Abstract
Tumors significantly impact individuals’ physical well-being and quality of life. With the ongoing advancements in optical technology, information technology, robotic technology, etc., laser technology is being increasingly utilized in the field of tumor treatment, and laser ablation (LA) of tumors remains a prominent area of research interest. This paper presents an overview of the recent progress in tumor LA therapy, with a focus on the mechanisms and biological effects of LA, commonly used ablation lasers, image-guided LA, and robotic-assisted LA. Further insights and future prospects are discussed in relation to these aspects, and the paper proposed potential future directions for the development of tumor LA techniques.
Introduction
Cancer is a serious health condition that has a negative impact on individuals, and it currently stands as the second leading cause of death globally. Statistical projections suggest that by 2040, there will be approximately 28.4 million new instances of cancer worldwide [1]. Tumor treatment mainly includes conventional surgical treatment, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and optical therapy. These methods have exhibited rapid advancement in recent years. Optical technology has gained substantial traction within the fields of biology and medicine, offering advantages such as speed, real time, great controllability, and operability [2]. When it comes to medical applications [3], conventional therapies, including laser ablation (LA), photodynamic therapy (PDT), photothermal therapy (PTT), and photocoagulation therapy, have been integrated with laser techniques for clinical treatments.
The evolution of laser technology in the medical industry has encouraged its extensive utilization for cancer treatment [4]. Presently, lasers are crucial for the early diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The application of LA in place of surgical resection for treating tumors is becoming more widespread [5]. Laser therapy employs a focused narrow beam of intense light to eliminate or destroy cancer cells and abnormal cells with the potential to become cancerous. This approach aims to reduce or eliminate tumors or precancerous lesions. Selective laser wavelengths can be employed to precisely target tumor cells, exploiting their different wavelengths (or colors) compared to normal cells. Laser therapy is a localized method of treatment [6] that can be applied to specific body regions, and is frequently used to treat superficial cancers on the organ surfaces or inner linings of internal organs, which includes various types of cancer such as skin cancer [7], liver cancer [8], thyroid cancer [9], breast cancer [10], prostate cancer [11], and other types of cancer.
The integration of image-guided LA [12] and robot-assisted technology [13] has emerged as a current focus in both research and clinical applications. LA treatment has made diverse imaging-guided techniques, including endoscopic guidance, optical coherence tomography (OCT) guidance, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance, ultrasound (US) image guidance, and multimodal image [photoacoustic (PA), MRI-US] guidance. These image-guided treatment technologies hold immense potential across various tumor treatment domains. OCT offers high-resolution imaging data (on a micrometer scale) for visualizing and detecting superficial or early-stage cancers [14–16], thus serving as an invaluable real-time imaging tool and diagnostic technique. Effective recognition and precise measurement, facilitated by medical imaging, enable the accurate definition and delineation of target tissue [17], comparable to the “eye” of accurate identification, and empower LA to achieve enhanced precision and efficiency in therapeutic outcomes. Furthermore, the ongoing advancement in robotic technology has facilitated targeted and precise tumor treatment through robot-assisted laser therapy. Combined with exquisite end effectors carrying laser fibers, a new type of “hand” is installed on the robot in this way, using fibers to deliver energy to the targeted tumor tissue for therapeutic interventions.
The path of intelligent theranostics holds immense significance in the future medical development [17]. Research into intelligent analysis-guided LA therapy based on medical imaging and robot-assisted LA therapy grounded in reinforcement learning has gained substantial interest in recent years, in line with the continuous evolution of artificial intelligence and allied technologies. Additionally, equipping intelligent end effectors to guide optical fiber LA can generate noninvasive or minimally invasive therapeutic effects for intracavitary and natural cavity therapy. Employing flexible robot [18] to guide optical fibers in delivering light energy to target tissues for ablation treatment enables minimally invasive theranostics. Furthermore, the fusion of preoperative and intraoperative images or data is used to construct a three-dimensional (3D) model of the target tumor tissues for localization. Through surgical navigation technology [19] to guide intelligent treatment, an intelligent image-guided theranostic LA technology is established. Therefore, the integration of intelligent recognition, diagnosis, and treatment offers a potent solution for tumor LA treatment.
Intelligent multimodal image-guided LA therapy represents a key technical solution and path of development for tumor therapy research and clinical applications. In the course of tumor LA therapy, it is urgently necessary to find efficient strategies that synergize diagnostic and treatment modalities, multimodal information fusion techniques, and intelligent manipulation methods. This paper reviews the mechanism of LA therapy, recent advancements in image-guided LA, and prominent aspects of robot-assisted laser therapy and explores the future development direction of LA technology (Fig. 1). The contents included in this review are chiefly described in Table 1.
Fig. 1.
Research fields and hot frontiers of LA of tumor.
Table 1.
Summary of LA for tumor treatment
Project | Research directions | Key features | Author/reference |
---|---|---|---|
Mechanism of LA therapy | Mechanism and biological effects of LA | Damaging tissues with light-generated heat | Walsh [20] |
Dependent factors: laser wavelength, laser power, tissue optics, etc. | Müller and Roggan [21] | ||
Tissue changes: damage, coagulation, carbonization, or ablation | Niemz [22] | ||
Common laser types | CO2 laserNd:YAG laserDiode laserHo:YAG laserTm:YAG laser | Omi and Numano [7]Xu et al. [8]Mao et al. [29]Rashid et al. [40]Lan et al. [47] | |
Simulation of LA model | Pennes biothermal equationDamage equation, Arrhenius equationTransient numerical simulation model predicts LA behavior.Reconstruction of tissue temperature distribution based on Bayesian framework. | Pennes [55]Henriques [59]Mohammadi et al. [65]Schulmann et al. [66] | |
Image-guided laser ablation therapy | Endoscopic imaging, medical imaging (OCT, PA, etc.), US, MRI, and multimodal imaging can guide surgery by monitoring tissue damage during ablation in real time. | ||
Endoscopic-guided LA | Single-fiber bundle for endoscopic imaging and laser irradiation modulation.Dual-mode GNR near-infrared fluorescence imaging and ablationControlling tumor temperature with a thermal imaging sensor, visible light endoscope, and laser fiber. | Miyoshi et al. [12]Gournaris et al. [84]Ohara et al. [85] | |
OCT-guided LA | OCT-based real-time LA monitoring and control using double-clad fiberFibers for Tm and OCT beams, dual time reflectors for guide and therapy light.Integrated ablation and OCT catheter.Real-time LA guidance and monitoring employing independent fibers for laser and OCT beams. | Maltais et al. [92]Katta et al. [93]Kang et al. [94]Fan et al. [95] | |
US-guided LA | US-guided LA has been used in the clinical treatment of thyroid cancer, breast cancer, and pancreatic cancer, proving its feasibility.US-guided laser discectomy improves accuracy and safety.New three-fiber optical US probe. | Yong-Ping et al. [9]Perretta et al. [100]Di Matteo et al. [102]Hu et al. [105]Zhang et al. [106] | |
MRI-guided LA | MRI-guided LA has been used in the clinical treatment of epilepsy, osteoid osteoma, and prostate cancer, demonstrating its feasibility.LA temperature management using the preset temperature time curve to alter laser output power.New intraoral laser software robot MRI-guided minimally invasive techniqueAn MRI-compatible electromechanical needle navigation system. | Curry et al. [112]Barqawi et al. [114]Mehralivand et al. [115]Desclides et al. [120]Fang et al. [121]Knull et al. [122] | |
Multimodal image fusion-guided LA | A thermal diffusion-based tissue heat distribution model and real-time photoacoustic monitoring of the treatment region enable quick three-dimensional temperature mapping.A phased-array endoscope-based LA system combining ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging can simultaneously ablate tissue, identify tissue features, and monitor tissue temperature.MRI-US fusion has been recommended as the third imaging modality for real-time monitoring during prostate cancer treatment interventions.FDA has provided MRI-US fusion equipment through 510 (k)-approved targeted prostate biopsy. | Landa et al. [123]Basij et al. [124]Wimper et al. [125] | |
Robot-assisted laser ablation | Advanced LA surgical robot systems require the research of new robot catheters and precision micro-robot end effectors to reposition imaging sensors and laser actuators closer to the surgical area for stable and precise positioning and real-time monitoring of the ablation process. | ||
Micro-robot end effector | A laser scanner driven by magnetic force.A novel robot system with cable driven parallel mechanism.Oral robot surgery uses a piezoelectric beam-driven microelectromechanical integrated structure-based millimeter-level tip/tilt laser scanning system.This device is further miniaturized and can control the position and speed of fiber optic laser transmissionAn endoscope tip with stereo vision, illumination, and fixed-focus laser | Acemoglu et al. [133]Zhao et al. [134]Bothner et al. [135]York et al. [52]Kundrat et al. [53] | |
Continuum robotics (CR) | Tendon-driven CRMagnetic navigation CRSoft material-driven CR:Shape memory effect CRConcentric tubesConducting polymer-driven CRHydraulic pressure-driven CRHybrid actuation CRNovel biocompatible conductive polymer for visceral medical robotics | Kouh Soltani et al. [137]Liu et al. [139]Namazu et al. [141]Liu et al. [142]Piskarev et al. [143]Gopesh et al. [144]Zhang et al. [145]Chikhaoui et al. [80] |
Mechanism of Laser Treatment
LA involves the use of laser energy and a medium that transmits laser light within the tissue. The laser acts as a tool to convert light energy into heat within tissues. The interaction between the laser and biological tissues is influenced by the laser’s characteristics and its wavelength. The medium is typically a flexible optical fiber with a small diameter (0.2 to 0.8 mm) used for laser transmission in deep organs. By delivering laser energy to the target area, the tissue absorbs and converts it into thermal energy, resulting in the ablation of tumors.
Basic principles and biological effects of LA
LA utilizes thermal energy generated by light to cause tissue damage [20]. Only the energy absorbed by the tissue can produce biological effects as light can propagate within tissue through reflection, transmission, scattering, or absorption. The tissue's ability to absorb light determines its heating capacity. Different tissue components and chromophores exhibit varying absorption characteristics based on wavelength, leading to specific interactions between laser light and tissues. The nature of the laser–tissue interaction is determined by a number of elements, including laser wavelength, laser power, exposure time, pulse duration, and repetition frequency (when utilizing pulse emission), optical properties of the target tissue [21].
The heat effect is the most important biological effect in the interaction between laser and tissue during LA. The amount of tissue burned at a particular wavelength is determined by the laser flux and irradiance. According to Niemz’s [22] research, at a typical body temperature of 37 °C, under a particular heating intensity, biological tissue cells can experience damage, coagulation, carbonization, or ablation depending on the degree and duration of tissue heating:
-
a.
Heat therapy involves a modest temperature increase that elevates the tissue temperature to 41 to 44 °C within a few minutes, causing cellular damage, disintegration of cell membranes, and enzymatic denaturation.
-
b.
Coagulation refers to a temperature range of 50 to 100 °C that the tissue reaches for about 1 s. The tissue necrosis occurs within this temperature range. Coagulation induces dehydration, leading to denaturation of protein and collagen, resulting in tissue contraction.
-
c.
Ablation refers to the process where tissue reaches a temperature range of 100 to 1,000 °C in a short period of time (approximately 1/10th of a second), resulting in material loss and the removal of various components in the form of steam.
The various zones affected by heat resulting from the interaction between the laser and biological tissue are illustrated in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Distribution map of heat-affected area using laser radiation.
Ablation laser types
The effect of laser on tissues depends on the laser’s operational mode and wavelength. The most essential factor is the penetration depth, which is defined as the tissue depth necessary to absorb 63% of the input light intensity. Different laser types exhibit varying penetration depths, based on the laser’s wavelength and the characteristics of both the tumor and surrounding healthy tissue [23]. Many different lasers are utilized for tumor ablation to achieve diverse therapeutic outcomes. As a result, in practical practice, light wavelengths with substantial penetration depth are necessary to treat deep-seated cancers. During the surgical procedure, the operator must select the most suitable laser and its settings to achieve the therapeutic objectives [4]. Within the wavelength range of 940 to 1,100 nm, LA is suitable due to a favorable equilibrium between absorption and tissue penetration in this optical window, resulting in a broad solidification area.
The most common laser sources in optical therapy are shown in Table 2, which can shrink or destroy tumors and can be used in conjunction with endoscopes. CO2 laser can ablate the surface of the skin without penetrating deeper layers, so it can be used to remove superficial cancers, such as skin cancer [7,24]. In contrast, Nd:YAG laser has been the most widely used laser for decades due to its excellent penetration capability within deep tissues, which is used to treat liver cancers [8,25], breast cancers [10,26], osteoid osteoma [27,28], and others. Diode lasers offer wavelengths between 800 and 980 nm, and their tissue penetration is similar to that of Nd:YAG lasers. Presently, they have been used for treating prostate cancers [29–31], brain tumors [32–34], laryngeal cancers [35,36], intraocular cancers [37,38], traumatic fibroma [39], and so on. Ho:YAG laser has an average between output power of approximately 20 and 150 W and are commonly used for laser lithotripsy [40,41], prostate ablation surgery [11,42,43], orthopedic surgery [44,45], hysteroplasty [46], and so on. The average output power of Tm:YAG laser falls between approximately 20 and 100 W, and is commonly used for treating prostate hyperplasia [47–49], bladder cancers [50,51], and urolithiasis [52,53].
Table 2.
Commonly used tumor ablation lasers and related parameters
Laser | Wavelength (nm) | Absorption chromophore | Target organ or tissue |
---|---|---|---|
CO2 laser | 10,600 | Water | Skin |
Nd:YAG laser | 1,064 | Pigments, proteins | Liver tumor, breast cancer, osteoid osteoma |
Diode laser | 800–970 | Pigments, water (range) | Prostate tumor, brain tumor, laryngeal tumor, intraocular tumor, traumatic fibroma |
Ho:YAG laser | 2,100 | Water | Laser lithotripsy, prostate ablation surgery, orthopedic surgery, hysteroplasty |
Tm:YAG laser | 2,020 | Water | Prostate hyperplasia, bladder tumors, and urolithiasis |
Laser radiation can be achieved utilizing either continuous wave (CW) or pulse wave (PW) during the LA process. The laser power range in CWs is between 2 and 30 W, and the treatment duration varies from a few minutes to 20 min. In PW mode, laser energy is released periodically as a sequence of pulses, and the pickup power (i.e., the power level of each pulse) is higher than that of CW emitting lasers, but the average power remains equivalent. The suitable laser mode is determined by the specific treatment requirements and goals. CW mode is appropriate for long-term continuous treatment, whereas PW mode is suitable for circumstances requiring higher peak power.
Simulation of LA
The modeling of physical processes in biological tissues irradiated by laser beam can be divided into three steps: modeling of laser energy deposition, temperature distribution, and damage in laser irradiated tissues [54]. Many heat transfer models have been developed to characterize the temperature distribution in laser-irradiated tissues. One of the most well-known models for estimating heat transmission in biological tissues is Pennes biothermal equation [55], which represents the temperature distribution within biological tissues. For constant thermophysical parameters, it has the following forms:
(1) |
ρ is the tissue density (kg cm−3), c is the tissue specific heat (J kg−1 °C−1), k is the tissue thermal conductivity (W m−1 °C−1), T is the tissue temperature (°C), t is the time (s), ρb is the blood density (kg cm−3), c b is the blood specific heat (J kg−1 °C−1), ω b is the unit volume blood perfusion rate (kg m−3 s−1), Tb is the arterial blood temperature at 37 °C, Q r is the internal heat source term caused by photon absorption (W m−3), and Q m is the metabolic heat production per unit volume, which can be ignored [56,57].
Vita et al. [58] employed fiber optic sensors to measure temperature inside the livers of perfused pigs undergoing LA. As illustrated in Fig. 3A, artificial blood arteries are employed to replicate blood perfusion in the isolated liver. Comparisons were made between temperature distribution in two different spatial configurations of blood vessels and fibers to study the effect of blood perfusion on LA.
Fig. 3.
(A) Schematic diagram of organ scaffold for pig liver in LA. Reproduced with permission from [58]. (B) Schematic diagram of the geometric shape of healthy tissues, including tumors, blood vessels, and their boundary conditions. Reproduced with permission from [65].
The final step in analyzing the tissue heating process is to estimate the extent of damage, typically achieved using the Arrhenius equation [59–61], which can obtain the degree of tissue damage during the treatment process, expressed as follows:
(2) |
A is the frequency factor (s−1) and ∆E is the activation energy of irreversible damage reactions (J mol−1). These two parameters depend on the type of organization. R is the general gas constant. The value is 8.31 J mol−1 K−1, and T is the absolute temperature. The expression Θ d for the proportion of necrotic tissue is as follows:
(3) |
The main numerical simulation methods for LA include finite difference, finite volume, boundary element, spectral analysis, numerical integration transformation, and others. There are several main factors that affect LA results, including laser wavelength, power, and treatment duration [62]; mechanical, thermal, and optical properties of the tissue [63]; the presence and quantity of blood flow [64]; and the optical emission characteristics of the applicator [21].
Mohammadi et al. [65] created a transient numerical model to predict the behavior of LA under various settings, and developed a thermal mechanical model, as illustrated in Fig. 3B. Experimental data from pig liver tissue were employed to assess its applicability and efficacy, revealing that laser power and exposure time are the most critical variables impacting ablation phenomena. However, it is the result of certain geometric forms and situations; thus, individual patient scenarios should be considered in optimizing therapeutic application.
Schulmann et al. [66] proposed a fast data assimilation Bayesian framework for real-time reconstruction of the spatiotemporal distribution of tissue temperature under laser irradiation. They used unscented Kalman filters to associate the predictions of the heat transfer model with sparse real-time temperature measurements obtained from fiber-optic thermometers. This approach further optimizes the 3D degree of the structural domain while considering tissue heterogeneity and physiological heat sources, facilitating automatic LA control in the clinical setting. During the LA process, Korganbayev et al. [67] achieved constant temperature control through a closed-loop feedback proportional integral differential controller. This controller adjusts the laser power based on real-time measurement, thereby maintaining the tissue temperature within a constant target range. These studies aim to enhance the control and monitoring of LA processes. By real-time reconstruction of tissue temperature distribution and achieving automatic control, medical professionals can more accurately adjust laser parameters to achieve the desired therapeutic effect. These methods provide important support for the accuracy and safety of LA, further advancing the application of this technology in the clinical practice.
Medical Image Guide LA
LA is a minimally invasive technique that destroys tumors within solid organs by directing low-power laser energy into the tissue. As an alternative method to surgical resection, LA is increasingly gaining recognition in the field of tumor treatment. Although being associated with certain complications, LA stands as the only accessible treatment option for patients who cannot tolerate general anesthesia, as it is a minimally invasive or noninvasive method that can be performed under local anesthesia.
In the course of LA treatment, it is important to take into account all factors influencing the generated ablation effect while safeguarding the surrounding healthy tissues. Therefore, real-time assessment of tissue damage throughout the ablation process is critical for guiding surgery process, enhancing surgical efficiency, and defining the endpoint of laser energy deposition [68]. Histology has typically been regarded as the gold standard for distinguishing tumor types in clinical diagnosis. Histological analysis of biopsy, on the other hand, is an intrusive and time-consuming procedure that can result in misinterpretation due to sample variability. Consequently, noninvasive diagnostic procedures utilizing real-time imaging are preferred. Various approaches, such as endoscopic imaging, medical imaging (including OCT, photoacoustic tomography, etc.), US/endoscopic US (EUS), MRI, and multimodal imaging, can all be used to guide and monitor LA progress. Pacella and Mauri [69] summarized the technical characteristics and clinical application of image-guided LA, which has been used in treating lung cancers [70], thyroid cancers [71], brain cancers [72], and prostate cancers [73].
Endoscopy-guided LA
The combination of endoscopic access and laser therapy has been successfully applied in a wide range of clinical applications [74]. Compared to open surgery and laparoscopic access, endoscopic access minimizes the need for incisions and sutures [75], resulting in less patient trauma. Furthermore, laser therapy, characterized by its noncontact nature, exceptional selectivity, and resolution, can be further automated through the utilization of robot technology [76] and numerical simulation [77–79]. Researchers have developed micro-endoscopic tips with enhanced flexibility and functionally [80–82] in order to expand the scope of endoscopic applications. These micro-endoscopic tips have a smaller outer diameter and greater mobility, allowing laser treatment in narrow and complex abdominal structures.
Mo et al. [83] designed a flexible endoscope system with 2- and 12-mm-diameter flexible manipulators, combined with an integrated camera. Endoscopes can provide visual feedback, while flexible manipulators can transmit and control laser beams through optical fibers. Flexible manipulators and endoscopic movements have been decoupled through the specialized mechanical structures and novel cable configurations. This provides an effective solution for laser-assisted endoscopic surgery within confined spaces. In subsequent research, further studies are required to evaluate the surgical applicability of in vitro and in vivo tissue ablation.
Miyoshi et al. [12] created a novel endoscopic image-guided laser therapy system. As illustrated in Fig. 4A, this system uses a single-fiber bundle to capture endoscopic images while simultaneously modulating the laser irradiation region, allowing for minimally invasive endoscopic laser treatment in narrow anatomical sites. The approach achieves laser-guided steering by manipulating the position of magnetic core near the laser input, which has some limitations and might be improved. Additionally, this technology lacks real-time temperature monitoring during the ablation process, which constitutes a limitation.
Fig. 4.
Endoscopy-guided LA diagram. (A) Schematic diagram of endoscopic image-guided laser treatment system based on fiber bundle laser steering. Reproduced with permission from [12]. (B) Schematic diagram of NIRF endoscopic image-guided PTA for bimodal GNR treatment of colorectal cancer. Reproduced with permission from [84].
As illustrated in Fig. 4B, Gournaris et al. [84] developed a near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) endoscopic image-guided photothermal ablation (PTA) approach for the effective treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). The bimodal gold nanorods (GNRs) were created by combining rod-like gold nanoparticles and Cy5.5 NIR fluorescent molecules, which can not only facilitate NIRF imaging but also exhibit an efficient photothermal effect upon near-infrared wavelength laser irradiation through an endoscope. Precise ablation of polyps was achieved utilizing NIRF endoscopic image-guided PTA and bimodal GNRs. However, this method also lacks real-time temperature monitoring during the ablation process.
Endoscopic LA has the advantages in terms of minimal invasiveness, shortened procedure duration, and enhanced precision [75]. However, there are limitations in the ablation process due to the current inability to achieve real-time temperature monitoring. Traditional treatment procedures often require temperature measurement using a thermal imager placed outside the body, thereby inhibiting temperature control and potentially resulting in damage to healthy tissues due to overheating. In response, Ohara et al. [85] created a thermal imaging endoscopic system to regulate tumor temperature for treating peritoneal dissemination. This system incorporates a thermal imaging sensor, a visible light endoscope, and a laser fiber. The researchers established a tumor temperature control system based on feedback control and a Gaussian function for estimating tumor temperature. This approach is noninvasive and has a good therapeutic efficacy. Experimental results indicate that the system maintains the essential stability of tumor temperature required for inducing tumor necrosis, resulting in a therapeutic impact. This work offers a new technique for temperature management in endoscopic laser therapy, which improves treatment accuracy and controllability. However, additional study and testing are required to verify the system’s effectiveness and safety.
While endoscope allows for precise localization of pathological areas, achieving real-time and accurate control of tissue temperature during LA therapy via endoscopic imaging remains a challenge. This is due to the need for external temperature sensors for monitoring, which poses a significant hurdle for miniaturizing endoscopes. Hence, one of the future directions is to develop compact, efficient, and precise temperature sensors, which would facilitate real-time and accurate control of tissue temperature during tumor LA.
OCT-guided LA
OCT is a high-resolution imaging technology that is label free, real time, noninvasive, and radiation free. It offers the ability to provide real-time imaging at the micrometer level, which has clear benefits in guiding surgical ablation procedures. Because OCT imaging uses fiber optics, it is simple to connect with handheld surgical probes, laparoscopes, catheters, and endoscopes [86]. OCT imaging, unlike US imaging, is noncontact and can be imaged through air. Furthermore, OCT systems are often small and portable, making them simple to transport and operate. Finally, OCT has a swift imaging speed and can acquire image data on huge portions of tissue in a brief timeframe. OCT imaging has major application value in guiding the LA process because it is based on the optical backscattering characteristics of tissues and can detect the LA features of tissues. It can continuously track the impact of laser energy on tissues in real time and provide valuable guidance and feedback.
Yu et al. [87] investigated the use of OCT for real-time guidance in retinal surgery, showing its viability for real-time guidance. Several research teams have employed B-scan OCT feedback to track the tips of various instruments such as micropipettes [88], fixtures [89], and injection pipettes [90]. These studies indicate that OCT can be utilized to successfully guide various robot procedures in real time. Boppart et al. [91] performed extensive ablation studies on more than 60 components of five different types of isolated rat organ tissues. Their work discovered that OCT can swiftly identify tissues and guide ablation positions, as well as capture dynamic changes in tissue optical reflectance induced by laser heating before, during, and after laser irradiation. These findings highlight OCT’s potential as an image-guided tool in tumor ablation.
As illustrated in Fig. 5A, Maltais et al. [92] created an endoscopic OCT-guided LA system capable of real-time monitoring and control of laser therapy. This system employs OCT technology to perform simultaneous imaging and treatment using a double-clad fiber. The system evaluates tissue coagulation depth using speckle intensity correlation and introduces noise reduction and motion correction methods to enhance monitoring precision and stability. It can detect the depth of the coagulation layer in real time and turn off the therapy laser automatically to obtain the desired treatment outcome. In the future, this technique opens the possibility for high spatial and temporal resolution, and single-fiber endoscopic-guided laser therapy.
Fig. 5.
Schematic diagram of OCT-guided LA system. (A) Schematic diagram of endoscopic OCT-guided LA system. Reproduced with permission from [92]. (B) Schematic diagram of OCT and nanosecond-pulsed thallium TM laser tumor resection system. Reproduced with permission from [93].
Katta et al. [93] designed a tumor excision system that combines OCT and a nanosecond-pulsed thallium (TM) laser system. As shown in Fig. 5B, this system utilizes optical fibers to transmit TM and OCT beams, aligning them using reflection collimators and dual-time reflectors. Beam focusing is achieved through the galvanometer reflector in the focal plane behind the scanning lens. The simulation programs COMSOL and Zemax were utilized by the study team to build a model of this process. The simulated results for tissue removal rate closely aligned with experimental outcomes. The OCT-TM system emerges as a promising tool for cancer surgery. Another notable approach, by Kang et al. [94], introduces a temperature monitoring LA system based on OCT. Using a multifunctional integrated catheter for both LA and OCT imaging, this high-resolution and high-speed system enables real-time monitoring of the LA process. The design of this multipurpose integrated catheter allows LA and OCT imaging to be conducted in the same device, making real-time monitoring more convenient and efficient.
Recently, our team pioneered a new spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) real-time guidance and monitoring LA system, aiming to achieve accurate treatment of soft tissue [95]. This system combines OCT and LA, using a separate optical path and manually aligning endoscopic images for operation. In this system, OCT initially generates tumor images, followed by real-time monitoring of the LA process. The system has been tested through phantom and in vitro pig brainstem experiments, demonstrating its efficiency and feasibility of accurate resection of lesions. In addition, we conducted further research and proposed a scanning mode with a common optical path to achieve OCT-guided LA [96], as illustrated in Fig. 6A. We also designed an intelligent optical theranostic system for tumor resection [97], as illustrated in Fig. 6B, incorporating automatic lesion localization and LA functions. Phantom and animal experiments were conducted for systematic verification. The robot can reach the planned position with high accuracy, approximately 1.16 mm. The accuracy of tissue classification using OCT images reaches 91.7%, and a minimal error of approximately 0.74 mm for OCT-guided automatic LA. This system offers real-time monitoring of automated operations with enhanced accuracy and efficiency compared to traditional cancer theranostics.
Fig. 6.
(A) Schematic diagram of scanning mode for common optical path. Reproduced with permission from [96]. (B) Intelligent optical theranostic system for tumor resection. Reproduced with permission from [97].
OCT-guided LA surgery introduces improved controllability and precision in interactions between tools and tissues, facilitating precise surgical margins while minimizing collateral damage to neighboring structures such as blood vessels, nerve tissues, or other adjacent tissues. Experimental findings from various research teams have indeed demonstrated the potential of OCT-guided laser procedures in accurate tumor resection. Nonetheless, further research and validation, particularly in clinical settings, are imperative to assess its safety, feasibility, and efficacy. Despite these promising prospects, challenges persist in fully integrating OCT and LA within endoscopic systems. Future endeavors could explore co-optic pathways for OCT and therapeutic lasers, enabling their registration at the robotic end of endoscopes. The development of reliable control methodologies would be instrumental in achieving precise tissue ablation.
US imaging-guided LA
US imaging can produce high-quality images that are simple to use, adaptable, radiation free, and affordable. It is extensively used to guide the ablation of parenchymal organs and tissues, particularly within the abdomen and pelvic cavities, due to its ability to provide real-time visualization of lesion size and its relationship with neighboring structures.
Lim et al. [98] investigated the acute reaction of pancreatic tissue following EUS-guided cylindrical interstitial laser ablation (CILA) in a pig model, aiming to compare the effects of different energy levels on pancreatic tissue ablation. The study found that EUS-guided CILA, facilitated by a diffusion applicator, produces consistent and predictable ablation under real-time EUS guidance. It demonstrated that adjusting the total energy delivered allows for control over the ablation area. The results show that EUS-guided CILA is a feasible method for effective pancreatic cancer treatment.
US/EUS-guided LA has made significant progress in clinical applications. Clinical application of this method is highlighted in Table 3 across various diseases, including thyroid cancers [9,99], breast cancers [100,101], and pancreatic cancers [102]. These studies indicate that during follow-up examinations, US/EUS-guided LA successfully achieved the treatment goal, with complete lesion ablation and no residual tumors observed. These findings validate the safety and feasibility of US/EUS-guided LA as a potential alternative for patients unsuitable for traditional surgical approaches [101]. However, longer-term follow-up studies and larger-scale research are indispensable to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of this method.
Table 3.
US imaging-guided LA
Author | Tumor (number of patients) | Device | Guided image | Follow-up/complications |
---|---|---|---|---|
Yong-Ping et al. [9] | Thyroid cancer (43) | MT,EXL | US | 23.47 ± 6.50 months, no complications, the ablation lesion disappeared |
Zhang et al. [99] | Thyroid micro-cancer (12) | MT,EXL | US | 19.75 ± 11.46 months, all ablated lesions completely disappeared or only scar strips remained |
Perretta et al. [100] | Breast cancer (11) | MTM9,EXL | US | 32.6 ± 9.2 days, no tumor residue (10), 1/11 residual cancer (1) |
Nori et al. [101] | Breast cancer (12) | ML70,EXL | US | 28.5 months, there was no evidence of local or distant recurrence in patients |
Di Matteo et al. [102] | Pancreatic cancer (9) | EUE,EXL | EUS | Median survival period, 4.29 months |
Intraoperative US is critical for real-time monitoring of LA. It can monitor the range and size of the echo produced by the gas in the ablation area, guiding complete ablation while minimizing thermal damage. However, traditional US imaging before and after LA therapy often exhibits low monitoring efficiency due to frequent deviations between the measured tumor size in the images and predictions [103]. Furthermore, traditional US has limitations in measuring the efficacy of ablation following surgery due to the interference of strong echo generated by the gas in the ablation zone. Contrast agents offer a solution by enhancing the backscattered echo in US imaging, hence boosting the resolution, sensitivity, and specificity of US diagnosing outcomes [104]. These agents can substantially increase contrast within the tumor area, allowing for a more accurate assessment of ablation effects. With the implementation of this technique, the monitoring of US imaging in LA treatment becomes more reliable and effective.
Hu et al. [105] offered US-guided percutaneous laser discectomy as a new approach for treating cervical root pain. Compared with traditional surgery, real-time imaging allows for enhanced accuracy and safety, which is beneficial in identifying the corresponding sections of the cervical intervertebral disc and preventing vascular injury. The goal of this study is to introduce a noninvasive treatment plan alternative to existing conventional surgical techniques. US-guided laser resection can result in more accurate and safe surgical treatments, as well as better therapeutic outcomes. This study is of significant importance in enhancing the quality of life of patients suffering from cervical root discomfort.
Figure 7A shows a novel type of optical ultrasound (OpUS) probe created by Zhang et al. [106]. This device can perform LA as well as real-time complete optical US imaging for ablation monitoring. The probe is made up of three optical fibers with a total equipment diameter of less than 1 mm. This probe features two fibers for ultrasonic transmission and reception, and one for LA light transmission. The authors performed ablation monitoring experiments on isolated porcine liver and heart tissue, and employed a segmentation algorithm to track ablation depth and identify lesion boundaries. The study results demonstrate the potential of the OpUS probe in real-time guided minimally invasive ablation procedures. Additionally, the integration of this probe into a medical needle (Fig. 7B) for performing laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and monitoring on isolated lamb kidneys demonstrates its feasibility [107].
Fig. 7.
(A) Schematic diagram of OpUS imaging and LA system. Reproduced with permission from [106]. (B) Schematic of the fiber device. Reproduced with permission from [107].
The novelty of this study lies in the combination of LA and complete optical US imaging, which allows for simultaneous operation of both functionalities within the same probe. This integrated design simplifies and expedites the surgical process, and the real-time imaging capability of the OpUS probe assists clinicians in properly locating the ablation area and lesion boundaries, improving surgical accuracy and safety. Further research and practice are warranted to explore the performance, feasibility, and applicability of this probe across various tissue types and lesion scenarios. This will contribute to the broader adoption of OpUS probes in minimally invasive ablation surgery.
In recent years, patch or wearable US imaging [108,109] has made significant progress in deep tissue imaging, with a remarkable resolution of 0.5 mm. These techniques yield clear results ever in deep tissues. Wearable US imaging offers the advantages of easy disassembly and reassembly. By adhering to the surface of biological tissues, it allows for prolonged observation of tissue changes [110]. The fusion of portable or patch-type US imaging-guided interventional fiber LA will provide huge technical support in the ablation treatment of deep-seated tumors.
MRI-guided LA
In recent years, MRI has been widely developed and used as a guiding tool. It boasts soft tissue contrast, spatial and temporal resolution, and imaging capabilities that are practically real time. MRI exhibits high sensitivity to temperature changes within tissues, making it excellent for monitoring the thermal effects of laser energy on tissues compared to traditional interventional monitoring techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and US. MRI can scan multiple planes and possesses a vascular emptiness effect and an inflow-related enhancement effect without the need of contrast agents or radiation. It can position piercing guide needles and optical fibers in three dimensions. MRI is useful in tumor detection as it enables tumor localization and volumetric assessment and provides accurate guidance throughout the biopsy process. Furthermore, during minimally invasive treatment, MRI can provide real-time tracking of treatment effectiveness. The MRI-based temperature measurement system offers outstanding spatial resolution and accuracy, making it a promising technology approach. However, several restrictions, including the high cost of MRI equipment, complex operation [4], and stringent patient cooperation requirements.
LA technology compatible with MRI employs optical fibers to deliver laser energy through a sapphire tip to the core of brain lesions. The laser induces concentrated thermal damage by heating the surrounding tissues. Real-time MRI temperature measurement is utilized to monitor and regulate the ablation process to ensure accuracy and safety. This system captures real-time temperature data, enabling physicians to monitor temperature changes in the treatment area and adjust the ablation accordingly [111].
In Table 4, some clinical applications of MRI-guided LA are reported, and this technology has been applied in monitoring the ablation treatment of epilepsy [112] and osteoid osteoma [28]. Especially in the surgical treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy in children [113], MRI-guided LITT has demonstrated the potential of being a minimally invasive alternative therapy.
Table 4.
MRI-guided LA
Author | Tumor (number of patients) | Device | Follow-up/complications |
---|---|---|---|
Curry et al. [112] | Hamartoma (71) | NeuroBlate system | 23% need several ablations |
Arocho-Quinones et al. [113] | Pediatric brain tumors (86) | Visualase system (Medtronic) [156], NeuroBlate system (Monteris Medical) [157] | 80.6% of patients had stereotactic LA to reduce tumor volume after 24 months |
Seemann et al. [28] | Osteoid osteoma (31) | Philips Panorama HFO 1.0T MRI system | Short-term follow-up (97% patient satisfaction) Long-term follow-up (100% pleased) |
Barqawi et al. [114] | Prostate cancer (7) | GE Signa HDxt 3.0 T scanner | Six patients did not experience any surgical complications during the 1-year follow-up period |
Mehralivand et al. [115] | Prostate cancer (15) | Philips Achieva 5.1T scanner | Seven patients experienced recurrenceTwo patients received FLA salvage treatment at 3 and 20 months, respectively |
MT, MyLab Twice Ultrasound system; MTM9, MyLab 9 XP Ultrasound system; ML70, MyLab 70 XVG;
EUE, EG-3830UTK Ultrasound endoscope; EXL, Echolaser X4 laser (Nd:YAG laser).
In a phase I prospective cohort study, MRI-guided focused laser ablation (FLA) has been shown to be a feasible and safe option for treating patients with localized low-to-medium risk prostate cancer [114–117]. Recent study investigated the possibility of FLA for recurrent prostate cancer. MRI-guided FLA provides exceptional soft tissue contrast and anatomical visualization to facilitate treatment planning and targeting. Therefore, MRI-guided FLA offers significant imaging advantages over other surgical and ablation techniques that rely on transrectal US guidance and monitoring for treatment [118]. In addition, a study has confirmed that MRI-guided FLA can serve as a feasible salvage treatment for recurrent high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) guided by MRI [119].
Desclides et al. [120] have developed a real-time automatic temperature control method for LITT, which utilizes MRI to measure tissue temperature and adjusts laser output power based on a predetermined temperature time curve. This procedure was implemented on a clinical MRI scanner and assessed using gel and animal models. Results indicate that this approach can precisely and reliably regulate tissue temperature, which should enhance the clinical efficacy and safety of LITT treatment.
As shown in Fig. 8A, Fang et al. [121] have devised a new type of software-driven robot for intraoral laser minimally invasive procedures guided by MRI. Comprising both soft and rigid structures, this robot possesses five degrees of freedom and operates safely and flexibly within MRI-confined space. To accomplish precise laser positioning and control, the robot is propelled by a fluid of microvolume. Traditional intraoral surgery necessitates the use of specialized instruments, whereas laser minimally invasive procedure can achieve precise tissue cutting through the use of precisely positioned laser beams, thereby minimizing harm to the surrounding normal tissues. The future direction of development is to use lens tail fiber as the OCT sampling arm, coupling OCT with ablation settings, which can provide tissue depth images with micrometer resolution, thereby enhancing visibility and precision during surgical procedures and enabling physicians to better understand and treat oral lesions.
Fig. 8.
(A) Schematic diagram of a five-degree-of-freedom endoscope. Reproduced with permission from [121]. (B) Computer-aided design isometric model of MRI-compatible electromechanical needle guidance system for prostate focal LA needle intervention. Reproduced with permission from [122].
Knull et al. [122] developed an MRI-compatible electromechanical needle navigation system for thermal FLA of local prostate cancer. This system features a remotely driven four-degree-of-freedom transperineal puncture localization and needle guidance mechanism, along with an adaptable needle catheter, as shown in Fig. 8B. Using a tissue-simulated prostate model, this system demonstrated needle localization and delivery under mechatronic MRI guidance. This MRI-compatible electromechanical needle navigation system enhances surgical precision and safety by enabling more precise and controlled needle positioning during procedures.
Multimodal imaging-guided LA
PA imaging is a technique that utilizes pulsed laser stimulation to induce thermoelastic expansion and subsequent relaxation to generate sound waves. The underlying principle is shown in Fig. 9A. Due to its temperature sensitivity, PA imaging can be used to monitor heat treatment and draw temperature distribution within biological tissues. Landa et al. [123] proposed a rapid 3D temperature mapping method through real-time PA sensing of the treatment area, coupled with a tissue heat distribution model based on thermal diffusion. This method can map the development of temperature field during laser-induced thermotherapy, which helps to improve the safety and efficacy of optical therapy. The layout of their experimental setup is shown in Fig. 9B. Basij et al. [124] have developed an LA treatment device that integrates US and PA imaging guidance with traditional phased-array endoscopes. This device uses a phased-array endoscope for tissue ablation while simultaneously discerning tissue characteristics and monitoring tissue temperature. Applying this US/PA-guided theranostic system in clinical setting can greatly minimize complications. The combination of PA imaging and therapy provides the ability for simultaneous imaging and manipulation, leading to safer and more effective treatment. The application of this technology helps to improve the accuracy and outcome evaluation of treatment, and has broad potential in clinical practice.
Fig. 9.
(A) PA imaging principal diagram. Reproduced with permission from [155]. (B) Layout of experimental settings. Reproduced with permission from [123].
With the advancement of technology, the MRI-US fusion system and its associated technology have undergone significant progress. MRI-US fusion has been recommended as the third imaging modality for real-time monitoring during prostate cancer treatment [125]. The advantage of this fusion technology lies in its potential to offer both medical professional and patients improved accessibility to services while potentially reducing costs. Among the available approaches, the simplest and possibly least accurate method is “cognitive fusion” technology. This technique involves utilizing multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for pre-procedure visualization, followed by real-time US guidance during biopsy procedures. However, this method is susceptible to variations based on the operator’s expertise, and in situations involving small lesions, achieving accurate sampling might pose challenges [126]. Table 5 lists the devices approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in recent years to provide MRI-US fusion for targeted prostate biopsy through the 510 (k) pathway.
Table 5.
FDA-approved MRI-US fusion devices through 510 (k) pathway
Manufacturer/trade name | US image acquisition | Biopsy path | Tracking mechanism | Year of FDA approval | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Biobot Surgica/iSR'obot Mona Lisa 2.0 | Robotic arm moving for US scanning | Transperineal | 8-axis mechanical arm | 2021 | Integrated with existing US device, importing MRI images for registration |
Eigen/Artemis | Manual US scanning | Transperineal/transrectal | Mechanical arm with encoders | 2016 | Integrated with existing US device, importing MRI images for registration |
Invivo Corporation/Uronav (Version 2.0) | Manual US scanning | Transperineal/transrectal | Electromagnetic measurement system | 2015 | Integrated with existing US device, importing MRI images for registration |
KOELIS/TRINITY | Specially designed US probes | Transperineal/transrectal | Organ-based tracking fusion | 2016 | Provide real-time 3D MRI-US fusion |
Focal Healthcare/Fusion Bx 2.0 | Manual US scanning | Transperineal/transrectal | Mechanical arm with encoders | 2018 | Integrated with existing US device, importing MRI images for registration |
The iSR'obot Mona Lisa 2.0 is a system with MRI-US fusion function that can provide visualization and locate regions of interest. Using UroFusion software, medical professionals can create personalized biopsy plans and employ a robotic system to guide the biopsy needle with precise target positions, achieving complete prostate coverage. The Eigen/Artemis system supports early detection of prostate cancer through the diagnostic software ProFuseCAD. This system integrates information from various imaging modalities such as mpMRI, positron emission tomography, CT, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound to enhance US fusion, enabling targeted biopsy and treatment. The Invivo Corporation/Uronav (Version 2.0) system integrates pre-biopsy MRI of the prostate with real-time US-guided biopsy images, providing clear visualization of the prostate and suspicious lesions while delineating the biopsy needle path. The Uronav system combines electromagnetic tracking and navigation with onboard computers and real-time imaging interfaces, providing precise positioning for clinical practice in mobile workstations. KOELIS/TRINITY is a fully integrated mobile fusion imaging platform equipped with 3D US probes and KOELIS’ patented organ-based tracking fusion technology, designed specifically for personalized prostate care. Focal Healthcare/Fusion Bx 2.0 enables urologists to complete surgery in a shorter time and with minimal training through a step-by-step workflow. The buttons on the stepper allow urologists to complete most of the operations without having to move their hands away from the probe, and automatic motion compensation adjusts for patient movement to maintain image alignment.
The development of these devices and systems has significantly enhanced the accuracy and efficacy of the theranostic process for prostate cancer, providing medical professionals with enhanced visual guidance and precise positioning capabilities. Natarajan et al. [127] performed FLA surgery on 11 individuals with moderate-risk prostate cancer using MRI-US fusion as guidance. This technology directed laser fibers to the lesion containing prostate cancer via the rectum. Real-time temperature monitoring during LA was achieved using a thermal sensor. Ten of 11 patients were effectively treated with local anesthesia. This study demonstrated the feasibility and safety of using MRI-US fusion for guiding focal LA, highlighting its potential in prostate cancer treatment.
With the development of diagnostic imaging techniques using MRI or MRI-US fusion, the reliable characterization of tumors can provide more accurate diagnostic information, thus enabling more comfortable options like active monitoring and “super active monitoring” or local treatment [128].
LA guided by multimodal optical imaging has achieved significant success [129], especially in applications such as brain tumors. However, endoscopic optical imaging-guided LA remains a research focus. There is a growing need to advance and refine the shared optical path coupling techniques like OCT, PA, and LA to meet the needs of specific clinical applications. Thorough exploration of multimodel medical imaging fusion alongside the strategic design of a proficient robot system serves to resolve the intricate issues surrounding positioning and control within endoscopic laser surgery. These efforts collectively work toward the successful navigation and guidance of surgical procedures, ensuring precision and effectiveness during surgery.
Robot-Assisted LA
In current clinical practice, LA surgeries are performed using a flexible bronchoscope approach. This technique involves the insertion of an optical fiber through the bronchoscope biopsy. The distal end of the bronchoscope is extended by at least 1 cm, ensuring alignment and maintaining a distance of approximately 4 to 10 mm from the intended ablation target. However, this method lacks automation and real-time monitoring capabilities for the ablation process. At present, there are ongoing clinical applications of the robot-guided platforms for both biopsies and LA interventions. Song et al. [130] designed a new type of biopsy capsule robot driven by an external magnetic field, which can cut and collect intestinal tissue samples without tearing or sticking. Rubino et al. [131] used the MedTech ROSA ONE Brain robot to successfully execute LA procedures for brain tumors in a cohort of 43 patients under MRI guidance, and only one single patient required reoperation, which proved the ROSA robot’s capacity to achieve efficient, safe, accurate, and fast LA treatment.
In order to enhance the stability and precise localization of the surgical ablation area, as well as to enable real-time monitoring of the ablation process, researchers are developing new continuum robotics (CRs) and micro-robot end effectors for advanced LA surgery robot systems. This innovative approach involves positioning the imaging sensors and laser actuators closer to the surgical site, thereby enhancing surgical precision and enabling real-time monitoring of the ablation procedure.
End effector of micro-robotic LA
The micro-robot is designed to serve as the end effector of an LA system, providing precise laser guidance near the surgical site while offering high-resolution motion and rapid response capabilities. In their work, Lee et al. [132] reviewed robots for LA surgery by controlling optical fibers, and classified them based on their actuation strategies into magnetically driven, motor-driven, and piezoelectric actuated robots. Acemoglu et al. [133] developed a magnetic drive-based laser scanner for high-speed laser scanning in endoscopic minimally invasive procedures. This device employs a magnetic drive to manipulate the laser fiber, enabling precise control over 2D positioning and rapid scanning. This innovation aims to combine the advantages of the free beam laser scanning system with the endoscopic minimally invasive procedures, thereby enhancing the precise and effective treatment in patient. Zhao et al. [134] have developed a novel robot system with a cable-driven parallel mechanism for controlling laser fibers for surgery. This system adopts an innovative mechanical structure, which can independently generate scanning paths or allow user-driven free paths for scanning. Characterized by high precision and repeatability, it offers accurate laser guidance and operation, and gives minimally invasive procedures greater flexibility and control.
Bothner et al. [135] proposed a novel laser scanning system based on a piezoelectric beam-driven micro-electromechanical integrated structure for oral robot surgery. This system employs lasers for tissue cutting during surgery, reducing the collateral damage to healthy tissue. This instrument incorporates the benefits of both laser-based minimally invasive procedure and robot-assisted minimally invasive procedure, and can be operated by a robot arm to achieve more precise cutting and sharper incisions. Subsequently, this device was further miniaturized [52], as illustrated in Fig. 10A, which can control the position and speed of fiber optic laser transmission. It can be affixed to the tips of surgical instruments (such as flexible endoscopes or continuous surgical robots) and can access dissection structures within narrow canal that are typically hard to reach. Moreover, the system is equipped with sensing capabilities and can use laser-based imaging modalities (such as OCT and PA) to visualize deep anatomical structures within the body. This additional information provides surgeons with additional information and visual assistance, enabling them to make more precise decisions. This technology holds the potential to advance the development of minimally invasive procedures and provide patients with improved treatment outcomes and recuperation experiences. Kundrat et al. [53] created an endoscope tips with stereo vision, lighting, and fixed-focus lasers ,as illustrated in Fig. 10B. These specialized tips can be used for noncontact intralaryngolasia surgery and have demonstrated success in pig larynx experiment. The endoscope is anticipated to be further miniaturized in the subsequent stage, allowing for a wider range of clinical applications for the surgical access through the natural openings.
Fig. 10.
Precision micro-robot end effector. (A) Micro-robot laser steering system. Reproduced with permission from [52]. (B) Endoscopic tip. Reproduced with permission from [53].
Continuum robotic LA
In the LA surgery, the specific purpose of CRs is to provide a robotic framework for deploying, supporting, and correctly positioning imaging and laser steering systems. CRs are robotics whose mechanisms are driven by operators or actuators. Hu et al. [136] reviewed CRs in minimally invasive procedures, outlining their achievements and future applications. According to their driving principles, CRs are divided into four categories: tendon-driven CRs [137,138], magnetic navigation CRs [139,140], soft material-driven CRs (including shape memory effect CRs [141], concentric tubes [142], conducting polymer-driven CRs [143], and hydraulic pressure driven CRs [144]), and hybrid actuation CRs [145], as illustrated in Fig. 11. Chikhaoui et al. [80] have developed a novel biocompatible conductive polymer that can be used in visceral medical robots. This polymer can cause a volume change in the pipeline by applying a reduction or oxidation potential to the component electrode, thereby achieving the desired bending of the pipeline.
Fig. 11.
CR for LA of tumor treatment. (A) Magnetic navigation CR. Reproduced with permission from [139]. (B) Shape memory CR. Reproduced with permission from [141]. (C) Concentric tube. Reproduced with permission from [142]. (D) Conductive polymer-driven conduit. Reproduced with permission from [143].
However, effective methods for regulating CRs, particularly in terms of end force control, are still a challenge. Although information on tip force can be obtained by designing sensors at the tip, the dependability of CRs may be compromised. In addition, there is a lack of efficient analysis tools for real-time feedback control of CRs, hindering the establishment of dynamic behavior models for CRs. The development of control methods and real-time feedback systems that can manipulate CRs to improve their accuracy and dependability requires additional research and development. This will assist in optimizing CR operation during LA surgery, and provide precise force feedback and control capabilities. Moreover, future research should focus on the creation of new analytical tools and models to better comprehend and predict the dynamic behavior of catheters with enhanced controllability.
Future directions of robotic-assisted LA
Robot-assisted laser surgery is a challenging and delicate operation that requires the development of corresponding technology development support. This includes tumor identification and diagnosis, exploration of biological effects of laser–tissue interaction, CRs, micro-electromechanical integration for laser steering robotic, tissue tracking, motion control, and real-time intraoperative temperature detection. These are fully integrated into a complete clinical robot system to realize the integration of optical tumor theranostics.
CRs, typically flexible and slender, are usually preferred to accommodate a wide range of patients, with micro-electromechanical integration robots coupled at their ends for coordinated movements for performing precise LA. Equipped with lighting and high-definition imaging systems, the robot integrates advanced 3D vision, thereby optimizing the automatic control and path planning methods for surgical precision. At the end of the CRs, an optical diagnostic probe can also be integrated, coupled with laser beams such as OCT, PA, and LA through the optimization of multimodal algorithms, so as to accurately and quickly identify the edge of tumor tissue and precise LA procedures.
At present, the exploration of combining established technologies with innovative structures is still in its infancy, and a complete robotic system has not yet been realized. Nevertheless, this domain is seen as the focus of future research. Despite the complex changes surrounding the clinical implementation of robotic-assisted LA, its potential benefits are clear to patients, surgeons, hospitals, and the public healthcare system. As these technologies undergo clinical validation, more patients will have the opportunity to undergo LA surgery and benefit from improved surgical precision and quality. Surgeons will benefit from more intuitive surgical arrangements and robotic assistance, which will help them better plan and execute delicate interventions, thereby diminishing the risk of surgical trauma. Furthermore, the application of these technologies will also yield advantages for hospitals, including reducing the surgical complications and recurrence, improving patient satisfaction, and reducing medical costs to a certain extent. However, prior to the clinical integration of these technologies, the aspects of safety, dependability, biocompatibility, and sterilizable characteristics still need to be fully demonstrated. This will be a critical step to ensure its feasibility and successful application.
Perspectives and Challenges
LA is an emerging discipline in minimally invasive interventional tumor therapy, and its safety and efficacy have been largely confirmed. It stands as a promising surgical alternative for various cancers. Compared to conventional treatment, LA can reduce recovery time, minimize blood loss, and lower risk. However, its limited laser penetration depth restricts its suitability to superficial tumor tissue ablation [146]. Therefore, improving the laser source is one of the future directions of LA, along with expanding the clinical applications of LA to other fields, continuing to investigate the interaction between laser and tissue, elucidating the laser treatment mechanisms of different wavelengths and laser parameters, refining the targeting of tumor laser treatment, and using it to treat new diseases and viral diseases.
This paper focuses on the application of LA to tumors and provides a thorough discussion of the mechanism and biological effects of tumor LA treatment, image guidance, robot assistance, and other aspects. Effective simulation of laser parameters and elucidation of biological effect mechanisms will have a significant impact on the LA effect in terms of the LA mechanism. For precise LA treatment, it is necessary to elucidate the laser tissue interaction mechanism of tumors in various positions and tissue structures. Image guidance can provide essential structural and functional information for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative ablation outcomes, thereby providing the technical methods for the accurate and effective evaluation of ablation effects, particularly in preoperative planning, intraoperative navigation, and postoperative evaluation.
Image-guided LA has been proven to have promising prospects in tumor treatment, with confirmed efficacy and safety [74,101,114,127], and is changing the available treatment options for patients. Nevertheless, present clinical cases mostly rely on single-modality imaging for guidance, which may offer limited structural and functional data of afflicted tissues. In addition, image resolution, penetration depth, imaging speed, and field of view (FOV) are important factors for real-time outcome visualization. Consequently, multimodal imaging-guided LA is also one of the future development directions. Multimodal imaging can reduce misdiagnosis rates, enhance the recognition efficiency of tumor tissue, and provide anatomical and functional information of tumors with high spatial/temporal resolution [147]. Integrated multimodal imaging and LA treatment can substantially boost diagnostic and therapeutic efficiency.
As a result of the constant advancement of technology, endoscopically guided surgery is increasingly utilized in clinical tumor resections. However, current feasible image-guided laser surgery systems still encounter numerous obstacles and require extensive research and technological innovation in the years ahead. A prime example is the design of a multimodal endoscopic instrument [148], effectively coupling diagnostic and therapeutic light, providing high-quality optical images for tumor diagnosis and real-time control of laser parameters for precise tissue volume ablation. Moreover, it is also urgent to achieve wide-field imaging for multimodal image fusion and construct an effective macro-micro image fusion for extensive FOV guidance in LA, alongside strategies for tissue tracking and motion compensation via robotic catheters.
As an intelligent optical diagnostic and therapeutic instrument in the future, the implementation of LA in the field of tumor theranostics is becoming increasingly widespread. Robot-assisted LA technology is a research hotspot in the field of cancer treatment at the moment. The autonomous and controllable regulation and precise control of robots can facilitate the efficient execution of invasive fiber optic or integrated theranostics with the advent of artificial intelligence and deep learning. In conjunction with deep reinforcement learning [149–151] and other technical parameters, the LA robot or laser theranostic robot can effectively execute operations in a continuous high-dimensional space, thereby enabling intelligent laser theranostics. Moreover, forming a 3D space of the human body based on multidisciplinary computational anatomy [152] via preoperative and intraoperative image fusion, augmented by surgical navigation-guided autonomous robotic operation strategies [153], will facilitate the efficient operation of laser theranostic robotics. However, more research is required in the field of medical ethics.
Over the past 60 years [154], LA has gradually been widely used in clinical applications. The safety of laser therapy is an aspect that must be considered in tumor treatment [4]. Controlling the laser output dose is an important manifestation of the accuracy of LA. While the journey toward clinical systems might be long, the integration of endoscopic optical theranostics is a development trend. This new therapeutic diagnostic technology can bring significant benefits to medical theranostic applications, particularly in delicate human organ surgeries. This includes the potential for more precise surgical margins in oncology applications as well as safer procedures for better preservation of healthy tissues and essential structures.
Conclusion
This paper aims to comprehensively review the present status and future directions of tumor LA therapy. The paper first discussed the mechanism and biological effects of LA, followed by an evaluation of image-guided technologies employed in tumor LA therapy. Furthermore, the paper also focuses on LA therapy assisted by surgical robots and puts forward new thinking and perspectives on the prospect of the integration of intelligent multimodal image guidance and LA theranostics.
This paper points out that intelligent multimodal image-guided LA theranostic technology has broad application prospects in the field of tumor LA therapy. By combining a variety of intelligent image-guided technologies, precise guidance and monitoring of the tumor LA process can be achieved, resulting in enhanced treatment accuracy and effect of treatment, and improving clinical efficacy. The expansion of this technology is poised to bolster the extensive application of tumor LA therapy and bring better treatment outcomes for patients.
In general, with the continuous advancement of technology, the fusion of multimodal image guidance with LA theranostics promises revolutionary transformations in the field of tumor therapy. This will not only improve the effect of LA treatment but also empower medical practitioners with more precise treatment plans, which will bring greater benefits to patients' health.
Acknowledgments
Funding: This research was partially funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under grant nos. 82172112 and 81901907, the Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars under grant no. XSQD-202123006, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under grant no. 2022LY-22.Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
- 1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Yun SH, Kwok SJ. Light in diagnosis, therapy and surgery. Nat Biomed Eng. 2017;1:0008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Dong J, Xiong D. Applications of light emitting diodes in health care. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45(11):2509–2523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Schena E, Saccomandi P, Fong Y. Laser ablation for cancer: Past, present and future. J Funct Biomater. 2017;8(2):19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Grabowski MM, Otvos B, Mohammadi AM. Stereotactic laser ablation of glioblastoma. Neurosurg Clin. 2021;32(1):105–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Rodriguez A, Tatter SB. Laser ablation of recurrent malignant gliomas: Current status and future perspective. Neurosurgery. 2016;79:S35–S39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Omi T, Numano K. The role of the CO2 laser and fractional CO2 laser in dermatology. Laser Ther. 2014;23(1):49–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Xu M, Xu D, Deng Z, Tian G. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided laser ablation for liver tumors in the caudate lobe: 5 years of experience. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022;1-7(5):558–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Yong-Ping L, Juan Z, Li J, Qi H-H, Liu J-P, Zhao Y-F, Liu W-G, Zhang X, Zhou P. The value of ultrasound guided laser ablation in papillary thyroid recurrence carcinoma: A retrospective, single center study from China. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:Article 946966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kerbage Y, Betrouni N, Collinet P, Azaïs H, Mordon S, Dewalle-Vignion A-S, Merlot B. Laser interstitial thermotherapy application for breast surgery: Current situation and new trends. Breast. 2017;33:145–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Mahmood AS, Khattab OS, Tanno SY. Effects of Ho: YAG laser (2100nm) in prostate tissue: An in vitro study. Iraqi J Laser. 2019;18:51–60. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Miyoshi Y, Nishimura T, Shimojo Y, Okayama K, Awazu K. Endoscopic image-guided laser treatment system based on fiber bundle laser steering. Sci Rep. 2023;13:2921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kucur C, Durmus K, Dziegielewski PT, Ozer E. Transoral robot-assisted carbon dioxide laser surgery for hypopharyngeal cancer. Head Neck. 2015;37(5):743–745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Fan Y, Xia Y, Zhang X, Sun Y, Tang J, Zhang L, Liao H. Optical coherence tomography for precision brain imaging, neurosurgical guidance and minimally invasive theranostics. Biosci Trends. 2018;12(1):12–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Zhou W, Chen Z, Zhou Q, Xing D. Optical biopsy of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma progression by noncontact photoacoustic and optical coherence tomography: In vivo multi-parametric characterizing tumor microenvironment. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019;39(6):1967–1974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Gong P, Chin SL, Allen WM, Ballal H, Anstie JD, Chin L, Ismail HM, Zilkens R, Lakhiani DD, McCarthy M, et al. Quantitative micro-elastography enables in vivo detection of residual cancer in the surgical cavity during breast-conserving surgery. Cancer Res. 2022;82(21):4093–4104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. He J, Baxter SL, Xu J, Xu J, Zhou X, Zhang K. The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):30–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Cianchetti M, Laschi C, Menciassi A, Dario P. Biomedical applications of soft robotics. Nat Rev Mater. 2018;3: 143–153. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kok EN, Eppenga R, Kuhlmann KF, Groen HC, Veen R, Dieren JM, Wijkerslooth TR, Leerdam M, Lambregts DM, Heerink WJ, et al. Accurate surgical navigation with real-time tumor tracking in cancer surgery. NPJ Precision Oncol. 2020;4:8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Walsh JT. Basic interactions of light with tissue. In: Welch AJ, van Gemert MJC, editors. Optical-thermal response of laser-irradiated tissue. Netherlands: Springer; 2011. p. 13–26.
- 21.Müller GJ, Roggan A. Laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy. SPIE Press; 1995.
- 22.Niemz MH. Interaction mechanisms. In: Laser-tissue interactions: Fundamentals and applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2002. p. 45–149.
- 23. Jacques SL. Optical properties of biological tissues: A review. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(11):R37–R61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Conforti C, Vezzoni R, Giuffrida R, Fai A, Fadda S, Marangi GF, Persichetti P, Piccolo D, Segreto F, Zalaudek I, et al. An overview on the role of CO2 laser in general dermatology. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(2):Article e14692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Di Costanzo GG, Tortora R, Guarracino M, Mattera M. Liver tumors laser ablation. In: Pacella C, Jiang T, Mauri G, editors. Image-guided laser ablation. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 31–44.
- 26. Norsyuhada WMSW, Hazri B, Shumaila I, Noriah B, Sayang B, Salehhuddin H, Azahar CAM. Stimulated ag nanoparticles by pulsed laser ablation for breast cancer treatment. Biomed Environ Sci. 2021;34(2):119–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Ghanaati H, Firouznia K, Rezaei M, Shakiba M, Ghavami N. Management of osteoid osteoma using radiofrequency ablation. Iran J Radiol. 2020;17. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Seemann R, Böning G, Schwabe P, Teichgräber U, Gebauer B, Streitparth F. Osteoid osteoma: Treatment outcome and long-term follow-up after MRI-guided laser ablation. Ann Trans Med. 2022;10(5):240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mao T, Zhang H, Cui J, Yan F, Sun J, Zhang W. Preliminary experience of 980nm diode laser treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder tumor with en bloc technique; 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30. Walser E, Nance A, Ynalvez L, Yong S, Aoughsten JS, Eyzaguirre EJ, Williams SB. Focal laser ablation of prostate cancer: results in 120 patients with low-to intermediate-risk disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(3):401–409. e402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Atri M, Gertner MR, Haider MA, Weersink RA, Trachtenberg J. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for real-time monitoring of interstitial laser thermal therapy in the focal treatment of prostate cancer. Can Urol Assoc J. 2009;3(2):125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Paiva ALC, Araujo JLV, Lovato RM, Veiga JCE. Safety and efficacy of 980nm diode laser for brain tumor microsurgery—A pioneer case series. World Neurosurg. 2021;146:e461–e466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Paiva AC, Araujo JLV, Lovato R, Krambek M, Veiga JE. Surg-43. Applications and restriction of 980nm diode laser for brain tumor microsurgery-a pioneer case series and a critical review. Neuro-Oncology. 2020;22:ii212. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Carpentier A, McNichols RJ, Stafford RJ, Itzcovitz J, Guichard J-P, Reizine D, Delaloge S, Vicaut E, Payen D, Gowda A. Real-time magnetic resonance-guided laser thermal therapy for focal metastatic brain tumors. Operat Neurosurg. 2008;63(1 Suppl 1):ONS21-ONS29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Liu S-C, Lin D-S, Su W-F. The role of diode laser in the treatment of ventricular dysphonia. J Voice. 2013;27(2):250–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Tunçel Ü, Cömert E. Preliminary results of diode laser surgery for early glottic cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149(3):445–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Hepler R, Allen R, Straatsma B. Photocoagulation of choroidal melanoma: Early and late histopathologic consequences. Arch Ophthalmol. 1968;79(2):177–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Journee-de Korver J, Oosterhuis J, Wolff-Rouendaal D, Kemme H. Histopathological findings in human choroidal melanomas after transpupillary thermotherapy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997;81(3):234 –239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Jain P, Jain S, Awadhiya S, Sethi P. Excision of traumatic fibroma by diode laser. J Dental Lasers. 2018;12(4):67. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Rashid AO, Attar A, Mohammed KS, Fakhralddin SS, Abdulla LN, Buchholz N. Direct comparison of pneumatic and Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy in the management of lower ureteric stones. Urol Int. 2020;104(9-10):765–768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. El-Feel A, Samir A, Fathy H, Abdel-Razzak OM. Retrograde ureteroscopic holmium: Yag laser lithotripsy for ureteral and renal stones. Egypt J Urol. 2009;121(2):125. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Barski D, Richter M, Winter C, Arsov C, Geeter P, Rabenalt R, Albers P. Holmium laser ablation of the prostate (HoLAP): Intermediate-term results of 144 patients. World J Urol. 2013;31(5):1253 –1259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Türk C, Neisius A, Petrík A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Thomas K. EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. Arnhem (The Netherlands): European Association of Urology; 2021.
- 44. Ji L, Zhang L, Cao L, Zheng J, Wang J, Han W, Zhang H. Laser rapid drilling of bone tissue in minimizing thermal injury and debris towards orthopedic surgery. Mater Des. 2022;220:Article 110895. [Google Scholar]
- 45. Zhang X, Chen C, Chen F, Zhan Z, Xie S, Ye Q. In vitro investigation on Ho: YAG laser-assisted bone ablation underwater. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31(5):891–898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Kulkarni AV, Kulkarni VM, Alahabade R, Ruikar PD, Kulkarni AV. Holmium: YAG laser: A better tool for hysteroscopic septal transection. J South Asian Feder Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;13:114–117. [Google Scholar]
- 47. Lan Y, Wu W, Liu L, Zhou S, Lan C, Ketegwe IR, Zeng G. Thulium (tm: YAG) laser vaporesection of prostate and bipolar transurethral resection of prostate in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2018;33(7):1411–1421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Shoji S. Treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with tm: YAG laser. J Japan Soc Laser Surg Med. 2017;38:29–34. [Google Scholar]
- 49. Herrmann TR, Becker B, Netsch C. Thulium YAG is the best laser for the prostate because of versatility. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023;48:18–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Hashem A, Mosbah A, El-Tabey NA, Laymon M, Ibrahiem E-H, Elhamid MA, Elshal AM. Holmium laser En-bloc resection versus conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors for treatment of non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol Focus. 2021;7(5):1035–1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Migliari R, Buffardi A, Ghabin H. Thulium laser endoscopic En bloc enucleation of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. J Endourol. 2015;29(11):1258–1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. York PA, Peña R, Kent D, Wood RJ. Microrobotic laser steering for minimally invasive surgery. Sci Robot. 2021;6(50):eabd5476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Kundrat D, Graesslin R, Schoob A, Friedrich D, Scheithauer M, Hoffmann T, Ortmaier T, Kahrs LA, Schuler P. Preclinical performance evaluation of a robotic endoscope for non-contact laser surgery. Ann Biomed Eng. 2021;49(2):585–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Welch A. The thermal response of laser irradiated tissue. IEEE J Quantum Electron. 1984;20:1471–1481. [Google Scholar]
- 55. Pennes HH. Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm. J Appl Physiol. 1948;1(2):93–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Jiang S, Zhang X. Dynamic modeling of photothermal interactions for laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy: Parameter sensitivity analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2005;20(3-4):122–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Salavati M, Baygi M. A three-dimensional finite element model to study dynamic changes of tissue during laser interstitial thermotherapy. Am J Biomed Eng. 2015;5:86–93. [Google Scholar]
- 58. De Vita E, De Landro M, Massaroni C, Iadicicco A, Saccomandi P, Schena E, Campopiano S. Fiber optic sensors-based thermal analysis of perfusion-mediated tissue cooling in liver undergoing laser ablation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020;68(3):1066–1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Henriques FC Jr. Studies of thermal injury; the predictability and the significance of thermally induced rate processes leading to irreversible epidermal injury. Arch Pathol. 1947;43(5):489–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Henriques F Jr, Moritz AR. Studies of thermal injury: I. the conduction of heat to and through skin and the temperatures attained therein. A theoretical and an experimental investigation. Am J Pathol. 1947;23(4):530. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Moritz AR, Henriques F Jr. Studies of thermal injury: II. The relative importance of time and surface temperature in the causation of cutaneous burns. Am J Pathol. 1947; 23(5):695. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Saccomandi P, Schena E, Caponero MA, Di Matteo FM, Martino M, Pandolfi M, Silvestri S. Theoretical analysis and experimental evaluation of laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy in ex vivo porcine pancreas. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012;59(10):2958–2964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Rossmann C, Haemmerich D. Review of temperature dependence of thermal properties, dielectric properties, and perfusion of biological tissues at hyperthermic and ablation temperatures. Cric Rev Biomed Eng. 2014;42(6):467–492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Singh S, Repaka R, Al-Jumaily A. Sensitivity analysis of critical parameters affecting the efficacy of microwave ablation using Taguchi method. Inter J RF Micro Comput-Aided Eng. 2019;29:Article e21581. [Google Scholar]
- 65. Mohammadi A, Bianchi L, Korganbayev S, De Landro M, Saccomandi P. Thermomechanical modeling of laser ablation therapy of tumors: Sensitivity analysis and optimization of influential variables. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021;69(1):302–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Schulmann N, Soltani-Sarvestani M, De Landro M, Korganbayev S, Cotin S, Saccomandi P. Model-based thermometry for laser ablation procedure using Kalman filters and sparse temperature measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022;69(9):2839–2849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Korganbayev S, Orrico A, Bianchi L, Paloschi D, Wolf A, Dostovalov A, Saccomandi P. PID controlling approach based on FBG array measurements for laser ablation of pancreatic tissues. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2021;70:1–9.33776080 [Google Scholar]
- 68. Periyasamy V, Özsoy Ç, Reiss M, Deán-Ben XL, Razansky D. In vivo optoacoustic monitoring of percutaneous laser ablation of tumors in a murine breast cancer model. Opt Lett. 2020;45(7):2006–2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Pacella CM, Mauri G. Image-guided laser ablation. Cham: Springer; 2020.
- 70. Zhang S, Li C, Cao L, Moser MA, Zhang W, Qian Z, Zhang B. Modeling and ex vivo experimental validation of liver tissue carbonization with laser ablation. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2022;217:Article 106697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Kim HJ, Chung SM, Kim H, Jang JY, Yang JH, Moon JS, Son G, Oh J-R, Bae JY, Yoon H. Long-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided laser ablation for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: Results of a 10-year retrospective study. Thyroid. 2021;31(11):1723–1729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Srinivasan ES, Grabowski MM, Nahed BV, Barnett GH, Fecci PE. Laser interstitial thermal therapy for brain metastases. Neuro-Oncol Adv. 2021;3(Suppl 5):v16–v25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Chao B, Lepor H. 5-year outcomes following focal laser ablation of prostate cancer. Urology. 2021;155:124–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Renevier R, Tamadazte B, Rabenorosoa K, Tavernier L, Andreff N. Endoscopic laser surgery: Design, modeling, and control. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2016;22:99–106. [Google Scholar]
- 75. Abe N, Takeuchi H, Ohki A, Hashimoto Y, Mori T, Sugiyama M. Comparison between endoscopic and laparoscopic removal of gastric submucosal tumor. Dig Endosc. 2018;30:7–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Olivieri E, Barresi G, Caldwell DG, Mattos LS. Haptic feedback for control and active constraints in contactless laser surgery: Concept, implementation, and evaluation. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2017;11(2):241–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Shimojo Y, Nishimura T, Hazama H, Ito N, Awazu K. Incident fluence analysis for 755-nm picosecond laser treatment of pigmented skin lesions based on threshold fluences for melanosome disruption. Lasers Surg Med. 2021;53(8):1096–1104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Sudo K, Shimojo Y, Nishimura T, Awazu K. Three-dimensional transient simulation of CO2 laser tissue vaporization and experimental evaluation with a hydrogel phantom. J Innov Optic Health Sci. 2022;15:2250016. [Google Scholar]
- 79. Shimojo Y, Nishimura T, Hazama H, Ito N, Awazu K. Picosecond laser-induced photothermal skin damage evaluation by computational clinical trial. Laser Ther. 2020;29(1):61–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Chikhaoui MT, Benouhiba A, Rougeot P, Rabenorosoa K, Ouisse M, Andreff N. Developments and control of biocompatible conducting polymer for intracorporeal continuum robots. Ann Biomed Eng. 2018;46(10): 1511–1521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Masaki F, King F, Kato T, Tsukada H, Colson Y, Hata N. Technical validation of multi-section robotic bronchoscope with first person view control for transbronchial biopsies of peripheral lung. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021;68(12):3534–3542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Friedrich DT, Modes V, Hoffmann TK, Greve J, Schuler PJ, Burgner-Kahrs J. Teleoperated tubular continuum robots for transoral surgery—Feasibility in a porcine larynx model. Inter J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg. 2018;14(5):Article e1928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Mo H, Li X, Ouyang B, Fang G, Jia Y. Task autonomy of a flexible endoscopic system for laser-assisted surgery. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2022;2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Gournaris E, Park W, Cho S, Bentrem DJ, Larson AC, Kim D-H. Near-infrared fluorescent endoscopic image-guided Photothermal ablation therapy of colorectal cancer using dual-modal Gold Nanorods targeting tumor-infiltrating innate immune cells in a transgenic TS4 CRE/APC loxΔ468 mouse model. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(24):21353–21359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Ohara M, Sanpei S, Seo C, Ohya J, Masamune K, Nagahashi H, Morimoto Y, Harada M. Developing thermal endoscope for endoscopic photothermal therapy for peritoneal dissemination. Paper presented at: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE2020); 2020 Oct 24; Las Vegas, NV, USA.
- 86. Boppart S, Bouma BE, Pitris C, Tearney GJ, Fujimoto JG, Brezinski ME. Forward-imaging instruments for optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett. 1997;22(21):1618–1620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Yu H, Shen J-H, Joos KM, Simaan N. Design, calibration and preliminary testing of a robotic telemanipulator for OCT guided retinal surgery. Paper presented at: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (IEEE2013); 2013 May 6–10; Karlsruhe, Germany.
- 88. Yu H, Shen J-H, Joos KM, Simaan N. Calibration and integration of b-mode optical coherence tomography for assistive control in robotic microsurgery. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2016;21(6):2613–2623. [Google Scholar]
- 89. Yu H, Shen J-H, Shah RJ, Simaan N, Joos KM. Evaluation of microsurgical tasks with OCT-guided and/or robot-assisted ophthalmic forceps. Biomed Opt Express. 2015;6(2):457–472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Joos KM, Shen J-H, Preliminary design and evaluation of a B-scan OCT-guided needle. Photonics. 2014;1(3):260–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 91. Boppart SA, Herrmann J, Pitris C, Stamper DL, Brezinski ME, Fujimoto JG. High-resolution optical coherence tomography-guided laser ablation of surgical tissue. J Surg Res. 1999;82(2):275–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Maltais-Tariant R, Boudoux C, Uribe-Patarroyo N. Real-time co-localized OCT surveillance of laser therapy using motion corrected speckle decorrelation. Biomed Opt Express. 2020;11(6):2925–2950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Katta N, McElroy AB, Estrada AD, Milner TE. Optical coherence tomography image-guided smart laser knife for surgery. Lasers Surg Med. 2018;50(3):202–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Kang J, Zhu R, Li J, Liu H, Ma X, Tao L, Sun Y. Optical coherence tomography-surveilled laser ablation using multifunctional catheter and 355-nm optical pulses. Opt Commun. 2021;501:Article 127364. [Google Scholar]
- 95. Fan Y, Zhang B, Chang W, Zhang X, Liao H. A novel integration of spectral-domain optical-coherence-tomography and laser-ablation system for precision treatment. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018;13(3):411–423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Chang W, Fan Y, Zhang X, Liao H. An intelligent theranostics method using optical coherence tomography guided automatic laser ablation for neurosurgery. Paper presented at: 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (IEEE2018). pp. 3224–3227. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 97. Li Y, Fan Y, Hu C, Mao F, Zhang X, Liao H. Intelligent optical diagnosis and treatment system for automated image-guided laser ablation of tumors. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021;16(12):2147–2157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Lim S, Truong VG, Choi J, Jeong HJ, Oh S-J, Park J-S, Kang HW. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided laser ablation using a diffusing applicator for locally advanced pancreatic cancer treatment. Cancers. 2022;14(9):2274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Zhang L, Zhang GP, Zhan WW, Zhou W. The feasibility and efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous laser ablation for multifocal papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Perretta T, Meucci R, Pistolese CA, Manenti G, Stefano CD, Vanni G, Anemona L, Ferrari D, Lamacchia F, De Stasio V. Ultrasound-guided laser ablation after excisional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for small malignant breast lesions: Preliminary results. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2021;20:1533033820980089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Nori J, Gill MK, Meattini I, Delli Paoli C, Abdulcadir D, Vanzi E, Boeri C, Gabbrielli S, Giannotti E, Lucci F, et al. The evolving role of ultrasound guided percutaneous laser ablation in elderly unresectable breast cancer patients: A feasibility pilot study. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:9141746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Di Matteo FM, Saccomandi P, Martino M, Pandolfi M, Pizzicannella M, Balassone V, Schena E, Pacella CM, Silvestri S, Costamagna G. Feasibility of EUS-guided Nd: YAG laser ablation of unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88(1):168–174. e161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Haraldsdóttir KH, Ivarsson K, Götberg S, Ingvar C, Stenram U, Tranberg K-G. Interstitial laser thermotherapy (ILT) of breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34(7):739–745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Ma S, Zhou P, Wu X, Tian S, Zhao Y. Detection of the single-session complete ablation rate by contrast-enhanced ultrasound during ultrasound-guided laser ablation for benign thyroid nodules: A prospective study. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9565364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Hu R, Zhu X, Zhou Y, Zhang J, Huang D, Zhou H. Feasibility study of ultrasound-guided percutaneous laser discectomy for cervical radicular pain. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):13285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Zhang S, Zhang EZ, Beard PC, Desjardins AE, Colchester RJ. Dual-modality fibre optic probe for simultaneous ablation and ultrasound imaging. Commun Eng. 2022;1(1):20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Zhang S, Bodian S, Zhang EZ, Beard PC, Noimark S, Desjardins AE, Colchester RJ. Miniaturised dual-modality all-optical ultrasound probe for laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) monitoring. Biomed Opt Express. 2023;14(7):3446–3457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Hu H, Ma Y, Gao X, Song D, Li M, Huang H, Qian X, Wu R, Shi K, Ding H, et al. Stretchable ultrasonic arrays for the three-dimensional mapping of the modulus of deep tissue. Nat Biomed Eng. 2023;1-14:1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Hu H, Huang H, Li M, Gao X, Yin L, Qi R, Wu RS, Chen X, Ma Y, Shi K, et al. A wearable cardiac ultrasound imager. Nature. 2023;613(7945):667–675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Wang C, Chen X, Wang L, Makihata M, Liu H-C, Zhou T, Zhao X. Bioadhesive ultrasound for long-term continuous imaging of diverse organs. Science. 2022;377(6605):517–523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Kamath AA, Friedman DD, Hacker CD, Smyth MD, Limbrick DD Jr, Kim AH, Hawasli AH, Leuthardt EC. MRI-guided interstitial laser ablation for intracranial lesions: A large single-institution experience of 133 cases. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2017;95(6):417–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Curry DJ, Raskin J, Ali I, Wilfong AA. MR-guided laser ablation for the treatment of hypothalamic hamartomas. Epilepsy Res. 2018;142:131–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Arocho-Quinones EV, Lew SM, Handler MH, Tovar-Spinoza Z, Smyth M, Bollo R, Donahue D, Perry MS, Levy ML, Gonda D, et al. Magnetic resonance–guided stereotactic laser ablation therapy for the treatment of pediatric brain tumors: A multiinstitutional retrospective study. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2020;26(1):13–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Barqawi A, Krughoff K, Li H, Patel NU. Initial experience of targeted focal interstitial laser ablation of prostate cancer with MRI guidance. Curr Urol. 2014;8(4):199–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Mehralivand S, George AK, Hoang AN, Rais-Bahrami S, Rastinehad AR, Lebastchi AH, Ahdoot M, Siddiqui MM, Bloom J, Sidana A. MRI-guided focal laser ablation of prostate cancer: A prospective single-arm, single-center trial with 3 years of follow-up. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021;27(3):394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Oto A, Sethi I, Karczmar G, McNichols R, Ivancevic MK, Stadler WM, Watson S, Eggener S. MR imaging–guided focal laser ablation for prostate cancer: Phase I trial. Radiology. 2013;267:932–940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Natarajan S, Raman S, Priester AM, Garritano J, Margolis DJ, Lieu P, Macairan ML, Huang J, Grundfest W, Marks LS. Focal laser ablation of prostate cancer: Phase I clinical trial. J Urol. 2016;196(1):68–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Wang S, Fan X, Yousuf A, Eggener SE, Karczmar G, Oto A. Evaluation of focal laser ablation of prostate cancer using high spectral and spatial resolution imaging: A pilot study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49(5):1374–1380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Magee D, Perlis N, Corr K, Chan R, Gertner M, Zisman A, Jokhu S, Ghai S. Salvage interstitial laser thermal therapy under MRI guidance (MRgFLA) for high-intensity focal ultrasound (HIFU) recurrences: Feasibility study. Clin Imaging. 2021;76:217–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Desclides M, Ozenne V, Bour P, Faller T, Machinet G, Pierre C, Chemouny S, Quesson B. Real-time automatic temperature regulation during in vivo MRI-guided laser-induced thermotherapy (MR-LITT). Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):3279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Fang G, Chow MC, Ho JD, He Z, Wang K, Ng T, Tsoi JK, Chan P-L, Chang H-C, Chan DT-M, et al. Soft robotic manipulator for intraoperative MRI-guided transoral laser microsurgery. Sci Robot. 2021;6(57):eabg5575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Knull E, Bax JS, Park CKS, Tessier D, Fenster A. Design and validation of an MRI-compatible mechatronic system for needle delivery to localized prostate cancer. Med Phys. 2021;48(9):5283–5299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Landa FJO, Deán-Ben XL, Sroka R, Razansky D. Volumetric optoacoustic temperature mapping in photothermal therapy. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):9695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Basij M, John S, Bustamante D, Kabbani L, Maskoun W, Mehrmohammadi M. Integrated ultrasound and photoacoustic-guided laser ablation theranostic endoscopic system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022;70(1):67–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Wimper Y, Fütterer JJ, Bomers JG. MR imaging in real time guiding of therapies in prostate cancer. Life. 2022;12(2):302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Sonn GA, Margolis DJ, Marks LS. Target detection: Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion–guided prostate biopsy. Paper presented at: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations. p. 903–911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 127. Natarajan S, Jones TA, Priester AM, Geoghegan R, Lieu P, Delfin M, Felker E, Margolis DJ, Sisk A, Pantuck A, et al. Focal laser ablation of prostate cancer: Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion for guidance. J Urol. 2017;198(4):839–847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Bloom JB, Gold SA, Hale GR, Rayn KN, Sabarwal VK, Bakhutashvili I, Valera V, Turkbey B, Pinto PA, Wood BJ. Super-active surveillance: MRI ultrasound fusion biopsy and ablation for less invasive management of prostate cancer. Gland Surg. 2018;7(2):166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Fan Y, Sun Y, Chang W, Zhang X, Tang J, Zhang L, Liao H. Bioluminescence imaging and two-photon microscopy guided laser ablation of GBM decreases tumor burden. Theranostics. 2018;8(15):4072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Song Z, Zhang W, Zhang W, Paolo D. A novel biopsy capsule robot based on high-speed cutting tissue. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2022;2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Rubino F, Eichberg DG, Cordeiro JG, Di L, Eliahu K, Shah AH, Luther EM, Lu VM, Komotar RJ, Ivan ME. Robotic guidance platform for laser interstitial thermal ablation and stereotactic needle biopsies: A single center experience. J Robot Surg. 2022;1-9(3):1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Lee HC, Pacheco NE, Fichera L, Russo S. When the end effector is a laser: A review of robotics in laser surgery. Adv Intell Syst. 2022;4:2200130. [Google Scholar]
- 133. Acemoglu A, Pucci D, Mattos LS. Design and control of a magnetic laser scanner for endoscopic microsurgeries. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2019;24:527–537. [Google Scholar]
- 134. Zhao M, Vrielink TJO, Kogkas AA, Runciman MS, Elson DS, Mylonas GP. LaryngoTORS: A novel cable-driven parallel robotic system for transoral laser phonosurgery. IEEE Robot Auto Lett. 2020;5:1516–1523. [Google Scholar]
- 135.Bothner SA, York PA, Song PC, Wood RJ. A compact laser-steering end-effector for transoral robotic surgery. Paper presented at: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE2019); 2019 Nov 3-9; Macau, China.
- 136. Hu X, Chen A, Luo Y, Zhang C, Zhang E. Steerable catheters for minimally invasive surgery: A review and future directions. Comput Assist Surg. 2018;23(1):21–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Kouh Soltani M, Khanmohammadi S, Ghalichi F. A three-dimensional shape-based force and stiffness-sensing platform for tendon-driven catheters. Sensors. 2016;16(7):990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Hooshiar A, Sayadi A, Jolaei M, Dargahi J. Analytical tip force estimation on tendon-driven catheters through inverse solution of cosserat rod model. Paper presented at: 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE2021); 2021 Sep 27; Prague, Czech Republic.
- 139. Liu D, Liu X, Chen Z, Zuo Z, Tang X, Huang Q, Arai T. Magnetically driven soft continuum microrobot for intravascular operations in microscale. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2022;2022:9850832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Iacovacci V, Ricotti L, Sinibaldi E, Signore G, Vistoli F, Menciassi A. An intravascular magnetic catheter enables the retrieval of nanoagents from the bloodstream. Adv Sci. 2018;5(9):1800807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Namazu T, Komatsubara M, Nagasawa H, Miki T, Tsurui T, Inoue S. Titanium-nickel shape memory alloy spring actuator for forward-looking active catheter. J Metall. 2011;2011:1. [Google Scholar]
- 142. Liu T, Zhang G, Zhang P, Cheng T, Luo Z, Wang S, Du F. Modeling of and experimenting with concentric tube robots: Considering clearance, friction and torsion. Sensors. 2023;23(7):3709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Piskarev Y, Shintake J, Chautems C, Lussi J, Boehler Q, Nelson BJ, Floreano D. A variable stiffness magnetic catheter made of a conductive phase-change polymer for minimally invasive surgery. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32:2107662. [Google Scholar]
- 144. Gopesh T, Wen JH, Santiago-Dieppa D, Yan B, Pannell JS, Khalessi A, Norbash A, Friend J. Soft robotic steerable microcatheter for the endovascular treatment of cerebral disorders. Sci Robot. 2021;6(57):eabf0601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Zhang T, Yang L, Yang X, Tan R, Lu H, Shen Y. Millimeter-scale soft continuum robots for large-angle and high-precision manipulation by hybrid actuation. Adv Intell Syst. 2021;3(2):2000189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Chu KF, Dupuy DE. Thermal ablation of tumours: Biological mechanisms and advances in therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(3):199–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Zhang L, Liu Y, Huang H, Xie H, Zhang B, Xia W, Guo B. Multifunctional nanotheranostics for near infrared optical imaging-guided treatment of brain tumors. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2022;114536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Lee H, Lee Y, Song C, Cho HR, Ghaffari R, Choi TK, Kim KH, Lee YB, Ling D, Lee H, et al. An endoscope with integrated transparent bioelectronics and theranostic nanoparticles for colon cancer treatment. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Tan X, Chng C-B, Su Y, Lim K-B, Chui C-K. Robot-assisted training in laparoscopy using deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2019;4:485–492. [Google Scholar]
- 150. Nwoye E, Woo WL, Gao B, Anyanwu T. Artificial intelligence for emerging technology in surgery: Systematic review and validation. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2022;16:241–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Wei Y, Zhou J, Wang Y, Liu Y, Liu Q, Luo J, Wang C, Ren F, Huang L. A review of algorithm & hardware design for AI-based biomedical applications. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuit Syst. 2020;14(2):145–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Hashizume M. Perspective for future medicine: multidisciplinary computational anatomy-based medicine with artificial intelligence. Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2021;2021:Article 9160478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Saeidi H, Opfermann JD, Kam M, Wei S, Léonard S, Hsieh MH, Kang JU, Krieger A. Autonomous robotic laparoscopic surgery for intestinal anastomosis. Sci Robot. 2022;7(62):eabj2908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Solon LR, Aronson R, Gould G. Physiological implications of laser beams: The very high radiation flux densities of optical masers point to important biomedical applications. Science. 1961;134:1506–1508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Zhou Y, Li M, Liu W, Sankin G, Luo J, Zhong P, Yao J. Thermal memory based photoacoustic imaging of temperature. Optica. 2019;6(2):198–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Medvid R, Ruiz A, Komotar R, Jagid J, Ivan M, Quencer R, Desai M. Current applications of MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy in the treatment of brain neoplasms and epilepsy: A radiologic and neurosurgical overview. Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(11):1998–2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Mohammadi AM, Schroeder JL. Laser interstitial thermal therapy in treatment of brain tumors—The NeuroBlate system. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2014;11(2):109–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.