personal lives.
In a broader context, this study's significance extends to educational research methodology. By championing the exploration of emotionalized learning experiences, it encourages a shift towards more comprehensive assessment techniques that capture the multidimensional nature of human learning. As such, the research adds to the growing body of knowledge that seeks to revolutionize educational paradigms and offer a more nuanced understanding of effective pedagogy.
Thus, the study's exploration of the impact of emotionalized learning experiences on the affective domain is of paramount significance. By uncovering the potential of emotional connections and positive attitudes in learning, the research addresses a critical gap in education, provides actionable insights for educators and policymakers, and contributes to a more holistic, adaptable, and emotionally intelligent generation of learners.
3. Objectives of the study
The objectives of the study are enumerated below:
-
1.
To examine the effect of the affective domain on the cognitive and psychomotor domains based on the emotionalized learning experiences offered.
-
2.
To determine the effect of emotionalized learning experiences on students' academic achievement in the three domains based on the teaching resources and the cognitive, emotional, and social settings for learning.
-
3.
To assess the difference in the effect of teaching methods on students' academic achievement in the three domains.
-
4.
To compile the benefits derived by students from emotionalized learning experiences
4. Hypotheses of the study
It is hypothesized that the affective domain significantly affects the cognitive and psychomotor domains based on the emotionalized learning experiences offered. There is a considerable difference in the impact of emotionalized learning experiences on students' academic achievement in the three domains based on the teaching resources and the cognitive, emotional, and social settings for learning. It is also hypothesized that there is a significant difference in the effect of teaching methods on students’ academic achievement in the three domains.
5. Methodology
5.1. Participants
The study conducted an experiment during the spring semester of 2022, which lasted from 14th February to April 15, 2022. The study selected four semesters of BS Education students and included a sample of 140 students. Intact groups were randomly selected by using the cluster sampling technique out of 16 sections of BS Education (8 semesters each semester with two sections i.e. A & B). Of the 140 students, 111 were male (79 %), and 29 were female (21 %). The average age of the students was 21 years. The experimental groups, consisted of 35, 46, and 31 students, respectively, while the control group comprised 28 students.
5.2. Ethics statement
All participants in the experiment provided informed consent, and the study was conducted after obtaining ethical approval from the KIU Diamer Ethical Review Committee. The allocated approval number for this study was Edu-037.
5.3. Design of the study
The study was experimental in nature and utilized a between-subjects design to evaluate the effectiveness of four teaching methods on intact classes of undergraduate students. This design was preferred due to its suitability for testing non-equivalent groups, such as those with similar competencies and abilities and falling within the same age group, which helps reduce passive influences from reactive arrangements.
The researchers considered several factors to ensure the experiment was valid and produced meaningful results. These factors included providing adequate students in each group, avoiding situational bias, and promoting group homogeneity. These steps were taken to address the inherent limitations of the between-subjects design.
5.4. Treatment
The experimental groups, consisting of 35, 46, and 31 students, respectively, were taught using activity learning, reflective learning, and collaborative learning methods, while the control group, comprised of 28 students, was taught using the discussion method. As a motivating factor, participants in the study were given a certificate upon completing the course. The Treat fidelity grid is designed and given as Table 1 below ensuring the integrity and consistency of the implementation of the implementation of the treatment. The details of the four different treatments are discussed as follows:
-
1.
Control Group (C): The teacher facilitated the delivery of compelling content by using discussions that were centered on questions that were both problematic and informational in nature. Additionally, the teacher requested volunteers to regularly summarize a key concept discussed in the class in their own words and provide an example to support it. Additionally, students were required to write what they inferred from a particular discussion in their own words. Students were also assigned to write a term paper.
-
2.
Experimental Group 1 (X1): To teach the affective content, the activity method was used, operational definitions of which is given in Table 2, the following activities were employed:
-
•
Selecting appropriate responses from a list to answer questions
-
•
Answering multiple-choice questions
-
•
Matching terms with their corresponding definitions or descriptions
-
•
Engaging in video activities with questions at the end
-
•
Listening to real-life stories and anecdotes
-
•
Shuffling tables or groups
-
•
Completing a term paper
-
3.
Experimental Group 2 (X2): Affective content was conveyed using reflective learning method, operational definition of which is given in Table 2 below, to employ it following was done;
-
•
Self-assessments were used to impart emotional substance.
-
•
Self-reflection worksheets encouraged students to relate the content to their personal lives.
-
•
The reflection circle allowed each student to answer a teacher-posed question randomly.
-
•
Video activities were used to incite self-reflection.
-
•
A term paper was used as a means to convey effective content.
-
4.
Experimental Group 3 (X3): Emotionalized learning experiences were offered by using collaborative learning method operational definition of which is given in Table 2 and it was based on the following:
-
•
Learning Partners: I: Suggesting how concepts relate to the characters or situations depicted in the video clips
-
•
Learning Partners: II: Enabling partners to discuss a particular content and then each writes how it applies to him or her.
-
•
Self-Study Triads: Proposing strategies for addressing organizational problems or those depicted in the video clips
-
•
Learning Triads: Assessing how the characters depicted in the video clips could make effective use of the lessons taught during the workshops
-
•
Term paper
Table 1.
Treatment fidelity assessment grid.
| Type of Fidelity | Steps Taken to Ensure Fidelity | How Was Fidelity Assessed? |
|---|---|---|
| Fidelity to Theory |
|
|
| Training Provider |
|
|
| Treatment Implementation |
|
|
| Treatment Receipt |
|
|
| Treatment Enactment | Checking the implementation of new behaviors |
|
Table 2.
Operational definition of the teaching methods used.
| Method | Operational Definition |
|---|---|
| Discussion | Utilizing the discussion method in education can foster students' cognitive development in multiple domains, including creative thinking, critical reasoning, problem-solving, and literary appreciation, while promoting their communication and interpersonal skills. By engaging in dialogic exchanges, students can strengthen their ability to articulate and defend their positions, address counterarguments, and respond to inquiries from their peers, ultimately enhancing their academic proficiency and self-efficacy. |
| Activity Learning | The “whole-body learning” approach is a teaching methodology that employs a diverse range of active and stimulating activities to facilitate comprehensive learning across the three domains of learning. Essentially, it emphasizes a “learning by doing” approach, which may intersect with other teaching methods based on the content and extent of the subject matter being taught. |
| Reflective Learning | Reflective learning is an instructional approach that empowers learners to reflect on their personal experiences, abilities, and limitations, and develop a heightened sensitivity toward the challenges faced by others. This introspective technique enables students to gain a comprehensive understanding of their own selves and the surrounding environment, which can foster transformative changes in their attitudes and beliefs, ultimately leading to positive societal impact. Essentially, it is a profound soul-searching journey that allows learners to discover their true selves. |
| Collaborative Learning | Collaborative learning is a pedagogical approach that encourages students to work together in pairs, triads, or groups of varying sizes to share their experiences, knowledge, and skills, in order to arrive at collective solutions, propose recommendations, report findings, and develop projects either with or without the guidance of the teacher. |
The achievement test was administered before and after the treatment. The symbolic representation of the research design adapted from Best and Kahn (2010) is:
| O1 X1 O2 O1 O3 O5 O7 = Pretests |
| O3 X2 O4 O2 O4 O6 O8 = Posttests |
| O5 X3 O6 X1 X2 X3 = Experimental treatments |
| O7 C O8 C = Control treatment |
5.5. Affective content
The program “Discover a New You,” a part of the University Personal Enrichment Initiative, incorporated five personal enrichment workshops as a treatment to offer emotionalized learning experiences. These workshops formed the basis of the affective content, which was taught to each group using their agreed-upon teaching method. The operational definitions of the four teaching methods used with the four groups in the study are given as Table 2.
5.6. Variables of the study
In this study, the independent variable was the teaching methods employed and the four dimensions of emotionalized learning experiences, namely, the cognitive, emotional, and social settings for learning and the teaching resources utilized. The dependent variable was academic achievement measured across the three domains of learning. Furthermore, the researchers took measures to control for situational and participant variables, as well as those relating to the internal and external validity of the study.
5.7. Research instruments
The study utilized two research instruments: an achievement test and an emotionalized learning experience questionnaire. Participants were instructed to rate each statement or item in both instruments on a five-point Likert scale, where “Very Low” was assigned a score of 1, “Low” was assigned 2, “Moderate” was assigned 3, “High” was assigned 4, and “Very High” was assigned 5.
5.8. Development of the achievement test
During the planning phase, the research team identified the intended learning objectives, selected relevant topics from each workshop to meet these objectives, and ensured a balanced representation of objectives across the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. They also determined the number of test items needed to effectively cover the topics to be assessed. To facilitate this process, a table of specifications was created to link each topic with its corresponding behavioral objective.
5.9. Development of the emotionalized learning experiences questionnaire
The questionnaire, developed based on a detailed review of related literature and consisting of 41 statements, was designed to be simple and easy to understand. The questionnaire aimed to cover the dimensions of cognitive, emotional, and social settings for learning and teaching resources. Five open-ended questions were also included in addition to 41 items to gather students' views on the benefits of emotionalized learning experiences, thus total number of items was 46. Four specialists in the field validated the research instruments, and factor analysis was deemed appropriate for the study data. The reliability of the research instruments was determined by calculating Cronbach's alpha, which was 0.874 for the achievement test and 0.942 for the emotionalized learning experiences questionnaire after modifications were made to their items. The data were collected by personally administering the research instruments based on a proper administration schedule and then sorted and tabulated.
In Table 3 the correlation coefficients indicate the strength and direction of the relationships between the domains. The correlation between affective and cognitive domains is.780, indicating a strong positive relationship. Similarly, the correlation between affective and psychomotor domains is.762, indicating a strong positive relationship. The correlation between cognitive and psychomotor domains is.818, also indicating a strong positive relationship.
Table 3.
Relationship among the three domains of learning.
| Academic achievement | Affective | Cognitive | Psychomotor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 82.18 | 79.31 | 79.89 | |
| N | 140 | 140 | 140 | |
| Affective | Pearson Correlation (r) | 1 | .780a | .762a |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .000 | .000 | ||
| Cognitive | Pearson Correlation (r) | .780a | 1 | .818a |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .000 | .000 | ||
| Psychomotor | Pearson Correlation (r) | .762a | .818a | 1 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | .000 | .000 | ||
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
These correlations are significant at the 0.01 level, meaning that the relationships between these domains are unlikely to be due to chance. These findings suggest strong interrelationships among the three learning domains and that they should be considered when assessing students' learning outcomes.
Multiple regression was conducted to examine the effect of emotionalized learning experiences on students' cognitive, affective, and psychomotor achievement related to the achievement test. Four independent variables (dimensions of emotionalized learning experiences) were entered simultaneously into the analysis, namely:
-
•
The cognitive setting for learning;
-
•
The emotional setting for learning;
-
•
The social setting for learning; and
-
•
Teaching resources.
Various diagnostic tests were performed to fulfill the assumptions related to data compatibility for performing a multiple regression. Mahalanobis distance was applied to remove outliers from the data set, and thus 14 cases were excluded from the results. .
Table 4.
Statistical significance of the linear combination of the dimensions of emotionalized learning experiences.
| Academic Achievement | Linear combination of the dimensions of emotionalized learning experiences |
|---|---|
| Cognitive Achievement | F (4, 126) = 6.810, p < .000 |
| Affective Achievement | F (4, 126) = 5.556, p < .000 |
| Psychomotor Achievement | F (4, 126) = 5.323, p < .001 |
In Table 4 the linear combination of the dimensions of emotionalized learning experiences is significantly related to cognitive achievement, F (4, 126) = 6.810, p < .000; affective achievement, F (4, 126) = 5.556, p < .000; and psychomotor achievement, F (4, 126) = 5.323, p < .001.
Based on Table 5, the emotionalized setting for learning has a statistically significant positive effect on cognitive, affective, and psychomotor achievement, with beta values of.582,0.415 and 378, respectively, and all Sig. Values 0.05. This suggests that emotionalized learning experiences can improve student outcomes across these three domains.
Table 5.
Statistically significant beta values showing the effect of emotionalized learning experiences on students’ cognitive, affective and psychomotor achievement.
| Emotionalized Learning Experience | Cognitive Achievement |
Affective Achievement |
Psychomotor Achievement |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (b) | Sig. | (b) | Sig. | (b) | Sig. | |
| Cognitive Setting for Learning | −.284 | .146 | −.129 | .516 | −.155 | .436 |
| Emotional Setting for Learning | .582 | .001 | .415 | .018 | .378 | .031 |
| Social Setting for Learning | −.007 | .968 | .145 | .412 | .182 | .306 |
| Teaching Resources | .093 | .546 | −.052 | .740 | −.027 | .864 |
In contrast, the cognitive setting for learning has a negative beta value for cognitive achievement (−0.284), but this relationship is not statistically significant (Sig. = 0.146). The social setting for learning and teaching resources has small beta values and is not statistically significant for any of the three achievement domains.
Overall, the results suggest that emotionalized learning experiences significantly impact students' cognitive, affective, and psychomotor achievement. However, more research is needed to explore the specific aspects of emotionalized learning experiences most beneficial for student learning outcomes.
A one-way relationship between subjects ONE-WAY ANOVA was conducted to examine the effect of teaching methods on students' academic achievement in the three learning domains.
In Table 6, mean and standard deviation of students' academic achievement in the three domains are presented in the table above based on four teaching methods: discussion method (M = 79.25, SD = 8.316), activity method (M = 80.00, SD = 9.283), reflective learning method (M = 82.00, SD = 8.305), and collaborative learning method (M = 79.65, SD = 8.048). ANOVA results indicate no significant difference in the impact of teaching methods on students' academic achievement in the three domains at the p < .05 level for the three conditions: F (3, 136) = 0.819, p = .485. Therefore, hypothesis H3 is rejected, and post-hoc tests are not necessary since there is no significant difference in the effect of teaching methods on students' academic achievement in the three domains.
Table 6.
One-way ANOVA to determine the effect of teaching methods on students’ academic achievement in the three domains.
| Mean and Standard Deviation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching Method | N | Mean | SD | ||
| Discussion | 28 | 79.25 | 8.316 | ||
| Activity learning | 35 | 80.00 | 9.283 | ||
| Reflective learning | 46 | 82.00 | 8.305 | ||
| Collaborative learning | 31 | 79.65 | 8.048 | ||
| Total | 140 | 79.89 | 9.460 | ||
| ANOVA | |||||
|
Df |
F |
Sig. |
|||
| Between Groups |
3 |
.819 |
.485 |
||
| Within Groups | 136 | ||||
| Total | 139 | ||||
Table 7 presents the top five benefits that students have garnered from their participation in emotionalized learning experiences, specifically the personal enrichment workshops. An overwhelming majority of participants, precisely 89 %, reported a notable boost in their self-confidence. Additionally, 86 % of respondents expressed that they gained a heightened awareness of their personal strengths and weaknesses as a direct result of their participation in these workshops. Moreover, a significant 84 % of participants attributed an increased value to their overall education, thanks to the valuable insights and learning acquired during the experiment. Remarkably, 82 % of respondents disclosed that they have successfully incorporated positive thinking techniques into their daily lives, a skill acquired through these workshops. Furthermore, an impressive 80 % of participants reported that they have begun to apply strategies for enhancing their personal presence, showcasing the tangible impact of these emotionalized learning experiences.
Table 7.
Top 5 Benefits derived by students from emotionalized learning experiences.
| Benefits Derived by Students | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Improved self-confidence | 89 % |
| Awareness of strengths and weaknesses | 86 % |
| Increase in the value of the overall education received from the university | 84 % |
| Application of positive thinking techniques | 82 % |
| Application of strategies for creating personal presence (personality development) | 80 % |
6. Discussion
The study's findings indicate that the three learning domains, namely cognitive, affective, and psychomotor, are significantly interrelated. Notably, a strong correlation exists between affective achievement and cognitive and psychomotor achievement. This suggests that the affective domain is crucial in influencing achievement in the other two domains. Furthermore, a strong correlation exists between cognitive and psychomotor achievements, indicating that affective education impacts all three domains. It is worth mentioning that emotionalized learning experiences, such as the cognitive setting for learning, the emotional setting for learning, the social setting for learning, and teaching resources, significantly contributed to students' academic achievement in all three domains.
The results of the study conducted by Khidzir [51] on implementing virtual learning environments in higher education institutions suggest that the three domains of learning are interrelated, albeit weakly correlated. This could be attributed to the fact that the study was based on respondents' perceptions rather than an experiment determining the effect of affective education on academic achievement. Additionally, the role of the emotional setting for learning was critical in boosting students' overall achievement in all three domains.
Moreover, the study reveals no significant difference in the effect of teaching methods on students' academic achievement in the three domains. However, the discussion method was more productive than the collaborative learning method concerning providing emotionalized learning experiences. This finding is inconsistent with the study by Ganyaupfu [52] which found that the student-teacher interactive method is more effective than the student-centered method in teaching inferential statistics. The consistency in the result could be because courses like inferential statistics need more affective value, and meaningful interaction with students helps teachers make effective connections with them 53.
The top five benefits that students derived from emotionalized learning experiences were improved self-confidence, awareness of strengths and weaknesses, and an increase in the value of overall education in the form of a positive impact on students’ CGPA as reported by their respective teachers, positive thinking techniques, and strategies for creating personal presence. These benefits highlight the high affective value of emotionalized learning experiences, which can benefit students in all groups.
Overall, the study underscores the critical role of the affective domain in influencing academic achievement in all three learning domains. Emotionalized learning experiences, especially those that promote the emotional setting for learning, are essential for boosting students' overall achievement. Further research in this area will contribute to the current knowledge on effective education.
7. Conclusion
In the culmination of this comprehensive inquiry, the empirical analysis revealed intricate insights into the interplay of affective, cognitive, and psychomotor domains within the realm of learning experiences. The substantial nature of these relationships became vividly apparent through the calculated correlations – notably, a robust correlation between the affective and cognitive domains, an equally significant correlation between the affective and psychomotor domains, and an unmistakable correlation between the cognitive and psychomotor domains. These correlations distinctly underscored the pronounced positive associations between these dimensions.
Moreover, a pivotal revelation emerged as the linear amalgamation of emotionalized learning experiences exhibited profound statistical significance in its relationship to cognitive, affective, and psychomotor achievements. This was evidenced by notable statistical values, affirming the potent role of emotionalized learning experiences in enhancing student outcomes.
A paramount finding was the definitive influence of the emotionalized learning context, with its salient positive effect demonstrated by substantial values for cognitive, affective, and psychomotor achievements, respectively. These values, coupled with their significance, affirm the potent role of emotionalized learning experiences in enhancing student outcomes.
In contrast, the cognitive setting for learning exhibited a negative value for cognitive achievement, although its statistical significance was not established. The contributions of the social setting for learning and teaching resources, while displaying modest values, remained statistically insignificant across the three achievement domains.
As the results were unveiled through various teaching methods, the study showcased the notable benefits reaped by students through emotionalized learning experiences. The top benefits included heightened self-confidence, a refined understanding of strengths and weaknesses, an elevation in the perceived value of the overall education, adept application of positive thinking techniques, and effective utilization of strategies for personal presence and personality development.
Thus, this research underscores the intricate interplay of emotionalized learning experiences across cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains, wherein the potency of affective influences emerges as a pivotal factor in fostering student achievements. These findings stand as a testament to the transformative potential of integrating emotions into the learning process, reaffirming its ability to catalyze multifaceted academic growth.
8. Implications
The implications drawn from these findings bear profound significance for the realm of education. The robust interconnections observed among the affective, cognitive, and psychomotor domains underscore the imperative of embracing a holistic approach to learning. This underscores the necessity of acknowledging emotional dimensions alongside cognitive and practical aspects in education. The remarkable positive influence of emotionalized learning contexts on cognitive, affective, and psychomotor achievements accentuates the pivotal role emotions play in enhancing the learning process. This accentuates the urgency for educators to adopt pedagogical strategies that are centered on the unique needs and preferences of students, thereby catering to individual learning styles.
Furthermore, the discernible impact of emotional contexts on learning outcomes underscores the significance of fostering positive emotional environments within educational settings. Striking a harmonious balance between cognitive rigor and emotional engagement emerges as a key consideration, albeit one that requires thoughtful calibration. The benefits students derive from emotionally enriched learning experiences, including heightened self-confidence and increased awareness of strengths and weaknesses, present a compelling case for the integration of emotional engagement into instructional practices.
While the parity in outcomes across various teaching methods implies comparable effectiveness, it underscores the importance of imbuing diverse pedagogical approaches with emotional engagement. These implications possess the potential to shape educational policies, underscoring the role of emotional connections in fostering comprehensive student growth. By embracing this paradigm, education equips individuals to navigate the complexities of an ever-evolving world with resilience and accomplishment.
9. Limitations
The study's findings could be influenced by the specific educational context, curriculum, and teaching methods used. This might limit the applicability of the results to different educational settings. Also, the study relied on self-reported data, participants may provide responses that they perceive as socially desirable or in line with expectations, potentially leading to a bias in the reported emotional experiences. The study focused on the short-term effects of emotionalized learning experiences. Long-term effects on learners' attitudes, behaviors, and academic outcomes might not be fully explored, thus dimensional effect was not measured.
10. Recommendations
It is recommended to provide undergraduates with effective learning experiences to facilitate their self-discovery, goal-setting, self-efficacy, self-esteem enhancement, positive behavioral attitudes, and development of resilience to confront life's challenges. Foster a welcoming and emotionally safe classroom atmosphere where students feel comfortable expressing their feelings and ideas. Teachers should connect lesson content to real-life situations and current events to make learning more emotionally engaging and relatable for students. They may employ a variety of pedagogical approaches, including activity-based learning, reflective exercises, and collaborative projects, to cater to different learning styles and stimulate emotional engagement. Similarly, teachers can incorporate regular reflection exercises that encourage students to think about their emotional responses to the subject matter, their strengths, and areas for improvement. Varying opportunities for students might be created to discuss their thoughts and feelings about the topics being studied, fostering emotional connection and social interaction. By integrating multimedia resources, such as videos, images, and interactive simulations, teachers can evoke emotional responses and enhance comprehension. Such assessments may be incorporated that gauge students' emotional development, such as self-assessment journals or group discussions, to track progress and adapt teaching strategies accordingly. By integrating these recommendations into their teaching practices, educators can create a rich learning environment that not only enhances students' cognitive and psychomotor skills but also nurtures their emotional growth, resulting in more well-rounded and engaged learners.
11. Policy recommendations
Additionally, educators must offer tangible strategies to teachers to effectively integrate the affective domain in the teaching-learning process. Researchers in Pakistan must also provide assistance to promote effective education. However, educators and researchers must first be given an orientation on the affective domain concerning its role and genuine potential.
An exciting avenue for future studies could involve examining how the political climate and policy decisions at the institutional or governmental level influence the integration of affective learning experiences in educational settings. Understanding how political factors can either support or hinder the implementation of emotionally engaging pedagogical methods could provide valuable insights. Investigating how political factors shape educational policies related to affective learning experiences in diverse cultural and national contexts could be an intriguing area of research. Comparative studies could reveal how political ideologies and policies impact the adoption of these practices globally.
Data availability statement
The authors are unable to share the data since the participants have explicitly requested that it remains confidential and not be disclosed.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Yen-Ku Kuo: Project administration. Sadia Batool: Project administration, Conceptualization. Sheila devi: Formal analysis, Data curation. Tehseen Tahir: Validation, Methodology. Jiawen Yu: Writing – original draft.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr Sadia Batool reports was provided by Karakoram International University. Dr Sadia Batool reports a relationship with Karakoram International University that includes: employment. Has patent pending to.
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23263.
Contributor Information
Sadia Batool, Email: sadia.batool@kiu.edu.pk.
Tehseen Tahir, Email: dr.tehssen78@gmail.com.
Appendix A
Annexure A.
Table of specification
| Contents | Objectives |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive |
Affective |
Psychomotor |
Total | |||||||
| Com. | Ana. | Eva. | Res. | Org. | Cha. | Man. | Art. | Nat. | ||
| Workshop 1: Enhancing Personal Insight | ||||||||||
| Individuals with strong Personal Insight | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Obstacles to Personal Insight | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Benefits of Personal Insight | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Elements making up true Personal Insight | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||||
| Personal Inventory - Worksheet | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
| Self-Management Skills | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Workshop 2: Cultivating Happiness through a Positive Outlook on Life | ||||||||||
| Positive Attitude | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Leading a Meaningful Life -Worksheet | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Time-tested Techniques for Happiness based on Positive Thought | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
| Practice developing a Positive Outlook on life - Worksheet | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Workshop 3: Creating a Professional Presence and Image | ||||||||||
| Checklist to make sure you are Groomed Properly | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Standing out from the rest | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
| Acting as an Example for others | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Golden Attitudes for the Workplace | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||||
| What is Outstanding Behavior at work? | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Workshop 4: Unlocking the Winner Within | ||||||||||
| Unlocking the Winner Within | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||||
| Significance of Re-inventing oneself | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Future Wise: Be a learner to take hold of your Future | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
| Time-tested 7Rs to re-invent yourself | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Discovering the Winning Track | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
| Workshop 5: Building Inner Strength and Fortitude | ||||||||||
| Essence of Personal Enrichment | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | ||||||
| Inner Strength and Fortitude | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | |||||
| Importance of Self-Worth | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Adopting a healthy Lifestyle | 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| Total number of Items | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 45 |
| Percent of Evaluation (%) | 33.33 | 33.33 | 33.33 | 100 | ||||||
Annexure B.
Learning objectives and content
| Learning Objectives | Learning Content |
|---|---|
|
The content encompasses the following salient focal points:
|
|
Workshop Title: Cultivating Happiness through a Positive Outlook on Life After the session the participants will be able to do the following; |
The content encompasses the following salient focal points:
|
Workshop Title: Creating a Professional Presence and Image: Enhancing Communication, Grooming, and Productivity
|
The content encompasses the following salient focal points:
|
|
The content encompasses the following salient focal points:
|
|
|
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Brockbank A., McGill I. first ed. Kogan Page Limited; London: 2006. Facilitating Reflecting Learning through Mentoring and Coaching. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hyland T. Mindfulness, adult learning and therapeutic education: integrating the cognitive and affective domains of learning. Int. J. Lifelong Educ. 2010;29(5):517–532. doi: 10.1080/02601370.2010.512792. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pishghadam R., Ebrahimi S., Esterabadi A.R., Parsae A. 2023. Emotions and Success in Education: from Apathy to Transpathy. Cognition, Emotion, and Education. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.MacFadden R.J. Souls on ice: incorporating emotion in web-based education. J. Technol. Hum. Serv. 2005;23(1–2):79–98. doi: 10.1300/J017v23n01_07. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dar F.R. Rethinking education – emerging roles for teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 2015;3(2):63–74. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2015.030201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hamid M. Organizational learning, privacy concern, innovation capability impact on creative performance. Journal of Digitization and Information System. 2022;2(2):122–138. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rahmat T.E., Raza S., Zahid H., Abbas J., Mohd Sobri F.A., Sidiki S.N. Nexus between integrating technology readiness 2.0 index and students' e-library services adoption amid the COVID-19 challenges: implications based on the theory of planned behavior. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2022;11:50. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_508_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tiamwatt J.M. Intensive school-based instructional supervision (ISBIS) influences academic teaching performance. Int. J. Membr. Sci. Technol. 2023;10(2):149–154. 10.15379/ijmst.v10i2.1177 [Google Scholar]
- 9.Batool S., Akhter T. Causal attribution patterns of mainstream school students and their effect on achievement. FWU Journal of Social Sciences. 2012;6(2):131–134. https://www.proquest.com/openview/f3422862740bcae71449e743116b2288/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=55194 [Google Scholar]
- 10.Patel R.N. In: Educational Evaluation: Theory and Practice. Rev, editor. Himalaya Publishing House; Mumbai: 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rabahi M., Yusof H., Awang M. Model of hope: leading learning among the indigenous orang asli students. International Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences. 2016;2(1):1. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brett A., Smith M., Price E., Huitt W. Valdosta State University; Valdosta, GA: 2003. Overview of the Affective Domain. Educational Psychology Interactive.http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/affect/affect.html [Google Scholar]; [a] Malinda M. Effectiveness of entrepreneurship and innovation learning methods. Case study at Universitas Kristen Maranatha, Bandung, Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies. 2018;4(3):122. [Google Scholar]
- 13.OO M.N.C.H.P. The status and the problem of western vocal music teaching in Myanmar. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences and Humanities. 2016;1(1):9–17. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tahir T., Batool S., Gul R., Ishfaq U. Relationship between self-concept and academic achievement: an evidence of female students. Educ. Law. 2023;11(5s) doi: 10.52783/rlj.v11i5s.888. Article Sidebar. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Flanagan N. Take back teaching now. Educational Leadership Journal. 2014;71:34–38. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/take-back-teaching-now [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kinuthia H.J. University College London, Institute of Education; 2021. Teacher Professionalism, Education Reform and 21st Century Skills in the United Arab Emirates. (Doctoral Dissertation) [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kinuthia H.J. University College London, Institute of Education; 2021. Teacher Professionalism, Education Reform and 21st Century Skills in the United Arab Emirates. (Doctoral Dissertation) [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yu S., Abbas J., Draghici A., Negulescu O.H., Ain N.U. Social media application as a New paradigm for business communication: the role of COVID-19 knowledge, social distancing, and preventive attitudes. Front. Psychol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gul R., Tahir T., Batool S., Ishfaq U., Nawaz H. Effect of different classroom predictors on students' behavioral engagement. Journal of Positive School Psychology. 2022;6(8):3759–3778. http://journalppw.com [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hashim H., Salam S., Mohamad S.N.M. Investigating learning styles for adaptive massaive open online cource (MOOC) learning. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences. 2017;3(5):282–292. [Google Scholar]
- 21.AL-Takhayneh S.K., Karaki W., Alhwayan O.A.A., Khader R., Altarawneh A.J.O.A. Mother's lifestyle in digital era, life satisfaction and well-being: moderating role of E-learning anxiety among Jordanian mothers of grade 1-3 students. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences. 2022;20(1):63–79. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shephard K. Higher education for sustainability: seeking affective learning outcomes. Int. J. Sustain. High Educ. 2008;9(1):87. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Li H.X. Digital knowledge and innovativeness: catalysts for digital entrepreneurship success in taiwan's architecture and interior design industries. Journal of Digitovation and Information System. 2023;3(1):1–15. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rupani C.M., Bhutto M.I. Evaluation of existing teaching-learning process on Bloom's Taxonomy. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2011;1:119–128. doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v1-i2/42. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Batool S., Tahir T., Ishfaq U., Karamat M., Bibi H. The teaching milieu of Pakistan: rudiments for an efficacious teacher. Webology. 2021;18(3):594–609. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Patel R.N. In: Educational Evaluation: Theory and Practice. Rev, editor. Himalaya Publishing House; Mumbai: 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pierre E., Oughton J. The affective domain: undiscovered country. Coll. Q. 2007;10(4):1–7. https://core.ac.uk/download/234634041.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shing L.A.B., Xiaodie P.J. Exploring the relationship between leadership, organizational culture, trust, and effectiveness of knowledge sharing by forced learning. Journal of Administrative and Business Studies. 2017;3(2):90–104. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kuboja J.M., Ngussa B.M. Affective learning and cognitive skills improvement: experience of selected schools in Arusha, Tanzania. Int. J. Acad. Res. Prog. Educ. Dev. 2015;4(2):38–53. doi: 10.6007/IJARPED/v4-i2/1566. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Arli D., Setiawan G. Who is more religious and ethical, Republicans, Democrats or others? International Journal of Religion. 2023;4(1):19–38. doi: 10.33182/ijor.v4i1.2205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hyland T. Mindfulness, adult learning and therapeutic education: integrating the cognitive and affective domains of learning. Int. J. Lifelong Educ. 2010;29(5):517–532. doi: 10.1080/02601370.2010.512792. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dettmer P. New blooms in established fields: four domains of learning and doing. Roeper Rev. 2006;28(2):70–78. doi: 10.1080/02783190609554285. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Khan M.I. Sophistication of medical education and teaching Bioethics - editorial. Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College. 2014;18(1):1–2. doi: 10.12669/pjms.301.4456. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yao J., Ziapour A., Abbas J., Toraji R., NeJhaddadgar N. Assessing puberty-related health needs among 10-15-year-old boys: a cross-sectional study approach. Arch. Pediatr. : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie. 2022;29(4):307–311. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2021.11.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Egle C. Rural Health Education Foundation; Deakin, Australia: 2007. A Guide to Facilitating Adult Learning. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Abbas J., Aman J., Nurunnabi M., Bano S. The impact of social media on learning behavior for sustainable education: evidence of students from selected universities in Pakistan. Sustainability. 2019;11(6):1683. doi: 10.3390/su11061683. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Deeves M. Public Health Ontario. Agency for Health Protection and Promotion; Toronto, ON: 2015. Education Lift off: Key Principles and Strategies for Teaching Adult Learners – Presentation. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Post H.W. Pacer Center; Minneapolis, MN: 2010. Teaching Adults: what Every Trainer Needs to Know about Adult Learning Styles. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gunawardena G. Diploma in Youth Development Work. Commonwealth Youth Program; London: 2007. Module 1: Learning Processes.https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/27145644/module-1-learning-processes-diploma-in-youth-development-work Commonwealth Secretariat. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Egle C. Rural Health Education Foundation; Deakin, Australia: 2007. A Guide to Facilitating Adult Learning. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ayaz S., Anwar S., Sial M.H., Hussain Z. Role of agricultural credit on production efficiency of farming sector in Pakistan–a data envelopment analysis. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences. 2011;9(1):38–44. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Patel R.N. In: Educational Evaluation: Theory and Practice. Rev, editor. Himalaya Publishing House; Mumbai: 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Reznich B.C., Yelon S.L. Office of Medical Education Research and Development, College of Human Medicine; East Lansing, MI: 2011. Learner Evaluation and Test Item Construction. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Michigan State University Polytechnic Institute . 2015. Guidelines for Test Design and Construction.https://homepages.rpi.edu/∼verwyc/chap2tm.html Retrieved. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute . 2015. Guidelines for Test Design and Construction.https://homepages.rpi.edu/∼verwyc/chap2tm.html Retrieved. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Devine M., Yaghlian N. Center for Teaching Excellence. Cornell University; Ithaca, NY: 2015. Test Construction Manual. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Alghamdi H., Sun L. Analysis of the fit of learning and management systems in higher education institutions: a case study from Saudi arabia. International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs. 2017;2(4):260–267. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Howe J. Maryam jameelah and the affective economy of islamic revival. International Journal of Religion. 2022;3(2):85–98. doi: 10.33182/ijor.v3i2.2286. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Madsgaard A., Røykenes K., Smith-Strøm H., Høyland S. The affective component of learning in simulation-based education – facilitators' strategies to establish psychological safety and accommodate nursing students' emotions. BMC Nurs. 2022;21(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00869-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zach S., Rosenblum H. The affective domain—a program to foster social-emotional orientation in novice physical education teachers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health. 2021;18(14):7434. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wu R., Yu Z. Exploring the effects of achievement emotions on online learning outcomes: a systematic review. Front. Psychol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.977931. Article 977931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Khidzir N.Z., Daud K.A.M., Ibrahim M.A.H. The relationship among students' domain of learning development implementing virtual learning in higher learning institutions. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 2016;6(6):418–422. doi: 10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.702. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ganyaupfu E.M. Teaching methods and students' academic performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention. 2013;2(9):29–35. http://www.ijhssi.org/papers/v2(9)/Version-1/G029112935.pdf [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors are unable to share the data since the participants have explicitly requested that it remains confidential and not be disclosed.
