Skip to main content
American Journal of Translational Research logoLink to American Journal of Translational Research
. 2023 Dec 15;15(12):6918–6925.

Risk factors for male breast cancer

Ian S Fentiman 1
PMCID: PMC10767513  PMID: 38186995

Abstract

Male breast cancer (MBC) presents problems with identification of high-risk groups. Risk factors include hepatic dysfunction, high ambient working temperature, exposure to exhaust fumes and obesity, but none identify a group with a high absolute number of MBC cases. The two significant cohorts are BRCA2 mutation carriers and individuals with Klinefelter’s syndrome (KS), responsible for up to 15% of cases. Since >90% of male tumours are ER+ve, endocrine intervention is logical with the likely agent being tamoxifen. In terms of an acceptable endocrine agent, compliance studies. Compliance studies indicate that men do not tolerate tamoxifen well because of side-effects. Although certain groups with an increased risk of MBC can be identified, the absolute number of cases is small so, at present, a meaningful prevention study is not an option.

Keywords: Male breast cancer, BRCA2, Klinefelter’s syndrome, tamoxifen, prevention

Introduction

Search for subtle differences which could be exploitable for more gender-specific therapy for MBC is ongoing. One striking difference between female breast cancer (FBC) and male breast cancer (MBC) is the very high rate of tumor estrogen receptor positivity (ER+ve) in males. In a collaborative study of 1483 MBC cases, 99% had cancers that were ER+ve and 82% were progesterone receptor positive [1], implying that endocrine manipulation could be used for prevention. Firstly, a high-risk group has to be identified. Of the numerous risk factors identified the major components are geographical location, obesity, occupation, genetic mutations and Klinefelter’s syndrome.

Location

In the developed world, MBC comprises <1% of all breast cancers but, in sub-Saharan Africa a male/female incidence ratio of 1:10 has been recorded [2]. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) was present in up to 25% of tested individuals, with the highest rate in Zimbabwe [3]. Resulting hepatic dysfunction increases risk through peripheral conversion of androgens to estradiol. Paradoxically, in Tanzania the incidence of MBC has dropped significantly since the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic because of increased mortality [4].

Occupation

Older case-control studies linked MBC to work in hot environments, such as blast furnaces, steel works and rolling mills [5-8]. High ambient temperature overrides the heat exchange mechanism normally maintaining the testes 2-7°C cooler than body core temperature. Heat inhibits spermatogenesis and testosterone synthesis. Steel production in the USA peaked at 111.4 million tons in 1973 and fell to 70 million tons by 1984. In 1974 there were 512,000 steel workers but, by 2020 only 57,800, with many not working close to the heat sources, reducing the potential at-risk group. In the tropics the situation is different. A cross-sectional study from South India assessed thermal stress by wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) and dehydration from urine color and specific gravity [9]. Of concern, 90% of WBGT measurements were above the recommended threshold limits, associated with excessive sweating, fatigue, and tiredness. Increased mortality from lung cancer, ischaemic heart chronic and liver disease, probably obscures any signal of increased MBC risk.

A Danish study of occupational exposure to petrol and exhaust fumes included 12,880 controls and 230 MBC cases, with a 2.5-fold increase in odds ratio (OR) for MBC with an estimated lag time of >10 years [10]. The OR rose to 5.4 among men aged <40 when first employed. Florida firefighters have reduced overall mortality from cancers but more deaths from MBC [11]. Carcinogens in exhaust emissions include polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, benzene, toluene and 1.3-butadiene, present in both tumors and benign tissue [12]. Wide variation in DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) adduct levels may partly result from DNA repair gene polymorphism [13].

Welding fumes are carcinogenic, containing iron, nickel, molybdenum and indium tin oxide [14]. In a European multi-center study with 644 cases and 1,959 controls, welding histories were linked up with a measurement-based exposure matrix [15]. Lifetime exposure to welding fumes above the median of exposed controls was associated with a doubling of the risk of MBC (OR 2.07). Results are summarised in Table 1 and despite revealing risk factors do not delineate a high-risk group.

Table 1.

Occupational risk of MBC

Author Occupation Study MBC risk
Mabuchi 1985 Steel making Case control 7 versus 0
McLaughlin 1988 Printing Cohort SIR 3.9
Perfume making SIR 7.6
Lenfant-Pejovic 1990 High temperature Case control OR 2.8
Cocco 1998 High temperature Case control OR 3.4
Hansen 2000 Gasoline & exhaust Case control OR 2.5
Ma 2005 Firefighters Cohort SMR 7.4
Kendzia 2022 Welders Case control OR 2.07

SIR, standardized incidence rate. OR, odds ratio. SMR, standardized mortality rate.

Obesity

Obesity is the most common cause of hyperestrogenisation in males and is associated with at least a doubling of MBC risk [16-19]. Similarly, there is a doubling of risk for diabetics as vascular disease leads to testicular dysfunction in up to 90% [18,20,21]. Swerdlow et al conducted an interview population-based study with 1998 cases and 1597 controls [22]. MBC risk increased significantly with increasing body mass index (BMI) and age, as shown in Table 2. There was an even stronger association between large waist circumference five years before interview. Although significant, because it is common, obesity does not define a manageable high-risk group for a prevention study.

Table 2.

Risk of MBC with BMI and age (Swerdlow 2021)

Variable OR 95% CI
BMI age 20 per 2 unit change 1.07 1.02-1.12
BMI age 40 per 2 unit change 1.11 1.07-1.16
BMI age 60 per 2 unit change 1.14 1.09-1.10

Genetics

Between 5 and 10% of MBC cases are due to autosomal dominant inheritance, mostly BRCA2 mutations [23]. The risk of MBC in BRCA2 mutation carriers is 8.9% to age 80 [24]. Using exome sequencing in a cohort of 50,726 volunteers, there were pathogenic mutations in 267 (0.5%), 95 BRCA1 and 172 BRCA2 [25]. Compared with clinical ascertainment, exome sequencing-based screening increased the identification of mutation carriers fivefold.

The role of the androgen receptor (AR) in the etiology of MBC is contentious. Within exon 1 of the AR gene, a polymorphic region containing a variable number of and shorter cytosine, adenine, and guanine (CAG) repeats increases transactivation of the receptor [26]. In 53 MBC cases and controls, Young et al found no overall difference in the length of CAG repeats and no controls had >28 repeats whereas, 2 MBC cases had 29 and 30 repeats [27]. In contrast, a Finnish study screening the entire AR coding region and CAG repeats in 32 cases found no germline mutations and no difference in CAG repeat lengths, concluding that AR gene mutations did not significantly affect risk [28]. Analysis of tissue microarrays from 1984 MBC cases showed that FOXA1+ve and AR+ve tumors were associated with better disease-free survival in ER+ve cases [29]. The authors suggested that AR blockade was a feasible therapeutic approach.

Klinefelter’s syndrome

Of newborn boys, 0.16% have Klinefelter’s syndrome (KS), with at least one X chromosome added to the normal XY karyotype (most frequently 47XXY). Swerdlow et al followed a cohort of 3518 individuals with KS for an average of 15 years: 3002 (85%) were 47XXY and 320 (9%) 47XXY/XY mosaic [30]. They reported that the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for MBC was significantly elevated at 19.2 and the standardized mortality rate (SMR) greatly increased at 57.8. Comparing those having a 47XXY karyotype with men having a 47XXY/46XY mosaic, the latter group had a higher SMR for MBC (223 versus 29). Reviewing these findings, although there was a 20-30-fold increase in risk compared with the male population, Brinton pointed out that this was lower than that of the UK female population (SIR = 166) [31].

Using DNA from 1355 MBC, Moelans et al performed massively parallel sequencing, targeting all exons of 1943 cancer-related genes and reported that 5 (4%) cases had KS and 5/44 (11%) with paired normal tissue had pathogenic BRCA2 germline mutations [32]. By joining these disparate risk factors, possibly up to 15% of men who will develop breast cancer could be identified and offered surveillance in the context of a randomized controlled trial (RCT).

The larger studies of KS have not given the age at diagnosis of MBC, but the case reports and small series show a median age of 57 (range 50-69) [33-36]. On this basis, the appropriate age group for surveillance would be aged 50-70. In the UK, there are approximately 55,000 individuals with KS, in the US, 269,000 have KS. These are enough to generate an adequately powered RCT.

Gynecomastia

Self-limiting gynecomastia is common in pubertal boys and, there is an increased incidence in later life, often spontaneously regressing [37]. Histologically, the incidence of gynecomastia in mastectomy specimens from MBC cases was 21%, less than the 40-55% in unselected autopsy cases [38]. Several older studies found no linkage between gynecomastia and MBC [39-41].

Evidence of a possible association of gynaecomastia with MBC risk came from an investigation of discharge records from the US Veterans Affairs Medical Care System [42]. Among the 4,501,578 men, there were 642 cases of MBC. Conditions significantly related to risk included diabetes, obesity, orchitis, Klinefelter syndrome and gynecomastia. After adjustment for obesity, the diabetic risk disappeared, but gynecomastia remained a significant risk factor. The diagnosis of gynaecomastia was not defined, comprising both true and pseudo gynaecomastia. In some cases, the breast lump may have been a missed MBC.

Coopey et al reviewed histopathology specimens from 932 males undergoing excision biopsy or mastectomy looking for atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) [43]. ADH was present in 19 cases of gynecomastia, 13 being bilateral. After a mean follow-up of 75 months, no breast cancers occurred, suggesting ADH in males carries a lower risk than for females. Most studies indicate that gynecomastia is not a significant risk factor and does not identify a manageable high-risk group.

Endocrine risk factors

Case-control studies examining serum and urinary hormones in MBC showing results that have mostly yielded negative results [44-47] except one which reported increased levels of estradiol in cases [48]. Testicular damage from mumps orchitis aged >20, undescended testes, congenital inguinal hernia and orchidectomy can result in low testosterone levels, an uncommon risk factor for MBC [49].

Diet

Hsing et al interviewed the next of kin of 178 men who had died of MBC and 512 men who had died of other diseases to obtain data on diet, exercise, height, weight, occupation, use of alcohol and tobacco [17]. They found a non-significant trend of increased risk with consumption of red meat and a decrease with higher intake of fruit and vegetables. Higher socio-economic status was associated with increased risk (OR = 1.8, CI 1.1-3.0).

Using data from 10 cancer registries, Rosenblatt et al conducted a study of diet in 220 cases of MBC and 291 controls derived by random digit dialing [50]. There was no association between intake of fat, carbohydrate, or protein fiber. Contradictory results are unsurprising since, until recently, the same situation existed for diet and risk of FBC. It took a cohort study of 188,736 postmenopausal women, of whom 3501 developed breast cancer, to show that a doubling of the percentage energy derived from fat significantly increased risk (HR 1.15) [51]. In the UK Women’s Cohort Study of 35,372 women, 283 developed premenopausal and 395 postmenopausal breast cancer [52]. In postmenopausal women, the hazard ratio was 1.1 for each 50 g of meat per day. These significant but small effects would be undetectable in the male case-control studies so far conducted.

Alcohol

Evidence accumulates that alcohol consumption is a risk factor. Earlier studies of cirrhotic males had shown no increased risk, possibly confounded by the high mortality from cirrhosis and the rarity of MBC [17,20]. Nevertheless, a large Danish study of 11,642 cirrhotic men, with relatively short follow-up (4.3 years), found a fourfold increase in the expected number of cases of MBC [53].

A European multi-centre study with 74 cases and 1432 population controls reported a significant relationship between alcohol consumption and MBC risk [54]. The odds ratio for alcohol intake >90 g/day was 5.89 (CI 2.21-15.69). The risk rose by 16% per 10 g of daily alcohol intake. A bigger study of 1457 MBC cases and 3374 population controls found a similar effect [55]. The high mortality rate in cirrhotics precludes any MBC study.

Ionizing radiation

Exposure of the breasts to ionizing irradiation increases FBC risk and there is some evidence of a similar effect in males [56]. In a study of 75 MBC cases, using neighbourhood controls matched for age and ethnicity, there were no significant differences in exposure to fluoroscopy, repeated chest X-rays, or upper body irradiation, but excess risk associated with ≥10 fluoroscopies [47]. Thomas et al reported a modest increase in risk with repeated chest X-rays or upper body irradiation in a case-control study of 227 MBC cases [57]. The effect emerged 20-35 years after exposure and declined after 40 years.

Using data from the Hiroshima and Nagasaki Tumor Registries, Ron et al reported 9 cases of MBC among 45,880 male atomic bomb survivors [58]. There was a dose response relationship with a significant 8-fold increase in risk per sievert. These conflicting data may result from a long latent period from exposure, so differences in length of follow-up may miss a significant effect of radiation.

Wang et al examined the incidence of MBC after childhood cancer in a systematic review of 38 publications and analyzed data in the PanCareSurFup cohort [59]. The cohort-specific frequencies of MBC were between 0 and 0.40% after follow-up from 24 to 42 years. In the cohort of 37,738 males, there were 16 cases of MBC (0.04%), representing a 22.3-fold increased risk compared with the general male population. Male survivors of childhood cancers have an elevated propensity for MBC, but absolute numbers are low.

Problems with prevention

To conduct a prevention trial with any hope of success, a high-risk group has to be identified. Additionally, an effective, non-toxic, relatively inexpensive intervention is required. There are outstanding problems with each of these criteria. The individuals at high risk of MBC will be a heterogeneous group, including those carrying BRCA2 mutations. Genetics based clinics could provide these individuals, as could others with Klinefelter’s, although some of them would have been diagnosed in male infertility clinics.

Potential agents

For women involved in prevention trials, the main agents tested were the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) tamoxifen [60], aromatase inhibitor anastrozole [61] and the steroidal aromatase inhibitor exemestane [62]. It is logical to test one of these agents in men at risk of MBC since the cancers are almost invariably ER+ve. In the IBIS-II trial, there were 48 ER+ve cancers diagnosed in the anastrozole arm versus 103 in the control arm (HR 0.46).

There are however, problems with gender differences in compliance and efficacy. Men are less likely than women to accept side effects. Three cancer centres have reported side effects in MBC cases receiving adjuvant tamoxifen [63-65]. These included reduced libido, weight gain, hot flashes and mood alterations. As a direct result, >20% stopped tamoxifen within a year of diagnosis, compared with only 10% of females. With these levels of non-compliance in men diagnosed with breast cancer how much more difficult will it be to persuade males at risk to take tamoxifen?

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are ineffective in MBC. In a SEER-derived analysis of 124 MBC cases, 95 received tamoxifen and 19 an aromatase inhibitor [66]. Cancer mortality was lower in those receiving tamoxifen compared with no adjuvant therapy but there was no benefit from adjuvant AIs. In a series of 257 German MBC patients with ER+ve cancers, 207 received tamoxifen and 50 were prescribed AIs [67]. After 42.2 months, there were 47 (18%) deaths in the tamoxifen group compared with 16 (32%) in the AI group, a 1.5-fold increase. In a study of 316 FBC and 158 MBC treated with adjuvant tamoxifen, together with 60 FBC and 30 MBC given AIs, the 5-year overall survival of FBC and MBC patients given tamoxifen was similar: 85% versus 89% [68]. In contrast, FBC patients given AIs had significantly better survival than MBC cases 85.0% versus 73.3% (P = 0.028). The gender difference in efficacy of adjuvant AIs may relate to testicular estrogen synthesis, unaffected by AIs [69]. Approximately 20% of male estrogen originates from the testes. This means that if men are given an AI, it should be combined with a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) analog (GnRHa) to stop testicular stimulation by the hypothalamus but with an increase in side-effects such as hot flashes.

Reinisch et al measured changes in serum estradiol levels in 56 MBC cases after three months of therapy with tamoxifen alone, tamoxifen plus GnRH analog (GnRHa) or an aromatase inhibitor plus GnRHa [70]. Median estradiol levels increased by 67% with tamoxifen, decreased by 85% with tamoxifen plus GnRHa, and decreased by 72% with AI plus GnRHa. Both sexual function and quality of life were worse with added GnRHa. This illustrates the limited repertoire of endocrine candidates for MBC prevention.

In the absence of prevention, it is necessary to revert to early detection and indeed, the screening programmes have successfully picked up small cancers in women. For males, mammography can be painful and time-consuming. In contrast, although requiring an expert ultrasonographer, ultrasound scans would be a reasonable approach for men at risk. Early detection could be examined in a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing annual ultrasound with annual clinical examination. The target group would comprise men with KS and carriers of BRCA2 and occasionally BRCA2 mutations. Unfortunately, although there is a significantly elevated standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 21.3 this is derived from a population of 3518 KS cases, followed for 15 years in which there were 4 cases of MBC [30]. Hence, the logistics of conducting a trial for this group appear daunting because of the rarity of MBC.

Conclusions

At present, there are no outstanding candidate agents for the prevention of MBC, but there is scope for an RCT of early detection in those at increased risk with Klinefelter’s syndrome or being carriers of BRCA2 mutations. A possible trial could compare annual clinical examination versus annual clinical examination plus bilateral breast ultrasound. Such a study would need national and international support and provide an opportunity for broader recognition of this rare but potentially fatal disease.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Cardoso F, Bartlett JMS, Slaets L, van Deurzen CHM, van Leeuwen-Stok E, Porter P, Linderholm B, Hedenfalk I, Schroder C, Martens J, Bayani J, van Asperen C, Murray M, Hudis C, Middleton L, Vermeij J, Punie K, Fraser J, Nowaczyk M, Rubio IT, Aebi S, Kelly C, Ruddy KJ, Winer E, Nilsson C, Lago LD, Korde L, Benstead K, Bogler O, Goulioti T, Peric A, Litiere S, Aalders KC, Poncet C, Tryfonidis K, Giordano SH. Characterization of male breast cancer: results of the EORTC 10085/TBCRC/BIG/NABCG International Male Breast Cancer Program. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:405–417. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hassan I, Mabogunje O. Cancer of the male breast in Zaria, Nigeria. East Afr Med J. 1995;72:457–458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zampino R, Boemio A, Sagnelli C, Alessio L, Adinolfi LE, Sagnelli E, Coppola N. Hepatitis B virus burden in developing countries. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:11941–11953. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i42.11941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Amir H, Kaaya EE, Kwesigabo G, Kiitinya JN. Breast cancer before and during the AIDS epidemic in women and men: a study of Tanzanian Cancer Registry Data 1968 to 1996. J Natl Med Assoc. 2000;92:301–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mabuchi K, Bross DS, Kessler II. Risk factors for male breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1985;74:371–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McLaughlin JK, Malker HS, Blot WJ, Weiner JA, Ericsson JL, Fraumeni JF Jr. Occupational risks for male breast cancer in Sweden. Br J Ind Med. 1988;45:275–6. doi: 10.1136/oem.45.4.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lenfant-Pejovic MH, Mlika-Cabanne N, Bouchardy C, Auquier A. Risk factors for male breast cancer: a Franco-Swiss case-control study. Int J Cancer. 1990;45:661–5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910450415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cocco P, Figgs L, Dosemeci M, Hayes R, Linet MS, Hsing AW. Case-control study of occupational exposures and male breast cancer. Occup Environ Med. 1998;55:599–604. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.9.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Krishnamurthy M, Ramalingam P, Perumal K, Kamalakannan LP, Chinnadurai J, Shanmugam R, Srinivasan K, Venugopal V. Occupational heat stress impacts on health and productivity in a steel industry in Southern India. Saf Health Work. 2017;8:99–104. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2016.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hansen J. Elevated risk for male breast cancer after occupational exposure to gasoline and vehicular combustion products. Am J Ind Med. 2000;37:349–352. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(200004)37:4<349::aid-ajim4>3.0.co;2-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ma F, Fleming LE, Lee DJ, Trapido E, Gerace TA, Lai H, Lai S. Mortality in Florida professional firefighters, 1972 to 1999. Am J Ind Med. 2005;47:509–517. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rundle A, Tang D, Hibshoosh H, Estabrook A, Schnabel F, Cao W, Grumet S, Perera FP. The relationship between genetic damage from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in breast tissue and breast cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2000;21:1281–1289. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Smith TR, Levine EA, Perrier ND, Miller MS, Freimanis RI, Lohman K, Case LD, Xu J, Mohrenweiser HW, Hu JJ. DNA-repair genetic polymorphisms and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:1200–1204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.International Agency for Research on Cancer. Welding, molybdenum trioxide, and indium tin oxide: IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum, Volume 118. https://publications.iarc.fr/569. [PubMed]
  • 15.Kendzia B, Kaerlev L, Ahrens W, Merletti F, Eriksson M, Guénel P, Lynge E, Costa-Pereira A, Morales Suárez-Varela M, Jöckel KH, Stang A, Behrens T. Lifetime exposure to welding fumes and risk of some rare cancers. Am J Epidemiol. 2022;191:1753–1765. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.D’Avanzo B, La Vecchia C. Risk factors for male breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1995;71:1359–1362. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1995.264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hsing AW, McLaughlin JK, Cocco P, Co Chien HT, Fraumeni JF Jr. Risk factors for male breast cancer (United States) Cancer Causes Control. 1998;9:269–275. doi: 10.1023/a:1008869003012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ewertz M, Holmberg L, Tretli S, Pedersen BV, Kristensen A. Risk factors for male breast cancer--a case-control study from Scandinavia. Acta Oncol. 2001;40:467–71. doi: 10.1080/028418601750288181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Johnson KC, Pan S, Mao Y Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Research Group. Risk factors for male breast cancer in Canada, 1994-1998. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2002;11:253–263. doi: 10.1097/00008469-200206000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Weiderpass E, Ye W, Adami HO, Vainio H, Trichopoulos D, Nyrén O. Breast cancer risk in male alcoholics in Sweden. Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12:661–664. doi: 10.1023/a:1011216502678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Amaral S, Oliveira PJ, Ramalho-Santos J. Diabetes and the impairment of reproductive function: possible role of mitochondria and reactive oxygen species. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2008;4:46–54. doi: 10.2174/157339908783502398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Swerdlow AJ, Bruce C, Cooke R, Coulson P, Griffin J, Butlin A, Smith B, Swerdlow MJ, Jones ME. Obesity and breast cancer risk in men: a national case-control study in England and Wales. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021;5:pkab078. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Martin AM, Weber BL. Genetic and hormonal risk factors in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1126–35. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.14.1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Evans DG, Susnerwala I, Dawson J, Woodward E, Maher ER, Lalloo F. Risk of breast cancer in male BRCA2 carriers. J Med Genet. 2010;47:710–1. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2009.075176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Manickam K, Buchanan AH, Schwartz MLB, Hallquist MLG, Williams JL, Rahm AK, Rocha H, Savatt JM, Evans AE, Butry LM, Lazzeri AL, Lindbuchler DM, Flansburg CN, Leeming R, Vogel VG, Lebo MS, Mason-Suares HM, Hoskinson DC, Abul-Husn NS, Dewey FE, Overton JD, Reid JG, Baras A, Willard HF, McCormick CZ, Krishnamurthy SB, Hartzel DN, Kost KA, Lavage DR, Sturm AC, Frisbie LR, Person TN, Metpally RP, Giovanni MA, Lowry LE, Leader JB, Ritchie MD, Carey DJ, Justice AE, Kirchner HL, Faucett WA, Williams MS, Ledbetter DH, Murray MF. Exome sequencing-based screening for BRCA1/2 expected pathogenic variants among adult biobank participants. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1:e182140. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chamberlain NL, Driver ED, Miesfeld RL. The length and location of CAG trinucleotide repeats in the androgen receptor N-terminal domain affect transactivation function. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:3181–6. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.15.3181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Young IE, Kurian KM, Mackenzie MA, Kunkler IH, Cohen BB, Hooper ML, Wyllie AH, Steel CM. The CAG repeat within the androgen receptor gene in male breast cancer patients. J Med Genet. 2000;37:139–40. doi: 10.1136/jmg.37.2.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Syrjäkoski K, Hyytinen ER, Kuukasjärvi T, Auvinen A, Kallioniemi OP, Kainu T, Koivisto PA. Androgen receptor gene alterations in Finnish male breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003;77:167–70. doi: 10.1023/a:1021369508561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Humphries MP, Sundara Rajan S, Honarpisheh H, Cserni G, Dent J, Fulford L, Jordan LB, Jones JL, Kanthan R, Litwiniuk M, Di Benedetto A, Mottolese M, Provenzano E, Shousha S, Stephens M, Kulka J, Ellis IO, Titloye AN, Hanby AM, Shaaban AM, Speirs V. Characterisation of male breast cancer: a descriptive biomarker study from a large patient series. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45293. doi: 10.1038/srep45293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Swerdlow AJ, Schoemaker MJ, Higgins CD, Wright AF, Jacobs PA UK Clinical Cytogenetics Group. Cancer incidence and mortality in men with Klinefelter syndrome: a cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1204–1210. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brinton LA. Breast cancer risk among patients with Klinefelter syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2011;100:814–818. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.02131.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Moelans CB, de Ligt J, van der Groep P, Prins P, Besselink NJM, Hoogstraat M, ter Hoeve ND, Lacle MM, Kornegoor R, van der Pol CC, de Leng WWJ, Barbé E, van der Vegt B, Martens J, Bult P, Smit VTHBM, Koudijs MJ, Nijman IJ, Voest EE, Selenica P, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS, van der Wall E, Cuppen E, van Diest PJ. The molecular genetic make-up of male breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2019;26:779–794. doi: 10.1530/ERC-19-0278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jackson AW, Muldal S, Ockey CH, O’Connor PJ. Carcinoma of male breast in association with the Klinefelter syndrome. Br Med J. 1965;1:223–225. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5429.223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Robson MC, Santiago Q, Huang TW. Bilateral carcinoma of the breast in a patient with Klinefelter’s syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1968;28:897–902. doi: 10.1210/jcem-28-6-897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lynch HT, Kaplan AR, Lynch JF. Klinefelter syndrome and cancer. A family study. JAMA. 1974;229:809–811. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sanchez AG, Villanueva AG, Redondo C. Lobular carcinoma of the breast in a patient with Klinefelter’s syndrome. A case with bilateral, synchronous, histologically different breast tumors. Cancer. 1986;57:1181–1183. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860315)57:6<1181::aid-cncr2820570619>3.0.co;2-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Treves N. Gynecomastia; the origins of mammary swelling in the male: an analysis of 406 patients with breast hypertrophy, 525 with testicular tumors, and 13 with adrenal neoplasms. Cancer. 1958;11:1083–1102. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(195811/12)11:6<1083::aid-cncr2820110602>3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Andersen JA, Gram JB. Male breast at autopsy. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand A. 1982;90:191–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1982.tb00081_90a.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sasco AJ, Lowenfels AB, Pasker-de Jong P. Review article: epidemiology of male breast cancer. A meta-analysis of published case-control studies and discussion of selected aetiological factors. Int J Cancer. 1993;53:538–49. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910530403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Carlsson G, Hafstrom L, Jonsson P. Male breast cancer. Clin Oncol. 1981;7:149–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Olsson H, Bladstrom A, Alm P. Male gynecomastia and risk for malignant tumours--a cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2002;2:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-2-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Brinton LA, Carreon JD, Gierach GL, McGlynn KA, Gridley G. Etiologic factors for male breast cancer in the U.S. veterans affairs medical care system database. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;119:185–192. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0379-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Coopey SB, Kartal K, Li C, Yala A, Barzilay R, Faulkner HR, King TA, Acevedo F, Garber JE, Guidi AJ, Hughes KS. Atypical ductal hyperplasia in men with gynecomastia: what is their breast cancer risk? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;175:1–4. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-05117-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Scheike O, Svenstrup B, Frandsen VA. Male breast cancer. II. Metabolism of oestradiol-17β in men with breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem. 1973;4:489–501. doi: 10.1016/0022-4731(73)90064-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ribeiro GG, Phillips HV, Skinner LG. Serum oestradiol-17 beta, testosterone, luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone in males with breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1980;41:474–7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1980.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ballerini P, Recchione C, Cavalleri A, Moneta R, Saccozzi R, Secreto G. Hormones in male breast cancer. Tumori. 1990;76:26–28. doi: 10.1177/030089169007600106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Casagrande JT, Hanisch R, Pike MC, Ross RK, Brown JB, Henderson BE. A case-control study of male breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1988;48:1326–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Calabresi E, De Giuli G, Becciolini A, Giannotti P, Lombardi G, Serio M. Plasma estrogens and androgens in male breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem. 1976;7:605–9. doi: 10.1016/0022-4731(76)90084-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Thomas DB, Jimenez LM, McTiernan A, Rosenblatt K, Stalsberg H, Stemhagen A, Thompson WD, Curnen MG, Satariano W, Austin DF, et al. Breast cancer in men: risk factors with hormonal implications. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135:734–48. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rosenblatt KA, Thomas DB, Jimenez LM, Fish B, McTiernan A, Stalsberg H, Stemhagen A, Thompson WD, Curnen MG, Satariano W, Austin DF, Greenberg RS, Key C, Kolonel LN, West DW. The relationship between diet and breast cancer in men (United States) Cancer Causes Control. 1999;10:107–113. doi: 10.1023/a:1008808925665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Thiébaut AC, Kipnis V, Chang SC, Subar AF, Thompson FE, Rosenberg PS, Hollenbeck AR, Leitzmann M, Schatzkin A. Dietary fat and postmenopausal invasive breast cancer in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:451–62. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Taylor EF, Burley VJ, Greenwood DC, Cade JE. Meat consumption and risk of breast cancer in the UK Women’s Cohort Study. Br J Cancer. 2007;96:1139–46. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sørensen HT, Friis S, Olsen JH, Thulstrup AM, Mellemkjaer L, Linet M, Trichopoulos D, Vilstrup H, Olsen J. Risk of liver and other types of cancer in patients with cirrhosis: a nationwide cohort study in Denmark. Hepatology. 1998;28:921–5. doi: 10.1002/hep.510280404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Guenel P, Cyr D, Sabroe S, Lynge E, Merletti F, Ahrens W, Baumgardt-Elms C, Ménégoz F, Olsson H, Paulsen S, Simonato L, Wingren G. Alcohol drinking may increase risk of breast cancer in men: a European population-based case-control study. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15:571–580. doi: 10.1023/B:CACO.0000036154.18162.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lynge E, Afonso N, Kaerlev L, Olsen J, Sabroe S, Ahrens W, Eriksson M, Guénel P, Merletti F, Stengrevics A, Suarez-Varela M, Costa-Pererra A, Vyberg M. European multi-centre case-control study on risk factors for rare cancers of unknown aetiology. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:601–612. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Schottenfeld D, Lilienfeld AM, Diamond H. Some observations on the epidemiology of breast cancer among males. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1963;53:890–7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.53.6.890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Thomas DB, Rosenblatt K, Jimenez LM, McTiernan A, Stalsberg H, Stemhagen A, Thompson WD, Curnen MG, Satariano W, Austin DF, et al. Ionizing radiation and breast cancer in men (United States) Cancer Causes Control. 1994;5:9–14. doi: 10.1007/BF01830721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ron E, Ikeda T, Preston DL, Tokuaka S. Male breast cancer incidence among atomic bomb survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:603–5. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang Y, Reulen RC, Kremer LCM, de Vathaire F, Haupt R, Zadravec Zaletel L, Bagnasco F, Demoor-Goldschmidt C, van Dorp WJ, Haddy N, Hjorth L, Jakab Z, Kuehni CE, Lähteenmäki PM, van der Pal HJH, Sacerdote C, Skinner R, Terenziani M, Wesenberg F, Winther JF, van Leeuwen FE, Hawkins MM, Teepen JC, van Dalen EC, Ronckers CM. Male breast cancer after childhood cancer: systematic review and analyses in the PanCareSurFup cohort. Eur J Cancer. 2022;165:27–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Cuzick J, Sestak I, Cawthorn S, Hamed H, Holli K, Howell A, Forbes JF IBIS-I Investigators. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: extended long-term follow-up of the IBIS-I breast cancer prevention trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:67–75. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71171-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Cuzick J, Sestak I, Forbes JF, Dowsett M, Cawthorn S, Mansel RE, Loibl S, Bonanni B, Evans DG, Howell A IBIS-II investigators. Use of anastrozole for breast cancer prevention (IBIS-II): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;395:117–122. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32955-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Goss PE, Ingle JN, Alés-Martínez JE, Cheung AM, Chlebowski RT, Wactawski-Wende J, McTiernan A, Robbins J, Johnson KC, Martin LW, Winquist E, Sarto GE, Garber JE, Fabian CJ, Pujol P, Maunsell E, Farmer P, Gelmon KA, Tu D, Richardson H NCIC CTG MAP.3 Study Investigators. Exemestane for breast-cancer prevention in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2381–91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Anelli TF, Anelli A, Tran KN, Lebwohl DE, Borgen PI. Tamoxifen administration is associated with a high rate of treatment-limiting symptoms in male breast cancer patients. Cancer. 1994;74:74–7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940701)74:1<74::aid-cncr2820740113>3.0.co;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Visram H, Kanji F, Dent SF. Endocrine therapy for male breast cancer: rates of toxicity and adherence. Curr Oncol. 2010;17:17–21. doi: 10.3747/co.v17i5.631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pemmaraju N, Munsell MF, Hortobagyi GN, Giordano SH. Retrospective review of male breast cancer patients: analysis of tamoxifen-related side-effects. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:1471–1474. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Harlan LC, Zujewski JA, Goodman MT, Stevens JL. Breast cancer in men in the United States: a population-based study of diagnosis, treatment, and survival. Cancer. 2010;116:3558–3568. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Eggemann H, Ignatov A, Smith BJ, Altmann U, von Minckwitz G, Röhl FW, Jahn M, Costa SD. Adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen compared to aromatase inhibitors for 257 male breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137:465–70. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2355-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Eggemann H, Altmann U, Costa SD, Ignatov A. Survival benefit of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor in male and female breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144:337–341. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2539-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Doyen J, Italiano A, Largillier R, Ferrero JM, Fontana X, Thyss A. Aromatase inhibition in male breast cancer patients: biological and clinical implications. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:1243–1245. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Reinisch M, Seiler S, Hauzenberger T, Kamischke A, Schmatloch S, Strittmatter HJ, Zahm DM, Thode C, Furlanetto J, Strik D, Möbus V, Reimer T, Sinn BV, Stickeler E, Marmé F, Janni W, Schmidt M, Rudlowski C, Untch M, Nekljudova V, Loibl S. Efficacy of endocrine therapy for the treatment of breast cancer in men: results from the MALE phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7:565–572. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Translational Research are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES