Skip to main content
BMC Pulmonary Medicine logoLink to BMC Pulmonary Medicine
. 2024 Jan 2;24:6. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02758-0

Impact of comorbidities in COPD clinical control criteria. The CLAVE study

Pere Almagro 1,, Juan José Soler-Cataluña 2, Arturo Huerta 3, Diego González-Segura 4, Borja G Cosío 5; on behalf of the CLAVE Study Investigators
PMCID: PMC10759491  PMID: 38166965

Abstract

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) frequently coexists with other chronic diseases, namely comorbidities. They negatively impact prognosis, exacerbations and quality of life in COPD patients. However, no studies have been performed to explore the impact of these comorbidities on COPD clinical control criteria.

Research question

Determine the relationship between individualized comorbidities and COPD clinical control criteria.

Study design and methods

Observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study performed in Spain involving 4801 patients with severe COPD (< 50 predicted forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1%]). Clinical control criteria were defined by the combination of COPD assessment test (CAT) scores (≤16 vs ≥17) and exacerbations in the previous three months (none vs ≥1). Binary logistic regression adjusted by age and FEV1% was performed to identify comorbidities potentially associated with the lack of control of COPD. Secondary endpoints were the relationship between individualized comorbidities with COPD assessment test and exacerbations within the last three months.

Results

Most frequent comorbidities were arterial hypertension (51.2%), dyslipidemia (36.0%), diabetes (24.9%), obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (14.9%), anxiety (14.1%), heart failure (11.6%), depression (11.8%), atrial fibrillation (11.5%), peripheral arterial vascular disease (10.4%) and ischemic heart disease (10.1%). After age and FEV1% adjustment, comorbidities related to lack of clinical control were cardiovascular diseases (heart failure, peripheral vascular disease and atrial fibrillation; p < 0.0001), psychologic disorders (anxiety and depression; all p < 0.0001), metabolic diseases (diabetes, arterial hypertension and abdominal obesity; all p < 0.001), sleep disorders (p < 0.0001), anemia (p = 0.015) and gastroesophageal reflux (p < 0.0001). These comorbidities were also related to previous exacerbations and COPD assessment test scores.

Interpretation

Comorbidities are frequent in patients with severe COPD, negatively impacting COPD clinical control criteria. They are related to health-related quality of life measured by the COPD assessment test. Our results suggest that comorbidities should be investigated and treated in these patients to improve their clinical control.

Take-home points

Study question: What is the impact of comorbidities on COPD clinical control criteria?

Results: Among 4801 patients with severe COPD (27.5% controlled and 72.5% uncontrolled), after adjustment by age and FEV1%, comorbidities related to lack of clinical control were cardiovascular diseases (heart failure, peripheral vascular disease and atrial fibrillation; p < 0.0001), psychologic disorders (anxiety and depression; p < 0.0001), metabolic diseases (diabetes, arterial hypertension and abdominal obesity; p < 0.001), obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (p < 0.0001), anaemia (p = 0.015) and gastroesophageal reflux (p < 0.0001), which were related to previous exacerbations and COPD assessment test scores.

Interpretation: Comorbidities are related to health-related quality of life measured by the COPD assessment test scores and history of exacerbations in the previous three months.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-023-02758-0.

Keywords: COPD: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CAT: COPD assessment test, Comorbidities, Clinical control criteria, Exacerbations, Charlson index


According to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common, preventable, and treatable disease characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation due to airway and/or alveolar abnormalities, usually caused by significant exposure to noxious particles or gases [1]. COPD has experienced a steady increase during the last decades, affecting to over 400 million people globally, becoming the third leading cause of death for chronic diseases, with 3.2 million patients dying due to this disease [2, 3]. Recent normative and guidelines consider COPD an heterogeneous disease in which prognosis and treatment include the severity of the airway obstruction, symptoms and risk of exacerbations [1, 4, 5]. A recent, dynamic definition of clinical control criteria in COPD has been proposed, combining the impact and the stability of the disease over time [68]. A low clinical impact is considered when patients meet three out of the four clinical variables: low dyspnea grade, no need for rescue treatment more than three times within the last week, clear sputum color, and daily physical activity ≥30 min each day. Clinical stability is defined when patients do not experience exacerbations within the previous three months and have a favorable perception of their health status. In a simple, alternative definition, patients are considered clinically controlled if they had a COPD assessment test (CAT) score of ≤16 and no exacerbations within the last three months [6, 9, 10]. This classification is usually used since it is similar to the one in the GOLD guidelines, although with different thresholds [1]. To classify symptoms, GOLD considers a cut-off point of ≥2, equivalent to the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale to a score of ≥10 points in CAT. However, several studies have shown that a score of ≥2 in mMRC corresponds better to a CAT score of ≥17, while an mMRC score of ≤1 is roughly equivalent to CAT scores of ≤10 [11, 12]. On the other hand, the presence of one or more exacerbations within the previous three months is usually assessed, since it can better capture the degree of control of patients in comparison to the exacerbation history during the last year [13]. The definition of clinical control used in our study has shown a good concordance with previous control criteria, sensitivity to change and is related to the risk of exacerbations and mortality [6, 8, 9, 14, 15].

COPD is also characterized by a systemic component, with an increased prevalence of concurrent chronic diseases. They are defined as comorbidities when describing the burden of several chronic illnesses coexisting with a particular disease of interest, in this case, COPD. By contrast, when the importance relies in the interaction between multiple chronic conditions in the same subject, multimorbidity seems to be a more appropriate concept, since the simultaneous combination of these chronic diseases affects differently the symptoms, prognosis, and treatment of an individual patient [16, 17]. The more frequent chronic disorders associated with COPD are cardiovascular, metabolic and psychological diseases. These comorbidities are often undiagnosed and hence undertreated [18]. Prospective studies performed on severe COPD patients show that virtually all of them had at least another chronic disease, and half of them had four or more comorbidities [19, 20]. These chronic diseases are often related to smoking, systemic inflammation, and ageing, but they occur at younger ages in patients with COPD than in the general population [21]. Comorbidities negatively impact the prognosis, symptoms, and quality of life in COPD patients, but to our knowledge, their impact on clinical control criteria has only been partially explored [16, 19, 20, 22].

The main objective of this study was to explore the impact of individualized comorbidities on COPD clinical control criteria and their relationship with the CAT and previous exacerbations.

Study design and methods

Study design

The CLAVE study was an observational, cross-sectional, multicenter cohort analysis involving patients with severe COPD in Spain. Details of the study protocol have been described elsewhere [6]. Briefly, participants included in this study were males and females aged ≥40 years, with a smoking history of ≥10 pack-year; predicted post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1%) of < 50%, and in chronic COPD treatment. Patients receiving oral corticosteroids or antibiotics for a recent COPD exacerbation were excluded. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (Spain), and procedures were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Endpoints and variables

The primary endpoint was the association between individualized comorbidities and the clinical control of COPD. Patients with a CAT score of ≤16 and no exacerbations within the last three months were considered clinically controlled subjects. The CAT is an 8-item questionnaire designed to evaluate Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) in COPD patients. Each item can be scored from 0 (no limitation) to 5 (very limited) [23]. Comorbidities were documented using the previously validated Charlson index, a standard scale with 19 chronic diseases graded for disease severity without age adjustment. Since all patients had COPD, which adds a point to this index, the minimum score was 1 point [24]. Additionally, comorbidity data was collected using a specific previously published questionnaire that included relevant pathologies in COPD, whether incorporated or not in the Charlson index [25]. The validated Spanish version of CAT, alongside the number of exacerbations in the past three months and the number of chronic treatments, were compared with each comorbidity for the secondary endpoints. In addition, the BODEX and CODEX indexes were also evaluated regarding COPD clinical control criteria.

Statistical analyses

Quantitative variables were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD) if data followed a normal distribution, with comparisons performed with the Student’s t-test. Non-normally distributed variables were described as median and interquartile ranges (IQR: 25–75%) and analyzed with non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney U test). Qualitative variables were expressed as number and percentage and analyzed with the χ2 test or the Fisher exact test. A binary logistic regression was carried out to identify comorbidities potentially associated with COPD clinical control criteria after age and FEV1% adjustment. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were reported. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4.

Results

A total of 4801 patients were included. Of those, 1322 (27.5%) were considered as controlled, and 3479 (72.5%) as uncontrolled for COPD clinical criteria according to CAT scores (≤16 vs ≥17) and exacerbations in the previous three months (none vs ≥1). Most of them were male (82.2%) living in urban areas (64.7%) with a mean age of 69.6 ± 9.3 years, with more than half of the sample (51.7%) being above 70 years old. Most participants (75.7%) were former smokers with a mean of 50.8 ± 25.7 packs-years, and a mean predicted FEV1% of 39.0 ± 8.3. Most of them had moderate or low physical activity (43.2% and 40.4%, respectively) and had good treatment adherence (61.0%) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Population characteristics according to COPD clinical control criteria

Whole sample (n = 4801) Patients with controlled COPD (n = 1322) Patients with uncontrolled COPD (n = 3479) p-valuea
Gender, n (%)
 Male 3947 (82.2) 1103 (83.4) 2844 (81.7) 0.1722
 Female 854 (17.8) 219 (16.6) 635 (18.3)
Age, years
 Median (P25; P75) 70.0 (63.0; 76.0) 69.0 (63.0; 75.0) 70.0 (63.0; 77.0) < 0.0001
Active smoking, n (%)
 Yes 1168 (24.3) 333 (25.2) 835 (24.0) 0.3915
 No b 3633 (75.7) 989 (74.8) 2644 (76.0)
Number of packs-year, nc
 Median (P25; P75) 45.0 (33.0; 60.0) 45.0 (35.0; 60.0) 45.0 (32.3; 60.0) 0.4344
Level of care, n (%)d
 Primary health care 337 (7.1) 57 (4.4) 280 (8.1) < 0.0001
 Specialists 4426 (92.9) 1251 (95.6) 3175 (91.9)
Degree of physical activity (IPAQ), n (%)e
 High 738 (16.5) 316 (26.0) 422 (12.9) < 0.0001
 Moderate 1937 (43.2) 626 (51.4) 1311 (40.1)
 Low or inactive 1811 (40.4) 275 (22.6) 1536 (47.0)
Post-bronchodilator FEV1%
 Median (P25; P75) 41.0 (33.0; 46.0) 42.4 (35.2; 47.0) 40.0 (32.0; 46.0) < 0.0001
Degree of treatment adherence (TAI), n (%)f
 Good 2767 (61.0) 850 (68.1) 1917 (58.3) < 0.0001
 Intermediate 887 (19.6) 242 (19.4) 645 (19.6)
 Bad 883 (19.5) 157 (12.6) 726 (22.1)

aMann-Whitney non-parametric U test was used to analyze differences between quantitative variables and the Chi-Square test for qualitative variables

bEx-smokers: abstinence for at least the last six months

cPacks-year = [number of cigarettes per day * number of years] / 20

dn = 4763 patients with information about the level of care

en = 4486 patients with answered IPAQ

fn = 4537 patients with answered TAI

The most frequent clusters of comorbidities were metabolic disorders (arterial hypertension [51.2%]; dyslipidemia [36.0%]; diabetes mellitus [24.9%]; abdominal obesity [15.8%]), cardiovascular diseases (myocardial infarction [10.1%]; heart failure [11.6%]; peripheral vascular disease [10.4%]; atrial fibrillation [11.5%]), and psychological disorders (anxiety [14.1%]; depression [11.8%]) (Tables 2 and 3) (Fig. 1). Higher scores in the non-age adjusted Charlson index were related to lack of COPD clinical control (1.90 [1.35] vs 2.28 [1.6]; p < 0.0001). Individualized comorbidities significantly related to COPD control are specified in Table 2 and Fig. 2, while comorbidities not included in the Charlson index are detailed in Table 3 and Fig. 2, respectively. In the adjusted analysis, the most relevant clusters of comorbidities associated with COPD clinical control criteria were metabolic, cardiovascular, and psychological disorders, alongside gastroesophageal reflux, non-ferropenic anemia, osteoporosis, obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) and dementia. Dementia had the highest impact (OR: 3.9; 95% CI: 1.4–10.8; p = 0.0102) but a lower prevalence (1%).

Table 2.

Association between the presence of comorbidities according to the non-adjusted Charlson index and COPD clinical control criteria

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysisa; OR (CI 95%); p-value
Total Controlled COPD Non-controlled COPD p-value
Charlson index, n (%) 4801 (100.0) 1322 (100.0) 3479 (100.0)
Mean (SD) 2.17 (1.54) 1.90 (1.35) 2.28 (1.6) < 0.0001
Comorbidities included in the Charlson index, n (%)
 Myocardial infarction 484 (10.1) 128 (9.7) 356 (10.2) 0.5714 1.03 (0.83–1.28); p = 0.7968
 Congestive heart failure 558 (11.6) 95 (7.2) 463 (13,3) < 0.0001 1.83 (1.45–2.31); p < 0.0001
 Peripheral vascular disease 498 (10.4) 89 (6.7) 409 (11.8) < 0.0001 1.80(1.41–2.29); p < 0.0001
 Cerebrovascular disease 239 (5.0) 51 (3.9) 188 (5.4) 0.0278 1.32 (0.96–1.82); p = 0.0856
 Dementia 49 (1.0) 4 (0.3) 45 (1.3) 0.0023 3.85 (1.38–10.79); p = 0.0102
 Pathology of connective tissue 73 (1.5) 14 (1.1) 59 (1.7) 0.1072 1.74 (0.96–3.14); p = 0.0664
 Ulcer disease 191 (4.0) 41 (3.1) 150 (4.3) 0.0553 1.32 (0.93–1.88); p = 0.1239
 Mild liver pathology 220 (4.6) 49 (3.7) 171 (4.9) 0.0736 1.42 (1.02–1.97); p = 0.0353
 Diabetes 1023 (21.3) 250 (18.9) 773 (22.2) 0.0124 1.22 (1.04–1.44); p = 0.0138
 Diabetes with organic lesion 173 (3.6) 24 (1.8) 149 (4.3) < 0.0001 2.33 (1.50–3.61); p = 0.0002
 Hemiplegia 18 (0.4) 3 (0.2) 15 (0.4) 0.4298f 1.86 (0.53–6.50); p = 0.3299
 Renal pathology (moderate or severe) 219 (4.6) 49 (3.7) 170 (4.9) 0.0801 1.22 (0.88–1.70); p = 0.2297
 Solid neoplasm without metastasis 448 (9.3) 103 (7.8) 345 (9.9) 0.0237 1.21 (0.96–1.52); p = 0.1134
 Leukemia 18 (0.4) 3 (0.2) 15 (0.4) 0.4298f 1.77 (0.51–6.19); p = 0.3686
 Malignant lymphoma 18 (0.4) 2 (0.2) 16 (0.5) 0.1834f 3.10 (0.71–13.52); p = 0.1324
 Liver pathology (moderate or severe) 73 (1.5) 13 (1.0) 60 (1.7) 0.0608 1.89 (1.03–3.48); p = 0.0408
 Solid metastasis 18 (0.4) 3 (0.2) 15 (0.4) 0.4298f 1.97 (0.56–6.87); p = 0.2880
 AIDS 30 (0.6) 7 (0.5) 23 (0.7) 0.6052 1.46 (0.62–3.44); p = 0.3925

aBinary logistic regression adjusted by age and FEV1% to identify comorbidities potentially associated with the lack of control of COPD

Table 3.

Association between the presence of comorbidities non-included in the Charlson index and COPD clinical control criteria

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysisa; OR (CI 95%); p-value
Total Controlled Non-controlled p
Asthma 192 (4.0) 49 (3.7) 143 (4.1) 0.5235 1.23 (0.88–1.72); p = 0.2185
Sleep disturbance (OAHAS or equivalent) 715 (14.9) 151 (11.4) 564 (16.2) < 0.0001 1.57 (1.29–1.91); p < 0.0001
Lung neoplasm 125 (2.6) 32 (2.4) 93 (2.7) 0.6234 1.08 (0.72–1.63); p = 0.7109
Sinus node disease 37 (0.8) 8 (0.6) 29 (0.8) 0.4188 1.24 (0.56–2.73); p = 0.6001
Arterial hypertension 2457 (51.2) 624 (47.2) 1833 (52.7) 0.0007 1.20 (1.05–1.37); p = 0.0076
Chronic atrial fibrillation 553 (11.5) 106 (8.0) 447 (12.8) < 0.0001 1.56 (1.25–1.96); p = 0.0001
Atrio-ventricular block 50 (1.0) 11 (0.8) 39 (1.1) 0.3784 1.24 (0.63–2.43); p = 0.5408
Thromboembolic disease (PTE or DVT precedents) 106 (2.2) 26 (2.0) 80 (2.3) 0.4833 1.18 (0.75–1.85); p = 0.4836
Iron-deficiency anemia (Hgb < 13 g/l) 193 (4.0) 41 (3.1) 152 (4.4) 0.0458 1.30 (0.91–1.85); p = 0.1512
Other anemia (Hgb13 g/l) 154 (3.2) 27 (2.0) 127 (3.7) 0.0047 1.69 (1.11–2.59); p = 0.0152
Dyslipidemia 1726 (36.0) 460 (34.8) 1266 (36.4) 0.3039 1.08 (0.94–1.24); p = 0.2664
Abdominal obesity (men > 102 cm; women 88 cm) 757 (15.8) 173 (13.1) 584 (16.8) 0.0017 1.42 (1.18–1.71); p = 0.0002
Osteoporosis 376 (7.8) 73 (5.5) 303 (8.7) 0.0002 1.58 (1.21–2.06); p = 0.0008
Anxiety 677 (14.1) 114 (8.6) 563 (16.2) < 0.0001 2.06 (1.66–2.55); p < 0.0001
Depression 567 (11.8) 89 (6.7) 478 (13.7) < 0.0001 2.21 (1.74–2.80); p < 0.0001
Gastroesophageal reflux 372 (7.7) 71 (5.4) 301 (8.7) 0.0001 1.72 (1.32–2.25); p < 0.0001
Digestive malignancy 55 (1.1) 16 (1.2) 39 (1.1) 0.7951 0.87 (0.48–1.57); p = 0.6405

OAHAS: Obstructive apnoea-hypopnea syndrome

aBinary logistic regression adjusted by age and FEV1% to identify comorbidities potentially associated with the lack of control of COPD

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Prevalence of individualized comorbidities according to COPD clinical control criteria. Values are represented as percentage and number of patients

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

COPD comorbidome. Binary logistic regression adjusted by age and FEV1% to identify comorbidities potentially associated with the lack of control of COPD. The size of the circles represents the prevalence of individualized diseases, while the distance to the centre represents the odds ratio for diseases and COPD control (the closer the disease is to the center of the figure, the more negative it is for COPD control). The central black circle (center) represents the lack of control of COPD. Green circles: cardiovascular diseases. Yellow circles: metabolic diseases. Blue circles: psychologic disorders. Orange circles: other diseases. Grey circle: dementia. A.O.: abdominal obesity. CVD: cerebrovascular diseases. H.F.: heart failure. aPVD: arterial periferic vascular disease. A.F.: atrial fibrillation. DEP: depression. ANX: anxiety. OST: osteoporosis. GER: gastroesophageal reflux. AN: anaemia. OAHAS: obstructive apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome. D.M.: diabetes mellitus: D.M.*: diabetes mellitus with organ damage. D: dementia

The most relevant metabolic comorbidities in the adjusted analysis were diabetes with organic damage (OR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.5–3.6), diabetes without organic lesion (OR: 1.2; 95% CI: 1.0–1.44), abdominal obesity (OR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.2–1.7) and arterial hypertension (OR: 1.2; 95% CI: 1.1–1.4). Significant cardiovascular comorbidities were congestive heart failure (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.45–2.3), peripheral vascular disease (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.4–2.3) and chronic atrial fibrillation (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2–2.0). Regarding psychological disorders, both depression (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.7–2.8) and anxiety (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.7–2.5) were also associated with a lack of COPD control. Other significant comorbidities related with COPD control were non-ferropenic anemia (OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1–2.6), osteoporosis (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2–2.1) and obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.3–1.9) (Tables 2 and 3; Fig. 2).

According to CAT scores, the most significant differences were observed for congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, diabetes with and without organic lesion, iron-deficiency anemia and depression (eTable 1; Fig. 3). Several comorbidities were also related to a higher number of exacerbations within the last year (eTable 2; Fig. 3). The median number of chronic domiciliary treatments was increased in nearly all the comorbidities explored (eTable 3). The different inhaled treatments for COPD stratified according to the different comorbidities analyzed (included or not in the Charlson index) are detailed in the supplementary material. No differences were observed between the inhaled treatments and the different comorbidities, except for asthma, in which, as expected, there is less use of LABA+LAMA and more treatments with LABA+ICS and triple therapies (eTable 4 and eFigs. 1 and 2). Finally, scores in BODEX and CODEX indexes were higher in patients with uncontrolled COPD (eTable 5).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Median CAT scores (A) and number of exacerbations in the previous year (B) in individualized comorbidities

Discussion

Our study confirms the high prevalence of comorbidities in patients with severe COPD and their impact on clinical control criteria, measured by CAT scores and history of previous exacerbations. This finding is relevant since it suggests that, at least in patients with advanced COPD, the concurrence of other chronic pathologies must be considered in the evaluation of clinical control criteria. Thus, two patients with the same respiratory condition can be classified as controlled or non-controlled depending on the presence of comorbidities. To our knowledge, this is the first study in which the relationship between detailed comorbidities and COPD clinical control criteria has been explored.

In the CHAIN cohort, in which changes in control status in 798 patients with COPD over long-term follow-up were described and the factors that were associated with longitudinal control patterns were analyzed, comorbidities assessed with the Charlson index were significantly associated with a lack of clinical control. However, the impact of individualized chronic diseases was not analyzed [8]. The mean values of the Charlson index in our study were higher than those reported in the CHAIN cohort, probably for the differences in mean age (69.6 vs 65.7 years) and severity of airway obstruction (mean FEV1%: 39 vs 60.2). Notably, mean CAT scores were also higher in our study (17.3 vs 12.6). On the contrary, no differences were observed in another study performed on 267 patients between the age-adjusted Charlson index and clinical control criteria [7, 15].

Nearly all patients with severe COPD had at least another concurrent chronic disease. Vanfleteren et al. identified in an observational study performed in a pulmonary rehabilitation program that 97.7% out of 213 patients had either one or more comorbidities, with 53.5% of them having at least four of these conditions [19]. These results are similar to those reported in a cohort of 606 COPD patients hospitalized by acute exacerbation [20]. Worthy of note, many of the most frequent comorbidities collected in these studies, such as arterial hypertension, psychologic disorders, arrhythmias, obesity or anemia, were not included in the Charlson index. Additionally, since concurrent chronic diseases in COPD are closely related to ageing and pulmonary function impairment, the impact of comorbidities in our study was analyzed after age and FEV1% had been adjusted.

Similarly, to previous publications, the most prevalent chronic diseases in our cohort are metabolic disorders such as arterial hypertension (51.2%), dyslipidemia (36.0%), diabetes (24.9%) and abdominal obesity (15.8%) [1820, 2629]. Their combination represent the metabolic syndrome, a strong predictor of the risk of cardiovascular events [30]. Metabolic syndrome is more frequent in COPD patients than in the general population. It is also related to higher levels of dyspnea, lower effort capacity measured as 6 minutes walking test (6MWD), higher CAT scores and more frequent exacerbations [3133]. In previous studies, all individual components of metabolic syndrome were more prevalent in COPD, even after their adjustment with age, gender or socioeconomic level [3437]. In our study, arterial hypertension, diabetes and abdominal obesity were negatively associated with clinical control criteria. Arterial hypertension and diabetes were previously associated with higher levels of dyspnea, and reduced 6MWD, while the relation between physical activity and abdominal obesity remained controversial [38].

Cardiovascular diseases are closely related to COPD. These conditions frequently concur in the same subjects, and their joint prevalence exceeds that expected for shared risk factors like smoking, ageing or low-grade systemic inflammation, among others [39]. The prevalence of heart failure is two-fold increased in COPD compared with the general population, although it varies largely among different design studies and analyzed populations [33, 40, 41]. In our study, 11.6% of the patients had a previous diagnosis of heart failure, with a two-fold adjusted risk for lack of clinical control criteria. This is not surprising since it is known that heart failure worsens the quality of life and increases the risk of exacerbations in COPD patients [25, 42, 43]. A similar prevalence and relation with non-controlled patients were observed for arterial peripheral vascular disease and chronic atrial fibrillation. Both disorders have been previously related to a lower quality of life and risk of exacerbations in COPD [4446].

Depression and anxiety disorders are two to three times more likely in people with chronic diseases, including COPD, than those without chronic physical conditions [47, 48]. Both diseases are related to worse scores in COPD quality of life questionnaires, including CAT, and to a higher risk of exacerbations [45, 46, 49, 50]. In our cohort, depression and anxiety prevalence reached figures of 11.8 and 14.1%, respectively, and are two-fold more frequent in uncontrolled patients. Non-ferropenic anemia, sleep disorders (OAHS) and gastroesophageal reflux were also more frequent in patients with non-controlled COPD criteria. All of them were previously related to HRQL and exacerbations in different cohorts [45, 46, 51].

Finally, the comorbidity with the most significant impact on the COPD clinical control was dementia, but its prevalence was very low. In our opinion, this was due to an unavoidable selection bias. Although the incidence of dementia increases in patients with COPD and is a strong predictor of impaired quality of life, patients with moderate-severe dementia are usually unable to perform a quality spirometry, so they were excluded in our study because the obstruction criteria could not be demonstrated [52].

Our study had several limitations. Firstly, it was a cross-sectional study performed in a single country, although the sample size was considerably larger than that of previous publications about COPD clinical control criteria. Secondly, chronic diseases were collected according to clinical history and physical examination, and therefore several disorders, especially the less severe ones, could be underdiagnosed. Nevertheless, comorbidities were collected in a prospective form using validated questionnaires, and their prevalence was similar to the ones reported in previous cohorts. Thirdly, our study focused on patients with severe airflow obstruction, so our results might be different in other populations.

Interpretation

In conclusion, our data confirm the relevance of several comorbidities in COPD clinical control criteria, supporting the notion that these conditions should be carefully evaluated in future studies. Our study warrants the need for prospective studies about the treatment impact of these chronic diseases on COPD control.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1. (155.9KB, docx)
Additional file 2. (18.4KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

The authors of this study would like to thank ADKNOMA for the editorial support. Investigators in the CLAVE study are listed in the Additional file 2.

Notation of prior abstract publication/presentation

None.

Abbreviations

CAT

COPD assessment test

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

FEV1

Forced expiratory volume in the first second

FVC

Forced vital capacity

GOLD

Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease

HRQL

Health-Related Quality of Life

mMRC

Modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale

OAHAS

Obstructive apnoea-hypopnea syndrome

FEV1%

Predicted postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in the first second

6MWD

6-minute walk distance

Authors’ contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; took part in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreed to submit to the current journal; gave final approval of the version to be published; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

The study described within the paper was sponsored by Chiesi España SAU.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (Spain), and procedures were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardian(s).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Pere Almagro declares he has received speaking or advisory fees, or economic aid to attend congresses from Astra-Zeneca, GSK, Novartis, Chiesi, Menarini, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Ferrer, and Rovi. Borja G Cosío declares he has received speaking or advisory fees, or economic aid to attend congresses from Astra-Zeneca, GSK, Novartis, Chiesi, Mundipharma, Menarini, Sanofi, TEVA, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Rovi. He also reports non-financial support from Separ. Juan José Soler-Cataluña has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Bial, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GSK, Menarini, and consulting fees from Bial, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi and GSK. Diego González-Segura is an employee of Chiesi España SAU, the sponsor of the study. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.GOLD Reports, editor. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. GOLD; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Adeloye D, Chua S, Lee C, et al. Global and regional estimates of COPD prevalence: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2015;5(2) 10.7189/JOGH.05-020415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.GBD 2015 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1459–1544. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31012-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Celli BR, Wedzicha JA. Update on clinical aspects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(13):1257–1266. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1900500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Soler-Cataluña JJ, Piñera P, Trigueros JA, et al. Spanish COPD guidelines (GesEPOC) 2021 update. Diagnosis and treatment of COPD exacerbation syndrome. Arch Bronconeumol. 2022;58(2):T159–T170. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2021.05.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Soler-Cataluña JJ, Almagro P, Huerta A, et al. Clinical control criteria to determine disease control in patients with severe COPD: the CLAVE study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021;16:137–146. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S285385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Miravitlles M, Sliwinski P, Rhee CK, et al. Predictive value of control of COPD for risk of exacerbations: an international, prospective study. Respirol. 2020;25(11):1136–1143. doi: 10.1111/resp.13811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Calle Rubio M, Rodriguez Hermosa JL, de Torres JP, et al. COPD clinical control: predictors and long-term follow-up of the CHAIN cohort. Respir Res. 2021;22(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01633-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Soler-Cataluña JJ, Marzo M, Catalán P, Miralles C, Alcazar B, Miravitlles M. Validation of clinical control in COPD as a new tool for optimizing treatment. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018;13:3719–3731. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S178149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Soler-Cataluña JJ, Alcázar B, Marzo M, Pérez J, Miravitlles M. Evaluation of changes in control status in COPD: an opportunity for early intervention. Chest. 2020;157(5):1138–1146. doi: 10.1016/J.CHEST.2019.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Casanova C, Marin JM, Martinez-Gonzalez C, et al. New GOLD classification: longitudinal data on group assignment. Respir Res. 2014;15:3. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-15-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Karloh M, Mayer AF, Maurici R, Pizzichini MMM, Jones PW, Pizzichini E. The COPD assessment test: what do we know so far?: a systematic review and meta-analysis about clinical outcomes prediction and classification of patients into GOLD stages. Chest. 2016;149(2):413–425. doi: 10.1378/CHEST.15-1752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sadatsafavi M, McCormack J, Petkau J, Lynd LD, Lee TY, Sin DD. Should the number of acute exacerbations in the previous year be used to guide treatments in COPD? Eur Respir J. 2021;57(2) 10.1183/13993003.02122-2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Nibber A, Chisholm A, Soler-Cataluña JJ, Alcazar B, Price D, Miravitlles M. Validating the concept of COPD control: a real-world cohort study from the United Kingdom. COPD. 2017;14(5):504–512. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2017.1350154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Miravitlles M, Sliwinski P, Rhee CK, et al. Changes in control status of COPD over time and their consequences: a prospective international study. Arch Bronconeumol. 2021;57(2) 10.1016/J.ARBRES.2020.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.Burke H, Wilkinson TMA. Unravelling the mechanisms driving multimorbidity in COPD to develop holistic approaches to patient-centred care. Eur Respir Rev. 2021;30(160) 10.1183/16000617.0041-2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Hughes LD, McMurdo MET, Guthrie B. Guidelines for people not for diseases: the challenges of applying U.K. clinical guidelines to people with multimorbidity. Age Ageing. 2013;42(1):62–69. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Smith MC, Wrobel JP. Epidemiology and clinical impact of major comorbidities in patients with COPD. Int J COPD. 2014;9:871–888. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S49621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vanfleteren LEGWGW, Spruit MA, Groenen M, et al. Clusters of comorbidities based on validated objective measurements and systemic inflammation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187(7):728–735. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201209-1665OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Almagro P, Cabrera FJ, Diez J, et al. Comorbidities and short-term prognosis in patients hospitalized for acute exacerbation of COPD: the EPOC en servicios de medicina interna (ESMI) study. Chest. 2012;142(5):1126–1133. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Divo MJ, Celli BR, Poblador-Plou B, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as a disease of early aging: evidence from the EpiChron cohort. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0193143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fabbri LM, Luppi F, Beghé B, Rabe KF. Complex chronic comorbidities of COPD. Eur Respir J. 2008;31(1):204–212. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00114307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jones PW, Harding G, Berry P, Wiklund I, Chen WH, Kline LN. Development and first validation of the COPD assessment test. Eur Respir J. 2009;34(3):648–654. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00102509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Almagro P, Cabrera FJ, Diez J, et al. Comorbidities and short-term prognosis in patients hospitalized for acute exacerbation of COPD. Chest. 2012;142(5):1126–1133. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Raherison C, Ouaalaya EH, Bernady A, et al. Comorbidities and COPD severity in a clinic-based cohort. BMC Pulm Med. 2018;18(1) 10.1186/S12890-018-0684-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 27.Hansen NS, Ängquist L, Lange P, Jacobsen R. Comorbidity clusters and healthcare use in individuals with COPD. Respir Care. 2020;65(8):1120–1127. doi: 10.4187/RESPCARE.07136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Divo M, Cote C, De Torres JP, et al. Comorbidities and risk of mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(2):155–161. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201201-0034OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pelaia C, Pastori D, Armentaro G, et al. Predictors of renal function worsening in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a multicenter observational study. Nutrients. 2021;13(8):2811. doi: 10.3390/nu13082811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mottillo S, Filion KB, Genest J, et al. The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(14):1113–1132. doi: 10.1016/J.JACC.2010.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Després JP, Lemieux I. Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2006;444(7121):881–887. doi: 10.1038/NATURE05488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cebron Lipovec N, Beijers RJHCG, van den Borst B, Doehner W, Lainscak M, Schols AMWJ. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review. COPD. 2016;13(3):399–406. doi: 10.3109/15412555.2016.1140732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Diez-Manglano J, Barquero-Romero J, Almagro P, et al. COPD patients with and without metabolic syndrome: clinical and functional differences. Intern Emerg Med. 2014;9(4):419–425. doi: 10.1007/s11739-013-0945-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chen W, Thomas J, Sadatsafavi M, FitzGerald JM. Risk of cardiovascular comorbidity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(8):631–639. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00241-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yin HL, Yin SQ, Lin QY, Xu Y, Xu HW, Liu T. Prevalence of comorbidities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Med. 2017;96(19):e6836. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim SH, Park JH, Lee JK, Heo EY, Kim DK, Chung HS. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is independently associated with hypertension in men: a survey design analysis using nationwide survey data. Med. 2017;96(19):e6826. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mannino DM, Thorn D, Swensen A, Holguin F. Prevalence and outcomes of diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular disease in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2008;32(4):962–969. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00012408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Miller J, Edwards LD, Agustí A, et al. Comorbidity, systemic inflammation and outcomes in the ECLIPSE cohort. Respir Med. 2013;107(9):1376–1384. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Almagro P, Boixeda R, Diez-Manglano J, Gómez-Antúnez M, López-García F, Recio J. Insights into chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as critical risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Int J COPD. 2020;15:755–764. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S238214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Müllerova H, Agusti A, Erqou S, Mapel DW. Cardiovascular comorbidity in COPD: systematic literature review. Chest. 2013;144(4):1163–1178. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Armentaro G, Pelaia C, Cassano V, et al. Association between right ventricular dysfunction and adverse cardiac events in mild COPD patients. Eur J Clin Investig. 2023;53(2):e13887. doi: 10.1111/eci.13887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lee H, Jhun BW, Cho J, et al. Different impacts of respiratory symptoms and comorbidities on COPD-specific health-related quality of life by COPD severity. Int J COPD. 2017;12:3301–3310. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S145910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Axson EL, Bottle A, Cowie MR, Quint JK. Relationship between heart failure and the risk of acute exacerbation of COPD. Thorax. 2021;76(8):807–814. doi: 10.1136/THORAXJNL-2020-216390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Houben-Wilke S, Jörres RA, Bals R, et al. Peripheral artery disease and its clinical relevance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the COPD and systemic consequences–comorbidities network study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(2):189–197. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201602-0354OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Miyazaki M, Nakamura H, Chubachi S, et al. Analysis of comorbid factors that increase the COPD assessment test scores. Respir Res. 2014;15(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-15-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wacker ME, Jörres RA, Karch A, et al. Assessing health-related quality of life in COPD: comparing generic and disease-specific instruments with focus on comorbidities. BMC Pulm Med. 2016;16(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/S12890-016-0238-9/TABLES/4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Read JR, Sharpe L, Modini M, Dear BF. Multimorbidity and depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2017;221:36–46. doi: 10.1016/J.JAD.2017.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Clarke DM, Currie KC. Depression, anxiety and their relationship with chronic diseases: a review of the epidemiology, risk and treatment evidence. Med J Aust. 2009;190(S7) 10.5694/J.1326-5377.2009.TB02471.X. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 49.Gudmundsson G, Gislason T, Janson C, et al. Risk factors for rehospitalization in COPD: role of health status, anxiety and depression. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(3):414–419. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00078504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Xu W, Collet JP, Shapiro S, et al. Independent effect of depression and anxiety on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations and hospitalizations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(9):913–920. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200804-619OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Putcha N, Fawzy A, Paul GG, et al. Anemia and adverse outcomes in a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease population with a high burden of comorbidities an analysis from SPIROMICS. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15(6):710–717. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201708-687OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chang SS, Chen S, McAvay GJ, Tinetti ME. Effect of coexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cognitive impairment on health outcomes in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(10):1839–1846. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04171.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Additional file 1. (155.9KB, docx)
Additional file 2. (18.4KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).


Articles from BMC Pulmonary Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES