Abstract
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), a common cause of healthcare-associated infections, are caused by a diverse array of pathogens that are increasingly becoming antibiotic resistant. We analyze the microbial occurrences in catheter and urine samples from 55 human long-term catheterized patients collected over one year. Although most of these patients were prescribed antibiotics over several collection periods, their catheter samples remain colonized by one or more bacterial species. Examination of a total of 366 catheter and urine samples identify 13 positive and 13 negative genus co-occurrences over 12 collection periods, representing associations that occur more or less frequently than expected by chance. We find that for many patients, the microbial species composition between collection periods is similar. In a subset of patients, we find that the most frequently sampled bacteria, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis, co-localize on catheter samples. Further, co-culture of paired isolates recovered from the same patients reveals that E. coli significantly augments E. faecalis growth in an artificial urine medium, where E. faecalis monoculture grows poorly. These findings suggest novel strategies to collapse polymicrobial CAUTI in long-term catheterized patients by targeting mechanisms that promote positive co-associations.
Subject terms: Clinical microbiology, Bacteriology, Urology
The authors examine temporal polymicrobial community composition in patients with long-term urinary catheters to identify species co-occurrences and demonstrate uropathogenic Escherichia coli augments growth of a prevalent opportunistic uropathogen in urine.
Introduction
Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) represent a significant public health burden, where an estimated 1 in 31 patients that enter a hospital will go on to develop an HAI, resulting in an additional $28.4 billion in healthcare-related expenses and 100,000 deaths1,2. Among HAIs, urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common, affecting over 400 million people worldwide in 2019 alone3. UTIs can be distinguished as complicated or uncomplicated. Up to 75–85% of uncomplicated UTIs are caused by uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC)4–6. Unlike uncomplicated UTIs, catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI) is caused by a diverse range of pathogens, including UPEC (23.9%), fungal Candida spp. (17.8%), Enterococcus spp. (13.8%), P. aeruginosa (10.3%), and Klebsiella sp. (10.1%)7,8. Uncomplicated UTIs (uUTIs) predominantly affect pre-menopausal and non-pregnant women and occur in otherwise healthy individuals with no functional or structural abnormalities of the kidneys or urinary tract4. Complicated UTIs (cUTIs) occur in individuals with additional risk factors, including underlying health conditions and abnormalities or obstructions in the kidneys and urinary tract, pregnancy, and intermittent or long-term catheterization4.
It is estimated that 15-25% of hospitalized patients will receive a urinary catheter and that 75% of healthcare-acquired UTIs are associated with catheterization9. Furthermore, the risk of bacterial colonization of a catheter increases 3–7% per day upon placement, with the risk of catheter colonization and associated complications near 100% in long-term catheterized patients10,11. The treatment of UTIs has been complicated by the rise of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) uropathogens, many of which were cited as urgent or serious threats in the CDC’s 2019 Antibiotic Threats Report. These AMR pathogens were classified as: (i) urgent, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; and (ii) serious, drug-resistant Candida, ESBL- Enterobacterales, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)12. Indeed, a 2019 report listed UTIs as one of the leading global causes of AMR-associated deaths13. As these uropathogens become increasingly antibiotic-resistant, new treatment strategies are necessary to combat the rise of antibiotic-resistant UTIs.
Another factor complicating the treatment of CAUTIs is the high prevalence of polymicrobial catheter colonization, with 31–87% of catheters and urine from catheterized patients colonized by two or more species, depending on the study14–16. Polymicrobial bacteraemic UTIs are associated with increased mortality relative to bacteraemic UTIs caused by a single uropathogen17. The relationships between the bacteria in these polymicrobial communities is still poorly understood, including the mechanistic drivers of the positive species interactions that promote species co-occurrence and the negative species interactions that prevent co-occurrence in the same microenvironment. During urinary catheterization, the host wounding response results in the deposition of host proteins, including fibrinogen, onto the catheter that can be used by several bacterial species as a food source and as a means to adhere to and form biofilms on the catheter18–20. Positive co-occurrences between species may thus result from pioneer species that are able to colonize the catheter and then recruit other microbial species, forming polymicrobial communities. While this has been demonstrated to occur in the polymicrobial communities of oral biofilms, wherein certain groups of bacteria, including streptococci and Actinomyces species, serve as the pioneering species that can adhere to enamel pellicle and facilitate the colonization of other microbial species, the establishment of pioneer species and the subsequent effects on colonization in CAUTI has yet to be fully elucidated21,22. Within these communities, “cross-feeding” or “cross-signaling” may occur to augment the growth and/or biofilm formation of one or more of the species. Further, it has been shown that E. faecalis can suppress the host innate immune response, allowing for augmented growth of E. coli in a co-infection model of CAUTI23. Negative co-occurrences may be due to competition for nutrients or alterations in host response. For instance, MRSA elicits a robust host response which may result in decreased co-colonization by other bacterial species that are unable to withstand this response24. Understanding the mechanisms that drive the formation and persistence of these communities is essential to designing new therapeutics that target the bacterial interactions that promote CAUTI.
Here we analyze the polymicrobial community composition on catheters of long-term catheterized patients. We collected a total of 366 catheter and urine samples from 55 patients over an average of 6–7 ~monthly collection periods. We discovered that ~80% of the collected samples are polymicrobial, however most of these samples only contained 2–3 detected bacterial species. We performed co-occurrence analysis to determine the genera that co-occur in samples more and less often than expected by chance, identifying several positive and negative significant pairwise genus interactions among common uropathogens. We also observed clustering of the microbial species composition between sample periods within the same patients in a principal coordinate analysis, suggesting similarities in the community composition upon several re-catheterization events within the same individual. For multiple patients, we observed these long-term co-occurrences between the most common uropathogen, UPEC, with the most sampled Gram-positive opportunistic pathogen E. faecalis. We show that these species co-localize on patient catheters and that co-culture of clinical UPEC isolates dramatically increases the growth of clinical E. faecalis isolates in artificial urine medium. These results suggest that the urinary tract environment may be a significant contributor driving positive and negative interactions and must be considered in future in vitro analysis of polymicrobial CAUTI.
Results
Sample collection from long-term catheterized patients and demographics
We collected catheter and urine samples approximately monthly for up to 12 collection periods from enrolled non-hospitalized, long-term catheterized patients at the Barnes-Jewish Hospital System that were subsequently cultured for bacterial growth and identified via 16 S rRNA sequencing (Fig. 1a)25. We enrolled 55 patients, 20 females and 35 males, at an average age of 64 years at the time of enrollment (Fig. 1b). The reasons for catheterization included bladder outlet obstruction (n = 18), peripheral or central neuropathy (n = 22), rectovesical or rectourethral fistula (n = 4), stress urinary incontinence (n = 4), atonic bladder (n = 6), and temporary post-operative issues (n = 1, with catheter use exceeding 50 days). For each patient, we collected an average of ~7 samples, which consisted of catheter and urine samples at a given time point, with average catheter dwell times of 29.7 ± 10.4 days (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 9).
Inclusion criteria included patients that were scheduled to undergo removal of the indwelling urinary device(s) (such as catheters, both urethral and suprapubic, ureteral stents, etc.), being 18 years of age or older at the time of consent and being willing and able to provide informed consent. There were no exclusion criteria. As the long-term catheterized patients came into the clinic to have their catheters replaced, the removed catheter was placed into a sterile bag and urine from the visit was collected in a sterile cup (Fig. 1a, see “Methods”). The tip of the catheter (0.5 cm) and 10 μL of urine were cultured in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar, as previously described25. For the catheter and urine samples, colonies were distinguished based on unique size, color, and morphology, resulting in 1–9 colonies selected per sample, and single colonies were cultured overnight and subsequently archived. Genomic DNA was then purified from each isolate for species identification via 16 S sequencing (see “Methods”).
Antibiotic use in long-term catheterized patients
Most patients (40/55, 72.7%) received at least one course of antibiotics over the course of the study, and nearly 50% (27/55) received more than one course of antibiotic and more than one type of antibiotic (Fig. 1d). The most prescribed antibiotics among our patient cohort included those commonly or specifically used to treat urinary tract infections, such as nitrofurantoin, methenamine, the fluoroquinolone antibiotic ciprofloxacin, the combination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole, and the combination of the ß-lactam antibiotic amoxicillin and the ß-lactamase inhibitor clavulanic acid. The specific antibiotics prescribed over the course of catheterization for each patient are indicated in Supplementary Figs. 1–7.
Identification of bacterial isolates in long-term catheterized patients
Overall, we detected 88 different species representing 32 genera of bacteria. Enterococcus was the most common genus detected, appearing in 192 samples, followed by Escherichia (104), Klebsiella (98), Proteus (95), Pseudomonas (93), and Staphylococcus (86) (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 8). To better understand the temporal aspects of genera detection in long-term catheterized patients, we examined the frequency (the proportion of the selected genera vs the total genera sampled for a specific collection period) of genus detection at the initial collection period (t = 0) through the final collection period (t = 11) for patients that had 9+ collection periods. We found that while Enterococcus species were sampled more frequently during the first couple of collection periods for an individual, the frequency of detection for Escherichia species remained fairly constant throughout the course of a particular individual’s time in the study (Fig. 2b).
As the use of urine is the current clinical standard for the detection of bacteria in the urinary tract, we examined whether genus presence in the urine was concordant with genus detection on the catheter. We found that while species from Enterococcus and Escherichia were simultaneously detected on both the catheter and in urine, they were rarely detected in the urine alone. In contrast, species from Pseudomonas were frequently detected in the urine alone (Fig. 2c). Further, we found that multiple genera were detected over the collection periods for most patients (Fig. 2d), which together prompted us to further examine the microbial species composition and dynamics of catheter and urine samples from our long-term catheterized patient cohort.
Catheter and urine samples from long-term catheterized patients are polymicrobial
The most frequently identified genera were typically dominated by a single species. For example, the majority of enterococcal species were E. faecalis (187/192), Escherichia were all E. coli (104), and Klebsiella were predominately K. pneumoniae (80/98) (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 8). For each individual patient, we detected a median of six different species (5.95 mean) cumulatively over all collection periods, ranging from 1 to 16 species per patient (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 9). Given our data set consisted of several collections per each patient, which were representative of individual collection periods over consecutive time points, we sought to understand the dynamics of the microbial composition for individual samples within a single time point. For all collected samples, including urine and catheter samples from each time point, we detected two or more species in ~80.1% (296/366) of samples, concordant with current reports that most lower urinary tract samples are polymicrobial. There were 70 single-species samples collected across 28 different patients (Supplementary Table S1). Most samples with a single species detected contained species from the Staphylococcus genus (37.1%), with representatives from S. epidermidis (65.4%) and S. aureus (19.2%) in the majority of the samples. Of the other single-species samples detected, 42.8% were common CAUTI uropathogens including E. faecalis, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, or P. aeruginosa (Supplementary Table S1).
While most of the samples were polymicrobial, we found that the median number of species detected for a given individual at a given collection was 2 (average 2.6), with a range from 1 to 8 species detected, contrasting the 6 species identified per patient over all collection periods (Fig. 3c). The first and third quartiles contained two and three species per catheter. Thus, most samples were polymicrobial, but had less than three species detected.
Detection of positive and negative pairwise genera co-occurrence
We performed co-occurrence analyses to determine the pairwise genera that had positive and negative co-occurrences, defined as genera that were positively or negatively associated more frequently than would be expected by chance. The co-occurrence analyses were binned by collection periods (0–11), ensuring sample independence between patient collections over multiple time points26. For this analysis, genera were identified as “occurring” during a single collection period independent of the source of isolation (catheter, urine, or both). Our analysis identified 13 positive interactions and 13 negative interactions (P value < 0.05) with an expected co-occurrence greater than 0 over all collection periods (Fig. 4a–l and Supplementary Tables S2–13). Of the significant negative interactions, where genera co-occur less often than would be expected by chance, the majority (11/13) involved Staphylococcal species repelling both Gram-positive (Enterococcus) and Gram-negative (Proteus, Pseudomonas, and Klebsiella) species. These data are consistent with the previous observation that the majority of samples that were not polymicrobial (e.g., only a single species detected) were from the Staphylococcus genus. The other negative interaction occurred between Proteus and Pseudomonas at collection periods zero and one.
For the positive co-occurrences, with expected co-occurrence greater than 0, the most common were between the Proteus genus with Providencia (detected at collection periods 5, 10, and 11) and Morganella (detected at collection periods 3 and 4). We also detected positive interactions between the Klebsiella genus with Pseudomonas at early collection periods (periods 1 and 2) and Enterococcus at a late collection period (period 10). Additional positive co-occurrences included Candida and Serratia (collection period 0), Providencia with Pseudomonas and Serratia (collection period 1), Morganella with Alcaligenes (collection period 1), and Aerococcus with Enterobacter (collection period 4).
PCoA reveals similarities of species occurrences within patients over successive collection periods
To determine the similarity of successive microbial community compositions isolated from the same patient over time we performed a Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA). We found that the major species driving the variance in community composition were E. faecalis, E. coli, P. mirabilis, S. epidermidis and S. aureus (Fig. 5a). We also observed clustering of collection points between the same patient, suggesting that the communities isolated from the same patient were very similar through multiple re-catheterization events (Fig. 5b). This was particularly evident for Patient 132, where all 12 collection periods clustered in the same area of the PCoA, suggesting that the polymicrobial communities isolated from this patient were not drastically altered by subsequent re-catheterization events. Indeed, we found that Patient 132 was colonized by E. faecalis and E. coli over all 12 collection periods, suggesting a positive relationship between these species in the lower urinary tract environment.
Co-culture of E. coli and E. faecalis stimulates E. faecalis growth in artificial urine media
The co-occurrence of E. faecalis and E. coli isolates at all collections in Patient 132 suggests that co-colonization may benefit one or both species in the lower urinary tract (Fig. 6a). To determine if the E. faecalis and E. coli strains were co-localizing on the catheter, we performed immunohistochemistry on the portion of the catheter that was formalin-fixed upon collection. The fixed catheters were incubated with anti-E. faecalis and anti-E. coli primary antibodies to determine the location of the bacterial species. We observed a large overlap in the signals for the detection of E. coli and E. faecalis, suggesting that the species were co-localizing on the catheters (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Fig. 10). To study the interactions between E. faecalis and E. coli that facilitate their co-existence and colocalization in the polymicrobial community, we tested the growth of these two bacteria when grown alone or in mixed cultures using a nutrient-limited artificial urine medium (AUM, see “Methods”)23. All E. faecalis strains tested, including model strain OG1RF, and 12 clinical isolates collected from Patient 132 (EF132-0 ~ EF132-11, Supplementary Table S14) exhibited deficient bacterial growth in AUM (Fig. 6c). Unlike E. faecalis isolates, E. coli strains, including model strain UTI89 and the 12 clinical isolates collected from patient HUC132 (EC132-0 ~ EC132-11, Supplementary Table S14) were able to achieve robust growth in nutrient-limited AUM (Fig. 6c). Moreover, we discovered that, compared to the monoculture of E. faecalis in AUM, E. faecalis growth was significantly enhanced when cocultured with E. coli in AUM ( > 2 log CFU, P < 0.001, Supplementary Table S17) (Fig. 6c). In contrast, E. coli exhibited no distinguishable growth differences between monocultures and mixed cultures with E. faecalis (Fig. 6c).
To determine whether the growth augmentation in AUM extended to E. faecalis and E. coli isolates outside of Patient 132, we tested the pairwise combinations of E. faecalis and E. coli isolated from the same collection periods for Patient 92, which clustered closely with the Patient 132 collection periods in the PCoA (Figs. 5b and 6d and Supplementary Table S14). Immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed portions of the catheter revealed colocalization of E. faecalis and E. coli on the catheters (Fig. 6e and Supplementary Fig. 11). Similar to Patient 132, we found that the E. faecalis isolates from Patient 92 grew poorly in AUM monoculture and that growth was augmented in co-culture with E. coli isolates (Fig. 6f and Supplementary Table S17). Again, E. coli growth in AUM appeared to be unaffected by the presence or absence of E. faecalis co-culture (Fig. 6f). In contrast, in rich BHI medium, all 22 E. faecalis isolates were able to achieve robust bacterial growth in both mono and mixed cultures (Supplementary Fig. 12), demonstrating no significant growth differences between the mono and mixed cultures, similar to what was observed for the E. coli strains in AUM. In addition, time series experiments indicated that while E. faecalis exhibited deficient growth in monoculture at 12-, 24-, and 48-h time points in AUM, E. coli isolates were able to promote E. faecalis growth in mixed cultures at all time points (P < 0.001, Supplementary Fig. 13). E. coli isolates exhibited no growth differences between the mono and mixed cultures at 12-, 24-, and 48-h time points.
We also characterized two additional pairs of bacterial interactions, including E. faecalis and K. pneumoniae as well as E. faecalis and P. aeruginosa. We chose these pairs based upon the isolate abundance, co-occurrence, and longitudinal co-colonization analyses results. E. faecalis and K. pneumoniae isolates were identified with positive co-occurrence at collection period 10 (Fig. 4k), and in vitro bacterial interaction tests between these two species collected at periods 10 and 11 from Patients 92 and 100 (Supplementary Table S15) revealed that K. pneumoniae promoted the growth of E. faecalis in the mixed cultures using AUM (Supplementary Fig 14). P. aeruginosa was also found to co-colonize the urinary tract together with E. faecalis for a long period in Patient 132 (Fig. 6a), and bacterial interaction tests of these two species in Patient 132 (Supplementary Table S16) identified one pair with mutually beneficial interaction, with P. aeruginosa enhancing the growth of E. faecalis in the co-culturing system in AUM (Supplementary Fig. 15).
Together, these results suggest that mutually beneficial interactions between different bacterial species exist in the polymicrobial community to achieve enhanced bacterial growth under nutrient-limited conditions, which may contribute to the co-colonization of various species and lead to polymicrobial CAUTI15,27. This is consistent with our findings from the whole patient cohort with multiple bacterial strains co-colonizing the urinary tracts of long-term catheterized patients.
Discussion
Urinary catheters are placed in 60% of critically ill patients and 5–22% of residents in long-term care facilities28–31. While catheterization often represents a necessary medical intervention, placement of the catheter alters the bladder environment and provides a nidus for bacterial colonization. Bacteriuria incidence increases 3–7% each day the catheter is in place, resulting in colonization for nearly all patients with long-term catheters10,11. Further, 25% of all sepsis isolates can be traced back to urinary pathogens32. Accordingly, long-term catheters are a major source for morbidity and mortality for the patients in which they reside, with some long-term care facilities reporting over 50% of bacteraemic episodes attributed to pathogens associated with CAUTI33. It is critical that we improve our understanding of these infections to reduce the burden of this persistent and pervasive disease33,34.
Our study of microbial community composition of the lower urinary tract, including voided urine and catheters from 55 long-term catheterized patients that were collected approximately monthly over a year, shows that while each patient is colonized by 6–7 species over all collection periods, only 2–3 unique species were identified at a single collection period. Only 20% of samples were found to contain a single species. Among the patients included in this study, ~73% (40/55) received at least one course of antibiotics over the study enrollment period with nearly 50% (27/55) receiving more than one course of antibiotic and more than one type of antibiotic.
We observed that several patients, including Patient 82, 92, 97, 100, 104, 115, 123, 127, 130, and 133 (Supplementary Figs. 1B, 2C, F, 3C, D, 4D, 5F, 6D, and 7A, C) received antibiotics over 4 or more collection periods. Despite this recurrent antibiotic treatment, one or more bacterial species persisted on their catheters. Given the growing concern over the rising incidence of antimicrobial-resistant uropathogens, we assayed the effect of long-term antibiotic use on the antibiotic resistance profiles of the bacterial species that persisted in the lower urinary tract environment for Patient 104, a male with a spinal cord injury. Patient 104 was prescribed the combination ß-lactam antibiotic amoxicillin with the ß-lacatmase inhibitor clavulanic acid over 5/6 collection periods. Despite this antibiotic use, the catheters collected from Patient 104 were consistently colonized by the opportunistic pathogen Serratia marcescens (Supplementary Fig. 3D). As ß-lactam antibiotics represent one of the most prescribed classes of antibiotics, we tested the S. marcescens isolates from each collection period for patient 104 against a range of ß-lactam antibiotics, including amoxicilliln (penicillin derivative), ampicillin (penicillin derivative), cefazolin (first-generation cephalosporin), ceftriaxone (a third-generation cephalosporin), cefepime (a fourth-generation cephalosporin), and meropenem (carbopenam antibiotic). All 6 S. marcescens isolates were highly resistant to amoxicillin, ampicillin, cefazolin, and ceftriaxone. Interestingly, for cefepime and meropenem, which are used to treat highly resistant infections, the S. marcescens isolate from the first collection period exhibited a MIC of 0.5 and 0.25 µg/mL respectively, well below the level of clinical resistance (4 and 2 µg/mL, respectively), however the isolate from the final collection period exhibited resistances much closer to the clinical resistance thresholds at 2 and 1.5 µg/mL, respectively (Table 1)35. These data suggest that long-term catheterized patients may be at increased risk of developing antibiotic-resistant infections, and that further understanding the composition of these communities may aid in the development of novel strategies to develop effective therapeutics.
Table 1.
S. marcescens 104 | Augmentin (penicilllin, >32) | Ampicillin (penicillin, >8) | Cefazolin (1st gen, >2) | Ceftriaxone (3rd gen, >2) | Cefepime (4th gen, >4) | Meropenem (carbopenam, >2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
104-0 | No effect | No effect | No effect | 16 | 0.5 | 0.25 |
104-1 | No effect | No effect | No effect | 32 | 3 | 1.5 |
104-2 | No effect | No effect | No effect | 24 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
104-3 | No effect | No effect | No effect | 24 | 1.5 | 1 |
104−4 | No effect | No effect | No effect | 32 | 3 | 1.5 |
104-5 | No effect | No effect | No effect | 32 | 2 | 1.5 |
The clinical resistance cutoff for each antibiotic is indicated in parentheses. MICs are listed in µg/mL.
While the growing prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant uropathogens represents a significant public health crisis on its own, the polymicrobial nature of CAUTI makes these infections further recalcitrant to treatment with our current arsenal of antibiotics. Thus, better understanding of the polymicrobial community composition and the mechanisms that drive positive co-occurrences will allow for targeted treatments that aim to collapse the community structure, rendering the individual uropathogens more susceptible to treatment.
E. faecalis, E. coli, P. mirabilis, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa were amongst the most common species colonizing the catheters in this study, which is similar to a previous study where the highest colonizers from weekly urine samples in a long-term catheterized patient cohort included E. faecalis, P. mirabilis, P. stuartii, and S. aureus15. Armbruster et al. also identified highly concordant species pairs in the urine, including P. mirabilis and P. stuartii, which is consistent with the positive associations detected between Proteus and Providencia described across several collection periods here and P. mirabilis and M. morganii, which also appeared during multiple collection periods between Proteus and Morganella in our study15. They also identified concordant species that were not identified across any time points in our study, including P. stuartii and P. mirabilis with E. faecalis. Conversely, our study identified positive co-occurrences between the highly sampled Klebsiella and Pseudomonas genera as well Klebsiella and Enterococcus that were not identified in Armbruster et al. These differences could be attributable to differences in study design, where Armbruster et al. analyzed weekly urine samples from 17 long-term catheterized patients while we received both catheter and urine samples approximately monthly from 55 long-term catheterized patients.
It is interesting to note that the Gram-positive staphylococci represent the genus with the most negative co-occurrences and are the most frequently monomicrobial samples. S. aureus has been shown to elicit a robust pro-inflammatory response in the murine bladder, which could act to reduce colonization of competing species24. These negative interactions were best exemplified by Staphylococcus and Enterococcus in our long-term catheterized patient cohort, which had negative co-occurrences in 7/12 collection periods in our study. In contrast to these results, a recent study by Ch’ng et al. has shown positive interactions between Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis that result in augmented biofilm production and facilitated E. faecalis growth through a S. aureus-derived heme cross-feeding mechanism36. Ch’ng et al. analyzed isolates from various body sites, whereas our study was limited to isolates in the urinary tract. Ch’ng et al. showed that S. aureus USA300LAC had drastically heterogeneous responses in augmenting biofilm biomass when cocultured with a diverse panel of E. faecalis isolates, including bloodstream, wound, UTI, and gastrointestinal isolates, where only 6/32 E. faecalis isolates showed increased biomass in co-culture, suggesting the environment and other factors may be important for dictating the nature of the interaction between staphylococcal and enterococcal species. Consistent with the results presented here, among the E. faecalis isolates tested in the previous study, those isolated from UTIs did not show a statistically significant augmentation in dual-species biofilms when cocultured with S. aureus USA300LAC36. Together these data suggest that the environment in which these species co-occur dictates how they interact with one another.
One limitation of this study is the use of a culture-based approach, wherein organisms that grow well under the selected laboratory conditions, namely in rich undefined media at 37 °C, will grow and be detected in subsequent 16 S sequencing whereas fastidious and anaerobic species will be lost due to their inability to grow under these conditions. Thus, a culture-based approach limits the species that can be included in the downstream co-occurrence analysis. While newer sequencing applications can be used to sequence directly from catheter and urine samples, circumventing the limitations noted above, we chose to use a culture-based approach as that is currently the gold standard in clinical microbiology laboratories. Future studies are necessary to bridge the gap between standard clinical techniques for microbial detection and newer sequencing-based approaches that are not currently used in the clinical setting. Also necessary are studies of the cytokines and host factors present in the urine of long-term catheterized patients, which will allow for better understanding of the immune responses associated with certain polymicrobial community compositions. The microbial positive associations detected in our study represent those present in human urinary tracts of long-term catheterized patients spanning many subsequent re-catheterization events, warranting further investigation to the molecular drivers of these interactions for insights to perturb the formation and stability of problematic polymicrobial communities.
Methods
Study approval
For all patients included in this study, informed consent was obtained. As previously described, the urines and catheters were collected upon the clinical decision to remove the catheter for standard-of-care25,37. This study was approved by the Washington University School of Medicine (WUSM) Internal Review Board (approval #201410058) and performed in accordance with WUSM’s ethical standards and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
Statistics
For the co-occurrence analysis, all P values were calculated using the cooccur package in R26. For the PCoA, the dissimilarity matrix was generated using the “vegdist” function from the Vegan package in R using the default settings which was passed to the built in “cmdscale” function38. The species scores were generated using the ‘add.spec.scores’ function from the BiodiversityR library39.
Comparisons of bacterial growth (measured in colony-forming units, CFUs) from mono- and mixed cultures were conducted using an unpaired t test in GraphPad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad software).
General bacteriology
All strains were grown in brain heart infusion (BHI) or Luria-Bertani (LB) media restreaked onto BHI+agar or LB+agar plates unless stated otherwise and grown overnight at 37 °C statically.
Sample preparation
As previously described24,25, upon receiving the samples at the lab, 0.5 cm of tip of the catheter was cut and placed into BHI liquid media and samples were grown overnight at 37 °C. The resulting overnight cultures were then plated on BHI-agar and grown overnight at 37 °C. The remaining catheter was split into two pieces and one half was fixed in formalin for immunohistochemistry. A small portion of the urine (10 μL) was plated onto BHI-agar and grown overnight at 37 °C and the remaining sample was aliquoted into 50 mL conical tubes and stored at −20 °C. Colonies were distinguished based on size, morphology, and color and 1–9 single colonies per sample were selected for DNA extraction. 16 S sequencing was performed as previously described24,25.
Bioinformatics
All basic plots were generated in R v4.2.1 using Rstudio v2022.12.0 + 353. Repeated species identifications from the same collection period were condensed into one entry and the source of the isolate (urine, catheter, or both) was noted. For the co-occurrence analysis, a matrix of species occurrence by site was generated using the Source Data as an input stratified by time point. The co-occurrence analysis was completed using the package co-occur in R26 with default settings, except where the threshold option was switched to ‘false’ to include the co-occurrences between less abundant species.
Immunohistochemistry on human catheters
The formalin-fixed catheters were prepared as described previously25,37. Briefly, catheter samples were washed three times with PBS and subsequently blocked with PBS containing 1.5% BSA and 0.1% sodium azide overnight at 4 °C. The blocked catheters were then washed three times with PBS-T and incubated with Enterococcus polyclonal antibody (PA1-73120, Invitrogen, validation statement for immunofluorescence application available at: https://www.thermofisher.com/antibody/product/Enterococcus-Antibody-Polyclonal/PA1-73120) and E. coli serotype-O/K Polyclonoal Antibody (PA1-73032, Invitrogen, validation statement for immunofluorescence application available at https://www.thermofisher.com/antibody/product/E-coli-serotype-O-K-Antibody-Polyclonal/PA1-73032) at 1:400 dilutions in dilution buffer (PBS-T, 0.1% w/v BSA, 0.5% methyl alpha-D-mannopyranoside) for two hours at room temperature. The catheters were then washed and incubated with IRDye 680LT Donkey anti-Rabbit (LI-COR, 926-68023) and IRDye 800CW Donkey anti Goat (LI-COR, 926-32214) antibodies (1:10,000 dilution in dilution buffer) for one hour at room temperature. The catheters were then washed three times in PBS-T and imaged using the Odyssey Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences) and merged in Adobe Photoshop. The control portion of the catheter was not incubated with primary antibody.
Clinical isolate mono- and co-culturing in AUM and rich BHI media
Twenty-two pairs of E. faecalis and E. coli, including one pair of model strains (E. faecalis OG1RF and E. coli UTI89), 9 pairs of clinical isolates from patient HUC92, and 12 pairs of clinical isolates from patient HUC132, were examined in a pairwise manner for studying the interaction between these two bacterial species (Supplementary Table S14). The pair of OG1RF and UTI89 was used as the example to illustrate the experiment design as follows. OG1RF and UTI89 strains were streaked out from frozen stocks on brain heart infusion (BHI) and Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates, respectively, and grown overnight at 37 °C statically. Next, OG1RF and UTI89 cultures were grown from multiple colonies in BHI and LB media, respectively, overnight at 37 °C statically, adjusted to OD = 1.0 using fresh media, and washed with PBS three times40–42. Three types of bacterial inoculums, OG1RF, UTI89, or OG1RF plus UTI89 (OG1RF + UTI898) were inoculated into AUM or rich BHI media at 1:1000 dilution (OD = 0.001), and 200 µL cultures were added into 96-well plates to grow for 48 hours at 37 °C statically. At 12, 24, or 48 h, OG1RF, UTI89, and OG1RF + UTI89 cultures were plated on LB + Kan50 (Kanamycin = 50 µg/mL), LB + Vanco6 (Vancomycin = 6 µg/mL), and both LB + Kan50 and LB + Vanco6 agar plates, respectively, for CFU enumerations as CFU/mL18,41,43. For E. faecalis and E. coli strains tested in this study, E. faecalis strains were resistant to Kan50 but sensitive to Vanco6, while E. coli strains were resistant to Vanco6 but sensitive to Kan50, therefore Kan50 and Vanco6 antibiotic agar plates were able to differentiate between E. faecalis and E. coli strains in the mixed cultures. The 9 and 12 pairs of E. faecalis and E. coli clinical isolates from patients HUC92 and HUC132, respectively, were tested in the same manner to measure the bacterial growths in mono or mixed cultures for investigating interactions between E. faecalis and E. coli in the polymicrobial community. Additionally, four pairs of E. faecalis and K. pneumoniae strains from Patient 92 and 100 (Supplementary Table S15), and two pairs of E. faecalis and P. aeruginosa strains from Patient 132 (Supplementary Table S16), were also selected for 48-h bacterial interaction studies using the same protocol as described above. Antibiotic plates were used for differentiating bacterial species in the mixed cultures. For characterizing E. faecalis and K. pneumoniae interactions, E. faecalis strains were resistant to Kan50 but sensitive to Vanco6, while K. pneumoniae strains were resistant to Vanco6 but sensitive to Kan50, therefore Kan50 and Vanco6 antibiotic agar plates were able to differentiate between these two species in the mixed cultures. For characterizing E. faecalis and P. aeruginosa interactions, P. aeruginosa strains were resistant to Vanco6, while E. faecalis strains were sensitive to Vanco6, therefore Vanco6 antibiotic plates were used for counting P. aeruginosa CFU in the co-cocultures and E. faecalis CFU was determined by total CFU minus P. aeruginosa CFU.
Antibiotic susceptibility testing
Isolates were streaked from frozen stocks onto agar plates and grown overnight at 37 °C. A single colony was placed in liquid media for overnight growth at 37 °C. Overnight cultures were normalized to an OD600 of 2.0, and 100 µL of normalized culture was spread onto agar plates using sterile glass beads. Antibiotic test strips from LicofilchemTM MTSTM for Ampicillin (22-777-657), Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Acid (22-778-044), Cefazolin (22-778-041), Cefepime (22-777-915), Ceftriaxone (22-777-915), and Meropenem (22-777-858) were placed onto the bacteria-agar plates using sterile forceps, with a maximum of two inverted antibiotic strips per plate. Serial dilutions of the culture inoculums were plated for initial colony-forming units and all plates were incubated at 37 °C. MICs and initial CFUs were enumerated and recorded the following morning.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health RO1DK51406 (S.J.H. and M.G.C.) and KO1 DK128381-O1A1 (J.N.W). T.M.N. was supported by the W.M. Keck Postdoctoral Fellowship and by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number T32AI007172. The authors thank the lab of Dr. Matthew Chapman for their feedback and support in manuscript preparation. We also thank all study participants for their sample donations.
Author contributions
T.M.N., Z.Z., A.L.F.M., J.N.W., K.W.D., A.D., M.G.C., and S.J.H. designed the research studies, T.M.N., Z.Z., C.L.P.O., J.S.P., E.L., K.K, K.B., A.K., A.L.F.M., J.N.W., and D.W. conducted experiments and acquired data, T.M.N., Z.Z., and D.W. analyzed the data, T.M.N. and Z.Z. wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors contributed to the editing of the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
Sequencing files for isolates sequenced after January 14, 2020 have been deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read archive under BioProject ID PRJNA956906. Despite exhaustive efforts to locate the original sequencing prior to this date, the authors were unable to locate the original files. All analyses have been performed on the subset of data for which the sequencing data exists (see Supplementary Figs. 8 and 9) and the conclusions, including the average species identified per patient, species identified per collection period, and relative species abundance were the same. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Taylor M. Nye, Zongsen Zou.
Contributor Information
Michael G. Caparon, Email: caparon@wustl.edu
Scott J. Hultgren, Email: hultgren@wustl.edu
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-44095-0.
References
- 1.Magill SS, et al. Changes in prevalence of health care-associated infections in U.S. hospitals. New Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:1732–1744. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Scott, R. D. The Direct medical costs of healthcare-associated infections in U.S. hospitals and the benefits of prevention. In Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Preparedness, Detection, and Control of Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (eds Polock, D. A. & Stone, P. W.) (2009). https://www.cdc.gov/hai/pdfs/hai/scott_costpaper.pdf.
- 3.Yang X, et al. Disease burden and long-term trends of urinary tract infections: a worldwide report. Front. Public Health. 2022;10:888205. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.888205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hooton TM. Uncomplicated urinary tract infection. New Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:1028–1037. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1104429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Flores-Mireles AL, Walker JN, Caparon M, Hultgren SJ. Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015;13:269–284. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Foxman B. The epidemiology of urinary tract infection. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2010;7:653–660. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Weiner LM, et al. Vital signs: preventing antibiotic‐resistant infections in hospitals—United States, 2014. Am. J. Transpl. 2016;16:2224–2230. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Flores-Mireles A, Hreha TN, Hunstad DA. Pathophysiology, treatment, and prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Top. Spinal Cord. Inj. Rehabil. 2019;25:228–240. doi: 10.1310/sci2503-228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI). https://www.cdc.gov/hai/ca_uti/uti.html (2019).
- 10.Hooton, T. M. et al. Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 International Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Infect. Dis. 50, 625–663 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 11.Nicolle LE. Catheter-related urinary tract infection: practical management in the elderly. Drugs Aging. 2014;31:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s40266-013-0089-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.). Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. 10.15620/cdc:82532 (2019).
- 13.Murray CJL, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399:629–655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Holá V, Ruzicka F, Horka M. Microbial diversity in biofilm infections of the urinary tract with the use of sonication techniques. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2010;59:525–528. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00703.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Armbruster, C. E., Brauer, A. L., Humby, M. S., Shao, J. & Chakraborty, S. Prospective assessment of catheter-associated bacteriuria clinical presentation, epidemiology, and colonization dynamics in nursing home residents. JCI Insight6, e144775 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Gaston, J. R., Johnson, A. O., Bair, K. L., White, A. N. & Armbruster, C. E. Polymicrobial interactions in the urinary tract: is the enemy of my enemy my friend? Infect. Immun. 89, 10–1128 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 17.Siegman-Igra Y, Kulka T, Schwartz D, Konforti N. Polymicrobial and monomicrobial bacteraemic urinary tract infection. J. Hosp. Infect. 1994;28:49–56. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(94)90152-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Flores-Mireles AL, Pinkner JS, Caparon MG, Hultgren SJ. EbpA vaccine antibodies block binding of Enterococcus faecalis to fibrinogen to prevent catheter-associated bladder infection in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014;6:254ra127. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Goble NM, Clarke T, Hammonds JC. Histological changes in the urinary bladder secondary to urethral catheterisation. Br. J. Urol. 1989;63:354–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1989.tb05216.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Glahn BE. Influence of drainage conditions on mucosal bladder damage by indwelling catheters. I. Pressure study. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 1988;22:87–92. doi: 10.1080/00365599.1988.11690391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bowen WH, Burne RA, Wu H, Koo H. Oral biofilms: pathogens, matrix, and polymicrobial interactions in microenvironments. Trends Microbiol. 2018;26:229–242. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Palmer RJ., Jr. Composition and development of oral bacterial communities. Periodontol 2000. 2014;64:20–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2012.00453.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tien, B. Y. Q. et al. Enterococcus faecalis promotes innate immune suppression and polymicrobial catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Infect. Immun. 85, 10–1128 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Walker JN, et al. Catheterization alters bladder ecology to potentiate Staphylococcus aureus infection of the urinary tract. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E8721–E8730. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1707572114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Walker JN, et al. High-resolution imaging reveals microbial biofilms on patient urinary catheters despite antibiotic administration. World J. Urol. 2020;38:2237–2245. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-03027-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Griffith DM, Veech JA, Marsh CJ. Cooccur: probabilistic species co-occurrence analysis in R. J. Stat. Softw. 2016;69:1–17. doi: 10.18637/jss.v069.c02. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gaston, J. R. et al. Enterococcus faecalis polymicrobial interactions facilitate biofilm formation, antibiotic recalcitrance, and persistent colonization of the catheterized urinary tract. Pathogens9, 835 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Mody L, et al. Enhancing resident safety by preventing healthcare-associated infection: a national initiative to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections in nursing homes. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015;61:86–94. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rogers MAM, et al. Use of urinary collection devices in skilled nursing facilities in five states. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2008;56:854–861. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01675.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kunin CM, Douthitt S, Dancing J, Anderson J, Moeschberger M. The association between the use of urinary catheters and morbidity and mortality among elderly patients in nursing homes. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1992;135:291–301. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tsan L, et al. Nursing home-associated infections in Department of Veterans Affairs community living centers. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2010;38:461–466. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Levy MM, et al. Outcomes of the surviving sepsis campaign in intensive care units in the USA and Europe: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2012;12:919–924. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70239-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hooton TM, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 International Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010;50:625–663. doi: 10.1086/650482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mylotte JM. Nursing home-acquired bloodstream infection. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2005;26:833–837. doi: 10.1086/502502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 13.0, 2023. http://www.eucast.org (2023).
- 36.Ch’ng J-H, et al. Heme cross-feeding can augment Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis dual species biofilms. ISME J. 2022;16:2015–2026. doi: 10.1038/s41396-022-01248-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Flores-Mireles AL, et al. Fibrinogen release and deposition on urinary catheters placed during urological procedures. J. Urol. 2016;196:416–421. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.01.100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Oksanen J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package_. R package version 2.6-4, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (2022).
- 39.Kindt, R. Coe R. Tree diversity analysis. A manual and software for common statistical methods for ecological and biodiversity studies_. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF). ISBN 92-9059-179-X. http://www.worldagroforestry.org/output/tree-diversity-analysis (2005).
- 40.Hannan TJ, Mysorekar IU, Hung CS, Isaacson-Schmid ML, Hultgren SJ. Early severe inflammatory responses to uropathogenic E. coli predispose to chronic and recurrent urinary tract infection. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1001042. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zou, Z. et al. E. coli catheter-associated urinary tract infections are associated with distinctive virulence and biofilm gene determinants. JCI Insight8, e161461 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 42.Brooks T, Keevil CW. A simple artificial urine for the growth of urinary pathogens. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1997;24:203–206. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765X.1997.00378.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Guiton PS, et al. Combinatorial small-molecule therapy prevents uropathogenic Escherichia coli catheter-associated urinary tract infections in mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012;56:4738–4745. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00447-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Sequencing files for isolates sequenced after January 14, 2020 have been deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read archive under BioProject ID PRJNA956906. Despite exhaustive efforts to locate the original sequencing prior to this date, the authors were unable to locate the original files. All analyses have been performed on the subset of data for which the sequencing data exists (see Supplementary Figs. 8 and 9) and the conclusions, including the average species identified per patient, species identified per collection period, and relative species abundance were the same. Source data are provided with this paper.