Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Trends Microbiol. 2023 Jul 8;31(12):1225–1237. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2023.06.005

The Roles of Calcium Signaling and Calcium Deposition in Microbial Multicellularity

Ilana Kolodkin-Gal 1,@, Matthew R Parsek 2,@, Marianna Patrauchan 3,@
PMCID: PMC10772221  NIHMSID: NIHMS1915954  PMID: 37429751

Abstract

Calcium signaling is an essential mediator of signal-controlling gene expression in most developmental systems. In addition, calcium has established extracellular functions as a structural component of biogenic minerals found in complex tissues. In bacteria, the formation of calcium carbonate structures is associated with complex colony morphology. Genes promoting the formation of biogenic minerals are essential for proper biofilm development and protection against antimicrobial solutes and toxins.

Here we review recent findings on the role of calcium and calcium signaling as emerging regulators of biofilm formation in beneficial bacteria, as well as essential mediators of biofilm formation and virulence in human pathogens.

The presented analysis concludes that the new understanding of calcium signaling may help to improve the performance of beneficial strains for sustainable agriculture, microbiome manipulation, and sustainable construction. Unraveling the roles of calcium may also promote the development of novel therapies against biofilm infections that target calcium uptake, calcium sensors, and calcium carbonate deposition.

Introduction

Calcium, the third most abundant metal in nature, was adopted as a regulator of organismal behavior at an early evolutionary stage. Calcium signaling is an essential mediator of gene expression in developmental systems. During multicellular development, calcium has established extracellular functions as a structural component of biogenic minerals. The formation of these structured minerals requires a regulated developmental process. During the maturation of these minerals, they actively interact with the organic extracellular matrix [1], [2].

In surface-associated bacterial communities called biofilms, calcium promotes the formation of hierarchically structured organic−inorganic matrices reminiscent of the calcium scaffolds generated by eukaryotic organisms, such as shells [1], bones, and teeth [2]. Biofilm formation shares many features with multicellular differentiation but was not extensively studied as calcium-dependent behavior.

Besides calcium, several metals were shown to play a fundamental role in biofilm development. For example, ferric and ferrous cations are tightly connected to microbial development. Iron acquisition by siderophores is necessary for biofilm formation in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [3, 4]. Fe is essential for cellular survival while calcium is dispensable, but the requirement of biofilm cells for Fe were shown to be significantly higher than the requirement of planktonic cells, and indicated a specific role for this Fe in biofilm formation [5].

Calcium only recently emerged as a fundamental regulator of microbial development and biofilm formation [6]. In biofilms, calcium plays similar roles to those established in multicellular eukaryotes, and regulates motility, adhesion, and gene expression [7]. Moreover, calcium mineralization and its interactions with the organic extracellular matrix can impact essential biofilm properties, including permeability and diffusivity of antibiotics and small molecule solutes, community metabolism, mechanical strength, and antimicrobial susceptibility [8]. Recent findings demonstrated the presence of intracellular calcium carbonate storages (intracellular calcium mineralization) in biofilm-forming bacteria for both photosynthetic and heterotrophic species [9, 10]. These results indicated that biofilm cells can maintain a source of intracellular calcium that can be used for its structural or/and signaling function.

This review will discuss the emerging themes of calcium deposition and signaling, their roles in microbial biofilms, and their biotechnological, ecological, and medical applications. We will discuss recent findings that suggest that the regulation of calcium expands well into the microbial domain of life, where it covers nearly all aspects of cell function and controls many processes, including the transition to multicellularity.

Calcium Carbonate and Carbonate Producing Enzymes Contribute to Biofilm Formation

In ecological scenarios, the most common biogenic minerals formed by eukaryotes are calcite and aragonite, which support the three-dimensional (3D) organization of mollusks, echinoderms, calcisponges, corals, certain algae, and others [11]. For example, corals are single-cell polyps held together by calcium carbonate scaffolds to support their resilient and complex structure [11].

The most advanced understanding of biologically regulated calcium mineralization and the formation of a functional mineral has been achieved for Bacillus subtilis, where the formation of calcium carbonate structures is associated with an increased complexity of colony morphology [1214]. B. subtilis is a Gram-positive soil-dwelling bacterium associated with plant roots. It is commonly used as a biocontrol agent to protect plants from fungal and viral infections [15]. It can also reside in the human gastrointestinal tract and is currently widely used as a probiotic intended to promote digestive health and a healthy immune system [16].

One indication that calcium biomineralization supports the formation of 3D biofilm structure is the discovered necessity of genes canonically linked to calcium deposition for biofilm formation. For example, microbial-induced calcium carbonate precipitation can be driven by the hydrolysis of urea by urease [11, 12, 17]. The products of urea hydrolysis, carbonic acid, and ammonia increase the pH of the reaction’s local environment, promoting calcium precipitation and, thereby, calcium mineralization [11]. B. subtilis Urease mutants failed to generate complex architecture in biomineralization media and formed flat featureless biofilm colonies (highly reminiscent of colonies formed by exopolysaccharides-deficient mutants), supporting a function of calcium carbonate precipitation in biofilm development [18]. The genes encoding urease were shown to be expressed in biofilm cells under nitrogen statvation [19] as ureA transcription is activated by TnrA and repressed by GlnR [20].

The chemical inhibition of urease also reduces the development of complex morphology in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms [14, 21]. This specie can cause devastating chronic biofilm infections in compromised hosts, such as in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and those with burn wounds or implanted medical devices [22]. P. aeruginosa belongs to the ESKAPE group of pathogens, bacterial pathogens with increased virulence, persistence, and transmissibility [23] that has been recognized by both the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and the WHO (world health organization) as a severe threat requiring urgent development of new therapeutics.

In addition to urease, carbonic anhydrases (CAs) can facilitate calcium carbonate mineralization. These zinc-binding enzymes catalyze the reversible conversion of carbon dioxide and water to bicarbonate and one proton. Specific CAs are involved in the carbonate biomineralization in distinct metazoan lineages, including sponges [24], and their role in the microbial mineralization of calcium carbonate was also recently reported [14, 21, 25]. Consistent with the role of carbonate in the establishment of colony-biofilms, overexpression of the CA YvdA enhanced the formation of complex morphological patterns in B. subtilis colony-biofilms [13]. However, whether these patterns were associated with enhanced calcite deposition remains to be determined.

The role of CAs in the calcium-dependent shaping of the biofilms was also observed in P. aeruginosa as the depletion of three β class CAs impaired the formation of cell clusters and pattern formation in P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilms [25]. These altered patterns are likely due to the changes in the spatial distribution of cells and their aggregates within the cell clusters caused by the deposition of extracellular calcium carbonate. Both cell aggregation and calcium deposition were dependent on the presence/activity of one of the three b-class carbonic anhydrases encoded in the PAO1 genome, psCA1, and were diminished by the treatment with CA inhibitors [25]. Calcium carbonate was also recently shown to have a role in complex structures formed by Mycobacterium smegmatis [18] and Mycobacterium abscessus [21], a soil bacterium and emerging pathogen belonging to the Actinomycetota phylum. In both Actinobacteria, the inhibition of CA and/or urease impacted biofilm colony architecture [18], [21].

Several factors and processes can impact calcium carbonate mineralization. Alkaline pH effectively promotes calcium carbonate precipitation and can occur within microenvironments within a biofilm. In addition to ureolysis, bacterial metabolic pathways that can increase the solution pH include photosynthesis, ammonification, denitrification, sulfate reduction, and formate oxidation [26, 27]. For most, if not all, of these pathways, it remains to be determined whether their local and temporal activation supports matrix mineralization.

Calcium was also shown to promote biofilm formation through the regulation of aggregation by oral pathogens from the Streptococcus mutans group [28]. The carboxyl and phosphate groups on the peptidoglycan of the cell wall are the interaction sites with calcium cations. In these model organisms, the association of calcium with bacterial cells only took place in external pH above pH 6.5, indicating that in oral plaques, calcium precipitation is probably induced rather than regulated by the microbial cells [28].

These findings extend the role of biogenic carbonate minerals in supporting structure formation in bacterial biofilms and establish that mineral matrix provides structural stability to the community. The exact functions of calcium and calcium carbonate deposits in biofilm structure are particularly interesting. The following sections will highlight the diverse mechanisms calcium regulates microbial development and physiology.

The Biofilm Extracellular Matrix interacts with Calcium and Calcium Carbonate.

The biofilm extracellular matrix was studied extensively for cell-cell and cell-substrate adhesion [29]. In multicellular organisms, the extracellular matrices absorb Ca2+ and promote calcium carbonate formation by providing additional nucleation sites, one of the main prerequisites of calcium mineralization [2, 30] A classic example is the maturation of amorphous calcium phosphate to a crystalline bone within the collagen matrix [2]. Whether calcium mineralization occurs within the cell (controlled/regulated biomineralization) [8] or outside the cell (MICP-Microbial Induced Calcium Precipitation [11]), the organic extracellular matrix is crucial to support mineralization and allows significant accumulation of calcium carbonate (estimated by the ratio between the dry weight of the mineral the organic biomass).

Matrix proteins:

Emerging research on calcium mineralization in B. subtilis provides direct evidence of mineral absorption and assembly supported by the extracellular matrix components secreted during biofilm formation [13, 14, 18, 31, 32]. By mapping the organic extracellular matrix (ECM) signature and the mineral signature by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Azulay et al. discovered a clear bias in the metal binding properties of the extracellular matrix. Calcium was found to be preferentially bound and retained within the biofilm, thus maintaining a high concentration gradient, and enriching for local Ca concentrations relative to the surrounding medium [32]. Other ions, such as Zn, Mn, and Fe were freer to diffuse and flow as solutes, potentially accumulating in the water channels below the wrinkles of the colonies. The relative abundance of Zn, Mn, and Fe was similar in ECM mutant biofilms and the bulk of WT biofilms (away from wrinkles), suggesting that extracellular matrix binds calcium. This study also identified a major component of B. subtilis organic matrix, TasA, that forms fibrils during interactions with hydrophobic surfaces and at low pH [16]. These fibrils are atypical as TasA monomers assembled into fibres through donor-strand exchange, and TasA β-sheet-rich fibres are not amyloids per se [33]. TasA was suggested to serve as a scaffold for binding calcium within biofilm matrix and support calcite formation: X-ray fluorescence analysis supported that TasA bundles formed in high-salt and high-protein concentrations accumulated more Ca relative to Zn, Mn, and Fe [32]. These results are compatible with previous observations that the matrix proteins TasA and TapA induced the formation of calcium carbonate crystals distinct from the abiotically precipitated calcium carbonate [13, 31, 32, 34, 35].

TasA is not the only biofilm adhesin that interacts with calcium in a manner that is strictly dependent on the biofilm microenvironment. In the Gram-positive pathogen Staphylococcus aureus, biofilm-associated proteins (Baps) are a surface proteins that mediate adhesion and biofilm development [36]. In one such protein, the predicted amyloidogenic regions B and SP (hereafter BSP, aa 361–947) form a consensus of fourteen short peptide segments. Recently, it was determined that the BSP amyloid structure and function are heavily influenced by interaction networks and mediate bacterial aggregation and biofilm formation. The BSP monomer has an asymmetric dumbbell-shaped structure that can be further divided into five modules (1–5): modules 1 (aa 361–541) and 2 (aa 542–728) constitute the N-terminal lobe, whereas modules 4 (aa 775–859) and 5 (aa 860–947) constitute the C-terminal lobe. The N-terminal and C-terminal lobes are held together by a middle module (MM) 3 (aa 729–774), a sensor of pH and [Ca2+] changes. The calcium binding module 3 is intrinsically disordered at low [Ca2+]. Upon Ca2+ binding, both the monomer (B) and dimer (BSP) become more compact. Millimolar [Ca2+] was shown to counteract the effects of varying pH on BSP and its subconstructs, and to antagonize pH dependent aggregation. This response of BSP to Ca2+ may be responsible to inhibiting S. aureus biofilm development by 10–12 mM Ca2+ [37], a concentration consistent with the Ca2+ concentration in milk [38]. Since the levels of free Ca2+ fluctuate in different body liquids, for example, it is maintained about 1.1 and 1.3 mM in mammalian blood [39], Bap was suggested to act as a Ca2+ and pH sensor through disorder-to-order conformational switches that conferred the ability of S. aureus to sense environmental signals and adapt to environmental conditions[39].

In contrast to B. subtilis and Staphylococci sp., the functional amyloid, FapC [40], is a part of the biofilm matrix. It promotes biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa but hasn’t been implicated in calcium binding.

eDNA:

Extracellular genomic DNA (eDNA) is a crucial structural component in many bacterial biofilms that can productively interact with calcium cations [41]. DNase can inhibit biofilm formation or disrupt established biofilms of multiple microbial species including B. cereus [42, 43]. In S. aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Vibrio cholera, and P. aeruginosa PAO1, the DNase-driven disruption of established biofilms was dependent on biofilm age; young biofilms were more sensitive to DNase than older biofilms [42, 44, 45]. Thus, eDNA is a vital component for biofilm structure and maturation. eDNA was shown to interact with other ECM components, such as the P. aeruginosa PEL exopolysaccharide and other protein components, adding to structure stability [41]. In a biofilm, eDNA is released from lysed cells or via regulated eDNA secretion mechanisms. For example, in S. aureus, cell lysis is controlled by the cidA-lrgA holin-antiholin system [46] The abundance of eDNA could affect calcium carbonate deposition in biofilms as in vitro, DNA molecules mediated the nucleation and growth of the inorganic phase of calcium carbonate[47].

Direct evidence for the contribution of extracellular DNA (eDNA) to calcium carbonate precipitation was recently obtained in B. cereus. This bacterium produces an organic extracellular matrix containing negatively charged eDNA that was suggested to act as a proficient nucleator for calcium carbonate mineralization [48, 49]. In this bacterium, the accumulation of extracellular DNA (eDNA) and the precipitation of calcium carbonate required the presence of both calcium and DNA in the medium. At the same time, other polymers were independent of CaCO3. Removal of eDNA by DNase did not affect other matrix components (exopolysaccharides and proteins) but resulted in a six-fold decrease in the abiotic precipitate yield. The formation of calcium carbonate was also accelerated after the addition of exogenous salmon sperm DNA. In many biofilms, the negatively charged eDNA lattice can promote local Ca2+ supersaturation, which, together with an increase in the concentration of carbonate ions, may promote the formation of an insoluble precipitate of calcium carbonate [49]. These results indicated that exopolysaccharides and eDNA independently impact calcium carbonate precipitation in biofilms.

Exopolysaccharides, surfactants, and poly-γ-glutamic acid:

P. aeruginosa strains can synthesize at least three different exopolysaccharides, Pel, Psl, and alginate, composing the biofilm matrix [22]. While the ability to do so varies between strains and clinical isolates [50], all polymers can interact directly or indirectly with calcium. It was shown that P. aeruginosa biofilms induce substantial in situ precipitation of calcite [51, 52] and that, similarly to B. subtilis, the deposits produced were morphologically distinct from abiotically precipitated calcium carbonate particles. Under supersaturated conditions, the in situ biomineralization occurred with abiotically formed calcium particles trapped in P. aeruginosa biofilms [51]. Both processes immobilize inorganic carbon and contribute to microbial carbonate sequestration. No carbonate biomineralization occurred in the biofilm matrix exopolysaccharide mutant strain PAO1 Δpel Δpsl, lacking two of the three exopolysaccharides, suggesting that these components of biofilm matrix contribute to carbonate precipitation[51]. Further, calcite biomineralization was not found in metabolically inert biofilms, expressing Pel and Psl [51]. These results highlight the possibility that in non-mucoid PAO1, active metabolism, rather than exopolymeric substances binding, is the predominant mechanism for heterogeneous carbonate biomineralization in biofilms [51, 52]. In support of this notion, some metabolic features that are enhanced in biofilm cells but not in single cells were associated with increased biomineralization. For example, the expression of Urease(UreA) was enhanced in biofilms. This induction was likely due to the enhanced amino acid catabolism in nitrogen-deprived cells, as the availability of nitrogen was affected by the altered diffusion within biofilms [53].

β-carbonic anhydrases were also shown to be differentially regulated in biofilm and planktonic cells in response to elevated levels of calcium and carbon dioxide ([25] (unpublished data)). It is interesting to determine whether the P. aeruginosa Pel and Psl exopolysaccharide matrix components affect respiratory conditions within the biofilm to induce the expression of carbonic anhydrases. Since the biofilm microenvironment maintains an oxygen gradient and, thereby, a potential carbon dioxide gradient [54], Pel and Psl may indirectly limit the diffusion of carbon dioxide from aerobic respiration. Considering that tightly packed P. aeruginosa biofilm aggregates producing a Psl and Pel rich biofilm matrix were found to be commonly present in CF sputum and lung samples [55, 56], understanding the potential link between the accumulation of Pel-Psl containing matrix and increased calcium carbonate deposition warrants investigation.

While the metabolism-matrix-calcium carbonate interactions in non-mucoid Pseudomonas strains remain to be resolved, mucoid P. aeruginosa strains may respond more directly to calcium. These strains overproduce the negatively charged polysaccharide alginate. The elevated levels of calcium that are commonly detected in CF sputum [57] were shown to increase the expression of alginate biosynthetic genes and lead to the accumulation of alginate in the matrix of significantly enhanced (10–20 fold) biofilms [58]. More recently, Jacobs et al. provided details on the molecular mechanism of calcium-alginate interactions by comparing three isogenic P. aeruginosa strains, PAO1 (nonmucoid; AlgU is inactivated), PAO1 mucA22 (mucoid; AlgU is active), and PAO1 mucA22 ∆algD (nonmucoid mutant where AlgU is active, but alginate cannot be produced) [59]. The mucoid strain PAO1 mucA22 produced gelled biofilm in the presence of calcium, but without calcium, formed comparatively small aggregates. These results suggested that alginate gelation occurs by calcium cross-linking between the negatively charged alginate polymers. Consistently, calcium-gelled mucoid biofilms were frequently thicker than their non-gelled counterparts. This, together with the elevated levels of calcium in the CF sputum, supports the hypothesis that calcium regulation of alginate biosynthesis and its interactions with produced alginate occur in vivo in patients.

Additional regulators of calcium-exopolysaccharides interactions are microbial surfactants. The role of P. aeruginosa - produced surfactants rhamnolipids in calcium carbonate precipitation was exposed during the investigation of the interactions between alginate and calcium carbonate in a synthetic system (i.e., with no bacterial cells) [60] . Importantly, the effect of these biosurfactants was dependent on their concentration and whether they are present directly in the hydrogel matrix or the carbonate solution surrounding the hydrogel [60]. The highest increase in vaterite (calcium carbonate polymorph) content, as well as specific surface area and porosity (allows the passing through of liquid or vapor), were observed when rhamnolipid micelles were present directly in the CaCl2 cross-linked hydrogel at a concentration of 0.05 M. The mechanism of CaCO3 precipitation in pure alginate hydrogel containing rhamnolipids has been proposed to rely on cross-linking, resulting in a gelled biofilm matrix [60]. The production of rhamnolipids is conditional, and their concentrations vary in different stages of biofilm formation [61]. However, it remains to be determined how local and temporal rhamnolipids production is regulated and how it affects calcium carbonate deposition and alginate gelation in P. aeruginosa biofilms.

In B. subtilis, the shape and molecular organization of extracellularly precipitated calcium carbonate are strongly hampered by deletions in the tyrosine kinase PtkA (previously ywqC) that regulates exopolysaccharide biosynthesis [13]. In addition, B. subtilis exopolymers often contain negatively charged molecules that bind calcium. For example, B. subtilis exopolysaccharides are enriched with negatively charged uronic acids, which have a high affinity for calcium [62]. Another example is poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) [16]), a water-soluble, edible, nylon-like Bacillus-derived exopolymer strongly associates with calcium ions [63]. B. subtilis biofilms are also natural producers of a potent surfactant, designated surfactin [64], whose role in calcium-mediated gelation of exopolysaccharides remains to be determined. Interestingly, an interaction between calcium and surfactin was already suggested to play a role in biofilm development [65].

Although calcium was shown to interact with the extracellular polymers produced by diverse bacteria, and the accumulation of calcium carbonate was dependent on the organic extracellular matrix, more research is needed to fully characterize the regulation and the complex various, multifaceted interactions between the organic and inorganic components of matrixes in microbial biofilms.

Calcium Signaling Plays a Role in Shaping the Transcriptome of Bacterial Biofilms

Among the multiple roles of calcium in biofilms, its role as a signal is the least studied. In eukaryotes, calcium signaling is a key mechanism for intracellular communication and controls a wide variety of essential cellular processes ([66, 67]). This mechanism relies on the tightly regulated homeostasis of intracellular Ca2+ concentration (termed [Ca2+in]). In bacteria, Ca2+ has also been shown to control several vital physiological processes, including those relevant to biofilm development. Among these processes, chemotaxis, cell differentiation, membrane transport (channels, primary and secondary transporters- see below), virulence, and host-pathogen interactions were documented [68].

We and others established key mechanistic prerequisites for Ca2+in signaling in bacteria exemplified by P. aeruginosa. Similarly to eukaryotes, P. aeruginosa tightly controls the [Ca2+in] at low micromolar level and, in response to the elevated extracellular calcium concentration (termed [Ca2+ex]), generates a transient increase in [Ca2+in] that returns to the resting state within minutes, even when the [Ca2+ex] is three orders of magnitude higher than [Ca2+in] [69]. Several key transporters required for the maintenance of Ca2+in homeostasis have been identified in P. aeruginosa [69]. Recently, a Ca2+ channel, CalC, that is required for Ca2+ regulation of gene expression in P. aeruginosa was identified (Guragain et al., submitted). CalC mutant failed in forming complex 3D structures of biofilm colonies [21]. Supporting this observation is the increasing evidence of the prevalence of bacterial calcium-binding proteins [69] that may be involved in intracellular Ca2+ signaling. Proteomic and transcriptomic studies in P. aeruginosa and B. subtilis showed that changes in Ca2+ availability alter the expression of hundreds of genes [14, 70]. Still, the mechanisms are much better resolved. P. aeruginosa. These results support the premise that a functional Ca2+in signaling system exists in bacteria and set the stage for the next goal of determining the molecular details of Ca2+ sensing and signaling that controls cellular responses.

Bacteria are also able to recognize and transmit extracellular Ca2+ signal. Several types of sensing systems are involved in these processes. The first type includes bacterial two-component regulatory systems commonly consisting of a sensor kinase and a transcriptional activator. In P. aeruginosa, PhoQ is a Ca2+ and Mg2+ sensor that modulates transcription in response to these cations. In addition to Ca2+ and Mg2+, PhoQ can bind Mn2+. This binding keeps the protein in a repressed state, where it inhibited the transcription of many virulent genes [71]. Another two-component regulatory system, CarSR is positively regulated by elevated Ca2+ and controls Ca2+ dependent regulon including a putative nucleotide-binding carP [70] that is required for maintaining the basal level of Ca2+in and Ca2+-dependent induction of pyocyanin production, tobramycin and oxidative stress resistance, as well as swarming motility [72]. CarSR from PAO1 is identical to its homolog BqsSR from PA14, and both responded to iron [73].

The second type of Ca2+ sensor is LadS, a hybrid membrane-bound sensor, containing a histidine kinase domain and a periplasmic Ca2+-binding DISMED2 domain [74]. In response to Ca2+, this protein stimulates the Gac/Rsm pathway and triggers the switch from acute-to-chronic behavior of the pathogen [74].

Finally, the EF-hand domain-containing Ca2+ sensor EfhP that possesses several key features of a eukaryotic Ca2+ sensor calmodulin was discovered to undergo Ca2+ dependent structural rearrangements and contribute to the Ca2+-dependent transcriptional regulation of a large number of P. aeruginosa genes [75] [76]. Interestingly, transcription of efhP is regulated by Ca2+ and iron, which sets the sensor at a regulatory crossroad between calcium and iron signaling. The dual response of both CarSR and EfhP to calcium and iron suggested an intimate connection between the two metals in the coevolution of P. aeruginosa adaptation. These findings strongly suggest that extracellular calcium serves as a signal. The mechanisms for this signaling pathway and their dependence on membrane-associated receptors remain to be further explored.

In B. subtilis, calcium also acted as a signal and induced biofilm formation and the production of extracellular matrix [13, 14]. However, the exact mechanism remained unknown. Calcium signaling was suggested to involve three calcium transporters: YloB (ATP-driven Ca2+ pump) [77], ChaA (H+/ Ca2+ exchanger) [78], and YetJ (pH-dependent calcium leak channel) [79]. Mutating YloB alone impairs biofilm formation and calcium deposition, however, a dual mutant for ChaA and YetJ remains to be examined. The regulatory role of Ca2+ex was manifested by the transcriptome response: about 20% of the genome (n=875) was shown to be induced in biofilm cells in response to Ca2+ex. Calcium-induced genes included those associated with biofilm formation and extracellular matrix biosynthesis [13]. A follow-up transcriptome study determined that calcium induces the tapA-sipW-tasA operon, exopolysaccharide biosynthesis, and sporulation [14]. In contrast, genes associated with motility were repressed [14]. The response of the Ca2+in concentration to the addition of Ca2+ex ([80] supported the hypothesis that Ca2+ regulation in B. subtilis also involved Ca2+in signaling, but the involved signaling cascades and mechanisms remained to be determined.

A transcriptome study revealed that Ca2+in homeostasis plays a crucial role in regulating genes involved in the synthesis of lignocellulolytic enzymes and exoenzymes, especially under graphene oxide stress [80] . The use of Ca2+ chelator (EDTA) and deletion of spcF (encoding a calmodulin-like protein essential for stage III sporulation) eliminated the effect of Ca2+ex on gene expression [80]. So far, no phenotype for calmodulin-like proteins in biofilm development has been reported in B. subtilis, although genes regulated downstream to spcF were suggested to play a role in biofilm formation. For example, exoproteases (regulated by SpcF) can support extracellular matrix remodeling and nutrient supply [81].

While the molecular mechanisms of calcium homeostasis in B. subtilis are mainly unresolved, Keren-Paz et al., found that the formation of calcium-dependent biofilms was impaired in ΔyhdQ (previously CueR), a mutant of poorly characterized transcriptional regulator belonging to the metal-responsive MerR family[82]. This mutant had a distinct defect in biofilm development and regulation of all known calcium transporters [82]. Transcriptome analysis revealed that YhdQ null mutant affected pathways involved in both magnesium [14, 83] and calcium homeostasis [14]. Although the specificity of the activation signal for YhdQ remained unclarified, the alteration of the calcium-dependent transcriptome in the absence of YhdQ [14] suggested that calcium may serve as at least one of them.

Intracellular Calcium Storage and its Role in Calcium Deposition

Intracellular calcium carbonate accumulation (most likely as amorphous calcium carbonate ACC rather than as a crystalline material) was described in the Gram-positive bacteria B. licheniformis [48] and B. subtilis, where it involved the calcium transporter YloB and the response regulator YhdQ [14]. In B. subtilis, intracellular calcium storage was detected in cells from structured biofilms formed under calcium-rich conditions [14]. It was shown that the frequency of cells with noticeable intracellular calcium storage increased within the structured colony areas [14]. Intracellular calcium carbonate storage was also documented in photosynthetic and magnetotactic bacteria [9, 10, 84]. The local storage could be due to the differential availability of calcium, carbonate, a potential local nucleator, or micro-alkaline pH within the cell [8]. All these possible causes for ACC accumulation within the cell are not mutually exclusive.

Intracellular calcium storage is expected to affect extracellular matrix calcification directly or indirectly. For example, lysed cells may release ACC to interact with the organic extracellular matrix. Alternatively, ACC can be actively secreted to promote matrix mineralization [14]. Internal ACC storage may also affect intracellular calcium signaling, change global and local cytoplasmic calcium concentrations, and play a significant role in the overall calcium-cells relationship.

Harvesting Calcium Signaling and Calcium Deposition for Sustainable Construction and the Engineering of Probiotics

Resolving the molecular mechanisms by which B. subtilis interacts with calcium and vice versa is highly relevant to environmental biotechnology, as microbial biomineralization can be utilized to produce environmentally friendly biocement, enhancing its durability and rigidity [11]. Bacterial producers of cementous materials can also be used to restore heavily damaged calcareous stones from monuments and artworks [85]. This application is of great environmental importance as the production of cement (composed primarily of calcium carbonate) is responsible for about 8% of the world’s carbon dioxide emissions [86]. In sharp contrast, carbon dioxide is sequestered during biomineralization. Thereof, carbonate-mineralizing cells and their EPS (to achieve the desired cement properties) can reduce carbon dioxide emissions from the construction industry.

Crystals formed over the organic templates that can enhance biocement properties are either vaterite (generated by lactobacillus and cyanobacteria), aragonite (by corals and cyanobacteria) [87] or calcite (by B. subtilis and related species) [11]. These biomineralization systems offer a clear advantage to the construction industries by providing building blocks for self-healing cementitious materials [88]. Furthermore, Bacillus related species are easily genetically manipulatable. Therefore, the increasingly resolved genetics of calcium carbonate opens numerous pathways to utilize synthetic biology for carbon-neutral or low-carbon construction. In addition, B. subtilis biofilms are potent biocontrol agents, serving to repel viral, microbial, and fungal pathogens from crops (as reviewed extensively in [15, 16]). Thereby, the discovery of calcium-dependent biofilm formation in the Bacillus clade (including phylogenetically related Bacillus species with similar properties) [89] is expected to contribute to sustainable agriculture.

In addition to sustainable construction and agriculture, mineralization was recently suggested to play a crucial role in the engineering of probiotics. Supplementation with beneficial microbes has been commonly applied as an appealing strategy to prevent or reduce pathogen colonization and to maintain a healthy microbial flora [90]. The effectiveness of microbial biotherapeutics could be hampered by a significant reduction of the viability of probiotics following their oral delivery to the intestine [91]. Therefore, protective methods are urgently needed for preparing oral living biotherapeutics. Geng et al. recently introduced a mineralization-dependent strategy to protect probiotic bacteria from external insults to tackle these challenges. Microbial bio-interface mineralization was used to deposit an ultra-resistant and self-removable coating for bacterial protection. The bacteria were coated by productive interactions between inorganic-organic hybrids mimicking biomineralization [92]. Single-cell coating with calcium minerals allowed the probiotic agents (Bacteroides fragilis) to resist insults associated with manufacture and product sterilization, including oxygen exposure, UV irradiation, and ethanol. After oral ingestion, gastric acid could rapidly neutralize low intragastric pH and promote the demineralization-triggered release of coated bacteria. These findings were extended to other probiotic strains including Escherichia coli Nissle 1917, the obligate anaerobe Bifidobacterium, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. This work suggested that bio-interface mineralization but also biomineralization can open a window for preparing multifunctional bacterial-based bioagents for various biomedical applications [92]. In this context, it is interesting to consider the potential of the proficient calcite former B. subtilis as a biotherapeutic and probiotic agent [93, 94].

Clinically relevant applications of Calcium Signaling and Calcium Deposition

Calcium deposition was shown as a potential factor altering the resistance of biofilms to antibiotics [8] and the 3D structure of biofilms, though other minerals may serve similar functions. These outcomes have a major impact on the clinical aspects of bacterial biofilms. For example, deposition of calcium phosphate crystals within Proteus mirabilis, P. vulgaris, and Providencia rettgeri biofilms blocks catheters in infected patients [9597], and calcium phosphate mineralization (mediated by Urease) was shown to increase P. mirabilis resistance to ciprofloxacin [98] and increase its survival in dual-species biofilms [99]. The physiological role of calcium phosphate deposits within these medical biofilms and whether dedicated cells facilitate this process remains to be determined. While calcium deposition’s role in the virulence of Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens remains to be further studied, calcium signaling in P. aeruginosa is robustly linked to biofilm formation and virulence. Several Ca2+ regulatory and signaling network components may serve as potential drug targets. They include calcium sensors (e.g., EfhP [70, 72] and LadS [74]), calcium transporters (e.g., CalC)[21], calcium-responsive two-component systems (e.g., CarSR)[70] and their regulatory targets with pleotropic impacts on P. aeruginosa virulence, such as CarP [70]. However, further studies are imperative to validate these candidates for specific drug development.

Concluding Remarks

The evidence emerges for the role of extracellular calcium and intracellular calcium signaling in biofilm formation in environmentally and clinically important bacteria, including two examples of strong biofilm formers, B. subtilis and P. aeruginosa (Figure 1). In the former, calcium regulates the gene expression of motility genes and extracellular matrix genes. In the latter, calcium signaling controls genes associated with host colonization and virulence. Connections between calcium and iron/redox sensing were observed for both microorganisms. It is feasible that this coupling reflects a frequent co-occurring of the two stressors, for example, the high abundance of calcium cations in the CF sputum and the increased levels of iron commonly generated by neutrophils and macrophages during the respiratory burst to combat pathogens.

Figure 1. Extracellular and intracellular roles of calcium in microbial biofilms.

Figure 1.

Calcium influx through calcium channels at the cellular membrane connects extracellular and intracellular calcium in P. aeruginosa and B. subtilis. In addition, calcium negatively regulates by direct interactions with the adhesin Bsp of Staphylococci but can also induce the transcription of the TasA adhesin of B. subtilis. Calcium and calcium carbonate interact with exopolysaccharides in the extracellular environment. Calcium ions interact with alginate, eDNA, and matrix fibrils. Calcium may act to cross-link exopolysaccharides but is also affected by all negatively charged components of the extracellular matrix, providing additional nucleation sites for biomineralization. Surfactants may have essential roles in determining the porosity of the formed minerals. Within the cells, calcium homeostasis and signaling dictate the transfer of cells from free-living (planktonic) cells to adherent/matrix-producing/virulent cells. Calmodulin-like proteins mediate some but not all calcium-dependent gene expression (Calmodulin-like protein image was imported from hypermol). The figure was generated by Biorender software. Calmodulin image was imported from PDB-101 [100], and calcium carbonate images from [13].

Calcium signaling may also provide adaptive regulatory wiring to protect against oxidative stress, as shown in the soil bacterium B. subtilis. The continuous investigation of these signaling systems may highlight the conservation of calcium signaling principles in all domains of life and discover conserved protein functions that mediate calcium-dependent circuits. While considering the importance of calcium and calcium homeostasis as regulators of gene expression, the role of calcium deposition in morphogenesis must be regarded as equally important (Figure 1). It is an exciting and vital challenge to continue developing these complementary research directions. Since these pathways can be utilized in various applications ranging from biotechnology and ecology to construction and medicine, their importance cannot be overestimated.

Outstanding Questions.

  • What are the roles of calcium in biofilm development?

  • What are the specific contributions of calcium signaling and calcium-matrix interactions to biofilm development?

  • Which extracellular matrix components are essential for biomineralization in biofilms, and how are these interactions spatio-temporally regulated?

  • What are the exact pathways by which calcium signaling regulates gene expression in bacteria?

  • How does intracellular calcium mineralization affect calcium homeostasis?

  • How can we utilize microbial mineralization to generate more efficient biocementous materials?

  • How can calcium sensory systems be targeted to control acute biofilm infections by Pseudomonas aeruginosa?

Highlights.

  • Calcium signaling is an essential mediator of gene expression in all-developmental systems.

  • Intracellular and extracellular calcium recently emerged as regulators of biofilm formation in bacteria and were characterized in more detail for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis.

  • Calmodulin-like proteins play a fundamental role in calcium-dependent gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis.

  • The formation of calcium carbonate extracellular structures is associated with complex colony morphology and altered diffusion in microbial biofilms.

  • A broad range of extracellular matrix polymers, including functional amyloids, eDNA, and exopolysaccharides, interact with calcium and promote calcium carbonate mineralization.

  • The genetic pathways underlying microbial mineralization open pathways to utilize synthetic biology for carbon-neutral or low-carbon biocement for construction.

  • Several Ca2+ regulatory and signaling network components may serve as potential drug targets, including calcium channels and calcium-responsive two-component systems.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References:

  • 1.Niu YQ, et al. (2022) Calcium carbonate: controlled synthesis, surface functionalization, and nanostructured materials. Chem Soc Rev 51, 7883–7943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hou X, et al. (2022) Calcium Phosphate-Based Biomaterials for Bone Repair. J Funct Biomater 13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Banin E, et al. (2005) Iron and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102, 11076–11081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kolodkin-Gal I, et al. (2013) Respiration control of multicellularity in Bacillus subtilis by a complex of the cytochrome chain with a membrane-embedded histidine kinase. Genes & development 27, 887–899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Saha R, et al. (2013) Microbial siderophores: a mini review. J Basic Microbiol 53, 303–317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Berridge MJ, et al. (2000) The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 1, 11–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dominguez DC (2004) Calcium signalling in bacteria. Molecular microbiology 54, 291–297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Keren-Paz A and Kolodkin-Gal I (2020) A brick in the wall: Discovering a novel mineral component of the biofilm extracellular matrix. N Biotechnol 56, 9–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Blondeau M, et al. (2018) Amorphous Calcium Carbonate Granules Form Within an Intracellular Compartment in Calcifying Cyanobacteria. Frontiers in microbiology 9, 1768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Benzerara K, et al. (2022) A New Gene Family Diagnostic for Intracellular Biomineralization of Amorphous Ca Carbonates by Cyanobacteria. Genome Biol Evol 14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dhami NK, et al. (2013) Biomineralization of calcium carbonates and their engineered applications: a review. Frontiers in microbiology 4, 314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hoffmann TD, et al. (2021) Genetic optimisation of bacteria-induced calcite precipitation in Bacillus subtilis. Microb Cell Fact 20, 214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Oppenheimer-Shaanan Y, et al. (2016) Spatio-temporal assembly of functional mineral scaffolds within microbial biofilms. NPJ biofilms and microbiomes 2, 15031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Keren-Paz A, et al. (2022) The roles of intracellular and extracellular calcium in Bacillus subtilis biofilms. iScience 25, 104308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hou Q and Kolodkin-Gal I (2020) Harvesting the complex pathways of antibiotic production and resistance of soil bacilli for optimizing plant microbiome. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Arnaouteli S, et al. (2021) Bacillus subtilis biofilm formation and social interactions. Nature reviews. Microbiology 19, 600–614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Xue ZF, et al. (2022) Catalyzing urea hydrolysis using two-step microbial-induced carbonate precipitation for copper immobilization: Perspective of pH regulation. Frontiers in microbiology 13, 1001464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Keren-Paz A, et al. (2018) Micro-CT X-ray imaging exposes structured diffusion barriers within biofilms. NPJ biofilms and microbiomes 4, 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Michna RH, et al. (2016) SubtiWiki 2.0--an integrated database for the model organism Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic acids research 44, D654–662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tam le T, et al. (2007) Global gene expression profiling of Bacillus subtilis in response to ammonium and tryptophan starvation as revealed by transcriptome and proteome analysis. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 12, 121–130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cohen-Cymberknoh M, et al. (2022) Calcium carbonate mineralization is essential for biofilm formation and lung colonization. iScience 25, 104234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sauer K, et al. (2022) The biofilm life cycle: expanding the conceptual model of biofilm formation. Nature reviews. Microbiology 20, 608–620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Boucher HW, et al. (2009) Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 48, 1–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Voigt O, et al. (2014) Calcareous sponge genomes reveal complex evolution of alpha-carbonic anhydrases and two key biomineralization enzymes. BMC Evol Biol 14, 230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lotlikar SR, et al. (2019) Pseudomonas aeruginosa beta-carbonic anhydrase, psCA1, is required for calcium deposition and contributes to virulence. Cell Calcium 84, 102080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hammes F and Verstraete* W (2002) Key roles of pH and calcium metabolism in microbial carbonate precipitation. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology 1, 3–7 [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ganendra G, et al. (2014) Formate oxidation-driven calcium carbonate precipitation by Methylocystis parvus OBBP. Applied and environmental microbiology 80, 4659–4667 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rose RK (2000) The role of calcium in oral streptococcal aggregation and the implications for biofilm formation and retention. Biochim Biophys Acta 1475, 76–82 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Muthami JM, et al. (2022) What is the fate of the biofilm matrix? Environmental microbiology [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 30.Qin D, et al. (2022) Collagen-based biocomposites inspired by bone hierarchical structures for advanced bone regeneration: ongoing research and perspectives. Biomater Sci 10, 318–353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Azulay DN and Chai L (2019) Calcium Carbonate Formation in the Presence of Biopolymeric Additives. J Vis Exp [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 32.Azulay DN, et al. (2022) Multiscale X-ray study of Bacillus subtilis biofilms reveals interlinked structural hierarchy and elemental heterogeneity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bohning J, et al. (2022) Donor-strand exchange drives assembly of the TasA scaffold in Bacillus subtilis biofilms. Nature communications 13, 7082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Azulay DN, et al. (2020) Colloidal-like aggregation of a functional amyloid protein. Phys Chem Chem Phys 22, 23286–23294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ido N, et al. (2020) Bacillus subtilis biofilms characterized as hydrogels. Insights on water uptake and water binding in biofilms. Soft Matter 16, 6180–6190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Valle J, et al. (2020) Revisiting Bap Multidomain Protein: More Than Sticking Bacteria Together. Frontiers in microbiology 11, 613581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Arrizubieta MJ, et al. (2004) Calcium inhibits bap-dependent multicellular behavior in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 186, 7490–7498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Huertas JR, et al. (2019) [Milk and dairy products as vehicle for calcium and vitamin D: role of calcium enriched milks]. Nutr Hosp 36, 962–973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ma J, et al. (2021) Structural mechanism for modulation of functional amyloid and biofilm formation by Staphylococcal Bap protein switch. EMBO J 40, e107500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sonderby TV, et al. (2022) Functional Bacterial Amyloids: Understanding Fibrillation, Regulating Biofilm Fibril Formation and Organizing Surface Assemblies. Molecules 27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Karygianni L, et al. (2020) Biofilm Matrixome: Extracellular Components in Structured Microbial Communities. Trends in microbiology 28, 668–681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Whitchurch CB, et al. (2002) Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science 295, 1487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vilain S, et al. (2009) DNA as an adhesin: Bacillus cereus requires extracellular DNA to form biofilms. Applied and environmental microbiology 75, 2861–2868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Deng W, et al. (2022) DNase inhibits early biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa- or Staphylococcus aureus-induced empyema models. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology 12, 917038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Seper A, et al. (2011) Extracellular nucleases and extracellular DNA play important roles in Vibrio cholerae biofilm formation. Molecular microbiology 82, 1015–1037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ranjit DK, et al. (2011) Staphylococcus aureus CidA and LrgA proteins exhibit holin-like properties. J Bacteriol 193, 2468–2476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cheng B, et al. (2010) DNA-mediated morphosynthesis of calcium carbonate particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 352, 43–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ivanova LA, et al. (2020) THE MATRIX IS EVERYWHERE: CACO3 BIOMINERALIZATION BY THE BACILLUS LICHENIFORMIS PLANKTONIC CELLS. bioRxiv, 2020.2010.2022.351619
  • 49.Ivanova LA, et al. (2023) Matrix is everywhere: extracellular DNA is a link between biofilm and mineralization in Bacillus cereus planktonic lifestyle. NPJ biofilms and microbiomes 9, 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hoiby N, et al. (2010) Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in cystic fibrosis. Future Microbiol 5, 1663–1674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Li X, et al. (2015) Spatial patterns of carbonate biomineralization in biofilms. Applied and environmental microbiology 81, 7403–7410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Li X, et al. (2016) In Situ Biomineralization and Particle Deposition Distinctively Mediate Biofilm Susceptibility to Chlorine. Applied and environmental microbiology 82, 2886–2892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Janssen DB, et al. (1982) Nitrogen control in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mutants affected in the synthesis of glutamine synthetase, urease, and NADP-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase. J Bacteriol 151, 22–28 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Dietrich LE, et al. (2013) Bacterial community morphogenesis is intimately linked to the intracellular redox state. J Bacteriol 195, 1371–1380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bjarnsholt T, et al. (2009) Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in the respiratory tract of cystic fibrosis patients. Pediatr Pulmonol 44, 547–558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jennings LK, et al. (2021) Pseudomonas aeruginosa aggregates in cystic fibrosis sputum produce exopolysaccharides that likely impede current therapies. Cell Rep 34, 108782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Smith DJ, et al. (2014) Elevated metal concentrations in the CF airway correlate with cellular injury and disease severity. Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society 13, 289–295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sarkisova S, et al. (2005) Calcium-induced virulence factors associated with the extracellular matrix of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. J Bacteriol 187, 4327–4337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Jacobs HM, et al. (2022) Mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa Can Produce Calcium-Gelled Biofilms Independent of the Matrix Components Psl and CdrA. J Bacteriol 204, e0056821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Czaplicka N, et al. (2022) Precipitation of calcium carbonate in the presence of rhamnolipids in alginate hydrogels as a model of biomineralization. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 218, 112749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Pamp SJ and Tolker-Nielsen T (2007) Multiple roles of biosurfactants in structural biofilm development by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 189, 2531–2539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Marvasi M, et al. (2010) Exopolymeric substances (EPS) from Bacillus subtilis: polymers and genes encoding their synthesis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 313, 1–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Parati M, et al. (2022) Microbial Poly-gamma-Glutamic Acid (gamma-PGA) as an Effective Tooth Enamel Protectant. Polymers (Basel) 14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Xia L and Wen J (2022) Available strategies for improving the biosynthesis of surfactin: a review. Crit Rev Biotechnol, 1–18 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 65.Mhatre E, et al. (2017) Presence of Calcium Lowers the Expansion of Bacillus subtilis Colony Biofilms. Microorganisms 5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Martin N, et al. (2023) Regulation and role of calcium in cellular senescence. Cell Calcium 110, 102701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ravi B, et al. (2023) Calcium decoders and their targets: The holy alliance that regulate cellular responses in stress signaling. Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol 134, 371–439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Domínguez D (2018) Calcium Signaling in Prokaryotes. InTech [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 69.Guragain M, et al. (2013) Calcium homeostasis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa requires multiple transporters and modulates swarming motility. Cell Calcium 54, 350–361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Guragain M, et al. (2016) The Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 Two-Component Regulator CarSR Regulates Calcium Homeostasis and Calcium-Induced Virulence Factor Production through Its Regulatory Targets CarO and CarP. J Bacteriol 198, 951–963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gellatly SL, et al. (2018) Novel roles for two-component regulatory systems in cytotoxicity and virulence-related properties in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. AIMS Microbiol 4, 173–191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.King M, et al. (2021) Calcium-Regulated Protein CarP Responds to Multiple Host Signals and Mediates Regulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Virulence by Calcium. Appl Environ Microbiol 87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kreamer NN, et al. (2012) BqsR/BqsS constitute a two-component system that senses extracellular Fe(II) in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 194, 1195–1204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Broder UN, et al. (2016) LadS is a calcium-responsive kinase that induces acute-to-chronic virulence switch in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nature microbiology 2, 16184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sarkisova SA, et al. (2014) A Pseudomonas aeruginosa EF-hand protein, EfhP (PA4107), modulates stress responses and virulence at high calcium concentration. PLoS One 9, e98985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kayastha BB, et al. (2022) EF-hand protein, EfhP, specifically binds Ca(2+) and mediates Ca(2+) regulation of virulence in a human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Scientific reports 12, 8791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Gupta HK, et al. (2017) A Novel Calcium Uptake Transporter of Uncharacterized P-Type ATPase Family Supplies Calcium for Cell Surface Integrity in Mycobacterium smegmatis. mBio 8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lu S, et al. (2020) Intracellular Ca(2+) regulation of H(+)/Ca(2+) antiporter YfkE mediated by a Ca(2+) mini-sensor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117, 10313–10321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Guo G, et al. (2019) Ion and pH Sensitivity of a TMBIM Ca(2+) Channel. Structure 27, 1013–1021 e1013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Liu S, et al. (2022) Improvement of Lignocellulolytic Enzyme Production Mediated by Calcium Signaling in Bacillus subtilis Z2 under Graphene Oxide Stress. Applied and environmental microbiology 88, e0096022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Marlow VL, et al. (2014) The prevalence and origin of exoprotease-producing cells in the Bacillus subtilis biofilm. Microbiology (Reading) 160, 56–66 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Moore CM, et al. (2005) Genetic and physiological responses of Bacillus subtilis to metal ion stress. Molecular microbiology 57, 27–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wendel BM, et al. (2022) A Central Role for Magnesium Homeostasis during Adaptation to Osmotic Stress. mBio 13, e0009222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Monteil CL, et al. (2021) Intracellular amorphous Ca-carbonate and magnetite biomineralization by a magnetotactic bacterium affiliated to the Alphaproteobacteria. The ISME Journal 15, 1–18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Jroundi F, et al. (2017) Protection and consolidation of stone heritage by self-inoculation with indigenous carbonatogenic bacterial communities. Nature communications 8, 279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Myhr A, et al. (2019) Towards a low CO2 emission building material employing bacterial metabolism (2/2): Prospects for global warming potential reduction in the concrete industry. PLoS One 14, e0208643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Golubic S, et al. (2000) Cyanobacteria: Architects of Sedimentary Structures. In Sediments Microbial (Riding RE and Awramik SM, eds), pp. 57–67, Springer Berlin; Heidelberg [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Sovljanski O, et al. (2022) Relationship between Bacterial Contribution and Self-Healing Effect of Cement-Based Materials. Microorganisms 10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Maan H, et al. (2022) Resolving the conflict between antibiotic production and rapid growth by recognition of peptidoglycan of susceptible competitors. Nature communications 13, 431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Suissa R, et al. (2022) Molecular genetics for probiotic engineering: dissecting lactic acid bacteria. Trends in microbiology 30, 293–306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Anselmo AC, et al. (2019) Non-invasive delivery strategies for biologics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 18, 19–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Geng Z, et al. (2023) Biointerface mineralization generates ultraresistant gut microbes as oral biotherapeutics. Science Advances 9, eade0997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Lv L, et al. (2022) Clinical study on sequential treatment of severe diarrhea irritable bowel syndrome with precision probiotic strains transplantation capsules, fecal microbiota transplantation capsules and live combined bacillus subtilis and enterococcus faecium capsules. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology 12, 1025889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Oladokun S and Adewole D (2023) The effect of Bacillus subtilis and its delivery route on hatch and growth performance, blood biochemistry, immune status, gut morphology, and microbiota of broiler chickens. Poult Sci 102, 102473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Broomfield RJ, et al. (2009) Crystalline bacterial biofilm formation on urinary catheters by urease-producing urinary tract pathogens: a simple method of control. J Med Microbiol 58, 1367–1375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Mathur S, et al. (2006) Factors affecting crystal precipitation from urine in individuals with long-term urinary catheters colonized with urease-positive bacterial species. Urol Res 34, 173–177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Tan Y, et al. (2018) Inhibitory effect of probiotic lactobacilli supernatants on single and mixed non-albicans Candida species biofilm. Arch Oral Biol 85, 40–45 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Li X, et al. (2016) Ureolytic Biomineralization Reduces Proteus mirabilis Biofilm Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60, 2993–3000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Li X, et al. (2016) Biomineralization strongly modulates the formation of Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa dual-species biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Ecol [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 100.Zardecki C, et al. (2022) PDB-101: Educational resources supporting molecular explorations through biology and medicine. Protein Sci 31, 129–140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES