Abstract
Conventional imaging systems can only capture light intensity. Meanwhile, the lost phase information may be critical for a variety of applications such as label-free microscopy and optical metrology. Existing phase retrieval techniques typically require a bulky setup, multiframe measurements, or prior information of the target scene. Here, we proposed an extremely compact system for complex amplitude imaging, leveraging the extreme versatility of a single-layer metalens to generate spatially multiplexed and polarization phase–shifted point spread functions. Combining the metalens with a polarization camera, the system can simultaneously record four polarization shearing interference patterns along both in-plane directions, thus allowing the deterministic reconstruction of the complex amplitude light field in a single shot. Using an incoherent light-emitting diode as the illumination, we experimentally demonstrated speckle-noise–free complex amplitude imaging for both static and moving objects with tailored magnification ratio and field of view. The miniaturized and robust system may open the door for complex amplitude imaging in portable devices for point-of-care applications.
A metalens-integrated compact imaging system can deterministically capture the complex amplitude light field in a single shot.
INTRODUCTION
Light wave contains both amplitude and phase information. However, because of its high oscillation frequency, approximately 1014 Hz (1), the phase of light cannot be directly detected by human eyes or photodetectors. Nonetheless, the simultaneous recording of the complex amplitude light field can provide comprehensive information towards various applications such as label-free microscopy in biomedicine (2, 3), optical metrology (4, 5), and adaptive optics (6).
To visualize phase information, Zernike (7) first proposed the phase contrast technique in 1934. Together with the later developed differential interference contrast (8) technique, they have been widely adopted in the observation of cells while avoiding issues in fluorescence microscopy such as photobleaching and phototoxicity. Recently, there has also been a rapid development in quantitative phase imaging (QPI) techniques, which further allows the quantitative determination of morphological parameters, such as the thickness and refractive index, of the sample under test. One prevalent QPI technique is based on phase-shifting interferometry (9, 10) or off-axis digital holography (11, 12), in which the phase distribution can be retrieved from the interference pattern. However, despite their high accuracy and spatial resolution, these techniques remain prone to issues such as laser speckle noise and susceptibility to vibrations. Recent advancements based on Fourier ptychography (13, 14), transport-of-intensity equation (TIE) (15), and lensless imaging (16–18) have made notable strides in addressing these limitations. Nonetheless, the phase reconstruction accuracy and speed of these improved techniques are often dependent on the number of measurement frames and may require specific sample priors. It remains a major challenge to construct a miniaturized system for the deterministic reconstruction of the complex amplitude light field in a single shot.
One potential strategy to address the abovementioned issue is to leverage the recent development in nanophotonics. Optical metasurface is an emerging class of diffractive optical elements consisting of nanoscale scatterers. Compared to conventional refractive or diffractive optical elements, it can be manufactured by a single-step lithography process and is extremely versatile in manipulating the vectorial light field (19–28). Recently, metasurfaces (29–36) and thin-film optical devices (37–39) with nonlocal (angle-dependent) responses have been investigated for phase visualization and QPI. Most related to this study, a delicately aligned bilayer metasurface has been implemented to construct a quantitative phase gradient microscope (40), which can capture the one-dimensional (1D) phase gradient of the target object in a single shot. A single-layer metasurface has also been combined with a 4-f imaging system to capture the 1D phase gradient based on polarization phase shift (41, 42). However, although the combination of iterative algorithms (43) and prior information of the target object can be used to reconstruct a 2D phase image from a 1D phase gradient, the reconstruction is nondeterministic, with limited reconstruction fidelity and speed. There is still room to further reduce the overall volume of the imaging system.
In this study, we proposed and experimentally demonstrated an extremely compact imaging system using a single-layer metalens that allows the single-shot deterministic reconstruction of complex amplitude light field information. By judiciously designing the metalens with spatial- and polarization-multiplexed point spread functions (PSFs), the left- and right-handed circularly polarized (LCP and RCP) light shearing interference patterns can be recorded with a commercially available polarization camera. With a single measurement, four shearing interference patterns, each with a unique phase shift, were captured to generate phase gradient images along both orthogonal in-plane directions, with the verified smallest measurable phase gradient of 42 mrad/μm. Subsequently, the 2D phase gradient image can be used to deterministically reconstruct a 2D complex amplitude image with a relative phase accuracy of 0.0021λ. Compared to conventional QPI techniques, our system is also immune to laser speckle noise with a light-emitting diode (LED) as the illumination source. We experimentally showcased that the system can be used for surface metrology and for dynamic complex amplitude imaging of living cells.
RESULTS
The working principle of the metalens-assisted complex amplitude imaging system is schematically illustrated in Fig. 1A. The system was inspired by the polarization phase-shifting shearing technique but has a greatly simplified form factor compared to conventional systems (44, 45). Using a single-layer metalens, a pair of shearing interference images of the target object, one along the x axis, and another along the y axis, can be simultaneously recorded on a polarization camera via spatial multiplexing. Each shearing interference pattern consists of LCP and RCP images with a shearing distance ∆s along the x and y directions, respectively.
The x and y shearing interference patterns are projected to the four polarization detection channels along 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135°, respectively, using the polarization camera (Fig. 1B). For each polarization channel, the recorded intensity of the shearing interference pattern can be calculated as (for more details, see text S1)
(1) |
where ILCP and IRCP are the light intensity of the LCP and RCP images, respectively. m = 1, 2, 3, 4 corresponds to the polarization detection angle of 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135°, respectively. Subsequently, based on the four-step phase-shifting method, the phase gradients along the x and y direction ∇x/yφ (Fig. 1C) can be deterministically calculated as
(2) |
Last, the 2D intensity image I(x, y) can be extracted from the sum of the light intensities of two arbitrary orthogonal linear polarizations, while the 2D phase image φ(x, y) can be reconstructed from the phase gradients using the higher-order finite difference–based least squares integration method (46) (as shown in Fig. 1D; for more details, see text S2). Note that the imaging system needs to be calibrated in prior with a collimated beam to eliminate the additional phase gradients caused by the nonplanar wavefront of the incident beam and by possible system alignment errors (for more details, see text S3). The system can use an LED as the illumination source to avoid laser speckle noise as long as the spatial coherence length is greater than the shearing distance ∆s (47). To avoid the random polarization phase difference between LCP and RCP light, the LED illumination is set to be linearly polarized and the direction of polarization can be arbitrary (for more details, see text S1).
The schematic of the spatial- and polarization-multiplexed metalens that shears and focuses orthogonally circularly polarized light is shown in Fig. 2A. With a plane wave incidence, the distance between the x and y shearing interference images is d'. With the target object placed at a finite distance, the actual image splitting distance d can be tailored by varying the magnification ratio M of the imaging system as d = (1 + M) d' and ∆s = (1 + 1/M) ∆s', where ∆s' is the shearing distance with a plane wave incidence (for more details, see text S4). For the phase reconstruction, the spatial sampling interval is directly proportional to ∆s and should ideally be minimized. Nonetheless, ∆s should be larger than twice the macro pixel size of the polarization camera according to the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem (48).
For the metalens shown in Fig. 2, it has a diameter D = 2 mm and focal length f = 1.5 cm, resulting in a numerical aperture (NA) of 0.066. With collimated light illumination, the field of view (FOV) of the imaging system is identical to the aperture size of the metalens. The FOV can be further expanded with an increased lens diameter. For an object distance do = 2.5 cm and image distance di = 3.75 cm, the corresponding M = 1.5, and the shearing distance ∆s = 25 μm. To avoid the overlap between the shearing interference images with the zero-order diffraction, the splitting distance d' is set as 2 mm (for more details, see text S5).
To generate such a shearing interference PSF at an operating wavelength of 800 nm, we designed a single-layer metalens consisting of an array of rectangularly shaped silicon nanopillars with varying geometry on a sapphire substrate, as shown in Fig. 2B. By combining the propagation phase of the rectangular nanopillars with the geometric phase generated through rotation, we can independently modulate the transmission phase of the LCP and RCP incident light over a full 2π range while maintaining near-unity transmittance. The phase profiles of the metalens for LCP and RCP incident light, which incorporates both focusing and polarization splitting terms, are depicted in Fig. 2C (for more details of the designed phase profiles, see text S6). The designed metalens was fabricated using a standard electron-beam lithography and reactive-ion etching process (see Materials and Methods). The optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy images of the fabricated metalens are shown in Fig. 2, D and E, respectively. The measured PSFs for LCP and RCP incident are in close agreement with the simulation (inset of Fig. 2A). The metalens was measured to have a diffraction efficiency of 26.47% (for more details, see text S7 and Materials and Methods).
The fabricated single-layer metalens was subsequently integrated with a polarization camera for complex amplitude imaging (see Materials and Methods), with an extremely small optical path volume of 0.85 by 0.71 by 6.25 cm3, defined as the size of the photosensor × (do + di), as shown in Fig. 3A. Compared to conventional interference-based systems, the proposed system may be much less susceptible to environmental disturbance, such as mechanical shocks, air turbulence, and temperature fluctuations.
To experimentally validate the performance of the compact complex amplitude imaging system, we first measured the surface morphology of transparent drop-casted ultraviolet (UV) adhesives. The x and y shearing interferometric images in the four polarization channels were directly captured by the polarization camera, as shown in Fig. 3 (B and C). Subsequently, the phase gradients along both the x and y directions (Fig. 3, D and E) and the 2D phase profile φ(x, y) can be reconstructed. The resulting height distribution z(x, y) of the UV adhesive sample is illustrated in Fig. 3F, which is derived as
(3) |
where λ = 800 nm is the incident wavelength and Δn is the refractive index difference between the UV adhesive sample and air. Note that the system is also suitable for measuring samples with circular dichroism (49) and with weak circular birefringence (50) (for more details, see text S8).
To benchmark the system performance, we also measured the surface morphology of the identical UV adhesive sample using a commercial white light interferometer (WLI) (Nexview, Zygo), with the height distribution and residual shown in Fig. 3 (G and H, respectively). The relative average deviation (RAD) for the entire measurement area, defined as , is 3.79%, where N is the number of spatial sampling points, and is the average height measured by our system and by the WLI. While it took the WLI 15 s to measure the height distribution of the 1.2 mm–by–1.2 mm sample, it only took 10 ms for our system. Furthermore, we found the metalens-assisted imaging system could also be used to characterize the phase distribution of other phase objects, such as a metasurface carrying orbital angular momentum (for more details, see text S9).
The metalens can also be integrated with a standard microscope as a quick-release module for the observation of microscopic objects (see Materials and Methods), as shown in Fig. 4A. For microscopy applications, we designed a different metalens with a focal length of 2.5 mm, resulting in an NA of 0.37, corresponding to a theoretical diffraction limit of 1.31 μm. With do set as 3.9 mm, the corresponding M = 1.75 and ∆s = 1.57 μm. After the secondary magnification using a 20× objective lens, the total system magnification ratio is 35. The spatial resolution of the imaging system is limited by the diffraction limit and the shearing distance.
To quantitatively characterize the phase reconstruction performance of the proposed microscopy system, we measured the phase distribution of a commercially available 1951 U.S. Air Force phase resolution target (Quantitative Phase Microscopy Target, Benchmark Technologies). As shown in Fig. 4B, the four polarization shearing interference patterns of the 361-nm-thick resolution target (group 6, element 1) were captured in a single shot, allowing the subsequent determination of the phase gradients (Fig. 4C) and target thickness (Fig. 4D). Such a process was repeated for seven phase resolution targets with different thicknesses (for more details, see text S10). The measured thickness, averaged over the gray area as depicted in Fig. 4D, closely matches the results obtained by a WLI, as shown in Fig. 4E. The verified smallest detectable phase gradient is 42 mrad/μm, corresponding to a phase resolution target at a height of 57 nm (for more details, see text S10). In addition, the measured average spatial and temporal noise levels are 25.93 and 2.88 mrad/μm, respectively. With the phase reconstruction algorithm filtering the high-frequency spatial noise (46), the system has a high relative phase accuracy of 0.0021λ, defined as the root mean square error of the reconstructed reference plane wave (for more details, see text S11) (51). The maximum detectable phase gradient ∇φmax of the microscopy system is determined by the NA of the metalens and the shearing distance. In the current implementation, ∇φmax = 2π/λ · NA = 1.45 rad/μm.
The complex amplitude microscopy system’s spatial resolution for intensity and phase imaging was experimentally measured to be 4.38 and 5.52 μm, respectively (for more details, see text S12), which is mainly limited by the sheared PSF and the diffraction limit. To further improve the spatial resolution of the imaging system, one could design a metalens with a higher NA or use advanced algorithms to further optimize the metalens topology (52). In the microscopy system, the FOV is 85 μm by 85 μm, mainly limited by the size of the photosensor, the spatial multiplexing scheme, and the overlap between the zero-order diffraction and the shearing interference patterns. The FOV limitation caused by spatial multiplexing may be partially addressed by radial shearing interferometry, despite that such a scheme may result in uncertainty for the reconstruction of phase objects of particular topology (53). The cross-talk between the zero-order diffraction and shearing interference patterns was avoided by off-axis imaging (for more details, see text S5).
The complex amplitude imaging microscope can be used for the label-free observation of living cells. As an example, we imaged living cancer cell MDA-MB-468, as shown in Fig. 5A, with the reconstructed phase gradients and complex amplitude image shown in Fig. 5 (B to D, respectively). Because the complex amplitude image can be obtained in a single shot, the system is particularly suitable for observing the dynamic evolution of living cells and other transparent materials. Here, we also measured complex amplitude images of moving paramecium, with the video recorded at a frame rate of 10 Hz, as illustrated in Fig. 5 (F and G) and movie S1. In addition, we recorded the change in the surface morphology of an uncured UV adhesive sample subjected to an air cluster at a video frame rate of 50 Hz (movie S2). The frame rate is limited only by the frame acquisition time of the polarization camera. Each frame, with a resolution of up to 281 × 281 pixels, can be reconstructed from raw measurements in approximately 0.41 s using a computer equipped with an AMD Ryzen 7 3700X central processing unit and 32-gigabyte random-access memory.
DISCUSSION
In conclusion, this work combined the unmatched spatial- and polarization-multiplexing capability of a single-layer metalens with a commercially available polarization camera to allow deterministic reconstruction of complex amplitude light field in a single shot. The metalens can be designed as a stand-alone lens or to be coupled with a microscope system for a variety of imaging tasks. The system’s minimum form factor and high robustness make it highly suitable for space-constrained imaging scenarios such as in endoscopes (18, 54) and for portable point-of-care diagnostics of fast-moving targets (55). We also envision that the proposed system’s capability to simultaneously record the complex amplitude light field information may pave the way for the construction of aberration-corrected 3D cameras (56). Last, by combining multiple compact complex amplitude imaging systems, one may build a long-sought, robust synthetic aperture lens at optical frequencies, similar to a synthetic aperture radar, for single-shot far-field super-resolution imaging (57).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Metalens fabrication
The metalens was fabricated by a commercial service (Tianjin H-chip Technology Group). Fabrication began with a silicon-on-sapphire substrate, with a monocrystalline silicon film thickness of 600 nm. Electron-beam lithography (JEOL, JBX-6300FS) was used to inscribe the metasurface pattern using a negative tone resist hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ). The pattern was then transferred to the silicon layer via reactive-ion etching, with HSQ directly serving as the mask. Last, the HSQ resist was removed using buffered oxide etchant.
PSF and diffraction efficiency measurement
To measure the PSF of the fabricated metalens, we constructed a setup as shown in fig. S7. The illumination source consists of collimated light from a supercontinuum laser (YSL SC-PRO-7) and a bandpass filter (Thorlabs, FB800-10) with a central wavelength of 800 nm and a bandwidth of 10 nm.
To estimate the diffraction efficiency of the metalens, the collimated laser beam was filtered by a linear polarizer (Thorlabs, LPNIR100-MP2). An optical power meter (Thorlabs, PM122D) with a pinhole of 2 mm in diameter, equal to the metasurface diameter, was first placed in front of the metasurface to measure the power of the incident light Pinc. In the next step, to measure the power of the focused light Pf, a pinhole of 200 μm in diameter was placed in front of the power meter. The position of the power meter was spatially scanned and maximized near the designed focal point of the metasurface. The diffraction efficiency of the metalens was estimated as η = Pf/Pinc.
Complex amplitude imaging setup
For the compact complex amplitude imaging system, the illumination source consists of a collimated LED, a narrowband filter with a center wavelength λ of 800 nm, a bandwidth of 10 nm, and a linear polarizer. For shearing interferometry, it is required that the spatial coherence length ds of the light source is greater than the shearing distance ∆s. The spatial coherence length ds is calculated as ds = 1.22λL/R = 325.33 μm, where L = 10 cm is the focal length of the collimated lens and R = 300 μm is the radius of the LED source. The spatial coherence length can be adjusted by placing a circular pinhole with different radius in front of the LED source. The complex amplitude light field was captured by a commercial polarization camera (MV-CH050-10UP, Hikvision) through the metalens. The polarization camera is equipped with a polarization-sensitive complementary metal-oxide semiconductor sensor (IMX250LQR, SONY). Each subpixel of the sensor has a size of 3.45 μm, with 2 by 2 subpixels forming a macro pixel for polarization detection along 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135°, respectively.
For the complex amplitude microscopy system, the collimated illumination source was generated via Köhler illumination. The light field at the image plane of the metalens was further magnified by a standard optical microscope consisting of an objective lens (20×; Mitutoyo, MPLNAPO20XVIR) and a tube lens with a focal length of 20 cm.
Cell preparation
Cancer cells MDA-MB-468 (Procell Life Science & Technology, China) were used in experiments. MDA-MB-468 cells were cultured using an incubator (Forma 381, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) at 37°C in 5% CO2 and passaged three times a week with high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Life Technologies, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Life Technologies, USA). After completing one cell passage, the cells were placed in the incubator and cultured for 1 day to obtain the sample of adherent cells for conducting the experiments.
Acknowledgments
Y.Y. acknowledges C. Zuo at Nanjing University of Science and Technology for helpful discussion.
Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (62135008 and 61975251), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023 M731911), and the Guoqiang Institute, Tsinghua University.
Author contributions: Conceptualization: L.L., S.Wa., and Y.Y. Methodology: L.L., S.Wa., and Y.Z. Investigation: L.L., S.Wa., Y.Z., and Y.Y. Visualization: L.L., S.Wa., and Y.Y. Writing—original draft: L.L., S.Wa., and Y.Y. Supervision: Y.Y. Writing—review and editing: L.L., S.Wa., F.Z., Y.Z., S.We., H.C., Y.G., W.W., L.C., and Y.Y.
Competing interests: Y.Y., L.L., and S.Wa. are inventors on a pending China patent related to this work filed by Tsinghua University (no. 202311398503.4, filed 26 October 2023). The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials.
Supplementary Materials
This PDF file includes:
Other Supplementary Material for this manuscript includes the following:
REFERENCES AND NOTES
- 1.M. Born, E. Wolf, Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light (Cambridge Univ. Press, ed. 7, 2013). [Google Scholar]
- 2.G. Popescu, Quantitative Phase Imaging of Cells and Tissues (McGraw-Hill Education, ed. 1, 2011). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Park Y., Depeursinge C., Popescu G., Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine. Nat. Photonics 12, 578–589 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zuo C., Qian J., Feng S., Yin W., Li Y., Fan P., Han J., Qian K., Chen Q., Deep learning in optical metrology: A review. Light Sci. Appl. 11, 39 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gao Y., Cao L., Iterative projection meets sparsity regularization: Towards practical single-shot quantitative phase imaging with in-line holography. Light Adv. Manuf. 4, 6 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Guyon O., Limits of adaptive optics for high-contrast imaging. Astrophysical J. 629, 592–614 (2005). [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zernike F., How I discovered phase contrast. Science 121, 345–349 (1955). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.W. Lang, Nomarski Differential Interference-Contrast Microscopy (Carl Zeiss Oberkochen, 1982). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Creath K., Phase measurement interferometry techniques. Prog. Opt. 26, 348–393 (1988). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Flores Munoz V. H., Arellano N. I., Serrano Garcia D. I., Martinez Garcia A., Rodriguez Zurita G., Garcia Lechuga L., Measurement of mean thickness of transparent samples using simultaneous phase shifting interferometry with four interferograms. Appl. Optics 55, 4047–4051 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Marquet P., Rappaz B., Magistretti P. J., Cuche E., Emery Y., Colomb T., Depeursinge C. D., Digital holographic microscopy: a noninvasive contrast imaging technique allowing quantitative visualization of living cells with subwavelength axial accuracy. Opt. Lett. 305, 468–470 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Luo Z., Ma J., Su P., Cao L., Digital holographic phase imaging based on phase iteratively enhanced compressive sensing. Opt. Lett. 44, 1395–1398 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zheng G., Horstmeyer R., Yang C., Wide-field, high-resolution Fourier ptychographic microscopy. Nat. Photonics 7, 739–745 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sun J., Chen Q., Zhang J., Fan Y., Zuo C., Single-shot quantitative phase microscopy based on color-multiplexed Fourier ptychography. Opt. Lett. 43, 3365–3368 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zuo C., Li J., Sun J., Fan Y., Zhang J., Lu L., Zhang R., Wang B., Huang L., Chen Q., Transport of intensity equation: A tutorial. Opt. Lasers Eng. 135, 106187 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Greenbaum A., Luo W., Su T. W., Gorocs Z., Xue L., Isikman S. O., Coskun A. F., Mudanyali O., Ozcan A., Imaging without lenses: achievements and remaining challenges of wide-field on-chip microscopy. Nat. Methods 9, 889–895 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zuo C., Sun J., Zhang J., Hu Y., Chen Q., Lensless phase microscopy and diffraction tomography with multi-angle and multi-wavelength illuminations using a LED matrix. Opt. Express 23, 14314–14328 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sun J., Wu J., Wu S., Goswami R., Girardo S., Cao L., Guck J., Koukourakis N., Czarske J. W., Quantitative phase imaging through an ultra-thin lensless fiber endoscope. Light Sci. Appl. 11, 204 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yang Y., Wang W., Moitra P., Kravchenko I. I., Briggs D. P., Valentine J., Dielectric meta-reflectarray for broadband linear polarization conversion and optical vortex generation. Nano Lett. 14, 1394–1399 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Khorasaninejad M., Chen W. T., Devlin R. C., Oh J., Zhu A. Y., Capasso F., Metalenses at visible wavelengths: Diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging. Science 352, 1190–1194 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chen W. T., Zhu A. Y., Sanjeev V., Khorasaninejad M., Shi Z., Lee E., Capasso F., A broadband achromatic metalens for focusing and imaging in the visible. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 220–226 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhou Y., Zheng H., Kravchenko I. I., Valentine J., Flat optics for image differentiation. Nat. Photonics 14, 316–323 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu M., Zhu W., Huo P., Feng L., Song M., Zhang C., Chen L., Lezec H. J., Lu Y., Agrawal A., Xu T., Multifunctional metasurfaces enabled by simultaneous and independent control of phase and amplitude for orthogonal polarization states. Light Sci. Appl. 10, 107 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pan M., Fu Y., Zheng M., Chen H., Zang Y., Duan H., Li Q., Qiu M., Hu Y., Dielectric metalens for miniaturized imaging systems: Progress and challenges. Light Sci. Appl. 11, 195 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang X., Huang L., Zhao R., Zhou H., Li X., Geng G., Li J., Li X., Wang Y., Zhang S., Basis function approach for diffractive pattern generation with Dammann vortex metasurfaces. Sci. Adv. 8, eabp8073 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ni Y., Chen C., Wen S., Xue X., Sun L., Yang Y., Computational spectropolarimetry with a tunable liquid crystal metasurface. eLight 2, 23 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shen Z., Zhao F., Jin C., Wang S., Cao L., Yang Y., Monocular metasurface camera for passive single-shot 4D imaging. Nat. Commun. 14, 1035 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang S., Wen S., Deng Z. L., Li X., Yang Y., Metasurface-Based solid Poincaré sphere polarizer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 123801 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kwon H., Arbabi E., Kamali S. M., Faraji-Dana M., Faraon A., Computational complex optical field imaging using a designed metasurface diffuser. Optica 5, 924 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huo P., Zhang C., Zhu W., Liu M., Zhang S., Zhang S., Chen L., Lezec H. J., Agrawal A., Lu Y., Xu T., Photonic spin-multiplexing metasurface for switchable spiral phase contrast imaging. Nano Lett. 20, 2791–2798 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Engay E., Huo D., Malureanu R., Bunea A. I., Lavrinenko A., Polarization-dependent all-dielectric metasurface for single-shot quantitative phase imaging. Nano Lett. 21, 3820–3826 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yi S., Xiang J., Zhou M., Wu Z., Yang L., Yu Z., Angle-based wavefront sensing enabled by the near fields of flat optics. Nat. Commun. 12, 6002 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ji A., Song J.-H., Li Q., Xu F., Tsai C.-T., Tiberio R. C., Cui B., Lalanne P., Kik P. G., Miller D. A. B., Brongersma M. L., Quantitative phase contrast imaging with a nonlocal angle-selective metasurface. Nat. Commun. 13, 7848 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wang X., Wang H., Wang J., Liu X., Hao H., Tan Y. S., Zhang Y., Zhang H., Ding X., Zhao W., Wang Y., Lu Z., Liu J., Yang J. K. W., Tan J., Li H., Qiu C. W., Hu G., Ding X., Single-shot isotropic differential interference contrast microscopy. Nat. Commun. 14, 2063 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang Y., Lin P., Huo P., Liu M., Ren Y., Zhang S., Zhou Q., Wang Y., Lu Y. Q., Xu T., Dielectric metasurface for synchronously spiral phase contrast and bright-field imaging. Nano Lett. 23, 2991–2997 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liu J., Wang H., Li Y., Tian L., Paiella R., Asymmetric metasurface photodetectors for single-shot quantitative phase imaging. Nanophotonics 12, 3519–3528 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhu T., Huang J., Ruan Z., Optical phase mining by adjustable spatial differentiator. Adv. Photonics 2, 016001 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wesemann L., Rickett J., Song J., Lou J., Hinde E., Davis T. J., Roberts A., Nanophotonics enhanced coverslip for phase imaging in biology. Light Sci. Appl. 10, 98 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Li L., Jia W., Jin C., Wang S., Shen Z., Yang Y., Single-Shot Wavefront Sensing with Nonlocal Thin Film Optical Filters. Laser Photonics Rev. 17, 2300426 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kwon H., Arbabi E., Kamali S. M., Faraji-Dana M., Faraon A., Single-shot quantitative phase gradient microscopy using a system of multifunctional metasurfaces. Nat. Photonics 14, 109–114 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhou J., Wu Q., Zhao J., Posner C., Lei M., Chen G., Zhang J., Liu Z., Fourier optical spin splitting microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 020801 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu S., Fan F., Chen S., Wen S., Luo H., Computing liquid-crystal photonics platform enabled wavefront sensing. Laser Photonics Rev. 17, 2300044 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wu Q., Zhou J., Chen X., Zhao J., Lei M., Chen G., Lo Y.-H., Liu Z., Single-shot quantitative amplitude and phase imaging based on a pair of all-dielectric metasurfaces. Optica 10, 619–625 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kothiyal M. P., Delisle C., Shearing interferometer for phase shifting interferometry with polarization phase shifter. Appl. Optics 24, 4439–4442 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Creath K., Goldstein G., Dynamic quantitative phase imaging for biological objects using a pixelated phase mask. Biomed. Opt. Express 3, 2866–2880 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Huang L., Idir M., Zuo C., Kaznatcheev K., Zhou L., Asundi A., Comparison of two-dimensional integration methods for shape reconstruction from gradient data. Opt. Lasers Eng. 64, 1–11 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 47.J. Hardy, A. MacGovern, Shearing interferometry: A flexible technique for wavefront measurement. in Proceedings of the 31st Annual Technical Symposium on Optical and Optoelectronic Applied Sciences and Engineering (SPIE, 1987), pp. 180–195. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Shannon C. E., Communication in the presence of noise. Proc. IRE 37, 10–21 (1949). [Google Scholar]
- 49.He Y., Bo W., Dukor R. K., Nafie L. A., Determination of absolute configuration of chiral molecules using vibrational optical activity: A review. Appl. Spectrosc. 65, 699–723 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.D. Glick, Methods of Biochemical Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, 2009). [Google Scholar]
- 51.Liu K., Wang J., Wang H., Li Y., Wavefront reconstruction for multi-lateral shearing interferometry using difference Zernike polynomials fitting. Opt. Lasers Eng. 106, 75–81 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 52.Phan T., Sell D., Wang E. W., Doshay S., Edee K., Yang J., Fan J. A., High-efficiency, large-area, topology-optimized metasurfaces. Light Sci. Appl. 8, 48 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hariharan P., Sen D., Radial shearing interferometer. J. Sci. Instrum. 38, 428–432 (1961). [Google Scholar]
- 54.Pahlevaninezhad H., Khorasaninejad M., Huang Y. W., Shi Z., Hariri L. P., Adams D. C., Ding V., Zhu A., Qiu C. W., Capasso F., Suter M. J., Nano-optic endoscope for high-resolution optical coherence tomography in vivo. Nat. Photonics 12, 540–547 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ziv Y., Burns L. D., Cocker E. D., Hamel E. O., Ghosh K. K., Kitch L. J., El Gamal A., Schnitzer M. J., Long-term dynamics of CA1 hippocampal place codes. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 264–266 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wu J., Guo Y., Deng C., Zhang A., Qiao H., Lu Z., Xie J., Fang L., Dai Q., An integrated imaging sensor for aberration-corrected 3D photography. Nature 612, 62–71 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wang K., Zhu Y. Q., An Q. C., Zhang X. C., Peng C., Meng H. R., Liu X. Y., Even sampling photonic-integrated interferometric array for synthetic aperture imaging. Opt. Express 30, 32119–32128 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.