Abstract
Adipocytes are the primary sites for fatty acid storage, but the synthesis rate of fatty acids is very low. The physiological significance of this phenomenon remains unclear. Here, we show that surplus fatty acid synthesis in adipocytes induces necroptosis and lipodystrophy. Transcriptional activation of FASN elevates fatty acid synthesis, but decreases NADPH level and increases ROS production, which ultimately leads to adipocyte necroptosis. We identify MED20, a subunit of the Mediator complex, as a negative regulator of FASN transcription. Adipocyte-specific male Med20 knockout mice progressively develop lipodystrophy, which is reversed by scavenging ROS. Further, in a murine model of HIV-associated lipodystrophy and a human patient with acquired lipodystrophy, ROS neutralization significantly improves metabolic disorders, indicating a causal role of ROS in disease onset. Our study well explains the low fatty acid synthesis rate in adipocytes, and sheds light on the management of acquired lipodystrophy.
Subject terms: Metabolic diseases, Fat metabolism, Metabolic syndrome
The physiological significance of low fatty acid synthesis in adipocytes remains unclear. Here, the authors show a protective role of this phenomenon by demonstrating that overproduction of fatty acids increases ROS production and results in adipocyte necroptosis and lipodystrophy.
Introduction
Adipose tissue is the primary site for lipid storage and an important endocrine organ. It plays a pivotal role in maintaining the whole-body metabolic homeostasis1. Despite that adipose tissue stores large amounts of fatty acids, it has been well appreciated that adipose tissue itself does not synthesize much fatty acids2–4. The majority of the stored fatty acids are from dietary fat or made by the liver. However, the physiological significance of the low de novo fatty acid synthesis rate in adipocytes remains unclear.
Excessive adipose tissue in obesity is closely associated with insulin resistance, fatty liver and dyslipidemia5, whilst lack of functional adipose tissue causes a pathological condition called lipodystrophy, characterized by similar metabolic disorders6. Lipodystrophies are rare heterogeneous disorders that are inherited or acquired7,8. While inherited lipodystrophies are largely due to genetic mutations9,10, the causes of acquired lipodystrophies are more diverse11. The most prevalent form of acquired lipodystrophy occurs in HIV patients who underwent highly active antiretroviral therapy9. Other forms of acquired lipodystrophies are poorly diagnosed or studied. Due to the heterogenous nature of the disease, current treatment options are mainly aiming at the metabolic complications and have variable efficacy9. It is in urgent need to understand the underlying mechanism of acquired lipodystrophy and to develop more effective management strategies.
Oxidative stress is an essential factor in the pathogenesis of many diseases12. High level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) impairs adipogenesis, induces insulin resistance and adipocyte hypertrophy, and causes metabolic disorders including type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases13,14. Increased oxidative stress in adipocytes has also been observed in inherited or acquired lipodystrophies15–17, but the causal relationship between them remains unclear.
Here, to explore the physiological significance of the low de novo fatty acid synthesis rate in adipocytes, we activated the transcription of fatty acid synthase (FASN) in adipocytes by the CRISPR-based activation system. The de novo fatty acid synthesis rate indeed increased, but the adipocytes died of necroptosis due to increased ROS production. We identified MED20, a subunit of the Mediator complex, as a suppressor of Fasn transcription. We showed that knocking out Med20 in adipocytes induced lipodystrophy in mice, which was largely reversed by either scavenging ROS or inhibiting necroptosis. Furthermore, in a mouse model of HIV-associated lipodystrophy and in a human patient with acquired lipodystrophy, we demonstrated that increased ROS in adipocytes might be a driving force for acquired lipodystrophy. Taken together, our studies uncovered the physiological significance of the low fatty acid synthesis rate in adipocytes, and shed lights on the management of acquired lipodystrophy.
Results
Transcriptional activation of FASN in adipocytes leads to necroptosis
To address the physiological significance of the low fatty acid synthesis rate in adipocytes, we first examined the effect of artificially elevating fatty acid synthesis by overexpression of FASN in adipocytes. As the Fasn gene is fairly long (~7.5 kb) and hard to manipulate, we used the CRISPR-based activation system18 to activate the endogenous transcription of Fasn (Fig. 1a). We obtained 3T3-L1 cells which showed a 2-fold increase in the mRNA and protein levels of FASN (Fig. 1b–d). We then differentiated the cells into adipocytes and treated them with uniformly 13C-labeled glucose to evaluate de novo fatty acid synthesis (Fig. 1e). On the day of experiment, the control and FASN-overexpressing adipocytes did not show visible difference. As expected, overexpression of FASN caused increased incorporation of 13C into myristate (C14:0), palmitate (C16:0), palmitoleate (C16:1) and stearate (C18:0) (Fig. 1f). A close examination of 13C incorporation into myristate and palmitate further illustrated the results (Fig. 1g and Supplementary Fig. 1a).
We went on to monitor the effect of excessive fatty acid synthesis on the morphology and survival of the adipocytes. On day 6 of differentiation, there was no visible difference between control and FASN-overexpressing adipocytes; however, on day 15, there was a 45% decrease in the cell number of the FASN-overexpressing adipocytes, as illustrated by the empty areas in the culture dish and increased LDH release into the culture medium (Fig. 1h–j). Consistent with increased fatty acid synthesis, the surviving FASN-overexpressing adipocytes had a significantly higher percentage of big lipid droplets than control cells (Fig. 1k).
To confirm the results and rule out the off-target effect of the guide RNA of Fasn, we treated FASN-overexpressing adipocytes with an inhibitor of FASN, C75. As shown in Extended Data Fig. 1b–d, C75 treatment largely prevented cell death of FASN-overexpressing adipocytes and decreased the size of lipid droplets, confirming that overproduction of fatty acids causes cell death of the adipocytes.
We next sought to identify the type of cell death in FASN-overexpressing adipocytes by treating with different types of cell death inhibitors. The RIPK1 inhibitor NEC-1, but not the caspase inhibitor ZVAD or the ferroptosis inhibitor LIP-1, largely prevented cell death of FASN-overexpressing adipocytes (Fig. 1l–n), suggesting that the cells might die of necroptosis. To further strengthen the point, we checked the phosphorylated and total levels of necroptosis marker proteins, RIPK1, RIPK3 and MLKL19,20. The phosphorylated forms of RIPK1 (1.4-fold), RIPK3 (2.6-fold) and MLKL (3.3-fold) all significantly increased in FASN-overexpressing adipocytes (Fig. 1o; Supplementary Fig. 1e).
Taken together, accelerated de novo fatty acid synthesis causes necroptosis of adipocytes.
Increased ROS production drives necroptosis of FASN-overexpressing adipocytes
Next, we went on to identify the underlying mechanism of the necroptosis of FASN-overexpressing adipocytes. De novo fatty acid synthesis weighs heavily on the reducing agent NADPH. For each round of elongation (two carbons), it requires 2 molecules of NADPH. We therefore hypothesized that accelerated de novo fatty acid synthesis might decrease the cellular pool of NADPH, which could subsequently increase ROS production and cause cell death.
As fatty acid synthesis occurs in the cytosol, we monitored the cytosolic content of NADPH using the genetically encoded fluorescent iNAP sensor21,22. Figure 2a, b show that the NADPH level decreased by about 30% in FASN-overexpressing adipocytes. We also used a HYPER sensor23 to monitor cellular content of H2O2, the major form of ROS. Figure 2c, d show that the H2O2 level increased about 2.3-fold in FASN-overexpressing adipocytes. To further confirm the results, we used CellROX, a specific fluorescent dye for ROS24, to quantify the cellular ROS levels. Figure 2e, f show that the cellular ROS increased about 3.8-fold in FASN-overexpressing adipocytes. Thus, surplus synthesis of fatty acids indeed decreases NADPH level and increases ROS production.
To explore whether increased ROS production was the driving force of the cell death of FASN-overexpressing adipocytes, we treated the adipocytes with ROS scavenging reagents, BHA and GSH. As shown in Fig. 2g, h, both reagents could largely reverse the necroptosis of FASN-overexpressing adipocytes.
Taken together, overproduction of fatty acids causes necroptosis of the adipocytes by increasing ROS production.
MED20 inhibits the transcription of Fasn through SNAIL and SLUG
We next sought to investigate the upstream regulators of Fasn transcription in adipocytes. In hepatocytes, SNAIL and SLUG have been reported to regulate the transcription of Fasn25,26. To examine whether SNAIL and SLUG might also control the transcription of Fasn in adipocytes, we knocked down either one or both of them. As shown in Fig. 3a, knockdown of either of them increased the mRNA level of Fasn. Furthermore, cell death of adipocytes was induced by knockdown of either SNAIL or SLUG, which was worsened by double knockdown of them (Fig. 3b, c; Supplementary Fig. 2a). In addition, it was necroptotic cell death induced by SNAIL and SLUG double knockdown in adipocytes, as it could be rescued by NEC-1 (Supplementary Fig. 2b–d). Furthermore, scavenging ROS with GSH also largely reversed cell death (Fig. 3d, e; Supplementary Fig. 2e). Thus, SNAIL and SLUG are required for the survival of the adipocytes by inhibiting the transcription of Fasn.
We went on to identify the upstream regulators of SNAIL and SLUG. In preadipocytes, we have previously identified MED20, a non-essential subunit of the Mediator complex, as a key regulator of adipogenesis27. MED20 directly binds C/EBPβ and controls the transcription of the central regulator of adipogenesis, PPARγ and C/EBPα27. We re-visited the chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-Seq) data performed in 3T3-L1 cells27, and found that MED20 bound on the promoter regions of Snai1 and Snai2 (Fig. 3f), which encode SNAIL and SLUG, respectively. Furthermore, knockdown of MED20 dramatically decreased the binding of RNA polymerase II on the promoters of Snai1 and Snai2 (Supplementary Fig. 2f). These results suggest that MED20 might be an upstream regulator of SNAIL and SLUG.
We went on to explore whether MED20 would control the transcription of Fasn through SNAIL and SLUG. We isolated primary stromal vascular fractions (SVFs) from Rosa-CreERT2;Med20f/f mice, differentiated them into adipocytes, and induced deletion of Med20 with 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT). As revealed by RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq), knockout of Med20 decreased the transcription of Snai1 and Snai2, but increased the transcription of Fasn, as well as Acly and Acc1, two other genes involved in de novo fatty acid synthesis (Fig. 3g). We further validated the results by qRT-PCR and western blot analysis (Fig. 3h; Supplementary Fig. 2g, h).
We next examined the effect of MED20 on fatty acid synthesis and survival of the adipocytes. We performed 13C-glucose labeling and found that Med20-depleted adipocytes showed a 2- to 3-fold increase in the newly synthesized C16:0, C16:1, C18:0 and C18:1 (Fig. 3i; Supplementary Fig. 2i, j). As indicated by CellROX and DCFDA, ROS production was also increased in Med20-depleted adipocytes, which was largely reversed by inhibiting FASN with C75 (Fig. 3j; Supplementary Fig. 2k). Similar to FASN overexpression or knockdown of SNAIL and SLUG, depletion of Med20 caused cell death of the adipocytes, and it could be largely reversed by inhibiting FASN with C75, scavenging ROS with BHA or GSH, or inhibiting necroptosis with NEC-1 (Fig. 3k, l). We also detected the marker proteins of necroptosis and found that there was a dramatic increase in p-MLKL (2.1-fold), p-RIPK1 (1.9-fold) and p-RIPK3 (3.9-fold) in Med20-depleted adipocytes (Supplementary Fig. 2l, m). The data further confirmed that knocking out Med20 caused necroptosis of the adipocytes.
Taken together, MED20 is essential for the survival of adipocytes by inhibiting the transcription of Fasn via two transcriptional suppressors SNAIL and SLUG (Fig. 3m).
Adipocyte-specific knockout of Med20 triggers progressive lipodystrophy
We then sought to study the physiological significance of overproducing fatty acids in adipocytes. We generated adipocyte-specific Med20 knockout (Med20-AKO) mice by crossing Med20f/f mice with AdipoQ-Cre mice (Fig. 4a; Supplementary Fig. 3a). After 17 weeks on chow diet, Med20-AKO mice did not differ from control littermates in body weights (Fig. 4b); however, when subjected to glucose tolerance test and insulin tolerance test, Med20-AKO mice showed slower glucose clearance ability and were insulin resistant (Fig. 4c, d). Body composition analysis revealed that the fat mass in Med20-AKO mice (2.5 ± 0.1% of body weight) was significantly lower than that in control mice (7.6 ± 0.5% of body weight) (Fig. 4e). When dissected, the inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT), gonadal WAT (gWAT) and brown adipose tissue (BAT) weighed significantly lighter and appeared smaller in Med20-AKO mice (Fig. 4f, g). In contrast, the liver of Med20-AKO mice weighed heavier and looked bigger than that in controls (Fig. 4f, g). Consistently, there was a 3-fold increase in liver triglyceride content in Med20-AKO mice (Fig. 4h; Supplementary Fig. 3b). Plasma levels of triglyceride and insulin were also significantly higher in Med20-AKO mice (Fig. 4h, i). As a reflection of reduced fat mass, plasma leptin level was reduced in Med20-AKO mice (Fig. 4i). These phenotypes mimicked the features of lipodystrophy.
We also took a close examination of the adipose tissues by H&E staining. In iWAT, gWAT and BAT of Med20-AKO mice, the number of adipocytes dramatically decreased, but the remaining adipocytes were much bigger than those in the control mice (Fig. 4j). Both mRNA and protein levels of de novo fatty acid synthesis genes were significantly higher in the iWAT of Med20-AKO mice (Supplementary Fig. 3d–f). There were also areas with clusters of nuclei in all the three types of adipose tissues of Med20-AKO mice (Fig. 4j), suggesting macrophage infiltration. To prove the point, we performed immunostaining using anti-Perilipin1 to indicate lipid droplet, and anti-Galectin3 to indicate macrophages. Indeed, large amounts of macrophages were observed in the adipose tissues of Med20-AKO mice (Fig. 4j). Consistently, the mRNA levels of the macrophage markers, F4/80, CD11c, IL-6 and IL-1β, were significantly upregulated in iWAT and gWAT of Med20-AKO mice (Supplementary Fig. 3c).
To further confirm that the adipocytes in Med20-AKO mice died of necroptosis, we performed immunohistochemistry using the p-MLKL antibody. As shown in Fig. 4k, the p-MLKL signal was much stronger in the iWAT and BAT of Med20-AKO mice compared with those of Mde20f/f mice.
We have previously shown that knockout of Med20 in the preadipocytes inhibits adipogenesis27. As defect in adipogenesis can cause lipodystrophy6, one could argue that the AdipoQ-Cre might delete Med20 in the preadipocytes, although it has been shown that the AdipoQ-Cre is highly specific to mature adipocytes and cannot induce gene deletion in preadipocytes28,29. To clarify the point, we isolated primary SVFs, and found that the protein level of MED20 in the preadipocytes of Med20-AKO mice did not differ from that of control mice (Supplementary Fig. 3g, h). However, after 9 days of differentiation, the protein level of MED20 was dramatically decreased in Med20-AKO adipocytes (Supplementary Fig. 3g, h). Thus, the adipoQ-Cre did not delete Med20 in preadipocytes, but in adipocytes. Furthermore, on day 9 of differentiation, the Med20-AKO cells fully differentiated into mature adipocytes (Supplementary Fig. 3i–k), and the marker proteins of mature adipocytes, C/EBPα, PPARγ and Perilipin1, did not show any difference between control and Med20-AKO adipocytes (Supplementary Fig. 3g, h). On day 12 of differentiation, we noticed cell death of adipocytes from Med20-AKO mice. By day 15 and day 18, the majority of the Med20-deficient adipocytes died, while the control adipocytes survived well (Supplementary Fig. 3i–k). From these above, we conclude that the lipodystrophy of the Med20-AKO mice is not due to the deletion of Med20 in preadipocytes.
To figure out when Med20-AKO mice started to develop lipodystrophy, we examined the mice at different ages. At 2 and 4 weeks old, the Med20-AKO mice did not show significant differences with their control littermates (Supplementary Fig. 4a–f). At 5 weeks old, the BAT of Med20-AKO mice started to weigh significantly less than that in control mice (Supplementary Fig. 4a). As revealed by H&E analysis, enlarged adipocytes and signs of inflammation started to show up in the BAT of Med20-AKO mice from 5 weeks old (Supplementary Fig. 4g). Starting from 7 weeks old, similar observations were made in the iWAT and gWAT of Med20-AKO mice (Supplementary Fig. 4b, c; h, i). Consistent with the decreased mass of WAT, plasma leptin levels in Med20-AKO mice started to be significantly lower from 7 weeks old (Supplementary Fig. 4d). Starting from 9 weeks old, the liver of Med20-AKO mice weighed heavier, and contained more triglycerides (Supplementary Fig. 4e, f and j), indicating ectopic lipid storage.
Taken together, adipocyte-specific knockout of Med20 induces progressive lipodystrophy in mice.
Scavenging ROS or inhibiting necroptosis largely reverses lipodystrophy in Med20-AKO mice
To further consolidate the results, we next sought to examine whether we could rescue the lipodystrophic phenotype by scavenging ROS or inhibiting necroptosis. We first treated 6-week-old Med20-AKO mice with a daily gavage of BHA for 8 weeks (Fig. 5a). Figure 5b shows that BHA treatment did not have much effect on body weights (Fig. 5b); however, it significantly improved glucose clearance rate and insulin sensitivity of Med20-AKO mice (Fig. 5c, d). Body composition analysis revealed that BHA treatment significantly increased the fat mass of Med20-AKO mice (Fig. 5e), which was further illustrated by the increased sizes of iWAT and gWAT (Fig. 5f). Furthermore, the elevated levels of plasma and liver triglyceride in Med20-AKO mice were also largely normalized by BHA treatment (Fig. 5g). We also noticed an increase in plasma H2O2 level in Med20-AKO mice, which was brought down to normal by BHA treatment (Fig. 5h). H&E and immunofluorescence analysis revealed that BHA treatment dramatically reduced macrophage infiltration in iWAT (Fig. 5i). Overall, scavenging ROS largely reverses the lipodystrophy in Med20-AKO mice (Fig. 5j).
We then explored whether we could rescue the lipodystrophy in Med20-AKO mice by inhibiting necroptosis with NEC-1 (Supplementary Fig. 5a). Similar to BHA, NEC-1 treatment significantly improved the metabolic disorders in Med20-AKO mice and largely reversed the lipodystrophy (Supplementary Fig. 5b–i).
These studies further indicate that scavenging ROS or inhibiting necroptosis can rescue the lipodystrophy in Med20-AKO mice.
Scavenging ROS reverses stavudine-induced partial lipodystrophy
We then sought to investigate whether the mechanism we identified could be applied to other forms of acquired lipodystrophies. HIV-infected patients with highly active antiretroviral therapy tend to develop partial lipodystrophy, characterized by selective loss of subcutaneous fat9. Nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are responsible for the most severe form of HIV-associated lipodystrophies30. NRTIs are shown to cause mitochondrial dysfunction and increase oxidative stress in adipocytes31. Patients with HIV-associated lipodystrophy have higher levels of lipid and protein oxidation in the plasma15. However, it remains unclear whether increased ROS production is a cause or consequence of HIV-associated lipodystrophy.
To address the issue, we treated adipocytes with stavudine, an NRTI that is still used as a first-line treatment under settings of limited resource. We found that stavudine treatment caused cell death of adipocytes and increased ROS production (Fig. 6a–c; Supplementary Fig. 6a, b). Furthermore, GSH treatment largely rescued stavudine-induced cell death (Fig. 6a–c; Supplementary Fig. 6a, b). We noticed that stavudine did not have much effect on the expression of de novo fatty acid synthesis genes (Supplementary Fig. 6c), suggesting that stavudine might increase ROS production through other mechanisms. We also confirmed that stavudine-induced cell death is necroptosis, as NEC-1, but not ZVAD or LIP-A, rescued the cell death (Supplementary Fig. 6d–f).
To further validate the above results, we generated a mouse model to mimic HIV-associated lipodystrophy by treating HFD-fed mice with stavudine for 9 weeks (Fig. 6d). Although having no effect on body weights (Supplementary Fig. 6g), stavudine treatment significantly impaired glucose clearance and insulin sensitivity of the lipodystrophy mice, which was largely reversed by daily treatment with GSH (Fig. 6e, f). At the end of the experiment, stavudine-treated mice showed selective loss of iWAT (Fig. 6g, h; Supplementary Fig. 6h), similar to that in patients with HIV-associated partial lipodystrophy30. GSH treatment largely restored the fat mass of iWAT (Fig. 6g, h). A further examination by H&E and immunostaining revealed that stavudine-treated mice showed increased adipocyte size and macrophage infiltration in iWAT, which could be largely reversed by GSH treatment (Fig. 6i). Stavudine also caused an increase in liver triglyceride content and plasma H2O2 level, which was also normalized by GSH treatment (Fig. 6j, k; Supplementary Fig. 6i).
These results indicate that increased ROS production in adipocytes is the major cause of lipodystrophy in stavudine treated HIV patients, and that scavenging ROS with glutathione might be a potential therapeutic strategy to reverse the side effect of the NRTIs in HIV-infected patients (Fig. 6l).
Glutathione treatment improves metabolic disorders in a patient with acquired lipodystrophy
We moved on to examine whether increased ROS production might also drive the onset of other forms of acquired lipodystrophy. We admitted a 48-year-old female patient with lipodystrophy to the hospital in August, 2020. She had a normal BMI (20.5 kg/m2), but looked very skinny and muscular (Fig. 7a). Body composition analysis showed that her fat mass index (FMI) was 2.43 kg/m2, way below the normal range (5-9 kg/m2). Her fasting blood glucose was 6.31 mM, and HOMA-IR was 2.09. She also had hypertriglyceridemia (2.76 mM). From a fribroscan analysis (CAP, 305) and liver biopsy, she was diagnosed with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b). According to the patient, she started to notice loss of subcutaneous fat in 2015. The patient did not have a family history of metabolic disorders. We performed whole-genome exon sequencing of the patient, her brother and parents, but did not find any novel mutations that might lead to lipodystrophy (Supplementary Fig. 7c). From all these above, the patient was diagnosed with acquired generalized lipodystrophy.
The patient was on different medications from August 2020 to November 2021. Her plasma triglyceride level was well controlled, decreasing from 2.76 to 1.76 mM. Her CAP score dropped to 263 dB/m (Supplementary Table 2), but it was still at a high level, steatosis grade 2, reflecting that 34-66% of her hepatocytes contain fat vacuoles. Her ALT and AST values were 70.4 U/L and 43 U/L, respectively (Supplementary Table 2), indicating liver damage.
Of note, the patient runs a hair salon where she is constantly exposed to oxidants in hair dye materials. We therefore reasoned that increased oxidative stress might be the potential cause of her acquired lipodystrophy. Indeed, her plasma H2O2 level was higher than normal (Fig. 7b). Based on the liver dysfunction, which was proven by liver biopsy and biochemical tests, we further added GSH (0.4 g, tid) on top of her previous prescription and evaluated her conditions 6 months later. Figure 7b shows that her plasma H2O2 level fell to the normal range after GSH treatment. Her body weight increased from 52.4 to 53.25 kg (Supplementary Table 2). Her total body fat and fat mass index also increased (Fig. 7c), which was further confirmed by the increase in the subcutaneous fat (Fig. 7d). Fibroscan analysis revealed that her CAP score decreased from 263 to 240 (Fig. 7e), indicating an improvement in her fatty liver condition. MRI-PDFF analysis further confirmed that 6 of the 9 regions of her liver showed decreased fat fraction after GSH treatment (Fig. 7f, g). Furthermore, her plasma levels of ALT, AST and HbA1c dropped to normal ranges after GSH treatment (Fig. 7h, i). These results indicate that GSH treatment improves the metabolic disorders of the patient (Fig. 7j). Therefore, scavenging ROS might be a potential strategy to manage acquired generalized lipodystrophy.
Discussion
Despite that adipose tissue is the primary site for fatty acid storage, the majority of the stored fatty acids is not made by itself2,3. The physiological significance of such a phenomenon remains unclear. Here, we show that elevated de novo fatty acid synthesis increases ROS production and causes necroptosis in adipocytes. We first activated the transcription of FASN with the CRISPR-based activation system. Although the FASN-overexpressing cells synthesized more fatty acids, they showed decreased cellular content of NADPH and subsequently increased ROS production, which ultimately led to necroptosis of the adipocytes. We then identified MED20 as a negative regulator of endogenous transcription of FASN. Loss of MED20 in adipocytes significantly upregulated the mRNA levels of FASN and increased de novo fatty acid synthesis. MED20-deficient adipocytes died of increased ROS production, and Med20-AKO mice developed lipodystrophy. Consistent with our results, adipocyte-specific overexpression of SREBP-1c, a master regulator of lipid synthesis genes including Acly, Acc1 and Fasn, causes congenital lipodystrophy32. SREBP1c has also been suggested to play a key role in the pathogenesis of human lipodystrophies33. In addition, increased FASN expression in human adipose tissues is linked to insulin resistance and inflammation34. Therefore, it is reasonable to believe that the low de novo fatty acid synthesis rate in adipocytes is a protective strategy to avoid oxidative stress-induced cell death.
It should be noted that liver is the primary site for de novo fatty acid synthesis; however, the hepatocytes, unlike the adipocytes, are able to manage the ROS induced by de novo fatty acid synthesis. A possible explanation is that hepatocytes have the highest GSH content in the body, which can go up to 10 mM, whereas other cell types have a GSH concentration around 1-2 mM35–37. The high GSH content might help to manage the oxidative stress caused by high rates of de novo fatty acid synthesis.
We have also identified increased ROS production as a potential cause of acquired lipodystrophy. As lipodystrophy is a rare disease, little is known about the underlying mechanisms and the management strategies remains poor. Here, we found that Med20-AKO mice progressively developed lipodystrophy, which mimic the features of acquired generalized lipodystrophy and can be rescued by ROS scavenging. We generated another acquired lipodystrophy mouse model using stavudine and demonstrate that stavudine induces partial lipodystrophy through increasing ROS production. Importantly, in a patient with acquired lipodystrophy, we showed that supplementation of glutathione facilitated management of metabolic disorders.
In agreement with our findings, in a clinical study in HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy, 24-week treatment of vitamin E, a lipophilic antioxidant, significantly decreased levels of plasma alanine aminotransferase and cytokeratin 18, and CAP scores, indicating improved NASH38. It should be noted that in obese people with NASH, vitamin E has been shown to be an effective treatment for patients without type 2 diabetes39, but not for those with type 2 diabetes40. As many lipodystrophic patients also develop type 2 diabetes, more clinical studies might be required to evaluate the therapeutic potential of vitamin E in treating HIV-associated lipodystrophies.
Notably, due to the rarity of acquired lipodystrophy, we only recruited one patient in the study. Thus, there might be some uncertainty to apply the observation in the current study to other patients with acquired lipodystrophy. However, based on the evidences we obtained from mouse studies and the metabolic benefits of anti-oxidant in HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy38, it is reasonable to deduce that increased oxidative stress might be a potential cause of acquired lipodystrophies. It is also promising that GSH might be a therapeutic treatment for patients with acquired lipodystrophy.
It has been well documented that long-term engagement in occupations involving regular exposure to oxidants would cause an increase in plasma ROS levels41. However, in the population-based epidemiological studies, BMI and other common biological metabolic evaluations are used, without providing a precise evaluation of body fat distribution; therefore, the association has not been established between long-term engagement in occupations involving regular exposure to oxidants and lipodystrophy. In the future, it will be interesting to investigate the causal-effect study about oxidants exposure and fat mass and adipocyte function in humans.
Our studies have also uncovered a new role of MED20 in regulating the physiological function of adipose tissues. Although MED20 is a common component of the Mediator complex, it has been shown to be a non-essential subunit of the Mediator complex42,43. We have previously shown that MED20 act as a functional bridge between C/EBPβ and RNA polymerase II to control the transcription of C/EBPα and PPARγ, thereby regulating adipogenesis27. Here, we show that MED20 controls the transcription of Snai1 and Snai2 to inhibit the transcription of Fasn. Taken together, we speculate that in different contexts, MED20 might interact with different transcription factors to control the transcription of downstream genes. Notably, a previous study reported a homozygous mutation in MED20 in human44. The mutation-bearing siblings were diagnosed with infantile-onset spasticity and childhood-onset dystonia, progressive basal ganglia degeneration and the brain atrophy44. It was not documented about whether the patients developed lipodystrophy, which would be interesting to know in the future.
Macrophages play a pivotal role in the homeostasis of adipose tissues45. In both WAT and BAT, we observed large amounts of macrophage infiltration and elevation of inflammatory markers in Med20-AKO mice. The inflammation was dramatically improved after treating the mice with ROS scavenging reagent or necroptosis inhibitors. Therefore, we speculate that the macrophages are recruited by the dead adipocytes. In addition to clean the dead adipocytes, the macrophages might also help to regenerate the adipose tissues46.
Interestingly, preventing necroptosis using NEC-1 also improves the lipodystrophy phenotype and comorbidities; however, inhibition of necroptosis will presumably not resolve the cellular ROS stress induced by MED20 deficiency. We noticed that the surviving adipocytes were much bigger in size and the inflammation markers were decreased in NEC-1-treated adipose tissues. Therefore, inhibition of necroptosis likely does not cause other types of cell death of the adipocytes, at least in the 8-week period of the experiment. Currently, we do not have a clear answer about how these adipocytes live with the ROS stress. Presumably, the adipocytes might develop a compensatory mechanism to resolve the ROS stress, or they might eventually die when the ROS levels accumulates to a certain level.
In summary, our findings uncover the physiological significance of the low fatty acid synthesis rate in adipocytes, identify a potential cause of acquired lipodystrophy and may provide an effective means for lipodystrophy management.
Methods
We obtained dexamethmasone, isobutylmethylxanthine (IBMX), pioglitazone, bovine insulin, 4-hydroxy tamoxifen (4-OHT), SDS, DTT, DMSO and Triton X-100 from Sigma-Aldrich; Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with low (1 g/L) or high (4.5 g/L) glucose, fetal and neonatal bovine serum, and puromycin from Thermo Fisher Scientific; protease inhibitor cocktail from Roche Applied Science; and all other chemicals from local suppliers unless otherwise specified. For knockdown of genes, a pLKO.1 vector (Addgene, 10878)47 was used. The primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Patient information
The patient was diagnosed with acquired lipodystrophy at the first affiliated hospital of Nanjing Medical University in August, 2020. She was on pioglitazone (30 mg, qd) from August to October in 2020, gliclazide (60 mg, qd) from October in 2020 to April in 2021, and switched to LANTUS insulin glargine injection (20 u, qn) from April to November in 2021. From November in 2021, on top of LANTUS insulin glargine injection (20 u, qn), she was on GSH (0.4 g, tid). GSH is a standard and widely used choice for treating liver dysfunction. The CAP and LSM scores were measured by fibroscan (Echosens Fibroscan PRO). The visceral and subcutaneous fat areas were measured by OMRON HDS-2000. Total body composition was analyzed by DXA (Hologic DXA Discovery). Fat content in different regions of the liver was analyzed by MRI-PDFF (Siemens magnetom vida). The observational study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Human Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (2019-SR-122). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Mice
All mice were housed in colony cages at 22oC with 12-h light/12-h dark cycles. The dark cycle began at 7 pm. All animal studies were performed with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee at Fudan University and Xiamen University. Mice were euthanized by isoflurane at the appropriate time during the study and tissue sample were removed for further experiments.
Med20f/f mice were previously generated by our laboratory27, and they were bred with an AdipoQ-Cre28 mice to generate adipocyte-specific Med20 knockout mice (Med20-AKO). Med20f/f mice were also crossed with Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(cre/ERT2)Tyj mice48 to generate inducible Med20 knockout mice, which was used for isolation of primary stromal vascular fractions.
The chow diet (Xietong Organism, Nanjing, China) and high-fat diet (HFD, Research Diet, D12492) contain 12% and 60% of calories from fat, respectively.
Glucose and insulin tolerance tests
Glucose and insulin tolerance tests were performed as previously described49,50. Briefly, for oral glucose tolerance test, mice were fasted from 5 pm to 9 am and gavaged with D-glucose at 2 mg/kg (chow) or 1 mg/kg (HFD). For insulin tolerance test, mice were fasted from 8 am to 2 pm and intraperitoneally injected with insulin at 0.5 U/kg (chow) or 1 U/kg (HFD). Blood was collected from tail vein at 0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after gavage of glucose or injection of insulin.
Histology, immunofluorescent and immunohistochemistry analysis
At the end of the experiments, adipose tissues and liver were collected and fixed in 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20-48 h. The fixed tissues were embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 5 μm. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed as previously described51.
Immunofluorescence was performed as previously described27. Briefly, slides were deparaffinized by boiling in 10 mM sodium citrate, blocked with 10% goat serum, 0.1% Triton X-100 and 1% BSA in PBS for 30 min at 37 oC, and incubated with antibodies of Perilipin1 (1:200, CST, #9349 s) and Galectin3 (1:200, Protein Tech, #60207-1-Ig). The slides were visualized on a Zeiss LSM-880+ confocal microscope.
Immunohistochemistry of p-MLKL was performed as previously described20. Briefly, slices were deparaffinized and boiled in 10 mM sodium citrate to unmask the antigens following a standard protocol. Slices were blocked with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 3% BSA in PBS for 30 min at room temperature, followed by incubation with anti- p-MLKL (1:250; Abcam, ab187091) overnight at 4oC. On the second day, slides were incubated with diluted HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 50 min at room temperature, followed by adding DAB substrate (Beyotime, #P0202) for 3 min as manufacturer’s guide. The slides were visualized on an Evident Olympus VS200 microscope.
Measurements of metabolic parameters
Body composition was monitored on an Echo-MRI analyzer. Plasma levels of insulin, leptin, and H2O2 were measured using commercial Elisa kits from EZassay (#MS100), Cayman Chemical (#A05176), and Solarbio (#BC3595), respectively. Liver triglyceride was extracted using the Folch method. Triglyceride was measured using a commercial kit from Wako (#290-63701).
Isolation of primary stromal vascular fractions
Inguinal white adipose tissue (iWAT) was dissected from 4-week old male Rosa-CreERT2;Med20f/f mice and subjected stromal vascular fractions (SVFs) isolation as previously described51,52. Briefly, inguinal WAT was minced and digested with 1 mg/ml collagenase II (C6885, Sigma-Aldrich) at 37oC for 1 h. The digested cells were neutralized with Medium A (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with low glucose (1 g/L)) and filtered with a 100-μm nylon cell strainer (BD Biosciences). Cells were then resuspended in Medium A, filtered with a 40-μm nylon cell strainer (BD Biosciences) and plated into 6-well plates in Medium A at 37oC in an atmosphere of 8.8% CO2. SVFs were immortalized with lentivirus encoding SV40 large T antigen as previously described53.
Culture and differentiation of preadipocytes
3T3-L1 preadipocytes and SVFs were cultured in Medium A at 37oC in an atmosphere of 8.8% CO2 and maintained in less than 50% confluence. Cells were subjected to a standard cocktail hormone as previously described49,51. After day 8, mature adipocytes were cultured in Medium B (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with high glucose (4.5 g/L), 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin), and fresh medium was changed every two days. For inducible deletion of Med20, SVFs-derived adipocytes (Rosa-CreERT2;Med20f/f), on day 6 of differentiation, were treated with 4-OHT (10 μM) for 4 days. On day 14, cells were harvested for imaging under bright field. The cultured medium was also collected for measurement of released LDH (Beyotime, #C0016).
Lentivirus production and infection
To knock down genes in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, indicated shRNAs were cloned into pLKO.1 vector (Addgene, 10878), and lentivirus was produced in HEK293T cells as previously described50,51. Briefly, HEK293T cells were co-transfected with the related plasmid with psPAX2 (Addgene, 12260) and pMD2.G (Addgene, 12259). Lentivirus-containing medium were collected, aliquoted and stored at −80oC until use. Lentivirus expressing iNap sensors of NADPH and its control mutant were as previously described21. For expression of iNap sensors, preadipocytes were infected, and later differentiated into mature adipocytes for further study. For knockdown of genes, cell on day 4 of differentiation were infected, and further differentiated to mature adipocytes for indicated studies.
CRISPR-based activation
The CRISPR-based activation system was adopted from a published protocol18. To overexpress Fasn in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, the indicated sgRNA was cloned into lentiSAMv2 (Addgene, 75112). Lentiviruses including lentiSAMv2 and lentiMPHv2 (Addgene, 89308) were produced in HEK293T cells as mentioned above. Preadipocytes were infected and selected with Hygromycin B and Blasticidin for 6 days, and differentiated into mature adipocytes for further study.
Visualization and quantification of intracellular reactive oxygen species
Adipocytes after 12 days of differentiation were used for the analysis, when both control and MED20-deficient adipocytes were alive. To visualize intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), cells were treated with CellROX (2.5 μm, Thermo fisher, #C10422) and BODIPY 493/503 (10 μm, Thermo Fisher, #D3922) for 30 min at 37 oC. After wishing 3 times with PBS, cells were harvested and imagined on Zeiss LSM-880+ confocal microscope. DCFDA is also used to measure cellular ROS. Cell were treated with DCFDA (25 μM, Abcam, #ab113851) for 45 min at 37 oC. To quantify the DCFDA signal, cells were treated with DCFDA as above. Cells were then harvested and the fluorescent intensity of DCFDA was quantified on a Tecan Spark plate reader at Ex/Em = 485/535 nm.
Visualization and quantification of intracellular NADPH and H2O2
A genetically encoded fluorescent indicator of NADPH (iNAP1) or its mutant that lost NADPH binding (iNAPc)21, or HYPER sensors to indicate H2O223, was introduced to immortalized preadipocytes (Rosa-CreERT2;Med20f/f) by lentivirus. After 8 days of differentiation, Med20 was inducibly deleted by 4-OHT (8 μM). On day 12, cells were harvested and imaged on Zeiss LSM-880+ confocal microscope. The ratio of fluorescence excited at 405 nm and 488 nm (R405/488) was used to evaluate the intracellular content of NADPH. R488/405 was used to evaluated the content of H2O2.
De novo fatty acid synthesis
The cells were set up in 35-mm dishes. On the indicate days of differentiation, control, FASN-overexpressing or MED20-deficient adipocytes were incubated with DMEM containing uniformly 13C-labeled glucose (25 mM) for 24 h. Cells were harvested for lipid extraction and saponification as previously described54. Briefly, cells were extracted in 1 ml 50% methanol containing 0.1 M of HCl (prechilled to −20 oC), and the resulting products were scraped into a glass vial. Chloroform (0.5 ml) was added, and the mixture was vortexed and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min. The organic phase was dried under nitrogen gas, and reconstituted into 90% methanol solution containing 0.3 M KOH. The mixture was incubated at 80 oC for 1 h, acidified, extracted with hexane. Dried samples were resuspended in 150 μl dichloromethane: methanol and subjected to LC/MS analysis.
Gene expression analysis
Total RNA was isolated on day 12 of differentiation from control and MED20-deficient adipocytes, or adipose tissues from control and Med20-AKO mice. RNAs from 3 samples were pooled and subjected to RNA-Seq analysis as previously described49. Genes with a FPKM no less than 1 were included in the analysis. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) measurements were performed as described55. The primers are listed in Supplementary Table 1. All reactions were done in triplicates. The relative amount of each mRNA was calculated by using the comparative threshold cycle (CT) method. Cyclophilin or 36B4 mRNA was used as the invariant control.
Western blot and antibodies
Total proteins of adipose tissues were extracted and western blot was carried out as previously described51. The following antibodies were used: anti-β-Actin (1:1000, Protein Tech, 60008-1-Ig), anti-MED20 (1;1000, Protein Tech, 17598-1-AP), anti-GAPDH (1:5000, CST, 5174 s), anti-MLKL (1:1000, Abcam, ab184718), anti-P-MLKL (1:1000; Abcam, ab187091), anti-Cleaved Caspase-3 (1:1000, CST, 4190), anti- Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase1 (1:1000, CST, 4190), anti-ACLY (1:1000, CST, 13390), anti- RIPK3 (1:1000, ABclonal, A5431), anti-RIPK1 (1:1000, ABclonal, A7414), anti-P-RIPK3 (1:1000, Abcam, ab205421), anti-P-RIPK1 (1:1000, ABclonal, AP1230), anti-C/EBPα (1:1000, CST, 8178 S), anti-PPARγ (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-7273), anti-CD36 (1:1000, Sino Biological Inc, 80263-T48), anti-Perilipin 1 (1:1000, CST, 9349 s) and anti-FASN(1:1000, CST, 3180).
Statistics and Reproducibility
All the statistical analysis was performed by student’s two-tailed paired t-test using EXCEL2010. All the values represent mean ± s.e.m. All the statistical details of the experiments can be found in the figure legends, including exact number of cells or mice. No data were excluded from any of the experiments. All the experiments were repeated at least twice.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2020YFA0803601 to T.-J.Z.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32125022, 32230053 and 92157301 to T.-J.Z.; 32301083 to L.W.; 82270928 to C.-Q.L.; 32101046 and 32371364 to X.W.; 32201063 to W.-S.T.), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023M730691 to W.-S.T.), Excellent Youth Project of Natural Science Research of Anhui Education Department (2022AH030079 to X.W.), and Shanghai Basic Research Field Project “Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan” (21JC1400400 to P.L.).
Author contributions
L.W., W.-S.T., X.W., N.-N. H., Y.T. and K.-Z.L. performed the experiments. C.-Q.L., Y.-Y.G., W.J., Y.Li and H.-W.Z. performed clinical study of the patient with acquired lipodystrophy. S.-N.L. and Y.-Z.Z. helped to perform the analysis of NADPH and H2O2 sensors. H.H. helped to analyze de novo fatty acid synthesis. K.Y., Z.-P.H., L.C., Y.Lu, H.Y. and X.D. provided materials and expertise. P.L. and T.-J.Z. designed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Martina Schweiger and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. The RNA-Seq data generated in this study have been deposited in the GEO database under accession code: GSE249808. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Li Weng, Wen-Shuai Tang, Xu Wang, Yingyun Gong.
Contributor Information
Hongwen Zhou, Email: drhongwenzhou@njmu.edu.cn.
Peng Li, Email: li-peng@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn.
Tong-Jin Zhao, Email: zhaotj@fudan.edu.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-44393-7.
References
- 1.Coelho M, Oliveira T, Fernandes R. Biochemistry of adipose tissue: an endocrine organ. Arch. Med. Sci. 2013;9:191–200. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2013.33181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Patel MS, Owen OE, Goldman LI, Hanson RW. Fatty acid synthesis by human adipose tissue. Metabolism. 1975;24:161–173. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(75)90017-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shrago E, Spennetta T, Gordon E. Fatty acid synthesis in human adipose tissue. J. Biol. Chem. 1969;244:2761–2766. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)83461-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Guo ZK, Cella LK, Baum C, Ravussin E, Schoeller DA. De novo lipogenesis in adipose tissue of lean and obese women: application of deuterated water and isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 2000;24:932–937. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cohen P, Spiegelman BM. Cell biology of fat storage. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2016;27:2523–2527. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e15-10-0749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Melvin A, Stears A, Savage DB. Recent developments in lipodystrophy. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2019;30:284–290. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Garg A. Acquired and inherited lipodystrophies. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;350:1220–1234. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra025261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mann JP, Savage DB. What lipodystrophies teach us about the metabolic syndrome. J. Clin. Invest. 2019;129:4009–4021. doi: 10.1172/JCI129190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fiorenza CG, Chou SH, Mantzoros CS. Lipodystrophy: pathophysiology and advances in treatment. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2011;7:137–150. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2010.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Garg A, Agarwal AK. Lipodystrophies: disorders of adipose tissue biology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1791:507–513. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2008.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Knebel, B., Muller-Wieland, D. & Kotzka, J. Lipodystrophies-Disorders of the Fatty Tissue. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2110.3390/ijms21228778 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.Sies H. Oxidative stress: a concept in redox biology and medicine. Redox Biol. 2015;4:180–183. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rani V, Deep G, Singh RK, Palle K, Yadav UC. Oxidative stress and metabolic disorders: Pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies. Life Sci. 2016;148:183–193. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Castro JP, Grune T, Speckmann B. The two faces of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in adipocyte function and dysfunction. Biol. Chem. 2016;397:709–724. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2015-0305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vassimon HS, Deminice R, Machado AA, Monteiro JP, Jordao AA. The association of lipodystrophy and oxidative stress biomarkers in HIV-infected men. Curr. HIV Res. 2010;8:364–369. doi: 10.2174/157016210791330347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vigouroux C, Caron-Debarle M, Le Dour C, Magre J, Capeau J. Molecular mechanisms of human lipodystrophies: from adipocyte lipid droplet to oxidative stress and lipotoxicity. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2011;43:862–876. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2011.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Villarroya F, Domingo P, Giralt M. Lipodystrophy associated with highly active anti-retroviral therapy for HIV infection: the adipocyte as a target of anti-retroviral-induced mitochondrial toxicity. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2005;26:88–93. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2004.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Joung J, et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout and transcriptional activation screening. Nat. Protoc. 2017;12:828–863. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yang ZT, et al. RIP3 targets pyruvate dehydrogenase complex to increase aerobic respiration in TNF-induced necroptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018;20:186. doi: 10.1038/s41556-017-0022-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang RC, et al. Gut stem cell necroptosis by genome instability triggers bowel inflammation. Nature. 2020;580:386. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2127-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tao R, et al. Genetically encoded fluorescent sensors reveal dynamic regulation of NADPH metabolism. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:720–728. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zou Y, et al. Analysis of redox landscapes and dynamics in living cells and in vivo using genetically encoded fluorescent sensors. Nat. Protoc. 2018;13:2362–2386. doi: 10.1038/s41596-018-0042-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Markvicheva KN, et al. A genetically encoded sensor for H2O2 with expanded dynamic range. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011;19:1079–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cheng G, et al. Detection of mitochondria-generated reactive oxygen species in cells using multiple probes and methods: Potentials, pitfalls, and the future. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:10363–10380. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.003044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liu Y, et al. Insulin/Snail1 axis ameliorates fatty liver disease by epigenetically suppressing lipogenesis. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:2751. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05309-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu Y, et al. Hepatic Slug epigenetically promotes liver lipogenesis, fatty liver disease, and type 2 diabetes. J. Clin. Invest. 2020;130:2992–3004. doi: 10.1172/JCI128073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tang WS, et al. The Mediator subunit MED20 organizes the early adipogenic complex to promote development of adipose tissues and diet-induced obesity. Cell Rep. 2021;36:109314. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Eguchi J, et al. Transcriptional control of adipose lipid handling by IRF4. Cell Metab. 2011;13:249–259. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jeffery E, et al. Characterization of Cre recombinase models for the study of adipose tissue. Adipocyte. 2014;3:206–211. doi: 10.4161/adip.29674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Caron-Debarle M, Lagathu C, Boccara F, Vigouroux C, Capeau J. HIV-associated lipodystrophy: from fat injury to premature aging. Trends Mol. Med. 2010;16:218–229. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2010.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lagathu C, et al. Some HIV antiretrovirals increase oxidative stress and alter chemokine, cytokine or adiponectin production in human adipocytes and macrophages. Antivir. Ther. 2007;12:489–500. doi: 10.1177/135965350701200407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shimomura I, et al. Insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus in transgenic mice expressing nuclear SREBP-1c in adipose tissue: model for congenital generalized lipodystrophy. Genes Dev. 1998;12:3182–3194. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.20.3182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jeninga EH, Kalkhoven E. Central players in inherited lipodystrophies. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2010;21:581–588. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2010.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Berndt J, et al. Fatty acid synthase gene expression in human adipose tissue: association with obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2007;50:1472–1480. doi: 10.1007/s00125-007-0689-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vairetti, M. et al. Changes in glutathione content in liver diseases: an update. Antioxidants1010.3390/antiox10030364 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.Mari M, et al. Redox control of liver function in health and disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2010;12:1295–1331. doi: 10.1089/ars.2009.2634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Forman HJ, Zhang H, Rinna A. Glutathione: overview of its protective roles, measurement, and biosynthesis. Mol. Aspects Med. 2009;30:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2008.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sebastiani G, et al. Vitamin E is an effective treatment for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in HIV mono-infected patients. AIDS. 2020;34:237–244. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sanyal AJ, et al. Pioglitazone, vitamin E, or placebo for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:1675–1685. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bril F, et al. Role of Vitamin E for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:1481–1488. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Soleimani E, Moghadam RH, Ranjbar A. Occupational exposure to chemicals and oxidative toxic stress. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 2015;7:1–24. doi: 10.1007/s13530-015-0216-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.El Khattabi L, et al. A Pliable mediator acts as a functional rather than an architectural bridge between promoters and enhancers. Cell. 2019;178:1145–1158.e1120. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lariviere L, Seizl M, Cramer P. A structural perspective on Mediator function. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2012;24:305–313. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Vodopiutz J, et al. MED20 mutation associated with infantile basal ganglia degeneration and brain atrophy. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2015;174:113–118. doi: 10.1007/s00431-014-2463-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ahmed B, Sultana R, Greene MW. Adipose tissue and insulin resistance in obese. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021;137:111315. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Asterholm IW, et al. Adipocyte inflammation is essential for healthy adipose tissue expansion and remodeling. Cell Metab. 2014;20:103–118. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Moffat J, et al. A lentiviral RNAi library for human and mouse genes applied to an arrayed viral high-content screen. Cell. 2006;124:1283–1298. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ventura A, et al. Restoration of p53 function leads to tumour regression in vivo. Nature. 2007;445:661–665. doi: 10.1038/nature05541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wang X, et al. DDB1 binds histone reader BRWD3 to activate the transcriptional cascade in adipogenesis and promote onset of obesity. Cell Rep. 2021;35:109281. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang, X. et al. DDB1 prepares brown adipocytes for cold-induced thermogenesis. Life Metab.loac00310.1093/lifemeta/loac003 (2022).
- 51.Wang J, et al. DHHC4 and DHHC5 facilitate fatty acid uptake by palmitoylating and targeting CD36 to the plasma membrane. Cell Rep. 2019;26:209–221.e205. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hao JW, et al. CD36 facilitates fatty acid uptake by dynamic palmitoylation-regulated endocytosis. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:4765. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18565-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Fasshauer M, et al. Essential role of insulin receptor substrate 1 in differentiation of brown adipocytes. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001;21:319–329. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.1.319-329.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tumanov S, Bulusu V, Kamphorst JJ. Analysis of fatty acid metabolism using stable isotope tracers and mass spectrometry. Methods Enzymol. 2015;561:197–217. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2015.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhao TJ, et al. Ghrelin secretion stimulated by β1-adrenergic receptors in cultured ghrelinoma cells and in fasted mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:15868–15873. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011116107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. The RNA-Seq data generated in this study have been deposited in the GEO database under accession code: GSE249808. Source data are provided with this paper.