Abstract
Many parts of the animal and human body host groups of bacteria, viruses, and fungi that together are known as the microbiome. Microbiomes do not cause disease but are important for the healthy working of many systems in the body, including for reproduction and fertility. While the microbiome that lives in a reproductive tract play the most direct role, microbiomes from other areas of the body may also affect reproductive health. However, not much is known about how these groups of microorganisms regulate fertility as well as the health of parents and offspring and help animals to cope with environmental changes. Furthermore, compared to the large amount of research in laboratory species and humans, there is less information about domestic or wild animal species. This special series of Reproduction and Fertility on microbiomes is aimed at filling this gap with articles from experts highlighting important evidence in reproductive microbiomes, current research gaps, and new directions.
Keywords: microbiomes, fertility, human, reproductive health, animal
Introduction
Microbiomes are diverse communities of microorganisms (including bacteria, fungi, viruses, and phages) residing in various niches (e.g. gut, oral cavity, skin, and vagina) in and on living organisms. They play crucial roles in many aspects of health and influence disease as well as disease risks. In recent decades, great research strides have been made to characterize the influence of different communities of microbiota on reproduction and fertility in both human and animal species (Hummel et al. 2022). Different microbiomes in the reproductive tract interact with and regulate physiological functions that are related to reproduction and fertility even before conception. This even includes attraction between individuals through secondary sexual features (Rowe et al. 2020). Moreover, the quality of gametes and the reproductive tract environment is very much dependent on a healthy microbiome during and shortly after conception. It then encompasses the optimal development of the fetus and microbiome seeding at birth (Sun et al. 2023). In many animal species, the perinatal stage is known to be a key period for microbiome influences on both maternal health and appropriate colonization of the infant gut. In mammals, the milk microbiome also plays a key role during the lactation (Keady et al. 2023) to influence the microorganisms that take up residence in the newborn gut.
This special series of the journal Reproduction and Fertility explores the intricate relationship between different microbiome niches and reproductive health, shedding light on mechanisms and implications of their interaction. Although many areas remain to be addressed, the special series provides new insights about microbiomes in reproductive tracts, milk microbiomes, the link between microbiota and reproductive pathologies, and the possibility to manipulate or engineer microbiomes to treat diseases and medical conditions. It also explores comparative aspects and plasticity of microbiomes in wild and domestic animal species.
‘Reproductive’ microbiomes
The microbiome has been shown to impact gamete development, including spermatogenesis and oogenesis. Specifically, studies in mice have demonstrated that the gut microbiome is capable of influencing the expression of genes related to spermatogenesis and steroidogenesis (Ding et al. 2020, Diviccaro et al. 2022). This interplay may affect hormone levels and reproductive outcomes. Similarly, suboptimal vaginal microbiome has been associated with impaired oocyte quality and reduced fertility in women (Xu et al. 2020).
The microbiome of the reproductive tracts in both males and females contribute to maintaining homeostasis and protecting against pathogens. In females, the vaginal microbiome helps regulate pH and prevent the overgrowth of potentially harmful microorganisms, which can affect fertility and increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (Moumne et al. 2021). In males, the prostate and seminal microbiomes are thought to influence sperm function and reproductive success (Farahani et al. 2021).
The microbiome is also noted to have implications for assisted reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilization (IVF). Studies have shown that the bacterial composition of the vaginal microbiome can influence the success rate of IVF procedures, with specific microbial profiles associated with improved implantation and pregnancy rates (Franasiak et al. 2021). Furthermore, emerging evidence suggests that the microbiome of the embryo culture medium used during IVF may impact embryo development and viability (Cariati et al. 2023).
During pregnancy, the maternal microbiome undergoes dynamic changes to allow greater energy harvesting and decreased immune response that influence maternal health and fetal development. Imbalances in the gut microbiome have been linked to gestational complications, such as preeclampsia and gestational diabetes (Stupak & Kwaśniewski 2023). Furthermore, specific bacterial species have been linked to preterm birth independently of clinically apparent infection, uterine anomalies, and other pregnancy complications (Vidmar Šimic et al. 2023). Additionally, the placental microbiome has been a subject of investigation but also controversy, with some studies identifying potential implications for fetal immune development and long-term health (Stupak & Kwaśniewski 2023) while others have highlighted the inconsistencies in this research (Walter & Hornef 2021).
The microbiome can also have transgenerational effects on reproductive health. Evidence from animal studies suggests that perturbations in the maternal microbiome can impact the microbiome of offspring, influencing their reproductive outcomes and susceptibility to diseases later in life (Russell et al. 2023). Further research is still needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying these transgenerational effects.
Commonalities and differences between animal species (including humans)
Various animal species harbor diverse bacterial communities in their reproductive tracts, including the vagina, uterus, and seminal fluid. These communities contribute to maintaining a balanced microbial ecosystem critical for reproductive health. For example, females from many animal species, including humans, display a dominance of Lactobacillus spp. in their reproductive tract (Chen et al. 2021). Lactobacilli have several beneficial properties including contributing to an acidic environment, preventing the overgrowth of pathogenic microorganisms, and promoting sperm survival (Souza et al. 2023). Microbes in the reproductive tract can influence fertility by modulating hormone levels, immune responses, and nutrient availability (Moreno & Simon 2019). For instance, certain bacteria produce metabolites that regulate ovulation (Liu et al. 2023) or affect sperm motility (Farahani et al. 2021).
Anatomical differences between animal species lead to variations in the structures of reproductive tracts. This, in turn, influences the composition and diversity of their reproductive microbiome. The presence of a cloaca in nonmammalian versus mammalian species is a good example (Videvall et al. 2018). Moreover, diet is one of the most impactful influences of the microbiome (Dahl et al. 2020), and dietary preferences of animal species impact their microbiome composition (Pilla & Suchodolski 2021), including those involved in reproduction. Herbivorous species may have distinct microbial profiles compared to carnivorous or omnivorous species, affecting reproductive functions (Ley et al. 2008, Wu et al. 2022). Interestingly, animal species with different modes of reproduction, such as internal fertilization, external fertilization, or asexual reproduction, exhibit variations in their reproductive microbiome. For example, species engaging in internal fertilization often have more complex microbial communities in their reproductive tracts (Rowe et al. 2020). Lastly, each animal species has evolved unique interactions with its microbiome, leading to species-specific microbial compositions. These interactions are influenced by factors such as genetics, behavior, and environment, resulting in distinct microbial signatures in the various reproductive microbiomes (Rowe et al. 2020).
Current limitations in the study and understanding of the role of microbiomes
Despite the growing interest, several limitations impede our comprehensive understanding of the intricate relationship between the microbiome and reproductive health.
One major limitation is the vast variability and complexity of the microbiome across individuals, tissues, and time (Bharti & Grimm 2021). For instance, the composition and function of the human microbiome is readily influenced by several factors such as age, sex, genetics, geography, lifestyle, and environmental exposures. This heterogeneity poses challenges in establishing consistent associations between specific microbial profiles and reproductive outcomes.
Another limitation stems from the lack of standardized protocols for sampling and analysis of the microbiome in reproductive biology (Bharti & Grimm 2021). Variations in sample collection techniques, storage, DNA extraction, sequencing methods, and bioinformatics pipelines can introduce biases and hinder comparability across studies. Developing standardized procedures and establishing robust quality control measures are essential to facilitate data harmonization and enable more accurate comparisons and meta-analyses (Kim et al. 2017).
Establishing causality between specific microbiome alterations and reproductive outcomes remains challenging. Many studies rely on correlation analysis which alone cannot determine whether microbial changes directly impact fertility or if they are merely bystanders given the bidirectional relationships of hormones and the microbiome. Functional studies using animal models, in vitro experiments, and intervention trials are necessary to unravel the mechanistic pathways and causal relationships underlying microbiome–reproduction interactions. Additionally, identifying specific microbial metabolites and their effects on reproductive tissues can provide valuable insights into microbial mechanisms of action.
Most of the current research focuses on cross-sectional studies, limiting our understanding of the temporal dynamics, volatility, and stability of the microbiome in relation to reproductive health (Park & Plantinga 2023). Longitudinal studies tracking microbiome changes over time considering baseline differences as well as influencing factors are crucial to capture the dynamic nature of microbial communities and assess how fluctuations impact reproductive outcomes. These studies would provide insights into the role of microbiome stability and resilience in maintaining fertility and optimizing reproductive interventions. Ethical considerations also pose limitations on conducting microbiome studies in reproductive health. Collecting samples from reproductive tissues, such as the uterus or fallopian tubes, are invasive and challenging. Additionally, designing studies that account for confounding factors, such as lifestyle, medications, hormonal fluctuations, and fertility treatments, requires careful consideration. Ethical guidelines and innovative study designs that overcome these challenges are essential to advance our knowledge in this field.
Future directions
Future studies should aim to comprehensively characterize the composition and dynamics of reproductive tract microbiomes across different species. Investigating variations in microbial populations, their interactions, and their responses to environmental factors could also provide valuable insights into the factors influencing fertility and reproductive health. A deeper understanding of the intricate interactions between reproductive tract microbiomes and their host organisms is crucial. Elucidating the mechanisms by which microbiota influence reproductive processes, such as hormone regulation, gamete development, and implantation, can pave the way for targeted interventions to enhance or even suppress fertility.
The role of the microbiome in reproductive disorders and pathologies requires further exploration. Research should focus on discerning how dysbiosis, i.e. alterations in microbiome composition, may contribute to conditions such as endometriosis, polycystic ovary syndrome, and male infertility. Identifying specific microbial signatures associated with these pathologies can aid in early detection, prevention, and personalized treatment strategies. The potential therapeutic applications of microbiome modulation in reproductive health merits extensive investigation. Developing microbiome-based interventions, such as precision probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics, could offer novel approaches to enhance fertility outcomes, mitigate reproductive disorders, and improve assisted reproductive technologies success rates.
Considering the influence of environmental factors on reproductive tract microbiomes is essential. Studies should examine how lifestyle choices, dietary patterns, exposure to toxins, and antibiotic use impact microbiome composition and function. Such knowledge can guide the development of evidence-based recommendations to optimize reproductive health in humans as well as in animal species.
Comparative studies across different animal species can provide valuable insights into the evolution and conservation of microbiome-mediated reproductive processes. Investigating similarities and differences in reproductive tract microbiomes can shed light on fundamental mechanisms and highlight potential targets for therapeutic interventions in both humans and animals.
The integration of technologies to identify microbes and analyze their functions (including metagenomics, meta-transcriptomics, metabolomics, and mass spectrometry) will advance our understanding of the complex relationships between reproductive tract microbiomes and host physiology. These approaches can unveil functional pathways, microbial metabolites, and gene expression profiles that underpin reproductive processes, offering new avenues for therapeutic interventions.
Conclusions
Although the study of the microbiome in reproduction and fertility holds great promise, important limitations need to be addressed. Standardizing methodologies, establishing causality, conducting longitudinal studies, and navigating ethical considerations are crucial steps to overcome these limitations. There also is an urgent need to identify and classify of lot of unknown microbes. Advances in these areas will foster a more comprehensive understanding of the intricate interactions between microbiomes and reproductive health, ultimately leading to innovative interventions and personalized approaches to optimize fertility and reproductive outcomes.
Declaration of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of this commentary.
Funding
This work did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.
Author contribution statement
SO and PC equally contributed to the conception, drafting, writing, editing, and finalization of the manuscript.
References
- Bharti R & Grimm DG. 2021Current challenges and best-practice protocols for microbiome analysis. Briefings in Bioinformatics 22178–193. ( 10.1093/BIB/BBZ155) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cariati F, Carotenuto C, Bagnulo F, Pacella D, Marrone V, Paolillo R, Catania MR, Di Girolamo R, Conforti A, Strina I, et al. 2023Endometrial microbiota profile in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients by culturomics-based analysis. Frontiers in Endocrinology 141204729. ( 10.3389/FENDO.2023.1204729) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X Lu Y Chen T & Li R. 2021The female vaginal microbiome in health and bacterial vaginosis. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 11631972. ( 10.3389/FCIMB.2021.631972) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dahl WJ Rivero Mendoza D & Lambert JM. 2020Diet, nutrients and the microbiome. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science 171237–263. ( 10.1016/BS.PMBTS.2020.04.006) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ding N, Zhang X, Zhang Di XD, Jing J, Liu SS, Mu YP, Peng LL, Yan YJ, Xiao GM, Bi XY, et al. 2020Impairment of spermatogenesis and sperm motility by the high-fat diet-induced dysbiosis of gut microbes. Gut 691608–1619. ( 10.1136/GUTJNL-2019-319127) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diviccaro S Fitzgerald JA Cioffi L Falvo E Crispie F Cotter PD O’Mahony SM Giatti S Caruso D & Melcangi RC. 2022Gut steroids and microbiota: effect of gonadectomy and sex. Biomolecules 12. ( 10.3390/BIOM12060767) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farahani L Tharakan T Yap T Ramsay JW Jayasena CN & Minhas S. 2021The semen microbiome and its impact on sperm function and male fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrology 9115–144. ( 10.1111/andr.12886) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Franasiak JM Alecsandru D Forman EJ Gemmell LC Goldberg JM Llarena N Margolis C Laven J Schoenmakers S & Seli E. 2021A review of the pathophysiology of recurrent implantation failure. Fertility and Sterility 1161436–1448. ( 10.1016/J.FERTNSTERT.2021.09.014) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hummel GL Austin K & Cunningham-Hollinger HC. 2022Comparing the maternal-fetal microbiome of humans and cattle: a translational assessment of the reproductive, placental, and fetal gut microbiomes. Biology of Reproduction 107371–381. ( 10.1093/BIOLRE/IOAC067) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keady MM Jimenez RR Bragg M Wagner JCP Bornbusch SL Power ML & Muletz-Wolz CR. 2023Ecoevolutionary processes structure milk microbiomes across the mammalian tree of life. PNAS 120e2218900120. ( 10.1073/PNAS.2218900120) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim D, Hofstaedter CE, Zhao C, Mattei L, Tanes C, Clarke E, Lauder A, Sherrill-Mix S, Chehoud C, Kelsen J, et al. 2017Optimizing methods and dodging pitfalls in microbiome research. Microbiome 552. ( 10.1186/S40168-017-0267-5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ley RE, Hamady M, Lozupone C, Turnbaugh PJ, Ramey RR, Bircher JS, Schlegel ML, Tucker TA, Schrenzel MD, Knight R, et al. 2008Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science 3201647–1651. ( 10.1126/SCIENCE.1155725) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu J Liu Y & Li X. 2023Effects of intestinal flora on polycystic ovary syndrome. Frontiers in Endocrinology 141151723. ( 10.3389/FENDO.2023.1151723) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moreno I & Simon C. 2019Deciphering the effect of reproductive tract microbiota on human reproduction. Reproductive Medicine and Biology 1840–50. ( 10.1002/rmb2.12249) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moumne O Hampe ME Montoya-Williams D Carson TL Neu J Francois M Rhoton-Vlasak A & Lemas DJ. 2021Implications of the vaginal microbiome and potential restorative strategies on maternal health: a narrative review. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 49402–411. ( 10.1515/JPM-2020-0367) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park DJ & Plantinga AM. 2023Impact of data and study characteristics on microbiome volatility estimates. Genes 14. ( 10.3390/GENES14010218) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pilla R & Suchodolski JS. 2021The gut microbiome of dogs and cats, and the influence of diet. Veterinary Clinics of North America 51605–621. ( 10.1016/J.CVSM.2021.01.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rowe M Veerus L Trosvik P Buckling A & Pizzari T. 2020The reproductive microbiome: an emerging driver of sexual selection, sexual conflict, mating systems, and reproductive isolation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 35220–234. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2019.11.004) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Russell AL McAdams ZL Donovan E Seilhamer N Siegrist M Franklin CL & Ericsson AC. 2023The contribution of maternal oral, vaginal, and gut microbiota to the developing offspring gut. Scientific Reports 1313660. ( 10.1038/S41598-023-40703-7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Souza SV Monteiro PB Moura GA Santos NO Fontanezi CTB Gomes IA & Teixeira CA. 2023Vaginal microbioma and the presence of Lactobacillus spp. as interferences in female fertility: a review system. JBRA Assisted Reproduction 27496–506. ( 10.5935/1518-0557.20230006) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stupak A & Kwaśniewski W. 2023Evaluating current molecular techniques and evidence in assessing microbiome in placenta-related health and disorders in pregnancy. Biomolecules 13911. ( 10.3390/BIOM13060911) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun Z Lee-Sarwar K Kelly RS Lasky-Su JA Litonjua AA Weiss ST & Liu YY. 2023Revealing the importance of prenatal gut microbiome in offspring neurodevelopment in humans. EBiomedicine 90104491. ( 10.1016/J.EBIOM.2023.104491) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Videvall E Strandh M Engelbrecht A Cloete S & Cornwallis CK. 2018Measuring the gut microbiome in birds: comparison of faecal and cloacal sampling. Molecular Ecology Resources 18424–434. ( 10.1111/1755-0998.12744) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vidmar Šimic M Maver A Zimani AN Hočevar K Peterlin B Kovanda A & Premru-Sršen T. 2023Oral microbiome and preterm birth. Frontiers in Medicine 101177990. ( 10.3389/FMED.2023.1177990) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walter J & Hornef MW. 2021A philosophical perspective on the prenatal in utero microbiome debate. Microbiome 95. ( 10.1186/S40168-020-00979-7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu X Wei Q Wang X Shang Y & Zhang H. 2022Evolutionary and dietary relationships of wild mammals based on the gut microbiome. Gene 808145999. ( 10.1016/J.GENE.2021.145999) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu J Bian G Zheng M Lu G Chan WY Li W Yang K Chen ZJ & Du Y. 2020Fertility factors affect the vaginal microbiome in women of reproductive age. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology 483. ( 10.1111/AJI.13220) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]