Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 1998 Dec;180(24):6793.

Impact of Culture-Independent Studies on the Emerging Phylogenetic View of Bacterial Diversity

Philip Hugenholtz 1, Brett M Goebel 1, Norman R Pace 1
PMCID: PMC107794

Volume 180, no. 18, p. 4765–4774, 1998. Page 4767, column 1: Table 1 should appear as shown below.

TABLE 1.

 Summary of 16S rRNA-based clonal analyses of diversity of uncultivated bacteriaa

Habitat type No. of studies Bacterial divisionsb
No. of sequencesc Proteobacteriad
Cytophagales Actinobacteria Low-G+C gram positivese Acidobacterium Verrucomicrobia Spirochetes Nitrospira GNS OP11 Plantomycetes Green sulfur TM7 TM6 Thermus/Deinococcus Cyanobacteriac Synergistes OP8 Termite group I OS-K Chlamydia OP3 OP10 WS1 OP5 Marine group A Fibrobacter Flexistipes Dictyoglomus Thermotogales Thermodesulfobacterium Aquificales
αc β γ δd ɛe
Geothermal 10 212
Soil 16 743
Marine 23 687
Freshwater 4 107
Wastewater 5 430
Pollutant associated 7 202
Acid metal leaching 2 2
Subsurface 6 229
Symbionts and commensals 10 280
Disease associated 3 7
 Totals 86 2,918
a

An expanded version of this table detailing individual studies is available at http://crab2.berkeley.edu/∼pacelab/176.htm

b

Incidence of division-level representatives in studies of particular habitat types ranked from most represented to least represented divisions: >75% (•), 25 to 75% (○) or <25% (√) of studies have representatives of division. No symbol indicates division not detected. 

c

Excluding organelles. 

d

Proteobacteria are presented at the subdivision level due to the extensive sequence representation of this division. 

e

Cannot establish as a monophyletic gorup in all analyses. 


Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES