Abstract
Null mutations of the Lama2-gene cause a severe congenital muscular dystrophy and associated neuropathy. In the absence of laminin-α2 (Lmα2) there is a compensatory replacement by Lmα4, a subunit that lacks the polymerization and α-dystroglycan (αDG)-binding properties of Lmα2. The dystrophic phenotype in the dy3K/dy3K Lama2−/− mouse were evaluated with transgenes driving expression of two synthetic laminin-binding linker proteins. Transgenic muscle-specific expression of αLNNd, a chimeric protein that enables α4-laminin polymerization, and miniagrin (mag), a protein that increases laminin binding to the receptor αDG, separately improved median mouse survival two-fold. The double transgenes (DT) improved mean survival three-fold with increases in overall body weight, muscle size, and grip strength, but, given absence of neuronal expression, did not prevent hindlimb paresis. Muscle improvements included increased myofiber size and number and reduced fibrosis. Myofiber hypertrophy with increased mTOR and Akt phosphorylation were characteristics of mag-dy3K/dy3K and DT-dy3K/dy3K muscle. Elevations of matrix-bound α4-, β1 and γ1 laminin subunits were detected in muscle extracts and immunostained sections in response to DT expression. Collectively, these findings reveal a complimentary polymerization and αDG-binding benefit to Lama2−/− mouse muscle largely mediated through modified laminin-411.
Introduction
Skeletal muscle myofibers are surrounded by a specialized extracellular matrix (ECM), the endomysial basement membrane (BM), supporting and protecting myofibers against mechanical forces generated by contraction and relaxation. Laminin-211 (α2β1γ1 heterotrimer, abbreviated Lm211), the major endomysial laminin, is important for BM assembly, architecture and receptor-interactions. Mutations within the Lama2 gene coding for the Lmα2-subunit cause as much as 30% of cases of congenital muscular dystrophy (CMD). These mutations most commonly result in a complete or near-complete loss of protein subunit expression. Patients are floppy at birth, fail to ambulate, and often die of muscle wasting and respiratory failure by the second decade if untreated [1]. In a subset of cases, the subunit is defective and unable to participate in polymerization [2]. The resulting muscle pathology for both consists of myofiber degeneration and regeneration, chronic inflammation and progressive fibrosis [3].
While currently there is no known cure for the disease, several promising therapeutic candidates have emerged in recent years [4,5]. Of these, a number address repair of the structural defect that results from laminin mutations through alteration of gene expression. An approach from our work and those of colleagues focusses on modifying the compensatory laminin that is expressed in the dystrophic muscle sarcolemma, i.e. replacement of the α2 subunit by α4, mainly as Lm411 [4]. Lm411 cannot polymerize, binds weakly to integrins α6β1 and α7β1, and does not bind to αDG [6–8]. Normally confined to vessels, peripheral nerve branches and neuromuscular junctions in muscle, α4-laminin has been found to contribute to vasculature maturation and to myelination [9–11] in which the underlying mechanisms are thought to involve receptor interactions in the absence of polymerization. One possible contribution is that Lm411 normally competes for the α2-LN domains bound to the β1-γ1 LN dimers in polymers of Lm211, reducing signaling through modulation of extracellular matrix layer stiffness [12]. A balance of polymerizing (Lm211) and non-polymerizing (Lm411) laminins may be required for optimal function. In this study, laminin-binding linker proteins were used to alter α4-laminin such that activities present in α2-laminin were transferred to α4-laminins [8].
The muscle sarcolemmal BM can be described as a layer of transversely linked proteins extending from stromal-interface collagen-VI to BM to trans-membrane integrin α7β1 and α/β-dystroglycan complex to cytoskeletal dystrophin. The BM in turn is connected by inter-laminin-211 and inter-collagen-IV bonds that form laterally-oriented planar polymer arrays [13]. This structural arrangement helps to explain how mutations that alter these components result in muscular dystrophies ranging in severity from mild to severe [3]. A key step in the assembly of the BM is provided by the Lm211 attachment to αDG and α7β1 integrin receptors and Lm211 self-assembly. αDG is thought to provide the more critical receptor link in muscle [14]. Several mutations that alter the αDG mannosyl-O-linked carbohydrate (matriglycan) essential for ligand binding by Lm-211, agrin and perlecan cause severe congenital and limb girdle dystrophies. In contrast, mutations ablating α7β1 integrin function result in a milder dystrophy [14]. The importance of the lateralizing links provided by laminin polymers is illustrated by the dystrophy that develops with mutations in the LN domain selectively preventing laminin polymerization [2,15,16].
A chimeric protein, αLNNd, binds to laminins at the nidogen-binding locus in the Lmγ1 short arm and enables polymerization of laminins with an absent or defective N-terminal αLN domain [2,17] (Fig. 1). The dy2J/dy2J mouse, a model for a less severe form of laminin-deficiency, expresses non-polymerizing α2-laminin resulting from a destabilizing in-frame deletion within the α2LN domain [15]. Transgenic muscle expression of αLNNd in dy2J/dy2J dystrophic mice was found to enable polymerization of the defective Lm211 and substantially improved mouse muscle strength and histology [18]. A second engineered laminin-binding protein is mini-agrin (mag). Consisting of an internally shortened version of non-neuronal agrin, it binds to the laminin coiled-coil and the αDG receptor [8,19]. Transgenic muscle-specific expression of this protein in the dyW/dyW Lama2 hypomorphic mouse [20] with considerably reduced Lmα2 subunit expression partially restored muscle function and histology [19]. In contrast, co-expression of both proteins in the dyW/dyW hypomorphic mouse improved histology, survival, body weights and strength to a greater extent than either transgene alone [8].
In the current study, we evaluated dual transgenic expression of the two linker proteins in the full knockout of the Lama2 gene (dy3K/dy3K, [21]). We focused on dy3K/dy3K because, unlike dyW/dyW, there is no detectable expression of surviving truncated α2 subunits lacking LN domains [20] to complicate analysis, muscle laminin levels are challenging low, and the mouse model corresponds to the most common presentation of Lama2-RD [22–24]. The mice exhibit the severest dystrophic phenotype of all Lama2 dystrophic models [25]. We report that each transgene provided similar limited amelioration with considerable benefit achieved with double transgene expression as measured by mouse survival, weights, muscle size, and grip strength. Extraction studies revealed that an increased amount of laminin, mostly Lm411, was retained in extracellular matrix in the presence of linker proteins.
Results
Predictions were that the extent of Lm411 assembly on myofiber surfaces depends on protein concentration with the most efficient assembly occurring when both polymerization and anchorage are facilitated. Since laminins have only a single high-affinity binding site for the nidogen G3 domain (γ1LEb3) [26] and a single high-affinity binding site for the agrin NtA domain (coiled-coil) [27], the three proteins should assemble on cells as ternary complexes. When cultured myotubes were incubated with equimolar Lm411, αLNNd and mag, cell surface assembly (measured as accumulation) was found to be concentration dependent with the greatest accumulation seen with the combination of linker proteins, supporting the expectations (Suppl. Fig. S1).
Transgene expression improves mouse survival, growth and muscle function:
αLNNd and mag transgenes, both driven by the muscle creatine kinase (MCK) promoter, were prepared and evaluated for sarcolemmal expression in muscle as previously described [18,19]. The transgenic mice were bred with dy3K/+ mice to generate wild-type (+/+, dy3K/+ without or with transgenes), dy3K/dy3K dystrophic, and dy3K/dy3K mice expressing one or both transgenes. Survival times, weights and specific grip strengths were compared among dystrophic mice without and with single and double transgene expression (Fig. 2).
The dystrophic dy3K/dy3K mice were smaller than WT mice, developing characteristic hindlimb behavior with a slowly progressive gait abnormality by about two weeks of age. Upon picking up the mice by their tails at weaning, normal mice extended their hindlimbs while dystrophic mice variably flexed their hindlimbs, bringing them close against the abdomen. The DT-dy3K/dy3K mouse gait abnormality was largely confined to the hindlimbs, initially without greatly affecting mobility (Supplemental Figure S3 and Video). The dy3K/dy3K mice, in the absence of transgenes, were smaller and exhibited limited mobility. They usually died before development of obvious hindlimb contractures. The mice bearing transgenes gradually developed hindlimb extension contractures over the ensuing weeks, initially transiently. Since these anomalies have been reported in Schwann cell-specific laminin-γ1 deficient mice, it is likely that these particular behavioral defects are due to sciatic nerve amyelination rather than a primary muscle defect [11,28,29]. Single and double transgenes improved survival and weights; however, the hindlimb abnormalities were not ameliorated by the muscle-specific transgenes.
Survival gains in the dy3K/dy3K mouse:
The survival of the four groups of dystrophic mice (dy3K/dy3K, αLNNd-dy3K/dy3K, mag-dy3K/dy3K, and DT-dy3K/dy3K) was examined and plotted by the Kaplan-Meir method with log-rank analysis (Fig. 2A). Those mice approaching a moribund state were sacrificed according to an approved protocol. Mice sacrificed for this reason or for tissue retrieval are indicated as censored data points along with mice sacrificed for tissue retrieval. The dy3K/dy3K mice without transgene were short-lived with a mean survival of 4 weeks and no survivors beyond 8 weeks of age. The dy3K/dy3K mice with single transgene expression survived about twice as long with no statistical difference between αLNNd- dy3K/dy3K and mag-dy3K/dy3K. The dy3K/dy3K mice with double-transgene expression lived the longest with a three-fold mean increase. One mouse survived longer than one year. No significant survival sex difference was noted (Suppl. Fig. S2).
Weight gain:
The WT mice doubled their weights between 3 and 10 weeks of age while the dy3K/dy3K mice without transgene maintained their wean weight until death (Fig. 2B). In comparison, homozygous dystrophic mice expressing either the αLNNd or mag transgene alone exhibited little increase in weight, while those expressing both transgenes increased considerably higher than that seen with single transgene, but still below that of WT mice.
Muscle function:
Forelimb and all-limb specific muscle grip strength was evaluated (Fig. 2C,D). Comparisons made among all genotypes at 5 weeks age revealed increased grip strength for DT-dy3K/dy3K mice compared to dy3K/dy3K with small differences among single transgene and DT mice. Measurements were compared among DT- dy3K/dy3K, WT and dy3K/dy3K mice over a four-week period – thereafter, the hindlimb paresis and associated progressive extensor hindlimb contractures interfered with all-limb measurements and surviving dy3K/dy3K were no longer available for comparison. Significant but small (forelimb) to modest (all-limb) improvements of both grip strength were observed for DT-dy3K/dy3K compared to dy3K/dy3K mice.
Muscle histology:
Hindlimb skeletal muscles was examined histologically in mid-length cross-sections of plantaris (Fig. 3), tibialis anterior (Fig. 4) and triceps (Suppl. Fig. S5) with morphometric measurements. Periodic acid Schiff (PAS) was used to assess myofiber size and shape and delineate the sarcolemmal BMs while Picro-Sirius Red (PSR) was used to characterize collagen accumulation (fibrosis). Dystrophic changes were more severe in plantaris compared to tibialis anaterior (TA). The number of fibers in plantaris and TA was reduced in dy3K/dy3K in which many of the myofibers were of small caliber. Expression of a single transgene, whether αLNNd or mag, was associated with limited change in plantaris or TA myofiber counts. In contrast to αLNNd-treatment, an increase in average individual myofiber caliber in mag-dy3K/dy3K mice was noted in plantaris (as well as hindlimb gastrocnemius and rectus femoris), but not TA. A significant increase in the number of myofibers/muscle in plantaris and TA and the average myofiber area was noted in DT-dy3K/dy3K. The fraction of myofibers with non-peripheral (“central”) nuclei, a marker for regeneration, was high in all dy3K/dy3K muscle, regardless of transgene expression. This is in contrast with αLNNd transgene expression in dy2J/dy2J muscle but similar to that observed with double transgene dyW/dyW muscle [8,18] and older dy3K/dy3K mice rescued with a full-length Lmα1 transgene [30]. Collagen increases were noted in dy3K/dy3K muscles in a largely peri-sarcolemmal distribution. This was somewhat reduced in dystrophic muscle with single transgene expression, and considerably reduced with DT expression. Immunostaining of macrophages in muscle (3 weeks age) for F4/80 (reflecting chronic inflammation) revealed decreased staining in the presence of both transgenes (Suppl. Fig. S6).
Muscle hypertrophy and mTOR/Akt phosphorylation.
Further examination of plantaris (Fig. 3) and other severely affected muscles (by inspection) revealed that mag- dy3K/dy3K myofibers were hyper-trophic (i.e. larger cross-sectional areas) compared to those of αLNNd- dy3K/dy3K and untreated dy3K/dy3K myofibers. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a regulator of protein translation, has been implicated in the control of muscle mass such that inactivation of mTOR results in atrophy [31]. Phosphorylation of mTOR and Akt was examined in muscle of WT, dy3K/dy3K and dy3K/dy3K expressing αLNNd, mag, or both (Fig. 5, Suppl. Fig. S7). WT and dy3K/dy3K phosphorylation of both were similarly low. Both phosphor-mTOR and Akt were elevated in mag- dy3K/dy3K and DT-dy3K/dy3K muscle, but not in αLNNd-dy3K/dy3K muscle.
Laminin subunit detection in muscle extracts:
Hindlimb muscle obtained from three week-old-mice at an age that largely predates the onset of fibrosis was chosen for immuno-biochemical analysis (Fig. 5). To compare the muscle extracellular matrix (“myomatrix” [32]) laminin β1 and α4 subunits among WT, dy3K/dy3K, αLNNd-dy3K/dy3K, mag-dy3K/dy3K, and DT-dy3K/dy3K 3 week-old mice, excised frozen forelimb muscle ground and washed with Triton X-100 to remove loosely-bound and intracellular proteins. The remaining material was extracted with EDTA/SDS and subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions and immunoblotted with subunit detection with antibodies specific for the laminin β1 and α4 subunits (Fig. 6 and Supplemental. Fig. S8). The immunoblots revealed no significant increase in either β1 or α4 subunits in dy3K/dy3K single transgene muscle compared to dy3K/dy3K in the absence of transgene. In contrast, double transgene (DT) expression in dy3K/dy3K significantly increased BM laminins by elevating β1 and α4 laminin levels in the myomatrix fraction to levels significantly higher than dy3K/dy3K muscle without or with single transgenes.
In a comparison of laminin heterotrimers, muscle was extracted with a sequence of buffers based on an approach developed previously to separate soluble peripheral laminin from myomatrix laminin integral to BM [18]. An initial NP40 neutral salt buffer was used to remove loosely adherent and intracellular laminins. This was followed by sequential a combined collagenase-treatment (“C”) that releases some laminins, EDTA-extraction (“E”) to depolymerize laminins and break receptor interactions, and finally SDS-extraction of the remaining pellet (“P”) to remove more strongly-bound residual laminins. These “CEP” fractions were combined and analyzed by an ELISA-sandwich technique to detect laminin trimers with antibodies to β and α subunits (Fig. 7 and Supplemental Fig. S9). The analysis revealed that (a) myomatrix CEP laminins were the principal fraction in WT and DT- dy3K/dy3K, whereas the NP40 fraction predominated in dy3K/dy3K without transgenes, (b) WT muscle contained relatively high levels of α2-laminins that were, as expected, not present in dy3K/dy3K muscle. (c) α4 laminins represented the principal laminins in dy3K/dy3K muscle with only a small contribution of α5 laminins. In the absence of transgenes, dy3K/dy3K laminins were reduced to ~1/3 compared to WT laminins (by mass) and α4-laminins were ~30% by mass (~1/3 on molar basis) of WT α2 laminins. (d) Double transgene expression increased the total α4 laminins from ~30% to ~52% by mass (~65% on a molar basis). (e) This increase was in the CEP fraction with a decrease in NP40 fraction. (f) Overall myomatrix laminins reached ~50% of WT laminins levels.
Linker proteins and laminin subunits visualized in muscle sarcolemma and capillaries.
While embryonic skeletal muscle BMs contain α1, α2, α4 and α5 laminins [33], mature WT muscle sarcolemmal BMs lose all but the α2 laminins with α4 and α5 laminins limited in distribution to intramuscular blood vessel BMs [33,34]. In contrast, laminin-deficient and laminin-null muscle sarcolemmal BMs contain primarily α4 laminins [34] in which α4 and α5 subunits appear to be redistributed from a localized microvascular to a sarcolemma plus microvascular distribution.
Frozen sections of hindlimb muscle from 3-week-old mice immunostained for laminin γ1 (common to all BMs) and laminin α4 were examined (Fig. 8). The BM expression of Lmγ1 in untreated dystrophic muscle were notably reduced compared to WT muscle, evidence for a general decrease in total laminins in dystrophic muscle. In contrast, the Lmγ1 subunit was increased in dystrophic muscle expressing both (DT) transgenes. Laminin α4 expression was slightly increased in untreated dystrophic muscle accompanied by a prominent change in distribution from capillaries to sarcolemma. The sarcolemmal α4 staining was considerably increased in dystrophic muscle expressing both transgenes.
Muscle immunostaining of other BM zone components and receptors.
Frozen sections of proximal hindlimb muscle from 3-week-old mice were examined by immunostaining for laminin subunits α5, α2, β1 and β2, perlecan, collagen-IV, agrin (Supplemental Fig. S11) and for β1- and α7 integrins and αDG (Supplemental Fig. S12). Lmα5 was detected in the microvasculature in WT muscle that extended to include sarcolemma in dy3K/dy3K and DT-dy3K/dy3K. However, the ELISA sandwich assays (Fig. 7) led us to conclude that Lmα5 is a minor species relative to Lmα4 in the dystrophy. Lmα2, as expected, was present only in the sarcolemma of WT muscle. Sarcolemmal Lmβ1 (like Lmγ1, Fig. 8) and collagen-IV were decreased in dy3K/dy3K and increased in DT-dy3K/dy3K. Lmβ2 was mainly detected in the perineurium of sciatic nerve branches (and some vasculature) and was a minor component of muscle sarcolemma while perlecan was present in the different mice with small differences. Endogenous agrin (the antibody does not react with mag) was increased in sarcolemmal and microvascular dy3K/dy3K and DT- dy3K/dy3K. Sarcolemmal β1- and α7-integrins were reduced in dy3K/dy3K and increased in DT- dy3K/dy3K, suggesting that the BM laminin reduction and increments causes parallel changes in α7β1 integrin. Sarcolemmal αDG was moderately increased in both dy3K/dy3K and DT- dy3K/dy3K relative to WT.
Histology of muscle from a one-year-old surviving DT-dy3K/dy3K mouse.
Fixed and paraffin-embedded forelimb and hindlimb muscles from the mouse were stained with PAS and PSR. Plantaris, TA and triceps images are shown (Supplemental Fig. S13). The extent of fibrosis was similar to that observed at six weeks. The fraction of central nuclei were even somewhat higher, suggesting that regeneration continued for months without depletion of the pool of satellite cells.
Discussion
The αLNNd and mag muscle-specific transgenes each exerted a limited amelioration of the muscular dystrophy of the dy3K/dy3K mouse seen mostly as a doubling of survival. When the two transgenes were combined, survival time was tripled, weights were increased, and improvements in muscle histology that included increases in myofiber number, whole muscle cross-sectional area, average individual myofiber size, and reduction of fibrosis were noted. However, the elevated dystrophic regeneration (as reflected in the fraction of central nuclei) was not reduced, suggesting that continued regeneration was required to maintain the increase in muscle mass. Evidence for continued regeneration with age and retained regenerative capacity is suggested by the high central nucleation that was observed in a one-year-old DT-dy3K/dy3K mouse. Finally, while the measured increases in forelimb and all-limb grip strength were significant, they were still well below that of wild-type mice.
The observed amelioration correlated with increases in muscle BM laminin. Analysis of total γ1 or β1 laminin in muscle by immunofluorescence intensity and immunochemical analysis of muscle laminins revealed that the dystrophic muscle contained only about one-quarter of the laminin in WT muscles in the myomatrix fraction representing BM and adjacent stroma. This increase was seen mostly in the subunits of Lm411. Further, WT muscle compared to dystrophic muscle contained a larger fraction of laminins in the myomatrix BM compared to the detergent-wash fraction, evidence that the predominant Lm411 species is poorly retained in BM. This laminin isoform property can be explained by previous analyses that revealed that α4-laminins neither polymerizes nor binds to αDG, rendering it poorly adherent to cell surfaces, self, and other BM components [8]. Further, Lm411 binds weakly to α7β1 integrin compared to Lm211 [8,35]. The expectation in providing the two transgenes to the dystrophic mice was that enabling polymerization with αLNNd and enabling binding to the αDG receptor would stabilize the laminin layer through the formation of lateral linkages that enhance cooperativity of association and that increase anchorage to the myofiber surface. This combination of modifications would increase laminin incorporation into the BM (“capture”) and decrease the laminin lost through dissociation of weak bonds from the myofiber surface and BM. The finding of a substantial increases in α4-laminins in BMs with an accompanying decrease in the detergent fraction through dual-linker transgenesis supports this expectation. While it is possible there is an additional contribution through increased transcription and/or synthesis (Lmα4-transcription was only found to trend higher in the DT-dy3K/dy3K), that would not explain the shift from the detergent to the matrix fraction.
The normally high levels of laminin expression in BMs demands a high level of linker protein expression since the assembly process is stoichiometric rather than catalytic. Therefore, the level of transgenic expression of linker proteins relative to that of laminins likely greatly determine the amount of functional BM laminin. The creatine kinase promoter, while effective, is not an optimal one for high muscle expression. For example, in a comparison of muscle-specific vs. universal (CBh) expression by AAV-mediated transgenesis of the dy2J/dy2J mouse dystrophy, considerably higher expression and phenotypic benefit was achieved with the latter [36].
The increase in muscle fiber diameter and in mTOR and Akt phosphorylation observed in the dy3K/dy3K mice with the mag transgene alone, but not with the αLNNd transgene alone, suggests that those changes are mediated through α4-laminin binding to αDG rather than through its polymerization. If only polymerization occurs, αLNNd-α4-laminin is still unable to bind αDG and bind only weakly to α7β1 integrin to form linkages to the cytoskeleton and transduce signals. Phosphorylated mTOR and Akt values may be higher in mag-treated muscle compared to WT because there is an ongoing process of active myofiber death and regeneration in the former but not the latter state. In another study, disrupting the interaction between αDG and laminin was found to induce apoptosis and reduce Akt phosphorylation [37] while treatment of a fukutin-deficient dystroglycanopathy with the mTOR inhibitor RAPA was found to increase myofiber size [38]. Thus, a similar misregulation of mTOR and Akt signaling appears to exist in both fukutin- and Lama2-deficiency, one that might be correctable by restoration of laminin binding to αDG.
Overall, co-expression of the two transgenes produced an amelioration of the severe disease that was substantial, but not as robust as that achieved with the same transgenes and promoter in the less severely-affected hypomorphic dyW/dyW mouse [8]. Further, the amelioration was even less than that achieved by transgenic expression of the entire Lmα1 subunit driven by a strong universal (CAG) promoter [25]. The dyW/dyW mouse is not a full knockout in that it expresses small amounts of a truncated laminin that lacks the LN (domain “VI” by the old nomenclature) domain [20]. Muscle-specific linker protein repair, previously evaluated in dy2J/dy2J and dyW/dyW mice, has now been evaluated in dy3K/dy3K mice, revealing a spectrum of striking to modest responses correlating with disease severity. The difference in Lmα2 expression among the mouse models may be the most important factor accounting for the degree of disease severity and response to linker expression. Half of untreated dy3K/dy3K died by 4 weeks while half of the dyW/dyW mice died by about 18 weeks in a linker protein study [8]. Dy2J/dy2J mice, on the other hand, exhibit only a slight reduction in laminin expression and are long-lived. Treatment of these mice with a single linker protein, αLNNd, ameliorated the muscle phenotype such that forelimb muscle strength was similar to that of normal mice [18]. The amelioration response in dy2J/dy2J and dyW/dyW mice to double transgene treatment (αLNNd and mag) was less than single transgene expression in dy2J/dy2J. Further, amelioration was not identical in the two severely affected mouse models in that survival was extended three-fold in dy3K/dy3K and five-fold in dyW/dyW. On the other hand, the increases in weights were similar in both with DT with dystrophic mice reaching about 15 grams by 10 weeks of age compared to about 22 grams for WT mice. Although measured by different types of assays, total laminin levels appeared to be considerably less in the dy3K/dy3K compared to the dyW/dyW mice (nearly the same as WT). Of note, the surviving dyW/dyW Lmα2 subunit shares a structural feature with dy2J/dy2J Lmα2 in that both lack the α2LN polymerization domain. They differ, of course, in that the dyW/dyW mice express very little α2 laminin whereas the dy2J/dy2J mice express only slightly reduced levels of α2 laminin. However, since αLNNd repairs polymerization by providing a missing LN domain, one would predict that it would improve the phenotype in dy3K/dy3K only by enabling α4 laminin polymerization whereas it would improve the phenotype in dyW/dyW by enabling polymerization of the residual α2 laminin as well as by α4 laminin. To what extent this difference accounts for differences in disease amelioration is unclear.
The approach to therapy suggested by the muscle-specific current study uses small proteins that add needed functional activities to compensating α4 laminins. The DNAs coding for these proteins are able to fit, along with a high-expression promoter and poly-A tail, within the small capsid of adeno-associated virus [36,39]. A superior repair for Lama2- dystrophy was achieved in dy3K/dy3K mice by universal transgenic expression of the entire laminin α1 subunit using the high-expression CAG promoter [25,30,40,41]. The Lmα1 subunit has a domain structure that is identical to the absent Lmα2 such that as trimeric laminin polymerizes and binds to the α7β1 integrin and to αDG. Specifically, the transgenic Lmα1 dystrophic mice exhibited near-normal grip strengths and weights even though by adulthood exhibited high regeneration rates in several muscles. While a limitation of the initial studies is that the transgenic DNA coding for the subunit is far too large (~9 kB DNA) to be delivered to a dystrophic host by other means, a recent study demonstrated that AAV-CRISPR-Cas was used to activate the Lama1 gene in muscle and peripheral nerve in dy2J/dy2J mice with substantial amelioration of the dystrophic phenotype comparable to that achieved by AAV-CBh-αLNNd [36,42]. Presumably this novel alternative approach can also be used to treat the dyW/dyW and dy3K/dy3K mouse models, possibly achieving high WT weights and grip strength. Improvements in survival, weight and strength may depend on two factors. The first is that high expression is needed for a stoichiometric structural repair. A second factor is that addition of high affinity α7β1 binding may further contribute to phenotypic improvement as well. Further optimized studies comparing linker protein to whole laminin subunit repair will be needed to determine the most important factors.
Methods
Protein determinations: Molar laminin concentrations were determined by densitometry of Coomassie blue-stained acrylamide gels in comparison to an EHS-laminin (710 kDa protein mass) standard ([43]) corrected for changes in calculated mass (LmΔαLN-L4b, 558 kDa), Lm-411 (513 kDa), Lm-511 (784 kDa) and Lm-211 (718 kDa) as previously described ([17,44]). Absorbance at 280 nm was used to measure the concentration of αLNNd (156 kDa) and miniagrin (136 kDa).
Mice and genotyping:
(a) Dy3K/+ mice, originally in a C57Bl/6 background, were bred with 129SvEv-Tac mice (Taconic Labs) to generate hybrid mice with improvements in litter frequency and size. (b) For genotyping at the time of weaning, genomic DNA was purified from small pieces of mouse tail in 0.1 M NaOH buffer and boiled at 100°C in PCR tubes in the thermocycler for 10 min. Samples were cooled, vortexed and immediately diluted into 40 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.0. Genotyping PCRs were done with one ml of genomic DNA per 20 ml reaction according to the Jumpstart Taq (Sigma P2893) instructions.
Microscopy and Morphometry:
Forelimbs and hindlimbs were dissected from euthanized mice and processed basically as described [36]. (a) For paraffin embedding, muscles were fixed in 10% buffered formalin overnight (Sigma SF93–4). Specimens were then incubated overnight at RT with an acidic decalcification solution (Fisher Cal-Ex CS510–1D), washed in running tap water for several hours, re-fixed in 10% formalin overnight, rinsed, cross-sectioned, and maintained in 70% ethanol for tissue processing. Tissues were embedded, sectioned at 5 μm, and stained with periodic acid Schiff (PAS) and Picro-Sirius Red (PSR) at the Histopathology Core Pathology Services Rutgers University). Panoramic images were recorded with a Leica Slide Scanner and analyzed with Aperio ImageScope software. (b) For frozen sections, unfixed muscles were embedded in OCT (Tissue-Tek, Elkhart, IN) and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Five-micron thick sections were cut with a cryostat (Leica CM 1850) at −20 °C and adhered to positively charged slides (Fisher). Sections were then washed for 5 min in TBS-50 followed by fixation in 3.2 % paraformalde-hyde in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. Slides were washed in PBS and blocked in 5% goat serum overnight at 4 °C. Primary antibodies were added the following day for 1–3 h at room temperature and washed 3 times in PBS for 10 min. Secondary antibodies conjugated with fluorescent probes were added for 1 hour at room temperature, followed by 30 min of PBS washes changed every 10 min. Slides were mounted with coverslips in 6% DABCO (1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane) in glycerol. Detection of bound primary antibodies in fixed frozen sections was accomplished with Alexa Fluor 488 and 647 goat anti-rabbit, chicken, and mouse IgG secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes) at 1:100. Tissue sections were stained together with antibodies tittered to ensure linear detection of basement membrane components. Regions of muscle were matched between genotypes, and the same exposure times and normalizations were applied to all images being compared. (c) For electron microscopy, skeletal muscle was fixed in 0.5% gluteralde-hyde and 0.2% tannic acid in PBS for 1 h, washed with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, transferred to modified Karnovsky’s fixative, post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h, and prepared and imaged as previously described [29].
Antibodies:
(a) An antibody specific for the laminin-a2 N-terminus (Sigma L0663 rat 1 μg/ml) was used to detect laminin-211 levels in mouse muscle as described [18]. (b) Antibodies to αLNNd were prepared in rabbit against recombinant mouse αLN-Lea [36] and used at a 1 μg/ml dilution for immunostaining. (c) Antibody to miniagrin was prepared in rabbits against recombinant chicken miniagrin (7) and affinity-purified on a chicken miniagrin Sepharose-4B column. (d) An antibody specific for the laminin-a4 subunit was employed at 1 μg/ml, [18]. (e) Rabbit polyclonal laminin-α5 antibody used at 1 mg/ml as described [18]. (f) Monoclonal rat laminin-β1 antibody was used at 0.5 μg/ml (Invitrogen MA5–14657). (g) The laminin-γ1 subunit in mouse tissues was detected by a rat anti-mouse antibody (1914P, Millipore, 1:100). In the myotube laminin assembly assays, a mouse anti-human laminin-γ1 monoclonal was used (Millipore mAb1920, 1:100). (h) Antibodies to evaluate mTOR, Akt and FAK were as follows: Rabbit anti-phospho-Ser2448 mTOR 1:1000 (Cell Signaling 5536s), rabbit anti-mTOR 1:1000 (Cell Signaling 2983s), rabbit anti-Ser473 Akt 1:2000 (Cell Signaling 4060s), rabbit anti-Akt 1:1000 (Cell Signaling 4691s), rabbit anti-phospho-FAK Tyr 925 (Cell Signaling 3284s), rabbit anti-FAK 1:1000 (Cell Signaling 3285s), 1:3000 anti-rabbit HRP (Invitrogen 65–6120), mouse anti α-actinin 1:2000 (Millipore A7811), and 1:3000 anti-mouse HRP (Invitrogen 62–6520). (i) F4/80 monoclonal rat anti-mouse antibody (1:100; Abcam, catalog no. ab6640) was used to detect macrophages in muscle frozen sections. Sections were counterstained with rabbit anti perlecan antibody (1 μg/ml; [45]). (j) Frozen sections of muscle were incubated with the following: Rabbit anti-perlecan (1 μg/ml or 1:100) and rabbit anti-collagen IV (0.5 mg/ml, Millipore AB756p) with detection with 1:100 anti-rabbit Alexa-488 (Invitrogen A11034); Rat anti-β1 integrin antibody (10 μg/ml, Millipore MAB1997) with detection with 1:100 anti-rat Alexa-647 (Invitrogen A21247); Rat anti-α7 integrin antibody (5 μg/ml, R&D Systems 334908) with detection with 1:100 anti-rat (Alexa 647); mouse anti-αDG (1:100 Upstate 05–298) or mouse anti-agrin (5 μg/ml Millipore MAB502) each detected with 1:100 anti-mouse Alexa-647 (Invitrogen A21236). The mouse agrin antibody did not react with chick mag in an ELISA assay (0.02 to 10 μg/ml antibody; 10 μg/ml protein coat) in contrast to rabbit- anti chick mag which did react with chick mag (reaching half-maximal binding at 0.1 μg/ml). Laminin a5 was stained with 1 mg/ml chicken anti-Lmα5 and detected with 1:100 anti-chicken Alexa-647 (Invitrogen A32933); rabbit antii-Lmβ2 (1:1000, gift from Jeff Miner [46]) and detected with 1:100 anti-rabbit Alexa-488.
Extraction and fractionation of laminins from muscle:
Method A: This method of extraction was used for the ELISA sandwich assay to detect heterotrimeric laminins and is based on that as described [18]. Briefly, mouse muscle fragments of equal mass were homogenized (Polytron) in 2 ml of ice cold TBS-50 (50 mM Tris, 90 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, pH 7.4 with protease inhibitors (Sigma P8340)). Homogenates were transferred to 2 ml Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged (13,000 rpm, 10 min, 4°C). The supernatants (NP40 buffer fraction) were saved and the pellets, after washing with fresh TBS-50 buffer, were suspended in a collagenase solution (0.2 mg/ml bacterial collagenase (Worthington CLSPA) in TBS-50, 2 mM calcium chloride, protease inhibitors), incubated at 37 °C for 1 h with frequent agitation, and centrifuged (20 min) with the supernatant saved (collagenase fraction). Pellets were then suspended in ice-cold EDTA buffer (20 mM EDTA in TBS-50, protease inhibitors), rocked overnight at 4 °C, centrifuged (20 min, 4 °C) and supernatants saved (EDTA fraction). The final pellet residue was then extracted with Laemmli SDS solubilizing buffer and the supernatant (SDS fraction) saved after centrifugation. The collagenase (“C”), EDTA (“E”) and SDS pellet (“P”) fractions were combined (“CEP”) and used for determination of matrix-bound laminins. Method B: This method was used for immunoblot detection and comparison of single laminin subunits. The initial steps through the NP40 extraction step are as described above using Triton x-100 and the addition of phosphatase inhibitors (Sigma P0044). The remaining pellet was then extracted with buffered SDS/EDTA (2 ml of ice-cold TBS-150 (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mm EDTA pH 7.4) 1%SDS, 1% Triton x-100, with protease inhibitors (Sigma P8340)) to release matrix-bound laminins.
ELISA sandwich assay of heterotrimeric laminins in muscle extracts:
Ninety-six well high protein-binding Costar plates were coated (1–2 μg/ml) with rabbit anti-β1/γ1 laminin (2 μg/ml). The wells were then washed and blocked with blocking buffer (PBS, 1% BSA, 0.06% Triton X100). Two-fold serial dilutions of muscle extracted protein NP40 and CEP fractions were prepared in PBS containing 1% BSA and 1% NP40 and applied (0.1 ml; 100% lysate = 1.25 mg extract protein) to the laminin antibody-coated wells. After incubation for 2 hrs (RT), unbound protein extract was removed by washing. An α-subunit-specific antibody was then added to each well for an hour. The wells were again washed, followed by addition anti-chicken-IgY or anti-goat IgG coupled to HRP (1:5000) to detect bound α-subunit specific antibody. Plates were washed again, and then incubated with TMB color reagent for 3 min. Absorbance was measured at A450 following addition of sulfuric acid to halt further color development. The use of serial dilutions for unknowns rather that same-dilution replicates allowed for determination of whether the unknowns fell into the near-linear initial range of the assay. A standard recombinant laminin of known concentration was separately added to two rows of antibody-coated wells for each plate. Bound laminin was detected by the same antibody reagent used to detect the unknown wells. An apparent dissociation constant (Kd) and Bmax value was determined from replicates of the laminin standard and used to covert absorbance values to ng/well values (ng=(Kd*A450)/(Bmax-A450)). Four lysate values (6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 %) from the fitted sample plot were converted to mass of protein (ng) with the above equation and averaged. For determination of α2-laminins the ELISA plate wells were coated with polyclonal rabbit anti-laminin β1,2/γ1 antibody (4 μg/ml) with lysate detected with monoclonal anti-laminin N-terminal antibody. Recombinant Lm211 was used as standard. For estimation of α4-laminins, plate wells were coated with rabbit laminin β1,2/γ1 antibody (4 μg/ml) with lysate detected with chicken anti-laminin α4 antibody (1 μg/ml). Recombinant Lm411 was used as standard. For estimation of α5-laminins, plate wells were coated with polyclonal rabbit anti-laminin β1,2/γ1 antibody with lysate detected with chicken anti-Lmα5 antibody (1 μg/ml). Recombinant Lm511 was used as standard.
Statistics:
Averages (Av) and standard deviations (s.d.) were calculated from measured values obtained from three or more images and morphometric measurements of perimeters and areas with the statistical package in SigmaPlot 12.5 or Excel. Averages and standard errors of the mean (s.e.m.) were determined from the means of consecutive sets of determinations (e.g. grip-strength) from different mice and from the means of myofiber cross-section areas from different mice. Three or more conditions were compared by one-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak pairwise analysis in Sigma-Plot. A difference was considered significant for P values ≤ 0.05 and trending towards significance for P values >0.05 – ≤0.10.
Study Approvals:
The mouse protocol (9999–00384) for the study was approved by the Rutgers University – Robert Wood Johnson Medical School IACUC Committee, Piscataway, NJ. The biosafety protocol (IBC# 13–574) for the study was approved by the Institutional Biosafety Committee of Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by NIH grant R01-DK36425 (“Basement membrane self-assembly and structure”). We thank Shin’ichi Takeda and Bruce Patton for providing the dy3K mice for study and Markus Rüegg and Judith Reinhard for providing the transgenic animals and valuable discussions.
Footnotes
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Karen K. McKee: Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Data curation, Writing – original draft. Peter D. Yurchenco: Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft.
Supplementary materials
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2023.03.001.
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
References
- [1].Bonnemann CG, Wang CH, Quijano-Roy S, Deconinck N, Bertini E, Ferreiro A, Muntoni F, Sewry C, Beroud C, Mathews KD, Moore SA, Bellini J, Rutkowski A, North KN, Diagnostic approach to the congenital muscular dystrophies, Neuromuscul. Disord 24 (4) (2014) 289–311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].McKee KK, Aleksandrova M, Yurchenco PD, Chimeric protein identification of dystrophic, pierson and other laminin polymerization residues, Matrix Biol 67 (2018) 32–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Jimenez-Mallebrera C, Brown SC, Sewry CA, Muntoni F, Congenital muscular dystrophy: molecular and cellular aspects, Cell Mol. Life Sci 62 (7–8) (2005) 809–823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Yurchenco PD, McKee KK, Reinhard JR, Ruegg MA, Laminin-deficient muscular dystrophy: molecular pathogenesis and structural repair strategies, Matrix Biol 71–72 (2018) 174–187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Sarkozy A, Foley AR, Zambon AA, Bonnemann CG, Muntoni F, Lama2-related dystrophies: clinical phenotypes, disease biomarkers, and clinical trial readiness, Front. Mol. Neurosci 13 (2020) 123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Fujiwara H, Kikkawa Y, Sanzen N, Sekiguchi K, Purification and characterization of human laminin-8:laminin-8 stimulates cell adhesion and migration through alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta1 integrins, J. Biol. Chem 276 (20) (2001) 17550–17558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Nishiuchi R, Takagi J, Hayashi M, Ido H, Yagi Y, Sanzen N, Tsuji T, Yamada M, Sekiguchi K, Ligand-binding specificities of laminin-binding integrins: a comprehensive survey of laminin-integrin interactions using recombinant alpha3beta1, alpha6beta1, alpha7beta1 and alpha6beta4 integrins, Matrix Biol 25 (3) (2006) 189–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Reinhard JR, Lin S, McKee KK, Meinen S, Crosson SC, Sury M, Hobbs S, Maier G, Yurchenco PD, Ruegg MA, Linker proteins restore basement membrane and correct Lama2-related muscular dystrophy in mice, Sci. Transl. Med 9 (396) (2017) pii: eaal4649, doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aal4649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Thyboll J, Kortesmaa J, Cao R, Soininen R, Wang L, Iivanainen A, Sorokin L, Risling M, Cao Y, Tryggvason K, Deletion of the laminin alpha4 chain leads to impaired micro-vessel maturation, Mol. Cell Biol 22 (4) (2002) 1194–1202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Wallquist W, Plantman S, Thams S, Thyboll J, Kortesmaa J, Lannergren J, Domogatskaya A, Ogren SO, Risling M, Hammarberg H, Tryggvason K, Cullheim S, Impeded interaction between Schwann cells and axons in the absence of laminin alpha4, J. Neurosci 25 (14) (2005) 3692–3700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Yang D, Bierman J, Tarumi YS, Zhong YP, Rangwala R, Proctor TM, Miyagoe-Suzuki Y, Takeda S, Miner JH, Sherman LS, Gold BG, Patton BL, Coordinate control of axon defasciculation and myelination by laminin-2 and −8, J. Cell Biol 168 (2005) 655–666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Sun Z, Guo SS, Fassler R, Integrin-mediated mechanotransduction, J. Cell Biol 215 (4) (2016) 445–456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Colognato H, Yurchenco PD, Form and function: the laminin family of heterotrimers, Dev. Dyn 218 (2) (2000) 213–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Han R, Kanagawa M, Yoshida-Moriguchi T, Rader EP, Ng RA, Michele DE, Muirhead DE, Kunz S, Moore SA, Iannaccone ST, Miyake K, McNeil PL, Mayer U, Oldstone MB, Faulkner JA, Campbell KP, Basal lamina strengthens cell membrane integrity via the laminin G domain-binding motif of alpha-dystroglycan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 106 (31) (2009) 12573–12579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Colognato H, Yurchenco PD, The laminin alpha2 expressed by dystrophic dy(2J) mice is defective in its ability to form polymers, Curr. Biol 9 (22) (1999) 1327–1330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Patton BL, Wang B, Tarumi YS, Seburn KL, Burgess RW, A single point mutation in the LN domain of Lama2 causes muscular dystrophy and peripheral amyelination, J. Cell Sci 121 (Pt. 10) (2008) 1593–1604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].McKee KK, Capizzi S, Yurchenco PD, Scaffold-forming and adhesive contributions of synthetic laminin-binding proteins to basement membrane assembly, J. Biol. Chem 284 (13) (2009) 8984–8994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].McKee KK, Crosson SC, Meinen S, Reinhard JR, Ruegg MA, Yurchenco PD, Chimeric protein repair of laminin polymerization ameliorates muscular dystrophy phenotype, J. Clin. Invest 127 (3) (2017) 1075–1089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Moll J, Barzaghi P, Lin S, Bezakova G, Lochmuller H, Engvall E, Muller U, Ruegg MA, An agrin minigene rescues dystrophic symptoms in a mouse model for congenital muscular dystrophy, Nature 413 (6853) (2001) 302–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Guo LT, Zhang XU, Kuang W, Xu H, Liu LA, Vilquin JT, Miyagoe-Suzuki Y, Takeda S, Ruegg MA, Wewer UM, Engvall E, Laminin alpha2 deficiency and muscular dystrophy; genotype-phenotype correlation in mutant mice, Neuromuscul. Disord 13 (3) (2003) 207–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Miyagoe Y, Hanaoka K, Nonaka I, Hayasaka M, Nabeshima Y, Arahata K, Nabeshima Y, Takeda S, Laminin alpha2 chain-null mutant mice by targeted disruption of the Lama2 gene: a new model of merosin (laminin 2)-deficient congenital muscular dystrophy, FEBS Lett 415 (1) (1997) 33–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Oliveira J, Gruber A, Cardoso M, Taipa R, Fineza I, Goncalves A, Laner A, Winder TL, Schroeder J, Rath J, Oliveira ME, Vieira E, Sousa AP, Vieira JP, Lourenco T, Almendra L, Negrao L, Santos M, Melo-Pires M, Coelho T, den Dunnen JT, Santos R, Sousa M, Lama2 gene mutation update: toward a more comprehensive picture of the laminin-alpha2 variome and its related phenotypes, Hum. Mutat 39 (10) (2018) 1314–1337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Tan D, Ge L, Fan Y, Chang X, Wang S, Wei C, Ding J, Liu A, Wang S, Li X, Gao K, Yang H, Que C, Huang Z, Li C, Zhu Y, Mao B, Jin B, Hua Y, Zhang X, Zhang B, Zhu W, Zhang C, Wang Y, Yuan Y, Jiang Y, Rutkowski A, Bonnemann CG, Wu X, Xiong H, Natural history and genetic study of Lama2-related muscular dystrophy in a large Chinese cohort, Orphanet J. Rare Dis 16 (1) (2021) 319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Gawlik KI, Durbeej M, A Family of Laminin alpha2 chain-deficient mouse mutants: advancing the research on Lama2-CMD, Front. Mol. Neurosci 13 (2020) 59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Gawlik K, Miyagoe-Suzuki Y, Ekblom P, Takeda S, Durbeej M, Laminin alpha1 chain reduces muscular dystrophy in laminin alpha2 chain deficient mice, Hum. Mol. Genet 13 (16) (2004) 1775–1784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Mayer U, Nischt R, Poschl E, Mann K, Fukuda K, Gerl M, Yamada Y, Timpl R, A single EGF-like motif of laminin is responsible for high affinity nidogen binding, EMBO J 12 (1993) 1879–1885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Kammerer RA, Schulthess T, Landwehr R, Schumacher B, Lustig A, Yurchenco PD, Ruegg MA, Engel J, Denzer AJ, Interaction of agrin with laminin requires a coiled-coil conformation of the agrin-binding site within the laminin gamma1 chain, EMBO J 18 (23) (1999) 6762–6770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Chen ZL, Strickland S, Laminin gamma1 is critical for Schwann cell differentiation, axon myelination, and regeneration in the peripheral nerve, J. Cell Biol 163 (4) (2003) 889–899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].McKee KK, Yang DH, Patel R, Chen ZL, Strickland S, Takagi J, Sekiguchi K, Yurchenco PD, Schwann Cell Myelination Requires Integration of Laminin Activities, J Cell Sci 125 (19) (2012) 4609–4619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Gawlik KI, Durbeej M, Transgenic overexpression of laminin alpha1 chain in laminin alpha2 chain-deficient mice rescues the disease throughout the lifespan, Muscle Nerve 42 (1) (2010) 30–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Bentzinger CF, Lin S, Romanino K, Castets P, Guridi M, Summermatter S, Handschin C, Tintignac LA, Hall MN, Ruegg MA, Differential response of skeletal muscles to mTORC1 signaling during atrophy and hypertrophy, Skelet. Muscle 3 (1) (2013) 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Durbeej M, Laminin-alpha2 chain-deficient congenital muscular dystrophy: pathophysiology and development of treatment, Curr. Top. Membr 76 (2015) 31–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Patton BL, Miner JH, Chiu AY, Sanes JR, Distribution and function of laminins in the neuromuscular system of developing, adult, and mutant mice, J. Cell Biol 139 (6) (1997) 1507–1521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Patton BL, Connoll AM, Martin PT, Cunningham JM, Mehta S, Pestronk A, Miner JH, Sanes JR, Distribution of ten laminin chains in dystrophic and regenerating muscles, Neuromuscul. Disord 9 (6–7) (1999) 423–433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Nishiuchi R, Murayama O, Fujiwara H, Gu J, Kawakami T, Aimoto S, Wada Y, Sekiguchi K, Characterization of the ligand-binding specificities of integrin alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta1 using a panel of purified laminin isoforms containing distinct alpha chains, J. Biochem 134 (4) (2003) 497–504 Tokyo. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].McKee KK, Yurchenco PD, Amelioration of muscle and nerve pathology of Lama2-related dystrophy by AAV9-laminin-alphaLN linker protein, JCI Insight 7 (13) (2022) e158397, doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.158397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Langenbach KJ, Rando TA, Inhibition of dystroglycan binding to laminin disrupts the PI3K/AKT pathway and survival signaling in muscle cells, Muscle Nerve 26 (5) (2002) 644–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Foltz SJ, Luan J, Call JA, Patel A, Peissig KB, Fortunato MJ, Beedle AM, Four-week rapamycin treatment improves muscular dystrophy in a fukutin-deficient mouse model of dystroglycanopathy, Skelet. Muscle 6 (2016) 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Qiao C, Dai Y, Nikolova VD, Jin Q, Li J, Xiao B, Li J, Moy SS, Xiao X, Amelioration of muscle and nerve pathology in Lama2 muscular dystrophy by AAV9-mini-agrin, Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev 9 (2018) 47–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Gawlik KI, Mayer U, Blomberg K, Sonnenberg A, Ekblom P, Durbeej M, Laminin alpha1 chain mediated reduction of laminin alpha2 chain deficient muscular dystrophy involves integrin alpha7beta1 and dystroglycan, FEBS Lett 580 (7) (2006) 1759–1765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Gawlik KI, Akerlund M, Carmignac V, Elamaa H, Durbeej M, Distinct roles for laminin globular domains in laminin alpha1 chain mediated rescue of murine laminin alpha2 chain deficiency, PLoS One 5 (7) (2010) e11549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Kemaladewi DU, Maino E, Hyatt E, Hou H, Ding M, Place KM, Zhu X, Bassi P, Baghestani Z, Deshwar AG, Merico D, Xiong HY, Frey BJ, Wilson MD, Ivakine EA, Cohn RD, Correction of a splicing defect in a mouse model of congenital muscular dystrophy type 1A using a homology-directed-repair-independent mechanism, Nat. Med 23 (8) (2017) 984–989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Yurchenco PD, Cheng YS, Self-assembly and calcium-binding sites in laminin. A three-arm interaction model, J. Biol. Chem 268 (1993) 17286–17299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].McKee KK, Harrison D, Capizzi S, Yurchenco PD, Role of laminin terminal globular domains in basement membrane assembly, J. Biol. Chem 282 (29) (2007) 21437–21447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Colombelli C, Palmisano M, Eshed-Eisenbach Y, Zambroni D, Pavoni E, Ferri C, Saccucci S, Nicole S, Soininen R, McKee KK, Yurchenco PD, Peles E, Wrabetz L, Feltri ML, Perlecan is recruited by dystroglycan to nodes of Ranvier and binds the clustering molecule gliomedin, J. Cell Biol 208 (3) (2015) 313–329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Sasaki T, Mann K, Miner JH, Miosge N, Timpl R, Domain IV of mouse laminin beta1 and beta2 chains, Eur. J. Biochem 269 (2) (2002) 431–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.