Skip to main content
PMC home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1991 Jan;95(1):305–315. doi: 10.1104/pp.95.1.305

Water Transport across Maize Roots 1

Simultaneous Measurement of Flows at the Cell and Root Level by Double Pressure Probe Technique

Guo Li Zhu 1, Ernst Steudle 1
PMCID: PMC1077523  PMID: 16667970

Abstract

A double pressure probe technique was used to measure simultaneously water flows and hydraulic parameters of individual cells and of excised roots of young seedlings of maize (Zea mays L.) in osmotic experiments. By following initial flows of water at the cell and root level and by estimating the profiles of driving forces (water potentials) across the root, the hydraulic conductivity of individual cell layers was evaluated. Since the hydraulic conductivity of the cell-to-cell path was determined separately, the hydraulic conductivity of the cell wall material could be evaluated as well (Lpcw = 0.3 to 6.10−9 per meter per second per megapascal). Although, for radial water flow across the cortex and rhizodermis, the apoplasmic path was predominant, the contribution of the hydraulic conductance of the cell-to-cell path to the overall conductance increased significantly from the first layer of the cortex toward the inner layers from 2% to 23%. This change was mainly due to an increase of the hydraulic conductivity of the cell membranes which was Lp = 1.9.10−7 per meter per second per megapascal in the first layer and Lp = 14 to 9.10−7 per meter per second per megapascal in the inner layers of the cortex. The hydraulic conductivity of entire roots depended on whether hydrostatic or osmotic forces were used to induce water flows. Hydrostatic Lpr was 1.2 to 2.3.10−7 per meter per second per megapascal and osmotic Lpr = 1.6 to 2.8.10−8 per meter per second per megapascal. The apparent reflection coefficients of root cells (σs) of nonpermeating solutes (KCI, PEG 6000) decreased from values close to unity in the rhizodermis to about 0.7 to 0.8 in the cortex. In all cases, however, σs was significantly larger than the reflection coefficient of entire roots (σsr). For KCI and PEG 6000, σsr was 0.53 and 0.64, respectively. The results are discussed in terms of a composite membrane model of the root.

Full text

PDF
305

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fiscus E. L. Determination of hydraulic and osmotic properties of soybean root systems. Plant Physiol. 1977 Jun;59(6):1013–1020. doi: 10.1104/pp.59.6.1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fiscus E. L. The Interaction between Osmotic- and Pressure-induced Water Flow in Plant Roots. Plant Physiol. 1975 May;55(5):917–922. doi: 10.1104/pp.55.5.917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frensch J., Steudle E. Axial and Radial Hydraulic Resistance to Roots of Maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Physiol. 1989 Oct;91(2):719–726. doi: 10.1104/pp.91.2.719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hanson P. J., Sucoff E. I., Markhart A. H. Quantifying Apoplastic Flux through Red Pine Root Systems Using Trisodium, 3-hydroxy-5,8,10-pyrenetrisulfonate. Plant Physiol. 1985 Jan;77(1):21–24. doi: 10.1104/pp.77.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hüsken D., Steudle E., Zimmermann U. Pressure probe technique for measuring water relations of cells in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 1978 Feb;61(2):158–163. doi: 10.1104/pp.61.2.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Miller D. M. Studies of Root Function in Zea mays: III. Xylem Sap Composition at Maximum Root Pressure Provides Evidence of Active Transport into the Xylem and a Measurement of the Reflection Coefficient of the Root. Plant Physiol. 1985 Jan;77(1):162–167. doi: 10.1104/pp.77.1.162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Newman E. I. Interaction between Osmotic- and Pressure-induced Water Flow in Plant Roots. Plant Physiol. 1976 May;57(5):738–739. doi: 10.1104/pp.57.5.738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Radin J. W., Matthews M. A. Water transport properties of cortical cells in roots of nitrogen- and phosphorus-deficient cotton seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1989 Jan;89(1):264–268. doi: 10.1104/pp.89.1.264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Steudle E., Oren R., Schulze E. D. Water transport in maize roots : measurement of hydraulic conductivity, solute permeability, and of reflection coefficients of excised roots using the root pressure probe. Plant Physiol. 1987 Aug;84(4):1220–1232. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.4.1220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Steudle E. Water-relation Parameters of Individual Mesophyll Cells of the Crassulacean Acid Metabolism Plant Kalanchoë daigremontiana. Plant Physiol. 1980 Dec;66(6):1155–1163. doi: 10.1104/pp.66.6.1155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Westgate M. E., Steudle E. Water transport in the midrib tissue of maize leaves : direct measurement of the propagation of changes in cell turgor across a plant tissue. Plant Physiol. 1985 May;78(1):183–191. doi: 10.1104/pp.78.1.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES