Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Jan 10;19(1):e0296938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296938

Factors associated with an increased risk of developing pneumonia during acute ischemic stroke hospitalization

Pornpong Jitpratoom 1, Adhiratha Boonyasiri 2,*
Editor: Jean Baptiste Lascarrou3
PMCID: PMC10781189  PMID: 38198494

Abstract

Stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) is a common complication of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This single-center retrospective observational study aimed to identify factors associated with SAP and predictors of poor outcomes in hospitalized patients with AIS. The study included patients admitted to Chumphon Khet Udomsakdi Hospital in Thailand within 7 days of the onset of AIS between July 2019 and July 2020. The patients were divided according to whether they were diagnosed with SAP during hospitalization into a pneumonia group and a non-pneumonia (control) group. Factors associated with SAP were identified. After 3 months, the patients with AIS were divided into those with a poor outcome (modified Rankin scale [mRS] score ≥4) and those with a non-poor outcome (mRS score <4). Factors associated with a poor outcome were sought. During the study period, 342 patients (mean age 65 years, 61% men) were admitted with AIS, of whom 54 (15.8%) developed SAP. Multivariate analysis identified a failed water-swallowing test (WST; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 87.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 21.00–364.51, p<0.001), endotracheal intubation with invasive mechanical ventilation (aOR 12.38, 95% CI 2.44–101.35, p = 0.001), and a retained Foley catheter (aOR 5.67, 95% CI 2.03–15.83, p = 0.001) to be associated with SAP. Of the 342 patients, 112 (32.7%) had a poor outcome at 3 months, predictors of which included having hypertension as a comorbidity (aOR 2.87, 95% CI 1.18–6.98, p = 0.020), a pre-stroke mRS score ≥2 (aOR 4.53, 95% CI 1.50–12.72, p = 0.007), an initial Barthel Index score <40 (aOR 3.35, 95% CI 1.57–7.16, p = 0.002), a failed WST (aOR 5.04, 95% CI 2.00–12.74, p = 0.001), and brain edema (aOR 20.67, 95% CI 2.10–203.26, p = 0.009). This study emphasized the association of SAP with a failed WST, endotracheal intubation with invasive mechanical ventilation, and a retained Foley catheter but also identified hypertension, a pre-stroke mRS score ≥2, an initial BI score <40, a failed WST, and brain edema as predictors of a poor outcome for patients 3 months after AIS.

Introduction

Stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) is a common infectious complication of stroke and has variously been reported to occur in 1.2%–22% of patients admitted to hospital with acute stroke [1]. SAP typically has a poor clinical outcome, including an increased risk of mortality and long-term disability [2,3]. Several factors increase the risk of respiratory tract infection in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). These may be a direct consequence of the brain injury caused by the stroke; for example, dysphagia, an impaired cough reflex, and immobility all increase the risk of aspiration [1]. Accumulating evidence also suggests that brain-induced immunosuppression increases the risk of systemic infections in stroke patients via the central nervous system-mediated impairment of immune competence [46]. However, these infections could also be an indirect consequence of factors associated with the stroke but not caused by it, such as advanced age and comorbidity [1]. Although data on SAP are limited [7] and not entirely consistent, predictors appear to include severe hypertension, older age (>65 years), pre-stroke disability, speech impairment, dysphagia, tube feeding, tracheal intubation, and comorbidity (in particular, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, and diabetes) [1,46,811]. This study aimed to identify associated factors for SAP in patients with AIS during hospitalization and predictors of poor outcomes in patients with AIS 3 months after diagnosis.

Materials and methods

This retrospective observational study was performed at Chumphon Khet Udomsakdi Hospital, a 509-bed regional teaching hospital that provides clinical services in Chumphon Province, Thailand. The data were accessed for research purposes on 1st October 2020. Patients aged 18 years or older who were admitted with a diagnosis of AIS within 7 days of symptom onset between July 2019 and July 2020 were screened for eligibility for inclusion in the study. However, due to the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in Thailand that began in March 2020, every patient prior to admission and inpatients with fever or respiratory symptoms had been screened. If their test results were positive, they were not included. Patients for whom clinical and laboratory data, chest radiographs, brain images, and 3-month outcome data were incomplete were also excluded. Pneumonia was diagnosed based on the presence of at least three of the five following acute lower respiratory tract symptoms and signs: fever (temperature ≥37.8°C), cough, dyspnea (respiratory rate >25 breaths/minute), breathing-related (pleuritic) chest pain, and signs of consolidation or crackles combined with a chest radiograph showing evidence of new infiltration [1217]. Eligible patients were then divided according to whether or not they developed pneumonia within 7 days of AIS onset during hospitalization and classified based on their meeting the SAP criteria of the Pneumonia in Stroke Consensus Group [18] into a pneumonia group and a non-pneumonia (control) group. Pneumonia that developed 48 hours or more after admission to the hospital was classified as hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) [19,20], and pneumonia that was present before 48 hours was classified as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Patients who developed pneumonia after endotracheal intubation for more than 48 hours were defined as having ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) [2123]. Pneumonia that developed sequentially after macroaspiration within 3 days was diagnosed as aspiration pneumonia [24].

Baseline information was collected on demographics and clinical characteristics, including age, sex, and comorbidities. The following AIS data on admission were also recorded: presenting symptoms; results of initial laboratory investigations; Glasgow Coma Scale score (used for the objective determination of the extent of impaired consciousness, ranging from 3 [coma] to 15 [normal]) [25,26]; National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (used for the objective quantification of stroke severity, ranging from 0 [normal] to 42 [coma with quadriplegia]) [27,28]; Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification [29]; modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (representing degree of disability because of stroke and ranging from 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) [30]; and the Barthel Index (BI) score (used to measure performance in activities of daily living, ranging from 0 [totally dependent] to 100 [normal]) [31]. The 3-month outcome was assessed using the mRS and BI scores, whose use for this purpose is supported by substantial evidence [30,31].

Information on pneumonia was collected, including signs and symptoms, chest radiographs, pathogens, antibiotic sensitivity, and antibacterial treatment. The CURB-65 score and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria for identifying sepsis were also explored. The CURB-65 score is a pneumonia severity score that comprises five variables, with one point assigned for each of the following: new-onset confusion; urea >19 mg/dL. respiratory rate ≥30/min, systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≤60 mmHg, and age ≥65 years [32]. This score has been extensively validated as a predictor of 30-day mortality in patients with pneumonia [33]. The SIRS criteria require at least two of the following: tachycardia (heart rate >90 beats/min); tachypnea (respiratory rate >20 breaths/min); fever or hypothermia (temperature >38°C or <36°C); and leukocytosis, leukopenia, or bandemia (white blood cells >12,000/mm3 or <4,000/mm3, or band count >10%) [34]. Invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, endotracheal intubation, nasogastric tube placement, Foley catheter status, and water-swallowing test (WST) results were also reviewed.

The data were compared between the pneumonia group and the control group to identify factors associated with pneumonia. The impact of pneumonia on the results of treatment, including post-stroke complications, length of stay, status at discharge, and 3-month mRS and BI scores, was also investigated. For stroke complications, progressive stroke was defined as the gradual worsening of neurological function (NIHSS score increase ≥4) during the 72 hours after stroke onset from an ongoing ischemic process [3540]; brain edema was diagnosed when the patient had a new neurological deficit from brain swelling that was seen in a brain image [41]; and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was defined as any intracranial hemorrhage with neurologic deterioration, as indicated by an NIHSS score of ≥4 points higher than the baseline value [42]. The characteristics of all patients who developed SAP were examined in detail. Finally, determinants of a poor outcome (mRS score ≥4) after 3 months in patients with AIS were sought.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using the PASW Statistics 18.0 package (Predictive Analytics Software, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic variables, including patient age and sex. Quantitative data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range) and qualitative data as the frequency (percentage). Differences in categorical variables (e.g., patient sex) were compared between the pneumonia and control groups using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. Differences in quantitative variables (e.g., patient age) were compared between the two groups using the independent t-test or Mann–Whitney U test. Variables with a p-value <0.05 in univariate analysis were considered for entry in multivariate analysis. Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in the pneumonia and control groups using a backward method with a probability of removal of 0.17. Categorical variables were compared between the patients with AIS according to whether the 3-month outcome was poor (mRS score ≥4) or non-poor (mRS score <4) using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. All factors with a p-value of <0.05 in univariable analysis were considered for inclusion in multivariable analysis using multiple logistic regression (with the backward step method), and their aORs and 95% CIs were calculated to compare the data according to whether or not the outcome was poor.

The study was approved by the human research ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University (Ref: MTU-EC-OO-0-180/63). The requirement for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee owing to the retrospective observational nature of the research. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations, including the Declaration of Helsinki, the Belmont Report, the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences guidelines, and ICH-Good Clinical Practice guidelines.

Results

Demographic data

A total of 342 patients hospitalized for AIS during the study period were enrolled. Their mean age was 65±15 years, and more than half (61%) of the patients were male. According to the TOAST classification, AIS was caused by small-vessel occlusion in 158 patients (46%), followed by large-artery atherosclerosis in 104 (30%), cardioembolism in 66 (19%), other determined etiology in 11 (3%), and undetermined etiology in three (1.0%). The five most common comorbidities were hypertension (72%), dyslipidemia (54%), diabetes mellitus (30%), chronic kidney disease (23%), and atrial fibrillation (18%). Furthermore, 41% of the patients smoked, 36% were obese (body mass index ≥25, calculated as kg/m2), 25% consumed alcohol, and 2% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Factors associated with an increased risk of developing SAP

Pneumonia was diagnosed in 54 patients (15.8%), who were assigned to the pneumonia group. The remaining 288 patients without pneumonia were assigned to the control group. The results of the univariate analysis of factors potentially associated with pneumonia are shown in Table 1 and those of the multivariate analysis in Table 2. Multivariate analysis identified SAP to be associated with a failed WST (aOR 87.48, 95% CI 21.00–364.51, p<0.001), endotracheal intubation with invasive mechanical ventilation (aOR 12.38, 95% CI 2.44–101.35, p = 0.01), and a retained Foley catheter (aOR 5.67, 95% CI 2.03–15.83, p = 0.001).

Table 1. Factors identified to be potentially associated with stroke-associated pneumonia via univariate analysis.

Variable Total (n = 342) Control group
(n = 288)
Pneumonia group (n = 54) p-value*
Sex 0.92
    Male, n (%) 207 (60.5) 174 (60.4) 33 (61.1)
    Female, n (%) 135 (39.5) 114 (39.6) 21 (38.9)
Age, mean ± SD (years) 65±15 64±15 73±14 <0.001
Age ≥70 years, n (%) 141 (41.2) 105 (36.5) 36 (66.7) <0.001
BMI, mean ± SD 24±5 24±5 24±4 0.71
Obesity (BMI ≥25), n (%) 122 (35.7) 102 (35.4) 20 (37.0) 0.82
Lifestyle habits
Alcohol consumption, n (%) 87 (25.4) 80 (27.8) 7 (13.0) 0.022
Smoking, n (%) 140 (40.9) 125 (43.4) 15 (27.8) 0.032
Comorbidities
Hypertension, n (%) 246 (71.9) 207 (71.9) 39 (72.2) 0.96
Diabetes mellitus, n (%) 101 (29.5) 86 (29.9) 15 (27.8) 0.76
Chronic kidney disease, n (%) 79 (23.1) 59 (20.5) 20 (37.0) 0.008
Dyslipidemia, n (%) 185 (54.1) 156 (54.2) 29 (53.7) 0.95
Coronary artery disease, n (%) 42 (12.3) 28 (9.7) 14 (25.9) <0.001
Atrial fibrillation, n (%) 62 (18.1) 42 (14.6) 20 (37.0) <0.001
Previous stroke, n (%) 52 (15.2) 43 (14.9) 9 (16.7) 0.74
BPH (men only), N (%) 9 (2.6) 5 (1.7) 4 (7.4) 0.038
COPD, n (%) 7 (2.0) 6 (2.1) 1 (1.9) 1.00
HIV infection, n (%) 2 (0.6) 2 (0.7) 0 (0.0) 1.00
Presenting symptoms
Alteration of consciousness, n (%) 59 (17.3) 32 (11.1) 27 (50.0) <0.001
Headache, n (%) 25 (7.3) 19 (6.6) 6 (11.1) 0.25
Weakness, n (%) 303 (88.6) 250 (86.8) 53 (98.1) 0.016
Facial palsy, n (%) 91 (26.6) 75 (26.0) 16 (29.6) 0.58
Visual disturbance, n (%) 35 (10.2) 34 (11.8) 1 (1.9) 0.027
Vertigo, n (%) 58 (17.0) 53 (18.4) 5 (9.3) 0.10
Sensory abnormality, n (%) 105 (30.7) 99 (34.4) 6 (11.1) <0.001
Aphasia, n (%) 54 (15.8) 41 (14.2) 13 (24.1) 0.069
Dysarthria, n (%) 216 (63.2) 183 (63.5) 33 (61.1) 0.73
Dysphagia, n (%) 7 (2.0) 3 (1.0) 4 (7.4) 0.014
Ataxia, n (%) 32 (9.4) 30 (10.4) 2 (3.7) 0.12
Initial blood pressure
SBP (mmHg), median (IQR) 159 (140,180) 161 (140,183) 148 (134,164) 0.007
SBP >140 mmHg, n (%) 249 (72.8) 215 (74.7) 34 (63.0) 0.076
DBP (mmHg), median (IQR) 90 (79,100) 90 (80,101) 90 (78,98) 0.34
eGFR (mL/min), median (IQR) 83 (62,95) 84 (65,96) 74 (50,92) 0.026
Scoring system
Pre-stroke mRS score ≥2, n (%) 31 (9.1) 22 (7.6) 9 (16.7) 0.065
Initial mRS score ≥4, n (%) 261 (76.3) 208 (72.2) 53 (98.1) <0.001
Initial BI score <40, n (%) 112 (32.7) 74 (25.7) 38 (70.4) <0.001
Initial GCS score ≤8, n (%) 21 (6.1) 9 (3.1) 12 (22.2) <0.001
Initial NIHSS score ≥15, n (%) 83 (24.3) 49 (17.0) 34 (63.0) <0.001
TOAST classification <0.001
Large-artery atherosclerosis, n (%) 104 (30.4) 79 (27.4) 25 (46.3)
Small-vessel occlusion, n (%) 158 (46.2) 152 (52.8) 6 (11.1)
Cardioembolism, n (%) 66 (19.3) 44 (15.3) 22 (40.7)
Other etiology, n (%) 11 (3.2) 10 (3.5) 1 (1.9)
Undetermined etiology, n (%) 3 (0.9) 3 (1.0) 0 (0.0)
Stroke treatment
Intravenous thrombolysis (rt-PA), n (%) 47 (13.7) 36 (12.5) 11 (20.4) 0.12
Antiplatelets, n (%) 281 (82.2) 249 (86.5) 32 (59.3) <0.001
Anticoagulants, n (%) 52 (15.2) 35 (12.2) 17 (31.5) <0.001
Statins, n (%) 336 (98.2) 286 (99.3) 50 (92.6) 0.007
Device
Nasogastric tube, n (%) 82 (24.0) 32 (11.1) 50 (92.6) <0.001
Failed WST, n (%) 85 (24.9) 34 (11.8) 51 (94.4) <0.001
Endotracheal intubation with invasive mechanical ventilation, n (%) 41 (12.0) 14 (4.9) 27 (50.0) <0.001
Duration of endotracheal intubation (days), median (IQR) n = 41
12 (5,27)
n = 14
14 (6,39)
n = 27
9 (5,24)
0.22
Non-invasive ventilation, n (%) 9 (2.6) 2 (0.7) 7 (13.0) <0.001
Retained Foley catheter, n (%) 88 (25.8) 44 (15.3) 44 (81.5) <0.001
Duration of retained Foley catheter (days), median (IQR) n = 88
6 (3,13)
n = 44
4 (2,10)
n = 44
8 (5,14)
0.005

BMI was calculated as kg/m2

*The control group and pneumonia group were compared using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. BI, Barthel Index; BMI, body mass index; BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IQR, interquartile range; mRS, modified Rankin scale; n, number; N, number of men; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; rt-PA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SD, standard deviation; TOAST, Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; WST, water-swallowing test.

Table 2. Potential predictors of stroke-associated pneumonia in patients with acute ischemic stroke in multivariate analysis.

Variable Adjusted OR (95% CI) p-value*
Demographic
Age 1.04 (0.998–1.088) 0.059
Presenting symptoms
Sensory abnormality 0.24 (0.06–1.09) 0.061
Aphasia 0.31 (0.11–1.03) 0.052
Device
Failed WST 87.48 (21.00–364.51) <0.001
Endotracheal intubation with invasive mechanical ventilation 12.38 (2.44–101.35) 0.001
Retained Foley catheter 5.67 (2.03–15.83) 0.001

The multivariate analysis model was adjusted for age, history of alcohol consumption, smoking, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, weakness, visual disturbance, vertigo, sensory abnormality, aphasia, dysphagia, ataxia, alteration of consciousness, systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg, eGFR, pre-stroke mRS score ≥2, initial mRS score ≥4, initial BI score <40, initial GCS score ≤8, initial NIHSS score ≥15, intravenous thrombolysis (rt-PA), antiplatelets, statins, a failed WST, endotracheal intubation with invasive mechanical ventilation, non-invasive ventilation, and a retained Foley catheter. TOAST classification and patients in whom anticoagulants were used or a nasogastric tube was placed were excluded because of multicollinearity via generalized variance inflation factor criteria >5. The adjusted OR was calculated by logistic regression with a backward method (Wald probability for removal 0.1)

*Control group vs pneumonia group. BI, Barthel index; CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; mRS, modified Rankin scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OR, odds ratio; TOAST, Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; WST, water-swallowing test.

Post-stroke complications, length of stay, discharge status, and 3-month outcomes

The incidence of the following stroke complications was found to be significantly higher during hospitalization in the pneumonia group than in the control group: urinary tract infection, respiratory failure, sepsis, brain edema, asymptomatic hemorrhagic transformation, gastrointestinal bleeding, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, acute kidney injury (AKI), and hyponatremia (Table 3). The median hospital stay duration was significantly longer in the pneumonia group than in the control group (10 days vs 3 days; p<0.001). There was a statistically significant between-group difference in discharge status, in that the proportion of patients who died while in the hospital was higher in the pneumonia group than in the control group (20% vs. 3%; p<0.001). Compared with the control group, a significantly higher proportion of patients in the pneumonia group had a 3-month mRS score ≥4 (unable to walk without assistance, bedridden or deceased, 74% vs. 25%, p<0.001) and a 3-month BI score <40 (completely dependent on others; 67% vs. 17%, p<0.001). However, our multivariate analysis did not reveal an independent association between SAP status and a poor 3-month outcome after controlling for premorbid risk factors, age, and stroke severity.

Table 3. Post-stroke complications, length of stay, discharge status, and 3-month outcomes.

Variables Total (n = 342) Control group
(n = 288)
Pneumonia group (n = 54) p-value*
Infectious complications
Urinary tract infection, n (%) 31 (9) 13 (5) 18 (33) <0.001
Respiratory failure, n (%) 42 (12) 15 (5) 27 (50) <0.001
Sepsis, n (%) 64 (19) 17 (6) 47 (87) <0.001
Neurological complications
Brain edema, n (%) 12 (4) 4 (1) 8 (15) <0.001
Seizure, n (%) 14 (4) 11 (4) 3 (6) 0.47
Progressive stroke, n (%) 10 (3) 10 (3) 0 (0) 0.37
Bleeding complications
Symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation, n (%) 7 (2) 4 (1) 3 (6) 0.082
Asymptomatic hemorrhagic transformation, n (%) 8 (2) 4 (1) 4 (7) 0.024
Gastrointestinal bleeding, n (%) 11 (3) 4 (1) 7 (13) <0.001
Cardiovascular complications
Myocardial infarction, n (%) 3 (1) 1 (0) 2 (4) 0.066
Congestive heart failure, n (%) 21 (6) 10 (3) 11 (20) <0.001
AF with RVR, n (%) 11 (3) 6 (2) 5 (9) 0.018
Other complications
Hypoglycemia, n (%) 5 (1) 4 (1) 1 (2) 0.58
Hyperglycemia, n (%) 3 (1) 2 (1) 1 (2) 0.40
Acute kidney injury, n (%) 21 (6) 6 (2) 15 (28) <0.001
Hyponatremia, n (%) 9 (3) 4 (1) 5 (9) 0.006
Length of stay (days), median (IQR) 3 (2,5) 3 (2,4) 10 (5,16) <0.001
Discharge status <0.001
Complete recovery, n (%) 10 (3) 10 (3) 0 (0)
Improvement, n (%) 288 (84) 256 (89) 32 (59)
No improvement, n (%) 25 (7) 14 (5) 11 (20)
Death, n (%) 19 (6) 8 (3) 11 (20)
3-month stroke outcomes
mRS score, median (IQR) 2 (1,4) 2 (1,4) 5 (3,6) <0.001
mRS score ≥4, n (%) 112 (33) 72 (25) 40 (74) <0.001
BI score, median (IQR) 95 (35,100) 100 (65,100) 6 (0,55) <0.001
BI score <40, n (%) 86 (25) 50 (17) 36 (67) <0.001

*Control group vs pneumonia group; length of stay and treatment outcomes were compared between groups using the Mann–Whitney U test and complications using Fisher’s exact test. AF, atrial fibrillation; BI, Barthel index; IQR, interquartile range; mRS, modified Rankin scale; RVR, rapid ventricular response.

Clinical characteristics of stroke-associated pneumonia

Forty-one (75.9%) of the 54 patients in the pneumonia group had CAP, 13 (24.1%) had HAP, five (9.3%) had VAP, and five (9.3%) had aspiration pneumonia. The median time to develop pneumonia was 1 day (IQR 1, 2). Fever, dyspnea, and cough were the three most common symptoms of pneumonia (Table 4). The median number of SIRS criteria met was 3 (IQR 2, 4) and the median CURB-65 score was 2 (IQR 1, 3). Most of the pneumonia lesions observed on radiographs were in the lower lung field (left lower lung, 40.7%; right lower lung, 38.9%). Overall, the most prevalent organism was Klebsiella pneumoniae, which was found in 17 of 54 patients (31.5%). When we categorized SAP into CAP and HAP, the most common causative organism in the CAP group was K. pneumoniae, which was found in 17 of 41 patients (41.5%), whereas carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii was the most commonly found causative organism in the HAP group at 38.5% (five of 13 patients). Table 4 also presents the antibiotic susceptibility data, which show that more than 80% of bacterial isolates causing CAP continued to be susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ceftriaxone, and levofloxacin but none of the bacteria causative of HAP were susceptible to meropenem. Antibiotics were prescribed as monotherapy in 77.8% of cases, and the remaining 22.2% of patients with pneumonia received combination treatment. Invasive mechanical ventilation was required in 50.0% of cases and non-invasive ventilation in 13.0%.

Table 4. Clinical characteristics and laboratory results of patients with pneumonia.

Clinical variable Total (n = 54)
 Type of infection
    • Community-acquired, n (%) 41 (75.9)
    • Hospital-acquired, n (%) 13 (24.1)
Ventilator-associated pneumonia, n (%) 5 (9.3)
Aspiration pneumonia, n (%) 5 (9.3)
Time to development of pneumonia after admission (days), median (IQR) 1 (1,2)
Symptoms and signs of pneumonia
    • Fever, n (%) 51 (94.4)
    • Dyspnea, n (%) 51 (94.4)
    • Cough, n (%) 47 (87.0)
    • Alteration of consciousness, n (%) 42 (77.8)
    • Crackles, n (%) 19 (35.2)
    • Pleuritic chest pain, n (%) 2 (3.7)
SIRS criteria met, median (IQR) 3 (2,4)
CURB-65 score, median (IQR) 2 (1,3)
Chest radiographs
    • Left lower lung infiltration, n (%) 22 (40.7)
    • Right lower lung infiltration, n (%) 21 (38.9)
    • Bilateral perihilar infiltration, n (%) 5 (9.3)
Pathogens causative of community-acquired pneumonia (n = 41)
    • Klebsiella pneumoniae, n (%) 17 (41.5)
    • Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, n (%) 4 (9.8)
    • Haemophilus influenzae, n (%) 3 (7.3)
    • Moraxella catarrhalis, n (%) 1 (2.4)
    • Normal flora, n (%) 9 (22.0)
Pathogens causative of hospital-acquired pneumonia (n = 13)
    • Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, n (%) 5 (38.5)
    • Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, n (%) 2 (15.4)
    • Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, n (%) 2 (15.4)
    • Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, n (%) 1 (7.7)
    • Normal flora, n (%) 3 (23.1)
Antibiotic susceptibility of community-acquired pneumonia
    • Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, n/N (%) 22/23 (95.7)
    • Ceftriaxone, n/N (%) 22/24 (91.7)
    • Levofloxacin, n/N (%) 22/26 (84.6)
    • Piperacillin-tazobactam, n/N (%) 21/21 (100.0)
Antibiotic susceptibility of hospital-acquired pneumonia
    • Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, n/N (%) 0/7 (0.0)
    • Ceftriaxone, n/N (%) 0/7 (0.0)
    • Ceftazidime, n/N (%) 0/7 (0.0)
    • Gentamicin, n/N (%) 2/7 (28.6)
    • Amikacin, n/N (%) 7/7 (100)
    • Levofloxacin, n/N (%) 2/7 (28.6)
    • Piperacillin-tazobactam, n/N (%) 0/7 (0.0)
    • Meropenem, n/N (%) 0/7 (0.0)
    • Colistin, n/N (%) 5/5 (100.0)
Treatment (n = 54)
Monotherapy, n (%) 42 (77.8)
    • Piperacillin-tazobactam, n (%) 15 (27.8)
    • Ceftriaxone, n (%) 15 (27.8)
    • Ceftazidime, n (%) 7 (13.0)
    • Meropenem, n (%) 2 (3.7)
Combination therapy, n (%) 12 (22.2)
Respiratory support
    • Invasive mechanical ventilation, n (%) 27 (50.0)
    • Non-invasive ventilation, n (%) 7 (13.0)

CURB-65 is an acronym for the following risk factors: confusion, uremia, elevated respiratory rate, low blood pressure, and age 65 years or older. IQR, interquartile range; n, number; N, number of patients who underwent an antimicrobial susceptibility test; SIRS, systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Predictors of a poor 3-month outcome in patients with AIS

The poor outcome group (mRS score of ≥4) included 112 (33%) of the 342 AIS patients at 3 months, and the non-poor outcome group included the remaining 230 patients. Table 5 shows the univariate associations between factors influencing poor outcomes, and Table 6 shows the results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Having hypertension as a comorbidity (aOR 2.87, 95% CI 1.18–6.98, p = 0.020), a pre-stroke mRS score ≥2 (aOR 4.53, 95% CI 1.50–12.72, p = 0.007), an initial BI score <40 (aOR 3.35, 95% CI 1.57–7.16, p = 0.002), a failed WST (aOR 5.04, 95% CI 2.00–12.74, p = 0.001), and brain edema (aOR 20.67, 95% CI 2.10–203.26, p = 0.009) were independent predictors of a poor outcome after 3 months of AIS.

Table 5. Factors identified to be potentially associated with a poor 3-month outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke via univariate analysis.

All
(n = 342)
Non-poor outcome
mRS <4 (n = 230)
Poor outcome
mRS ≥4 (n = 112)
p-value*
SAP, n (%) 54 (16) 14 (6) 40 (36) <0.001
Sex 0.37
Male, n (%) 207 (61) 143 (62) 64 (57)
Female, n (%) 135 (39) 87 (38) 48 (43)
Age (years), mean ± SD 65±15 61±14 75±13 <0.001
Age ≥70 years, n (%) 141 (41) 64 (28) 77 (69) <0.001
BMI, mean ± SD 24±5 24±5 23±5 0.018
Obesity (BMI ≥25), n (%) 122 (36) 87 (38) 35 (31) 0.23
Lifestyle habits
Alcohol consumption, n (%) 87 (25) 67 (29) 20 (18) 0.025
Smoking, n (%) 140 (41) 106 (46) 34 (30) 0.005
Comorbidities
Hypertension, n (%) 246 (72) 154 (67) 92 (82) 0.003
Diabetes mellitus, n (%) 101 (30) 71 (31) 30 (27) 0.44
Chronic kidney disease, n (%) 79 (23) 31 (13) 48 (43) <0.001
Dyslipidemia, n (%) 185 (54) 120 (52) 65 (58) 0.31
Coronary artery disease, n (%) 42 (12) 23 (10) 19 (17) 0.066
Atrial fibrillation, n (%) 62 (18) 26 (11) 36 (32) <0.001
Cerebrovascular disease, n (%) 52 (15) 30 (13) 22 (20) 0.11
BPH (men only), N (%) 9 (3) 4 (2) 5 (4) 0.16
COPD, n (%) 7 (2) 3 (1) 4 (4) 0.22
Presenting symptoms
Alteration of consciousness, n (%) 59 (17) 17 (7) 42 (38) <0.001
Headache, n (%) 25 (7) 19 (8) 6 (5) 0.33
Weakness, n (%) 303 (89) 196 (85) 107 (96) 0.005
Facial palsy, n (%) 91 (27) 61 (27) 30 (27) 0.96
Visual disturbance, n (%) 35 (10) 29 (13) 6 (5) 0.038
Vertigo, n (%) 58 (17) 47 (20) 11 (10) 0.014
Sensory abnormality, n (%) 105 (31) 83 (36) 22 (20) 0.002
Aphasia, n (%) 54 (16) 27 (12) 27 (24) 0.003
Dysarthria, n (%) 216 (63) 140 (61) 76 (68) 0.21
Dysphagia, n (%) 7 (2) 1 (0) 6 (5) 0.006
Ataxia, n (%) 32 (9) 27 (12) 5 (4) 0.030
Initial blood pressure
SBP (mmHg), median (IQR) 159 (140,180) 160 (140,180) 157 (140,182) 0.80
SBP >140 mmHg, n (%) 249 (73) 167 (73) 82 (73) 0.91
DBP (mmHg), median (IQR) 90 (79,100) 90 (80,100) 90 (78,100) 0.90
eGFR (mL/min), median (IQR) 83 (62,95) 87 (72,100) 67 (43,86) <0.001
Scoring system
Pre-stroke mRS score ≥2, n (%) 31 (9) 8 (3) 23 (21) <0.001
Initial mRS score ≥4, n (%) 261 (76) 153 (67) 108 (96) <0.001
Initial BI score <40, n (%) 112 (33) 37 (16) 75 (67) <0.001
Initial GCS score ≤8, n (%) 21 (6) 4 (2) 17 (15) <0.001
Initial NIHSS score ≥15, n (%) 83 (24) 24 (10) 59 (53) <0.001
TOAST classification <0.001
Large-artery atherosclerosis, n (%) 104 (30) 55 (24) 49 (44)
Small-vessel occlusion, n (%) 158 (46) 132 (57) 26 (23)
Cardioembolism, n (%) 66 (19) 30 (13) 36 (32)
Other etiology, n (%) 11 (3) 10 (4) 1 (1)
Undetermined etiology, n (%) 3 (1) 3 (1) 0 (0)
Stroke treatment
Intravenous thrombolysis (rt-PA), n (%) 47 (14) 30 (13) 17 (15) 0.59
Antiplatelets, n (%) 281 (82) 199 (87) 82 (73) 0.003
Anticoagulants, n (%) 52 (15) 26 (11) 26 (23) 0.004
Statins, n (%) 336 (98) 226 (98) 110 (98) 1.00
Device
Nasogastric tube placement, n (%) 82 (24) 19 (8) 63 (56) <0.001
Failed WST, n (%) 85 (25) 22 (10) 63 (56) <0.001
Endotracheal intubation with invasive mechanical ventilation, n (%) 41 (12) 12 (5) 29 (26) <0.001
Endotracheal intubation period (days), median (IQR) 12 (5,27) 8 (3,11) 12 (6,32) 0.077
Non-invasive ventilation, n (%) 9 (3) 0 (0) 9 (8) <0.001
Retained Foley catheter, n (%) 88 (26) 32 (14) 56 (50) <0.001
Retained Foley catheter interval (days), median (IQR) 6 (3,13) 3 (2,7) 7 (5,16) <0.001
Post-stroke infection
Urinary tract infection, n (%) 31 (9) 7 (3) 24 (21) <0.001
Respiratory failure, n (%) 42 (12) 12 (5) 30 (27) <0.001
Sepsis, n (%) 64 (19) 16 (7) 48 (43) <0.001
Post-stroke neurological complications
Brain edema, n (%) 12 (4) 2 (1) 10 (9) <0.001
Seizure, n (%) 14 (4) 3 (1) 11 (10) <0.001
Post-stroke bleeding complications
Symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation, n (%) 7 (2) 0 (0) 7 (6) <0.001
Asymptomatic hemorrhagic transformation, n (%) 8 (2) 4 (2) 4 (4) 0.45
Gastrointestinal bleeding, n (%) 11 (3) 2 (1) 9 (8) <0.001
Post-stroke cardiovascular complications
Myocardial infarction, n (%) 3 (1) 0 (0) 3 (3) 0.034
Congestive heart failure, n (%) 1 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1) 0.33
AF with RVR, n (%) 11 (3) 3 (1) 8 (7) 0.007
Other complications
Hypoglycemia, n (%) 5 (1) 3 (1) 2 (2) 0.66
Hyperglycemia, n (%) 3 (1) 2 (1) 1 (1) 1.00
Acute kidney injury, n (%) 21 (6) 2 (1) 19 (17) <0.001

*Non-poor outcome group vs poor outcome group with comparisons made using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. BMI was calculated as kg/m2. AF, atrial fibrillation; BI, Barthel Index; BMI, body mass index; BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; mRS, modified Rankin scale; n, number; N, number of male patients; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; rt-PA, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; RVR, rapid ventricular response; SAP, stroke-associated pneumonia; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SD, standard deviation; WST, water-swallowing test.

Table 6. Risk factors for a poor outcome after 3 months in patients with acute ischemic stroke identified via multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Variables Adjusted OR (95%CI) p-value*
Comorbidities
Hypertension 2.87 (1.18–6.98) 0.020
Presenting symptoms
Alteration of consciousness 2.45 (0.91–6.57) 0.075
Scoring system
Pre-stroke mRS score ≥2 4.36 (1.50–12.72) 0.007
Initial mRS score ≥4 2.96 (0.92–9.53) 0.068
Initial BI score <40 3.35 (1.57–7.16) 0.002
Device
Failed WST 5.04 (2.00–12.74) 0.001
Post-stroke neurological complications
Brain edema 20.67 (2.10–203.26) 0.009
Seizure 6.32 (0.90–44.50) 0.064

*Non-poor outcome group vs poor outcome group. The multivariate analysis model was adjusted for SAP, age, BMI, smoking, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, AF, atrial fibrillation, cerebrovascular disease, alteration of consciousness, weakness, visual disturbance, vertigo, sensory abnormality, aphasia, dysphagia, ataxia, eGFR, a pre-stroke mRS score ≥2, an initial mRS score ≥4, an initial BI score <40, an initial GCS score ≤8, an initial NIHSS score ≥15, antiplatelets, a failed WST, endotracheal intubation with invasive mechanical ventilation, non-invasive ventilation, a retained Foley catheter, urinary tract infection, respiratory failure, sepsis, brain edema, seizure, symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation, gastrointestinal bleeding, myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, hyponatremia, and length of stay. The multivariate analysis model included all factors with a p-value <0.2 in the univariable analysis. TOAST classification and patients in whom anticoagulants were used or a nasogastric tube was placed were excluded because of multicollinearity via generalized variance inflation factor criteria >5. The adjusted OR was calculated by logistic regression with a backward method (Wald probability for removal 0.1). BI, Barthel index; CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; mRS, modified Rankin scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OR, odds ratio; SAP, stroke-associated pneumonia; TOAST, Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; WST, water-swallowing test.

Discussion

Pneumonia is a common stroke complication with a reported frequency of 10%–20% [24]. Our finding of a 15.8% incidence of pneumonia in acute stroke patients is within the previously reported range. It is clear that alcohol consumption [4347] and smoking [4851] are both risk factors for developing pneumonia. However, according to our univariate analysis, the proportions of alcohol consumption (13.0% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.022) and smoking (27.8% vs. 43.4%, p = 0.032) were lower in the pneumonia group than in the control group. The likelihood of drinking alcohol declined as adults matured into their 70s and 80s. Between 10% and 50% of individuals aged 60 years or older are estimated to consume alcohol, a range that decreases to 20% to 25% in those 75 years or older [52]. Likewise, smoking prevalence is lower among older adults (≥65 years of age; 8.3%) than among younger adults (≤64 years; 22.2%) [53]. According to our univariate data, the mean age of controls was 64 years and that of the pneumonia group was 73 years (p <0.001). The lower percentage of alcohol consumption and smoking in the pneumonia group may be due to the older age of the patients.

Our multivariate analysis revealed that a failed WST, a widely used dysphagia screening tool, was associated with pneumonia (aOR 87.48, 95% CI 21.00–364.51), which is consistent with the data of Sellars et al. (aOR 20.1, 95% CI 10.6–37.8) [4] and Liang et al. (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.30–1.65) [54]. Furthermore, a study by Yeh et al. in Taiwan found that screening for dysphagia was associated with a decreased risk of post-stroke pneumonia in all stroke patients (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18–1.00, p = 0.05) [55] and concluded that screening for dysphagia could help to prevent pneumonia, emphasizing the importance of swallowing tests in patients with acute stroke.

Tracheal intubation thwarts the cough reflex, compromises mucociliary clearance, injures the tracheal epithelial surface, provides a direct conduit for the rapid transport of bacteria from the upper to the lower respiratory tract, and allows the formation of biofilm on the surface of the endotracheal tube, resulting in an increased risk of pneumonia [56]. Due to the limitation of temporal relations in our study, the relationship between pneumonia and intubation with mechanical ventilation was bi-directional. VAP developed after intubation in 9.3% of all pneumonia patients. The remaining patients may have developed pneumonia before respiratory failure and intubation. A prospective observational study by Hilker et al. found that endotracheal intubation with invasive mechanical ventilation was associated with a significantly increased relative risk of SAP of 7.3 (p<0.001, chi-squared test) [3]. Moreover, a multifactorial analysis in a retrospective study by Sui et al. found that patients who underwent tracheal intubation were 2.980 times more likely to develop SAP than those who did not [9]. Our multivariate analysis showed that endotracheal intubation with invasive mechanical ventilation (aOR 12.38, 95% CI 2.44–101.35) was one of the factors associated with SAP, which is consistent with the findings of the previous studies.

A retained urinary catheter is a well-established risk factor for urinary tract infection [5759]; it is also a risk factor for post-stroke urinary tract infection in acute stroke patients [60]. Data on the association between Foley catheterization and SAP are limited. One study from the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry in 2016 found that urinary catheterization in hospitalized patients with acute stroke was associated with SAP (aOR 2.42, 95% CI 2.15–2.72) [61], which is consistent with our data (aOR 5.67, 95% CI 2.03–15.83). However, a limitation of our study is that we could not document the temporal relationship between this procedure and the onset of pneumonia. The association between pneumonia and Foley catheter placement could reflect the fact that patients with pneumonia may require urinary catheterization for intensive urine output monitoring, and prolonged bed rest may induce urinary retention [62]. On the other hand, stroke patients with extensive neurological damage also tend to be on bed rest more frequently, which can increase the risk of pneumonia due to the inability to ambulate [63], more frequent catheterization, and prolonged catheterization, which can introduce occult urinary tract infections that may be disseminated into the lung [64]. It is interesting to note that Klebsiella pneumoniae, the most common pathogen in our study, was also the second most common in post-stroke urinary tract infection patients [65,66].

In our study, several types of post-stroke complications, including sepsis, urinary tract infection, brain edema, bleeding, cardiovascular events, AKI, and hyponatremia, were more common in the pneumonia group than in the control group (Table 3), which is in line with previous reports. Xu et al. detected a higher proportion of sepsis in patients with SAP than in those without SAP (48.4% vs. 17.7%; p<0.001) [67], while Matz et al. found a higher proportion of neurological, cardiac, and other infective complications in patients with SAP than in those without SAP [61]. In terms of outcomes, post-stroke pneumonia has been associated with a significantly longer hospital stay [1,6775], a higher in-hospital mortality rate [69,7679], a higher 3-month mortality rate [80], a worse 3-month mRS score [8083], a worse 14-month mRS score (3.5±1.7 in a SAP group vs. 2.2 in a non-SAP group) [3], and a worse 14-month BI score (50.5±42.4 in a SAP group vs. 81.5±27.8 in a non-SAP group) [3]. These findings agree with our data (Table 3) showing that the pneumonia group had a longer hospital stay, poorer discharge status, and worse 3-month stroke outcomes (i.e., worse mRS and BI scores).

Pneumonia is the most common cause of fever within the first 48 hours after an acute stroke [1,7,81,8385], and pneumonia that occurs within 48 hours of admission is classified as CAP [86]. We found that CAP was present in 75.9% of patients in our pneumonia group; this figure is higher than the value of 58% reported by Hilker et al. [3]. The remaining 24.1% were cases of HAP (Table 4). There are limited data on the incidence of VAP in patients who develop SAP. De Montmollin et al. reported that 35.9% of their patients with AIS who required invasive ventilation at admission and had pneumonia during hospitalization had VAP [68]. Furthermore, in the studies reported by Xu et al. [67] and Kasuya et al. [87], 31.9% and 28%, respectively, of cases of pneumonia among patients with acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke comprised VAP. In our study, the incidence of VAP among patients with AIS who developed pneumonia was 9.3%, which is lower than the values referenced above. Hemorrhagic stroke is more severe than ischemic stroke [88] and is more likely to disturb the level of consciousness [89]; thus, it may increase the risk of respiratory failure with mechanical ventilation [90]. Moreover, a higher proportion of invasive ventilation is typically associated with an increased risk of VAP [91], which may explain the higher incidence of VAP in the previous studies.

Stroke can impair swallowing function, leading to dysphagia and aspiration [61]. SAP is often caused by aspiration and will usually affect the gravity-dependent portions of the lungs (i.e., the lower lobes) [24,92]. Most of the chest radiographs of our patients who developed pneumonia showed unilateral lower lung involvement (Table 4). In a study by Chen et al., the most common presentation was a unilateral lung lesion [93], which is compatible with our results. Of note, aspiration pneumonia, as defined in our study, requires a history of macroaspiration, which accounted for only 9.3% of all cases of SAP.

Acute post-stroke pneumonia often occurs in recently hospitalized patients, and the microbiology does not resemble the CAP commonly caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae [94,95]. This etiology of SAP often includes aerobic gram-negative bacteria such as K. pneumoniae, Acinetobacter, Enterobacter, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [92]. In the present study, we found K. pneumoniae to be the most common pathogen in patients with CAP (41.5%). Studies of SAP by Chen et al., Xu et al., and Guo et al. also found K. pneumoniae to be the most common pathogenic organism [67,93,96], and this bacterium has also been linked with aspiration pneumonia [11,97100]. For HAP, the most common causative organisms were carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (38.5%) followed by carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (15.4%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (15.4%), and S. maltophilia (7.7%). These findings are similar to the etiology of HAP and VAP found in other tertiary hospitals in Thailand [101,102].

In our study, we classified antibiotic susceptibility into two categories, namely, CAP and HAP. In CAP, even though K. pneumoniae was the most prevalent organism, ceftriaxone, levofloxacin, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid were effective in over 80% of cases (Table 4). Therefore, for CAP after a stroke, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ceftriaxone, and levofloxacin are still good choices for empirical therapy. In contrast, only 28.6% of the organisms in patients with HAP were susceptible to levofloxacin and gentamicin. Moreover, none of them were susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and meropenem, as shown in Table 4. The susceptibility of each organism to meropenem was 87.5%–100% in a retrospective study of HAP among patients with AIS in Pakistan published in 2021 [103]. This difference indicates a trend of meropenem resistance in our region. Thus, combination therapy can be considered for empirical treatment in patients with hospital-onset pneumonia after a stroke.

Several factors have previously been associated with poor outcomes in AIS patients, such as age, stroke severity, dementia, atrial fibrillation, cancer, malnutrition, previous stroke, and heart failure [104107]. SAP has been found to be associated with higher odds of a long length of stay (OR 1.93 [1.67–2.22]) and a worse functional outcome (OR 7.17 [5.44–9.45]) [108]. SAP also had a high mortality rate [109,110]. In our study, the univariate analysis found SAP to be a significant factor associated with a poor outcome. Unfortunately, it was not an independent risk factor in the multivariate analysis. While this present data does not definitively demonstrate a causative association between SAP and a poor outcome, the various limitations of the study (sample size, retrospective chart review) may have limited the power to detect such an association.

In observational studies, both extremely high and low blood pressure values have been associated with poor outcomes, whether defined by early neurological deterioration, stroke recurrence, death, or late dependency [111113]. Willmot et al. found that high blood pressure in acute ischemic stroke is associated with subsequent death, death or dependency, and death or deterioration [114]. In our data, having hypertension as a comorbidity was also associated with a poor outcome (aOR 2.87, 95% CI 1.18–6.98, p = 0.020).

According to Golda et al.’s 2020 study, AIS patients with a pre-stroke mRS score ≥2 and mechanical thrombectomy might have an extremely poor prognosis after 3 months [115]. Furthermore, Quinn et al. found that every point increase in the pre-stroke mRS of acute stroke patients is associated with higher mortality at 7 days and 1 year, length of stay, discharge destination, and post-stroke complications of pneumonia and urinary tract infection [116]. Our data found that a pre-stroke mRS score ≥2 was a predictor of poor outcomes (aOR 4.53, 95% CI 1.50–12.72, p = 0.007), which fits with both reports.

We found an initial BI score <40 to be a risk factor for poor outcomes at 3 months (aOR 3.35, 95% CI 1.57–7.16, p = 0.002), which was consistent with data from Saksathien et al. showing that admission BI scores below 50 in AIS patients were correlated with poor 6-month functional outcomes [117]. Moreover, Wade’s follow-up study revealed that the lower the baseline BI score, the higher the death rate among stroke patients 6 months later [118], and Li’s study revealed that BI scoring is a highly valuable scoring system for the mortality risk prediction of patients with acute cerebral infarction [119].

Following the multivariate logistic regression analysis of Smithard’s study in 1996, the presence of an abnormal swallow on bedside assessment after acute stroke remained a significant predictor of mortality (χ2 [1 df] = 6.4, p = 0.01) [120], and multinomial logistic regression in 2007 by the same author showed that residence in a nursing home was more likely to occur in those who failed a WST during the first week of their stroke at 3 months (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 1.73, 95% CI 1.02–2.95), 4 years (RRR 3.35, 95% CI 1.37–8.19), and 5 years (RRR 3.06, 95% CI 1.06–8.83); there was also a significant association with increased mortality at 3 months (RRR 2.03, 95% CI 1.12–3.67) [121]. Congruent with our data, a failed WST (aOR 5.04, 95% CI 2.00–12.74, p = 0.001) was associated with a poor 3-month outcome.

Cerebral edema is a common complication of acute ischemic stroke that leads to poorer functional outcomes and substantially increases the mortality rate [122]. Battey et al. discovered that the presence of swelling independently predicted a worse 3-month outcome in non-lacunar ischemic stroke (mRS ≥3, odds ratio [OR] 4.55, 95% CI 1.21–18.9, p<0.02) [123]. McKeown et al. have shown that a midline shift greater than 3 mm after ischemic stroke can independently predict poor 3-month outcomes (mRS ≥4, OR 4.46, 95% CI 3.56–5.59, p<0.001) [124]. Our study also reiterates that brain edema is a poor prognostic factor (mRS ≥4, aOR 20.67, 95% CI 2.10–203.26, p = 0.009).

This study has several limitations. First, although the total number of patients was not small, the number of patients with pneumonia was relatively small. Second, the study data were collected retrospectively, which means that temporal relationships were difficult to assess. Third, the study was performed on patients from one center, which lacks the scientific rigor or external validity required to support widespread changes and may limit the generalizability of our findings.

Conclusions

This study confirms that SAP is associated with a failed WST, endotracheal intubation with invasive mechanical ventilation, and placement of a Foley catheter in hospitalized patients with AIS. Patients with SAP had more post-stroke complications, a longer hospital stay, a worse discharge status, and a poor stroke outcome at 3 months. Most of our patients with SAP who developed pneumonia did so within 48 hours of admission and had a unilateral lower lung lesion. The most common causative pathogen in these patients was K. pneumoniae. In terms of antibiotic susceptibility, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ceftriaxone, and levofloxacin can still be recommended as empirical therapy for patients with community-onset SAP. However, combination therapy might be considered for patients with hospital-onset SAP according to the local antibiogram. Finally, having hypertension as a comorbidity, a pre-stroke mRS score ≥2, an initial BI score <40, a failed WST, and brain edema were emphasized as determinants of a poor 3-month prognosis in AIS patients.

Abbreviations

baumannii

Acinetobacter baumannii

ADL

activities of daily living

AIS

Acute Ischemic Stroke

aOR

adjusted Odds Ratio

BI

Barthel Index

BPH

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

CI

Confidence Interval

CIOMS

Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences

DBP

Diastolic Blood Pressure

E. coli

Escherichia coli

eGFR

estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate

GCS

Glasgow Coma Scale

ICH-GCP

International Conference on Harmonization-Good Clinical Practice

IQR

interquartile range

K. pneumoniae

Klebsiella pneumoniae

ml/min

milliliter per minute

mg/dL

milligram per deciliter

mmHg

millimeters of mercury

mRS

modified Rankin Scale

n

number

NG tube

Nasogastric tube

NIHSS

National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale

qSOFA

quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment

rt-PA

recombinant tissue Plasminogen Activator

SAP

Stroke-Associated Pneumonia

SBP

Systolic Blood Pressure

SD

Standard Deviation

S. maltophilia

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

SIRS

systemic inflammatory response syndrome

SPSS

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

TOAST

Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment

UTI

Urinary Tract Infection

USA

United States of America

WST

Water-Swallowing Test

Data Availability

There are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set. Individual level data cannot be shared publicly because of patient confidentiality under current Thai legislation. The data that support the findings of this study are available from Chumphon Khet Udomsakdi Hospital, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from Dr. Nopparat Jungjaroennorasook (Ethics Committee Assistant of Chumphon Khet Udomsakdi Hospital, 222 Phisit Phayaban Road, Tha Taphao, Mueang Chumphon, Chumphon, Thailand 86000, Email: nopparat.11026@gmail.com) upon reasonable request and with permission of Chumphon Khet Udomsakdi Hospital and the appropriate ethics committee.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.P Johnsen S., L Svendsen M., and Ingeman A.J.T.O.I.D.J., Infection in patients with acute stroke. 2012. 6(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alberti A., et al., Non-neurological complications of acute stroke: frequency and influence on clinical outcome. 2011. 6(1): p. 119–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hilker R., et al., Nosocomial pneumonia after acute stroke: implications for neurological intensive care medicine. 2003. 34(4): p. 975–981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sellars C., et al., Risk factors for chest infection in acute stroke: a prospective cohort study. 2007. 38(8): p. 2284–2291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Finlayson O., et al., Risk factors, inpatient care, and outcomes of pneumonia after ischemic stroke. 2011. 77(14): p. 1338–1345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ishigami K., et al., Association of severe hypertension with pneumonia in elderly patients with acute ischemic stroke. 2012. 35(6): p. 648–653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Grau A.J., et al., Fever and infection early after ischemic stroke. 1999. 171(2): p. 115–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Matsumura T., et al., Risk factors for the onset of aspiration pneumonia among stroke patients in the recovery stage. 2014. 51(4): p. 364–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sui R. and Zhang L.J.N.r., Risk factors of stroke-associated pneumonia in Chinese patients. 2011. 33(5): p. 508–513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bruening T., Al-Khaled M.J.J.o.S, and Diseases C., Stroke-associated pneumonia in thrombolyzed patients: incidence and outcome. 2015. 24(8): p. 1724–1729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grossmann I., et al., Stroke and pneumonia: mechanisms, risk factors, management, and prevention. 2021. 13(11). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mandell L.A., et al., Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. 2007. 44(Supplement_2): p. S27–S72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Santos J.W.A.d., et al., Community-acquired staphylococcal pneumonia. 2008. 34: p. 683–689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Reechaipichitkul W., Management of pneumonia. KKU Journal of Medicine, 2015. 1(4): p. 17–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kaysin A. and Viera A.J.J.A.f.p, Community-acquired pneumonia in adults: diagnosis and management. 2016. 94(9): p. 698–706. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Metlay J.P., et al., Diagnosis and treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. An official clinical practice guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2019. 200(7): p. e45–e67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lim W., et al., Pneumonia Guidelines Committee of the BTS Standards of Care Committee. BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults: update 2009. 2009. 64(Suppl 3): p. iii1-55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Smith C.J., et al., Diagnosis of stroke-associated pneumonia: recommendations from the pneumonia in stroke consensus group. Stroke, 2015. 46(8): p. 2335–2340. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lanks C.W., Musani A.I., and Hsia D.W.J.M.C., Community-acquired pneumonia and hospital-acquired pneumonia. 2019. 103(3): p. 487–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shebl E. and Gulick P.G., Nosocomial Pneumonia, in StatPearls [Internet]. 2021, StatPearls Publishing. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Koenig S.M. and Truwit J.D.J.C.m.r, Ventilator-associated pneumonia: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. 2006. 19(4): p. 637–657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Society A.T., I.D.S.o.A.J.A.j.o. respiratory, and c.c. medicine, Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. 2005. 171(4): p. 388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Miller F.J.A., Pneumonia associada à ventilação mecânica. 2018: p. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mandell L.A. and Niederman M.S.J.N.E.J.o.M, Aspiration pneumonia. 2019. 380(7): p. 651–663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Teasdale G. and Jennett B.J.T.L., Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. 1974. 304(7872): p. 81–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jain S. and Iverson L.M., Glasgow coma scale. 2018. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Brott T., et al., Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. 1989. 20(7): p. 864–870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Goldstein L.B., Bertels C., and Davis J.N.J.A.o.n, Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale. 1989. 46(6): p. 660–662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Adams H.P. Jr, et al., Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. 1993. 24(1): p. 35–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Banks J.L. and Marotta C.A.J.S., Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and synthesis. 2007. 38(3): p. 1091–1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Quinn T.J., Langhorne P., and Stott D.J.J.S., Barthel index for stroke trials: development, properties, and application. 2011. 42(4): p. 1146–1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lim W., et al., Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. 2003. 58(5): p. 377–382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chalmers J.D., et al., Severity assessment tools for predicting mortality in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Systematic review and meta-analysis. 2010. 65(10): p. 878–883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dellinger R.P., et al., Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. 2008. 34(1): p. 17–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Anderson D.C.J.S., Defining" progressive stroke". 1991. 22(8): p. 1085–1085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen W.-H., et al., Safety of endovascular therapy in progressive ischemic stroke and anterior circulation large artery occlusion. 2019. 122: p. e383–e389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Seners P. and Baron J.-C.J.J.o.n, Revisiting ‘progressive stroke’: incidence, predictors, pathophysiology, and management of unexplained early neurological deterioration following acute ischemic stroke. 2018. 265(1): p. 216–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang Y., et al., Safety and Efficacy of Endovascular Treatment for Progressive Stroke in Patients With Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion. 2021. 12: p. 774443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sümer M.M., Özön A.Ö.J.T.J.o.P.M, and Rehabilitation, Progression in acute ischemic stroke: Is widespread atherosclerotic background a risk factor? 2018. 64(1): p. 46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rocha M. and Jovin T.G.J.S., Fast versus slow progressors of infarct growth in large vessel occlusion stroke: clinical and research implications. 2017. 48(9): p. 2621–2627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nehring S.M., Tadi P., and Tenny S., Cerebral edema. 2019. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hacke W., et al., Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. 2008. 359(13): p. 1317–1329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gupta N.M., Deshpande A., and Rothberg M.B.J.C.C.J.o.M, Pneumonia and alcohol use disorder: Implications for treatment. 2020. 87(8): p. 493–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Simet S.M. and Sisson J.H.J.A.r.c.r, Alcohol’s effects on lung health and immunity. 2015. 37(2): p. 199. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kornum J.B., et al., Alcohol drinking and risk of subsequent hospitalisation with pneumonia. 2012. 39(1): p. 149–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bradley S.F.J.J. n.o., Alcohol Use Disorder and Risk of Pneumonia: How Much Is Too Much, How Long Is Enough, and What Else Is Involved? 2019. 2(6): p. e195179–e195179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Simou E., Britton J., and Leonardi-Bee J.J.B.o, Alcohol and the risk of pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2018. 8(8): p. e022344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jiang C., Chen Q., and Xie M.J.T.I.D., Smoking increases the risk of infectious diseases: A narrative review. 2020. 18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Baskaran V., et al., Effect of tobacco smoking on the risk of developing community acquired pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 2019. 14(7): p. e0220204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Arcavi L. and Benowitz N.L.J.A.o.i.m, Cigarette smoking and infection. 2004. 164(20): p. 2206–2216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.McGeoch L.J., et al., Cigarette smoking and risk of severe infectious respiratory diseases in UK adults: 12-year follow-up of UK biobank. 2023: p. fdad090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Moos R.H., et al., Older adults’ alcohol consumption and late‐life drinking problems: a 20‐year perspective. 2009. 104(8): p. 1293–1302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kleykamp B.A. and Heishman S.J.J.J., The older smoker. 2011. 306(8): p. 876–877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Liang J., et al., Predictors of dysphagia screening and pneumonia among patients with acute ischaemic stroke in China: findings from the Chinese Stroke Center Alliance (CSCA). 2022: p. svn-2020-000746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yeh S.-J., et al., Dysphagia screening decreases pneumonia in acute stroke patients admitted to the stroke intensive care unit. 2011. 306(1–2): p. 38–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Pneumatikos I.A., et al., Ventilator-associated pneumonia or endotracheal tube-associated pneumonia? An approach to the pathogenesis and preventive strategies emphasizing the importance of endotracheal tube. 2009. 110(3): p. 673–680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wagenlehner F., et al., The global prevalence of infections in urology study: a long-term, worldwide surveillance study on urological infections. 2016. 5(1): p. 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Li F., et al., Risk factors for catheter‐associated urinary tract infection among hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies. 2019. 75(3): p. 517–527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Anggi A., Wijaya D.W., and Ramayani O.R.J.O.A.M.J.o.M.S, Risk factors for catheter-associated urinary tract infection and uropathogen bacterial profile in the intensive care unit in hospitals in Medan, Indonesia. 2019. 7(20): p. 3488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Stott D., et al., Urinary tract infection after stroke. 2009. 102(4): p. 243–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Matz K., et al., Post-stroke pneumonia at the stroke unit–a registry based analysis of contributing and protective factors. 2016. 16(1): p. 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Knight J., Nigam Y., and Jones A.J.N.T., Effects of bedrest 4: Renal, reproductive and immune systems. 2019. 115(3): p. 51–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Yamauchi K., et al., Ambulation status at an acute care hospital predicts pneumonia and mortality in stroke patients: A retrospective cohort study. 2022. 22(8): p. 554–559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Quarata F., et al., A urinary tract infection caused by Escherichia coli mucoid phenotype progresses to a pneumonia and respiratory failure. 2023. 401(10380): p. 950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jitpratoom P. and Boonyasiri A.J.B.n, Determinants of urinary tract infection in hospitalized patients with acute ischemic stroke. 2023. 23(1): p. 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mukapa N., et al., Incidence, risk factors and microbiological aetiology of urinary tract infections in admitted stroke patients at a teaching hospital in Zimbabwe: A prospective cohort study. 2022. 4(2): p. 100210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Xu C., et al., Analysis of risk factors and prognosis of post-stroke pulmonary infection in integrated ICU. 2021. 25(2): p. 856–865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.de Montmollin E., et al., Pneumonia in acute ischemic stroke patients requiring invasive ventilation: Impact on short and long-term outcomes. 2019. 79(3): p. 220–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ovbiagele B., et al., Frequency and determinants of pneumonia and urinary tract infection during stroke hospitalization. 2006. 15(5): p. 209–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Chen C.-M., et al., Infections in acute older stroke inpatients undergoing rehabilitation. 2012. 91(3): p. 211–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Katzan I., et al., The cost of pneumonia after acute stroke. 2007. 68(22): p. 1938–1943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lakshminarayan K., et al., Utility of dysphagia screening results in predicting poststroke pneumonia. 2010. 41(12): p. 2849–2854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hinchey J.A., et al., Formal dysphagia screening protocols prevent pneumonia. 2005. 36(9): p. 1972–1976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hannawi Y., et al., Stroke-associated pneumonia: major advances and obstacles. 2013. 35(5): p. 430–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Ingeman A., et al., In-hospital medical complications, length of stay, and mortality among stroke unit patients. 2011. 42(11): p. 3214–3218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kwan J. and Hand P.J.A.N.S., Infection after acute stroke is associated with poor short‐term outcome. 2007. 115(5): p. 331–338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hamidon B., et al., The predictors of early infection after an acute ischaemic stroke. 2003. 44(7): p. 344–346. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Tirschwell D.L., et al., Medical complications of ischemic stroke and length of hospital stay: experience in Seattle, Washington. 1999. 8(5): p. 336–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ifejika-Jones N.L., et al., The interaction of aspiration pneumonia with demographic and cerebrovascular disease risk factors is predictive of discharge level of care in the acute stroke patient. 2012. 91(2): p. 141–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Aslanyan S., et al., Pneumonia and urinary tract infection after acute ischaemic stroke: a tertiary analysis of the GAIN International trial. 2004. 11(1): p. 49–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Dziewas R., et al., Pneumonia in acute stroke patients fed by nasogastric tube. 2004. 75(6): p. 852–856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hong K.S., et al., Impact of neurological and medical complications on 3‐month outcomes in acute ischaemic stroke. 2008. 15(12): p. 1324–1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Westendorp W.F., et al., Post-stroke infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2011. 11(1): p. 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Johnston K.C., et al., Medical and neurological complications of ischemic stroke: experience from the RANTTAS trial. 1998. 29(2): p. 447–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Vermeij F.H., et al., Stroke-associated infection is an independent risk factor for poor outcome after acute ischemic stroke: data from the Netherlands Stroke Survey. 2009. 27(5): p. 465–471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Guimarães C., et al., Pneumonia associated with health care versus community acquired pneumonia: different entities, distinct approaches. 2011. 17(4): p. 168–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kasuya Y., et al., Ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill stroke patients: frequency, risk factors, and outcomes. 2011. 26(3): p. 273–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Andersen K.K., et al., Hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes compared: stroke severity, mortality, and risk factors. 2009. 40(6): p. 2068–2072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Poungvarin N., Viriyavejakul A., and Komontri C.J.B.M.J., Siriraj stroke score and validation study to distinguish supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage from infarction. 1991. 302(6792): p. 1565–1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Robba C., et al., Mechanical ventilation in patients with acute ischaemic stroke: from pathophysiology to clinical practice. 2019. 23(1): p. 1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Wu D., et al., Risk factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically III patients. 2019. 10: p. 482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Armstrong J.R. and Mosher B.D.J.T.N., Aspiration pneumonia after stroke: intervention and prevention. 2011. 1(2): p. 85–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Chen L.-F., et al., Bacterial pneumonia following acute ischemic stroke. 2013. 76(2): p. 78–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Bartlett J.G., et al., Practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clinical infectious diseases, 2000. 31(2): p. 347–382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Metlay J.P., et al., Diagnosis and treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. An official clinical practice guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2019. 200(7): p. e45–e67. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Guo T., Dou L., and Zhou X.J.A.o.P.M, Risk factors of stroke complicated with hospital-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. 2021. 10(12): p. 12381–12389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.El-Solh A.A., et al., Microbiology of severe aspiration pneumonia in institutionalized elderly. 2003. 167(12): p. 1650–1654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Marik P.E. and Careau P.J.C., The role of anaerobes in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and aspiration pneumonia: a prospective study. 1999. 115(1): p. 178–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Wei C., et al., Microbiology and prognostic factors of hospital-and community-acquired aspiration pneumonia in respiratory intensive care unit. 2013. 41(10): p. 880–884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Terpenning M.S., et al., Aspiration pneumonia: dental and oral risk factors in an older veteran population. 2001. 49(5): p. 557–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Reechaipichitkul W., et al., Causative agents and resistance among hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia patients at Srinagarind Hospital, northeastern Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health, 2013. 44(3): p. 490–502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Werarak P., Kiratisin P., and Thamlikitkul V., Hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults at Siriraj Hospital: etiology, clinical outcomes, and impact of antimicrobial resistance. J Med Assoc Thai, 2010. 93(Suppl 1): p. S126–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Wattoo M.A., et al., Clinical and Microbiological Analysis of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Among Patients With Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Outlook. 2021. 13(5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Appelros P., Nydevik I., and Viitanen M.J.S., Poor outcome after first-ever stroke: predictors for death, dependency, and recurrent stroke within the first year. 2003. 34(1): p. 122–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Cutting S., et al., Three-month outcomes are poor in stroke patients with cancer despite acute stroke treatment. 2017. 26(4): p. 809–815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Cai Z.-m., et al., Being at risk of malnutrition predicts poor outcomes at 3 months in acute ischemic stroke patients. 2020. 74(5): p. 796–805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Ding G.-y., et al., Clinical scoring model based on age, NIHSS, and stroke-history predicts outcome 3 months after acute ischemic stroke. 2022. 13: p. 935150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Teh W.-H., et al., Impact of stroke‐associated pneumonia on mortality, length of hospitalization, and functional outcome. 2018. 138(4): p. 293–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Hassan A., et al., Stroke-associated pneumonia: microbiological data and outcome. 2006. 47(3): p. 204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Zhu Y., et al., Risk factors and outcomes of stroke-associated pneumonia in patients with stroke and acute large artery occlusion treated with endovascular thrombectomy. 2020. 29(11): p. 105223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Carlberg B., Asplund K., and Hägg E.J.S., The prognostic value of admission blood pressure in patients with acute stroke. 1993. 24(9): p. 1372–1375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Castillo J., et al., Blood pressure decrease during the acute phase of ischemic stroke is associated with brain injury and poor stroke outcome. 2004. 35(2): p. 520–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Lattanzi S., Brigo F., and Silvestrini M.J.T.J.o.C.H., Blood pressure and stroke: From incidence to outcome. 2019. 21(5): p. 605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Willmot M., Leonardi-Bee J., and Bath P.M.J.H., High blood pressure in acute stroke and subsequent outcome: a systematic review. 2004. 43(1): p. 18–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Goda T., et al., Prestroke conditions of acute ischemic stroke patients are associated with functional outcome after mechanical thrombectomy. 2020. 29(2): p. 104540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Quinn T.J., et al., Pre-stroke modified Rankin scale: evaluation of validity, prognostic accuracy, and association with treatment. 2017. 8: p. 275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Suksathien R. and Sukpongthai T.J.J.T.R.M., Predictors of long-term functional outcomes in acute stroke patients. 2017. 27: p. 96–100. [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Wade D.T., Hewer R.L.J.J.o.N, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. 1987. 50(2): p. 177–182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Li Q.-X., et al., Value of the Barthel scale in prognostic prediction for patients with cerebral infarction. 2020. 20(1): p. 1–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Smithard D., et al., Complications and outcome after acute stroke: does dysphagia matter? 1996. 27(7): p. 1200–1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Smithard D., et al., Long-term outcome after stroke: does dysphagia matter? 2007. 36(1): p. 90–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Zhang X., Huang P., and Zhang R.J.F.i.N., Evaluation and prediction of post-stroke cerebral edema based on neuroimaging. 2022. 12: p. 763018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Battey T.W., et al., Brain edema predicts outcome after nonlacunar ischemic stroke. 2014. 45(12): p. 3643–3648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.McKeown M.E., et al., Midline shift greater than 3 mm independently predicts outcome after ischemic stroke. 2022: p. 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

There are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set. Individual level data cannot be shared publicly because of patient confidentiality under current Thai legislation. The data that support the findings of this study are available from Chumphon Khet Udomsakdi Hospital, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from Dr. Nopparat Jungjaroennorasook (Ethics Committee Assistant of Chumphon Khet Udomsakdi Hospital, 222 Phisit Phayaban Road, Tha Taphao, Mueang Chumphon, Chumphon, Thailand 86000, Email: nopparat.11026@gmail.com) upon reasonable request and with permission of Chumphon Khet Udomsakdi Hospital and the appropriate ethics committee.


Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES