Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2023 Dec 1;300(1):105524. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105524

Independent regulation of Piezo1 activity by principal and intercalated cells of the collecting duct

Kyrylo Pyrshev 1,, Anna Atamanchuk-Stavniichuk 1,, Mariya Kordysh 1, Oleg Zaika 1, Viktor N Tomilin 1, Oleh Pochynyuk 1,
PMCID: PMC10772730  PMID: 38043795

Abstract

The renal collecting duct is continuously exposed to a wide spectrum of fluid flow rates and osmotic gradients. Expression of a mechanoactivated Piezo1 channel is the most prominent in the collecting duct. However, the status and regulation of Piezo1 in functionally distinct principal and intercalated cells (PCs and ICs) of the collecting duct remain to be determined. We used pharmacological Piezo1 activation to quantify Piezo1-mediated [Ca2+]i influx and single-channel activity separately in PCs and ICs of freshly isolated collecting ducts with fluorescence imaging and electrophysiological tools. We also employed a variety of systemic treatments to examine their consequences on Piezo1 function in PCs and ICs. Piezo1 selective agonists, Yoda-1 or Jedi-2, induced a significantly greater Ca2+ influx in PCs than in ICs. Using patch clamp analysis, we recorded a Yoda-1-activated nonselective channel with 18.6 ± 0.7 pS conductance on both apical and basolateral membranes. Piezo1 activity in PCs but not ICs was stimulated by short-term diuresis (injections of furosemide) and reduced by antidiuresis (water restriction for 24 h). However, prolonged stimulation of flow by high K+ diet decreased Yoda-1-dependent Ca2+ influx without changes in Piezo1 levels. Water supplementation with NH4Cl to induce metabolic acidosis stimulated Piezo1 activity in ICs but not in PCs. Overall, our results demonstrate functional Piezo1 expression in collecting duct PCs (more) and ICs (less) on both apical and basolateral sides. We also show that acute changes in fluid flow regulate Piezo1-mediated [Ca2+]i influx in PCs, whereas channel activity in ICs responds to systemic acid–base stimuli.

Keywords: mechanosensitivity, Ca2+-signaling, urinary flow, acidosis, Yoda-1


Mechanosensitivity is an universal stress-responsive mechanism allowing effective adaption to external physical forces induced by physiological as well as pathological states/conditions (1). Most common cellular responses to mechanical stimuli include cytoskeleton reorganization, activation of various plasma membrane delineated intracellular signaling cascades, and a direct flux of electrolytes via mechanoactivated channels (1, 2). Piezo1 was identified as a long-anticipated molecular conduit of the mechanically activated cation currents observed in a variety of cells (3, 4). Functional Piezo1 channel is comprised of three subunits each having 14 transmembrane domains to form a single central cation-conducting pore (5). The overall structure resembles a propeller with three flexible extracellular blades, which are well-suited to transduce mechanical force to the gate of the central pore (5, 6). Patch clamp analysis of Piezo1 in native cells and over-expression systems revealed that application of a negative pressure to the recording pipette (i.e. membrane stretch) induces a rapidly inactivating cation-selective current with single channel conductance around 20 pS (4, 7). Further development of channel-selective agonists/activators Yoda-1 (8) and Jedi-2 (9) allowed quantification of the Piezo1-dependent Ca2+ influx in different cells without constraints associated with its rapid inactivation. Importantly, it was recently shown that chemical (Yoda-1) and mechanical (hypotonicity) stimuli induce similar actions on Piezo1 blade expansion, which correlate with channel activity (6) indicative of the common underlying mechanism of Piezo1 stimulation.

At the systemic level, Piezo1 was implicated in a variety of essential physiological processes, such as development of vasculature (10, 11), blood pressure control (12), and voiding function (13, 14) to name a few. Piezo1 deletion caused embryonically lethal phenotype in mice due to profound deficiencies in the flow-dependent vascular remodeling during the development (10, 11). On the other hand, gain-of-function Piezo1 mutations have been linked to several clinically relevant syndromes, such as hereditary xerocytosis with fetal hydrops (15, 16). Piezo1 is broadly expressed in both excitable and non-excitable (most commonly epithelial) tissues, including the kidneys (4). However, the physiological significance of Piezo1 in the renal tubule is just beginning to emerge. It was previously shown that conditional Piezo1 deletion does not affect urinary concentrating ability but delays urinary dilution upon rehydration (17). On the other hand, pathological upregulation of Piezo1 levels has been implicated in the progression of renal fibrosis (18). In the renal tubule, Piezo1 expression has been reported predominantly in the late segments from the cortical to inner medullary collecting ducts (17, 19), although a weaker diffuse staining was also detected in glomeruli (19) and proximal tubule (18). The collecting duct is comprised of two cell types: principal and intercalated (PCs and ICs, respectively) exhibiting distinct morphology and physiological roles (20, 21). In particular, more abundant PCs are primarily involved in Na+-water reabsorption and K+ secretion, while ICs are critical for enacting acid–base transport (20, 21). It is not currently known whether Piezo1 is functional in both cells types and whether it is regulated by the same or cell-type specific mechanisms.

It is well appreciated that the collecting duct is subjected to the highest variations/changes in fluid flow rates and osmotic gradients depending on dietary electrolyte intake and water consumption (22, 23). These mechanical forces are known to induce comparable elevations in [Ca2+]i in both PCs and ICs (24, 25), which are instrumental in modulating water-electrolyte transport, for instance, by promoting the flow-induced K+ secretion (26). However, published evidence suggests that Piezo1-reporting signal is largely accumulated on the basolateral side (17, 19), which does not align with its role as a flow-sensor. Indeed, we and others have previously shown that the activity of another mechanosensitive [Ca2+]i permeable channel, transitransient receptor potential vanilloid channel type 4 (TRPV4) is imperative for flow-dependent [Ca2+]i signaling (22) and subsequently flow-induced K+ secretion in the collecting duct (27, 28, 29). Interestingly, a functional interplay was shown in different cell types, including acinar cells and chondrocytes, where an initial transient Ca2+ influx via Piezo1 could lead to sustained TRPV4 activation (30, 31). It is not known whether a similar coupling exists between Piezo1 and TRPV4 in the collecting duct cells.

The current study was undertaken to examine the significance of Piezo1 activation on [Ca2+]i signaling in native collecting duct cells. We focused on addressing the following research questions: (1) if Piezo1 can be found on both basolateral and apical membrane? (2) is there a functional interaction between mechanosensitive Piezo1 and TRPV4 in the collecting duct? (3) whether Piezo1 activity is comparable in PCs and ICs? and (4) what systemic stimuli modulate Piezo1 activity in these cell types?

Results

Piezo1-dependent [Ca2+]i influx is greater in PCs of the collecting duct

Previous studies using transgenic reporter mice showed the most abundant Piezo1 expression in the collecting duct (17, 19). In agreement, our immunofluorescence confocal microscopy found the strongest Piezo1 signal in AQP2-positive tubular segments in both cortical and medullary renal sections (Fig. 1). Here, Piezo1 signal was present on both apical and basolateral sides, whereas AQP2-negative tubular segments exhibited much weaker basolateral staining.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Piezo1 expression in the kidney is most abundant in the collecting duct. Representative confocal micrographs showing Piezo1 (pseudocolor green), AQP2 (pseudocolor red) reporting signals, and the merged image in renal cortical (top row) and medullary (bottom row) sections. Nuclear DAPI staining is shown with pseudocolor blue. Piezo1-reporting signal predominantly localizes to the AQP2-positive (collecting duct) segments of the renal nephron. At the same time, a weaker basolateral Piezo1 signal is present in AQP2-negative renal tubules. AQP2, aquaporine 2; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

We next probed whether activation of Piezo1 contributes to intracellular [Ca2+]i signaling in the collecting duct cells. Application of a selective channel agonist, Yoda-1 (20 μM for 5 min), induced a robust increase in [Ca2+]i in all cells within split-opened area of a freshly-isolated collecting duct (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, we detected two distinct patterns of cellular responses to the treatment with Yoda-1 with the majority of cells responding with a rapid large increase followed by a slow decline in [Ca2+]i, while the remaining population exhibited a slow progressive rise in [Ca2+]i. Postexperimental staining of the collecting duct with AQP2 revealed that the observed two populations corresponded to PCs and ICs, respectively (Fig. 2, A and B). The summary graph in Figure 2C shows significantly higher Yoda-1-induced [Ca2+]i elevations from the baseline (time-point 1) at the beginning (time-point 2) and at the end of application (time-point 3) in PCs than in ICs. As shown in Figure 3, application of another structurally nonrelated selective Piezo1 agonist, Jedi-2 (500 μM for 5 min) also elicited distinct responses in PCs (larger) and ICs (smaller). This directly implies that the observed differences in [Ca2+]i dynamics to Piezo1 stimulation are not attributable to a particular channel agonist.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A selective Piezo1 agonist, Yoda-1 induces different [Ca2+]iresponses in principal (PCs) and intercalated (ICs) cells of the collecting duct.A, representative pseudocolor images (blue-low and red-high) of an isolated split-opened collecting duct loaded with Ca2+-sensitive dye fura-2 at the baseline (1), after 30 s (2), and 5 min (3) of 20 μM Yoda-1 application. Shown on the right is confocal micrograph of the same split-opened collecting duct probed with anti-AQP2 (pseudocolor red) antibodies to discriminate PCs (highlighted with yellow arrows) and ICs (highlighted with white arrows). B, the averaged time courses of [Ca2+]i changes in PCs (black) and ICs (gray) upon application of Yoda-1 (shown with a bar on top). The time points shown in (A) are marked as 1 to 3. Number of individual cells is shown. Six different collecting ducts from three different mice were used for analysis. C, the summary graph comparing the magnitudes of Yoda-1-mediated [Ca2+]i elevations calculated as the difference in [Ca2+]i values before (time point 1), at the beginning (time point 2), and at the end (time point 3) of Yoda application in individual PCs and ICs from the conditions in A. Bars and whiskers represent SE and SD, respectively. Mean and median values are denoted with a dot and a line, respectively. ∗ - significant decreases (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test) between experimental groups shown with lines on the top. AQP2, aquaporine 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Stimulation of Piezo1 with Jedi-2 induces greater [Ca2+]iresponses in principal (PCs) than in intercalated (ICs) cells of the collecting duct.A, representative pseudocolor images (blue-low and red-high) of an isolated split-opened collecting duct loaded with Ca2+-sensitive dye fura-2 at the baseline (1), after 30 s (2), and 5 min (3) of 500 μM Jedi-2 application. Shown on the right is a confocal micrograph of the same split-opened collecting duct probed with anti-AQP2 (pseudocolor red) antibodies to discriminate PCs (highlighted with yellow arrows) and ICs (highlighted with white arrows). B, the averaged time courses of [Ca2+]i changes in PCs (black) and ICs (gray) upon application of Jedi-2 (shown with a bar on top). The time points shown in (A) are marked as 1 to 3. Number of individual cells is shown. Six different collecting ducts from three different mice were used for analysis. C, the summary graph comparing the magnitudes of Jedi-2-mediated [Ca2+]i elevations calculated as the difference in [Ca2+]i values before (time point 1), at the beginning (time point 2), and at the end (time point 3) of Jedi-2 application in individual PCs and ICs from the conditions in A. Bars and whiskers represent SE and SD, respectively. Mean and median values are denoted with a dot and a line, respectively. ∗ - significant decreases (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test) between experimental groups shown with lines on the top. AQP2, aquaporine 2.

Yoda-1-induced [Ca2+]i elevations might involve both direct Ca2+ entry via Piezo1 as well as accompanying Ca2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) intracellular stores. To further test this, removal of extracellular Ca2+ (buffered with 5 mM EGTA) abolished responses to Piezo1 stimulation in both PCs and ICs (Fig. 4A) suggesting that Yoda-1 triggered a direct Ca2+ influx across the plasma membrane. We next quantified responses to Yoda-1 upon inhibition of the endoplasmic Ca2+ ATPase with thapsigargin (4 μM) to deplete ER storages. As expected, thapsigargin led to a mild increase in basal [Ca2+]i levels, which was more pronounced in PCs than in ICs (Fig. 4B). However, this maneuver had no significant effect on the magnitude and different kinetics of Yoda-1-induced [Ca2+]i elevations in both PCs and ICs (Fig. 4C). This strongly argues against a notable role of the intracellular ER stores in the Ca2+ responses to Piezo1 stimulation with Yoda-1. Overall, our results in Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 show that functional Piezo1 is present in all collecting duct cells. However, the Piezo1-dependent Ca2+ influx is markedly greater in PCs than in ICs.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Direct extracellular Ca2+entry accounts for the Yoda-1 induced [Ca2+]ielevations in the collecting duct.A, the averaged time courses of [Ca2+]i changes in PCs (black) and ICs (gray) upon application of Ca2+ free medium (5 mM EGTA), followed by a selective Piezo1 agonist Yoda-1 (20 μM). The application times are shown with gray and black bars on top, respectively. All other conditions are the same as in Figure 2. Number of individual cells is shown. Four different collecting ducts from two different mice were used for analysis. B, the averaged time-courses of [Ca2+]i changes upon application of the endoplasmic Ca2+ ATPase blocker, thapsigargin (4 μM, shown with the gray bar on top) followed by Piezo1 agonist, 20 μM Yoda-1 (shown with the black bar on top) in individual principal (PCs, black) and intercalated (ICs, gray) cells within split-opened area of the collecting duct. Number of individual cells is shown. Five different collecting ducts from three different mice were used for analysis. C, the summary graph comparing the magnitudes of Yoda-1-mediated [Ca2+]i elevations calculated as the difference in [Ca2+]i values before (time point 1), at the beginning (time point 2), and at the end (time point 3) of Yoda-1 application in individual PCs and ICs from the conditions in B. Bars and whiskers represent SE and SD, respectively. Mean and median values are denoted with a dot and a line, respectively. Dashed lines represent respective average values in control (untreated) conditions.

Functional Piezo1 is present at both apical and basolateral membranes of the collecting duct cells

We next monitored subcellular localization of Piezo1 in split-opened collecting ducts with confocal immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 5) to gain insights on the distinct kinetic profiles of [Ca2+]i responses to Yoda-1 and Jedi-2 in PCs and ICs. As shown on the representative images of a 3-D scan, Piezo1-reporting signal is distributed on the apical and basolateral sites in all cells (Fig. 5A). Importantly, the intensity of the signal was significantly higher in AQP2-positive PCs than in AQP2-negative ICs within the same collecting duct, as summarized in Figure 5B. Thus, we show that the lower channel expression is in agreement with lesser [Ca2+]i responses to Piezo1 agonists in ICs (Figs. 2 and 4).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Piezo1 expression is larger in principal collecting duct cells.A, representative confocal images of a split-opened collecting duct probed with anti-AQP2 (pseudocolor red, left panel), anti-Piezo1 (pseudocolor green, middle panel) antibodies and the merged image. Nuclear DAPI staining is shown with pseudocolor blue. The area depicted with a white square is shown on the right with a higher magnification. Respective Z-stacks (XZ planes) in the area depicted by the white dashed lane are shown below. “a” and “b” denote apical and basolateral sides, respectively. B, representative confocal image of a split-opened collecting duct probed with anti-AQP2 (pseudocolor red) and anti-Piezo1 (pseudocolor green) antibodies similar to that shown in (A). The area depicted with a white square shows examples of AQP2-positive principal cells (PCs, yellow arrows) and AQP2-negative intercalated cells (ICs, white arrows). Shown on the right is the summary graph of the intensities of Piezo1-reporting signal in PCs and ICs within the same split-opened collecting duct. ∗- significant decrease (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test) between experimental groups shown with lines on the top. AQP2, aquaporine 2; DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; ICs, intercalated cells; PCs, principal cells.

Since fluorescence Piezo1-reporting signal is apparent at the apical and basolateral sides in the collecting ducts (Fig. 5), we next used patch clamp electrophysiology to inquire whether the channel is indeed functional at both membranes. For this, pipettes were backfilled with Yoda-1 (20 μM) allowing diffusion of the agonist to a patch delineated membrane surface. We observed a gradual activation of a silent or a near silent channel(s) in approximately 30% of cell-attached experiments (10 out of 30) performed on split-opened collecting ducts. A typical experiment is shown in Figure 6A. Further analysis revealed that this is a nonselective cation channel with fast kinetics and 18.6 ± 0.7 pS conductance (Fig. 6B). These biophysical properties are reminiscent of those reported for Piezo1 in native cells and over-expression systems (4, 7). A Yoda-1-stimulated channel with identical properties was also recorded in cell-attached experiments on the basolateral membrane in freshly isolated collecting ducts (Fig. 6C). A summary graph in Figure 6D quantifies activation of Piezo1 by Yoda-1 in cell-attached experiments on the apical and basolateral sides. As is clear, the presence of Yoda-1 in a recording pipette exhibited a comparable activation of Piezo1 on both membranes, though the overall activity (NPo) was moderately higher on the basolateral side. We also attempted to distinguish PCs and ICs by morphology (polygonal and round shape, respectively (insets in Fig. 6, A and C), as described previously (32, 33). As highlighted in gray (Fig. 6D), Yoda-1 was less potent in ICs than in PCs, which is consistent with lower [Ca2+]i responses (Fig. 2) and expression (Fig. 5) in the former.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Piezo1 is functionallyexpressedon both apical and basolateral membranes of the collecting duct cells.A, representative continuous current trace from a cell-attached patch clamp experiment on the apical membrane of a cell within a split-opened collecting duct, as shown on the left. Examples of polygonal shape principal (PCs) and round-shape intercalated (ICs) cells are highlighted with red and yellow, respectively. The pipette was backfilled with Piezo1 agonist Yoda-1 (20 μM), which diffused toward the tip, as shown by a scheme on the top. Inward currents are downward. “c” and “o” denote closed and open states, respectively. The applied pipette voltage was -Vp = −60 mV. Black bars above the trace denote areas shown below with an expanded timescale. B, the unitary current (i) – voltage (V) relation of the Yoda-1 activated nonselective cation channel similar to that shown in (A). The channel conductance (18.6 ± 0.7 pS) was assessed as a slope of linear fit. The numbers of individual recordings are shown for each applied voltage. C, representative continuous current trace from a cell-attached patch clamp experiment on the basolateral membrane of a collecting duct cell, as shown on the left. Examples of polygonal shape principal (PCs) and round-shape intercalated (ICs) cells are highlighted with red and yellow, respectively. The pipette was backfilled with Piezo1 agonist Yoda-1 (20 μM), which diffused toward the tip, as shown by a scheme on the top. Inward currents are downward. “c” and “oi” denote closed and open states, respectively. The applied pipette voltage was -Vp = −60 mV. D, summary graphs comparing changes in Piezo-1 activity (NPo) at the start (1) and at the end (2) of Yoda-1 application in cell-attached experiments on the apical and basolateral sides. Experiments on PCs and ICs are highlighted with black and gray colors, respectively. ICs, intercalated cells; PCs, principal cells.

Interplay between mechanosensitive Piezo1 and TRPV4 in the collecting duct

Piezo1-dependent Ca2+ influx was shown to stimulate TRPV4 in different cell types (30, 31). TRPV4 is a mechanosensitive Ca2+ permeable channel abundantly expressed in the collecting duct (22, 29). Thus, we next probed potential functional coupling between Piezo1 and TRPV4 in split-opened collecting ducts using pharmacological and genetic tools. In the first set of experiments (Fig. 7A), we monitored Yoda-1 stimulation of Piezo1 in PCs and ICs, when TRPV4 activity was blocked by pretreatment with a mixture of selective antagonists HC-067047 (4 μM) and GSK2798745 (40 nM). To exclude an incomplete inhibition and/or putative adverse effects of the blockers, we also documented Piezo1 activation with Yoda-1 in split-opened collecting ducts isolated from TRPV4−/− mice (Fig. 7B). In both cases, we observed similar [Ca2+]i elevations in PCs (Fig. 7C) and ICs (Fig. 7D) at the peak (time-point 2) and at the end (time-point 3) of Yoda-1 application. It should be noted that there was a slight decrease in the basal [Ca2+]i levels due to the acute TRPV4 inhibition, as we reported previously (34, 35, 36). Thus, the amplitude of Yoda-1-induced [Ca2+]i elevations were assessed from this new baseline. Interestingly, inhibition and genetic deletion of TRPV4 led to a moderately (∼25%) but significantly lower responses in PCs when compared to the control values in Figure 2C. In contrast, disruption of TRPV4 activity had no measurable effect on Yoda-1-induced [Ca2+]i elevations in ICs. Overall, we concluded that stimulation of Piezo1 leads to a partial TRPV4 activation in PCs. The absence of stimulatory effect ICs might be attributed to a much lower Piezo1 expression in this cell type.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Moderately decreased Yoda-1-dependent [Ca2+]iresponses in the absence of TRPV4.A, the averaged time-courses of [Ca2+]i changes upon application of selective TRPV4 antagonists HC-067047 (4 μM) and GSK2798745 (40 nM) (shown with the gray bar on top) followed by Piezo1 agonist, 20 μM Yoda-1 (shown with the black bar on top) in individual principal (PCs, black) and intercalated (ICs, gray) cells within split-opened area of the collecting duct. Number of individual cells is shown. Five different collecting ducts from three different mice were used for analysis. B, the averaged time-courses of [Ca2+]i changes upon application of a selective Piezo1 agonist, 20 μM Yoda-1 (shown with the black bar on top) in individual principal (PCs, black) and intercalated (ICs, gray) cells within split-opened area of the collecting ducts isolated from mice with global deletion of TRPV4 (TRPV4−/−). Number of individual cells is shown. Four different collecting ducts from two different mice were used for analysis. The summary graphs comparing the magnitudes of Yoda-1-mediated [Ca2+]i elevations calculated as the difference in [Ca2+]i values before (time point 1), at the beginning (time point 2), and at the end (time point 3) of Yoda-1 application in individual PCs (C) and ICs (D) from the conditions in (A and B). Bars and whiskers represent SE and SD, respectively. Mean and median values are denoted with a dot and a line, respectively. Dashed lines represent respective average values in control (untreated) conditions. # - significant decreases (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test) versus respective control values shown in Figure 2C. TRPV4, transitransient receptor potential vanilloid channel type 4.

Piezo1 activity in PCs is transiently activated by an increase in fluid flow/tubular stretch

Piezo1 was identified as a mechanosensitive channel rapidly activated by a direct physical distortion of the plasma membrane (3, 4). Thus, we next hypothesized that physiological states associated with variations in tubule fluid flow rates affect Piezo1-mediated Ca2+ influx in the collecting duct. For this, we first assessed Yoda-1-induced [Ca2+]i responses in PCs and ICs from collecting ducts of mice injected with diuretic furosemide (2 mg/kgBW, 18 h and 2 h before the experiment) to increase flow in the collecting duct (Fig. 8A). In the second set, experimental animals were water deprived for 24 h to induce antidiuresis (Fig. 8B). As it is clear from the averaged time-courses in Figure 8, A and B and summary graph in Figure 8C, pretreatment with furosemide significantly increased, whereas water restriction significantly decreased Yoda-1-dependent [Ca2+]i elevations in PCs versus untreated control condition. In contrast, we did not detect notable changes in the responses to Piezo1 stimulation with Yoda-1 in ICs under all tested conditions (Fig. 8D).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Short-term changes in flow regulate Piezo1-dependent [Ca2+]isignaling in the collecting duct principal cells.A, the averaged time-courses of [Ca2+]i changes upon application of a selective Piezo1 agonist, 20 μM Yoda-1 (shown with the black bar on top) in individual principal (PCs, black) and intercalated (ICs, gray) cells within split-opened area of the collecting ducts isolated from mice injected with furosemide (2 mg/kgBW) 18 h and 2 h prior to experiments. Number of individual cells is shown. Four different collecting ducts from two different mice were used for analysis. B, the averaged time-courses of [Ca2+]i changes upon application of a selective Piezo1 agonist, 20 μM Yoda-1 (shown with the black bar on top) in individual principal (PCs, black) and intercalated (ICs, gray) cells within split-opened area of the collecting ducts isolated from mice subjected to water deprivation for 24 h before experiments. Number of individual cells is shown. Six different collecting ducts from three different mice were used for analysis. The summary graphs comparing the magnitudes of Yoda-1-mediated [Ca2+]i elevations calculated as the difference in [Ca2+]i values before (time point 1), at the beginning (time point 2), and at the end (time point 3) of Yoda-1 application in individual PCs (C) and ICs (D) from the conditions in (A and B). Bars and whiskers represent SE and SD, respectively. Mean and median values are denoted with a dot and a line, respectively. Dashed lines represent respective average values in control (untreated) conditions. ∗- significant decrease (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test) between experimental groups shown with lines on the top. # - significant decreases (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test) versus respective control values shown in Figure 2C.

We next investigated the consequences of a continuous elevation in tubular flow in the collecting duct. For this purpose, mice were fed high KCl (5% K+) diet for 7 days, which led to at least 3-fold increase in urinary output (28). Unexpectedly, Yoda-1 application induced smaller [Ca2+]i responses in PCs (Fig. 9, A and B), which were comparable to those observed in the state of antidiuresis (Fig. 8C). Again, there were no detectable changes in the magnitude of Yoda-1-induced responses in ICs. A similar reduction in Yoda-1-induced [Ca2+]i responses in PCs was also observed when Cl- was replaced with organic anions (bicarbonate/citrate) in high K+ diet (not shown). Immunofluorescence confocal microscopy studies showed that the intensity of Piezo1-reporting signal (under identical laser settings) was similar in collecting ducts from mice kept on regular and high K+ diets (Fig. 9C). We also did not detect apparent changes in the subcellular distribution, where Piezo1 was present at the apical and basolateral sides in both tested groups. At the same time, we noted a notable flattening of the collecting duct cells, which could reflect cytoskeleton rearrangement due to prolonged flow-induced shear stress. To exclude potential distortion of cell size during these ex vivo preparations, we quantified the changes in nucleus shape and specifically eccentricity (ratio of maximal height to width), which is known to be an index of cytoskeleton rearrangement due to prolonged mechanical stress of the plasma membrane (37). As shown in Figure 9D, nuclear eccentricity was significantly decreased during the high K+ diet similarly in both PCs and ICs. Since Piezo1 activation by mechanical forces critically depends on the local membrane environment (6), it is reasonable to propose that overstretching of Piezo1-mechanosensitive blades due to cell flattening decreases its sensitivity to respond to mechanical stress.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Long-term stimulation of fluid flow in the collecting duct by high K+diet decreases Piezo1-mediated Ca2+influx in principal cells.A, the averaged time-courses of [Ca2+]i changes upon application of a selective Piezo1 agonist, 20 μM Yoda-1 (shown with the black bar on top) in individual principal (PCs, black) and intercalated (ICs, gray) cells within split-opened area of the collecting ducts isolated from mice fed a high potassium (5% K+) diet for 1 week. Number of individual cells is shown. Six different collecting ducts from three different mice were used for analysis. B, the summary graph comparing the magnitudes of Yoda-1-mediated [Ca2+]i elevations calculated as the difference in [Ca2+]i values before (time point 1), at the beginning (time point 2), and at the end (time point 3) of Yoda-1 application in individual PCs and ICs from the conditions in A. Bars and whiskers represent SE and SD, respectively. Mean and median values are denoted with a dot and a line, respectively. Dashed lines represent respective average values in control (untreated) conditions. # - significant decreases (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test) versus respective control values shown in Figure 2C. C, representative high magnification confocal images of split-opened collecting ducts probed with anti-aquaporine 2 (pseudocolor red) and anti-Piezo-1 (pseudocolor green) isolated from mice kept on regular (0.9% K+) and high potassium (0.9% K+) diets. Nuclear DAPI staining is shown with pseudocolor blue. Images were rotated to achieve vertical position of the collecting ducts. Side areas with no data are separated by thin white dashed lines. Respective Z-stacks (XZ planes) in the area depicted by the thick white dashed lane are shown below. “a” and “b” denote apical and basolateral sides, respectively. D, summary graph comparing nuclear eccentricity in principal (PCs) and intercalated cells (ICs) in freshly isolated split-opened collecting ducts from mice kept on regular (0.9% K+) and high potassium (5% K+) diets. Four different collecting ducts from two different mice were used for analysis. For each individual cell, nuclear eccentricity was assessed as the ratio of the maximal height to maximal widths of DAPI fluorescence. ∗- significant decrease (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test) between experimental groups shown with lines on the top. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.

Overall, the results in Figures 8 and 9 suggest that short-term increases in fluid flow augment Yoda-1-induced [Ca2+]i responses in PCs of the collecting duct, whereas sustained elevations in flow rate/perfusion pressure cause rearrangement of cell shape likely rendering Piezo1 inactivation without notable changes in its levels.

Metabolic acidosis but not metabolic alkalosis increases Piezo1 activity in ICs

The lack of regulation of Piezo1-dependent [Ca2+]i elevations in ICs by variations in fluid flow implies that additional mechanisms might be involved. ICs are known to play a central role in regulation of systemic acid–base balance by secreting H+/HCO3- to control urinary pH (21, 38). Thus, we next tested whether systemic acid or alkali loads can affect [Ca2+]i signaling in response to Piezo1 stimulation in ICs. Mice were kept on NH4Cl (280 mM) or NaHCO3 (280 mM) water for three days to induce metabolic acidosis or alkalosis, respectively, as described previously (39, 40). Neither treatment had measurable effect on the Yoda-1-induced [Ca2+]i responses in PCs, when compared to the control conditions (Fig. 10, AC). Importantly, systemic acid load significantly increased Piezo1-dependent [Ca2+]i elevations in ICs at both the beginning (time-point 2) and at the end (time-point 3) of Yoda-1 application (Fig. 10D). In contrast, no significant changes in Piezo1-dependent Ca2+ responses were observed in ICs from mice subjected to base load.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Metabolic acidosis stimulates Yoda-1-induced [Ca2+]iresponses in the collecting duct intercalated cells.A, the averaged time-courses of [Ca2+]i changes upon application of a selective Piezo1 agonist, 20 μM Yoda-1 (shown with the black bar on top) in individual principal (PCs, black) and intercalated (ICs, gray) cells within split-opened area of the collecting ducts isolated from mice kept on ammonium (NH4Cl, 280 mM) water for three days prior to experiments to induce metabolic acidosis (acid load). Number of individual cells is shown. Six different collecting ducts from three different mice were used for analysis. B, the averaged time-courses of [Ca2+]i changes upon application of a selective Piezo1 agonist, 20 μM Yoda-1 (shown with the black bar on top) in individual principal (PCs, black) and intercalated (ICs, gray) cells within split-opened area of the collecting ducts isolated from mice kept on bicarbonate (NaHCO3, 280 mM) water for three days to induce metabolic alkalosis (base load). Number of individual cells is shown. Five different collecting ducts from three different mice were used for analysis. The summary graphs comparing the magnitudes of Yoda-1-mediated [Ca2+]i elevations calculated as the difference in [Ca2+]i values before (time point 1), at the beginning (time point 2), and at the end (time point 3) of Yoda-1 application in individual PCs (C) and ICs (D) from the conditions in (A and B). Bars and whiskers represent SE and SD, respectively. Mean and median values are denoted with a dot and a line, respectively. Dashed lines represent respective average values in control (untreated) conditions. ∗- significant decrease (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test) between experimental groups shown with lines on the top. # - significant increase (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test) versus respective control values shown in Figure 2C. ICs, intercalated cells; PCs, principal cells.

Discussion

In this study, we inquired onto the molecular and signaling determinants of Piezo1 function in the collecting duct cells. Specifically, we showed expression and regulation of the mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel, its interplay with Ca2+-permeable TRPV4 in the collecting duct, and revealed cell-specific regulation of [Ca2+]i signaling in response to Piezo1 stimulation by systemic cues (Fig. 11). While Piezo1 is present on both apical and basolateral membranes, its expression and Piezo1-dependent Ca2+ influx were much greater in PCs than in ICs. Moreover, we also found that the magnitude of Yoda-1-induced [Ca2+]i responses positively correlated with acute changes in tubular flow in PCs, whereas Piezo1-dependent [Ca2+]i signaling in ICs was augmented by dietary acid load.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Principal scheme of Piezo1 function and regulation in principal (PCs) and intercalated (ICs) cells in the collecting duct. TRPV4–transient receptor potential vanilloid channel type 4. The size of respective icons of Piezo1 and TRPV4 reflects their activity. Green and red arrows represent stimulatory and inhibitory actions, respectively. TRPV4, transitransient receptor potential vanilloid channel type 4.

Using electrophysiological and imaging techniques, we show that mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel is functional in the collecting duct cells with its activation by Yoda-1 leading to a notable Ca2+ influx in both PCs and ICs (Figs. 2 and 6). It has to be noted that quantification of Yoda-1-stimulated [Ca2+]i responses offers only an indirect, though convenient, assessment of Piezo1 function. At the same time, we did not detect a significant contribution of intracellular mechanisms, such as Ca2+ release from the ER, during pharmacological Piezo1 stimulation with Yoda-1 (Fig. 4). While it seems more accurate to quantify Piezo1 activity in response to mechanical (membrane stretch) rather than pharmacological (with Yoda-1) stimulation, a comparable extension of the plasma membrane attached blade domains has been observed in both cases (6) pointing to a common uniform mode of Piezo1 activation. In addition, there are notable difficulties to accurately measuring Ca2+ influx via Piezo1 in response to changes in flow-induced shear stress or hypotonicity triggered stretching of the plasma membrane due to rapid channel inactivation in millisecond range. In contrast, application of Yoda-1 allows the assessment of the maximal Piezo1-dependent Ca2+ conductance in the collecting duct cells with minor distortions of the accompanying mechanisms, such as Ca2+ release from the ER (Fig. 4).

One may think that Piezo1 is ideally positioned to operate as mechanosensor accounting for the commonly observed [Ca2+]i elevations in response to changes in flow and osmolarity existing in the collecting duct (25). In contrast, we and others documented that the activity of Ca2+-permeable TRPV4 is essential for flow-dependent [Ca2+]i elevations in the collecting duct (22, 27, 41). TRPV4 exhibits notable mechanosensitive properties and can be activated by mechanical stress both directly and indirectly, via a phospholipase A2 (PLA2)-dependent signaling cascade (31, 42, 43). Furthermore, increased flow over the apical membrane fails to affect [Ca2+]i in the collecting ducts when TRPV4 is deleted or blocked (22, 27, 36). This seeming controversy does not consider rapid inactivation of Piezo1 with channels being already closed within hundreds of milliseconds from the beginning of mechanical distortion of the plasma membrane (4). In contrast to the prolonged opening of the channel by Yoda-1 (Fig. 2), physiologically relevant (i.e. mechanical) stimulation of Piezo1 would not lead to sustained mechanosensitive elevations of [Ca2+]i, which are TRPV4-dependent. Thus, it is reasonable to propose that mechanosensitive Piezo1 and TRPV4 channels have distinct yet complementary functions by tracking the velocity and magnitude of flow changes in the collecting duct, respectively.

An initial transient activation of Piezo1 by mechanical forces was shown to facilitate subsequent TRPV4 channel opening in pancreatic acinar cells with exaggeration of this mechanism leading to the pressure-induced pancreatitis (30). Indeed, TRPV4 is shown to be activated by modest elevations in [Ca2+]i via a signaling pathway involving calmodulin binding to its C terminus (44). Consistently, we show here that either inhibition or deletion of TRPV4 channel moderately reduced Yoda-1-dependent [Ca2+]i elevations in PCs (Fig. 7). This suggests that Piezo1-mediated Ca2+ influx is capable of partially stimulating TRPV4. Much lower Piezo1 expression (Fig. 5) and consequently reduced Piezo1-mediated Ca2+ influx (Fig. 2) could be responsible for the lack of TRPV4 activation in ICs. Other factors, such as different lipid composition and overall architecture of the plasma membrane of PCs and ICs, could also affect Piezo1 function known to be strongly regulated by local environment (6). It is unlikely, though, that the secondary TRPV4-mediated Ca2+ influx could account for the differences in Yoda-1-induced [Ca2+]i responses during short-term variations in fluid flow after furosemide and water deprivation (Fig. 8). Thus, we previously showed that sustained elevation of fluid flow in the collecting duct by high K+ diet dramatically increased TRPV4 expression and activity (27) to mediate flow-induced K+ secretion via Ca2+-activated big potassium (BK) channels (27, 28). At the same time, we found that this treatment led to a significantly decreased Yoda-1-induced [Ca2+]i responses (Fig. 9, A and B) pointing to reduced Piezo1 activity. While the exact mechanism remains to be further explored, we did not observe changes in Piezo1 expression and subcellular localization in this condition (Fig. 9C). Importantly, we detected notable flattening of the collecting duct cells (Fig. 9D), suggesting cytoskeleton reorganization due to increased perfusion pressure existing during high K+ intake. Published evidence suggest that shear stress mediated signaling to nucleus (monitored as changes in nuclear shape and size) is Ca2+-dependent and could be recapitulated by Piezo1 stimulation by Yoda-1 in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) epithelial cells (45). It is possible that such notable cytoskeleton reorganization due to Piezo1-or potentially TRPV4-dependent Ca2+ signaling would lead to reciprocal negative feed-back inhibition of Peizo1 function to limit further structural changes. Alternatively, direct monitoring conformational dynamics of the membrane bound mechanosensitive elements (i.e. blades) of Piezo1 using nanoscopic fluorescence imaging revealed that the magnitude of blade expansion correlates with channel activation (6). Thus, it is possible that prolonged shear stress induces deformation of the plasma membrane and overstretching of the blades thereby impeding Piezo1 mechanosensitivity.

The finding that Piezo1 expression (Fig. 3) and activity (Figs. 2 and 5) are high in PCs but low in ICs is intriguing. In fact, ICs are generally larger in size than PCs, thus protruding to the tubular lumen. One may think that they are better suited to sense flow- and tonicity-induced mechanical pressure. However, this view is not supported by the predominant Piezo1 expression in PCs shown in this study. The same pattern was also reported by other groups using Piezo1-reporter transgenic mouse models (17, 19). Moreover, mice with a conditional KO of Piezo1 in the renal tubule have normal urinary concentrating ability but exhibit a delayed urinary dilution after rehydration (17). Since PCs (and not ICs) mediate AQP2-dependent water reabsorption to control urinary osmolarity, the overall phenotype in the KOs is indicative of predominant Piezo1 expression in this cell type. Consistently, we found that Yoda-1-induced [Ca2+]i responses in PCs but not ICs are diminished during water deprivation but are augmented by an acute increase in flow due to furosemide (Fig. 8). It is worth noting that the expression of mechanosensitive TRPV4 channel is also higher in PCs, though the difference is not that large (22). Interestingly, expression of mechanosensitive volume-regulated anion channels (VRACs, also known as SWELLs) and particularly LRRC8A/E heteromer has been specifically reported in ICs but not PCs (46). Such a striking separation of the cation- and anion-selective mechanosensitive channels to PCs and ICs, respectively is reminiscent of the predominant cation-selective (mostly Kir4.1/5.1 potassium channel) and anion-selective (ClC-K2 chloride channel) basolateral conductance in these cell types (47, 48, 49). It is plausible to propose that such separation of cationic and anionic permeability is instrumental for independent physiological roles of PCs and ICs requiring different mechanisms of mechanosensitivity in fine-tuning water and electrolyte transport in the collecting duct.

Our patch clamp data (Fig. 6) provide a direct evidence of the presence of a ∼19 pS Yoda-1 activated channel on both apical and basolateral membranes of the collecting duct cells. The observed biophysical profile is very similar to that reported for Piezo1 (4, 7). The overall channel activity (NPo) after stimulation by Yoda-1 seems to be greater in polygonal-shape PCs than in round-shape ICs and on the basolateral side more than on the apical side. These results are in a good agreement with immunofluorescence detection of Piezo1 in renal sections (Fig. 1) and isolated split-opened collecting ducts (Fig. 5). Consistently, Piezo1-reporting transgenic mouse models also found the most abundant signal on the basolateral side of PCs in the collecting duct (17, 19). It is currently not established whether Piezo1 has different functional roles on the apical versus basolateral membranes. However, it might be reasonable to assume that the apical Piezo1 is better suited to sense acute changes in fluid flow and to facilitate TRPV4 activation (which is preferentially on that side (22)), whereas basolateral Piezo1 could be instrumental in sensing the overall pressure/tension arising from either osmotic gradients or substantial increases in fluid delivery to the collecting duct. The lower Piezo1 expression in ICs indicates that the channel is not likely playing a major role in acid–base transport at this site. On the other hand, we observed a specific upregulation of Piezo1 in ICs in response to metabolic acidosis (Fig. 9). Future studies are necessary to examine the potential contribution of Piezo1 for renal adaptation to systemic acid–base stimuli.

Experimental procedures

Reagents

All chemicals and materials were from Sigma-Aldrich, VWR, Thermo Fisher Scientific, and Tocris Bioscience unless noted otherwise and were at least of reagent grade.

Research animals

Animal use and welfare adhered to the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals following protocols reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. For experiments, male C57BL/6J (Charles River Laboratories) and TRPV4−/− (22, 50) mice 6 to 10 weeks old were used. Animals were maintained on standard rodent chow and had free access to tap water unless specified otherwise. To increase urinary output, mice were fed high KCl diet (5% K+, TD150699), and high KBicarbonate/citrate (KB/C) diet (5% K+ with bicarbonate to citrate in 4:1 ratio, TD150759) for 1 week. All diets were purchased from Envigo. Diuretic furosemide (2 mg/kgBW; TCI America; Cat. # F01825G) was injected intraperitoneally 18 h and 2 h prior to experimentation. To induce metabolic acidosis/alkalosis, animals were given water supplemented with 280 mM NH4Cl + 0.5% sucrose (acid load) or 280 mM NaHCO3 + 0.5% sucrose (base load) for three days, respectively, as was described previously (39, 40).

Isolation and split-opening of cortical collecting ducts

The procedure for isolation of the cortical collecting ducts from mouse kidneys suitable for fluorescence [Ca2+]i measurements and patch clamp electrophysiology closely followed the protocols previously published by our group (39, 51). Kidneys were cut into thin slices (<1 mm) with slices placed into an ice-cold bath solution containing (in mM): 150 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 5 glucose, and 10 Hepes (pH 7.35). Straight cortical-to-medullary sectors, containing approximately 30 to 50 renal tubules, were isolated by microdissection using watchmaker forceps under a stereomicroscope. To dissolve the basal lamina and to get direct access to the basolateral membrane, isolated sectors were further incubated in the Ringer’s solution containing 0.8 mg/ml collagenase type I (Alfa Aesar) and 5 mg/ml of dispase II (Roche Diagnostics) for 12 min at 37 °C followed by extensive washout. Cortical collecting ducts were visually identified by their morphological features (pale color; coarse surface) and by their postexperimental staining with anti-AQP2 (Fig. 2 for example). The collecting ducts were mechanically isolated from kidney slices by microdissection using watchmaker forceps under a stereomicroscope. Isolated collecting ducts were attached to 5 × 5 mm cover glasses coated with poly-L-lysine. A cover-glass containing a collecting duct was placed in a perfusion chamber mounted on an inverted Nikon Eclipse Ti-S microscope and perfused with bath solution at room temperature. Cortical collecting ducts were further split opened with two sharpened micropipettes, controlled with different micromanipulators, to reliably monitor [Ca2+]i signals from individual cells. The collecting ducts were used within 2 h of isolation.

Intracellular Ca2+ measurements

Split-opened cortical collecting ducts were loaded with fura-2 by incubation with 2 μM fura-2/AM acetoxymethyl ester in the bath solution for 40 min at room temperature followed by a washout with the bath solution for additional 10 min. Collecting ducts were placed in an open-top imaging study chamber (RC-26GLP; Warner Instruments) with a bottom coverslip viewing window and the chamber attached to the microscope stage of a Nikon Ti-S Wide-Field Fluorescence Imaging System (Nikon Instruments) integrated with Lambda XL light source (Sutter Instrument) and QIClick 1.4 megapixel monochrome CCD camera (QImaging) via NIS Elements 4.3 Imaging Software (Nikon Instruments). Cells were imaged with a 40× Nikon Super Fluor objective and regions of interest were drawn for individual cells. For [Ca2+]i measurements, the fura-2 fluorescence intensity ratio was determined by excitation at 340 nm and 380 nm and calculating the ratio of the emission intensities at 511 nm in the usual manner every 5 s. The changes in the ratio were converted into changes in intracellular calcium, as we described in great details previously (52). Minor fura-2 bleaching during the timeline of experiments was corrected. Experiments were performed under permanent perfusion of a solution containing (in mM): 150 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 5 glucose, and 10 Hepes at 1.5 ml/min rate. Ca2+-free medium was prepared from the bath solution by removal of CaCl2 and addition of 5 mM EGTA. In average, six individual collecting ducts (30–50 cells in each) from three mice were used for each experimental set.

Immunofluorescence microscopy (split-opened collecting ducts)

Following [Ca2+]i measurements, split-opened collecting ducts were fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin (Azer Scientific; Cat. # PFNBF240) for 15 min at room temperature. After fixation, the samples were permeabilized by addition of 1% SDS (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. # L4390) in PBS for 10 min and washed in PBS two times for 10 min. Nonspecific staining was blocked with 10% normal goat serum (Novus Biologicals; Cat. # NBP223475) in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. The samples were incubated overnight at +4 °C in dark with rabbit anti-mouse anti-AQP2 antibodies (1:4000, Alomone Labs; Cat. # AQP2-002), washed with PBS, and incubated with goat anti-rabbit Alexa 594 F(ab’) secondary antibodies (1:1000 Jackson ImmunoResearch, Cat. # 111–587–003) for 60 min at room temperature. For double staining protocol, collecting ducts were incubated overnight at +4 °C with conjugated rabbit anti-mouse anti-AQP2-ATTO Fluor-550 (1:200, Alomone Labs; Cat. # AQP2-002-AO) and anti-Piezo1 (1:100, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat. # PA577617) antibodies. Followed by washing with PBS for 20 min at room temperature, the samples were incubated with goat anti-rabbit Alexa 647 (H + L) secondary antibodies (1:1500, Thermo Fisher Scientific; Cat. # A32733) for 60 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS (2 times for 5 min) the samples were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (300 nM concentration, MilliporeSigma, Calbiochem; Cat. # 5.08741.0001) to visualize nuclei. The samples were mounted with ProLong Gold antifade reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Cat. #P10144). The samples were imaged with a Nikon A1R confocal microscope using 405, 640, and/or 561 nm laser diodes and emission captured with a 16 bit Cool SNAP HQ2 camera (Photometrics) interfaced to a PC running NIS elements software.

Immunofluorescence microscopy (kidney sections)

Freshly isolated kidneys were decapsulated and placed into cryo tubes with embedding medium (Andwin Scientific Tissue-Tek CRYO-OCT Compound 4583; Cat. # 14-373-65). The kidneys were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin at +4 °C overnight and soaked in 0.9 M sucrose overnight at +4 °C. The kidneys were next flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen for 3 to 5 min. Transverse cut 6 μm thick sections were made on CM 1850 cryostat (Leica). The sections were allowed to warm to room temperature, washed with PBS and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton x100 (Sigma-Aldrich; Cat. # 56H0850) for 10 min. After extensive washout, the samples were treated with 10% normal goat serum for an hour at room temperature. Sections were incubated overnight at +4 °C with rabbit anti-mouse anti-Piezo1 (1:50, Thermo Fisher Scientific; Cat. # PA577617) antibodies. Followed by washing with PBS for 20 min at room temperature, the samples were incubated with goat anti-rabbit Alexa 647 (H + L) secondary antibodies (1:1500, Thermo Fisher Scientific; Cat. # A32733) for 60 min at room temperature. Followed by washing with PBS for 20 min at room temperature, the samples were incubated with 5% normal rabbit serum for 30 min at room temperature and further with rabbit anti-mouse anti-AQP2-ATTO Fluor-550 (1:200, Alomone Labs; Cat. # AQP2-002-AO) overnight at +4 °C. After washing with PBS for 20 min at room temperature, nuclei were stained with DAPI (0.5 μg/ml) for 10 min. The samples were mounted with ProLong Gold antifade reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Cat. #P10144). The labeled kidney sections were imaged with a Nikon A1R confocal microscope, as we did similarly before (39). In brief, samples were excited with 405, 640, and/or 561 nm laser diodes and emission captured with a 16 bit Cool SNAP HQ2 camera (Photometrics) interfaced to a PC running NIS elements software.

Patch clamp electrophysiology

Single-channel activity of Yoda-1-activated Piezo1 channel was determined in cell-attached patches on the apical membrane in freshly isolated split-opened collecting ducts and on the basolateral membrane in freshly isolated collecting ducts, as shown in representative images in Figure 6. Gradual activation of Piezo1 by Yoda-1 was detected under voltage-clamp conditions (−Vp =− 60 mV), as previously described (47, 53). To assess single channel conductance, pipette voltage was changed from -Vp = −100 mV to +60 mV for at 30 s. PCs and ICs were visually identified by their polygonal and round shape, respectively. Recording pipettes had resistances of 4 to 8 megaohm. Bath solution was (in mM): 150 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 5 glucose, and 10 Hepes (pH 7.35). Tip of the recording pipette (approximately 3 mm) was filled with control solution containing 150 KCl, 2 MgCl2, 10 Hepes, and 5 glucose (pH 7.35). The rest of pipette was filled by the same solution also containing Yoda-1 (20 μM). Gap-free single channel current data from gigaohm seals were acquired and analyzed with Axopatch 200B (Molecular Devices) patch clamp amplifier interfaced via a Digidata 1440 (Molecular Devices) to a PC running the pClamp 10.7 suite of software (Molecular Devices). Currents were low-pass filtered at 1 kHz with an eight-pole Bessel filter (Warner Instruments). Events were inspected visually prior to acceptance. Channel activity in individual patches, defined as NPo, was calculated using the following equation: NPo = (t1 + 2t2 + … + ntn), where N and Po are the number of Piezo1 in a patch and the mean open probability of these channels, respectively, and tn is the fractional open time spent at each of the observed current levels. The stimulatory effect of Yoda-1 was quantified as a difference in NPo (over a 30 s span) at the beginning (control) and after 2 to 3 min, allowing for the Yoda-1 diffusion to the pipette tip.

Data analysis

All summarized data are reported as mean ± SD (whiskers) and SE (bars). Statistical comparisons were made using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey test or one-way repeated measures ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni test. p value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Data availability

All research data are contained within the manuscript. Individual immunofluorescence images and patch clamp recordings could be obtained from the corresponding author upon a reasonable request.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

Acknowledgments

Author contributions

K. P., A. A.-S., M. K., O. Z., V. N. T., and O. P. investigation; K. P., A. A.-S., M. K., O. Z., V. N. T., and O. P. formal analysis; K. P., A. A.-S., M. K., O. Z., V. N. T., and O. P. writing–review and editing; K. P. and O. P. funding acquisition; O. P. writing–original draft; O. P. conceptualization.

Funding and additional information

This research was supported by NIH-NIDDK DK117865, DK119170, AHA EIA35260097 (to O. P.) and AHA-23POST1020372 (to K. P.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Reviewed by members of the JBC Editorial Board. Edited by Mike Shipston

References

  • 1.Martino F., Perestrelo A.R., Vinarsky V., Pagliari S., Forte G. Cellular mechanotransduction: from tension to function. Front. Physiol. 2018;9:824. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jin P., Jan L.Y., Jan Y.N. Mechanosensitive ion channels: structural features relevant to mechanotransduction mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2020;43:207–229. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-070918-050509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Coste B., Xiao B., Santos J.S., Syeda R., Grandl J., Spencer K.S., et al. Piezo proteins are pore-forming subunits of mechanically activated channels. Nature. 2012;483:176–181. doi: 10.1038/nature10812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coste B., Mathur J., Schmidt M., Earley T.J., Ranade S., Petrus M.J., et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science. 2010;330:55–60. doi: 10.1126/science.1193270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ge J., Li W., Zhao Q., Li N., Chen M., Zhi P., et al. Architecture of the mammalian mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel. Nature. 2015;527:64–69. doi: 10.1038/nature15247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mulhall E.M., Gharpure A., Lee R.M., Dubin A.E., Aaron J.S., Marshall K.L., et al. Direct observation of the conformational states of PIEZO1. Nature. 2023;620:1117–1125. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06427-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nosyreva E.D., Thompson D., Syeda R. Identification and functional characterization of the Piezo1 channel pore domain. J. Biol. Chem. 2021;296 doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.015905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Syeda R., Xu J., Dubin A.E., Coste B., Mathur J., Huynh T., et al. Chemical activation of the mechanotransduction channel Piezo1. eLife. 2015;4:e07369. doi: 10.7554/eLife.07369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang Y., Chi S., Guo H., Li G., Wang L., Zhao Q., et al. A lever-like transduction pathway for long-distance chemical- and mechano-gating of the mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:1300. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03570-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li J., Hou B., Tumova S., Muraki K., Bruns A., Ludlow M.J., et al. Piezo1 integration of vascular architecture with physiological force. Nature. 2014;515:279–282. doi: 10.1038/nature13701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ranade S.S., Qiu Z., Woo S.H., Hur S.S., Murthy S.E., Cahalan S.M., et al. Piezo1, a mechanically activated ion channel, is required for vascular development in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014;111:10347–10352. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409233111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yang X., Zeng H., Wang L., Luo S., Zhou Y. Activation of Piezo1 downregulates renin in juxtaglomerular cells and contributes to blood pressure homeostasis. Cell Biosci. 2022;12:197. doi: 10.1186/s13578-022-00931-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ihara T., Mitsui T., Shimura H., Tsuchiya S., Kanda M., Kira S., et al. Different effects of GsMTx4 on nocturia associated with the circadian clock and Piezo1 expression in mice. Life Sci. 2021;278 doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dalghi M.G., Ruiz W.G., Clayton D.R., Montalbetti N., Daugherty S.L., Beckel J.M., et al. Functional roles for PIEZO1 and PIEZO2 in urothelial mechanotransduction and lower urinary tract interoception. JCI Insight. 2021;6:e152984. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.152984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Albuisson J., Murthy S.E., Bandell M., Coste B., Louis-Dit-Picard H., Mathur J., et al. Dehydrated hereditary stomatocytosis linked to gain-of-function mutations in mechanically activated PIEZO1 ion channels. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:1884. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Beneteau C., Thierry G., Blesson S., Le Vaillant C., Picard V., Bene M.C., et al. Recurrent mutation in the PIEZO1 gene in two families of hereditary xerocytosis with fetal hydrops. Clin. Genet. 2014;85:293–295. doi: 10.1111/cge.12147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Martins J.R., Penton D., Peyronnet R., Arhatte M., Moro C., Picard N., et al. Piezo1-dependent regulation of urinary osmolarity. Pflugers Arch. 2016;468:1197–1206. doi: 10.1007/s00424-016-1811-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhao X., Kong Y., Liang B., Xu J., Lin Y., Zhou N., et al. Mechanosensitive Piezo1 channels mediate renal fibrosis. JCI Insight. 2022;7:e152330. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.152330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dalghi M.G., Clayton D.R., Ruiz W.G., Al-Bataineh M.M., Satlin L.M., Kleyman T.R., et al. Expression and distribution of PIEZO1 in the mouse urinary tract. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2019;317:F303–F321. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00214.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pearce D., Soundararajan R., Trimpert C., Kashlan O.B., Deen P.M., Kohan D.E. Collecting duct principal cell transport processes and their regulation. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015;10:135–146. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05760513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Roy A., Al-bataineh M.M., Pastor-Soler N.M. Collecting duct intercalated cell function and regulation. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015;10:305–324. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08880914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Berrout J., Jin M., Mamenko M., Zaika O., Pochynyuk O., O'Neil R.G. Function of TRPV4 as a mechanical transducer in flow-sensitive segments of the renal collecting duct system. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:8782–8791. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.308411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Weinbaum S., Duan Y., Satlin L.M., Wang T., Weinstein A.M. Mechanotransduction in the renal tubule. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2010;299:F1220–1236. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00453.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Woda C.B., Leite M., Jr., Rohatgi R., Satlin L.M. Effects of luminal flow and nucleotides on [Ca(2+)](i) in rabbit cortical collecting duct. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2002;283:F437–446. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00316.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu W., Xu S., Woda C., Kim P., Weinbaum S., Satlin L.M. Effect of flow and stretch on the [Ca2+]i response of principal and intercalated cells in cortical collecting duct. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2003;285:F998–F1012. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00067.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu W., Morimoto T., Woda C., Kleyman T.R., Satlin L.M. Ca2+ dependence of flow-stimulated K secretion in the mammalian cortical collecting duct. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2007;293:F227–235. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00057.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mamenko M.V., Boukelmoune N., Tomilin V.N., Zaika O.L., Jensen V.B., O'Neil R.G., et al. The renal TRPV4 channel is essential for adaptation to increased dietary potassium. Kidney Int. 2017;91:1398–1409. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stavniichuk A., Pyrshev K., Zaika O., Tomilin V.N., Kordysh M., Lakk M., et al. TRPV4 expression in the renal tubule is necessary for maintaining whole body K(+) homeostasis. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2023;324:F603–F616. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00278.2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pyrshev K., Stavniichuk A., Tomilin V.N., Zaika O., Pochynyuk O. Evolving concepts of TRPV4 in controlling flow-sensitivity of the renal nephron. Curr. Top. Membr. 2022;89:75–94. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctm.2022.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Swain S.M., Romac J.M., Shahid R.A., Pandol S.J., Liedtke W., Vigna S.R., et al. TRPV4 channel opening mediates pressure-induced pancreatitis initiated by Piezo1 activation. J. Clin. Invest. 2020;130:2527–2541. doi: 10.1172/JCI134111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Servin-Vences M.R., Moroni M., Lewin G.R., Poole K. Direct measurement of TRPV4 and PIEZO1 activity reveals multiple mechanotransduction pathways in chondrocytes. eLife. 2017;6:e21074. doi: 10.7554/eLife.21074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Madsen K.M., Tisher C.C. Structural-functional relationship along the distal nephron. Am. J. Physiol. 1986;250:F1–F15. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1986.250.1.F1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rice W.L., Van Hoek A.N., Paunescu T.G., Huynh C., Goetze B., Singh B., et al. High resolution helium ion scanning microscopy of the rat kidney. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zaika O., Mamenko M., Berrout J., Boukelmoune N., O'Neil R.G., Pochynyuk O. TRPV4 dysfunction promotes renal cystogenesis in autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2013;24:604–616. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012050442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mamenko M., Zaika O.L., Boukelmoune N., Berrout J., O'Neil R.G., Pochynyuk O. Discrete control of TRPV4 channel function in the distal nephron by protein kinases A and C. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:20306–20314. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.466797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tomilin V., Reif G.A., Zaika O., Wallace D.P., Pochynyuk O. Deficient transient receptor potential vanilloid type 4 function contributes to compromised [Ca(2+)]i homeostasis in human autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease cells. FASEB J. 2018;32:4612–4623. doi: 10.1096/fj.201701535RR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang N., Tytell J.D., Ingber D.E. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009;10:75–82. doi: 10.1038/nrm2594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Carraro-Lacroix L.R., Malnic G. Acid-base transport by the renal distal nephron. J. Nephrol. 2010;23:S19–S27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pyrshev K., Khayyat N.H., Stavniichuk A., Tomilin V.N., Zaika O., Ramkumar N., et al. ClC-K2 Cl(-) channel allows identification of A- and B-type of intercalated cells in split-opened collecting ducts. FASEB J. 2022;36 doi: 10.1096/fj.202200160R. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zaidman N.A., Tomilin V.N., Hassanzadeh Khayyat N., Damarla M., Tidmore J., Capen D.E., et al. Adhesion-GPCR Gpr116 (ADGRF5) expression inhibits renal acid secretion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2020;117:26470–26481. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007620117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Du J., Wong W.Y., Sun L., Huang Y., Yao X. Protein Kinase G inhibits flow-induced Ca2+ entry into collecting duct cells. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2012;23:1172–1180. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011100972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vriens J., Watanabe H., Janssens A., Droogmans G., Voets T., Nilius B. Cell swelling, heat, and chemical agonists use distinct pathways for the activation of the cation channel TRPV4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004;101:396–401. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0303329101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gualdani R., Seghers F., Yerna X., Schakman O., Tajeddine N., Achouri Y., et al. Mechanical activation of TRPV4 channels controls albumin reabsorption by proximal tubule cells. Sci. Signal. 2020;13:eabc6967. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.abc6967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Strotmann R., Schultz G., Plant T.D. Ca2+-dependent potentiation of the nonselective cation channel TRPV4 is mediated by a C-terminal calmodulin binding site. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:26541–26549. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M302590200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jetta D., Gottlieb P.A., Verma D., Sachs F., Hua S.Z. Shear stress-induced nuclear shrinkage through activation of Piezo1 channels in epithelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 2019;132:jcs226076. doi: 10.1242/jcs.226076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lopez-Cayuqueo K.I., Planells-Cases R., Pietzke M., Oliveras A., Kempa S., Bachmann S., et al. Renal deletion of LRRC8/VRAC channels induces proximal Tubulopathy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2022;33:1528–1545. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021111458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tomilin V.N., Zaika O., Subramanya A.R., Pochynyuk O. Dietary K(+) and Cl(-) independently regulate basolateral conductance in principal and intercalated cells of the collecting duct. Pflugers Arch. 2018;470:339–353. doi: 10.1007/s00424-017-2084-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nissant A., Paulais M., Lachheb S., Lourdel S., Teulon J. Similar chloride channels in the connecting tubule and cortical collecting duct of the mouse kidney. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2006;290:F1421–1429. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00274.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lachheb S., Cluzeaud F., Bens M., Genete M., Hibino H., Lourdel S., et al. Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channel forms the major K+ channel in the basolateral membrane of mouse renal collecting duct principal cells. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2008;294:F1398–F1407. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00288.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Liedtke W., Friedman J.M. Abnormal osmotic regulation in trpv4-/- mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003;100:13698–13703. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1735416100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tomilin V., Mamenko M., Zaika O., Wingo C.S., Pochynyuk O. TRPV4 deletion protects against hypokalemia during systemic K(+) deficiency. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2019;316:F948–F956. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00043.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mamenko M., Zaika O., O'Neil R.G., Pochynyuk O. Ca2+ Imaging as a tool to assess TRP channel function in murine distal nephrons. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013;998:371–384. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-351-0_29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tomilin V.N., Pyrshev K., Stavniichuk A., Hassanzadeh Khayyat N., Ren G., Zaika O., et al. Epac1-/- and Epac2-/- mice exhibit deficient epithelial Na+ channel regulation and impaired urinary Na+ conservation. JCI Insight. 2022;7:e145653. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.145653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All research data are contained within the manuscript. Individual immunofluorescence images and patch clamp recordings could be obtained from the corresponding author upon a reasonable request.


Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES